And it's not only about language barriers but also about the disabled. If I were them I'd look up to see if there's any laws about making works accessible to the deaf. There's laws about government websites in the USA, surely there's a loophole somewhere about deaf people and movies.
The problem is that we live in a world of scarcity, we can't get all that stuff that we want, or need. The communist system tries to make everything equal, however that means everyone will be living in scarcity, and not really having what they need or want. Because everyone will be wanting, it will open the door for someone(s) to cheat the system and try to get more, once they have more they will hold on to it. And the system begins to fail.
This is your typical right-wing FUD right there. You don't understand the principle and then you go and make your own mind about so-called "facts".
Communism isn't about giving everyone a fucking Hummer and a fucking five-story house with a lot the size of ten football fields and gold jewelry.
You need to understand that making everyone equals doesn't mean there will be scarcity. Communism isn't about what people *want*, it's about what people *need*. Everybody should have free basic food, free basic housing, free potable water, free transportation, free health care, etc. You want extra? That's where the capitalism should kick in.
With more and more jobs going to automated factories, I'm pretty sure that's where we're headed. Too lazy and want to be passive? You don't get anything extra but you can live your life peacefully without sickness and hunger. You want more than the basics? You work to get it.
That's the problem. Some parts were made by subcontractors in Australia, where up is down, rats are as tall as humans and hop around and flat-chested 30-years-old women are classified as underage teenagers.
There's a difference between true communism and corrupt, dictatorial regimes.
For those too lazy to click on the link:
Communism (from Latin communis - common, universal) is a revolutionary socialist movement to create a classless, moneyless and stateless social order structured upon common ownership of the means of production, as well as a social, political and economic ideology that aims at the establishment of this social order.
A perfect example of true communism applied to a specific field would be open-source software. A perfect example of corruption (on the capitalism side, too) would be Microsoft, threatening computer manufacturers about increasing the cost of Windows if they offered Linux options.
Americans are obsessed with guns. They supposedly have the right to own them in case they need to overthrow a corrupt government but for the last two or three decades they haven't even blinked.
As they say, HTTP 1.1 isn't going anywhere -- this'll be a dual-stack web with 2.0 being used by new browsers and 1.1 still available for old browsers/people.
It is? That's good to know, thanks!
Everything he said assumed people were getting copies of the movies themselves without paying for them.
Subtitles are not the movie, they're text versions of translated text of the voice track of a movie.
They don't know either, the survey was outsourced to India.
And it's not only about language barriers but also about the disabled. If I were them I'd look up to see if there's any laws about making works accessible to the deaf. There's laws about government websites in the USA, surely there's a loophole somewhere about deaf people and movies.
Either you're a troll or a fucking asshole who didn't even care to read the topic before posting his pro-RIAA/MPAA bullshit.
We are? I better tape this flashlight to my gun, then.
This is your typical right-wing FUD right there. You don't understand the principle and then you go and make your own mind about so-called "facts".
Communism isn't about giving everyone a fucking Hummer and a fucking five-story house with a lot the size of ten football fields and gold jewelry.
You need to understand that making everyone equals doesn't mean there will be scarcity. Communism isn't about what people *want*, it's about what people *need*. Everybody should have free basic food, free basic housing, free potable water, free transportation, free health care, etc. You want extra? That's where the capitalism should kick in.
With more and more jobs going to automated factories, I'm pretty sure that's where we're headed. Too lazy and want to be passive? You don't get anything extra but you can live your life peacefully without sickness and hunger. You want more than the basics? You work to get it.
Where the hell is it written that your reward is subsistence living? The reward is everyone living up to the same standards.
We should just rename it once and for all, to end the debate.
I suggest Davydium.
So, it's spelled properly in all modern countries and spelled improperly in third-world countries.
That's the problem. Some parts were made by subcontractors in Australia, where up is down, rats are as tall as humans and hop around and flat-chested 30-years-old women are classified as underage teenagers.
There's a difference between true communism and corrupt, dictatorial regimes.
For those too lazy to click on the link:
A perfect example of true communism applied to a specific field would be open-source software.
A perfect example of corruption (on the capitalism side, too) would be Microsoft, threatening computer manufacturers about increasing the cost of Windows if they offered Linux options.
You hire Cole Sear.
Indeed it has, in 1991.
Americans are obsessed with guns. They supposedly have the right to own them in case they need to overthrow a corrupt government but for the last two or three decades they haven't even blinked.
Why do you write aluminum but you don't write gallum?
Because it's aluminium and gallium.
I use "libre-sex" all the time.
Follow the path to the Dragon's Lair!
And you can probably afford a spell checker. Every lair contains a villain. Every layer adds complexity.
Fuck you RIAA and fuck you France, eh?
In Korea, HTTP 1.1 is for old people.
Imagine how good they'd be if they were farmers.
We can last longer in bed because we're less sensitive, erm, down there.
And why the hell would there be $2.3 million in service costs to destroy $170,500 worth of equipment?
Sounds more like Fucking Retards Money Wasting Administration to me.