Slashdot Mirror


User: Smallest

Smallest's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
395
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 395

  1. Re:Nazi America on When Students Become Informers · · Score: 1
    Zero tollerence isn't about guns, drugs, etc. It is about control of the masses.

    Nonsense.

    Zero tolerance is about a politician who, after hearing the desparate cries of "enough of this! do something, anything! make a law!" from a vocal group of the voters he represents, throws up his hands and chooses the easiest possible solution: all situations that meet the following criteria (X,Y,Z) are punishable by (P).

    It's about the fact that you can't come up with a law that fairly covers all situations, so you draw hard lines and wash your hands of the problem.

    -c

  2. Re:Americans on When Students Become Informers · · Score: 1

    a person rarely practices what he preaches, still he's viciously quick to point out this tendency in others.

    america, like every other country, is full of people acting like people.

    -c

  3. Re:Oh my God... on Full GPL Game Company - Nevrax · · Score: 1

    you bastard!

  4. Re:Old Boys Club on Does Age Really Matter? · · Score: 1

    That's not "old boy's club" that's called "management".

    somedays, it feels like my job is to simply cover the sales peoples' asses.

    whee!

    -c

  5. Re:So what? on Sun To MS: You Don't Get It · · Score: 1

    In order to achieve that the code will be compiled to pseudocode and interpreted by a JIT-compiler. (Sounds familiar)
    <p>
    a nitpick...
    <p>
    actually, apps will be compiled to IL (intermediate language), and shipped. when they are run (or installed, i've read both) they will be compiled to native code. there is no interpretation, but there is JIT compilation.
    <p>
    =c

  6. Re:Do-it-yourself at home, too! #2 on Nasty Bad Men Are Using Encryption · · Score: 1

    and here's one that lets you use BMP, TIFF, PCX, etc.
    <p>
    <a href="http://www.smalleranimals.com/stash.htm"> http://www.smalleranimals.com/stash.htm</a>
    <p>
    -c

  7. Re:why not an XHL? on Technology And The XFL · · Score: 1


    <p>
    so multiply it by some arbitratry number, like, say 6 (or 2 or 3, for all you roundballers). there, is that better ?
    <p>
    -c

  8. Re:Here's an idea... on A Love Song For Napster · · Score: 1

    DVD is a case where the new technology is better than the old (VHS).

    if we're strictly talking about stereo sound, there's not much you can do that's better than a CD...is there?

    -c

  9. Re:Question - not entirely O/T on A Love Song For Napster · · Score: 1

    then performers with popular (choose your own definition of "popular") MP3s on Napster should sure Napster.

    -c

  10. Re:Here's an idea... on A Love Song For Napster · · Score: 1

    big deal. within hours of their release, these albums will be MP3'd, burned to CD-R or cassette.
    if you can't decrypt the content to a WAV file, just put a mic in front of the magic-copyright-smart speaker.

    the record companies can't put copyright-enforcers in our ears (yet).

    -c

  11. Re:here's some coffeecake on A Love Song For Napster · · Score: 1

    sure it's idealistic - the subject is "Here's an idea..." not "Here's an algorithm". :)

    so, you're suggestion is to, what, sigh and play along?

    -c

  12. Here's an idea... on A Love Song For Napster · · Score: 5
    if SDMI gets off the ground and they (sony and pals) actually start trying to sell these copyright-enforcing players, don't buy them.

    don't throw out your CD-RWs, your CD players, your old receiver from 1993, your cassette player or your gasp turntable! keep them, use them, encourage record companies (with your wallet) to keep producing CDs compatible with current players.

    if nobody buys the new fancy gear, They lose.

    -c

  13. Re:Where will it stop? on The Unblinking Eye · · Score: 1

    because my going to a football game is not the same as my going to a fucking police line-up.

  14. Re:I can kinda understand on BIND Security Info For "Members Only"? · · Score: 1

    obscrutiny?

  15. Re:Evolutionary process on Compounds Necessary For Life 'All Over Space' · · Score: 1
    Evolution is not a mostly random process;

    False.

    If it isn't random, there would have to be a plan. But, no plan is required for evolution to work.

    Critters are born with a set of attributes (parentAttribs +/- random changes). Some critters die without reproducing. Some die having reproduced a lot. This is evolution. No plan is required. Random changes will suffice.

    -c

  16. Re:We are alone. on Compounds Necessary For Life 'All Over Space' · · Score: 1
    Yes it does. It is aimed at survival. There are numerous survival strategies, of which physical strength, stealth, speed and intelligence are examples

    No, it doesn't. Evolution is not planned, it has no strategy. If you want a plan, go to God. Evolution doesn't care.

    Changes occur in critters. Changes that are bad for the species eventually go away or are displaced by the changes that are good for the species. But the changes are entirely random (unless you believe that something is causing specific changes for specific reasons). The fact that the changes seem to follow a plan or path is entirely coincidental - the "path" is a product of human imagination. Evolution doesn't care.

    -c

  17. Re:Well of course on Compounds Necessary For Life 'All Over Space' · · Score: 1
    Hopefully we're now coming to the end of the humanocentric period of our history in which we view life on Earth as something unique

    Yeah right. We can't even get past racism, nationalism, regionalism, culturalism and all of the other stupid "us vs. them" isms.

    As soon as we find ET's, we're gonna have to kill them in order to preserve our precious Way of Life.

    Fucking idiots, all of us.

    -c

  18. Re:Is that horse high enough for you? on Interesting Commercials · · Score: 1

    Geeks are outcast for being geeks, not for being smart. There are plenty of smart jocks, and stupid geeks. Ever go into a Radio Shack ? Those guys are geeks, but they ain't none too smart.

    -c

  19. Re:A Name, A Name, What is in a Name? on Does .NET Sound Like Java? · · Score: 1

    C-pound

    C-tick-tac-toe

    C-really-not-equal

  20. Re:Sun had an interesting soundbyte... on Does .NET Sound Like Java? · · Score: 1

    that legacy code will have to be rewritten (to one degree or another) to run on .NET. even VB is changing in a number of significant ways.

    this is where .NET doesn't matter. if you're going to rewrite something, you can choose anything you like...

    -c

  21. Re:not a Java expert *but* on Does .NET Sound Like Java? · · Score: 1

    C# isn't closed. it's been submitted to the great Standards Body in the Sky. it's as open as C++.

    -c

  22. Re:Won't this software be illegal in the US? on French Hackers Break SDMI · · Score: 1

    Copyright infringement denies the author the ability to profit from his control of the distribution of his efforts. The asset is the control over distribution.

    Yes, it is stealing.

    -c

  23. Re:Microsoft case must be abandoned on Bush And The Tech Nation · · Score: 1
    The fact that there will now be two elephants fighting in the field is no consolation to the smaller animals which will continue to be trampled.

    Nobody's trampling me.

    Chris
    President, Smaller Animals Software, Inc. :)

    -c

  24. Re:Something I fail to see on Bush And The Tech Nation · · Score: 4
    I fail to see why trying to align technology to moral standards should a bad thing

    Who's morals get to be the standard?

    Remember, if the morals aren't mine, then they suck. (repeat 6 billion times)

    -c

  25. Re:Wrong method??? on Looking For Aliens In All the Wrong Places · · Score: 1
    Well, why don't we just look for little green men on mars

    No way. We want the giant green women!!!

    -c