There are a couple possibilities I can think of. A) Maybe there is a risk that the PNG you used would already be encrypted, so it says to use an external source. B) Malware tends to hook common system functions, such as those used to generate data for testing, and the malware author gives his solution just in case. This is particularly true with.net assemblies, as the entire set of addresses for the method table is readily available. C) Some combination of the 2.
Test network? Restarting the application? Pfft my patches get injected at runtime, and are 100% reflection. Thats how you out-elite the elitists!
Actually I once had to patch a mission-critical piece of software with a java agent at runtime. Waiting to see if loadAgent() failed was a real nailbiter.
CISSP seems like an odd thing to choose...infosec is a tiny sliver of IT. As someone with a GSE and CISSP I'm gonna say it's the best part. Red team 4 lyfe!
I've found that devs (working devs!) without degrees tend to have a far more broad knowledgebase. Typically they are part of the "IT culture" and are immersed in learning 24/7.
Too many degreed devs do it for money and only know what they were taught in school. Most dont even bother to remember ASM/C in favor of high level languages.
Someone who feels development helps define them as a person is usually far more competent.
Slashdot Mirror
Uhh...those come after beta and would be more polished. Alpha and prealpha are the least polished stages of dev.
Heh. This guy gets it
This is super obvious...how did this paper get published?
Don't you mean fusible relays?
Uhhhh Win7 is widely regarded as the one they DIDNY screw up
Fuses? Is it 1985?
"Im gonna weld stuff onto these minivans so that they look like a gokart"
I'm agreeing with APK...the new owners of slashdot are! already making things weird.
Oh my..an SEO company..if we thought Dice was bad..
There ARE some good ones just not many...Zimbardo's comes to mind
If you can't provide an alternative advocacy yor entire rant is moot.
So you're saying his brain is an ASM stack?
There are a couple possibilities I can think of. .net assemblies, as the entire set of addresses for the method table is readily available.
A) Maybe there is a risk that the PNG you used would already be encrypted, so it says to use an external source.
B) Malware tends to hook common system functions, such as those used to generate data for testing, and the malware author gives his solution just in case. This is particularly true with
C) Some combination of the 2.
Test network? Restarting the application? Pfft my patches get injected at runtime, and are 100% reflection. Thats how you out-elite the elitists!
Actually I once had to patch a mission-critical piece of software with a java agent at runtime. Waiting to see if loadAgent() failed was a real nailbiter.
I smell an elitist application dev (webdevs are scrubs)...but you're not wrong.
CISSP seems like an odd thing to choose...infosec is a tiny sliver of IT. As someone with a GSE and CISSP I'm gonna say it's the best part. Red team 4 lyfe!
I've found that devs (working devs!) without degrees tend to have a far more broad knowledgebase. Typically they are part of the "IT culture" and are immersed in learning 24/7.
Too many degreed devs do it for money and only know what they were taught in school. Most dont even bother to remember ASM/C in favor of high level languages.
Someone who feels development helps define them as a person is usually far more competent.
There's overlap, but that's been my experience.
This is not true if develepors in my experience...we have tons of metrics that decide it.
xbox 360 used it actually...still many devices that do
Found the guy who last used or upgraded Windows a decade ago.
4k is a very real reason for it
That webcam app is itself bloatware.
You dont put xeons in the same machines with quadro\firegl..you use i7s. 99.99% of boxes with a xeon dont even have a GUI.
Certain scientific purposes demand both...but cad/video/etc do not. Their software is not optimized for lowspeed high corecount environments.
Haha..this is the slashdot I miss
Said company only operates in half this context. A RAM mfg isnt going to make that tool...the burden is on MS. It would piss off investors/be a waste