Slashdot Mirror


User: PieDude

PieDude's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
15
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 15

  1. Re:The Source of This Headline? on Google and Apple Spent More On Patents Than R&D Last Year · · Score: -1

    Sources blahblahblah cites blobloblo journalistic integrity blablabla. Serious who talks like that?

  2. Why does Apple use its own connectors? on Apple Now Shipping Lightning To 30-Pin Adapters · · Score: -1

    Why they use their own connectors instead of the industry standard mini-usb?

  3. Re:Ummm on Sweden Returns Passport To Pirate Bay Co-Founder · · Score: 1

    bayfiles seems pretty sucky, I mean, ui with a single button and they manage to make that confusing.

    It's intended to be. It's just another scammy way TPB guys are making money.

  4. Re:seems a bit extreme on Sweden Returns Passport To Pirate Bay Co-Founder · · Score: 1

    I've also been to Cambodia/Thailand several times. Yes they are cheap countries to live, but they all seemed to live quality life there. The other TPB admin had a rent of $750 per country on Phnom Penh's most touristy street. Remember that people usually make around $30 per month there, if even that. It's also much higher than what the cheapest apartments in Sweden are.

    They obviously made lots of money running the site and then ran to live in beautiful countries (in Cambodia's case to use drugs) with their millions.

  5. Re:update on Mozilla To Bug Firefox Users With Old Adobe Reader, Flash, Silverlight · · Score: 0

    This also establishes Silverlight on the market as a true competitor to Flash. Otherwise Firefox wouldn't care about Silverlight.

  6. Re:seems a bit extreme on Sweden Returns Passport To Pirate Bay Co-Founder · · Score: 1

    Which is a huge problem for him as he is currently residing in Laos, unable to make it back to Thailand.

    By the way, doesn't anyone wonder how they're all living the dream in tropical countries? TPB wasn't supposed to be making lots of money, right?

  7. Re:Pathetic, isn't it? on Sweden Returns Passport To Pirate Bay Co-Founder · · Score: 0

    What billions? Do you have any concrete proof of how much they have "spent to take TPB down"?

  8. Re:Face recognition on Google Puts Souped-Up Neural Networks To Work · · Score: 0

    Yeah right, you work in "Google ads" but forgot that Google Content Network(tm) has ads all over the internet.

  9. Face recognition on Google Puts Souped-Up Neural Networks To Work · · Score: 0

    How long until Google starts using this for face recognition? It already has all the images of the internet indexed and is trying to make their own social network Google+ with profile pics and hidden party photos. How long until Google starts using this to recognize faces "to improve targeted ads"?

  10. Re:The reason why it won't work on Decentralized Social Networking — Why It Could Work · · Score: 3, Funny

    If there's no other option, I'll end my existence.

    Dude, don't do it! Slashdot is with you. We understand you. Don't do it. DON'T DO IT!

  11. Re:Facebook Privacy Controls on Facebook Privacy Boosted As Private Message 'Leak' Is Dismissed · · Score: 1

    I did. Facebook nicely announces new posts on Slashdot on my wall.

  12. Re:could somebody please explain the logos?? on 15 Years of Stuff That Matters · · Score: 1

    Hover mouse over it and theres your explanation.

  13. Linux? on 15 Years of Stuff That Matters · · Score: 4, Interesting

    15 years and no mention of Linux?

  14. Re:Microsoft cares about privacy on Advertisers Blast Microsoft Over IE Default Privacy Settings · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Like that is going to work. They did so well with the Safari incident, too.

  15. Microsoft cares about privacy on Advertisers Blast Microsoft Over IE Default Privacy Settings · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't really understand what people are crying about. Microsoft has said that they will try to make IE10 better for users and this is one of the features implemented to enable that. Note that Microsoft itself owns an advertising network and is part of the advertising committee - it's that much that Microsoft wants to protect their users.

    Of course, Microsoft's actions aren't new. They have always cared about privacy. Their tracking and beta debugging has always been opt-in. This in unlike Google where you often cannot even opt-out, and it's never opt-in in any case.

    Microsoft simply cares about users privacy and advertisers are crying about it. Too bad for them, I say. Advertisers on TV manage to work without any tracking, it should work on the internet too.