'I' do not have a 'feeling' or an 'opinion' on GMO because I have not seen 'any' uncorruptible scientific presentations or documentation capable of being recreated by third party or by myself on the matter based upon coherently perceived understanding and observation of corruption in both science and media for obvious reasons of profits. China and Africa have both refused delivery of GMO products, and I'd have to say they probably won't be the only ones in the future. Would you jump off a bridge for a dollar?
Science, or the understanding of it is not relevant, it is the people that present it that can be subject to manipulating results due to political or monetary interests.
People do not trust the studies anymore, being aware the media is used, publicized studies smell of political and profit based motivation behind them. Yes, people behind GMO are naive, with consideration to man kinds unique and almost focused ability to screw things up, usually due to cut corners and are profit motivated, playing in the arena of the basis of life is quite naive...
To be honest, scientific analysis about things such as global warming has been shown to be strong armed/manipulated. It doesn't really matter what the people are told about it, deep down they know that messing with mother nature in that capacity just doesn't sit well with them. When it is observed that organic food is under attack by way of competition from it, along with GMO becoming more impossible to avoid, that settles it for them.
Too bad you were never consulted about having a military protecting you or a street to drive on. Asshole, rest assured that I would be the first person busting down your door with a.45 caliber if there were nothing to stop me. Stockpile more shit please.
Most people have concluded that the military has been crafted as a tool to protect politicians, corporations, and from their own complicit, fowl foreign policy and this has effectively stood since Vietnam. So yes, it is in the interest of the people in protecting themselves. I see the roads, I also see roads that kick the crap out of my car, I see NSA military force turned upon the people of the US while not under any announced martial law. I see snot nosed inheritors of power in the ranks of the elite lacking insight to damages rendered by erasing the lines between military force and the people, I see oil company's getting their way and contaminating water tables and water aquifers in land used to grow food and where people once lived. I see DHS (a domestic agency) purchasing over 2 billion rounds of.223 and armored personnel carriers. So if you'd like to step up as a responsible party for all that this situation will bring the people, don't let "nothing" stop you, come and peddle us your "safety". It is interesting the see the government start a small arms race with it's own people, I'm waiting for them to piss off the scientists. Government selling "safety" is nothing more than snake oil, or better know as fraud.
The NSA isn't spying on them to get that information. My point still stands, the NSA shouldn't be spying on anyone without a valid warrant signed by a judge, just as the constitution clearly states. That they are elected doesn't make them better than you or I, and their outrage should be the same regardless of who is being spied upon without a warrant.
the NSA shouldn't be spying on anyone domestically without a valid warrant signed by a judge, just as the constitution clearly states.
FTFY... NSA is US DOD, it is also use of military force on the people.
Congress Critter>Ur not spying on us r u? NSA>Like your position to the people, we maintain 'superposition' on the matter by neither confirming or denying as it may endanger national security. However there is the very real threat that cave dwelling, rock tossing terrorists may lobby US political figureheads forcing us to install/uninstall members of the House, Senate or Congress... Congress Critter>Well, that makes it ok then.
Being that the BSAFE library is closed source, exactly how can you say that they just "weakened" it? Why does it take so long for the crypto suite to perform a simple operation on today's multicore processors? To weaken it does not make sense to their directive, to break it by design by governing the process to accommodate a master key every time the suite is used does fit the bill, it also fits the bill for on the fly encrypted apps that transmit data they can capture. Me thinks that compooter security became "unobtainium" just as soon as the National [In]security Agency got their claws in it.
The elite at the top are actually temporary political positions that come and go with presidents. The worst of the NSA programs have been continuous programs lasting between administrations.
Conceptually, corporate lobbying cuts out all that red tape.
With the recent political discovery of Bitcoin, along with consideration of the current value, this would fit the current political theme of "How can we loot it?".
Wow, I mean, just wow. My very own personal corporate driven politically sponsored shill driveling troll. You will receive no clothing from me, slave. Tido... Bring me a tissue, I think he hurt my... My... It's my feelings... Boohoo
Considering RSA has likely granted keys to the palace, NSA probably has direct access to M$ CVS. As such it may explain why certain distro's of linux have been directly attacked in the past.
That is not entirely true, though open source does have huge benefits in the world today, and RSA has shown pretty serious reasoning as to why core security should remain open source. The primary target of malicious affection will always be the majority of the market share, any os can be hardened, unfortunately hardened is in most cases less user friendly.
Slashdot Mirror
NSA live this one down? The people will not have it.
But it's gotta be better than trolling the NSA about an email you accidentally deleted and know they have a copy of!
Actually I think Dell took care of that one for the spooks, they probably didn't like the option available to the end user to run in FIPS mode or not.
Why not? It probably comes stock listening on TCP port 32764.
1. Buy firewall.
2. Setup sniffer.
3. Make questionably threatening statements on phone.
4. Capture traffic on firewall WAN.
Wallah! Instant keys to palace to credit card, banking industry, anything that uses RSA security, probably oil company's too!
"We ain't cops, we are corporate mercenary's, and we ain't gonna tolerate no democracy bull trying change that!"
'I' do not have a 'feeling' or an 'opinion' on GMO because I have not seen 'any' uncorruptible scientific presentations or documentation capable of being recreated by third party or by myself on the matter based upon coherently perceived understanding and observation of corruption in both science and media for obvious reasons of profits. China and Africa have both refused delivery of GMO products, and I'd have to say they probably won't be the only ones in the future. Would you jump off a bridge for a dollar?
Science, or the understanding of it is not relevant, it is the people that present it that can be subject to manipulating results due to political or monetary interests.
People do not trust the studies anymore, being aware the media is used, publicized studies smell of political and profit based motivation behind them. Yes, people behind GMO are naive, with consideration to man kinds unique and almost focused ability to screw things up, usually due to cut corners and are profit motivated, playing in the arena of the basis of life is quite naive...
To be honest, scientific analysis about things such as global warming has been shown to be strong armed/manipulated. It doesn't really matter what the people are told about it, deep down they know that messing with mother nature in that capacity just doesn't sit well with them. When it is observed that organic food is under attack by way of competition from it, along with GMO becoming more impossible to avoid, that settles it for them.
Too bad you were never consulted about having a military protecting you or a street to drive on. Asshole, rest assured that I would be the first person busting down your door with a .45 caliber if there were nothing to stop me. Stockpile more shit please.
Most people have concluded that the military has been crafted as a tool to protect politicians, corporations, and from their own complicit, fowl foreign policy and this has effectively stood since Vietnam. So yes, it is in the interest of the people in protecting themselves. I see the roads, I also see roads that kick the crap out of my car, I see NSA military force turned upon the people of the US while not under any announced martial law. I see snot nosed inheritors of power in the ranks of the elite lacking insight to damages rendered by erasing the lines between military force and the people, I see oil company's getting their way and contaminating water tables and water aquifers in land used to grow food and where people once lived. I see DHS (a domestic agency) purchasing over 2 billion rounds of .223 and armored personnel carriers. So if you'd like to step up as a responsible party for all that this situation will bring the people, don't let "nothing" stop you, come and peddle us your "safety". It is interesting the see the government start a small arms race with it's own people, I'm waiting for them to piss off the scientists. Government selling "safety" is nothing more than snake oil, or better know as fraud.
Or maybe big business trying to squash competitors.
Two fold, they quash the competitor, and steal the idea instead of having to wait and have to buy it out later...
Somewhere along the line I think the application of the 16th amendment has escaped you.
The NSA isn't spying on them to get that information. My point still stands, the NSA shouldn't be spying on anyone without a valid warrant signed by a judge, just as the constitution clearly states. That they are elected doesn't make them better than you or I, and their outrage should be the same regardless of who is being spied upon without a warrant.
the NSA shouldn't be spying on anyone domestically without a valid warrant signed by a judge, just as the constitution clearly states.
FTFY... NSA is US DOD, it is also use of military force on the people.
Congress Critter>Ur not spying on us r u?
NSA>Like your position to the people, we maintain 'superposition' on the matter by neither confirming or denying as it may endanger national security. However there is the very real threat that cave dwelling, rock tossing terrorists may lobby US political figureheads forcing us to install/uninstall members of the House, Senate or Congress...
Congress Critter>Well, that makes it ok then.
Terrorist=Threat to power of elite.
Let me ask the rock tossing, cave dwelling terrorist to take a good look at his Iphone and ask him his opinion on the subject....
He reported back that he has no place to plug it in his aftermarket charger, not even Apple can at get him with fire!
In other news; the Unobtainium['computer_insecurity'] market for government peddled corporate espionage is booming!
The NSA wasn't in charge of Obamacare...if they were you wouldn't even need to sign up, they could just figure out your selections for you.
Not really, irrelevant of what you believe your selections are, they'll tell you what your selections will be.
It's a tool to help them justify congress how they can be spying on all Americans and not spying on any Americans at the same time.
How dare you question congressional superposition on this matter!
Being that the BSAFE library is closed source, exactly how can you say that they just "weakened" it? Why does it take so long for the crypto suite to perform a simple operation on today's multicore processors? To weaken it does not make sense to their directive, to break it by design by governing the process to accommodate a master key every time the suite is used does fit the bill, it also fits the bill for on the fly encrypted apps that transmit data they can capture. Me thinks that compooter security became "unobtainium" just as soon as the National [In]security Agency got their claws in it.
The elite at the top are actually temporary political positions that come and go with presidents. The worst of the NSA programs have been continuous programs lasting between administrations.
Conceptually, corporate lobbying cuts out all that red tape.
With the recent political discovery of Bitcoin, along with consideration of the current value, this would fit the current political theme of "How can we loot it?".
My bad, CVS does not bare any resemblance to SourceSafe.
Wow, I mean, just wow. My very own personal corporate driven politically sponsored shill driveling troll. You will receive no clothing from me, slave. Tido... Bring me a tissue, I think he hurt my...
My...
It's my feelings... Boohoo
Considering RSA has likely granted keys to the palace, NSA probably has direct access to M$ CVS. As such it may explain why certain distro's of linux have been directly attacked in the past.
That is not entirely true, though open source does have huge benefits in the world today, and RSA has shown pretty serious reasoning as to why core security should remain open source. The primary target of malicious affection will always be the majority of the market share, any os can be hardened, unfortunately hardened is in most cases less user friendly.
True, now if we could just bread that trait out of politicians we'd be set!