Once SpaceX starts flying those "used" cores it will push the whole industry of space flight to the same level of reuse. We are going to see some great advances in engineering coming from all over the world as others start to catch up to SpaceX.
Interesting that it needs to be internet connected as well to run the planting. I could see this for keeping a running total of people using the farmbot bust just registering something would have been fine.
"Internet â" FarmBot can only be programmed and controlled using the web application, meaning an active internet connection is required to send and receive data."
Similar experience, our main product was something that had lived a previous life on an IBM AS400. The app was ported to windows and the users complained a lot. Of course the developers were indifferent with comments of they are using it wrong, etc. So sitting the devs down with users at work caused that oh crap moment that the software really is the problem. After that, to stay in touch with the user base, the developers were assigned as the programmer of the day to help the support staff on calls. There is nothing like being in the trenches with users to get that usability in a design.
Not convinced that it is cheating. For cheating I would have expected to see some evidence of not running a part of the benchmark to get a higher score. But here it looks just to be the OEMs trying to modify the power consumption to game the score. Heh, with that said I guess it is a little swarmy that all of them took the time to change from the default settings just for a bump in the ratings.
Once SpaceX starts flying those "used" cores it will push the whole industry of space flight to the same level of reuse. We are going to see some great advances in engineering coming from all over the world as others start to catch up to SpaceX.
Interesting that it needs to be internet connected as well to run the planting. I could see this for keeping a running total of people using the farmbot bust just registering something would have been fine. "Internet â" FarmBot can only be programmed and controlled using the web application, meaning an active internet connection is required to send and receive data."
Re-brand? What was the hurry to get the ARM version out for if there was problems with the Microsoft apps on the platform?
Similar experience, our main product was something that had lived a previous life on an IBM AS400. The app was ported to windows and the users complained a lot. Of course the developers were indifferent with comments of they are using it wrong, etc. So sitting the devs down with users at work caused that oh crap moment that the software really is the problem. After that, to stay in touch with the user base, the developers were assigned as the programmer of the day to help the support staff on calls. There is nothing like being in the trenches with users to get that usability in a design.
Yeah that is the swarmy part. I agree cheating it is.
Thanks, I agree with that. Cheating it is.
Not convinced that it is cheating. For cheating I would have expected to see some evidence of not running a part of the benchmark to get a higher score. But here it looks just to be the OEMs trying to modify the power consumption to game the score. Heh, with that said I guess it is a little swarmy that all of them took the time to change from the default settings just for a bump in the ratings.
So a compromised network allowed more than one business unit to be hijacked. Horrible. Some admins are in deep trouble.
Can we assume that all the major Certificate Authorities have been "compromised" by the FBI / NSA as well.