The NSA and any national intelligence forces have ZERO access to messages that are encrypted 256 at source and only decrypted using long (eg 25 character non-dictionary) passwords that have been exchanged manually. Even a SuperComputer would take hundreds of thousands of years or more to crack these, and never forget paper messages exchanged manually bypass ANY security altogether! So either stone-age bits of paper or very high tech encryption will suffice. If there is an additional random insert of characters based on a further password, decryption is totally totally impossible!
The only weak point is getting hold of the passwords and encryption methods. If these are secure, no-one else can get at the data. The sensible thing to do of course is to have a different passwords for each data destination, So even if one is compromised, all the others are secure!
The NSA and any national intelligence forces have ZERO access to messages that are encrypted 256 at source and only decrypted using long (eg 25 character non-dictionary) passwords that have been exchanged manually. Even a SuperComputer would take hundreds of thousands of years or more to crack these, and paper messages exchanged manually bypass ANY security altogether!
So either stone-age bits of paper or very high tech encryption will suffice. If there is an additional random insert of characters based on a further password, decryption is totally impossible!
Slashdot Mirror
The NSA and any national intelligence forces have ZERO access to messages that are encrypted 256 at source and only decrypted using long (eg 25 character non-dictionary) passwords that have been exchanged manually. Even a SuperComputer would take hundreds of thousands of years or more to crack these, and never forget paper messages exchanged manually bypass ANY security altogether! So either stone-age bits of paper or very high tech encryption will suffice. If there is an additional random insert of characters based on a further password, decryption is totally totally impossible! The only weak point is getting hold of the passwords and encryption methods. If these are secure, no-one else can get at the data. The sensible thing to do of course is to have a different passwords for each data destination, So even if one is compromised, all the others are secure!
The NSA and any national intelligence forces have ZERO access to messages that are encrypted 256 at source and only decrypted using long (eg 25 character non-dictionary) passwords that have been exchanged manually. Even a SuperComputer would take hundreds of thousands of years or more to crack these, and paper messages exchanged manually bypass ANY security altogether! So either stone-age bits of paper or very high tech encryption will suffice. If there is an additional random insert of characters based on a further password, decryption is totally impossible!
LOL! - Beats me why the USB port isn't hidden safely inside with secure bank access only! That would be BASIC common sense!
WOW! Boo Hoo NSA HaHa!!!!