It also suggests that when you try to go reduce "gun violence" by going after guns, you're still left with "violence."
Hint: go after violence instead.
The best they can do is probably to make it illegal to sell or share the blueprints for gun parts, similar to how its illegal to sell or share bomb-making guides.
I imagine making it illegal to share the information would work about as well as efforts to stop software piracy.
You can't make most bombs with just a trip to the grocery store. It takes a trip to the grocery store, the hardware store, and the pharmacy. Then you can most bombs yourself, assuming you have a junior high level of chemistry lab capability.
It's true that dictatorships and poorly run communist states are poor, but it's not a requirement of communism to monitor and terrorise its population - it's just the easiest way to keep them subjugated.
As Milton Friedman would say, capitalism is a necessary though not sufficient condition of freedom, and communism will naturally precipitate terror and tyranny. Communism is not a state under which anyone wants to live. The only thing it ever provided for in abundance was misery. The vast majority of people have to be forced to live under communism, and that requires terror.
I can't believe you managed to find that link, not read it, state something directly contradicted by the link itself, and then claim the link supports you.
It also suggests that when you try to go reduce "gun violence" by going after guns, you're still left with "violence." Hint: go after violence instead.
The best they can do is probably to make it illegal to sell or share the blueprints for gun parts, similar to how its illegal to sell or share bomb-making guides.
I imagine making it illegal to share the information would work about as well as efforts to stop software piracy.
You can't make most bombs with just a trip to the grocery store. It takes a trip to the grocery store, the hardware store, and the pharmacy. Then you can most bombs yourself, assuming you have a junior high level of chemistry lab capability.
http://www.amazon.com/U-S-Army-Improvised-Munitions-Handbook/dp/1616083840/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1368887905&sr=8-1&keywords=us+army+guide+improvised+munitions
If you know a ban wouldn't make sense or be effective, then why would you support it? You're admitting that you let your emotion overpower your logic.
It's true that dictatorships and poorly run communist states are poor, but it's not a requirement of communism to monitor and terrorise its population - it's just the easiest way to keep them subjugated.
As Milton Friedman would say, capitalism is a necessary though not sufficient condition of freedom, and communism will naturally precipitate terror and tyranny. Communism is not a state under which anyone wants to live. The only thing it ever provided for in abundance was misery. The vast majority of people have to be forced to live under communism, and that requires terror.
I can't believe you managed to find that link, not read it, state something directly contradicted by the link itself, and then claim the link supports you.