I saw a demo of RH-5.8.4 and it included KDE. I knew this because kdm was running as an alternative for xdm. I don't know if this is in place for 5.9, but it's there if not the default.
Do you think the install will autodetect cd-burners?
Tongue in Cheek crap from CNN.
on
Linux on CNN
·
· Score: 1
Not surprising it comes from CNN-- almost all journalists are very poor, but CNN has some that are very, very, very poor. But you must have known this already, no?
They're not writing for you, anyway. You only read it 'cause it was linked on/. Funny:
see link on/.
read
report crapiness to other people on/. who already know it is crap
possibly flame any/.er who liked it
repeat often
Here's a novel idea, but I think you'll like it.
on
Feature:Distortions
·
· Score: 1
How about Richard's good articles get published here, his bad ones don't? It sounds crazy, I know, to suggest something other than never/always (like a slashdot poll) but I think it could work. In fact, during the "deciding whether this article stays or gets dumped" any spelling, wrong links, other errors or points of style could be addressed and then the articles that stay could be even better.
I think this is a good idea. We already have readers' comments for people to send their unedited ideas to the readers of slashdot. Maybe for the feature articles, we could up the quality a bit. Don't let Richard perform any crazy-journalism-social-experiments on the naive./ readers by giving him the free-reign Katz got. Act like editors, editors. I know you can do it.
Slashdot Mirror
I saw a demo of RH-5.8.4 and it included KDE. I knew this because kdm was running as an alternative for xdm. I don't know if this is in place for 5.9, but it's there if not the default.
Do you think the install will autodetect cd-burners?
Not surprising it comes from CNN-- almost all journalists are very poor, but CNN has some that are very, very, very poor. But you must have known this already, no?
They're not writing for you, anyway. You only read it 'cause it was linked on /. Funny:
How about Richard's good articles get published here, his bad ones don't? It sounds crazy, I know, to suggest something other than never/always (like a slashdot poll) but I think it could work. In fact, during the "deciding whether this article stays or gets dumped" any spelling, wrong links, other errors or points of style could be addressed and then the articles that stay could be even better.
I think this is a good idea. We already have readers' comments for people to send their unedited ideas to the readers of slashdot. Maybe for the feature articles, we could up the quality a bit. Don't let Richard perform any crazy-journalism-social-experiments on the naive ./ readers by giving him the free-reign Katz got. Act like editors, editors. I know you can do it.