Slashdot Mirror


User: Windrip

Windrip's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
89
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 89

  1. Re:Don't forget--Unix isn't straightforward! on Making Linux Look Harder Than It Is · · Score: 1

    MS-DOS had pipes and filters since day one. Somehow people figured out how to use them.

  2. Buy 'em anyway on NSync Copy Protected CD · · Score: 1

    Buy these things and return them. Even if you don't plan on listening.
    Pull the lever if they're counting.

  3. What to say when you don't know how to say it on Senator Hollings and the SSSCA · · Score: 1
    For those who don't know what to say:

    start w/ Dan's article; start with the contents of other postings on /.; take Dan's questions and send them to the Senator. They are good questions; they deserve answers.

    War is Peace
    Freedom is Slavery
    Ignorance is Strength

  4. Compiling to threads on Chuck Moore Holds Forth · · Score: 1

    PDP-11 BASIC+2, VAX FORTRAN (and probably other languages from DEC) were compiled to threads of the language run-time system. VAX/Alpha object language is a stack-oriented language.

    Threads are an enormously powerful tool for compiler writers. They allow one to emit consistent sequences (idioms) from a "ridiculously" easy front end.

    At run-time, the loader transfers control to the familiar indirect loop, which gnaws through the "object" code.

    One of the pure charms of programming was to see the PDP-11/VAX/Alpha FORTH inner interpreter.

  5. Re:Insurance Concerns on U.S. Attack -- More Updates · · Score: 1

    The BBC have a good story w/r/t to this issue
    see Insurers face record claims

  6. Re:Your op-ed piece in the WSJ on Big Brother To Watch Judges? · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I received this reply from Kozinski:
    I agree with your (sic) entirely. In fact, one of my major concerns in this matter is that if we adopt the most intrusive policy for our employees, we're more likely to approve it for others as well, when the issue arises in cases before us. Check out the attached article, as well as http://www.tnr.com/091001/rosen091001.html

    If you wish to help in this struggle, please check out http://www.eff.org/alerts/20010831_eff_judicial_mo nitoring_alert.html

    Sending a letter as suggested there, and copying in relevant members of congress, would be a big help.

    Once again, many thanx.

    Ciao. AK

  7. Re: Your op-ed piece in the WSJ on Big Brother To Watch Judges? · · Score: 1

    The original post had nothing to do with "your fantasy of all rich "fat-cats" voting for Bush"

    Among other things, the post was about the fact that the judiciary in the U.S. has lost its mantle of independance and impartiality.

    For the reality-impaired: Gore won the popular vote, lost the electoral college vote, but still the Supremes interfered and appointed Bush. Dispute those facts and go directly to /dev/null.

  8. Re: Your op-ed piece in the WSJ on Big Brother To Watch Judges? · · Score: 1

    So we have two classes of information users? Where one class is allowed unfettered access to information?
    Monitoring judges sucks. Too bad for them. Perhaps when the shoe is on the other foot, they won't be so eager to allow Corpos to stuff their will down employees' throats.
    I'm really happy for you that you can "take it as one factor in my employment decisions." Today is the 10th anniversary of the Brewster, N.C. fire. I'm sure the 25 dead had lots of "employment decisions."
    There is no such thing as "an independant judiciary." Bush's appointment put the lie to that civic hallucination.
    There is no such thing as "an informed judiciary." The on-going case against 2600, Sklyarov, Microsoft et. al. put the lie to that civic hallucination.

  9. Your op-ed piece in the WSJ on Big Brother To Watch Judges? · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Dear Sir:

    Employees are monitored all day, every working day in this country. They don't have access to the august pages of the WSJ to make their case. Since when should I believe you are a champion of the Little Guy? You represent the same class of people who appointed George Bush president, who support restitution for unauthorized computing in Georgia, Internet filtering for unauthorized reading in Michigan, arresting foreign nationals in California for unauthorized coding. When the tide turns against you, we should be concerned? My civil liberties are stripped from me daily with judicial complicity. What can you possibly expect in return?

  10. My letter to the Office on US Copyright Office Releases DMCA Advisory Report · · Score: 1
    To Whom It May Concern:


    IN the "sec-104-report-vol-1.pdf", page xix, you blurted: "Physical copies degrade with time; digital information does not."


    This is wrong in so many ways. Clearly, the bits under discussion do not spontaneously mutate between one and zero. However, this is the functional equivalent of saying that two does not spontaneously mutate to three. Bits do not exist independently of the media upon which they are recorded. Numbers do not exist independently either. If you doubt this, please pick up a two and compare it to a three. I've recorded my address above. Please send me the results of your comparison.


    Since bits do not exist independently of the media upon which they are recorded, it is disingenuous to suggest that "Works in digital information can be reproduced flawlessly..." Please contact the U.S. Census office. Ask them for Census information recorded from 1960 census. Consider carefully their answer. Please contact the Smithsonian Museum. Perhaps they can explain the digital archive process. Consider their answer.

  11. Re:Webcast on Felten & Co. Present SDMI Findings, Finally · · Score: 0
    DDJ really screwed the pooch on this one.

    Too bad they didn't debug .ogg delivery on something less important.

  12. Re:Underappreciated..... on Recreating The Lost Art Of Damascus Steel · · Score: 0

    A.E. Van Vogt explained this long ago... The Indians used high carbon steel

  13. Independent Computer Consultant's Assoc. on Ethics In Computer Consulting · · Score: 1
    From the ICCA home page

    Independent Computer Consultants Association (ICCA) is a national not-for-profit association, founded in 1976 with headquarters in St. Louis. ICCA provides professional development opportunities and business support programs for independent computer consultants. ICCA has chapters in many major metropolitan areas representing nearly 1500 consulting firms nationwide. ICCA also offers its members numerous Benefits and Services.

    Members of the ICCA abide by a Code of Ethics and adhere to the Standards and Practices of ICCA. Members are computer and software experts who have practical experience with the industry's rapidly changing technology. Members use, recommend and install the latest products, and help corporations and individuals utilize the capabilities of the technology they own.

    Membership into ICCA is by firm, ranging from a 1 person, 2-9 person and 10+ person firms. Membership dues are $175, $225 or $275 a year, based on firm size. ICCA chapters have individual dues ranging from $35 to $100 a year, based on your chapter selection. You can join ICCA at any time throughout the year, generating anniversary/renewal date one year from your join date.

    Hope this helps,

    Berezelius

  14. W/R/T prior art in database copying bounty on BountyQuest Announces First Winners for Prior Art · · Score: 1

    Oracle bought Rdb from DEC in 1996. One would assume this also includes Rdb's snapshot technology.