As AC said, just because you're an American, doesn't mean you can't be anti-American. But you'll notice General Motors is there as well as something called the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers.
The trade group formed on January 13, 1999 to replace the American Automobile Manufacturers Association, which had represented only American manufacturers. As of 2009, the Auto Alliance members are:[3]
BMW Group FCA US LLC Ford Motor Company General Motors Corporation Jaguar Land Rover Mazda Mercedes-Benz USA Mitsubishi Motors Porsche Toyota Volkswagen Group of America Volvo Cars North America
In comments submitted so far, automakers have expressed concern that allowing outsiders to access electronic control units that run critical vehicle functions like steering, throttle inputs and braking "leads to an imbalance by which the negative consequences far outweigh any suggested benefits," according to the Alliance of Global Automakers. In the worst cases, the organizations said an exemption for enthusiasts "leads to disastrous consequences."
You'll see "Global" in that quote mind you. But if you look at some of the organizations, they include companies like Honda, Nissan, Kia, Hyundai, Toyota, Volvo, etc. I'm gonna just chalk this up to anti-American bias.
In a living document, the interpretation does not or should not change. If something needs to change, then the document must be amended. Supreme Court decisions regarding the First Amendment will reference Jefferson's Statute here, because it had major influence on how the First Amendment was written, particularly the Establishment Clause. The Constitution is a holy document, that's the point of it. It is above the power of any single person. If a statute, law or, ruling contradicts the Constitution then the former is invalid. If you have a problem with the historical understanding of a portion of the Constitution you need to push for an amendment.
It's actually the opposite. Game titles tend to want to hit the T rating for games so they draw from the largest pool possible. Destiny is a good recent example of a game that toned down its content to hit a T rating.
Look at the Continuum feature in Win10. That's all I can say. Here's a recent CNN article that shows the feature being demo'd: http://money.cnn.com/2015/03/1...
Apparently, after leaving the the department you sign this form (http://www.gsa.gov/portal/forms/download/115326)
1. I have surrendered to responsible officials all classified or administratively controlled documents and material with which I was charged or which I had in my possession, and I am not retaining in my possession, custody, or control, documents or material containing classified or administratively controlled information furnished to me during the course of such employment or developed as a consequence thereof, including any diaries, memorandums of conversation, or other documents of a personal nature that contain classified or administratively controlled information. 2. I have surrendered to responsible officials all unclassified documents and papers relating to the official business of the Government acquired by me while in the employ of the Department or USIA.
If she signed that she lied and therefore essentially lied under oath.
6. I have been advised by the interviewing officer whose signature appears below and fully understand that Section 1001 of Title 18, United States Code, provides criminal penalties for knowingly and willfully falsifying or concealing material fact in a statement or document submitted to any department or agency of the United States Government concerning a matter under its jurisdiction.
It's an argument that those attacking her are being hypocrites.
Wow really? Everyone attacking her is being a hypocrite? The argument is stupid, deal with it. If it was wrong when Bush did it, it's wrong now. And the people using arguments like cahuenga's are being the real hypocrites.
Are you touched in the head? Seriously? Bush did it, so let's not worry. Wrong is wrong, Bush got away with it, fine. Let's not let another person get away with. Particularly, the person who called the Bush administration corrupt and full of cronyism over their email scandal (she did this in 2007 btw).
Except in 2007 Hillary in a speech denounced the "secretive" Bush administration practices, calling it cronyism and corruption. She then has the gall to do this. Really?
Since the private email server is not part of the agency record, a FOIA request can not be made on it. I don't give a shit if you're an AC pretending to be some non-civilian. You apparently don't have a clue. FOIA requests are for public records, not private records. Her email server is a private record, so to get at it, you must have subpoena. The only hope you have with a FOIA record in this instance is that she didn't leave out any important emails. But good luck at getting anyone to willingly give up for record keeping incriminating emails.
Slashdot Mirror
Redistribute that wealth yo.
Also Auto Alliance: http://www.autoalliance.org/me...
Man, swing and a miss.
As AC said, just because you're an American, doesn't mean you can't be anti-American. But you'll notice General Motors is there as well as something called the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A...
The trade group formed on January 13, 1999 to replace the American Automobile Manufacturers Association, which had represented only American manufacturers. As of 2009, the Auto Alliance members are:[3]
BMW Group
FCA US LLC
Ford Motor Company
General Motors Corporation
Jaguar Land Rover
Mazda
Mercedes-Benz USA
Mitsubishi Motors
Porsche
Toyota
Volkswagen Group of America
Volvo Cars North America
General Motors is in there by themselves if you scan through the comments I linked.
Because you actually need to RTFA.
This is linked in the article: http://copyright.gov/1201/2015...
Relevant section:
In comments submitted so far, automakers have expressed concern that allowing outsiders to access electronic control units that run critical vehicle functions like steering, throttle inputs and braking "leads to an imbalance by which the negative consequences far outweigh any suggested benefits," according to the Alliance of Global Automakers. In the worst cases, the organizations said an exemption for enthusiasts "leads to disastrous consequences."
You'll see "Global" in that quote mind you. But if you look at some of the organizations, they include companies like Honda, Nissan, Kia, Hyundai, Toyota, Volvo, etc. I'm gonna just chalk this up to anti-American bias.
In a living document, the interpretation does not or should not change. If something needs to change, then the document must be amended. Supreme Court decisions regarding the First Amendment will reference Jefferson's Statute here, because it had major influence on how the First Amendment was written, particularly the Establishment Clause. The Constitution is a holy document, that's the point of it. It is above the power of any single person. If a statute, law or, ruling contradicts the Constitution then the former is invalid. If you have a problem with the historical understanding of a portion of the Constitution you need to push for an amendment.
The basis and history for our religious freedom laws precludes such a decision.
This article on Jefferson's VA Statute for Religious Freedom for example:
http://www.theatlantic.com/pas...
It usually has to have some historical merit before it get's to tax exempt status.
Thanks for compiling a character sequence list and explaining the algorithm...
Strawman! HO!
I'm not wasting real mod points for an AC, but +1 for the Year One reference.
Columbine happened five years after the ESRB was created.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C...
It's actually the opposite. Game titles tend to want to hit the T rating for games so they draw from the largest pool possible. Destiny is a good recent example of a game that toned down its content to hit a T rating.
Because blue screen of death dude!!
Look at the Continuum feature in Win10. That's all I can say. Here's a recent CNN article that shows the feature being demo'd: http://money.cnn.com/2015/03/1...
Here's a different one she may have broken, http://www.foxnews.com/politic...
Apparently, after leaving the the department you sign this form (http://www.gsa.gov/portal/forms/download/115326)
1. I have surrendered to responsible officials all classified or administratively controlled documents and material with which I was charged or which
I had in my possession, and I am not retaining in my possession, custody, or control, documents or material containing classified or administratively
controlled information furnished to me during the course of such employment or developed as a consequence thereof, including any diaries,
memorandums of conversation, or other documents of a personal nature that contain classified or administratively controlled information.
2. I have surrendered to responsible officials all unclassified documents and papers relating to the official business of the Government acquired by
me while in the employ of the Department or USIA.
If she signed that she lied and therefore essentially lied under oath.
6. I have been advised by the interviewing officer whose signature appears below and fully understand that Section 1001 of Title 18, United States
Code, provides criminal penalties for knowingly and willfully falsifying or concealing material fact in a statement or document submitted to any
department or agency of the United States Government concerning a matter under its jurisdiction.
It's an argument that those attacking her are being hypocrites.
Wow really? Everyone attacking her is being a hypocrite? The argument is stupid, deal with it. If it was wrong when Bush did it, it's wrong now. And the people using arguments like cahuenga's are being the real hypocrites.
Are you touched in the head? Seriously? Bush did it, so let's not worry. Wrong is wrong, Bush got away with it, fine. Let's not let another person get away with. Particularly, the person who called the Bush administration corrupt and full of cronyism over their email scandal (she did this in 2007 btw).
Except in 2007 Hillary in a speech denounced the "secretive" Bush administration practices, calling it cronyism and corruption. She then has the gall to do this. Really?
About half the country has open primaries I think.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O...
Not really.
Well that can't be true, I clearly see the dress as black/blue but saw B....OMG...I'm some sort of freak of nature!!!
I'm not trying to defend Hillary here, but for honesty's sake, I clicked the link you gave and saw a B. I hit clear cache and it retested as B. :/
Citation: http://www.foia.gov/how-to.htm...
From FOIA.gov:
FOIA request can be made for any agency record.
Since the private email server is not part of the agency record, a FOIA request can not be made on it. I don't give a shit if you're an AC pretending to be some non-civilian. You apparently don't have a clue. FOIA requests are for public records, not private records. Her email server is a private record, so to get at it, you must have subpoena. The only hope you have with a FOIA record in this instance is that she didn't leave out any important emails. But good luck at getting anyone to willingly give up for record keeping incriminating emails.