And that is one of the things these guys, the CIA and NSA, at least used to be good at, taking in tons of information published and analyzing each journalist's degree of authority and reliability and in what subjects. Some will always be better at seeing little things and connecting dots that seem meaningless to everyone else and others will follow the herd. I like reading Robert X. Cringly over at PBS, once in a while He sees things that everybody elses misses, but when he's wrong he's way wrong.
I always thought Solaris was a BSD unix where ad what Novel had bought was system V rights, any Unix historians know for sure? If Novel is system V and sun is BSD all should be well for them.
By dumping it in the ocean I mean either 1.seading the seas with iron, causing an algea bloom, which will sequester the CO2 and the Algea dies sinks to the floor or, 2. just dropping the dry ice,solid CO2, and letting it sink to the bottom or , 3. just pump air down a pipe deep enough for the CO2 to liquefy and sink to the bottom
in most of the ocean, it's cold and deep enough for the CO2 to stay on the bottom as either a liquid or a sold that buries itself in the mud on the floor. I do agree that any warming due to CO2 is saturated.
Eventually we will have to, we are at ~330 ppm CO2, and the increase isn't slowing, at 1000 ppm the air is going to start feeling pretty thick, like on one of those hot hot 100% humidity days when breathing seems to take a conscious effort, only all of the time. Sooner or later people are going to start dying, we'll have to dump the CO2 into the ocean and it's going to be expensive.
I need to see the data that the algorithms operated on, presented and explained by someone with a doctorate in climatology. First if you want to study the algorithms you need Computer Scientist/Engineers and Statistician, disciplines that have existed for more than a couple decades unlike climatologists. I consider Climatology an area of interest within geology or meteorology rather than a science in it's own right; certainly it's rigor is seems to be on a level closer to astrology the geology
What it means is that this pseudo-science called climatology has a demonstrated tendency toward dogma. Real Scientists know that Oscam's razor cuts a jagged wound, and nice clean data is almost always doctored, unless you say so publicly. When the data took a big jump on January 2000, all of the ones, and zeros in the date should have made a normal person suspicious, I know it made me curious and I'm not even close to being a scientist. I bet the Professional Scientists with 3 letters after their names that signed the paper are starting to feel like the goatse.cx guy. The bottom line is the clownish antics of Mann and these guys at NASA, Ruedy and Hansen, does is make the issues more uncertain.
I've got a little internal app I wrote using MySQL as the RDBMs and my experience is if your app has trouble shifting database engines then changing versions of MySQL will give you fits as well. If I have to change code because a feature is added and they let the work-around get broken; that means I have to check the RDBMs for it's version and write two or more functions to do the same thing. From there it's a no-brainer to add for Postgress and Oracle as well.
Have i just mis-read the GNU license? Yes you have, if you distribute binaries, you are required to provide the source code to the binaries to the entities you have distributed to, but you are not required to provide the source to anyone who merely wants it; and you are not required to do it for free. You can charge a reasonable copying fee, and it's entirely possible to make considerable money off copying fees, considering the horrendous copying fees people have to pay for court transcripts, how far do you think a law suit would get?
In my case it's that I once tried it about ten years ago and it was different, kind of a thing so inertia took over and I used MySQL instead, for no good reason. Next time about 5 years ago I tried the startup was a bit cranky in my distro, so it got shelved, last time everything worked, and seemed to work well, now do I really want to port over all the SQL?
If they've used GPL'ed code they're obligated to offer the source code to anyone who has a copy of the software and they are free to distribute it as they please as well. They do, customers have an account that allows them to download the sources and the customers are free to do as the please there after. Only customers can download the enterprise editions of MySQL so MySQL is under no obligation to provide the source to every Tom, Dick and Harry on the internet. MySQL does allow every Tom, Dick and Harry to download the unsupported, well test and more up-to-date stable community versions as well as the beta and alpha versions and anyone can download the sources as required by the GPL.
Anything that is contributed and excepted will be available in the community editions, which is still available in source code form ad-lib, and then moves into the enterprises where the source code is still available to the people to whom it is distributed to as per the requirements of the GPL.
Secret Service Agent "Mr. President, you have to realize that we don't work for you now, we work for your Wife, Madam President and you shouldn't expect the same level of discretion that enjoyed before...."
There really isn't any need for a fork, the community version is the one with more features that are slightly less mature, so the community is more leading edge and after a baptism of fire in the community, it's deemed uber-stable for the enterprise version.
You do realize that without E. coli in your intestines, you would die an agonizing death by having the screaming shits, well assuming you didn't bleed to death due to a vitamin K deficiency first; and all those little guys got in one way, you ate them. If you don't believe me try dropping a gram of Erythomycin an tell me your belly don't feel like the schoolyard bully used it for a punching bag.
seems like it's like dating people on the internet, at first contact Email, you want to be interesting, but not overbearing, yet still there is some anonymity and after a while you realise that things have come to an impass and aren't likely to progress without a face-to-face; so the problem is to meet in the middle, some place safe and public. Where can two space faring civilizations meet that safe and public when for all they know they are the only two there are?
Humans, the mostly harmless people of Earth who think the 20 light-years is a long way, a billion years is a long time and 1.21 Gigajoules is a lot of energy; planet currently in developmental quarantine status.
I'm not sure we have a transmitter that is powerful enough to send a tight beam signal to an other star to be received so how could one be broadcast? We have just started to listen and have only taken a quick listen at most areas that are +- 30 degrees. I have wondered if maybe we should think about frequencies that are both able to penetrate the junk in space and are relatively quiet and listen there as well; that's where I'd do my talking if I were an ET.
If there were civilizations out there with spaceships that could travel instantly across time/space are we sure we would want them to know about us, or might the risk be a bit more than we are comfortable with. I would love to "talk" with an extrastellar civilization, but I'm not sure about a face-to-face meeting and I'm sure more than a couple of our neighbors think the same way
you are wrong, you said the Telco's already squandered the millions of dollars that were supposed to be used for upgrading broadband, instead of the Telco's already squandered the BILLIONS of dollars that were supposed to be used for upgrading broadband,
Slashdot Mirror
And that is one of the things these guys, the CIA and NSA, at least used to be good at, taking in tons of information published and analyzing each journalist's degree of authority and reliability and in what subjects. Some will always be better at seeing little things and connecting dots that seem meaningless to everyone else and others will follow the herd. I like reading Robert X. Cringly over at PBS, once in a while He sees things that everybody elses misses, but when he's wrong he's way wrong.
I always thought Solaris was a BSD unix where ad what Novel had bought was system V rights, any Unix historians know for sure? If Novel is system V and sun is BSD all should be well for them.
By dumping it in the ocean I mean either ,solid CO2, and letting it sink to the bottom or ,
1.seading the seas with iron, causing an algea bloom, which will sequester the CO2 and the Algea dies sinks to the floor or,
2. just dropping the dry ice
3. just pump air down a pipe deep enough for the CO2 to liquefy and sink to the bottom
in most of the ocean, it's cold and deep enough for the CO2 to stay on the bottom as either a liquid or a sold that buries itself in the mud on the floor. I do agree that any warming due to CO2 is saturated.
Eventually we will have to, we are at ~330 ppm CO2, and the increase isn't slowing, at 1000 ppm the air is going to start feeling pretty thick, like on one of those hot hot 100% humidity days when breathing seems to take a conscious effort, only all of the time. Sooner or later people are going to start dying, we'll have to dump the CO2 into the ocean and it's going to be expensive.
I need to see the data that the algorithms operated on, presented and explained by someone with a doctorate in climatology.
First if you want to study the algorithms you need Computer Scientist/Engineers and Statistician, disciplines that have existed for more than a couple decades unlike climatologists. I consider Climatology an area of interest within geology or meteorology rather than a science in it's own right; certainly it's rigor is seems to be on a level closer to astrology the geology
What it means is that this pseudo-science called climatology has a demonstrated tendency toward dogma. Real Scientists know that Oscam's razor cuts a jagged wound, and nice clean data is almost always doctored, unless you say so publicly. When the data took a big jump on January 2000, all of the ones, and zeros in the date should have made a normal person suspicious, I know it made me curious and I'm not even close to being a scientist. I bet the Professional Scientists with 3 letters after their names that signed the paper are starting to feel like the goatse.cx guy.
The bottom line is the clownish antics of Mann and these guys at NASA, Ruedy and Hansen, does is make the issues more uncertain.
I've got a little internal app I wrote using MySQL as the RDBMs and my experience is if your app has trouble shifting database engines then changing versions of MySQL will give you fits as well. If I have to change code because a feature is added and they let the work-around get broken; that means I have to check the RDBMs for it's version and write two or more functions to do the same thing. From there it's a no-brainer to add for Postgress and Oracle as well.
Have i just mis-read the GNU license?
Yes you have, if you distribute binaries, you are required to provide the source code to the binaries to the entities you have distributed to, but you are not required to provide the source to anyone who merely wants it; and you are not required to do it for free. You can charge a reasonable copying fee, and it's entirely possible to make considerable money off copying fees, considering the horrendous copying fees people have to pay for court transcripts, how far do you think a law suit would get?
In my case it's that I once tried it about ten years ago and it was different, kind of a thing so inertia took over and I used MySQL instead, for no good reason. Next time about 5 years ago I tried the startup was a bit cranky in my distro, so it got shelved, last time everything worked, and seemed to work well, now do I really want to port over all the SQL?
If they've used GPL'ed code they're obligated to offer the source code to anyone who has a copy of the software and they are free to distribute it as they please as well.
They do, customers have an account that allows them to download the sources and the customers are free to do as the please there after. Only customers can download the enterprise editions of MySQL so MySQL is under no obligation to provide the source to every Tom, Dick and Harry on the internet. MySQL does allow every Tom, Dick and Harry to download the unsupported, well test and more up-to-date stable community versions as well as the beta and alpha versions and anyone can download the sources as required by the GPL.
Anything that is contributed and excepted will be available in the community editions, which is still available in source code form ad-lib, and then moves into the enterprises where the source code is still available to the people to whom it is distributed to as per the requirements of the GPL.
Secret Service Agent "Mr. President, you have to realize that we don't work for you now, we work for your Wife, Madam President and you shouldn't expect the same level of discretion that enjoyed before ...."
How do we know it wasn't one of Zonk's alter-ego posting some flamebait to start a flame war jack up the page-view revenues a bit?
She wasn't your girlfriend, she would just play D&D at the same table as you as long as the Mountain Dew and Cheetos were free and abundant
There really isn't any need for a fork, the community version is the one with more features that are slightly less mature, so the community is more leading edge and after a baptism of fire in the community, it's deemed uber-stable for the enterprise version.
You do realize that without E. coli in your intestines, you would die an agonizing death by having the screaming shits, well assuming you didn't bleed to death due to a vitamin K deficiency first; and all those little guys got in one way, you ate them. If you don't believe me try dropping a gram of Erythomycin an tell me your belly don't feel like the schoolyard bully used it for a punching bag.
We'd just be using Macs instead of PC's, spending more for hardware and less for virus scanners; so it would work out about the same.
I'd say it's active if it has a customised front page and some adsense links; in short most parkers, typo-squatter and cybersquatters
A windows workstation is an oxymoron in my book, kind of like a Linux Desktop only worse
seems like it's like dating people on the internet, at first contact Email, you want to be interesting, but not overbearing, yet still there is some anonymity and after a while you realise that things have come to an impass and aren't likely to progress without a face-to-face; so the problem is to meet in the middle, some place safe and public. Where can two space faring civilizations meet that safe and public when for all they know they are the only two there are?
Humans, the mostly harmless people of Earth who think the 20 light-years is a long way, a billion years is a long time and 1.21 Gigajoules is a lot of energy; planet currently in developmental quarantine status.
Moris code is digital, base three to be exact as well as Huffman encoded a compression technic
I'm not sure we have a transmitter that is powerful enough to send a tight beam signal to an other star to be received so how could one be broadcast? We have just started to listen and have only taken a quick listen at most areas that are +- 30 degrees. I have wondered if maybe we should think about frequencies that are both able to penetrate the junk in space and are relatively quiet and listen there as well; that's where I'd do my talking if I were an ET.
If there were civilizations out there with spaceships that could travel instantly across time/space are we sure we would want them to know about us, or might the risk be a bit more than we are comfortable with. I would love to "talk" with an extrastellar civilization, but I'm not sure about a face-to-face meeting and I'm sure more than a couple of our neighbors think the same way
you are wrong, you said the Telco's already squandered the millions of dollars that were supposed to be used for upgrading broadband, instead of the Telco's already squandered the BILLIONS of dollars that were supposed to be used for upgrading broadband,