And like well written code needs few comments, asserts are not a substitute for unclear code or for understanding the code that failed. A failed assert needs to be understood just like you need to understand why a regular code statement failed.
Soo, asserts is only needed for cases where the code it self does not fail fast enough.
Hm, so according to USA Law, you can slander a company (or person?) in any way you want as long as it is deemed to be satire. Is it not just the Copyright that is protected in this way could he not be sued for "slander" (in lack of juridical term).
And like well written code needs few comments, asserts are not a substitute for unclear code or for understanding the code that failed. A failed assert needs to be understood just like you need to understand why a regular code statement failed.
Soo, asserts is only needed for cases where the code it self does not fail fast enough.
Hm, so according to USA Law, you can slander a company (or person?) in any way you want as long as it is deemed to be satire. Is it not just the Copyright that is protected in this way could he not be sued for "slander" (in lack of juridical term).
Where would that be?