Slashdot Mirror


Could the Best Windows 10 Laptop Be a Mac?

dkatana writes: Now that Windows 10 is finally out there many people are looking for the best laptop with the power to make the new OS shine. The sweet spot appears to be in $900-$1500 machines from Dell, Asus and HP. But Apple, the company that has been fighting Windows for ever, has other options for Windows 10: the MacBook Pro and MacBook Air. According to InformationWeek there are many reasons to consider purchasing a MacBook as the next Windows machine, including design, reliability, performance, battery life, display quality and better keyboard. Also MacBooks have a higher resell value, retaining up to 50% of their price after five years.

435 comments

  1. And how much do they pay for slashvertisements? by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Or are you guys Doing It For Free(tm)?

    --
    A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    1. Re:And how much do they pay for slashvertisements? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Wait...who is paying for this one? Apple or Windows?

    2. Re:And how much do they pay for slashvertisements? by NatasRevol · · Score: 2

      Well, Informationweek gets the clicks...

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    3. Re:And how much do they pay for slashvertisements? by Adriax · · Score: 4, Funny

      Apple.
      Microsoft employs weasels in their marketing department, not car dealers.

      "Now see here son. Not only is this here Macbook the purdiest thang this side of the Mississippi, but it's also a real investment in your future. You buy this and I guarantee you'll get atleast half your money back when you trade up in 5 years. Guaranteed.
      Can't say that about any of those other clunkers out there. They lose 95% of their value as soon as you get one. Might as well be pissing your money down the drain. Pardon my french."

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
    4. Re:And how much do they pay for slashvertisements? by danbob999 · · Score: 2

      Apple obviously.
      If the article was "Could Windows be the best OS for an Apple laptop" then it could be paid by Microsoft.

    5. Re:And how much do they pay for slashvertisements? by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      Funny enough, an ancient Dual G5 PowerMac ( 2004-ish ) still goes for at least $150... not bad for an 11-year-old box.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    6. Re:And how much do they pay for slashvertisements? by TWX · · Score: 1

      Wasn't that one of the last non-Intel commercial-grade Macintoshes? I expect that it's a matter of being a niche product for a niche that is willing to spend the money when it's necessary. If one has commercial software for a specific purpose, like video or audio editing, one might have to stick with a certain platform.

      Besides, asking price and transaction price are not the same thing. Someone is soliciting $150 for it, but that doesn't mean they'll find buyers.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    7. Re:And how much do they pay for slashvertisements? by plasm4 · · Score: 5, Informative

      My apple notebook is nearly 5 years old and the same model has sold recently on eBay for roughly 50% of what I paid. It's not bullshit.

    8. Re:And how much do they pay for slashvertisements? by Gumbercules!! · · Score: 1

      I doubt either Apple or Microsoft either paid for, or were even aware of this Slashdot "article". I'd say it's infinitely more likely Slashdot simply know starting a holy war people Apple and Microsoft fans (or Microsoft fans and anti-Microsoft or Apple fans and anyone) just guarantees clicks. Look at the articles on the main page - this one far and away has the most comments.

      This is about ad revenue through clicks, from the Zealots that are guaranteed to comment below - not direct paid product endorsement.

    9. Re:And how much do they pay for slashvertisements? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It IS bullshit, but .. it just happens to be the very rare breed of *true* bullshit :).

    10. Re:And how much do they pay for slashvertisements? by doccus · · Score: 1

      Meh.. *every* time a new version of Windows comes out this byline appears "Is the best windows PC a Mac?" Only difference is it says "laptop",,,

    11. Re:And how much do they pay for slashvertisements? by doccus · · Score: 1

      HEy that's ebay.. Locally, they're more like $500...

  2. What? No? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good god, does absolutely anything get accepted as content here now? Just go away. Shoo!

  3. Yes - known for years. by pubwvj · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yes, the Best Windows machines are Macs. This has been the case for a looong time. Not only are they less expensive for the lifetime of ownership, longer lives, more powerful, more fully featured but as a bonus you get to use the MacOSX and better integration with iOS. Total win.

    1. Re:Yes - known for years. by real+gumby · · Score: 5, Funny

      I have mod points but don't know how to use them in this case: Funny? Insightful? Informative? Flamebait? It's like an all-in-one post!

    2. Re:Yes - known for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I wanted to read the summary then I would have read the summary or better yet I wouldn't have been on /.

    3. Re:Yes - known for years. by war4peace · · Score: 5, Funny

      When in doubt, +1 Funny.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    4. Re:Yes - known for years. by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Although you can boot Windows on a Mac, you don't have to do that. Windows, including Win 10, can be run safely in a Parallels or VMWare sandbox.

    5. Re:Yes - known for years. by azzy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, OS X is terrible!! That's why running Windows 10 is such a bad idea. Got it. Thanks.

    6. Re:Yes - known for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      And, as a bonus, I can finally move up in hipster rank from "Outsider" to "Posuer."

    7. Re:Yes - known for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Like Apple or not, they've done a fair amount to force notebooks to be as good as they are today: very high resolution IPS panels, thinness, aluminum bodies, etc. I will ding Apple for seemingly starting the widescreen fad.

      The only real competitor were the IBM ThinkPads but since those have been sold to Lenovo, Apple is about the only computer make who is capable of creating a decent notebook computer without just blatantly ripping off someone else's design.

      Consider the Dark Ages of notebooks just a few short years ago. Crap from Dell and the others were sporting 1024x768 resolutions on crap LCD displays and were thick, heavy pieces of garbage. My ThinkPad T43 from 2004 had a 1400x1050 IPS panel and 5 years later, outside of CPU, the enterprise class machines actually had worse specifications!

    8. Re:Yes - known for years. by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I assume you must be thinking of one that's well-known enough we'd all get your reference, which would suggest you're talking about the one making the rounds in the news recently, right? But that one was only introduced in the latest version of the OS, rather than "existing for years". And that one has already been patched in both the latest version of the OS and the next version of the OS.

      So surely you must be thinking of another one. Or else you just ignored all of the inconvenient truths. Either way, I'm eager to be corrected or informed, as appropriate.

      Worth noting: next version of OS X switches to a "rootless" security model, à la SELinux.

    9. Re:Yes - known for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      You still have a long way to go, young padawan:

      Level 0 -- Outsider
      Level 1 -- Poseur
      Level 2 -- Johnny Come Lately
      Level 3 -- Mainstream Trend Follower
      Level 4 -- Whatever, dude
      Level 5 -- Tolerated
      Level 6 -- Hipster
      Level 7 -- Douchebag
      Level 8 -- Pretentious Douchebag
      Level 9 -- Uber Douchebag
      Level 10 -- Shia Labeouf

    10. Re:Yes - known for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Wrong. Longer lives? Tell that to the 10s-of-thousands in the class action suit about 2011 Macbooks that can't be fixed even with new motherboards directly from Apple. The replacement motherboards keep dying, I've had 6 replaced motherboards and each one lasts a couple of months. Claiming Apple has superior build quality is just a fallacy, they make their hardware ultra-thin and leave out vital things like adequate cooling. Not less expensive over lifetime of ownership, not longer lives, and not more powerful - what Macbook can be expanded to 32GB of RAM? None of them - but there are laptops from non-apple manufacturers that are more powerful. Good luck with your Apple fantasy world.

    11. Re:Yes - known for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're modded Funny, but this is really insightful. I have sat next to two different contractors who used Windows 7 *in a virtual machine* on a MacBook Pro and it ran quicker and smoother than Windows 7 installed on the bare metal of my (not too shabby) desktop PC. Running Windows on a Mac is something that many developers do when they want to get the best performance out of the OS.

    12. Re: Yes - known for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your comment is so....last year! Lol.
      Google 'Dell XPS 13 2015 review' so that you can see why I say it.
      There was a time when this slashvertisement could have some truth. But not anymore.

    13. Re:Yes - known for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple didn't start the widescreen thing: I remember absurdly wide "laptops" (more like two and a half feet long) with cinema-ratio displays back in the early 2000's. Mac's innovation in form factor was going for a small size: the square-display 12" PowerBooks were light and easy to carry anywhere, while the widescreen PC laptops, especially the piano-keyboard-sized high-end laptops, were barely luggable. Apple taught that laptops really could be light, long before the MacBook Air.

    14. Re:Yes - known for years. by Ravaldy · · Score: 1, Troll

      How do you figure that?

      more powerful

      Mac book processing specs ($1900):
      1.2GHz dual-core Intel Core M processor (Turbo Boost up to 2.6GHz) with 4MB shared L3 cache
      8GB DDR3
      512SSD
      Intel HD Graphics 5300

      Lenovo Y50-70 (highest model) ($1750)
      4th Generation Intel Core i7-4720HQ Processor (2.60GHz 1600MHz 6MB)
      16GB DDR3
      512MB SSD
      NVidia 960M

      The Lenovo is above or equal in all major categories.

      more fully featured

      How so? It has less USB port, smaller screen...

      Not only are they less expensive for the lifetime of ownership

      Explain how. I don't see it.

      longer lives

      Compared with $300 laptops maybe but all the Lenovo laptops purchased 5 years ago in our business environment are still going strong. The one I purchased for my wife is 6 years old. The only thing I did was replace the drive with an SSD drive to improve her user experience.

      Total win

      What Apple has over all it's PC equivalent is the amazing in store support but that's only available for those who live where there's an Apple Store.

    15. Re:Yes - known for years. by Blaskowicz · · Score: 2

      Just to be the contrarian, they're also responsible for chiclet keyboards everywhere. The Commodore PET 2001 was panned for having one!

    16. Re:Yes - known for years. by ITRambo · · Score: 1

      And yet, work got done on those old crappy Dells. Many of them still work just fine, for their owners of them at least.

    17. Re:Yes - known for years. by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      Yep. I have a Lenovo Yoga 2 Pro (this was before the news about Lenovo shitting all over users with Superfish and whatnot came out, I wouldn't buy one now, but last year it looked like a good choice) that cost $1200. Its specs were equal to or better than the (very few) Macs in its price range, except for battery life, where it's merely adequate.

      The "better screen" claim is especially hilarious; the Lenovo has 3200x1800, a higher resolution than any13" (or 15") Mac I'm aware of, and it's a touchscreen to boot (which is actually really handy on that form factor, when you fold the keyboard away and use it for things like watching movies on the plane). I wish it had a better pointing device than the clickpad, but at least you can still get non-Applie laptops with things other than clickpads; not so for Apple.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    18. Re:Yes - known for years. by rsborg · · Score: 1

      I will ding Apple for seemingly starting the widescreen fad.

      You'd be wrong then. Mac laptops are some of the few remaining that even support 16:10 while most PC laptops are 16:9. I mean, yeah, I prefer 4:3 but it's actually a huge difference to lose the last 10% of vertical space as you go to 16:9.

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    19. Re:Yes - known for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You realize InformationWeek is just a shill company taking money to advertise stuff btw?

      One week its stocks/shares, the next it's personal hovercraft and now its the Mac and its 3-year-old graphics card technology and 5 year old memory tech....

    20. Re:Yes - known for years. by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The best win7 boxes were Macs, I'm disappointed they stopped supporting Win7 via bootcamp, but I can't imagine the other players in the field will beat them for Win10. The PC industry is mostly now focusing on large buying corporate customers who want cheap, and don't care if things break, don't quite work right, or annoy users (read employees) who are being paid to put up with it.

      The gauntlet is there for someone to make a quality laptop and desktop that is not Apple, and provide full system test & support. But so far it's a bunch of boutique companies that integrate parts I could do on my own and have no value add, or it's roll my own. Apple continues to show that people will pay a premium for a finished solution.

    21. Re:Yes - known for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      woosh motherfucker

    22. Re:Yes - known for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ignore that new 'Macbook' thing, the 13 and 15" macbook pro are where its at for useful laptops.

    23. Re:Yes - known for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The reason Macs are good Windows machines is simply that there are fewer configurations of them. Anywhere there are fewer configurations you're going to find higher reliability because of more consistent testing. Apple also tend to build their machines more end-to-end so they have fewer vendor specific abstractions and doohickeys bonding all the pieces together (which translates to "more things to go wrong").

      The problem with Windows is that they have vendors that pack them with crapware, information is flowing both ways and everyone gets confused. The development effort is so spread out that communication errors are amplified. It's hard to build a well-contained and well-defined system in that situation. Heck, even when everyone's in the same room it's still horribly difficult - just less so.

    24. Re:Yes - known for years. by chipschap · · Score: 1

      I'm a pro-Linux bigot and don't buy any Apple products, but in all honesty --- Apple hardware is probably the best anything for anything, if you don't mind the price (and don't want to do your own mods/repairs). They make solid stuff that lasts and IMHO no one comes close.

    25. Re:Yes - known for years. by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      You can say that again. This is the first year the Holy Grail of Dell XPS 512 meg XP's being the defacto standard of work for me.

      Those things lasted forever well past what should have been retirement. Shoot I remember 1 gig of ram being standard by 2005/2006 so these are probably from 2002 which ran for 10 freaking years

    26. Re:Yes - known for years. by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      With the exception of outdated drivers and little to no support from Apple fixing them and forcing WIndows 8 on newer macs.

    27. Re:Yes - known for years. by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      this was before the news about Lenovo shitting all over users with Superfish and whatnot came out, I wouldn't buy one now, but last year it looked like a good choice

      This really should have been pinned on Paolo Alto since they are the source of the software and in business you trust your partners. This is one case where Lenovo should not have trusted it's partners. I forgave them for it because it didn't affect my production machines as they usually get wiped and imaged to company requirements.

      The "better screen" claim is especially hilarious; the Lenovo has 3200x1800, a higher resolution than any13" (or 15") Mac I'm aware of

      His claim probably stems from the Retina display available in the MacBook Pro which you can also get as 4k resolution with the Lenovo.

    28. Re:Yes - known for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A product is more than just a list of features. Apple understands this.

      Here are some people that don't: Blackberry, Nokia, Palm, Anyone who made a pocketPC based phone, etc.

      Seriously, though, have you ever just picked up and examined the two machines you list? Side by side. Just merely handled them.

      Even at a cursory glance the Apple devices show a level of finish, quality, design that blows their competitors away.

      The Lenovo is a built-down-to-a-price collection of mis-fitting parts from many lowest bidding vendors. Creaking plastic, loose joints. Lots and lots and lots of screws.

      Apple has the unique ablity to control their entire product from end-to-end and it shows.

      People that bitch about how much an apple costs while comparing it to a list of features from some random chinese OEM have never even seen an apple laptop in person.

    29. Re:Yes - known for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      rootpipe: existed for years, at least as of 10.7. Apple has said they will not patch except in 10.10 and later
      DYLD_PRINT_TO_FILE: brand new in 10.10; patched as of 10.10.5
      tpwn: affects 10.9.5? and later; unpatched as of 10.10.5

    30. Re:Yes - known for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My late 2011 Macbook Pro works just fine except that the airport is broken; Never had replaced motherboard.

    31. Re:Yes - known for years. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Macs have a high TCO. As well as the purchase price, you now increasingly need extras because e.g. there is only one USB port. Maintenance costs are high too, because Apple tries to force you to pay them for replacement of consumable items like batteries.

      As for build quality and durability, Macs are not as solid as machines like business Thinkpads or Panasonic Let's Note (Toughbook). They are just not designed to be. Thinkpads in particular are way ahead, offering complete and easy instructions for maintenance, easy access to spare parts and so forth. Macs are not designed to be as durable or repairable as these machines, they are designed to look nice and go back to Apple for any work. Don't get me wrong, they are well made, but nothing exceptional.

      One other thing - Apple don't offer laptops with TPM chips. TPM is useful for Bitlocker support. If you want to run Windows with encryption (maybe not NSA proof, but cop/border security/thief proof) then a TPM chip is worth having and almost all business oriented laptops have them. Might even be a requirement for some corporate users.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    32. Re:Yes - known for years. by TWX · · Score: 1

      That's why they can have my Alienware M17 when they pry it from my cold, dead hands.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    33. Re:Yes - known for years. by TWX · · Score: 1

      I like virtualbox. Yes, I know, it's Oracle's now. But, I can move the VM files easily from computer to computer if I have to so long as the VM is down when I do it.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    34. Re:Yes - known for years. by macs4all · · Score: 0

      Yes, the Best Windows machines are Macs. This has been the case for a looong time. Not only are they less expensive for the lifetime of ownership, longer lives, more powerful, more fully featured but as a bonus you get to use the MacOSX and better integration with iOS. Total win.

      Why is the Parent modded "Funny"?

    35. Re:Yes - known for years. by TWX · · Score: 2

      I was an outsider before it was popular...

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    36. Re:Yes - known for years. by TWX · · Score: 1

      We picked up a Thinkpad Yoga with the 12.5" screen for my wife, with 8GB RAM and the Core i7 processor, it's a very nice computer. Not as fast as my dual-quad Xeon Precision Workstation, but certainly no slouch...

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    37. Re: Yes - known for years. by Gr8Apes · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And that Dell XPS 13 2015 will cost a pretty penny, as soon as you deck it out to similar specs, if you even can. That's not to say that Dell hasn't improved significantly over the past 5 years, because they have. But, I still recall my run of 5 Dell laptops in less than 3 years, because they kept crapping out. I have had 3 MBPs in the past 10 years, the first which I still own and still works fine, the second died after 5 and a half years of dev machine use, the third is my current all around box used daily. It's over a year old and you'd never know it.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    38. Re:Yes - known for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like Apple or not, they've done a fair amount to force notebooks to be as good as they are today: very high resolution IPS panels, thinness, aluminum bodies, etc. I will ding Apple for seemingly starting the widescreen fad.

      The only real competitor were the IBM ThinkPads but since those have been sold to Lenovo, Apple is about the only computer make who is capable of creating a decent notebook computer without just blatantly ripping off someone else's design.

      Consider the Dark Ages of notebooks just a few short years ago. Crap from Dell and the others were sporting 1024x768 resolutions on crap LCD displays and were thick, heavy pieces of garbage. My ThinkPad T43 from 2004 had a 1400x1050 IPS panel and 5 years later, outside of CPU, the enterprise class machines actually had worse specifications!

      FYI the 2015 Macbook Air has a TN screen with a lower resolution than your T43 from 2004.

    39. Re:Yes - known for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mac book processing specs ($1900):
      1.2GHz dual-core Intel Core M processor (Turbo Boost up to 2.6GHz) with 4MB shared L3 cache
      8GB DDR3
      512SSD
      Intel HD Graphics 5300

      Lenovo Y50-70 (highest model) ($1750)
      4th Generation Intel Core i7-4720HQ Processor (2.60GHz 1600MHz 6MB)
      16GB DDR3
      512MB SSD
      NVidia 960M

      The Lenovo is above or equal in all major categories.

      Uhh, seriously, WTF are you looking up??

      My MacBook has a Core i7-5730k (3.2GHz 4MB cache), 32 GB DDR3 RAM, a 512GB SSD plus a 1 TB HD, an NVidia 880M and Intel 3000HD.
      It also was only $1600 sans the SSD I purchased afterwards.

      Far as I can see, you Lenovo example has half the memory, one less video card, can't drive 4k with the internal LCD, slower by a whole GHz, and one less drive.
      Or just ignore the one less drive and say your option is $150 more for all of the above missing resources.

      I mean seriously, should I look up specs on a $200 Lenovo to compare just to make it look that much better?

    40. Re:Yes - known for years. by macs4all · · Score: 0, Troll

      With the exception of outdated drivers and little to no support from Apple fixing them and forcing WIndows 8 on newer macs.

      If the drivers are so outdated and horrible, then why does review after review claim that Windows performance (pick your version) is stellar on Macs?

      And are you talking about Boot Camp not supporting earlier versions of Windows? I was sad when they stopped supporting XP, too; but it is understandable from a Support point-of-view. And like every other (or almost every other) PC manufacturer immediately drops driver support for the previous version of Windows when the new one comes out... It's just the way things are in the whole PC industry.

      Do you really think that Apple wants to move Windows users forward to a new Windows version? That's nonsensical. I would suspect that it's more like, just like everyone else, Apple relies on "reference designs" for the basis of their Drivers (especially the Windows Drivers), and when they update their hardware designs, they can't find compatible driver-models for earlier versions of Windows, any more than anyone else can. Think about it.

    41. Re:Yes - known for years. by Gr8Apes · · Score: 0
      Mac Book Pro 15" ($1999)

      2.2-3.4Ghz Core i7 (quad)
      16 GB Ram
      256GB PCIe flash based storage (about 2-3 times faster than your SSD)
      Intel Iris Pro

      You can get everything to meet the eyeball specs for $2500 with the 512GB PCIe flash based storage and discrete graphics. I doubt the Lenovo can touch it in real world use. I've used several Lenovos over the years, I'd was happy to give them back. My MBP actually gives my desktop a run for its money, and outperforms it on certain tasks.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    42. Re:Yes - known for years. by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Apple has the unique ablity to control their entire product from end-to-end and it shows.

      Yes, but most people just don't care enough to pay the price Apple commands.

      People that bitch about how much an apple costs while comparing it to a list of features from some random chinese OEM have never even seen an apple laptop in person.

      Nonsense, I have and Apple notebooks are works of art, beautiful and everything you say they are.

      So what? I'm typing this on an Acer V17 Nitro notebook that was half the price of a MacBook Pro while having twice the performance.

      Yes, it is heavier, and yes it isn't as well built (but don't knock it, it is better than most notebooks), but so what?

      It is half the price and twice the performance.

      Apple isn't even in the ballpark, which is why their market share is nearly nothing. They do make a crap ton of money, I own their stock, so I like them for that reason. :) I don't own Acer stock, they don't make a crap ton of money.

      So lesson learned, buy stocks of companies that make tons of money, but buy products from companies that don't. :)

    43. Re:Yes - known for years. by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      My MacBook has a Core i7-5730k (3.2GHz 4MB cache), 32 GB DDR3 RAM, a 512GB SSD plus a 1 TB HD, an NVidia 880M and Intel 3000HD.
      It also was only $1600 sans the SSD I purchased afterwards.

      That is impressive... link?

    44. Re:Yes - known for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      here's a correction, you idiot! you are an idiot!

    45. Re:Yes - known for years. by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Yes, the Best Windows machines are Macs

      "best" is a subjective term... best in what way?

      Not only are they less expensive for the lifetime of ownership

      I'm sorry, I can't stop laughing at this. Apple is anything BUT less expensive... They charge a lot of money for what they offer.

      ---

      Apple does have its uses, but for most people, they are not the way to go.

      As proof, Apple is in the middle single digits for desktop marketshare.

    46. Re: Yes - known for years. by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 4, Informative

      And that Dell XPS 13 2015 will cost a pretty penny, as soon as you deck it out to similar specs, if you even can.

      Ahh, no...

      The Dell is $800 feature complete with a nice Core i3. What does the MacBook have? Core M. Not even close. It is also $1,300, more than 50% more expensive.

      The only thing the MacBook has is 256GB of SSD storage, to the XPS 13's 128GB. Otherwise the XPS 13 is a better machine. A 13.3" 1080p display, very light and tons of battery life.

      Why anyone would buy the MacBook, other than to look "cool", is beyond me. You can buy three of the XPS 13 for less than the cost of 2 MacBooks.

    47. Re: Yes - known for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah bro, check the DellBook Air models, they're super inventive and cutting edge.

    48. Re:Yes - known for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best win7 boxes were Macs, I'm disappointed they stopped supporting Win7 via bootcamp

      Because dual-boot is a dead-end technology. Get yourself a proper hypervisor, and just fire up a Win7 Virtual Machine running alongside your mac.

      Trick out your macbook pro, and you can easily run a decently-performant (2 core / 4GB RAM per) Linux and Windows system on the same hardware as your Mac (4 cores / 8 GB ram) host system, simultaneously. No need to jump back and forth between boots, no need to carve up your internal drive to service 3 separate systems poorly.

    49. Re:Yes - known for years. by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      My Acer V17 Nitro has similar specs and was a lot less money.

      http://www.newegg.com/Product/...

      That is a newer version of what I have.

      Intel Core i7 4720HQ (2.60GHz) (quad)
      16GB Memory
      1TB HDD
      256GB SSD
      17.3" 1080p IPS display
      NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M 4 GB GDDR5

      Mine is last year's model with the 2.5 GHz version of the i7 and the 860M GPU. It is rocket fast and smooth, if you think it takes a Mac to do that, then you haven't used a nice notebook, which this is.

      The above machine is $1,200, it is heavier than the MacBook Pro, to be sure, but it has nice build quality (it is more solid than most consumer machines) and it has good cooling for the CPU and GPU. Battery life is great when not playing games (the NVIDIA GPU really eats into it for gaming).

      The Mac is just stupid expensive for what it is, other than perhaps for people who want light weight at any cost.

      ---

      BTW, my main desktop is a Core i7 4770K and this notebook feels just as fast. I've also played with Macs, and I'll grant they are lightweight and works of art, but they aren't faster running Windows.

    50. Re:Yes - known for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. The best hardware.

      Only one fucking mouse button.

      But the best hardware.

    51. Re:Yes - known for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Consider the Dark Ages of notebooks just a few short years ago. Crap from Dell and the others were sporting 1024x768 resolutions on crap LCD displays and were thick, heavy pieces of garbage. My ThinkPad T43 from 2004 had a 1400x1050 IPS panel and 5 years later, outside of CPU, the enterprise class machines actually had worse specifications!

      Uh, my Dell C840 from 2002 has a 1600x1200 IPS display and I still use that brick of laptop to this day. For some reason people seem to equate Dell with their only consumer lines but their business lines are where the good meat is and they cost about the same or only slightly more.

    52. Re:Yes - known for years. by vux984 · · Score: 1

      My MacBook has a Core i7-5730k (3.2GHz 4MB cache), 32 GB DDR3 RAM, a 512GB SSD plus a 1 TB HD, an NVidia 880M and Intel 3000HD.
      It also was only $1600 sans the SSD I purchased afterwards.

      You buy it hot? Because you sure didn't buy it from apple with those specs at that price. I'm skeptical Apple has even sold an i7 equipped macbook for less than $2000.

    53. Re:Yes - known for years. by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 2

      Like Apple or not, they've done a fair amount to force notebooks to be as good as they are today: very high resolution IPS panels, thinness, aluminum bodies, etc. I will ding Apple for seemingly starting the widescreen fad.

      I ding Apple for designs that discourage serviceability: Non-removable batteries, very difficult to access HDD / RAM, etc.

    54. Re: Yes - known for years. by unami · · Score: 4, Informative

      aah no, $ 1300 gets you a macbook pro with an i5 - comparable to the xps 13 9343 from dell with the same cpu, ram & ssd capacity, sold for the same price. the dell is a little smaller, but got a lot of brittle carbon fibre, the mbp has more ports (hdmi & 2x thunderbolt/mini display port), a more than 50% larger battery, slightly lower screen resolution, but a faster gpu to go with it. so it's at least a tie with the mbp being the faster, but slightly bigger & heavier machine. i'd go for the macbook, because it also got mag-safe, osx and a better touchpad. but if you're a windows user, the windows keyboard of the dell is something to consider.

    55. Re:Yes - known for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple has done a good job with raising the bar with laptops, to the point where the MacBook design in 2008 is still quite usable and modern now. Even before that, the white/black plastic laptops were well-made (cracks and discolorations aside.)

      Before that, you had one PC maker putting desktop chips in laptops that had 1280x1024 screens in a 10 pound, 17" form factor, with enough fans that it sounded like a Harrier taking off. At that time, the only decent products were the Sony VAIO models.

      Software? Good luck. Usually the only way to find drivers (like a USB 2.0 driver) would be to either dig it out of the bloatware-laden install image, find the OEM and grab it there, or hack a similar driver to recognizing the card.

      Even now with Apple's older designs, Apple is still ahead of the game with fit, finish, and materials. No ugly rubber plugs near the hinge.

      Software? If a user gets malware on their PC, it is pretty likely they didn't make recovery media, and the recovery HDD image is infected. So, it requires a clean Windows install, which can be $200, which is almost the cost of a new computer.

      Newer Macs are not perfect... but if the internal HDD/SSD is completely erased, one can download a stub, and eventually the entire install of OS X from a Wi-Fi AP, so the machine can be rendered usable that way. One also can make boot media as well. So, no OS doesn't mean the machine is useless.

    56. Re:Yes - known for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're quoting the specs of a MacBook yet have added $301 to the list price?
      If, on the other hand, you've actually got the Lenovo specs right and they are indeed those of the Y50-70's "highest model" then that's not up to much. I'd rather pay a bit more and get a MacBook Pro.

    57. Re: Yes - known for years. by unami · · Score: 0

      p.s.: sure, you can compare the cheapest dell with the macbook with the worst bang for the buck, based purely on specs. but as the mentioned laptops in the article are the macbook air and pro, i guess that's what they meant.

    58. Re:Yes - known for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When did Apple stop supporting Windows 7 on Bootcamp? Every model released today is listed here as supporting Windows 7: https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT205016

      I just installed it two weeks ago on a 2014 Mac Mini with no issues...

    59. Re:Yes - known for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows 7 IS still supported on all current Mac Models. What are you talking about???? https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT205016

    60. Re: Yes - known for years. by unami · · Score: 1

      oh, come on, you're comparing a 15-inch plastic-laptop to a 12-inch alu-laptop. at least take one of the macbook pro's the article is talking about and then compare it to the lenovo.

    61. Re: Yes - known for years. by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 2

      i5, i3, to a notebook, they are mostly the same thing...

      both dual core, both hyperthreaded... the only thing the i5 really has is turbo boost, but you likely won't notice any difference.

      The Dell is $800, the Macbook is $1,300, it begins and ends there. Both machines are very close overall, with each having slightly higher something or other.

    62. Re:Yes - known for years. by maccodemonkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Uhhhh what? You're spec'ing a sub notebook against a 15" notebook. Of course the sub notebook is not going to be configurable into the same range, and is going to get very expensive.

      If you're comparing against a 15" Lenovo, you want to compare against the 15" Macbook Pro, which is the equivalent.

    63. Re: Yes - known for years. by unami · · Score: 1

      p.p.s. and no pre-installed mc-affee crapware on the macbook as well...

    64. Re: Yes - known for years. by Redbehrend · · Score: 1

      You won't win vs apple fan boys they still think safari is a modern browser lol

    65. Re: Yes - known for years. by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Fair enough :)

      Mind you, I did say that Apple makes a pretty machine, does that count?

      It is just expensive for the hardware in it, you're paying a premium for having a Mac.

      Which is fine, if that is what you want. But don't say that it is the same price or cheaper than a Windows box, which it isn't.

    66. Re:Yes - known for years. by aralin · · Score: 0

      Except that the Lenovo is twice as heavy and battery lasts half as long.

      --
      If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
    67. Re:Yes - known for years. by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      The chiclet keyboards of today have little in common with the chiclet keyboards that caused inssues in the 80s. The complaint back then had more to do with the physical mechanism (often a single rubber membrane for the whole keyboard and very poor quality/design) rather than the fact that the keytops were flat with a little space between the keys.

    68. Re:Yes - known for years. by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      Did you not notice that all of Apple's 2015 notebooks are missing from the list you linked? They're on the corresponding lists for Win8 and Win10.

      The only current mac that is listed as supporting Win7 is the mid-2015 Retina 5K iMac.

    69. Re: Yes - known for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah bro, check the DellBook Air models, they're super inventive and cutting edge.

      So are you one of those complaining PCs are not doing like Apple, or one of those complaing PCs are doing like Apple?

    70. Re:Yes - known for years. by Carewolf · · Score: 2

      With the exception of outdated drivers and little to no support from Apple fixing them and forcing WIndows 8 on newer macs.

      If the drivers are so outdated and horrible, then why does review after review claim that Windows performance (pick your version) is stellar on Macs?

      Because you read Apple fanboy sites? Anyway it is not hard to have stellar performance when you have SSDs. Most laptop over average price are "stellar" and outside benchmarks hard to tell apart in performance.

    71. Re:Yes - known for years. by drinkypoo · · Score: 0

      One other thing - Apple don't offer laptops with TPM chips. TPM is useful for Bitlocker support. If you want to run Windows with encryption (maybe not NSA proof, but cop/border security/thief proof) then a TPM chip is worth having

      Wait, you're trusting the TPM chip? I cannot laugh long enough or loud enough in print to express my feelings about that.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    72. Re:Yes - known for years. by Mousit · · Score: 2

      ...very high resolution IPS panels...

      Consider the Dark Ages of notebooks just a few short years ago. Crap from Dell and the others were sporting 1024x768 resolutions on crap LCD displays and were thick, heavy pieces of garbage. My ThinkPad T43 from 2004 had a 1400x1050 IPS panel and 5 years later, outside of CPU, the enterprise class machines actually had worse specifications!

      I was with you right up to that part. Apple lagged woefully behind in screens for a very long time, unless you're forgetting that the 15" MBP was 1440x900 right up to mid-2012, long after other laptops had gone to at LEAST 1680x1050 (or 1600x1200 for 4:3) for the same size screen, with some even using 1920x1200. The 17" model was better, at 1680x1050 to start out with and then quickly moved to 1920x1200 in late 2008. However 1920x1200 had been fairly common on other 17" laptops already by that time. At least when talking at the MBP's same price point, of course.

      And this is all just considering the MacBook Pro, which only came out in 2006; the PowerBooks before that had even lower specs. Your 2004 T43 had a 15" screen option for UXGA at 1600x1200 that outclassed the 15" MBP right up to mid-2012. :P

      And keep in mind that the Retina screens have an actual resolution and an effective resolution. My 15" Retina MBP might have a 2880x1800 native IPS panel, but my actual usable desktop in OS X still defaults to that goddamn paltry 1440x900, pixel-doubled so it looks all pretty. Yes I know I can change the default, but it still annoys me that that's what it defaults to at all.

    73. Re:Yes - known for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm in the market for a new laptop but what the hell is with both the XPS and MacBook Pro both having non upgradeable RAM? i.e soldered to the motherboard. In fact damn near every laptop, including the Lenovo's have this as well. These high end ones you can choose between 8GB and 16GB but you can never buy the 8GB and decide to upgrade it later.

    74. Re:Yes - known for years. by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      My MacBook Pro 13" can display a max resolution of 3360 x 2100. It's kind of useless to switch to this resolution (you'll need a 3rd party utility to do so -- I use SwitchRez X, but you can also do it via the terminal if you are handy). I suppose it's useful if you plug in an external monitor. I think they've updated this model. The top end 15" could probably be much higher than that -- but again, why? You'd need a magnifying glass to make that useful.

      The latest MacBook Pro at about $1800 has these specs;
      2.9GHz dual-core Intel Core i5
      Turbo Boost up to 3.3GHz
      8GB 1866MHz LPDDR3 memory
      512GB PCIe-based flash storage1
      Intel Iris Graphics 6100
      Built-in battery (10 hours)2
      Force Touch trackpad

      If you max out at $2500, well you get;
      2.5GHz quad-core Intel Core i7
      Turbo Boost up to 3.7GHz
      16GB 1600MHz memory
      512GB PCIe-based flash storage1
      Intel Iris Pro Graphics
      AMD Radeon R9 M370X with 2GB GDDR5 memory
      Built-in battery (9 hours)2
      Force Touch trackpad

      BTW the PCIe-based flash storage is faster than almost any RAID. Up to 4X the normal flash storage on the 512 GB models.

      The battery specs are accurate, not sure about the competitors.

      So while the Macs aren't the cheapest bang for the buck around - they tend to be more than just their specs. They remove the bottlenecks, whisper quiet, stable.

      Though if I had the money, I'd go for the discrete graphics card. And I can't wait for the new OS, as Yosemite seems to not be as stable as Mavericks.

      As far as TCO, I don't NEED to buy a lot of utilities, anti spyware and the like, or remove shovel-ware buried in my system. The average Windows user may spend less up front, but they seem miserable with a hybrid OS 8, trojan horses hijacking their system (my mother went through various apps like Kaspersky and never got her system working right).

      But I'm not preaching -- I don't care. Use what you want. There are robust PCs but you pay for them -- so then you are left with the OS.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    75. Re:Yes - known for years. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Yes, the Best Windows machines are Macs. This has been the case for a looong time. Not only are they less expensive for the lifetime of ownership, longer lives, more powerful, more fully featured but as a bonus you get to use the MacOSX and better integration with iOS. Total win.

      Funny?

      Sound exactly like my experience. Running Windows in bootcamp on my iMac runs about as perfect as can be. And having owned both WinPC's and Macs concurrently since the early 90's, I always got a coupe more years out of my Macs than my PC's.

      Plus I have a wider choice of programs than Windows only users. Total win.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    76. Re:Yes - known for years. by FranTaylor · · Score: 2

      As for build quality and durability, Macs are not as solid as machines like business Thinkpads or Panasonic Let's Note (Toughbook). They are just not designed to be.

      ??? huh ??? WTF ??? wow !?!?!

      Aluminum body MacBooks are just crazy durable. My wife and I are both terrible klutzes, we break phones and remotes all the time. We both have 2008 MacBooks and they both look close to new. They have both been dropped on the floor many times. They run like they did when we bought them seven years ago. We also have friends and relatives with macbooks, they all say the same thing, totally rock solid.

    77. Re: Yes - known for years. by elmer+at+web-axis · · Score: 1

      Not for Australian s DELL consistently rips off this market. Apple is world priced so what you pay in the states translates to everywhere else. This to me speaks volumes about the companies.

    78. Re: Yes - known for years. by laffer1 · · Score: 1

      The dell also has right click. This doesn't matter if you're going to hook a mouse up to it anyway.

    79. Re:Yes - known for years. by chipschap · · Score: 1

      The "one mouse button" thing is a design decision and has nothing to do with how well the hardware is made. You're getting things mixed together here.

      It makes an Apple mouse useless with other systems, but that doesn't mean it isn't a quality product.

    80. Re:Yes - known for years. by jisom · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I like being at the top of this list too.

    81. Re:Yes - known for years. by jisom · · Score: 1

      They did a recall this year, if you are talking about the Radeon gpu problem.

    82. Re:Yes - known for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a Sony from 2006 with a 1080p screen, so I have no idea what you mean by other companies not making a decent computer...

      Sure, if you skimped out and bought $1000 laptops, you'd get stuck with low resolution screens and such...

    83. Re:Yes - known for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? That's exactly why I dig them. Honestly, I don't need to upgrade or service those things. I appreciate that they're soldered on so that they could refine and miniaturize the design as much as possible. The MacBook Air, for example, is a marvel of design that wouldn't have been possible with a removable battery or upgradeable HDD / RAM, etc.

    84. Re:Yes - known for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problem is gaming. You run a Valve game in a VM, expect to be autobanned (VAC ban) the second the program does its search of the machine and finds either a virtual machine based HDD signature or client drivers. Even just having Hyper-V enabled might earn a person a permanent VAC ban. Same with SOE/Daybreak games. Running them in a VM is an insta-ban because the first thing the anti-cheat software looks is to see if it is running on bare metal or not.

      So, VMs are nice, but not for all uses, especially with the game companies that forbid them, as they want to console-ify your machine.

    85. Re:Yes - known for years. by ElderKorean · · Score: 1

      Although you can boot Windows on a Mac, you don't have to do that. Windows, including Win 10, can be run safely in a Parallels or VMWare sandbox.

      On a Mac you can have both of these - my Windows 7 bootcamp install is also the VMware target. So I can run it natively for games, and later as a VM if for I'm working on OSX. Not upgraded yet to 10 - hoping it works just as well.

    86. Re:Yes - known for years. by ElderKorean · · Score: 2

      Yes. The best hardware.

      Only one fucking mouse button.

      But the best hardware.

      Not used one lately hey?, the whole magic mouse surface is the button - and it is multi-touch enabled.

      One finger click for regular left click. Two finger click for regular right click.

    87. Re:Yes - known for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anywhere there are fewer configurations you're going to find higher reliability because of more consistent testing.

      Yet in practice Apple laptops are not very reliable. I think it has mostly to do with choosing lower weight over better build quality and lower noise over decent cooling, although cost cutting in the component selection is probably a factor too.

    88. Re:Yes - known for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do not care about my laptop being a few tenth of a mm thinner, or a few grammes lighter. I won't even notice the difference. However, I will notice the difference when one of these components breaks down (which will happen at some point) and my laptop stops working without a way to solve it. I will also notice it when I can't do something because the RAM or the SSD are too small and I can't upgrade it.

    89. Re: Yes - known for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cheapo acer 15inch had same 1280x800 in 2003 that macbook 14 had on 2012. Osx having god awful dpi support is the reason they waited until they could simply pixeldouble shit. Oh and the fucking gpu was about as fast too. Infoshitweek is a shill.

    90. Re:Yes - known for years. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Well, let's look at the reality of the situation instead of the paranoid rantings we find on the internet about TPM.

      TPM is a secure storage chip. These things are well established and used in a lot of areas. We also know that they are fairly effective, in that so far no law enforcement agency has been able to use information stored in a TPM or similar chip against the owner. Maybe GCHQ/NSA have the ability to extract that information, in fact I'm fairly sure they do, but they are only going to use it against you if they consider you a very high value target. The risk of letting that become public knowledge is too great. Same with other country's security services.

      So in practice a TPM chip is a useful, secure way of storing encryption keys. Note that in the case of Bitlocker it's actually more secure than Truecrypt. Truecrypt stores the key on the disk itself, meaning that that it is available to an attacker with no effort. Bitlocker stores the key in the TPM chip, so there is an additional barrier to accessing it, and even then the key is still encrypted with a hash of the user's password in the same way as Truecrypt.

      Thus, even if there is a backdoor into the TPM chip, it's still no worse than Truecrypt.

      Of course, you might suspect Bitlocker itself, but again unless you are an extremely high value target... Even Bruce Schneier recommends it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    91. Re: Yes - known for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aaaand.. Unbelievable enough, people are fools for the marketing department of Apple - Macs are PCs as well.

    92. Re:Yes - known for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do they do this? What is their objection to virtualisation?

    93. Re:Yes - known for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it is. Hipster fanboys can say things like this a million times, but it remains funny.

    94. Re:Yes - known for years. by tw2k · · Score: 1

      This is a bit old, pretty much every Mac in the last 10 years has come with a device that supports the right click, generally through the use of no physical buttons at all, the new MacBook of course is doing away with physical buttons for all clicking now just like the Mighty Mouse did. Personally, I have enabled the two finger right click on all the Windows laptops I have and use that in preference to the physical right button virtually all the time. I'm not yet sure if I'm going to be completely happy with the removal of the physical button as has happened on the new MacBook, I tend to only use it when I'm dragging and dropping so will be interesting to see how I manage without it. I'm not yet convinced it's a good thing.

    95. Re:Yes - known for years. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      The corporate market is actually relatively intolerant of failure; and to the degree that it is tolerant, demands that swift repair or replacement be at least available as an option. This has the downside of often creating oddballs that are a real pain if you don't have warranty service, since they are composed entirely of proprietary FRUs with no availability beyond assorted secondary market refurb slingers; but when they are under warranty the expectation is that isolating the faulty part will be fast, a replacement should be on the Fedex truck as fast as possible, and physically swapping it out will be minimally fussy and ideally toolless. Not all models achieve this ideal, and there have been some notorious ones over the years; but neither the customer nor the vendor is at all happy in those situations. The customer deals with a lot of downtime; the vendor has a large number of customers with fancy warranties, so if their parts are crap actually honoring those warranties can get very expensive, very fast(even if the replacement parts were free, the shipping alone will erase your profit on the sale of the unit pretty quickly).

      Apple is actually an interesting sort of middle ground. They refuse to sell the real low-cost crap, and so are largely spared the "well of course it broke within 18 months; because we had to squeeze the BOM until it bled in order to get you to buy it, rather than the other guy's one that cost $5 less" problems. They also offer the best in-person support around(if you are suitably close to one of their retail locations). Other consumer brands are usually restricted to mail-in service from the vendor, or the painfully uneven and often horrific world of 3rd party support(some of which is excellent; but much of which is the geek squad). However, their gear is not exactly built with serviceability in mind; and they aren't terribly aggressive about very fast turnaround, on site tech visits, or other (costly; but available with the fancy warranty) corporate-market services.

      It's easy to see why they are so popular in the consumer market; they've done a great job of forcing users to buy the computer that they actually want, rather than picking the price tag that they think they want; and offer better support than most vendors' consumer-grade lines; but they definitely won't coddle you the way an enterprise vendor with whom you have a suitably nice warranty agreement will.

    96. Re:Yes - known for years. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Was an SSD involved? Unless you are really scraping the bottom of the barrel, or running something brutal, it's tricky to under-buy on CPUs; and even the RAM situation isn't as bad as it used to be(you still probably want to double what the base model has; but back in the bad old days you effectively needed to double and probably wanted to quadruple what the base model has); but the difference between systems running from HDDs and systems running from SSDs is a pretty dramatic jump.

    97. Re:Yes - known for years. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      For the purposes of pro-Linux bigotry the big letdown of Apple hardware(the x86 stuff, the big letdown of the ARM based stuff is obvious); is the firmware. The situation is slightly improved by the fact that there aren't too many variants to target, and macs are popular with software developers; but Apple's interpretation of EFI is weirder, if perhaps more competent, than even the horrible people on the PC side.

    98. Re:Yes - known for years. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Given Apple's giant pile of money, I can't argue that they are making a mistake; but it's never been news that desktops are the segment that they can barely bring themselves to care about; much less actively attempt to engage potential new customers(even more now that iDevices are a viable 'gateway' purchase; and desktop market share is being eaten by laptops even among PCs).

      If Apple gave a damn, the mythical mac min-tower would exist; and it'd be possible to buy something that costs somewhere between a mini and an imac; but has at least one PCIe x16 slot and maybe even some space for hard drives. It doesn't; and really never has, unless you count the runt-of-the-litter single socket workstations, which were that expandable; but pricier.

      If you are in this market, Apple has nothing to offer you, and it appears that they like it that way.

    99. Re:Yes - known for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      some might say the opposite, too.. the best osx system is a windows one.... less expensive, easier to repair when needed, more powerful and more fully featured.. and as a bonus, you get standard parts and better support for everything non-apple, and get to tell apple to "suck it" when you run osx on your choice (within compatibility requirements) of hardware instead of theirs.

    100. Re:Yes - known for years. by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Personally, I don't even look at the weight of a laptop. Usually the other stuff I have in my laptop bag far exceeds the weight of the laptop, and that's what they make laptop backpacks for. As for battery.. I don't trust batteries in any device, ever. The technology just sucks. I'm plugged in 99% of the time.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    101. Re:Yes - known for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer 4:3 but it's actually a huge difference to lose the last 10% of vertical space as you go to 16:9.

      ... or the horizontal space when you go 16:10

      PC 16:9: 2560x1440
      PC 16:10: 2560x1600
      Apple 16:10: 2304x1440

    102. Re:Yes - known for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love that keyboard type though.

    103. Re:Yes - known for years. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Well, let's look at the reality of the situation instead of the paranoid rantings we find on the internet about TPM.

      The reality is that you don't know what's in there or if anyone else has the keys. The reality is therefore that you don't actually know it's making you any more secure. You're just wishing and hoping.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    104. Re: Yes - known for years. by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      The only thing the MacBook has is 256GB of SSD storage, to the XPS 13's 128GB...i5, i3, to a notebook, they are mostly the same thing...

      So the only thing is the storage... and the processor....

      the mbp has more ports (hdmi & 2x thunderbolt/mini display port), a more than 50% larger battery, slightly lower screen resolution, but a faster gpu to go with it

      the ports... the battery... the GPU...

      Don't get me wrong, Macs do have a price premium, but it's not nearly as drastic as you are portraying. I hated macs, until windows 8 came around, and handling/using the machines on display at my local microcenter just sold me on the build quality of the Macs. So I bought a mac, setup a dualboot of windows 8 (I wish I could have done otherwise) and it's the best windows laptop I've ever owned. Check my post history prior to 2013 I was an absolute anti-mac standard PC fanboy. It's just that now that I focused a bit more on the quality of the hardware over individual specs the Mac turned out to be a good choice (Not the best for all) but for me .

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    105. Re:Yes - known for years. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      You missed the point. Truecrypt stores the key on your hard drive. It doesn't even attempt to limit access to it. Bitlocker can store the key on your hard drive if you don't have a TPM chip too. The TPM chip is just an extra layer of security, and if it does exactly nothing, or even if it's a secret radio transmitter that broadcasts you key directly to GCHQ, it is still no weaker than Truecrypt.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    106. Re:Yes - known for years. by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      If it saves weight I have not so much problems with it on a portable device.

      I know very few people who bother to upgrade things on a laptop any way, except maybe the RAM in some cases.
      I know I never bothered, even though I have upgraded my desktops many times.

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
    107. Re:Yes - known for years. by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      Yeah but then you fall way outside the price range.

    108. Re:Yes - known for years. by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      I wear shoes that weight more than the difference in weight and I drag those along all day.

      Laptops are usually worked on while on a desk or lap (hence laptop).

      The argument wasn't that Macbooks aren't great but rather that the argument was unfounded and extremely incorrect.

    109. Re: Yes - known for years. by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

      You buy a Mac when you're a web developer and want Unix that that works. It's too much trouble keeping Linux going...

      --
      Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    110. Re: Yes - known for years. by bmarkovic · · Score: 0

      Oh deary me. In fact for $1000 XPS13 gets you a 5200U scoring 3800 at cpumark, and at $1300 Mac gets you twice as big SSD and a 5257U scoring 4250. You can probably invest those 300 in lots more than more SSD with Dell. And you get a leaner machine. Also, Windows and Ubuntu will fly on the Dell. OSX is a horrible hog (that's why Macbooks always have beefy processors, even though most of their users only use them for facebook, iworks and email), and everyone using Windows or LInux on them will testify that they simply fly, whereas people running Hackintoshes on mid-spec notebooks aren't having nearly as much fun despite their machines being very performant with WIndows, even with all that bloatware users typically get, and especially Linux.

    111. Re: Yes - known for years. by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      Plastic or Aluminum, it's all the same inside. The topic was about the OS not the wielding of the hardware. An at the end of the day, who gives a damn. The aluminum doesn't do anything other than be a "We got it" feature. It doesn't improve weight anymore than plastic or strength.

      In addition I took two products at similar price points. If you want to bump up to a MacBook Pro we can start comparing with the even better products that will surpass the MacBook Pro by a long margin.

    112. Re:Yes - known for years. by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Because it is. Hipster fanboys can say things like this a million times, but it remains funny.

      Or is it nervous laughter on your part; because, deep down, you know it's true?

    113. Re:Yes - known for years. by graphius · · Score: 1

      I will ding Apple for seemingly starting the widescreen fad.

      I bought my macbook pro (15") largely because it has a less wide screen than much of the competition. That and the fact it did not come with Win8...

    114. Re: Yes - known for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only there were a cluetard mod option.... You're clearly ignorant of what's available in the market.

    115. Re:Yes - known for years. by dl_sledding · · Score: 1

      Gotta agree here too... I think Lenovo is overlooked quite often. I've had a T430S that I got 3 years ago (or so, can't remember exactly) that has been absolutely bulletproof. When I specced it out (I-7, 16gB, 500gB), the only company (including Apple) that could compare was Alien, in a monster 17", heavy "laptop" that was twice the cost. I was moving from a MacBook Pro, and had a real hard time making that move because I enjoyed the MacBook so much, but now I am definitely a Lenovo fan, and until their quality takes a dump, will continue to be. It may not be an all metal case (which is what my fascination with the MacBook was all about), but it's as inflexible as the MacBook due to the internal metal frame, and that has stood up very well for me.

      I have had one issue with it (2 weeks after I got it): the touchpad took a dump. I called them, they set up a return/repair, and I had it back in my hands 2 days later. Where I live, that's positively incredible, since it takes a letter two days to get across town. Their customer service is superb.

      Not worried about the whole Superfish issue... as soon as the laptop is in my hands I repartition and install Mint anyway.

    116. Re: Yes - known for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      16:9 is 16:9. It is not less wide, but your understanding is clearly narrower.

    117. Re: Yes - known for years. by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      I personally at this time would never buy a MacBook. At the price, it's an MBP, or a much cheaper Mac Air. It all depends upon what you need it for.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    118. Re: Yes - known for years. by Gr8Apes · · Score: 2

      All touchpads on macs do right click via a 2-finger tap.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    119. Re:Yes - known for years. by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      will continue to be. It may not be an all metal case (which is what my fascination with the MacBook was all about), but it's as inflexible as the MacBook due to the internal metal frame, and that has stood up very well for me.

      May I ask why the fascination with the aluminum case? Plastic can be as strong and even stronger than aluminum if it has the same bends and lips in it. To me the only major advantage aluminum is it's ability to transfer heat away from the components but in this case the case is not designed to do so.

      The other advantage is the look of polished or brushed aluminum. Lenovo has produced equivalents with plastics but the finish doesn't last like it does with aluminum.

    120. Re: Yes - known for years. by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Running a very well performing Hackintosh desktop, you have no idea what you're talking about. "aren't having nearly as much fun"? Not sure what you mean there.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    121. Re: Yes - known for years. by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      I'd go a step further - and say if you're an enterprise developer, meaning anything that runs on *nix. Why be hamstrung by Windows in those cases?

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    122. Re:Yes - known for years. by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      I want small, lightweight, and most importantly: no wasted time dealing with non-essential pieces. Great battery life is a big plus too. Yes, using discrete graphics eats into battery life, although I actually haven't done a test with the newest one, it does last 8 hours doing builds and tests including running browsers, DBs, appservers and webservers. I've never had a Dell/Lenovo come anywhere close to that. And don't take my word for it, actually try out some disk I/O tasks on a mac. Even my 2 drive RAID0 SSD array can't touch my MBP for disk I/O. Certain tasks will just run faster on the MBP.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    123. Re:Yes - known for years. by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      If you are in this market, Apple has nothing to offer you, and it appears that they like it that way.

      I could well be wrong, but I think Apple is leaving a LOT of money on the table by not offering a decent desktop choice. Likewise, they don't offer a reasonable laptop choice either, thinking their iPad fills that segment (it doesn't, but they probably think it does).

      I just ordered another notebook, this time an ASUS:

      http://www.amazon.com/gp/produ...

      For $349, you get:

      Intel Core i3-5010U 2.1GHz
      4GB RAM
      500GB 5400RPM
      DL DVD±RW/CD-RW
      WiFi 802.11ac
      2 x USB 3.0, 1 x USB 2.0, 1 x HDMI and VGA ports
      15.6" Full HD (1920*1080)
      Windows 10

      Is it the best built notebook? No. Does It weight the least? No.

      For pete's sake, it is $350 bucks! Who fracking cares! That is a lot of computer for the money, Apple's MacBook might be nice, but it is more than triple the price.

    124. Re: Yes - known for years. by BadDreamer · · Score: 1

      The Dell has a fan. It's got a plastic base. It's got a completely different customer base than the Macbook. Comparing them is pointless. If you need what the Macbook offers, the Dell is no substitute. If you find the Dell adequate, the Macbook is no upgrade.

    125. Re: Yes - known for years. by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      The Dell has a fan because it has a real CPU. The i3 is a lot faster than Core M is. Granted, Core M is enough for some people, but it isn't the same thing.

      It might be more fair to compare the Dell XPS 13 to the MacBook Air, in which case, the Dell still wins that one.

      This is all a moot subject, because you can buy a slightly heavier, bigger machine than either of those for half the price. $350 buys a lot of computer these days. I just ordered an ASUS off Amazon for $349, and while it isn't thin and light like the XPS 13 or MacBook is, it is a lot less money and actually more powerful than both machines, while still having a good battery life.

      Different market, to be sure, but it brings us back to... "Macs are the best machine to run Windows", and that just doesn't hold up. It might be the case for a LIMITED part of the market, but for most people, it is not a true statement.

      If you need more evidence, look at the Mac marketshare, it is barely over 5%. They are expensive and just not in demand, despite Apple's amazing ability to get people to talk about them.

      I find this all to be a shame, I like the Mac and I'd like Windows to have real competition. But not at those insane prices.

    126. Re: Yes - known for years. by BadDreamer · · Score: 1

      You are making the statement "The Macbook is not the best machine to run Windows, because I do not consider a fan an impediment" and extrapolating from there.

      That is an underhanded tactic. No-one has claimed this. The Macbook is a niche machine, and you are stating the obvious that outside it's niche it's not worth considering. No-one needs to be told this.

    127. Re:Yes - known for years. by guruevi · · Score: 1

      sudo?

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    128. Re: Yes - known for years. by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      The OP of this whole thread stated that the Mac was the best machine to run Windows, as did the submission. That is why I said it.

    129. Re:Yes - known for years. by maccodemonkey · · Score: 1

      At $1999? That's like a few hundred bucks. Not "way outside of the price range." That's $100 difference from the laptop spec'd above.

    130. Re: Yes - known for years. by BadDreamer · · Score: 1

      "The Mac" is not identical to "Macbook". You can't cherry pick one niche machine and by showing that a niche machine does not suit everyone then declare that the whole ranged of Macs are therefore shown not to be best.

      For my needs a Macbook Pro 13 Retina is pretty near perfect. I haven't found anything from any other manufacturer which even comes close, no matter how much I am prepared to pay. A Macbook would not suit my typical work case at all, although it would be perfect the few times I spend weeks at the time on the road.

      One of my colleagues finds the Macbook Pro 15 Retina to fit all his needs (including robustness) so well he just can't replace it, even if he wanted to. Granted, there is some emotional investment by now (as with all good tools), but it really works well for him.

      Are there other cases where there is no Mac which fits? Definitely. But for business use, coding and graphical work there tends to be a Mac for everyone. Is it always the best choice? Too many variables to state that, but it is definitely a very good choice for a vast ranger of uses.

      And that very good choice is seldom the Macbook. We know that. Apple knows that. And that's fine. When the Macbook is a good choice, it has pretty much no competition. When it isn't, there is pretty much no reason to pick it. Such are niche products.

    131. Re: Yes - known for years. by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Are there other cases where there is no Mac which fits? Definitely. But for business use, coding and graphical work there tends to be a Mac for everyone.

      If you don't care about price, you're generally right.

      A 13" MacBook Pro starts at $1,300 for a dual core CPU, 8GB of RAM, and 128GB of SSD space.

      That is insanely expensive for such a basic machine. If you like yours, by all means, enjoy... Just don't kid yourself, it is a massively overpriced machine with fancy packaging.

      Example:

      ASUS Zenbook:

      http://www.amazon.com/Zenbook-...

      Core i5, 8GB, 256GB SSD, 1080p IPS touchscreen, etc.

      That is very similar to the $1499 MacBook Pro in terms of features. Slightly lower screen res (but at 13", it is plenty), but it is touchscreen (the Mac isn't).

      Price is $850, just over HALF the price of the Mac. Same weight (slightly less actually)

      If you like your Mac, fine. Just don't kid yourself, you paid nearly double what you had to pay for the same machine from someone else.

    132. Re: Yes - known for years. by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      For my needs a Macbook Pro 13 Retina is pretty near perfect. I haven't found anything from any other manufacturer which even comes close, no matter how much I am prepared to pay.

      Look harder next time. :)

      http://www.amazon.com/Zenbook-...

      43% less than the Mac for the same basic configuration, same weight and size, plus a touch screen.

    133. Re:Yes - known for years. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Sure, they are well made, but a Let's Note (Toughbook in the west) is rugged. Mine claims that it can take 100kg on the lid, i.e. if I accidentally sat on it then it would be fine. Do you think your Macbook's LCD would survive that?

      Liquid spills are also a big killer of laptops, and Macbooks are no exception. Panasonic and Lenovo design their hardware to drain liquid away from important areas and out the bottom.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    134. Re: Yes - known for years. by BadDreamer · · Score: 1

      One of my requirements is a solid chassis. I've handled Zenbooks, and they are incredibly flimsy compared to Macbook Pro Retinas. There used to be some Thinkpads which were comparable, but Lenovo have abandoned that track, sadly.

      Also, the touchpad of the Zenbook is horrible next to the Macbook touchpad. It's better than most PC touchpads, but it's still not in the same league as the Mac ones.

      And touch screen is a liability. It's one more thing that can start malfunctioning, sending spurious input to the system. I'm buying a laptop, not a tablet.

    135. Re: Yes - known for years. by BadDreamer · · Score: 1

      If you don't care about quality, you're generally right.

      But if you manage to find a competing laptop with as solid a chassis, as high a resolution screen with the same color accuracy, and as good a touch pad, you'll be looking at at best comparable prices.

      If all I wanted was a specific performance envelope, a light composite chassis and a backlit keyboard, sure, I could save a chunk of money. But I travel a lot, need to rely on my laptop in many environments and after a lot of abuse, and require color accuracy and a good touchpad over gimmicks like touch screens. That leaves very few alternatives for me, especially since Lenovo went to the dark side.

    136. Re:Yes - known for years. by aralin · · Score: 1

      Your comment is saying essentially... there is a one person who does not care about some of the specs of the computer. What does such comment bring to the discussion?

      And it's nice that you only use laptop as a desktop, but there are other people, who use them as laptops. For those batter time is important. I like being able to take my computer to a design meeting that can last hours without worrying about the charger. I like to go to a park to work. tether my computer to internet through phone and don't need any wires. And I'd prefer not to lug it behind me on a cart :) I care about the fact that my computer doesn't start to immediately overheat, as soon as I put it on my lap. Just .. you know... the things that you actually get a laptop for.

      --
      If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
    137. Re:Yes - known for years. by aralin · · Score: 1

      If you sit and put the computer on your lap, you will feel every ounce after a while. Extra 4 pounds and extra heat is not something great. Also when the computer is this heavy, it slides in your lap constantly. It is completely distracting. So you pretty much need to be chained to a desk. Why have a laptop at all then?

      --
      If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
    138. Re:Yes - known for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FWIW, both my desktop PC and the MacBook Pro had SSD's.

    139. Re: Yes - known for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The i5 has iris 6100 GPU in the macbook pro vs. the crappy GPU the i3 comes with.

    140. Re: Yes - known for years. by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      i5, i3, to a notebook, they are mostly the same thing...

      But Core M isn't. BECAUSE!

      Your argument is truly convincing. But hey, maybe a benchmark could shed some light.

      http://browser.primatelabs.com... - MacBook (Early 2015) with Intel Core M-5Y51 @ 1.20 GHz (first MacBook listed)
      Single-Core Score Multi-Core Score
      2591 5407
      http://browser.primatelabs.com... - Dell Inc. XPS 13 9343 with Intel Core i3-5010U @ 2.10 GHz (only Core i3 Dell XPS)
      580 1202

      Ouch?

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    141. Re: Yes - known for years. by julian1825 · · Score: 1

      The XPS13 2015 is the same size as the Macbook Air 11". It has a screen the size and battery capacity of a Macbook Air 13", and the two screen options are both higher resolution than Apple offers, never mind having touch input as well.

      Let's compare sizes:

      MBP13: 325 x 227 x 24.1 mm, 2.06 kg

      MBA13: 325 x 227 x 17 mm, 1.35 kg

      MBA11: 299.5 x 192 x 17 mm, 1.08 kg

      XPS13 2015: 304 x 200 x 20.7 mm 1.18 kg, or 1.27 kg with a 4K/touch screen

      Why would you go for the MBA13 when it is bigger, with a lower specc'd screen, gets the same battery life, and costs the same, if you were just going to install Windows/Linux on it? The MBA11 has an 11" screen and only 2/3 the battery life of the XPS. And the MBP doesn't even come in the same form factor as the XPS13...

    142. Re: Yes - known for years. by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, if you value those points, then buy a Macbook Pro...

      All I'm saying is that most people clearly don't value those points, or Apple would be selling more machines...

    143. Re: Yes - known for years. by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, if those are the points you value, then I can see why you made the choice you made.

      IMHO, it is an expensive choice, but it is yours to make and it sounds like you made it with thought rather than randomly.

    144. Re:Yes - known for years. by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      Those were Canadian dollars which would show a 25% higher number. Comparing Canadian with Canadian currency:

      Y50-70 (highest model): $1729 exactly
      MacBook : $1899.00
      MacBook Pro: $2499.00

      I can't see the US price for the Lenovo because it reverts back to Canadian $$$. Check it for yourself.

    145. Re: Yes - known for years. by BadDreamer · · Score: 1

      Quite so. Just like most people don't buy more expensive cars even if they would stand up to harder wear, or buy a premium overcoat even though it will take a beating and still look good enough for a board room. I spend the money on both of those as well, because they pay off with my lifestyle.

      But then, Apple sells a fair amount of machines. They are world wide fifth among all PC makers (desktop and laptop) in most statistics I find, and with the low number of SKU's they have this means they can really optimize production. That shows. They have a high profit margin, but they are not overpriced - if you need what they offer.

    146. Re: Yes - known for years. by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Try another site that anyone has heard of, those numbers are clearly wrong.

    147. Re:Yes - known for years. by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      I can't argue that it's heaver. Not 4 pounds heavier but 2-3 for sure based on side specs. You can opt for another model that is less graphic intense and is lighter than the MacBook. In the MacBook Pro price range you have even more options.

      With the SSD drive the heat is very minimal. I own a previous version of the laptop and the bottom doesn't get hot.

    148. Re:Yes - known for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great logic: IBM ThinkPads, but since they're now Lenovo they don't count anymore! Why?

    149. Re: Yes - known for years. by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      But then, Apple sells a fair amount of machines. They are world wide fifth among all PC makers (desktop and laptop) in most statistics I find

      While that is true, they are only 5th due to the huge number of PC makers...

      The number of machines they sell compared the total number of Windows PCs is hardly more than a rounding error...

      As for profits, they make far more money on iOS devices than on Macs. I'm not even sure the Mac would be a viable platform without the iOS devices, but it might be a nice niche business...

      I just think the Mac could be so much more, if they wanted it to be...

    150. Re: Yes - known for years. by BadDreamer · · Score: 1

      Seven percent is nothing to scoff at.

      And while they make more money than Microsoft on their iPhones alone, they also make as much money on their laptops as all other laptop makers make combined.

      The Mac is much more already. Apple doesn't care about the budget segment. Competing on price leads to low quality products. That is nothing Apple wants to sell.

    151. Re:Yes - known for years. by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      And the only reason I use Windows is gaming... which I think is mostly obvious. If I simply wanted a Windows OS to run apps that won't work in Linux or OS X I'd use the VM option, and in fact I have a windows VM on my linux box for exactly that purpose.

      But afaik video cards do not yet do hw based virtualization, at least when it comes to graphics.

    152. Re: Yes - known for years. by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      And while they make more money than Microsoft on their iPhones alone

      Yep, that is indeed impressive...

      they also make as much money on their laptops as all other laptop makers make combined.

      Citation needed...

      Apple doesn't care about the budget segment. Competing on price leads to low quality products. That is nothing Apple wants to sell.

      Fair enough, but then they will always remain in the single digit percentages...

    153. Re: Yes - known for years. by BadDreamer · · Score: 1

      Single digit percentages is fine. I would love to be there while making more revenue than all other laptops combined.

      http://betanews.com/2015/08/12...

    154. Re: Yes - known for years. by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Try another site that anyone has heard of, those numbers are clearly wrong.

      Hey, you made the claim, you show some numbers. And nobody heard of Geekbench? What kind of phony are you?

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    155. Re:Yes - known for years. by maccodemonkey · · Score: 1

      So now I'm doing some research, and finding issues:

      The Y50-70 is a Haswell. The Macbook Pro is a Broadwell. So you're complaining a last gen PC with a current gen Mac. Maybe not a huge performance difference, but if you at least want to be fair, go find a fire sale previous gen Mac to compare with the fire sale pervious gen PC, or compare with the Y50-80 which is actually Broadwell.

      When I jump to the Y50-80 (with SSD) the normal US price is $1,799. They're running a sale at $1,499. The sale price is somewhat competitive with the 15" Macbook Pro. The non-sale price really isn't.

      The SSD it uses is pretty cheap, not PCI-E, not that fast. So they're trimming price because the SSD is about 1/3 of the speed of what the Macbook Pro ships, possibly 1/4 of the performance, and cheap SSDs are cheap. The GPU is fast, but the 860m is very hot. The CPU is a little beefier. The screen is higher res. The battery life sucks balls compared to the Macbook Pro.

      So yeah, it's cheaper. But it's not really comparable. You're definitely making tangible sacrifices. 5 hours of battery life vs. 10 hours is a big issue. An SSD 30% the speed is an issue (and you can't even configure it with a 1 TB SSD).

      The Y50-80 is clearly designed to be a gaming machine. The Macbook Pro can play games, but it's designed to be a work machine. If you're into just gaming the Y50-80 looks like an ok choice. But as a work machine? Please. It blows giant chunks. The battery life and I/O are unacceptable for pros working in big applications. It's not a work machine. If you're looking for a bunch of slow components tied to a giant power sucking GPU, a Mac isn't going to be for you.

    156. Re:Yes - known for years. by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      I wear shoes that weight more than the difference in weight and I drag those along all day.

      Translation: Yes, I'm comparing an apple to an orange, but they're both fruit so they're still the same thing, right?

      Laptops are usually worked on while on a desk or lap (hence laptop).

      And how do they get back and forth from that desk at work to your lap at home? By being carried. You might not care of the laptop weighs 2 pounds or 8, but some people do.

    157. Re:Yes - known for years. by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      My Acer V17 Nitro has similar specs and was a lot less money.

      Not similar: the two extra pounds and what looks like a nice, plastic case, as opposed an aluminum unibody. It also doesn't say anything about having it's SSD hooked up by PCI-E. It does have a larger screen, though.

    158. Re:Yes - known for years. by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      It is better than average plastic, it is well built and very solid feeling, no flex at all.

      While you're right that it isn't quite the same body, honestly, do most people care? I know I don't and based on sales, I don't think most people do.

      The SSD isn't hooked up by PCI-E, but really that isn't going to make a lot of difference. Some perhaps, but for what such a machine is likely to be used for, nothing worth jumping up and down about.

      The screen is beautiful and just the right size to get work done.

      Oh yes, did I also mention it was a whole lot less money? :) As in, 40% less?

      Acer makes a 15" version, about the same money, if you want less weight. Still not as light as the MacBook Pro, but closer.

      ---

      Again, this comes back to the point of "a Mac is the best machine to run Windows on", where "best" is a subjective term and for many people, it is wrong anyway.

      I'm not suggesting that Macs are bad, I'm suggesting they are expensive for what they really are.

    159. Re:Yes - known for years. by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Yes, it is heavier, and yes it isn't as well built

      You kinda answered you're own Concern there.

      It is half the price and twice the performance.

      You're entitled to your confirmation bias, but you aren't entitled to your own set of facts. The fastest Nitro on Newegg has a 2.6 ghz i7 for $1350. The slowest 15" MacBook Pro has a 2.2 ghz i7 for $2,000. The Nitro has a much better GPU than the base Pro, but the Pro has faster PCI-E flash storage.

      You want to argue it has a 16% faster CPU, and better video performance for 67% of the price, have at it. But "half the price and twice the performance" has no basis in reality.

    160. Re:Yes - known for years. by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Wrong. Longer lives? Tell that to the 10s-of-thousands in the

      Tell it to the reliability surveys that have put Apple as the most reliable PC manufacturer, for forever in computer terms.

      in the class action suit about 2011 Macbooks that can't be fixed even with new motherboards directly from Apple

      Because no PC manufacturers ever have QC issues. Ever. No phone manufacturers, either.

    161. Re:Yes - known for years. by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      I was with you right up to that part. Apple lagged woefully behind in screens for a very long time, unless you're forgetting that the 15" MBP was 1440x900 right up to mid-2012

      Not if you got it with the 1680x1050 display, which was an option starting on the 2011 models. It's not as if all PC manufacturers had jumped on 1080p at that point, so it's a wee bit of a wash.

    162. Re:Yes - known for years. by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      FYI the 2015 Macbook Air has a TN screen with a lower resolution than your T43 from 2004.

      FYI that's comparing a 13" laptop to a 15" laptop. And if you don't want the Air, get the Macbook, which is smaller than the 13" Air yet has a 2304-by-1440 resolution.

    163. Re:Yes - known for years. by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      I was thinking of the dual core in the 13", my mistake...

      A quad is indeed twice the performance of a dual, to be sure...

      60% of the price, $1,200 vs $2,000. :) But that is getting nitpicky I suppose...

      It is but one of many examples... regardless, I'll point out that the Mac has but single digit marketshare, so while some people buy them, it is is a corner of the market.

      Of course, it looks huge compared to the marketshare of Linux on the desktop, and you can't really talk to those people either, they are so stuck in fanboyism.

      The Mac perhaps has its place, but it is over in the corner, which is why Steve Jobs wisely opened his own stores, it wasn't getting love anywhere else.

    164. Re:Yes - known for years. by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Well....if this is jury selection, and you're going to use your counselors prerogative to kick Apple's superior case, battery, 40% greater resolution, weight, SSD and thunderbolt expansion out of the pool, then...

      ...I'm going to do the same for Acer's GPU (base MBP only has integrated graphics), ability to have both an SSD and an HDD, DVD drive, gig-e, and yes, the price. Everyone should buy what is is they want, at the price they want, after considering the advantages and disadvantages of the options.

      If what you want is a big plastic brick with a good GPU, that's peachy. But it's not like people buying MBP's aren't getting what they paid for.

    165. Re:Yes - known for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Dell Latitude from 2001 had a 1600x1200 display and was built like a tank. It was much better than anything else out there.

    166. Re:Yes - known for years. by dl_sledding · · Score: 1

      Plastic can be as strong and even stronger than aluminum if it has the same bends and lips in it.

      But most are not. I looked at quite a few brands and models (thanks Best Buy!), and found that almost all of them were very flexible. I like flexible, in every place other than my laptop frame. Twisting circuit boards is not good for their long-term health, and my laptop goes everywhere with me.

      I don't really care what is providing the rigidity to the frame, as long as the rigidity is there.

      Likewise, looks are secondary to function, at least when it comes to my laptops. My MacBook Pro had (has) a Macally protective jacket over it, so the aluminum is not visible anyway. I want it to be fast and reliable, very unlike a supermodel. :)

    167. Re:Yes - known for years. by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      People are just too fussy. There is such a thing as 'good enough'.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    168. Re:Yes - known for years. by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      The iMac and the garbage can shaped Mac Pro aren't known for their serviceability either.

    169. Re:Yes - known for years. by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      I think you are miss understanding my original post. I was responding to someone that was basically saying nobody was in range which was completely incorrect. See the original comment:

      Not only are they less expensive for the lifetime of ownership, longer lives, more powerful, more fully featured

      We could probably argue for hours and at the end of it we would both be right because each machine is built with slightly different needs in mind. HP, Dell, Lenovo and Apple all make very competitive product each with their own set of features and benefits.

      Apple has a well balanced product but there are competitors and it's a matter of budget.

      The SSD it uses is pretty cheap, not PCI-E, not that fast. So they're trimming price because the SSD is about 1/3 of the speed of what the Macbook Pro ships, possibly 1/4 of the performance, and cheap SSDs are cheap

      This has been a very interesting forum topic on Tom's Hardware. I was unable to find the post but I was actually involved in it. The conclusion was that the PCIE 3.0 SSD are 3 times faster using a bench test. This means that you can apply the 3x rule to any software that is highly optimized for read/writes such as some premium encoding software available out there.

      For the rest of your applications (generally speaking), you aren't gaining much since the HD I/O in general only account for 5% of the bottleneck when comparing with a 6GB SATA. What does this mean? If it takes you 10 seconds to load an Excel file, you can improve speed by 2/10th of a second.

      The other thing is that the boot time between PCIE and SATA is equal. The SATA SSD also outperforms the PCIE in certain areas and the PCIE really doesn't shine for regular desktop usage. The following benchmark by a reputable reviewer is very much point you to believe the same thing:
      http://www.overclock.net/t/148...

    170. Re:Yes - known for years. by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      Translation: Yes, I'm comparing an apple to an orange, but they're both fruit so they're still the same thing, right?

      Maybe you don't see the correlation. Can't help you there.

      And how do they get back and forth from that desk at work to your lap at home? By being carried. You might not care of the laptop weighs 2 pounds or 8, but some people do.

      Yes, which is why some will chose on computer over another. Nobody said Apple wasn't a great option but the original poster was way off on his claims and it's why I pointed out one of many options that compete. If weight is your primary concern you won't buy a MacBook, you'll opt for one of the many less than 2 pound graphite laptops offered by Lenovo, HP or others. If you are willing to compromise on weight then MacBook comes back to the front but at a higher cost than other performance equals.

      For a person with normal physical strength, 2 pounds is more or less noticeable but I can't argue with personal preferences as long as your willing to pay for it

    171. Re:Yes - known for years. by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      Which would indeed be a reason for me not to buy them. For a desktop machine, where space and weight are less of an issue, I see little reasons to make servicing hard.

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
    172. Re:Yes - known for years. by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Maybe you don't see the correlation. Can't help you there.

      I have no problems seeing selective reasoning.

      you'll opt for one of the many less than 2 pound graphite laptops offered by Lenovo, HP or others

      Many? According to Google, the lightest HP laptop is .17 pounds heavier than a Macbook. The lightest Lenovo laptop is 1.72 pounds, 8.5% lighter than the Macbook.

      If you are willing to compromise on weight then MacBook comes back to the front but at a higher cost than other performance equals.

      You can't get from "weight doesn't matter" to "8.5% difference is a 'compromise'" without hackery. Sorry.

    173. Re:Yes - known for years. by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      Many? According to Google, the lightest HP laptop is .17 pounds heavier than a Macbook. The lightest Lenovo laptop is 1.72 pounds, 8.5% lighter than the Macbook.

      Where are you getting your information? Specs on Apple's web site say the MacBook is 3.48 pounds which is only true if you pick the lightest features. The Dell XPS is 2.6 pounds. If the lightest Lenovo is 1.72 pounds that makes it almost 50% the weight of the MacBook. And 8.5% should be a big deal if I base myself on you previous quote:

      By being carried. You might not care of the laptop weighs 2 pounds or 8, but some people do.

      .

      Are you maybe confusing pounds with kilograms?

      Again, I'm fine with Apple. I think they make a great products but it's not the only product and they don't win in all categories no matter how hard to try to convince yourself.

      I really wish we could have a unbiased conversation but you're clearly a fan boy trying to justify his purchase of a MacBook. I'm happy you like your purchase but Apple isn't the only company with competitive quality products these days.

  4. Drivers have been the major problem we've had... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    with Windows 10. The upgrade hasn't gone smoothly on any of our desktops and even worse on laptops. Our biggest customer is upgrading to 10, so have to use it for testing so we have no choice but to upgrade some of our systems. The MacBook we tried 10 on worked pretty well. It locked-up a couple of times in a week of use, but that's better than the non-Apple systems. The Apple drivers for Windows, while not perfect, seem better than the ones from most other companies. I would guess that after the next Boot Camp update, it will be even better. With Microsoft's policy of not providing drivers and leaving them to manufacturers, they've really put users between a rock and a hard place.

  5. Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by t0qer · · Score: 2

    There was a time I understood this during the PPC era of mac, but now that macs run on commodity, non specialized CISC based x86, I have no idea why they retain their value. A lot of PC makers are starting to make machines that look *almost* as nice as a MBP. My HP Envy Beats laptops have a nice aluminum case.

    1. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There was a time I understood this during the PPC era of mac, but now that macs run on commodity, non specialized CISC based x86, I have no idea why they retain their value. A lot of PC makers are starting to make machines that look *almost* as nice as a MBP. My HP Envy Beats laptops have a nice aluminum case.

      One reason is that they've poured a lot of effort into materials design, visual design, and industrial design, and have been doing so for years. We laugh at the Toilet Seat, the Cube, and various other goofy flops they've had in their history, but it demonstrates a) just how far back their design efforts go, and b) just how much they've learned since. A lot of other companies are getting into this now, but Apple has a pretty big head start, and they're not showing any signs of abandoning this practice any time soon.

      --

      Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    2. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      I think part of it is in the nature of OSX. in my experience, and from what I hear from others, windows operating systems tend to be much more demanding with each generation, so you may only get 2 generations of windows on a machine before performance degrades. eg you buy an XP system, it runs vista, it struggles with win7 but barely gets by, and then the machine is tapped out. But due to the way apple designs the OSX upgrades, from my personal experience a new version will run better on my old machine that the prior version. so even with an old MacBook you can still have the latest and greatest software. I suspect this is what is driving the high resale value.

      my MacBook at home is like 7 years old but I'm running osx 10.10 Yosemite with no problem, and I'm looking forward to upgrading to El Capitan or whatever it's called in the fall. At the time I upgrade the OS I might upgrade the hard drive to SSD and cut out a partition to boot camp win7.

    3. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a Veblen good, and you're reasoning like its a normal good.

    4. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by Solandri · · Score: 1, Interesting

      PC laptops are nearly always labeled with easy-to-identify model numbers that you can search for on Google or eBay. Apple makes it very difficult for the average buyer to identify which year a Macbook was built, so the neophyte buyer just sees "Macbook" and assumes it's reasonably current. My cousin almost got suckered by this into buying a Core 2 Duo Macbook during the Sandy Bridge days (just before Ivy Bridge's release). His school store was selling it at a "massive" $200 discount. An appropriate discount would've been $400-$500.

      To figure out exactly what model Macbook you're getting, you need the serial number.

    5. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by vux984 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Three major reasons:

      1) Apple don't make an inexpensive model. They start at around $1000 and go up. People who can't afford a mac but want mac will buy a used mac.

      You can buy a new PC for $300.

      2) Apple only has few SKUs. This makes it pretty easy to know what you are buying. It's overwhemling buying a new PC ... but a used one ... much harder to find out whether that Sony SGH-5512-T(C)-A2 is any good or not, or what it even has. Buying a macbook on craigslist... "early 2012 macbook pro, 2.4GHz 4GB RAM" ... there's pretty much all you need to know.

      3)
      And the low SKU count means there is a fairly healthy cottage industry and DIY info for repairs.

      Buy a 5 year old HP or Toshiba or Lenovo or Dell, there's not an ifixit guide with links to instructions and parts for it.

      This amounts to informal long term support not available from other vendors and props up the value.

      4) Viruses and malware and the relative complexity of reinstalling Windows software if it doesn't come with a restore CD or the recovery partition is blown. This is less of a problem on Mac's, and if you can get a current OSX image you can install it. No licensing greif or keys or drivers.

      5) Free OS upgrades. Nobody wants a Vista laptop.

      I agree with you that there is some really good PC hardware out there now. Dell XPS ultrabooks are nice. Asus has some nice stuff too. the HP Envy series you mentioned is nice kit too.

    6. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      There was a time I understood this during the PPC era of mac, but now that macs run on commodity, non specialized CISC based x86, I have no idea why they retain their value.

      Well, for instance, I have a 17" 2011 MacBook Pro. It's still running strong on Yosemite, despite only having 8 GB RAM & 512 MB Video card. I don't do a whole lot of gaming, but I've been able to still play games like Civilization: Beyond Earth & Deus Ex: Human Revolution Director's Cut, etc. without issue. I mostly use it for writing apps with Xcode nowadays, but it works fine for all other tasks (email, web browsing, etc.) as well. It meets my needs and will probably continue to function well for a few more years. You typically don't get that kind of longevity/performance from a Windows PC.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    7. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nonsense. The model number is printed on the bottom case or readily available from within the OS X "About this Mac" display or the System Report.

      You only need a serial number to verify the model if you don't have access to the physical machine.

    8. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > You only need a serial number to verify the model if you don't have access to the physical machine.

      You just proved the guys point and you don't even seem to realize it.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    9. Re: Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Almost? Check a review for the Dell XPS 13 2015. Former MacBook fans who have evaluated this ultrabook have praised it as a better alternative.

    10. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

      Making them out of metal helps. A five year old mac looks pretty good, unless there are actual dents in it. The plastic cased notebooks tend to have the colour start wearing off and/or fading, more delicate plastic bits like vent louvres break, etc.

      Also, having faded, half peeled off stickers for all the hardware manufacturers all over it doesn't help.

    11. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      A lot of other companies are getting into this now, but Apple has a pretty big head start, and they're not showing any signs of abandoning this practice any time soon.

      It's important to compare apples with apples :)

      I'm only partially in agreement. While HP appeared to continue dumping crappy products 7-8 years ago, it's competitor Lenovo has done a bang up job for a little more money. OS aside, Lenovo has had a decent lineup of laptops if you look at the $700+ price point. Where all laptop manufacturers failed is at providing an affordable SSD option. It took until 2015 to start seeing decent price point offerings for laptops with SSDs.

      The fact is that the Laptop manufacturer's reputation hangs from all level of products. So the $300 laptop that only lasted 3 years make HP, Lenovo and Dell look like crappy manufacturers compared to Apple's $1500 MacBook. Fact is that the $800 laptops did very much compete directly with the MacBooks while the $1200 laptops competed with the MacBook Pros.

    12. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 3, Informative

      Incorrect: Apples also have a model number, it's printed in small type on the back/underside along with the power requirements and FCC compliance statement, and looks like A####. For example, I'm typing this on a model A1416, punch that into google and you'll see exactly what I'm using without even having to leave the search result page.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    13. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      metal box = effort, got it

    14. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reading comprehension?

      IF YOU DON'T HAVE THE MACHINE

      Which part of that did you not understand?
      If you have the machine it's printed on the bottom.

    15. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      There are iFixit guides for random laptops, and for something as recent as 5 years you tend to get "accidental" cross-vendor compatibility for LCD panels (the 1366x768 15.6") and PSU so you can actually mix parts from different laptops. But brands like HP etc. are dicks and use an identical PSU with a different connector, and all your other points stand.

    16. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      Funny part is that at least in one case, even the flops have turned into massive sellers later on - the Cube (I owned one) eventually became the Mac Mini (and I would argue that it also became the 'trash can' Mac Pro, given how everything is jammed in there).

      Even their biggest flop, the Newton, had probably laid the misty design foundations for the iPod and iPhone...

      That's the thing, though - they actually pay attention to design, almost to the point of religion. Most other OEMs might at most throw one or two designers at their upcoming wares, mostly with a mission of '...and make sure it looks like that thing Apple makes...'

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    17. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by Wraithlyn · · Score: 2

      OK seriously is that a joke? I have a T61 Lenovo Thinkpad sitting right here. I haven't a clue how to figure out what year it's from. Googling "T61 thinkpad" sure doesn't help.

      With a Mac you just go to "About this Mac" in the always-visible Apple menu, and there you are... "MacBook Pro (Retina, 15-inch, Early 2013)". They could not make it any easier to tell, unless they etch the year number into the damn aluminum chassis (and who would want that?).

      Apple "makes it difficult" my ass.

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    18. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      Well, anecdotal evidence, a guy had some PC laptop with the very first i5 (32nm Westmere, dual core, four threads) which implies year 2010 or 2011 at best, 4GB RAM. Bare Windows 7 with malware. I installed Windows 7 32bit (don't care) with proper security, and the thing just didn't choke ever even when running what's apparently the most heavy task for a Windows PC : Windows Update.
      Damn thing is better than my linux desktop. Powerful hardware is powerful.

    19. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, you have to dig extremely deep to know if your PC OEM laptop was built with top-shelf parts (vidcard, memory, HDD, etc) and not 'house-brand' versions (which Dell was especially prone to do.) I've lost track of how many people thought they had a great deal only to discover that their Best-Buy purchased 'gaming' laptop only had an Intel Graphics processor, or that the RAM was only DDR2 instead of DDR3 (or the clock-speed was throttled), that the max resolution was too low (or the screen was crap quality) etc.

      If anything, the (very) wide configuration options a typical PC OEM provides to Joe Sixpack can screw him over way faster, though truth be told this is a hazard to anyone buying anything from anyone other than getting it brand-new from the OEM.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    20. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      You can buy a new PC for $300.

      ...and you get only $300 worth of quality and performance. If you buy a low-end econobox car, you'll get the same quality and performance as a low-end econobox car.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    21. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nonsense. Year and screen size (and diff form base model) would mostly give you its spec unless they upgrade

    22. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by edremy · · Score: 1
      Hmm- I just checked my order and my home PC is from August, 2007, so almost exactly 8 years old. Works just fine on Win7 64-bit, will upgrade to 10 when it gets its first service pack. I do game on it- not cutting edge, but Skyrim, Borderlands 2, Fallout NV and the like run just fine. I will admit to upgrading the video card and installing a SSD a few years back- it's mostly limited at this point by the 4GB RAM on it. I don't want to buy more since I suspect it will crap out someday and DDR2 800 isn't of much value anymore, but I have no intentions to upgrade so long as it runs.

      Don't see too many Macs from 2007 still in use. I got a new work iMac about two years back which was nice since the previous one (~2010) was almost too slow to use. An SSD would have made it tolerable (Apple mechanical HD's are the lowest tier junk out there) but of course you can't upgrade an iMac. My current one is nicer since I stuffed it with RAM and a SSD- it will probably make it 5 years.

      --
      "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
    23. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by Scoth · · Score: 1

      Granted everyone has different expectations and patience when it comes to computers and OSes, but this hasn't been my experience at all. I keep around a Dell Latitude D620 (released 2006, I think) for some uses where I need a real serial port that handled Windows 8 just fine, and still runs 10 pretty well. Bootup takes a little longer than might be ideal on its crappy slow hard drive, but it's completely usable and faster than 8 in most things. I also ran 7 and 8 on a Compaq Presario C700 laptop (was my previous laptop, released 2007) though I've stolen some parts from it so I haven't upgraded it to 10. Then I have a relatively new Thinkpad T430 as my "real" laptop, and it runs 10 brilliantly (i5, 16gb of RAM).

      Yeah, I know, anecdotes, opinion, etc, but I have no complaints. I also generally have no reason to try to resell computers, so resale value isn't a concern to me. In general, Windows has gone faster and improved performance for each version past Vista for me, on the same hardware usually.

    24. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      PC laptops are nearly always labeled with easy-to-identify model numbers that you can search for on Google or eBay. Apple makes it very difficult for the average buyer to identify which year a Macbook was built, so the neophyte buyer just sees "Macbook" and assumes it's reasonably current.

      On this old MacBook Pro I'm currently using... Apple Menu -> About This Mac: First line says "MacBook Pro (13-inch, Early 2011)"

      Yeah that was difficult.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    25. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by vux984 · · Score: 1

      There are iFixit guides for random laptops,

      Yes. But due to the limited sku count and rabid fanbase there are iFixit guides for pretty much ALL apple ones, and they're very well organized and easy to use. From identifying your unit exactly to links to parts that will be compatible.

      Take a new dell precision M4800. And head over to ifixit. Ok... PC laptop... Dell... Precision... yikes.

      There are ifixit guides for an M20 and an M65. The M65 is around 7 years old. The M20 is even older by the looks of the screenshot. The M20 has a single lower disassembly guide. The M65 just has a couple questions about unlocking a locked bios, no disassemble guide at all.

      So basically nothing at all for the M4800 specifically, and almost nothing for the entire precision line of laptops. A single lower teardown guide for a laptop made probably 8+ years ago... I doubt that's going to be helpful.

      Contrast to a recent Macbook Pro ... 25+ guides each for every model, every screen size, every year, tailored to almost every replaceable part; complete with links to tools, supplies, and replacement parts...

      Finding even just a just a complete tear down for your PC laptop is a crap shoot.

      you tend to get "accidental" cross-vendor compatibility for LCD panels

      Agreed. But finding out what you have exactly, and what is compatible from what else exactly tends to be a lot more leg work and a bit of a crap shoot.

    26. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      On this old MacBook Pro I'm currently using... Apple Menu -> About This Mac: First line says "MacBook Pro (13-inch, Early 2011)"

      Yeah that was difficult.

      How do I do that when looking at MacBooks on eBay?

      Once you have the machine in hand, it is a bit beside the point.

    27. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the $300 laptop that only lasted 3 years make HP, Lenovo and Dell look like crappy manufacturers compared to Apple's $1500 MacBook. Fact is that the $800 laptops did very much compete directly with the MacBooks while the $1200 laptops competed with the MacBook Pros.

      My crappy HP laptop was much more expensive than $300.

      Never again.

    28. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      interesting points. Here is the history of my operating system use

      Windows 3.1
      Windows 95
      Windows XP
      [skip vista]
      Windows 7
      mac osx
      ios

    29. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by vux984 · · Score: 1

      "...and you get only $300 worth of quality and performance. If you buy a low-end econobox car, you'll get the same quality and performance as a low-end econobox car."

      No dispute.

      But if all you can afford or need is an econobox; then on the PC world you can either buy a 3 year old "good laptop", or a brand new "econobox".

      There are advantages to both... but the new econobox has a new battery, and a warranty and benefited from moores law so it might well be as fast as the older one, and it comes with the latest OS, and has a USB3 port, and the power supply is brand new...

      So there's not much reason to buy a used one, unless its either really cheap, or you specifically need something obsolete. Thus used PC laptop prices are pushed very low.

      On a Mac if all you can afford is an econobox... then you buy a unit old enough that you can afford it.. Because there is no new econobox competing for your purchase. That's served (along with the other reasons I gave) to prop the price up.

    30. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      To figure out exactly what model Macbook you're getting, you need the serial number.

      Apple Menu, "About This Mac", shows you the OS version, the model name and year (for example "MacBook Pro Late 2010"), processor with clock speed, RAM, graphics card, serial number, and a button "System Report" which gives you more details than you likely want to know.

    31. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what the guy wrote:

      PC laptops are nearly always labeled with easy-to-identify model numbers that you can search for on Google or eBay. Apple makes it very difficult for the average buyer to identify which year a Macbook was built...

      Apple computers have the serial number etched on the bottom of the case. Other manufacture's model numbers don't convey build-to-order options. I know the Lenovo BTO computer models use the same number per model. If components where upgraded from the base system, you cannot tell from the model number, you need the actual serial number to find out the specifications. Either way, you need to go to somebody's website and find the information. Apple makes it easy to find this information and the current warranty coverage at their support site.

    32. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The model number doesn't convey systems specifications. The base model and build to order options use the same numbers. Its format is A#### EMC ####. The late 2013 and the early 2015 13" MBP both use A1502 with different EMC numbers. To find the actual specifications of the computer, you need the serial number, which is also etched into the bottom of every Apple computer.

    33. Re: Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by unami · · Score: 1

      how do you know that anything you buy on ebay is the thing the seller is really selling? well, yeah...

    34. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      One reason is that they've poured a lot of effort into materials design, visual design, and industrial design, and have been doing so for years. We laugh at the Toilet Seat, the Cube, and various other goofy flops they've had in their history,

      By Toilet Seat do you mean the original iBook "Clamshell" that actually looked like a clamshell? I'm not the biggest fan of the aesthetics, but it did seem very rugged, and had a convenient carry handle. Too bad it came with the god awful MacOS 8/9. In the era they did try to make computers fun and colorful when everything (including Apple) was boring beige boxes before. Granted by 2002 they were going all bleached white look, we can't blame Microsoft for the Playskool look in Windows XP. They clearly copied from Apple.

      On the Cube what was the problem other than being expensive? Obviously it inspired the design of the Mac mini.

      How about the hockey puck mouse. What an awful mouse that was. Difficult to keep right side up in your hand. I also hate the ballpoint scrollwheel on the "mighty mouse". It's so tiny I never liked it for scrolling.

    35. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      I think part of it is in the nature of OSX. in my experience, and from what I hear from others, windows operating systems tend to be much more demanding with each generation, so you may only get 2 generations of windows on a machine before performance degrades. eg you buy an XP system, it runs vista, it struggles with win7 but barely gets by, and then the machine is tapped out. But due to the way apple designs the OSX upgrades, from my personal experience a new version will run better on my old machine that the prior version. so even with an old MacBook you can still have the latest and greatest software.

      I've never heard of anyone EVER say a machine ran Vista, and struggles with Win7.

      The biggest thing I've seen is Driver support. If a machine runs XP great, but does not have Vista/7 specific drivers, and has to run XP drivers, performance will degrade. Specifically graphics cards, as the driver model is different between XP and Vista/7. For example, Intel GMA 910/915 was on systems marked "Vista ready", but only had "XPDM", not "WDDM" drivers, so performance suffered, and some features like Aero were flat out not available.

      I had a laptop that shipped with Vista. I hated it and downgraded to XP. 2 years later I upgraded to Windows 7 and it ran fantastic.

      Love or hate the forced Metro dialog boxes, newer machines with full Windows 8 driver support will run Windows 8.1 better than Windows 7 (even when they have full drivers for Windows 7 too). Microsoft has not appreciably increased the actual minimum requirements since Vista, but there's a lot of great improvements in the kernel. One problem is Software companies (like Mozilla), and website makers (anyone that uses heavy flash or Javascript) make the web experience on older machines miserable, and a lot of people blame the OS maker.

      Apple drops support for older hardware too. Yosemite requires a 2007 or newer iMac, and requires 2GB RAM. Machines from the same vintage, with the same specs will run Win 8.1 / Win 10 as well.

    36. Re: Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol, there speaks someone clueless. An M65 is so easy to maintain a tear down manual is not needed, unlike the up repairable garbage that is crapple.

    37. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by MikeMo · · Score: 1

      They are not commodity computers. There is a "commodity" cpu, the chipset, but the rest of the MB is totally unique, designed by Apple, and made from top shelf components. Then there's the shell, which is made from a solid piece of aluminium. It adds a lot of nice stiffness to the thing. Of course, this may be of no value to some folks.

    38. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Or if all you want is 6 year old hardware, you can pay considerably less on a used laptop. Why would I spend $300 on a pos shiny new budget entry level HP netbook with a crappy Pentium/Celery/Atom?

      Case in point, I have just started a university course and wanted a portable. $AUD50 (that's about $US35) bought me a Core 2 Duo with 3GB RAM and a 250GB HD (no bad sectors). It's winter, so I save on heating.

      It came with a 3 month warranty, 90 mins of battery life, and a re-imaged install of Windows 7, now upgraded to Windows 10 Home. When I get tired of Windows 10 I'll swap in my 128GB SSD running debian to give the machine a speed boost, which cost more than the laptop - 2 computers ago.

      And I can leave this laptop in a busy library while I pee - no one's going to steal a scratched up Toshiba when all the cool kids half my age leave unattended $1000 macbooks. :)

    39. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      I think my mbp is 2008. I bought it in summer of 2009, but I may have purchased the last year's model to save $$. so does that mean it will be capped out after el capitan? by the way, did I say how disappointed I was at their name choice? el capitan is located in Yosemite. I would have chosen Mojave or Joshua tree.

    40. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      True (the 2014 models are also A1502, MBP 11,1), and a fair correction. However the point stands that it isn't necessary to switch on an Apple to find out its specifications, though I'd add that the System Profiler is the best way to see what you're getting in a second hand machine.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    41. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      How do I do that when looking at MacBooks on eBay?

      Ask the seller to do it for you. If they can't (or won't), don't bid.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    42. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 1

      While HP appeared to continue dumping crappy products 7-8 years ago, it's competitor Lenovo has done a bang up job for a little more money.

      7-8 years ago, yes. Apple released the Toilet Seat in 1999, and the Cube in 2000. That's another 15-16 years for those products alone, years before IBM sold their laptop business to Lenovo.

      Back then, the design efforts of most other computer manufacturers focused on "how can we most efficiently construct and customize our machines?" You'll recall that Dell was doing some really clever stuff in terms of streamlining the manufacturing process, in particular; lots fewer screws, lots more quick-release tabs and easy-connect parts. This did wonders for manufacturing costs, and is what catapulted them ahead for a time--but they, like pretty much every other PC maker, were focusing on "how do we make what we already have cheaper/easier to build". They were chasing the margins. Eventually, the margins became too thin, and the big producers imploded in a hail of flimsy cases, cheap components and margins that you'd cut yourself on.

      That's why I say that Apple had a big head-start. Today, lots of PC makers are making some pretty hefty investments in the same sorts of quality and novelty design areas that Apple has been doing for ages. They're still at a disadvantage, though, because it can take a long time and a lot of money to build up a solid in-house design group, and few companies share Apple's luxury of mountains of cash money lying about to do these sorts of blue-sky experiments with their production lines.

      --

      Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    43. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 1

      On the Cube what was the problem other than being expensive? Obviously it inspired the design of the Mac mini.

      In addition to being expensive, it had problems with overheating (recall it was a fanless design) and the acrylic case had a bad habit of developing cosmetic hairline cracks early on. These problems hit early and hard and got lots of press. They fixed the problem with the case, but the heat was still an issue; at any rate, it was too little, too late.

      That said, they learned from these mistakes. The Cube was effectively an early predecessor of the (very successful) Mac Mini.

      --

      Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    44. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

      You can buy a new PC for $300.

      ...and you get only $300 worth of quality and performance. If you buy a low-end econobox car, you'll get the same quality and performance as a low-end econobox car.

      For $300 you can get a very nice chromebook, zippy fast, very tiny, decent quality. They run various flavors of linux so you're not stuck in google land.

    45. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You realize that you can't "just go" to anything when you're being sold a sealed box or over the internet, right?

      At least with a T61 model number, it's painfully easy to know if it's better than my (for example) T42.

    46. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by tw2k · · Score: 1

      If you don't have the physical machine, where are you going to get the serial number from?

    47. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by tw2k · · Score: 1

      Come on, this is rubbish. The Wintel PC industry is no better. Just been to Dell's site, picked a model at random and now I see I can have a Dell Latitude 3450 a Dell Latitude 3450 a Dell Latitude 3450 or a (wait for it) Dell Latitude 3450. The differences between those 4 model numbers(!) are a CPU that ranges from celeron to an i5, different ram, different amounts of storage etc. There are also 5000, 6 and 7000 series there, but nothing to describe, in real terms, what the differences in those ranges are, just a bit of marketing blurb about who they are targeted at. All those numbers might mean something to someone but at best, they just distinguish between the many types of models in the current range the distinction that Apple manages via the model name, not a number.

    48. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      There was a time I understood this during the PPC era of mac, but now that macs run on commodity, non specialized CISC based x86, I have no idea why they retain their value. A lot of PC makers are starting to make machines that look *almost* as nice as a MBP. My HP Envy Beats laptops have a nice aluminum case.

      What I don't understand about the 'macs retain their value!' thing is not the hardware side(macs indeed tend to have excellent build quality and, unless one of the specific cursed models, reliability); but the fact that the OSX upgrade pace is so ruthless; and Apple has so many of the 3rd party developers onboard.

      An older PC may be a piece of shit held together with spit and duct tape; but whiny corporate customers and driver releases from assorted device and chip vendors mean that even surprisingly ancient PC hardware can be upgraded long, long, after it was made(though it'll probably need more RAM if you want to enjoy the process). Plus, while running an OS that doesn't get security patches anymore is insane, 3rd party vendors tend to support OSes 1 or 2, sometimes more, versions behind the latest release, so the only programs that effectively exclude old hardware are the ones that simply demand too much power.

      OSX goes through versions swiftly, leaves models in its wake without mercy; and 3rd party vendors are usually pretty quick to also move to the new-and-shiny OS version, with support for users of older OSes confined to making old versions of their products available, if that.

      That is what puzzles me: The mac is likely to be in excellent physical condition after all those years; but it will be much closer to being stricken from the OSX upgrades list; and once that happens 3rd party support also dwindles pretty quickly. That would seem to cut a lot of the value off, unless you have a particular legacy app you need to support; or are planning on bootcamping/running Linux anyway.

    49. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      Don't see too many Macs from 2007 still in use. I got a new work iMac about two years back which was nice since the previous one (~2010) was almost too slow to use.

      I have a 27" 2010 iMac at home, and it works fine. The only upgrade I did to it was to add 2 4GB DIMMs to bring it up to 12 GB total. My in-laws & cousin both have 2008 iMacs. The in-laws use a 20" at their business. My cousin uses his 24" iMac mostly for web surfing & e-mail.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    50. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      The lack of flexing on the display when I opened it was a big factor for me. Some of the laptops out there made me feel like I was going to put a crack in the display.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    51. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you can get a current OSX image you can install it

      It's actually better than that - for many years now Macs have been able to bare-metal install the OS over the internet. I had to do that one time after a totally borked wipe attempt. I formatted the drive, booted it up, pressed the magic key config (which I'd have to google again) and it spent the next 3-4 hrs downloading the factory install of OSX over the internet and installing it.

      With the free OS upgrades, it then upgraded itself to the current version over the next several hours.

    52. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      There was a time I understood this during the PPC era of mac, but now that macs run on commodity, non specialized CISC based x86, I have no idea why they retain their value. A lot of PC makers are starting to make machines that look *almost* as nice as a MBP. My HP Envy Beats laptops have a nice aluminum case.

      Have you tried using an old Mac?

      My 2007 Macbook Pro still gets used very often. Runs the latest OSX, 2.4 GHz dual core, 4GB RAM, GeForce 8600GT/256MB, 160GB HD, Dual DVI, 1440x900 screen, 2560x1600 on the Cinema HD 30" external screen. It weighs 2.4 kg in a very nice slim (for 2007) aluminium case and still gets 4+ hours of battery life. It really is a good solid machine with lots of attention to detail, like the keys that light up if it gets dark, built in microphone and camera, ...

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
    53. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My new job has Dell's 7440's, my old job had macbook pro's (2010,2012).
      The macbooks traveled to Africa, South America, Asia and practically no physical damage.
      The Dell's tend to stay in the office, or just back and forth to the employee's home, a few times a month.
      I had to replace about 15% of the Dell screens in less than a year.
      The Dell's were $200 more than the macbooks.

    54. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by vux984 · · Score: 1

      90 mins of battery life

      One reason why almost nobody wants it; especially for school.

      It's winter, so I save on heating.

      Another reason why no one wants it. (Laptops that run hot are irritating to use... you can have them on your lap, and even on a desk, i hate typing on a "hot" keyboard, or listening to the fans.

      Core 2 Duo [...] Why would I spend $300 on a pos shiny new budget entry level HP netbook with a crappy Pentium/Celery/Atom?

      Don't be too snobby about about the cpu "branding"... 6 years is a long time.

      A 6 year old core 2 duo mobile... say the Dore 2 Duo (SL9400) released in 2008 benchmarks at 1313; a Core 2 Duo T5200 also from 2006 benchmarks at 836.

      A new Celeron N3150 benchmarks 1354.
      A new Pentium N3700 benchmarks faster at 1923
      A new Atom Z3770 (baytrail) benchmarks at 1272

      (benchmarks from cpubenchmark.net)

      If you think your Core 2 Duo is perfectly serviceable; you'll find their are lots of "crappy" Celeron/Pentium/Atom's" that can now match or even comfortably outperform it. While drawing a fraction of the wattage, giving you much better battery life.

      and a 250GB HD (no bad sectors)

      Ugh.. a 6 year old 5400 rpm laptop hard drive. Do yourself a favor and swap in an SSD :)

      All that said... you paid $35US for it... so its still a REALLY good value. But its not want what most people would want... or would even tolerate if they could get something better.

      And I can leave this laptop in a busy library while I pee - no one's going to steal a scratched up Toshiba when all the cool kids half my age leave unattended $1000 macbooks. :)

      Don't worry, as long as someone left a macbook air unattended even a new dell is safe. :) Always park next to something nicer than yours, right? :)

    55. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      yes that is true, though I have never owned a mac laptop and have had plenty of laptops without the display flexing. its interesting because the only ones I seem to recall having that problem are the absolute cheapest available, which is saying this yougo has thin panels, buy a Bentley

    56. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      One reason why almost nobody wants it; especially for school.

      I can plug in at many places, so a 90 min limit is a good excuse for a coffee break. :) I'm typically carrying 5kg in my backpack, so a power brick doesn't bother me!

      Don't be too snobby about about the cpu "branding"... 6 years is a long time.

      I'm referring more to the low end CPUs being intentionally crippled by Intel for the low-cost/tablet market to limit them to a 1 or 2 GB - I wouldn't spend $300 on such a machine. Like I said, mainstream manufacturers like HP are still selling low-end devices with WXGA 14" screens that max out at 2GB. I didn't check Dell/Lenovo at that price point but their models seemed 25% extra at my local shop.

      i hate typing on a "hot" keyboard, or listening to the fans.

      No problems with the keyboard. The fan does get noisy but libraries are surprising loud, even in the 'quiet area' zones. So I usually have a pair of headphones. :)

      Don't get me wrong, I do appreciate quiet and have a fanless machine at home - this is purely a portable device with a screen.

      Do yourself a favor and swap in an SSD :)

      Like I said, I do have a debian testing SSD on standby for when I'm done playing with Win 10.

      To summarize, a $US35 laptop isn't for everyone - if I were working professionally and needed a laptop for work I'd probably look at a Surface Pro 4. But equally, I'll save my money by not shelling out for a new 'budget' machine.

    57. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      On this old MacBook Pro I'm currently using... Apple Menu -> About This Mac: First line says "MacBook Pro (13-inch, Early 2011)"

      Yeah that was difficult.

      How do I do that when looking at MacBooks on eBay?

      Once you have the machine in hand, it is a bit beside the point.

      How do you check what you're actually buying for anything on eBay? With Apple products, you can at least easily check once its there.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    58. Re:Could someone ELI5 how Macbooks retain value? by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Hmm- I just checked my order and my home PC is from August, 2007, so almost exactly 8 years old. Works just fine on Win7 64-bit, will upgrade to 10 when it gets its first service pack. I do game on it- not cutting edge, but Skyrim, Borderlands 2, Fallout NV and the like run just fine.

      Would this PC be a desktop? Which are either more powerful than laptops (what the parent was talking about) for the same amount of money, or less money for similar CPU's and GPU's. In which case, I would hope so.

  6. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The BEST laptop is a pen and paper.

    Hyperboble is mine.

  7. Fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And gay.

    1. Re:Fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And gay.

      That is what your mother says about you.

  8. meh, keep OS X on your macbook by WSOGMM · · Score: 1

    If you're interested in using windows, keep it on your desktop. In my experience, macbooks mesh a little better in research/workplace environments than windows laptops. For desktops on the other hand, where you might actually need some power (for gaming, design, personal computation, etc), windows is still king of compatibility.

    1. Re:meh, keep OS X on your macbook by macs4all · · Score: 1

      If you're interested in using windows, keep it on your desktop. In my experience, macbooks mesh a little better in research/workplace environments than windows laptops. For desktops on the other hand, where you might actually need some power (for gaming, design, personal computation, etc), windows is still king of compatibility.

      So, you're actually going to post on Slashdot that Windows is more "powerful" than UNIX?

    2. Re:meh, keep OS X on your macbook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I hope your job doesn't require any reading comprehension skills.

    3. Re:meh, keep OS X on your macbook by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Are you really going to argue that a desktop isn't more powerful than a laptop?

      The comment was that Windows is the king of compatibility and that desktops are where the power is (faster/more drives, more powerful processors, more memory).

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    4. Re:meh, keep OS X on your macbook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you're actually going to post on Slashdot that Windows is more "powerful" than UNIX?

      Yes, it is. Unquestionably. Shitty UNIX design has no place in the modern world. Thank god Linux and OSX managed to subvert the shitty kernel architecture and improve upon it.

    5. Re:meh, keep OS X on your macbook by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > Are you really going to argue that a desktop isn't more powerful than a laptop?

      Mine is. But then again, I don't buy Apple laptops or laptops that try to be Apple wannabes.

      Mac laptops "powerful"??? as if...

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    6. Re:meh, keep OS X on your macbook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are really going to imply that Macs run UNIX? On Slashdot !?!?

      If you are going to be an ahole, at least you should make sure that you don't leave yourself an easy target, fanboi. (Term is justified, look at your nickname. If anyone should understand that Macs run a modified BSD it should be you.)

    7. Re:meh, keep OS X on your macbook by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Are you really going to argue that a desktop isn't more powerful than a laptop?

      Depends on the Desktop and the Laptop, now doesn't it? Are you really going to argue that a $600 Dell POS desktop is more powerful than a tricked-out $3000 MacBook Pro?

      BTW, in case you didn't know, Apple makes at least 3 "desktop" machine-lines; and one of them is pretty damned powerful, and the other isn't so bad, neither. The third one is the economy model; but for a lot of uses, it does just fine.

      And I notice you didn't address the relative "power" of a UNIX-based OS vs. Windows. Wonder why?

    8. Re:meh, keep OS X on your macbook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope your job doesn't require any reading comprehension skills.

      Great One. Just wish I had mod points left for this AC!

    9. Re:meh, keep OS X on your macbook by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Read the comment you originally responded to again. He wasn't comparing Apple to Microsoft. He was comparing Desktop to Laptop. It doesn't matter how powerful Apple's desktops are, desktops are inherently more powerful than laptops. The Mac Pro is more powerful than the Macbook Pro, and always will be (for the same generation). You can't get 32 or 64 GB of ram in a laptop (yet), you can't get 4 hard drives in a laptop (likely ever).

      You came up with the relative power, it was a strawman that wasn't in the original post you replied to. There was no need to respond to the strawman you came up with.

      This is one point s/he made:

      windows is still king of compatibility

      This is the other point:

      For desktops on the other hand, where you might actually need some power

      The point was that desktops are more powerful than laptops, not that Windows is more powerful than Unix. The other point was that Windows is still king of compatibility. Can you refute either of those points? Your response didn't address either of them, and I attempted to point that out to you.

      I know all about what Apple designed, but that has 0 bearing on the comment you replied to.

      As far as the Dell $600 computer, it depends, at different times Dell has come out with $600 computers that run circles around the current at the time Apple models, so just writing them off as POS is silly. Also, why would you compare a $600 Dell instead of a $2000 Dell that would beat the pants off of the $3000 Macbook pro?

      http://configure.us.dell.com/d...

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  9. Mac has a firewall... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 4, Interesting
    .... so that might be beneficial if this is correct: A Traffic Analysis of Windows 10

    Some Czech guy did a traffic analysis of data produced by Windows 10, and released his findings the other day. His primary thesis was that Windows 10 acts more like a terminal than an operating system -- because of the extent of the "cloud" integration, a large portion of the OS functions are almost dependent on remote (Microsoft's) servers. The amount of collected information, even with strict privacy settings, is quite alarming. ... All text typed on the keyboard is stored in temporary files, and sent (once per 30 mins) to:...

    1. Re:Mac has a firewall... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you install Windows on your mac laptop there is no mac firewall. Instead, you have the Windows firewall.

      On the other hand, if you buy a mac, you might as well keep OS X installed which has the side benefit of not sending spy information to Microsoft.

    2. Re:Mac has a firewall... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This kind of thing is a real concern with Windows 10, but the article you linked to is overblown. It looks like he was doing analysis on a Windows Insider build. Microsoft were public from the beginning that these builds are reporting everything up to and including keylogging.

    3. Re:Mac has a firewall... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows 10 RTM has a keylogger that cannot be disabled in the start menu search function, which also happens to be tied directly into the Microsoft store.

    4. Re:Mac has a firewall... by laffer1 · · Score: 1

      True, but OS X has a lot of 0 days lately giving root access. You don't run OS X for security.

  10. HelpDesk Review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had a co-worker on the HD (Hi Josh!) years ago state that he'd never own an Apple computer. Just didn't like OS X.

    Then a few years ago (we've since both left the company) he shoots me an email to announce that he was running Windows on a Macbook Pro! He simply couldn't believe how damn FAST the thing was, nor that he was able to completely blow out the Apple OS and make it 100% Windows OS.

    And this we before SSDs came into play...

    1. Re:HelpDesk Review by macs4all · · Score: 1

      He simply couldn't believe how damn FAST the thing was, nor that he was able to completely blow out the Apple OS and make it 100% Windows OS.

      I'm glad he got half-wise; but he "blew out" the best part of owning a Mac: OS X.

      I work all day as an application developer in Windows, and have for decades. I also have to do some Admin work on Windows Servers (many different versions). So I know the difference.

    2. Re:HelpDesk Review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well not only have I written programs for Windows, Linux, Mac, BSD, Android, ChromeOS, and Blackberry; but I have maintained all of those systems, and I did so while working at Area 53 (its on the moon) and in my experience Macs don't charge very fast in 0G environments. Therefore I recommend running PC hardware and Blackberry software as it makes the best combination. Ohh and all anecdotal experiences should be taken as proof, because people on the internet don't lie.

    3. Re:HelpDesk Review by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Well not only have I written programs for Windows, Linux, Mac, BSD, Android, ChromeOS, and Blackberry; but I have maintained all of those systems, and I did so while working at Area 53 (its on the moon) and in my experience Macs don't charge very fast in 0G environments.

      I actually got a chuckle out of that. But I have to ask why you feel the need to come to someone else's defense.

    4. Re:HelpDesk Review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One could ask the same of you, macs4all. Always coming to Apple's defense. Why?

    5. Re:HelpDesk Review by macs4all · · Score: 1

      One could ask the same of you, macs4all. Always coming to Apple's defense. Why?

      The answer is simple: I have enjoyed using Apple's products for many decades; and considering the horseshit lies and over-the-top innuendos regarding Apple products and policies that are propagated by a certain group of Slashdotters, I feel that it is somewhat important to attempt to correct those lies and innuendos whenever I encounter them.

      Is Apple perfect? Fuck no! But they do at least TRY to do the right thing, and to actually listen to their users, and that, my friend, is a rarity among businesses.

      Oh yeah, and they do build some of the best-in-class computers, phones, portable music players and tablets on the market. They may not have the most number of ports and geegaws; but what they have works, and works very well, and works seamlessly with their software. Which again, is a rarity. And then their are their software products. I believe that, by and large, they do a bangup job on their OSes, and most of their other software offerings. And they have also offered many unique and improved technologies as Open Source Projects, and have also kept things like CUPS as Open Source, when they could have just given a big middle-finger to Linux when they purchased same.

      So yeah, I think that Apple gets maligned far too much in these pages, and, considering their products and their track record, actually deserves a little defending.

      Oh and unlike YOU, Mr. COWARD, at least I have the balls to stick my Karma on the line (something I have regretted more than once!). BIG DIFFERENCE!

  11. Something's In the Air... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm on my second Macbook Air. Delightful design, and I'm sure that Windows would work just fine on it, for those insane enough to try it.
    But...
    The translucent Apple logo on the lid is only lightly glued in, and tends to go walkabout. Not much of an issue.
    More seriously, the plastic sleeving on the power cord disintegrates. This is a known issue, but not much of a problem unless the shield wiring comes across exposed AC pins on the loosely plugged in Power Adapter.
    Clear the short, reset the House Breaker, and you are good to go.
    Otherwise, my next Computer will be the next generation Macbook Air, which would be my 15th Mac.
    They're that good.

  12. It could be if..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it had a touch screen. I've been using hybrids for YEARS. almost a decade now & I won't go back to a dedicated laptop. If Apple wants me to give up my Surface Pro, I'm gonna need to see a MacBook where I can remove the screen from the keyboard.

    If Apple bought parallels and built it into OSX. My roommate runs windows on his Mac thanks to it. But its a different and weird animal.

    1. Re:It could be if..... by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Yes and yes. I would be hard pressed to buy anything that isn't a convertible form factor after having a Sony flip for a while. W10 is made with touch and pen input in mind. Throwing that away by buying a mac is giving up some of the coolest features.

      Of course, it would still be a waste because the battery life of a mac running windows sucks (or, at least, is no standout). Sadly, macs fare no better under windows when it comes to battery life than regular windows. Windows simply does not prioritize battery life and optimize the overall system like OSX does, and there's no getting around the straight up physics of the backlight, graphics, processor and memory when it comes to using power.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    2. Re:It could be if..... by macs4all · · Score: 1

      If it had a touch screen. I've been using hybrids for YEARS. almost a decade now & I won't go back to a dedicated laptop. If Apple wants me to give up my Surface Pro, I'm gonna need to see a MacBook where I can remove the screen from the keyboard.

      If Apple bought parallels and built it into OSX. My roommate runs windows on his Mac thanks to it. But its a different and weird animal.

      Since Apple is the King of Touch; how many Touch-hybrid Macbook and iMac prototypes do you think are lurking in the Apple Labs? Do you REALLY think they've never generated an internal Touch-based version of OS X?

      There is a very good reason why they have kept Touch out of OS X. But use their Trackpads and Mice and you'll see why "their way" is actually better in most cases.

      And "Gorilla Arm" is a real thing. Don't believe it? Hold your hand out in front of your chest for about 2 minutes. Even after about 30 seconds it gets to be tiring. It works for Tablets because you don't use them at the same angles as you do a laptop. And imagine owning a Touch-enabled iMac. I used to think I wanted just such a thing; but after experimenting with my (non-touch) monitor, I quickly realized that Apple knows what they're doing in not jumping on the Touch-hybrid bandwagon.

    3. Re:It could be if..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.modbook.com

      They convert a MacBook Pro into a graphic tablet (high resolution, pressure sensitive and angle sensitive touch screen).

    4. Re:It could be if..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Bookmarked this post. I am willing to bet 100 dollars that when Apple comes out with a touch screen Mac that you completely flip flop and claim its the best thing since sliced bread. Care to take me up on that?

    5. Re:It could be if..... by cbhacking · · Score: 2

      Historically, the reason that Macs had poor battery life under Windows was because Apple did not provide worthwhile drivers for their (proprietary) hardware, leading to things like fans that ran at full speed constantly, rather than running on demand. It was 100% Apple's fault; Windows has plenty of features for reducing power usage, but the Bootcamp-provided drivers - the only ones that work at all, in most cases, on Apple hardware - didn't support low-power states.

      Now, this was on 2007-2009 hardware, which is a long time ago. Maybe Apple has decided that it's worth making their machines run a little better under their competitor's OS now. After all, it's obvious that it's their fault and users are totally savvy enough to blame Apple, instead of blaming Microsoft, when a MacBook has bad battery life in Windows... right?

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    6. Re:It could be if..... by macs4all · · Score: 0

      Bookmarked this post. I am willing to bet 100 dollars that when Apple comes out with a touch screen Mac that you completely flip flop and claim its the best thing since sliced bread. Care to take me up on that?

      I will only do that if they don't do it stupid like I see HP and others doing, with the damned "flip the screen over so the keyboard is on the OUTSIDE of the "tablet" ".

      "Tent mode" indeed!

      But seriously, don't you think that if Apple was going to enter the "convertible" market, they would have done so by now. And besides, they don't want to eviscerate the market for iPads. Apple is VERY conscious to NOT compete with themselves. Haven't you noticed that? Jobs even talked about that in the Keynote where he introduced the iPad.

    7. Re:It could be if..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The coolest design i've seen for a convertable had the screen flip over horizontally in the top half of the laptop so that you just closed the laptop only now the screen is on the outside.

      Way better than the ones where you have to spin the monitor around (*snap* no! not that direction!) and then close it again.

      Which is still better than pressing all the keys while you're trying to hold the damn thing in "tablet" mode.

    8. Re: It could be if..... by unami · · Score: 1

      i'm pretty sure, they haven't optimized their windows drivers. they are the only pc-macer whose sales increase, let alone their profits. why should they make windows run on their machine as good as osx - this makes zero sense for them and their business-model (including locking people into their eco-system). if you have some windows apps, you can't live without, get parallels, and if you really need windows, sure use bootcamp, if you have to - and have fun with old drivers & a keyboard not very suited for windows. just so that you are reminded of the frustrating days you had back in your windows-past.

    9. Re:It could be if..... by ElderKorean · · Score: 1
      I work in a school where some of the student/teacher laptops are touch and some not.

      I don't need or want touch on a desktop - I've got a full keyboard and and a real mouse.

      On my personal macbook pro - touch would be nice, but the mac's touch-pad is pretty sweet, though occasionally I connect a real mouse

      On last year's laptop, a 12" windows laptop with a tiny touch-pad - it is crying out for a touch screen.

      On this year's model laptops that have windows 8, touch screen and a touch-pad too - it is awesome.

      For fast use the touch screen, clicking dialog boxes, installing software, fixing things - you generally don't have to keep typing.

      For accurate use the touch-pad. editing, anything that uses both keyboard and mouse.

  13. 2 of the Worst Drivers to Buy a Computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    1. Design
    2. Resell Value

    Sure, they can be factors if everything else is a tie...

    That is, unless by "Design" they mean "weight, size, form factor" instead of "Apple Logo".

  14. Re:Windows 10 is for cows. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are all cows. Cows say moo. MOOOOOOO! MOOOOOOO! Moo cows MOOOOO! Moo say the cows. YOU WINDOWS 10 COWS!!

    Hilarious. -_-

  15. All very good reasons, except for one deal killer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I can't believe Apple made such a crappy touch screen. It's totally unresponsive.

  16. second mouse button by Nukenbar · · Score: 1

    Be wary of this if you are used to a windows laptop because not having a dedicated second mouse button takes some getting used to.

    1. Re:second mouse button by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Be wary of this if you are used to a windows laptop because not having a dedicated second mouse button takes some getting used to.

      The Apple Bootcamp drivers make it so two-fingered click is right-click. Have to admit, it's pretty damn easy and convenient to use once you get used to it. or if you're using a Mac, it comes naturally.

    2. Re:second mouse button by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The mouse can be configured to handle left and right clicks, all you need to do is enable it in settings.

    3. Re:second mouse button by wbo · · Score: 1

      The problem is, until very recently the Apple touch-pad driver for Window had a nasty bug that would cause a blue screen of death at random times (usually immediately after a two-fingered click.)

      Fortunately the latest driver update appears to have fixed the problem, but Apple has had numerous bugs in their Bootcamp drivers that have resulted in catastrophic blue screens so I typically try to avoid using them whenever possible. I have much better luck using drivers directly from Intel, nVidia, etc than the "customized" versions that Apple packages up in their installer.

    4. Re:second mouse button by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      Apple's Windows drivers are, and always have been, a total shit-show. Gaping security holes allowing trivial local EoP, lack of power management support so Macs run noisier and have substantially less battery life under Windows than under OS X, lower-performance graphics drivers than the ones from the GPU maker, and (as you say) stability issues.

      Apple has made Windows on a Mac a decidedly second-class experience, and that seems to be by design. Even their user-space software shows it; iTunes for Windows (or Safari, when that was a thing, or Quicktime, when anybody cared) has always been a much worse user experience than on Mac OS.

      Also, since we're talking about touch pads: clickpads suck, always have, and probably always will. Multi-touch helps (although two-finger click is no substitute for a dedicated hardware button), the pressure required to click is always too high (because if they made it closer to what a button's pressure would be, you'd click by accident, because some moron decided the whole tracking surface needed to be the button...), and gestures alone will never match the kinds of things you can have with gestures (which all PCs have supported for at least five years now) plus hardware buttons.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    5. Re:second mouse button by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      I can't believe with the Awful state Quicktime, Safari, and iTunes runs on Windows that anyone buys Apple products. Especially when they used to buddle each other, so an attempt to install Quicktime (when it was a thing to watch online videos) meant somehow you got a terrible web browser, and a monstrous music player that started 45 background services.

      On iTunes, I have an iPod touch that's a decent music and video player, but I can't stand iTunes. I use CopyTransManager to sync music and videos, and i-Funbox to sync files to other applications.

  17. Instead of advertising for Apple and Microsoft, by LichtSpektren · · Score: 5, Insightful

    why not advertise for System76 and other companies that sell good hardware with Linux pre-installed?

    1. Re:Instead of advertising for Apple and Microsoft, by phantomfive · · Score: 0

      Because a Mac might be the best Linux laptop, too........

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:Instead of advertising for Apple and Microsoft, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the build quality of their laptops is kind of lacking. I've owned 2 over the last 5 years and they both have horrid trackpads and cheap keyboards. And since they are basically "off the shelf" components, there's little innovation going on in terms of weight or extended battery life designs. You buy System 76 because the stuff is highly compatible with Linux, not because they are high quality laptops.

    3. Re:Instead of advertising for Apple and Microsoft, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      System76 is overpriced imo, you'd do better buying like a dell xps or something with linux on it
      ZaReason is much more fairly priced, but even then I think you might be able to do better buying a similar laptop much cheaper and putting linux on it yourself

  18. What about touch interfaces? by mamono · · Score: 4, Informative

    There are no MacBooks with touch screens (and unlikely to be one any time soon). All newer Windows versions are so heavily touch-oriented I don't see how the TFA could be true. Even with a keyboard and mouse attached, the touch interface has it's advantages. I often find myself occasionally trying to use my finger to navigate a non-touch laptop and then remember "oh yeah, no touch interface".

    1. Re:What about touch interfaces? by Vyse+of+Arcadia · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't call Windows 10 heavily touch-oriented. The touch stuff is there, but only in tablet mode. Otherwise, the whole interface, and that includes the "metro" apps, is closer to Win7 than Win8.

      That said, with my touchscreen laptop, it is nice to jab my finger at onscreen buttons occasionally rather than drag the cursor all the way over there.

    2. Re:What about touch interfaces? by cbhacking · · Score: 2

      As you say, touch is very helpful even when not using a "touch-oriented" interface. When my girlfriend and I are watching Netflix on her machine, it's a lot easier to poke the screen where the play/pause button appears than to move the mouse pointer to that button, click it, and then move it off again so the playback controls vanish. When using a trackpad, it can actually be easier to do things like swipe up on a taskbar icon (check it out: this does the same thing as right-clicking on the icon, displaying the jump list; this feature was added in Win7) than to move the pointer down there and right-click it. When reading over somebody's shoulder, scrolling (in, say, a web page or PDF) with a fingertip is a lot easier than grabbing the mouse or keyboard, especially if you're standing.

      There are a lot of places where touch is a win, even on devices that you aren't using like a tablet. Of course, that gets even more true with the increasing number of "2-in-1" Windows laptops that can detach or fold away their keyboards, becoming quite respectable tablets; my Yoga 2 Pro, for example, can easily be used on an airplane tray-table with the keyboard folded back 315 degrees and acting as a stand for the screen. Never mind that a Mac's hinge won't go even close to 180 degrees, it would be useless if it could unless you had some peripheral like a mouse (that doesn't fit on the small surface)

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    3. Re:What about touch interfaces? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't call Windows 10 heavily touch-oriented. The touch stuff is there, but only in tablet mode. Otherwise, the whole interface, and that includes the "metro" apps, is closer to Win7 than Win8.

      That's only if you don't know what changed under the box. Windows 10 has sloppy access to hit points on windows from the touch screen. Resize a window with your finger on Windows 7? Good luck. Windows 8? Well the window border was like 5 pixels wide. Windows 10? It looks like Windows 7 but the border is still easily accessible via touch.

      Buttons are easier to click with rough clicks in the areas registering as hits on many interfaces. Their default browser is more touch friendly, the start menu has large hit tiles and bigger spacing between options, and let's not get started about the control panel. Then consider the side bar from swipe, again with BIG buttons easy to push with fingers and then let's not forget the default install of One Note which is about as touch oriented as a program can get.

      I agree tablet mode is a steaming turd that went too far (unable to access the desktop, all apps are full screen, wtf!) but to say Windows 10 is like Windows 7 and not touch friendly couldn't be further from the truth.

    4. Re:What about touch interfaces? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, what I was thinking. Mac's are ancient tech now, and will never support the benefits of touch...

      I use touch on my tablet, my laptop and my desktop ( Multi-touch in all cases ) - Sometimes I just prefer it that way - even if I don't use it a lot, I do miss it when it's not there.

      The best Windows 10 system? Probably surface. Being able to write on the screen is fantastic. Yeah, I know it's not a laptop... But laptops are only relocatable desktops nowadays.

      If not for touch, you might as well stay with Windows 7.

    5. Re:What about touch interfaces? by Vyse+of+Arcadia · · Score: 1

      I never said Win10 wasn't touch friendly, I said it wasn't touch oriented. Unlike Win8, it doesn't feel like you need a touchscreen to use it, but if you do have a touchscreen it's pretty nice.

    6. Re:What about touch interfaces? by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      When my girlfriend and I are watching Netflix on her machine, it's a lot easier to poke the screen where the play/pause button appears than to move the mouse pointer to that button, click it, and then move it off again so the playback controls vanish.

      Even easier: the spacebar. Closer to you than the screen, and avoids gorilla arm.

  19. Car Analogy #1 by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

    "Could The Best Chevrolet Be A Bentley?"

    Slashdot, where art thou?

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Car Analogy #1 by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      I'd love to see the look on some pompous limeys face when he popped the hood on a Bentley and found a thumping rat.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:Car Analogy #1 by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      I'd love to see the look on some pompous limeys face when he popped the hood on a Bentley and found a thumping rat.

      Where I live, the only Bentleys I see are driven by Chicago Bulls players (I live a few blocks from a Bulls practice facility. When I first moved here, I noticed a lot of very tall, very well-dressed black men driving Aston Martins, Bentleys, and a shorter guy (probably a point guard) driving an Audi A8. Once I even saw a Koenigsegg and the guy was coming out of the gym and I was walking the dog. I told him "I drive that car in Need For Speed Rivals" and he laughed and said, "Good choice". I didn't have the heart to tell him that, at least in the game, the the LaFerrari was a better choice.

      [true story]

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    3. Re:Car Analogy #1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like "Could the best platform for Chevy's newest engine be a Bentley?"

  20. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  21. Resale value is worthless when outdated by Khyber · · Score: 1, Troll

    "Also MacBooks have a higher resell value, retaining up to 50% of their price after five years."

    They may maintain up to 50% of their price, but most certainly don't retain 50% of their usability. You're stuck on obsolete programs and OS updates.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    1. Re:Resale value is worthless when outdated by null+etc. · · Score: 1

      They used to retain up to 50% of their resale value, before Apple started aggressively obsoleting their own hardware every year or two. They certainly don't now, at least for the former high-end MacBooks that now only match specs with current mid-end MacBooks.

    2. Re:Resale value is worthless when outdated by plasm4 · · Score: 1

      Mine is just about 5 years old. I'm running the newest versions of everything still.

    3. Re:Resale value is worthless when outdated by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

      before Apple started aggressively obsoleting their own hardware every year or two.

      huh? my 2008 macbook is seven years old and still fully supported in OSX yosemite

    4. Re:Resale value is worthless when outdated by Khyber · · Score: 1

      That's gotta be bullshit unless you're running a 64-bit Mac. Lion killed off 32-bit support in 2011. Model, please?

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    5. Re:Resale value is worthless when outdated by null+etc. · · Score: 1

      before Apple started aggressively obsoleting their own hardware every year or two.

      huh? my 2008 macbook is seven years old and still fully supported in OSX yosemite

      Yeah, but who wants a non-Retina, non-SSD, non-illuminated-keyboard Mac? No one, these days.

    6. Re:Resale value is worthless when outdated by sessamoid · · Score: 1

      That's gotta be bullshit unless you're running a 64-bit Mac. Lion killed off 32-bit support in 2011. Model, please?

      Not the parent poster, but my 6 year old mid-2009 15" MBP is currently running the latest public El Capitán beta with no problems. My 2008 Mac Pro is on the current Yosemite release, as I don't run beta OSs on that machine.

      --
      "No, no, no. Don't tug on that. You never know what it might be attached to."
    7. Re:Resale value is worthless when outdated by plasm4 · · Score: 1

      15" Macbook Pro Early 2011. 2.0 quad core i7, running 10.10.5.

    8. Re:Resale value is worthless when outdated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You *do* realize that there was precisely *one* generation of 32-bit MacBooks, right?

  22. But the keyboard... by Toshito · · Score: 1

    I wanted to buy a macbook, but sadly for us french canadians Apple with their great wisdom have chosen the completely retarded https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QWERTY#Canadian_Multilingual_Standard/

    At least on Windows laptops they still use the old https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QWERTY#Quebec_French/ layout. Like I have on my desktop at work, and everywhere else...

    I've been typing with this layout for the last 25 years, I don't want to change...

    Now get off my lawn!!

    --
    Try it! Library of Babel
    1. Re:But the keyboard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do the same thing in the Netherlands, the default selected keyboard layout is Dutch.
      I am not sure how it is in Canada. But no-one in the Netherlands uses a Dutch keyboard layout, I mean no-one, we use the US-international layout.

      I heard my co-worker bought the notebook with the Dutch keyboard layout. He contacted Apple and they replaced it immediately. I am guessing it happens a lot.

      However Microsoft in their infinite wisdom with their XBox One has decided to language lock their console (and all the games) to Dutch if you live in the Netherlands. You can set it to English, if you lie and say the xbox is in England, but then you cannot link your credit card to the console to buy games or DLCs.

    2. Re:But the keyboard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can order a Macbook online with a French keyboard.

    3. Re:But the keyboard... by danbob999 · · Score: 1

      Except... we don't use a "French" (Azerty) keyboard either. We use a french Canada keyboard, and Apple doesn't sell that layout at all. It's the only PC maker with the stupid canadian multilingual keyboard.

    4. Re:But the keyboard... by Yaztromo · · Score: 1

      Except... we don't use a "French" (Azerty) keyboard either. We use a french Canada keyboard, and Apple doesn't sell that layout at all. It's the only PC maker with the stupid canadian multilingual keyboard.

      Does anyone anywhere use the Canadian Multilingual keyboard layout on any OS, anywhere?

      I've worked in industry and in government, in both English and French Canada, and I can't recall ever seeing anyone anywhere using the Canadian Multilingual layout. Ever. I've seen more Dvorak users than Canadian Multilingual.

      Why does it even exist in the first place? (and FWIW, it's a terrible layout for coding IMO).

      Yaz

    5. Re:But the keyboard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quebec French???

      Oh what the rest of the world calls "Hillbilly French".

      Donne moi un hotdog et un hamburger avec un Molson Rouge.

      Fuckin idjits in my country!! SEPARATE ALREADY!!!!

  23. Clickbait by Leslie43 · · Score: 1

    Nothing more.

    1. Re:Clickbait by WSOGMM · · Score: 1
      [e-arnold]

      Noo it iz all about da powah. I djust find back-propah-gating weights and pumping ions to be orgasmic.

      [terminate joke]

  24. Better keyboard?! What. by Sowelu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I cringe every time I have to use a Mac keyboard. They're awful. In what universe are they better? They're usually not even full keyboards. The one I'm stuck with at work doesn't even have pgup/pgdn, not even with the fn key. There's holes where you could put them near the arrow keys, too, like a sane laptop, but nooo.

    Okay, I like the extra bucky bit, but that's an OS thing and it isn't worth the price of "nothing on a macintosh has accelerator keys".

  25. No Trackpoint = Bad Windows Laptop by MSTCrow5429 · · Score: 2

    Nothing makes up for lack of a Trackpoint. Also, the article gives no evidence that Macs retain up to 50% of their value after 5 years, which is a sketchy claim, considering how fast things are improved.

    --
    Slashdot: Playing Favorites Since 1997
    1. Re:No Trackpoint = Bad Windows Laptop by HornWumpus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      'Up to' is a weasel phrase. Like 'some scientists believe', anything qualified by this is sure to be pure BS.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:No Trackpoint = Bad Windows Laptop by j2.718ff · · Score: 1

      I used to think so too, but then I tried apple's touchpad. The fact that it's quite large, and handles a variety of gestures make it quite useful. (Not as nice as having an actual mouse, but we're talking laptops, after all.)

    3. Re:No Trackpoint = Bad Windows Laptop by H0p313ss · · Score: 2

      I used to think so too, but then I tried apple's touchpad. The fact that it's quite large, and handles a variety of gestures make it quite useful. (Not as nice as having an actual mouse, but we're talking laptops, after all.)

      Agreed, I have both a thinkpad and a macbook on my desk right now. The macbook touchpad is much easier to use (assuming you have the drivers... note that bootcamp 6 just landed with drivers for Win 10)

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    4. Re:No Trackpoint = Bad Windows Laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to think so too, but then I tried apple's touchpad. The fact that it's quite large, and handles a variety of gestures make it quite useful. (Not as nice as having an actual mouse, but we're talking laptops, after all.)

      Agreed, I have both a thinkpad and a macbook on my desk right now. The macbook touchpad is much easier to use (assuming you have the drivers... note that bootcamp 6 just landed with drivers for Win 10)

      Disagree. I have a late 2011 15" MacBook Pro and I don't like the touch pad. I would much rather have a trackpoint. If I'm using the laptop for more than 5 minutes, I plug in a portable, wireless mouse. I also don't like the keyboard. Spongy, flat keys with weird spacing. It's hard to type on. And the layout sucks. Where's my PgUp/PgDn, Home/End, and Delete? There are things that I like about the laptop, but lots of things that I hate. But it's my work-assigned laptop since part of my job is doing iOS development.

    5. Re:No Trackpoint = Bad Windows Laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but the people who buy those devices tend to be idiots.

      As posted by someone else, they'll buy a laptop without knowing what model it is or buy way above what they need (a friend of mine bought one with a 512GB SSD two years ago, adding $800 to the price instead of 256GB which was $500+ cheaper. He hasn't used more than 100-150 ever.

      They'll stupidly buy a used phone for 90% of the purchase price instead of ponying up 10% more for a new one...

    6. Re:No Trackpoint = Bad Windows Laptop by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      I also don't like the keyboard. Spongy, flat keys with weird spacing. It's hard to type on. And the layout sucks. Where's my PgUp/PgDn, Home/End, and Delete?

      Agreed. My Mac spends about half it's useful time docked on my desk with external monitors, keyboard etc. So half the time even when I'm using OSX it's with a Microsoft keyboard and a Logitech mouse.

      In my fantasy world, laptops of the future all have Thinkpad keyboards from a decade ago. I can dream can't I?

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    7. Re:No Trackpoint = Bad Windows Laptop by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Nothing makes up for lack of a Trackpoint.

      You and the other five users on the planet who prefer them. Maybe you should form a user group with with four people who prefer mice with thumb balls on the side.

  26. The best thing about Macs is... by overnight_failure · · Score: 1

    ...they don't have Windows on them.

  27. and better keyboard by danbob999 · · Score: 1

    Certainly not for the fr-CA locale, where Apple uses a keyboard layout that nobody else uses.

  28. commodity economics by XXongo · · Score: 1

    There was a time I understood this during the PPC era of mac, but now that macs run on commodity, non specialized CISC based x86, I have no idea why they retain their value. A lot of PC makers are starting to make machines that look *almost* as nice as a MBP.

    Because Windows machines are a commodity. A Windows box is a Windows box, what you get is pretty much all the same, so the vendors are in a "race to the bottom"-- who can make it the cheapest? They don't expect brand loyalty, and for the most part they don't get it-- most customers buy on price. And nobody is saying "I like my Dell machine so much I'll buy a telephone from them, and also a MP3 player, and I'm thinking about the Dell watch."

    Apple, on the other hand, does rely on brand loyalty. They count on it. And they count on that when people like their Macbook Air, they'll buy a phone, and a MP3 player, and -- who knows-- maybe even a watch. They don't dare race to the bottom... and they don't have to.

    1. Re:commodity economics by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Race to the bottom? They're already there. They arrived with the debut of the iPad. That's a great irony of the situation that many people don't fully grasp. Apple created a new market by being the cheap option.

      You're just making the mistake of assuming that fruity logo actually means something. Except for the novelty form factors, Apple is a PC maker just like anyone else. The same random collection of spare parts that's in a Mac are also in Dell and any other brand.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  29. Effectively removes only reason to own an apple. by xenotransplant · · Score: 2, Insightful

    People don't buy apples to run windows on them. They buy apples because they cost 1.5x more, hating windows is hip, and the millennial hipsters thrive on conspicuous consumption.

  30. Re:Better keyboard?! What. by XXongo · · Score: 1

    ON the other hand, they could easily lose that damn caps lock key. Who invented that anyway? When I get my time machine I'm going to go back in time and strangle them as a baby. I'm not also completely sure I need function, control, option and command keys. That seems like some of those functions could be consolidated.

  31. DO NOT BUY A MACBOOK PRO TO RUN WINDOWS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I currently do this but like everyone else doing this via Bootcamp (I haven't tried a clean install and information about this is scarce), I'm stuck with a hot machine with short battery life, because it *runs the discrete graphics continuously*, and AFAIK nobody has figured out how to make it switch to integrated graphics. Apple disables the integrated graphics in the EFI, the device won't even show up in Device Manager. You can disable the discrete driver, but that just means Microsoft's driver for the discrete board kicks in, looking crappy and *still* running hot and eating battery.

    You have been warned...

    1. Re:DO NOT BUY A MACBOOK PRO TO RUN WINDOWS! by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      get it with Intel graphics only.. well, don't get it for other reasons, such as the keyboard.

  32. tl;dr by KlomDark · · Score: 2

    No

  33. Re:Windows 10 is for cows. by bughunter · · Score: 2

    I think in this thread, MOOF! is more appropriate.

    --
    I can see the fnords!
  34. Re:Drivers have been the major problem we've had.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > even worse on laptops.

    Those trackpad drivers! Dell says their Alps drivers are compatible with 10, but so far we've had to downgrade every laptop we've tried 10 on. I don't blame Alps, because we make fingerprint scanners and can't get our own driver to work well with 10. Even though we have the $2,500 per year version of VisualStudio that is supposed to come with support, Microsoft hasn't been helpful at all.

  35. Insert free slashvertisement for Microsoft .. by nickweller · · Score: 1

    "According to InformationWeek there are many reasons to consider purchasing a MacBook as the next Windows machine"

    translation: Windows is rapidly losing market share ..

    Wouldn't it be simpler for Apple to pay Microsoft a 'license' for every version sold, similarly to Microsoft extorting an Android 'license' out of the hardware manufacturers. I know of no one on the planet who goes 'OS X is terrible must upgrade to Windows' ..

  36. Better Quality Displays? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice submission. The Macbook Air has been through several revisions over the past 5 years and still uses low resolution shitty TN screens instead of higher quality panels like IPS.

    1. Re:Better Quality Displays? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you, but you are missing the point.
      The Air is supposed to be a lightweight mobile platform for lightweight usage, with a long battery life, and as such, the resolution is perfectly adequate. I really quite like mine. I also really like the routine 10 hour battery lifetime, even with Wifi turned on, at medium brightness. (13 hours with Wifi turned off.)
      "Retina" display resolution may be desired for Professional reasons, but the Air is not meant for Professionals.
      And that is the point.

  37. 1/2 the battery by Ayanami_R · · Score: 1

    I have read in a few places that macs get 1/2 the batt life running win 10. I bet that's intentional.

    --
    "Science is the power of man"
  38. You've got it all wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mac doesn't run Windows better... You're just used to the limited and crappy performance of OS #.

    Welcome to the real world.

  39. Wrong by Luthair · · Score: 5, Informative

    They do not last any longer than any business class hardware, they are no faster than any other laptop (I guess other than a pcie SSD which really doesn't translate into noteable improvements)

    As someone who has spent the last 5-years using macbooks with windows installed for work there are massive downsides. The keyboards are awful (bad layout and bad feel), they run very hot, and the battery life is poor. Both the last two points are Apples fault for disabling various power CPU states and using a proprietary GPU switching solution which they do not provide a driver for leaving Windows with access only to the integrated GPU.

    If you're a Windows user you should not by Apple unless you absolutely need to have access to OSX, and even then you should consider a Windows laptop and a mac mini which combined will probably cost less.

    1. Re:Wrong by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

      The keyboards are awful (bad layout and bad feel), they run very hot, and the battery life is poor.
        Both the last two points are Apples fault

      Whatever you say, I have a dell, it behaves just like your apple machine. The apple is a solid piece of metal and the dell is a cheap piece of plastic that flexes when I type on it. Its battery life is just a couple of hours, I have to leave it plugged in all the time. The Dell has terrible driver problems, sound is totally broken and the nvidia driver crashes occasionally with a big screen flash and a lovely error dialog. No such problems with my mac.

    2. Re:Wrong by Luthair · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the dell you purchased is just cheapy? My personal x220 works well on Windows, though does run hot under Linux.

    3. Re:Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The apple is a solid piece of metal and the dell is a cheap piece of plastic that flexes when I type on it.

      So I gather you have the only MacBook in the world that does not flex when you type?

    4. Re:Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely - as professional user, macs are much less useful than a windows dedicated laptop. My boss used macbook for about two years, but had to give it up because keyboard was atrocious and difficult for him to be productive with it. What's more, macbook doesn't have lot of options that windows laptops commonly have, such as swappable battery (for long flights), and swappable multi-drive bays, not to mention lots of more connectivity ports. As for macs lasting longer, that's only true if nothing breaks. Macbook pro retina is infamous for being a throwaway computer (totally non upgradable, no user servicible parts inside, nearly impossible to disassemble). And another downside is that Apple only support macbooks newer than 4 years old for latest mac os. So if your macbook is older than 4 years, you are out of luck.

  40. An iPad aint cheap by rsborg · · Score: 1

    Race to the bottom? They're already there. They arrived with the debut of the iPad. That's a great irony of the situation that many people don't fully grasp. Apple created a new market by being the cheap option.

    You're just making the mistake of assuming that fruity logo actually means something. Except for the novelty form factors, Apple is a PC maker just like anyone else. The same random collection of spare parts that's in a Mac are also in Dell and any other brand.

    I'm surprised you think an iPad is a race to the bottom. It's not even a general purpose PC (wake me when I can code and compile iOS app on an iOS device without jailbreaking). An iPad is likely in the top-tier of most expensive tablets - you can get a Kindle Fire for about $150 these days - about 2-3x cheaper than the basic iPad.

    Sure you could keep confusing the tablet market with the PC market, why not throw the smartphone market in there as well? That's just about as valid.

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    1. Re:An iPad aint cheap by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      you can get a Kindle Fire for about $150 these days - about 2-3x cheaper than the basic iPad.

      And 2-3x less capable. You get what you pay for.

  41. Parent is On Topic actually by waspleg · · Score: 0

    Fuck the M$ shills and fanboys (really?) with mod points.

    1. Re:Parent is On Topic actually by kuzb · · Score: 2

      As opposed to what? The Apple shills and fanboys?

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    2. Re:Parent is On Topic actually by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      As opposed to what? The Apple shills and fanboys?

      And where are they? Sitting over there next to Santa Clause and the Easter Bunny? You know, two other things that don't actually exist here, despite a lot of hot air to the contrary.

  42. Re:Drivers have been the major problem we've had.. by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    with Windows 10. The upgrade hasn't gone smoothly on any of our desktops and even worse on laptops. Our biggest customer is upgrading to 10, so have to use it for testing so we have no choice but to upgrade some of our systems. The MacBook we tried 10 on worked pretty well. It locked-up a couple of times in a week of use, but that's better than the non-Apple systems. The Apple drivers for Windows, while not perfect, seem better than the ones from most other companies. I would guess that after the next Boot Camp update, it will be even better. With Microsoft's policy of not providing drivers and leaving them to manufacturers, they've really put users between a rock and a hard place.

    I find this hard to believe unless it is a small mom and pop shop with a son who loves modern thingies. Most IT managers and executives would fire anyone with poor judgement when the 1st service pack hasn't been released and it is not at least 6 months to a 1 year old with no testing.

  43. Re:Better keyboard?! What. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NONSENSE. I CAN'T IMAGINE TYPING THIS RESPONSE WITHOUT CAPS LOCK KEY.

    (slashdot filter error, please shut up, it's not yelling at all asdf fewfe adf g ghg a asdfewef)

  44. Re:Better keyboard?! What. by cbhacking · · Score: 1

    Function is technically a meta key, but practice it triggers special OS- or even hardware-defined functions (like screen brightness controls) rather than behaving like a traditional meta key that does things like turn the S key into the Save key.

    Also, a real keyboard user can always find a use for more meta keys. For example, on Windows, did you know that you can hold Shift with the arrow keys to select text as the cursor moves, Ctrl to move by words (or paragraphs, for vertical) at a time, and Ctrl+Shift together with the arrow keys to select by the word or paragraph? I use this *constantly* - I literally used it once without even realizing what I was doing while writing this very paragraph, when I decided to re-write a sentence - and it drives me nuts when I don't have it.

    With that said, I'm with you on Caps Lock. I technically use it more often than Scroll Lock, but unlike Scroll Lock (which very few laptop keyboards have anymore) it's completely replaceable with just a little user effort. But yeah, as Sowelu said, the lack of accelerator keys on Mac keyboards is fucking terrible. You can have my PgUp/PgDn/Home/End keys (and real Insert and Delete for good measure) when you pry them from my cold, dead hands.

    Oh, and most 15+" non-Apple widescreen laptops have a numpad. Apple doesn't, and never has, even on their 17" laptops... which is just stupid. Without the numpad you just have a bunch of wasted space on either side of the keyboard; they put in speaker grilles there but they are neither necessary nor sufficient to produce sound quality that many non-Apple laptops achieve with much smaller speaker grilles while also making numerical entry really easy.

    --
    There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
  45. Re:Better keyboard?! What. by Kergan · · Score: 2

    Fn + Up/Down for Page Up/Down works fine on my end. Not sure what you did with your device.

  46. Re:Better keyboard?! What. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I The one I'm stuck with at work doesn't even have pgup/pgdn

    Page up/down is option-up and option-down. Home and end are command-left and command-right. But that's actually an EXCELLENT argument for why it's not a good choice if your main OS is going to be Windows 10, since I just tried them on Parallels and they didn't translate. Though I use an external keyboard usually when I'm in Parallels, since that means I'm working.

  47. Re:Better keyboard?! What. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fn+Up/Down

  48. Re:Effectively removes only reason to own an apple by WheezyJoe · · Score: 1

    People buy apples because so many PC laptops and desktops suck. Take a walk to any Best Buy, Wal Mart, or even Microsoft Store and you will see stacks of cheap, plastic underpowered suckage. Apple has an incentive for their machines to run their OS well or they won't sell. PC manufacturers have the luxury of getting to sell junk to people who don't know any better. To Microsoft's credit, Windows 10 seems to work pretty well on underpowered PC's, but at the cost of substantial privacy issues.

    There are some good PC laptops out there. I really like the new Dell XPS 13, for example. But pound for pound, it costs about the same as a comparable Mac, particularly if you go with an SSD, which is standard on all Macs (e.g., Dell XPS 13 with 256 GB SSD and 8GB RAM and Windows Home is $1599; a 13-inch Macbook Pro with similar specs comes in at $1499).

    But as some other poster already said, the reputation of PC's generally stinks because the quality, and after-market support, is so spotty. A lot of people are posting that ThinkPads kick ass (and I can attest that they used to be awesome), but I've seen just as many people post ThinkPads have gone steadily downhill since Lenovo took over. Right now, the XPS 13 is the only laptop I have confidence recommending to people. And PC desktops? Roll you own, lest that retail box come with a two-year-old Celeron and a 90 Watt power supply.

    --
    Take it easy, Charlie, I've got an Angle...
  49. Wipe and install Windows by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

    I thought, at first that this was about buying a MacBook for the hardware quality and then wipe/install Windows 10.

    I was ready for a good Apple vs Microsoft slashwar.... ah well...

    --
    My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
  50. Dell Latitude Ultrabook by acoustix · · Score: 1

    I use a Dell Latitude 7440 and absolutely love it. i7, 16GB RAM, 256 SSD, 14" 1080p, backlit keyboard, great battery life with Win 7. There's no way I would pay double for a Mac with similar specs.

    --
    "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
    1. Re:Dell Latitude Ultrabook by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      I use a Dell Latitude 7440 and absolutely love it. i7, 16GB RAM, 256 SSD, 14" 1080p, backlit keyboard, great battery life with Win 7. There's no way I would pay double for a Mac with similar specs.

      You're right - there's no way you'd pay double for a Mac with similar specs. Let's compare the baseline models, for example - even though the Mac has twice the RAM and twice the SSD space, as well as a faster processor. Oh, and by the way it appears the 7440 has a low-end 1366x768 display, not 1080P like you stated...

      Dell Latitude E7440 w/ 2.0GHz i5 processor, 4GB RAM, 128GB SSD, 14" screen - $1202.55 (after $687 "instant savings")
      Retina MacBook Pro w/ 2.7GHz i5 processor, 8GB RAM, 256GB SSD, 13" screen - $1299.00

      Bumping the MacBook Pro up to 3.1GHz i7, 16GB RAM raises the price to $1799. Unfortunately the Dell page doesn't seem to let me configure the E7440 with options you've listed, so I can't give you their quoted price for the upgrade - but I doubt they're selling it for $400 less than the barebones version, which would have to be the case for your statement to be true.

      I did find one on Amazon that was spec'ed more like what you say - except it still has that 1366x768 display, and doesn't have a backlit keyboard. Even that is selling for $1500.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:Dell Latitude Ultrabook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You probably don't realize it but your display resolution sucks.
      That alone is worth extra premium of retina MBP.

    3. Re:Dell Latitude Ultrabook by acoustix · · Score: 1

      Good job cherry picking the models.

      My model has everything I said it did. Then you show a Mac with lesser specs. Good job.

      --
      "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
    4. Re:Dell Latitude Ultrabook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You probably don't realize it but your display resolution sucks.
      That alone is worth extra premium of retina MBP.

      If a person can't tell the difference between a 37" 720P and 1080P TV, then there's know way that you'll notice it on a 13" screen.

    5. Re:Dell Latitude Ultrabook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strange... I thought he was *agreeing* with you. There *is* no way you'd pay double for a Mac with similar specs, because the Mac with similar specs doesn't *cost* double, it costs roughly the exact same amount.

      If you're going to call him on 'cherry picking' models, provide a link to the model *you* were referring to. Don't make him try to *guess* which of several 'Dell Latitude 7440' models you're referring to.

      I just priced out a DELL Latitude 7450 (because I couldn't *find* the 7440 you mention) with specs matching what you posted, and it prices out at: $2,004.74 (including the $866.12 of 'Instant Savings').
      The matching MacBook Pro comes in at $1,999.00.

      The price is a wash, but the MacBook Pro comes with a *much* nicer display and a *faster* i7 processor.

      I suppose if you *really* wanted to, you *could* pay double for the Mac, but there's no reason to, because you'd be spending more than double to cost of the Mac in the process of doing so.

  51. Re:Better keyboard?! What. by Sowelu · · Score: 1

    Actually, by accelerators I mean things like dialogues where a letter on some radio button or field label underlined, and you press alt-[letter] to go straight to that option. (I think that's the name for them?) I haven't seen that anywhere in Mac, and cross-platform programs like SourceTree have them in Windows but not in Mac. Drives me up the wall, but it isn't truly keyboard related...just typical bad Mac design.

  52. Dell Screens by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

    My work laptop (Dell E6440) has a very nice 1080p 14" screen with much better color than pretty much any other laptop I've seen. And it can drive 3 external 1080p displays when it is docked. I've got good eyes so I appreciate 1080p even when small for more room. It only has a dual core i5 but other processors are available. I even use this laptop to connect back to my faster Toshiba laptop that doesn't have as nice of a screen.

    1. Re:Dell Screens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1920x1080 resolution on 14" panel? Meh.
      13" retina MBP has 2560x1600 panel. Anything lower resolution is just ridiculous nowadays.

  53. Re:Better keyboard?! What. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and it drives me nuts when I don't have it.

    Out of curiosity, what systems don't have shift-to-select?

  54. May actually do that by Charlotte · · Score: 0

    This isn't a bad idea really. OS X crashes on me all the time, whereas my Windows 7 box is rock solid. Having OS X hardware plus Windows might be the best of both worlds!

  55. Re:Resell value? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Myself, I consider it a disadvantage, I read: "Macbooks are much more expensive to buy second hand".

  56. Re:Better keyboard?! What. by Sowelu · · Score: 1

    Tell that to console applications. I want to send PgDn to the program or server, not scroll the window.

  57. Yes, of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://forums.rocketshoppe.com/showthread.php?t=15283

  58. Never understood why people think that by mrun4982 · · Score: 1

    I like Macs and a MacBook (Pro) has been my laptop of choice for years but the whole reason to pay the "Apple tax" is to get the whole package, including OSX (which is the main reason I use a Mac). If you're going to throw away the best part you might as well save your money and get something else. If I didn't care about OSX, I'd probably get a Lenovo or something where I can get something that's more powerful, has more ports, doesn't force me to buy adapters and for less money.

  59. lol maintenance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maintenance costs are high too, because Apple tries to force you to pay them for replacement of consumable items like batteries.

    I walk into an Apple store with a busted up laptop, it's back in my hands next day, usually free of charge* unless I've done something really stupid.

    * Yeah, of course, you're paying a premium and snagging AppleCare. Shit's cheaper than buying a new laptop.

    1. Re: lol maintenance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The second mb replacement isnt free. And it will burn itself if its a 2010 - 2012

  60. Re: And how much do they pay for slashvertisements by Redbehrend · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sold my ASUS laptop that was 4 years old for 60% of what I paid. Hate to break it to apple people but you buy a good enough machine it or the parts will be worth something later, not just apple.

  61. Dell XPS 13 Ubuntu by OFnow · · Score: 1

    Had a Mac Air, but replaced with Dell XPS 13 developer edition with Linux (Ubuntu) using the Gnome Flashback Metacity, not the default Unity at login. Yes, Dell sells it with Ubuntu 14.04 LTS installed. Long battery life, light weight, avoid the Apple bugs and misfeatures.

  62. Re: And how much do they pay for slashvertisements by plasm4 · · Score: 2

    I never said otherwise

  63. Re:Effectively removes only reason to own an apple by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 2

    I bought a three year old Dell Latitude with an i7 processor in it for $250 about a month ago. The idiots crowing that a 5 year old Macbook 'holds half it's value' are clearly looking at it as the seller, not the buyer.

    The Latitude I bought is even one of the more popular Hackintosh models.

  64. Re: And how much do they pay for slashvertisements by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funnily enough, they give those away here. I got 4 only a few months ago.

  65. Re:Effectively removes only reason to own an apple by Teckla · · Score: 1

    There are some good PC laptops out there. I really like the new Dell XPS 13, for example. But pound for pound, it costs about the same as a comparable Mac, particularly if you go with an SSD, which is standard on all Macs

    The less expensive Macs (...which are still expensive...) still come with a paltry amount of SSD storage, though (128 GB? sheesh).

    For example, the 13 inch MacBook "Pro" for $1299 (ouch!) only comes with 128 GB of SSD storage (double ouch!).

    But I guess you can pay an extra $200 for an extra 128 GB of SSD storage (triple ouch!!!).

  66. Mac's losing some luster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have been buying Mac's before they were cool. I have seen residual values rise for Mac's. But as of the last few years I think that trend has reversed itself. My last MacBook Air traded at 4 years old was worth $300. Now I agree that is better then $100 for a PC notebook. But then again, I probably would have spent $900 on a PC notebook of same hardware vs $1300 for the MacBook Air. You people do the math? Is a Mac worth the investment? Only if you keep it beyond probably 5 years or so. I really do not see any real advantage of buying a Mac over a PC except for OS X. Windows does not run better on a Mac then on a PC. Battery life is bad, drivers are at the mercy of Apple to update and frankly who needs Windows to run on a $1300 computer anyway. I bought a $300 Dell and Windows 8 and now 10 runs better then my new MacBook Air. Yosemite is not the best and most efficient OS X that Apple has done. Unless Apple comes out with a $800 Mac notebook I am done with Mac's. You look at the hardware and its just not there for the money.

  67. Yes, except for all the others by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Compared to the Macbook air and even the smallest Macbook the Surface 3 Pro is faster, smaller, lighter, cheaper, more feature rich, has touchscreen, pen input, and all around better or comparable specs. Shit it even has a better build quality with a mag alloy housing.

    I'm reporting Infoweek to the police. Given their assertion that Macs are not only better, but have "a better keyboard", I can only conclude that their office allows liberal consumption of narcotics in the workplace.

  68. One USB port? by John+Bokma · · Score: 2
    • MacBook Air: Two USB 3 ports (up to 5 Gbps), Thunderbolt 2 port (up to 20 Gbps)
    • MacBook Pro: Two Thunderbolt 2 ports (up to 20 Gbps), Two USB 3 ports (up to 5 Gbps)
    1. Re:One USB port? by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Is Thunderbolt actually practical for anything you couldn't otherwise be using USB or network for at half the price?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    2. Re:One USB port? by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      Ok, so I use a MacBook Pro for my laptop, but Thunderbolt peripherals are sorely lacking last I checked. Anything out there was expensive, or very niche. I'd much rather have 2+ USB ports on one side of my mac than my unused Thunderbolt ports.

      The specs are great, but I can't use anything with it.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    3. Re:One USB port? by John+Bokma · · Score: 1

      Connecting multiple monitors.

    4. Re:One USB port? by John+Bokma · · Score: 1

      I have no idea what you want to do with 2+ USB ports. If I was to buy a MacBook I probably would also buy a "Belkin Thunderbolt 2 Express HD Dock" or "Elgato Thunderbolt 2 Dock" or similar because when I need more than one USB port I am most likely at my desk juggling with several USB devices. Those devices are not cheap, but provide a lot of connectivity options.

      And if I was travelling with more than 2 USB devices I most likely have space for something like Anker's "USB 3.0 7-Port Portable Aluminum Hub" or similar.

      I am afraid that needing more than one (or two) USB ports is in itself a niche. Not here, on Slashdot, but in general. And I think that's often overlooked at this site, that the "techies" are not the majority but people like my mom are.

  69. Re:Effectively removes only reason to own an apple by Jeremi · · Score: 1

    I can't speak for other people, but I buy Macs because I can't stand using Windows, and MacOS/X is the best-supported and easiest-to-use Unix-like OS that's currently available. The extra cost isn't a problem, since I only buy a computer once every 5 years or so anyway.

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  70. Apple support excellent! by jlgreer1 · · Score: 1

    Apple also provides excellent support even as a MacBook begins to age. Another reason that Windows on a Mac is a good option when necessary. OS X though is far superior to any version of Windows.

    1. Re:Apple support excellent! by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Support? Tell that to Dell which offers replacement parts far longer than any mac has ever been formally supported. As someone else pointed out you can get replacement batteries for mac, but no you can't get them from Apple unless in warranty period, and even then it's a trip to a genius bar for you.

      I not so fondly remember having to go to A DIFFERENT COUNTRY to get support. Okay extreme example since this was before there was an Apple store in my city, and we only lived a short drive from the American border anyway, but still it was a 2 hour drive to replace some faulty hardware. By comparison I logged a call with Dell about a faulty screen on an XPS and they send a tech to my house to replace the screen at my house. No genius required.

      Apple's support is great. ... If you're in warranty .... and have Apple Care .... and live next to the genius bar ... and don't fell like doing basic things like replacing batteries yourself because they think this shouldn't be allowed .... Yeah screw that.

    2. Re:Apple support excellent! by AqD · · Score: 1

      What do you need their support for? The support guys aren't driver developers, or BIOS designers, or participating in any stage of OS or hardware development at all.

      They're just useless, unless you're retarded to the point that you need a computer babysitter to troubleshoot app installation or usb problem for you. But I highly doubt such people would come to Slashdot.

  71. ummmm by mosdave · · Score: 1

    Also MacBooks have a higher resell value, retaining up to 50% of their price after five years.

    I've never owned an Apple product that still worked after five years...

  72. Re:Better keyboard?! What. by swillden · · Score: 1

    Tell that to console applications. I want to send PgDn to the program or server, not scroll the window.

    That's an issue with the terminal emulator, not the keyboard. You'd have the same problem if you did have PgUp and PgDn buttons. Your issue is how the key is interpreted, not how to type it.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  73. DELL Inspirion 1720 by future+assassin · · Score: 1

    Going strong after 7 years of use with the help of a SSD drive.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    1. Re:DELL Inspirion 1720 by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      Yep. A simple upgrade turns a 7 year old laptop into a very usable device.

  74. No. (see Betteridge) by just+another+AC · · Score: 1

    C'mon dice... seriously.

  75. Re:Better keyboard?! What. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    For example, on Windows, did you know that you can hold Shift with the arrow keys to select text as the cursor moves, Ctrl to move by words (or paragraphs, for vertical) at a time, and Ctrl+Shift together with the arrow keys to select by the word or paragraph?

    On Mac: you can hold Shift with the arrow keys to select text as the cursor moves, Option to move by words (or paragraphs, for vertical) at a time, and Option+Shift together with the arrow keys to select by the word or paragraph.

    You can have my PgUp/PgDn/Home/End keys (and real Insert and Delete for good measure) when you pry them from my cold, dead hands.

    PgUp: Fn-Up Arrow
    PgDn: Fn-Down Arrow
    Home: Ctrl-A
    End: Ctrl-E
    Not sure what you mean by "real Insert and Delete". If you mean "backspace and delete", Fn again does the trick.

  76. What indications are that Apple is fighting? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    If Apple were "fighting" Microsoft, why would Apple build and maintain BootCamp for mac laptops?

    If Apple were fighting Microsoft, why would there be any Microsoft software on the iPad or iPhone? As it is, there is quite a lot.

    Instead all indications are that Apple's plan is simply to pretend that Microsoft is irrelevant, a powerful strategy that seems to be working just fine.

    The summary also forgot to mention that few Window laptops ship with trackpads of the same quality as Apple offers.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  77. Re:Better keyboard?! What. by Archibald+Buttle · · Score: 1

    Very true. This is a terminal emulator issue. Plus, as it stands, the Terminal.app has preferences that let you define exactly how all the function keys get interpreted.

    In my Terminal the configured behaviour of PgDn is to send the key sequence \033[6~ which for all the terminal apps I'm using gets interpreted correctly as a PgDn (e.g. 'less' will scroll down a page). The config for Shift+PgDn is "Scroll Page Down", which will scroll the window. There's a chance that sometime over the past decade I changed those settings, but I suspect they're the defaults.

  78. The trackpad may be the best feature by clay_buster · · Score: 1

    The giant "no button" trackpad on a macbook is a great feature. I don't understand why companies like dell continue to produce high end machines with small trackpads and big buttons. My E6430 has two sets of buttons and two pointers instead of one really big pad :-(

    1. Re:The trackpad may be the best feature by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      OMG I hate trackpads. Give me a trackpoint any day. Trackpads are good for lying in bed surfing the web one-handing it, but I'm an admin and frequently work with small fonts. Hand-to-keyboard, hand-to-trackpad, Hand-to-keyboard, hand-to-trackpad, Hand-to-keyboard, hand-to-trackpad, all day drives me nuts.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    2. Re:The trackpad may be the best feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hated trackpads before I got my first MacBook, too. (I bought a Bluetooth mouse along with it.)
      I've never quite been able to put my finger on it, but *something* about the implementation of the trackpads on Macs makes it actually nice to use. It seriously surprised me. I have yet to find a Windows 'native' laptop whose trackpad similarly 'feels right'.
      I know it isn't *totally* an OS X vs. Windows thing, because the MacBook's trackpad remains usable when running windows.

  79. Windows 10 drivers by clay_buster · · Score: 1

    Windows 10 upgrades in general have been problematic for me.

    E7240 MBR SSD in the second bay requires that the MSATA SSD be moved to another machine to do the upgrade and won't run windows update after the upgrade.

    E6420 single partition MBR Windows 7 is erased and converted to RAW by the upgrade process.

  80. Re:Drivers have been the major problem we've had.. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

    I, thankfully, am in the 'Windows 10? Why there are years left on our Win7 support!' boat at work; but the one major inducement, if you happen to be stuck with any, is some of the hardware that shipped with Win8 or 8.1: Some perfectly normal, also-supports-win7-at-least-if-purchased-as-a-business-customer, hardware was crippled with Win8; but there were also a lot of tablet and tablet-ish things that came out of Intel's "Let's sell Bay Trail Atoms for negative amounts of money because ARM is starting to scare us" campaign.

    Win10 is very arguably a substantial improvement over Win8; and that class of devices is never going to get Win7 support. Those were the systems where storage was often eMMC rather than PATA/SATA, a nontrivial number of peripherals were not on the PCI root at all, and various other oddities that freak Win7 out. If you have those; Win10 is starting to look a lot more attractive than Win8/8.1

    If you have more normal PC-compatible gear, the prospect is less exciting.

  81. Re: And how much do they pay for slashvertisements by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A lot of people is Doing IT For Free.

  82. Delete/Backspace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mac laptop keyboards are fatally flawed for Windows users.

    Also, don't expect to get the quoted 9-10hrs of battery life if using Windows.

  83. Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The trackpad is kind of flaky in bootcamp. In addition some of the other features don't work as well like the ambient light sensor integration. In OS X you don't even notice the screen dimming and brightening, it's practically perfect. On the windows side it can't make up it's mind and is pretty annoying. Top top that off the battery doesn't last nearly as long.

    This is not a knock against windows 10, OS X or Mac. All are fantastic. I just found from my experience windows in boot camp is less than ideal.

  84. ROFLMAO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No fscking way unless apple gets some decent hardware and decent dGPUs into their notebook at REASONABLE prices.

    I really do NOT see ANY of these coming to pass, so I think that I'll stick with something clevo based personally. e.g. Sager, Mythlogic, etc.

    ebay prices: try SGI, SUN, etc. workstations. Old mac prices aren't much better than old PC prices when compared to those. OTOH those old workstations aren't made any longer but are still used in ALOT of applications whereas old macs probably just go to collectors or fantards.

  85. Re:Better keyboard?! What. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I *think* he might mean over-type mode where the character you type replaces the character to the right of the cursor? It's not something I ever used *on purpose* on a PC (dating all the way back to DOS 4.0), so I can't say I've ever missed it on my Macs.

  86. "Yes" for home use; "No" for business by lameduck77 · · Score: 1

    Apple's laptops are sturdy, well-designed, and retain value well - all things that are good for the home consumer. If (when) I had (have) a chance to see Windows 10 running well on a MacBook Pro, I'd be happy to recommend it to any Windows user I know.

    For the enterprise, it's still a non-starter for the overwhelming majority of users. The most important part of an enterprise laptop is the warranty, because even the most well-designed, hand-carved, white-gloved alloy case in the world holds parts that *will* break, and in the case of heavy road-warrior use, will break often. Fact: No amount of Apple stores in the world will get travelling executives to bring their laptops in for service themselves. Unless Apple gets serious about having global teams able to come on-site in 4 or 8 business hours, their laptops will only be a luxury in the enterprise afforded by those who can get away with flouting the rules (and then later complain when the service is not what they expected).

    Arguably, given Apple's history with the enterprise, they are comfortable with this.

  87. Re:Better keyboard?! What. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The modifier keys for navigation work similarly, at least under under OS X. Alt-(arrow) jumps the cursor forward or backward one word, or to the beginning or end of the line. Shift-(arrow) selects text as you describe, Shift and (e.g.)-Alt-(arrow) also allows block selection in a manner pretty much as you describe.

    Numeric keypads are purely a matter of taste. I'm left-handed,and given that those are usually integrated on the right-hand side of the keyboard, I *never* use it, and actually resent the desk space it pointlessly takes up on my work-issued desktop Linux box. The idea of having one stuck on a machine designed to be carried around with me is utterly absurd to me., & I prefer that the keys I use all the time are directly under the screen I'm looking at, rather than stuck off to one side. But hey, each to their own.

    (Captcha: polemic)

  88. Laptops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Honestly the markets are starting to even out many of the major brands are starting to even out in quality as the price for better computers continues to decrease.

  89. what is this shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So really, what is this article about: um.. I guess you can go and buy a mac.. Really, what's the point of this? Why is it here?

  90. Effectively, thats hatorade and snobbery talking by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    People don't buy apples to run windows on them. They buy apples because they cost 1.5x more, hating windows is hip, and blah blah blah blah

    You've long paid similar prices for PC's compared to similar Apple products. That Apple doesn't compete in the 6 pound, $300 POS special laptop category means they don't compete in that market segment, not that their products "cost 1.5x more". To pick one example, Apple's 5k iMac costs just a little more than Dell's 27" 5k monitor, but the Mac has a computer attached to it.

  91. For the same reason Hondas and Toyotas do. by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    Apple doesn't make cheap unreliable shit, and they routinely are at the top of product reliability surveys. Now, for the hatebois who are halfway into their "don't hold it wrong" comments:

    1) Better doesn't mean flawless. Apple have had to extend warranties on some of their products over the years because they were shipped with crappy parts...same as Toyota and Honda.

    2) Remember the Hatorade Distortion Effect. Google Maps has had some doozies of directions, but errors in GPS software weren't an international incident until the release of Apple Maps. People have gotten the Galaxy S6 screen to shatter at pressures where the iPhone 6 merely bends, yet ShatterGazi was never a thing. And of course remember not to hold your Galaxy S5 wrong. Or the S4. Or the HTC Evo. Or the Lumia 900.....

  92. Wronger by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    The keyboards are awful (bad layout and bad feel)

    Purely personal preference.

    they run very hot

    And regular PC laptops don't?

    and the battery life is poor

    As opposed to regular PC laptops?

    Both the last two points are Apples fault for disabling various power CPU states and using a proprietary GPU switching solution which they do not provide a driver for leaving Windows with access only to the integrated GPU.

    More like Microsoft's design choice to prioritize speed over power savings, while Apple has done the reverse.

    1. Re:Wronger by Luthair · · Score: 1

      Purely personal preference.

      Layout sure (though for tech people contorting your hands to use insert, home, end, delete, pg up and pg down is not good), the feel is definitely worse than thinkpads, though ultrabooks all feel like junk.

      As opposed to regular PC laptops?

      Yes, the macbook pros I've had have had 2.5-3 hours maximum battery life in Windows, less when doing many full builds. Comparable PC laptops are over double this.

      More like Microsoft's design choice to prioritize speed over power savings, while Apple has done the reverse.

      It has nothing to do with that, while I agree OSX uses less battery (though is also more aggressive with dimming etc.) bootcamp boots Windows with some CPU power states inaccessible and only access to the discrete GPU (instead of the CPU integrated). Obviously both of these are pretty harmful to battery life.

  93. Cherry picking by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    Sure, they are well made, but a Let's Note (Toughbook in the west) is rugged. Mine claims that it can take 100kg on the lid,

    No kidding, because it's a Toughbook, and you pay for what you get, and get what you pay for. The only thing that really compares to a Toughbook for commercial products is....another Toughbook.

    Macs have a high TCO.

    Yes, all that money spent on annual subscriptions to anti-virus software really ads up over the years.

    Maintenance costs are high too, because Apple tries to force you to pay them for replacement of consumable items like batteries.

    If you want a laptop with a swappable battery, buy a latptop with a swappable batter. Zombie Jobs isn't holding a gun to your head to force you to buy one with batteries soldered to the board to save space.

    One other thing - Apple don't offer laptops with TPM chips. TPM is useful for Bitlocker support.

    And if it doesn't, you have to jump through hoops to enable it. Apple has supported home folder encryption on any disk for 12 years, and whole disk encryption for five. True, with TPM Bitlocker can be 10-15% or so faster than FileVault - so it's a good thing that Apple uses PCI-E flash storage, which is faster than SATA.

  94. Re: And how much do they pay for slashvertisements by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    Hate to break it to apple people but you buy a good enough machine it or the parts will be worth something later, not just apple.

    Your logical fallacy is straw man.

  95. No by allo · · Score: 1

    If you have to ask: no.