And the top Answer even before Spot 1 is: Contributor to the Forbes contributor network and cut-rate bar mitzvah DJ training academy. Which has nothing to do with aforementioned jobs of "Journalist" and "Media" [sic].
Well when I order them they get delivered to my home or office. I haven't yet seen a way to reach into my monitor and pull the item from "on-line". Just curious how someone could steal my stuff on-line before it gets to me. DUH!
Why would somebody believe "Selling on-line" means ' reach into my monitor and pull the item from "on-line".'?
I think the problem is it isn't sincere. Apple have repeatedly demonstrated that Security is a long way down the list to things they consider more important like usability, convenience and whether or not they have the time or desire to fix a problem.
Yeah, that's why what Apple says after the boilerplate is "While our initial analysis indicates that many of the issues leaked today were already patched in the latest OS, we will continue work to rapidly address any identified vulnerabilities.", while Samsung says "We are aware of the report in question and are urgently looking into the matter."
Because Apple is not sincere and doesn't really care about security and Samsung is sincere and does care about security.
Defeat? You can't even read and understand my posts before replying with personal attacks!
You know how you could avoid personal attacks? By not being such a stupid prick who constantly throws around statistics he doesn't understand. IOW you can't. Of course that doesn't hurt you half as much as the fact that Apple still exists despite your claims it wouldn't. Sting.
OTOH you could always ask why they don't just push the electricity down the line they are using anyway to transmit the power to a point where they DO have a hill and build it on land where it's much cheaper to build and easier to maintain
Yeah, pretty much the first thing I thought of when half a dozen people all replied to me that ocean wind farms aren't near hills.:)
Storage doesn't need to have any geographic connection to generation; quite the opposite, it's far more efficient (all else equal) to store excess electricity near the point of use, because you're "discounting" the amount you need to store by all the line losses between the turbines and the end user.
So what makes you think that there are hills near where the power is used? Or that the people who don't want wind turbines on those hills nearby will instead accept water pump storage?
It makes me wonder if anyone has considered a turbine generation system for storm water runoff.
My back of the envelope math says that our local stormwater system handles something like 40,000 acre-feet of water per year, which is the current flow rate of the Mississippi river at St Paul for a month.
That's potentially a lot of water flow that hasn't been tapped, and a lot of it is all downhill with no pumping (because it goes into the river itself).
Well, a couple of reasons. First of all you only get power from it a couple of times a year at best. While you need to keep the equipment ready al the time. Which is likely to break because of the storm. Just like the power lines in the area - which means you couldn't even use the power locally.
Listen asswipe, every time I have to correct your use of statistics that don't prove your point I tell you exactly why I keep insulting you. Because you keep doing that. Over and over and over and over and over and over and over.
Aren't apple's professional laptops really high end while the google laptops mentioned as beating apple in the classroom really low end? I don't bother keeping up with either, but I thought the pro touch bar apple laptop was like $2000 while the chromebooks' upper end was about $500.
You just explained perfectly why ultra cheap Chromebooks outsell Macs in the US education market. Because they are cheaper and it feels like doesn't matter if you have to buy more of them because you have to replace them sooner. So they do. How that works out in the long run however...
Got a link to something that shows that? I'm sure you don't, or you'd have provided it.
Gee, why am I not surprised that something who has mastered the art of manipulative quoting of statistics pretending not being able to find it. Why don't you try using Google or look at Apple's fucking numbers on their page? Fuck, you can even find it on your beloved Statista - although not on the premium section, so everybody can actually look at it, unlike the links you constantly post from them. https://www.statista.com/statistics/263401/global-apple-iphone-sales-since-3rd-quarter-2007/
A dock that I specifically mention in my post; as a matter of fact, I even linked to it!
The post I was replying to specifically mentioned the included adapter, and was in response to another post specifically mentioning charging while listening to music. Maybe read and understand the thread before replying? Hell, just reading the entire post you are replying to would be a start.
So you admit you know you were lying. Just wanted to make that clear. Thanks for confirming it again.
Did I word my response poorly? Yes, I'll own that. However, my point still stands once you extract your cranium from your rectum and consider how the market voice actually works. Rather than waste my time explaining it all again here, I'll just link to my response to your other comment.
Why don't you follow your own advice, human monopede? Why do't you stop waisting your time by making up stuff, and even better stop searching for statistics you don't understand Fuck, I've been correcting your bullshit interpretations for years now, and you still fuck around with them.
You're a fucking moron. I didn't make up any silly rumors/quote>
No, you are the fucking moron because you didn't even notice you made up a brand new silly rumor, that you convinced yourself to be true, which also proves you're an imbecile.
Slashdot Mirror
The Top 10 Jobs That Attract Psychopaths...
https://www.forbes.com/sites/k...
And the top Answer even before Spot 1 is: Contributor to the Forbes contributor network and cut-rate bar mitzvah DJ training academy. Which has nothing to do with aforementioned jobs of "Journalist" and "Media" [sic].
Well when I order them they get delivered to my home or office. I haven't yet seen a way to reach into my monitor and pull the item from "on-line". Just curious how someone could steal my stuff on-line before it gets to me. DUH!
Why would somebody believe "Selling on-line" means ' reach into my monitor and pull the item from "on-line".'?
Unless they are a Russian troll?
AC's apparently too dumb to get jokes, probably due to living in a country with a poor education system...
I recommend that you continue to post as AC for the sake of your reputation
sigh
Wait, the "joke" was that somebody only pretended to be uneducated, and to an American being uneducated is funny. Yeah, that explains a lot.
I think the problem is it isn't sincere. Apple have repeatedly demonstrated that Security is a long way down the list to things they consider more important like usability, convenience and whether or not they have the time or desire to fix a problem.
Yeah, that's why what Apple says after the boilerplate is "While our initial analysis indicates that many of the issues leaked today were already patched in the latest OS, we will continue work to rapidly address any identified vulnerabilities.", while Samsung says "We are aware of the report in question and are urgently looking into the matter."
Because Apple is not sincere and doesn't really care about security and Samsung is sincere and does care about security.
etc
There are plenty of MMOs for mobile devices (just not iOS)
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=mmo+...
Defeat? You can't even read and understand my posts before replying with personal attacks!
You know how you could avoid personal attacks? By not being such a stupid prick who constantly throws around statistics he doesn't understand. IOW you can't. Of course that doesn't hurt you half as much as the fact that Apple still exists despite your claims it wouldn't. Sting.
Here's Google Home's answer
So you admit that you repeatedly lied. Fine by me.
So you admit defeat. Fine by me.
Another idiot who can't tell the difference between marketshare and sales. And has a small dick.
OTOH you could always ask why they don't just push the electricity down the line they are using anyway to transmit the power to a point where they DO have a hill and build it on land where it's much cheaper to build and easier to maintain Yeah, pretty much the first thing I thought of when half a dozen people all replied to me that ocean wind farms aren't near hills. :)
Storage doesn't need to have any geographic connection to generation; quite the opposite, it's far more efficient (all else equal) to store excess electricity near the point of use, because you're "discounting" the amount you need to store by all the line losses between the turbines and the end user.
So what makes you think that there are hills near where the power is used? Or that the people who don't want wind turbines on those hills nearby will instead accept water pump storage?
It makes me wonder if anyone has considered a turbine generation system for storm water runoff.
My back of the envelope math says that our local stormwater system handles something like 40,000 acre-feet of water per year, which is the current flow rate of the Mississippi river at St Paul for a month.
That's potentially a lot of water flow that hasn't been tapped, and a lot of it is all downhill with no pumping (because it goes into the river itself).
Well, a couple of reasons. First of all you only get power from it a couple of times a year at best. While you need to keep the equipment ready al the time. Which is likely to break because of the storm. Just like the power lines in the area - which means you couldn't even use the power locally.
Yep, me and every economist and tech writer on the planet,
Every? Like he said: delusional.
Don't be confused by your shrinking dick.
Listen asswipe, every time I have to correct your use of statistics that don't prove your point I tell you exactly why I keep insulting you. Because you keep doing that. Over and over and over and over and over and over and over.
Why don't you follow your own advice, human monopede?
With the personal attacks, again.
Look who's talking: It's BronsDumb, the insulting moron without real arguments.
"Suddenly" is your word. Worldwide smartphone affordability has been an ongoing trend for quite some time now.
Let me clarify, then, the entirety of untapped emerging mobile markets represents 2.5 billion people.
Which includes > 2 billion people who haven't even bought a dumbphone yet.
Aren't apple's professional laptops really high end while the google laptops mentioned as beating apple in the classroom really low end? I don't bother keeping up with either, but I thought the pro touch bar apple laptop was like $2000 while the chromebooks' upper end was about $500.
You just explained perfectly why ultra cheap Chromebooks outsell Macs in the US education market. Because they are cheaper and it feels like doesn't matter if you have to buy more of them because you have to replace them sooner. So they do. How that works out in the long run however ...
But they sold more of them.
Got a link to something that shows that? I'm sure you don't, or you'd have provided it.
Gee, why am I not surprised that something who has mastered the art of manipulative quoting of statistics pretending not being able to find it. Why don't you try using Google or look at Apple's fucking numbers on their page? Fuck, you can even find it on your beloved Statista - although not on the premium section, so everybody can actually look at it, unlike the links you constantly post from them. https://www.statista.com/statistics/263401/global-apple-iphone-sales-since-3rd-quarter-2007/
You are such a phony.
A dock that I specifically mention in my post; as a matter of fact, I even linked to it! The post I was replying to specifically mentioned the included adapter, and was in response to another post specifically mentioning charging while listening to music. Maybe read and understand the thread before replying? Hell, just reading the entire post you are replying to would be a start.
So you admit you know you were lying. Just wanted to make that clear. Thanks for confirming it again.
Did I word my response poorly? Yes, I'll own that. However, my point still stands once you extract your cranium from your rectum and consider how the market voice actually works. Rather than waste my time explaining it all again here, I'll just link to my response to your other comment.
Why don't you follow your own advice, human monopede? Why do't you stop waisting your time by making up stuff, and even better stop searching for statistics you don't understand Fuck, I've been correcting your bullshit interpretations for years now, and you still fuck around with them.
You're a fucking moron. I didn't make up any silly rumors/quote> No, you are the fucking moron because you didn't even notice you made up a brand new silly rumor, that you convinced yourself to be true, which also proves you're an imbecile.
Who had Pence going to jail before Trump?
Declining sales seem to indicate otherwise.
Errm, sorry, wrong link: http://bgr.com/2016/12/07/iphone-7-sales-ios-vs-android/ "Explosive sales prove that the iPhone 7’s most controversial feature was a non-issue" - from just a week later.
Declining sales seem to indicate otherwise.
https://www.engadget.com/2017/01/31/apple-q1-2017-earnings/ : Same source now admits they were wrong. Oooops.