This means you can't distribute *.o files made in C++ from one OS to another.
Maybe some of you have had to do this before in your life, but I never have. And if you do, older versions of GCC are freely available for you to downgrade to (but if you're the
type that sends C++ object files around, you knew that).
IMHO, this is not the issue. The issue is with people who use Redhat in a development environment. With the inclusion of gcc 2.96, companies that distribute linux binaries will never use Redhat 7 because it there would be binary incompatibilities with other flavors of linux.
I know that I will be staying with 6.2 for a while.
Not only are they not using thier own distribution, but they didnt even bother to compile their own Webserver. They are using the defualt Apache installation that comes with Redhat! Connected to www.mlerp.com. Escape character is '^]'. HEAD / HTTP/1.0 HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1999 23:48:04 GMT Server: Apache/1.3.9 (Unix) (Red Hat/Linux) Last-Modified: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 22:21:00 GMT ETag: "de002-10e-37f3e24c" Accept-Ranges: bytes Content-Length: 270 Connection: close Content-Type: text/html
but why must we pay $150 for something that is free? I am assuming that you are paying the $150 for the RSA license. It is illegal to use OpenSSL/mod_ssl for commercial purposes here in the US and Canada.
Slashdot Mirror
This means you can't distribute *.o files made in C++ from one OS to another. Maybe some of you have had to do this before in your life, but I never have. And if you do, older versions of GCC are freely available for you to downgrade to (but if you're the type that sends C++ object files around, you knew that).
IMHO, this is not the issue. The issue is with people who use Redhat in a development environment. With the inclusion of gcc 2.96, companies that distribute linux binaries will never use Redhat 7 because it there would be binary incompatibilities with other flavors of linux.
I know that I will be staying with 6.2 for a while.
Not only are they not using thier own distribution, but they didnt even bother to compile their own Webserver. They are using the defualt Apache installation that comes with Redhat! Connected to www.mlerp.com. Escape character is '^]'. HEAD / HTTP/1.0 HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1999 23:48:04 GMT Server: Apache/1.3.9 (Unix) (Red Hat/Linux) Last-Modified: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 22:21:00 GMT ETag: "de002-10e-37f3e24c" Accept-Ranges: bytes Content-Length: 270 Connection: close Content-Type: text/html
but why must we pay $150 for something that is free? I am assuming that you are paying the $150 for the RSA license. It is illegal to use OpenSSL/mod_ssl for commercial purposes here in the US and Canada.
I just booted up 2.2 pre 3 on a pentium 233 machine. here is the output from top..
:)
2:13pm up 31 min, 0 users, load average: 1.86, 1.83, 1.37
65 processes: 61 sleeping, 4 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
CPU states: 950.0% user, 70.5% system, 0.0% nice, 0.0% idle
Mem: 127804K av, 74876K used, 52928K free, 61852K shrd, 4432K buff
Swap: 130748K av, 100K used, 130648K free 25768K cached
PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT LIB %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND
631 homebrew 14 0 852 852 440 R 0 99.9 0.6 39:08 l3enc
349 root 2 0 16168 15M 876 R 0 72.9 12.6 24:35 Xaccel
432 homebrew 0 0 3272 3272 2552 S 0 31.0 2.5 5:42 dtterm
447 homebrew 0 0 16644 16M 7236 S 0 22.8 13.0 16:58 netscape-com
641 homebrew 3 0 732 732 560 R 0 17.7 0.5 0:08 top
Notice that the processor usage is listed as 950% user
Anyone else notice this?