AOL/Netscape STILL can't do tables correctly and crashes or dies with a DOS on pages with spelling mistakes in the HTML. That's pitiful.
Netscape DOES do tables right if you DO them right. For example, most (all?) the table problems I've seen is when a tag is not closed. Are they depending on MSIE to 'correct' the error for them?
And, what do you mean with 'spelling mistakes in the HTML'? I've never seen that happen before. Groundless accusations are pitiful.
Netscape is, though, still behind on standards (CSS!), but that's what Mozilla is going/suppose to fix.
For what I've seen, read, and heard from industry professionals (such as members of WC3), Microsoft has done everything possible to follow public WC3 specs.
WC3? Oh, you mean W3C! Sure, all-knowledgeable one.
Is evolution too weak? Does it need to be protected by law? Do we need a law to root out creationism? Evolution=freedom? Freedom that needs to be protected by prohibiting the rest?
The article indicated that evolution was what was being rooted out. I have not read anything against creationism, but I haven't went through all 1K+ posts.
All freedom is equal. But some freedom is more equal then others. So: just calm down:-)
What's that suppose to mean?
And, what's with this Slashdot load, nothing seems to be loading... This is too often now, and the comment limit is annoying.
Ah I see, thanks. Actually, I tried ^Z as well, and I might've meant to post that instead. Regardless, I've been in Linux too long. But it makes good when I get sick of being in Windows. (Console is good!). Anyways, I didn't know you had to hit enter after ^Z.
The light version of Slashdot does not read cookies. This requires me to login via each article to moderate/post. Of course, it's inconsistent enough since when you click on an article it's no longer in light mode. I use it because IMO the main page looks ugly because all the articles seem centered (lynx).
First off, I'd like to say both protocols ("Instant Messaging" versus "IRC") are designed differently. While I speak, there are 48,855 people on EFnet, which also shows me how much you actually researched your claims. (Although 40,000 of those are probably idle clients or bots.)
"monstrously complex"? I don't find hitting "+" and "-" and occasionally being prompted for dependencies a difficult task. Oh, you can also hit "?" if you get confused.
... or they can download it! For free! They're aware you have to learn, that's why they haven't given it a chance. Because you have to read documentation.
I like Google because it has no ads, but it doesn't offer all the features that I've been used to with AltaVista. For example, you can't even search by phrases in Google (99% of my searches). Yeah, I've noticed they improved, too. No porn ads in searches!
The only negative thing to say is the fact that you don't have control of what packages are installed.
Oh, that's all. So, you don't even have control of what packages goes into your system. I don't see how that couldn't of been implemented, and everything else... Unless they were in a hurry, of course. But I'm sure it was thoroughly tested! (especially considering everyone complaining about it not working.)
... and the crazy Unix commands make sense when you read documentation or the man pages. I'm not against the GUI, but it's not any harder if you read up on what you're doing. The "stupid people"? You mean lazy. Oh, and maybe the less savvy (anti-nerds) will be left behind, but since they probably don't even install Windows from scratch, that's a different issue. It's getting easier, though -- I wonder how much more it can get without losing it's functionality.
OK, X didn't come with the most flashy fonts, but that doesn't mean you can't install them. You don't *have* to use MS fonts, there are plenty others out there, so Verdana is not a requirement. You could get xfstt and read the installation instructions which'll just require a symlink to your Windows fonts directory if you desire all of them.
Slashdot Mirror
I'm athiest because I don't believe in god. And that's the bottom-line. Did you pull this out of your ass?
Hmmph! Open source software developed on a closed source operating system using closed source development tools. Shame on you!
Netscape DOES do tables right if you DO them right. For example, most (all?) the table problems I've seen is when a tag is not closed. Are they depending on MSIE to 'correct' the error for them?
And, what do you mean with 'spelling mistakes in the HTML'? I've never seen that happen before. Groundless accusations are pitiful.
Netscape is, though, still behind on standards (CSS!), but that's what Mozilla is going/suppose to fix.
WC3? Oh, you mean W3C! Sure, all-knowledgeable one.
The article indicated that evolution was what was being rooted out. I have not read anything against creationism, but I haven't went through all 1K+ posts.
What's that suppose to mean?
And, what's with this Slashdot load, nothing seems to be loading... This is too often now, and the comment limit is annoying.
Send your daughter off there! ;-)
That's why you browse with Lynx!
Ah I see, thanks. Actually, I tried ^Z as well, and I might've meant to post that instead. Regardless, I've been in Linux too long. But it makes good when I get sick of being in Windows. (Console is good!). Anyways, I didn't know you had to hit enter after ^Z.
Hmm. I remember doing this ages ago, but now I can't get it working. When I hit ^D it just inserts it rather than stop.
How dare you!
The light version of Slashdot does not read cookies. This requires me to login via each article to moderate/post. Of course, it's inconsistent enough since when you click on an article it's no longer in light mode. I use it because IMO the main page looks ugly because all the articles seem centered (lynx).
In this article.
Under a firewall, executed locally...
First off, I'd like to say both protocols ("Instant Messaging" versus "IRC") are designed differently. While I speak, there are 48,855 people on EFnet, which also shows me how much you actually researched your claims. (Although 40,000 of those are probably idle clients or bots.)
I remember this being posted (as a comment) on Slashdot by the author on some Pirates of Silicon Valley article. ( http://www.fre eyellow.com:8080/members7/geraldholmes/MScartoon1. html)
"monstrously complex"? I don't find hitting "+" and "-" and occasionally being prompted for dependencies a difficult task. Oh, you can also hit "?" if you get confused.
I see. That's not YOUR opinion, that's
principal. Or common sense? And you don't fit
in that category, because you're one of the elite.
Correct?
... or they can download it! For free! They're
aware you have to learn, that's why they haven't
given it a chance. Because you have to read
documentation.
I like Google because it has no ads, but it doesn't offer all the features that I've been used to with AltaVista. For example, you can't even search by phrases in Google (99% of my searches). Yeah, I've noticed they improved, too. No porn ads in searches!
Oh, that's all. So, you don't even have control of what packages goes into your system. I don't see how that couldn't of been implemented, and everything else ... Unless they were in a hurry, of course. But I'm sure it was thoroughly tested! (especially considering everyone complaining about it not working.)
You might try upgrading to 4.x. (It works in 4.6.)
... and the crazy Unix commands make sense when you read documentation or the man pages. I'm not against the GUI, but it's not any harder if you read up on what you're doing. The "stupid people"? You mean lazy. Oh, and maybe the less savvy (anti-nerds) will be left behind, but since they probably don't even install Windows from scratch, that's a different issue. It's getting easier, though -- I wonder how much more it can get without losing it's functionality.
OK, X didn't come with the most flashy fonts, but that doesn't mean you can't install them. You don't *have* to use MS fonts, there are plenty others out there, so Verdana is not a requirement. You could get xfstt and read the installation instructions which'll just require a symlink to your Windows fonts directory if you desire all of them.
Hmm, Netscape ran faster than IE on my P75, and also currently on my PIII450 (or so it seems).
it's still there. infoworld wouldn't care, as
long as they're getting money off the hits.
tua mater