Slashdot Mirror


User: SEWilco

SEWilco's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
5,473
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 5,473

  1. A Chip Off The Old Block on Changing Earth's Orbit Proposed · · Score: 2

    Of course the posts are funny when we're talking about the ultimate mass transportation system. I submitted the article, and I was tempted to point out that this might help Linux survive its second billion years. That would have really stirred up the responses...

  2. Re:Wrong approach on Changing Earth's Orbit Proposed · · Score: 1
    The Earth already has a large magnetic bubble around it. The Moon doesn't. Build a strong magnetic field around the Moon. But would that cause additional drag that would slow down the orbit and move us toward the Sun? Well, if you can turn the magnetic field on and off every two weeks you could create thrust in different directions...

    But would probably be easier to drop some asteroids on the Moon to speed it up a little (and shift the center of gravity a little), then chew up the asteroids (or the Moon) and spit it out with mass drivers to apply thrust to the Moon.

  3. Re:Right... on Changing Earth's Orbit Proposed · · Score: 1

    If we're maneuvering asteroids, nothing would have an unobstructed shot at us.

  4. Re:Seems a little arrogant on Changing Earth's Orbit Proposed · · Score: 1

    The ecological calculation is greatly simplified when the alternative is to leave the Earth where it is and letting it burn to a cinder. Besides, preventing getting blown out of the heavens by a big rock can only be solved by putting an engine on that big rock and moving it. Within a billion years we'll have a lot of former Doomsday asteroids with drive engines on them...

  5. Re:Unanimous.... on Changing Earth's Orbit Proposed · · Score: 1

    So the British will move us into a warmer orbit, the Libyans will move us into a cooler orbit, the Swiss will make the orbit take exactly 365.25 days...Everybody dance!

  6. Re:It's an organizer? on Cheap Linux PDAs · · Score: 2

    The point of having Linux is so there's a chance that you can make the thing more useful to you. If you get a black box which you can't change, you're stuck with it and its current bugs. If you can change it, you (or someone you hire) can improve it.

  7. Me Too on "Mirror cells" May Be Key To Communication · · Score: 1

    Gee, I could have done that research!

  8. Re:Covert Channels on NSA + VMware = Crackproof Computing? · · Score: 1
    Indeed, any shared resource including CPU usage can be measured by something else on the same hardware.

    Or someone with access to that hardware can accomplish copying through other means -- looped back serial ports, feeding video image to a machine with video capture card, making beeps and listening to them...

  9. Re: Can You Suggest Any Non-Zero Sum Games? on Can You Suggest Any Non-Zero Sum Games? · · Score: 1

    It depends upon the simulation. Some have limited resources which you have to use, and you have to accomplish something to "win" before running out of a resource. A game can be tuned to make it more open-ended, such as considering fusion to be "free" power and using that power to recycle everything -- including mining old landfills which were occupying real estate.

  10. Whose Code Is It Anyway? on Can You Suggest Any Non-Zero Sum Games? · · Score: 2

    I'll give 5,000 points to whoever creates a computer-based version of "Whose Line Is It Anyway?".

  11. Juno? on Sun Releases Grid 5.2 for Linux · · Score: 3

    Well, there's no mention of an interface for Juno distributed processing...

  12. Re:remote control for emergency landing? on NASA Controls Jet With Nerve Signals · · Score: 1

    Well, it is more complicated than that...for example at 300 MPH it's not unusual to have significant weather events within 1/2 hour. But it's almost possible, so I'm only being a little silly. Particularly because there already are aircraft for which it will be easier to do. Not that pilot incapacitation happens easily...

  13. Re:remote control for emergency landing? on NASA Controls Jet With Nerve Signals · · Score: 1

    If the avionics are advanced enough for this, just push the red "EMERGENCY" button on the top of the instrument panel. It will put the plane level at altitude, and eventually it'll land as best it can at the nearest airport. It's there to give Hollywood stewardesses other things to do. It's standard equipment, effective as of the next "Die Hard" movie.

  14. Re:Login names on The Etymology Of NickNames? · · Score: 1
    Indeed, I chose this login name about 30 years ago because it's short enough for many systems. It's also distinctive enough to prevent confusion, yet "Wilco" is a recognizable word.

    I also tried to avoid all simple names and characters. Because "All The Good Names Are Taken" was obvious.

  15. Re:blocking their view?? on Space War 2017: US v. China · · Score: 1

    You're right, another way to block imaging would be to drag a sticky tongue across the lens.

  16. Re:Another prior art infringement! on BountyQuest Announces First Winners for Prior Art · · Score: 1

    Those guys aren't offering bounties on the Internet. But BailJumpers.Net is.

  17. Re:Patents on BountyQuest Announces First Winners for Prior Art · · Score: 1

    Well, at least it doesn't scare BountyQuest. They issued a bounty on their own business model.

  18. Re:Autonomous robot miners worry me on Robotic Mining Arrives · · Score: 1

    They can't yet refine and shape metal parts. Wait for the mechanic-replacing robots to be developed. The evil-enhanced versions of these robots can only dig secret tunnels and gather piles of robot raw materials in preparation for the next step...

  19. Engineering Problem on Can Supernovae Switch Black Holes On And Off? · · Score: 1
    The engineering to make use of this is just a little beyond us. :-)

    Moreover, they don't mention any observations that the black hole is evaporating during starvation. That would be interesting data.

  20. It was on Red Hat And Eazel To Partner · · Score: 1

    It was an international mistake.

  21. Re:This is so stupid!!! on Space War 2017: US v. China · · Score: 1

    The military will have its own power sources when needed. There are plenty of resources, it's just a matter of where they're distributed. California simply did a bad job, by restricting consumer price but not cost.

  22. Re:blocking their view?? on Space War 2017: US v. China · · Score: 2

    Squirtgun. Bolo net. Magnets.

  23. Re:Wargames maybe, but not likely on Space War 2017: US v. China · · Score: 1
    If you destroy enough of the enemy's war resources, they have to devote more resources to building replacements, thus stressing the enemy's country. Make the enemy devote enough resources to the war and more people have to sacrifice more in order to replace the losses. Either the entire country changes to a war machine to sustain the war, or the defenses will be worn down and the attacker can pick more targets.

    This was done recently in Iraq, with much of the normal infrastructure torn apart and the political balance between the population and goverment left to develop as it would. Of course, the Iraqis which were "defenders" were dealing with an "attacker" which was not trying to take their possessions, unlike the situation when Kuwait was the "defender" several months earlier.

  24. Internet Search History on Author of Archie Challenges Alta Vista Patents · · Score: 4
    Thanks to Wiley, here is a History of Search Engines, with a section on Archie and AltaVista. By the time of AltaVista there were a number of crawlers, spiders, etc.

    You can also see AltaVista's Brief History sixth paragraph). Archie FTP, AltaVista HTML.

  25. How Many Clams? on Napster Introduces Subscription Charge · · Score: 2