Slashdot Mirror


User: XMyth

XMyth's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
691
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 691

  1. Re:home page n' stuff on The Largest Unpiloted Legged Robot Yet · · Score: 1

    Offtopic? What an intelligent moderator. THIS post is offtopic.

  2. Re:So What on Napster to Filter by Filenames · · Score: 1

    Doesn't it though?

  3. Re:Imagine... on How Printable Computers Will Work · · Score: 1

    That comment alone made enduring all the other Beowulf cluster jokes worth it.

  4. Re:Time to boycott and RIAA artist material! on OpenNaps Targeted; Gnutella "Validated" · · Score: 3

    Aren't we already not purchasing any music? =)

  5. Re:Web Standards on Web Standards Project: Upgrade, Or Miss Out · · Score: 1

    Check there page for Amaya. It's their browser that is supposed to be completely(?) standards compliant. It looks like CRAP though.

  6. Re:Read the article - scary stuff on Bad Call For Referee Dispute · · Score: 1

    They'll probably sue for that too. =)

  7. Re:This should be interesting, in MS' appeal... on MS Wants To Outlaw Open Source: "Threatens" the "American Way" · · Score: 1

    There are clearly no laws currently in effect which make open source applications/OSes illegal. Even if some comes into play, those laws can't be applied retroactively. So this really has little bearing on their current legal situation.

  8. Re:Unix was not designed for GUI's on Are Unix GUIs All Wrong? · · Score: 1

    Heh. So I should just stop using computers until one comes out that was written in this millenium? Ok, no problem.

  9. Re:How about a Quake-style console in the GUI? on Are Unix GUIs All Wrong? · · Score: 1


    That is a great idea. I've always wondered that myself when I'm playing quake. It just seems so natural to be able to switch to a console with just one button. It shouldn't be hard to add such functionality to most window managers. I might try that one day when I have time, but who has time these days?

  10. Re:Here we go again! on Are Unix GUIs All Wrong? · · Score: 1
    This is flamebait I'm sure, but oh well.

    Define a valid linux box please. I thought you could do what you wish with something you buy assuming you're not harming other people with it. Who are you to say what a "real" computer user is? Bah.

  11. Re:Don't hide 404 messages! on W3C On How To Fix Browsers · · Score: 1

    Ironic that you use them as an example when their search tool you talk about isn't working. "We are unable to perform your search at the moment. Please try again later." Haha. =)

  12. Re:Biased responses on FreeBSD 4.1.1 vs. Linux 2.4 · · Score: 1

    I grew up on Windows 3.11. And I think I'm going to ride it out...

  13. Re:Some voice recognition trivia... on IBM, TrollTech Integrate Linux Voice Recognition · · Score: 1

    Apparently not many people have tried this....I have though...=) My experience is Windows won't let you format the C drive while it's in use. So nothing really happens when you do that.

  14. Re:What a poor article. Here's the low down. on DirecTV's Secret War On Hackers · · Score: 1

    And the card are bad. In the PROM (programmable read only memory) there are 8 bytes. They can only be written to once. Think of it as little fuses that can only be blown, and not rewired. Well, DirecTV blew all the bytes, and without an electron microscope and machinery capabile of depositing single atoms, you card is pretty much screwed. This value is check eary in the bootstrap of the IRD. If this value is bad, the card goes into an infinate loop. So, inorder for H cards to be usuable again, they have to make somesort of hardware add-on that bypasses the bootstrap or feeds it a bum value, sort of like a mod chip in a PSX. Just though you shoud know.

  15. Not DirecTV alone on DirecTV's Secret War On Hackers · · Score: 1

    It sounds like DirecTV came up with this magnificent counterstrike on the satellite hacking community. Well, they had some help. An "organization" by the name of NorthSat wrote scripts that when applied with a smartcard programmer, would enable all the channels. DirecTV sued them, but they weren't after money or damages. They wanted some assistance. So, in order to avoid jailtime and massive fines, NorthSat assisted in this ECM (electronic countermeasure). NorthSat knew the cards better than DirecTV did. They knew all the holes that were open, where and why they changed the EEPROM, and how to finally take them down. So, give NorthSat some credit. Bad guys gone good, yes. But FREE good guys.

  16. Re:Best hack on DirecTV's Secret War On Hackers · · Score: 1

    This wasn't a hack on DirecTV's part. They sued an "organization" named NorthSat that sold scripts that activated all the channels. Anyway, DirecTV made a pact with this "organization" to either help them or be punished to the fullest. So, NorthSat agreed (which I would have, also) and then help DirecTV put together this intelligent assault on the satellite pirates. So, please don't credit DirecTV, credit the bad guy gone good.