... and there you made your mistake. While that's a grammatically and semantically correct sentence, you're more likely to phrase it as, "Morgen schreibe ich noch einen.", actually using present tense to convey a future statement.
Oh ja, da ich ja 'nen Volltrottel bin, hab' ich garnix gemerkt dass meine Sätze die These des Artikels widersprach...
Gut dass du für mich da war, sonst wäre ich dummgeblieben.
I think we're entirely in agreement.
From my perspective, however, the point being, that it is absurd for someone to claim that Alan Turing's "human rights" were violated, if the very concept of human rights is being asserted without reference to an objective morality.
Without objective morality there really isn't any such thing as "human rights", there's just some norms that represent the consensus of people in a given place and time. It doesn't really make any sense for people who don't accept objective morality to say that what happened to Alan Turing was "wrong" in any absolute sense, and such people commonly say such things.
Because without objective morality there are no objective rights at all.
Sure the majority can always force it's will upon dissenters -- as I said, crime & punishment, defined by capricious and arbitrary standards.
Without an omnipotent and eternal creator, then there is no objective morality. The best you can do is a consensus judgment of the persons living in a given place and time. But if morality is not objective, then the consensus majority has no objectively valid right to impose their consensus upon dissenters. What you are left with is, in fact, no morality at all -- only crime and punishment defined by capricious and arbitrary standards.
Wow this is amazing! Kudos to Bloomberg for such an unexpected and generous gift!
Why, now anyone at all can connect to Bloomberg's proprietary and expensive market data feeds.
That's what I call true philanthropy.
Slashdot Mirror
What they will discover is that the Higgs both does exist, and doesn't exist, at the same time.
Ummm... that doesn't look like an iPad.
It looks more an an old Powerbook with the keyboard broken off.
I wish I could be a paid shill.
How much does it pay?
Well now I know what article of clothing I WILL NEVER be buying.
Morgen werde ich noch einen schreiben.
... and there you made your mistake. While that's a grammatically and semantically correct sentence, you're more likely to phrase it as, "Morgen schreibe ich noch einen.", actually using present tense to convey a future statement.
Oh ja, da ich ja 'nen Volltrottel bin, hab' ich garnix gemerkt dass meine Sätze die These des Artikels widersprach... Gut dass du für mich da war, sonst wäre ich dummgeblieben.
Du glaubst wohl ich habe das unwissend und unabsichtlich so getippt... oje.
Jetzt schreibe ich einen Satz.
... Just lost two pounds and made $10!
Morgen werde ich noch einen schreiben.
I think we're entirely in agreement.
From my perspective, however, the point being, that it is absurd for someone to claim that Alan Turing's "human rights" were violated, if the very concept of human rights is being asserted without reference to an objective morality.
Without objective morality there really isn't any such thing as "human rights", there's just some norms that represent the consensus of people in a given place and time. It doesn't really make any sense for people who don't accept objective morality to say that what happened to Alan Turing was "wrong" in any absolute sense, and such people commonly say such things.
Because without objective morality there are no objective rights at all. Sure the majority can always force it's will upon dissenters -- as I said, crime & punishment, defined by capricious and arbitrary standards.
"Further analyzing the issue" is irrelevant. You will be assimilated. Resistance is futile.
Without an omnipotent and eternal creator, then there is no objective morality. The best you can do is a consensus judgment of the persons living in a given place and time. But if morality is not objective, then the consensus majority has no objectively valid right to impose their consensus upon dissenters. What you are left with is, in fact, no morality at all -- only crime and punishment defined by capricious and arbitrary standards.
Wow this is amazing! Kudos to Bloomberg for such an unexpected and generous gift! Why, now anyone at all can connect to Bloomberg's proprietary and expensive market data feeds. That's what I call true philanthropy.
Indeed. The only thing that has stopped me from producing such a heavily commented disassembly of Microsoft Office is that it is sadly illegal.
By hanging