Slashdot Mirror


Florida Activates System For Citizens To Call Each Other Terrorists

An anonymous reader writes "Sheriffs in 13 Northeast Florida counties announced an online system Thursday for residents to report suspicious activity they think may be terrorism-related. The site provides examples of red flags to watch for, such as people with an unusual interest in building plans or who are purchasing materials useful in bomb making. Important places to watch include hobby stores and dive shops."

501 comments

  1. Really??? by bobthesungeek76036 · · Score: 2

    Can't they just call 9-1-1???

    --
    Karma: Bad
    1. Re:Really??? by cold+fjord · · Score: 3, Insightful

      911 is for emergencies. They are looking for tips.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    2. Re:Really??? by mwvdlee · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, you use 9-1-1 for real threats involving actual terrorists.
      This is for increasing the level of fear in citizens in order to make privacy invasion more acceptable.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    3. Re:Really??? by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      This is for increasing the level of fear in citizens in order to make privacy invasion more acceptable.

      And since it will be the police getting the reports, how do you figure it will increase the level of fear in citizens?

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    4. Re:Really??? by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 3, Insightful

      the media

    5. Re:Really??? by X0563511 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The same way it happened during the Red Scare?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    6. Re:Really??? by mwvdlee · · Score: 5, Interesting

      For one, they'll probably report some statistics for "dozens of reports of possible terrorist threats each day".
      Secondly, the mere existence of the reporting tool means people get reminded of terrorism more often.
      Finally, "Where there's smoke, there's fire"; this is the smokescreen (bad pun, sorry).

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    7. Re:Really??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      1) The fact this program ('report suspected terrorists') exists must mean that there are terrorists out there. I'm afraid.

      2) I need to buy a new pressure cooker for the big meal I'm cooking... what if I get reported as a possible terrorist?? I'm afraid.

    8. Re:Really??? by Mystakaphoros · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is for increasing the level of fear in citizens in order to make privacy invasion more acceptable.

      And since it will be the police getting the reports, how do you figure it will increase the level of fear in citizens?

      The first time local law enforcement says, "Reports of terrorism are up 900% this year; we need an increased budget to deal with the increased threat."

    9. Re:Really??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, this is a tool for taking swatting to the next level.

    10. Re:Really??? by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny

      911 is for emergencies. They are looking for tips.

      Here is tip, comrade, everyone is a terrorist, but me!

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    11. Re:Really??? by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      This is for increasing the level of fear in citizens in order to make privacy invasion more acceptable.

      And since it will be the police getting the reports, how do you figure it will increase the level of fear in citizens?

      They'll have less resources to assign to the 90% of the time they have given to domestic disputes and even less to the chuckleheads who are cutting you off, talking on their phones, while drunk and snorting coke, while driving.

      Every new law should be bound to carry funding to enforce it.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    12. Re:Really??? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because they will release reports on how many calls come in. Be afraid, citizen, be afraid!

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    13. Re:Really??? by SmittyVonSmitSmit · · Score: 1, Funny

      Because 911 is a joke. Boyeeeee....

    14. Re:Really??? by malakai · · Score: 1

      In NYC they don't want us calling 911.
      They want us calling 1-888-NYC-SAFE or 311.

      I saw something odd walking down the street a few months back. I called 311, who talked to me about what I was seeing for about 30 seconds and then said, "ok, i'm going to bring in a 911 officer now and they will handle this".

      I wasn't sure if what I was seeing was benign or not, which is why I would never have called 911 to report it.

      I got called back later about the situation from a detective. It's a good thing I felt comfortable enough to dial 311.

    15. Re:Really??? by Shoten · · Score: 1

      No, you use 9-1-1 for real threats involving actual terrorists.
      This is for increasing the level of fear in citizens in order to make privacy invasion more acceptable.

      Now, now, now...it's also going to be very useful for getting kids off lawns, too. Don't forget that!

      --

      For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    16. Re:Really??? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, that should work out well for them; I mean, it's not like Florida is filled with geriatrics who find everyone under the age of 50 to be suspect, right?

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    17. Re:Really??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because it won't take long for people to hear stories that "so and so got thrown in the pokie because Martha called him in on a terrorist suspicion and they found that his computer had downloaded movies on it, and weed in the bathroom"

    18. Re:Really??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fear that the police will show up at their door and subject people to all sorts of questioning while being entirely innocent. Fear that they wouldn't set up such a system and waste money on it unless there was a real terrorist threat. Fear that your neighbor would report you for "suspicious" activity (real or imagined) because they don't like you. Fear that this is a colossal waste of money on an official witch/terrorist hunt.

      There's more than enough fear to go around.

    19. Re:Really??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or the witch hunts in Salem. IS there a Salem in Florida?

    20. Re:Really??? by gr8_phk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And since it will be the police getting the reports, how do you figure it will increase the level of fear in citizens?

      Because once you've got that label they will throw away whatever legal protections you may have. Don't leave the country because then you are a possible drone target - all because your nosy neighbor thought *you* were suspicious. Remember, everyone probably looks suspicious to someone and you've always had the ability to report suspicious activity. But now you get to add that label. Does it scare you now?

    21. Re:Really??? by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      After the police falsely accuse people enough times they will catch "somebody" upset enough to do something stupid.

    22. Re:Really??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does this program include mosque watching as well? Since Hobby shops are possible points for terrorists to shop, how about mosque to gather at?

      Posting as AC for obvious reasons...

    23. Re:Really??? by AJH16 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the geriatrics don't know how to use the website so....

      --
      AJ Henderson
    24. Re:Really??? by cold+fjord · · Score: 0

      Here is tip, comrade, everyone is a terrorist, but me!

      I don't think you are a terrorist, just a troll.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    25. Re:Really??? by cold+fjord · · Score: 1, Troll

      I see your logic. The proper thing to do then is replace this system with an issue of brooms to the police for clean up after events since tips from concerned citizens never solve terrorist cases or prevent terrorist attacks.

      Got it.

       

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    26. Re:Really??? by screwdriver · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Pretty soon it will be illegal to have a hobby. Just consume your goods and go to work like a good little citizen. I'd rather be a victim of a terrorist than live in that society.

    27. Re:Really??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will they be required to carry their "little red book" at all times as well?
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_red_book

    28. Re:Really??? by mrbester · · Score: 1

      Pre-empt that by red flagging all the politicians, C*Os, lawyers and sheriffs in Florida. Repeatedly. After all, they are untrustworthy and engage in dubious practises.

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    29. Re:Really??? by Mystakaphoros · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...so they'll just be repeatedly calling their grandchildren and asking how to do it. THIS IS A TOOL OF THE DEVIL.

    30. Re:Really??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AC to preserve mods. Yes! So few people are seeing the parallels between the terrorism boogey-man and the red scare. To paraphrase Mr. Twain, history doesn't repeat itself, but it sure does rhyme a lot.

    31. Re:Really??? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      What - instead of a secret decoder ring, there will be a secret decoder red book? Cool!

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    32. Re:Really??? by cold+fjord · · Score: 0

      Do you know how to tell the difference between a "boogey-man" and a real threat? Real threats leave dead bodies when they aren't caught before hand. If you check the record, the terrorist have actually managed to kill large numbers of people in many countries, including many in Europe, even the UK.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    33. Re:Really??? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Amen, Brother!

      I may have the slimmest chances of fighting the terrorists. There is no fighting a dozen snooping neighbors who anonymously drop a dime on your ass every time you do ANYTHING "unusual".

      "Sheriff, he's singing in the shower! His voice is AWFUL! No one would sing in the shower with a voice like that. I think he's signaling someone. OF COURSE he's a terrorist - her terrifies ME!!"

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    34. Re:Really??? by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      1) The fact this program ('report suspected terrorists') exists must mean that there are terrorists out there. I'm afraid.

      Since terrorists are known to exist already, and in fact recently conducted a successful attack, how does that change anything? It doesn't. Your point is nonsense.

      2) I need to buy a new pressure cooker for the big meal I'm cooking... what if I get reported as a possible terrorist?? I'm afraid.

      Because you couldn't have been reported before? Once again nonsense.

      Apparently "fear" is the keyword for good moderation. Just suggest that people will live in fear, and Bobs your uncle, +5.

      Apparently a lot of people here live in fear of living in fear to the point they post and positive moderate nonsense.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    35. Re:Really??? by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      This is for increasing the level of fear in citizens in order to make privacy invasion more acceptable.

      And since it will be the police getting the reports, how do you figure it will increase the level of fear in citizens?

      The first time local law enforcement says, "Reports of terrorism are up 900% this year; we need an increased budget to deal with the increased threat."

      And drones don't forget the drones!!

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    36. Re:Really??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Florida, terrorists report you to authorities!

    37. Re:Really??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But my hobby is to consume goods!

    38. Re:Really??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Depends on your definition of "large numbers". More people die from everyday things than terrorists. An example of the cure being worse than the disease. We've lost more soldiers to suicide than actual war in our current wars.

    39. Re:Really??? by jhoegl · · Score: 1

      A Teroll?

    40. Re:Really??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I should go buy 10 pressure cookers, then wait for the alphabet soup to come get me so I can take them to court over flagrant 4th amendment violations.

    41. Re:Really??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IS there a Salem in Florida?

      Yes, almost directly across the very top of the peninsula from Jacksonville.

    42. Re:Really??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You must be a cop. Cause you're not living in the same world as the rest of us. If you can't see the problem here, you're either a cop, or stupid, or 12.

    43. Re:Really??? by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      You are overlooking one other important, and much more likely, possibility. Can you guess? Do you need a clue*?

      * Repeat that last sentence while looking in a mirror.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    44. Re:Really??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't self-terror every once in a while, you don't live a full life.

    45. Re:Really??? by lgw · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When terrorists become more of a threat than ladders, maybe then I'll consider thinking about giving the government new powers to stop them. Until them, fuck off you dictator wannabee.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    46. Re:Really??? by stanlyb · · Score: 1

      The fact that his suggestion is TRUE does not change anything, i suppose...

    47. Re:Really??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds like something a terrorist would say...

    48. Re:Really??? by stanlyb · · Score: 1

      They EXIST? WOW, and he is ALIEN. Alien 4th? (the best one, if you ask me :D )

    49. Re:Really??? by stanlyb · · Score: 1

      What was the tel. number.......

    50. Re:Really??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."
      and
      "Sell not virtue to purchase wealth, nor Liberty to purchase power."

        -- Benjamin Franklin

      from http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Benjamin_Franklin

      One usually interprets these in the context of referring to oneself, thus "I shouldn't give up my liberty to get more power for myself". Sadly, the 1% have corollaries like "...it is acceptable to sell the Liberty of others to purchase power for myself", and "...therefore one should give up essential liberty to obtain theoretically permanent , if the benefit/cost value for my self/family/political party/summer house warrants it."

      The "utility", in economic lingo, depends on the "see who benefits" idea.

    51. Re:Really??? by ubrgeek · · Score: 1

      This is Slashdot. Of course it does.

      --
      Bark less. Wag more.
    52. Re:Really??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sorry, forgot the "utility/value" after "theoretically permanent".

    53. Re:Really??? by Sperbels · · Score: 1

      Just don't consume anything "unusual" and you'll be fine. If you accidentally do, we'll just kick in your door and confiscate all your stuff and hold it a warehouse for a few years...then auction it off. We may or may not detain you for a few days depending on how much you swear at us.

    54. Re:Really??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I need to buy a new pressure cooker for the big meal I'm cooking... what if I get reported as a possible terrorist??

      Are you brown? Do you have a white friend you can send to the store instead?

    55. Re:Really??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And people die from vaccine as well. May I take it that you oppose vaccination?

      I oppose Action A, which results in more death than InAction A. Therefore I also oppose Action B, which results in fewer deaths than InAction B.

      .....what?

    56. Re:Really??? by cold+fjord · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, it doesn't because it is irrelevant. The US lost more than 100x the number of people that died at Pearl Harbor in WW2, but it still went to war against Japan, Germany, and Italy. The problem they presented wasn't going to go away by doing nothing. I expect that far more people at the time died of accidents of various sorts than were killed in the attack. Not relevant. The problem of Al Qaida is the same - it won't go away by itself. but will only get worse if ignored. It has to be addressed to turn it around. The point about suicide versus battlefield casualties doesn't negate that and is irrelevant. Although I will take a moment to recognize the considerable improvements in battlefield medicine and personal protection through various means which have resulted in a much lower death rate than previous conflicts - fabulous work.

      On a tangential note, you might want to find out what Al Qaida's goals are. They are ultimately independent of US actions.

      The Future of Terrorism: What al-Qaida Really Wants
      The short version: Restore the Islamic Caliphate dissolved in 1923, take over the work, and convert the world to Islam. It is a long term goal. You may not think that is realistic, but that is what they fight and kill for.

      Including this lot: Bomb plot: Life sentence for Irfan Naseer, ringleader of Birmingham men planning wave of UK suicide attacks
       

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    57. Re:Really??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. I mail-ordered some lead sheet from Small Parts Inc a number of years ago, to increase the weight of HO scale model train freight cars (so they track better). I've often wondered when the FBI was going to show up.

    58. Re:Really??? by stanlyb · · Score: 1

      During the "Great Cherry War" some 12000 years ago almost 90% of the population of the "village" was destroyed. Here you go, with relevant comments. You wanna more?

    59. Re:Really??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... involving actual terrorists.

      So like when the cops pepper-spray kids again, the TSA harasses your balls, or Blackwater^WXe^WAcademi mercenaries are anywhere near you?

      Or do you mean only the religious kind... like the WBC, Scientology or Catholibans?

      Or it it just limited to brown foreigners?

    60. Re:Really??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's existence acts as a fear motivator. Conform or be branded the outsider (terrorist, sympathizer, etc). Then of course when the media inevitably jumps on the first few bandwagons that this will create, with their main motive being ratings, the idea of dire consequences for marching out of step will be further imprinted into Joe Sixpack's mind.

    61. Re:Really??? by triffid_98 · · Score: 2

      If 'doing something about it' means two draft dodgers sending tens of thousands of soldiers to die in the desert on a complete fking lie, then (in future) I'd really rather they not do anything about it.

    62. Re:Really??? by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Because we shouldn't be telling people that they need to look for terrorists everywhere. THe odds the average american are going to meet an actual terrorist are incredibly slim. This is simply a road to hell.

      --
      Good-bye
    63. Re:Really??? by cold+fjord · · Score: 0

      When terrorists become more of a threat than ladders, maybe then I'll consider thinking about giving the government new powers to stop them.

      I hate to break it to you, but government at all levels in the US, UK, Canada, Australia, Europe, and indeed, pretty much the entire world save various tribes in the Amazon, New Guinea, certain parts of Africa, have been using phones for some time. They have also used TIPs lines for a very long time. No new power needed to do this.

      It looks to me that the 9/11 attacks killed about 7.5x the number of people that died from ladders in 2001. The fact that it hasn't been repeated isn't an accident, but rather hard work, and actively taken measures.

      In the UK, the 7/7 attacks appear to have equalled it. Her Majesty's government continues to fight the problem. Example: "Bomb plot : Life sentence for Irfan Naseer, ringleader of Birmingham men planning wave of UK suicide attacks"

      Until them, fuck off you dictator wannabee.

      I would say your civility and insight have converged on this matter.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    64. Re:Really??? by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      How ever could concerned citizens have solver terrorist cases if they had no special website to report such concerns?
      Oh wait... they just reported it like you'd report any other concern to the police.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    65. Re:Really??? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      It looks to me that the 9/11 attacks killed about 7.5x the number of people that died from ladders in 2001.

      If you count stairs as well, then more people have died from falling off stairs and ladders in 2001 than in 9/11.

    66. Re:Really??? by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      It doesn't really matter either way. No government is going to sit idly by while thousands of its citizens are slaughtered by terrorist attacks. The action by the coalition of Sheriff's departments is nothing special.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    67. Re:Really??? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Well, that should work out well for them; I mean, it's not like Florida is filled with geriatrics who find everyone under the age of 50 to be suspect, right?

      I know it's a joke, but it should be kept in mind that people who retire to FL generally don't stop in the northeast corner of the State. They go on south a ways....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    68. Re:Really??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My neighbor in the city I used to live in was a gardener. Dude was like 70. Anyway, had a nice greenhouse, would make some cash on the side selling flowers and tomatoes and such every spring/summer. Anyway, one day the feds kicked his door in, tore up his house, wrecked his greenhouse, etc, because someone reported they saw pot there. Feeling they got fucked with, the feds dragged in the person that made a tip to point out the pot. They pointed to a plant with similar leaves that looked nothing like it, that he had openly on sale.

      Whatdya know? Turns out the person that called in the tip was also a gardener that now had a much better chance to sell their wares now that his competition was basically ruined. Neighbor gets out of it with a sprained wrist, bruises, a bunch of broken flower pots, ripped bags, busted lights, etc. Looked like a damn hurricane hit the place.

      We wrecked an old dude's life on an anonymous tip that he was growing pot there, in the open, in front of tons of straight edged old geezers that would freak out if they so much as saw a real pot leaf.

    69. Re:Really??? by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      After the police falsely accuse people enough times they will catch "somebody" upset enough to do something stupid.

      When the police falsely accuse people enough times they will make "somebody" upset enough to do something stupid.

    70. Re:Really??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      know it's a joke, but it should be kept in mind that people who retire to FL generally don't stop in the northeast corner of the State. They go on south a ways....

      You obviously have never been to Jacksonville.

    71. Re:Really??? by lgw · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of good and useful things a government can do with bullshit like these witch hunts or the TSA or other security theater. Hardening cockpit doors has basically ended hijacking in America - no intrusion into people's daily lives required.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    72. Re:Really??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) The fact this program ('report suspected terrorists') exists must mean that there are terrorists out there. I'm afraid.

      Since terrorists are known to exist already, and in fact recently conducted a successful attack, how does that change anything? It doesn't. Your point is nonsense.

      There's a big difference between 'knowing' something (like say,' terrorists exist', or 'the water I'm drinking was once urine'), and having it brought up over and over so you are consciously thinking about it.

      2) I need to buy a new pressure cooker for the big meal I'm cooking... what if I get reported as a possible terrorist?? I'm afraid.

      Because you couldn't have been reported before? Once again nonsense.

      Before there was no reason to report someone buying a pressure cooker. Or fertilizer, or a million other things. Now ("See Something? Say Something!") there is.

      Apparently "fear" is the keyword for good moderation. Just suggest that people will live in fear, and Bobs your uncle, +5.

      Apparently a lot of people here live in fear of living in fear to the point they post and positive moderate nonsense.

      Just because you're too dumb to see what they're doing, don't drag the rest of us down with you.

    73. Re:Really??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It looks to me that the 9/11 attacks killed about 7.5x the number of people that died from ladders in 2001. The fact that it hasn't been repeated isn't an accident, but rather hard work, and actively taken measures.

      Then what is your explanation as to why there was no '9/11' in the 10 years before 2001? There were no "actively taken measures" then.

      Face it, 9/11 was a one-off. A rare event, that will not be repeated. No special "actively taken measures" needed. /Oh, BTW- I have an anti-tiger rock for sale.

    74. Re: Really??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would oppose a vacine when more people die taking it than would otherwise die from the disease

    75. Re:Really??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember, citizens, it's your patriotic duty to report possible cases of thoughtcrime to the Party!

    76. Re:Really??? by Culture20 · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Jimmy, do you still want to be an architect? And you still shoot model rockets? Oh that was your brother, right. Could you help me with a website?"

    77. Re:Really??? by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Hardening cockpit doors works because terrorist have a fairly hard time getting a bomb on board, both because of screening before the gate, and general law and immigration enforcement. That didn't used to be the case.

      This new reporting mechanism doesn't constitute a witch hunt any more than the phone on the sheriff's desk.

      TSA is largely an amalgamation of the existing security mechanisms, there isn't much new there.

      There is at least as much civil rights theater as security theater.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    78. Re:Really??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      everyone with a computer is a potential FBI hacker

    79. Re:Really??? by lgw · · Score: 1

      Hardening cockpit doors works because terrorist have a fairly hard time getting a bomb on board

      You're conflating hijacking with bombing a plane. Terrorists don't hate our airplanes, you know. Hijacking is a particular threat because, as we saw on 9/11, an airliner is one hell of a weapon. A terrorist who just wants to kill a bunch of people with a bomb has far better targets than airplanes, as the only terror value in attacking an airplane is the hope of provoking irrational overreaction to it, which we can utterly defeat by not being afraid.

      BTW, have you ever met a new government power you didn't like? Can you give an example of when giving up some civil rights in return for some security would be bad?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    80. Re:Really??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your terrorism is not even terrorism. It's just anger at social injustice directed through brainwashing by the other side of the pyramid. It is conflict created by money and power and ideology coming into conflict. But neither by themselves are the culprit. But when manipulated together they form what you see.

      People who believe in something USUALLY don't feel the need to kill you to prove it to you. Even religious nuttery would eventually temper itself if it was given respect and the people were not enslaved and told to fear their enemies through xenophobic propaganda. And they were slowly indoctrinated to the truth of their religions.

      That they are all owned by one satanic (symbolism) overlord who dictates church, mosque, temple, policy and re-writes history and religious text to suite their brainwashing flavor of the day.

      Your statement that terrorism IS the evil shows how misguided you are. It's a symptom manifesting itself in a greater more complex system.

      Then you have shit like the current Boston bombings and a rapper kid being both mislabeled as terrorism. None of those people are terrorists. Their political dissidents at best. And psychotic thugs at worst. Their goal is/was anarchy. Not to affect a political regime change.

    81. Re:Really??? by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      I guess if you've got nothing better to do. Just remember they'll ruin your life in the process.

    82. Re:Really??? by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      You're conflating hijacking with bombing a plane.

      No, what I'm doing is making comments based on background knowledge of the problem. If you look at the history of hijacking, there have been very many aircraft hijacked under threat of a bomb, as in, "Fly to Greece, or I will explode the bomb." It generally worked pretty well. Being able to actually see the bomb added to the threat. The purpose of hijacking in those instances wasn't necessarily to use the plane as a weapon, per se, but to keep hostages and have transportation. However it could still be used as a weapon, too.

      I consider bravery a virtue, and am all for it. But being brave does not mean that you shouldn't exercise care to reduce the opportunity for evil men to work their will and flourish. And keep in mind that bravery, courage, is not a constant.

      He supposes all men to be brave at all times and does not realize that the courage of the troops must be reborn daily, that nothing is so variable, and that the true skill of a general consists in knowing how to guarantee it by his dispositions, his positions, and those traits of genius that characterize great captains. --- MAURICE DE SAXE. Reveries on the Art of War

      --------

      BTW, have you ever met a new government power you didn't like?

      What is going on here isn't a new government power. Many of the powers that the government already has can be used for good or evil purposes, it all depends on the intent, much like surgery. If my leg has gangrene that will kill me and you cut it off to save my life, with my permission, I will be happy to be alive. If you cut off my leg to try to force me to tell you where all my bank accounts are because you think I cheated on my taxes, that is torture, evil, and I won't be happy at all. Same thing with intercepting communications. The NSA and army listening in on the communications of an enemy division that is going to attack them overseas is completely OK. The NSA listening in on a communications session of someone in the US in direct contact with Al Qaida is OK, as long as proper procedures are followed. NSA listening in on a couple of American moonshiners in West Virginia planning to deliver a truck full of hooch to Ohio is completely over the line and unacceptable in any way.

      Giving up the right to vote, maybe having a "President for Life" based on the idea that it would bring security would be BAD. Is that agreeable to you? You might keep in mind that Benjamin Franking opened other people's mail during the war to get intelligence information to help the colonies in their war effort. I doubt he did that in peace.

      You might want to check out this post. I strongly disapprove of much of what is going on here. There should be people going to jail for a number of things going on. When authority is granted, it must not be abused, it must not be used to persecute, and that appears to be what has been going on.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    83. Re:Really??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in America the citizens police themselves

    84. Re:Really??? by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Then you should feel much better since that isn't what happened. But don't worry, anytime the country gets tired of taking proper security measures, there will be fellows like this bunch that come along to give incentive to correct the problem.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    85. Re:Really??? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Role-players of Florida, beware! Will somebody notice all the time I spent conspiring with others to break into government buildings with the intent of destroying things? Granted, we didn't recognize the Empire as a legitimate government, or Palpatine as Emperor, but it was the de facto government and it was those buildings the Jedi accompanied us into.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    86. Re:Really??? by lorenlal · · Score: 1

      So have all sort of things. Look, I don't want to minimize the crime. I get it, they're really bad people, and they do really bad things.

      The same can be said about gun owners, cars, airplanes, lightning... They're all more likely to kill you than a terrorist. Is that worth another Red Scare, or Salem? If you train the people to distrust each other, you lose your society. So, I'm all for being vigilant. If you see someone in their back yard trying to bring in a big bag of gunpowder and some pressure cookers, by all means ask them what's up.

      But, please don't justify this as a "terrorists are bad so we should constantly report each other for suspicious activity."

    87. Re:Really??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) The fact that SETI exists must mean that there are aliens out there. I'm afraid (actually, I'm excited!)

      2) I have to cross the road... What if I get hit by a car?? (likely driven by someone on their phone at the time.)

      Blah, blah, I'm scared of the gubment.

    88. Re:Really??? by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      It isn't thought crime that is the concern, but rather "ball bearing" crime.

      This is what happens when you catch them before they attack.

      Bomb plot: Life sentence for Irfan Naseer, ringleader of Birmingham men planning wave of UK suicide attacks

      This is what happens when you don't.

      Madrid Train Station Blasts Kill 190
      Bali bombing remembered 10 years on
      London Attacks
      Investigation of Boston Marathon bombings continues

      I would think this is easy to understand.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    89. Re:Really??? by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Wait, are you saying that people report things to the police now? So why are you agitated that they might use a web site to do it instead of a phone? Do you think the internet is evil or something?

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    90. Re:Really??? by bbelt16ag · · Score: 1

      why do all the stupid people live in my state? can't they just all go back north? Havent they done enough to our country in their lives why do they need to ruin my home!.

      --
      NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER GIVE UP! "No limitations, no boundaries, there is no reason for them."
    91. Re:Really??? by Mystakaphoros · · Score: 1

      Was working with a school that, to combat bullying, instituted a "bully-box" where kids could drop anonymous tips. Guess who used it? Kids who wanted to gang up on others using the power of authority as a weapon. *cough* Totally worked.

    92. Re:Really??? by Nyder · · Score: 1

      My neighbor in the city I used to live in was a gardener. Dude was like 70. Anyway, had a nice greenhouse, would make some cash on the side selling flowers and tomatoes and such every spring/summer. Anyway, one day the feds kicked his door in, tore up his house, wrecked his greenhouse, etc, because someone reported they saw pot there. Feeling they got fucked with, the feds dragged in the person that made a tip to point out the pot. They pointed to a plant with similar leaves that looked nothing like it, that he had openly on sale.

      Whatdya know? Turns out the person that called in the tip was also a gardener that now had a much better chance to sell their wares now that his competition was basically ruined. Neighbor gets out of it with a sprained wrist, bruises, a bunch of broken flower pots, ripped bags, busted lights, etc. Looked like a damn hurricane hit the place.

      We wrecked an old dude's life on an anonymous tip that he was growing pot there, in the open, in front of tons of straight edged old geezers that would freak out if they so much as saw a real pot leaf.

      Guess this would of ended better if you had done some minor investigation instead of stormtroopering in because you got a "tip" that pot was there? Sure, a bad tip sucks, but what sucks worse is this idea that law enforcement has to go in kicking down doors and destroying a mans business instead of doing some basic fact checking first.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    93. Re:Really??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hard work. Actively taken measures.

      Bullshit. The MJ12 shock troops just have gotten lazy with their suicide bomber programs. Terror only happens when its convenient these days. It's hardly random, frequent, or specifically targeted at any group.

    94. Re: Really??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real trick is to catch them before that. Minorities, Teenagers that wear black/trenchcoats, etc.

    95. Re: Really??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No red book. But your report will not be taken seriously unless you're wearing a brown shirt.

    96. Re: Really??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is the whipper-snappers in charge (of the "NET") don't trust anybody over the age of 35.

    97. Re:Really??? by bkcallahan · · Score: 1

      According to my neighbor, 911 is for when you see a photo of your car with the words "Stupid Bitch" on your neighbor's car window.

    98. Re:Really??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes... monopolism in the markets (rebranded as nice-sounding so called "legal rights" cough..) almost as rampant as in Soviet. Just replace the politicians in the Communist Party with a few well selected corporate monopolists and the similarities start popping up...

      And... well you know that Iron Curtain was there to protect the Motherland.. keep those envious capitalists out of Glorious Russia. And that was how it was used... really..?

      Keep the envious mexicans out...
      airport security to keep "bad guys" and terrorists out...

      hmm... Similarities..?

    99. Re:Really??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That just gets me so fucking angry.. it's enough with all big corporation trying to get monopoly and bully us for our hobbies but that is just... ARGH.

      I like Florida alot. Don't ruin it with stupid "security politics" please. :(

    100. Re:Really??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The expense of war is the problem. On going wars against small enemies add up to a catastrophic expense over the decades. There has to be some reality in understanding that our kinder, gentler, war policies encourage all kinds of enemies to attack or commit hostile actions against us. Looking back we were a big aid to Germany and Japan after WWII. We did not punish N. Korea and we restrained and fought limited wars in Vietnam etc..
                          If we had exterminated N. Korea do you think there would have been a war in Vietnam?
                          If we had applied total war to the Desert Storm operations in 1990 do you think any mid eastern nation would dare offend us? What we perceive as civilized behavior some other nations perceive as weakness. If we unleash our full power against one player you can bet all the rest will demonstrate a sudden attitude adjustment.

    101. Re:Really??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck, I sure am glad your here to think of the children, asshole.

    102. Re:Really??? by DickMardy · · Score: 1

      First off - I know you said: "the West shouldn't sit back and do nothing", and you didn't say "the West should continue to behave as we currently are". That said, the WW2 analogy doesn't work for me, and I'm not so sure about "the problem [of Islamic / anti-Western fundamentalism] only getting worse if ignored" either. In WW2, there were already war-mongering, totalitarian regimes in complete control in the countries the US went to war with, and those countries were already at war with countries the US had affinities with. In other words, "the problem" back then was already massive before Pearl Harbor happened. In the present day, fundamentalists work in a network that is independent of nation states, and any attempt to suppress their activity by action in a specific state (e.g. Afghanistan) unavoidably involves collateral damage to innocent bystanders. And then that collateral damage can easily used by the fundamentalists to justify their actions against "Western imperialism" (e.g. "There was no war going on here before they came... Why are they murdering our people?" etc). There is also an undeniable history of Western nations exploiting the rest of the world that goes back to the 18th and 19th and early 20th centuries - which it's easy to argue the Haliburtons of this world continue to operate within, given some of the things that have happened in Iraq since the second invasion there. Again, such borderline corrupt activity on the part of the West could easily be used as recruitment propaganda for fundamentalist groups as it undermines any genuine justification for an intervention. Such activities by the West, therefore, provide further weight to the fundamentalists' cause. So trying to "address the problem" by using drones (a completely cowardly form of intervention - if you're going to attack your enemies, at least show them the respect of risking your own skin to do so), waterboarding, holding people without trial in Guantanamo etc only serves to make the problem bigger. You don't make friends with people in the Middle East or elsewhere by conforming to the exact stereotype your enemies are using to turn such people against you. So I agree, "don't ignore it", but it would be better to ignore it than approach it the way we currently are.

  2. First terrorist by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Ben Kingsley looks like a very convincing one in Florida if Iron Man 3 is anything to go by. Bit of a different role to Ghandi :)

    1. Re:First terrorist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not Ghandi, it's Gandhi!

    2. Re:First terrorist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gandhi.

    3. Re:First terrorist by lexsird · · Score: 1

      He's a good actor. You know it's good if he's in it.

      --
      Take the Red Pill.
    4. Re:First terrorist by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 2

      Slipstream
      Species
      Thunderbirds
      The Love Guru
      The Dictator

      Everyone's done some stinkers in their time.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    5. Re:First terrorist by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      That's right. An out of work actor is simply unemployed.

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    6. Re:First terrorist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Explain BloodRayne.

    7. Re:First terrorist by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Don't forget House of Sand and Fog. What a horrible movie. The acting was good by everyone involved, but what a horrible, pointless plot. I'd rather watch Species any day; at least Species has a super-hot chick and some good alien scenes in it.

    8. Re:First terrorist by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      The Dictator was good. Not as funny as Borat or Bruno, but by no means a stinker.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    9. Re:First terrorist by epo001 · · Score: 1

      Well, you know *he* will be good if he's in it. Most of the rest of that cast were phoning it in.

  3. Quick, everybody report somebody. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    With enough reporting, they might catch a single person who once thought about some act of terror. But wait, isn't that different from a terrorist attack?

    Oh well, let Florida sort it out, they're good at that.

  4. The Haystack by Mystakaphoros · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because the best way to find a needle in a haystack is to dump increasing amounts of hay on top.

    1. Re: The Haystack by pollarda · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Is Bruce Schneier quoted as much as XKCD or is XKCD quoted as much as Bruce Schneier?

    2. Re:The Haystack by cold+fjord · · Score: 0

      Or add more needles. Maybe you've heard that eye-witness reports can be helpful to police?

      Citizens’ tips solve an average of two crimes a day

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    3. Re:The Haystack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's if the goal is actually to find the needle, rather than simply expand the business of government.

      If you listen to what they say, you will be fooled. If you watch what they actually do, you will be enlightened.

    4. Re: The Haystack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It is kinda funny to see so many references to needles and haystacks crop up since Schneier said that, but despite the unoriginality of the people who quote it, I think the reason it's so often quoted is that Schneier managed to finally articulate something a lot of intelligent (but not so eloquent) people have been thinking for a long time. Ditto with XKCD -- it taps deep into the geek mind and displays the results with wit and elan. People read Schneier (or XKCD) and because they are well-written and well presented, they think "oh my gosh, he *gets* it." So of course they're going to repeat it.

      Anyway, snark all you want, but the unoriginality of an oft-quoted argument has no bearing on the merits of said argument.

    5. Re:The Haystack by c · · Score: 5, Funny

      Because the best way to find a needle in a haystack is to dump increasing amounts of hay on top.

      I thought it was to burn the entire field to the ground, then sift the ashes over a magnet?

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    6. Re:The Haystack by cob666 · · Score: 1

      Because the best way to find a needle in a haystack is to dump increasing amounts of hay on top.

      In this case: the best way to find a needle in a haystack is to tell the people that the haystack is filled with needles and reward them for giving you information on the location of a needle in the hopes that one tip will give you the location of the ACTUAL needle.

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law - Aleister Crowley
    7. Re:The Haystack by wagnerrp · · Score: 2

      Are you suggesting the police forces adopt a "scorched earth" tactic?

    8. Re:The Haystack by P-niiice · · Score: 4, Interesting

      An eyewitness report of an actual crime and a tip on some subjective activity that is arguably suspicious are two different things entirely. In florida, sitting and reding the Koran on my front porch would probably be enough to get me called in.

    9. Re:The Haystack by P-niiice · · Score: 2

      and the result of that is a shitload of hay

    10. Re:The Haystack by GrumpySteen · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Who says they haven't? Rounding everyone up and decide who to actually arrest later sounds like scorched earth tactics to me.

    11. Re: The Haystack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and the merits of the argument are shit.

      Dumping more security camera footage on top of the pile of footage you already have is not adding more hay to the stack with a needle in it. In all of the hay, both the current stack and the new stack, there are going to be some needles. You plan to dig through the stack and find as many needles as possible. Therefore, adding more hay isn't a bad thing, since it also adds more needles for you to eventually find.

    12. Re:The Haystack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's one thing to report someone breaking into a house, backing up a truck filled with electronics to their garage, or seeing somebody get beat up; but what we're talking about is reporting your neighbors. And we're talking about Florida.

      So, some woman is wearing a Hijib? Looks suspicious to Bubba.

      Brown skin? Hoodie? Suspicious.

      While in Florida, and I'm a white guy, I was taking pictures of a local historic house. The neighbors - all old people - were all peaking out their windows and hiding when I looked their way. The local cops didn't do much because they were the ones that told me about this house.

      You see, the public lives their lives watching TV and the fanciful things that happen there and they have a problem disguising between reality and fantasy. Why, for example, the current president of the NRA is under the impression that just owning guns (I'm all for it, but I'm a realist) will help in fighting tyranny. ANd he used the Revolutionary war as a example. If he actually read a book instead fo basing his opinion on what's shown action movies, he would know that in the beginning, the British were mopping up the armed rebel citizens of the American Colonies with very little if any causalities. It wasn't until this German mercenary started drilling the Americans and teaching to actually fight that things turned a little bit better - of course, the French Military and Navy (professional soldiers) were the ones who tipped the balance in our favor.

      Why? Because the British were sending trained soldiers and the Americans were a bunch of farmers with guns.

      Don't me started on the people who think just owning a AR-15 with the over priced M-4 package, spending an or so at the shooting range will prepare them for "fighting against tyranny".

    13. Re:The Haystack by Mystakaphoros · · Score: 1

      Whereas if you're Florida pastor Terry Jones, and you decide to barbecue another Koran...

    14. Re:The Haystack by Jaysyn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The edges of a "kettle" would be the absolute best place for a suicide bomber to strike. You'd get to kill a ton of tightly packed innocents & as a bonus, eradicate quite a few LEOs at the same time.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    15. Re:The Haystack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While just owning a gun won't make someone ready to 'fight against tyranny,' it's a much better start than having to fight tyranny without one.

    16. Re:The Haystack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't me started on the people who think just owning a AR-15 with the over priced M-4 package, spending an or so at the shooting range will prepare them for "fighting against tyranny".

      Not much point in getting training if you don't have any equipment when you need it.

    17. Re:The Haystack by Hunter+Shoptaw · · Score: 1

      Exactly how do you fight an idea with a gun? Imaginary bullets?

    18. Re: The Haystack by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      It only helps if the new material increases the needle to hay ratio. If not you simply have more work to do for the same end result.

    19. Re:The Haystack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One guy in particular had exactly this type of setup.

    20. Re: The Haystack by Mystakaphoros · · Score: 1

      ...and the merits of the argument are shit.

      Dumping more security camera footage on top of the pile of footage you already have is not adding more hay to the stack with a needle in it. In all of the hay, both the current stack and the new stack, there are going to be some needles. You plan to dig through the stack and find as many needles as possible. Therefore, adding more hay isn't a bad thing, since it also adds more needles for you to eventually find.

      If you have increased manpower to process through all the footage and all the tips that come in, then yes, you've got a point. But if you're just throwing a bunch of off-the-wall suspicion on top of the mix, then I can see this getting in the way.

    21. Re:The Haystack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Finding a needle in a haystack is easy. Finding one particular needle in a needle stack is painful.

    22. Re:The Haystack by Mystakaphoros · · Score: 4, Funny

      The edges of a "kettle" would be the absolute best place for a suicide bomber to strike. You'd get to kill a ton of tightly packed innocents & as a bonus, eradicate quite a few LEOs at the same time.

      You don't happen to live near Jacksonville, do you? 'Cause I might need to report that.

    23. Re: The Haystack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, what a false pretense you present.

      There aren't always more needles, but they are always adding more hay.

      And the hay is usually an invasion of privacy.

    24. Re:The Haystack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly how do you fight an idea with a gun? Imaginary bullets?

      The same way you fight a gun with an idea. Just go die.

    25. Re:The Haystack by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      Because the best way to find a needle in a haystack is to dump increasing amounts of hay on top.

      I thought it was to burn the entire field to the ground, then sift the ashes over a magnet?

      Better hope the needle was made of some robust metal, otherwise you will find that the haystack contained only a few pieces of ferrous dust.

    26. Re:The Haystack by NatasRevol · · Score: 2

      Duh, kill all the people with the idea.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    27. Re:The Haystack by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      Rounding everyone up and decide who to actually arrest later sounds like scorched earth tactics to me.

      Well, it's an excellent analogy. When you have nice law abiding citizens who do what the police say, kettling works. You can round up a bunch of innocent people and deprive them of their democratics rights---all piling hay onto the haystack.

      When you actually have rioters as was demonstrated a month or two notice who are charging around at random, hurling petrol bombs, steling things, overturning cars and setting fire to stuff, kettling isn't a tactic which even works in the slightest.

      But the police seem to love hay since those needles are prickly and hard to deal with.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    28. Re: The Haystack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, because there are still more needles. You're not looking for more clues per hour of video, you're looking for more clues. Also, it's ridiculous to assume that adding more security cameras wouldn't provide footage with the same clues per hour of video as your existing cameras.

      The haystack argument assumes that there is only one needle, and that adding more hay is just going to obscure it further. However, with security cameras, you don't necessarily know that any "needles" are going to be in your existing pile, nor do you know that there won't be any in what you add to that pile. It's a stupid argument that only sounds clever on the surface.

    29. Re: The Haystack by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Informative

      You can only watch so many hours of video.

      Sorry, if that is a revelation to you.

    30. Re:The Haystack by chill · · Score: 1

      In Florida? You go bowling.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    31. Re:The Haystack by c · · Score: 1

      Better hope the needle was made of some robust metal, otherwise you will find that the haystack contained only a few pieces of ferrous dust.

      You mean "pieces of terrorist dust", don't you?

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    32. Re:The Haystack by Mystakaphoros · · Score: 1

      Finding a needle in a haystack is easy. Finding one particular needle in a needle stack is painful.

      This may well be a better metaphor. I'm sure these reporting systems (and the resulting investigations) will lead to seizures of marijuana and illegal pet reptiles, and because some people investigated will get rowdy, there'll be some assault charges generated as well. None of those charges will involve actual terror plots, but there'll be enough "crime" discovered to justify the system.

    33. Re: The Haystack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Certainly, in the case of this story, the hay added to the stack will be mostly needle-free, and so it is a huge waste of time.

      My comments were directed towards Bruce Schneier's haystack argument against increasing the number of surveillance cameras, where it makes no sense at all since new cameras can be expected to be just as likely to record useful footage as the cameras which already exist, and so adding more cameras doesn't just obscure what you're looking for even further.

    34. Re: The Haystack by JustOK · · Score: 2

      You've got two eyes and you're only watching one video at a time? Slacker.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    35. Re:The Haystack by JustOK · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you don't report it, yer a terrorist sympathizer. I'm gonna report you.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    36. Re:The Haystack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the best way to find a needle in a haystack is to dump increasing amounts of hay on top.

      No. You burn the haystack.

    37. Re:The Haystack by LoRdTAW · · Score: 2

      Tightly packed people are more likely to have lower casualties. Suicide bombs can only be so powerful. Humans are quite "squishy" and the people immediately around the bomb will absorb most of the blast energy and the people next to them may or may not survive though they will have severe injuries. Just look at how many people died in the Boston attacks vs how many were injured. Three people died yet nearly 300 people were injured by two bombs.

    38. Re:The Haystack by interkin3tic · · Score: 2

      I don't know about the Koran, but "Sitting on a front porch in Florida" should probably be a red flag of imminent drunken lewd behavior in public and/or violence.

    39. Re: The Haystack by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but I'm not convinced. That's the kind of thing that might be true, but which there is very little evidence to support. Perhaps it will become true when computer analysis of video imagry is good/fast/cheap enough.

      OTOH, there's also the question of whether it should be done even were it to be shown to be effective. This is rarely debated except by people who implicitly assume that their view is the only reasonable one. There are, however, valid arguments on both sides, so such close-mindedness isn't very convincing.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    40. Re:The Haystack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      reding the Koran

      Friend... You give good counsel.

    41. Re:The Haystack by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      They say that they are searching for a needle. But what they really want is to have all the hay in the barn.

    42. Re:The Haystack by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      Finding hay and calling it needle is even easier. Redefinition is easy when you control the dictionary.

    43. Re:The Haystack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, some woman is wearing a Hijib? (sic) Looks suspicious to Bubba.

      Brown skin? Hoodie? Suspicious.

      Brown person? Turban and beard? Heavy accent? Let's not even go there. Kanwaljit Singh is still recovering from gunshots. I would not be surprised that the thug(s) who shot this fellow are LE and this program is merely another attempt to make his life and the lives of others like him miserable.

    44. Re:The Haystack by enjerth · · Score: 1

      Exactly how do you fight an idea with a gun? Imaginary bullets?

      Make the idea unlawful. Then you can use all the guns you want to kill the idea.

    45. Re:The Haystack by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      The problem here is getting the U.S. military to fire on US citizens en masse. Try telling a B-2 pilot he has to go carpet bomb Kansas City.

      --
      Good-bye
    46. Re: The Haystack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Poe's Law in action people.

    47. Re:The Haystack by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      An eyewitness report of an actual crime and a tip on some subjective activity that is arguably suspicious are two different things entirely.

      Agreed. And when it comes to terrorism, here is the difference: If you have eyewitness reports of an actual terrorist attack, you most likely already have dead bodies, maybe a lot of them. The terrorists may be on their way to escaping, and the two in Boston almost did. When you get a tip about suspicious activity that might suggest a connection to terrorism, there probably aren't any dead bodies, and the police or security services can investigate in a calm, thoughtful manner, with all of the legal nicities that everyone here likes. So, which is your preference? Discovery before or after an attack?

      In florida, sitting and reding the Koran on my front porch would probably be enough to get me called in.

      In Florida it would probably get you called, "neighbor," as in "Howdy neighbor."

      Muslims grow, Baptists decline in Metro Orlando, religion census says

      Metropolitan Orlando's Muslim population grew dramatically in the past decade, gaining more than 25,000 worshippers since 2000, according to a new census of religions released Tuesday. Muslims were second only to Roman Catholics, whose numbers increased by nearly 64,000, the census found.

      Muslims now outnumber Presbyterians, Lutherans and Episcopalians in the Orlando area of Lake, Orange, Osceola and Seminole counties. Imam Tariq Rasheed, director of the Islamic Center of Orlando, said the growth comes from Muslims moving to Central Florida from other American cities and from abroad.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    48. Re:The Haystack by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I'm not disagreeing, as it sounds like you're referring to an actual incident where kettling was tried and failed, but given a sufficient number of police to contain the rioters, and given the police have sufficient gear (riot shields, pepper spray, batons, etc.), I don't understand quite why kettling wouldn't work. Any violent protesters who try to leave the kettle-zone will just get sprayed or beaten down, right?

    49. Re:The Haystack by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Why, for example, the current president of the NRA is under the impression that just owning guns (I'm all for it, but I'm a realist) will help in fighting tyranny. ANd he used the Revolutionary war as a example.

      He has to use the revolutionary war because if he pointed to anything more modern like the multi-billion dollar failures in vietnam, iraq and afghanistan he would cause so much cognitive dissonance in his core constituency that their heads would asplode like scanners.

      Note that I'm aware that guns were not the only weapons the underdogs used in those fights, but they were a necessary component.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    50. Re:The Haystack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      burn the effing hay

    51. Re:The Haystack by T-Bone-T · · Score: 1

      It is easier to imagine if the b-2 pilot is given a specific target. We don't carpet bomb anymore because our bombs are accurate and we can accurately aim them.

    52. Re:The Haystack by T-Bone-T · · Score: 1

      There was a subway bombing in Russia, I believe, and they determined that the fact that it was rush hour actually saved lives instead of increasing the body count. Pretty ironic.

    53. Re:The Haystack by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      That doesn't work:
      - Once upon a time, the lawful government of a powerful country tried to kill all the members of an upstart religious group that was worshipping some guy who (they claimed at least) the government executed for high treason. That upstart religious group is now the most popular and most powerful religion in the world.

      - Once upon a time, the lawful government of a powerful country tried to kill everyone who believed that citizens should be equal. That government was overthrown.

      - Once upon a time, the lawful government of a powerful country put down a major rebellion of almost 1/3 of the country by force over the course of about 5 years of fighting. 150 years later, there are still thousands of people who think that the rebels were right, and the symbols of that rebellion are still frequently seen, most commonly in the area where the rebellion started.

      I could go on, but I think you get the point.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    54. Re:The Haystack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't report it, yer a terrorist sympathizer. I'm gonna report you.

      Sounds like you're trying to instigate terror in someone. Report yourself like a good citizen, you ungodly terrorist.

    55. Re:The Haystack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't the american way more like "burn every haystack on the planet on suspicion that there could be a needle hiding in one of them"...?

    56. Re:The Haystack by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Do, or do not. There is no try.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    57. Re:The Haystack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And when it comes to terrorism, here is the difference: If you have eyewitness reports of an actual terrorist attack, you most likely already have dead bodies, maybe a lot of them. The terrorists may be on their way to escaping, and the two in Boston almost did. When you get a tip about suspicious activity that might suggest a connection to terrorism, there probably aren't any dead bodies, and the police or security services can investigate in a calm, thoughtful manner, with all of the legal nicities that everyone here likes. So, which is your preference? Discovery before or after an attack?

      And when it comes to Cthulu summoning, here is the difference: If you have eyewitness reports of an actual Cthulu summoning, you most likely already have undead bodies, maybe a lot of them. The summoners may be on their way to being undead. When you get a tip about suspicious activity that might suggest a connection to Cthulu summoning, there probably aren't any undead bodies, and the police or security services can investigate in a calm, thoughtful manner, with all of the legal nicities that everyone here likes. So, which is your preference? Discovery before or after an attack?

      "I heard my next door neighbor say he believes in a flying spaghetti monster. That's related to Cthulu, right?"

    58. Re:The Haystack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're watching all of you :D

    59. Re: The Haystack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, but... job creation!

    60. Re: The Haystack by cusco · · Score: 1

      And video analytics are useless for finding that kind of information. They work fine for vehicles going the wrong way, objects being moved, sometimes for objects left behind and for loitering (what else is in the field of view is extremely important), but not a lot more. Yes IAAPSP (physical security professional).

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    61. Re:The Haystack by Crypto+Gnome · · Score: 1

      Because the best way to find a needle in a haystack is to dump increasing amounts of hay on top.

      Somebody confused the difference between DATA and INFORMATION.

      To stop the terrorists we need MORE INFORMATION, not MORE DATA.

      See: Signal To Noise Ratio.

      Or, perhaps (ie MORE LIKELY) this has NOTHING to do with Catching The BadGuys and EVERYTHING to do with BEING SEEN TO BE DOING SOMETHING (aka Security Theater, The ONLY thing we have to fear is fear itself, The BEST way for a government to control the people is keep them in a constant state of fear)

      --
      Visit CryptoGnome in his home.
    62. Re:The Haystack by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      When you get a tip about suspicious activity that might suggest a connection to Cthulu summoning, there probably aren't any undead bodies, and the police or security services can investigate in a calm, thoughtful manner, with all of the legal nicities that everyone here likes. So, which is your preference? Discovery before or after an attack?

      Clever, I guess. Here is a list of arrests and convictions for terrorism related offenses. Do you think you can find something similar for Cthulu related offenses? I'll assume not, since that is make-believe, but the terrorists sitting in prison are real.

      FBI’s Top Ten News Stories for the Week Ending January 27, 2012

      Denver: Man Arrested for Providing Material Support to a Designated Foreign Terrorist Organization

      Jamshid Muhtorov was arrested by members of the FBI’s Denver and Chicago Joint Terrorism Task Forces on a charge of providing and attempting to provide material support to the Islamic Jihad Union, a Pakistan-based designated foreign terrorist organization.

      Baltimore: Man Pleads Guilty to Attempted Use of a Weapon of Mass Destruction in Plot to Attack Armed Forces Recruiting Center

      U.S. citizen Antonio Martinez, aka Muhammad Hussain, pled guilty to attempted use of a weapon of mass destruction against federal property in connection with a scheme to attack an armed forces recruiting station in Catonsville, Maryland.

      Washington Field: Man Pleads Guilty to Shootings at Pentagon, Other Military Buildings

      Yonathan Melaku, of Alexandria, Virginia, pled guilty to damaging property and to firearms violations involving five separate shootings at military installations in northern Virginia between October and November 2010, and to attempting to damage veterans’ memorials at Arlington National Cemetery.

      FBI’s Top Ten News Stories for the Week Ending January 13, 2012

      1.Tampa: Florida Resident Charged with Plotting to Bomb Locations in Tampa

      A 25-year-old resident of Pinellas Park, Florida was charged in connection with an alleged plot to attack locations in Tampa with a vehicle bomb, assault rifle, and other explosives.

      2.Baltimore: Former Army Solider Charged with Attempting to Provide Material Support to al Shabaab

      A man who secretly converted to Islam days before he separated from the Army was charged with attempting to provide material support to al Shabaab, a foreign terrorist organization, and was arrested upon his return to Maryland after traveling to Africa.

      FBI’s Top Ten News Stories for the Week Ending December 9, 2011

      Seattle: Man Pleads Guilty in Plot to Attack Military Processing Center

      A former Los Angeles man pled guilty in connection with the June 2011 plot to attack a military installation in Seattle.

      FBI’s Top Ten News Stories for the Week Ending December 2, 2011

      San Diego: Woman Guilty of Conspiring to Provide Material Support to al Shabaab

      Nima Yusuf, 25, a resident of San Diego, pled guilty to conspiring to provide material support to al Shabaab, a foreign terrorist organization.

      More here.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    63. Re:The Haystack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A car is easier to get ahold of and much more efficient, just wait for christmas sales or something. Cheap car, packed street, max speed... sploosh splat. There's your budget Jones-terrorist.

      What to do to protect against that? Ban cars? Lock everyone up?

      You just can't protect against terrorism... it is Impossible. You can take pre-emptive measures to try and keep people happy and healthy enough for them to not want to do terrorist-related stuff.

      It is such a fucking shame us humans are so easy to scare into crazy oppressive politics. Just like clothed monkeys really.

    64. Re:The Haystack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, do you think the military will agree shoot against the own people in case there is an uprising? They have their own families as potential casualties among the "other side" you know.

    65. Re:The Haystack by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      That's very interesting & a good thing over all, but injured people are generally more fearful than dead ones.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
  5. Oh, good. by illumastorm · · Score: 2

    What can possibly go wrong?

    1. Re:Oh, good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What can possibly go wrong?

      "Well, ya never know!"

    2. Re:Oh, good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like, "I guess we are going to find out."

    3. Re:Oh, good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I've got a bad feeling about this..."

  6. What Could Go Wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's see ... where's that 'Anonymous Coward' checkbox?

  7. All Of Them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is our chance!
    Report Them All !!!

    1. Re:All Of Them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You mean the sheriffs? The politicians? The newspaper editors? Who exactly do you want us to report all of?
      Maybe it should be a poll:

      Who should we focus on when making reports about terrorism in Florida:
      * The local police department.
      * A state or federal police-related department.
      * The local judiciary
      * State or federal judiciary
      * State politicians
      * Federal politicians
      * Newspaper editors
      * Cowboy Neal

    2. Re:All Of Them! by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      Don't include bankers on that list, they are outside scope

  8. Pressure cookers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And anyone foreign-looking who buys a pressure cooker...

  9. Overload by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anonymous will overload the system by making loads of fake reports, and get this police-state spectacle over with quickly. It can never work.

  10. Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What could possibly go wrong?

  11. Ripe for abuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not from the US, but I see this being spammed to high heaven. All them terrorists need to do is file enough false reports that (in conjunction with the many "It's probably nothing but..." calls from 'genuinely concerned' citizens) and any genuine calls will get lost in the noise.

    Maybe the real purpose of it is to spend some slush fund, in which case it will obviously be a success.

    1. Re:Ripe for abuse by GrumpySteen · · Score: 1

      Have you seen what how the idiots in Florida behave? Terrorists don't need to file false reports of suspicious activity. The people living there will file a ton of real reports of suspicious activity which will almost all turn out to crazy people with no intentions of committing terrorism.

    2. Re:Ripe for abuse by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Holy shit, that's hilarious. In addition, this is the first really good use for Twitter I have ever seen in my life.

  12. Dive and Hobby Shops, Eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Watch out for people going in to diving shops here in Florida! That's some suspicious activity.

  13. If you don't want to be tagged by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    Drop out of school. Anybody who wants to learn any math and language at all is obviously suspicious. The buttons on the Mcdonalds cash register don't have any numbers or words on them. Curiosity kills more than cats.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:If you don't want to be tagged by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      Drop out of school. Anybody who wants to learn any math and language at all is obviously suspicious.

      Then wouldn't dropping out of school be suspicious?

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    2. Re:If you don't want to be tagged by Jaysyn · · Score: 3, Funny

      Then wouldn't dropping out of school be suspicious?

      Not in Florida, unfortunately.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    3. Re:If you don't want to be tagged by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      If Florida is anything like Arizona, no.

  14. Facepalm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please also note that all of the documents about what to watch for and how to act are provide by the U.S DoJ and Homeland Security.

    It is a local implementation of a federal program.

    I feel much safer now knowing that my reluctance to disclose personal information to some sleazy dive shop is regarded as suspicious terrorist activity.

    Awesome.

  15. Dear Sen, McCarthy by Overzeetop · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have here in my hand a list of all the people I suspect of terrorism. It includes many of my business competitors and personal acquaintances I find annoying or otherwise repulsive. For example, you'll see on page 5 I've included Ms. Johnson from down the street who lets her dog shit in my yard and never cleans up after it. I've noticed her making furtive glances at my front window while the dog is dumping and I'm pretty sure she's making notes of when I'm not home so she can steal the propane tank from my Grillmaster and use it in her reign of terror.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:Dear Sen, McCarthy by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It also includes all the people who live near me that I think are Muslim. I don't have any evidence that they're doing anything bad, but I'm scared of them because of what Osama bin Laden did to us, so I think you should investigate them for terrorism.

      My list also can include, for an appropriate fee, any prominent members of political groups that opposed you in the previous election.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    2. Re:Dear Sen, McCarthy by dhermann · · Score: 1

      People who don't clean up after their dogs are terrorists.

    3. Re:Dear Sen, McCarthy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spot on. An old lady used to call the cops on a Colombian living next to her, saying he was a drug dealer. She called at 2am indicating fake transactions. They even sent a swat team to storm his house. The police already knew him and the issue, but they were required to go and check every fake call from the lady.

    4. Re:Dear Sen, McCarthy by girlinatrainingbra · · Score: 2

      You'd think that after too many of those calls (and wouldn't the second or third verifiably false call have been too many?), the police might consider arresting her for filing a false police report or for misuse of the "911" emergency response system!

    5. Re:Dear Sen, McCarthy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Depending on the breed of dog, they might be terrier-ists.

    6. Re:Dear Sen, McCarthy by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 3, Informative

      Exactly how a lot of people ended up in Gitmo. Besides the hundreds we've released already, there are other innocent men certified as such by our intelligence services that they won't release.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    7. Re:Dear Sen, McCarthy by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      My list, if I still lived in Arizona, would include all my neighbors who have dogs and let them bark for hours on end every day. And all my neighbors who have pit bulls that "get loose" every few days and attack people.

      Luckily, I moved out of Arizona to the northeast, and no one here seems to have out-of-control barking dogs or pit bulls. In fact, for the first time in about 2 decades, I actually like all my neighbors. It's sorta like Mayberry up here, completely unlike the total ghetto that was Arizona.

    8. Re:Dear Sen, McCarthy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly how a lot of people ended up in Gitmo. Besides the hundreds we've released already, there are other innocent men certified as such by our intelligence services that they won't release.

      *Can't* release is the more correct term. No country will take them, innocent or not.

    9. Re:Dear Sen, McCarthy by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      So, the only option is to keep them imprisoned?

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  16. Well color me not surprised. by miffo.swe · · Score: 2

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stasi

    Read it, think, reflect.

    --
    HTTP/1.1 400
    1. Re:Well color me not surprised. by Mystakaphoros · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm sure Stasi PR didn't refer to the organization that way.

    2. Re:Well color me not surprised. by miffo.swe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "The Stasi was primarily an organ of political control"

      Do you think for one second that Stasi did not use the exact same rhetoric as NSA, Homeland Security etc? What they did and what people in east germany thought they did are not at all the same.

      --
      HTTP/1.1 400
    3. Re:Well color me not surprised. by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      The Stasi was primarily an organ of political control, not an anti-terrorism or ordinary local law enforcement.

      Trying to draw a parallel is nonsense.

      Couldn't a government also use agencies charted for local law enforcement and anti-terrorism for purposes of political control? It would actually be a pretty good cover story.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    4. Re:Well color me not surprised. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL. They certainly didn't think of themselves that way. Their name means: Ministry for State Security. What is proposed here is just that: supposed state security (from terrorism, among others).

    5. Re:Well color me not surprised. by kilfarsnar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The Stasi was primarily an organ of political control, not an anti-terrorism or ordinary local law enforcement.

      Trying to draw a parallel is nonsense.

      Contrary to popular perception, the DHS can also be used for political control. Remember when the Occupy Wall Street movement was considered a terrorist threat? Remember when students staging a sit-in were pepper sprayed by the police? That's political control right there.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    6. Re:Well color me not surprised. by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Yes, I've noticed that, you seem to be sure of a lot of things that aren't so.

      "The Stasi motto was "Schild und Schwert der Partei" (Shield and Sword of the Party), that is the ruling Socialist Unity Party of Germany (SED)."

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    7. Re:Well color me not surprised. by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      "The Stasi motto was "Schild und Schwert der Partei" (Shield and Sword of the Party), that is the ruling Socialist Unity Party of Germany (SED)." They were very up front about their mission - political control.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    8. Re:Well color me not surprised. by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      That cover story gets blown when you arrest people for making jokes about the president. Ref: See Putin & Pussy Riot

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    9. Re:Well color me not surprised. by idontgno · · Score: 1

      Overpowering irony: The Stasi was more fundamentally honest than DHS or DoJ are being now.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    10. Re:Well color me not surprised. by shikaisi · · Score: 1

      Just to make things clear for everyone, I suggest they call this new system the Suspicious Terrorist Activity Special Intelligence line.

      Just call 1-888-FL-STASI

      --
      No left turn unstoned.
    11. Re:Well color me not surprised. by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      That cover story gets blown when you arrest people for making jokes about the president. Ref: See Putin & Pussy Riot

      True, but by then it doesn't matter.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    12. Re:Well color me not surprised. by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      ;)

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    13. Re:Well color me not surprised. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you going for the 'most one-dimensional fucktard on slashdot' award for today or something? Step away from the keyboard, buddy.

  17. Ooh great by maroberts · · Score: 2

    I am just looking at my hate list and deciding who deserves more more than just a minor SWATting....

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

  18. True terrorist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So did the citizens start reporting that law enforcement and law makers activities as suspected terrorism?

  19. Sigh..Florida. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As a relatively reclusive person with an electronics "lab" in my garage with the door always open I can see it now.. Police barge in and force me to the ground. "what is this device? it's used for making bombs isn't it!" "no sir.. that is called an oscilloscope." Hell, that might be enough to ship me off to gitmo, but I'm white so probably not.

    1. Re:Sigh..Florida. by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      I was just thinking about this:
      I live alone in a largeish house (Why does one person need that much space?)
      I don't have a TV (Terrorist!!!!)
      I have a small Electronics lab (Who knows what he could be making)
      I have numerous ham radios (Why would anyone want a big bulky radio when you can just pick up the phone?)
      I enjoy taking photographs of unusual subjects (Why would he take a picture of that old car, he must be photographing something behind the car.)
      I own several weapons (Terrorists have weapons)
      I work on my own vehicles (Could be cover for ANYTHING!?!??)
      I have a large black dog (Big dogs are scary, what is he protecting?)
      I have large amounts of outdoor equipment (For hiding out after he does whatever he is planning to do?)

      It's a good thing I don't live in Florida.

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    2. Re:Sigh..Florida. by x_t0ken_407 · · Score: 1

      It's amazing. Everytime we take a step forward we take 3 steps back.

    3. Re:Sigh..Florida. by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      that's nothing, I have some tiny graduated cylinders and erlenmeyer flasks for treating water in the aquarium, so I'm obviously running a meth house

    4. Re:Sigh..Florida. by c0lo · · Score: 1

      Additional suggestion: buy yourself a pressure cooker.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    5. Re:Sigh..Florida. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't report yourself like a law-abiding citizen, it will just prove that you ARE a terrorist!

  20. This just in.. by auximage77 · · Score: 1

    all of Florida's landscaping business now under suspicion of being terrorists. Multiple instance of fertilizer being purchased have been witnessed..

    1. Re:This just in.. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      all of Florida's landscaping business now under suspicion of being terrorists. Multiple instance of fertilizer being purchased have been witnessed..

      Actually, you might want to skip the people buying fertilizer and just call in the people selling it...

  21. Auto-SWATing. . . by Salgak1 · · Score: 1

    . . . .What a breakthrough! NOW, you don't need to hack VOIP to SWAT somebody, the most you need to do is spoof your IP address. . . .assuming the system is smart enough to log and geo-locate IPs in the first place. . .

  22. There your country goes... by GodGell · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...right down the drain.

    I genuinely don't know what to say to Americans now. It's not like they can just pack up and move to the next country over. But I sure as hell wouldn't be staying another week if I was there... what a sad ending to a country with great promise.

    --
    [SHOW SOME LENIENCY TOWARDS ... I mean, FUCK BETA] Eat. Survive. Reproduce. GOTO 10
    1. Re:There your country goes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of us are just waiting for our 401ks to be fully vested

    2. Re:There your country goes... by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 5, Funny

      What? Over? Did you say "over"?

      Nothing is over until we decide it is!

      Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? Hell no!

      And it ain't over now. 'Cause when the goin' gets tough...

    3. Re:There your country goes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? Hell no!

      Time travel may not work, but here's proof of space-travel, shifting between parallel universes. Arguably equally useful.

    4. Re:There your country goes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ".. when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?"

      - that (Pearl Harbor) was The Chinese.

    5. Re:There your country goes... by stenvar · · Score: 1

      You're from where again? Hungary?

      We have our problems, but perhaps you still have bigger problems to worry about in your own country?

    6. Re:There your country goes... by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? Hell no!

      Time travel may not work, but here's proof of space-travel, shifting between parallel universes. Arguably equally useful.

      Or just travel 1 hour 50 minutes into the future while watching this classic.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    7. Re:There your country goes... by cuncator · · Score: 2

      ... the tough get going! Who's with me? Let's go!!

      What the fuck happened to the Slashdot I used to know? Where's the spirit? Where's the guts?

    8. Re:There your country goes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh come on, how could any place where people talk like Eva Gabor have real problems? Hungary has to be an awesome place.

    9. Re:There your country goes... by kilfarsnar · · Score: 3, Interesting

      ...right down the drain.

      I genuinely don't know what to say to Americans now. It's not like they can just pack up and move to the next country over. But I sure as hell wouldn't be staying another week if I was there... what a sad ending to a country with great promise.

      I don't know what to say to Americans either, and I am one. Most of my fellow citizens have no idea what is happening. They think the world is just as it is presented on the news. And they are so conditioned that America = Awesome, and so take their rights and liberties for granted, they are blind to the state trying to take them away. As I have said before, people think fascism has to look like Nazi Germany and even then it has to look like it does in the movies. It's frustrating and scary to me.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    10. Re:There your country goes... by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      what a sad ending to a country with great promise.

      You appear to be overlooking our sadder beginning. I'd also argue you were mislead about the "great promise."

      Also, what's this "ending" business? Nothing is ending, the matter of trading freedom for security is far from settled. The idea that history is ended and everything will forevermore be as it is now is a common illusion, but is an illusion nonetheless. From my perspective, our freedoms are staying about the same at the current time. Floridians may have lost some freedom from nosy paranoid neighbors, but in Minnesota, they just said "The government will no longer follow your religion in limiting who can marry and who can't." If you ask me, that's maybe a half step back but two steps forward.

    11. Re:There your country goes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...right down the drain.

      It's not like [americans] can just pack up and move to the next country over.

      You just made a lot of Canadians very nervous.

    12. Re:There your country goes... by Wookact · · Score: 1

      Somebody missed the reference...

    13. Re:There your country goes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't ask you, because you are stupid. If you think 'who can marry who' has any bearing on the freedom discussion, you are an idiot.

    14. Re:There your country goes... by GodGell · · Score: 1

      That's right, Hungary. And yeah, we do have quite a lot to worry about right now as well, what with Mr. Ego running the show. But bigger problems?

      Hell no.

      In our case, it boils down to us having put the (truly) wrong person in the leading position, and we are now paying for it - but it's causing a great uproar in the process, both inside the country and outside it. He is not getting away with it, and he is just one guy. Once he's out of the way, we can start fixing things. In the USA's case, well... do you really see any chance of that happening?

      This isn't some random whacko politician's dystopic reign, that will only last while he's there. What's happening now in the USA is systematic. And it is continuing effortlessly under the command of (at least) the second administration/president now. Even large-scale citizen unrest has happened, was effectively dealt with, and is apparently gone with no effect at all.

      --
      [SHOW SOME LENIENCY TOWARDS ... I mean, FUCK BETA] Eat. Survive. Reproduce. GOTO 10
    15. Re:There your country goes... by GodGell · · Score: 2

      It's frustrating and scary to me too, and I'm nowhere near as close to the fire as you are!

      Since you mentioned Nazi Germany's case, the irony is that the social climate that allowed Hitler to rise to power was also largely based on patriotism (<our country> is/was the mightiest) and paranoia about the "enemy" corrupting that great country of theirs - without that fear, Hitler's "it's all because of the Jews" propaganda wouldn't have worked, or at least nowhere near as effectively. In today's USA, it's terrrists and Muslims instead of Jews, but one can't ignore the similarities with the fear-mongering tactics being applied (making people feel as afraid as if they were at war). Except, of course, in the 21st century, all you have to do is sprinkle them into the News Cycle and add water!

      --
      [SHOW SOME LENIENCY TOWARDS ... I mean, FUCK BETA] Eat. Survive. Reproduce. GOTO 10
    16. Re:There your country goes... by stenvar · · Score: 1

      Wow, this is really fascinating. You guys are truly experts of liberty and peaceful co-existence! Why can't the US with its piddly 200+ years of democracy learn from the glorious history of Hungary and the enlightened and democratic attitudes of its citizens!

    17. Re:There your country goes... by phorm · · Score: 1

      It's not like they can just pack up and move to the next country over

      And we (the Canadians) are all very thankful for that!

    18. Re:There your country goes... by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Do explain, please.

    19. Re:There your country goes... by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Shhhh... he's on a roll!

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    20. Re:There your country goes... by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      Your 401(k)?

    21. Re:There your country goes... by mianne · · Score: 1

      I got it! We can flee en masse to Canada as refugees! No wait. Too many of the folks who distrust our political system are the paranoid paramilitary types, -- They'll simply invade Canada and rename it "Patriot Land",

      My apologies to Canada, but if it's any consolation, it'll leave an even larger percentage of the morbidly obese, reality-show fanatics behind, making the US look even more like Idiocracy. I suppose we can both then seek asylum in Mexico.

      --
      Javascript, cookies, flash, and ActiveX must be enabled in order to view this sig.
    22. Re:There your country goes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, except that I realized something:

      Most Americans are very conservative. Extremist conservative even, by global standards.
      Conservatives are people who don't want any changes, because apparently change is by definition bad.
      They don't want changes, because those changes *scare* them.

      Conclusion: They are *complete* **pussies**!! ;)
      Biggest pussies the world has ever seen. Everything new has them up in arms. Waaah, my Jello is not red but green today! We're all gonna die!!

      Of course this must be compensated. Which is where the "'MERICA, fuck yeah" and "Best America!" comes in. The louder and more confident they are, the dumber and more frightened they are.

      I'm just sad for the *great* people that also happen to live in the USA.
      But I guess just like with Nazi Germany, all the good scientists and artists will GTFO. Hopefully back to Germany this time. ;)

    23. Re:There your country goes... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      One of the benefit of them getting democracy later in the game is that they could learn from your mistakes. And 200+ years of US democracy include slavery, genocide of Indians, a civil war, witch hunts for communists, and Japanese internment camps, so there's plenty to learn from.

      Also, I wouldn't diss Hungary on the grounds of little experience with liberty. After all, they were the only country in the Soviet bloc that had a country-wide armed popular uprising against their Soviet government - even if that ultimately failed.

    24. Re:There your country goes... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Most of my fellow citizens have no idea what is happening. They think the world is just as it is presented on the news.

      It's worse than that. While cops were going door-to-door in Boston, taking house occupants out at a gunpoint and searching them and their homes (without any warrants, I must add), many the people who were watching that from the windows were cheering for it as an example of government working efficiently to "keep them safe". This, more than anything, has convinced me that a police state is perfectly viable in US - you just need some enemy, real or imagined or concocted, for a convenient scapegoat, and you can do practically anything in the name of security, with cheers from the crowd.

    25. Re:There your country goes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... Germans bombed Pearl Harbor ...

      Uh, that was by Japan tired of being pushed around by the USA.

      ... 'Cause when the goin' gets tough...

      ... The USA turns a little, ugly war into a middle-sized, ugly war.

    26. Re:There your country goes... by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking of moving to Finland.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    27. Re:There your country goes... by c0lo · · Score: 1

      I genuinely don't know what to say to Americans now.

      Wish them luck, they'll need it.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    28. Re:There your country goes... by Mystakaphoros · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking of moving to Finland.

      I've got a couple of friends who have recently, and they just love it!

    29. Re:There your country goes... by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      ... Germans bombed Pearl Harbor ...

      Uh, that was by Japan tired of being pushed around by the USA.

      Whoosh!

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    30. Re:There your country goes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wasn't just patriotism: as in the US now, a huge motivator was a lengthly economic downturn that left a slowly-growing number of citizens primed by frustration & anxiety to accept an even slightly plausible suggestion of who or what to blame.

      -- by TheSeatOfMyPants, anon to avoid undoing moderation

    31. Re:There your country goes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. Gonna be difficult to just "go" anywhere.. Airport "security" is up to max and border to Mexico is quite.. well.. watched. But.. that's to keep the bad guys OUT, right..? Or...

    32. Re:There your country goes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least US citizenry is quite well-armed to fend for themselves in a worst case scenario.

    33. Re:There your country goes... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      In theory, yes, but for all the talk about how "second amendment is there to ensure that all the others apply", I don't see it actually happening, despite the rapid encroachment on other freedoms over the course of the 20th century, and especially in the last few decades.

    34. Re:There your country goes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Germans bombed pearl... what. What.

    35. Re:There your country goes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  23. Glad I'm in Pennsylvania by scotts13 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...Otherwise, I'd be spending all my time talking to the cops. I'd probably set off every single alarm that's on their "suspicious activity" list. I'm active in hobby rocketry, and sometimes transport my engines in surplus bazooka shell cases. Plus, the girlfriend is a dive instructor.

    Hey, anyone remember the 50's and 60's? One the AWFUL things were were told about the Soviet system was the constant suspicion - people encouraged to turn in their neighbors, children encouraged to turn in their parents... (SIGH)

    1. Re:Glad I'm in Pennsylvania by ai4px · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the press that was in the government's power too!

    2. Re:Glad I'm in Pennsylvania by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, anyone remember the 50's and 60's? One the AWFUL things were were told about the Soviet system was the constant suspicion - people encouraged to turn in their neighbors, children encouraged to turn in their parents... (SIGH)

      Didn't the exact same thing also happen in the states with "communists"?

    3. Re:Glad I'm in Pennsylvania by Hunter+Shoptaw · · Score: 1

      Good thing we learned from those mistakes, huh! Am I right?! We could never have something like McCarthy-ism again, we're so much more evolved.

    4. Re:Glad I'm in Pennsylvania by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      When will you be taking orders for the underwater-shoulder-fired missiles?

    5. Re:Glad I'm in Pennsylvania by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it" ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Santayana )

      A large part of the general public is unfortunately too stupid to remember even something that happened last week if the news stop reporting it.

      And for what it is worth, this is not only limited to Americans but almost all people in any country you may pick ....

    6. Re:Glad I'm in Pennsylvania by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recall the slogans, "Better dead than Red" and "Don't Red on your neighbors". Since they are advocating the second, I believe the people who wrote this might be communists. Where do I report the communist subversives? Who is the latest rendition of Republican U.S. Senator Joseph McCarthy?

    7. Re:Glad I'm in Pennsylvania by kimvette · · Score: 1

      That's because politicians read 1984 and mistake it for an instruction manual rather than a warning.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    8. Re:Glad I'm in Pennsylvania by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya know, they don't call it "Russianism"....
      McCarthyism

    9. Re:Glad I'm in Pennsylvania by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Soviets also put up this iron curtain bordering western Europe.
      To keep the greedy capitalists out of Russia.

      Border to mexico watched.. to keep Mexicans out.. (?)
      Increased airport security to keep terrorists out.. (?)

  24. Just remember white-heads in Florida ... by tgd · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If they're young, or wearing a hoodie, or darker skinned than you, or listening to that rock music... they must be up to no good.

    1. Re:Just remember white-heads in Florida ... by Virtucon · · Score: 1

      There's zits everywhere.

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    2. Re:Just remember white-heads in Florida ... by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      No, that's not why they're up to no good. The reason is because the guy was carrying Skittles and a bottle of iced tea, not because he's darker-skinned, young, and wearing a hoodie.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    3. Re:Just remember white-heads in Florida ... by kilfarsnar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Shooting a crackhead that attacked you should be punishable offense" said the dumbass liberal dem

      How do we know the crack head attacked you? Because you say so?

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    4. Re:Just remember white-heads in Florida ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is. Self-defence is a mitigating circumstance, voiding the punishment.

    5. Re:Just remember white-heads in Florida ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shoot the rainbow!

    6. Re:Just remember white-heads in Florida ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Shooting a crackhead that attacked you should be punishable offense" said the dumbass liberal dem

      How do we know the crack head attacked you? Because you say so?

      Because there are other witnesses who say so, there is physical evidence of the crackhead having attacked the person who shot him, and the crackhead's girlfriend said he told her over the phone that he was going to go attack this white guy.

      /different AC, but I paid attention to the Zimmerman case to which the other AC is referring... and Trayvon Martin was a pothead and dealer, not a crackhead... and dumbass liberal dems did say that shooting someone who attacked you should be a criminal offense, and I'm saying that as a smartass liberal dem.

    7. Re:Just remember white-heads in Florida ... by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Race-baiting modded "Insightful" - what a surprise . . . not.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    8. Re:Just remember white-heads in Florida ... by cold+fjord · · Score: 1
      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  25. Obligatory post by DiEx-15 · · Score: 1

    This will not end well.

  26. Re:Might be a good idea by gl4ss · · Score: 3, Insightful

    chemical (water processing etc) engineers are interested in one of the country's largest man made chemical(water) processing structure.

    shocking!

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  27. Witchcraft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wow, if you replace the word 'terrorism' with 'witchcraft' - it sort of reads like a document from Salem, MA circa 1692.

    1. Re:Witchcraft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Sheriffs in 13 Northeast Florida counties announced an online system Thursday for residents to report suspicious activity they think may be witchcraft-related."

    2. Re:Witchcraft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Burn them!

    3. Re:Witchcraft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see a mistake in your logic; I'm going to report you, Errorist!

    4. Re:Witchcraft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's basically McCarthyism again. There's a commy under every bed, in the cupboards and you get to report people you don't like or disagree with.

    5. Re:Witchcraft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FoxReplace is what you are looking for ;)

    6. Re:Witchcraft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or if you replace it with the word "communist" it's a lot closer to home

    7. Re:Witchcraft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, if you replace the word 'terrorism' with 'witchcraft' - it sort of reads like a document from Salem, MA circa 1692.

      And if you replace 'terrorism' with 'muggles', it looks like something out of Harry Potter.

      And if you replace 'terrorism' with 'Romulans', it looks like something out of Star Trek.

      And if you replace 'terrorism' with 'cattle rustling', it looks like something out of the Old West.

      And if you replace 'terrorism' with 'spamming', it looks like something ISP operators would send to each other.

      And if you replace 'terrorism' with 'criminal activity' in general, it looks like every police request for public input, ever.

  28. Friend Computer... by CodeHxr · · Score: 1

    My neighbors are mutants. And Commies. And they talk of these security levels that I know can't exist...

    1. Re:Friend Computer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you traitor!

    2. Re:Friend Computer... by ghmh · · Score: 3, Funny

      The Computer wants you to be happy. If you are not happy, you may be used for reactor shielding.

  29. Their first domain choice was taken... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...so they went with stasi.com for the domain....

  30. Double by Jericho+Whiplash · · Score: 2

    Double plus good! Vote "Fascist" for a seventh glorius decade of secure stability!

  31. Available to all by Transfinite · · Score: 1

    Looks like a report submition can be sent from outside the US. This will be abused massively.

    1. Re:Available to all by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      One can only hope...

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  32. Getting Straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lyrics to a song a couple of decades ago ... http://www.gugalyrics.com/lyrics-854992/*p-k-limited-getting-straight.html.
    "This may no longer be the land of the free
      Thank God it's still home of the brave"

  33. "If you ask amateurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to act as front-line security personnel, you shouldn't be surprised when you get amateur security."
    - Bruce Schneier

  34. United we stand.... by ai4px · · Score: 1

    United we stand, divided we fall. Now we can all not trust one another.

  35. Dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But it is Florida after all.

  36. I've activated plans to call Florida a shithole. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And if you have ever visited the place you know I am correct.

  37. Florida Stasi then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just how is this different from the system employed in East Germany before the Wall came down?

    The USA needs to watch out. It is heading for 4th world status.

  38. Ahh a world of "Gladys Kravitz" by Virtucon · · Score: 1

    This is just what we need. All of the Gladys Kravitzs' of the world unite to create suspicion and problems with your neighbors. A system that lets you anonymously turn in those you hate. Shit, the KGB would love this.

    It reminds me of "Cheech and Chong's Next Movie:" In an effort to get the cops to come to the hotel for the protagonists activities, i.e., breaking into a room, Paul Rubens in his Pee Wee Herman motif tells the police: "Look I think they're Iranian!" Next thing you know SWAT and dozens of squad cars show up.

    So, grab some popcorn and lets watch to see what happens next when some poor guy is shot or arrested for welding in his garage.

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
  39. Time to elect 13 new sheriffs by WillAdams · · Score: 1

    This is a good example of why I prefer to live where the local top police official is elected, not appointed.

    --
    Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
  40. Perhaps we could call by ai4px · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Perhaps we could call the terrorist hotline and report a black car with tinted windows. I just saw the driver looking around suspiciously as he sat in the car and just before he closed the door, I noticed he was carrying a pistol out in the open and had what seemed to be a sawed off shotgun in the front seat. He spoke using a lot of codes, as if they were second nature to him. I strongly suspect this individual to be involved in a rather large, well organized group who seems to want to harass and harm people. I think he's either a terrorist or a government agent in an unmarked car.... it is so hard to tell the difference these days.

    1. Re:Perhaps we could call by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he's either a terrorist or a government agent in an unmarked car.... it is so hard to tell the difference these days.

      One is a subset of the other.

  41. Only the police and military... by stevegee58 · · Score: 1

    Only the police and military should have hobbies.

    1. Re:Only the police and military... by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      and should be interested in architecture and civil engineering.

      normal people watch reality television and listen to pop music. and if they vote, they vote for the bitches of the elite of either of the two parties.

  42. Names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can we get the names of those 13 sheriffs, and some background information, so we all can properly report them as suspicious.

  43. Don't forget the brown shirts by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

    Didn't Germany have a similar program to this, where a citizen could report suspicious behavior on their fellow citizens?

  44. Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi,

    I'd like to report someone who has overseen his followers kidnap people from foreign countries, round them up into a prison in a another country, kept them there for 10+ years without trial, abused them, tortured them and broken all their human rights (without even being able to prove it was them that actually did anything).

    Then invaded their "home" countries and blown up lots of innocent people who might or might not have been associated with them and generally used the threat of terror (i.e. we'll bomb your homes until we find him) to have their demands met (which seem to include the persecution of a particular religion).

    The name? Do I really need to give you that?

  45. Re:Might be a good idea by Mystakaphoros · · Score: 1

    7 Caught Trespassing At Quabbin Reservoir; Patrols Stepped Up Across State

    BELCHERTOWN (CBS) – Shortly after midnight Tuesday, seven people were caught trespassing at the Quabbin Reservoir.

    State Police say the five men and two women are from Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and Singapore, and “cited their education and career interests” for being in the area. The men told police they were chemical engineers and recent college graduates.

    The Quabbin, in Belchertown, is one of the country’s largest man-made public water supplies. Boston’s drinking water comes from the Quabbin and the Wachusett Reservoirs.

    Looks like the Massachusetts State Police were able to spot this one on their own.

    Though my suspicion is that these gentlement just got directions to a B&B in Enfield, and didn't realize it was at the bottom of the reservoir now.

  46. V science fiction series by grag · · Score: 1

    This definitely reminds me of the V science fiction series from the 80s. Society looks down on science and scientists, and society puts full faith and trust in the authorities. People are ready to snitch on their neighbors over the slightest bit of suspicion.

    The only difference from the series and real life, the enemy isn't an external force; it's us tearing ourselves apart in fear. Meanwhile, the power hungry simply use that fear to gain more power and wealth while everyone else is distracted and takes little notice.

    1. Re:V science fiction series by funky_vibes · · Score: 1

      The "visitors" were obviously supposed to be a species with a methodical way of trying to accomplish their goals with least expenditure of resources.
      That means finding our weakness and using it against us.

      Our obvious general weaknesses are:
      Unshakable trust in self-proclaimed authority and posturing.
      Fear of change and differing individuals (scientists)
      i.e. what isn't understood.

    2. Re:V science fiction series by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People are ready to snitch on their neighbors over the slightest bit of suspicion.

      What are you, a 'hardened' criminal? If you know for a fact that someone committed a crime then you SHOULD testify and get their ass locked up. Characterizing a citizen's civic duty as "snitching" is the mark of a brainwashed coward. That is why citizens are afraid to go outside... And that is why law enforcement needs anonymous tips because the citizenry are head-in-the-sand cowards.

      However I agree that if you don't know facts -- anonymous tips WILL be abused, as yet another way to violate your rights. Hey we don't need (or should easily get without evidence) a warrant! We got a tip!

  47. I am waiting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am waiting for the day people are brought to court for knowing how to build bombs.

  48. I am Confused..and want to Do It Right by NEDHead · · Score: 2

    Should I report Mike Holmes alone, or do I need to name each member of his crew

  49. Elect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the government doesn't trust the people, it should elect a new people

  50. Back in the U.S.S.R. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Turn in your Comrade, get extra bonus special pay.

  51. Re:Might be a good idea by fl!ptop · · Score: 2, Interesting

    chemical (water processing etc) engineers are interested in one of the country's largest man made chemical(water) processing structure.

    I'm a chemical engineer, and I too visited several water and wastewater treatment facilities while in college. The whole class went at the same time on these "field trips." But, from TFA:

    Shortly after midnight Tuesday, seven people were caught trespassing at the Quabbin Reservoir.

    All of the "field trips" we took were during the day, and never "shortly after midnight." And, the trips were made while we were still in school, not after we graduated. The actions of these people seem very suspicious to me.

    --
    When you recognize love in another and realize how precious it is, everything else seems so insignificant.
  52. Re:Might be a good idea by GrumpySteen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    State Police say there were no warrants or advisories on any of the individuals and "there was no evidence that the seven were committing any crime beyond the trespassing."

    How does that justify a tip line for people to report suspected terrorist activity?

    Even if those people were trying to poison the water, that reservoir holds 412 billion gallons of water. You would have to dump tanker truck loads of poison it before you'd have any chance of making anyone sick.

    There's simply no way that seven people trespassing can carry enough of anything to have any real effect, yet that's exactly the sort of thing that would get reported to the tip line (along with crazy people reporting their neighbors and all the people reporting Florida Man).

  53. Terminology by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

    Considering this is Florida... Instead of Big Brother, this can be called Paranoid Granny.

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  54. Finally, someone's thinking of the children! by hoboroadie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I immediately (certainly didn't RTFA) thought of the retirees already staking out the pressure cookers at Wal-Mart.
    Now they'll have a # to call, this should save the 911 operators a lot of grief.

    --
    They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
    1. Re:Finally, someone's thinking of the children! by RabidReindeer · · Score: 2

      I immediately (certainly didn't RTFA) thought of the retirees already staking out the pressure cookers at Wal-Mart.
      Now they'll have a # to call, this should save the 911 operators a lot of grief.

      We're talking North Florida, here. Not as many retirees, more rednecks. Most of whom actually probably only would buy a pressure cooker for bomb-making purposes.

    2. Re:Finally, someone's thinking of the children! by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      Not as many retirees, more rednecks. Most of whom actually probably only would buy a pressure cooker for bomb-making purposes.

      Pressure cooked Possum Roadkill Surprise (PRS) is damned tasty.

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    3. Re:Finally, someone's thinking of the children! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I immediately (certainly didn't RTFA) thought of the retirees already staking out the pressure cookers at Wal-Mart.
      Now they'll have a # to call, this should save the 911 operators a lot of grief.

      We're talking North Florida, here. Not as many retirees, more rednecks. Most of whom actually probably only would buy a pressure cooker for bomb-making purposes.

      I am a redneck and cook with a pressure cooker you f*cking insensitive clod

    4. Re:Finally, someone's thinking of the children! by Jawnn · · Score: 2

      We're talking North Florida, here. Not as many retirees, more rednecks. Most of whom actually probably only would buy a pressure cooker for bomb-making purposes.

      Hey! Them pressure cookers is great for makin' a really tender 'gator stew, you insensitive clod.

    5. Re:Finally, someone's thinking of the children! by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Rednecks would probably buy the pressure cooker for making moonshine.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    6. Re:Finally, someone's thinking of the children! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes - certainly. Rednecks would NEVER buy something that helps them make BBQ more easily!

    7. Re:Finally, someone's thinking of the children! by White+Flame · · Score: 1

      Building a bomb doesn't mean you're a terrorist. Plenty of redneck ideas for doing things like removing tree stumps or being bored out in the middle of nowhere involve explosives. That's not terrorism.

  55. So gardeners are screwed? by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So when I pull the plans for my home and the neighbors, then purchase stump remover and fertilizer I can expect a visit from the cops? If I have a pool I am double screwed?

    Bomb materials are quite often things that have very many innocent uses. Last time I was at homedepot I saw no bomb aisle. I did see a pool section and a garden section that would give you just about everything you needed.

    1. Re:So gardeners are screwed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last time I was at homedepot I saw no bomb aisle.

      Yeah. That's why I stick with my downtown hardware store. Good luck finding bombs at the big box stores.

      Buy local.

    2. Re:So gardeners are screwed? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Knowing that gets you on this list. Be sure to report your neighbours before they report you!

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  56. FDLE wants to be in your homes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Today we are asking the citizens to become part of the team, really become the eyes and ears of law enforcement in their employment, in their homes and neighborhoods," said Steve Donaway, of the Florida Department of Law Enforcement.

    - news4jax.com

    1. Re:FDLE wants to be in your homes... by moeinvt · · Score: 1

      " really become the eyes and ears of law enforcement ... in their homes"

      Their HOMES ? Kids ratting out their parents for doing home improvement projects involving pipe, electrical wire or fertilizer?

  57. Rick Scott? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering how our Governor Rick Scott has been trying to destroy the State of Florida ever since he took office, should I report him?

  58. Soviet Russia won, after all. by Moskit · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is exactly the methods used in Soviet Russia and other countries with similar political system.

    For years various such countries lived under communism, and they finally got rid of it 25 years ago. For years USA was hailed as the "country of freedom", and it recently adopts communist-like methods.

    In California if you want to purchase medicaments, they check your ID and input your date of birth to the cash register, because law prohibits sale of medicaments (known to Americans as "drugs") to minors.
    You also need to provide your ID and date of birth if you purchase a knife sharpener (made in China, of course). Sales of knives to minors is prohibited, and knife sharpeners are put under the same "knife" type of merchandise.
    Heck, you cannot even buy something as simple as contact lenses without a prescription! Apparently it is too dangerous for people to buy without doctor approval. Must be true, so many people in Europe die because they bought wrong lenses, right?

    Combine this all with extensive spying on their own citizens, security theatre (most visibly by TSA) and now encouraging citizens to spy on the others... Stalin would have been proud!

    What next? USA remake of Pavlik Morozov?
    Wait, they already have people sue their parents... some will surely chose to denounce instead.

    (note: this is slightly on pessimist side to compensate for the optimists out there who will surely reply "nah, it's not an issue, we don't have a problem")

    1. Re:Soviet Russia won, after all. by petes_PoV · · Score: 3, Insightful

      countries lived under communism ...

      I think you're confusing communism with a surveillance society. Sure, the USSR encouraged a climate of fear, but that was because the regime was poor and having the citizens in a continual state of fear is the cheapest way to control them. The way that the USA and other western democracies used to use to control their citizens was the threat of taking away their wealth and lifestyle. They've now discovered that the same goals can be achieved much cheaper by the use of fear - so they've adopted the tactics of the totalitarian regimes. It's true that dictatorships and poorly run communist states are poor, but it's not a requirement of communism to monitor and terrorise its population - it's just the easiest way to keep them subjugated.

      --
      politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    2. Re:Soviet Russia won, after all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      California isn't the entire US.

    3. Re:Soviet Russia won, after all. by Moskit · · Score: 2

      Why do you think I confuse it?

      I wrote that communist countries (mainly Soviet Russia) used certain methods, and that USA now uses them. This is accurate, as you have also described very clearly. Nothing about USA becoming a communist country.

    4. Re:Soviet Russia won, after all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's worse than that. A friend of mine bought a slingshot the other day...he was asked for ID. You have to be over 18 to buy a damn SLINGSHOT now.

      Dennis the Menace, sure sounds like a terrorist name...

    5. Re:Soviet Russia won, after all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The way that the USA and other western democracies used to use to control their citizens was the threat of taking away their wealth and lifestyle

      Obviously now that our wealth and lifestyles have been taken away, something else is seriously required.

    6. Re:Soviet Russia won, after all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Growing up in USSR, and knowing its history well, I do not agree.

      USSR had relatively short, but _very_ diverse history. It is not really appropriate to dismiss or describe it in phrases like "communism governments are always like...", "dictatorship regimes are always like..."

      The mentioned "fear mongering" in the communist society was indeed used to gain control over people and to subdue them - with their own help, because even a communist government, however "dictatorship", cannot force _everyone_ into subduction, it needs help of the society. This "fera mongering" did not prevail through the whole length of the state's history. It had its ups and downs, pulses and relaxations. The really hard "nuts tightening" occurred relatively infrequently - and only in situations where the significant part of population started feeling and behaving as more or less free people (still poor, but free - yes, there were such periods in history, and many). And the tactics indeed looked... well, just identical. Find a good enemy or threat. Make it local. An ICBM overseas is a real danger, but totally useless in the local context - so start looking for a spy, or even better, for a local hidden collaborationist of the spy, in your back yard, that will try, e.g. to set a beacon in your neighborhood for that ICBM... done! Set everyone looking for these totally fake threats (or threats that are real,small but inflated out of proportion). Gain and publish huge "statistics" on the reports to demonstrate credibility of the threats and efforts to corral them. Legislate extra limitations on "freedom" habits and behaviours (or discourage them informally, communist states had more ways of that than the democracies). Be positive - threat should be big, but you _always_ should be at least a step ahead, always stronger than the enemy, never give impression that you are weak and can't control the situation. Nothing apocalyptic!

      But the _main_ thing in all this combination - to let people _themselves_ take their freedoms away from them, when they started becoming too "free". Not just "delegate" it all to government - that would seem too "oppressive", even for communism. No, take them away themselves - from each other. If this "looks familiar" to some people in today's Western world - well, it might indeed indicate that ways in which societies (and governments) function and operate are not really that deeply different between the continents, nationalities or economic models...

    7. Re:Soviet Russia won, after all. by paavo512 · · Score: 1

      Communism is actually not to be blamed here. I quite like communists, kind of in old Copenhagen's Christiania, I would not object to live in a commune. But I have born and lived in the Soviet Union and there was no trace of communism, ever (except on placards, of course). I guess the last communists were killed by Stalin some 50 years before.

    8. Re:Soviet Russia won, after all. by felrom · · Score: 1

      It's true that dictatorships and poorly run communist states are poor, but it's not a requirement of communism to monitor and terrorise its population - it's just the easiest way to keep them subjugated.

      As Milton Friedman would say, capitalism is a necessary though not sufficient condition of freedom, and communism will naturally precipitate terror and tyranny. Communism is not a state under which anyone wants to live. The only thing it ever provided for in abundance was misery. The vast majority of people have to be forced to live under communism, and that requires terror.

    9. Re:Soviet Russia won, after all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the USSR encouraged a climate of fear, but that was because the regime was poor and having the citizens in a continual state of fear is the cheapest way to control them.

      And how is that different to the US-backed regimes in impoverished European nations who are now gripped by the (manufactured) so-called "economic Crisis"?

    10. Re:Soviet Russia won, after all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "it recently adopts communist-like methods."

      would certainly suggest that "you're confusing communism with a surveillance society".

      The rest of your argument sounds like a libertarian/Tea Party sympathiser.

  59. Re:Might be a good idea by Triv · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Here's your lesson, kids: caring about the thing you got your degree in should stop the minute you graduate, because any learning not done between 9 and 5 and in a school building by a tenured professor will get you arrested.

    wtf is wrong with you?

  60. Don't suspect a friend, report him. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mind that parcel: eagle eyes may save a life.
    Happiness: we're all in this together.
    Trust in haste, Regret at leisure.
    Be Safe: Be Suspicious
    Loose Talk is Noose Talk

  61. Re:Might be a good idea by Hatta · · Score: 1

    This is exactly why it's a bad idea.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  62. Learn baby learn by tanveer1979 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Looks like they haven't learnt from the Korean debacle.
    Korean govt started this thing for traffic offenses (South Korea).
    There was a monetary benefit too attached. Soon there were people, who deliberately slowed down while crossing on green, so their hiding snapper friend would click pictures of motorists caught unawares. Soon this developed to a stage that motorists beat up a few people., and it also resulted in streetfights. Needless to say, it was abandoned.
    Now of course, there is no monetary benefit here, but you will have a small percentage who would be misguided into thinking that its their patriotic duty. There will also be a small percentage of malicious people who want to get even with their "weird" neighbor. Then there would be some douchebags who will think its a nice prank to have a swat team in their neighborhood.
    So its going to be a party now

    --
    My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
    FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
    1. Re:Learn baby learn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the monetary benefit made a massive difference but that's not to say that this doesn't seem like a fucking dumb idea. My immediate thought was East Germany where sometimes both spouses were informants reporting the suspicious activities of the other. I can very well imagine two neighbors om Florida starting to report how their neighbor's behavior has gotten increasingly suspicious when they began monitoring it - it's as if the neighbor was watching them...

    2. Re:Learn baby learn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you explain this scenario in details that makes sense? I cannot figure out what traffic infraction you're talking about here or how you'd come to fighting about it...

    3. Re:Learn baby learn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now of course, there is no monetary benefit here, but you will have a small percentage who would be misguided into thinking that its their patriotic duty.

      Please explain for us how it is misguided for people to believe that they should report criminal activity and acts of war against their own country to the proper authorities, in such cases where a private citizen catches someone who is actually guilty.

      The alternatives to public cooperation in state policing are 1) an expanded surveillance society to allow the police to collect the information that the public would have otherwise given, 2) allowing criminal activity and terrorist acts to occur because the state is left uninformed, and 3) vigilante action. Please explain how any of these three outcomes is advantageous to the situation of the public cooperating with the state police in identifying illegal activity.

      Finally, please explain how it is not the patriotic duty of people to assist in the defense of their own country and communities during a time of war.

  63. It is Florida... by BonThomme · · Score: 1

    Once they're reported, you're allowed to shoot them, right?

  64. This looks all kinds of ugly. by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
    First, "iWATCH"? Really? Apples lawyers are going to be all over this.

    Second, âoeThe majority of citizens want to do whatâ(TM)s right,â? "Wanting to do what's right" is usually the exact opposite of "Doing what's right."

    And third, this sounds like an excellent way of getting back at those annoying neighbos. There are so many suspicious activities that they're bound to engage in a least one or two of them. Nothing like seeing them "evicted" by a SWAT team someday.

  65. I'm shocked! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am completely shocked the post has been up this long and there is still no Nazi/Hitler/Godwin reference. If any story deserved it this would be it.

  66. Catch 22 by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 2

    "The site provides examples of red flags to watch for, such as people with an unusual interest in building plans or who are purchasing materials useful in bomb making."

    So, you report your neighbour for purchasing chemicals X and Y from the gardening store because they can be used to make IEDs, and are yourself flagged because you know that chemicals X and Y can be used to make IEDs.

    Dear America,

    Please add me to your No Fly lists so I never, even accidentally, come anywhere near your Orwellian country again.

    --
    Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    1. Re:Catch 22 by turp182 · · Score: 1

      Please note that L4t3r4lu5 has been added to the no fly list.

      You are welcome.

      --
      BlameBillCosby.com
  67. How nice of them ... by Ihlosi · · Score: 2
    ... to have a lots and lots of PDFs about the sites to watch and the possibly suspicious activities.

    I'm sure the terrorists(tm) will never ever read those PDFs and even if they do, will not at all use the information found therein to obfuscate their activities.

    1. Re:How nice of them ... by JobyOne · · Score: 1

      It's not like that shit is secret or sensitive in any way. Those bunk-ass PDFs aren't exactly military-grade training manuals.

      Anybody who has ever watched the Bourne movies or interacted with other human beings is pretty well trained to avoid the warning signs this nonsense advises watching for.

      --
      Porquoi?
    2. Re:How nice of them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Simple. You have a TOS that says, "You may not read these documents if you are a terrorist".

      Then, when the Evil Terrorists download the documents, you've got them on Copyright and CFAA violations!!! 35 years in jail!!!!!!

      Posting AC for the obvious reason.

  68. Fear wins by Snjit · · Score: 1

    Way to build more fear and distrust of your neighbours.

  69. Learning from history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like the TIPS program from America's glorious past:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_TIPS

    1. Re:Learning from history by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1
      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  70. :%s/witch/terrorist/g by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    how do you know she's a witch?

    she turned me into a NEWT!

    a newt?

    well, I got better...

    1. Re::%s/witch/terrorist/g by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "how do you know she's a terrorist?"

      *dead body parts fail to respond*

      a bomb?

      *dead body parts fail to respond*

  71. Hope they have lots of staff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I hope they have lots of staff, because between the "OMG I heard somebody speaking terrorist on the bus today" anti-Muslim freakouts and the "OMG the UN is coming for OUR GOLFS! AGENDA 21!!!one!!!!" full-on whackjob calls they're gonna have a lot to deal with...

  72. Re:Might be a good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Farmers and manufacturers dump truck loads of poison into our ground water all the time. Maybe they're the real terrorists.

  73. What? by paysonwelch · · Score: 1

    I can't believe I just read this, but I guess I'm not surprised.

  74. That's a place? by JobyOne · · Score: 1

    My favorite thing so far about their site is that one of the "Places to watch" is "Peroxide-Based Explosives."

    Sounds like a fun place to spend a weekend.

    --
    Porquoi?
  75. Measuring is not a crime! by EvilSS · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I love the first one:

    People drawing or measuring important buildings.

    I really just want to go grab a sketch pad and a measuring tape and head downtown...

    --
    I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    1. Re:Measuring is not a crime! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should be safe as long as you look white enough.

    2. Re:Measuring is not a crime! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet a quick photograph would do all that so much faster.....

    3. Re:Measuring is not a crime! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And wear a Burka while you're at it...

    4. Re:Measuring is not a crime! by richlv · · Score: 1

      i've measured and photographed lots of buildings that are important for americans - in florida.
      so i'm suspicious for mapping supermarkets on openstreetmap.

      --
      Rich
    5. Re:Measuring is not a crime! by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      "i've measured and photographed lots of buildings that are important for americans - in florida."

      TERRORIST!!!

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
  76. Incredible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Really something which could have been taken out of propaganda material from WW2.

    Achtung ! Achtung ! Dies wird eine Ansage für ihre Schutzt ! Bitte melden sie jede merkwürdiges AktivitÃt ab, die zu eine terroristische Akt führen konnte ! Insbesonders melden sie jede braune Leute ab, weil die sowieso Suspekt sind.

    We will see if they will get a better result than the Nazi during WW2 (They got so many denunciation that they had to close the postbox , or shoot everybody in the cities in some country).

  77. Re:Might be a good idea by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    A newspaper report of statements by the police about the actions of these people seem very suspicious to me.

    FTFY ;)

    Quabbin, though... I dunno, sounds suspiciously Muslim to me.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  78. Dragons Fang on the door by KickedAbyss · · Score: 1

    ...In other news today, Florida became the first official supporter of Amadicia, and both White Cloacks and dark friends rejoice in this public approval of what many are calling the "Dragons Fang" law.

  79. Re:Might be a good idea by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    How does that justify a tip line for people to report suspected terrorist activity?

    It doesn't. Don't the cops have a non-immediate-emergency number for this kind thing? 912? I made it a point to memorise the local police force's main phone number, which has come in handy a couple of times.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  80. Someone needs to report these sheriffs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real terrorists are these sheriffs in those 13 counties.

  81. Stasi by NikeHerc · · Score: 1

    Are we headed down the road of emulating the DDR (the German Democratic Republic)?

    "... counting part-time informers, the Stasi had one informer per 6.5 people. By comparison, the Gestapo employed one secret policeman per 2,000 people." (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stasi)

    --
    Circle the wagons and fire inward. Entropy increases without bounds.
  82. Re:Might be a good idea by WilyCoder · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If the ultimate goal is to observe something then it is best done during daylight when you can see better.

    Trespassing, at midnight, to satisfy educational curiosity?

    The only time I have been that hungry for knowledge was when i lived next door to some hot sorority girls who kept the window shades open while changing.

  83. Simple solution by fufufang · · Score: 1

    Time to report whoever came up with this idea as the terrorist.

    1. Re:Simple solution by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      You're right. As far as terrorism is defined as the instillment of fear and distrust in the population for political ends, this fits the bill.

  84. Also Cleveland, Ohio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Cleveland, too:
    iWatch NE Ohio

  85. America doesn't need to worry about terrorists by FuzzNugget · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's doing a perfectly good job destroying itself from the inside.

    Budding chemists, engineers, pilots and generally skilled people are being caught up in the dragnet and being rounded up as potential terrorists in this persistent culture of fear. Especially if they're brown.

    1. Re:America doesn't need to worry about terrorists by Hypotensive · · Score: 1

      And surveyors, apparently.

    2. Re:America doesn't need to worry about terrorists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My chinese friends works in a civil engineering company and design bridges and roads for the state. A few times when they were doing field inspections and someone reported. State police show up quickly, verified their IDs and call state DOT to verify.

    3. Re:America doesn't need to worry about terrorists by White+Flame · · Score: 1

      This is a little disingenuous, because this response is exactly what the terrorists plan on. Their goal isn't to blow up a country and kill all the people themselves, but to turn the country in on itself.

      Every single politician who goes along with this crap is perpetuating the goals of terrorism and is a traitor.

  86. Every time I'm at the grocery store... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I see people buying flour.

    Everybody knows that flour is explosive. They must be terrorists!

  87. Re:Might be a good idea by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

    So, an "education session" after midnight, in the dark, when you can't see very far, at a geophysical structure known for being enormous is size - where you would have to see far to see much of anything, after trespassing to do it, is part of their "continuing education?"

    You don't go to broom closets to watch ball games, do you?

    Nothing about the totality of the incident raises even just a sliver of curiosity?

    wtf is wrong with you?

    I could ask the same of you, and that moderator.

    I'll tell you what . . .if there are many people in your society that think like you do, especially people responsible for public safety, there will be some real leaning that is likely to happen eventually. I just doubt you will enjoy the lesson.

       

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  88. I wonder how long... by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

    I wonder how long it will be before they start paying people to spy on their neighbours?

  89. in soviet florida you come from cuba to the same s by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    in soviet florida you come from cuba to the same system of reporting.

  90. More terrorists than you can shake a stick at by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 1

    I love when police gather huge amounts of data resulting in tonnes of false positives. So now every farmer (fertilizer) with a pressure cooker (most) who like Scuba (some) will be getting a visit. If that same farmer donates to a tea-party then the police will think they now have probable cause for a warrant. I really hope that judges will say, "Other than having a computer tell you to raid his house what actual police work have you done?"

    Reason 587 to enshrine privacy rights and limit data gathering right in the constitution.

  91. Pointless. by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

    Why the fuck did we spend the resources and lives to fight those wars to prevent the spread of this 'communist' behavior for again? I mean, was it a war over patents and we had to wait 20 years to implement it here?

  92. Re:Might be a good idea by cold+fjord · · Score: 0

    Your post provided negative information. You didn't even manage to repeat back their justification for being there, but instead came up with something else. People reading your post are less informed, or better - misinformed, after reading it than if they hadn't read it at all.

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  93. Re:The State Militia by hoboroadie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyone planning armed resistance to our criminal government is an idiot. (Peaceful resistance looks pretty fucking foolish, as well.)
    Anyone who thinks that taking away my guns improves security is an idiot. (If I can't be trusted with WMDs, then wtf am I doing AT LARGE?)
    I can't seem to get through to anyone that the Second Amendment's purpose was to keep us from maintaining a tyrannical military, to be used for crimes against the People. Publius had to do a lot of hard selling to convince everyone that we could trust a national army. I think we got conned.

    --
    They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
  94. Dive and Hobby shops by tompaulco · · Score: 1

    80 or 90% of Florida's border is water, and they have 30,000 lakes encompassing 3 million acres of land. So clearly, nobody would ever just dive there recreationally. And hobby shops? Well, everyone knows lots of old people live in Florida, and certainly old people don't have any hobbies. Model Trains? Crochet? Those are just covers for terrorist activity. Quick, take away granny's knitting needles before she knits an Afghan!

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  95. Re:Might be a good idea by Issarlk · · Score: 1

    Exactly, these kids probably just have an alergy to sun, that's why they went at midnight. Nothing suspicious, no sir.

  96. oh that's what we need by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    It had to be Florida? Elderly people suspicious of their neighbors? Yeah, that never happens. Let's give them all an outlet for it! A family from Kosovo moved into my grandma's neighborhood a few years back and she was convinced they were drug-dealing terrorists. It turns out they were just assholes but it's easy for old people to get confused about that.

  97. INGSOC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This smacks of the beginnings of the Ministry of Truth. I feel sorry for all of the Winston Smiths in the 13-county area.

    Under the spreading chestnut tree
    I sold you and you sold me—

  98. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm an architect. I'm always asking for building plans for inspiration. I guess that makes me a terrorist.

    Now, how do we define terrorists? Architects?

  99. Report the system to itself by Sloppy · · Score: 1

    "By my hand, a $BAD_EVENT can happen to anyone, any time. There is no defense unless you crawl into your shell and stop living life. You might sometimes think you are safe but no matter who you are, I might inflict $BAD_EVENT upon you. The random $BAD_EVENTs will continue until you, my pool of victims, collectively persuade your government to alter its policies in accordance with my wishes."

    We all agree that the above really is the very essence of terrorism, right?

    export BAD_EVENT=reporting innocent people to the terrorist suspect database

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  100. Re:Might be a good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you have 4 gallon jugs of a 100% concentration poison, as might be reasonably carried by the group, then, assuming it'll perfectly disperse, you'll get a 0.00001 ppm concentration. What poisons are so strong that they are lethal at such a concentration?

    Alas, the perfect dispersal is a very suspect notion. If you'd dump it close to where the intakes are, you'd probably be dissolving it in a very small fraction of the volume. I'd think that 1ppm concentration would be quite achieveable, then.

    So let's see. Assume a potent toxin like botulinum toxin, and a conservative lethal dose of 100ng/kg. That's about 10ug lethal dose per an adult. You'd probably want to drink that much in a 250mL glass of water, so we need 40ug/L concentration, or 150ug/gallon, or 150ug/3.79kg. That's 40ppm. I think we're a bit short with 1ppm, and I don't know if it's really all that easy to produce botulinum toxin in gallon quantities. You spill any, breathe the evaporated dust, and you're dead. If it happens outside, you leave dead people behind you. Not fun.

  101. Re:Might be a good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It holds 412 billion gallons of water, sure, but nobody supposed they wanted to poison it all.
    What happen if you dump 10 liters of strong poison directly at a water intake? Methink a bunch of people would get dangerous glass of water from their tap.

  102. I've got a name for it by Cigarra · · Score: 2

    Florida System for Normalizing Information on Terrorists, Criminals and Hazards.

    Now if only I could come up with a good short name for that...

    --
    I don't have a sig.
    1. Re:I've got a name for it by moeinvt · · Score: 1

      Oh, that's perfect. +1 funny & insightful

      Unfortunately, it will probably be something like:

      "Suspicious Terrorist Activity Reporting System"

      With a promotional campaign showing cartoon characters telling you how you can be a STAR by ratting on your neighbors or even your parents and siblings.

  103. dive shops? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what can I buy at a dive shop to make a bomb? I know home depot has lots of stuff for bombs, but dive shops?

    1. Re:dive shops? by NikeHerc · · Score: 1

      Dude, did you not see what happened to the shark in the first Jaws movie?

      --
      Circle the wagons and fire inward. Entropy increases without bounds.
    2. Re:dive shops? by rbgnr111 · · Score: 1

      what can I buy at a dive shop to make a bomb? I know home depot has lots of stuff for bombs, but dive shops?

      my thought is the gasses you might get, and the tanks that contain them could be used.... much like sections of pipes, propane tanks, and many other things like that you can pick up just about anywhere...and yes... anyone that needs a propane tank or pipe or possibly anything else you might buy at home depot or the grocery store is defiantly a terrorist.

  104. Re:Might be a good idea by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

    State Police say there were no warrants or advisories on any of the individuals and "there was no evidence that the seven were committing any crime beyond the trespassing."

    How does that justify a tip line for people to report suspected terrorist activity?

    Reconnaissance of vulnerable targets.

    Even if those people were trying to poison the water, that reservoir holds 412 billion gallons of water. You would have to dump tanker truck loads of poison it before you'd have any chance of making anyone sick.

    You only have sufficiently dense poison of sufficient toxicity at the water intake. You don't have to have a uniform distribution of poison or biological substance through the entire reservoir. In the same way, poison only needs to get to your heart or brain, not your little toe.

    There's simply no way that seven people trespassing can carry enough of anything to have any real effect, yet that's exactly the sort of thing that would get reported to the tip line (along with crazy people reporting their neighbors and all the people reporting Florida Man).

    Since you can't piece it together, I'll lay it out: 7 people conduct reconnaissance, note where the water intakes are, and identify routes to the place. At some future time, either they or others return driving trucks of toxic substance and dump it at the water intake, achieving lethal density of toxins.

    But I forget myself, we should only be picking up bodies, not preventing them from being poisoned.

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  105. Who to report? by WillgasM · · Score: 1

    You can start with your senators, representatives, and all their lobbyists.

  106. Re:Might be a good idea by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

    wtf is wrong with you?

    He's been conditioned into a state of fear, just like so many of our fellow citizens. Now everyone is watching what they say and do and jumping at their own shadows. You know, like in any free country...

    --
    "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  107. Its about time by PPH · · Score: 1

    I was afraid that I was going to have to spend a lot of money to get back at my SOB neighbor by building a big, ugly fence. Now I can do it with an anonymous post .

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  108. Re:Might be a good idea by Mystakaphoros · · Score: 3, Funny

    Quabbin, though... I dunno, sounds suspiciously Muslim to me.

    Al-Qabin? I hear they've been collecting supplies for weapons of mass achusetts.

  109. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They finally got The Internet in Florida?

    Took em long enough... terrorists....

  110. Just change the name to DDR already by X.25 · · Score: 2

    And be done with it.

    Sad.

  111. Re:Might be a good idea by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

    They should have known better than to use Apple Maps.

  112. sarcasm coming by saturnianjourneyman · · Score: 1

    Good thing there are no legitimate divers, hobbyists or home builders in Florida. It would be a shame if this brilliant plan accidentally snagged one or two thousand false leads and innocent citizens.

  113. home depot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    everyone shopping at home depot should also be suspected....

  114. Old New by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

    Terrorists, the new communists

    --
    blindly antisocialist = antisocial
  115. just add a 25k reward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and we'll get the same system that populated gitmo

  116. Mind terror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Terrorist is the new communist.

  117. Not exactly new by evil_aaronm · · Score: 1

    About six months ago, or more, I was in a hobby shop in western New York - not necessarily a hot-bed of anything, really; Amish dudes and farming? - and the guy behind the counter tried to impress me with his position as "investigator of potential terrorist activity" based on a sheet he'd been given by the authorities regarding suspicious purchases that could be masked as mere hobby activity. I chuckled - yeah, right, this is gonna happen around here? And you're gonna catch a would-be international terrorist, Gomer? - and groaned inwardly, at the same time, for what we've become.

  118. The Monsters on Maple Street by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This sounds like the plot of a Twilight Zone episode. I saw it...it DOES NOT end well!

  119. Good idea, but kind of futile by Kimomaru · · Score: 1

    So, there's a school of thought that says that a system like this could only lead to trouble since people will abuse it. Even if it's totally effective, do they really have the staff to follow up on every tip?

  120. snitch by Msdose · · Score: 0

    The cops used informants back in the day to catch hippies trading pot. Got the idea from the chinese (of course). Now the drug trade is run by informant-proof gangs. So they traded the hippies for the gangs. Now thats terrorism.

  121. Obligatory Deus Ex by ChickenNugget · · Score: 1

    Be Safe: Be Suspicious

    Terrorism has become an unfortunate fact of life not only in New York but the country at large, a direct assault on our communities and our way of life that leaves citizens struggling to find answers to difficult questions, not the least of which is "What can I do to prevent such atrocities? How can I help?"

    Quite simply, terrorism is successful because terrorists are able to pass unnoticed and unremarked upon - but they fail to count on the best intelligence network ever devised: the American people. How can you tell who might be a terrorist? Look for the following characteristics:

    * A stranger or foreigner.
    * Argumentative, especially about politics or philosophy.
    * Probing questions about your work, particularly high-tech.
    * Spends a greater than average amount of time on the Net.
    * Interests in chemistry, electronics, or computers.
    * Large numbers of mail-order deliveries.
    * Taking photographs of major landmarks.

    And those are just a few. If you're suspicious, then turn them in to your local law enforcement for a thorough background check. Better safe than sorry. You and your neighbors will sleep more securely knowing that you're watching each other's back.

  122. Have You Tried To Buy a Pressure Cooker Lately? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My wife had been pestering me to buy a new pressure cooker for over a year. After the Boston bombing they disappeared from store shelves. It's as if retailers have pulled them.

    Did DHS issue a pressure-cooker crackdown?

  123. Re:Might be a good idea by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

    He is applying his brain and professional experience and training to make an assessment. You aren't doing the first, and probably aren't qualified to do the second. It is really astonishing that you can't figure out that there just might be something suspicious there.

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  124. This seems completely unnecessary by Minwee · · Score: 1
  125. Ah, Old Berlin! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And Old East Berlin.
    Noisy neighbor's kids won't let you rest? His t* of a wife keeps flaunting her new fur stole at you or yours? The seedy young man in 405 came in at dawn, drunk, when you're going out to work and overtime? Just give a call and those neat, clean boys and men in shining uniforms will be by soon. Or at least a pair of very discreetly coated fellows in dark glasses, first. Who knows? The vacated units might be cheap to buy and rent handsomely. Only the Reconquista and the old Inquisition could beat *that*.

  126. Probable Cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My only concern is if they try to use these anonymous reports as a case of probable cause for a warrant.

    1. Re:Probable Cause by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      If you read TFA you would know that this is not an anonymous system, and that people making reports must provide their contact information and, if requested, be interviewed by police.

  127. So cool - finally something I can use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Awesome. About time. Now I can finally get those kids that walk on my lawn, those immigrants with the smelly food across the street, that mouthy couple who walk around in Obama t-shirts. And of course those bloody people who piss me off by just being different. Putting them on the terror watchlist. Yes!!

    (this is sarcasm btw)

  128. Turn it into a police corruption hotline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe some web developer with some free time could copy the site, use all the hooks for the fields in the site and push data to it...

  129. FLOOD IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not flood the system with FL state officals, USA officals, and others lol.

  130. Everything old is new again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know exactly what we can call this system:

    McCarthy 2.0

    And the most appropriate captcha possible: "Kinship"

  131. Look at medical marijuana dispensaries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think Florida is barking up the wrong tree. Rather than suspect innocent people, let's look at those are already committed to violating federal law -- the drug addicts.

    Given that both Boston terrorists were lifelong marijuana addicts, supporters of marijuana legalization, and involved in a brutal murder over marijuana, we should take a closer look at the criminal subclass of drug users and see what they are up to. The customer list for a "medical" marijuana dispensary may provide a veritable who's-who of potential terrorists.

  132. Re:Might be a good idea by Microlith · · Score: 2

    Of course this means that they're TERRORISTS out to kill people, and not just stupid people tresspassing.

    The important thing here is that you adapt to the state of perpetual fear that you're supposed to live in.

  133. Re:Might be a good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks who is talking fucknut. You've littered this whole thread with your tripe.

  134. Re:Might be a good idea by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

    The reservoir used to be a cool place to go drink beer back in the day.

    --
    Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
  135. Re:Might be a good idea by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

    I take it then that it didn't, and probably never would, occur to you that they might simply be conducting reconnaissance to see if an attack is feasible? You do know that Al Qaida agents have been caught more than once doing that?

    So, you don't want to live in a state of perpetual fear? May I assume then that you don't bother to check both ways before crossing the street since that would be "giving in to fear" of being hit by a car? And perhaps drinking water from the toilet wouldn't bother you because you refuse to "live in fear" of disease? And insurance? Doesn't that just show you are living in fear of an accident? Apparently in your world, people don't do things that are prudent, they only act out of fear. Pity that.

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  136. Simple. by denzacar · · Score: 1

    By promoting said "Rep-a-trrrst service".
    What's the point of a program no one knows about, right?

    It's a mere 150k grant for 13 counties, so it's not about simply spending taxpayer's money. At least not at this stage.
    Their care may be genuine. As in genuinely delusional.

    Those making reports must provide their name and contact information. ...
    For iWATCH, people are less likely to be targeted by rumors or malicious accusations. Also, it gives investigators the opportunity to further interview the person reporting the activity.

    "It's always a concern that someone may be setting up a neighbor," Rutherford said.

    Godforbid, someone should get the idea of misrepresenting one's identity to get one's neighbor (or two) in trouble with the authorities.

    I mean, it's not like one could just say his or her name is Neighbor A and report on Neighbor B - and then watch snickering while police pays a visit to both neighbors.
    At the very least, one of the neighbors will start being paranoid about the other.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  137. Good thing about sheriffs by moeinvt · · Score: 1

    The good thing about sheriffs is that they are elected. The citizens should demand that their county sheriff opt-out of this snitch system or face the consequences at the next election.

    Attempting to influence national elections is hopeless. At the county level, some determined activists could make a real difference. Come on Floridians. How about giving us a few small victories for civil liberties?

  138. That's ok cause by cellocgw · · Score: 1

    I only buy porn, and that's not on the suspicious list.

    Oh, and I start my sentence in the subject line, but that's not on the terrorist list either.

    --
    https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
    1. Re:That's ok cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, and I start my sentence in the subject line, but that's not on the terrorist list either.

      It should be...

  139. Terror war dialing cuz you can never be sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am concerned someone living in Jacksonville may in fact be a terrorist. I hear terrorists live in places where there are other people and they even breath the same air as those of us who are not terrorists.

    To help stop terrorism you will need the following:

    1. A list of addresses of all homes in the city. This information is normally easily obtained electronically from the cities assessors office.

    2. A perl/python scraping library to load data obtained in step 1 and and submit a suspicious report for each household in Jacksonville to the following website:
    http://www.iwatchjax.com/submit-report/

    You can never be sure.. if your submission creates probable cause to search every residence of the 800k living in Jacksonville and just one terrorist is found you will be a hero!!!1!!!!!

  140. Re:Might be a good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not a conspiracy nut, but thinking one day about Ergot / precursors & it's complete removal from society (even this mention will probably bring someone to read this comment). I wonder if the reaction to LSD is primary because with an active dosage of 100-200 UG, it could be a threat to a district or city water supply given enough of it. Think about how far the goverment has gone to & been successful in declining avail. of this drug, but they can't stop anything else.

    Posted anon with proxy because I know they listen for anyone mentioning ergot.

  141. Back in my time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we activated a system to call each other *theorists*!

    Now... You're welcome on my lawn!

  142. Red Scares by handy_vandal · · Score: 1

    Red Scares, plural.

    1919 - 1921

    1947 - 1957

    Red scare

    That's just the USA. No doubt other countries have similar histories.

    --
    -kgj
  143. Re:Might be a good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know they were just making up an excuse trying to explain why they were there. They really just wanted to go skinny dipping and have a quick shag.

  144. Re:Might be a good idea by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

    Facts are stubborn things.

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  145. In the words of the great Sir Michael Caine... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    [on Jaws: The Revenge (1987)] I have never seen it, but by all accounts it is terrible. However, I have seen the house that it built, and it is terrific.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  146. You assume there ARE more needles... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    While back in the reality only thing you can safely assume is that there is more hay.

    Only way to be sure that there IS a needle prior to searching trough ALL the hay (at least twice) is if you're the one who's put it there.
    And if you're certain that THERE is there and not over there or here.

    And even if you find one - how can you tell if it's the only one?
    How can you tell that you haven't missed many needles while finding that one?
    How can you even tell it's a needle? Maybe it's a nail? Or a piece of wire?

    False positives are a bitch too... Just like confirmation bias.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  147. Witnesses at fault in 75% of wrongful convictions: by denzacar · · Score: 2

    http://www.innocenceproject.org/understand/Eyewitness-Misidentification.php

    Eyewitness misidentification is the single greatest cause of wrongful convictions nationwide, playing a role in nearly 75% of convictions overturned through DNA testing.

    While eyewitness testimony can be persuasive evidence before a judge or jury, 30 years of strong social science research has proven that eyewitness identification is often unreliable. Research shows that the human mind is not like a tape recorder; we neither record events exactly as we see them, nor recall them like a tape that has been rewound. Instead, witness memory is like any other evidence at a crime scene; it must be preserved carefully and retrieved methodically, or it can be contaminated.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  148. Re:Might be a good idea by spire3661 · · Score: 2

    Your 'reconnaissance of vulnerable targets' is why i cant take pics of bridges anymore without feeling the chilling effect on my neck. You REALLY should study the meaning of Liberty.

    --
    Good-bye
  149. Paranoid-racist much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seven students went to a fucking lake. Let us all tremble in fear.

      ...in the laaaaand of the freeeee... And the hooooomeee... of the... something-something.

  150. Re:Might be a good idea by LateArthurDent · · Score: 1

    I take it then that it didn't, and probably never would, occur to you that they might simply be conducting reconnaissance to see if an attack is feasible? You do know that Al Qaida agents have been caught more than once doing that?

    I think everyone in this thread has gone out on a tangent from what this story was all about.

    I don't know if these guys are potential terrorists on a recon mission, or if they're a bunch of guys who were hanging out one night and randomly decided they should check the facility out because of professional curiosity. I don't really care. They were trespassing, which is an already illegal activity, which gives the police all the authority they need to arrest them and question them on what they were doing there. Seems perfectly reasonable to me.

    What this article is about is having people call the police's "tip" hotline when they decide they see others do "suspicious" things that are perfectly legal. I have a problem with that.

  151. taking away more freedoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once again our government is taking away our right to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

  152. The presents a prisoner's dilemma by section321a · · Score: 1

    If I inform on my neighbors, I won't be suspected of being a terrorist. If my neighbor informs on me, I might be considered a terrorist based solely on that accusation. My neighbor might be thinking the same thing. Whoever informs first has the best chance of not being branded a terrorist. Think it can't happen? Read the Gulag Archipelago

  153. Dob in a terrorist/pedo/hippy/democrat/whatever! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're Un-American!

  154. Re:Might be a good idea by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

    I'm afraid you've misaddressed that complaint. You should be sending it to this lot. If they have their way, it won't just be a "chilling effect" you feel on your neck. On the other hand, they like to give people a "hot time" when they can. If it makes you feel any better, I think the restrictions on that sort of thing aren't as rigid as they were in WW 2.

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  155. Nice Title to Story by dfievet · · Score: 1

    You think the system might work for non citizens as well ?

  156. Oh there's no chance this will be misused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can see it now Betty gets mad because Alice got BINGO before her so she calls her in as a terrorist. Bill catches a bigger fish than John, so John naturally turns him in. I foresee 95% of the citizens of Florida on that list.

  157. Re:The State Militia by cusco · · Score: 1

    To a great extent the Second Amendment's purpose was to protect commerce and property. Notice that it never distinguishes between different kinds of weapons, only says "arms". Not long guns, not handguns, not even cannons. This was because commercial shipping was commonly armed (some of them better than some of the naval ships), convoys of valuable goods traveled with armed guards, and the 'town hall cannon' wasn't just decorative. Communities mounted cannon at the mouth of their harbors for fear of pirates and Spaniards. Local militias formed to protect against roving bands of brigands. Frontier communities built palisades where they could retreat if Indians or Frenchmen attacked. It was a different world.

    --
    "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  158. Re:Might be a good idea by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

    The Slashdot tradition: Facts are flamebait if they don't agree with your politics.

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  159. Re:Might be a good idea by Triv · · Score: 1

    Or some engineers, fresh out of college, got bored and wanted to go on an adventure and went exploring.

    Everything we do is a learning experience. You don't have to sequester yourself in an office with a pile of books to figure out something new.

    We all need to take a deep breath and relax and realize that not everybody out looking at things or throwing around what-ifs is up to no good. They could be bored and curious, and the cost of expansive freedom and the right to be curious and explore to satisfy that curiosity means that, yeah, the occasional nutter intent on harm succeeds.

    I'm okay with that.

  160. Re:Might be a good idea by Triv · · Score: 1

    And we are (or I am, at least; can't speak for the other guy) applying my memories of what it was like to be young with the freedom to get in relatively minor kinds of trouble without people assuming I was a terrorist.

    You've got to have more faith in people than that. The world is complicated enough as it is without assuming that everybody in it is out to do damage to you.

  161. Re:Might be a good idea by Microlith · · Score: 1

    I take it then that it didn't, and probably never would, occur to you that they might simply be conducting reconnaissance to see if an attack is feasible?

    Because we must always assume the worst, and therefore we should overreact and assume a state of perpetual paranoia?

    You do know that Al Qaida agents have been caught more than once doing that?

    Really? Got anything to back that up?

    May I assume then that you don't bother to check both ways before crossing the street since that would be "giving in to fear" of being hit by a car?

    Ah yes, because driving oneself into a state of paranoia such that we must live in constant suspicion of our neighbors is equivalent to making no cars are traveling down the street.

    perhaps drinking water from the toilet wouldn't bother you because you refuse to "live in fear" of disease? And insurance? Doesn't that just show you are living in fear of an accident? Apparently in your world, people don't do things that are prudent, they only act out of fear. Pity that.

    You're completely fucking off base.

  162. More silly terrorist stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Plus watch out for those Photographer Terrorists. It seems when I bicycle and snap photos in a local park, people call the police to report - "Strange man taking photos in the park" .....I fear those crazy busy body citizens than any terrorists.

  163. Oh, yeah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...that'll never be abused. Just like the IRS is never partisan. "We thowwy, we didin know dey wuz ALL conserwatives!"

  164. McCarthyism by ShadowFoxx · · Score: 1

    History... Rinse cycle repeat.

  165. why seven people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do they need seven people to recon ?

  166. ridiculous witchhunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    another witch hunt started by the crooked ass media.... this country is going to shit fucking pathetic

  167. Confidential? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    From the website submission form:

    If you see suspicious activity, please use this form to submit it. Your information is held strictly confidential.

    Unfortunately, unlike Slashdot they don't have a checkbox for "Post Anonymously".

  168. looks more like awareness training by KingBenny · · Score: 1

    pretty harmless (apart from the part where they could probably easily be misled by someone who knows the program and what people will be watching for) since the rat can't be anonymous about it. I was kinda worried they would provide a list of ingredients used in making explosives but i'm happy to see that's supposed to be common knowledge to all people behind the floridan wall. Double-edged sword

    --
    Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?