I once heard someone say that you can tell how corrupt a charity is by the kind of car its director drives. If a charity's director is driving a new Mercedes, it's a pretty safe bet that most of your donations aren't going to feed hungry children. So now that's my rule of thumb for a charity: look into the intentions and lifestyles of the heads of the charity and you will probably see its true heart.
I know this is somewhat off-topic, but I was a big supporter of the whole micro-finance thing at one time myself. Sounds like a great idea and all, right? But then I saw former micro-financier Hugh Sinclair's BookTv segment and read his book and it opened my eyes to how much of this micro-finance fad has become a feeding ground for scammers, con men, and other vultures in the countries they're ostensibly supposed to be helping--and how much corruption there is in many of these "charitable" non-profits and financiers that sell the idea of micro-finance to well-meaning supporters.
Again, I know it's not directly related to the hack. But every time micro-finance comes up, I like to point out this info--since the vast majority of people still think of the subject in very naive and rosy terms, oblivious to the deep corruption that has become so pervasive in its execution.
I hate to let you in on a little-spoken-of secret, but a LOT of those Medal of Honor stories (especially the ones awarded posthumously) are...ahem..."exaggerated."
It also helps to never give out your cell # except to friends and family. I found that a lot of the businesses I was giving my phone number to were somehow passing it along to telemarketers (I could tell because sometimes I would vary my name slightly just to see).
Thank god we still at least have Mythbusters. With Bullshit gone, if we lose Mythbusters it will be the end of any voice of reason in the sea of pseudoscientific and paranormal hogwash that cable TV floats on these days.
This is too true. Politicians are the masters at manipulating "truth" to their own agendas. You can say something completely factually accurate and still subtly *imply* with the statement something completely false. A simple statement like "This President says he wants to fight terrorists, this President Barak Hussein Obama, claims that he's going to fight Muslim terrorists" is 100% factually accurate. But it conveys something much more sinister and 100% false (that the President is somehow sympathetic with, or perhaps even in league with, Muslim terrorists).
Nonsense! Placebos are actually some of the most effective known treatments for all psychosomatic illnesses.
I've got an aunt whose fibromyalgia was cured by a legendary Native American healer who happened to also bear a strong resemblance to a Hispanic actor who I knew from work.
It greatly saddens me that in the 21st century, there is still this spate of "ghost hunter" and paranormal reality shows, even on once respectable networks like the History Channel and other cable network channels. But has there ever been talk of doing a James Randi or skeptic-based reality show (akin to Penn & Teller's Bullsh*t)?
An amusingly reasonable finding from the tribunal:
So, with guilt under current law established, the Tribunal set about the task of a financial punishment. According to regulations, in a downloading case the cost of the infringed products must be considered. Man Down is available of iTunes for $2.39 (US$2.00) and Tonight Tonight at $1.79 (US$1.50).... With this in mind the Tribunal said it would order the subscriber to pay RIANZ double the iTunes price of Man Down (2 x $2.39) and the same for Tonight Tonight (2 x $1.79) – a total of $6.57 (US$5.49). This aspect of the Tribunal’s decision will be a huge disappointment for RIANZ.
Selling it as a phone that combines the security and safety of an enterprise phone with the features an fun of a "home" phone is the right approach. But they're still going to have to prove themselves on both fronts. And the clock is definitely ticking.
I don't think it's too late for them, but it's definitely the 11th hour.
Slashdot Mirror
I once heard someone say that you can tell how corrupt a charity is by the kind of car its director drives. If a charity's director is driving a new Mercedes, it's a pretty safe bet that most of your donations aren't going to feed hungry children. So now that's my rule of thumb for a charity: look into the intentions and lifestyles of the heads of the charity and you will probably see its true heart.
I know this is somewhat off-topic, but I was a big supporter of the whole micro-finance thing at one time myself. Sounds like a great idea and all, right? But then I saw former micro-financier Hugh Sinclair's BookTv segment and read his book and it opened my eyes to how much of this micro-finance fad has become a feeding ground for scammers, con men, and other vultures in the countries they're ostensibly supposed to be helping--and how much corruption there is in many of these "charitable" non-profits and financiers that sell the idea of micro-finance to well-meaning supporters.
Again, I know it's not directly related to the hack. But every time micro-finance comes up, I like to point out this info--since the vast majority of people still think of the subject in very naive and rosy terms, oblivious to the deep corruption that has become so pervasive in its execution.
Wait, I thought everyone was supposed to work for free on some hippie FOSS project.
[ducks]
Citizens see the cost situation like this:
Cost to pursue and prosecute these cases -(is greater than)- The return in fines + the benefit to society.
Politicians see it like this:
Donations to my campaign from the media industries + Future support from my party -(is greater than)- Any backlash from voters about the cost
Eh, Cyberdyne is still faster than the Half-Life 3 development team.
I wonder what frat he'll pledge.
I hate to let you in on a little-spoken-of secret, but a LOT of those Medal of Honor stories (especially the ones awarded posthumously) are...ahem..."exaggerated."
The feds and ISP's are too busy busting kids for downloading movies in their dorm rooms.
Or how they disguise their sales pitch as a "survey" to use THAT loophole.
It also helps to never give out your cell # except to friends and family. I found that a lot of the businesses I was giving my phone number to were somehow passing it along to telemarketers (I could tell because sometimes I would vary my name slightly just to see).
Thank god we still at least have Mythbusters. With Bullshit gone, if we lose Mythbusters it will be the end of any voice of reason in the sea of pseudoscientific and paranormal hogwash that cable TV floats on these days.
*Once* respectable.
This is too true. Politicians are the masters at manipulating "truth" to their own agendas. You can say something completely factually accurate and still subtly *imply* with the statement something completely false. A simple statement like "This President says he wants to fight terrorists, this President Barak Hussein Obama, claims that he's going to fight Muslim terrorists" is 100% factually accurate. But it conveys something much more sinister and 100% false (that the President is somehow sympathetic with, or perhaps even in league with, Muslim terrorists).
How ever, once open wifi is the norm
Fine, but you boys go first.
Nonsense! Placebos are actually some of the most effective known treatments for all psychosomatic illnesses.
I've got an aunt whose fibromyalgia was cured by a legendary Native American healer who happened to also bear a strong resemblance to a Hispanic actor who I knew from work.
It greatly saddens me that in the 21st century, there is still this spate of "ghost hunter" and paranormal reality shows, even on once respectable networks like the History Channel and other cable network channels. But has there ever been talk of doing a James Randi or skeptic-based reality show (akin to Penn & Teller's Bullsh*t)?
oops, misread my own quote. It was $6.57 (NZ), or $5.49 (US).
An amusingly reasonable finding from the tribunal:
So, with guilt under current law established, the Tribunal set about the task of a financial punishment. According to regulations, in a downloading case the cost of the infringed products must be considered. Man Down is available of iTunes for $2.39 (US$2.00) and Tonight Tonight at $1.79 (US$1.50). ...
With this in mind the Tribunal said it would order the subscriber to pay RIANZ double the iTunes price of Man Down (2 x $2.39) and the same for Tonight Tonight (2 x $1.79) – a total of $6.57 (US$5.49). This aspect of the Tribunal’s decision will be a huge disappointment for RIANZ.
Just once, I'd like to run into a cult of bunny worshipers.
The first rule of the Church of Peter is you DO NOT talk about the Church of Peter.
Can the apps and OS be removed?
Aside from a few off-brand tablets, have you ever known any tablet that you could do this to (without jailbreaking them)?
They still have some clout in enterprise circles, where they're coasting on their name and one-time legendary rep, basically.
Not saying that's going to be enough. Just saying that if there is a CHANCE, this is the best hope they've got.
So someone else can take all the risk of testing out a new idea, while Facebook gets to reap all the rewards when they integrate it later.
Selling it as a phone that combines the security and safety of an enterprise phone with the features an fun of a "home" phone is the right approach. But they're still going to have to prove themselves on both fronts. And the clock is definitely ticking.
I don't think it's too late for them, but it's definitely the 11th hour.
I would probably go to Chrome if they had noscripts too.
Have to admire the guy.