"by whom"?
By our governments. It seems like they all are heading in the same direction: More internet control, more observation and registration, more traffic tracking, more financial control, more privacy invasions, etc. etc.
The big corporations are everywhere busy to lure our governments in colluding with them in order to control the population and to force us to buy their products. Through patenting (Monsanto et. al.) or through legislation (compulsory vaccinations, health insurance) or through harassment and out-legislation of the small producers, and especially the organic ones (fresh milk anyone?).
In short: fascist tyranny.
'The right direction'...
That would be
1. Keep Guantanamo open
2. More debt
3. Introduce and expand extrajudicial killings by drones
4. More war
5. More TSA
6. More DHS
7. More evil
and on, and on, and on...
Is this your 'right direction'?
Anyway, thanks for trying to bring the discussion back to the totally useless Dem-Rep-debate.
Speaking of idiots...
They may be getting classified intelligence of planning outlines of attacks on stadiums.
I see. So that's the reason why they only ask some questions.
As in: "We've got credible information about pending terrorist attacks, but let's not upset the people too much with scanners.
Let's keep that for later, when they are more used to our appearance in the public.
In the mean time, let's just wait for 'the terrorists' to succeed.
... and what exactly does this have to do with GMO?
And how many lives did his technology cost in terms of diseases through the soil exhaustion, hence reduced nutrient content in food?
... are more the result of the introduction of hybrid vs. the native varieties.
The fact that the big agricultural corporations preferred to introduce GMO hybrids, more than non-GMO hybrids, and push them relentlessly through bribery, does not make the increased production a result of GMO 'an sich'.
As long as there is no conclusive science telling us where all the 'modern' diseases (cancer, cardiovascular, diabetes) are coming from, to me the correlation with the introduction of processed and chemically grown, and even GMO, foods is too strong to state that the choice to fear GMO's (and processed food) is 'superstitious'.
That's why my opinion is that everyone has the right to choose for 'organic' food, and to demand also labeling of the same.
Good one. One I didn't dare to propose because I have no shred of any evidence.
Swiss bank accounts maybe?
(Or bitcoins, anonymously generated over TOR?)
If any hate is spewing, is targeted against the ex M$ bigwig Elop which brew this destructive strategy.
As pointed out above, it was the board that was already decided at ditching the previous CEO and hiring Elop/MS instead.
Now, as Dilbert has pointed out, this was a strategic move of sheer genius, with which MS has realised three very strategic goals:
1. Windows phone introduced in the market,
2. Nokia, the biggest competitor for their own phone hardware sales ambitions has been crushed,
3. Linux as OS for the mobile phone has been disabled.
Luckily, there is still the Jolla (currently connection time out) initiative with Tizen.
The grand question: How did the Nokia board get played up so much by Microsoft?
Then the Americans have digged themselves deep into a pile of (fascist) shit for which there is no solution other then the next, very very bloody, revolution. (I'm hinting here at the 1 billion hollow-point bullets that the DHS recently ordered.)
...describes the areas and extent to which the federation's authorities supersede the state's.
As this is a state's ballot, it is in the state's legislature that anonymity has to be arranged.
Even more where the federal government hasn't gotten the authority over state ballots.
So, I think the judge was right, although I'm also very surprised by the fact that anonymity in ballots is not guaranteed.
...you just don't dare to.
That's why you're a coward.
And that's also why soon you actually can't speak what you feel, because your right will be taken away from you.
Because you're a coward.:)
Slashdot Mirror
"by whom"?
By our governments. It seems like they all are heading in the same direction: More internet control, more observation and registration, more traffic tracking, more financial control, more privacy invasions, etc. etc.
The big corporations are everywhere busy to lure our governments in colluding with them in order to control the population and to force us to buy their products. Through patenting (Monsanto et. al.) or through legislation (compulsory vaccinations, health insurance) or through harassment and out-legislation of the small producers, and especially the organic ones (fresh milk anyone?).
In short: fascist tyranny.
Yeah, for me the warning bells signalled back in tum-te-tum-oh-one when they ... invaded Irak based on a non-sense presentation in the UN.
'The right direction'...
That would be
1. Keep Guantanamo open
2. More debt
3. Introduce and expand extrajudicial killings by drones
4. More war
5. More TSA
6. More DHS
7. More evil
and on, and on, and on...
Is this your 'right direction'?
Anyway, thanks for trying to bring the discussion back to the totally useless Dem-Rep-debate.
Speaking of idiots...
They may be getting classified intelligence of planning outlines of attacks on stadiums.
I see. So that's the reason why they only ask some questions.
As in: "We've got credible information about pending terrorist attacks, but let's not upset the people too much with scanners.
Let's keep that for later, when they are more used to our appearance in the public.
In the mean time, let's just wait for 'the terrorists' to succeed.
Yeah right, as if that is adding to security.
Actually, 'TSA' stands for:
The SA...
If it's coming from you, then you know where you can stick it :)
I moved out of the US 4 years ago because I can see where it's going.
I'm afraid this time it will be a worldwide co-ordinated fascist attack on all our freedoms.
Geez, what a 'friends' one can make on facebook.com.
Not my venue...
a person who is adamantly on one side of the debate but who was convinced to join the other.
Which not necessarily means that he got it right this time.
The tests that I have seen, say that GMO in the long run is detrimental to our health.
... and what exactly does this have to do with GMO?
And how many lives did his technology cost in terms of diseases through the soil exhaustion, hence reduced nutrient content in food?
... are more the result of the introduction of hybrid vs. the native varieties.
The fact that the big agricultural corporations preferred to introduce GMO hybrids, more than non-GMO hybrids, and push them relentlessly through bribery, does not make the increased production a result of GMO 'an sich'.
As long as there is no conclusive science telling us where all the 'modern' diseases (cancer, cardiovascular, diabetes) are coming from, to me the correlation with the introduction of processed and chemically grown, and even GMO, foods is too strong to state that the choice to fear GMO's (and processed food) is 'superstitious'.
That's why my opinion is that everyone has the right to choose for 'organic' food, and to demand also labeling of the same.
That's a lot of unproven statements in 3 sentences...
Why, is 'defending' China 'unpatriotic'?
That's the work-around they've found around democracy (first, and then) freedom, and they are applying it now, going full-throttle.
Good one. One I didn't dare to propose because I have no shred of any evidence.
Swiss bank accounts maybe?
(Or bitcoins, anonymously generated over TOR?)
If any hate is spewing, is targeted against the ex M$ bigwig Elop which brew this destructive strategy.
As pointed out above, it was the board that was already decided at ditching the previous CEO and hiring Elop/MS instead.
Now, as Dilbert has pointed out, this was a strategic move of sheer genius, with which MS has realised three very strategic goals:
1. Windows phone introduced in the market,
2. Nokia, the biggest competitor for their own phone hardware sales ambitions has been crushed,
3. Linux as OS for the mobile phone has been disabled.
Luckily, there is still the Jolla (currently connection time out) initiative with Tizen.
The grand question: How did the Nokia board get played up so much by Microsoft?
Then the Americans have digged themselves deep into a pile of (fascist) shit for which there is no solution other then the next, very very bloody, revolution. (I'm hinting here at the 1 billion hollow-point bullets that the DHS recently ordered.)
...describes the areas and extent to which the federation's authorities supersede the state's.
As this is a state's ballot, it is in the state's legislature that anonymity has to be arranged.
Even more where the federal government hasn't gotten the authority over state ballots.
So, I think the judge was right, although I'm also very surprised by the fact that anonymity in ballots is not guaranteed.
The real question is how were they able to truncate your password if they used a hash?
was hinting to the fact that it implies that MS stores your passwords somewhere in plain text.
In other words, vulnerable for hack attacks.
The real question is how were they able to truncate your password if they used a hash?
Somebody who understands the consequences of this, please mod it up!
... is a contradiction in terminis.
Evidence proves, otherwise it's not evidence.
"Disturbing the peace" pretty much every municipality has a law for it
I didn't ask about disturbing the peace, I asked if arguing could land you in prison. For me that's something totally different. .com:
To quote webster
argue verb \är-()gyü\ - intransitive verb
1 : to give reasons for or against something : reason
2 : to contend or disagree in words : dispute
...you just don't dare to. :)
That's why you're a coward.
And that's also why soon you actually can't speak what you feel, because your right will be taken away from you.
Because you're a coward.