If it wasn't big pharma then it must have been big sugar that payed Ansel Keyes to lure the recent generations into stopping eating meats and fats and replacing that with carbohydrates and sugar.
Nobody needs carbohydrates. Fat and even protein can supply enough energy, so If you simply stop eating carbohydates, your insulin would not go up so much, you'd get less fat, loose your insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome and even your diabetes type 2, your blood pressure lowers and your 'bad cholesterol' also.
Only that it's the government setting up these shooting theater pieces to get rid of the 2nd.
So they can start slaughtering the populace.
That's also why they forbid the mere possession of quality protective gear.
Me court. Me stupid. Me don't want to check merits of case. Me just hear one argument only. Me cannot think about validity. Me don't know where is... U s Of A??
It's the other way around.
The government wants the exclusive right to slaughter its population.
2nd amendment stands in their way though as population can defend themselves.
So they set up those shootings by some fake 'lone wolf' with access to weapons in order to whip the population into abandoning the 2nd.
Then the shit hits the fan.
Why else would it be forbidden for Joe average to possess protective gear?
Exactly Stallman's point: the software functions properly in the eye of the user.
But secretly it can do all kinds of other, unintended, things he'll never may know of.
Ah, those fossil fuel bastards again.
Don't worry about them.
Soon there'll be no more fossil fuel and everybody will drive electric cars and 'fuel' their homes with solar and wind energy.
Nobody cares whether humanity will go extinct.
Every individual that's alive is proof that humanity isn't.
And every individual that isn't born obviously won't care shit.
Strange thing is that I've never seen a letter of 20,000 mathematicians stating that the value of pi isn't 3, when some state was going to pass a law that pi=3.
Or a letter of 10,000 physics that supported (or rejected) Einsteins views.
Was it maybe because in those cases solid proof was actually available?
Slashdot Mirror
If it wasn't big pharma then it must have been big sugar that payed Ansel Keyes to lure the recent generations into stopping eating meats and fats and replacing that with carbohydrates and sugar.
Nobody needs carbohydrates. Fat and even protein can supply enough energy, so If you simply stop eating carbohydates, your insulin would not go up so much, you'd get less fat, loose your insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome and even your diabetes type 2, your blood pressure lowers and your 'bad cholesterol' also.
This isn't arstechnica.com where you indeed [quote]like this.[/quote]
Only that it's the government setting up these shooting theater pieces to get rid of the 2nd.
So they can start slaughtering the populace.
That's also why they forbid the mere possession of quality protective gear.
Our last and only hope is Elon Musk getting interested in fusion.
Actually, there seems to be a fair amount of helium on the moon. https://www.extremetech.com/ex...
Another example: http://www.dilutedthinking.com...
Me stupid. You explain much better.
Me court. Me stupid. Me thinks TOR is son of Odan. Me thinks IP numbers don't exist. Me rulez!
...it's not necessarily the court's fault.
Me court. Me stupid. Me don't want to check merits of case. Me just hear one argument only. Me cannot think about validity. Me don't know where is ... U s Of A??
It's the other way around.
The government wants the exclusive right to slaughter its population.
2nd amendment stands in their way though as population can defend themselves.
So they set up those shootings by some fake 'lone wolf' with access to weapons in order to whip the population into abandoning the 2nd.
Then the shit hits the fan.
Why else would it be forbidden for Joe average to possess protective gear?
...it’s “essentially capturing lightning in a bottle, but without the bottle.”
and
...forming a donut-shaped glowing plasma that’s dozens of microns in diameter.
then I can't help it, but I have to LOL!
Maybe, but you probably wouldn't get the meaning.
The arguments aren't worth the karma hit to want to login.
This is what's wrong with Slashdot.
Maybe he was just misquoted?
This is completely off-topic but probably you don't understand that.
Exactly Stallman's point: the software functions properly in the eye of the user.
But secretly it can do all kinds of other, unintended, things he'll never may know of.
Did you misread the word 'warning' as 'warming'?
You cited the right skeptic at the right place. :)
Ah, those fossil fuel bastards again.
Don't worry about them.
Soon there'll be no more fossil fuel and everybody will drive electric cars and 'fuel' their homes with solar and wind energy.
Ok, let's fight both corrupt sides.
Now what does that say about the truth or untruth of AGW?
Get educated and vote green.
It would really have been funny if there wasn't that stupidly eye hurting spelling error.
Nobody cares whether humanity will go extinct.
Every individual that's alive is proof that humanity isn't.
And every individual that isn't born obviously won't care shit.
No, in 50 years population will have stabilized.
Strange thing is that I've never seen a letter of 20,000 mathematicians stating that the value of pi isn't 3, when some state was going to pass a law that pi=3.
Or a letter of 10,000 physics that supported (or rejected) Einsteins views.
Was it maybe because in those cases solid proof was actually available?