You are allowing yourself to be used as a tool by the very people you view as oppressing you. Look objectively at all the the radicalization taking place and simply ask yourself "who benefits".
Are you fucking kidding me, or has Fascist Zombies already eaten away your brain? Fascism is the Zombie Apocalypse, and you can't defeat the Zombie Apocalypse with rational arguments.
They have been beating people up, for certain. But the murders will happen soon.
Oooh. In addition to beating up thousands, the Fascists have been murdering people for decades. Heck, this very article is about one such murder. Beating up Fascists is self defense of a very self restraining (thus anti-American) kind. A true American would actual shoot Fascists at sight. Are you no true American?
Yes. Because they work best against the Fascists. Just like the worst fires are fought with fire. So you fear the Antifa? Well, Mr. Fascist, booh-hooh-hooh.
It's debatable if Trump is the strongest Fascist leader at the moment or not, given the issues in The Philippines and in Russia, but as far as the power of the nation he theoretically leads, definitely.
Leading a "powerful nation" doesn't make you a powerful leader.
That's right. We're seeing some big changes in our planet in the past 30 years. So big that you could see it from another planet. The point I'm making is we see these same type of changes on other planets from our own planet.
That's not what your article says. You need to read it again, and again, and again, until you understand that.
The way I see, both sides have valid points: the earth is in a warming trend, and would be with or without us.
That's an odd claim considering that one side predominantly proclaims there is no warming trend. Even if what you claimed were true, it would obviously not be a compromise position.
Is that why global temperatures change was essentially flat between 1998 and 2013 and NOAA had to falsify data to make it look otherwise? https://science.house.gov/news...
You should not blindly believe what the science hater (aka "Christian Scientist") Lamar Smith claims. He has proven time and again that the only thing he knows less about than science is honesty.
But in interviews with the Associated Press and E&E, an online energy and environmental news outlet, Bates said he had not accused his colleagues of data manipulation.
Bates told the AP on Feb. 6 that there was “no data tampering, no data changing, nothing malicious” involved with his colleagues’ study. “It’s not trumped up data in any way shape or form,” he said.
To a first approximation, these terms are synonymous.
It's the details that matter, as I laid out in my extensive reply which quoted from the IPCC.
You could start by comparing how much more we know since the first IPCC report (just look at the most recent one) - and how little those details have changed the overall picture in the direction of "it's not man made".
How much longer are you going to pretend that Achilles can't possibly pass that tortoise?
If you stop reading the MSM and get some real news you'd see it - http://www.washingtontimes.com... . Look at pictures of any planet from 30 years ago and today and you can see changes with your own eyes
Errm, the news you linked to talks about "larger variations over thousands of years", not 30.
Please feel free to discredit the pre-industrial revolution scientists who created the data that I linked to,
I'd gladly do. Too bad you and Ballsy don't actual provide the data you "use" your graph. Do you have anything to hide? Like what and how was actually measured? Maybe because those measurements not only include the gaseous CO2 that is actually greenhouse effect relevant, but also CO2 soluted in the air humidity, which isn't relevant, and ignored today? Heck, the huge variation for data from the same time should show you something is wrong with the data.
The article mentions that the "officials familiar with the probe said investigators were looking into the possibilities that the incidents were carried out by a third country such as Russia, possibly operating without the knowledge of Cuba’s formal chain of command."
Of course it doesn't mention that the device could have come from the second party. Hint: I'm talking about the USA spy agencies. Because all US embassies have strange spying devices in or (mostly) on top of them, And do those of the other four "Five Eyes" countries - including Canada...
But then again: could a whistle blown into a telephone cause hearing problems for "US diplomats" listening in on Cuban phone calls?
using a focused sound/energy device to make someone deaf is totally the same-thing as listening to voice mails lol
you realy need to come back to reality
At whom or what would a device hidden inside the embassy be focused on? No to mention: why would it be targeted at any body or thing? Unless maybe a US listening device inside the embassy...
Sorry, you have been lied to. CO2 levels have been the same since we started to scientifically measure them pre-industrial revolution.
Bullshit. One retired geologist claims thousands of sites measuring CO2 levels are faked. What are the chances you fell for "it", swallowing the whole trawler?
Since we launched Halide, the most unexpected compliment we’ve heard is about its size. At 11 megs, we’ll push less data in one year than a social network pushes in a single update.
“So you aren’t using Swift,” asked a friend. After all, Swift bundles its standard libraries into your app, bloating its size. Halide is almost entirely Swift.
Slashdot Mirror
You are allowing yourself to be used as a tool by the very people you view as oppressing you. Look objectively at all the the radicalization taking place and simply ask yourself "who benefits".
Are you fucking kidding me, or has Fascist Zombies already eaten away your brain? Fascism is the Zombie Apocalypse, and you can't defeat the Zombie Apocalypse with rational arguments.
Well, since corporations are legally people
They are "persons".
They have been beating people up, for certain. But the murders will happen soon.
Oooh. In addition to beating up thousands, the Fascists have been murdering people for decades. Heck, this very article is about one such murder. Beating up Fascists is self defense of a very self restraining (thus anti-American) kind. A true American would actual shoot Fascists at sight. Are you no true American?
You do realize that their actions have proved them to be more "fascist" than those they accuse of Fascism, right?
So what did they do, drive a car into a crowd to murder them? Oh, wait, that was a Fascist.
What's ironic is they use fascist tactics.
Yes. Because they work best against the Fascists. Just like the worst fires are fought with fire. So you fear the Antifa? Well, Mr. Fascist, booh-hooh-hooh.
It's debatable if Trump is the strongest Fascist leader at the moment or not, given the issues in The Philippines and in Russia, but as far as the power of the nation he theoretically leads, definitely.
Leading a "powerful nation" doesn't make you a powerful leader.
Corporations should not have opinions on social matters. I would sue GoDaddy with extreme prejudice if I was this lady. For one million or more.
Even so it sounds like a Bond Girl, "Daily Stormer" is not a lady.
That's right. We're seeing some big changes in our planet in the past 30 years. So big that you could see it from another planet. The point I'm making is we see these same type of changes on other planets from our own planet.
That's not what your article says. You need to read it again, and again, and again, until you understand that.
All the humans on the planet could fit inside the county of Jacksonville, Florida. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
And they'd all get wet feet in a few years.
The way I see, both sides have valid points: the earth is in a warming trend, and would be with or without us.
That's an odd claim considering that one side predominantly proclaims there is no warming trend. Even if what you claimed were true, it would obviously not be a compromise position.
Citing two known liars who should be in jail for defrauding the public perfectly proves how wrong your argument is.
CO2 already blocks 100% (it is opaque) in the bands of IR that it interferes with
https://skepticalscience.com/s...
>
Is that why global temperatures change was essentially flat between 1998 and 2013 and NOAA had to falsify data to make it look otherwise? https://science.house.gov/news...
You should not blindly believe what the science hater (aka "Christian Scientist") Lamar Smith claims. He has proven time and again that the only thing he knows less about than science is honesty.
http://www.factcheck.org/2017/...
But in interviews with the Associated Press and E&E, an online energy and environmental news outlet, Bates said he had not accused his colleagues of data manipulation.
Bates told the AP on Feb. 6 that there was “no data tampering, no data changing, nothing malicious” involved with his colleagues’ study. “It’s not trumped up data in any way shape or form,” he said.
To a first approximation, these terms are synonymous.
It's the details that matter, as I laid out in my extensive reply which quoted from the IPCC.
You could start by comparing how much more we know since the first IPCC report (just look at the most recent one) - and how little those details have changed the overall picture in the direction of "it's not man made".
How much longer are you going to pretend that Achilles can't possibly pass that tortoise?
If you stop reading the MSM and get some real news you'd see it - http://www.washingtontimes.com... . Look at pictures of any planet from 30 years ago and today and you can see changes with your own eyes
Errm, the news you linked to talks about "larger variations over thousands of years", not 30.
Please feel free to discredit the pre-industrial revolution scientists who created the data that I linked to,
I'd gladly do. Too bad you and Ballsy don't actual provide the data you "use" your graph. Do you have anything to hide? Like what and how was actually measured? Maybe because those measurements not only include the gaseous CO2 that is actually greenhouse effect relevant, but also CO2 soluted in the air humidity, which isn't relevant, and ignored today? Heck, the huge variation for data from the same time should show you something is wrong with the data.
But others digged up the facts and already debunked that graph from your link years ago: http://www.somesnarksareboojum...
The article mentions that the "officials familiar with the probe said investigators were looking into the possibilities that the incidents were carried out by a third country such as Russia, possibly operating without the knowledge of Cuba’s formal chain of command."
Of course it doesn't mention that the device could have come from the second party. Hint: I'm talking about the USA spy agencies. Because all US embassies have strange spying devices in or (mostly) on top of them, And do those of the other four "Five Eyes" countries - including Canada...
But then again: could a whistle blown into a telephone cause hearing problems for "US diplomats" listening in on Cuban phone calls?
using a focused sound/energy device to make someone deaf is totally the same-thing as listening to voice mails lol
you realy need to come back to reality
At whom or what would a device hidden inside the embassy be focused on? No to mention: why would it be targeted at any body or thing? Unless maybe a US listening device inside the embassy ...
So you're saying that all the warming of the 20th century was NOT unprecedented,
Nope. Learn to read, that might help with your life problems.
Sorry, you have been lied to. CO2 levels have been the same since we started to scientifically measure them pre-industrial revolution.
Bullshit. One retired geologist claims thousands of sites measuring CO2 levels are faked. What are the chances you fell for "it", swallowing the whole trawler?
however, temperatures recorded in the 20th century may not be unprecedented in the last 2000 years
You may not be aware, but we are living in the 21st century, and so far that has been warmer than the 20th.
More people, globally, die from cold, as opposed to death by heat.
And even more people die from exposure to the bullshit you keep posting without evidence.
That Kevin Costner movies was NOT a documentary, you know.
And this isn't Rotten Tomatoes, so stay on topic.
Since we launched Halide, the most unexpected compliment we’ve heard is about its size. At 11 megs, we’ll push less data in one year than a social network pushes in a single update.
“So you aren’t using Swift,” asked a friend. After all, Swift bundles its standard libraries into your app, bloating its size. Halide is almost entirely Swift.
It doesn't work that way.
Try telling the jury that I committed this crime. You'll need actual proof that I committed it. Not just that it happened.
And then I prove it and and then we are at the point this thread started. And then you'l plead insanity.