Winamp has been using Bugzilla for the last year to assist in developing the new Winamp 3. It's certainly great for developers, provided that they have a dedicated user base that's willing to "weed out" bad or duplicate bugs. It's also great for users who are beta testing - then we can know which bugs they know about, without e-mailing the developers and wasting their time.
While Winamp's Bugzilla doesn't have the same magnitude as Mozilla's, it's still quite valuable.
Oh, great. Everybody has been talking about all the innocent people killed in these tragic events, and now you want to do the same thing to Afghanistan? Retaliation is necessary IMHO, but "bombing the hell" out of Taliban-controlled areas just kills many innocent people in a terrible situation.
I don't think this is wrong at all. Many people in America - especially high profile companies - are willing to assist with the investigation wherever possible. What kind of public image would result from a statement like "The FBI reports that AOL and Earthlink refuse to cooperate with the authorities?"
The terrorists had to communicate, and there were lots of people involved, so e-mail would be a plausible solution.
For me, checking every possible lead for these attacks is far more important than privacy concerns.
Slashdot Mirror
Winamp has been using Bugzilla for the last year to assist in developing the new Winamp 3. It's certainly great for developers, provided that they have a dedicated user base that's willing to "weed out" bad or duplicate bugs. It's also great for users who are beta testing - then we can know which bugs they know about, without e-mailing the developers and wasting their time.
While Winamp's Bugzilla doesn't have the same magnitude as Mozilla's, it's still quite valuable.
Winamp Bugzilla
Oh, great. Everybody has been talking about all the innocent people killed in these tragic events, and now you want to do the same thing to Afghanistan? Retaliation is necessary IMHO, but "bombing the hell" out of Taliban-controlled areas just kills many innocent people in a terrible situation.
I don't think this is wrong at all. Many people in America - especially high profile companies - are willing to assist with the investigation wherever possible. What kind of public image would result from a statement like "The FBI reports that AOL and Earthlink refuse to cooperate with the authorities?"
The terrorists had to communicate, and there were lots of people involved, so e-mail would be a plausible solution.
For me, checking every possible lead for these attacks is far more important than privacy concerns.
As other people have said, this product has been available for quite a while. Here's one link (first four entries are the mouse from the article):
U
http://www.cdw.com/shop/search/results.asp?grp=MO