Slashdot Mirror


Adobe Hacked: Almost 3 Million Accounts Compromised

sl4shd0rk writes "Adobe Systems Inc. is expected to announce today that hackers broke into its network and stole source code for an as-yet undetermined number of software titles, including its ColdFusion Web application platform, and possibly its Acrobat family of products. The company said hackers also accessed nearly three million customer credit card records, and stole login data for an undetermined number of Adobe user accounts."

256 comments

  1. See... this is why I torrent cracked versions. by hawks5999 · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's too risky to give your credit card number to a company like Adobe.

    1. Re:See... this is why I torrent cracked versions. by Ksevio · · Score: 1, Informative

      In related news, it turns out Adobe will give you some sort of software if you give them a credit card number. What a crazy business model!

    2. Re:See... this is why I torrent cracked versions. by amicusNYCL · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You choose to not pay for the software that you prefer to use because you don't want to give your credit card number to Adobe? After which episode that Adobe had credit card records stolen from it did you make that decision? How long ago was that? How many times has Adobe been attacked and had customer credit card information stolen? You're sure that's not just a lame justification for not wanting to pay for the software that you prefer to use?

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    3. Re:See... this is why I torrent cracked versions. by CCarrot · · Score: 1

      You choose to not pay for the software that you prefer to use because you don't want to give your credit card number to Adobe? After which episode that Adobe had credit card records stolen from it did you make that decision? How long ago was that? How many times has Adobe been attacked and had customer credit card information stolen? You're sure that's not just a lame justification for not wanting to pay for the software that you prefer to use?

      Shhh! I can't hear anything for all the whooshing around here!

      --
      "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
    4. Re:See... this is why I torrent cracked versions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're sure that's not just a lame justification for not wanting to pay for the software that you prefer to use?

      He's sure. It's called a joke.

    5. Re:See... this is why I torrent cracked versions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Good point; up until now, Adobe's security track record has been pretty superb... I mean, look how frequently they churn out security patches. From this you can tell that Adobe takes security very seriously, and that they really do care about their customers' well-being. If only human persons like hawk5999 were as honest and altruistic as corporate persons, we'd have a much better world for our betters to live in.

    6. Re:See... this is why I torrent cracked versions. by amicusNYCL · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm a programmer, not a cunning linguist. Taking things at face value is my specialty.

      And I don't have to "climb up" on some high horse, you clod, I'm here all the time.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    7. Re:See... this is why I torrent cracked versions. by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 5, Informative

      In related news, it turns out Adobe will give you some sort of software if you give them a credit card number. What a crazy business model!

      Not for long... their new business model is that they will let you have access to their cloud if you give them a credit card number, and keep paying them regularly.

    8. Re:See... this is why I torrent cracked versions. by rk · · Score: 1

      That's insensitive clod to you, mister!

    9. Re:See... this is why I torrent cracked versions. by amicusNYCL · · Score: 3, Funny

      I have a fantastic sense of humor. Which is not mutually-exclusive with being socially retarded.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    10. Re:See... this is why I torrent cracked versions. by causality · · Score: 1

      I'm a programmer, not a cunning linguist. Taking things at face value is my specialty.

      The way that you say this reminds me of a photograph I saw in a history textbook back in high school. I have searched and (not remembering its name) cannot locate the image or else I'd provide a link, but I believe it comes from the time of the Industrial Revolution.

      It's an old black-and-white photograph. It shows a man using a large wrench or spanner on a machine. The man's back is bent into an arc and his body contorted so that he may use the wrench on something not designed with ergonomics in mind. The purpose of the photograph is to show a man bending and yielding to a machine that was nominally supposed to serve men. It's similar to the notion that what you own also owns you.

      I realize you were possibly being facetious, yet nonetheless you reminded me of something I haven't seen or heard about in years. I'd be interested if anyone here knows the photo to which I refer.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    11. Re:See... this is why I torrent cracked versions. by causality · · Score: 1

      I have a fantastic sense of humor. Which is not mutually-exclusive with being socially retarded.

      Do you mean that literally, or do you merely observe that few social conventions actually make any sense? Some of them even seem deliberately designed to inhibit personal growth.

      Because in a way, that's a great big joke all by itself. It's just not nearly so funny as it could be.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    12. Re:See... this is why I torrent cracked versions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod this up. I pirate with the best of them but at least I don't try to make some lame justification.

    13. Re:See... this is why I torrent cracked versions. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      Are you thinking of this well known picture?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    14. Re:See... this is why I torrent cracked versions. by rtb61 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Especially when the break in was prior to the 17th of September and they didn't notify customer until another customer noticed Adobe source code floating around the internet October the 13th. It would seem if an outside company had not discovered the evidence of the breach Adobes customers would never have been warned that their log in details and credit card details had been stolen. Oh but the credit card details still maybe might secure because they were encrypted and those that could hack the system (likely ex-insiders and outsourcers) maybe might not have passwords for the encryption even though they had passwords for everything else.

      It seems like Adobe needs to be answering some very serious question in a court of law as to why that information was withheld from customers for so long.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    15. Re:See... this is why I torrent cracked versions. by mevets · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should give it some exercise, it seems to have grown a bit dull.

    16. Re:See... this is why I torrent cracked versions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whooosh!

    17. Re:See... this is why I torrent cracked versions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hoo fucking ray. Adobe is to monolithic for anyone's good. Fuck their creative cloud and perpetual hand in wallet.

    18. Re:See... this is why I torrent cracked versions. by causality · · Score: 1

      Are you thinking of this well known picture?

      Yes! Thank you. It's a nuisance when you can so clearly see something in your mind's eye and know it should be easy to find, but not be able to find it because of not remembering its name. Good work.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    19. Re:See... this is why I torrent cracked versions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      As the article says. They'll also give your credit card to anyone else who asks their computer nicely for it too...

    20. Re:See... this is why I torrent cracked versions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No they won't, you give them your credit card number and they let you borrow some software for a month.

    21. Re:See... this is why I torrent cracked versions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In related news, if or when that eventuality comes to pass, my shop will discontinue using new Adobe products. Their competitors will likewise surely welcome the ensuing boom in business.

    22. Re:See... this is why I torrent cracked versions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are Adobe. They are a corporate. They have (effectively) immunity...

    23. Re:See... this is why I torrent cracked versions. by daveime · · Score: 4, Funny

      > source code floating around the internet October the 13th

      Adobe have source code for a Time Machine ?

    24. Re:See... this is why I torrent cracked versions. by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      In related news, it turns out Adobe will give you some sort of software if you give them a credit card number. What a crazy business model!

      Now it's Adobe will ONLY give you software if you give THEM your credit card details. Cloud only services sure is crazy business model to be sure.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    25. Re:See... this is why I torrent cracked versions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      source code floating around the internet October the 13th

      Adobe have source code for a Time Machine ?

      #!/bin/bash
      echo "OMG, our source code on the interwebs!"
      sleep 10d
      echo "OMG, it still there!"

    26. Re: See... this is why I torrent cracked versions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't want to give my information to the Ford dealer, so I stole my truck. After I was arrested I explained to the Judge that it was a privacy issue.

    27. Re:See... this is why I torrent cracked versions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woosh.

      You're completely missing the point that pirated software is likely to give someone not only your CC number, but your computer's root password, your bank acount numbers, and those nude pictures you took of your wife. Using pirate software is stupid. It isn't like a song or a movie.

    28. Re:See... this is why I torrent cracked versions. by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Not for long... their new business model is that they will let you have access to their cloud if you give them a credit card number, and keep paying them regularly.

      Yep..that's the reason I stopped at CS6 versions of everything with Adobe. It will last me quite awhile I believe and by then, either they may change their business model, or competitors will be in the market by then that are in the same ballpark with functionality.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    29. Re:See... this is why I torrent cracked versions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that's Apple.

    30. Re:See... this is why I torrent cracked versions. by ragefan · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing Adobe's cheese-cloth approach to security with PDF and Flash should certainly be huge red flags that the rest of their infrastructure was likely not up to par either.

    31. Re:See... this is why I torrent cracked versions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > source code floating around the internet October the 13th

      Adobe have source code for a Time Machine ?

      No, Apple has the Time Machine. Guess that's some kind of forensic clue.

    32. Re:See... this is why I torrent cracked versions. by antdude · · Score: 1

      It is too risky to do any online payments these days. Trust no one like Fox Mulder says. :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    33. Re:See... this is why I torrent cracked versions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do not need to torrent .... you install the trial and deactivate the trial day-counter code - very easy to do.

  2. Couldn't have happened... by jwsarvey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...to a nicer company. I feel bad for their customers, but I'm hoping this kind of breach pushes people to insist that their sensitive data isn't stored when it isn't absolutely necessary.

    1. Re:Couldn't have happened... by aleator · · Score: 1

      credit cards stored in plain? or stored at all?? amateurs!

    2. Re:Couldn't have happened... by ralphaostrander · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Why do they need to store it use it lose it credit card companies need to insist as it is them who foot the bill when it is used. I will not lose the number it is on my card you have no need to store it. Storing it should be conspiracy to steal it and use it.

    3. Re:Couldn't have happened... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Adobe have been pushing software rental for the last couple of years. This involves recurrent payments. Recurrent payments require the vendor to store credit card details, or outsource the payment processing to a third party who stores the details.

      Either way, if you're renting software your credit card details are being stored.

    4. Re:Couldn't have happened... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Usually the way this works with a company that spends the time to do it right is that the Payment Gateway/Processor will store the card in perpetuity and give you a token you can reauth against. Since the token itself is useless and can be revoked, it's vastly safer, barring any issues with the Gateway/Processor/Token (Heartland....)

    5. Re:Couldn't have happened... by 0123456 · · Score: 3, Funny

      But we are talking about the people who wrote Flash...

    6. Re:Couldn't have happened... by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      http://img.docstoccdn.com/thumb/orig/72668443.png
      http://www.java-samples.com/showtutorial.php?tutorialid=355

      This shows the standard payment/accountability workflow. Usually the gateway and processor aren't the same; the gateway often stores card data, however.

    7. Re:Couldn't have happened... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately Abobe have moved to a monthly subscription model for products like Acrobat. So storing this information is 'necessary'.

      Of course it should never have been stored in such a way that it was ever readable remotely.

    8. Re:Couldn't have happened... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe, just maybe one could also pay directly to the vendor's bank account with a billing number. No credit card numbers required.

    9. Re:Couldn't have happened... by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 1

      Usually the way this works with a company that spends the time to do it right is that the Payment Gateway/Processor will store the card in perpetuity and give you a token you can reauth against. Since the token itself is useless and can be revoked, it's vastly safer, barring any issues with the Gateway/Processor/Token (Heartland....)

      It also means you are somewhat locked in to using that gateway.
      If you are doing a lot of volume you will also probably want to use multiple gateways and process through whoever can give you the best rate at any point in time.

      --
      Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
    10. Re:Couldn't have happened... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you do is create a public and private key, encrypt the private key with a strong password, and encrypt everyone's credit card information with public key.

      Then it doesn't matter if everything gets stolen. The private key and credit card information is encrypted, and the public key can't be used to decrypt anything.

      Have a human enter the password for the private key once a month when it comes time to accept payments.

    11. Re:Couldn't have happened... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But we are talking about the people who wrote Flash...

      What has Macromedia to do with this?

    12. Re:Couldn't have happened... by firex726 · · Score: 1

      TBH it seems like I am getting an email every week now of some site or company having their records hacked and telling me to change my passwords.

    13. Re:Couldn't have happened... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least you're changing your passwords regularly! That means you're safer, right?

  3. good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    you can still buy offline standalone applications from adobe.... oh, wait.

    1. Re:good thing by guytoronto · · Score: 1

      Yes you can, via their corporate TLP (Transactional Licensing Program). Unfortunately, it's not the latest and greatest version, but for many people, that isn't critical.

  4. Interesting Quote by BenSchuarmer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    However, as far as the source code is concerned, Adobe assured that there is no "increased risk to customers as a result of this incident."

    In other words, the risk is as bad as ever.

    1. Re:Interesting Quote by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      Worse. The source code included the required NSA backdoor. Now requiring to insert backdoors to manufacturers will lead to the logical consequence

    2. Re:Interesting Quote by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Funny

      However, as far as the source code is concerned, Adobe assured that there is no "increased risk to customers as a result of this incident."

      In other words, the risk is as bad as ever.

      I'm not sure why Adobe is being so pessimistic. This might be the first time in years that anybody who could find their own ass with both hands and a map, much less do code security, has examined the source code involved...

    3. Re:Interesting Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      on the flip side... maybe those that acquired the source code will sniff out said backdoors and publicize their findings so that we have some additional verification beyond what the future nobel prize winner has released.

    4. Re:Interesting Quote by causality · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Worse. The source code included the required NSA backdoor. Now requiring to insert backdoors to manufacturers will lead to the logical consequence

      We live in a society that, as Bill Hicks noted, is at about an eighth-grade emotional level collectively (he was being generous). Few people acknowledge the logical consequence, and seem to believe it magically goes away if they really, badly, truly wish hard enough or get upset enough.

      I suspect the government understands the situation, however. Malicious attackers and other criminals exploiting mandatory backdoors only provides an excuse for more laws regulating the Internet and expanding executive powers. To protect you from those evil hackers, of course. If nothing else, the NSA gets their little back-door so they can more easily betray their own countrymen in the name of safety; if that goes wrong in the worst possible way, then: bonus! For the evil men who love power and know no loyalty, it's a win-win. Sadly.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    5. Re:Interesting Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See, it's optimism, they're getting a FREE code audit.

      And they'll retain all rights, without officially licensing the source, because anybody who tries to file a claim on them will come with dirty hands because they looked at illegally acquired source code.

    6. Re:Interesting Quote by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      More laws regulating the internet to empower the NSA efforts will lead to countries (not just Brazil) leaving internet, or setting walled gardens, you can get out (by approved and monitored paths), you can use what is inside, but people from outside can't get in, and maybe the use of commercial US software could have some penalization (less access/tighly controlled). Is not a win-win, is an all-lose scenario but with someone yelling that we won.

    7. Re:Interesting Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'll also have opportunity to know what the software does to flag currency scanned in at higher resolutions with an error message. Unlike the rest of us, if they manage to crack it, they might be able to Photoshop money.

    8. Re:Interesting Quote by AHuxley · · Score: 2

      Yes, recall the printing efforts:
      Secret Code in Color Printers Lets Government Track You
      https://www.eff.org/press/archives/2005/10/16
      Makes you wonder what a digital file could hold or have blurring reversible :)

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    9. Re:Interesting Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Outside of the (declined) credit cards, NO risk to the user. The risk is for Adobe, at long last.

      Basically if their precious code is AWOL... how long before we see "PainterlyChopp 2.0" complete with Chinglish menus... download for ten-dolla. Hmm. Three months.

      captcha: [declined]

    10. Re:Interesting Quote by lxs · · Score: 1

      You mean besides this?

    11. Re:Interesting Quote by Monsuco · · Score: 1

      Worse. The source code included the required NSA backdoor. Now requiring to insert backdoors to manufacturers will lead to the logical consequence

      Yes, I'm sure the NSA is simply fascinated by that image of your family you shopped your brother's ex out of. I'm sure they spend their time looking at THAT.

    12. Re:Interesting Quote by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      Adobe not only make Photoshop. Adobe Flash Player and Adobe Acrobat Reader rings any bell?

    13. Re:Interesting Quote by causality · · Score: 1

      More laws regulating the internet to empower the NSA efforts will lead to countries (not just Brazil) leaving internet, or setting walled gardens, you can get out (by approved and monitored paths), you can use what is inside, but people from outside can't get in, and maybe the use of commercial US software could have some penalization (less access/tighly controlled). Is not a win-win, is an all-lose scenario but with someone yelling that we won.

      It's a win for people who view strife and chaos as a means to achieve power. Historically, a peaceful prosperous nation with no crises and no serious threats has never been a means of expanding political power. "All lose" in the general sense, because the few who do gain are so tiny in number that they are less than a rounding error compared to those who lose, so I don't think your statement is generally false.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
  5. Re:First post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First to get hacked!

    (runs off to AC-land)

  6. Creative Cloud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope this destroys their "Creative Cloud" or rather their extortion scheme for locking up your files if you ever stop paying them.

    1. Re:Creative Cloud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, right along with Micro$oft's Office 365 thing... Man that's a ripoff!

    2. Re:Creative Cloud by Dr.+Zim · · Score: 1

      Even with Creative Cloud, you can store your files locally, then stop paying. Knock it off with the FUD already.

      --
      (name withheld by request)
    3. Re:Creative Cloud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      When you stop paying, the software stops working and you can't access open your files anymore. cloud storage or no cloud storage.

      kind of like a ransom.

    4. Re:Creative Cloud by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Even with Creative Cloud, you can store your files locally, then stop paying. Knock it off with the FUD already.

      Maybe if you save it as a .jpg or .png or whatever your format of choice is. A locally stored .psd is useless without photoshop.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  7. PDF Exploit? by Statecraftsman · · Score: 5, Funny

    What are the odds this attack didn't involve a pdf exploit?

    1. Re:PDF Exploit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You never know it could have been a flash exploit...

    2. Re:PDF Exploit? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you upgrade to a suitably new version of Acrobat, you can put your flash exploits inside your exploit PDF. Totally worth the license fee.

    3. Re:PDF Exploit? by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1

      Even odds. The APT may have started with Flash.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    4. Re:PDF Exploit? by rosencreuz · · Score: 1

      Don't worry about that. That's double jeopardy, so it's completely secure.

    5. Re:PDF Exploit? by Bacon+Bits · · Score: 1

      I think you're assuming an awful lot saying that the source code is easier to decipher than the binaries. Considering the number of flaws that continually appear in their products, I think it's arguable that reading the binaries is just easier.

      --
      The road to tyranny has always been paved with claims of necessity.
  8. adobe is such bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    jesus christ, will someone make a fucking photoshop alternative already (don't say gimp that shit blows dongs)

    1. Re:adobe is such bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ok, I won't say gimp. How about Corel Draw?

    2. Re:adobe is such bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's stopping you?

    3. Re:adobe is such bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have the capital to start a large business with the dozens of computer science phds it will take to catch up to adobe's product. if you think one dude coding in his garage is going to catch up to adobe...get a clue, to put it mildly.

    4. Re:adobe is such bullshit by Darth+Twon · · Score: 1

      Where did companies like Apple and Microsoft come from then?

      --
      Take this sig and smoke it.
    5. Re:adobe is such bullshit by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      Where did companies like Apple and Microsoft come from then?

      Microsoft began with MS Basic, which, if I remember correctly, was about 8k of assembler.

      Even 'Hello World' compiles to more than 8k on most modern operating systems.

    6. Re:adobe is such bullshit by Arkh89 · · Score: 1

      One 4KB Demo maybe then : Chaos Theory 4k (KK remix).

    7. Re:adobe is such bullshit by bmo · · Score: 1

      The first two versions they made were named after the size of the code.

      4k and 8k BASIC. As a kid in the early 80s, I used a lot of 4k and 8k BASIC listings and "ported" programs over to Apple, TRS-80, and TI BASIC.

      Because everybody had different syntax for BASIC.

      And they were named Micro-Soft at the time.

      /old

      //slashies on slashdot? [palin] you betcha [/palin]

      ///and peek and poke were the gateway drug to assembler.

      --
      BMO

    8. Re:adobe is such bullshit by Skapare · · Score: 1

      Obviously, then, 640kb is way overkill.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    9. Re:adobe is such bullshit by Arkham · · Score: 1

      http://www.pixelmator.com/ An amazing piece of software, and only $15! Seriously, if you have a Mac and you don't get this you are doing yourself a disservice.

      --
      - Vincit qui patitur.
    10. Re:adobe is such bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true. I just compiled a 'Hello World' program, and while it's only 7KiB on disk (ignoring the 57KiB of wasted slack space), it links to 3701KiB worth of shared libraries and requires 4592KiB of RAM to actually run.

    11. Re:adobe is such bullshit by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      How does Krita fair?

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    12. Re:adobe is such bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all, my sdk style windows utilities in Pelles C and PowerBasic are tiny funny power tools... misused are like running with scissors ja ja ja

      Pelles C is a great C compiler in a (now rare) lightweight windows implementation; But frankly, powerbasic is as lean and mean as a one can be, without giving out the direct access to the windows api; and still have high level sintax for specific tasks like dialog definitions (can use sdk style code generators like firefly too) freely mixed with assembler; and lately even do com/cx based development... the options are all there. You decide, but no bloatware is required ;-p

  9. WHY are Adobe storing credit card numbers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anybody?

    1. Re:WHY are Adobe storing credit card numbers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because they are the number one software subscription company in the world?

  10. Couldn't have happened to a nicer bunch of folks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's that? You can't manage to release plugins without 50 remotely exploitable holes every month? Not surprised to hear that your network was hacked.

  11. Anyone Surprised? by ScottCooperDotNet · · Score: 1

    Is anyone surprised that a company that is already battered by a poor security reputation would be compromised in this way?

    That they are doing their own billing isn't surprising considering their size, but not a place I'd put a personal card number.

    1. Re:Anyone Surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's nothing - I just downloaded the ENTIRE source code for the Linux kernel!

      Be afraid!

    2. Re:Anyone Surprised? by aNonnyMouseCowered · · Score: 1

      Sorry for those whose accounts were compromised. But speaking as a FOSS user, I see this as karma for all those times that Adobe made Linux look bad because Adobe Crash (aka Flash) ran worse under that OS than under MS Windows. Which isn't to say that it actually ran well under Windows, just that it ran worse under Linux and had 2x the system requirements. I even remember some Adobe engineer blaming the poor support for Linux on its fucktitude of audio (Alsa, OSS, Pulse, etc) and video system software when they could have coded to the lowest common denominator or at least the most widely deployed solutions (Alsa for audio or Open GL or maybe XVideo for accelerated video).

      Also, aside from the shortage of A-list gaming titles, among the most common complaints you'd hear from users who have tried but don't want to shift to Linux is the absence of Adobe graphics products, products that ran reasonably well under Wine, but which Adobe has persistently refused to release for Linux even during the time in the late 90s when desktop Linux penetration approached that of Apple.

  12. Adobe just shifted to a subscription-only model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They apparently don't sell permanent licenses anymore, you have to pay by the month.

    There are pluses and minuses to each approach, but this type of thing would definitely be a minus, since customers used to buy their shrink wrap boxes from a third party retailer.

  13. My conversation with a colleague by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ME: Did you hack adobe again?
    HIM: gross no
    HIM: i don't want to get that stuff on me
    ME: good point.

  14. Flash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Flash player sources ?

    Yeah. Nothing to worry about...

  15. This is just adobe's way of saying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... the NSA just visited the data center.

    1. Re:This is just adobe's way of saying... by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Every altered pic gets a unique, owner/camera/gps/ serial number string coded in, popular 'face blurring" methods are reversible and stenography efforts flagged in the saved files for easy detection at the network level?

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:This is just adobe's way of saying... by lxs · · Score: 3, Funny

      stenography efforts flagged

      That's why I stick to writing longhand. Take that Adobe!

    3. Re:This is just adobe's way of saying... by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Ty ixs :) *steganography

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  16. I, for one... by msauve · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...can't wait until the hackers fork their code, and create something stable and less buggy from it. It will obviously take lots of work, but if they have the skills to hack in, they're up to the challenge.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    1. Re:I, for one... by bmo · · Score: 1

      and create something stable and less buggy from it

      Wishful thinking requiring LSD and shrooms at the same time.

      Their code base for Photoshop, for example, goes back to the mid-80s. The amount of crunchy crusty cruft probably makes "cleaning it up and making it less buggy" impossible.

      And if the rant from the guy who maintained the Linux fork of Flash Player, a few years ago, is any indication, anything related to Flash is spaghetti-coded.

      So I'm not gonna hold my breath.

      --
      BMO

    2. Re:I, for one... by msauve · · Score: 2

      Well, they could rewrite it in Visual BASIC. It couldn't make it any worse.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    3. Re:I, for one... by bmo · · Score: 1

      I think rewriting it in any language, including TECO and brainfuck might improve things.

      Emacs was once a bunch of TECO macros. Which explains a lot about both RMS and emacs itself.

      --
      BMO

    4. Re:I, for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The word "Basic" in "Visual Basic" should never be capitalized. Implicitly even the connotation that BASIC has anything to do with that horrible monstrosity dreamed up by Microsoft is grounds for treason. Adobe has hired some genius level devs in the past and STILL managed to turn their efforts into a cluster****. A short history lesson...the inner-workings of Flash go back to the Macromedia days and back then it was no secret that Flash was hypercard on steroids. That being said rewriting something which has been built upon for nearly two decades like the Adobe products would be the same as proclaiming that someone should rewrite quickbooks in Ruby because it couldn't hurt. Hmm, so quick to judge- I applaud the efforts of the old Adobe Labs and both you and myself would have been lucky to be part of their team back then because they got paid to daydream in a sense. Not too many software shops are committed to R&D like they were in the golden age of programming. On the other hand change is a good thing and I for one welcome our new oppressors.

    5. Re:I, for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, LSD, pot and methamphetamine. Get your drug combos right.

    6. Re:I, for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked at Adobe - I'd be very surprised if a bunch of hackers could decipher the interesting blob that is the pdf viewer (as late as version 9 - the last time I worked on the product - the codebase was all C, not C++ and lots of macro's).

    7. Re:I, for one... by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Adobe still requires your filesystem to be case-insensitive. It simply doesn't work on a case-sensitive filesystem. Those kind of bugs are what needs fixing and that means there is a shitload of hard-coded stuff and things that even Adobe hasn't been able to fix since 2001

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  17. Open Source the code. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good. I hope the hackers open source the code.

    1. Re:Open Source the code. by tech.kyle · · Score: 1

      The code could easily be identified and the source taken down. It might make its rounds on file sharing sites, but all it'll likely be good for is compiling yourself with little to no modifications to the code or for learning from (which would be its most valuable use).

      --
      If we colonize Mars, it won't be the World Wide Web anymore. UWW?
    2. Re:Open Source the code. by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      The code could easily be identified and the source taken down. It might make its rounds on file sharing sites, but all it'll likely be good for is compiling yourself with little to no modifications to the code or for learning from (which would be its most valuable use).

      No, I think we'll find its most valuable use will be in finding exploits and selling them on the black market. Not valuable to most people, but definitely to those who stole the data.

    3. Re:Open Source the code. by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Learn by racing your new mulit threading, better RAM use, 64 bit optimized efforts vs the code?
      Chart how much faster or slower :)

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  18. A likely attack vector by TheloniousToady · · Score: 2

    I bet they used Flash to get in: since Adobe seems to be pushing Flash updates about every 10 minutes lately, it's evidently got some major security problems.

    1. Re:A likely attack vector by causality · · Score: 1

      I bet they used Flash to get in: since Adobe seems to be pushing Flash updates about every 10 minutes lately, it's evidently got some major security problems.

      It's just yet another proof (as though more were needed) that security isn't something you can bolt-on after the fact. It would probably have required of them less effort to have done a rewrite from scratch, designed from the beginning with security in mind, than to have issued so very many patches and updates throughout the years.

      Do they never consider that? Or I suppose it doesn't matter until something really embarassing like this happens?

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    2. Re:A likely attack vector by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      Bolt on after the fact?

      Flash has had so many patches that, if it were an actual physical thing, it would be composed entirely of welds and rivets.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:A likely attack vector by causality · · Score: 1

      Bolt on after the fact?

      Flash has had so many patches that, if it were an actual physical thing, it would be composed entirely of welds and rivets.

      It would be like Grey Goo, only produced without nanotechnology.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    4. Re:A likely attack vector by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the duct tape.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    5. Re:A likely attack vector by AbominousSalad · · Score: 1

      I'm suddenly very worried about the fact that YouTube stopped working in Chrome yesterday (for both Windows and Linux) and so I accepted a Flash update.

      Which fixed nothing. Naturally.

      --
      Every trollism an AC posts is prefixed, in my mind, with "A. Coward whined, in a weak and cowardly voice:"
  19. Re:3 million? by wiredlogic · · Score: 2

    Doesn't say much for the security of ColdFusion. Maybe it's time for Adobe to stop eating their own dogfood.

    --
    I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
  20. Adobe has three million customers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not that anybody assumed that Adobe would be any more immune to these type of attacks than any other company, but maybe they should take a look at how effective their web programming suites are?

  21. Source code by Dunbal · · Score: 2

    According to TFA :"no "increased risk to customers as a result of this incident."

    Considering that Adobe products are an endless stream of security vulnerabilities and zero days, I would say this is a fair statement. You have the same risk as you had before, when you allow their products onto your machines. As for the credit card data - shame on them. Why was that even on the same network?

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  22. No cloud for you! by onyxruby · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Adobe must be the one company in the world to have a worse track record at security than Microsoft, Oracle or Mozilla. They have ignored industry best practices and been a thorn in the side of the rest of the industry for years while being oblivious to the damage their customers have suffered from their shoddy practices.

    This is the same company that wants you to rely on their security as the only way to their products now that they only rent a cloud based versions of Acrobat Suite. Incidents like this are inevitable and people need to learn that their is nothing magical about the 'cloud'. Companies that have cloud dependencies for the use of their products necessarily expose all of their customers when they get cracked.

    Do you trust Adobe with your security? Do you really think a company with their track record is going to get their act together?

    1. Re:No cloud for you! by Voyager529 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Adobe must be the one company in the world to have a worse track record at security than Microsoft, Oracle or Mozilla.

      ...Sony?

    2. Re:No cloud for you! by Tom · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This is the same company that wants you to rely on their security as the only way to their products now that they only rent a cloud based versions of Acrobat Suite.

      This.

      I was actually on the verge of buying some of their stuff just a week ago. Decided against it when I found out they don't sell standalone versions anymore.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    3. Re:No cloud for you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate their cloud thing as much as the next guy but these are the same programs, just they phone home similar to FlexLM for licensing.

    4. Re:No cloud for you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These kind of news make me think:
      1) Who inside Adobe is responsible for this?
      2) Would Adobe put the blame on their new employees?
      3) Could this be the result of a zero day hack or...
      just an irresponsibility for many days?

    5. Re:No cloud for you! by slimdave · · Score: 1

      If you forget your Adobe password, they send it back to you in plain text.

      That's quality right there.

    6. Re:No cloud for you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still say Oracle and their craptastic java client is worse than flash.

  23. Seconded by themushroom · · Score: 2, Funny

    This makes me happy to have p1r4t3d versions of CS5 and CS6.
    Adobe doesn't know my details and neither do the hackers, easy peasie lemon squeezie.

    1. Re: Seconded by snowblind · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes we do Dave Watson 123 Anywhere Ln. Sunnyvale, CA 95014
      Ph# 408.123.4567
      Spouse: Miss Michigan
      Kids: Dave Jr and Susie

    2. Re: Seconded by slick7 · · Score: 0

      Yes we do Dave Watson 123 Anywhere Ln. Sunnyvale, CA 95014 Ph# 408.123.4567 Spouse: Miss Michigan Kids: Dave Jr and Susie

      Credit card American express 8956 3451 6745 7880

      --
      The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
    3. Re: Seconded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice try but American Express cards have 15 digits.

    4. Re: Seconded by icebike · · Score: 1

      which always begin with 37.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    5. Re: Seconded by fisted · · Score: 4, Funny

      what, all 15?

    6. Re:Seconded by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      This makes me happy to have p1r4t3d versions of CS5 and CS6. Adobe doesn't know my details and neither do the hackers, easy peasie lemon squeezie.

      Lol CS5 on my home PC is literally stolen not pirated, as is XP :P

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  24. Somebody got creative... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like somebody got creative with the Cloud.

  25. Who Got Fired for This? by BoRegardless · · Score: 1

    It is not like this hasn't been reported at least weekly for years for various companies.

    What the hell are major companies thinking?

  26. Nothing to worry about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As an Adobe customer, I'm happy they only got their hands on 3 million plaintext credit card numbers and not 4 million. That would've been a catastrophe. I'm sure Adobe will solve this problem in a flash.

    1. Re:Nothing to worry about by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      3 million plaintext numbers means that Adobe's PCI team rides the short PCI bus to work...

    2. Re:Nothing to worry about by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      3 million plaintext numbers means that Adobe's PCI team rides the short PCI bus to work...

      ...or it means that the attackers did a memory dump, and that many numbers were in memory at that time. Unlikely, but possible. More likely that Adobe gets their PCI status revoked. Except that in this case, the data was encrypted. The attackers just hit a lot of systems and grabbed a lot of data. Sorting it out to make anything useful out of some of the DBs may be quite a bit of work.

      However, they've got email addresses and source code. So they can forge emails from Adobe to their customers with links to trojanized "updates" without much difficulty.

    3. Re:Nothing to worry about by John3 · · Score: 4, Informative

      The articles so far seem to indicate the card numbers were encrypted.

      --
      "We make our world significant by the courage of our questions and by the depth of our answers." Carl Sagan
    4. Re:Nothing to worry about by theskipper · · Score: 1

      Adobe is so big that I doubt anything happens to their PCI status. Except a higher discount rate in the future from their current processor(s). In aggregate, the cost of which is slightly less than the calculated cost of Adobe switching processors.

    5. Re:Nothing to worry about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Encrypted.. By adobe...

      Yeah that inspires trust when they cant even manage to secure flash.

    6. Re:Nothing to worry about by Inda · · Score: 1

      They have 3 million customers?!?!?

      Shocking, truly shocking.

      Oh, and yeah, the hack raised an eyebrow.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    7. Re:Nothing to worry about by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      3 million plaintext numbers means that Adobe's PCI team rides the short PCI bus to work...

      Well, hashing the numbers would be useless because then they couldn't retrieve the numbers to charge against. If they have encryption on the partition on the system where the numbers are stored, I don't understand how that would have helped the situation anymore in this circumstance since usermode applications would access it the same way as unencrypted.

      What do you propose they should have done?

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    8. Re:Nothing to worry about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Adobe was not already a PCI level 1 (6 million transactions on a single card type), they will be escalated to it now.

      Even if they were considered compliant (likely) at the time of the breach, it is never cheap. Keep in mind that fines are assessed independently from each issuer (Visa says what they will charge, MasterCard says what they will charge, etc.). But it is true the charge will not be assessed directly to Adobe, rather their acquirer will have to figure out how to collect it. It's a good thing Adobe has some $4B in liquid assets.

    9. Re:Nothing to worry about by xystren · · Score: 1

      encrypted or not, with the access the bad-guys had, would it not be likely that the encryption keys would be the first things they would have harvested? A lock box is not good when the keys are stole with it.

  27. Dayamn! Thjs is big! by PerlPunk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is big news. Expect untold exploits for the Adobe technology stack to emerge out of this. If someone or some group is determined to run Adobe into the ground, they are off to a good start.

    1. Re:Dayamn! Thjs is big! by tech.kyle · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Expect untold exploits for the Adobe technology stack to emerge out of this.

      This. This is why people should be concerned. Open source programs have their code exposed to everyone, including those with malicious intent, and are therefor "battle hardened" for security. Closed source programs live a sheltered life and having that source suddenly available means those with malicious intent can use Adobe's relatively weak source code to develop new exploits for clients. Lots of them.

      Adobe is a household name that users couldn't get rid of if they wanted to. Flash, for example, is on nearly every internet-connected PC. This is a problem for everyone.

      --
      If we colonize Mars, it won't be the World Wide Web anymore. UWW?
    2. Re:Dayamn! Thjs is big! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Open source programs have their code exposed to everyone, including those with malicious intent, and are therefor "battle hardened" for security.

      +5 funny. Sorta like how Debian's maintained version of OpenSSL that generated weak keys was "battle hardened for security" because the source was exposed?

    3. Re:Dayamn! Thjs is big! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fag. Fag is what people that use "this" as a single word sentence are.

    4. Re:Dayamn! Thjs is big! by black3d · · Score: 2, Informative

      Open source programs have their code exposed to everyone, including those with malicious intent, and are therefor "battle hardened" for security.

      While this would the expected situation, the evidence demonstrates that it isn't.

      http://www.zdnet.com/six-open-source-security-myths-debunked-and-eight-real-challenges-to-consider-7000014225/
      http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/03/05/does_open_source_software_enhance/
      etc..

      You can search this on your own. The general consensus is that the "many eyes" theory is flawed, and outside a few exceptions where a particular product has been security hardened beyond usual standards, most experts agree open source software in general tends to be no more or less secure than proprietary software. On the flip-side however, it is true that when the source code for a closed-source product does get compromised, we do generally get a new flood of exploits.

      --
      "The true measure of a person is how they act when they know they won't get caught." - DSRilk
    5. Re:Dayamn! Thjs is big! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No way dude. The NSA is going to bring them down. I mean, they have unlimited power to survey, and use tax dollars to do so, all in the name of stopping stuff... Right Utah? Hey, guys... guys?

    6. Re:Dayamn! Thjs is big! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Expect untold exploits for the Adobe technology stack to emerge out of this.

      And that would differ from the state of things now in what way?

    7. Re:Dayamn! Thjs is big! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I disagree with your premises, and two articles does not a make a "general consensus", that is an unwarranted conclusion. Neither of the articles presented evidence, a case-study, or even a simple anecdote to support their conclusions either. Both articles are simply opinion pieces.

    8. Re:Dayamn! Thjs is big! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope meta-mods are paying attention to this one. +4 Informative for a couple of hyperlinks to unsupported opinions.

    9. Re:Dayamn! Thjs is big! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where "General Consensus" = "I selected a couple of items which fit my preconceptions"

      Also, you undermined your own argument by saying that
      a/ open source is no more secure in general than closed source
      b/ closed source will get a flood of exploits if its code is disclosed

      Since closed source can get disclosed at any time, and the public won't necessarily know if it has already happened, this means all closed source must be assumed to be highly insecure.

    10. Re: Dayamn! Thjs is big! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The many eyes theory doesn't talk about hidden security flaws. It tells you that when a security flaw is discovered, the many eyes will quickly find the correct fix for it.

      This is one reason patches to flaws in open source programs tend to come out more quickly.

    11. Re:Dayamn! Thjs is big! by jbitbang · · Score: 1

      Expect untold exploits for the Adobe technology stack to emerge out of this.

      This. This is why people should be concerned. Open source programs have their code exposed to everyone, including those with malicious intent, and are therefor "battle hardened" for security. Closed source programs live a sheltered life and having that source suddenly available means those with malicious intent can use Adobe's relatively weak source code to develop new exploits for clients. Lots of them. Adobe is a household name that users couldn't get rid of if they wanted to. Flash, for example, is on nearly every internet-connected PC. This is a problem for everyone.

      Just the code coverage over Adobe's software has to be difficult(with the exception of PDF display. no excuse hehe) in fact it would at this point be a good move for them to open source since they are licensing anyhow. It would of been a good move ten years ago when enough gigs of their software downloaded to make NSA proud. But then again as my cynicism awakens I realize we'd just have a thousand zero day exploit auctions.. Flash when it works properly is one of the easiest tools to trash the web. DId they ever remove sockets support? Flash proxy bounce pinball mitm xss csrf driveby hoot rides. i think i need more coffee.

  28. PAYG by themushroom · · Score: 1

    Was wondering how long it would be until this choice to rent, not sell, software would bite them in their big red A.

  29. I'm ready to renew my subscription by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For Photoshop!

  30. channeling Captain Kirk.. by Rinikusu · · Score: 1

    ............

    CLOUUUUUUUUUD!

    welp, guess it's time to get my CC changed.

    --
    If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    1. Re:channeling Captain Kirk.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your Creative Cloud?

    2. Re:channeling Captain Kirk.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would have been funnier if you did a Highlander thing...McCLOUUUUUUUUUUUUUUD! Yeah, sign me up for that service. This is a huge fire for Adobe, and it's probably sending shockwaves through the entire industry right now.

  31. Re:First post! by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 5, Funny

    Your post looks photoshopped. Yep, definitely. The reflections are all wrong.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  32. 3 million is 3 million paid, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not just trial accounts with cracked editions but legitimately paid accounts? I had heard of it, just never seen it with my own eyes.

    1. Re:3 million is 3 million paid, right? by smash · · Score: 1

      Try going to work at a large company.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  33. seeing the future verses the writing on the wall by themushroom · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Buying a piece of software from a vendor: Adobe doesn't have your details.
    Paying on a monthly basis to a software company: Adobe has your details.

    Your point about the inability to see the future is intact. However, it doesn't discount being able to predict the potential future based on math and science.

  34. Re:3 million? by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ColdFusion is built on JRun which is the most miserable POS Java servlet container conceived by the mind of man.

    Since the source code is out maybe it will get some bug fixes.

  35. NSA by Smiddi · · Score: 1

    Adobe appear to be so focused on pushing their "money making" business model (the no-one wants) they forget to secure their backend systems. I wonder what incentives the NSA give them to pipe the users details into PRISM?

  36. What kind of hack was it? by jennatalia · · Score: 0

    Was it an acrobatic hack?

  37. Re:First post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    photoshopped reflections expert here, can confirm

  38. They stole the source code? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's fucking epic. How will Adobe continue to develop any of those applications without it?

    1. Re:They stole the source code? by Psychotria · · Score: 1

      That's fucking epic. How will Adobe continue to develop any of those applications without it?

      They'll just have to start again. There will be a lot of Adobe developers putting in a lot of time to rewrite all that code.

    2. Re:They stole the source code? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's fucking epic. How will Adobe continue to develop any of those applications without it?

      They'll just have to start again. There will be a lot of Adobe developers putting in a lot of time to rewrite all that code.

      Maybe this time they'll end up with correctly designed software.
      Microsoft should be hacked as well. Time to put those microsofties to work. A well designed windows system. Yeah yeah I know it's an oxymoron but we can always hope no ?

      Seriously speaking, how the fuck do these companies (let's remember Valve as well) get their source code stolen ? Are they storing it on servers connected to the internet ? How fucking stupid must you be ?

    3. Re:They stole the source code? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FTFA: Arkin said the company has undertaken a rigorous review of the ColdFusion code shipped since the code archive was compromised, and that it is confident that the source code for ColdFusion code that shipped following the incident “maintained its integrity.”

      Sounds like they still have their code.

    4. Re:They stole the source code? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I figured the article was contradicting itself. The source code appears to have been copied, not stolen. Thanks for finding where in the article it is proven.

  39. Code analysis by kav2k · · Score: 5, Funny

    So, let me recap.
    Adobe just lost the source code to one of the most exposed attack surfaces known for vulnerabilities?
    That'll be one hell of a peer review.

    1. Re:Code analysis by mengel · · Score: 2

      Yes, I mean they stole the source code to Cold Fusion?!? That's kind of like breaking into Ford automotive and stealing the blueprints for the Pinto...

      --
      - "History shows again and again how nature points out the folly of men" -- Blue Oyster Cult, 'Godzilla'
    2. Re:Code analysis by jimmifett · · Score: 1

      I know i'm in the vast minority here defending ColdFusion, but likely you haven't done anything with coldfusion in the last couple years (if at all) and only recall the old days when CF was just a tag based language.

      It's come along way, no longer needing the old tag based language. Like many languages, any idiot can use it quickly, but an experienced programmer can make it shine. It happens to suffer from bad image from graphic design luddites and non-programmers using the quickest route to access databases with no thought of query security, application security, session or even authentication security. They just want the quick access and CF makes that possible. Of course, java, .net and php also makes this possible, with a little bit more language in the middle, but that still doesn't stop idiots with no security concerns from quickly throwing up crappy php tables with huge sql injection holes because they didn't bother to learn the less of little bobby tables.

      Take into account the huge swath of poorly written php pages that don't break up logic into some sort of MVC strategy, same for jsp and asp.net (tho i will grant that those languages have a higher entry bar and thus a little higher level of developer behind it.

      While I can't speak for other CF devs (and yes, i also work heavily with the rest of the alphabet soup in the web dev world), imo, only the noobs use CF's UI based features (with notable exceptions, specific tags are fast as hell, being heavily optimized), which is the same as those using random company's .net controls or downloading a fancy jquery snippet, not knowing what's going on under the hood. My code is based on solid framework design, object oriented, pure cfscript (ecmascript like language), and is modeled similar to java beans. Hell, I can easily convert my code to native java beans with very little logic changes, just a bunch more language cruft.

      Could I do the same stuff in native java or .net being more memory and cpu efficient? sure, but I also trace my code and optimize for cpu and memory efficiency as I go, as a real developer should. Also, using .net controls sucks. Would it take significantly longer? you betcha. More securely? not particularly.

      It could be worse, I could be a Ruby developer. Now those guys are delusional like the history channel guy proclaiming "Aliens!"

    3. Re:Code analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CF isn't as ancient and cheesy as everybody likes to say. It's basically equivalent to Groovy or JRuby these days (runs on the JVM, gives you access to the whole JRE and anything you want to load into it). It makes the basic stuff brain-dead simple, and provides a clean API over the top of the myriad of open source libraries that get embedded in any JEE app these days. There are even two or three open source mimics (Railo and Smith Project come to mind). In truth, Railo's probably a better implementation than Adobe's.

      Unfortunately, ever since Adobe bought Macromedia, they've managed it like a bunch of chimpanzees trying to figure out the space shuttle.

      It's unfortunate that the source has now been leaked like this. Adobe needs to be held accountable for this breach to the extent that their practices enabled it.

  40. All I can say is by sproketboy · · Score: 0

    LOL

  41. The sad truth is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The containment and clean up of this will cost Adobe a lot of money sure but, people are going to continue to use their software and Adobe will continue to operate as normal. The regular every day user won't care and the company will continue to make awesome profits.

  42. Re:3 million? by John3 · · Score: 1

    Not yet clear what system was breached and what platform it was running. Do you have a link to details of the attack vector? I haven't run Cold Fusion in years, once Adobe purchased it and moved it to JRun I migrated my code off Cold Fusion.

    --
    "We make our world significant by the courage of our questions and by the depth of our answers." Carl Sagan
  43. Re:First post! by ThisIsSaei2561 · · Score: 1

    From TFA: "nearly three million customer credit card records"

  44. Safe? by h8sg8s · · Score: 2

    Thank God I've never actually purchased any Adobe products. Phew, that was a close one.

    --
    Organization? You must be joking..
  45. Re:First post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seconded.

    Source: I've seen quite a few shops in my time. And the pixels.

  46. Wrong term... by Tetetrasaurus · · Score: 1

    Crackers, not hackers.

    1. Re:Wrong term... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crackers are a subset of hackers and are practically the same thing. Do you think hackers just magically appear in someone's mainframe like in the movie hackers? Yeah, maybe if teenage Angelina Jolie showed off some boob I'd float into a mainframe myself.

  47. Metachoice by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    After which episode that Adobe had credit card records stolen from it did you make that decision?

    Adobe may or may have had one before.

    But there are enough other companies that have, that it's easy to make a rational choice based on the probability that it will happen to a company like Adobe, based on what has happened to companies at large that attract large bases of credit card numbers - especially as Adobe has recently moving to a subscription based service where they have presumably got a lot more credit card numbers stored than they used to before.

    That was a factor in why I decided that I would not subscribe to the Photoshop subscription, even though the more recent photographically oriented pricing for just a few products was more appealing.

    I'm all for paying for products myself, I do so whenever possible. But what I am not for is needless exposure of my financial data just because a company would prefer recurring revenue.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  48. A desperate user, only way to get the bugs fixed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    since adobe doesn't listen, maybe we'll get the bugs fixed now.

    or at least some compatibility with other applications that
    are outside the adobe family

  49. Dare I say it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's becoming safer to download pirated software.

  50. source code stolen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not trying to start an argument but: why is source code accessible via an online server? is the code part of an open source project?

    i'm confused.

    1. Re:source code stolen? by Skapare · · Score: 1

      More likely the hacker took over someone's desktop machine that was running exploitable software, and was inside the network. Now they can get to file servers, source repository, etc., as soon as the person who had that desktop signs in to those servers. They probably also took over some other desktops used by people without that access. But they just keep trying and eventually get lucky. I'm sure a lot of people there were using exploitable software.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    2. Re:source code stolen? by mengel · · Score: 1

      Ah... so the Cold Fusion source code was stored on a box running Cold Fusion?

      --
      - "History shows again and again how nature points out the folly of men" -- Blue Oyster Cult, 'Godzilla'
  51. Re:3 million? by BemoanAndMoan · · Score: 1

    ColdFusion is built on JRun...

    Hey, the 90's are calling, they want your comment back.

    ColdFusion runs on Tomcat now.

  52. Re:First post! by slick7 · · Score: 1

    Adobe Hacked: Almost 3 Million Accounts Compromised

    Were 3 millions accounts were "almost" compromised or does the poster mean "close to" 3 million accounts compromised.

    Either way, thanks alot asshats.

    --
    The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
  53. The Solution is Dilution by retroworks · · Score: 1

    A responsible company that size should be releasing several thousand fake corporate client lists per day. If every company did its civil duty and released thousands of fake client lists, the identity thieves would never be able to find a needle in a haystack. Nature adapts camouflage, not invisibility.

    --
    Gently reply
  54. Adobe != security by oneiros27 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Adobe must be the one company in the world to have a worse track record at security than Microsoft, Oracle or Mozilla.

    At my work, they require us to take annual security training ... and this year, I flat out refused to take it from any of my systems ... because I had to install flash & turn on java in my web browser. I had to go to the 'training center' to take it from one of the machines there.

    ... not a week later, the first of the 2013 Flash vulnerabilities was announced ... then a couple of weeks later, another one ... then the Java one ...

    Then I was told that I had to take the 'advanced security' training ... what was the recommendation? to turn off flash & java in your web browser.

    ah, the irony.

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
    1. Re:Adobe != security by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1

      If your 'advanced' training is to disable Flash and Java, well, good luck at your company. Apparently the Peter Principle is alive and well there.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    2. Re:Adobe != security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking Hilarious.

    3. Re:Adobe != security by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 1

      I am quite certain that the entirety of the training was more than 5 words. You should feel bad. Not throw yourself off a building bad, but you should be required to open 5 random PDF files using adobe products as punishment.

    4. Re:Adobe != security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I am quite certain that the entirety of the training was more than 5 words.

      Indeed, but "disable Flash and Java" is supposed to be in the first sentence of chapter one of "security for dummies, grandma edition".

      So yes, if they only get to that part in the "advanced security" training, things aren't looking good for security in that company.

      Coming up next: "expert level security" training: How to change a password: "Today, we'll learn how to change our passwords from "dog" as we set them in basic security to the longer more secure password "fido".

    5. Re:Adobe != security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've worked in corporate training development and the reason for these requirements is two fold:
      1) The poor people who have to create the training are typically technical writers with no development skills and to create "interactive web based training" they use tools mimic PowerPoint such as the Articulate Suite. These tools usually output to Flash (multimedia!) and if they did offer "advanced" HTML5 output, the a percentage of the user base couldn't view it in their corporate IE6.
      2) The reason you typically need Java is that the learning management systems that record your progress use Java apps as the middle man. They don't need too, but LMS vendors suck and don't care.

      Also, some LMS implementations are/were so insecure that a simple JavaScript snippet can "help" you out - http://pipwerks.com/2009/03/22/cheating-in-scorm/

    6. Re:Adobe != security by xystren · · Score: 1

      It reminds me of my past information security officer, that would always call down in a panic, after watching CNN describing a security vulnerability and if we knew about it, and could this impact us. He just didn't seem to get it.... If he found out about it on the daily news, we knew about it for at least at week, typically a month, and often a year before.

      I remember an auditor just showing up unannounced, requesting a new 'audit' account be setup with domain admin rights. I just loved telling him that would be a breech of security procedures, and he would have to go through the proper channels to get the account created. When I was told to just do it, I refused, stating that a security audit should not be able to by-pass in-place security procedures... and speaking directly to the auditor "would this not be something that you would be compelled to write on the final report as a security violation?" By the looks on both of their faces, neither of them had never considered that - which is pretty sad for an auditor.

      Needless to say, almost getting me fired, saved me from almost getting fired. Irony loves company.

  55. Simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Make companies liable for triple damages related to stolen credit card numbers. I guarantee that their security will be air tight within 6 months.

  56. yay online only creative suite! by smash · · Score: 1

    Really, given the complete failure to secure well... any of their desktop software, is there any surprise?

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  57. most importantly.... by smash · · Score: 1

    They discovered they were hacked on thursday. Any idea when the breach occurred?

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  58. Adobe's Cloud -- In Action by MarkvW · · Score: 1

    I am so pissed off about Adobe's business model that I may never buy an Adobe product ever again.

    That company can go to hell.

  59. Use pre-paid credit card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    If you don't trust a company's security systems, then for smaller purchases from that company, use a pre-paid anonymous credit card. Don't attach any personal information to the card by registering it.

    You can also use a pre-paid anonymous credit card at gas stations, restaurants, etc. where you don't feel comfortable giving them your regular credit card.

    It costs a little more than using your regular credit card, and record-keeping for tax purposes is a little more trouble, but you'll be safer.

  60. Re:First post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Edge detect: Compression artifacts everywhere.

  61. Re:First post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm guessing English isn't your first language based on the poor grammar of your own post.. The headline is grammatically correct and unambiguous The word "almost" modifies "3 million" and is a perfectly appropriate word choice. "Close to" would be equally appropriate, but it's not a superior choice.

  62. old news by Msdose · · Score: 0

    Adobe probably just realized that their products have been hacked for years and this is just the cover story they put out.

  63. Re:First post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm guessing English isn't your first language either. It seems that you have just backhanded your reply without thinking twice about its grammar as well.

    unambiguous The word "almost" modifies

    Is the Capitalisation of word The and the lack of punctuation considered normal in the English schools you've attended? I've heard education in 3rd world countries is quite limited. I do feel sorry for the lack of resources and hardship you and your peers would have undergone in order to learn even just the basics surrounding grammar and punctuation.

  64. Macromedia wrote Flash by tulimulta · · Score: 1

    No we don't. That was Macromedia. Sorry for my lack of humour.

  65. Another reason to ignore Adobe updates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So in addition to the very frequent update requests from Adobe's software agent, I got a major update request from it a day or so ago. Luckily I have been refusing them all (thanks Little Snitch firewall!) but I think I said yes to it once or twice in the past. Now another good reason to disallow all updates of their crap, it always seemed like saying yes would reduce security.

  66. Why work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why work when you can steal?

  67. Virtual Credit Card Numbers by slonik · · Score: 4, Informative

    Citibank offers "Virtual Credit Cards" that are generated for you on demand. Each card is valid for one merchant only (the first transaction locks the merchant), has configurable expiration date and maximum amount limit. Even if stolen such virtual cards are of little use to the bad guys.

    1. Re:Virtual Credit Card Numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Citibank offers "Virtual Credit Cards" that are generated for you on demand. Each card is valid for one merchant only (the first transaction locks the merchant), has configurable expiration date and maximum amount limit. Even if stolen such virtual cards are of little use to the bad guys.

      Which for some unknown reason are only accessible through a Flash applet, so instead Citibank users will just be susceptible to the new Flash exploits that will come out of this. ;-)

    2. Re:Virtual Credit Card Numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my bank requires a two step authorization (SMS code) for every online payment

  68. card numbers and source code? by kaalon · · Score: 1

    So a compromised network allowed more than one business unit to be hijacked. Horrible. Some admins are in deep trouble.

  69. Re:3 million? by lennier1 · · Score: 2

    It's now running on a heavily customized Tomcat that's been twisted long enough until you could no longer simply update it independently.

  70. Re: First post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course it's normal use. However that does not mean it's grammatically correct.

  71. Re:seeing the future verses the writing on the wal by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

    Still not seeing the part where software piracy is justified.

  72. If only they released the Flash Player sourcecode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The I could fix those two trivial bugs in combination with VDPAU that Adobe has kept on ignoring (red and blue swapped and black used as key color for overlay.)

  73. Re:seeing the future verses the writing on the wal by Kremmy · · Score: 1

    Still not seeing the part where it needs to be.

  74. Next slogan by sjames · · Score: 1

    Adobe: You'll shit a brick!

    1. Re:Next slogan by Sabathius · · Score: 1

      Squinting_Up_and_Left.png

      I see what you did there.

  75. Please release improved versions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe now we can get usable hacked versions of their less-than-fine products - and all for freeeee? ;-)
    Or somebody can do a Linux flash player again?

  76. Re:First post! by dimeglio · · Score: 1

    Not an Adobe client. Not having to worry about such break-ins, another advantage of using FOSS.

    --
    Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the author.
  77. Whatever happened to Foxit for Linux? by water-and-sewer · · Score: 1

    That reminded me to go have a look at Foxit, which is a great little PDF reader and more for Windows. They used to have a version for Linux (unless I'm remembering wrong?) but just went to their website and saw no trace of it.

    Did they give up trying to sell to us freetards that don't want to pay for software? If so, too bad, it's a pretty good little PDF renderer. I'm using Okular, and like it too. Evince I'm not a big fan of.

    --
    If this were Usenet, I'd killfile the lot of you.
    1. Re:Whatever happened to Foxit for Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's still there on their download page, just checked. Though it looks like it hasn't been updated in four years...

      http://www.foxitsoftware.com/downloads/

  78. Dear Crackers by ikhider · · Score: 1

    Kindly bring Adobe to its knees and liberate us serfs. With love and hope,

    --
    "SO we bide our time, waiting for a purer kick to bloom and the future is still bleak, uncertain and beautiful" -GSYBE
  79. Re:3 million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is based on Tomcat now. You also have a .war option when installing, so you can use JBoss or WebSphere as well.

  80. Did they get the info to spoof an update? by Growlor · · Score: 2

    Forget the credit card info - the real juicy stuff for a criminal would be to get whatever is needed to trick the update feature to trust a malicious piece of code (especially if it can be automated without user interaction!)
    This is the most important thing I want to hear from Adobe's response team: Did the attackers get what would be needed to do this, yes or no?

  81. Re:seeing the future verses the writing on the wal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and you won't: you're an authoritarian

    ( you have been infected with 'diode morality': laws, regulations, EULAs, licenses, etc work ONE WAY ONLY, to the benefit of korporate slime, mere people have little/no rights in the marketplace...)

  82. Re:seeing the future verses the writing on the wal by MachineShedFred · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'll take this one further:

    Buying a piece of software from a vendor: Adobe doesn't have your details.
    Paying on a monthly basis to a software company: Adobe has your details.
    Software vendor not named Microsoft most responsible for exploits and attacks in the last 10 years: Adobe Systems

    If they can't even keep something like Acrobat Reader secure, how the hell does anyone trust them with credit card information? The long road that has been "software activation" led us to this place.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  83. Re:seeing the future verses the writing on the wal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, here is your justification: Using pirated software costs less than buying original software, and since de facto not everyone pirating the companies continue to produce the software. So if you want to avoid costs and save troubles from DRM (or stolen credit cards), just pirate the software. It's a no-brainer.

  84. Slashdot needs an undo (single step back) by Immerial · · Score: 1

    Undoing mod. Meant for Funny, got Overrated instead. "Missed it by that much."

  85. Re:seeing the future verses the writing on the wal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps you aren't looking at it correctly?

    First off, you presume justification -- which isn't clear. They gave an explanation. Which is a form of justification that it appears you have conflated with a moral, ethical, or legal stance.

    More relevantly, were it a moral argument, it might be justified in the literal terms they offered -- one of rational risk management.

    This is not a big proxy for 'the ends justify the means'. It just means that some people see and respond to risk differently.

    To some people a credit card theft could be utterly catastrophic. I doubt it holds for most people on /. though.

    That you and/or courts feel their action is unlawful and thus inherently unjustified (note multiple meanings of justified in this reply--in this context it means not a exonnerating circumstance) has nothing to do with the explanation that was offered.

    And frankly... it's Adobe. The only reason piracy isn't sanctionable against them after the hell they have caused on the web is because it continues to promote the utilization of a shit tier web, and the bullshit myths their marketing department propagates ("PDFs are uneditable and a great format for legal document exchange, "flash has 98% market penetration", "Don't worry, I won't cum in your mouth" ... )

  86. Re:First post! by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

    Not an Adobe client. Not having to worry about such break-ins, another advantage of using FOSS.

    Glad I stopped with CS6 Production Suite....I refused to rent software and did not go with Creative Cloud, where you do have to give a CC number.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  87. Re:seeing the future verses the writing on the wal by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

    I can't see the future but I have a prepaid credit card that I use for Internet transactions just in case...

  88. Re:3 million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dumbasses... it runs perfectly fine on ANY JEE app server... Websphere... Glassfish.... weblogic.... jboss.... jetty.... tomcat...

    It COMES with a customized version of Tomcat if you CHOOSE to use it that way.

    This is what sucks about working on CF stuff. It's not the language itself (it's great -- a lot like Groovy or JRuby), it's all the dumbasses who looked at CF 3.5 in 1996 and think that it hasn't changed since then.

  89. that's akin to breaking into by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a sewer main

  90. Source Code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean, we'll finally get the fix to be able to install Adobe Stuff on case-sensitive OS X systems? ;)

  91. Re:First post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is the CapitaliZation of THE word The and the lack of punctuation considered normal in the English schools you've attended?

    While we're nitpicking, I should point out that English is apparently not your first language either.

  92. Credit Card details stolen by jobst · · Score: 1

    At the beginning of August I purchased the latest version of Adobe Premier using a Credit card as this is the ONLY way you can do this - monthly payments require a credit card. Since this is a company purchase I used the company card, this card had never been used before for Internet transactions. I have a special card for this but because this is a monthly purchase I did not want to transfer money every month into the "special" credit card.
    On the 20.08.2013 the credit card was debited by a person called "NOVAPOKEREW" through a PAYPAL account. I rang paypal and after a lengthy conversation (on and off for 3 hours) and being handed from person to person they acknowledged this was fraudulent and have no problem giving the money back to me (thank you PAYPAL).
    What gives me the shits is that Adobe is lying because I have seen many people saying their credit card has been debited somewhere at the end of August - Adobe you are lying!!!!
    To add insult to injury when you try to reset your password you end up in an endless loop of resetting your password again and again - this too has been the experience of MANY other people (just search for Adobe Hacked and start reading).
    While I like your products ADOBE, you suck at security and customer service as well giving the incorrect information about an event.
    This is not about being hacked, it can happen to anyone - but leaving your customers in the dark - well if there would be another product like Indesign ot Premier - I would NOT be using Adobe anymore, that's for sure
     

    --
    to code or not to code, that is the question.