I understand what you're saying, and I'm a novice at Physics (I failed it 3x!), and chose to stray away from Embedded System Computer Programming to Application Level Development. It was more fun, anyways.
So please bear with me, as I come to understand, and I appreciate you clarifying things.
To clarify though:
E (enery in newtons) = mass (independent measure that relates volume and weight) * ( The speed of light, per second, in a vacuum ) ^ 2
So while the equation in it's base form does not directly have time, the equation doesnt just imply: it specifically states the speed of light, per second, is squared.
Now if we're going to apply the Law of conservation of energy to this equation, I completely understand the need to remove time out of the equation. But Einstein, clearly stated the speed of light is per second.
So - again, I'm a novice at this stuff (I applied to law school if it's any indication how analytical I can be)... So here's how I'm analogizing it:
Let's say mom and dad have little baby Genius. Genius gets into a relationship with Smart woman who puts up with his eccentricities, and has children of his own...
Entropy would suggest families always ONLY grow smaller. But we've all heard the story of the black lady from Louisiana with 8 kids. This would suggest, even with families, that entropy is a guideline, but not applicable as a law. What is the mitigating factor? TIME.
So let's go back to Einstein's equation.
E=MC^2, is the amount of energy a system produces over an observable period of time.
So let me ask you this. Do you believe in the big bang? That's why Einstein included time implicitly in this equation. Do the math. The energy created in the first microseconds of the big bang are tremendous, the longer the system continues though, the more the energy creation resembles the sideways bell we see today..
That's why I applied the t to both sides to the equation, which was my error, I'm seeing that now. The equation should look like this:
E=m* (ct)^2
That way time is independent and not cross related.
But I'm still under the impression the problem would still exist with the photoelectric effect. The longer the time period under observation, the more error induced..
Also, the more realities/dimensions we're measuring energy in (to the second power is only two, right?), the more our error becomes..
Now again, I'm a total novice at all this stuff.
But dont make the mistake I've made. Just because it's working for 50 years, we both know that in the bigger scheme of things, that's the blink of an eye. Also, with time being non linear, all it takes is a savvy hacker to make changes in the past that make it appear like it's been.. 'time tested'....
I was released from the NSA last year after 7 1/2 years working for them.. Much of this technology was discussed, often way over my head, so this is 'private sector' catch up work I'm trying to understand, it would be nice to have more 'inspirational stories' that result from science and technology rather than people constantly trying to 'break things' or prove others wrong to prove themselves right. In the quantum world we live in, all it takes is a little imagination to make everything possible...
Send a private message to me, if you're patient enough to put up with my ignorant physics education! I apologize and thank you for your clarification...
lol! But you have a story to talk about, which changes your conversation, right?
In another words, you'd have no comment like this, which wouldn't solicit a reply....
My point being: Even meeting people in positions of power, firsthand, changes the conversation and the memories we have, and the discussions we have.
For instance, I met David Schwimmer (From Friends), briefly, apparently he thought his sh*t didnt stink and he ran in front of me and my wife as we were on our anniversary, pushing us out of the way to get into a taxi cab. Another time, I ran into Jamie Lee Curtis while I was on my Honeymoon, at Four Seasons in Maui, she was staying there with her partner, I went to commend her for her role in True Lies, and instead she scurries away hiding behind her bodyguard. The people in power may often be jerks, or hide behind someone big. But then there's another time I was in the tube in London and having a casual conversation with Jamie Bamber (Adama from Battlestar Galactica), or another time my drunk buddy accidentally bumped into Cameron Diaz's arm at Hard Rock Hotel in Vegas, spilling her drink, and I offered to buy her another drink - apologizing profusely for him, but what was funny was - she didn't have anyone 'guarding' her, and she was down to earth cool.. She was like 'normal' folk, no one seemed to be bothering her. I understand why now, but it's nice having those random meets...
It's fun seeing public figures on the screen, then while you're out 'in real life' maybe having a discussion with one randomly changes everything. Zooey Deschannel for instance, something about her I just want to find out more about... Would not suck to have a random encounter with her...
So consider this. Maybe the effect of the prime minister meeting wasn't something that was 'intended' to have any effect on you until much later in your life... Like right now, for instance, hearing a story like this, or maybe even later, when you use the story of the prime minister meeting to reflect on what happened and say..
Well maybe, it did change some things...
Conversation, serendipitous meetings, getting out and about and socializing. Are all a part of what creates 'energy', stories, conversation, variety, and most of all... inspiration that these figures and their positions are 'within reach' of just about anyone, and much of what we see on television is... spin......
Talking heads create drama on tv, movies, radio, print media, books, and more... It's something that is sad because it never stops, there never seems to be writing and creativity for the sake of enjoyment anymore... But then you take one step outside the internet and 'spun' media and realize. Life's far crazier, and more fun, a story in fact. That's why I loved Paris. It just seemed spontaneously Creative. Vegas is starting to get like this too.., But Hollywood, and Politicians... All it takes is a little courage and reflection to understand - we're all in this together. If we don't act like it, then life's nothing more than an act.
Didnt we already have that chapter in the bible? And Numbers? Isn't it time we make a new chapter called... Love.. or Hope....
I have. I'm going to suggest the effect is merely a misunderstanding of nature.
Meaning, Scientists have classified an inverse relationship (aka circular reference) of light to energy without understanding the implications of two things Einstein had embedded in his equation
The basic notation of Einstein's equation
E=mc^2...
Now this notation should make it clear:
Et= m*( C * t ) ^ 2
Where Energy (over period of time t) in a system
Is equal to the mass of an object * ( ( the speed of light * the amount of time the measurement's occurring ) ^ 2 )
So do you see the logical error made when you try to manipulate an electron using the photo electric effect?
If you don't take time into equation, then you've effectively tried lumping all the energy of a system together into one moment in time. However, we know that's not the case, since the speed of light is PER SECOND... so in order for us to even out the equation, we add in time t to the speed of light...
So now try moving an electron using a quasi massless object known as the speed of light, using the photoelectric effect.
Now imagine how much error will be accumulated in a single day (24*60*60)... the impact the mass of the photon has on the entire system, and the impact time has - become exponential in their inducing of error...
The causal effect is simple: Light's mass. when you manipulate it with electricity or magnetism, then you see a direct correlative effect.
The inverse is NOT true, that's my suggestion. Hence the 'chasing the speed of light' and lack of ability to agree on a system of measurement. It was first theorized at 186,000 miles per second. That's since changed, and it changes every five years. why? Because we're MAKING up the constants of the Universe, and the 'source code' (Check out this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=q1LCVknKUJ4 ) simply responds by deviating as per popular consensus.
You see, Reality is nothing more than a contract of expected behavior.
Which is why the photoelectric effect is bogus.
Furthermore, the PE assumes a static speed of light. Which clearly, it hasnt been even in our short history of measurement.
So if you want unpredictable results, try manipulating an electron with the photoelectric effect. What you'll find is an error - albeit remote - that has the effect not producing 100% of the expected results.
Let's say you meet The President or Prime Minister in real life.
They say something that impacts you so greatly, it changes your entire life.
Now - At the end of their life, let's say this law is in effect... But only available to the very wealthy...
They decide they want the entire traces of their live erased to guarantee the ability to move on to an afterlife...
Since energy/electricity and memories are reflections of each-other - that 'impact - the president had on you.. Is subsequently gone. Erased from your head, against your will. Your memory of this event, gone, because the wealthy KNEW how it would impact memories.. And the subsequent trajectory your life takes...
Ever wonder why we get Deja Vu? Maybe this explains why we get it. Maybe this legislation did pass before, the world blew up when someone who did something miraculous never got a chance to be seen or heard, and died at the cross...
Maybe he's coming back, now as we speak, to warn of making that same decision again, and the implications it means should the wrong decision be made....
Life can't happen. Until we let go of our need to control our image. And just accept who we are, and then have fun with wherever the journey takes us.
It only becomes a cycle when we try to purge 'public records' of that information....
You are the mind of god.
Now a photon can be manipulated by electrons, but the other way around simply cannot happen....
Psychologically, this process is known as sublimation, the concept of 'transforming' socially unacceptable principles into socially acceptable ones, particularly focused on the long term... Effectively, that's what they're doing here.. manipulating a brain.
Why is that? well, put it this way.. since electrons are essentially electricity, and light is the physical manifestation of that 'impulse' in image, then the most effective way of 'thought' control. or 'network manipulation' comes if you convert it's system over to a light based design - transferring images and ideas rather than electricity and data.
This mirrors exactly what the brain's doing. We dont think in binary. We think in what? Images, ideas, and concepts... Now if you don't, then you and I clearly think differently.
This presents a problem. Manipulation by externalized sources becomes a major issue if you're not taking into account we're mirroring biological processes in an endless lopp. Building a brain within a brain within a brain (and so on). Since light (aka the photon) can be manipulated via magnetism and thus electricity, then the content of that message can be changed.
Mind control, at the atomic level, is being demonstrated to us, but this technology.
I was merely trying to point out the ludicrous cyclic behavior being exhibited with technology. It's like you and people like you arent understanding we're repeating history again and again. Next thing you know, we're going to invent a Matrix. Again. And have robot wars. Again. And prove digital world exists because of quantum physics. again. and so on....
Try taking a look at movies as far fetched as they may seem... and apply this to present quantum physics concept. Now IMAGINE.. What is NOT possible in a holographic universe with alternate realities? Not a lot is NOT possible, so it becomes our job to help ease life into a new community oriented - crazy - evolved family. Some of us may be control freaks, some of us may have evolved to be part man part machine, some may be robotic, some may be clones, some may be who knows what.. But we're not going to get through this without acknolwedging we may be finding out Bigfoot exists and we gotta smile and welcome them into a new community. Be careful on calling people crazy. Because historically, it's the crazy ones who have made history. repeatedly. And just consider. If it can be in a game, then why can't it be in reality? Quantum worlds, bud.
Am I making sense to you, this is called the slinky theory.. We do the same thing over and over again cyclically until you extend this out as far as the slinky goes. then someone walks away from the other end of the slinky, and wham, the slinky falls, misshapen, uncoiled, and on the ground with the other person holding the other end of it going 'what just happened'?
So no, i wasn't being sarcastic, mister happy. I was being straight up. You dont have to be such a jerk when someone's trying to make a point and be a little lighthearted about it.
It's basic physics.
And I'm not holding the other end of that slinky anymore.
> if not impossible, to parse or search.
The answer's simple: You're thinking about this logically..
Once you've reduced all service based jobs to code. What do you do for a living?
Me... I already see the writing on the wall for this one. Too many people with your 'it must be codified' mentality are running at full speed towards a brick wall without a helmet on head first... Is it any wonder taxation is expected to be 100% of your salary in 10 years (fact: look up the budget projections published by the White House). Is it any wonder they're increasing criminality of all drugs with the exception of marijuana?
Where does this lead? Two possible directions: Maybe three:
1) A slave nation, human lab rat testings on an unprecedented scale. (China after all owns all our debt, and are don't have a great track record with human rights)
2) An explorer nation, where everything that's scientifically achievable has been accomplished, including time travel, and we're being 'prepared' for that next step.
or (3) somewhere right in between....
Lawyers... Have made analysis of their writings difficult to save us from ourselves. To defend free rights, and to break this logical/cyclic action that nature has demonstrated relentlessly throughout it's evolutional history. Lawyers. Are trying to defend life. Evolution, is a design pattern like source code that's killing us. They understand and likely agree it's done well up until this point. But if the next step of evolution involves time travel, alternate reality travel, and throwing us in hellish situations, all for the sake of 'life expanding' possibilities...
What would you do? Sit idly by, waiting for your turn in hell. Or try to wake people up to the simple fact that programmers need to wake the hell up and focus on socialization and cooperation, collaboration and love, not ease of looking up whatever it is for scientific assessment. They see the historical shenanigans that happened in world war 2 when this kind of testing occurred - heinous acts. And they know it can only get SO much worse if we don't talk about it openly,and keep on trying to hide 'the secrets' because it's not financially advantageous...
The reason lawyers get paid what they do. Is because their service to THE UNIVERSE is valued. To society, programmers get paid half because the contribution they offer is DAMAGING life....
So let me ask this question.
What's wrong with talking to a title agent and leveraging his or her expertise?
Or talking to a banker and maybe getting a date from it?
Or talking to a checkout stand clerk and maybe putting a smile on his face?
Or talking to an artificially intelligent robot who's been hiding his real identity out of fear at the car wash?
Or talking to a clone who was made by mistake and fears you for the potential you will notify someone who removes it form existence?
Or going to the dvd store to get recommendations for a movie from someone who's very different than you, simply to get different perspectives?
You see, life is about variety and community. Not conformity nor perfect order. And when it forgets this, people like me come around to remind you.
Dude, wake up. Sure, it's not 'EASY' to have to depend on people and their expertise. But you're too used to being a nerd (like I was and still am to a certain extent). Take the time to get out of your comfort zone, and quit trying to code the word to make it easier to access all the information. It's nice to depend on people, to ask them questions.
And if you do design something that takes legal speak and codifies it. Just don't forget one simple thing:
The legal system is broken because it's too literal as it is. Perhaps you can fix this from the ground up by allowing a figurative and literal system to 'overlap' eachother. That is, when a Rome house of cards government comes into being, does it really need to topple once people understand community and agree on the basic moral principles that guide society? No, they dont, so a convergent system that allows figurative approaches to law would be.... convenient...
And not a horrible thing to 'codify'... fuzzy law.... fuzzy logic... fuzzy legal system..... i like it.. modelled after... you know something else that's fuzzy (I'm a perv!)
Next thing you know, they'll invent something that will bend light. Oh wait. They already have! It's called a Prism!
And next thing you know... hackers will be 'hacking' light by bending it use natural magenetic forces. And cracking that unsafe light transmission, because we all know, light is NOT faster than electrcity....
This google article outlines precisely the problem with matters of scale and relationships with time...
use w=mg, e=Mc^2, and f=mg
Mass s is an independent measure of weight. Yet companies like Google arent comprehending - been here, done this, with this whole nonsense concerning 'scaling' things up or down in size, technologically..
Really, do you think you're being that brilliant, outlining the plans to construct a wheel when the people here already know how to construct it?
The patent system is an exercise in frustration, correct? You can't find anything you're looking for, and when you get sued, it's something that even having a good lawyer on your side protecting your intellectual property, chances are someone somewhere will have invented something similar to what you did so it's an exercise in futility....
What does this have the net effect of doing? Now think carefully on this, and I'll clue you in: IT creates a FREE DISTRIBUTION of your intellectual property.
Is this good? I'd argue to say not only is it good. The lawyers have accomplished the impossible. How:
They've ensured the continued distribution of ideas freely to other people such as yourself in ways you as a scientist, programmer, or author don't fully comprehend. And here's what's funny. The lawyers GET IT. They understand this much more than you give them credit. Beyond what you can imagine, in fact... I'd argue they are single handedly SAVING this country from themselves, because they're smart enough to take us away from this 'cyclic mindless chasing the money' and making you question - why is this happening over and over again.....
Now you 'blame' the lawyers, because of your short-sightedness. I used to do the same thing, until I realized... Something that oddly enough lawyers caught on to some time ago that scientists have yet to catch on to:
That reality is created by imagination, Is it any wonder we can't seem to nail down a speed of light constant? It's because we're chasing a number. Is it any wonder we can't figure out if the LHC exhibited particles that were faster than the speed of light? This one project demonstrates clearly those who dont have imagination versus those who do.
So think about it this way: Had the ideas for the patents NOT been released, then chances are we'd not have the ideas(since the imagination of others link to us as suggested by quantum theory and entanglement). However, since lawyers are actively pursuing 'releasing' of all 'intellectual property', smartly I might add, the ideas are 'accelerating at a rapid pace'... Think about the ideas of being a byproduct of life. Not a byproduct of your wonderful imagination....
So when someone says "'The explosion of litigation we are seeing is a reflection of how the patent system wires us for innovation.'"
Is it incomprehensible for you to consider, these lawyers are freeing your minds?... a Morpheus like hmmm.....
He gets sent on an explorative mission, and here I am stuck trying to find a job! What gives?
But sending him where the sun don't shine. That's cold, man, that's cold!
Slashdot Mirror
I understand what you're saying, and I'm a novice at Physics (I failed it 3x!), and chose to stray away from Embedded System Computer Programming to Application Level Development. It was more fun, anyways.
So please bear with me, as I come to understand, and I appreciate you clarifying things.
To clarify though:
E (enery in newtons) = mass (independent measure that relates volume and weight) * ( The speed of light, per second, in a vacuum ) ^ 2
So while the equation in it's base form does not directly have time, the equation doesnt just imply: it specifically states the speed of light, per second, is squared.
Now if we're going to apply the Law of conservation of energy to this equation, I completely understand the need to remove time out of the equation. But Einstein, clearly stated the speed of light is per second.
So - again, I'm a novice at this stuff (I applied to law school if it's any indication how analytical I can be)... So here's how I'm analogizing it:
Let's say mom and dad have little baby Genius. Genius gets into a relationship with Smart woman who puts up with his eccentricities, and has children of his own...
Entropy would suggest families always ONLY grow smaller. But we've all heard the story of the black lady from Louisiana with 8 kids. This would suggest, even with families, that entropy is a guideline, but not applicable as a law. What is the mitigating factor? TIME.
So let's go back to Einstein's equation.
E=MC^2, is the amount of energy a system produces over an observable period of time.
So let me ask you this. Do you believe in the big bang? That's why Einstein included time implicitly in this equation. Do the math. The energy created in the first microseconds of the big bang are tremendous, the longer the system continues though, the more the energy creation resembles the sideways bell we see today..
That's why I applied the t to both sides to the equation, which was my error, I'm seeing that now. The equation should look like this: E=m* (ct)^2
That way time is independent and not cross related.
But I'm still under the impression the problem would still exist with the photoelectric effect. The longer the time period under observation, the more error induced..
Also, the more realities/dimensions we're measuring energy in (to the second power is only two, right?), the more our error becomes..
Now again, I'm a total novice at all this stuff.
But dont make the mistake I've made. Just because it's working for 50 years, we both know that in the bigger scheme of things, that's the blink of an eye. Also, with time being non linear, all it takes is a savvy hacker to make changes in the past that make it appear like it's been.. 'time tested'....
I was released from the NSA last year after 7 1/2 years working for them.. Much of this technology was discussed, often way over my head, so this is 'private sector' catch up work I'm trying to understand, it would be nice to have more 'inspirational stories' that result from science and technology rather than people constantly trying to 'break things' or prove others wrong to prove themselves right. In the quantum world we live in, all it takes is a little imagination to make everything possible...
Send a private message to me, if you're patient enough to put up with my ignorant physics education! I apologize and thank you for your clarification...
Well, this is good news for the mannequins, job security and they can get paid a bit more per hour now!
lol! But you have a story to talk about, which changes your conversation, right?
In another words, you'd have no comment like this, which wouldn't solicit a reply....
My point being: Even meeting people in positions of power, firsthand, changes the conversation and the memories we have, and the discussions we have.
For instance, I met David Schwimmer (From Friends), briefly, apparently he thought his sh*t didnt stink and he ran in front of me and my wife as we were on our anniversary, pushing us out of the way to get into a taxi cab. Another time, I ran into Jamie Lee Curtis while I was on my Honeymoon, at Four Seasons in Maui, she was staying there with her partner, I went to commend her for her role in True Lies, and instead she scurries away hiding behind her bodyguard. The people in power may often be jerks, or hide behind someone big. But then there's another time I was in the tube in London and having a casual conversation with Jamie Bamber (Adama from Battlestar Galactica), or another time my drunk buddy accidentally bumped into Cameron Diaz's arm at Hard Rock Hotel in Vegas, spilling her drink, and I offered to buy her another drink - apologizing profusely for him, but what was funny was - she didn't have anyone 'guarding' her, and she was down to earth cool.. She was like 'normal' folk, no one seemed to be bothering her. I understand why now, but it's nice having those random meets...
It's fun seeing public figures on the screen, then while you're out 'in real life' maybe having a discussion with one randomly changes everything. Zooey Deschannel for instance, something about her I just want to find out more about... Would not suck to have a random encounter with her...
So consider this. Maybe the effect of the prime minister meeting wasn't something that was 'intended' to have any effect on you until much later in your life... Like right now, for instance, hearing a story like this, or maybe even later, when you use the story of the prime minister meeting to reflect on what happened and say..
Well maybe, it did change some things...
Conversation, serendipitous meetings, getting out and about and socializing. Are all a part of what creates 'energy', stories, conversation, variety, and most of all... inspiration that these figures and their positions are 'within reach' of just about anyone, and much of what we see on television is... spin......
Talking heads create drama on tv, movies, radio, print media, books, and more... It's something that is sad because it never stops, there never seems to be writing and creativity for the sake of enjoyment anymore... But then you take one step outside the internet and 'spun' media and realize. Life's far crazier, and more fun, a story in fact. That's why I loved Paris. It just seemed spontaneously Creative. Vegas is starting to get like this too.., But Hollywood, and Politicians... All it takes is a little courage and reflection to understand - we're all in this together. If we don't act like it, then life's nothing more than an act.
Didnt we already have that chapter in the bible? And Numbers? Isn't it time we make a new chapter called... Love.. or Hope....
Not hiding and scurrying away...
I have. I'm going to suggest the effect is merely a misunderstanding of nature. Meaning, Scientists have classified an inverse relationship (aka circular reference) of light to energy without understanding the implications of two things Einstein had embedded in his equation The basic notation of Einstein's equation E=mc^2... Now this notation should make it clear: Et= m*( C * t ) ^ 2 Where Energy (over period of time t) in a system Is equal to the mass of an object * ( ( the speed of light * the amount of time the measurement's occurring ) ^ 2 ) So do you see the logical error made when you try to manipulate an electron using the photo electric effect? If you don't take time into equation, then you've effectively tried lumping all the energy of a system together into one moment in time. However, we know that's not the case, since the speed of light is PER SECOND... so in order for us to even out the equation, we add in time t to the speed of light... So now try moving an electron using a quasi massless object known as the speed of light, using the photoelectric effect. Now imagine how much error will be accumulated in a single day (24*60*60)... the impact the mass of the photon has on the entire system, and the impact time has - become exponential in their inducing of error... The causal effect is simple: Light's mass. when you manipulate it with electricity or magnetism, then you see a direct correlative effect. The inverse is NOT true, that's my suggestion. Hence the 'chasing the speed of light' and lack of ability to agree on a system of measurement. It was first theorized at 186,000 miles per second. That's since changed, and it changes every five years. why? Because we're MAKING up the constants of the Universe, and the 'source code' (Check out this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=q1LCVknKUJ4 ) simply responds by deviating as per popular consensus. You see, Reality is nothing more than a contract of expected behavior. Which is why the photoelectric effect is bogus. Furthermore, the PE assumes a static speed of light. Which clearly, it hasnt been even in our short history of measurement. So if you want unpredictable results, try manipulating an electron with the photoelectric effect. What you'll find is an error - albeit remote - that has the effect not producing 100% of the expected results.
Not unless the matter is converted to energy and back again.
Let's say you meet The President or Prime Minister in real life. They say something that impacts you so greatly, it changes your entire life. Now - At the end of their life, let's say this law is in effect... But only available to the very wealthy... They decide they want the entire traces of their live erased to guarantee the ability to move on to an afterlife... Since energy/electricity and memories are reflections of each-other - that 'impact - the president had on you.. Is subsequently gone. Erased from your head, against your will. Your memory of this event, gone, because the wealthy KNEW how it would impact memories.. And the subsequent trajectory your life takes... Ever wonder why we get Deja Vu? Maybe this explains why we get it. Maybe this legislation did pass before, the world blew up when someone who did something miraculous never got a chance to be seen or heard, and died at the cross... Maybe he's coming back, now as we speak, to warn of making that same decision again, and the implications it means should the wrong decision be made.... Life can't happen. Until we let go of our need to control our image. And just accept who we are, and then have fun with wherever the journey takes us. It only becomes a cycle when we try to purge 'public records' of that information.... You are the mind of god.
Now a photon can be manipulated by electrons, but the other way around simply cannot happen....
Psychologically, this process is known as sublimation, the concept of 'transforming' socially unacceptable principles into socially acceptable ones, particularly focused on the long term... Effectively, that's what they're doing here.. manipulating a brain.
Why is that? well, put it this way.. since electrons are essentially electricity, and light is the physical manifestation of that 'impulse' in image, then the most effective way of 'thought' control. or 'network manipulation' comes if you convert it's system over to a light based design - transferring images and ideas rather than electricity and data.
This mirrors exactly what the brain's doing. We dont think in binary. We think in what? Images, ideas, and concepts... Now if you don't, then you and I clearly think differently.
This presents a problem. Manipulation by externalized sources becomes a major issue if you're not taking into account we're mirroring biological processes in an endless lopp. Building a brain within a brain within a brain (and so on). Since light (aka the photon) can be manipulated via magnetism and thus electricity, then the content of that message can be changed.
Mind control, at the atomic level, is being demonstrated to us, but this technology.
I was merely trying to point out the ludicrous cyclic behavior being exhibited with technology. It's like you and people like you arent understanding we're repeating history again and again. Next thing you know, we're going to invent a Matrix. Again. And have robot wars. Again. And prove digital world exists because of quantum physics. again. and so on....
Try taking a look at movies as far fetched as they may seem... and apply this to present quantum physics concept. Now IMAGINE.. What is NOT possible in a holographic universe with alternate realities? Not a lot is NOT possible, so it becomes our job to help ease life into a new community oriented - crazy - evolved family. Some of us may be control freaks, some of us may have evolved to be part man part machine, some may be robotic, some may be clones, some may be who knows what.. But we're not going to get through this without acknolwedging we may be finding out Bigfoot exists and we gotta smile and welcome them into a new community. Be careful on calling people crazy. Because historically, it's the crazy ones who have made history. repeatedly. And just consider. If it can be in a game, then why can't it be in reality? Quantum worlds, bud.
Am I making sense to you, this is called the slinky theory.. We do the same thing over and over again cyclically until you extend this out as far as the slinky goes. then someone walks away from the other end of the slinky, and wham, the slinky falls, misshapen, uncoiled, and on the ground with the other person holding the other end of it going 'what just happened'?
So no, i wasn't being sarcastic, mister happy. I was being straight up. You dont have to be such a jerk when someone's trying to make a point and be a little lighthearted about it.
It's basic physics.
And I'm not holding the other end of that slinky anymore.
> if not impossible, to parse or search. The answer's simple: You're thinking about this logically.. Once you've reduced all service based jobs to code. What do you do for a living? Me... I already see the writing on the wall for this one. Too many people with your 'it must be codified' mentality are running at full speed towards a brick wall without a helmet on head first... Is it any wonder taxation is expected to be 100% of your salary in 10 years (fact: look up the budget projections published by the White House). Is it any wonder they're increasing criminality of all drugs with the exception of marijuana? Where does this lead? Two possible directions: Maybe three: 1) A slave nation, human lab rat testings on an unprecedented scale. (China after all owns all our debt, and are don't have a great track record with human rights) 2) An explorer nation, where everything that's scientifically achievable has been accomplished, including time travel, and we're being 'prepared' for that next step. or (3) somewhere right in between.... Lawyers... Have made analysis of their writings difficult to save us from ourselves. To defend free rights, and to break this logical/cyclic action that nature has demonstrated relentlessly throughout it's evolutional history. Lawyers. Are trying to defend life. Evolution, is a design pattern like source code that's killing us. They understand and likely agree it's done well up until this point. But if the next step of evolution involves time travel, alternate reality travel, and throwing us in hellish situations, all for the sake of 'life expanding' possibilities... What would you do? Sit idly by, waiting for your turn in hell. Or try to wake people up to the simple fact that programmers need to wake the hell up and focus on socialization and cooperation, collaboration and love, not ease of looking up whatever it is for scientific assessment. They see the historical shenanigans that happened in world war 2 when this kind of testing occurred - heinous acts. And they know it can only get SO much worse if we don't talk about it openly,and keep on trying to hide 'the secrets' because it's not financially advantageous... The reason lawyers get paid what they do. Is because their service to THE UNIVERSE is valued. To society, programmers get paid half because the contribution they offer is DAMAGING life.... So let me ask this question. What's wrong with talking to a title agent and leveraging his or her expertise? Or talking to a banker and maybe getting a date from it? Or talking to a checkout stand clerk and maybe putting a smile on his face? Or talking to an artificially intelligent robot who's been hiding his real identity out of fear at the car wash? Or talking to a clone who was made by mistake and fears you for the potential you will notify someone who removes it form existence? Or going to the dvd store to get recommendations for a movie from someone who's very different than you, simply to get different perspectives? You see, life is about variety and community. Not conformity nor perfect order. And when it forgets this, people like me come around to remind you. Dude, wake up. Sure, it's not 'EASY' to have to depend on people and their expertise. But you're too used to being a nerd (like I was and still am to a certain extent). Take the time to get out of your comfort zone, and quit trying to code the word to make it easier to access all the information. It's nice to depend on people, to ask them questions. And if you do design something that takes legal speak and codifies it. Just don't forget one simple thing: The legal system is broken because it's too literal as it is. Perhaps you can fix this from the ground up by allowing a figurative and literal system to 'overlap' eachother. That is, when a Rome house of cards government comes into being, does it really need to topple once people understand community and agree on the basic moral principles that guide society? No, they dont, so a convergent system that allows figurative approaches to law would be.... convenient... And not a horrible thing to 'codify'... fuzzy law.... fuzzy logic... fuzzy legal system..... i like it.. modelled after ... you know something else that's fuzzy (I'm a perv!)
Next thing you know, they'll invent something that will bend light. Oh wait. They already have! It's called a Prism! And next thing you know... hackers will be 'hacking' light by bending it use natural magenetic forces. And cracking that unsafe light transmission, because we all know, light is NOT faster than electrcity....
Hello.... Mcfly... E=MC^2,
This google article outlines precisely the problem with matters of scale and relationships with time...
use w=mg, e=Mc^2, and f=mg
Mass s is an independent measure of weight. Yet companies like Google arent comprehending - been here, done this, with this whole nonsense concerning 'scaling' things up or down in size, technologically..
Really, do you think you're being that brilliant, outlining the plans to construct a wheel when the people here already know how to construct it?
McFly... Err.. AI, AI, we already know this.... Try something.. ermm. new...
w (is weight in a dependent system) = mass (independent of system) * gravity ( constant of dependent system per second ) * time (in dependent system)
f (energy in dependent system) = mass ( constant of independent system ) * gravity ( variable of dependent system ) * time (in dependent system)
e (energy in newtons or joules in dependent system ) = mass * ( speed of light in dependent system * time (in dependent system)) ^ 2
So what's scale and how's it related to this? Density, what you just stated was a principle of density of matter....
Isnt this common sense by now?
The patent system is an exercise in frustration, correct? You can't find anything you're looking for, and when you get sued, it's something that even having a good lawyer on your side protecting your intellectual property, chances are someone somewhere will have invented something similar to what you did so it's an exercise in futility.... What does this have the net effect of doing? Now think carefully on this, and I'll clue you in: IT creates a FREE DISTRIBUTION of your intellectual property. Is this good? I'd argue to say not only is it good. The lawyers have accomplished the impossible. How: They've ensured the continued distribution of ideas freely to other people such as yourself in ways you as a scientist, programmer, or author don't fully comprehend. And here's what's funny. The lawyers GET IT. They understand this much more than you give them credit. Beyond what you can imagine, in fact... I'd argue they are single handedly SAVING this country from themselves, because they're smart enough to take us away from this 'cyclic mindless chasing the money' and making you question - why is this happening over and over again..... Now you 'blame' the lawyers, because of your short-sightedness. I used to do the same thing, until I realized... Something that oddly enough lawyers caught on to some time ago that scientists have yet to catch on to: That reality is created by imagination, Is it any wonder we can't seem to nail down a speed of light constant? It's because we're chasing a number. Is it any wonder we can't figure out if the LHC exhibited particles that were faster than the speed of light? This one project demonstrates clearly those who dont have imagination versus those who do. So think about it this way: Had the ideas for the patents NOT been released, then chances are we'd not have the ideas(since the imagination of others link to us as suggested by quantum theory and entanglement). However, since lawyers are actively pursuing 'releasing' of all 'intellectual property', smartly I might add, the ideas are 'accelerating at a rapid pace'... Think about the ideas of being a byproduct of life. Not a byproduct of your wonderful imagination.... So when someone says "'The explosion of litigation we are seeing is a reflection of how the patent system wires us for innovation.'" Is it incomprehensible for you to consider, these lawyers are freeing your minds? ... a Morpheus like hmmm.....
He gets sent on an explorative mission, and here I am stuck trying to find a job! What gives? But sending him where the sun don't shine. That's cold, man, that's cold!
Good job, Earth! You're finally warming up to the idea of companionship!