I'm pretty sure Germany's had laws about denial of the holocaust since well before modern internet culture was around.
Sure, but that didn't cause much conflict with other cultures. German laws only applied to Germany. But with the Internet, it is common to find forums that mingle people from different cultures, and different legal jurisdictions. One of the big differences between cultures, is how they deal with the tradeoff between "freedom" and "order". Americans and Germans see that tradeoff from very different historical perspectives, and make very different tradeoffs. As an American, I believe that people should be able to express even the most odious opinions, and suppression of those opinions causes more problems than it solves. The Germans see it differently.
... then they came for the Nazis, and I did not speak out because I was not a Nazi.
Of course this isn't really about Nazis and Holocaust denial. It's actually about all kind of racist posts and other hate speech. Which Facebook says they would delete in their Community Standards (yes, even in the US, so the cultures argument is bogus really):
Facebook removes hate speech, which includes content that directly attacks people based on their:
Race,
Ethnicity,
National origin,
Religious affiliation,
Sexual orientation,
Sex, gender, or gender identity, or
Serious disabilities or diseases.
But the real fun part is that "users also accuse the company of double standards for cracking down swifter and harder on nudity and sexual content than on hate-mongering."
So first the come for the nude people, you fucking asshole.
Yes, because as we all know, anger is the only possible reason why someone might call out a corporation for behaving in an undesirable way.
Well, the most common beside that is being paid by a competitor. Is that it in your case?
The way you and so many people like you celebrate your own narrow-minded view is astonishing. It's like a prisoner who brags about how wonderfully strong and well-made the bars are.
Wow, sounds exactly like something Samsung was fined for paying trolls to say about the competition. What, did Samsung tell you to deny that happened? Do you actually have a point, or didn't Samsung pay you to have one? What?
It seems that you are the moron here. You are judging information based on the source, not the content, therefore you are the one who can't see past a book's cover. I am giving plenty of information, you are the one too blind to see it.
No, I'm judging character based on source given. And when you like quoting a criminal liar, you are a moron - period.
"He's talking about people who deny climate changed in the past twenty years, or even in the past 100."
That applies to both sides. When people point to a 15 year stabilization of temperatures as evidence in the climate change debate
Is there a reason why you use outdated evidence - apart from the obvious? Just one year later and the "stabilization" isn't quite that obvious.
So few words to prove you are a partisan moron who can't read. I gave three sources in response to a request for better sources,
It doesn't matter how many sources you gave, you gave one too many. That one proved you're a moron. I already wrote it in the first reply, and I wasted my time trying to find out if I was wrong. I wasn't.
Politicians have found themselves on the no-fly list, witness the late Sen. Ted Kennedy, as a target of retaliation.
Actually, no he wasn't. There was a "T Kennedy" on the list but Ted's name was actually Edward Moore Kennedy - not even a silent "T" in there. Unless you count his nickname. By that time you can just make up names to be on the list if you don't want someone to fly.
And that's before we get to people getting past the name issue by -gasp- using an alias. Like some terrorist suspect once using the alias "T Kennedy", which is how that name got on the list.
Says the guy who quoted a site even Fox News look at funny.Look, it's already plain clear that the first part of "Crashmarik" properly describes his state of mind - better remain silent before somebody concludes you are also nuts.
The EPA may claim responsibility for the flooding happening now - but that would have happened anyway, today or in a year - simply proven by the fact that the pile of rubble holding it back was already leaking, which was the bloody reason the EPA was there to fix.
I repeat, in case you still didn't understand: the EPA did not put the arsenic and other poisonous material in the water, they merely released the water that was polluted by private enterprise, and not cared for properly. And it happened because quote "workers used a backhoe to hack at loose material". And idiot OP claims that that put arsenic in the water. As opposed to the actual putting of arsenic in the water. Get it now?
US air doctrine was long about strategic bombers with a nod to some intercepters that could be modified to drop bombs too. When they started getting blown out of the sky a lot they asked an outspoken flight instructor to head up development of some fighters. That's how the F15 and F16 were designed.
Errm, that was long after they had ICBMs to replace the bombs.
How conservative of you to blame the boy who tried to plug the dyke with his finger for it breaking, instead of the people who fucking did nothing for decades to stop the build-up of that huge waste water reservoir.
How lefty of you to think the bureaucrats are angels of light.
How stupid of you to pretend to think. You obviously don't. Obvious to anyone who's even a little smarter than you, which would include microbes.
"First shoot down the dangerous enemies with long range AAM, then the rest with short range AAM before they get a single shot at you"
If you can. Americans "experts" always ignore that the enemy may be able to evade all its missiles or most of them, the enemy pilots will not sit around being targets.
I didn't say any of the US war doctrines would work if they ever encountered an opponent with the good equipment. The naval doctrine of "Let's hope nobody sinks our carriers" is as shaky as the "Let's hope nobody sinks our battleships" was going into WW2.
That doesn't mean they aren't bubbles, or even fully legal. Heck, he operated "Trump University" without a licence. Gee, wonder what business practices where taught there...
This just goes to show that you don't know what you're talking about.
He doesn't run Trump University, he licencees his name and receives royalty payments for its use. I'm sure his name is listed as someone important there, but I'd be shocked if he has given it more than a day or two of his attention.
http://www.reuters.com/article... - Donald Trump is personally liable for operating a for-profit investment school without the required license, a New York judge ruled in a lawsuit brought by the New York Attorney General against the real estate entrepreneur.
Slashdot Mirror
I'm pretty sure Germany's had laws about denial of the holocaust since well before modern internet culture was around.
Sure, but that didn't cause much conflict with other cultures. German laws only applied to Germany. But with the Internet, it is common to find forums that mingle people from different cultures, and different legal jurisdictions. One of the big differences between cultures, is how they deal with the tradeoff between "freedom" and "order". Americans and Germans see that tradeoff from very different historical perspectives, and make very different tradeoffs. As an American, I believe that people should be able to express even the most odious opinions, and suppression of those opinions causes more problems than it solves. The Germans see it differently.
... then they came for the Nazis, and I did not speak out because I was not a Nazi.
Of course this isn't really about Nazis and Holocaust denial. It's actually about all kind of racist posts and other hate speech. Which Facebook says they would delete in their Community Standards (yes, even in the US, so the cultures argument is bogus really):
Facebook removes hate speech, which includes content that directly attacks people based on their: Race, Ethnicity, National origin, Religious affiliation, Sexual orientation, Sex, gender, or gender identity, or Serious disabilities or diseases.
But the real fun part is that "users also accuse the company of double standards for cracking down swifter and harder on nudity and sexual content than on hate-mongering."
So first the come for the nude people, you fucking asshole.
Hating Apple doesn't dominate our lives.
No just the time you post online. Ohh, wait...
You angry?
Yes, because as we all know, anger is the only possible reason why someone might call out a corporation for behaving in an undesirable way.
Well, the most common beside that is being paid by a competitor. Is that it in your case?
The way you and so many people like you celebrate your own narrow-minded view is astonishing. It's like a prisoner who brags about how wonderfully strong and well-made the bars are.
Wow, sounds exactly like something Samsung was fined for paying trolls to say about the competition. What, did Samsung tell you to deny that happened? Do you actually have a point, or didn't Samsung pay you to have one? What?
If I ever have to reference something called a "Genius Bar", I'm not sure I could ever look myself in the mirror again.
Could you even see yourself now?
You angry?
Yes, because as we all know, anger is the only possible reason why someone might call out a corporation for behaving in an undesirable way.
Well, the most common beside that is being paid by a competitor. Is that it in your case?
Being without a phone for six to eight weeks is not a viable option,
What makes you think it would take that long even if you mail it in? This guy replaces the camera in 3 minutes
You send in your phone and in 6-8 weeks you get it back.
What do you mean "how you should make calls in the meantime", what happened to your iPhone 5?
Use the "free" Samsung test loan. Of course you 'l probably wait longer for that to arrive than for you iPhone.
Try another site that anyone has heard of, those numbers are clearly wrong.
Hey, you made the claim, you show some numbers. And nobody heard of Geekbench? What kind of phony are you?
On this old MacBook Pro I'm currently using... Apple Menu -> About This Mac: First line says "MacBook Pro (13-inch, Early 2011)"
Yeah that was difficult.
How do I do that when looking at MacBooks on eBay?
Once you have the machine in hand, it is a bit beside the point.
How do you check what you're actually buying for anything on eBay? With Apple products, you can at least easily check once its there.
i5, i3, to a notebook, they are mostly the same thing...
But Core M isn't. BECAUSE!
Your argument is truly convincing. But hey, maybe a benchmark could shed some light.
http://browser.primatelabs.com... - MacBook (Early 2015) with Intel Core M-5Y51 @ 1.20 GHz (first MacBook listed)
Single-Core Score Multi-Core Score
2591 5407
http://browser.primatelabs.com... - Dell Inc. XPS 13 9343 with Intel Core i3-5010U @ 2.10 GHz (only Core i3 Dell XPS)
580 1202
Ouch?
It seems that you are the moron here. You are judging information based on the source, not the content, therefore you are the one who can't see past a book's cover. I am giving plenty of information, you are the one too blind to see it.
No, I'm judging character based on source given. And when you like quoting a criminal liar, you are a moron - period.
"He's talking about people who deny climate changed in the past twenty years, or even in the past 100." That applies to both sides. When people point to a 15 year stabilization of temperatures as evidence in the climate change debate
Is there a reason why you use outdated evidence - apart from the obvious? Just one year later and the "stabilization" isn't quite that obvious.
So few words to prove you are a partisan moron who can't read. I gave three sources in response to a request for better sources,
It doesn't matter how many sources you gave, you gave one too many. That one proved you're a moron. I already wrote it in the first reply, and I wasted my time trying to find out if I was wrong. I wasn't.
Is it smart to name your layer 3 network component after a layer 1 component?
No, it is not uncommon, but in the USA our penises are extremely large, which increases the probability of contact with the zipper.
Your sweat pants have zippers?
BTW, you are aware that Breitbart is known for their faked news? They are just less funny than the Onion.
How much do you wanna bet that this will turn out to be statistically wankery at its worst?
Politicians have found themselves on the no-fly list, witness the late Sen. Ted Kennedy, as a target of retaliation.
Actually, no he wasn't. There was a "T Kennedy" on the list but Ted's name was actually Edward Moore Kennedy - not even a silent "T" in there. Unless you count his nickname. By that time you can just make up names to be on the list if you don't want someone to fly.
And that's before we get to people getting past the name issue by -gasp- using an alias. Like some terrorist suspect once using the alias "T Kennedy", which is how that name got on the list.
instead you prefer to be partisan.
Says the guy who quoted a site even Fox News look at funny.Look, it's already plain clear that the first part of "Crashmarik" properly describes his state of mind - better remain silent before somebody concludes you are also nuts.
The EPA may claim responsibility for the flooding happening now - but that would have happened anyway, today or in a year - simply proven by the fact that the pile of rubble holding it back was already leaking, which was the bloody reason the EPA was there to fix.
I repeat, in case you still didn't understand: the EPA did not put the arsenic and other poisonous material in the water, they merely released the water that was polluted by private enterprise, and not cared for properly. And it happened because quote "workers used a backhoe to hack at loose material". And idiot OP claims that that put arsenic in the water. As opposed to the actual putting of arsenic in the water. Get it now?
US air doctrine was long about strategic bombers with a nod to some intercepters that could be modified to drop bombs too. When they started getting blown out of the sky a lot they asked an outspoken flight instructor to head up development of some fighters. That's how the F15 and F16 were designed.
Errm, that was long after they had ICBMs to replace the bombs.
Quoting Breitbart now? You can't be... - oh , you are serious. Yeah, figures.
How conservative of you to blame the boy who tried to plug the dyke with his finger for it breaking, instead of the people who fucking did nothing for decades to stop the build-up of that huge waste water reservoir.
How lefty of you to think the bureaucrats are angels of light.
How stupid of you to pretend to think. You obviously don't. Obvious to anyone who's even a little smarter than you, which would include microbes.
Just because a judge ruled that he is liable doesn't mean he runs the company or actually does anything with it day-to-day.
Yeah, it only means he was the only guy fully responsible for the joint. Or rather irresponsible.
"First shoot down the dangerous enemies with long range AAM, then the rest with short range AAM before they get a single shot at you" If you can. Americans "experts" always ignore that the enemy may be able to evade all its missiles or most of them, the enemy pilots will not sit around being targets.
I didn't say any of the US war doctrines would work if they ever encountered an opponent with the good equipment. The naval doctrine of "Let's hope nobody sinks our carriers" is as shaky as the "Let's hope nobody sinks our battleships" was going into WW2.
That doesn't mean they aren't bubbles, or even fully legal. Heck, he operated "Trump University" without a licence. Gee, wonder what business practices where taught there...
This just goes to show that you don't know what you're talking about.
He doesn't run Trump University, he licencees his name and receives royalty payments for its use. I'm sure his name is listed as someone important there, but I'd be shocked if he has given it more than a day or two of his attention.
http://www.reuters.com/article... - Donald Trump is personally liable for operating a for-profit investment school without the required license, a New York judge ruled in a lawsuit brought by the New York Attorney General against the real estate entrepreneur.
Sucks to be you, Donny Boy impersonator.