The Internet is such new and fresh technology were I though we be able to take a new course of human history with it. Yet again it seems society is just imprinting the old world into the new one.
From a first time stand point, it seemed that this version is more confusing to the first time viewer than the first movie was. It is missing a lot of details i.e. the mental thoughs of Paul. Remember his personal thoughs all thoughout the other movie. That is missing and it would be hard for someone to understand the story without those. Plus I like the darker nature of the old film in general. This one is very bright and colorful. What does make movies nice is when the are redone and new look and view is given to them. In life everything is one point with many views. All in all, this is still a great production and true Dune fans need to check it out.
P.S. The Fight scene between Paul and Gurney Halleck had better special effects in the old movie.
It is cool to find new and exciting heavenly bodies, but when are we actually gonna have a "real" attemp to visit these places. Are we willing to stay just remember that great visit on the moom or are we gonna try something better for once.
I feel maybe it should fragment. It would add more choices to what you want in your open-sourced kernel. Right now in light of the BSD's I feel unsafe using Linux for anything other than a desktop. Why would you use Linux for a Server when OpenBSD exists. Linux is very nice, I am far from saying it is a bad OS in any way, shape or form. I just feel that there is a big difference between using an OS for servers and desktops. Right now Linux is aiming at both markets with one kernel. What I like about OpenBSD is that it is not trying to pretend to be a desktop OS. They don't try to branch out in that direction. In doing that people don't waste their time on a OS that isn't ever going to a real desktop choice, thus those people go to Linux. A real solution from open-sourced desktops.
FreeBSD is heading the way of Linux. It starting to pull itself into too many directions using one kernel. It is far from what I believe Linux has become. Linux is aiming to please everyone. You can't do that it just doesn't work(Example : The Election). Fragmentation can be a good thing if you don't burn your bridges to do so. If they fragment, keep in a effort with the other fork to develop the best kernel you can. It is when fragmentation is done for personal reasons instend of honest professional and technical reasons that it turns sour.
Linux is and will always be better than M$, so keep the real enemy in mind.
Good this means Intel can say anything about how much better their chips are than Transmeta's. In light of resent events it looks like both need to go back and look at designs. I like Transmeta and what they are doing, but look like AMD can stand proud of their product.
GO AMD
Slashdot Mirror
The Internet is such new and fresh technology were I though we be able to take a new course of human history with it. Yet again it seems society is just imprinting the old world into the new one.
From a first time stand point, it seemed that this version is more confusing to the first time viewer than the first movie was. It is missing a lot of details i.e. the mental thoughs of Paul. Remember his personal thoughs all thoughout the other movie. That is missing and it would be hard for someone to understand the story without those. Plus I like the darker nature of the old film in general. This one is very bright and colorful. What does make movies nice is when the are redone and new look and view is given to them. In life everything is one point with many views. All in all, this is still a great production and true Dune fans need to check it out.
P.S. The Fight scene between Paul and Gurney Halleck had better special effects in the old movie.
It is cool to find new and exciting heavenly bodies, but when are we actually gonna have a "real" attemp to visit these places. Are we willing to stay just remember that great visit on the moom or are we gonna try something better for once.
I feel maybe it should fragment. It would add more choices to what you want in your open-sourced kernel. Right now in light of the BSD's I feel unsafe using Linux for anything other than a desktop. Why would you use Linux for a Server when OpenBSD exists. Linux is very nice, I am far from saying it is a bad OS in any way, shape or form. I just feel that there is a big difference between using an OS for servers and desktops. Right now Linux is aiming at both markets with one kernel. What I like about OpenBSD is that it is not trying to pretend to be a desktop OS. They don't try to branch out in that direction. In doing that people don't waste their time on a OS that isn't ever going to a real desktop choice, thus those people go to Linux. A real solution from open-sourced desktops.
FreeBSD is heading the way of Linux. It starting to pull itself into too many directions using one kernel. It is far from what I believe Linux has become. Linux is aiming to please everyone. You can't do that it just doesn't work(Example : The Election). Fragmentation can be a good thing if you don't burn your bridges to do so. If they fragment, keep in a effort with the other fork to develop the best kernel you can. It is when fragmentation is done for personal reasons instend of honest professional and technical reasons that it turns sour.
Linux is and will always be better than M$, so keep the real enemy in mind.
Good this means Intel can say anything about how much better their chips are than Transmeta's. In light of resent events it looks like both need to go back and look at designs. I like Transmeta and what they are doing, but look like AMD can stand proud of their product. GO AMD