not likely? coral bleaching is already no longer a localized event, but global phenomenon, with each event being larger or longer lasting than the previous. when the reefs go they trigger a cascade failure in their ecosystems.
The CRA of 1964 only expounds on a specific interpretation and logical extension of the civil rights enumerated in the constitution. For reference, since you seem to need it, that's 1-10, 13, 14, 15, and a couple others.
It also was merely one of several civil rights acts passed to expound upon and explain our civil rights.
here, ill help: -energy from the sun, in various wavelengths, including IR, impacts the earth's surface -in turn, some portion of that is converted into heat (IR) in the process. -the surface then re-radiates that heat into the atmosphere and ultimately space -additional CO impedes that IR retransmission into space, preventing that energy loss -net energy increases, temps go up.
Except that nobody ever made money saying "everything is all right, nothing to see here".
Right. The oil industry doesnt benefit at all from trying to bury climate research. Just like the tobacco industry before them and supressing the link between nicotine and cancer.
The difference between weather and climate is one of scale. Either in area or time. Hurricanes and their affects are sufficiently large enough and long lasting enough to count as both weather AND climate.
Slashdot Mirror
reality is this way.
we encourage you to join it.
not likely?
coral bleaching is already no longer a localized event, but global phenomenon, with each event being larger or longer lasting than the previous.
when the reefs go they trigger a cascade failure in their ecosystems.
theres no need for nukes when current green tech can do the job now, without the neagtives of nuclear.
linked to wattsup.
amount of credibility lost: 100%.
I vote daneel olivaw
no, it hasn't been debunked: https://www.newscientist.com/a...
prime example of why government intervention becomes neccesary.
government and private enterprise actually share similar efficiency rates.
+1 for plane nerd cred
if you abused and misused those terms any more than you already have, they'd have you locked up for crimes against humanity
no it was not
Get the fuck out.
The CRA of 1964 only expounds on a specific interpretation and logical extension of the civil rights enumerated in the constitution. For reference, since you seem to need it, that's 1-10, 13, 14, 15, and a couple others.
It also was merely one of several civil rights acts passed to expound upon and explain our civil rights.
what lack of hurricanes?
also, the only ones who argue over the terms are conservatives in these little rants like yours.
exactly.
keep going and you'll see the light.
here, ill help:
-energy from the sun, in various wavelengths, including IR, impacts the earth's surface
-in turn, some portion of that is converted into heat (IR) in the process.
-the surface then re-radiates that heat into the atmosphere and ultimately space
-additional CO impedes that IR retransmission into space, preventing that energy loss
-net energy increases, temps go up.
Except that nobody ever made money saying "everything is all right, nothing to see here".
Right.
The oil industry doesnt benefit at all from trying to bury climate research.
Just like the tobacco industry before them and supressing the link between nicotine and cancer.
Riiiiiight.
you let us know when research is free, and scientists dont also have a need to feed their families like the rest of us.
don't take any tax incentives
you first, obvious oil industry shill,
yes. those damn thousandaire scientists trying to learn shit.
thank god for those plucky oil billionaires willing to take a stand and expose them.
going to brietbart first is like putting your head up your ass to see if the sun is shining.
not when youre talking about across the average across an entire fucking planet it's not, you fucking moron.
Once again you prove you have no clue what youre talking about.
before posting again, i suggest learning the definitions of the words you use.
So I guess then you cant count?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
false.
The difference between weather and climate is one of scale. Either in area or time. Hurricanes and their affects are sufficiently large enough and long lasting enough to count as both weather AND climate.
Both units will easily pay for themselves in in under 10 years.
does that include the money you receive for writing these posts?