I think the show would be good with some better acting. It's almost painful to sit through the dialog, waiting for the technology to kick in and take the pressure off the "actors".
Didn't that one chick play in "Walker Texas Ranger?"
I've come to the opinion that.NET is an answer for, not necessarily a derivative or rip-off of Java.
As for C# specifically, the similarities to Java are noticeable, but not necessarily remarkable. In truth, any strictly OO language will have a similar look and feel to Java, and the languages both have the same syntactical roots.
I'm interested to see how.NET shapes out. I've always been a advocate for using the right language for the job, and.NET will hopefully be a step in the right direction.
It's not Java, but the Java mentality is certaintly there, plus a little innovation, which is a breath of fresh air from our friends at Microsoft.
They also have a greater initial understanding of the latest technologies. CIS folk are hired and have to spend a great deal of time in training. CS people hit the ground running.
These are some pretty vague generalizations, but I feel they hold true for the most part. Stick with CS... you'll be glad you did.
Oh, and CS = more money faster
Slashdot Mirror
I think the show would be good with some better acting. It's almost painful to sit through the dialog, waiting for the technology to kick in and take the pressure off the "actors".
Didn't that one chick play in "Walker Texas Ranger?"
I've come to the opinion that .NET is an answer for, not necessarily a derivative or rip-off of Java.
.NET shapes out. I've always been a advocate for using the right language for the job, and .NET will hopefully be a step in the right direction.
As for C# specifically, the similarities to Java are noticeable, but not necessarily remarkable. In truth, any strictly OO language will have a similar look and feel to Java, and the languages both have the same syntactical roots.
I'm interested to see how
It's not Java, but the Java mentality is certaintly there, plus a little innovation, which is a breath of fresh air from our friends at Microsoft.
They also have a greater initial understanding of the latest technologies. CIS folk are hired and have to spend a great deal of time in training. CS people hit the ground running. These are some pretty vague generalizations, but I feel they hold true for the most part. Stick with CS... you'll be glad you did. Oh, and CS = more money faster