Slashdot Mirror


User: quux26

quux26's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
275
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 275

  1. ... on It's Official: Deckard Was A Replicant · · Score: 1

    Your logic is truly dizzying.

    My .02
    Quux26

  2. Eloquent Critique on It's Official: Deckard Was A Replicant · · Score: 1
    His writing style isn't Bukowski, but it's certaintly better than yours. =)

    Besides, about 80% of what he pointed out I never thought of. If you have a criticism, perhaps you could be a little more specific.

    My .02
    Quux26

  3. Re:Encrypt Casually and Regularly on FBI's Wiretapping Demands May Nix Verio Deal · · Score: 1

    Hmmm. How about a distro of Linux that has everything built to do crypto out of the box. No dl'ing ssh and compiling, getting pgp and tweaking, just roll. I'd imagine the hassle is the biggest reason people don't use crypto.

    My .02
    Quux26

  4. Re:Anti-paranoia post on FBI's Wiretapping Demands May Nix Verio Deal · · Score: 1

    You have no idea how safe I feel now.

    My .02
    Quux26

  5. Re:Go back and read the story on Happy Independence Day, Jose · · Score: 1
    Big corporations are forcing nothing. At worst, various 3rd world countries are begging for it. If you want this problem fixed, A) get your government to ban such young labor, and B) if you are young, refuse to work for them.

    I dunno, the Thai government doesn't seem to be terribly interested in stamping out child prostitution. I mean, tourists are forcing nothing, at worst the Thai government is loving the tourism dollars.

    Nitwit.

    My .02
    Quux26

  6. Re:Oops - now and then. on Boies: Music Industry Could Lose Copyright · · Score: 1
    But think for a moment. The music industry at present is fuelled by large amount of cash. Sure, much of it is corporate gluttony, but can you imagine what would happen to music as an industry if musical copyright went flying right out the window?

    Hm. "Love". "Music". "Passion". "Black Ink".

    Now sing along with me, could you?

    One of these things just doesn't belong here, one of these things just isn't the same, cuz one of these things just doesn't belong here, now it's time to play our game...

    But seriously...

    I think that a system by which music is judged purely on merit can't be that bad. I don't begrudge those trying to make a buck from the market, I just don't see how losing the system would be detremental to music.

    My .02
    Quux26

  7. nitinol on New Walking Robot From Honda · · Score: 1
    ...to invent/formulate/discover a muscle-like substance (which contracts when current is applied)

    Nitinol.

    My .02
    Quux26

  8. Hate to be the one... on New Walking Robot From Honda · · Score: 1
    I normally don't like the "this is 10 day's old" rants, but this is ...over a half-year old. Better late then never I guess, but...

    And no, this isn't worthy of moderating up. =)

    My .02
    Quux26

  9. kuro5hin on Who Controls The Linux Media ? · · Score: 1

    Drat. You beat me to it. =)

    My .02
    Quux26

  10. not mentioning kuro5hin on Who Controls The Linux Media ? · · Score: 1

    Kuro5hin was mentioned here on May 29th of this year on Slashdot. And it didn't take a lot to find this either...[hint/nudge].

    My .02
    Quux26

  11. 210? on Inventor Building Rocket In Backyard · · Score: 1

    I wasn't aware a human could do much beyond 210mph or so in a pure vertical dive. Can any physics guys take this?

    My .02
    Quux26

  12. terminal velocity on Inventor Building Rocket In Backyard · · Score: 1

    Parachuting, huh? I believe that terminal velocity of a human body at that height - due to the lack of an atmosphere - is something like 350mph. Whee. Lets see if the XGames have any testicles...

    My .02
    Quux26

  13. the other thing on Software Packaging And The Environment? · · Score: 1
    Slightly off topic, but does anyone when CD's were brand new and they came in those tall cardboard boxes?

    [nostalgic sigh]

    My .02
    Quux26

  14. description on The Battlefield Earth Contest · · Score: 1

    The question is, could you sneak this description by the folks over at the patent office? =P

    My .02
    Quux26

  15. The best part. on The Battlefield Earth Contest · · Score: 1
    I think there were two outstanding moments in Battlefield Earth.

    When I had to pee and when the credits rolled.

    Now where is my !@#$ing prize? =)

    My .02
    Quux26

  16. Re:How to bill spammers on Taking On A Spammer · · Score: 1
    Why stop at $5?? I list $1,000.00 or whatever is allowed by federal/state law, whichever is lower. I recall a person nailed Radio Shack a few years back by putting "by cashing this check, you agree that my name will not be added to a mailing list" clause on the check (or similar), took them to court, and won. I don't remember the details tho.

    By sheer coincidence (or so I guess), I've yet to bill anyone - they haven't repeated the action yet.

    My .02
    Quux26

  17. Back Orifice 2000 on Taking On A Spammer · · Score: 1

    I've used this tool myself and obtained screenshots. It's silly easy to use too.

    My .02
    Quux26

  18. Re:Question Stands on ISPs Victimizing DoS Victims? · · Score: 1
    You wrote:
    Free speech is great, but should you be sued just because *you* don't want to risk your livelyhood/life/whatever to protect it?

    I replied:
    His question remains. Would you advocate a bank not servicing a black customer because of the high expense of windows and arson insurance? After all, if the bank gets burned by klan members then everyone loses out, right?

    You replied:
    Analogies are useful for conveying concepts, but they don't prove anything. Please stop acting as if they do.

    It's a completely valid question that you're avoiding for obvious reasons. This is not apples vs. oranges. Do business have moral high ground if they refuse customers (blacks/dialups) on the grounds that attackers will cause the business more harm than they're "worth"?

    The cheeziest brushoffs come from AC's.

    My .02
    Quux26

  19. Re:Save six bucks. on Taking Games Seriously · · Score: 1

    Or Forbidden Zone with Danny Elfman and Herve Villechaize (circa 1980). Or for those more curious about Danny Elfman's earlier days...

    My .02
    Quux26

  20. Re:So which is it? on Taking On A Spammer · · Score: 1
    Basically, if someone wants an anonymous internet, too bad. No one (who is sane) wants that.

    No, we want anonimity. Maybe you could start by backing up your assertion that wanting anonimity = insanity, possibly the most head-in-the-sand statement I can think of in today's global political situation (think China).

    My .02
    Quux26

  21. proofing on The Leased Life? · · Score: 1

    Ah, the joys of proofreading.

    My .02
    Quux26

  22. Question Stands on ISPs Victimizing DoS Victims? · · Score: 1
    Free speech is great, but should you be sued just because *you* don't want to risk your livelyhood/life/whatever to protect it?

    His question remains. Would you advocate a bank not servicing a black customer because of the high expense of windows and arson insurance? After all, if the bank gets burned by klan members then everyone loses out, right?

    My .02
    Quux26

  23. Re:anonimity on House To Hold Hearing On Napster · · Score: 1
    Would you also agree that free speech should be curbed or banned if the speech got ugly enough? You don't seem to understand (or perhaps reject) the idea that this isn't a matter of which does less harm. This is about my right, not a privelage, my right to transfer a perfectly legitimate format over the internet - ie, my right to communicate.



    My .02
    Quux26

  24. Yeah, but what will HR have to say. on New Mice from Apple - Without Buttons? · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure our HR department is going to get too cozy with something that you "squeeze, stroke or fondle".

    My .02
    Quux26

  25. Ounce of prevention on Pushing Microwaves Faster Than Light · · Score: 1
    " In the most striking of the new experiments a pulse of light that enters a transparent chamber filled with specially prepared cesium gas is pushed to speeds of 300 times the normal speed of light. That is so fast that, under these peculiar circumstances, the main part of the pulse exits the far side of the chamber even before it enters at the near side.

    ...But Einstein's theory, and at least a shred of common sense, seem to survive because the effect could never be used to signal back in time to change the past--avert the accident, in the example."

    Well, why? If the beam exits before it enters, just have a sensor at the end of the container shut off the machine when it detects the pulse. In this way, it will turn it off before the pulse is ever sent.

    My .02
    Quux26