You can't know that from their growth rate. Technically every year it could be the same customers upgrading, so they would have a 100% upgrade rate. There's just no way of knowing that from their sales how many customers are new and how many are upgrading from another iPhone.
You have people that buy every new phone, people on a two year upgrade cycle and people on a three year upgrade cycle. There's just to much variance for 'simple math' to get the right answer.
it's not really their fault. Microsoft designed a good operating system and even provided OEMs with good hardware designs that take advantage of the software, but as I've been told in tech press circles, the OEMs are stupid and short-sighted -- HP, the whole lot of them, can't think beyond tower computers and laptops unless they're pinned down.
It is Microsofts fault (or more correctly, was Microsofts fault).You can't blame HP. They tried with the HP Slate, but Microsoft just didn't add decent touch support into the OS soon enough. You can't blame OEMs, once HP got burned no one else wanted to be Microsofts next guinea pig. HP felt so let down by Microsoft that they went and bought Palm. If Microsoft had brought out Windows 8 and Windows Phone 8 sooner then we would have several versions of the surface in the market right now.
At this point, I don't think the combination of RIM/Nokia/Microsoft would substantially lessen competition in the cell phone industry. No regulator stops an acquisition if one of the companies is going to die without it. It's easy to show that with RIM, a Nokia acquisition would be harder to get past European regulators.
Still, the combined market share of all three for smartphones is ~15%. That isn't the kind of number where regulators step in.With dumb phones, RIM and Microsoft don't really compete for that market, so Nokia's marketshare there wouldn't be a problem. So on a regulator front, they probably would be able to go through with the merger. If Motorola went through, i don't think they are going to stop anyone but Apple from acquiring phone companies.
What are you syncing the contacts to? All of the things you named are for syncing your data between a mac or pc and an ios device.
There is zero reason for wanting to use icloud if you don't own an iOS device or a mac. There are so many other services for windows that do a much better job at a cheaper price. If someone likes apples ecosystem enough to stomach itunes or safari on windows then they already own an iOS device or a mac.
Well your question was, can you access icloud, not setup an account. There's no reason to want an icloud account if you don't have an iOS device or a Mac, which is probably why you can't setup an account online.
Sun was not happy about it, however their idiotic CEO at the time decided to act like he was fine with it in public. Look at James Goslings comment for a more accurate picture of how Google was screwing Sun.
They've bought both Anobit and P.A. Semi, doesn't that make them a semiconductor company?
Apple already co-invests with building fabrication plants through extremely large pre-purchases, and some analysts think Apple is already directly funding Samsung's A6 fab. You are right about Apple being a product company, they don't want to fund these factories. But they are forced to, because that is the current price of staying ahead of the competition in the phone industry.
These fabs aren't an optional investment, they are the cost of doing business.
I didn't mean it was 'simple' as in anyone could understand it, I meant the actual process for processing the GST is simple. It would take about three or four hours for an Australian tax specialist to give Amazon the appropriate advice. Costs for setting up a GST system is extremely low compared to the kind of revenue Amazon pulls in.
Australia has a GST tax. Just figuring out if you are liable for this will cost you a bundle.
Figuring out whether you are liable for GST takes about 5 minutes. Registering for GST would take a few hours. Nearly every company in Australia registers for GST, so the government made it extremely simple. These things are such a marginal cost that it is ridiculous to use them as a reason for significant price differences.
crippled late-to-tha-game almost-abandoned video streamer box is a revolution?
I personally think it is crippled at the moment (I jailbroke mine and run XBMC on it) but saying it is abandoned just shows your ignorance. Apple just released a new UI and new hardware, as well as building airplay into the next version of Mac OS X.
It's also an unsent draft of an e-mail written by a Google employee who wasn't working on Android!
Oracle are using the final sent email now, the reason they had to use drafts earlier was because Google tried to claim attorney-client privilege on the final email (because it was sent to a few lawyers). Also Lindholm has said that he worked on Android, just that he didn't work on it very much.
Your being an idiot aside, this was an unsent DRAFT email.
It is not just a draft. Oracle ARE using the drafts as evidence, but the final email also included the licensing language. The reason Oracle had to use the drafts was because the original email was at one point argued to be privileged information. It was found not to be and the final email is considered evidence.
A small amount? Apple made $2.5 billion from all ipods in the december quarter and $24 billion from iPhones. Apple doesn't breakdown sales by models so we don't know how many touches they are selling. If 50% of all ipods sold were touches (a pretty high guess) then Apple would be selling 5 times more iphones then touches.
There just isn't much demand (relatively) or money in gadgets like the ipod touch.
so they should rescale the bars so that when you are at half speed or less you get 1 bar.
The speed you get on LTE depends on both the congestion of the cell and the strength of the signal you get from that cell. I thought the iPad can only tell what the strength of the signal, that cell towers don't report levels of congestion (excluding when they are too congested to operate).
I don't think telecommunications companies would be willing to let consumers see how congested their network is either, they want consumers to see 5 bars all the time.
That's the same price as an iPad 2. The 10.1 may have a better screen but the iOS app ecosystem has quite a bit of percieved value.
The value just isnt there for the average customer. Customers looking for a cheap, light tablet will get a Kindle Fire and customers looking for the best experience will get an iPad 3. There just isn't a market for $400 android tablets at the moment.
Slashdot Mirror
because every old phone that goes out of service and ceases to be a candidate
But you don't know when phones go out of service. So you can't tell when people are upgrading and when they are holding onto their old phone.
You can't know that from their growth rate. Technically every year it could be the same customers upgrading, so they would have a 100% upgrade rate. There's just no way of knowing that from their sales how many customers are new and how many are upgrading from another iPhone. You have people that buy every new phone, people on a two year upgrade cycle and people on a three year upgrade cycle. There's just to much variance for 'simple math' to get the right answer.
Source?
it's not really their fault. Microsoft designed a good operating system and even provided OEMs with good hardware designs that take advantage of the software, but as I've been told in tech press circles, the OEMs are stupid and short-sighted -- HP, the whole lot of them, can't think beyond tower computers and laptops unless they're pinned down.
It is Microsofts fault (or more correctly, was Microsofts fault).You can't blame HP. They tried with the HP Slate, but Microsoft just didn't add decent touch support into the OS soon enough. You can't blame OEMs, once HP got burned no one else wanted to be Microsofts next guinea pig. HP felt so let down by Microsoft that they went and bought Palm. If Microsoft had brought out Windows 8 and Windows Phone 8 sooner then we would have several versions of the surface in the market right now.
That's because the media ignores them in portraying Apple as a company that never makes a mistake.
The media haven't ignored it at all, just recently Mossberg brought Ping up at All Things D
At this point, I don't think the combination of RIM/Nokia/Microsoft would substantially lessen competition in the cell phone industry. No regulator stops an acquisition if one of the companies is going to die without it. It's easy to show that with RIM, a Nokia acquisition would be harder to get past European regulators.
Still, the combined market share of all three for smartphones is ~15%. That isn't the kind of number where regulators step in.With dumb phones, RIM and Microsoft don't really compete for that market, so Nokia's marketshare there wouldn't be a problem. So on a regulator front, they probably would be able to go through with the merger. If Motorola went through, i don't think they are going to stop anyone but Apple from acquiring phone companies.
What are you syncing the contacts to? All of the things you named are for syncing your data between a mac or pc and an ios device.
There is zero reason for wanting to use icloud if you don't own an iOS device or a mac. There are so many other services for windows that do a much better job at a cheaper price. If someone likes apples ecosystem enough to stomach itunes or safari on windows then they already own an iOS device or a mac.
So the answer ist actually "No. You can't"
Well your question was, can you access icloud, not setup an account. There's no reason to want an icloud account if you don't have an iOS device or a Mac, which is probably why you can't setup an account online.
Yes you can, just go to icloud.com and log in.
Sun was happy about it
Sun was not happy about it, however their idiotic CEO at the time decided to act like he was fine with it in public. Look at James Goslings comment for a more accurate picture of how Google was screwing Sun.
Apple is not a semiconductor company
They've bought both Anobit and P.A. Semi, doesn't that make them a semiconductor company?
Apple already co-invests with building fabrication plants through extremely large pre-purchases, and some analysts think Apple is already directly funding Samsung's A6 fab. You are right about Apple being a product company, they don't want to fund these factories. But they are forced to, because that is the current price of staying ahead of the competition in the phone industry.
These fabs aren't an optional investment, they are the cost of doing business.
I didn't mean it was 'simple' as in anyone could understand it, I meant the actual process for processing the GST is simple. It would take about three or four hours for an Australian tax specialist to give Amazon the appropriate advice. Costs for setting up a GST system is extremely low compared to the kind of revenue Amazon pulls in.
US price= US$2599
Aus price= AUD$3949= US$4134
US/AUS= 2599/4134= 0.62
So not double but still a 60% increase (50% when you take into account GST)
Australia has a GST tax. Just figuring out if you are liable for this will cost you a bundle.
Figuring out whether you are liable for GST takes about 5 minutes. Registering for GST would take a few hours. Nearly every company in Australia registers for GST, so the government made it extremely simple. These things are such a marginal cost that it is ridiculous to use them as a reason for significant price differences.
crippled late-to-tha-game almost-abandoned video streamer box is a revolution?
I personally think it is crippled at the moment (I jailbroke mine and run XBMC on it) but saying it is abandoned just shows your ignorance. Apple just released a new UI and new hardware, as well as building airplay into the next version of Mac OS X.
It's also an unsent draft of an e-mail written by a Google employee who wasn't working on Android!
Oracle are using the final sent email now, the reason they had to use drafts earlier was because Google tried to claim attorney-client privilege on the final email (because it was sent to a few lawyers). Also Lindholm has said that he worked on Android, just that he didn't work on it very much.
Your being an idiot aside, this was an unsent DRAFT email.
It is not just a draft. Oracle ARE using the drafts as evidence, but the final email also included the licensing language. The reason Oracle had to use the drafts was because the original email was at one point argued to be privileged information. It was found not to be and the final email is considered evidence.
A small amount? Apple made $2.5 billion from all ipods in the december quarter and $24 billion from iPhones. Apple doesn't breakdown sales by models so we don't know how many touches they are selling. If 50% of all ipods sold were touches (a pretty high guess) then Apple would be selling 5 times more iphones then touches. There just isn't much demand (relatively) or money in gadgets like the ipod touch.
so they should rescale the bars so that when you are at half speed or less you get 1 bar.
The speed you get on LTE depends on both the congestion of the cell and the strength of the signal you get from that cell. I thought the iPad can only tell what the strength of the signal, that cell towers don't report levels of congestion (excluding when they are too congested to operate). I don't think telecommunications companies would be willing to let consumers see how congested their network is either, they want consumers to see 5 bars all the time.
I don't think the 1.2% increase in heat will actually bother many consumers in the real world.
That's the same price as an iPad 2. The 10.1 may have a better screen but the iOS app ecosystem has quite a bit of percieved value. The value just isnt there for the average customer. Customers looking for a cheap, light tablet will get a Kindle Fire and customers looking for the best experience will get an iPad 3. There just isn't a market for $400 android tablets at the moment.