Slashdot Mirror


U.S. Attack -- More Updates

I'm trying to get stuff together, and post an update: The Pentagon, which evidently has partly collapsed with a chasm 200-300 feet across, and fires on six stories, has ordered the USS JFK and George Washington into NYC. PLEASE GIVE BLOOD. Over 200 firemen are reported missing, and reports of 50,000 dead in the WTC collapse are being bandied about. Dick Cheney has assumed control of the White House, and is in the situation room there. GWB is not returning to the White House until things have calmed down -- and has gone evidently to an undisclosed location. The [CDC] in Atlanta has largely evacuated but has activated their bioterrorism units. American Airlines flight 11, the first to crash into the WTC, was going from BOS -> LAX. There are rumors of Akamai's founder being onboard on Flight 11, As well, the rumor is that the pilot of United Flight 193 flew it in into the ground, outside Pittsburgh, rather then fly into the USX building, which if true, makes him a better person then I -- but there are also rumors that it was shot down by a F-16. United Flight 175 also crashed into the WTC, according to Boston.com, and originated from Boston -- so the WTC was both Boston flights. Reports of a car bomb that was supposed to have gone off int front the State Department have been denied. In a statement, the Taliban government of Afghanistan has denied any involvement, and Yassar Arafat has denounced the attack. Remember: No one knows who did this yet, so don't make any assumptions -- remember what people first thought about the OKC attack. In other news, the US - Mexico/Canada borders are being heavily screened; all air traffic has been grounded; nationwide federal buildings are being evacuated; NATO personnel in Brussells have been sent home, Israeli embassies worldwide have been evacuated, all U.S. Disney parks shut down; major parts of European cities, Britain in particular, are being shut down; stock trading is shut down in all major European and American exchanges. There are 50 flights still in the air, with 2 international flights that have yet to respond. F16s from the US Air Force has been instructed to shoot down flights in a no fly zone over NYC & DC - an AVI of the WTC plane or mpeg here. More as we know.Update: 09/11 18:10 PM GMT by H :I've heard on NPR that all flights and planes are now accounted for -- but that a fifth crash has occurred in an undisclosed location. As well, a car bomb did go off in front of the State Department, and there was a crash near Camp David. There's a well done timeline - we also had a report from someone who lives 3 miles away from the PA crash. Evidently the plane veered several times, and then smashed into an abandoned strip mine - which was luckily not near any people or anything.

2,465 comments

  1. Airline Emergency Contact Numbers by tino_sup · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here are emergency contact numbers for the airlines with planes down.
    American Airlines - 800-245-0999
    United Airlines - 800-923-8555

    Hope this helps

    --
    I am me...I think
    1. Re:Airline Emergency Contact Numbers by dcgrigsby · · Score: 5, Informative

      families only please. Please don't flood the lines and make it so families can't find out.

    2. Re:Airline Emergency Contact Numbers by Odin's+Raven · · Score: 5, Informative

      Logan Airport has set up a Family Assistance Center in the Hyatt Hotel. If you have family members who may have been on one of the flights out of Boston, you can contact this center at 617-568-3100.

      This is for family members of those on the AA and UA flights only, not media inquiries, etc.

      --
      A marriage is always made up of two people who are prepared to swear that only the other one snores.
    3. Re:Airline Emergency Contact Numbers by shayne321 · · Score: 1
      Has any one here noticed the irony and symbollism of using two American Airlines and United Airlines jets as weapons on US targets as opposed to any other random jet that could have been used? This simply adds insult to injury.

      This is a sad, sad day for America. I'm not a religious person but I'll be saying a prayer tonight for the families of the victims and for our country to heal.

      Shayne

      --
      Today I didn't even have to use my AK; I got to say it was a good day -- Icecube
    4. Re:Airline Emergency Contact Numbers by Capt.+Mubbers · · Score: 1

      Being basically powerless to do anything other than observe, I looked at the United Airline website, and they have an updated Press Release that gives the full details of the code-shares and flights etc. No passenger list as yet, as they have not contact the relatives, etc.

      Again, hope this helps someone!

      --
      "Watch the skies, keep watching the skies"
    5. Re:Airline Emergency Contact Numbers by Odin's+Raven · · Score: 4, Informative

      Update to my previous post. The family assitance center will be at Logan Airport's Hilton Hotel, not the Hyatt. (The Hyatt will now be the location of a media center.)

      MassPort (Massachusett's Port Authority, which runs Logan) currently has information on contact numbers here:


      http://www.massport.com/about/advisory.html

      and also here (including the Boston Red Cross number, which is apparenlty coordinating volunteers):


      http://www.massport.com/about/91101.html

      --
      A marriage is always made up of two people who are prepared to swear that only the other one snores.
    6. Re:Airline Emergency Contact Numbers by huggyperson · · Score: 1

      Save the phone lines and find people online This site will register people who are safe: http://do.millennium.berkeley.edu/ You can query this site to search for people: http://do.millennium.berkeley.edu/find.php You can register the names of anyone you know is safe

    7. Re:Airline Emergency Contact Numbers by jallen02 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      This is the most active story on slashdot EVER And there are like four or FIVE stories on this and just one of them becomes the most active!

      Jeremy

    8. Re:Airline Emergency Contact Numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And messages! People posting messages!!! Words! Stories with words in!! And how!

  2. Remember the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "No matter how long it may take us to overcome this premeditated invasion, the American people in their righteous might will win though to absolute victory.... ....with confidence in our armed forces - with the unbounding determination of our people - we will gain the inevitable triumph - so help us god."

    - President Franklin D Roosevelt
    December 8th, 1941
    Speaking to the American people after the attack on Pearl Harbor

    1. Re:Remember the past by scanrate · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "I fear all we have done is to wake a sleeping giant, and fill him with a terrible resolve."

      Japanese Admiral Yamamoto
      After attack on Pearl Harbor
      Quoted from http://www.nps.gov/fdrm/generation/ph.htm

    2. Re:Remember the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yamamoto was a true war hero. Far more civilised than the brutish Yankee apes who opposed him, and who seem to still exist given the number of "OMG OMG NEWKE TEH ARRABZ!!1" posts here. A civilised man from a better age.

    3. Re:Remember the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      History has showed that Roosevelt was aware of the pending attack on Pearl Harbor. This is fact.

    4. Re:Remember the past by malevolence · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "When this war is over, the japanese language will be spoken only in hell."

      Admiral Bill "bull" Halsey
      Day after Pearl Harbor Attack
      As he looked out over the wreckage.

    5. Re:Remember the past by Tokens · · Score: 1

      Also remember what Truman said after dropping the atomic bomb over Hiroshima:

      "The world will note that the first atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, a military base..."

      Hope the U.S. doesn't jump to conclusions and do something stupid again...

    6. Re:Remember the past by SubtleNuance · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      ...fucking hubris - dont get so fucking high and mighty.. this shit is fucked up in the highest order, save your jingoist nationalism for the fucking masses.

      Who's dick is biggest - who fucking cares, grow UP! YOUR BEING MANIPULATED - YOU ARE THE MORONIC MASSES!

    7. Re:Remember the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Troll...

      But... http://www.tribo.org/nanking/

    8. Re:Remember the past by Nater · · Score: 2

      My sig says it all.

      --

      I like to play children's songs in minor keys.
      "We're all sons of bitches now." --J. Robert Oppenheimer

    9. Re:Remember the past by ziggr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So when do we start rounding up innocent US citizens and sending them to concentra...er...internment camps?

      Tomorrow morning's news will be filled with reports of vandalism and violence against shops run by humans of Middle Eastern descent. Let's try not to avoid another Krystallnacht.

      Yes. Remember the past. Don't repeat it.

    10. Re:Remember the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, look who's talking. cyborg_monkey. Know anything about Yamamoto? Thought not.

    11. Re:Remember the past by issachar · · Score: 1
      History has showed that Roosevelt was aware of the pending attack on Pearl Harbor. This is fact.


      No it is not! It is a rumour that has not been confirmed or even shown to be probable. That statement is less historical than Oliver Stone's movie JFK.

      --
      . --- If you're looking for free e-mail you won't find it here! http://www.noemailhere.com
    12. Re:Remember the past by ziggr · · Score: 1

      Oops. I meant "Let's try to avoid another Krystallnacht.", not "Let's try not to avoid another Krystallnacht. Yeesh. What good is the preview page if I don't read it more carefully!

      Damn, I hate it when I miss something stupid like that.

    13. Re:Remember the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, yes, it is a fact. They knew the Japanese were sending stuff to Hawaii (intercepted radio transmissions), but they either didn't think that they would attack, or didn't believe that they would be so dishonorable as to attack without warning, since they hadn't formally declared war yet.

      In short: they knew, but chose to ignore the threat.

    14. Re:Remember the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Declassified FOI documents indicate Roosevelt had several hours of warning. I guess those are bogus huh? Someone musta planted them! Maybe Bin Laden.

      If you'd like to view the FOI docs, get Puzzle Palace and Body of Secrets by James Bamford. We decrypted Japan's state department transmissions over a day before the bombs hit. Granted it took about 20 hours to get that info to the powers that be, they had enough time to issue a warning. But we needed a reason to enter WWII, so they kept quiet.

      Don't believe everything you hear on TV. According to mine we didn't really land on the moon.

    15. Re:Remember the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YOUR BEING MANIPULATED

      Or maybe you're just paranoid and we're not being manipulated. You can't really be sure if you're right or not.

    16. Re:Remember the past by Lalakis · · Score: 1
      Oh yes, and I'm sure you will continue to kill other people all over the world (either by war or not), you will continue to be the serif of the nations [without any profit for you, that is ;-)], and you will continue to be the Guardian Angel of our beloved Capitalism!

      Thank you USA :P

      Of course now I'm dead from a US "clever" missile, but this is a matter of lower priority!

    17. Re:Remember the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don{t know too much about the conflict between usa and china when they dropped the bomb... but that was really sick.

      i sinceresly send condolences to all us people family who died.

      i hope people understand that in this life (everyone life's) everything you do, you will pay it in this life.

    18. Re:Remember the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok that's just baloney.

      Moral ramifications aside, even if FDR was looking for a reason to join the war, what tatictian would use a very large and extremely expensive part of our Navy as bait just to pick a fight?

      He may or may not have known ( I personally think that's just a bunch of paranoid horse *), but that's just laugable that he let it happen so he'd haven a legit motive. There were several other ways and much cheaper ways to make an excuse for going into WWII.

    19. Re:Remember the past by tomblackwell · · Score: 1

      I think you should probably take a nap.

    20. Re:Remember the past by rjamestaylor · · Score: 2
      We've been attacked. Thousands of innocent civilians killed.

      To promise retaliation is not hubris, it's appropriate.

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    21. Re:Remember the past by SubtleNuance · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To promise retaliation is not hubris, it's apporpriate.

      no, its childish and immature - to retaliate, to lash out wildly is idiotic.

    22. Re:Remember the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know whether he's a Brit, but I am - and I'm also familiar with your work. I have no doubt that you think Yammamoto is a flying cartoon battleship... you witless fuckhead.

    23. Re:Remember the past by chuqui · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > no, its childish and immature - to retaliate, to lash out wildly is

      easy to say until someone you know is involved.

      --
      Chuq Von Rospach, Internet Gnome = When his IQ reaches 50, he should sell
    24. Re:Remember the past by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      >dont get so fucking high and mighty

      >YOUR BEING MANIPULATED - YOU ARE THE MORONIC >MASSES!

      Talk about being high and mighty

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    25. Re:Remember the past by logicnazi · · Score: 2

      I agree it may be childish and immature to lash out wildly. However it is probably a good strategy over all.

      Sure it may bot be the best response this time but unrestrained response will definatly make it less likely to happen again. Terrorism only works when the response is restrained (they hide in some unidentifiable group and hope to slowly wear down the resolve of the other party).

      If we show a consistant tatic of responding irrationally even when the results are perhaps not the best for us in the short run we may be better off in the long term.

      In other words if this national hubris (which I find somewhat distasteful myself) pushes the US into milatary action that might not be strictly justified on a cost benifit analysis than it may have served a good purpose.

      --

      If you liked this thought maybe you would find my blog nice too:

    26. Re:Remember the past by ncc74656 · · Score: 1, Flamebait
      To promise retaliation is not hubris, it's apporpriate.
      no, its childish and immature - to retaliate, to lash out wildly is idiotic.
      Get back to me when your country is attacked by a bunch of anonymous-coward terrorists. Until then, fuck off and die. )
      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    27. Re:Remember the past by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just out of curiosity, since you seem to be so in favor of appeasing these criminals. If you walked into your house and watched your wife being raped, and your daughter was apparently next, would you consider it "childish and immature" to retaliate against them to keep them from further damaging your loved ones?

      Or would you walk up to them and try to "negotiate" with them? Plead with them to just leave you alone?

      Here's a gun. Would you just watch them as they began on your daughter?

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    28. Re:Remember the past by y10k_complient · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I was listening to Moody radio when a professor of history was being interviewed. He was asked, what event in history can be likened to these events. His response was not Pearl Harbor, but the assassination of Lincoln, for the following reasons:
      1. Lincoln's assassination was part of a coordinated effort to kill Lincoln, Johnson, and Seward (sec of state). The attack on Johnson was aborted, and Seward survived a slash to the throat. Terrorist cooridination are two words that don't belong together.
      2. Lincoln's assassination was unprecidented and a complete shock. Although there have been terrorist attacks on the US and abroad, there has never been anything of this magnitute. I believe this will dwarf Pearl Harbor in terms of loss of life (2403 vs 50,000+) and long term impact (WWII vs. ??) The ideological, economic, political impact of this attack will take years to play out. I don't think WWIII is ineveitable, but the chages that are effected will be more wide spread than war. Just think of what has happened in just a few hours. The first total grounding of all air. Closure of borders. Stop of financial markets. Evacuation of every government and major building in the US. Even small details speak volumes - Mayor Gulianii, concerning the evacuation of NYC: "Everyone south of Canal Street WALK."
    29. Re:Remember the past by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      History has showed that Roosevelt was aware of the pending attack on Pearl Harbor. This is fact.
      No it is not! It is a rumour that has not been confirmed or even shown to be probable.
      My understanding is that an experimental radar installation detected the incoming Japanese fleet and fired off a warning to Washington, but it somehow got misrouted or misplaced. As a result, word of the pending attack never got through until it was too late. This would tend to refute the original poster's assertion.
      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    30. Re:Remember the past by AxelBoldt · · Score: 2
      To promise retaliation is not hubris, it's appropriate.



      If your opponent is a muslim engaged in holy war (which is pure speculation right now), then retaliation is stupid: that person *wants* to die in war, because then he will rise directly to paradise, will live forever next to the prophet and will get seven virgins who fulfill all his wishes. Not a bad deal if you ask me.

    31. Re:Remember the past by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

      Doh! A mindless peurile lashing out is *exactly* what terrorists want. So then they can point at the US and say "Oh, look, nobody likes you...and then you go off and bomb a harmless grits-and-trousers factory in the middle of North Africa. How /typical/!!"

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    32. Re:Remember the past by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

      And it is also rumored that FDR knew of the attack and *purposefully* ignored it in order to expedite the US's entry into the war. Remember, we were in a depression. (yeah, a lot of historical characters aren't as grand as the history books make out)

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    33. Re:Remember the past by beable · · Score: 1
      I agree it may be childish and immature to lash out wildly. However it is probably a good strategy over all. Sure it may bot be the best response this time but unrestrained response will definatly make it less likely to happen again. Terrorism only works when the response is restrained (they hide in some unidentifiable group and hope to slowly wear down the resolve of the other party). If we show a consistant tatic of responding irrationally even when the results are perhaps not the best for us in the short run we may be better off in the long term.
      That might be what "they" want you to do. Lashing out irrationally would be a bad response. The US military and intelligence services needs to determine who is responsible, and retaliate in an appropriate fashion.
      --
      ...
    34. Re:Remember the past by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      Acutally, retaliation is a huge part of our national security model. Prevention is incredibly difficult given the civil freedoms we all hold dear. Detection is obvious in this case. Next we move to investigation. Finally there will be some form of retribution or nullification. If we can manage a solid investigation, a response is mandatory.

      Our situation here is no different than if a criminal breaks into your house and robs you while you are at work. Or if you are attacked on the street. The police cannot guard everything at once. Hence they investigate reported crimes and hopefully the perpetrators are punished (and presumably potential perpetrators are deterred due to the risk of punishment).

      In our private lives, we can only hope that our liberties are preserved such that we have the means to defend ourselves. As a nation, we will have to examine some of our security policies, especially with regard to air travel.

      Ironic that air travel is normally one of our safest methods of transport from a consumer safety standpoint, but apparently the aviation system creates a huge vulnerability for the rest of our defense/security system.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    35. Re:Remember the past by rjamestaylor · · Score: 2
      person *wants* to die in war, because then he will rise directly to paradise, will live forever next to the prophet and will get seven virgins who fulfill all his wishes.

      Then I believe we should help him along. The point isn't to make the person responisble to regret, it's to punish them for the act and stop them from commiting another.

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    36. Re:Remember the past by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1
      Well, since the people that actually did the direct raping/killing equivalent are did, the real question is - if you served a sandwich to someone who later raped and killed my family, how would you feel if I came at you for revenge? What if someone decided to attack Oppenheimer and his students, and they people who supported and trained him?

      Everything is personal to someone. When we bombed Libya and Iraq and Panama etc. etc. etc., we killed innocent people. Not to judge those military actions per se, but the fact that People Get Pissed When Their Loved Ones Hurt is not exactly sophisticated or insightful foreign policy.

    37. Re:Remember the past by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2

      It is America that has been insulated for so long from the vicissitudes of history and its accompanying violence. Most non-Americans have a closer relationship with it than you ever have. In Spain, England, India, the Phillipines, Indonesia, and Mexico, governments and societies are doing exactly what the previous poster has suggested - trying to come to some sort of reconciliation. Of course, this is in coordination with a disciplined and effective security policy whenever it is effective; both carrot and stick are called for when dealing with groups like ETA and the IRA. But the fact is that the US is the last to arrive at this "party," not the first, and your outrage is misinformed.

    38. Re:Remember the past by jnik · · Score: 2

      No it is not! It is a rumour that has not been confirmed or even shown to be probable. That statement is less historical than Oliver Stone's movie JFK.
      Um, in October 2000 Congress cleared the commanders of forces in the Pacific of all charges, on the basis that information was intentionally witheld from them. Check out the book "Day of Deceit"--you don't have to agree with the guy's conclusions, but he has a fair number of texts reproduced from documents he obtained under FOIA.

    39. Re:Remember the past by WNight · · Score: 2

      There's a lot of evidence that the government knew the Japanese were up to something, and that they may have known specifics.

      There are many reasons though, why they might have sat on the news instead of informing people.

      1) This would have let the Japanese know their codes had been broken.

      2) They wanted to get into the war and needed a very bloody reason - it made the US the good guys.

      They had sent the carrier group out for exercises, and from what I've read, the base was undermanned because a lot of people were given leave. This could have meant that they preserved all they could, without giving it away. And maybe they didn't know exactly what was planned, and decided to simply decentralize everything for a while.

      Another theory is that they had decided that carriers were the way to win the war, but they couldn't get rid of all the battleships that were taking up so many resources, and had the support of all the old-timers. Having them sunk could have been a convenient way to achieve many goals at once.

      After all, it is *known* that the allies let certain European cities be bombed rather than let the Germans know Enigma had been cracked.

    40. Re:Remember the past by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

      I assure you that the people who planned this are still alive. Funny how the "masterminds" never do the suicide runs.

      But to sort-of answer your question, yes, if you harbor the criminals that raped and killed my family, I have no sympathy for you if you get shot while getting to them.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    41. Re:Remember the past by cavemanf16 · · Score: 2
      A mindless peurile lashing out is *exactly* what terrorists want.

      A small time terrorist group maybe, but this was HUGE! When it shuts down practically the entire world's travel and economy plans, it's time to go about kicking some ass. That's the reason we kicked Japan's ass in WWII, that's why we'll kick ass this time too. Now, if only we knew exactly who did it, that would help. I say for now, we go about first kicking Osama's ass, then Arafat's ass, for promoting a society that celebrates at the destruction and death of innocent lives. And Sadam and his Islamic fundamentalist cronies whined about us ACCIDENTALLY bombing their civilians. What an ass.

    42. Re:Remember the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll wait for GiZ to come back up before I begin mocking you again... perfumed lube-boy.

    43. Re:Remember the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thousands dead and yet American arrogance continues. This is our retribution for allowing our leaders to continue US terroism.(Columbia, etc)

    44. Re:Remember the past by billbro · · Score: 1

      you don't have a clue when you catagorize this as flamebait. This is exactly the same situation as it was in 1941. The people responsible (AFGANISTAN) will pay the price and rightfully so. I guess slashdot only wants broadband without knowing how you got it. Was china providing it?

    45. Re:Remember the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nanking: army

      Yamamoto: navy

      Buy a clue.

    46. Re:Remember the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Get back to me when your country is attacked by a bunch of anonymous-coward terrorists. Until then, fuck off and die.
      Jesus, are all Americans as ignorant of world events as this moron?

      I hope you get shot at the next IRA fundraiser that happens in the US.

    47. Re:Remember the past by Silent+Johnny · · Score: 1

      As if broadband made us happy. Anyway, maybe they would have if they didn't need to rebuild their country from scratch while facing more than 25 years of economic blockade and American military threat.......
      All Americans believe is that they brought the world nothing than good. I know there are millions of people who rightfully disagree.
      As your government proclaimed: food is not a basic human right (look it up in the UN resolutions...)

    48. Re:Remember the past by steemonk · · Score: 1

      You shouldn't jump to conclusions. After the Oklahoma City Bombing, everybody said it was the Arabs, the Islams, the Palestinians, the Libyans, Bin Laden (even though all of those examples are Arabs). As it turned out, it was an American. In fact, that North American was a U.S. citizen. Jumping to conclusions only spreads the flames.

    49. Re:Remember the past by dvdeug · · Score: 2

      Krystallnacht is not a good comparison. That was deliberate directed attack by the Nazi's. What response there is tomorrow will be undirected and uncordinated, and unfollowed up.

    50. Re:Remember the past by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      Another theory is that they had decided that carriers were the way to win the war, but they couldn't get rid of all the battleships that were taking up so many resources, and had the support of all the old-timers. Having them sunk could have been a convenient way to achieve many goals at once.


      This is sheer bunk. For several engagements, the Pacific Fleet bungled with fighting primarily only with airplanes. Plus, in a war you want every man and ship you can--that's why we were building so many, and by having so many is how we won the war.

      As for a radar detection... The Jappanese airstrikes were launched by submersible carriers (they used a tube & detactchable wings, 3 planes to a sub) to get their planes within striking distance.

      It's most likely that the US forces thought Japan *couldn't reach* pearl harbor, and that even if they did regular patrols would have given them more than enough warning.

    51. Re:Remember the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I fear all we have done is to wake a sleeping giant, and fill him with a terrible resolve."

      Japanese Admiral Yamamoto
      After attack on Pearl Harbor

      ---

      The question I ask myself:

      Is the giant still capable?

      You know, the Roman Empire wasn't lost because
      of the hordes of Barbarians, it was lost
      because of bread and circuses.

    52. Re:Remember the past by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2

      And by that very logic, you justify just the sort of attack that this was.

    53. Re:Remember the past by asbestos_diaper · · Score: 0

      i suspected as much.

      --

      Visit me online.

    54. Re:Remember the past by cyberkahn · · Score: 1

      Someone should mod this guy up. Excellent point!

    55. Re:Remember the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be a liberal pansy to make a statement like that. Who's lashing out wildly? Just turn your cute little bleeding heart away as we commence making whatever shit-kicker country these fools came from into a parking lot!
      Hiroshima!

    56. Re:Remember the past by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2

      The Jappanese airstrikes were launched by submersible carriers

      What color is the sky on your planet? The Japaneese carriers were not submersable. (Well, not more than once anyway.)
      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    57. Re:Remember the past by turpie · · Score: 1

      It might change your mind though if it was US citizens again like it was in Oklahoma. Will you be so keen to kill all of the terrorists fellow countrymen.
      Of course not all Americans were involved in the OKC bombing. So if this latest attack was by foreign terrorists, why should foriegn innocent civilians be killed in response.

    58. Re:Remember the past by awa · · Score: 1

      I assure you that the people who planned this are still alive. Funny how the "masterminds" never do the suicide runs.

      I'd really like to know how you can assure such a thing. You point to no evidence or data whatsoever to support your claim.

      --
      --Moo
    59. Re:Remember the past by jgerman · · Score: 2
      To lash out wildly is wrong of course, but to promise retaliation is not. Retaliation is not even the best word, punishment is.


      As I watched the coverage today I saw a clip from Palestine with people celebrating in the streets. I would gladly put a bullet in every one of their heads young and old, and feel no pains in doing so.


      When it gets to the point, where it has today, that thousands of innocents are killed because of the attitudes in other countries it no longer matters that humans are the same. There comes a time when we must protect our own, by whatever means necessary. None of those people celebrating in the streets today are innocents, that encourage this type of action.


      In my mind there are two ways to handle this. Once the leader is discovered, and he/she will be discovered, the country harbouring the individual must turn him over to us for execution, or we destroy that country killing every man, woman, and child within it's borders. This time I was lucky, so far no one I know was a victim of this attack, but I will condone any action that makes sure that next time my family and friends are not among the casualties.

      --
      I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
    60. Re:Remember the past by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      We know where training camps are. Why not strike all known terrorist training camps within 24 hours?
      Might not get the current criminals, but its a policy that would eventually prevail. At this moment Bush has a blank check. Do we dare cash it? What are the consequences if we don't?

    61. Re:Remember the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would not be one for lashing out. I want a calculated response. I want us to wait as long as needed to determine what group, and it's suppoting country (assuming there is one) is responsible.
      Once we know exactly who we are dealing with, I think that would be the time to send a message. Now, we may not be able to deter the terrorists themselves, but we can make sure that nations will think twice before supporting it.
      A calculated mass murder is just the response needed for the calculated mass murder which we have experienced today.
      Now, before anybody gives me the crap about "we don't want to sink to their level....", I want to say that there is only two levels. People who does what is needed, and those who don't. If we fail to act, we are squandering the chance to strike a blow against all terrorism, while there is sufficent public will.
      The only situation in which I would argue agaist a massive counter-strike is if the country from which the terrorists orginated was one which make a sincere effort to stamp out terrorism. For instance, a western european country, or Canada. In that case we would need to go the more conventional route of aprehension and execution. (I'm undecided about public torture's usefullness).

    62. Re:Remember the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I fear that we have awakened a sleeping giant and filled him with a terrible resolve." -- Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto, 1941

    63. Re:Remember the past by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      Yes, they were. (Ever watch the history channel?)

      These were special submersible carriers. They're just about useless now with the advent of sonar, but sonar WASN'T THAT PREVALENT during WWII.

      These things also only had sea-voyage time of one mission--they were useless for regular fleet battles, as the planes had to be fueled ahead of time.

      Three planes, with detachable wings, fit into a large watertight tube, and there was a slingshot in the front.(like every other carrier uses, and like the *first* carriers, which were just battleships with launch ramps attached to the guns)
      I don't recall if they were the only ships used in the attack, but I do know that they were a primary sneak-attack weapon--and they weren't effectivly used ever again in the war. (The Jappanese Navy had bigger problems in mind.)

      Please note that I never claimed that "all Japaneese carriers" were submarines. I said that they used "submersible carriers." I'm now quoting my source as the history channel, and if you care to rise above the level of a flame, you can go look it up yourself.

    64. Re:Remember the past by jallen02 · · Score: 1

      "You don't mess with the tires on a texas boys truck, or the cities of his country in the case of GWB" - Me

      It is situations like this I am glad to have a president like GWB. He may be more forward than most people like but hes shown he wont be toyed with already.

    65. Re:Remember the past by AnarchoFreak_00 · · Score: 1
      "We've been attacked. Thousands of innocent civilians killed.

      To promise retaliation is not hubris, it's appropriate."

      So then the US can attcak, and kill thousands of innocent people? Which means that the other side will retaliate back?

      Some people just don't understand the whole visous cycle of war and conflict.

    66. Re:Remember the past by SirSlud · · Score: 2

      > I would gladly put a bullet in every one of their heads young and old, and feel no pains in doing so.

      That is just so darn sad, although it displays as much cowardice and ignorance as the attack itself. In this sense, our reactions to events like these only serve to furthur illumnate the sad irony that humans are, for all intents and purposes, exactly alike. These people's reactions and attitudes are the result of social climate under a military government; capitalist systems also destroy human life (nevermind the planet), although the indirectness and lack of a clear responsible party for the devestation caused by western society (1000 people die here every year in my city alone from the quality of the air) makes it far easier for democratic victims to hide behind a curtain of baseless innocence, and generally allow the collective social conciousness to absolve itself of said responsibility. Yes, it's terribly tragic .. yes, loved ones by the thousands were lost .. my sincere condolances to those who were lost or have lost loved ones as a result. But to kill the responsible party is useless and futile (hell, they killed their own, volountarily to achieve their goal), and in no way addresses the grim reality that only a change in the current political global climate will prevent or discourage similar attempts in the future. One might even suggest it would only furthur cement the anti-US sentiment in the circles that condone such drastic and cowardly attacks.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    67. Re:Remember the past by shepd · · Score: 1

      Your statements are the exact reason why victims are not allowed to sentence their agressors.

      You cannot be rational about a situation when personally involved. I've had arguments with peolpe that left me wanting to punch the hell out of the other person (never did it though). Is that right?

      Hell no.

      Is it right for the raper to be shot?

      Hell no. No matter how much you hate them.

      You'll notice the law agrees with me. The only two reasons (that I know of) in which an agressor can be killed due to their actions are:

      - If they threaten life (rape is close, but not there).
      - If you can use the battered wife syndrome excuse (not applicable in this situation).

      There's other reasons *(maybe, depends where you live)* but most countries don't want vigilantees.

      Yes. I said it. Vigilatism. The most childish and immature act possible.

      The proper course of action would be to beat the hell out of the agressor, or find some other method of stopping them that doesn't kill them (tazer, stunner, tranquilizer darts [unlikely]).

      Situations aren't as black and white as the extremists among us would say. You don't just have the choices of kill or saying hello. You can stop the situation with force, among a myriad of other non-deadly options (police, neighbours, heck -- the fact the rapist knows there's another man about is more than likely going to scare them off -- most rape isn't about the sex, it's about having power over women. That power is gone when another man gets involved).

      For all you know that rapist is an escapee from a mental hospital who voluntarialy committed themselves last month whose treatment wasn't administered properly. And you want them dead?

      Your suggestion is as pathetic an excuse for murder as I have ever heard.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    68. Re:Remember the past by socialist+fish · · Score: 1

      So, that's the reason why U.S. nuked Hiroshima, killing uncountable civilians? OK, now I'm getting the idea.. Couldn't this be the retaliation for Hiroshima? It would be a very small retaliation.. In Hiroshima the damages weren't just the immediate killing, but also the long-term killing by radiation.

      Did you say accidentally bombing civilians in Irak? You're sooo childish. The US Army did NEVER care a damn about civilian lifes. Think Irak, Vietnam, Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Panamá, and all the killings sponsored by the US, like the ones in southamerica during the 1970's..

      --
      yadda yadda
    69. Re:Remember the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When they get these guys, they need to take away their money too. Or else someone else will just fill their place for another well-funded attack.

    70. Re:Remember the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. Someone disagrees with your opinion, insults you personally, doesn't kill anybody, doesn't even threaten your life, and you want to shoot them?

      Think about what you just said and what it means.

      I see lots of people with distasteful ideas (neo-nazis come to mind) who do much more disgusting things who I never even think about shooting.

      Speaking of that, I'm surprised that anyone with the name jGerman would suggest that killing all the innocent civilians occupying a dissenting area is the answer. If it were then I'd be surprised if anyone with the last name "German" would exist after WWII.

      To put it short: Get a grip!

    71. Re:Remember the past by rjamestaylor · · Score: 2
      So then the US can attcak, and kill thousands of innocent people?

      Yes. Of course.

      Which means that the other side will retaliate back? Some people just don't understand the whole visous cycle of war and conflict.

      And that would be you. Ask Germany, Japan, Italy, heck, Britian about this cycle. War DOES change things. (My point is these four countries are great friends of the US today but at one time we fought them to the death).

      Sometime evil just needs to be eradicated.

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    72. Re:Remember the past by Asparfame · · Score: 1
      Regardless of what the law says, I believe (and I'm sure I'm not alone) that the rapist DOES deserve to be shot. Not everybody shares your particularly kind set of values.


      Not everybody deserves life.

      --

      There's no reason for a sig here.

    73. Re:Remember the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does the horror of the days' events not strike you to ask one further question, BEFORE putting bullets into so many people's heads without so much as a second thought... question being:
      Don't you wonder WHY these people feel this way?
      Do not mistake me for one of their supporters; I horrified at the sight of their celebrating, too, and also felt sickened and angered at their joyousness over others' tragedies. I just had to wonder, however, if they had faced numerous tragedies of their own, that haven't received large democratic news coverage like our own experiences currently are.
      Perhaps I am wrong, but I think it is worth investigating the answers to ALL SIDES of the issue, for only then can we TRULY resolve these kinds of calamaties against humanity before they happen again.
      And, despite how this all may sound, I do support the hunting down and punishing of the perpetrators of these acts. One must draw the line somewhere, and that is coming from an individual completely AGAINST violence of any kind. I say this because I realize the reality of the world we live in at this time, but I also have hope for the world without a penchant for commiting these ridiculous attrocities against itself.
      May light, love, and peace be chosen by those of us who truly care about our neighbors. I am deeply saddened by what these events may mean to my young daughters, and their children. May peace find it's way into our hearts.
      - Jeff in Canada

    74. Re:Remember the past by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Not everybody deserves life.

      Not even the self commited nut desprately trying to get help that I described?

      How could you know the rapist's history before you shot him? Sure, chances are you'll get lucky and find out he's a serial rapist. Or you might not.

      Speaking about russion roulette, that involves guns too.

      >Not everybody shares your particularly kind set of values.

      I notice that -- slashdot really does open your eyes to the world of hatred out there. People calling people from the Middle East dogs, turban heads, whatever. An amazing whack of people saying that killing some citizens from Middle Eastern countries will ease the pain.

      Please don't take that as a personal attack -- The only thing you've suggested is that you hate rapists enough to kill them, who fortunately aren't innocent cvilians. But its still hate, none-the-less.

      I'll agree though, I also hate rapists. Just not enough to kill them. Actually, I don't hate anyone enough to kill them. Thinking like that would keep me up at night. :-/

      Fortunately the less kind among us has never been in power in free countries like the US long enough to change the system to their ideals.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    75. Re:Remember the past by AnarchoFreak_00 · · Score: 1
      No, that would still be you. I'm not talking about specifics when I mean war is a cycle. I'm talking about the big picture. There has always been wars going on, people retaliating to each other. It never stops, just look back into history and it's blatantly obvious.

      "Yes. Of course"? You really belive that it's OK to to kill innocent people? Sure.. your goverment might become friends with the other countries govenment afterwards. But what does that matter? They still killed innocent people.
      And yes, war does change things. But usaly for the worst.

      Also, you really think that some of the places in the Middle-east are going to be come pals with the western world, just cause the US fire a few missils into civilian buildings?

      Who are you standing for anyway? The govenments? or the people?

      The thing is, the people that flew those planes into the WTC, belived that evil needed to be eradicated to. You are just like them.

    76. Re:Remember the past by crbill · · Score: 1
      As far as American law goes, you are very wrong with regards to when deadly force may be used. Generally, it's okay to respond with force that is likely to cause death or serious injury when the same is imminent to/upon a person being attacked, or when one of several forcible felonies are being committed upon a person (murder, rape, sexual assault/battery, arson, treason, car-jacking, robbery, planting bombs, etc.). Vigilantism this is not, as the use of force is explicitly authorized by the law.


      I guess we Americans place a lower value on the lives those who initiate violence.

    77. Re:Remember the past by jgerman · · Score: 2
      Number one, my last name has nothing to do with my nationality. That's a foolish assumption.


      Number two they did kill somebody. So many innocent somebody's that we don't even have a count yet. This behavior encourages the kind of destruction that happened yesterday. Before yesterday I would not have cared less what those people thought. But when they give their support for terrorist scum they've crossed the line. If they did not exist it would not have happened.


      As far as killing innocent civilians, I never suggested that. I suggested killing the people who are harbouring criminals and who would not give them up.

      --
      I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
    78. Re:Remember the past by jgerman · · Score: 2
      No I don't question why these people feel this way, I don't care why these people feel this way. At this point they aren't people to me, they're animals.


      You are right and wrong in your statement. You are right in the sense that if we were dealing with rational human beings, investigating both sides could probably resolve the issues. But you're wrong because we are not dealing with rational people. If they were they would have realized that they are only bringing pain and suffering down on themselves tenfold.


      I wish that this didn't have to happen as well. But the fact is now that it has. What if somehow the terrorists responsible has gotten their hands on a nuke. Where would NY be now?

      --
      I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
    79. Re:Remember the past by albanac · · Score: 1
      Just out of curiosity, since you seem to be so in favor of appeasing these criminals. If you walked into your house and watched your wife being raped, and your daughter was apparently next, would you consider it "childish and immature" to retaliate against them to keep them from further damaging your loved ones?

      Please, please, do not permit terror to achieve it's aim. In attacking a (possibly strongly worded) call for rationalism and appropriate, consolidated world-wide response to this tragedy, you are perpetuating the success of the terrorist gesture. Furthermore, in reducing wide-scale murder and mayhem to a personal insult and an analogy on a personal scale, you are guilty of severe disrespect to the victims of this operation, and their families.

      Please, don't do that.

      ~cHris
    80. Re:Remember the past by Kaine · · Score: 1

      Well... I don't know. I read lots of powerful words. "Cowardly", "civilian targets", "horrific death toll", "scandalous", "caught unaware"... and all I can think of is Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Remember the past, eh? Cheers mate.

      --
      Language is what makes us different from primitive animals, and bureaucrats.
    81. Re:Remember the past by Ghengis · · Score: 1

      Well you can all forget arguing about whether it's good or not, because we're going to do it. If we don't, then the terrorists will gain confidence, hence, we will make an example out of who did this AND whoever harbors them.

      --

      "The best laid plans of mice and men gang oft agley..." - ROBERT BURNS

    82. Re:Remember the past by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      I'll agree though, I also hate rapists. Just not enough to kill them. Actually, I don't hate anyone enough to kill them. Thinking like that would keep me up at night. :-/

      You're insane! The rapist is walking toward your daughter. You have a gun in your hand. The guy is 6' 6", 300 pounds. There is no way you are going to physically stop him.

      If you would just watch him rape your daughter rather than shoot him, you are a monster. Yes, I would be perfectly, righteously justified in shooting the hell out of him. Curiously, his background or mental health is a nonconsideration when he is in my house threatening my family (or anybody else, for that matter).

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    83. Re:Remember the past by rjamestaylor · · Score: 2
      No, that would still be you. I'm not talking about specifics when I mean war is a cycle. I'm talking about the big picture. There has always been wars going on, people retaliating to each other. It never stops, just look back into history and it's blatantly obvious.
      In history it is blatantly obvious that evil men with evil intentions cannot be persuaded to stop carnage and death -- someone must rise and fight them. That means killing. And, I mean this, unfortunately innocents will be killed, too.
      "Yes. Of course"? You really belive that it's OK to to kill innocent people?
      Chalk the "of course" up to my nerves being frayed. I'm not a impassioned professional soldier. Anyway, sad to say, and I mean this, innocents will be killed in war. Especially when the opponent hides behind the civilians knowing our reluctance to kill innocents.
      Also, you really think that some of the places in the Middle-east are going to be come pals with the western world, just cause the US fire a few missils into civilian buildings?
      I don't care. Stopping the export of terrorism is the main goal. Stopping the support of terrorism would be good, too. Stopping the ideology of terrorism would be fantastic. Welcoming these terror-harboring countries into the world community of nations would be ideal.
      Who are you standing for anyway? The govenments? or the people?
      My government is of, by and for the people. You, AnarchoFreak, are an advocate of goverment of by and for yourself.
      The thing is, the people that flew those planes into the WTC, belived that evil needed to be eradicated to. You are just like them.
      Contrarily, I am nothing like them. I do not advocate killing civilians (admitting it will regretably occur is vastly different) and I do not advocate hitting non-military/infrastructure targets for terror purposes.

      I stand on the side of the fallible righteous. We're not perfect but we are governed by conscience and principles.

      I would turn this around and ask YOU how to stop the cycle? Or do you just hate America so much you hope we go down in the flames and are annihilated?

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    84. Re:Remember the past by ktambascio · · Score: 1

      Actually, maybe he doesn't deserve to be killed, but he deserves to have both his knee caps shot out so he can't run away, and beaten to within an inch of his life before the police get there. People who do that kind of thing are scumbags, and they don't deserve much more than just described above.

      And at least in America, rapists always get a taste of their own medicine while in prison, which makes me feel better that rapists are not killed, but instead sent to a long jail term, with a roomate who will treat his new girlfriend nice.

    85. Re:Remember the past by ktambascio · · Score: 1

      People who support a government such as Afghanistan that supports and harbors a criminal such as Bin Laden, are not innocent people. They are just terrorists in training.

    86. Re:Remember the past by shepd · · Score: 1

      >You're insane!

      No, you are.

      >If you would just watch him rape your daughter rather than shoot him, you are a monster.

      I wouldn't. I would find a different method of stopping the criminal that didn't involve killing. I place a higher value on human life than what you might think. I wouldn't be adverse to hurting the criminal, just adverse to killing him (wounds heal, death doesn't).

      People here just don't seem to understand the toll taking another life has on the non-criminal mind.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    87. Re:Remember the past by AnarchoFreak_00 · · Score: 1
      You, AnarchoFreak, are an advocate of goverment of by and for yourself.

      No. What makes you think that? I'm an advocate of the people, not myself, or the govenment.

      I would turn this around and ask YOU how to stop the cycle? Or do you just hate America so much you hope we go down in the flames and are annihilated?

      I never said I hated the US. I just don't like what part of the goverment has done to people. But that dosn't mean I hate the US. Maybe you could say I hate part of your goverment, but deffinitly not the US as a whole, or the US people.
      The point that I was trying to make, was that the US has a bad track record when it comes to things like this. And I hope that they do just kill the terroist groups, and not make a tragic situation more tragic by draging more innocent people into this whole thing.

    88. Re:Remember the past by rjamestaylor · · Score: 2
      And I hope that they do just kill the terroist groups, and not make a tragic situation more tragic by draging more innocent people into this whole thing.

      If you had said this, clearly, at the outset I would have said, "Yes, I agree."

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  3. Plea for peace by m2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    FWIW, I'm not a citizen of the U.S. nor do I live there.

    Violence induces more violence. Retaliation will only lead to more deaths. If you are a citizen of the U.S. of America, please write your representative right now and ask him to join a plea for peace. Historically the U.S. reaction to this kind of attack is to counter strike. It's highly probably that it's already being planned or even carried on. That will solve nothing. You might get even, but that achieves nothing. The death will not come back and the attack has been already recorded on the books of history. At this point in time, counter attacking is irrational and puts not only the lives of U.S. citizens at risk, but those of lots of people all arround the world, too.

    1. Re:Plea for peace by LiRM35 · · Score: 1

      Casualties of this magnitude should be regarded as an act of war.

    2. Re:Plea for peace by 1alpha7 · · Score: 0

      FWIW, I'm not a citizen of the U.S. nor do I live there. Violence induces more violence. Retaliation will only lead to more deaths. If you are a citizen of the U.S. of America, please write your representative right now and ask him to join a plea for peace.

      Yeah, you're right. You're not an American. Some one/place is about to join the stone age.

      1Alpha7

      --
      Live to be Moderated
    3. Re:Plea for peace by Diomedes01 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      I can respect your opinion, but you said it yourself - you are not a US citizen. So, really, there's no way you can possibly know how people living in the US feel right now. I doubt very much that you would have the same feelings if something like this happened in your country (wherever that may be). If you would indeed feel the same, then you're a bigger man than I. I think everybody's first reaction will indeed be to annihilate whoever was responsible. I have no problem with this whatsoever - hunt them down, root and branch, and eradicate them. Just be absolutely certain that they are, indeed, the correct people.

      --
      "To hope's end I rode and to heart's breaking: Now for wrath, now for ruin and a red nightfall!"
    4. Re:Plea for peace by TastyWheat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree. In all of military history, the ultimate weapon is a sacrificial. There is no conventional defense. Only peace can succeed. Anything less will be more deaths.

    5. Re:Plea for peace by Cairsten · · Score: 1

      This is, unless you count a couple of major Civil War battles, the largest single-day loss of life in the US. Ever. If ever there were justification for retaliation, this is it. I'm not advocating a witchunt by any means, but retribution is required, and will be demanded. The time for a call for peace was before the attack. "The avalanche has started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote."

      --
      We shall find peace. We shall hear angels, we shall see the sky sparkling with diamonds. - Chekov.
    6. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recall a number of years back my brother wanting to punish our family dog by not feeding it (I think it tore up some furniture, or some other non-heinous act of violence). My father replied "Dogs don't think like humans. You're wasting your time trying to teach it a lesson that it won't read as a lesson at all."

      These terrorists aren't going to say "you know, they pleaded for peace, so I guess we shouldn't bug them anymore". These folks the language of violence. That's the language that they speak, not peace. If you tell these folks you want peace, all they'll do is say "huh?" and bomb you again. Know this: THEY DON'T UNDERSTAND PEACE.

      Pray for peace all you want. I wish peace were possible. I'm backing full blown retaliation, though, because anything else will result in the US looking like a VERY effective target for attacks. Sorry, you won't change my mind about this.

    7. Re:Plea for peace by seletz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Right so. Especially as noone knows who _is_ responsible for this terrible thing.

    8. Re:Plea for peace by kryzx · · Score: 1

      Please.
      Rolling over, turning the other cheek, taking the pacifist approach, whatever you call it, does not solve anything either. I don't want rash, ill considered retaliation, but there is a lot to be said for sticking up for ourselves, establishing a record of punishing wrong-doers, creating a deterrent. And for eliminating those who we judge to be likely to commit unacceptable acts in the future. Like Bin Laden for example. Whether he did this or not, he's clearly an accomplished terrorist with no intention of stopping, who is targeting the US, and making threats. We should blast him to pigeon bait.

      --
      "I don't know half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
    9. Re:Plea for peace by JackRandom · · Score: 1

      The US has held a peaceful stance for a long time. A US president negotiated a peace treaty between Israel and Palestine. If a rabid dog bites you, you don't try to reason with it. You destroy it. Peace has not work in the Middle East EVER. America has tried helping those in need and negotiating with both sides and generally tried to maintain peace. You have seen the results of those efforts. It's time for a new strategy. I know you don't live in the US, but think about it. What if your capitol was bombed by an extreme terrorist group? How would you feel then?

    10. Re:Plea for peace by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 3, Flamebait

      You are SO wrong. Appeasement NEVER works. We tried to appease Hitler, and didn't work. Do you really think that we could have "pleaded" with Hitler for peace? Or "pleaded" with Japan when the bombed Pearl Harbor?

      On the other hand, when we bombed Khadafi in the 80s, terrorists didn't screw with us for YEARS.

      This requires a huge, huge response. The aggressors set the rules. At the very least, invasion of the country that either sponsored, or allowed to happen, this terrorism must be made.

      This "day of infamy" must not be allowed to stand.

      Go W!

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    11. Re:Plea for peace by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
      If ever there were justification for retaliation, this is it. I'm not advocating a witchunt by any means, but retribution is required, and will be demanded.


      No, not a witch hunt, but a calm, calculated, painful, extirmination.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    12. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you shitting me? If we do not retalliate, we show the world that the US is tolerant of terrorist actions and risk more attacks.

    13. Re:Plea for peace by Sir+Mix+A+Lot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Unfortunately it is not always so clear cut. Peace with one enemy could mean war with another. What good would it do to appease one attacker only to find out you've pissed off another. The only way to avoid such a situation is to prove that you won't take it lying down. It is most likely going to be bad... but in reality what other course of action is there? Even if peace with one enemy doesn't anger another, I bet there are a lot of pissed off people who will learn they can get what they want by blowing up buildings. What good will that lead to? It's a bad situation no matter how you look at it.

      --

      % rm * .o
      rm: .o: No such file or directory
      % ls
      %
      damn
    14. Re:Plea for peace by ldeviator · · Score: 1

      It's a very bad thing, but there is no way the American people will stand for this. Several thousand people are dead and the freinds and family of those people are itching to fly in the first wave. Bombing the hell outta them probably isn't the best way in the world, but _no one_ is going to say "oh that's ok". Peace has consequences too, and those consequences which would let those aggressors go unpunished... practically no American would let happen.

    15. Re:Plea for peace by froth · · Score: 1

      Hey, if you poke a tiger with a stick. There's a pretty good chance he will eat you.

      --
      "I murder kittens, robot. Whats it to 'ya?" - Badguy
    16. Re:Plea for peace by zulux · · Score: 2, Redundant
      Historically the U.S. Reaction to this kind of attack is to counter strike.

      THAT IS WHY WE ARE STILL HERE. That is why we have peace, and security and prosperity. We need to kill those responsible so they won't do it again, and to make an example out of them. No Justice, No Peace.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    17. Re:Plea for peace by Timodious · · Score: 1
      A counter-strike achieves several things, especially if the targets of the counter-strike are confirmed to be responsible. First, if the strike is successful it protects the U.S. against future attacks from that country, organization or individual. Secondly, it gives us the sense that we are responding; in the U.S., we respond to crises. We don't wring our hands and hope that the rest of the world will be nice from now on. And finally, a counter-strike will help to give the families, who have only just begun to grieve, a sense of closeure.


      You'd better be pretty happy that we respond to attacks; remember, it was the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor that brought the US into WWII, and we are all well aware of what a hell-hole the world would be if Hitler, Mussolini, and Emperor Hirohito had taken over...

    18. Re:Plea for peace by gokubi · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Would everyone out there clamoring for retaliation please take a moment and consider why the US would be attacked in such a violent manner? Sometimes bullies get their asses kicked. Or, as the more popular saying goes, "live by the sword, die by the sword." These attacks are not unprovoked.

      --
      I'm much funnier now that I'm a subscriber.
    19. Re:Plea for peace by Jason+Earl · · Score: 2, Flamebait

      So what do we do? Wait until this same group of madmen perpetrates another atrocity. Go read your history books if you think that madmen and terrorists can be stopped by simply giving into their demands. Letting this act of aggression pass will only embolden the terrorists so that their next attack will be even worse.

      Madmen, despots, and terrorists can only be opposed. Nations and groups that shelter such people can only be considered enemies, and treated as such. This attack will like prove as costly, in terms of human life, as Pearl Harbor and the United States of America will ignore it at its own peril.

      This isn't some school yard squabble where nothing more important than pride is on the line. If we allow terrorists to go unpunished then we will never be safe again.

    20. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a US citizen, and while I hope those responsible are brought to justice, we should not perpetutate this act of violence by retaliating against civilians or committing other atrocities. Even in war time not all is permitted. There are such things as war crimes and being the target of agression does not justify them. We should ensure those responsible are captured and tried, but not reduce ourselves to their level.

    21. Re:Plea for peace by Z4rd0Z · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I am a US citizen and I agree wholeheartedly. It should be common knowledge by now that violence breeds violence. That isn't to say that the responsible party should go unpunished. But going to war is to attack many innocent people.

      We don't even know who did it yet. I'm already seeing anti Middle Eastern sentiments popping up around me. It makes me sick. I'm also sickened and horrified by the destruction that took place. Still, I think the best thing to do is to remain as calm as possible, and not place blame on the "turban heads" (somebody actually said that to me this morning) or anyone else.

      --
      You had me at "dicks fuck assholes".
    22. Re:Plea for peace by jrsimmons · · Score: 1

      Peace is a great thing, but unfortunately, it requires more than one side to make peace. Before WWII, most of Europe attempted peace with Hitler. Not only did it fail, but it almost provided him with the timetable to conquer all of Europe. Pacifism does not work, never has, never will. Why would anyone think that pacifism will work to bring peace any better when dealing with terrorists than with dictators? It just won't work.

      --
      If you would like to be a leader with a large following...drive slowly down a windy two-lane road
    23. Re:Plea for peace by FFFish · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Correction: at least 20 000 of you *are not still here.* They died in the attack.

      Correction: you don't have peace or security. You just got attacked.

      Correction: those responsible are dead. They died attacking.

      Correction: there is NO justice possible in this situation. Nor is peace possible.

      There has to be retaliation for this, without a doubt. But it will not resolve the problem.

      You might also want to think about why this attack occurred. How did the USA get into a position where someone hates it *so* much that they'd suicide themselves in revenge?

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    24. Re:Plea for peace by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1
      This attack was an act of war. It is too late to beg for peace.

      Those involved should be and will be hunted down. They have declared war on the U.S. and the U.S. will respond in kind.

      If the U.S. does not respond and retaliate, we will be targeted again.

      My question to you is Why you are asking the U.S. not to retaliate, but not condeming the act?

      My question to the people involved is Why don't you make yourselves known?

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    25. Re:Plea for peace by Cairsten · · Score: 1

      We are, it seems, in complete agreement. As far as I am concerned, we were at war from the moment that first plane struck, and those responsible for this unbelievable loss of mostly innocent lives need to be found, brought into the US if they are not already here, and made an example of. It needs to be done efficiently, coldly, and soon. Undue delay on this simply shows the world that our current administration is ineffective, and it cannot be tolerated.

      --
      We shall find peace. We shall hear angels, we shall see the sky sparkling with diamonds. - Chekov.
    26. Re:Plea for peace by pigeon · · Score: 1

      I too am not a U.S. citizen, but I do believe this should not go unpunished. But the rub: who do you punish? The problem with those coward terrorists who have been lured into these vile deeds with stupid fairytales abouth paradise is taht they are already dead, and if not, they do not consider death a punishment. Now, if the U.S. could sublimate Ben Ladin and his gang, I would applaud that.

    27. Re:Plea for peace by Wubby · · Score: 1

      When was the last time America sent an attack to kill *thousands* of people just for the hell of it! I don't agree with violence, but this is a time when you get out your biggest stick and start whacking till it stops moving! Call us bullies, but we don't make our sole targets civilian! Don't you DARE say we brought THIS on ourselves!

      --
      Sig
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars
    28. Re:Plea for peace by mesocyclone · · Score: 2
      An act of war has been committed against the United States. Worse than that, it was an attack against innocent civilians.


      In order to prevent this in the future, the US must hold responsible all countries which harbor and aid terrorists, and take action against them - that action proportional to their involvement and their cooperation in soon to come demands for an end to their support and harbor.


      Peace is what the US has been doing. Now it is time for other means - violent means.

      The Palestinians, btw, do not do themselves a favor with their demonstrations in the street which celebrated this event.

      --

      The only good weather is bad weather.

    29. Re:Plea for peace by scorppete · · Score: 1

      Exactly. You are NOT a citizen nor live here. I think if something like this happened where you live, you might just have a different opinion. That is if you have half a brain and some sort of heartbeat going on.

      Pacifistic platitudes have been used so often in the past and that's just what savages take advantange of. It's apparent that olive branches do NOT work when you're dealing with a, fortunately small and sick, population of the world. Normally the UN does have success in their efforts, however, there is a demented segment of people to which human life is irrelevant. Usually and not surprisingly, religious zealotry is the mechanism that's used to get these people motivated to kill innocent people as they regard their own lives as easily replaceable and irrelevant. They are cowards and it's evidenced in their target, a massive building that houses workers of all levels. If these terrorists had any real bravery, they'd attack a military installation. Notice how rarely that happens. No, they kill innocent men, women and children in a place that has at least an even level of visitors as it has workers.

      A peaceful co-existence is possible with at least somewhat like-minded human beings this is true. This is probably what has kept the human race alive despite the amount of nuclear weapons on the planet. At some point, some sort of an arrangement can be made. However, when you're dealing with savages who are single-minded in their hatred, the only response that they understand and normally respect is a fast, severe response. I agree with the person that posted that whoever is responsible should have their disgusting, rank corner of the world turned into a parking lot. Once that happens, i'm SURE you will see terrorism die down markedly.

    30. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's correct. There is a saying "Those who fail to study history, are doomed to repeat it."

      This attack is much worse that the attack on Perl Harbor, that was an attack on a military target.

      This time, the U.S. mainland has been attacked and it's citizens attacked directly. Make no mistake about it, this is an act of war.

    31. Re:Plea for peace by Karn · · Score: 1

      I'm with you on this.

      Lots of people are going to say "But it wasn't Afghanistan", but indirectly it is!

      Consider if the US had a terrorist organization who frequently attacked Iraq.. We would be 'behind' the terrorists b/c we did not prevent it. Same applies to Afghanistan. They know of Bin Laden and they do nothing about him.

      --


      Why do I keep typing pythong?
    32. Re:Plea for peace by trcooper · · Score: 2, Troll

      Yeah, let's sit down and talk with these folks. Let's make the rest of the world aware that we will sit back and take terrorist attacks on our soil. Let's just let the UN handle this, what a competent group.

      No. When we find the responsible party, they're going to be in a world of hurt. And anyone contemplating anything like this will think twice.

      It's easy for you to preach peace. Your country was not attacked. Your people were not killed. After the dust settles, we will find out who is responsible, and there's not going to be any talking going on. This is an act of war, Perl Harbor II is how my representive described it.

      I assure you, no US representives will be asking for peace. And it is their responsibility to their citizens in not doing so. Whether this was an internal terrorist or a foriegn terrorist, this should, and will, be dealt with on our terms.

    33. Re:Plea for peace by filmcritic · · Score: 1

      That's right, you are NOT a citizen so your opinion does not count. Go ram a bottle up your ass and rotate. I say roll the tanks and overrun those little piss ant countries who harbor people who do these things. It's time to show the world who really has the balls.

    34. Re:Plea for peace by pete-classic · · Score: 2

      It may be true that violence induces more violence. But pacifism induces slavery.

      The large portion of Americans would die on their feet before living on their knees.

      -Peter

    35. Re:Plea for peace by surfimp · · Score: 1

      FWIW--I say we glaze the fucking bastards.

    36. Re:Plea for peace by bshort404 · · Score: 1

      fuck you.
      as though you would sit by if your friends, family, etc. died.
      You arrogant little fuck, who do you think you are?

      retaliation may not resolve the problem, but what would you have us do? Sit on our hands?

      The only way to stop this from ever happening again is to turn whoever did this (and their friends, and family, and distant relatives) into a parking lot.

      you mess with the bull, you get the horns.

      -B

      --
      -B
    37. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortuneately, we US citizens will be able to have little impact on anything planned for today. We could prevent a war, but bush could order a strike on a few hours notice, so it's in his hands. I agree wholeheartedly with you, though.

    38. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am an american citizen and I want peace...we could bomb the shit out of afghanistan or some poor country like that but it would resolve anything. Peace and compromise are the way to go.

      Not that I don't understand the anger...I myself would like to kill something after seeing those towers collapse, but I also know that it won't help

    39. Re:Plea for peace by osu-neko · · Score: 1
      Violence induces more violence. Retaliation will only lead to more deaths.

      This is a typical bit of retoric, but is it true? Anyone who beleives violence never solves anything needs to have a talk with the city fathers of Carthage. That particular conflict was ended with violence. It took three attempts, but by the third time the Romans figured out their problem -- on their previous attempts, they hadn't applied enough violence.

      It is true that most situations are simply made worse by applying some violence. It is also true that the situations can be solved by applying even more violence. If the problem is another people, group, or nation, a sufficient amount of violence will in fact eliminate the problem. If you have the stomach for genocide...

      This may not be kind, it may not be ethical, but it is true. A pacifist needs to concentrate on legitimate arguments, not repeat invalid and spurious ones.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    40. Re:Plea for peace by Noel · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm a US citizen, and I agree completely with the initial poster. There is no way that we can deal with terrorism if we rely on vengeance and retaliation. No matter how many terrorist or suspected terrorists we "annihilate", there will always be more springing up.

      Terrorist also have a major advantage. It's horribly easy for them to find a target, because they have no compunctions about killing the general populace.

      If we are to overcome them, we must move the fight away from their arena and their rules.

    41. Re:Plea for peace by frunch · · Score: 1

      You have obviously never heard of Gandhi and fight for the independence of S. Asia.

    42. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Well I'm glad someone noticed this. Is it just me, or do events like this bring out the reason why the majority of the world hates americans in the first place???


      Oh, we're being attacked, let's blow something up rather than solve the problem or engage in constructive prevention.

    43. Re:Plea for peace by fireant · · Score: 2
      Correction: those responsible are dead. They died attacking.

      Correction to your correction. Those responsible are cheering every time CNN shows the towers collapsing because they were not on the planes. Some deluded fanatic that thinks he's going to get rewards in the afterlife is dead. He died attacking.

    44. Re:Plea for peace by FFFish · · Score: 1

      Gulf war, I do believe. Plus the US support of Isreal, which is continually killing civilians.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    45. Re:Plea for peace by Dstrct0 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Hey dumbass, the planes were from the states. It is YOUR crappy airport security that allowed these people through. Chances are pretty fucking good that the government of wherever the terrorists came from (if it IS terrorists) has no idea that they were planning to blow up large chunks of the U.S. I agree that this is a horrible thing that has happened, and something must be done to ensure that it doesn't happen again, but ANOTHER WAR IS NOT GOING TO FIX THIS!!!!!! Look at the arms situation. If it was a nuclear capable organization that did this, any attack from the U.S. is going to result in those nukes being used. At which point the trigger happy, arrogant, imperialistic American government, will enter the pissing contest with their nukes, at which point the world will be a smoldering piece of dust in an otherwise uncaring universe.

      Start thinking with your brain instead of that mullet haircut I assume you have.

      --
      Build boards not bombs
    46. Re:Plea for peace by Chris+Hind · · Score: 1

      Things like this have happened repeatedly here in the UK for years now. The only hope of stopping them is to make peace with the perpetrators.

      --
      nal 11
    47. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From their point of view, the U.S. is a terrorist organization that frequently attack Iraq.

    48. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah... you're right... if the US will strike back the hole fuc#ing world will be in danger... I disagree with what happend in the US and i cannot expres my condoleances for the tragic events... Hope the gods will help you...

      Violence is not the answer...

      --Caesar

    49. Re:Plea for peace by ben_degonzague · · Score: 1

      FUCK YOU! You'd probably say not to react after Pearl Harbor. Well this is our Pearl Harbor and I say nuke these fuckers so bad that not even roaches can survive! Time to put an end to this liberal pussy shit in this country.

    50. Re:Plea for peace by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 5, Insightful
      "You might also want to think about why this attack occurred. How did the USA get into a position where someone hates it *so* much that they'd suicide themselves in revenge?"

      We need to be able to think of that _while_ also retaliating harshly.

      The fact that we have been brutally attacked does not make us automatically righteous. I've felt for a long time that US interests, in many ways, have been waging war on the rest of the world- but more like a siege. Mostly we have not been gunning people down- mostly our corporations have not been gunning people down- and we certainly haven't engaged in this sort of all-out assault recently.

      We're up again, and clearly we're going to be smashing the hell out of _somebody_... but we have got to take a minute afterwards, to ask: just how unprovoked was it? What have we been doing? Are we even aware of what our country may have been doing in our names? If more than half of us don't even _vote_ much less pay attention to what our country is doing with its massive weaponry and economic coercion, is that okay?

      It looks like we've got to smash somebody. In fact, it looks like the people we'll be hitting are fanatics. The fact that they are fanatics does not make us angels, and we gotta remain aware of that as we move into a 21st century and see multinational organizations taking over from nation-states.

      And boy, are we ever in the 21st century. :(

    51. Re:Plea for peace by j-beda · · Score: 1
      I don't know that everyone is in "complete agreement". There are many, many, many people who would not support violence as a retaliation.

      Finding, catching, and prosecuting the culprits I think would be the best thing for the world at large.

    52. Re:Plea for peace by IRSnarf · · Score: 1

      Also, if you rack a bear in the nuts, be prepared to die.

    53. Re:Plea for peace by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      what the US needs to do is to send out a notice to all countries that are considered....unfriendly to the US, if they harbor these people in thier country, we demand that you trun them over to us or face the wrath of the US, or at the least, expect us to enter the country to get those who have done this, and if they try to stop us, we will retailiate.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    54. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope the US is gonna make alot of glass over there. We have tried peace before. Time to test out some new weapons.

    55. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point is, he's not a US citizen, so he's in a position to be objective about this. What has happened is terrible, but two wrongs don't make a right.

    56. Re:Plea for peace by Chris+Hind · · Score: 1

      The US has recently weighed in massively on the side of Israel, and done nothing to help the Palestinian victims of Israeli terror attacks.

      Peace has worked in the Middle East before, and if the US campaign of violence and intimidation against the Palestinians stopped, it might work again.

      My capital has been repeatedly bombed by extremist terrorist groups for many years now. I support making peace with them, conceding to some of their demands, and releasing their captured prisoners of war from our jails.

      --
      nal 11
    57. Re:Plea for peace by bug1 · · Score: 1

      you are not thinking rationally.

      In the long term the best thing to do is try and bridge the gaps that obviously exist.

      In the short term you can beg for blood, but you become no better than those who you denounce.
      Sub Zsu said something along the lines of
      "beware of knowing your enemy too well for you shall become him"

      2 wrongs dont make it right

    58. Re:Plea for peace by osu-neko · · Score: 1
      The fact of the matter is, India would still be part of the British Empire if the English had had the stomach to commit the kinds of acts of brutal repression that some other people have done in history.

      Gandhi was right to believe he could win his battles without violence. Had he been fighting a different battle, against a different enemy, his tactics would have needed to be different, or he would have lost.

      The people who committed these acts are not squeemish. They don't have an island full of more or less ethical people who will react in horror and rage over what's being done. Gandhi shamed the British into giving up India. I doubt very much the people responsible for this attack feel much shame over what has been done...

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    59. Re:Plea for peace by Snow2.0 · · Score: 1

      The beings behind this attack are congratulating themselves right now, but it won't stand. War is like gangrene, the offending limbs have to be cut off in order for peace to flourish.

      +- 50,0000 people dead or missing...how many died at Pearl Harbor?

      Bring on the fuel-air weapons. We will send them to whatever God or ideal that prompted them to do this. And if it turns out that fucked up American Milita types had a hand in this, I think we whould have an old fashioned Southern Style barbecue.

    60. Re:Plea for peace by justins · · Score: 1

      I hope that most people are not interested in retaliation in kind - I hope we're not going to bomb anyone's cities and intentionally kill lots of innocent people, although plenty of people will suggest that. Ideally we would find everyone responsible for these acts and try them for these crimes.

      But would course would you suggest if the people responsible turn out to be sponsored by a foreign government? Or if their government(s) do not want to give them up for trial? That would make these attacks an act of war, and a very destructive one. While bombing civilian populations is not part of our military doctrine bombing military, infrastructure, and terrorist targets is. Would you really object to that, as a means of preventing this from happening again?

      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
    61. Re:Plea for peace by brsett · · Score: 1

      Violence induces more violence.

      I don't think this is true. The Soviet Union's hostage policy pretty much limited all terrorist attacks against there people.

      I believe when some militant group too k soviet hostages in the 70's, the soviet unions response was to burn down the entire town the hostages were held in, including their hostages. I don't advocate this solution, but to say that it doesn't work doesn't seem to be supported by the facts. A Soviet response to smething like this would be truly terrifying, and I don't personally want to see that kind of destruction. But I don't doubt that it would be effective. :-|

    62. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Firstly, most of the people who planned this are dead already, since it was a suisicde mission.

      Secondly, it would be really, really dumb for whoever planned this to leave a trail that leads to them. Acts of terrorism are not about making a stand, it's about sending a signal, and you can send signals without telling who you are. So the attack will most likely not be claimed. I suppose the hope of whoever is behind this is that the american public will be so outraged over this that they demand _somebody_ be killed for it, or bush gets fired. So either a scapegoat will be found (whether they're involved or not is besides the question) or (most likely) Bush's presidency will end sooner than planned.

      So the not so wise approach is to demand retribution, because that way you only make the effects worse of what happened. The intent was to disrupt life in the US and so far it's been very effective. Don't add to it by making demands that sombebody be punished, because somebody will be found if you ask for it. This is the perfect opportunity for the US government to finally attack some of their foes without getting slammed for it internationally. All Bush needs to nuke one of the more us-hostile countries is the support of the US people, and "proof" that the country was behind the attack. More loss of innocent lives would be a terrible shame.

    63. Re:Plea for peace by UdoKeir · · Score: 1

      US citizens regularly provide funding to terrorist organisations. Go look up NorAid. You will find that it is a 'charitable' front for the IRA. Does this mean that the British government has a legitimate excuse to nuke the US?

      Idiot.

    64. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can not fight with people willing to die for their cause. As long as some of them are left then "retribution" WILL fuel their hate towards the US and make it more likely that further attacks will happen.

      As somebody else here said: how are you going to fight people willing to die for their cause, die better than them?

    65. Re:Plea for peace by spiro_killglance · · Score: 1

      I'm not American either, I'm British. But I
      take this attack very personally. In fact I
      also take it as an act of war against me as
      well as america.


      Winston Churchill once said of a Terrorist
      attack: "Are we such dogs, that they may kill
      us in the street, and we do nothing in responce"


      This demdands bloody revenge

    66. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you really believe what you say? Anyone contemplating anything like this will thing twice? That's complete and utter bullshit, terrorist DO NOT THINK, and they DO NOT CARE ABOUT THEIR OWN LIVES, thus any kind of retaliation, no matter if you kill every last one of them, is not going to stop future ones from doing it again and again and again.

      I'm not saying that revenge is not understandable, but it still doesn't solve anything.

    67. Re:Plea for peace by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 2

      Actually, rolling over can help. By not retaliating you don't give the other party a reason to retaliate. Just look at what is happening the middle east. Who took the first tooth and who is going to take the last? Sometimes it take more might to do nothing that pulling out all the stops. The last thing we need is World War 3.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    68. Re:Plea for peace by Chris+Hind · · Score: 1
      Some one/place is about to join the stone age.
      Looking at the posts here, it seems to me that America regressed to the stone age morally some time between the first and the second plane.
      --
      nal 11
    69. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your an idiot . I almost think to myself that you "yourself" are sitting in a 3rd world country watching you fukin tube and laughing at the same time . Dont Fuk with the U.S. you fukin Kommie Bastard . Have a nice day .:)

    70. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Screw that, those who are responsible for this must be killed, their children killed, their houses burned and their fields salted. Erase their names from the book of the living.

    71. Re:Plea for peace by localman · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Have you ever considered that today's attack was a counterstrike - against America?

      I won't offer any trite solution - I don't know whether a counterstrike of our own would be effective or not. I'm not saying that there's an obvious path, but what I do know is that today's act was not a random act.

      We don't think we're at war because our homeland is (was) so isolated from the front lines, but America is involved in many wars through funding. And wars don't happen without funding. It's almost surprising that we're not attacked more often.

      Today is an awful day. I am heartsick at all the loss that has occurred. But I am even more terrified of what is to come.

    72. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      50,000 people dead and not retaliate....you must be out of your freaking mind !!!! This is a declaration of war. This is an all out war u moron !

    73. Re:Plea for peace by thewheeze · · Score: 1

      I'm sitting in school right now, reading all of these posts. If a country had a problem with our involvement the israelis, the most rational way would've been to take this up with the UN, or at least try a PEACEFUL way of resolution. I have no respect for any country or group that decides to attack a country using innocent bystanders and citizens like in this attack.

    74. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It may be true that violence induces more violence. But pacifism induces slavery.

      Great line. Worthy of a sig.

    75. Re:Plea for peace by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      Now which party agreed to peace, even when it was signed? I don't think this a good example as both parties were willing to step on the other's feet in spite of the agreement they signed. Stepping on other people's feet is one way of making them want to throw away any peace agreement signed.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    76. Re:Plea for peace by Chris+Hind · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Consider if the US had a terrorist organization who frequently attacked Iraq.
      I think they're known as "the United States Air Force". You've been conducting a bombing campaign against Iraq for several years now. Are you too isolated in your own little world to know this? Well, your little world just got hit by two hijacked airliners, and is currently drifting away on the New York breeze. Time for you to find out how the outside world works, I think.
      --
      nal 11
    77. Re:Plea for peace by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      What if the tiger in this case is another country and it is the US that has been poking the tiger with its stick of foreign policies? Sorry, just being devil's advocate.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    78. Re:Plea for peace by madcow_ucsb · · Score: 1

      You know, on the topic of Bin Laden, it never ceases to amaze me that Peter Jennings and whoever can find him and interview him, but no DOD/CIA/Other TLA officials can get to him and stop that fucker.

      Even so, rationally I think tha if we WERE to kill him and a lot of his people, the remaining ones (and some would CERTAINLY escape us) they would only reform with even more of a mission against us. I don't know what we SHOULD do, but no doubt the attackers' hope is to draw us into blind shooting without thinking of the long-term cosequences. We can't let them get away with this, but we have to retaliate without stooping to their level.

    79. Re:Plea for peace by RocketScientist · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, we need "Peace in Our Time".

      Who said that?

      Neville Chamberlain. After meeting with Adolf.

      schmuck.

      For the record: Negotiating with terrorists DOES NOT WORK. It's like negotiating with a hydra: Set peace with one, and the others will still attack. You're making the broad and stupid assumption that there is such a thing as a "terrorist organization" with rules that all of the terrorists follow. It doesn't work that way. The "Real IRA" popped up after the negotiated peace in Northern Ireland, and all of the Palestinian terrorist organizations that used to follow Arafat don't anymore, because they just want to kill bad guys, not solve the original problem.

      Germany and Japan don't seem to have attacked anyone since we settled that dispute back in the 1940's. I don't see a Spanish Armada any more. The British are still gone from the United States after the little hullaboo in the 1770's. History seems to bear out several cases where taking violence to the opposing force keeps them from attacking again. It also bears out that if you leave the opposition with enough strength that you'll continue to have problems after a lamely negotiated peace agreement: Iraq, Germany post World War 1, the Real IRA, Hamas.

      I'm not finding a lot of historical precedent that bodes well for the safety of the US if we don't track these folks down and wipe them out.

    80. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The usual suspects are of course people of arab descent. But still that doesn't give the US the right to attack IMMIDEATELY. I am Kenyan and after the last US embassy bombing back in 1998 in Nairobi Kenya, I understand the feelings that are being thrown here. In 1998 a factory in the Sudan was bombed something that later proved to be wrong and based on wrong CIA information

      This is what this poor guy (m2) means. If it is Bin Laden, then get him and stop killing other innocent people to. This way alot of peoples lives will be saved. Basically, I think as long as more than 2 Million Palestinian refugees don't have a permanent home and state, expect more terror. I think the US support for Israel is good or else they would be overan by the Arabs, but the US also has to stop Israel from occupying land and building settlements which are later used as bargaining chips in the on going peace process.

      Think about it before you think it is your right ot strike back

    81. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the stone age financially...

    82. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if you do retaliate you fuel the hate of whoever you're attacking and risk more actions.

      There is no right way to deal with this kind of problem. But to me human life is human life. If you retaliate and make collateral damage I personally can not condone it. Two wrongs don't make a right.

      And yes, even if they attacked my country I would be upset about this. Attack is not defense, and vice versa. If my country gets invaded, then I will personally kill the bastards for trying. But if they take out a single target, that's very bad, but unless we can trial the perpetrators I'd rather want that it has no consequences. War is just admitting that you can't deal with a problem in a civilised manner.

      But ofcourse, this all is irrelevant. If bush doesn't destroy somebody he WILL lose his presidency, because of emotional demands made by the US public, so he has to attack. It's who he's going to attack that will be interesting.

    83. Re:Plea for peace by haizi_23 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I am a citizen of the U.S., and watched the WTC collapse from my office window this morning. I sort of agree with you -- I certainly disagree that we should immediately rush off to kill someone. The fact is that we're being baited.

      Obviously, everyone who knows anthing about our military history and us as a people, knows that our first reaction will be to grab our guns and start shouting for blood. That's the move they want us to make. We need to be smart and do things in a considered manner. Those who are responsible DO need to be punished. But there are other ways than sending a phalanx of bombers somewhere to rain fire and brimstone on their heads.

      For one thing, that's obviously what these maniacs think they're doing to us -- just retribution for our various unpopular policies.

      I don't know what the right move is, but more is at stake here than our national pride and safety. It could certainly spark an immense international conflict, and I'd advocate doing a lot of serious thinking before walking into WWIII. If we have to act with violence, then we should do so -- but I don't think that it's at all clear right now that violence is the best alternative.

    84. Re:Plea for peace by Epi-man · · Score: 1

      You know, I don't enjoy seeing politics discussed on /., but this just makes me sick, on several levels. I am an American citizen, I am disgusted with what has happened today, I want someone strung up for this. But the primal feelings I have are disgusting to me.

      It's easy for you to preach peace. Your country was not attacked. Your people were not killed. After the dust settles, we will find out who is responsible, and there's not going to be any talking going on.

      Oh my goodness, wake up you haughty sheltered child! What the hell has our government been preaching about the middle east for the past 50 years?! We don't know yet that Palestinians attacked the US today, but I doubt many think any other group has the strength of belief to carry out what happened. Now look at what you said...and put those words into the mouths of the Palestinians who are literally kicked out of their homes to make space for Israeli settlements. They have been screaming for years about the atrocities occurring in the middle east, what did the US say...."sit down and talk, peace can be had." Now, the tables have turned, our home land has been attacked and you change your song so quickly.

      I assure you, no US representives will be asking for peace. And it is their responsibility to their citizens in not doing so. Whether this was an internal terrorist or a foriegn terrorist, this should, and will, be dealt with on our terms.

      I disagree, they will still ask for peace. What they will clammor for is Justice, as you should as well. The problem is I don't think we can all agree on what justice is. Do I think people should die for this? Only if there are still in existence people who helped coordinate this attack. I suspect there are, but I sure can't tell you for certain who they are. Any action before it is known who should be punished can not be called justice.

      Now, take your self-centered, arrogant American attitude back inside you. I have the same feelings, but I know they are not worthy of airing on a public forum, and I know how stupid they continue to make America look.

    85. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not a citizen of the U.S. nor do I live there.

      But i ask the American people to hunt the killers that do this, send them all the way to hell, by the most painfull way.
      No way to justify those fuckers.

      My moral support to the victims of this tragedy.

      Alfredo Bastreri, Montevideo, Uruguay,

      Sorry, much angry to set up an account now.

    86. Re:Plea for peace by Zachary+Kessin · · Score: 2

      Lets hope W is not another Nevill Chaberline. I would love to see Peace in Our Time. But not at the expense of appeasing terorists dictators and thugs. When we find out who did this we need to make them understand exactly how big a mistake attacking the USA is. And make sure that the entire world knows it.

      On 4 July 1976 an Air France Jet was hijacked and sitting on the ramp at Entebie Uganda. The people who did it were threating to kill all the Israelis and Jews on board. Until an Israeli special forces unit came in and took them out. Guess what no one has hijacked a jet leaving Israel since. The only way to deal with dictators and thugs it it hit them so hard that they don't get up again. Ever.

      The United States can not appease these people nor ever give in. They need to live in fear that at any second a flight of B52's or a team of Navy Seals could pop up and kill them. If they have such fear maybe they won't do this again.

      --
      Erlang Developer and podcaster
    87. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Peace is not a human trait.

    88. Re:Plea for peace by Watts+Martin · · Score: 2

      At this point counter-attacking is irrational chiefly because there's no one to attack. I'm not a big fan of our President-Select, but I don't believe he's going to run off and bomb Afghanistan because pundits on Fox News are chanting 'Bin Laden Bin Laden Bin Laden.'

      However, the reality, even for a bleeding-heart liberal pacifist like myself, is that for all intents this was an act of war. It was a stunningly sophisticated and well-coordinated attack. (The most plausible argument against Bin Laden's responsibility is that it would be a stretch even for his resources.) If these planes had been from a known military force rather than hijacked passenger planes, we'd declare war before the sun set.

      So sure, at this point in time counter-attacking is irrational. But that doesn't mean that any retaliation is irrational.

      Will retaliation "solve" anything? To turn the question around, how do you "solve" terrorism? It's worthy to ask whether US policy toward the Middle East fans the flames of anti-American sentiment, but that's an entirely separate issue from this attack. The lives of US citizens are already at risk. The lives of lots of people all around the world are already at risk. The risk isn't of American military attacks, it's of more attacks just like these. Will not retaliating address that?

    89. Re:Plea for peace by FFFish · · Score: 2

      Touche'

      And when those who are responsible are positively identified, fry 'em. Each and every one of them.

      And then be prepared for the retaliation. It's tit-for-tat when dealing with terrorist organizations.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    90. Re:Plea for peace by SquierStrat · · Score: 1

      I might write my Rep. and tell him to kill all the mother f**kers and let Allah sort them all out.

      We see int he middle east how well pleas for peace work out...massive counter-strikes work better it seems. Remember this affects you too: _World_ Trade Center...some of your country men might have been in there.

      --
      Derek Greene
    91. Re:Plea for peace by bshort404 · · Score: 1

      and you are not thinking at all.

      Without a strong response, what incentive is there for a terrorist to not do this again (and again, and again)? If people can attack you repeatedly, and without consequences, then how do you stop them.

      Or maybe you don't.

      I bet you're French.

      They were always really really good at surrendering.

      -B

      --
      -B
    92. Re:Plea for peace by spsheridan · · Score: 1

      Any organization that would commit this atrociuos act has demonstrated it's lack of reason. The people behind this are insane. They blindly kill civilians, children. I will not trust a word they say. If they surrender they can live in a small concrete cell for the rest of their lives. If they don't surrender they will die. Any organization that supports them now has a choice. Denounce these criminals as the monsters they are and lend support in tracking them down. Otherwise they are just as guilty as these cowardly terrorists and they will die as well.

      Some people don't want to talk. They choose to kill civilians instead of talking. They choose to hide and attack from the shadows. Now the have sown the wind. Soon they shall reap the whirlwind.

    93. Re:Plea for peace by Blnky · · Score: 1

      Peace is achieved through diplomats and world leaders talking together. This is not peace. This is a coward attack against unarmed people and yet you wish me to tell my senator to ask for peace? What peace has been given by this unprovoked attacked against non-military? People, regardless of many beliefs, values, political prefrences, and world views have been slaughtered without regard. Whether foreign or internal, whoever did this has killed innocents and deserves punishment. They conciously removed their own right to peace. Should this be the result of a small foreign group then I will expect what ever nation harbours them to hand the ofer to the Unites States. If they do not, whoever they might be, I shall not only support a declaration of war upon that country, but I shall also personally encourage my senator to vote to declare war. I shall personally request my President to ask for war. I shall support all American Armed Forces in every way I can. The military in this country is controlled by the people. We the people have been attacked without warning. We can and will direct our military to respond. Whoever planned this already destroyed the concept of peace between us and them. They chose war over peace before we even had a chance. They gave war. They will get war. Representationally I vote for a proper response to this act. I support justice to be served. I support liberty and freedom to be protected.

    94. Re:Plea for peace by weslocke · · Score: 1

      The problem is, how to be absolutely certain that they are indeed the people responsible? After all, the government is about to come under an absolutely enormous amount of political pressure to find the culprits.

      Look at how quickly Bin Laden's been named as the aggressor, with very little evidence.

      --

      'Life is like a spoonful of Drain-O, it feels good on the way down but leaves you feeling hollow inside'
    95. Re:Plea for peace by Kandrathe · · Score: 0

      You are wrong. The strongest possible response is neccesary, such that any would be terrorist would think twice, no three times before contemplating it again. Weakness now would only encourage this to happen again.
      This is an act of war, and must be treated as such. We can sue for peace once the mongrels are baying from beneath our boots. I say we should identify the culprits, and let slip the dogs of war! We didn't become the only super power in the world by rolling over.

      I feel better.

    96. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fuck that. fuck you. i just saw a good friend lose a parent. do you have any idea how much that ripped up my heart, not to mention HERS.

      war is one thing. terrorism is another. fucking LEVEL whoever did this.

    97. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I am not a US citizen, but I do live in the US.

      This is the worst act of terrorism in the history
      of the world. The only acts that compare with this are acts of genocide by Hitler, Pol Pot, etc.

      The US must show that anyone who engages in this kind of terror will never achieve their objectives and be utterly destroyed. If that means wiping Afghanistan off of the map (if it was Osama), then that is what the US will do.

      The US will show that attacking the US is the last thing anyone would ever want to do.

      Do I wish this won't happen? Of course I do. But what reaction do you expect from a country that has just had 50K civilians slaughtered?

    98. Re:Plea for peace by Nail · · Score: 1

      Paraphrased:

      No matter how often you shower, you will get dirty again.

      Dirt has an advantage. It is everywhere.

      If we are to stay clean, we must live in a bubble.


      Please, your reasoning stinks.
      If you want peace so bad you'll die for it, be my guest.

      Just don't take me along for the ride. :-/

      --
      ...yellow number five, yellow number five, yellow number five...
    99. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just as Chamberlain did with Hitler, right? Thank god you had Churchill.

    100. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been saying this for years. The only way we could have avoided this was to stay out of their business over there or completely annihilate them. Not this sticking our nose in other peoples business type shit.

    101. Re:Plea for peace by bshort404 · · Score: 1

      and its "Sun Tzu".

      moron.

      -B

      --
      -B
    102. Re:Plea for peace by localman · · Score: 2
      When we find the responsible party, they're going to be in a world of hurt. And anyone contemplating anything like this will think twice.

      You realize that this is probably exactly what the people in charge of this attack said. America stepped on them, so they decided they'd teach us a lesson. After their attack America would think twice about stepping on others.

      Well, it didn't work. We don't even know who did this and we're already ready to kill them.

      And our counterattack won't stop terroroism either. So far our "tough" policy on terrorism (while ignoring the causes) has led to today.

    103. Re:Plea for peace by .pentai. · · Score: 1

      Something to the effect of 2500 people or so died at Pearl Harbor, if I recall correctly...but that may be way off...what do I know right?

    104. Re:Plea for peace by Hilary+Rosen · · Score: 2

      Just because someone approves of this does not make them responsible. There are many reasons for people around the world to wish harm to the US. Most of them involve the Middle East. If the US government won't even talk about the possibility that Israel is a racist state, how can they be surprised when those affected by racism strike back?

      Note: I personally believe that killing people is never the right answer. Destroying your current enemies will only earn you more.

      --
      Yes, the nick is flamebait
    105. Re:Plea for peace by SpringRevolt · · Score: 1

      Well, the people directly resonsible are now dead.

      It does not seem moral to me to kill people who symathise with the suicide attackers.

    106. Re:Plea for peace by spsheridan · · Score: 1

      How exactly do you hide in this day and age? How exactly can you stop the satelites and echelon? They can not hide. The people who planned this attack are not dead. The people who trained the terrorists who did this attack are not dead. The people who gave money to support the training and execution of this attack are not dead. The people who guarded the training camps, who assisted in the execution of this attack, they are all still alive. They will all be caught. If they do not surrender themselves to the authorities when they come to the door they will die. Those who are caught will be tried. Those who are guilty will be punished. If they are punished in the states that means the death penalty. We did it to our own citizen for a far less heinous crime.

    107. Re:Plea for peace by 1ag0 · · Score: 1

      the only thing these people understand is force. the u.s. cannot "make peace" with them, they hate us. look at their targets: the capitol for capitalism of the world and the capitol of defence of the largest power in the world. that said, the target does not have to be absolutely accurate. scorching afghanistan and removing it from the map will remove nearly all of bin laden's ground troops and all of his civilian support. it may even make him a target from his own people.

      if you commit a terrorist act, or you know someone that commits or is planning a terrorist act against this country -- you should die. the trickle down effect of this will rid the world of this plague.

    108. Re:Plea for peace by Chris-en-topper · · Score: 1



      Assuming these were Palistinian terrorists, this attack still isn't justified nor provoked. I have sympathies towards those people's situation, I could understand them doing this to an Israeli city...but hitting us worse than you ever hit Israel, and a civilian target to boot? WTF are they smoking over there?

    109. Re:Plea for peace by coolgeek · · Score: 2
      Dude, you must be out of your mind. The US chose to allow the parties involved to resolve their own differences. This is NOT choosing sides. If anything, the US choosing to stand aside is indicative of a reversal of our previous support, which I believe is in response to the changing opinion of the American public that there is no hope to resolve the conflicts in the Middle East through diplomatic intervention. My attitude has changed over the years from one of hope, to "fuck 'em...let 'em slaughter each other" If the Palestinians are involved, this is a grave political mistake for them...Up till yesterday, I was starting to believe that the Israelis were equally as insane as the Palestinians. Now I'm in favor of getting mideavel on the responsible parties.

      And give me a break, peace has never worked in the Middle East. The people never wanted it. Sure, there was mutual tolerance of each other, shrouded in resentment. This is not mutual acceptance, a key ingredient in a lasting peace process. Some lyrics from an american classic song (War in the East, War in the West): Everyone MUST have a place...All this hate MUST become a memory.

      --

      cat /dev/null >sig
    110. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      1) Atomic bombs on Japan
      2) Attacks on Iraq (A couple of days before US attacked Iraq)
      3) Kosovo
      4) Palestine (US have vetoed all of the security counsel resolutions in favour of Israel who uses US made weapons to kill innocent citizens).
      5) Vietnam
      6) Somalia

      .... the list goes on and on ....

    111. Re:Plea for peace by gol64738 · · Score: 1

      Violence induces more violence


      hold on here. are you saying that a serial killer should be set free? why do you think we have nuclear weapons? to use them? it's called deterrence.

      see, if we do nothing to those responsible, then terriost attacks on the US will become more common. there will be nothing to deter future acts of violence.

      what you said looks awfully pretty on paper, but it just doesn't accurately reflect how the real world works.

    112. Re:Plea for peace by jafac · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There are only two ways to break the cycle of violence.

      1. Kill them all. Every last one of them. And anyone who ever cared about them. No one will be left to carry out revenge. No future generations will rise up.

      OR

      2. Forgive.

      Apparently, neither of these are really an option, so we'll be pedalling this cycle for a good long while to come.

      - - - -
      But really, "Go W"? Do you have any idea how rediculous that sounds? We'll be lucky if that bastard doesn't round up any person who is a moslem in the US and put them in camps for orderly disposal.
      I think that the US people have learned, and will soon have the lesson reinforced, what happens when you elect a president with WEAK foreign experience.
      I'm all for rallying around the flag, but I refuse to support this charlatan of a leader.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    113. Re:Plea for peace by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 2

      Oh, we're being attacked, let's blow something up rather than solve the problem or engage in constructive prevention.

      Most Americans have never stepped foot in foreign soil. Even fewer yet pay attention to events in foreign countries. To "hate Americans" for "what they've done" is quite a bit more irrational than for Americans to hate Terrorists, who consistantly kill innocent people instead of targeting threatening forces.

      America doesn't attack unprovoked. Consider America provoked. Any counter-strike is a logical, if highly unfortunately expected outcome.

      All those people cheering at the destruction of the trade centers should be a clue to the rest of the world how fucked up they are. They don't seem to grasp the concept that 20,000 innocent people that have never done anything to them are now dead.

      I hope justice is served in the form of all of their deaths, but I certainly won't cheer about it.

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
    114. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what do you suggest? all the violent people of all different religions gather up in circles to sings songs and eat marshmellos? fuckign blind peace talk is bullshit, it's as futile as christianity.

    115. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What incentive is there for them to do it again, i think they have made their point.

      With a strong response you do give them an insentive to do it again... it becomes a tit for tat situation.... violence beggests violence

      Dude, trying to resort to nationalistic insults doesnt strengthen your argument... you just come accross as a radical with the same mentality as those you denounce.

    116. Re:Plea for peace by gol64738 · · Score: 1

      i think i'll have to agree when you imply that

      arabs == dogs

      i mean, what human wipes their ass with their own hand? what human doesn't understand the value of life?

      i wanna make a small video clip of an arab (towel and all) looking at the camera and saying *elephant man style), "I am not a human being! I am an animal!"

    117. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not a citizen of the U.S. but I live here. I'll tell you what retalliation solves: making sure ppl know that if they piss off the wrong person they will surely pay. Next time, they'll think about it a little more before doing it. It's just psichology.

    118. Re:Plea for peace by SubtleNuance · · Score: 2

      FWIW, I'm not a citizen of the U.S. nor do I live there.

      Violence induces more violence. Retaliation will only lead to more deaths. If you are a citizen of the U.S. of America, please write your representative right now and ask him to join a plea for peace. Historically the U.S. reaction to this kind of attack is to counter strike. It's highly probably that it's already being planned or even carried on. That will solve nothing. You might get even, but that achieves nothing. The death will not come back and the attack has been already recorded on the books of history. At this point in time, counter attacking is irrational and puts not only the lives of U.S. citizens at risk, but those of lots of people all arround the world, too.

      ... i agree - relax people, do NOT think that a violent reaction is right - please, DO NOT react like schoolyard children. Reflect, THINK(!) we do not need more voilence - the people you kill in %SOME_FOREIGN_LAND% will also have children and familly.

    119. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the very least, invasion of the country that either sponsored, or allowed to happen, this terrorism must be made.

      So how do you know it's not domestic?

      Remember Oklahoma City?

    120. Re:Plea for peace by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      First, this is many orders of magnitude beyond a car bomb in front of a Department store.

      Second, if things happen repeatedly there, you don't have the answer.

      Third, how would you go about making peace with someone who literally views your entire nation as "The Great Satan?" You can only reason with reasonable people. These acts clearly show that the perpetrators are anything but reasonable.

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    121. Re:Plea for peace by StupidKatz · · Score: 1

      Gee, that's nice. So, "another country" is mad because of US politics, and they decide to murder a few thousand innocent CIVILIANS??

      There is no justification.

    122. Re:Plea for peace by JoeLinux · · Score: 1

      Not to be mean or anything, but the IRA has continually bombed the hell out of the place while people have been pleading for peace. People with these attitudes consider peace-mongers weak, and means to an end. They only respond to responses of greater firepower.

      JoeLinux

      Who *cares* if a laser guided 500 lb bomb is accurate to within 9 feet?

    123. Re:Plea for peace by zander · · Score: 1

      Bravo!
      Piece does not exist in a world where we say: "we strike harder, so don't strike us"

      Take a look at the prosecution at the Jugoslavian war tribunal a small number of years ago. It actually works.

    124. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think everyone is missing one important point...



      This was not the act of a country declaring war. This was an act committed but a terrorist organization.


      There is a very big difference here; it would be foolish for America to attack a country that, for all we know had nothing to do with this. (Whoever it was). America needs to seek out that group set this attack up and go after them. Asking the country that the group is from for help in the removing the group seems fare, if the country refused to help... then matters should be looked at differently.

      Xion
      xion@tarias.net

    125. Re:Plea for peace by Nail · · Score: 1

      It depends on what you think morality truly is.

      From your supposition that /. accurately reflects America, I don't think your opinion can be trusted.

      Good luck with the whole "take it in the rear for peace" thing, though.

      --
      ...yellow number five, yellow number five, yellow number five...
    126. Re:Plea for peace by Ian+Wolf · · Score: 2

      This is not Flamebait, its an opinion. One that is as seriously misguided as the response about someone soon joining the stone age.

      We, the United States, must proceed with caution and great care. Immediate retalition almost always misses the mark, and does nothing but strengthen the resolve of our enemies and push those on the fence firmly into the arms of those enemies. I do feel that retaliation is in order, but it must be precise. AND! it needs to be directed at the right people.

      --
      "The words of the prophets are written on the Slashdot walls."
    127. Re:Plea for peace by blafasel · · Score: 1
      • BEFORE you go to war, you should know who to go to war against
      • BEFORE you know who to go to war against, you should sit back, and make sure know what you're doing
      • BEFORE you can sit back to make sure know what you're doing, you should LEARN TO READ AND WRITE


      this is a flame, you're a fascist pig.

      if you had read up on WWII history, you would know that appeasement WORKED, because it bought the allies the time they needed to prepare for war.

      learn to spell. then start murdering.
      --

      check your speling
    128. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The United States has a history of ignoring UN resolutions it does not like.

    129. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its quite possible that these people came in through Canada. I believe our airlines and boarders have been called a "sive". Should Canada then be invaded ? I'm sure that our Intelligence agency has been doing a piss poor job on doing what they are supposed to be doing.

    130. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A loose paraphrase: "All that it takes for evil to win is for good men to sit idly by and do nothing."

    131. Re:Plea for peace by coolgeek · · Score: 4, Flamebait
      It is YOUR crappy airport security that allowed these people through.

      I disagree. It is our complacency that allowed them to breach security. Complacency should not be confused with Incompetence, in my book. I boarded a flight in the past three months where they did not even ask me the basics questions about how I handled my baggage. I knew that the ticket agent knew what she was supposed to do, and how to do it, and was probably capable of doing it well. She just didn't feel it was necessary any longer.

      And if you don't think the US is capable of infiltrating _every_ plane in the offending country and ramming them into _every_ major landmark on their soil, you are a fool. Our guys would probably even live to tell about it, too. Thing is, we have laws that prevent us from doing exactly that. Funny thing too, the laws seem to be enough deterrent for the average United States Citizen. The attack was well planned, well executed, some might even say impressive. The biggest mass murder in history. On the scale of expertise available in the world, it was rank amateur. The Palestinians can rally in the streets today, and celebrate the mass extermination of human beings. I doubt they will have any streets in a few years, whether the US retaliates or not. That kind of hatred is a spiritual disease that will eventually lead to their own destruction.

      --

      cat /dev/null >sig
    132. Re:Plea for peace by mesocyclone · · Score: 2

      The US Government does not provide funding to terrorists. I am aware of, and ashamed of NorAid, as an American of Irish ancestry. But it is *not* a government policy to support it.

      --

      The only good weather is bad weather.

    133. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your message is so full of prejudice directed toward Americans. Why are you taking shots at our airport security? We want to prevent these attacks without inducing severe measures on our citizens.

      I would say that your anger is very misplaced. It seems that you're primary message is that we eat the defeat and do nothing. Are you concerned that this might escalate into something that might include you? How terrible for you! Perhaps when you are gunned down we will be able to say with a clear conscience: "His defenses were down. He had it coming."

      .. now I am going to shampoo and groom my mullet.

    134. Re:Plea for peace by DrPascal · · Score: 1

      I completely agree.

      --
      DrPascal: Not the language, the mathematician.
    135. Re:Plea for peace by BluFinger · · Score: 1
      Are you serious? Don't you think that maybe those years of the not screwing with us were spent getting more and more pissed and planning bigger and bigger attacks. Like the one we're seeing today?

      Yeah, let's just blow the shit out of whatever country these people came from, and then be surprised when in ten years some horrific act 10 times as bad as today's happens.

      Get a fucking clue.

      --
      Lib.BENCH the only site you'll ever need!
    136. Re:Plea for peace by Oztun · · Score: 2

      Most likely this was retaliation for a war in the middle east. Americans are asleep to whats going on and most of you don't think twice when people die in the middle east. This was an obvious act of retaliation against Americans on our turf for a change. This isn't the start of a war we are in the middle of one.

    137. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - Missile attacks on Afghanistan and Sodan

    138. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      japan was pissed with us because we, one of their allies and there major oil supplier, stopped selling to them and negotiations broke down. perl harbor was to attempt to convince us to sell them oil again.

      btw, remember the term "collateral(sp?) damage"? us invented the term, about time we took some.

      before you complain remember dresden, hiroshima, and nagasaki.

      my aunt lives in new york, and alot of my family lives near boston, my parents arived home by plane yesterday, but i hope if any one of them was killed i would not contribute to the us becoming a police state, or demanding "revenge".
      i care, i just think us had it coming, and us pioneered the methods we are so shocked about, and no one is paying attention--including slashdot moderators.

    139. Re:Plea for peace by merlin_jim · · Score: 2

      Actually, many historians have said that war is a failure of the diplomatic process.

      Until Hitler, the bulk of humanity believed that war is never the answer. Hitler (and others that were not quite so well known at the time, such as Napolean or Genghis Khan) was a megalomaniac and this changed things. Up until then, the main goal of war was not wholesale slaughter, the killing of people, but convincing your enemy you are right. Either in annexing land or in diplomacy or whatever.

      But Hitler convinced us that sometimes you just have to stop talkinga and start dropping bombs.

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
    140. Re:Plea for peace by SubtleNuance · · Score: 2

      I think everybody's first reaction will indeed be to annihilate

      right. But with reason, with hind-sight(sp?) reasonable measures, with REASON(!) please, do not whip people around you - do not believe that might is right, might-is-right is what leads to this horror.

      the rest of the world has been rebuilding from the first 50 years of war in the world - WWI && WWII - do not confuse yourself, this is the same horror that has been felt/lived in the rest of the world.... they have set a course in complete and total opposition to the one set by USA, do you think this is from the wisdom gained from this event??

      Try and learn, live, grow - accept fate - but please do not replicate mistakes... do not think that physical retribution will make ANYTHING right again.

    141. Re:Plea for peace by tiggerbone · · Score: 1

      I completely agree! I am not by nature a violent person. On the other hand, I believe that we must show that terrorism is not a viable form or communication. Someone was displeased with our country. That's fine. I can respect that.

      It is NOT ok for them to vent that displeasure by engaging in acts which cause the deaths of innocent people or the destruction of property!

      We must think about our response carefully and weigh what effect it may have. Inaction would simply be taken as acceptance. The idea that violence begets more violence is true to an extent, however it has also been shown that fear of reprisal can be an effective deterrent in some individuals.

      Are these terrorists people of that sort?

      I tend to think not.

      Look at the very nature of these attacks. They were large, well planned, and very, very visible. A message was being sent here. We need to decipher it. What was the reason for these attacks? Who commited them? Will they do so again?

      If this was for a cause, and not merely the ramblings of some group of maniacs (internal or external to our country does not matter at this point), they will let it be known that they perpetrated this act. Reasons will be given. And as an added benefit to the one who confesses, a form of immortality will be bestowed.

      Yes, they shall be punished, but their fame will inspire others.

      What we truly need to do, is to find a way to punish terrorists and yet also destroy their fame at the same time. What good does dying for a cause do, if absolutely no one will ever know you or your cause existed?

      I know that this idea is unrealistic. As humans, we need to know who causes these apparently senseless acts. To hide the information, would offend our senses of justice, propriety, and curiosity. I don't know if it could be done.

      Punishment of some sort though, must be meted out. For in my experience, no bully has ever stopped picking on someone, simply because we ignored them.

    142. Re:Plea for peace by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
      An act of war has been committed against the United States. Worse than that, it was an attack against innocent civilians.


      I agree they were innocent (I am an adherent of Just War theory), but today's warmakers don't believe in "innocent" civilians. Witness our turning Iraq into a moonscape, and our destruction of Serbia's civilian infrastructure. Who suffers? Innocent civilians, but even US military leaders do it.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    143. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what are you talking about? You have peace? You just got bombed in 3 places for God's sake!

    144. Re:Plea for peace by norton_I · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You have to consider the possibility that there are some people whose way of life is fundamentally incompatable with yours. I believe that anyone capable of organizing the hijacking of several commerical airplanes and using them as weapons against both civillian and military targets in an unprovoked sneak attack is not someone that I can make amends with without making an unacceptable compromise of my integrity.

      If possible, pepetrators of this kind of terrorism should be made to see the error of their ways, in the hopes of preventing future incidents. However, if that proves to be impossible, the only recourse is total annihalation.

      I am a peaceful person. I would do just about anything to insure that we could all live harmoniously. But if other people force the issue into a "me or them" situation, I pick me, every time, and will defend that decision with ultimate force.

    145. Re:Plea for peace by Martigan80 · · Score: 0

      I must disagree American has been standing down for too long now. I don't want a full bombing run-I want stratigic eliminations.

      --
      This SIG pulled due to lack of funding. (This damn war is costing too much!)
    146. Re:Plea for peace by crush · · Score: 1

      1.Just because he's not a U.S. citizen doesn't mean he's not living in the U.S.
      2. The point is that the U.S. has the choice to enter into a cycle of violence which will beget more tragedies, or else to take the high moral ground.
      3. If you believe in vengeance then presumably you support the right of the approximately 1 million dead Iraqis to exact revenge upon the U.S.?
      I don't.
      Revenge is murder and it begets more murder. I'm sickened by this.

    147. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be from France or some other defenseless country. Pound them into the ground.

    148. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You fail to notice two key elements here though. First, a tiger will most probably attack you even
      /quote: Hey, if you poke a tiger with a stick. There's a pretty good chance he will eat you /endquote

      if you don't poke it in the eye, or in any other means prove harmful to it.

      And second, do you imply in contradictory terms with the peace, prosperity and the like the american dream has to "offer" that usa is a wildlife animal?

      Please.. the situation is critical throughout the world. Use reason before giving such paradigms to the readers. Things are fragile all right.

    149. Re:Plea for peace by forgoil · · Score: 1

      Took three days to declare war after Pearl Harbour (corect me if I am wrong)...

    150. Re:Plea for peace by Ian+Wolf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      His reasoning doesn't stink. A little overly optimistic, but you apparently haven't been reading the news for the last couple months.

      Israel has been waging an all out war on Hamas, and their killing innocents by the hundreds. As a result, Hamas is gaining popular support by leaps and bounds, and so is Saddam Hussein as he's been openly supporting Hamas. News reports have shown that the Iraqi flag is almost as prevalent as the Hamas flag in Palestinian refugee camps.

      A complete pacifistic reaction does nothing. Not even a change in U.S. intervention in the middle east would change anything. Unmitigated reactionary violence however is tantamount to disaster. The US response must be precise, measured, and carried out with absolute lethality.

      --
      "The words of the prophets are written on the Slashdot walls."
    151. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but the tiger is being attacked by a swarm of killer bees.

    152. Re:Plea for peace by issachar · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Peace and compromise are not always the best way to go. Neville Chamberlain declared peace in our time after speaking with Hitler, and then the second world war happened. Compromise was definately not the best option in that case.

      Neither is compromise the best option now. The United States should do it's best to identify the larger supporting organisations, and strike them so that the are unable to do this again. (We can't make them not want to do it again). This will involve killing many people, and it will involve collateral damage to civilians and loss of life for US military personel. That is unfortunate, but it should still be done.

      The Canadian response, (I am a Canadian), should be to support the US in whatever action it takes. No more fence sitting. These are our friends and neighbours and they need our support.

      --
      . --- If you're looking for free e-mail you won't find it here! http://www.noemailhere.com
    153. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I can respect your opinion, but you said it yourself - you are not a US citizen. So, really, there's no way you can possibly know how people living in the US feel right now.

      Of course... because as we all know... the US is the ONLY COUNTRY IN THE WORLD THAT HAS HAD TO SUFFER THROUGH TERRORISM!!!!

      I sympathise with the current situation in New York and Washington... I really, really do! I'm an apathetic, atheist Aussie, who bears no ill will to Americans... My gut was churning when I first saw the news reports, and I have been horrified in the hours since...

      But, damn, I really wish the average American and the average American news organisation could wipe the stars and stripes from their eyes for just ONE MINUTE to get a better perspective on the world.

      It's less than 6 hours after the attacks have occurred and already all of your major news organisations, media and political personalities are singling out different organisations/countries to be taken out in retalliation. All of this before you know who, what and why all of this has occurred...

    154. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they did take that to UN and US used its vote to crash them badly. :)

    155. Re:Plea for peace by crush · · Score: 1

      Wrong. The U.S. gives huge amounts of military aid to Israel in order to guarantee its oil supplies. Hence the support for the genocidal Israeli regime.

    156. Re:Plea for peace by uchian · · Score: 1

      Look at the arms situation. If it was a nuclear capable organization that did this, any attack from the U.S. is going to result in those nukes being used

      When I first saw on television the devestation, I had this terrfiying thought in the back of my mind that the tell-tale mushroom cloud would suddenly appear in the back of one of the broadcasts.

    157. Re:Plea for peace by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
      Any organization that would commit this atrociuos act has demonstrated it's lack of reason. The people behind this are insane.


      This was not insane or illogical, but FLAT OUT EVIL! Can you not distinguish between right and wrong?

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    158. Re:Plea for peace by Pheersum · · Score: 1

      Shut up. Until you've felt the pain of having family ripped from your clutches, shut up. Shut up, until you've had your country attacked by strange people who you've never met. Just shut up. You don't know how we feel, and you have no right to tell those who live in the United States what to do.


      I heard an anecdote today, a little tale that should warm your heart and give you an example of the horror this country is in right now. A woman who worked in the World Trade Center received a phone call today, a phone call not out of the ordinary at all. A simple call from her husband, who had just called to say that he loved her. Right after the converstation, the floor collapsed beneath her feet.

      Would you tell that man to forgive his wife's murderers? Would you tell that woman's children, if she has any, to stop crying, because we can still have peace? I realize that these things don't really have any connection to your topic, and so I apologize to the readers of Slashdot. Your blatant disregard for the feelings of those who have to live through this is just sickening, and so I decided to reply.

    159. Re:Plea for peace by haplo21112 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      I wish I had not used up my mod points yesterday, so I could mod you down you stupid idiot. I am an american citizen, and I want a counterstrike, I want one now, I want whatever organization, person, country whatever, Blasted back to the GOD Damned stone age, leveled, nuked, invaded, strung up by the short and curlies. There is no peace, there is only war when, and deserved war when crap like this happens. I bet the prick(s) who did this got in the country on H1B Visa's. So lets throw all of them out of the country while we are at it.

      --
      Power Corrupts,Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely, leaving one person(group)in charge is absolutely corrupt.
    160. Re:Plea for peace by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

      I think that the US people have learned, and will soon have the lesson reinforced, what happens when you elect a president with WEAK foreign experience. I'm all for rallying around the flag, but I refuse to support this charlatan of a leader.

      And Gore would have been better??? Please. It was a stroke of divine luck that we don't have that mamby-pamby fool in office.

      I think GWB is going to surprise a lot of people during this crisis, and during his term.

      I will say this: even if it was Clinton still in office right now (whom I abolutely despise with all my heart and is the very definition of a "charlatan of a leader"), I would support him during this time of crisis.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    161. Re:Plea for peace by issachar · · Score: 1
      Bin Laden's been named as the aggressor, with very little evidence

      Not to be picky, but there is some evidence.

      A coordinated operation such as this would require large funds. Bin Laden has that. It would also require pilots, (you couldn't rely on being able to force the US pilots to hit the right target or an untrained terrorist to fly a jumbo jet). Bin Laden's organisation has pilots.

      You'd also need a burning hatred for the US and a willingness to kill civilians. He definately has that. (But on the other hand, so does Arafat so that doesn't mean much).

      --
      . --- If you're looking for free e-mail you won't find it here! http://www.noemailhere.com
    162. Re:Plea for peace by DA_MAN_DA_MYTH · · Score: 1

      Violence induces more violence. Retaliation will only lead to more deaths.

      I agree with you, but this attack must not go unpunished, and if they is no action taken, more terroist attacks shall continue. Regan in the 80's stopped this by bombing the hell out of Libya. The same action must be taken. This attack, is a major attack, so I will be writing my representative to make sure our soils are safe.
      <rage intensity="50%">Turn the Middle East into a <rage intensity="100%">fscking glass parking lot.</rage></rage>

      --
      "It takes many nails to build a crib, but one screw to fill it."
    163. Re:Plea for peace by LordNimon · · Score: 1
      The US Government does not provide funding to terrorists.

      You are so naive. Our history is full of cases of our funding terrorists in various countries. In some cases, it's just a matter of perspective, but in others it's quite obvious to anyone who pays attention (which is only about 1% of the U.S. population).

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    164. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So then, since you all feel that peace is the only answer to all this. Then how much longer is this going to last? How much longer are we supposed to sit here and watch our families and friends fall victim to terrorist attacks? What closure are you prepared to give those families who had relatives and friends working on the 80th floor of the WTC (BofA's corporate HQ btw.). You think words will calm their souls? You think any US citizen is going to sit back and enjoy seeing whatever faceless cowards kick back in peace talks w/ us?

      Think again, I for one am giving into my insticts to annilate those who are responsible, bigger man or not, that is not my concern after today.

    165. Re:Plea for peace by jgalun · · Score: 1

      Well then, until you even talk about the possibility that: A) Arab states have almost never accepted the right of Israel to exist (Iran still doesn't), B) tried to wipe Israel out many times, C) Deny the existence of the Holocaust (Syria has done this twice this year), and D) blow up bombs in pizza parlors because they aren't getting what they want in negotiations, I reserve the right to blow up bombs in your town.

    166. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Those involved should be and will be hunted down. They have declared war on the U.S. and the U.S. will respond in kind.

      > My question to the people involved is Why don't you make yourselves known?

      I'll leave it as an exercise to the reader to answer the question.

    167. Re:Plea for peace by Noel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Completely inaccurate paraphrase. Please try thinking before replying.

      I'll rephrase:

      Retaliation will not reach those who performed these attacks -- they are dead.

      Retaliation will cause more hatred, resulting in more terrorists and terrorism.

      Retaliation can not eliminate terrorism.

      Please note, I am not arguing against justice. I hope that when we find out who is responsible for these acts, they will receive the punishment due to them for their dastardly attacks on innocent people.

      I *am* arguing against a reliance on retaliation as the solution to terrorism. Terrorism doesn't spring out of nothing. People aren't born terrorist. We need to find and deal with the *causes* of terrorism rather than just reacting to *acts* of terrorism. That's what I meant about moving it to a *different* *arena*.

      Our responsibility does not end when we find those responsible for the terrorist acts. We must take responsibility for finding out which acts and attitudes encourage terrorism, and eradicate them wherever they occur. We must be careful not to teach that unrestrained violence is the best solution. How many of the world's terrorists have developed their abilities while they were US-supported freedom fighters?

      Yes, there will always be *some* terrorism. We must *always* justly punish the acts of terrorism. But punishment alone will not eradicate terrorism. And if it becomes vengeance rather than just punishment, then we are actually encouraging more terrorism.

      If we can change our arrogant national attitude, we will give others less cause for terrorism. It's much better to prevent terrorism than to punish terrorism.

    168. Re:Plea for peace by issachar · · Score: 2
      Prosecution requires that you arrest those responsible. Those responsible are almost certainly being protected by anti-US regimes. That requires military action.

      (Incidentally they're the same regimes that were saying a few days ago at the UN conference about what an evil abuser of human rights the US is).

      --
      . --- If you're looking for free e-mail you won't find it here! http://www.noemailhere.com
    169. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI: I am not a US citizen, but my girlfriend is and I study and work here. I am an anti-militarist.

      It seems that most people agree that this IS an act of war.

      Now, it is extremely unlikely that this was initiated by any country, because every government in the world knows better than to attack US soil. Which means that the US is at war with a terrorist group.

      This has never happened before in history: the police deals with terrorists. How do you wage war on a small group of people? Does this mean that the US is being dragged into a guerrilla war with the entire planet as battlefield?

      I do think it would be wrong to declare war on the country/ies where these terrorists are based, but I expect the US to send commandos or even deploy troops into those countries.

      The consequences of this terrorist attack are going to change the nature of the international community beyond recognition, because history doesn't really repeat itself. This is not like Pearl Harbor, and the consequences won't be like WW II. We are dealing with an entirely new kind of animal.

    170. Re:Plea for peace by mesocyclone · · Score: 2
      There is a tremendous moral difference between targeting civilians, and hitting civilians as a side effect of military action. The US took extraordinary precautions to minimize civilian casualties in both Iraq and Servia. But nobody is perfect.


      Again, the difference is moral. Just War may kill civilians, but it doesn't target civilians. Terrorism targets civilians.

      --

      The only good weather is bad weather.

    171. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which fuckers are you talking about, Captain Overreaction?

    172. Re:Plea for peace by psychalgia · · Score: 1

      bullshit, you are all fucked.

      --

      ________________________________________________

    173. Re:Plea for peace by fireant · · Score: 1
      Just because someone approves of this does not make them responsible.

      Depends on the level of approval you are talking about. I believe what you are referring to is someone who thinks to themselves, "Wow, they beat me to it." No, they are not responsible. They may be lowlifes, but they are not responsible.

      What I was referring to was the person or persons that are directly responsible by recruiting those who actually carried out these horrible acts. They are respnsible just like a Mob boss is responsible for ordering a hit. They are charged with 1st degree murder just like the person who actually did the killing.

      The ones in charge are both legally and morally responsible for those deaths. I can guarantee you that whoever orchestrated this was not on any of the planes. He's hiding out somewhere with a satellite hookup to CNN so he and his flunkies can celebrate.

    174. Re:Plea for peace by ReidMaynard · · Score: 1

      You might also want to think about why this attack occurred. How did the USA get into a position where someone hates it *so* much that they'd suicide themselves in revenge?

      point 1: Many people hate, all they need is a focal point to do damage, I bet most of them didn't hate America until they were *taught* to.

      point 2: There isn't a Country / Group / Person / Rock / Atom on this planet that another Country / Group / Person / Rock / Atom doesn't hate.

      --
      -- www.globaltics.net

      Political discussion for a new world

    175. Re:Plea for peace by trexl · · Score: 2, Insightful
      With all due respect, counterstrikes occur against those that struck you. Attacking civilian targets is deplorable, cowardly, etc. If these actions are not considered an act of war, than an act of serial murder on American soil. Those responsible should be punished either militarily for the Pentagon attack or through the American judicial system for the World Trade Center.

      As for the original plea for peace, bullies and cowards, one in the same show there true colors when the tables are turned. Those that cheer the this country's hardship as victory need to feel the fear that they would impose upon us, so that they do not perform the same actions. Perhaps it is an endless cycle, but only because those that have been shown mercy mistake it for weakness.

      John F. Hurst
      'strength exists where the will has defeated pain'

    176. Re:Plea for peace by jgaynor · · Score: 1
      Historically the U.S. reaction to this kind of attack is to counter strike. It's highly probably that it's already being planned or even carried on. That will solve nothing


      It'll be a few less crazies to carry out these attacks, and maybe we'll take out a terrorist leader.



      Im so close to NY I can see the smoke from our house. I had to call like crazy to make sure that two of my uncles in manhattan were still alive this morning.



      I understand your point completely but its so very different when a catastrophe like this occurs in your backyard. Im just a techie but after this morning Id enlist in a heartbeat.

    177. Re:Plea for peace by Nail · · Score: 1

      I do think his reasoning stinks, as would a person without timely cleansings. I am judging this by his conclusion, not his discussion.

      A little optimistic? I must assume we have different definitions of that word.

      His argument seemed to call for a "pacifistic reaction", which you seem to disagree with, or did I get him/you wrong?

      I don't remember proposing a kind of reaction, but I do fully agree with your last sentence.

      --
      ...yellow number five, yellow number five, yellow number five...
    178. Re:Plea for peace by JabberWokky · · Score: 2, Flamebait
      There are only two ways to break the cycle of violence.
      1. Kill them all. Every last one of them. And anyone who ever cared about them. No one will be left to carry out revenge. No future generations will rise up.
      OR
      2. Forgive.

      Since number two is not incumbent upon us, and we can not force another group to forgive, you seem to have hit upon the one solution that works.

      I'm not saying it's a *good* solution, but the way to defeat terrorism is to eliminate terrorists. Since the initial killing of non-military personnel is generally caused by religious or philosophical beliefs taken to an extreme, the only way to deal with them is to eliminate those beliefs - eliminate those who believe.

      --
      Evan (who just said fuck it, and is replying directly at the beginning of the thread... read there).

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    179. Re:Plea for peace by Malcontent · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "It looks like we've got to smash somebody. In fact, it looks like the people we'll be hitting are fanatics."

      I remember when OKC happened Rush LImbaugh started calling for bombing of "whoever is responsible". Once we found that it was an American and that bombing "whoever is responsible" meant bombing Michigan Rush shut up. I guess killing innocent people is much more palatable in Iran or Iraq then Michigan.
      In the end our tendency to look at Arab and Muslim life as basically worthless will determine the scope of the attack. Not the desire to punish the people who are actually guilty. My guess is many many innocent people will die as a result of our retaliation which will make us exactly like the monsters who committed these crimes.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    180. Re:Plea for peace by joolios · · Score: 1

      Very well put.

      They've invited us into the animal world.

    181. Re:Plea for peace by 1010011010 · · Score: 2

      Do you honestly think they they will care that we have forgiven them, should we do that? Or that our forgiveness would change their behavior? They're on a holy war. We're the Great Satan. I'm not thinking that our forgiveness will mean a lot to them.

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    182. Re:Plea for peace by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      The US has recently weighed in massively on the side of Israel, and done nothing to help the Palestinian victims of Israeli terror attacks.

      The Israel/Palestine issue is a two-way street. Don't make it sound so one-sided.

      Peace has worked in the Middle East before, and if the US campaign of violence and intimidation against the Palestinians stopped, it might work again.

      What US campaign of violence and intimidation against Palestinians? Whose propaganda have you been reading?

      My capital has been repeatedly bombed by extremist terrorist groups for many years now. I support making peace with them, conceding to some of their demands, and releasing their captured prisoners of war from our jails.

      I'm sorry that has happened. So are many other people. There are probably a great number of people that would rejoice at the news (regardless of which capital you refer to).

      Concessions are for negotiations between reasonable parties. The only thing concessions teach terrorists is that terrorism works very effectively.

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    183. Re:Plea for peace by _Swank · · Score: 2

      add to that that he has attacked the World Trade Center before (1993) and that 3 weeks ago he threatened that they would be carrying out an attack on the US of unprecedented proportions.

      On the other hand, very few news organizations (and no respectable ones that I've) have named Bin Laden the aggressor. His name has come up often today in discussions on possible culprits along with the Hamas, DFLP, and a few other groups. But all news outlets I have seen this morning have cautioned against jumping to conclusions as to who actually perpetrated quite possibly the worst terrorist act ever.

    184. Re:Plea for peace by GreenBugsBunny · · Score: 1

      I would have to argue that someone knows who is responsible, they just aren't telling.

    185. Re:Plea for peace by mesocyclone · · Score: 2

      Please notice the tense. I said the US Government "does not" provide funding to terrorists. I never said we didn't in the past, although in most cases the funding was to rebels, not terrorists.

      --

      The only good weather is bad weather.

    186. Re:Plea for peace by Lars+T. · · Score: 1
      Correction: those responsible are dead. They died attacking.

      There has to be retaliation for this, without a doubt. But it will not resolve the problem.

      Those responsible are dead - there has to be retaliation for this. You are right, this kind of thinking will not resolve the problem.
      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    187. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Peace... How can anyone talk of peace in a situation like this. We (the US) are supposed to be one of the most powerful nations in the world. We have to keep the respect of other countries. Like Pearl Harbor attack... you cannot treat this with indifference... (Anyway, in the Pearl Harbor attack only 2-3000 people died... In the WTC there were about 50,000 people - close enough to how many casualties we had in Vietname)

      If we do not show the world that whoever is trying to commit acts of terrorism against the US will pay, what would they think... ??? If we go and make peace with the ... (whoever) then that will show how weak we are...

      WE HAVE TO MAKE THEM PAY FOR THEIR CRIMES AGAINST THE US and IT'S CITIZENS.

    188. Re:Plea for peace by 1010011010 · · Score: 2

      The people who did it were threating to kill all the Israelis and Jews on board. Until an Israeli special forces unit came in and took them out. Guess what no one has hijacked a jet leaving Israel since. The only way to deal with dictators and thugs it it hit them so hard that they don't get up again. Ever.

      I agree. Fights should be avoided. However, if you're going to get into a fight, make sure that the other guy never, ever, fights you again. Fight to win all future fights.

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    189. Re:Plea for peace by IronChef · · Score: 2


      I have heard that the UNofficial Soviet policy on terrorism was this: if a Soviet was held hostage somewhere, the KGB would catch someone from the bad guy's organization... and send him back to his buddies in a series of small boxes.

      Violence needs to be countered with overwhelming violence. No half measures.

    190. Re:Plea for peace by jafac · · Score: 2

      You misread what I said.

      Neither of those options I spoke of were legitimate options, nor were they likely to happen, nor were they "My Recommended Courses of Action".

      I merely said that they are the only two ways to break the cycle of violence.

      I regret that the cycle of violence WILL be perpetuated. And I accept that there's nothing anybody can do about it. This is the first dark day, of MANY dark days to come.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    191. Re:Plea for peace by Ian+Wolf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You have got to be a complete idiot.

      the target does not have to be absolutely accurate. scorching afghanistan and removing it from the map will remove nearly all of bin laden's ground troops and all of his civilian support. it may even make him a target from his own people.

      Do you honestly think the people of afghanistan have any clue? Sure, some do, especially within the ruling Taliban government. BUT, many people in afghanistan are not a party to the Taliban. A many people in that nation have taken up arms against the Taliban. Some of them have not forgotten that many Americans and Brits fought alongside them against the Soviets.

      Besides, Bin Laden isn't even an afghani, he's a Saudi and his supporters are scattered all over the world. By your grand scheme, we would have to Nuke Iran, Sudan, Yemen, and large portions of Ethiopia, Somalia, and countless other nations.

      if you commit a terrorist act, or you know someone that commits or is planning a terrorist act against this country -- you should die. the trickle down effect of this will rid the world of this plague.

      OR, you mobilize a couple billion Muslims against you. You kill one innocent, and their family is more likely to become a supporter of Bin Laden then the people who killed their loved one. The more you kill the more you drive into the arms of your enemy. If you don't believe me open any history book. One only needs to look at the numerous examples out there. The rise of Christianity in Ancient Rome, the aforementioned invasion of Afghanistan by the Soviets, the fall of the Khmer Rouge as well as any other Despotic system.

      --
      "The words of the prophets are written on the Slashdot walls."
    192. Re:Plea for peace by 4iedBandit · · Score: 1

      Correction: at least 20 000 of you *are not still here.* They died in the attack. Thanks to the attack the surviving 200 some million Americans are now willing to let the government use whatever force is necessary. Violence may not be the answer but America was given a statement, not a question. Those who live by the sword, will die by the sword.

      --
      "The avalanch has already started, it is too late for the pebbles to vote." -Kosh
    193. Re:Plea for peace by Kierthos · · Score: 2, Informative

      If retaliation will get the people who planned and organized this attack, then it's all good, in my opinion. Do you honestly think that the planners of this attack were the ones who were hijacking the planes?

      And I happen to believe that if you show what happens to the people who organize and plan terrorist attacks, it does deter those who are still out there and haven't been caught/punished yet.

      Lastly, it's not any national attitude. Some of these terrorist fruit loops hate the U.S. for no logical or sane reason. These are the same people who quote the Koran to give an excuse for killing Christians and Jews, while simultaneously ignoring the parts of the Koran that preach the ways of peace to the other peoples of God (which, coincidentally are Christians and Jews).

      Kierthos

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    194. Re:Plea for peace by Dexx · · Score: 1

      I've got to agree here. I have issues seeing this as anything else.

      I guess that when you're the 'cop of the world' sometimes you've got to deal with violent protestors.

      Well, I know what's next: break out the riot gear and tear gas.

      --
      Feel the fear and do it anyway.
    195. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I couldnt agree with you more Mr. Canadian! I am pleased that there are level headed people in this world that actually learn from the TRUTH of history. I applaud your stance and believe that many more will follow.

      I am an American and proud of it. I consider myself a patriot. Policy should take over from here... our policy should be "walk softly and carry a big stick", unfortunately i think that the US has messed up by being too noisy... not walking softly... but I hope we will soo weild our big stick!

      Your Neighbor,
      Mr. USA

    196. Re:Plea for peace by fireant · · Score: 2
      I don't see any other option here. It's not like it was a simple guerilla-style attack on a prominent US government official. It was a massive, high profile attack against civillians.

      This was much more than a terrorist attack. It was a provocation of the entire country. I don't see how this person or group would expect to survive. The only answer is that this group expects a massive US response. They want us to go to war... with someone. The only thing I can think of is that this is a group that wants to provoke the US into a war with the entire Middle Eastern Muslim population.

      I don't know if the orchestrator is actually a militant Muslim, or pretends to be in order to get kamikazes, or what. It could be an actual militant Muslim group that wants a direct confrontation with the US, or it could be someone who wants us to think that it is a militant Muslim group. Whatever it is, this group is clearly trying to get the US to destroy itself.

      Man, one thing's for sure, this event is going to bring out the conspiracy nut in all of us.

    197. Re:Plea for peace by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      Congratulations, you described what probably drove the attackers. Too bad you are not able to understand.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    198. Re:Plea for peace by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      Ghandi wouldn't even be a footnote in history if he were dealing with someone who didn't care about what others thought of their country/group/movement.

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    199. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good luck with the whole "take it in the rear for peace" thing, though.

      Yes, how dare he say anything so un-American and un-Christian as 'turn the other cheek'... hmm... never mind.

    200. Re:Plea for peace by Alexey+Goldin · · Score: 1

      Counterstrike is the only reasonable answer to it. But cold blooded counterstrike, after you figure out who is at fault, making sure that as little innocent people as possible are hurt. I am not a US citizen either, but I want them safely dead. Otherwise those guys will regard any kindness as sign of weakness and will keep pressing on.

    201. Re:Plea for peace by dedicke · · Score: 0

      Fuck you you fucking Arab. The blood of many Muslims and Arabs such as your self will soon be running through the streets of your hometown. America and American will NOT STAND FOR THIS. You fucking Muslims will soon find out how wrong you are about the almighty Allah and the rest of the garbage you preach. Enjoy HELL you motherfuckers.

      --
      raretshirts.com - cool vintage t-shirts
    202. Re:Plea for peace by crucini · · Score: 2
      The US chose to allow the parties involved to resolve their own differences. This is NOT choosing sides.

      Not really. The US provides weapons and aid to Israel. If the US simply withdrew from the Middle East, Israel would be gone very soon.
    203. Re:Plea for peace by dvdeug · · Score: 2

      > If the US government won't even talk about the possibility that Israel is a racist state, how can they be surprised when those affected by racism strike back?

      What the US government won't talk about is condeming Israel for being a racist state, and not talking about most of the rest of the middle east or any other racist countries in the world.

    204. Re:Plea for peace by crush · · Score: 1

      The US took extraordinary precautions to minimize civilian casualties in Irag[...]
      Your are completely mis-informed on this - shockingly so. The war against Iraq continues, hundreds of Iraqi children die every day as a result of US policies. Somewhere around a million Iraqis are dead (many of them against the totalitarian dictator in control there). Tens of thousands of Palestinians are dead as a result of US support of the Israeli regime.
      So do you think that these civilians have been killed by US terrorism?

    205. Re:Plea for peace by hedgefrog · · Score: 1

      If we were only interested in oil we wouldn't be supporting Israel, their enemies are the ones with the oil.

      --

      I lost my copy of the green golf ball joke can anyone find it for me?
    206. Re:Plea for peace by sydb · · Score: 2

      Such evidence is called "circumstantial" and you can't find someone guilty based on circumstantial evidence.

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
    207. Re:Plea for peace by Flower · · Score: 2
      Game theory advocates always striking back at terrorists.

      http://www.spectacle.org/995/scorp.html

      I see no reason to give the parties responsible for this atrocity any quarter once they have been identified. I would not sit down with them to make peace as, after viewing the crime they committed, I do not find them trustworthy. When they do not have the ability to sting any more then and only then would I be willing to parley and pursue peace. Until that time, I am mor than happy with the concept of using all available resources to neutralize their ability to do me and mine harm.

      --
      I don't want knowledge. I want certainty. - Law, David Bowie
    208. Re:Plea for peace by gorilla · · Score: 2
      The US Government does not provide funding to terrorists.

      Yes it does. The Contras being the best known examples. The US tends to act in short term goals, if the government of country X is one which the US currently opposes, then it will make short tatical actions, even if the long term results are bad. That's why Iraq became a problem, because they opposed Iran, and therefore must be the US's friends, right?

    209. Re:Plea for peace by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Isreal has an entire army ready to kill civilians as well should we count them out just yet by your reasoning?

    210. Re:Plea for peace by FFFish · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Live by the sword, die by the sword.

      Keep that in mind as the US retaliates.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    211. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Attacking planes at Pearl Harbor were pretty clearly marked as Japanese.

      Which nation do you suggest attacking for this?

    212. Re:Plea for peace by Lalakis · · Score: 1
      I think everybody's first reaction will indeed be to annihilate whoever was responsible. I have no problem with this whatsoever - hunt them down, root and branch, and eradicate them.
      Have you ever considered that maybe this is exactly what the terrorists did today?



      Just be absolutely certain that they are, indeed, the correct people.

      And they are sure as hell know who are the right people.

      I'm not saying that I approve their action (the opposite happens) but I can understand that they are fighting US as US fights them (them=their country, their people, their right to live).


      USA pisses a LOT of people off. You should expect this reactions and be afraid of those who have nothing because of you!

    213. Re:Plea for peace by Genom · · Score: 2

      I'm all in favor of retaliation - but I think you need to calm down for a second and think about what you're suggesting.

      Bringing out the nukes is the WORST thing we can do. Think about it. Once one nuke is in the air, if the intended target country has ANY nuclear capability, they will use it. In response, more are fired, and soon, every major city on the planet is a glass parking lot, and the air is unbreathable for a few hundred years ANYWHERE on the planet.

      No - I say we find out who's responsible, and punish THEM harshly - as harshly as our system will allow - in public - in front of the eyes of the world - and show EVERYONE what happens to those who fsck with us. But, we need to be ABSOLUTELY SURE we have the right people - and that we don't involve any more innocents in this than we have to - preferably none at all. I fear that we will take more drastic measures, however, and more innocent lives will be lost in the name of Justice.

    214. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, if you fly a fully fuelled 767 into a building, you will probably die.

    215. Re:Plea for peace by dimator · · Score: 2

      I think GWB is going to surprise a lot of people during this crisis, and during his term.


      The mother fucker mispronounced "appropriate" not 1 hour ago!

      (Luckily, the best minds in the world are at his side.)

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    216. Re:Plea for peace by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 1

      Hmm ... interesting. The last big terrorist act in the US was, to my knowledge, the bombing of the Federal building in Oklahoma.

      Go ahead - how do you plan to invade the US? How do you make a "huge, huge response" against your own people?

      Figure that one out, and maybe I'll be a bit more receptive to your idea of apparently nuking the bastards.

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    217. Re:Plea for peace by Snootch · · Score: 1

      At the very least, invasion of the country that either sponsored, or allowed to happen, this terrorism must be made.
      Now that's a good one. So you would, without hesitation, invade the country that these terrorists belong to. Sound OK so far?

      Right. Now imagine that the terrorists were domestic. I know that seems unlikely, but imagine that it were the case. Would you still pursue sanctions against the country that harboured them, failed in its duty to stop them? But of course, that's different, isn't it. Oh, no, when the US can't stop them (eg Oklahoma), it's OK, but if some poorer state with far less resources can't stop a ring with enough resources to hijack several planes at once, blow them all to hell! Yeah, that makes sense...

    218. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder how much hatred would occur against america if we didn't walk into other countries, and begin making demands from them to change their people and their culture.

      I agree appeasement is not the answer, but maybe if the bully doesn't like to get jumped, he should stop bullying other people.

    219. Re:Plea for peace by SethJohnson · · Score: 1


      I strongly agree with you when you say this action requires a military punishing of those responsible. Considering that the previous bombing of the World Trade Center (which was admittedly less severe than today's attack) did not escalate things to a state of war, perhaps we (the US) will take a strong, rational approach to eliminating the group responsible for this. Then again, the US is in a dramatically different economic and political situation than we were in 1993.

      As is evidenced by the Bush administration's "screw-em-if-they-don't-agree-with-us" isolationist approach to the ABM treaty and Kyoto Protocol, our leadership is probably the least-experienced we've had ever to deal with such an event. As citizens, we'll all need to resist the temptation to fuel the war hawks with spirited demands for revenge.

      I don't expect we have any worry about these terrorists launching a nuclear attack. If they had that capability, today we would have seen it. This isn't a tit-for-tat exchange. Those folks were putting all they had into this assault. They know that with this attack, they've escalated matters to such a level that their organization will be destroyed. They have prompted a global response that would advocate any amount of military action necessary to seek out and punish those responsible. If it takes the US army driving tanks over every square inch of Afganistan (Not that we have evidence that Osama Bin Laden is responsible for this), it would be hard to find any government other than possibly the Taliban who would resist the US doing so. And the Taliban is not exactly poised to impose economic sanctions on the world powers to protest.

      As for the difference between Gore and W... I think we all recognize that Bush isn't studied in world politics. Gore is. Bush is running his administration from 'gut instincts' making CEO-type decisions. This is exactly the kind of complicated world-issue that calls for a statesman of a leader, not the previous owner of a baseball team that never won a pennant.
    220. Re:Plea for peace by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Aggressors don't always set the rules.

      "Vietnam", "Afghanistan", "Retreat from Russia"

      In the latter, the Russian winter beat back Napolean, in the first two terrorism was able to hang on for years in the face of an aggressor.

      >This requires a huge, huge response. The aggressors set the rules. At the very least, invasion of the country that either
      >sponsored, or allowed to happen, this terrorism must be made.

      We don't know this was state sponsored. Clearly if it was, that country is in the deepest doo-doo imaginable. But it is most likely that this is done by a relatively small group of people; and may very well not be state related at all.

      If you really believe that invasion of the country that allowed this to happen should be done, what happens if that country unknowably turns out to be Canada?

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    221. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure you're not the same guy that said that the US should disarm their entire military as an example to the rest of the world? Because you're both seriously confused about how this world works.

      Disarming the military just makes it easier for the US's enemies to invade and conquer.

      Not responding to terrorist attacks would just say to the world "hey terrorists, feel free to plow down our buildings, murder our civilians, and generally cause trouble, since we won't do a thing about it." Ignoring them is not the way to stop it. Neither is over-retalliation, which very well could happen here and is what you were probably worried about. A counter attack aimed at the ones who actually did this would be reasonable. Nuking afghanistan, for example, would not be. There is a difference, even if you can't see it.

    222. Re:Plea for peace by crush · · Score: 1

      Israel is a US military base that enables Arab nationalists to be suppressed. It means that there is a convenient base to extend US hegemony to the region and slap down anyone that tries to throttle the supply of oil.

    223. Re:Plea for peace by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2
      Not to be mean or anything, but the IRA has continually bombed the hell out of the place while people have been pleading for peace.

      The total casualties in NI over the twenty odd years of the conflict were about 1,600 for both sides. Of those about 450 were catholics murdered by protestant paramilitaries. 250 ish were paramilitaries, most of whom either blew theselves up making bombs or were shot by other paramillitaries.

      The observation decks of the WTC alone have more tourists on an average day.

      Greater firepower as you put it is irrelevant. The UK is still one of the top ten millitary powers, the IRA had less than 500 active members, the protestant factions slightly more and the INLA about 50. No action has ever involved more than light arms and most of the bombs have used home made explosives.

      The INLA ceased to operate after its members killed each other in a dispute of the extortion rackets. The IRA suspended operations for a variety of reasons, in part in exchange for self government of NI but chiefly because 20 years of violence had achieved nothing.

      The issue is not greater firepower, war is diplomacy by other means. Regardless of whether Bin Laden is proven to be responsible the US will demand that the Taleban hand him over pronto. The demand for his capture will likely be worded in the same manner as the demands made on Serbia after the assasination of the Arch Duke. I do not expect them to accept the terms and the likely outcome will be a war.

      Much more important than the firepower against the Taleban will be which side Pakistan and Iran take. At this point I suspect that even the Pakistan generals who have been supporting the Taleban will realise that the game is up. Iran is not very likely to support the Taleban, particularly if the democraticaly elected leaders use the excuse to liquidate the clerics.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    224. Re:Plea for peace by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you're right... public speaking ability is the best measure of someone's intelligence. We should eliminate elections, and just have a panel of judges score their speechmaking style.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    225. Re:Plea for peace by linzeal · · Score: 1
      How sensless and reactionary can one be before one destroys one's self ? You would have us go to the ends of the earth for generations to root out these enemies of the US? You want another pointless crusade that will be scoffed at and ridiculed on A&E's military blunders show?

      You can certainly give war a chance but make damn sure that you can sacrifice your humanity in slaughtering others as those who have gone against you. Should we have islamic prison camps now? Maybe we should just gas the whole lot of them I'm sure a few of them are planning something.

    226. Re:Plea for peace by uchian · · Score: 1

      You sound all in favour for war, but I bet your not thinking of joining the army any time soon, are you?

    227. Re:Plea for peace by Lars+T. · · Score: 1
      Their answer was: Send armed troops to Northern Ireland and shoot anyone who looks at you funny. Worked great.

      BTW only reasonable people can reason with reasonable people.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    228. Re:Plea for peace by jsnorman · · Score: 1

      "Just because someone approves of this does not make them responsible"

      Actually, I think that is a pretty good reason to eliminate someone. Any person on this earth applauding this attack is our enemy, and this is a war make no mistake. You do not wait for a declared enemy to attack when you are at war.

    229. Re:Plea for peace by SubtleNuance · · Score: 2

      ...your a fucking idiot.

      this kind of cluelessness, complete lack of perspective, is why America is so copletelly detested.

      +5 Insightfull(!)

      if there are that many americans who would rally around your blind and idiotic opinions - you prove exactly why your country was attacked

      Its sad but true... lots of non-americans clearly see, clearly understand that america's sanctimonious response is typical but not surprising...

    230. Re:Plea for peace by epodrevol · · Score: 0
      And when those who are responsible are positively identified, fry 'em. Each and every one of them.

      Yes, And thier wives, husbands, sons, daughters (even babies). These people (most nations, except the US, specifically "Holy Landers" in this case) hold grudges for generations upon generations, and without us extending the tendrils of retribution, we will ensure that this will be an open opportunity for future terrorists.

      -epod

      --
      "I am a warrior, and information is my weapon..."
    231. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Point 1, is this a bad thing?


      Fuck you, you fucking piece of shit. You're every bit as bad as those who perpetrated this attack, and quite probably much worse. If anyone should be rounded up and disposed of, it should be people like you.

    232. Re:Plea for peace by Stephan+Schulz · · Score: 2, Insightful
      This is a typical bit of retoric, but is it true? Anyone who beleives violence never solves anything needs to have a talk with the city fathers of Carthage. That particular conflict was ended with violence. It took three attempts, but by the third time the Romans figured out their problem -- on their previous attempts, they hadn't applied enough violence.

      And as a result we still hail the glorious Roman republic, which brought us peace and prosperity till this day...

      The assumption that there is a small group of evil people and that all we need to do is to somehow neutralize them is naive. Every action leads to a like reaction. By turning on the heat, we are creating more victims, more martyrs, and more potential terrorists. Just look at the current example: Have you ever seen so many people shouting for blood? Any retaliation is likely to wake similar feelings on the other side. Any retaliation that is not extremely limited, well targeted, and justified to the world is likely to cause a lot of justified similar feelings all over the world.

      Somebody else already posted the famous Gandhi quote: "An eye for an eye, and the world goes blind".

      What I like about this quote is that it shows a certain symmetry. You cannot usually solve a conflict by assuming "I'm right, and I'll just keep on hitting the other guy until he sees the light". Most of the time, being right is a matter of perspective. Very few people consciously do deeds they consider evil.

      --

      Stephan

    233. Re:Plea for peace by linzeal · · Score: 1
      What do you call israel, when they assasinate people at will in "proactive strikes" to insure their safety? They are the most violent as evidence of the body count 500 palestinians to what less than 200 israelis?

      STOP SUPPORTING ISRAEL!!!

    234. Re:Plea for peace by MulluskO · · Score: 1

      Vengence is a valid emotion. It is an undenyable human drive. McVeigh was not killed becuse he would have remained a threat had he not been killed, he was killed becuase humanity is vengeful by nature. It is foolish to deny that which makes us human. The people that died in recent disasters might not have been responsible for the suffering that our prosperity has brought to other parts of the world, it was done out of vengence. When we retaliate, it will not be based upon rational thought, but instead upon the savage, vengefull thanatos within us all.

      --

      Too busy staying alive... ~ R.A.
    235. Re:Plea for peace by olafva · · Score: 1

      I agree! The world waits for Sadam, Arafat, bin Laden or others possibly responsible or even harboring, sympathizing with or contibuting to their causes to be uprooted, cross examined and eliminated if responsible for these atrocities. The world cannot put up with such cowards. They're time is over. Think about it if you have sympathy for such "people". The Palistinians cheering in the streets should be ashamed of themselves. The entire "civilized" world has no sympathy for such behavior..

      --
      What's past is NOT ALWAYS prologue for the future!
    236. Re:Plea for peace by cs668 · · Score: 1

      I do not think that killing any one person is more palatable than killing another!

      But, lets say that this ends up being organized by a group taking refuge in a country which protects them from extradition and shelters and finances them. Then, I think we should retailiate against that group AND the country that is protectiong them.

    237. Re:Plea for peace by rjamestaylor · · Score: 2
      If you are a citizen of the U.S. of America, please write your representative right now and ask him to join a plea for peace.

      Thankfully, our Representatives will not be swayed by such spineless dribble. We will give the only rational response: Id, Locate, Eradicate.

      Stay out of our way.

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    238. Re:Plea for peace by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      I think we all recognize that Bush isn't studied in world politics. Gore is. Bush is running his administration from 'gut instincts' making CEO-type decisions. This is exactly the kind of complicated world-issue that calls for a statesman of a leader,

      Almost no president, with the exception of Bush, Sr, has significant foreign policy experience (particularly Clinton). I think being a world leader requires character, resolve and, yes, intelligence, not necessarily "study". Bush has the pointy heads around him to give the history, if it's relevent. But this particular "world issue" requires someone with guts. This is about defending the United States of America from an act of war.

      Like I said, I think GWB is going to surprise a lot of people.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    239. Re:Plea for peace by localman · · Score: 2

      Thanks for your well thought out reply. With regards to this being a counterstrike, however, I would ask how much you really know about the bloodshed that America funds and promotes overseas. There are real injustices perpetrated by the American government on others that surpass what was seen today. Much of it has been carrying on for decades. And yes, civilians are involved.

      Today was wrong, but there is a reason that some of the people in the middle east are celebrating. It's not because they are evil, it is because they feel about us exactly how we feel about the attackers today: that justice must be served by any means necessary.

      I wish I there was a way out.

    240. Re:Plea for peace by Hilary+Rosen · · Score: 2

      To paraphrase Churchill: If you don't jaw-jaw you'll get war-war.

      --
      Yes, the nick is flamebait
    241. Re:Plea for peace by ksheff · · Score: 2

      I wouldn't be surprised at all if the State Dept has now told Israel they can do whatever they wish with the PLO.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    242. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It is YOUR crappy airport security that allowed these people through.

      *shrug* Not necessarily. Theoretically, give me a couple of years and I can get a couple dozen of my people in as baggage handlers, maintenance workers, even security people. After that, well, I can smuggle in as many people, weapons, and equipment as I need.

    243. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      USA pisses a LOT of people off. You should expect this reactions and be afraid of those who have nothing because of you!

      umm its one thing to piss ppl off, if u have 2 ppl who disagree strongly over an issue, someone goona be pissed, but that does not mean they can just go and blow things up with impunity, thats why the us must counter, otherwise it will continue to happen, and get worse.

    244. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's easy for you to preach peace. Your country was not attacked. Your people were not killed.

      Haven't we heard this before? Oh yeah, every time something happens somewhere in the world other than the U.S. and the U.S. preaches for peace and understanding.

      Face it. American culture, society and foreign policy is based on domination. You can't be a success in the U.S. unless you can crush your opponents. Football. Business. The Schoolyard. Microsoft.

      I was the stereotypical geek in school. A pacifist. Got picked on a lot. Got beat up every once in a while. Did I ever fansasise about giving the bullies a taste of their own medicine? I'd be lying if I said I didn't fantasise about it. Never did anything, because that would be wrong. Did bullies ever think that what they were doing was wrong? No, of course not.

      When you see a school shooting on the telly today, what do you think? "Oh, the horror of violence in the schools?" Or "What kind of sicko would resort to violence?" Or "How dare that geek attack that successful football player?" Shock. Anger. Revulsion.

      Is there also a little "That's one wimp with guts and one bully that learnt his lesson" in there as well? Don't lie.

      The real problem is that the bullies usually don't go away. They get mad instead of learning a lesson. And things just get worse. Because the weak have no real power to change things. The strong rule the world and they'll teach you should you try and strike back.

      What's the difference between striking out voilently against something you consider horribly wrong and wailing on slashdot about DMCA, RIAA, MicroSoft, Patents, &c?

      Answer: The first requires conviction, courage and putting the message above everything else, including human life. The second only requires internet access.

      Disclaimer: Yes, it's a horrible tragedy. So are the tens of thousands of lives lost a year in traffic accidents in the U.S. Or the hundreds of thousands lost worldwide in civil wars, religious wars, ethnic cleansing and tragic blimp collisions.

      If this teaches the average american anything, hopefully it will be perspective that most of the rest of the world has concerns beside which of 200 channels to watch and which bigger SUV to buy. But I doubt it.

    245. Re:Plea for peace by Mastoid · · Score: 1

      The large portion of Americans would die on their feet before living on their knees.

      Bullshit.

      Take a look around. Ever-increasing taxes, ever-decreasing rights, a monolithic, nightmarish maze of bureaucratic governmental laws and regulations, and you can say we won't live on our knees? We already are, my friend.

      Bet it felt like a satisfying piece of rhetoric to type, though.

      --
      I had an argument...with the person here at the university that teaches OS design. I wonder when I'll learn --Linus
    246. Re:Plea for peace by Ian+Bicking · · Score: 2
      1. Kill them all. Every last one of them. And anyone who ever cared about them. No one will be left to carry out revenge. No future generations will rise up. OR 2. Forgive.

      Since number two is not incumbent upon us, and we can not force another group to forgive, you seem to have hit upon the one solution that works.

      Mmm... yes, genocide always works pretty well. We can just kill anyone around the world who hates the United States -- what, there must be a few dozen such people, right? -- and then everyone left over will like us a lot.

      Oh, wait, there's millions of people around the world that hate the United States. After killing all of them, do you think all the people left will feel good about the United States?

      Terrorism comes from injustice. I don't mean to imply that terrorists are then on the side of justice -- but only that if people are treated justly and allowed redress for their grievences, they will not resort to self-destructive, violent behavior like this. This is not a call for forgiveness in particular, but rather for justice. Indiscriminate bombing -- hell, nearly any bombing at all -- is not justice; nor is murder. Justice must be patient and cannot be formed in anger.

    247. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem here is that both extremes do not really work. The terrorists simply want shock value and attention from the world media, they don't care wether it is good or bad. The Plea for peace idea simply allows them to carry on with business as usual and to expand their operations causing an escalation of events(re. the appeasement of hitler). The wild retaliation idea is not plausable either as it vindicates the use of terrorism and gives more extremists a reason to start up. Once again you have an escalation. The US bombing of Libiya was a retaliation against the source of the acts and not a wild retaliation. It was effective because it was made as a method to bring the terrorism back to the person who started it. It does not matter who claims responsibabilty for this attack, what must be done is to bring it back to the people who started it. Preferably through methods of Court and Law, but if necessary through military action. Rash acts at this point only serve to add fuel to the terrorists fire and the news networks are doing a good enough job of that.

    248. Re:Plea for peace by Planesdragon · · Score: 2

      those responsible for OKC were subjected to the fullest extent of the law. Tim McVeigh was killed, and his accomplice faces life in prison. There was no organization beyond them that we could find.

      If McVeigh had been an alien terrorist, and was hiding in a country that refused to extradite him, an act of war to bring him to justice would have been appropriate.

      If McVeigh had been part of the rogue breakaway state of Michigain, which had declared a "jihad" against the US, that rogue state would have been invaded and conqured very quickly.

      But we states don't rebel in the US--they just play politics, and let the rest of us get on with our lives instead of engaging in terrorism.

    249. Re:Plea for peace by bumski · · Score: 1

      I just heard Tony Blair express much the same sentiment. I was struck by his eloquence, especially in contrast to Bush's poorly delivered speech from that Louisiana swamp he hightailed it to. Giuliani & Pataki are in NYC, exhibiting traits of leadership, and Bush is where?

      You know, I've been pretty evenly appalled by the actions of the Israelis and the Palestinians. But seeing the CNN footage of the Palestinians dancing in the street, celebrating this incident, I find I have no sympathy for them any longer, regardless of any Palestinian complicity in this attack. Propaganda, perhaps, but effective.

      Plea for peace? I'm a little frightened by the level of testosterone-fueled rhetoric I see here, but on the other hand, I can no longer raise my voice in opposition to it. Maybe it's time to let the jarheads play Rambo, once and if the various TLA agencies can get on the ball and figure out who did this. Yes, violence begets violence, but with terrorists, so, apparently, do attempts to make peace.

    250. Re:Plea for peace by Nail · · Score: 1

      Your second post makes your position much more clear. Perhaps if you tried thinking before posting the first would have been sufficient.

      And oh, I thought you were referring to a "new arena" as though it were that "new paradigm" marketeers are always taking about. A non-existent place of pacifist wonder and beauty.

      Who advocates "unrestrained violence"? And how will those "punished" devine whether we "punished" them, had our "vengence" upon them, or "retaliated" against them? Will they not think us unjust for not accepting _our_ punishment and asking for more?

      I agree that any solution will benefit from a reasoned approach, but I will not leave unchallenged a response that smacks of pacifism as I believe that would be the equivalent of asking for more. Your original post definitely struck me that way, and this one doesn't wipe away all doubt.

      I am sincerely hoping you are not advocating an extended period of "self-reflection as a nation" before finding and punishing those responsible for this carnage. And I hope one of our "responsibilities" isn't to go soft on the perpitrators because "it's partially our fault".

      --
      ...yellow number five, yellow number five, yellow number five...
    251. Re:Plea for peace by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2
      US citizens regularly provide funding to terrorist organisations. Go look up NorAid. You will find that it is a 'charitable' front for the IRA. Does this mean that the British government has a legitimate excuse to nuke the US?

      Actually the US has banned fund raising by the IRA on several occasions. In addition the US assistence to the UK under the joint intelligence agreement is considerable.

      The situation with the Taleban is very different. In the first place the Taleban do not have the degree of control of the country that would allow them to expel or arrest bin Laden, on the other hand they have shown absolutely no inclination or desire to do so.

      The Taleban will probably be issued with an ultimatum, either they liquidate Bin Laden themselves or allow US troops to do it for them. Meanwhile the Taleban themselves will have their arms supply from Pakistan cut.

      My informed guess is that the ultimatum will be such that the Taleban will be unable to agree to its terms. It is a fractious coalition at best. The chances it will not stay in one piece are good.

      Regardless of whether the Taleban did or did not have a role in the attacks and whether that was active or merely passive, providing Bin Laden with a base to operate from, the fact is that only Pakistan would be at all upset if the regime went away

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    252. Re:Plea for peace by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 3, Troll

      Or maybe because bombing those responsible might have started with Rush's radio station.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    253. Re:Plea for peace by crush · · Score: 1

      Good point. And to add to it: Afghanistan - guess where Bin Ladin is based? So many places that are the results of CIA intervention in the interests of the US ruling classes that turn out to be threats to the ordinary people of the U.S. Iraq/Saddam is a creation of CIA intervention (Saddam's coup in which he took power of the Ba'athist Party was directly orchestrated by the CIA, the Islamic Nationalists in Afghanistan were backed by the CIA against the Soviets, General Noriega in Panama was another US creation).
      This brief and incomplete list comprises bloody-handed US backed dictators who have turned against the US. No-one gives a fuck as long as they operate with the US. THey can be carrying out atrocities as bad or worse against innocents all over the world and all those that are "shocked", "appalled" and "horrified" now, don't give a shit. I smell the stench of hypocrisy from you all. Yes, this is an appalling outrage now, but the fact that you only care about this (which is a fscking drop in the bucket compared to e.g. Iraq) makes you into heartless, cynical, stupid, complicit, irrational, hypocritial swine.
      Enough, I'm not reading or listening to any more of your hysterical shit.

    254. Re:Plea for peace by c4b4773r0 · · Score: 1

      So you like to use rhetoric. And I acknowledge that you are brave in posting a plea for peace. Now, we may not know exactly who was responsible for this attack. But I will stake everything -- I sh*t you not -- on the source here being an Islamic fundamentalist group. May I be so bold as to suggest that you use your love of rhetoric to CONDEMN religious fundamentalism. Here is PROOF that FUNDAMENTALISM IS A POISONOUS MINDSET. It TURNS MORALITY UPSIDE-DOWN, to the point where MASS MURDER IS SANCTIONED. FIGHT FUNDAMENTALISM by speaking out against it whenever possible. We need to start this debate and spread it world wide. Long live free speech. Now let's find these creeps and punish them. Thank you.

    255. Re:Plea for peace by Ian+Bicking · · Score: 2
      Guess what no one has hijacked a jet leaving Israel since. The only way to deal with dictators and thugs it it hit them so hard that they don't get up again. Ever.
      Israel has hardly been successful. They've only managed to become the biggest thugs on the block. They don't have peace, stability, or justice in their nation. The path they've chosen will never lead to anything but violence -- the only success they might have would be that they will perpetrate the violence rather than be victimized by it. I could imagine no worse model the US could follow, though unfortunately I can imagine model more likely.
    256. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but if he can't read a simple speech or hold a moment of silence without moving his lips, how much respect is he going to engender?

    257. Re:Plea for peace by micheas · · Score: 1
      A coordinated operation such as this would require large funds.

      • less then $500 US total to bribe the minimum wage security at the US airports.
      • arm four teams of two less than $8,000 US
      • transportation by greyhound/amtrack less than $1500 US
      so this may have been a sub 10k operation

      It would also require pilots,
      You'd also need a burning hatred for the US and a willingness to kill civilians This is a limiting factor if your a third world terrorist organization. But if your followers have served military duty in an American/European country this is a reasonable skill to come by . alternatively blow $500 US on a computer and pirate a flight simulator. (though the Pennsylvania crash leads makes it seem like they only had three willing pilots or something went rong during the hijacking or it just crashed.)

      You'd also need a burning hatred for the US and a willingness to kill civilians
      On every activism mailing list I've ever subscribed to someone has always asked in one form or another When do we just give up and start blowing things up?

      All in all this just seems like either a domestic attack or one that was carried out by a group that has been here a long time.

      Finally AFAIK this is a new attack method. There for it is most likely a group that has not carried out an attack before. And as American who has lived abroad off and on this just seems like it has an American flavor to it.

    258. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      --This requires a huge, huge response. The aggressors set the rules.
      -- At the very least, invasion of the country that either sponsored,
      -- or allowed to happen, this terrorism must be made.
      -- This "day of infamy" must not be allowed to stand.

      I bet this is what they think, too. I bet they are trying to show you that the AGES of infamy against them must not be allowed to stand, too.
      Where do you think this will stop? Lots of violence and destruction. What did you do to AVOID the violence? Sit on your couch watching TV. Come on, really... do you think US is the good guy? Attacker and attacked are both stupid in the SAME way.
      No, I don't live is US. So, no, I don't have the biased idea that your country is better and no, mine is also not the best either.
      What we all lack is the capability of thinking of the whole world as one, and all the people as equal. What is your idea about the people from Africa? China? Middle East? Wherever? Do you think you are better? If you do, than that planes were for you.
      by Ake.

    259. Re:Plea for peace by Malcontent · · Score: 2

      " Then, I think we should retailiate against that group AND the country that is protectiong them"

      Once again I think we will indeed retaliate if the country is not the united states. The point is how do you retaliate against a country? If you are the Untied States you simply drop bombs killing innocents as well as whoever you think is guilty. This makes you exactly like the terrorists.

      These terrorists are attacking the US citizens because they hold the United States responsible for some act or another. Instead of killing the actual person(s) responsible they kill many civilians in order to "retaliate against a country". Just like you would have us do. If we do that there is no difference between them and us. Two sides of the same coin.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    260. Re:Plea for peace by m2 · · Score: 2
      For the record: Negotiating with terrorists DOES NOT WORK. It's like negotiating with a hydra: Set peace with one, and the others will still attack. You're making the broad and stupid assumption that there is such a thing as a "terrorist organization" with rules that all of the terrorists follow.
      [...]
      I'm not finding a lot of historical precedent that bodes well for the safety of the US if we don't track these folks down and wipe them out.

      So, I'm the one making the stupid assumption, uh? Which country are you going to declare war against? War is an armed conflict between two sovereign nations. Precisely because this is a terrorist act you can't point your guns to some country and be done with it. In doing so, the U.S.A. will be drawn into starting a war, much like you were drawn into taking parts in a war because of Pearl Harbor. Justice is to be made, but war is not the way.

    261. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give me a break! The reaction of the US has been sorrow and outrage, grief and disbelief. We're not under the impression that we're the only ones who suffer from terrorism. We're in shock.

      Whoever did this should certainly be killed, but Justice is out of the question at this point. This is pure insanity.

    262. Re:Plea for peace by the_quark · · Score: 2
      There is a third option, which is what we were successfully able to do in World War II and its aftermath: Beat them until they beg for mercy and then help them with open and generous hearts.


      Appeasement is not the answer; we must show strength, not weakness. Once they sue for peace, would should help them rebuild their lives. But between now and then a lot of people need to die to keep this type of thing from being a part of the nightly news instead of just a once-in-a-lifetime event.

    263. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      He who would have peace must prepare for war. A measured retaliation will indeed lead only to more deaths. A massive retaliation will establish that the price of such a cowardly terrorist attack is too high.

      When there is a comparable attack on your country, I will listen to your counsel of timidity, although I have doubts whether you will be singing the same tune. Unless and until your country is the victim, I will be sceptical.

    264. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That is why we have peace, and security and prosperity.


      Peace? Security? Ok, tell me then what is that thing with school kids that shoot their friends? Is it just a cool new trend? You lack education from the begging, and I'm not talking about schools. I'm talking about understanding.
    265. Re:Plea for peace by Operandi · · Score: 1

      fuck you. if it was your family members who would have died in the WTC you would want justice. so easy for you to say that from your safe country. and muslims HATE the US, if we offered no threat of retaliation, they would overload the air traffic system with all of the suicide planes they would send at us. think about it you quixotic fucking retard, how many stores would be safe if cops wouldn't arrest you for shoplifting?

    266. Re:Plea for peace by anshil · · Score: 3, Troll

      I'm just thinking what must go in a mind of person that flies a 7?7 into a building with 10 thousend of persons inside.

      What personal pain such a person must have gone through? What has he seen? what was done to him? what pain must a person go through to be ready to to do such act? Had he to see to watch his family die? I just can't imagine what such person went trough.

      I believe to fight such attacks in future is best done in the long run to fight the causes which could raise such a pain in a person, btw: which must be highly educted, not everbody can fly a boing.

      It's obvios that not the airlines pilot steered the plane, why should he? he will be dead eitherway.

      --

      --
      Karma 50, and all I got was this lousy T-Shirt.
    267. Re:Plea for peace by DnA+Works · · Score: 1
      It always saddens me to read posts like this. Peace is good - peace at *any* price is not. The US hasn't paid for its sins today - up to 50 000 innocent people have paid for working in a target. Before any of you *people* say, "They're not innocent", I say; "Fucking prove it!!" Last time I checked, we are all innocent until proven guilty. Are they guilty of being Americans? Does that mean that they *deserved* death? I for one do not think so.

      You then go on to say that violence will prove nothing - I have only this to say, a rabid dog cannot be reasoned with, cannot feel pity and will not stop attacking you because you feel attacking him is wrong. If you don't believe that those who did this can be compared to rabid dogs, I can offer 500 rebuttals. Or maybe it's 20 000. Or maybe 50 000.

      *You* believe that Americans are not innocent because they won't stop what their government is doing. I would say that this applies equally well to those countries harboring these terrorists.

      Yes, I realize that you do not *explicitly* state that you think these Americans are guilty. If they were not guilty and they were executed, however, why do you not believe in removing the executioner and his or her ability to do this *ever* again? It would seem to me that these people are not only putting ".. the lives of U.S. citizens at risk, but those of lots of people all arround the world, too."

    268. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US military will have no trouble meeting their enlistment goals this year.

      The main reason we feared Russia is because they are one of the few nations with people as willing to fight for what they believe as the US is.

      The Japanese were right to fear the Sleeping Giant...

    269. Re:Plea for peace by Nail · · Score: 1


      Hmm..."turn the other cheek"...yeah, interesting.

      Perhaps you, AC, can take on the duty of turning that other cheek for those that took it on the first one. They might consider it, I am sure some of them are good Christians like yourself, but they're dead now...

      --
      ...yellow number five, yellow number five, yellow number five...
    270. Re:Plea for peace by tardlet · · Score: 1

      You can hardly compare the situation in the UK with what has occurred today for several reasons:

      1. The magnitude of devastation is much higher in these terrorist attacks.

      2. The conflict in the UK is more akin to a civil war, with one faction fighting for self government, etc. It is more similar to the current situation in Israel, with similar results. Today's events were not the result of any direct conflict between the U.S. and any other country or group.

      How do you make peace with someone you are not at war with?

    271. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your choice of language shows your maturity, friend.

    272. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So far, the biggest mass murders in history were performed in Hiroshima and Nagasaki (approx 2x150,000 died) and I think today's incident is not going to change that

    273. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What on earth do you propose that the U.S. do? As a Christian, I am taught to turn the other cheek and to be a pacifist; however; don't flame me to hard for this, at this present time I am reminded of this... the Catholic church has a doctrine of justifiable war. The war against Hitler is obviously the most obvious example of this. The same doctrine also makes reference to proportional retaliation. Part of the reasoning for retaliation that must be considered is that if there is none, what will prevent further and more immense acts of terrorism. I understand that things like this can be prevented by a change in culture and attitude and that America and ALL THE WORLD must take partial responsibility for creating a global culture of death, hatred, greed and dishonesty; but retaliation in a case like this is more DEFENSE and less REVENGE. America's policy of no negotiations with terrorists is an example of why institutionally a retaliation is based on defense. The defense of liberty for all those who live in fear -- all over the world. Retaliation is not the solution, but it is necessary to confront those that threaten liberty and life and unfortunately there is no peaceful way to approach the extreme groups who oppose the U.S. Which is why, for me, the argument to debunk the death penalty as a deterrent does not apply to the thought of retaliation in this case. God bless all of those involved in this tragedy and God bless everyone. I pray for peace; but please remember, like love, peace is an active choice and a MEANS not an END. As Aldous Huxley said, " Ends are ape essence, but only the means are man's."

    274. Re:Plea for peace by Malcontent · · Score: 2

      " those responsible for OKC were subjected to the fullest extent of the law. Tim McVeigh was killed, and his accomplice faces life in prison."

      Yes this is why our way of life is better then anybody elses. This is why America is decent place to live.

      "If McVeigh had been an alien terrorist, and was hiding in a country that refused to extradite him, an act of war to bring him to justice would have been appropriate. "

      I really don't think so. Declaring war against a country and the subsequent destruction and killing of people who are in no possible was responsible for the act in question is immoral and just plain wrong. It's the exact same thing tese terrorists did. Killing innocent people to exact some revenge makes you a terrorist and worse makes the United States into a terrorist nation. All those adjectives used to describe these terrorists like Vile, Cowardly etc will apply to you if you decide to take the same route.

      I see no reason to sink to their level and to kill innocents civilians. Unfortunately the aftereffects of this will be severe. The terrorists have already accomplished their goals.

      1) The public is now officially scared.
      2) Americans will lose many freedoms as a result.
      3) Americans will be suspicious of other Americans (it's going to suck to be an Arab or a Muslim in this country, if we can avoid concentration camps it will be good).
      4) There will be increased military presense in the streets and increased military input into civillian discourse. In others words America will become a more military controlled nation then it was yesterday.

      BTW whoever did this was massively funded and massively organized. They had insiders at every juncture. It would nto surprise me one bit if the responsible people were never found out.

      For the paranoid bunch there will be speculation about the involvement of the intelligence community (more funding as a result), Israel (getting europe and US off their backs about the palestenians) and maybe even fringe militia groups. If after months of investigation a finger is not pointed at some convenient, weak, and easy to attack target like Castro, Saddam, or khaddafi I would be shocked.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    275. Re:Plea for peace by seebs · · Score: 2

      When the people who did this admit it, and say "we were totally and absolutely wrong, and we will never do any such thing, to any target, ever again", I might believe you.

      When Palestinians are dancing in the streets cheering the death of ten thousand innocent bystanders, retaliation is not merely possible, but *necessary*. These are people who cannot conceive of "right" or "wrong". While they live, no innocent life is safe.

      You shoot rabid dogs. You shoot terrorists. It's the same action, for the same reason.

      --
      My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    276. Re:Plea for peace by cornflux · · Score: 1
      We'll be lucky if that bastard doesn't round up any person who is a moslem in the US and put them in camps for orderly disposal.

      I pity your ignorance. Bush is not the kind of person to do or think such a horrid thing. You are disgusting.

    277. Re:Plea for peace by rjamestaylor · · Score: 2
      Correction: those responsible are dead. They died attacking.

      Nope. The ones RESPONSIBLE include the planners, promoters and sympathetic providers of aid to the same. It's not just retaliation (which is justified) but it's also stopping further acts by those responsible.

      May your words, however, soon be true: "Those responsible are dead" -- Amen!

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    278. Re:Plea for peace by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2
      America doesn't attack unprovoked. Consider America provoked. Any counter-strike is a logical, if highly unfortunately expected outcome.

      America has attacked, essentially, unprovoked before. During the invasion of Panama, just to cite a recent example, more than 400 bombs were dropped on Panama City. Civilian casualties were reported from at least 200-some to as many as 4000. See: this.

      The problem is that American deaths are much more well-reported than 3rd-world deaths, not just in America, but anywhere than American media dominates (it can be frustrating, I assure you, for someone in Latin America to get more news about the school shooting in Colorado than about the hurricanes that just hit them. It is hard to communicate the resentment towards American hubris that this sort of situation creates.) We sentimentalize our own casualties and not those of foreigners.

      And we aren't the only ones that do this, either - it's a simple product of nationalism and tribalism and groupthink. It's usually only a thoughtful minority in any country that sees past this. The fact is that America has treated civilian deaths elsewhere as "collateral damage," but civilian deaths here as a national tragedy. That double standard is part of the problem.

    279. Re:Plea for peace by james(honest) · · Score: 1
      You have to consider the possibility that there are some people whose way of life is fundamentally incompatable with yours. I believe that anyone capable of organizing the hijacking of several commerical airplanes and using them as weapons against both civillian and military targets in an unprovoked sneak attack is not someone that I can make amends with without making an unacceptable compromise of my integrity.

      But on the other hand it is compatible with your way of life to:

      a. Drop an atom bomb and kill 125,000 civilians at hiroshima to satisfy a military objective. (Thats ok because they started it so it wasnt "unprovoked" or "sneaky").

      b. Napalm children in vietnam. (because you didnt like communists).

      c. Bomb civilians in Iraq after providing their leaders with weapons to bomb civilians in Iran after giving F-14's to Iran to bomb civilians elsewhere. (because you wanted oil).

      d. invade and assasinate the indonesian government. (because the IMF and WTO want mineral rights).

      I appologise if you arent a citizen of the "Free World".

      Remember, you can bomb civilians, as long as it isnt unprovoked and not sneaky. Well ask many citizens of this planet, and they might argue that its not "unprovoked".

    280. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Screw that, no one likes bin laden. Just kill him and all his kind and be done with it. Problem solved.

    281. Re:Plea for peace by Aerog · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Palestinians can rally in the streets today, and celebrate the mass extermination of human beings.

      Not that I'm condoning violence in any ay shape or form, (this act was utter atrocity), but your statement about Palestinians and immediately assuming they're responsible is bare-faced racism just like you accuse them of condoning. we have to remember at this time No group has claimed responsiblity and Arafat and even the Taliban have denounced the act. It is still unknown which group carried out the attack, and (I'm going to get modded down here), but the chance even holds that it could even be an American group (however small). We need to stop pointing fingers until there is sufficient evidence that this was an attack by group X.

      We need to focus on the aftermath and helping the survivors, and sadly I'm over half a continent and a closed border away or I'd be out there now. I hope we can put it behind us and work on the task at hand first, before condemning potentially innocent groups.

      --

      - Relativistic? That's barely Newtonian!
    282. Re:Plea for peace by TWR · · Score: 2
      Palistinians cheering in the streets should be ashamed of themselves

      The Palestinians cheering in the streest should be liquidated.

      -jon

      --

      Remember Amalek.

    283. Re:Plea for peace by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 1

      they didn't screw with you for years? eh... what about lockerbie? WTC bombing in .. (93??)

      The bombings against libya in '85, they were reagan's reaction to acts of terrorism in Rome and Vienna against El Al, the Isreali state airline. Since the US's unilateral violent interventation, nearly all the international acts of terrorism since then have been against the US (embassy attacks, WTC 93, US warship in Yemen ).

      What does this tell you?

      Violence begets violence. All the bombings of Libya in '86 accomplished was to draw even more terrorism towards the US!

      Wake up... bombing and killing might satisfy your lust for vengeance and appeal to that sense of "Gung-Ho"[5] that is all too prevalent amongst Americans. But the goal is peace. And violence, be it terrorism or state sanctioned, is a most extreme end towards that goal. To achieve peace through violence means you must understand the consequences and be willing to accept them and more importantly see it through despite those consequences. Violence only wins if it consumes all.

      War between nation states is one area where violence has a small /chance/ of /eventually/ bringing about peace. But even in this scenario, war more often causes festering hatred that will eventually just lead to more violence.

      But what you are dealing with now is not a clear cut case of a well defined nation state as the aggresor. there is no clear body for you to defeat. You are dealing with terrorists, and you don't even know which ones! They are underground, they could be anywhere. They are fanatics - each one you kill becomes a weapon they can use to recruit more to their cause.

      And there is the key. their cause. you can "attack" that. and you do that by removing the grounds for their cause.

      Look at northern ireland. for many years terrorism was a substantial fact of life there. the british government tried to fight fire with fire. Northern Ireland became a police state. Civil liberties were severaly curtailed in the fight against terrorism, police could you lock you up indefinitely, they could even shoot you dead with little consequence. the SAS infiltrated terrorist cells, and assasinated terrorist leaders.

      But never did the british govt. succeed with these tactics to defeat terrorism, the violence just escalated.

      Instead, in the early 90s they moved on a different tack, and in conjunction with the govt. of the Republic of Ireland, and the moderate political groups in the north, they started on a course of dialogue to attempt to bring the parties closer together. And now the north is at a stage where the guns have been quiet for 3 years, and where the "war" is now confined to elected representatives throwing words at each other in the media and legislature. The divisions are now expressed in words, rather than bullets and violence.

      The cause was, to an extent, greater representation for the republican POV in northern ireland. As the genuine and worthy wants of this movement were acknowledged, and as the possibility of working this out peacefully and democratically became more and more certain, so the violence instigated by the extremists became less and less.

      The lesson for the US to learn, when dealing with these terrorists once they become known, is that perhaps you should, however hard it is, set aside the bloodshed they have caused, and examine whether there actually are genuine and worthy wants they have that the US can help resolve. Eg, if it turns out to be Arabs, then perhaps you should examine why it is that feelings exist amongst them that would drive some to such an extreme. perhaps you should step back from your wholehearted support from israel, and instead pressure israel to work towards peace with the Arabs.[4]

      In the long-term, examing the causes as to why a group of people feel aggrieved enough that some turn to extremism, and then undertaking dialogue between all the parties concerned will be far more constructive towards lasting peace than killing people.

      --paulj

      . just look at the history of europe. we've only had peace since WW2. WW2 was a direct consequence of WW1. WW1 was a consequence of many simmering rivalries borne out of previous wars, which were ... etc.. And even WW2 did not bring peace for all. The Balkan situation, which was the spark for WW1, was unresolved and it reignited during the 90s.
      . but it could just as easily be some of the US's own lunatic fringe.
      . as opposed to kill palestinians with often american made guns, helicopters and rockets.
      4. the current middle east situation is borne out of mistakes made the british in the past, but unfortuntately for the US "you're it" at the moment. bomb the arabs, they'll just hate you more.
      5. war is a most awful thing. go talk to someone who has experienced it, if they'll actually talk about it that is. war should not be entered into lightly.

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
    284. Re:Plea for peace by mpe · · Score: 2

      The US Government does not provide funding to terrorists.

      They certainly have done in the recent past, notably in Central and South America.
      Also remember that the US took the approach of "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" with the likes of Iraq and Afganistan.
      Indeed the CIA actually coined the term "blowback" where things have rebounded on the US...

    285. Re:Plea for peace by Phaedrus4223 · · Score: 1

      You seem to have the misunderstanding that being Christian and being American are one in the same. While "turn the other cheek" is very Christian, it is VERY UN-American.

      Phaedrus

    286. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YOU'RE A MORON! I know hundreds of other /.'ers have posted this already, but the total ignorance of your comments just infuriate me to the point where I have to post, no matter how irrelevant it is. How would you feel if terrorists killed many of the citizens of your country. Look at the numbers.... you have 4-5 full airliners, 2 buildings, holding 40-50 THOUSAND people, the U.S. Pentagon, not to mention the countless numbers of bystanders who happened to be in the area as debris and rubbled rained upon their heads. And all you can say is to ask people to call for PEACE????????? I dont think so. If this turns into a military operation, and I wasn't disqualified from military service due to medical reasons, I would enlist just to help kick the ass of whoever is responsible!!

    287. Re:Plea for peace by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 1

      ah... what about the Gulf war?

      what about the many people who died under those many tin-pot dictatorships that the US has supported because it suited business interests?

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
    288. Re:Plea for peace by chupe · · Score: 1

      You are a god-damned retard.

      HEY NOW HITLER DIDN'T TURN ON THE GAS HIMSELF. HE DIDN'T ACTUALLY SHOOT ANYONE. HE WAS AN OK GUY!

      For the good of humanity, please shoot yourself.

      --
      nothing good can come of this
    289. Re:Plea for peace by SethJohnson · · Score: 1


      Like I said, I think GWB is going to surprise a lot of people.

      That's what I think a lot of us are afraid of.

      Bush has the pointy heads around him

      When a leader depends on the pointy heads around him for guidance, he is susceptible to extreme manipulation. When Japan bombed Pearl Harbor, Emporer Hirohito was totally out of touch with what was going on. He was a figurehead for the military regime that controlled his puppet strings. I'm not saying that Bush has as forceful handlers as Hirohito, but it does help explain his pretty-much absurd championing for the ABM system he's trying to get developed. NO public support has been calling for an ABM system. That's obviously something that the denizens of the smoke-filled back rooms are pressuring him about.

      Almost no president, with the exception of Bush, Sr,has significant foreign policy experience

      Through Gore's experience as VP, I think he has gained substantial foregin policy experience that would have made him better prepared to guide the country through this situation with more rationality, and big-picture perspective than I expect Bush will. I am really hoping that Bush impresses me rather than surprises me.

      Sure, not a lot of presidents were previously ambassadors, etc. but most of the best ones had studied foregin policy to some extent before they got behind the wheel. They understand how to forge comprimises in Congress. They understand how to build alliances with countries with competing interests. They know what American has to gain and lose depending on how foreign opinion of the country shifts. They learned a lot of this through history and also political science coursework, not MBA business school classes. At a minumum, many ex-presidents have fought or travelled overseas. Bush thinks he's bragging when he said he'd travelled to mexico prior to running for president. McCain or Gore both would have had a better perspective on world affairs than Bush. But like I said ealrier in this overly-winded post, I hope Bush impresses me rather than surprises me.
    290. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      What happened with the Mutual Assured Destruction ?

      Time to scramble the bombers i guess.

      Level em.

    291. Re:Plea for peace by O_D_Bear · · Score: 1

      from http://www.history.navy.mil/faqs/faq66-1.htm - "American dead numbered 2,403. That figure included 68 civilians, most of them killed by improperly fused anti-aircraft shells landing in Honolulu. There were 1,178 military and civilian wounded."

    292. Re:Plea for peace by flatrock · · Score: 2

      Have you ever considered that today's attack was a counterstrike - against America?

      This isn't a counter attack simply because this act is unjustifiable. An attack on a US militay post would be a counter attack. The only military target in this attack was the Pentagon. There is no justification for hijacking civillian aircraft full of civillians and crashing them into civillian targets.

      The people who are responsible for this need to be prevented from ever commiting this kind of act again. Anyone, or any nation, who harbors those individuals must also be brought to justice. Not only the US, but the entire world should not only speak out against such cowardly acts of terror, but act to prevent such acts from occuring in the future. I understand that it isn't fair for a nation to suffer for the actions of a few of it's citizens, but if those nations are harboring those terrorists, then they share the blame for this crime.

    293. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Noble comments. Unfortunately, to use a cliché, you are trying to get blood out of a turnip. Peace? An organization that plots the death of 50,000 innocent civilians can not even comprehend the meaning of peace. They obviously do not value life the same way we do. That said, common sense will prevail. After the initial shock is over, the talk of wiping Afghanistan off the map will subside. However, look for intelligence and anti-terrorism task forces to be increased by an order of magnitude. There will be a number of known terrorist and individuals linked to terrorists that will take their last breath before the year is out. You are correct, this will lead to more attacks and the cycle may never end---but peace is not a viable option.

    294. Re:Plea for peace by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 1

      well, israel only came about in 48 or so, through land the brits allocated, which the arabs felt belonged to them.

      anyway, the arab's hate the israeli's and arab fanatics suicide bomb them. the israeli's hate the arabs and discriminate terribly against arabs that live in israeli controlled territory, not to mention kill them.

      you presumably are israeli, you reserve the right to bomb arabs.

      so go on, you keep bombing/shooting arabs. the arabs can keep bombing you.

      and it can go on like that, till maybe one day all the israeli and arab fanatics have bombed each other to bits, undoubtably taking many innocents with them. then perhaps the ones left over can start to talk peace.

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
    295. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coward forgot password:

      My representative is too busy becoming informed about this situation or they better be!

      Yes. And sleuths that the US contains, puzzle people will figure out a way to secure air travel, train travel, car travel, and local trips to work for it's people. This got passed us, and it woe on us that happened. Don't expect an outpouring of sympathy, and reserve for the supporters of the sick minds that planned an attack on NYC and DC. Sorry, buddy, but this is premeditated murder. You support anybody like this, be prepared to get blown up,too.

      History means that future generations of US Citizens can't be afraid to fly, or travel in their own country.

      What the hell kind of note is this anyway? US is not a bunch of idiots all the time, and it it can be as calculated as the terrorist who planned this.

      Oh, sure, I want peace and patience with terrorists. No, mister, I want action, and I want action NOW to find those cells, and all who support terrorist attacks against any country. This has been going on too long, and it is time for a hard line for the sake of future in our country as well as the others.

      Go, fly a kit, buddy.

      This is WAR.

    296. Re:Plea for peace by fault0 · · Score: 1

      Arafat strongly condemns all terrorism.. why do you include him in your list?

    297. Re:Plea for peace by CleverNickName · · Score: 2
      But really, "Go W"? Do you have any idea how rediculous that sounds? We'll be lucky if that bastard doesn't round up any person who is a moslem in the US and put them in camps for orderly disposal.
      I think that the US people have learned, and will soon have the lesson reinforced, what happens when you elect a president with WEAK foreign experience.
      I'm all for rallying around the flag, but I refuse to support this charlatan of a leader.

      I couldn't agree with you more. Here's my greatest fear: Resident Bush will see this as an opportunity to look "Presidential", and bomb "Them" back to the stone age, and figure out who "They" are later.

      And all these comparisons to Pearl Harbor are just inflammatory. We have NO IDEA who did this, so we have NO IDEA who we should be retaliating against. Let's not lose our heads, people. We can be sure that the US will not let this go unanswered...but "Go W"?! Please.
    298. Re:Plea for peace by hrieke · · Score: 2

      The Tree of Librety must be watered with the blood of Patriots from time to time.

      What exactly do we say?

      --
      III.IIVIVIXIIVIVIIIVVIIIIXVIIIXIIIIIIIIVIIIIVVIIIV IIVIIIIIIVIII...
    299. Re:Plea for peace by tomblackwell · · Score: 1

      "I bet the prick(s) who did this got in the country on H1B Visa's

      Yeah. Just like those guys who blew up the Murragh building in Oklahoma City.

    300. Re:Plea for peace by RacerX69 · · Score: 1

      The only way I can see that air travel can be come completely safe is if:

      a) Conduct through background checks of all airport personnel & ALL passengers. (It's impractical to check all passengers, but may become necessary.)

      b) More complete through searches & security at all airports. (This is necessary anyways, but say goodbye to more privacy & freedom.)

      c) Maybe develop a secure way for air control towers to remotely take control of a aircraft. Emphasis on the SECURE, though to prevent hackers from gaining control. (Yes, I saw the X-Files episode where the plane was taken over.) That way if a hijacker does come on board a plane, control could be taken from him to prevent a intentional crash.

    301. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We Americans have tried to make peace through peacful means. We also have been known to disregard the outside world and live in complacent and contentment. However, once we see an attack against our fellow people, we can and will see this as an act of war. A quote mentioned above was something about a waking a sleeping giant. You do not want to see America take up arms and get ready for war. Pearl Harbor was part of America's waking up to the outside world during the World War.

      We will find a way to punish those who have harmed us and will seek justice, possibly in any means necessary. I highly doubt that only Americans were killed in any of the places.

      We have tried to be peacful, but don't get on our bad side. You do, and we will not be responsible for the consequences. America will back up its army/navy/airforce to see that justice is done.

      While there is a time for peace, this ain't it, until it gets resolved.

    302. Re:Plea for peace by abe+ferlman · · Score: 2

      the way to defeat terrorism is to eliminate terrorists

      I disagree.

      1. You can't eliminate terrorism. Anyone willing to die for a cause is going to be VERY hard to stop no matter how hard you try to root them out. And the harder you try to root them out, the more false positives you get, and the more power the authorities who prefer authoritarian rule are given.

      2. The best you can do is eliminate the *motives* for terrorism. This involves trying to deal more fairly with people everywhere. People who live comfortable lives generally do not want to die for causes. If everyone were a little more comfortable and a little less fearful, we'd be better off. This means not being greedy with our wealth, and being more compassionate and even-handed in our foreign policy.

      3. The American Colonists were "terrorists", often waging a guerilla war against the "organized" and "civilized" army of Britain. Were they wrong? Should we condemn our past? What if the only champions of free speech in the world were terrorists- would it change anything then? This isn't such a simple issue as it seems at first. To those who feel bullied by the US, it's not hard to see why they would interpret this as a military victory instead of an act of "faceless cowardice", to paraphrase our erstwhile president. I'd say flying a plane into a building, however misguided the act may be, is no act of cowardice. It's a sign that someone hates us *very* much, and it behooves us to at least understand *why*.

      --
      microsoftword.mp3 - it doesn't care that they're not words...
    303. Re:Plea for peace by JWW · · Score: 1

      Gore's foreign relation experience includes looking the other way while BILLIONS of dollars when from the IMF into the pockets of high ranking Russian officials. Not the best record there...

      That said if he were President I would support him at this time, but he's not. So Bush deserves the nation's support.

    304. Re:Plea for peace by jenesuispasgoth · · Score: 1

      First of all, I am not American either (actually, I'm French), and even though I can't speak in the name of every French person, I can safely say that every person I've crossed today were deeply sorry for the US. So am I, because this act of terrorism makes me want to cry. I know this won't help recovering from the loss of a relative, but I believe that knowing other countries are with the US can't be a bad thing : it's not a whole nation that made the Twin Towers burn.

      While I partly agree with you (there's a point where you just can't watch and say "Hey, you're behaving badly, let's discuss about it"), there's a problem standing : I'm not sure we're ever gonna know the truth about who did what. Let me explain :
      The only people saying they were responsible for this atrocity are belonging to a Palestinian terrorist group which didn't have the material means to commit such a crime. I was listening to an Israelian politician who was saying (and I think he's right) that such an action must have been a very long term plan. Unless every other country outside the US are willing to find those terrorists, months may pass before a serious lead shows.

      I sincerely thinks that even if people must seek who commited this horrible act, people must cool down a bit, lest they want to hit the wrong guy. I've read and heard tons and tons of different discourses about who could want to do that, and even though some leads seem to be pretty serious, I think people must remember that only a few people are responsible for this. In that way, I think there's a need for a "plea for peace".

      For the guilty part, though... No mercy.

    305. Re:Plea for peace by jsin · · Score: 1

      Not that I'm condoning violence in any ay shape or form, (this act was utter atrocity), but your statement about Palestinians and immediately assuming they're responsible is bare-faced racism

      You idiot, anyone stupid enough to celebrate this event deserves whatever rath consumes them. I think the original writer's point is that people who behave like this will destroy themselves

    306. Re:Plea for peace by thatmoron · · Score: 0

      Firstly, most of the people who planned this are dead already, since it was a suisicde mission.

      That statement seems inherently false to me. They planners of this are most likely NOT DEAD. They are sitting comfortable in their homes (whereever that may be) cheering. The people who planned this simply sent the gullible to their deaths,and to kill many other. They are cowards for attacking and killing innocent citizens, so I doubt they themselves were aboard the planes bound for death.

    307. Re:Plea for peace by pixel_bc · · Score: 1

      The US Government does not provide funding to terrorists.

      Oh, for Christ's sake... shut the hell up.

      They're only terrorists when they're on the OTHER side - otherwise they're "freedom fighters" - or are you to young to remember that little gem of Republican foriegn policy?

    308. Re:Plea for peace by Mike1024 · · Score: 2

      Hey,

      There has to be retaliation for this, without a doubt.

      Not retaliation. Justice. "An eye for an eye only makes the whole world blind." - Mahatma Gandhi

      We should identify individuals who are guilty of crimes, arrest them, allow them to be tried in accordance with law, and if they are guilty, arrange thier execution.

      We can't just say 'Some evidence indicates Palistinian extremists - let's nuke a city in blind rage'. There must be due process. Guilt must be proven, and it must be done visibly and transparently. Killing foreigners in 'retaliation' will only make more people hate the united states. If they can see that only demonstrably guilty people have been killed, further 'revenge' will be far harder to justify.

      Killing innocents for no reason other than to show what a big dick the US has is not an acceptable option. Visible accountability and justice is, and that is what is required.

      Michael

      --
      "Goodness me, how unlike the FBI to abuse the trust of the American public." -- The Onion
    309. Re:Plea for peace by Chris+Y+Taylor · · Score: 1

      Retaliation will lead to more deaths.

      But lack of retaliation will lead to far more.

      If The United States shows signs of weakness after this attack, then they will become far more common. If we pursue those who commited this act, and their accomplicies, and see that Justice is done in a very public fashion, then it will reduce the occurance of such attacks in the future. There will always be some fanatics willing to pay any price; but if those around them are terrified of us enough to not even think of being an accomplis in terrorism, then those fanatics will have a difficult time carrying out their activities. If we destroy the organization(s) responsible for these acts, then any rational leader (and most terririst leaders can actually be considered rational for such purposes) will know that carrying out such an attack is counter-productive.

      A proper response to this terrorist attack can greatly reduce the likelihood of future attacks for at least one, and possibly two generations. This "proper response" will likely by unpleasant and evil. Failure to make that response, showing weakness to the world, would be a far greater evil because the message it would send to terror groups and opposing forces would undoubtably lead to more and possibly even bigger attacks.

    310. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To answer your first statement... Shrapnel? :)

    311. Re:Plea for peace by Aerog · · Score: 2

      Okay, the first message I posted was written before I happened to see a news broadcast of the reaction by certain factions in Palestine, and in that I admit I acted a little hasty. The reactions are very, very inappropriate. However, the basic premise of the post holds.

      We can't interpret the reactions of a group of people as admissions of guilt and if there is a reaction against Palestine for simply reacting in an emotional way (given the situation they've been in), then the world is truly doomed. I agree that some reaction against the forces involved is necessary, but not just against people who did not cause the tragedy. As far as I can see (and I'm no expert in middle-eastern relations) the Palestinian people have been getting the proverbial kick in the balls from the US for quite sime time now (seemingly) and this may just be the reaction that happens when emotionally-charged people are given a situation. It's akin to (but not exactly) the reaction that will occur when the diabolical fiends who coordinated this are brought to justice. People will be so happy that the people who they see as bringing them suffering are punished. And no, I'm not saying that the US is directly causing the Palestinians to suffer, but oftentimes people who are only slightly informed will make such assumptions (the vast majority being common people (of any race or nationality).

      So what I'm trying to say is that yes, some of the the Palestinian people's reactions are very inappropriate, but there shouldn't be a reaction against it for the sake of goodwill and not plunging into all-out war. Attacking them would be like a very large child pounding the living crap out of a smaller (yet maybe just as loud) child for laughing when the bigger kid trips and breaks his leg.

      --

      - Relativistic? That's barely Newtonian!
    312. Re:Plea for peace by gurutech · · Score: 1

      UP YOURS! This type of attitude will only encourage more terrorist attacks on the US. The only language terrorism understands is force, and the answer is retaliation! This is WAR! Civilians have been slaughtered by the thousands, and we might not know specifically who orchestrated this attack, but we know what nationality has been responsible for the vast majority of terrorism in the work today - the Arab nations. This problem goes way beyond today's attack on the US, and I don't have time to go into it all, but the best thing we can do is retaliate against ALL Arab nations who support terrorism! There will always be enmity between the Arab race and the rest of the world, and rolling over will solve nothing. Destroying these countries will be a blessing to the world as a whole, not just the USA.

    313. Re:Plea for peace by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      I *am* an American citizen, and while I can only speak for myself, I'm sure many others will agree with me.

      We don't want violence. We merely want justice.
      Turning a blind eye to this type of senseless
      attack on innocent people only gives the attackers
      a sense of power and gives them no reason to
      fear further attacks on the US. Of course retaliating will not bring back the countless thousands of people who have been killed. But
      bringing those responsible to justice *will*
      prevent them from doing anything like this again.

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    314. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be really depressing if it came to that. If anyone has read Tom Clancy's "Sum of All Fears", I hope George W doesn't end up like the President in that novel.

    315. Re:Plea for peace by stripes · · Score: 2
      The British are still gone from the United States after the little hullaboo in the 1770's.

      Except for that rather irritating war of 1812 where they burned the capital building to the ground.

      Not that I disagree with the need to find out who was responsible for the attack and to punish them (and equally importantly not to harm those not responsible)

    316. Re:Plea for peace by Bobby+Orr · · Score: 1

      You are wrong. Chamberlain kept thinking, "Just a little more land, and Hitler will be happy." Hitler would not have been content with the whole world. He had to be killed to be stopped.

      War is horrible. War is hell. However, there are people in this world who will not stop hurting and killing other people until they themselves are killed.

      Whoever did this (not the suicide terrorists, but the big bosses) must die. They will continue to kill until they are killed. They will be content with the same amount of concession that would have contented Hitler -- No concession is enough.

      I will not cheer in the streets like the Palistinians (sp?) did when my fellow Americans died, but I will be somberly satisfied that justice has been done.

      The blood of innocent Americans cries out of the ground for justice. To walk away deaf to that cry is wrong.

    317. Re:Plea for peace by RocketScientist · · Score: 1

      And where, exactly, did I say we needed to declare war on anyone? I said we need to take people out, as in reduce their current and effetiveness to cause us problems to nil. I didn't say we needed to declare war on anything or anyone. For all I know, this could be a bunch of wackos in Montana, I'm not all that in favor of causing permanent damage to Montana either.

      I don't recall a declaration of war during the American Revolutionary war, specifically because there weren't two soverign parties involved, at least from the British standpoint. (Having a declaration of war would have implied that America was sovereign, actually.)

      While you can't have a war without two soverign nations, it is possible to negotiate a peace between two parties, and it is possible to have two parties that are having hostilities with each other without a declared war.

      Korea, Vietnam, Libya, hell, even Iraq are all examples. We can find these terrorists. We will find these terrorists. I just hope they don't go quietly, because as much as I fear terrorists, I fear the ridiculous excuse of a justice system we have that allows other terrorists who killed Americans to be tried in the Netherlands, where they can't be FRIED.

      Read, then comment next time. First READ, then comment.

      schmuck.

    318. Re:Plea for peace by operagost · · Score: 1

      You mean the rise of Catholicism in the Roman Empire. That was NOT Christianity.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    319. Re:Plea for peace by ginsu · · Score: 1
      I agree. Fights should be avoided. However, if you're going to get into a fight, make sure that the other guy never, ever, fights you again. Fight to win all future fights.


      Thanks Ender. This is hardly the time nor the place to be quoting Orson Scott Card's juvenile philosophies.

    320. Re:Plea for peace by ILikeRed · · Score: 1

      Which one of your solutions did we implement against the Japanese during WWII???

      Do you pay people to moderate your posts, or is this just the average intelligence here.

      --
      I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two is a law firm, and three or more is a congress -J Adams
    321. Re:Plea for peace by Bobby+Orr · · Score: 1

      2. The best you can do is eliminate the *motives* for terrorism. This involves trying to deal more fairly with people everywhere. People who live comfortable lives generally do not want to die for causes. If everyone were a little more comfortable and a little less fearful, we'd be better off. This means not being greedy with our wealth, and being more compassionate and even-handed in our foreign policy.


      You live in a dream world. The people who do this kind of thing are animals. They are not reasonable people who have a reasonable point of view. They kill and love it. They are happy for people to die. They are the truest fanatics. They are engaged in a Holy War.
      The solution you suggest might be great for logical people who have in diplomacy. Fanatics who regard human life as nothing are not diplomats. They have decalared war. Cute solutions like yours will make you feel good but it will do NOTHING to save human lives from terrorist fanatics.

    322. Re:Plea for peace by ReTay · · Score: 1

      First comes helping the Injured and burying the dead.
      Then securing the problems exposed to prevent it from happening again.
      Then comes the analysis of who did it.
      Then comes justice.
      Count on it. There will be retaliation. It will involve the military.
      They will figure out who did it and who helped.
      Talk all you wish, just stay out of the way when we go after the people who did this.

    323. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now you can see how we felt in bosnia when this kind of shit happened every day.

    324. Re:Plea for peace by Turtle+Master · · Score: 1
      > Palestinians can rally in the streets today, and celebrate the mass extermination of human beings.

      ...your statement about Palestinians and immediately assuming they're responsible is bare-faced racism...

      This statement isn't about who is responsible for the terrorist attacks. It's about the news coverage of Palestinians dancing in the street, passing out candy, and shouting "God is Great" in celebration of the attacks. Anyone celebrating what happened today is either ignorant of what actually happened, or is fanatical enough to believe that it somehow is a good thing. Anyone that believes the latter needs to be either re-educated, or exterminated.

    325. Re:Plea for peace by crucini · · Score: 1
      the most rational way would've been to take this up with the UN

      You mean like this? And what good did that do exactly?
      I have no respect for any country or group that decides to attack a country using innocent bystanders and citizens like in this attack.

      You mean like this?
    326. Re:Plea for peace by waveman · · Score: 1

      > I believe that anyone capable of organizing the hijacking of several commerical airplanes and using them as weapons against both civillian and military targets in an unprovoked sneak attack is not someone that I can make amends with ...

      Presumably you would also have trouble living in a country with a proven track record of murdering the leaders of other countries to further its own interests, installing and supporting corrupt murderous regimes in numerous countries, killing hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians (Hiroshima/Nagasaki), allowing the slaughter and oppression of the palestinians to continue with no oppositio, and which supported the radical Islamists in Afghanistan in order to give the Russians a hard time. Yes the good ol' US of A.

      Desperate people - people with nothing to lose - will do desperate, horrible things. The only answer to to give them some hope, something that for example the Palestinians do not have.

      As you will recall, they have been thrown out of the land they lived in for thousands of years, reprived of the vote, their houses confiscated or destroyed.

      America does what is in the interests of the wealthy people in America (eg DMCA). What is right and moral comes a very poor second. They preach free trade but have the biggest farm subsidies and import restrictions in the world. America did not honor copyright until it was in its interests. However they are forcing poor contries to honor intellectual property laws, even when this means that millions will die because they cannot afford patented medicines.

      I'm sorry but, no, the whole world does not necessarily see the US as the good guys.

    327. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just heard this on the radio: no known American group has so far carried out suicide attacks.

    328. Re:Plea for peace by operagost · · Score: 1

      That was a single man... this was a coordinated effort by several people (some of whom made the actual suicide attacks). Or did you think that one guy bailed from the first plane before it hit, then magically transported to the others to repeat the action?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    329. Re:Plea for peace by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      I am sure that the majority of the American people don't have the stomach to retaliate in kind. There are some who will not be satisfied with the lives of the responsible parties as the numbers just don't come out evenly. It's harder to wage a war against terrorists because they don't have borders. You can't reduce their infrastructure to rubble because they, like parasites, live off the infrastructure of a host country. In this case, with such a devastating loss of lives, I would think our government would view any host nation's refusal to give up the engineers of this plot as an act of overt aggression on the part of that government. An act of war.

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    330. Re:Plea for peace by damiam · · Score: 1
      And I happen to believe that if you show what happens to the people who organize and plan terrorist attacks, it does deter those who are still out there and haven't been caught/punished yet.

      Please. Terrorists are perfectly willing to die for their causes. The hijackers of the planes today knew they would die, but they did it anyway. Palestinians have been doing suicide bombings for years, and the Japanese were flying kamikaze planes in WWII.

      Punishment won't deter terrorist groups. We need to convince these groups that they don't want to attack us. Otherwise, they always will attack us and we really can't stop them (aside from a 1984-style society, which would be worse).

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    331. Re:Plea for peace by 1010011010 · · Score: 1

      Whatever. I wasn't quoting Card, and this is not science fiction.

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    332. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New Yorkers in panic - priceless

    333. Re:Plea for peace by fireman · · Score: 1

      Crappy security... Probably not... Maybe the terrorists were armed, maybe not... Get enough people on a plane and you can overpower anyone with or without guns, bombs, explosives and the like.

      Anyone who is determined enough can defeat any security measures you might put in place...

      Did you hear about a South African Armory that was broken into? The big thick steel door was not touched... The villains chiselled out the mortar and bricks at the side of the door to make a hole big enough to crawl through.

      --
      M.
    334. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The US response must be [...] measured [...]

      On the Richter scale.

    335. Re:Plea for peace by Dolly_Llama · · Score: 1

      OT, but you get mega bonus points for having a FEAR sig.

      --

      Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan

    336. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what peace...we get attacked and we should sit back... they will come again and maybe next time with nukes...and since i was in uptown i was safe today...but next time all of us will be wiped off the face of the earth...action must be taken...and sad to say but that action must be violence.

    337. Re:Plea for peace by dvdeug · · Score: 2

      Did Churchill talking about Checkslovakia stop war? Even short-term (pre-Poland), was the conquest of a soverign country by a racist imperialist dictator a good thing?

    338. Re:Plea for peace by damiam · · Score: 1
      There is a third option, which is what we were successfully able to do in World War II and its aftermath: Beat them until they beg for mercy and then help them with open and generous hearts.

      And WWII was "successful"?! Killing millions of Allied and Axis soldiers, setting a precedent for the use of atomic bombs, and letting six million Jews be executed was "successful"? Pardon me if I'm wrong, but I think the successful way is the one that works without killing lots of people.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    339. Re:Plea for peace by Chris+Hind · · Score: 1
      Good luck with the whole "take it in the rear for peace" thing, though.
      Works for my country.

      Good luck with the whole "piss off millions of people so they crash aeroplanes into your capital" thing, though.
      --
      nal 11
    340. Re:Plea for peace by WNight · · Score: 2

      Nope. There's a *whole lot* of "there's a bully who got what he deserved," in how I felt after the school shootings.

      My only regret is that they killed somewhat indiscriminately instead of only killing the bullies.

      What I really don't understand is your unwillingness to defend yourself... how you think violence is wrong. If a bully uses violence, chances are it's all they'll recognize. I'm not saying you should kill someone for hitting you, but if they hit you to control you, why is it unjust for you to hit them back harder to make them stop?

      You don't have to be a slave, but you need to realize that they'll always pick on you unless something makes them stop. That something will NOT be the school, or the police. (One of the jocks killed in the Columbine shooting was accused of raping a fellow student, the school helped keep him out of trouble because he was a star athlete.)

      When I was in school I got in two fights. One in grade four, and one in grade eight. Both times I was being picked on by a group, both times I violently dealt with the leader of the group, and both times I was left alone by all trouble makers for the remainder of my time at the school.

      In grade eight, I was told that I was going to have the "shit kicked out of me" after school. The bullies had progressed to moderate violence and knew where I lived and the direction I had to walk to get home. They had waited for me to leave school in the past. I told the administration and they did nothing, they didn't even investigate.

      When I was threatened the next day, I picked the lead bully up by the neck, slammed his head into a locker, and told him I'd throw him down the stairwell (we had an open stairwell three flights down) if he ever so much as threatened me again. I then wrapped both hands around his throat and began to squeeze while holding him in the air.

      When a teacher heard this and investigated I put him down and walked off to the office. They said there that they knew it was justified and I wouldn't be punished. I want to know why, if they knew, they hadn't done something earlier.

      But that was the turning point, after that he was always afraid of me, he and his friends never came near me again.

      All I had to do was show that I was willing to defend myself, that he couldn't walk all over me, and the harassment and threats ended.

      But, I bet you don't think I was justified, do you?

    341. Re:Plea for peace by 1alpha7 · · Score: 1

      Such evidence is called "circumstantial" and you can't find someone guilty based on circumstantial evidence.

      Perhaps in the UK, but here in the USA the majority of convictions are based in circumstantial evidence. One cannot depend on eyewitnesses to every crime, and they are notoriously unreliable anyway. Circumstantial evidence, like DNA, has proven far more reliable here in the USA

      1Alpha7

      --
      Live to be Moderated
    342. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > That kind of hatred is a spiritual disease that will eventually lead to their own destruction.

      you got it wrong: it was the destruction of their lives that led to this kind of hatred (for a lot of "them" at least).

    343. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> Palistinians cheering in the streets should be ashamed of themselves
      > The Palestinians cheering in the streest should be liquidated.

      for a lot of these palestenians, destroyed houses and dead friends is a frequent experience.
      if you were in their situation, you would probably be dancing in the streets.
      after all, the us has always been a strong supporter of israel (not always very openly).

    344. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *friends and neighbours* ... hmmmm

      do we need a martian attack to think as citizens of the world ... ?

      perhaps our problem is ... we respect people as *friends and neighbours* and not as people

    345. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me too, and I believe most Canadians feel the same way.

      Let's not forget that these are criminals here. We need to find them, prosicute them, and incarserate them.

      To my knowledge, no forign government was involved in this attack, so starting a war at this stage is not productive.

      However, when the responsible parties are identified, I pity the country that tries to protect them because I think that SHOULD provoke an ultimatum and response.

      What a shitty day.

    346. Re:Plea for peace by Moosifer · · Score: 1

      Great analogy. I recall how after the OK City incident the citizens of Michigan danced in the streets, passed out candy and exclaimed "God is Great!" Yes, the two situations are exactly the same, and they should be dealt with consistently.

    347. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > No Justice, No Peace.

      don't fucking call it justice.

    348. Re:Plea for peace by Nail · · Score: 1

      I am sure it does, and I'm sure you do, and like I said: good luck.

      To be clear, how exactly did the US piss "millions of people" (whomever they are) off? Or are we expected to do so in retaliating against the villains?

      More simply (just for you): does the "pissing off" (of which you speak) come before, or after the "crash aeroplanes into your captial" thing?

      Whatever the case, I do think "millions of people" are now "pissed off", and someone is probably going to take it in the rear, and a delicate peace (isn't it always?) will be had by some. For others, I think a longer lasting peace will be reserved.

      Please notice that I didn't ask what country you come from. Do not tell me, I do not care to know. There are brave men in every land, men who will stand up to those who would kill, harm, or take advantage of them, and I see no reason for them to bear the slander of your association.

      Peace will be had when two entities agree to behave peacefully toward one another, and it may be difficult to find such an agreement from US citizens at this time.

      --
      ...yellow number five, yellow number five, yellow number five...
    349. Re:Plea for peace by nobody69 · · Score: 1

      If you grade wars on a curve, WWII was sucessful. The Axis was stopped from taking over Europe, China and the Pacific Rim, and Germany, Japan and Italy have not invaded any countries since then. Compare this to WWI, where after the war ended without any of the major combatants being truly conquered, 25 years later there was a larger, bloodier war.

      The lesson from WWII and the American Civil War is that to truly defeat an enemy, you need to crush their ability to make war, then help them rebuild economically/socially in order to reduce their desire to make war. The numbers of economically healthy democracies that have fought wars with each other is very small - US vs. UK in the War of 1812?

      --
      "Bugger this, I want a better world." - Jenny Sparks
    350. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I hope justice is served in the form of all of their deaths, but I certainly won't cheer about it.
      when you hope that they will die, then you *will* cheer (if quietly) when it happens. where's the difference?

    351. Re:Plea for peace by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

      The entire point of terrorism is to create a reaction that perpetuates itself, in an effort to destablize the entire population and cause the collapse of government or civilization. An excellent example is how the IRA has traditionally operated in Ireland, attacking civilians in such a way that it promotes Catholics to start witch hunts against Protestants and vice versa. The same kind of witch hunt that Bush proposes in order to find the perpetrators of this crime "as soon as possible," and the same kind of witch hunts that will invariably happen in the wake of such an event among the civilian populace - ignorant people beating up and killing visible minorities as if they were somehow responsible as an act of revenge.

      Let's say that the American government responds by invading the West Bank in an effort to find the man responsible for all this. This action would cause outrage towards the US in the international community, among other things. As an added bonus, the group they seek either does not operate there, or has moved to Libya. The same terrorist group (now very well-funded by numerous ouraged oil sheiks) smuggles a nuclear weapon into Chicago and detonates it in outrage over the invasion which killed a million people, half of which were civilians.

      In reaction to such a disaster, the US closes its borders to keep foreigners out and puts soldiers on every street corner to keep the nation safe from such future attacks. Then it nukes Libya as "appropriate retaliation." You can imagine what might happen after that.

      All this because the American public and their president demands revenge for an act that was likely an act of revenge for some other percieved attack. Vengence is futile because it only breeds further vengence and it's not at all unlike a nuclear war between enemies that could easily wipe each other off the face of the earth. It is a lose-lose situation and the only way to win is not to play at all.

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
    352. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Kill them all. Every last one of them. And anyone who ever cared about them. No one will be left to carry out revenge. No future generations will rise up.

      I agree.

    353. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We can't make them not want to do it again

      This is probably the strongest point of your post. You cannot change these peoples' resolve just by throwing a few of them in jail. There is only *one* way to get rid of such rabid zealotry.

    354. Re:Plea for peace by mesocyclone · · Score: 2

      Sorry, but the Contras were no more terrorists than the Sandanistas and their bloody friends in El Salvador. We did indeed fund Contras, as revolutionaries, and I am glad we did.

      --

      The only good weather is bad weather.

    355. Re:Plea for peace by mesocyclone · · Score: 2
      I call Israel a nation under siege by terrorists. And the Palestinian authority, a dictatorship as opposed to the Israeli democracy, does its best to cause Palestinian casualties, to fool people like yourself.


      Israel isn't perfect, and in its war for independence some of its people committed unforgivable acts of terrorism - by the Stern gang and Irgun.


      Furthermore, I disagree with Israel's settlement policy. But they are a nation that has been attacked by neighboring countries. Remember, they only conquered Palestine after they had been invaded from their in 1967.


      However, targeting terrorist leaders is not terrorism. It is self defense. I hope the US starts doing the same thing. People who attack civilians on purpose are murderers and deserve whatever happens to them.

      --

      The only good weather is bad weather.

    356. Re:Plea for peace by SailorBob · · Score: 1
      The US has recently weighed in massively on the side of Israel, and done nothing to help the Palestinian victims of Israeli terror attacks.

      Israeli terror attacks? You mean when Israeli kills the people who are directly responsible for killing and attempting to kill it's citizens? Funny, in most of the world that's called self-defence, not terrorism.

      --

      Woopty Doo Basil, what does it all mean?!

    357. Re:Plea for peace by SailorBob · · Score: 1
      Arafat strongly condemns all terrorism.. why do you include him in your list?

      Arafat has a habit of talking out both sides of his mouth. He says one thing to the Western media because he knows it's what he needs to say to gain favor in the west, while at the same time saying the exact opposite to his own people. Arafat is a terrorist dictator who uses conflict to sustain and justify his own corrupt regime.

      --

      Woopty Doo Basil, what does it all mean?!

    358. Re:Plea for peace by cburley · · Score: 1
      Or maybe because bombing those responsible might have started with Rush's radio station

      You might be right, but I believe you likely support a common fallacy regarding Rush's show.

      I actually listen to him, and recall various important elements of the story quite clearly.

      For one thing, Rush never, to my knowledge, advocated any such response to the Waco tragedy.

      In fact, during hearings involving grilling Janet Reno for her handling of the situation, Rush criticized the way one Congressman (forget who offhand) treated her -- appropriate, since he was rather rude.

      In reward for that gallant act, that weekend, President Clinton "humorously" (with nobody laughing, IIRC) claimed Rush defended Reno "only because her attacker was a black man".

      Though Clinton tried to spin his way out of that mess later on, Rush pledged to never again defend a member of Clinton's cabinet on his show, and, I believe, stuck with that pledge. (So much for Clinton's ability to make friends.)

      And, of course, it goes without saying, to anyone who actually listens to Rush, as compared to blindly accepting the hateful rhetoric directed by the Left towards him, that he's much more of a "law-and-order" person than an "overthrow the government" type. Listeners who thought they heard him advocating a response to Waco like the OKC bombing already had mental problems, IMO -- I never heard him preaching anything remotely like that.

      Next, since the liberal media (and liberals generally) love to criticize Rush and make him the whipping-boy for their hatred of right-wingers, those who believe in God, whatever, without bothering to listen to him and decide for themselves, it became fashionable to depict his show as somehow culpable in motivating McVeigh.

      For example, a cartoon in a Seattle paper depicted the famous photo of a fireman/paramedic holding a dead child, with the balloon "thought" added, reading, "damn talk radio!", a phrase specifically designed to criticize right-wing talk radio, Rush Limbaugh in particular, being the dominant player in that field.

      Turns out, the actual fireman/paramedic who was photographed was a fan of Rush's show. He called in to Rush, they talked for awhile, and, IIRC, he didn't blame Rush one bit for the OKC bombing.

      That being said, it is still possible Rush's show played some role in motivating McVeigh to undertake his act. I'll include it in context, along with other things that certainly did play some role, for those who have forgotten, or refused to acknowledge the truth:

      • If Americans hadn't been so hot-to-trot on gun control, it is unlikely the BATF would have felt so justified conducting a sudden, unnecessary, high-visibility, extreme-force raid on the Branch Davidians over possible arms violations. Perhaps they would have handled it in a more downplayed manner, which we have since learned was easily possible. I believe America motivated them to make a "show of force" on this sort of issue.

        (In case anyone thinks I'm blindly pro-Rush or anti-Clinton: this event happened under President Bush, the 41st; further, I've heard Rush incorrectly state that it happened under Clinton several times, causing me to reinvestigate it in case my memory was faulty.)

        Of course, if the raid hadn't happened, not only would OKC not have happened, neither would law-enforcement agents have died for the illusion of security Americans call "gun control".

      • Had Janet Reno been more patient and not sent in tanks based on unsupported assertions that "there was child abuse going on in there" -- the sort of thing on which she built her career, and, later, implicitly used in justifying her armed raid to "unite Elian Gonzalez with his father" -- the Branch Davidians would likely be alive today, or at least not dead as a result of unnecessary use of government force.

        In that case, OKC would probably not have happened.

      • Had Americans responded to the unnecessary deaths of some 76 innocent men, women, and children (and, yes, they were innocent, based on Clinton defenders' claims that he must be "innocent until proved guilty", therefore could not be removed from office, and the Branch Davidians had not been proved guilty) by insisting that Reno and/or Clinton be removed, and especially had Reno been immediately fired, OKC might not have happened.

        (I'm basing this on my impressions of the government's case against McVeigh, not on expertise on it.)

      • It is possible that, had Rush Limbaugh not sought to defend Reno against a rude interrogation by a member of Congress, McVeigh would have taken solace (assuming he had been listening to Rush anyway -- not necessarily likely, given how Rush is viewed by those on the extreme Right) in knowing he had a popular radio host, with some 20 million listeners, who likely agreed that the Waco tragedy was a) one for which average American citizens were somewhat culpable, since it's their (our) government, and b) one for which these same citizens might learn to reduce their willingness to tyrannize their neighbor over unconstitutional laws.

      So, yes, Rush may have been partly to blame, but not, in my opinion, because he encouraged any actions remotely close to bombing a federal building. Unlike Clinton and Reno, Rush has played no evident part in killing innocents, either here in America or abroad, and all the self-delusional posturing in the world won't change that fact.

      Those who supported keeping Reno and Clinton in office, in my opinion -- whether individual citizens, newspaper editors, politicians -- are much more culpable in terms of encouraging McVeigh to believe there was a need to undertake the bombing. (I heard he was even considering just assassinating Reno, but decided Americans were sufficiently culpable that he had to resort to terrorism.)

      In short, Rush is an easy target for the OKC bombing, especially those who blindly adhere to certain sociopolitical views, but the blame rests, beyond on McVeigh and his co-conspirators, directly on the US government and the American people, not so much for what happened at Waco, but for how America responded -- deciding to continue starting to wage a war on guns that would certainly be as successful as its longrunning wars on poverty and on drugs, at least until recently.

      That wasn't the end of the story. Clinton, who surely believed his administration could kill anyone "outside the mainstream" (e.g. right-wingers, Muslims) with impunity, went on to kill a few innocent Sudanese in an aspirin factory by bombing it. He claimed it was making chemical weapons; it wasn't, and he apparently knew better than to get full input from all sides in his administration, shutting some of them out of the process. Conveniently, there was going to be some grand jury testimony scheduled for the same time he chose to bomb that building (or maybe it was some other event) -- an event that would have made the front pages, and which related to his scandalous behavior. That he couldn't find at any given time a number of people in his administration urging the bombing of some "chemical plant" somewhere, I find hard to believe, so I tend to believe he chose that building at that time because it was sufficiently convenient to him, not because it was militarily necessary (since it turned out to not be).

      To thise day, I don't believe we've heard an apology -- especially a genuine apology -- from him for killing innocent Sudanese as a result of pulling the trigger too quickly.

      Reno, who learned the same thing from Waco, went on to send men with guns to remove Elian from the clutches of his religious, presumably right-wing (certainly anti-Castro, anyway) relatives, despite the fact that there was no pressing reason to do so. (Some claimed "abuse", but no charges were ever brought. Some claimed there was a court order, but there wasn't, as far as I can tell -- there was a search warrant, but that's something quite different in a case like this.)

      To this day, of the politically active Americans, nearly a majority of them celebrate Reno's use of force against Elian's relatives, hardly any of them insisted on removing Clinton from office merely for the bombing of the aspirin factory, not to mention for all the other things he did, or allowed to be done, on his watch, indicating a sufficient disregard for life, liberty, law, and order to invalidate him for high office...

      ...and, generally, from an objective point of view, it seems quite clear that Americans do, in fact, embrace the use of force, even deadly force, against those who it finds inconvenient, even when they turn out, later on, to be innocent.

      (Yes, I know there are all sorts of accusations about American-perpetrated and American-supported horrors abroad. I don't have personal experience with these, and few Americans do. I also don't know enough about the context -- e.g. how much collateral damage is acceptable when targeting those who are planning and carrying out mass murder of innocents? Further, I don't generally trust those who make claims about such remote actions, and suspect many Americans share that distrust -- too many liars with an axe to grind against America are treated, by the liberal media, as truth-tellers (e.g. "there are 3 million homeless people in the US" during the '80s). So I focus only on events which we all did have an opportunity to view, up close and personal, and affect, especially given Clinton's penchant for reading public polls and acting accordingly.)

      So, as much as I admire Newt Gingrich, hearing him on Fox News this morning claiming that Americans were a "peaceable" people struck me as not entirely defensible.

      Sure, we like peace -- when it suits our purposes. Some of us even love it. A few of us work to make it.

      But too many of us choose to allow people who demonstrate an inability to avoid killing innocent people to continue to hold high political office, wielding weapons of unimaginable destruction, especially when they support the political causes we support (redistribution of wealth, abortion on demand, whatever).

      So, today's events I have, in some form, seen coming for several years now. It won't necessarily change the minds of many Americans, any more than Waco, or OKC, convinced many that gun control wasn't worth that loss of life.

      But it might bring home to enough Americans the simple fact that nobody should seek to impose their will on somebody else -- whether directly, indirectly (say, by allowing immoral men to remain in positions of public power), or by proxy (say, by supporting government legislation such as gun control or laws restricting free speech) -- without being prepared to accept the consequences.

      What today's actions have taught us, among many other things, is that we aren't safe in the sheltering arms of government (whether a federal building or a world trade center); we aren't safe by disarming the law-abiding citizens (were any of the passengers on the jets used as suicide missiles allowed to take their concealed firearms on board? NO!); we aren't safe by bombing remote lands in purported attempts to combat terrorism, conveniently distracting the populace from unsavory domestic scandals; we certainly aren't safe by hiding our heads in the sand when such things happen and not holding elected officials accountable; and we aren't safe simply by electing a new President who doesn't, personally, have a record of directing actions resulting in the deaths of innocent men, women, and children, especially if we haven't, first and foremost, squarely faced our culpability in previous such actions.

      Given the willingness of so many Americans to turn their view away from these issues in the past, despite their unprecedented wealth and ability to engage their government, I do not find it surprising that people in other lands, at least feeling very oppressed by great powers, look at us and conclude, like McVeigh did, that it is not the American government so much as the American people that accept the killing of innocents as necessary "collateral damage" to achieve some illusion of security.

      Needless to say, I'm very sad for today's victims. The dead have no further opportunity to learn from whatever mistakes they make and announce their apologies to us, which is especially a sad thing, and one more reason to celebrate life.

      But Americans do not, at present, appears to have a society, or culture, that truly values life. Whether it's innocent Muslims at the wrong place at the wrong time, innocent Christians caught up in international politics or targeting by gung-ho law enforcement, or children in the womb whom our "fairer sex" kills by the millions every few years, we don't have the high moral ground at present.

      In a sense, given that we might well die for our beliefs anyway, we must learn to ask ourselves, which beliefs are worth dying for? Gun control? Redistributing wealth? Protecting the unborn? Protecting our shores against invading forces? Consructing a missile-defense shield?

      I'm not advocating answers to these questions, just suggesting that perhaps there's a better, wiser basis for answering them than what has, to me, long appeared to be, for many Americans, "well, I want so-and-so to be made to do such-and-such, and since I know I won't face the consequences for forcing them to do so if I can convince the government to do that for me, it must be my divine right to so impose my will".

      The good news is, we can at once change our collective course and do the right things, whatever those might be, while recognizing, and making suitable restitution for, what we've done in the past.

      --
      Practice random senselessness and act kind of beautiful.
    359. Re:Plea for peace by mesocyclone · · Score: 2
      As one who has studied US 20th century history in depth, and who lived more than half of that century, and a Vietnam Veteran, all I can say is: you are equating apples and oranges.


      Differences that should be obvious include: we are a democracy, while our opponents have always been dictatorships; we have indeed supported rebels, and *some* of those rebels indeed performed terrorist acts, but that has certainly been against US policy since at least 1965.
      p

      --

      The only good weather is bad weather.

    360. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying the U.S. should commit more injustice in retaliation to this injustice? That's idiotic. I am a Canadian and don't want to support any more U.S. violence (we've already supported enough U.S. agression - time to support peace).

    361. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes:
      http://www.msnbc.com/news/190144.asp

    362. Re:Plea for peace by Theodore+Logan · · Score: 1
      If more than half of us don't even _vote_ [...]

      And remember people, today is election day (seriously!).

      --

      "If you think education is expensive, try ignorance" - Derek Bok

    363. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course! That's what's wrong with the world!

      The Jews should have forgiven Hitler for the death of 6 million Jews. He obviously would have stopped!

      Villigers in Sierra Leone who have had their families raped & tortured should forgive the rebel forces. The only reason they keep hacking off the limbs of innocents is they are awaiting forgiveness!

      The U.S. should have forgiven the attack on Pearl Harbour. The Japanese of the time were obviously misunderstood

      We should have forgiven Milosevic for his war-crimes, not tried him for them

      Sorry, but there is a point where extreme naiveté reaches the line of stupidity. You passed that line about five miles back.

    364. Re:Plea for peace by olafva · · Score: 1

      Of course Bin Laden and Sadam stand out with their objective in life to kill Americans and introduce terrorism and chaos into our world. Arafat has had a wonderful opportunity to bring about peace but evidently is NOT much of a leader as he can't control his countrymen against suicide attacks and Palistinians today rejoicing over the U.S. deaths in New York, Washington and Pennsylvania. The faces of the Palistinians rejoicing in the streets today will be remembered around the world. Hopefully their photos will be taken and entered in FACEIT (face recognition) software so they forever loose the privilige of riding on an airplane, at least any airplane I ride on.

      --
      What's past is NOT ALWAYS prologue for the future!
    365. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fine --- Got lots of NUKES we've been wondering what to do with an the world is overpopulated. Sounds like a win win response to me.

    366. Re:Plea for peace by klieber · · Score: 1
      OK, so let's debunk each one of your arguments, one at a time, shall we?

      a. Drop an atom bomb and kill 125,000 civilians at hiroshima to satisfy a military objective. (Thats ok because they started it so it wasnt "unprovoked" or "sneaky").

      The alternative was to continue to the lengthy island hopping campaign and then stage an all-out invasion of Tokyo, resulting in many, many more American deaths. Sorry sport, but choosing between killing lots of them or killing lots of our own boys isn't hard to make.

      b. Napalm children in vietnam. (because you didnt like communists).

      No, in fact, it was because some of those children were known to act as couriers for the Bad Guys, or even to engage in actual combat and we didn't know who was what. Again, if it comes down to killing them or letting them kill us, it's an easy choice to make.

      c. Bomb civilians in Iraq after providing their leaders with weapons to bomb civilians in Iran after giving F-14's to Iran to bomb civilians elsewhere. (because you wanted oil).

      In fact, the Gulf War had some of the lowest civilian casualties in any full-scale military conflict.

      d. invade and assasinate the indonesian government. (because the IMF and WTO want mineral rights).

      I'll admit ignorance here -- I haven't researched this issue enough to debate it cogently. Based on the tone and (in)accuracy of your other arguments, it seems likely that this argument is similarly grossly oversimplified with many of the pertinent facts left out that don't support your argument.

      I apologize if you aren't a citizen of the "Real World".

      Remember, it's easy to be an armchair quarterback. It's much more difficult to be faced with reality and have to deal with it head-on.

      --
      Gentoo Linux http://gentoo.org/
    367. Re:Plea for peace by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Israel was a decsion made on the spur of pity for the judiac peoples. The holocaust was a tragedy of terrible consequence but it does not compare to what israel systematically does to the palestines. If this does on indefinetely their will be far more rock-throwing palestines dead than there was in nazi death camps. One day the palestines in desperation are going to use a weapon of mass destruction, and guess what? Israel with sharon will nuke mecca or some equally fucked up retaliation, and than the blood will flow like cheap beer at a frat.

    368. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might also want to think about why this attack occurred. How did the USA get into a position where someone hates it *so* much that they'd suicide themselves in revenge?


      Well, sit down a while, I'll tell you why. After country after country punished the Jews, the Jews fought back and won their country back. And all the arab nations agree that they don't like the Jews, but they can't do anything because the US believes the Jews are right and has the firepower to stop them. Directing their hate to the US. And they turned it into a holy war. Which is important because in their religion if you die in a holy war, you go immediately to heaven. They're not martyrs, far from it.

    369. Re:Plea for peace by cs668 · · Score: 1

      Actually I think there is a difference. The countries that harbor terrorists are looking for a plausable deniability. They want to wage war against their precieved enemy(us) and be able to simply point the finger at the terrorist group and have an out.

      I think we should take that "out" away from them.

    370. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't eliminate the *motives* for terrorism. Terrorism stems from perceived cultural injustices that may or may not have their roots grounded in reality.

      Rebel groups in Sierra Lione have been killing and raping villagers who have committed no injustices whatsoever.

      The Jewish population of Germany had committed no crime other than that of religous freedom

      The assumption that these people will change their ways by dealing more "compassionately" with them is at best naive and at worst extremely dangerous.

    371. Re:Plea for peace by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      Its not about "getting even" its about eliminating a threat to the most basic of civil liberties. To retaliate out of blood lust is to join evil against evil. To remove a cancer is not to "get even" with those cells who have literally lost proportion.

      Hatred breeds hatred, yes. Persistant, continuing hatred - when it becomes overriding - breeds insanity. Terror as a tactical tool is a desperate and insane response. Lets cure the cause, yes. But eliminate the tumor before more healthy children and fathers and mothers of children are forced to die for a sick hatred fantasy.

    372. Re:Plea for peace by turpie · · Score: 1

      Just because some Palestinians are idiots doesn't mean that all or even a majority of them are.
      Just as the fact there are plenty of stupid Americans doesn't mean that that all or even a majority of them are.

      A TV football show here in Australia has a segment each week where a host (Sam Newman) goes out and speaks to people on the street. Almost every person they show is an idiot, many of them mentally handicapped. Obviously not all of the people you'd meet on the streets are idiots but they're the only ones that get shown.

    373. Re:Plea for peace by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      Genocide implies destroying a race of people. No one suggests the majority of any race of people has a culture so seaped in societal hatred as these criminals. No one is suggesting murder of innocents is expeditious enough to warrent wonton warefare. Well, no one except the criminals, apparently.

      Fact: Warfare has morphed.
      Fact: Acts of (modern) war have occured.

      Expect civil liberites to morph right along with the worst of behavior of terrorists...

    374. Re:Plea for peace by Malcontent · · Score: 2

      Once again.

      You can not punish a "country". Well you can but then you are absolutely no different then the monsters who blew up those buildings today. They too want to punish a "country" and do it by killing civilians. When (yes when) the US decides to punish whatever country they choose they will do it by killing tens of thousands of civilians just like these terrorists did.
      The guilty will walk away untouched. Hussein, Kaddafi, Bin Laden, Arafat, Sharon are all still alive and well despite targeting civilians over and over again.

      Like I said Americans are genetically incapable of acting rationally under these circumstances and will indeed kill tens of thousands of civilians and then they will walk around thumping their chests and telling the world what badasses they are. It's in our culture we can't help it. Too bad they can't look in a mirror and realize that they have just committed the exact same "cowardly and evil act" they accused the terrorists of doing.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    375. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      what pain must a person go through to be ready to to do such act?

      If the terrorists were Islamic, the promise of 40 virgins in heaven couldn't have hurt.

    376. Re:Plea for peace by Malcontent · · Score: 2

      "For one thing, Rush never, to my knowledge, advocated any such response to the Waco tragedy."

      I was not talking about waco I was talking about OKC. In specific Rush did advocate bombing (actually he used much harsher words like devestating or turning into dust or something like that) whoever was responsible for the OKC bombing. Once he found out that not only was the perpetrator an American but also a Republican he changed his tune. All of a sudden turning Michigan into a parking lot was not an option. Why is that? Well it's because Rush wanted to see arab civillians killed by the hundreds of thousands but did not want to see American civillians die. There can be no other explanation for this abrupt change of heart.

      As for the rest of your post..

      Whatever.

      I have heard enough of all this Reno bashing to last a lifetime. In my mind the proper response to "we have you surrendered, come out with your hands up" is not "Fuck you motherfucker I have guns and I ain't afraid to use them, come and get me if you can".

      1) Those people were under arrest.
      2) The police gave them plenty of time to surrender.
      3) Their fate was in their hands.

      All over the world incredibly brave people fight injustice by getting arrested, tortured and killed in jail. They are brave enough to become martyrs for their causes and are brave enough to die for their causes. These people you talk about didn't even have the guts to get arrested for their cause. If you want to talk about injustice talk to me about Stephen Biko or Nelson Mandella not some whiny ass nutcake like Koresh or some racist mutherfucker like Weaver.
      Making these people into some sort of Martyrs is beneath your dignity and besmirches the efforts of people all over the world who fight against injustice and are arrested , tortured or killed in Jail. If Weaver saw one hundredth the hardship Nelson Mandella or Ghandi did he would commit suicide. Mandella survived 27 years in a south African prison finally emerging to lead his country. Koresh wouldn't have made it a week in there.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    377. Re:Plea for peace by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      A question I heard asked was "why not give Israel everything right up to India? Would gas go back to 10 cents/gallon?" The professor was joking, I'm almost sure...

    378. Re:Plea for peace by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      It wasn't Michigan who did OKC. Else Michigan wouldn't be Michigan now. Likewise, its not a race of people who've done this today. Nor a culture. But it did and happen, and people *did* do it. Those are the only criminals. The victim count, however, will continue to climb. Here as well as around the world life will not be the same. No way.

    379. Re:Plea for peace by cs668 · · Score: 1

      I used to sit arround defending palistinians and muslim fundementalists in conversations with my friends. Making analogies to get them to understand how Isreal is the "bad guy".

      But, after seeing them handing out candy and selebrating today I really don't care if we can only punish a country by attacking its citizens.

      Sometimes when you fight with monsters you have to become one.

      The sad thing is that I think muslim countries where really wining the PR war with the ordinary US citizens lately. It may not have affected our governments pollicy yet. But, I think people were getting tired of Isreals actions and thought the palistinians were being given a raw deal. This would have eventually affected US policy. Now the average US citizen will never feal that way again.

    380. Re:Plea for peace by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      We have the technical means to find the answers. Can you say "sodium penythol" (LOL: can i even spell it?) The technical means is easy. The hard questions remain: Do we do it? Should we? What *are* the consequences of such breachments? These are hard questions. If we use the means to achieve this end, will it be easier for those means to be abused later?

    381. Re:Plea for peace by modulus · · Score: 1

      I wasn't sure where to post this, but this was the first post that showed up mentioning airport security. I've heard a lot of people mention airport security on the news, blaming them for having lax standards, not searching things properly, etc.



      WHAT THE FUCK SHOULD THEY BE SEARCHING FOR???



      People don't seem to understand how this thing worked. I'm no expert, but as I understand it:

      • There were NO bombs added to the planes. Just gas tanks.
      • There were NO guns onboard.


      Now, I can't claim to know for sure that there were no guns or bombs, but nothing has indicated the presence of bombs, and the one phone call from inside one of the hijacked planes indicated that the hijackers were using "knife-like" weapons. People seem to forget that under ranges like those in an airplane, a knife will kill you just as much as a gun. Further, knives definitely DO NOT have to be made of any kind of metal.



      So your crew of terrorists, not being stupid and having had time to think this out, does not do stupid things like attempting to smuggle in guns or bombs. They carry normal luggage, have believable stories, etc. They carry a knife (let's say it's ceramic, it could be anything. hell, they don't even really need knives) concealed on their person, say strapped to the inside of their thigh.



      So what are you going to do? Metal detectors aren't enough... you can't really expect to get away with x-raying every passenger, or frisking every passenger; and even if you did it wouldn't be enough to stop anyone with half a brain. So what do you do? Strip search everyone? Plus anal probes? No matter how tough security is, you can get a weapon in if you really need to.



      Not that you really need to. A couple tough guys could easily take out a crew with their bare hands. So what do you do now? Run background checks on everyone? Not enough. Only allow close personal friends of the pilots to fly? Still NOT ENOUGH.



      The point that it took me a while to make is that you can't realistically blame airport security for this. As IMHO is often the case, the problem can't be satisfactorily solved through restrictions and regulations.

    382. Re:Plea for peace by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      If your local media is ignoring local news then you have a right to be angry at your system. If you are refering to our media being so concerned about what happens here, then isn't this exactly what you say:

      "We sentimentalize our own casualties..."

      It seems your angry is misplaced.

    383. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That the dude isn't an American citizen is good--how you feel is irrelevant. If you make decisions based on your emotions rather than via rational thought, you won't make very good decisions. America should avoid war at all costs. I just hope that this tragedy makes Americans realize, especially our dumber Americans (e.g., Southerners) why the cyclical violence in Northern Ireland and Middle East continues.

    384. Re:Plea for peace by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      "Live by the sword, die by the sword".
      A two-edged proverb.

    385. Re:Plea for peace by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      That surpass what occured today? Not in terms of the impact. The delta-evil/delta-time was extraordinary. The intent and focus is orders of magnitude worse.

    386. Re:Plea for peace by Grayswan · · Score: 1

      I'm just thinking what must go in a mind of person that flies a 7?7 into a building with 10 thousend of persons inside.

      What personal pain such a person must have gone through? What has he seen? what was done to him? what pain must a person go through to be ready to to do such act? Had he to see to watch his family die? I just can't imagine what such person went trough.


      Its called brainwashing. I've heard that these suiciders are promised X concubines in heaven for each person they kill and will sit at the right hand of god_name_here. Its the carrot, not the stick.

      --
      If you open your mind too wide, people will throw trash in it.
    387. Re:Plea for peace by sketcher0 · · Score: 1

      hear, hear. I am in absolute agreement. Kill the bastards! I truly hope that other countries can get behind the efforts of the USA to rid our globe of this terrible and inhumane terrorist activity. leonard0

    388. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A moment of silence is the result of the ACLU sueing the hell out of anyone who wants to utter a prayer during a government sponsored event. I imagine he was praying, as any decent Christian would do at a time like this.

    389. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are absolutely right. Gore is much more experienced at taking bribe.. err political donations from foreign governments.

    390. Re:Plea for peace by mgblst · · Score: 1

      3. Americans have died!

    391. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You misspelled President.

    392. Re:Plea for peace by olafva · · Score: 1

      Please explain the concept of Islamic Gihad?
      Whoever believes in such a concept is the root of today's tragedy and needs to be retrained or perhaps removed from the face of the earth. If Gihad is found in the Koran (I believe NOT), then the KORAN should be changed so the rest of the world can live in peace. Unfortunately many Palistinians believe in and flaunt Islamic Gihad. The world knows it and has absolutely NO sympathy for anyone who espouses such a concept, or even worse, brings up their children to believe in such a concept.

      --
      What's past is NOT ALWAYS prologue for the future!
    393. Re:Plea for peace by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 1

      And you don't think there are people in the US, who are willing to die for an idea, no matter how stupid it is?

      Hmm ... Waco springs to mind.

      I don't really see just why, it couldn't be a group of americans. Not saying that it IS, just that it could be.

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    394. Re:Plea for peace by localman · · Score: 1

      You are right, if the death rate is what is most important. It's impossible to really gauge, I guess, but decades of war and pervasive terrorism in your hometown is at least as detrimental to a society as a catastrophic single event like this. I would argue moreso.

    395. Re:Plea for peace by Malcontent · · Score: 2

      "But, after seeing them handing out candy and selebrating today I really don't care if we can only punish a country by attacking its citizens."

      A few people in the street in no way represents the millions of muslims in the world. After the OKC building there were plenty of high five-ing in texas, arizona, montana and other wester states where anti govt fervor was running high. Of course you choose to ignore that bit of news and of course the media never covered it.

      "Sometimes when you fight with monsters you have to become one."

      As long as you realize that. You are officially the same as the vile, evil covards that you seek to destroy. They won!. They not only stopped the economy of the united states (for all practical purposes) for a day or two, they not only caused billions in damages and killed tens of thousands but they also succeeded in making america into a savage terrorist state. All of our Ideals of democracy, justice and honor will now be thrown out the window and we will become the monsters they say we are. There can be no greater victory for a terrorist then to have a country undermine it's own value system so thoroughly.

      "This would have eventually affected US policy. Now the average US citizen will never feal that way again."

      First of the chances of the United States actually doing something Israel does not want is small to null. Israel is truly the tail that wags the dog. Secondly though this points out a very strong motivation for Israel to have actually commited this act. When you think about it they are probably the only people with the organization and the intelligence to carry out such an action and it will indeed give them free reign to complete their genocide of the palestenians undisturbed by the rest of the world.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    396. Re:Plea for peace by salimma · · Score: 1
      (S)he is just stating the fact - the Palestinians were celebrating on the streets upon hearing the news.

      Not that they are necessarily involved in the attack, but sadly the decades of conflict might have made some people desperate for any way to strike back.

      Michel

      --
      Michel
      Fedora Project Contribut
    397. Re:Plea for peace by cs668 · · Score: 1

      Let me ask you a question.

      How would you have the US respond?

      Let say that we could change all of our policies right now so that no one in the world would be displeased, how long would it last?

      There will always be someone that is unhappy with us. If we always give in and never resort to using a deterent force - however unpleasant -- where will that leave us?

      BTW I realize that not all Muslims were dancing in the street, but I am not suggesting we target all muslim countries.

      I also don't equate rednecks in montana with organizations that get state protection and support. I actually think that our homegrown terrorists are too stupid to pull something like this off. They could not get 20 people to work well together. They are too busy being anti-establishment to establish that much organization.

      As for this being done by Israel, I don't think they would risk loosing their biggest supporter.

    398. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why does the American president pray for his citizens?

      How un-American. There's atheists who are crying right now.

    399. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's another Canadian supporting world peace rather than world war.

    400. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad this doesn't solve overpopulation since you can't reuse the nuked land for God-knows-how-long.

      BTW: They have nukes too. Most places do. I wonder what happens when they meet mid-flight?

    401. Re:Plea for peace by shepd · · Score: 1

      I take from that statement middle eastern militants are, infact, rabid dogs that need to be put down?

      Is there any wonder why these people hate you enough to blow you up? I wouldn't appreciate being called a rabid dog. Not that I'd kill over it, but then again, I'm not everyone.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    402. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cool, somebody recognized it. =)

    403. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many people must die to pause American terrorism?

      Would 10 be enough to get us a month?
      Would a thousand get us a year?
      Would a million get us two?
      Would ten million give us five?
      Would a billion give us fifty?
      Would 2 billion give us a hundred?

      A thousand a year seems to give us the best deal. Why not kill a hundred thousand and get rid of the next century of terrorism?

    404. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >are you saying that a serial killer should be set free?

      No. Most of your country already found a non-violent solution to that: Lifetime jail sentences.

      Either that or you could beat them until they said they were sorry. Why not use a stick on their ass until it bleeds, then keep going till you take a few chunks of flesh out of it?

      Oh. That might be because your president thought that wasn't an appropriate punishment for anything, nevermind a spray-painting American maniac in Singapore.

      That's because that's using an act of violence to support some perverted kind of "Justice".

      >why do you think we have nuclear weapons?

      I dunno. So you can use them and ensure the waft of nuclear rain ends up on an ally?

      They ceased to be a deterrence when US enemies got their hands on them. Then they became a problem.

      >but it just doesn't accurately reflect how the real world works.

      Actually, it does. Most of the civilized world doesn't shoot, hang, fry, or poison their criminals anymore. In fact, not too much of the US does that anymore either.

    405. Re:Plea for peace by pallex · · Score: 1

      "or is fanatical enough to believe that it somehow is a good thing"

      Celebrations of this sort go on whenever one side in a war achieves a `success`. Get over it. Its exactly what the States did around the time of the gulf war - remember?
      Unless you are suggesting americans should receive different treatment.
      Time to try and sort out problems in the middle east? Or time to clamp down on free speech, anonymous net use, encryption, civil liberties etc?

    406. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...the US is the ONLY COUNTRY IN THE WORLD THAT HAS HAD TO SUFFER THROUGH TERRORISM!!!! "

      thats total bull dude. england is often targeted as well.

    407. Re:Plea for peace by Lughlamfainne · · Score: 0

      ... the why is obvious, the WHO isn't.. ponder that for a moment.. and ask yourself- is an outside source foolish enough to do something so obvious? if so, what are they trying to tell america in this act of stupidity?

      --
      .sig under construction
    408. Re:Plea for peace by albanac · · Score: 1

      What if, as with Oklahoma, the country you want to invade turns out to be the United States of America?

      ~cHris

    409. Re:Plea for peace by M@T · · Score: 1

      The original statement was:
      I can respect your opinion, but you said it yourself - you are not a US citizen. So, really, there's no way you can possibly know how people living in the US feel right now.

      and my response was:
      Of course... because as we all know... the US is the ONLY COUNTRY IN THE WORLD THAT HAS HAD TO SUFFER THROUGH TERRORISM!!!!

      see sarcasm...

      --
      'sapientia potestas est'
    410. Re:Plea for peace by dmsetser · · Score: 1

      It does not matter whether or not the Palestinians are responsible for this mass murder or not. The fact that they and many Islamic people celebrate in the streets... No, the fact that their CHILDREN celebrate in the streets makes them accomplices whether by fact or by desire.

      Once I was an idealist. At the age of 19 I was enlisted in the Army and sponsoring a Palestinian Child and his family through Save the Children. When Iraq invaded Kuwait and I saw Palestinians chanting in the streets "death to America" I stopped sponsoring. Today when I see children jumping up and down cheering and when I see adults congratulating each other my heart goes hard and cold.

      I can only say this. Death to Islam. Death to those who ARE responsible. America is not compatible with Mohammed. And those that wish to see Allah can just ask. I'll send them to visit him personally.

      --
      65.0% slashdot pure
    411. Re:Plea for peace by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      Their answer was: Send armed troops to Northern Ireland and shoot anyone who looks at you funny. Worked great.

      BTW only reasonable people can reason with reasonable people.


      That's not at all what I'm talking about. Finding those responsible and bringing them to justice is a reasonable act.

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    412. Re:Plea for peace by FloT · · Score: 1

      I appeal to everyone who reads this to join the plea for peace to the American Congress. People who are not from the US should also initiate petitions/pleas to make other countries warn the US of taking military countermeasures.
      The result would be much worse than what happened till now.

      Please!

    413. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm angry as all hell too, but listen to what you're saying, you stupid fuck:

      " turn whoever did this (and their friends, and family, and distant relatives) into a parking lot"

      If you honestly believe that, you're no different than the terrorists: you're willing to take the lives of civilians despite the fact that they have no direct involvment in any act committed.

      FUCK YOU. People like you ARE the terrorists. You're the ones who, if you had the power, would kill innocent civilians (friends, family, and distand relatives). You crazy mother-fucking Nazi cum-bubble. Get your rifle and start shooting at kids in schools. What difference is there between them and the friends, family, and relatives of the terrorists.

      Try and think before you post something. What I'm more worried about isn't that you didn't think before posting (out of anger), but that you actually believe what you wrote. If so, I pitty your mother that you ended up the way that you are.

      You think that these terrorists are an afront to our nation and our way of life, you're no different.

    414. Re:Plea for peace by cburley · · Score: 1
      Rush did advocate bombing whoever was responsible for the OKC bombing. Once he found out that not only was the perpetrator an American but also a Republican he changed his tune. All of a sudden turning Michigan into a parking lot was not an option. Why is that? Well it's because Rush wanted to see arab civillians killed by the hundreds of thousands but did not want to see American civillians die.

      So, let me get this straight: you assume that because Rush wanted to see the perpetrators of the OKC bombing punished, he necessarily was calling for killing hundreds of thousands of Arab civilians??

      Wow. In addition to having a sig that's the product of massive self-delusion, you appear to have a very poor grasp of logic.

      Again, I've actually been listening to Rush's show for some 10 years now, and he's not exactly anti-Life, nor anti-Muslim, nor anti-Arab.

      He certainly believes more in the efficacy of the use of military force than I do, but I don't find it surprising that anyone who advocates the use of military force at all would be more willing to punish a distant enemy in a less-than-perfectly-precise way than a local enemy that way.

      Nor is it hypocritical to rationally assess one's ability to more reliably distinguish enemies among one's local neighbors than among people halfway around the world.

      Continuing your delusional reasoning, you assume I'm making Koresh and company into martyrs. Of course, I did nothing even remotely like that.

      What I was pointing out was that, in your "rush" to tar and feather Rush for supposedly causing violence, you ignore the fact of the hypocrisies of the Left, namely, that we are to unilaterally disarm against sworn enemies of our nation (USSR, China, Cuba, whoever, especially if they're communist or socialist), while aggressively roll tanks into highly confused members of a local cult that posed no significant threat to the safety of our nation. (In this sense, they continued the "great work" undertaken mostly by communist/atheist governments, whether killing members of Falun Gong, Christians, capitalists, and so on, because they fancy that such people pose a threat to their own power base.)

      Koresh and his followers had no choice but to surrender. Reno chose to not ensure that they made that choice by simply waiting them out. As with Elian, there was no pressing need to roll in those tanks.

      Yet she found plenty of excuses not to investigate Al Gore, despite substantial and credible evidence of campaign-finance violations, and despite her own pledge to undertake such investigations should even the appearance of wrongdoing in high places manifest itself.

      I'm not really trying to pick on Reno, or Clinton, or even defend Rush, so much as I'm trying to point out that it's American citizens who had plenty of opportunity to decide whether the people it puts in positions of power -- and, let's face it, Clinton/Reno exercised vastly more power to kill innocent people than Rush ever did -- deserved to remain, after having so spectacularly failed to avoid killing innocent human beings, especially citizens, and offered totally insufficient grounds for their actions. (In that sense, I don't even rule out putting Operation Desert Storm in that general category, but note that a) that was a war against an aggressive nation, at least a "proper" function of government, whether truly necessary or not, and b) Americans voted the victorious President who conducted that war out of office ASAP.)

      More to the point, yesterday morning, over half of Congress woke up thinking first not of how best to defend our national borders against sworn enemies of the USA, how to ensure that our military is vibrant, strong, and alert to all manner of potential attack, but how to attack our President, how to force him to cut military spending, how to force him to increase spending on unconstitutional (and, more to the point, militarily irrelevant) activities like our welfare state and federal education, and how to raise taxes back and even further.

      The result of the attack has been not to change the "tune", to any significant degree, of Rush and the congresscritters who most closely represent his thinking, but to change the entire mode of conduct of "those on the other side of the aisle" -- those whose prescriptions for our nation's needs, such as federally funding endless destruction of viable human life to do stem cell research, increasing the minimum wage, spending yet more on a failed federal education system, and so on, hold no promise whatsoever for repelling attacks such as yesterday's, and, further, do not require government to implement any of them. (Private funding can meet all those "needs". Unless you're willing to let more crazies like Koresh do whatever they like, the same can't be said for national defense.)

      Yet we've so overburdened the government as if it's a big rich sugar daddy, or Santa Claus, passing out goodies that it funds by collecting confiscatory taxes from the populace by force, that we've lost sight of the fact that daddy is driving and needs to concentrate solely on the road -- the defense of our nation.

      A government that fails to effectively defend against attack from enemies, especially in so simple and direct a manner, and, in response, fails to jettison everything not directly related to its defensive duties, doesn't deserve to continue existing as such. The people can do better on their own.

      The reason we were attacked is because we weren't prepared. And the reason we weren't prepared is because we listen to people like you, who consistently, and willfully, try to shift our national government's focus from its sole duty to defend our national borders and our defensive infrastructure, to fulfilling your personal fantasies about how best to enforce "compassion".

      My observation is that Rush's approach -- of having a government that focuses narrowly on defense rather than taking on the job of intruding into every corner of the lives of ordinary Americans -- likely works much better than the approach of people who, like yourself, would rather criticize Rush than the congresscritters who frittered time and our money away in failing to defend against yesterday's attack.

      (Am I personally advocating a "strong military", warfare, and so on? Not necessarily. Just pointing out what does and doesn't work, and what is and isn't true.)

      BTW: I don't recall mentioning (Randy?) Weaver at all. As I recall, that was the Ruby Ridge incident. How you manage to find such references in my writings is beyond me, especially since Reno had basically nothing to do with Ruby Ridge -- it happened, what, one year before she took over the Dept. of Justice??

      P.S. As far as your feelings about Koresh -- frankly, I shared them completely at the time. When I saw those BATF agents taking fire, I was furious, and I'm pretty sure that even when the final raid happened I was still basically supportive of "teaching a lesson" to those crazies and anyone else like them.

      That's why I was, and probably still am, unsuitable as a law-enforcement agent, especially a director, and the same goes (and always, apparently, has gone) for Janet Reno, who I also defaulted to admiring greatly for the first year or so she was on the national scene.

      But one thing stuck with me, and I can't recall whether it happened during the initial or final raid, and that was Bryant Gumbel muttering something on the CBS Morning News about how that episode "shows the sad state of gun control in this country".

      I kept thinking about that. Not being much in favor of gun control at that time, nor strongly opposed to it yet, I could see some logic in what I knew to be his attempt to imply that we need only pass strong-enough laws to prevent this sort of thing ever happening again.

      But ultimately I realized that it was the gun-control laws themselves that caused what happened. Without them, there'd have been no initial or subsequent raids, OKC wouldn't have happened, and maybe we'd have even begun getting away from our failed war on drugs, or at least finding a better, less violent, intrusive, and unconstitutional approach to "waging" it.

      So, I felt as you appear to, but, in the end, I couldn't find any rational basis for supporting the initial raid, the final raid, nor the keeping of the perpetrator of the final deadly raid in office, any more than the perpetrators of the (much less consciously-conduct) Kent State shootings should have been allowed to remain in office. When it comes to killing innocent citizens by accident in a voluntary police action, officials should be given very little lenience based on their "intentions", IMO.

      But I will admit it took a long time for me to get away from the emotion of that situation. I get very angry in such situations, or at least used to, because, like Rush appears to, I tend to "default" to law-and-order mode, even if we disagree on how best to achieve order and what truly constitutes law.

      P.P.S. I had an interesting conversation this past summer with a lawyer/teacher (retired, IIRC) who described himself as a "small-business-oriented leftist anarchist" or something like that. He had plenty of interesting viewpoints, including noting that the "right wing" lately went from loving law enforcement to resenting it (to which I offered a couple of answers I think he found persuasive).

      But when I pointed out to him, after he defended Reno's acts, that she had willingly and, apparently, unnecessarily assaulted poor right-wing Christians, but failed to properly follow through on her real job of investigating highly-placed, wealthy, left-wing government officials, such as Gore, I swear this guy was totally dumbstruck -- and, interestingly, though I'm only guessing, not because he felt he'd been outargued or anything, but because I think he genuinely found this point persuasive and truly disturbing to contemplate.

      In the end, I think he and I, despite having great disagreements on how best to have a peaceful yet prosperous world with full individual freedoms, shared those goals sufficiently to intelligently discuss many of these issues without rancor. He did, as you might imagine, castigate Rush as a "racist", and was probably surprised that I neither capitulated nor desired to argue much, just pointing out that I'd listened to him for many years and completely disagreed.

      (In my experience, the willingness of someone to claim Rush Limbaugh is a "racist" or "promotes violence like the OKC bombing" is a sure indicator of someone who is unwilling to listen to him or others, yet willing to unthinkingly repeat whatever vile things they hear about some unpopular figure. So I was quite surprised, after a long conversation, that he made the "racist" claim, yet continued to listen to me, especially since the very views he probably considers Rush to hold that make him "racist" are ones that I, too, hold, though he didn't inquire about any of them specifically. I'm guessing that he probably won't repeat the "Rush is racist" claim without first verifying it for himself and thus being able to back it up with firsthand experience. Some people just refuse to knowingly play the role of mindless sheep, following the herd of a leader who requires them to spew hatred.)

      --
      Practice random senselessness and act kind of beautiful.
    415. Re:Plea for peace by Computer! · · Score: 1
      These people are a disease. They threw candy in the streets at the news of the deaths of thousands of innocent Americans. We could give them the Holy Land, and they would still want anywhere Muslims have ever stepped foot. I was not a racist warmonger until yesterday, but I agree. Kill until no Muslim breathes air. They have worn out their welcome on planet Earth, and it is time for them to go. In order to prevent further loss of decent human life, they must be exterminated like the vermin they are. I will tell you why:
      • Anyone harboring terrorists must be sent a clear message that if the actions of their friends result in American deaths, they will die
      • Anyone considering gross destruction of American property and lives must know that their friends and family will pay for their actions, and the deaths of their children and parents will not be as "glorious" as theirs
      • Goverments that allow these people asylum will cease to exist

      Now that might curb Islamic terrorism, don't you think? Your desire to treat these people "justly" smacks of cowardice and naievete. If you are not willing to stand up and fight against the slaughter of helpless innocents, maybe a time machine can be arranged, so that you can go treat Hitler with the justice he thought he deserved. I hope to God you are not an American, or for the first time, I am ashamed to be one myself.

      --
      If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
    416. Re:Plea for peace by localman · · Score: 1
      This isn't a counter attack simply because this act is unjustifiable.


      I understand your sentiment, but do you really know about the unjustifiable acts that America is supporting in the Middle East? We support terrorism and killing of civilians and have been doing so for decades. It occured over a longer period of time, but the death toll over there is much higher than this single attack. Our media doesn't cover these things, though. You'd have to watch BBC or some other world news.

    417. Re:Plea for peace by Ian+Bicking · · Score: 2
      My God, you are a self-admitted racist warmonger, and you would deam to judge me?!?

      You talk about killing the children and friends of the terrorists, and you would tell me that I am not willing to stand up and fight against the slaughter of helpless innocents?!? You propose genocide, and yet you bring up Hitler?!?

      I am willing to stand up against the slaughter of helpless innocents. And right now it's people like you that are the greatest threat to innocents. Unlike you I am not a racist. Unlike you I value human life equally. Unlike you I do not condemn innocent people based on their associations or geographical location.

      I am not preaching peace, but I am preaching justice. There is no time when justice is not called for. There is no exception to its virtue.

      I am an American, and the reactionary, violent sentiments I have seen here have only increased my resolve that I must fight to keep people like you from winning. I fear for the nation's soul, for you would surely take us to hell.

    418. Re:Plea for peace by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 2

      That's a no op...

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    419. Re:Plea for peace by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      2. The best you can do is eliminate the *motives* for terrorism.

      Well now, that would eliminate terrorists, now wouldn't it? At least you're not as bad as the first person who replied who didn't see that I was saying that blind violence is *not* a cure.

      As to *how* to eliminate terrorists, you have no idea - I have no idea, and I don't think anybody has any idea. Certainly killing them all will just generate animosity the same way stirring a swirling pot backwards generates eddys.

      I think many people have died, and many will die soon. I only hope (as I think all people willing to face war do) that the number of people who will die in battle are lower than the number who would die without battle (i.e., with continued terrorist acts).

      That's one of the only reasons to fight[1], and we will always go into that decision blind, not knowing if we are doing the right thing.

      [1] I'd accept certain fights for human rights, freedom, etc as something worth war, as those are things that I would personally die for.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    420. Re:Plea for peace by Computer! · · Score: 1

      I do judge you, as a coward and an idealist idiot who has no concept of war's place in history, or of the loss of American life yesterday. I never made a single racist remark, so thanks for bringing up that good old strawman. I have read the Koran, and no-where in it is the justification for terrorist actions like these. Have you read the Koran, Mr. Non-violent Justice? It was appeasement that lead to the slaughter of millions of innocent Jews, Catholics, gays and Gypsies during the Holocaust. Appeasement that you support. You should be ashamed.

      What is it you are willing to do, Ian, to stand up for innocent (truly innocent, not gun-toting militia members) women and children? Demand a fucking trial? Pardon me if I'm not impressed. Will you take up a rifle and risk your life for those already dead in this tragedy, or will you sit there in your ergonomic chair and defend the monsters that commited this act of terrorism? American democracy is the pinnacle of world freedom, and an assualt against it is the same as an assault on all of civilization. Your tactic was used unsuccessfully throughout history, from the Romans to WW2. Your ideas have been proven worthless at the expense of millions of lives, so please don't waste any more by propagating them. You are outraged at my words because you are unable to stomach what is necessary to make sure that something like this never happens again. It is dirty work, but it must be done. This Jihad must end, and civilization must win. If you'd like to hug terrorists, feel free to book a flight to Afganistan. Make sure to wave an American flag once you get there, so that we don't have to have this discussion again.

      --
      If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
    421. Re:Plea for peace by Rupert · · Score: 2

      Huh?

      I forget the name of the logical fallacy you just committed, but I asserted:

      !J implies W

      and you replied:

      J does not imply !W

      thus refuting my argument. Except your reply is not a logical derivitive of my statement. To explain further:

      If you do not talk you will get war. If you do talk you may get war, or you may not. Of course, it's possible that I'm full of shit, and you can not talk, and still not have war, but that wasn't your point. Your point is that:

      If you talk, you may get war. Which is true, but does not contradict my statement.

      --

      --
      E_NOSIG
    422. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd definitely say that the proverb cuts both ways.

    423. Re:Plea for peace by StupidKatz · · Score: 1

      Yes, each and every one of those civilians murdered was directly responsible for "tin-pot, US supported dictatorships"... (end sarcasm)

      Maybe we'll get lucky and an errant bomb will fall on your head, thus improving the average quality of human life on this planet.

    424. Re:Plea for peace by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 1

      they weren't, but the US was, and yesterdays attack was targeted at the US, not those individuals specificaly.

      basically, the US is far from innocent. You have provided the funding that led to many many people across the world being killed and tortured, eg Pinochet in Chile, Panama, Nicaragua, lots of african countries, and dare i say it, the Taliban in Afghanistan!

      Yep, Osama Bin-Laden probably fought russians with weapons and training funded by you, the american taxpayer.

      The monsters you face are of your own creation.

      And before you talk to me from your moral high-ground, perhaps you should first open some history books and find out what your Govt. has done in your name in other countries.

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
    425. Re:Plea for peace by Malcontent · · Score: 2

      I am for any means that will actually punish the guilty. Weather that's chemical or not. I am not for torturing people to get answers. I am not for killing people who had nothing to do with this.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    426. Re:Plea for peace by Malcontent · · Score: 2

      You respond to it with the following manner.

      In all of your actions you seek to demonstrate that your core values have not changed. That we are still a country that believes in justice, fairness, morals.

      You find out who is guilty and then you punish them. Maybe you can't bring them here and maybe you have to kill them but you have to target only the guilty. This rules out dropping bombs in kabul or lebenon or otherwise indiscriminately destroying women and children whose only crime in life is to be born a muslim in a country you don't like.

      "There will always be someone that is unhappy with us."

      Yes of course there will be. What you have to make sure is that you are acting in an honorable way. That way when there are disagreements they are handled respecfully. Right now our credibility is shot all over the world. Mostly because of our undying pledge of allegience to israel but also because of our inability to let five years go by without bombing the crap our to some poor defenseless nation. We are a country enamoured of spilling blood whenever and whereever we want. as long as we act in a brutal manner in killing people all over the world then those people will feel justified in acting brutally with us. As long as we are willing to kill civilians (100,000 iraqis were killed and millions still suffer due to embargoes what did they ever do to you?) then they will feel justified in doing this to us. Remember these people are dying anyways. They are being bombed daily by the US in iraq. If they are marked for death by american bombs and planes then why not make your death mean something? Give people a reason to live and maybe they won't commit suicide on your soils.

      "BTW I realize that not all Muslims were dancing in the street, but I am not suggesting we target all muslim countries."

      Let me tell you something. Sometime in the next few weeks american palnes will drop bombs on innocent civilians. Thousands of people will die in far off cities including women and children. Americans all over the country will dance, whoop, drink beer and celebrate this bloodbath. Don't kid yourself. You are absolutely no better then those animals.

      "I also don't equate rednecks in montana with organizations that get state protection and support. "

      Those terrorists boarded in the US. They lived in the US and Canada (at least that's what the news is saying). Guess what. The state protection they get is from the US and Canada. Are you advocating bombing canada? Of course not they are white people. You would much rather bomb algeria, iraq, or afganistan where the brown people live.

      2) You make an honest effort to determine

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    427. Re:Plea for peace by Malcontent · · Score: 2

      "So, let me get this straight: you assume that because Rush wanted to see the perpetrators of the OKC bombing punished, he necessarily was calling for killing hundreds of thousands of Arab civilians??
      "

      I heard him with my own ears. he said he wanted to turn iraq into a parking lot. he wanted to kill everybody in that country!. Yes he really said that. Yes he really wanted kill arabs by the millions. Yes he actually advocated carpet bombing of civillians in retaliation. I heard him with my own ears.

      He did not say "whoever did this should be punished" he said "when we find out who did this we should turn that country into a parking lot".

      Now it was along ago and I forget the actual words he used but they definately involved killing the entire country. I repeat I heard it with my own ears.

      "Koresh and his followers had no choice but to surrender. Reno chose to not ensure that they made that choice by simply waiting them out. As with Elian, there was no pressing need to roll in those tanks."
      These people broke laws. They had plenty of opportunity to surrender peacefully to officers of the law. If they wanted to fight instead of going to jail they had plenty of time to get their women and children out of harms way. They chose not to do either. They used their children as shields and they mocked the law and the united states itself. Koresh had more then a month to do something noble he chose not to. People were begging him to come out peacefully and to release his children he did not choose to. He instead chose to endanger the lives of his childred and other children who were under his care. This was a despicable act. Those helpless children should have been let go on day one. Koresh chose to hold them hostage and use them as shields.

      Like I said the response to "come with your hand up" is not "come and get me mutherfuckers" especially if you have children in the building. He was a evil, coward, pychopath who wanted to go out in a blaze of glory and chose to take his children with him. If you believe in your cause then get arrested. Every single hero in history has done that.

      As for the rest of your rant..
      Whatever.
      I have heard the republican line over and over again (how could I not with the media so thoroughly controlled by the right). Suffice it to say I don't see the world through your black and white prism.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    428. Re:Plea for peace by Kierthos · · Score: 1

      Well, Hollywood crapola aside, I really can't see most leaders of terrorist organizations being on part of a suicide mission. Let's face facts, the leaders want to be around afterwards to celebrate and plan the next attack. They can't do that if they are dead.

      Yes, the hijackers, along with many innocent people, are dead. I seriously doubt, however, that every last person involved with the planning, preparation, and execution of the attack is dead. That, of course, needs to change.

      Kierthos

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    429. Re:Plea for peace by sydb · · Score: 2

      I was not aware of that, and it makes me worried.

      I don't know how you can compare circumstantial evidence with DNA. DNA found on a murder weapon is surely direct evidence, not curcumstantial. The reliability of circumstial evidence is to be found in obtaining a conviction, whether true or false, but not in achieving justice. IANAL, thank god.

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
    430. Re:Plea for peace by cburley · · Score: 1
      You claim the US constantly kills innocent citizens, yet repeatedly respond to my pointing out that Reno did exactly that by unnecessarily sending in tanks to Waco by talking about what Koresh did.

      At no point have you explained why Reno had to do what she did. At no point have you explained why she should have been allowed to hold onto her job afterwards.

      All you seem to want to do is cheer on Clinton and Reno, to try to "equalize" the evil you claim Rush represents, who, okay, maybe for one day was going off the deep end, like so many Americans, ranting about carpet-bombing a country that may have willingly hosted terrorists that had just attacked ours.

      I don't deny you might be right about Bush "SR" killing "innocent Iraqi civilians" (which is surely what you said, given your transition from killing "civilians" to blaming Bush for killing "hundreds of thousands of Iraqis"), but my impression is that he did not do that, an entire coalition of nations ordered Iraq to withdraw from Kuwait (where they were already killing plenty of civilians, and looking to invade Saudi Arabia), then, when Iraq decided for itself to fight "the mother of all ground wars", it was their soldiers, not civilians, that got killed by the hundreds of thousands. The civilians actually got killed by tiny numbers by traditional standards of warfare.

      Regarding sanctions, my impression is that the international community, what remains of that coalition, decided what would be sufficient to allow Iraq to subsist at least, possibly flourish, without building up its military and shoot down planes patrolling the no-fly zone. They might have the calculations wrong.

      Or, just possibly, Saddam Hussein might be diverting so much of the resources being allowed in for military use, willingly denying his own innocent men, women, and children those important foods and medicines, that mindless sheep will go along with his media campaign of blaming US, or Bush Sr (I notice you don't exactly bring up the fact that those sanctions continued, unchanged, under the Clinton/Reno regime, but continue to act as though Bush was solely responsible for them all the way along), always blaming somebody else, for his (Hussein's), and, by going along with it, his nation's, evil, and the comparatively-light sanctions resulting therefrom.

      The reality is that the US has a sadly, unprecedented history of giving generously to quickly rebuild nations that it has just defeated in war. (In Iraq's case, willingly keeping the prime perpetrator in power naturally disqualifies them for this treatment -- Iraq has chosen this result by its actions, is how I see it.)

      You, of course, willfully ignore that in your rants, paint pretty much all Americans, especially our Presidents, with the same broad brush of your hateful assumptions.

      Now, I might indeed have some facts wrong above -- I haven't investigated for myself. Maybe all the reporting from Iraq was wrong. Maybe the US media duped us. Maybe they never even invaded Kuwait. (I recall hearing that the persuasive testimony of some Kuwaiti leader's daughter regarding seeing a pregnant woman stabbed was shown to be a lie. Not a US media lie, but a lie of the sort I find hard to swallow...and, needless to say, I don't find Kuwait's willingness to follow through on promises made vis-a-vis democracy all that persuasive.)

      But, I do know that even Janet Reno has not offered anything close to a valid reason for ordering those tanks to roll in, killing those innocent children you keep claiming as so important for Koresh to release.

      Based on your moral reasoning about Rush, I call you what you are: an evil, unreasoning, mass murderer. You promote and defend murder of innocent American children, while blaming US Presidents for what international coalitions decide to do to guilty, murderous regimes and the soldiers that willingly sign up for them.

      AND GET THIS THROUGH YOUR HEAD, YOU CHILDISH IDIOT: ONCE KORESH'S CAMP WAS INVADED, ALSO UNNECESSARILY, HIS ABILITY TO REASON, ACT NOBLY, WHATEVER LITTLE OF THAT MIGHT HAVE ALREADY EXISTED, WENT OUT THE WINDOW. THAT WAS THE **WHOLE POINT** OF THAT RAID -- TO COMPLETELY DEMORALIZE, DISTRACT, CONFUSE, AND BLIND KORESH AND HIS FOLLOWERS.

      Comparing him to Janet Reno, who sat back in Washington calmly drinking tea, who had plenty of opportunity to understand the psychological state of the cult and its leader, and yet STILL SENT IN THOSE TANKS, shows what a complete and utter disregard you really have for innocent human life, compared to evil people who, in their thirst to show their power, undertake unnecessary actions resulting in the the loss of that innocent life.

      So, okay, I'll concede your point about Rush's rant for now. Like so many of us, he was furious for a day or so, I'll assume.

      Unlike Rush and the rest of us, Reno has never since gotten over her fury, her irrational, possibly insane to devotion to using force (though always against innocent, impoverished right-wing Christians, it seems) again and again...

      ...and, by choosing to repeatedly avoid defending her by logical argument or making it clear you consider her vastly more culpable for her actions than Rush has ever in his life been for killing any innocents, I claim you are more guilty than Rush of evil, of murdering innocents by proxy, based on your own reasoning.

      Lest anyone think you aren't a blind, hating, murderous-in-your-heart racist, they should re-read your own writing, IN THE WAKE OF THE MOST SEVERE LOSS OF AMERICAN LIFE ON OUR SHORES IN OVER A CENTURY, and, frankly, this will likely be the quote, and the timing, for which you will be known for the rest of your life, thanks to your putting it on public record:

      He is an american and like all americans he too likes to see people being killed all over the world.

      Lovely. Hope you're proud of making that claim about the approximately 20,000 innocent men, women, and children killed some 48 hours ago, including the three or so American men who decided to sacrifice their lives, rush the hijackers, and thus, quite probably, save the lives of many others somewhere in Washington DC.

      God bless America. And, God bless you.

      --
      Practice random senselessness and act kind of beautiful.
    431. Re:Plea for peace by dvdeug · · Score: 2

      [How pathetic do you have to be to have multiple Slashdot accounts for more karma?]

      This is not logic class. Your argument was that we should talk, because if we don't, we'll get war. My response was that if we do talk, we'll get war, so there's no reason to talk if that talk is morally wrong. Furthermore, I pointed out that war is not always the wrong solution; we can not talk and sacrifice all, instead of standing up for the right.

    432. Re:Plea for peace by Rupert · · Score: 2

      Not nearly as pathetic as someone who does so, but can't keep track so people find out that they're doing it. Or who loses track of their tags. Anyway, it's not the karma - I run multiple accounts so I can mod myself up. New Slashcode stops you from modding up posts from your IP address, though, so I guess I'll have to stop.

      Speaking of karma, can you imagine how much karma you'd lose in a normal /. thread if you claimed that there was such a thing as talk that was morally wrong? Next you'll be claiming free beer is immoral, too.

      Your new argument is that arguments don't have to be logical. This is unfortunately true, and the kind of thinking that will get Kabul flattened. You cite a case in which talking did not prevent war, and deduce that talking is of no use. You may be right, but you don't know that for certain, and neither does anyone else.

      Personally, I would talk to Satan himself if it would prevent further bloodshed.

      --

      --
      E_NOSIG
    433. Re:Plea for peace by BattyMan · · Score: 1

      No, your're _not_ in America, are you?

      --
      Exceeding the recommended torque is not recommended.
    434. Re:Plea for peace by dvdeug · · Score: 2

      > Your new argument is that arguments don't have to be logical.

      No, my argument is that simple logic ignores the subtilties of human conversation.

      > Personally, I would talk to Satan himself if it would prevent further bloodshed.

      And what happens when you realized you've let your family be killed while you were talking to him? That you've sold your soul, your family, your country down the river? If someone isn't interested in working with you, talking often gives them time to take advantage of you; if you put too high an importance on talking, you'll pay too much of a price for peace, often to discover it won't buy peace after all.

    435. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or when you let Bill Clinton react to every threat
      by bombing radar shacks (God forbid we should
      actually attack some of the folks responsible!)

    436. Re:Plea for peace by Malcontent · · Score: 2

      "At no point have you explained why Reno had to do what she did. At no point have you explained why she should have been allowed to hold onto her job afterwards."

      Let me try to expalin again. I don't give a flying fuck about koresh and his blind idiot followers, nor do I give a flying fuck about reno. Reno may have killed a few dozen people but that's nothing. First of all Koresh was exactly like the people who slammed that airplane into the WTC. He was a religious zealot who wanted to go out in a blaze of glory. Reno waited for over a month while koresh made a mockery of the US justice system. Republicans and democrats were alike wondering just exactly what the fuck was wrong with the police that they could not get this guy to come out. Ordinary citizens were grumbling that if they had committed a crime they would be in jail by now but koresh was getting a free ride.
      The fact is that he could have avoided all this by simply raising his hands up and coming out. He chose not to do that. It was his choice and his alone.

      I neither cheered clinton nor reno. I simply pointed out that clinton and reno also pariticipated in the much celebrated custom of killing innocent civilians abroad but that they had not done it to the levels that past presidents had done. Clinton killed less then one thousand innocent civilians but Bush sr. killed hundreds of thousands, reagan killed tens of thousands (and was indirectly responsible for ungodly torture and death of people in south america), and nixon of course carpet bombed much of southeast asia. Once again All american presidents (including clinton) enjoy killing innocent people overseas.

      As for iraq you are seriously deluded. I suspect this comes from blindly believing everything a republican tells you and wrapping the flag around eyes.
      1) The fact that iraq and kuwait have a disagreement has nothing to with protecting america. There was no need to go there in the first place.
      2) Saddam was suckered by Bush. Bush had told him that he would look the other way if saddam attacked kuwait but then pounced on him afterwards.
      3) All those so called soldiers were nothing but conscripts dragged out of their homes and put into the battlefield. That makes them prisoners not soldiers. Look at how they immediately surrendered. They were not fighting america they were waiting to be rescued by them. Nevertheless the relentless bombing proceeded for a month. Tens of thousands of people were killed bagdad. That bombing was absolutely no different the the NYC terrorism act. Except that you did it for cheap oil and they did it for religion (both of them silly excuse to kill people).

      4) United nations may have bowed to american pressure but they did not initiate it. If it wasn't for america none of that would have taken place.
      5) The sanctions were opposed by a lot of people and are still opposed by many european countries. Many of them have already broken them. It's at americas insistance that people of iraq are starving to death. In a way it would have been more humane to drop the bomb on them instead of subjecting them to slow and painful death by starvation. The fact is the the US holds the power of life and death over any country which opposes it. We could at a moments notice deploy nuclear weapons and wipe out europe and they know it. That's why when push comes to shove they will do whatever we say.

      "Lovely. Hope you're proud of making that claim about the approximately 20,000 innocent men'

      Hey sorry if the truth is hard to swallow. First of all the death count will be way less then twenty thousand. Putting that aside for a moment. As evil as that act was it does not compare to what the US has done overseas. We supported pinochet in his murderous regime, we supported Idi Amin, the Shah of Iran, the taliban, israel etc. the list goes on and on. Who do you think armed and trained the taliban? These same people who you are going to carpet bomb pretty soon were funded by your tax dollars to fight the russians remember that? BTW when your bombs are falling on kabul and killing people who had nothing to do with anything (just like the terrorists in NY did) the heads of the taliban will be off in the mountainside and Bin Lauden will be who knows where. You will kill innocents to make yourself feel better but you will not kill the actual guilty people. Just like you did with saddam. Kill the iraqi citizens let the monster live.

      There is a reason why people all over the world hate america. have you ever asked yourself why that might be? Have you ever looked at the history of your own country in an objective way? DO you think the people think warmly of your country when one of your mines blows up the legs off their children? When US bombs and US planes are dropping missiles in palestine blowing up homes and businesses do you think those people like you? When the taliban is cutting the heads off of women who dare to walk in the street or go to school do you think those victims are praising the US? When people are being tortured and killed in south america do you think they like the fact that US funds and training made all that possible?

      People hate you because you behave in a evil and hateful way. Not only towards all the people in the world but also with your own countrymen. Did you watch the news today? Did you see how your own citizens are treating your arab citizens?

      America is a racist country. For hundreds of years they treated blacks as pets, draft animals, hunting game, and sex slaves. When that ended they turned on everybody else. If you want proof just wait and see.
      I heard on the news that a few people were arrested in Germany in connection with this act. Do you think Germany will get bombed by the US for harboring terrorists? of course not they are white people. I also heard that some of these guys lived in canada. Will you bomb canada? of course not they are white people. You WILL bomb iraq, iran, afghanistan, libya, and any other nation where brown people live whether they had any connection to this or not. Iran is a shiite country and bin lauden is a sunni. They probably hate each other but it won't stop you from killing iranians by the ton will it? To you one brown man is just like another, kill them all they just muslims anyway right?

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    437. Re:Plea for peace by issachar · · Score: 1

      teenagers throwing rocks are not civilians!

      throwing rocks is a violent act and in a military zone that makes you a soldier.

      --
      . --- If you're looking for free e-mail you won't find it here! http://www.noemailhere.com
    438. Re:Plea for peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or more likely the same AC reposting...

      (maybe I'm still him)

  4. Live Streams of DC Police by PenguinRadio · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://www.penguinradio.com/ has live streams of the DC Police Special Operations channel. This is a shoutcast MP3 feed.

    1. Re:Live Streams of DC Police by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      Penguin radio is so slashdotted it aint funny.
      www.shoutcast.com
      search for scanner

      There are currently 4 shoutcast streams that are not dead yet for DC and NYC. 2 NYC servers went down, but the server loads are getting insane..

      If you are a linux person, download shoutcast or icecast, hook up your 2meter ham radio tuned to police or fire and get it on the net if you are in the NYC or DC area.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  5. Re:Nostradamus by Diomedes01 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm sorry, but that's way too vague to make any sense at all. How could anyone call DC or New York "the City of God" - I'm sick of all these new-age hippie bastards who wet their pants every time something happens that can be contorted to almost fit one of Nostradamus' ridiculous "prophecies". There are serious events in motion without letting stupid superstitions get in the way.

    --
    "To hope's end I rode and to heart's breaking: Now for wrath, now for ruin and a red nightfall!"
  6. Navy base near DC shut down by Goldenhawk · · Score: 1

    The navy base where I work (an hour from DC) has been shut down - all non-essential personnel ordered to leave. Gates are closed to incoming traffic and police are everywhere. The military appears to be treating this as a war.

    --
    --Brandon / Split Infinity Music

    1. Re:Navy base near DC shut down by slickwillie · · Score: 2

      It IS war.

      Well, one difference is that in a real war, soldiers kill other soldiers. In this case, a handful of cowards killed hundreds, if not thousands, of civilians.

    2. Re:Navy base near DC shut down by jafac · · Score: 2

      No this is war.

      Historically, when a city has been conquered by forces in the past, the civilians are raped, butchered, their belongings taken, the buildings burned. Standard Operating Procedure until only VERY recently in human history.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  7. Just Give Blood!!! by TopShelf · · Score: 4, Informative

    Even if you're not in NYC, blood supplies can be moved around, and are desperately needed in a situation like this. Given the situation, does anybody know if they'll accept donations from folks who gave less than 8 weeks ago?

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    1. Re:Just Give Blood!!! by Jodka · · Score: 1

      I am in New York. Tell me where I go to gived blood.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une signature.
    2. Re:Just Give Blood!!! by geekoid · · Score: 2

      56 days is ther SOP. They might make an acception if its close.
      I just gave 2 weeks ago. On one hand I'm glad my blood is ready to be used, OTOH I need to do something and I'd love to give more.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Just Give Blood!!! by andyfsu99 · · Score: 1

      I have a couple more weeks until I am eligible again. I would also like to know if there will be an exception made.

      Anyone know someone at the Red Cross?

      -Andy

      --
      -- "I will never let my schooling get in the way of my education." --Mark Twain
    4. Re:Just Give Blood!!! by remande · · Score: 5, Informative
      I just called the Manchester, NH office (5 hr drive to NYC). They didn't make an exception in my case, but I am only 1 day underdue, and am eligible tomorrow.


      Geekoid, please note that you have done your part, two weeks ago. If that pint isn't used in the rescue effort, it may have stood in place of a pint that will be.


      Anyone who has not given blood since 7/17/01 is eligible to give blood today (9/11/01). The Red Cross says that they will need donations all through the week. I expect that NYC will go into "Spaghetti surgery" mode and stabilize everybody they can today, then spend the next few days performing more permanent medicine as supplies arrive. Thus, people eligible to donate within the next week are encouraged to do so.


      Red Cross Internet: redcross.org (leads you to your local office, has news briefs, and is nearly slashdotted).


      Red Cross Bellnet: 800-462-9400


      Will someone post NYC donation data here, and someone else mod it up? That should save valuable phone lineage in NYC. I will post donation data if I can find it.

      --

      --The basis of all love is respect

    5. Re:Just Give Blood!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know that donating Plasma has a shorter waiting period between donations. I've been trying to get info, but plasma sites seem to be flooded, too.

    6. Re:Just Give Blood!!! by sporty · · Score: 1

      a recent announcement has made the exception. They are asking for all donations.

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    7. Re:Just Give Blood!!! by fishbonez · · Score: 2, Informative
      Here is the list of places you can donate blood in New York and New Jersey. Given the current situation many Blood Donation Centers are holding special drives outside of normally scheduled hours. Please call the Blood Donation Center nearest you for information.

      In Rockland County, Good Samaritan Hospital in Suffern, NY is accepting blood donations today.

      --
      Frylock: That's not a toy!
      Master Shake: You say that about everything you own. You should own toys. They're fun.
    8. Re:Just Give Blood!!! by Dream11 · · Score: 1

      My wife and I cannot donate blood because we lived in Europe for six years (mad-cow). Our local blood service advised us to urge anyone in a similar circumstance to canvas the neighborhood to ask others to donate.

    9. Re:Just Give Blood!!! by Chakat · · Score: 1

      Go to your local hospital, tell them you've got a vein that they can tap. If they don't take donations there, they can tell you where to go to donate. But the most important thing is to donate.

      --

      If god had intended you to be naked, you would have been born that way.

    10. Re:Just Give Blood!!! by Ted+V · · Score: 2

      I haven't been able to access the http://www.redcross.com [redcross.com] website.
      However, the Ammerican Association of Blood Banks, http://www.aabb.org is up, though slow. It has some listings of blood donations sites. You can also call 1-866-FROMYOU (1-800-376-6968)

    11. Re:Just Give Blood!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another site for finding a donation center:

    12. Re:Just Give Blood!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Called Red Cross. They said that blood takes a number of days to process. So the blood you give today will be unlikely to be used for the crisis.

      However, their supply will be reduced after that, so donating sometime within the next week would be sufficient.

      1) Is this true?
      2) Can blood processing be sped up in emergencies?

    13. Re:Just Give Blood!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      In light of this horrible tradjedy, I'm not going to get on my trivial little soap box. I can only express my regret. I have type O- blood, am very healthy (checked and tested), am currently about thirty miles from DC in N. Va, and would gladly give blood without a moments hesitation. However, I'm a gay male and they don't want my help. That makes me very sad.

    14. Re:Just Give Blood!!! by allism · · Score: 1
      I contacted Bonfils (the company who handles blood donations in Colorado--ARC's blood donation facility was shut down here by the health department) to see if I could donate, even though I'm 'ineligible' for the next ten days, and was turned down, but they said they really need donations. Bonfils has seven locations in Denver. Please don't forget, it will take a long time to stock the reserves back up once this is all over, so keep donating after today.


      A news site in Oklahoma (can't remember which one) said blood reserves in Oklahoma are being shipped to New York, and that donations (especially type O) are desperately needed.

    15. Re:Just Give Blood!!! by Sir+Joltalot · · Score: 1

      Canucks, like myself, can call 1-888-2DONATE to give blood, anywhere across Canada. They will tell you where the closest clinic is and make an appointment for you. Blood supplies can be moved around easily, so no matter where you are in Canada, help out!

      --
      "Caffeine is not an option. Caffeine is a way of life."
    16. Re:Just Give Blood!!! by allism · · Score: 1

      Update - Bonfils has a five hour wait and are asking anyone who has not come in to donate to wait until tomorrow, the next day, or even next week.

  8. Re:I hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Yeah, because bombing has done such a good job of stopping terrorists in the past...

  9. Fort Drum Army Base by Glove+d'OJ · · Score: 1

    ... in Northern New York is locked down tight. No one in, no one out. Damn.

    1. Re:Fort Drum Army Base by JerryKnight · · Score: 1

      Seems all major army bases are closed. Fort Hood, TX holds the largest single-building military entity (3 corps) Let's hope these are the only attacks. If they've gone this far, they could easily go further.

      --

      Catapultam habeo. Nisi omnem pecuniam tuam mihi dabis, ad tuum caput saxum immane mittam.
    2. Re:Fort Drum Army Base by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 2

      That's a problem because a major highway goes straight through the base.
      -russ

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    3. Re:Fort Drum Army Base by Kymermosst · · Score: 1

      I was stationed there two years ago, in 10th TAD. I am out of the military, but have concerns about getting a reactivation letter, for obvious reasons.

      Are you a soldier stationed there? If so, which unit? If they haven't restricted communications yet... (we had to turn in computer keyboards, monitors, mice, phones, etc. during alerts)... can you give us any more information?

      I assume the base is at threat level delta... I never saw it at more than Bravo, after the embassy attacks abroad.

      Praying for us all here.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    4. Re:Fort Drum Army Base by Glove+d'OJ · · Score: 1

      Have family in Watertown... neighbors of parents who work on base. Locked up tight... all soldiers are recalled-need picture ID to get on base, and even then "non-essential" people are being turned away.

      I believe that all bases are at Delta. Damn.

      This is the first day of a whole new way of looking at things.

      Just make sure you give blood to the Red Cross.

    5. Re:Fort Drum Army Base by Glove+d'OJ · · Score: 1

      I beg to differ... it would be an extremely insecure situation for a majot highway to go through an army base. NYS Rte 3 skirts it on the south, NYS Rte 11 to the north, and Interstate Rte 81 is several miles east. Only Rte 29 (Planck Road) goes through.

      Hope this helps.

      http://www.mapquest.com/cgi-bin/ia_find?link=btw n% 2Ftwn-map_results&uid=u5i0w2x2l8b9t5vd%3Atn9w8296t &SNVData=3mad3-g.fy%2528wrnqf1_%2529z85d0y%253bpq% 257cs9z%2Cp7%253b8aq.hqu%253b%2528_P%2517MM%2514JQ %2514W%253aL%2516%253dub0uu%2528%2511E%253arxhz8s% 253d%253dtshuas%253d0%2Chtb5m%2528lsr7dc%253bwh%25 7c2%2524hgv%2528l3iedgv%25245l1t%253b8&pcat=&aphot o=0&MAP_AB_LABELS=&WORK=&mouse_mode=center&map.x=1 31&map.y=318

    6. Re:Fort Drum Army Base by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 2

      Um ... Rte 29 *is* a major road in this part of the state. If you want to go to Utica from Northern New York, Rte 29 is the best way to go. Remember, Northern New York is the only part of New York State with no four-lane highway.
      -russ

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  10. Incorrect Details? by crashnbur · · Score: 2

    I've written too much on this already this morning, but a lot of the details in this post do not match with the several reports I've read, and I've posted the facts from those results to my web site, crash.neotope.com, along with several links to news sites that are actually letting me in...

  11. Giving Blood Wherever you live! by Hollinger · · Score: 3, Insightful

    People, give blood wherever you live, regardless of whether it's in California or in Rhode Island!

    1. Re:Giving Blood Wherever you live! by DigiDarkCloud · · Score: 1

      People, give blood wherever you live, regardless of whether it's in California or in Rhode Island!

      Or even Canada. Canadian Blood Services tells me they're helping out the States. Go to www.bloodservices.ca or phone 1-888-2-DONATE to learn how you can give blood. Innocent people need your help to survive.

      --
      SIG: 11
    2. Re:Giving Blood Wherever you live! by Mike+McTernan · · Score: 1

      I heard that Europeans are not welcome to give blood in NYC, even during this crisis.

      Can anyone verify this, and if so offer an explanation as to why?

      Or is this just another strange foreign policy of the US?

      --
      -- Mike
    3. Re:Giving Blood Wherever you live! by JosefK · · Score: 1

      I believe this is a fairly recent policy implemented due to the recent foot-and-mouth and mad cow disease scares in Europe.

    4. Re:Giving Blood Wherever you live! by Mike+McTernan · · Score: 1

      I thought it was just the cattle that were effected by foot & mouth, and anyhow, I very much doubt that many Europeans are affected by these. And don't they screen blood for this type of stuff?

      I wouldn't mind _any_ blood if it would fix me up in a bad situation.

      --
      -- Mike
  12. Now's the time for Bush to prove himself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    He wanted his chance to change his approval ratings... Now's the time.

  13. Look up by Mattygfunk · · Score: 1

    FAA reports that there is still approx 50 planes of varoius sizes still in the American skys. Best of luck to all of them.

    1. Re:Look up by jhaberman · · Score: 1
      Amen brother... Amen.


      Jason

      --
      He's totally creeping out the Great One, eh...
  14. Peace ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're at war.

    Yes, we need to calm down. And very methodically and carefully find out who's responsible for this. But once we know, I can assure you, there won't be any peace falling down on those responsible.

    We can't just sit here and continue to get attacked and terrorized for no apperent reason.

    1. Re:Peace ? by m2 · · Score: 2
      We can't just sit here and continue to get attacked and terrorized for no apperent reason.

      So, your answer is for both sides to bulldoze each other and call the last man standing the winner to enjoy whatever is left afterwards?

    2. Re:Peace ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you think we should do ? Give the terrorists involved in this a reward ?

    3. Re:Peace ? by TastyWheat · · Score: 1, Redundant

      The perpetrators are already dead moron. I'm not going to die for Isreal. How do you propose to stop ppl who r willing to die. Are you willing to die as much? I doubt it. If a people are willing to die, they are invincible. Try peace instead of war.

    4. Re:Peace ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well we kill all of the bastards. Easy enough.
      Ever here of Kamakazis. We blew the shit out of them we can (will) do it to whomever is orchestrating this.

    5. Re:Peace ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "How do you propose to stop ppl who r willing to die"

      Oblige them ;-)

    6. Re:Peace ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You honestly believe the masterminds of this are dead ? You gotta be kidding me.

    7. Re:Peace ? by AlefOne · · Score: 2, Interesting

      War is not dying for your contry, it is getting the other side to die for theirs. You stop people who are willing to die for their cause by granting their wish and wiping them out.

      Sometimes, civilization has to eradicate the beastly savages who prey on the innocent. We've succeeded in the past, and I am confident we will succeed this time as well.

    8. Re:Peace ? by brsett · · Score: 1

      No, the solution to people who are willing to die, is to kill them. I have no desire to be a killer, but I won't be a slave either.

    9. Re:Peace ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do they want? To govern the American people? Bullshit - They are homisidically insane and need to die.

    10. Re:Peace ? by Atrophis · · Score: 0

      ditto

      --

      i cant seem to come up with a sig.
    11. Re:Peace ? by Riplakish · · Score: 2

      Invinvible?

      Try this logic:

      They believe that they will be blessed by their God for dying for their religious beliefs. So, we kill all of them, that way they are one with their God, and are happy. They are dead and can't harm us so we're happy. It's a win-win for everyone.

    12. Re:Peace ? by FooDog · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter whether or not we're "willing to die as much". That's what long range weaponry is for.

    13. Re:Peace ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes, civilization has to eradicate the beastly savages who prey on the innocent.

      So the Native American Indians have a duty to destroy the US for taking all of their land and the near genocidal destruction of their tribes? Oh wait, you said sometimes. I guess it depends which side you are on?

    14. Re:Peace ? by Kengineer · · Score: 1

      Let's kill the God, starting with all his followers. Another Crusade is in order.

    15. Re:Peace ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Gentlemen may cry peace! peace! but there is no peace! The war is actually begun! .... Is life so dear, or peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take, but as for me, give me liberty, or give me death."

      It takes two to have peace. If one is peaceful and the other is not, what you have is oppression and a massacre.

      Perhaps another quote might be even more on target: "Never start a fight, son. But always finish one."

    16. Re:Peace ? by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Yes, I woul dsay that. Fuck it! Its not about who is right, its not about payback, its about living in peace.

      They are intelligent, educated human beings. They have some legitimate grievences. Who cares what they have done? Whats done is done. Its past now. NOTHING we do can brin gback the dead.

      We need to move forward. Lets take this as a wake up call. Lets do whats right. Lets call them to the table and talk to them rationally. Lets see their demands. Lets try to work for a solution that pleases all sides.

      More killing will do nothing. Let us not create more matryrs! Violence will never win against these people. It has no point. It is counter productive. All it can do is make us feel better about ourselves....not actually stop them.

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    17. Re:Peace ? by Mainusch · · Score: 1

      Yes, the desire for revenge is a factor.

      There is a far more important factor however. The cause for which these monsters fought, whatever that may be, MUST be SET BACK as a result of their actions. To not do major damage to the cause which inspired their bloodthirsty mission is to invite more of the same. The world MUST see that to launch terrorist attacks (particularly against us) is to damage your own cause!

      If those who gave the orders are still alive next month, terrorism has won, and will continue (apparantly unabated). We cannot not allow that.

      --
      Joe Mainusch http://www.weber-amps.com
    18. Re:Peace ? by crawling_chaos · · Score: 1

      This was an act of war, plain and simple. When we find out who was responsible and where they live, I suggest the following succint piece of legistlation: If (Country X) has not remanded individual(s) A, B, C, etc within 24 hours of the encactment of this law, as State of War shall exist between the United States of America and Country X. If they are so much as 15 seconds late with the handover, we reduce their nation to a pile of glowing embers that aren't safe to stand next to for the next 50 years.

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    19. Re:Peace ? by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You make the mistake of assuming that people such as these terrorists are willing to come to the negotiation table. They are not.

      The fact that they have reached a point that hijacking planes and crashing them into highly-populated office buildings seems like a good idea. Do you think they have any common ground with their targets? Do you think their greivances are so large that this kind of action can be justified?

      Dancin Santa

    20. Re:Peace ? by vnsnes · · Score: 1
      That's right, they are probably not willing to sit down and talk anymore. Why is that, do you think?

      I am thinking that the United States has screwed them over one way or another to the point that they feel that terror is the only option.

      For example, the US financed and trained Afghani militants to fight agains the Soviet incursion into Afghanistan. Once the Soviets pulled out, they turned the militias on themselves. The country is still in ruines and in civil unrest.

      Plus, I don't think the US would sit down with them even if there were willing. The US pulled out of a conference on racism just to make a statement. So, instead of sitting down and arguing things out in hopes of finding a common ground, the US effectively ignores them.

    21. Re:Peace ? by CmdrPinkTaco · · Score: 1

      It troubles me to hear people suggest that the US should just accept the facts, and do nothing about it. The people who attacked us have a belief, and they wanted to make a statement. While at theis time this statement is not known, and their belief is not know - it is pretty obvious that they disagree with the general consensus of the US belief system, we just don't now which part.

      To say that it is unfair to defend a belief system is to say that there is no point in having beliefs. If you owned a piece of land and someone was forcefully threatening to take that land away you would do everything in your means to keep that land. Even if it means a call to arms.

      The people of America need to realize that they may attack, but the attack should be provoked (which it justifibly has been) and any retaliation should be specifically targeted at those who threaten the American idea system. It is Americans defending what we believe in, much like it was the same thing when the WTC was targeted the first time.

      It is not unfair to defend what you believe in. The attacks on the WTC and the Pentagon show this,

      --
      Please give your mod points to others, Im at the cap. They will appreciate it more
    22. Re:Peace ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be so naive as to believe that the UN conference on racism was anything more than an Arab-backed indictment of Israel. That fact was shown brightly when the US and Israel asked that the tenor of the conference not be as anti-Israel as it was. That request was shot down immediately and of all the nations in the world that suffer from racism, none was so condemned as Israel and none other was named specifically except Israel. Is it any wonder that such a kangaroo court would be eschewed by the most just nation on Earth?

      That other countries participated in this pilloring is an indictment against them.

    23. Re:Peace ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You make the mistake of assuming that people such as these terrorists are willing to come to the negotiation table. They are not.
      Yes they are.
      Do you think they have any common ground with their targets?
      Yes.
      Do you think their greivances are so large that this kind of action can be justified?
      Yes.
    24. Re:Peace ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that'll certainly minimise American casualties.

      Why don't you run for office on this platform? Actually, why don't you run off the side of an oil platform?

    25. Re:Peace ? by uebernewby · · Score: 2

      To say that it is unfair to defend a belief system is to say that there is no point in having beliefs. If you owned a piece of land and someone was forcefully threatening to take that land away you would do everything in your means to keep that land. Even if it means a call to arms.

      But this isn't about defending beliefs, the WTC and the Pentagon weren't bombed because the terrorists who did it are opposed to democracy or capitalism ... the reason the US has been targeted is that it is (perceived to be) supportive of Israel/not doing enough to solve the Middle East crisis. Through some twists of logic "American government doesn't tell Israel to stop gunning down our kids" (which they do to Palestinian kids - not that they don't have a reason to do so, I suppose) becomes "all Americans are evil - let's destroy them".

      You can't seriously claim that "lackadaisical treatment of the Middle East problem" is a belief which it is your right to defend ...
      Of course I'm not saying flying an airplane into a building is a good thing to do, and I do think the US would be justified in retaliating for this attack, but I hope today's attack also serves as a wake up call to the Bush gov't to perform a more active role in finding a solution for the Middle East problem.

      Yes, I do think this bombing has something to do with the Middle East - only a religious fanatic who's into suicide bombing would be disrespectful enough of human life to wilfully murder 266 airplane passengers *and* thousands of WTC-dwellers. You could argue that Timothey McVeigh killed a fair number of people as well, but he was acting on his own, This attack was coordinated in such a way that it suggests a well organized group being responsible for it. The only well-organized groups who are capable of such an attack *and* who have such disrespect human life are fundamentalists.

      --

      News and bla for computer musicians: http://lomechanik.net/
    26. Re:Peace ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Without further elaboration on your part, I have to assume that you are simply a rabble rouser.

    27. Re:Peace ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming that the most adamant and active anti-American terrorist leader, Osama bin Laden, is behind this latest action, how can you say that he has any common ground with America? His is not a war of money or land or power, but one of religion. His god told him in a dream to destroy the United States, he is simply carrying out his god's wishes.

      Someone with that mindset will never negotiate. Negotiations with the an entity identified as the devil is paramount to collusion with such.

      Sorry, your quaint single quip answers are wrong.

  15. Vice President by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is in charge at the White House according to CBS news. Yeah, like that's something we didn't already know since day one.

  16. LibertyNews.org is UP by libertynews · · Score: 1

    My "lame little website" www.libertynews.org is up and running and available for news updates. Facts only please!

    Brian

    --
    Remember Lexington Green!
  17. Bush by Fifty+Squid · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Would this be happening if Gore were our Pres?

    1. Re:Bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Gore would ask everyone to try to be nice to each other. Bush will retaliate and turn some people into concrete. Thank GOD we have a real man in office.

    2. Re:Bush by Mistah+Blue · · Score: 1

      What is your point!? My guess is yes. Face it folks, these cowards don't like us and especially don't like our support of Israel.

    3. Re:Bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nope, we would have been dead months ago.

  18. More info by rw2 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Continual updates on poliglut. And we're still operating without lag.

    1. Re:More info by jbrw · · Score: 2

      We're running a similar thing at newsfilter, although from a slightly more UK perspective.

    2. Re:More info by RocketScientist · · Score: 1

      If you haven't checked it out, poliglut is also kicking a lot of ass with their coverage.

      Highly recommended.

  19. Re:I hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They can't fly plains into buildings when they're dead.

  20. this is NOT pearl Harbour by johnjones · · Score: 1, Interesting

    BBC reported that a US statesman as saying this is the second pearl harbour

    It is not

    think
    how many bombs have gone off in london how many lives have been lost in west bank
    how many people have died because of veiws of a few

    dont go assumeing that this wont happen again and again

    the world you live in is full of hate dont add to it

    regards

    john jones

    1. Re:this is NOT pearl Harbour by Paul+Crowley · · Score: 3, Informative

      About 3,000 have been killed since the sixties in Northern Ireland related violence. I suspect that today's deaths dwarf that figure.

    2. Re:this is NOT pearl Harbour by westcourt_monk · · Score: 1

      at least 50 000 people attacked, civilians... planes hijacked. The US is under attack, the likes of which have not been seen since Pearl Harbour. This is worse than Pearl Harbour and I dread the aftermath.

      --
      I am going to hell and I am going to take all of you with me.
    3. Re:this is NOT pearl Harbour by syates21 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Uh, *50,000* people work in the WTC.

      It's definitely not Pearl Harbor. It's worse. This is not a military installation they attacked

    4. Re:this is NOT pearl Harbour by cybrpnk · · Score: 2

      The time for peace is over. We must identify who did this, find out where they are, go in after them, and wipe them off the face of the Earth. We will suffer more casualties doing it this way. Too bad. The death toll is going to exceed Pearl Harbor and approach if not exceed use of a tactical nuke. We are at war.

    5. Re:this is NOT pearl Harbour by kettch · · Score: 1

      I agree, primarily this is not like pearl harbor.

      However, i believe that it does bear some resemblance to it on a world wide scale. Pearl harbor was an event that galvanized the US and alerted them to the true threat. This act will serve to alert the world to the fact that they are being dictated to by terrorists, and that they need to do something to end this threat. For decades there have been minor efforts to wipe out terrorism, but obviously, nothing very effective. Hopefully, this will do something to make sure these cowards are brought to justice, and that there will be no more such attacks anywhere.

      --
      Opportunities multiply as they are seized. --Sun-Tzu
    6. Re:this is NOT pearl Harbour by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 2

      Correct, this is not like Pearl Harbor in that is an attack on the US by a particular country. But the size of these attacks is absolutely huge. Bombs in London and the west bank have never, caused devastation of this magnitude. When the death tolls are in, they are going to be scary. Likely they will be larger than every other terrorist attack of the last twenty years combined.

    7. Re:this is NOT pearl Harbour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For reference, if we assume 50,000 dead, then this still pales in comparison to the literal "holocaust" (which means death by fire) that the United States imposed on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan. I beleive there were over 300,000 innocent civilians killed in those attacks.

    8. Re:this is NOT pearl Harbour by hearingaid · · Score: 2

      Agreed, but it's not Dresden either.

      It is bigger than Tripoli: 270 people were killed when Reagan ordered the attack on a civilian target. There were more people than that just on the planes.

      --

      my old sig used to be funny, but then slashcode ate it and now it's not funny anymore

    9. Re:this is NOT pearl Harbour by Phillip2 · · Score: 2

      "Hopefully, this will do something to make sure these cowards are brought to justice, and that there will be no more such attacks anywhere."

      I think its clear that many of the individiuals involved in this attack must have lost their lives during the course of it. This may well make them misguided, it may make them stupid, but it probably does not make them cowards.

      I think that the original poster was wrong. We not know how bad the situation is yet, but its clear that there will have been a large loss of life. The situation is as big a disaster as Pearl Harbour.

      In another way I think he is right though. The response to this sort of action can be an enormous upswelling of hate. There have been many periods in the past when powerful individuals have used this to commit massive atrocities against other countries, and an of course also against the citizens of their own countries.

      Hate is a dangerous emotion. In the end it damages everbody, and everyones freedom is lessened by it. Its a very real danger for the US at a time like this. And of course if its a risk to the US, then its a risk for the rest of us as well.

      Phil

    10. Re:this is NOT pearl Harbour by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

      And how many lives did it save by ending the war? Remember that the alternative was invading Japan. There would have been a horrendous loss of life, far greater than what the nukes caused.

      Also don't forget that we warned Japan before we dropped them.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    11. Re:this is NOT pearl Harbour by 15-6-2001 · · Score: 1


      Somehow he(the senator or governer or whatever) didn't mention maybe Hiroshima or the NATO bombings.. Politicans are full of pathos for months and years after this. Promises for a wind of change etc.. we'll see.

    12. Re:this is NOT pearl Harbour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      exactly -- add all of those up and youll get a death toll similar to this ONE terrorist strike.

    13. Re:this is NOT pearl Harbour by Tunguska · · Score: 1

      The US has my deepest sympathy. And our condolences go out to the victims families.

      You have our support and we will aid you in any way we can in hunting down and elimination of the people responsible for these attacks

      This is the start of the fabled clash of civilizations. The Christian Western civilization vs. The muslim civilization. This will have different consequences .... some good some bad

      The good(tm)
      Improved US/Russia relations. Increased civilization awareness in the Christian Western states.

      Dramatic increase in defense spending, especially in hitech resulting in new and novel toys for the True Geek (tm)

      The bad (tm)
      Escalation of middle east conflict. A rise in racial hatred against middle east immigrants especially in Europe. Politics wil take a right turn for a while.

      Personal privacy. This event justifies a massive step up in Big Brother activities. Remember the hijacked flights were internal US flights and therefore some degree of infiltration was undertaken by the terrorists. Expect security in airports to be upgraded to Retina, fingerprint, DNA identification.

      This was a large an complex and coordinated action on a scale barely within the capabilities of a single person or a small militant fraction. It is more likely the work some foreign government.
      The possible perpetrators can be placed in three groups:

      1) The usual suspects: Iraq, Libya, Iran, Afghanistan, Osma Bin Laden. Motivated by Islamic Holy War delusions and as a reaction against US middle east policy.

      2) The unlikely :

      Russia. Motivated by the need for help against the islamic pressure on its southern borders. If the attack is perceived as an islamic attack it will create a common enemy for Russia and the west.
      Putin (former KGB stationed in West Germany) was elected (as a strong man) without campaigning during a supposed Checnian terrorist bombing campaign in Moscow suburbs, a campaign rumored to be KGB orchestrated.

      Israel or Jewish extremists: A variation of Russia aimed at turning the world opinion against the islamic world.

      The Conspiracy:
      CIA and/or the arms industry for pure profit and to turn the US into the complete police state with a ridiculous defense budget. Could be Bush family initiated to boost Bush as *the right (strong) man*". High approval rating in no time.

      This variation includes ignoring gathered intelligence hinting at the eminent attack. 50000 lives is considered cheap for a turnaround in public opion across the atlantic.

      This event will furthermore change Europes attitude towards NMD making full trans atlantic implementation more likely, to the financial delight of the Arms industry. Perhaps even the creation of a european federal superstate will accelerate to create Fort Europe

      Sincerely

      Tunguska

      Denmark

      Only dead fish swim downstream......

      --
      Only dead fish swim downstream......
    14. Re:this is NOT pearl Harbour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In one sense you may be correct. This was not likely directly from a foreign government, but if a government provided the safe harbor for this attack, then they're in deep $hit. This is not another Pearl Harbor. This is worse. Pearl Harbor was an attack on a militarty installation that involved the deaths of hundreds. This was an attack on civilians, involving the deaths of perhaps thousands. Did you know that around 50,000 people work in those two buildings? That doesn't include visitors, the people who work in the buildings surrounding the WTC, and the emergency workers who were killed, too. The attack was unconscionable. I just hope the US gets the right target before they pull the trigger.

    15. Re:this is NOT pearl Harbour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how many lives did it save by ending the war? Remember that the alternative was invading Japan. There would have been
      a horrendous loss of life, far greater than what the nukes caused.

      Also don't forget that we warned Japan before we dropped them.


      What the hell kind of moron are you? Pearl Harbor was when Japan bombed the US Navy.

    16. Re:this is NOT pearl Harbour by RaginCajun · · Score: 1

      There's plenty of evidence to suggest that U.S. military intelligence was aware of Japan's plan to attack Pearl Harbour. Keep in mind that it was 1942, and Hitler was in control of most of mainland Europe. The Allies needed American help, but Americans had no desire to enter a war that was not directly affecting them. The Pearl Harbour bombing gave Roosevelt the popular support he needed to send troops to Europe.

      Did something similar happen today? I doubt it, but it certainly seems to have had a similar effect. Public opinion now overwhelmingly supports overwhelming military force against the perpetrators of this tragedy. I believe that there will be no quick resolution, and that the end result will just encourage more disasters like this.

    17. Re:this is NOT pearl Harbour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but it probably does not make them cowards

      Personally, I think they're cowards. Cowards attack unarmed, non-military civilian targets (okay, the Pentagon is a military building, but it doesn't make much sense to attack it unless you're at war, right?) during peacetime.

    18. Re:this is NOT pearl Harbour by cascadefx · · Score: 1
      About 3,000 have been killed since the sixties in Northern Ireland related violence. I suspect that today's deaths dwarf that figure.

      No one knows how many people were affected by these attacks, but the fact that they WTC sees close to 150,000 visitors a day and has roughly 50,000 people working in it may mean that your 3,000 number has a chance of being dwarfed. This is not to argue that the deaths in Northern Ireland are unimportant, but it is to say that this is a catastrophe of an unimaginable scale. Like Pearl Harbor, something like this has NEVER been seen before. It sheer size speaks to the comparisons.

    19. Re:this is NOT pearl Harbour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      He's the kind of moron who doesn't check his facts or context before he posts. In addition to not getting the event he was talking about right, I would also imagine that his analysis of the consequences of not dropping the atomic bomb are suspect, and of course any other facts he stated in his story you should independently verify before wasting your breath arguing with him.

      Or you could do what I do with RM 101's posts, which is ignore them.

    20. Re:this is NOT pearl Harbour by Xenophon+Fenderson, · · Score: 1

      It is never moral to kill another human being. It is, however, sometimes expedient.

      --
      I'm proud of my Northern Tibetian Heritage
    21. Re:this is NOT pearl Harbour by InsaneGeek · · Score: 2

      You should also put the japanese "Rape of Nanking" into your reference.... Hadn't heard of it? Then maybe you should look into it. It's where Japan invaded China, killed 300,000 men in the town of Nanking, and raped 20,000 women. The Japanese soldiers used live Chinese men as bayonet dummies for training. Women worked repeatedly raped until their "usefulness" wear off and they were repeatedly bayonetted (one survivor was gang raped, stabbed 30+ times in the back, and left for dead. Others had stakes driven through their vagina's, had their children bayonteded infront of them, tied up prisoners in a line and machinegunned them down into mass graves (kind of like the Nazi's), buried people alive.

      The sad part of it is, the US is willing to acknowledge that it dropped a deadly weapon on a country it was at war with; but Japan is unwilling to acknowledge during WWII they ever committed these horrendous acti in China, heck they won't even acknowledge they were ever even there in their own textbooks (there's learning from the past for you).

      Here's your proof.

      http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/Fortress/19 55 /nanking-pics.htm
      http://www.missouri.edu/~jschool/nanking/
      http://vikingphoenix.com/public/JapanIncorporate d/ 1895-1945/jpwcrmz.htm
      http://www.salon.com/books/sneaks/1999/01/11snea ks .html

    22. Re:this is NOT pearl Harbour by Asgard · · Score: 1

      How many high-rises are there on the west bank? I'd think if a country is constantly beset by bombings, nobody'd go near them.

  21. Worldwide effects by xXunderdogXx · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am from Newfoundland Canada, and our airports are the destination for many re-routed flights.
    Goose-Bay Labrador is expected to DOUBLE its population because it is a small city with a very large airport.

    As for St. John's (where I am) we have gotten at least a dozen planes and we are expecting more. I'm considering going to the airport to volunteer for any help I can.

    -underdog

    1. Re:Worldwide effects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Goose Bay.

      My sister works at one of the bars here (Bentleys sports bar and grill, the bar is being closed tonight though...) and she got a call earlier telling her to expect to be called into work early. One of the girls who works there also works at the only dry cleaner in town (shephards dry cleaning), and doesnt' know if she's gonna be able to get into work at the bar since they're busy cleaning sheets and blankets and stuff.

      My mother teaches at one of the schools here, which were all cleared out to set them up (including the CONA campus here).

      When I was out earlier, they had all the busses in the town (all school busses) lined up and ready to go up to the airport to pick up the people when they're ready to take them off the planes (I think in about 3 hours or so).

      So far, only 4 planes have landed here. And i've volunteered to go up and help at the school my mother teaches at if need be. All the restaurants are going to be supplying food to the people who come in.

      I'm just glad we're no longer a US Air Force Base.

  22. On a different tack by weslocke · · Score: 1

    I've been hearing that the price of gas is about to skyrocket. Anyone out there involved in the industry that might have any ideas? Why, how much possibly, etc?

    (My apologies for such a mundane question in the midst of the afternoon)

    --

    'Life is like a spoonful of Drain-O, it feels good on the way down but leaves you feeling hollow inside'
    1. Re:On a different tack by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      I'll tell you what, I went to the gas station across the street from my house and filled up both of my cars this morning. If they don't go up, well, that's fine too - they were both getting low anyway. :)

    2. Re:On a different tack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know as well as I do.. if their is a buck to be made no matter what it will.. in short yes expect a jump in prices by tommorrow that will last for a while, also expect new coverage of everyone and thier neighbor all over the US hording food and stuff

    3. Re:On a different tack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The reason for this is that the market expects the parties responsible for the attack to be rooted in the islamic community. Retalliation by the US command authority would alienate OPEC members with a possibility of a clamp down on hydrocarbon supply.


      Personally, I am dubious. The attacks in question could have been organized by a very small group, down to four to eight people (train on MS flight simulator, walk into airports unarmed, hijack flights which will have a huge amount of fuel left in the general east coast area, target psychological landmarks).

    4. Re:On a different tack by Pstrobus · · Score: 1

      Brent Crude went up about $3.20 today to $30.65 (or so). We may not see it at the pump all at once, but someone's betting that demand is going to be high. In a side note, gold hit $290 an ounce. In all it looks like folks expect war and American leaders aren't doing much for the peace party ("This is war." -Sen. John McCain).

      And sadly, it looks like the "Blame the Rag Heads" crowd are in full cry already. I do wish the States wouldn't be so keyed up to go off half cocked. If they attack, the Shelter Now detainees are dead. Maybe we find a better answer than bombs, please?

      --
      "The conduct of neither [party], if strictly examined, will be irreproachable." -Elizabeth Bennet
    5. Re:On a different tack by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      (I'm in Florida)

      A lot of major oil companies have decided to shut down their depots for the remainder of the week. I'm not sure why....

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    6. Re:On a different tack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope the person who modded that down enjoys paying twice what cloudmaster paid this morning. Ha!

    7. Re:On a different tack by cyclist1200 · · Score: 1

      Good, idea. I went, and everyone I know seems to have a full tank. I hear the price jumped to $4.00 in Cincinnati.

  23. 1-800-Give-Life by djrogers · · Score: 5, Informative

    Please, no matter where in the country you are - GIVE BLOOD! Blood banks all across the nation will be getting blood and plasma to NY and DC at this time, and we already have a serious shortage nationwide. If you're over 17 years old, 110 lbs, and have no STDs, call 1-800-give-life and find out where you can donate.

    --
    Think outside the... Hey, where'd the friggin' box go?
    1. Re:1-800-Give-Life by gorgon · · Score: 2

      The Red Cross site seems to be bogged-down, but many of the state chapters of the Red Cross have sites that seem to be working. For Minnesota and parts of surrounding areas the site is yourbloodcenter.org. Also, try the American Association of Blood Banks site.

      --

      And I'd be a Libertarian, if they weren't all a bunch of tax-dodging professional whiners.
      Berke Breathed
    2. Re:1-800-Give-Life by Epi-man · · Score: 1

      Yes we have special need as of today for increasing the safe blood supply, but let us all please try and remember this 1 month from now, 2 months from now, 2 years from now! There is ALWAYS a need blood, not just when a major crisis occurs. Hopefully science will find a replacement soon, but until then, if you are eligible donate regularly, even when there isn't an outcry.

    3. Re:1-800-Give-Life by dachshund · · Score: 2

      Most hospitals in NYC are taking blood, but there may be a huge wait time (5 hours in some midtown hospitals.) You may be best served by waiting a little while before you join the line. Also make sure you've eaten something today-- bring something, just in case you have a long wait.

    4. Re:1-800-Give-Life by Cinnamon · · Score: 1

      I'd love to, but they don't let faggots give blood. I wonder if anyone will die for a lack of blood I could have given them, were they to allow queers.

      But I'm not bitter.

      --
      -- If we were in any other industry they would've shot us a long time ago.
    5. Re:1-800-Give-Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Red cross doesn't care if you're gay or not, only if you've had unprotected anal intercourse. Possibly protected anal intercourse too. But the point it, it has nothing to do with your sexual persuasion.

    6. Re:1-800-Give-Life by fawlty · · Score: 0

      I'm rather pissed about that too. The questionairre I saw asked whether I'd ever had sex with a guy. Didn't care about type of sex or length of time passed.

    7. Re:1-800-Give-Life by nutznboltz · · Score: 1

      Red cross doesn't care if you're gay or not

      guess again

    8. Re:1-800-Give-Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Okay, not that I'm bitter or anything. One of the screening questions that is asked in screening is about whether you've ever been homosexually active. I have, and therefore, wasn't able to give blood last time I tried. So sorry for all of the people who die. Maybe we should try to discourage the alientation of people from whom we later might need help.

      Oh yeah, and I'll be dodging the draft when the war comes, 'cuz I know I'd just get a dishonorable discharge after it was over for being gay.

    9. Re:1-800-Give-Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Under FDA rules, men cannot give blood if they have had sex with another man at least once since 1977.


      It doesn't matter if you're gay, bisexual, or straight. Only whether you've had sex with another man at least once since 1977.

  24. God Bless Google by Bonker · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you are looking for news, you will find the most current information on TV or radio.
    Many online news services are not available, because of extremely high demand.
    Below are links to cached copies of news sites as they appeared earlier today.
    Breaking news: Attacks hit US [Washington Post - CNN.com (cached)]

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
  25. I am so scared... by Jin+Wicked · · Score: 1

    I work right down the street from NASA, and I caught on the television the tail end of something weird going on down there...

    --
    My Webcomic: Asylum on 5th Street
    1. Re:I am so scared... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Johnson Space Center has never been in Florida.

  26. Car bomb by joecool12321 · · Score: 1
    There was a car bomb outside the state department according to MSNBC. Powell is on his way back.

    American Airlines flight 11 from Boston was the first plane. It was a Boeng 767 200. It was hijacked near Albany at 8:28 am (according to flight path information). Just before hijacking the the speed gets very erratic.

    "Freedom itself was attacked, and freedom shall be protected" President Bush said from Barksdale. It is the closest military base to Florida with complete military communications which provide links to all aspects of the US military (including nuclear weaponry).

    1. Re:Car bomb by Viking+Coder · · Score: 2

      There was no car bomb explosion outside the State Department - that is being denied.

      --
      Education is the silver bullet.
  27. Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like Jelerial's site can host pictures as well as it hosts GiZ.

  28. Continuous Video Feed by marcop · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have been watching a continuous video feed for the past hour from http://www.sky.com/skynews/home/

    BTW, they www.sky.com runs Solaris. So does washingtonpost.com - which was one of the few sites that was up. I don't promote Solaris - but it is interesting.

    1. Re:Continuous Video Feed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, i noticed that too...on the other hand i also noticed that msnbc was the ONLY site i could consistently reach

  29. Cyberfront by Cypher_EVA1 · · Score: 1

    As far as I can discern it seems all of the .mil sites have been cut off from outside access or shut down, wether this is for security reasons or physical loss is yet to be determined.

    The dogs of war have been let loose and they shall not return to thier masters heal until death and blood are thiers.
    people, this is only going to get worse.

    --
    "Angel-headed hipsters burning for the ancient heavenly connection to the starry dynamo in the machinery of the night."
    1. Re:Cyberfront by StupidKatz · · Score: 1

      The fact that most .mil are not available to the public right now has *nothing* to do with this terrorist attack.

      Remember Code Red? Yep, the military is government, too. Go IIS! :P

  30. Donate Blood by MousePotato · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As I write this preparations or underway to turn our studio into an emergency blood donation center for the American Red Cross. They need help. Business want to help but most do not have the advantage we (martial art schools across the US) do; lots of floor space for them to setup.

    If you can't help this way please just go and donate blood today.

    My prayers go out to the hundreds, if not thousands of families who lost a loved one today. NYC is my home town. All I can do from 1375 miles away I will.

    Peace,

    Sandor Urban

    1. Re:Donate Blood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you live in Bay Ridge brooklyn - carpool @ 91st and 3rd avenue to give blood

  31. US repsonse? by Dante333 · · Score: 1

    It will be interesting to see the US response to whatever backwater country might think about harboring anyone connected with this act of terrorism. Especially if this act of terrorism was perpitrated by Bin Laden. The Taliban may want to reconsider its policy on harboring Bin Laden. In any case, I suspect that any US response will involve large holes in small countries.

    1. Re:US repsonse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great, isn't it? Now the americans are going to do what the soviets couldn't

  32. minor update by blonde+rser · · Score: 1

    although the us canadian border was closed it has been opened up again... at least the bc/washington was has been opened again. As for the rest I do not know. Traffic is moving slowly though due to stepped up customs inspections.

    1. Re:minor update by feronti · · Score: 1

      In Detroit, the tunnel to Canada is closed, but the bridges are still open...

    2. Re:minor update by mpe · · Score: 2

      although the us canadian border was closed it has been opened up again...

      How easily can the US/Canadian border be closed, considering it's length and the most of it is a line of latitude, rather than following any geographic feature.

  33. How to Donate Blood by spacey · · Score: 1

    Many of us in New York would love to donate blood or otherwise help in any way possible, but this is apparently difficult right now.

    The red cross does not seem to have anywhere I can donate blood in my area, so if anyone knows of any other resources that can use help from those of us sitting at home, wondering what we can do, please post links, phone numbers, whatever.

    -Peter

    --
    == Just my opinion(s)
    1. Re:How to Donate Blood by Rackemup · · Score: 3, Informative
      First you'll need a bucket and a butter knife...

      no no... I'm kidding... really

      The Cdn Blood Agency has lots of locations, might even set up triage sites for those situations needing "emergency" supplies. Check your local phone books for numbers to contact the Canadian Blood Services.

      I just donated a few weeks ago so I can't give again. Those people who don't donate because they "can never find the time" should get off their asses now.

    2. Re:How to Donate Blood by Cairsten · · Score: 1

      Peter, calling information will get you the number of your nearest hospital, if you can't find a donation center. Any hospital within NY right now, I should think, will accept donors. The operators are incredibly busy today, of course, so please be patient. And it's a wonderful gesture to tell your particular operator thank you for standing by to man the posts; the one I spoke to has family in Manhattan, and I know that at work is not where he wanted to be. Good luck, be safe.

      --
      We shall find peace. We shall hear angels, we shall see the sky sparkling with diamonds. - Chekov.
    3. Re:How to Donate Blood by Sauron · · Score: 1

      According to the police scanner just now, blood donations can be given at any NYC hospital.

      --
      I never claimed to be human.
    4. Re:How to Donate Blood by fenix+down · · Score: 1

      1-800-NYBLOOD should point you to where it's most needed.

  34. Re:Nostradamus by Smid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Nostradamus's predictions have been constantly discredited, being not only applicable to all sorts of events in past 500 years, but also originally written in an obscure version of french that was regularly mistranslated.

    Please, put your doomsayer sandwichboards down and stop ringing the bells.

    (Not you Diomedes, you talk sense)

    Smid

  35. There is no precedent for an attack this large by purduephotog · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Terrorists hit airlines.... this is the first time that an airline has been used to destroy a target- it literally is out of the Clancy Novel in which an airliner crashed into a joint seat of congress (THIS IS A BOOK!).

    As for everyone screaming for peace- shut up. The US has had a pathetic lax policy on terrorism. I feel we should move to a new "If you claim responsibility, you are dead. If you are planning it, you are dead. If you mastermind or participate, you are dead." policy- Eventually they'll run out of terrorists.

    picture links
    http://johnhaller.com/jh/terrorist/

    Thank god for /. - it was the only news source we had at work until the CNN and ABC servers got back up.

    1. Re:There is no precedent for an attack this large by Mistah+Blue · · Score: 1

      If you knew about it or know about a future one and don't try to stop... you are dead! Bye bye Mr. Arafat and all of the rest of the world's cowardly tangos! We won't miss you. It is time to return to the policy of the '80's in respect to this... deal with them harshly. Trials are not necessary. This is war.

    2. Re:There is no precedent for an attack this large by Hilary+Rosen · · Score: 2, Flamebait

      And how many civilians are you prepared to murder to carry out this policy?

      You are no better than bin Laden

      --
      Yes, the nick is flamebait
    3. Re:There is no precedent for an attack this large by chaos4ever · · Score: 1

      If you want war against those who caused a national crisis, look at the assassination that lead to World War I. Retaliation, and pointing blame to third parties lead us to a war of trenches, mass-scale slaughters, and a war only to be supersceded by another war caused by World War I, also known as World War II.

    4. Re:There is no precedent for an attack this large by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of them.

    5. Re:There is no precedent for an attack this large by ProtonMotiveForce · · Score: 0

      That's not flaimbait - you have to consider the fact that many people are advocating terror (don't fuck with the US or we'll bomb everyone in sight, civilians and all!) to fight terror.

      A terrorist act is one committed with the purpose to change political behavior by fear of tragedy. If we bomb out of anger then we're no better.

      Not that we shouldn't bomb - just make sure we know who we're bombing, and to do it for a military and defensive purpose.

    6. Re:There is no precedent for an attack this large by beardcz · · Score: 1

      Yeah, we don't need no stinking courts or judges or trials or anything. And if you happen to live in a building next to one where we think terrorists are, well it's your own fault for being born in that country.

      Come on, people. If you want to lead the rest of the world, you cannot lead by this kind of example. Killing some foreigners will not solve the problem, their friends and relatives will be just as angry as you are now and will want to hit back, and some of them may.

      --
      No sig for me - too lazy to fill one in...
    7. Re:There is no precedent for an attack this large by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bravo, for all those that think the death penalty has no deterrence value, if a death sentence had been carried out on Bin Laden for his past crimes this would not have happened.

    8. Re:There is no precedent for an attack this large by osu-neko · · Score: 1
      You're argument lacks impact. You know why?

      Most American's are not the slightest bit interesting in being better than anyone else in the sense that you mean. We're more than happy to attempt to win any war on whatever terms the opponent sets. We're more than happy to become murderous unethical bastards in response to murderous unethical bastards. We call it "fighting fire with fire" and it's a favorite phrase and tactic among Americans.

      Nietzsche warned, "beware when fighting monsters lest a monster ye become". American's response "let us show you what a real monster is..."

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    9. Re:There is no precedent for an attack this large by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Son, you are so stupid it's not funny.

      Them: 10 guys, a few thousand $, cause billions of $$ of damage and kill 40k people.

      Us: hundreds of thousands of men, billions of $$$, might pick off a few terrorists.

      There is no end of the terrorist supply, as long as there are people who desperate and have nothing to live for there will be terrorists. If you want an end you should be concerned with resolving conflicts globally and giving people something to live for.

    10. Re:There is no precedent for an attack this large by PW2 · · Score: 1

      And how many civilians are you prepared to murder to carry out this policy?

      You mean those "civilians" that fill the streets in support and joy of this event? Those civilians that volunteer to be the next kamikazis? I feel no love for them.

    11. Re:There is no precedent for an attack this large by uradu · · Score: 2

      > I feel we should move to a new "If you claim responsibility, you are dead.

      Hmm, that's pretty much been Israel's policy for a long time, look how well it served them. The fact is that while anger and the desire for revenge are natural human responses to violence, they only beget more violence. People who feel slightet, commit violence, and are punished, never pause to consider that they deserved the punishment. Look at the Middle East, look at Ireland, etc.

      Unless you're prepared for real, no-holds-barred genocide to completely remove the source of new terrorist recruits, that approach will fail. And even then, chances are some outsiders will symathise with the genocide and pick up their cause.

      If ever there was any serious consideration of your approach, it was after WWII when some proposed razing Germany to the ground and dispersing its population. It didn't find much favor then, and it won't now.

    12. Re:There is no precedent for an attack this large by Hilary+Rosen · · Score: 2

      No, I mean their next-door neighbours, who aren't out in the streets, but who will die just the same when a made-in-the-good-ole-USA cruise missile comes through their window.

      --
      Yes, the nick is flamebait
    13. Re:There is no precedent for an attack this large by SquierStrat · · Score: 1

      I'll bite.

      Kill 'em all.

      Muslims have this lovely belief that if Allah is in a good mood and you kill yourself while killing a Christian you get a free pass to 2 virgins and an all you can eat buffet for eternity, that's fine they wanna kill us no problem let's give them a free trip to meet Allah.

      Use a few B61s (tactical nukes) and turn the middle east into a big piece of glass if necesary, I don't care just kill 'em!

      --
      Derek Greene
    14. Re:There is no precedent for an attack this large by Pinchy · · Score: 1

      I feel we should move to a new "If you claim responsibility, you are dead. If you are planning it, you are dead. If you mastermind or participate, you are dead." policy

      Obviously your policy is not to be applied to US actions throughout the world, right?

    15. Re:There is no precedent for an attack this large by susano_otter · · Score: 2

      No, I mean their next-door neighbours, who aren't out in the streets, but who will die just the same when a made-in-the-good-ole-USA cruise missile comes through their window.

      Ass. I doubt we'll see much, if any, "conventional" military attacks. Look for small units carrying out assassinations of known terrorist affiliates, with little or no collateral damage.

      What kind of an idiot assumes that cruise missiles are the only solution for any problem?

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    16. Re:There is no precedent for an attack this large by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude if you cannot think you are dead .... I think thus I exist according to Descatres . US has funded many wars, invations and even the terrorists. The weapons used the aircrafts used the tanks used are sold by the US (mainly)... Some of the wars (udercovered or public) are created by the US. Think before you post ... Revenge is the main power which guides the terrorists to action such as today ... You dont want to be like them ... And eventually before they run out of terrorists the whole world will be terrorists ... And then they are going to try and kill all the "bad guys" ... You live in your own fake world .. You dont know whats going on you must shut up ...

    17. Re:There is no precedent for an attack this large by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm.. I agree that we need to rethink our policy on terrorism in order to prevent this sort of thing fromhappening again, but the sort of blind murder you propose is senseless. This is exactly what Isreal has been doing for decades (plus bulldozing their homes), and they don't seem tobe running out of terrorists. In fact, they are now seeing their OWN CITIZENS becoming suicide bombers.

    18. Re:There is no precedent for an attack this large by Hilary+Rosen · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      What kind of an idiot assumes that cruise missiles are the only solution for any problem?


      Republicans.

      --
      Yes, the nick is flamebait
    19. Re:There is no precedent for an attack this large by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Unless you're prepared for real, no-holds-barred genocide to completely remove the source of new terrorist recruits, that approach will fail. And even then, chances are some outsiders will symathise with the genocide and pick up their cause.

      So you would do nothing.? What lesson would be learned by that? If I took a buck from you and you did nothing I'm pretty sure that I would have learned that it's OK to take a buck from you. While I am not for blindly killing, I am even less for teaching others that there are no consequences for violence against me. The key seems to be reacting with the appropriate amount of force...

    20. Re:There is no precedent for an attack this large by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and Democrats bend over and spread their cheeks.

    21. Re:There is no precedent for an attack this large by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i wish a bomb would come through your window you stinking cunt bitch. fuck all smelly ass arabs, i myself plan to rape and pillage any of them i see at night for the next few months. but don't worry, i'll let you know which kind scream louder as i sodomize their children, the one's with towels on their heads or the ones with dots. go back to reading your communist manifesto or whatever other shit has fed your head with the delusions that you obviously harbor.

    22. Re:There is no precedent for an attack this large by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are you claiming that no democrat has ever used cruise missles? hmmm. that's what i thought you ignorant piece of shit. of course you look at the murder of 10s of thousands of people as a chance to denounce republicans. thanks for the finger fuck bitch, we now see your true colors.

    23. Re:There is no precedent for an attack this large by NecroPuppy · · Score: 2

      It was a Democrat (remember Mr. Bill?) who authorized the last firing of cruise missiles at a target. FYI.

      --
      I like you, Stuart. You're not like everyone else, here, at Slashdot.
    24. Re:There is no precedent for an attack this large by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well said in part

  36. Maryland State Security being tightened by strredwolf · · Score: 2

    Baltimore's security is being tightened. All schools are authroized to closed by Gov. Glendening. BWI is closed, folks, call ahead if you have a flight there. Local news is showing school closings now.

    --

    --
    # Canmephians for a better Linux Kernel
    $Stalag99{"URL"}="http://stalag99.net";
    1. Re:Maryland State Security being tightened by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Light rail to BWI is closed too

  37. Afghanistan by AndyChrist · · Score: 1

    If it's Bin Laden or the Taliban, we'll bomb those fuckers back into the stone....oh.

    1. Re:Afghanistan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHHA
      point well taken. i don't care who it is, they deserve to die, no matter how pathetic their current state may be.

  38. taleban.com hacked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You would figure that there would be this sort of reaction. www.taleban.com The sick feeling that I get is that this will be the beginning of an uglier time in human history. Im going home to make love to my wife. Might be the last time.

  39. Block all those possible terrorist countries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guys,

    I want to encourage you to ask all your providers to block immediate all possible sources of terroristic activities, which is all arabian countries including Israel!

    Cut these countries off the web, cut them from mail, cut them from every possible connection. WORLDWIDE!

    FYI: I am not an american citizen.

    thank you!

  40. more pictures and movies by yknott · · Score: 0

    www.lehigh.edu/~wsc2/terror.htm

  41. This WAS predicted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A well-known Astrologer had a dream which in hindsight seems to have been linked to this attack.

    Here's the full text, since the site is bound to be slashdotted:

    PRE-COGNITIVE DREAM
    by Eileen Nauman
    Every once in a while, I receive a pre-cognitive dream (maybe once a year or every couple of years....the thing is, I KNOW when I get them, they DO come true). I've had 2 pre-cogs in 2 days in a row; very disturbing. When I get these, they usually come true 6 to 9 months from the time I've had them. When I get them, they are usually very symbolic. However, this second one was very explicit. And that is why I need your help. Here's what I was shown:

    There is going to be a terrorist bombing occur in an office building, in a city. My sense was a city on a coast (like West Coast, East Coast). It APPEARED to be an American city (felt like San Diego, California), but I could not be sure of this.

    What I am sure of is this: The downtown office building was white with blue horizontal stripes. The stripes were really long rows of blue-tinted windows. The building has three "wings" or "towers" to it. Two shorter wings on the outside and the third and tallest tower in the middle.

    I was downtown, in this city. I was talking to police detectives at a police precinct (this building was 3-4 stories high and sandwiched in between taller buildings) that was only a half a block to 1 block from this multiple office tower-building. We were having lunch together at some small cafe or diner near the precinct. We left after having lunch. It was a bright, sunny day. The weather was warm (70's-80's), blue sky, and there were lots of people on the sidewalks, hurrying and scurrying by.

    The police detective was in a light brown sport coat; summer weight. He was short, about 5' 6" tall, in his mid-fifties, partly balding, with steel gray hair across the back of his head. His most outstanding feature was his brow was very wrinkled. He had a round face. He was lean, like a whippet and lively eyes (didn't see the color of them).

    I remember wide sidewalks; lots of people (elbow to elbow) rushing by, bustling, and in a hurry. It was summer. They were wearing a lot of colorful skirts, dresses and short sleeved shirts; some business suits, but for the most part, a dressed-down crowd. The streets were 4-lanes wide. I didn't see the traffic; I only heard it and smelled the diesel and car pollution, heard the horns honking, and heard engines running. One thing that stood out was that I saw a brown, wood, telephone pole with a cross fixture and saw black lines strung from it, to across the street.

    For whatever reason, I went back to the police precinct building (it was to the left of this office tower). I was in on the ground floor talking to the sergeant at the desk to get a hold of the detective who had gone upstairs. I was standing and asking the sergeant to get him for me. The police officer behind the tall, dark wooden desk was in a dark blue,

    short-sleeved uniform. I remember seeing three gold chevrons on his one arm sleeve. He was fat, his face square and jowly and I was thinking this guy was put behind the desk because he'd never make it as a beat cop. He had thick, dark brown hair, reddish colored cheeks and wore no glasses.

    As I was doing this, there was a concussive bomb explosion that went off. My ears hurt. The windows in the front of the police precinct bowed and shattered inward. The concussion came first. And then the horrendous sound. I was thrown forward and I grabbed for the desk. I thought it was an earthquake at first. We ran out to the window and looked to see what had happened. People everywhere were screaming, running and some stopped and pointed up at that 3-tower office building.

    As I looked up, I saw the explosion taking place (like a replay). About half way up, on the left side of the tallest, middle tower, I saw the red and yellow explosion, the white-colored dust vomit outward from within the building. It was as if half of that tower blew up. And then, to my horror, I saw the entire upper half of this tower begin to fall in slow motion downward. It was horrible. I saw the middle tower hit the smaller tower below it. The metal of the center tower seemed to bend over the smaller tower like hot butter and the middle tower crashed over the smaller tower, covering it.

    My detective friend and I hurried over there (I was an EMT, I might be able to help). As we approached, we saw hands, legs and heads sheared from bodies. People were in shock and shrieking. I felt the building was unsafe; and very unstable as we hurried to get a first look at if we could help or not. I was so emotionally staggered by this. I was nauseous from looking at how many people were killed in this explosion. The detective kept saying it was a terrorist bomb that had been planted. I don't know HOW he knew this, but this is what he kept saying over and over again to me as we searched among the many dead.

    I came out of that pre-cognitive dream. It had been as real as me standing there and actually seeing it happen. And I knew this was real. It was not some dream from the landscape of my imagination. I was VERY upset. I know the difference.

    I get these pre-cog dreams every one in a long while. And when I get them, they come true 6 to 9 months after I've seen them.

    I THINK I was in either an American city or an ENGLISH speaking city or, perhaps a city that spoke English as a second language. It FELT like I was on a coast; West Coast or East Coast--or a "coast" of some kind. The crowded conditions of downtown felt like Hong Kong. Or maybe the island of Taiwan; the sense of hurrying and scurrying, a fast walk, that the people of Hong Kong do and I've been to Hong Kong. It could be ANY crowded city in the world, possibly. Perhaps in Argentina, Peru (Lima), Australia, Spain, New Zealand, or Brazil... I just don't know. I wasn't given the details of city and country. I do know that I was talking to the detective in English and the people I saw on the streets looked "American"--they were Caucasian looking--I THINK--it could have been Japanese/Chinese ancestry,

    too. I just can't be sure on this point. One thing that I felt more sure of was a SEACOAST city. That is the place to start. Or, maybe "old" seacoast or sea--which would infer a DESERT region (because deserts are 'old ocean'). Like Las Vegas, for instance.

    The office building was big and beautiful, with these "wing-like" towers. It was white with blue (windows). I would guesstimate that the two smaller towers were probably 10-15 floors high, and that the middle tower, the tall one, was about 20-40 floors high. And it stood out because it was so beautiful and it appears "new" rather than an "old" office building. I'm not good at heights. I hope the drawings I put up on a web page will show approximate size/height proportions. Don't get hung up on details--it's more important to see the drawing for confirmation.

    I have made some drawings of what I saw. I'm going to ask Dan to put them up on a web page with this posted information, in hopes that someone will have recognized this office building where they live.

    I need your help in trying to find this building. If, where you live, there is such a building, please get a hold of me privately. I will then, once there has been a positive identification on this building, get a hold of the FBI and give the information to them. I don't know if they'll laugh me out of their office when I contact them or not--but I do know I have to try. Your help is of great value in searching for where this building is located--the city that it's in--the country that it's in. Good luck on your search.

    This amounts to a psychic detective hunt, if you will. I know some Athenians are highly clairvoyant. If, after reading this, you get any "flashes" or "hits" on it--please email me privately with the information. I will keep all of it. IF we are able to identify that this building does exist, I will take all information to the FBI about it--including your psychic 'hit' on it, as well.

  42. GIVE BLOOD by geekoid · · Score: 2

    I don't care where you are, give blood now. All reserves will be pulled from round the nation. if needed. New york hospitals are over flowing with injured.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  43. Another News Site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since CNN/BBC are so slow to load/are down completely to gain imformation you might try a regional news site such as http://www.nando.net in order to get AP news and relieve the burden on the other sites.

  44. Oh christ, the politics already... by weslocke · · Score: 1

    Just heard a senator (I believe) ranting about the fact that this is the very sort of thing that our goverment is supposed to protect us against, and that this shows how badly our republican led government has failed in their duty.

    To tell you the truth, I voted democrat in the last election. But this sort of statement is enough to sicken you, regardless of party affilliation.

    --

    'Life is like a spoonful of Drain-O, it feels good on the way down but leaves you feeling hollow inside'
    1. Re:Oh christ, the politics already... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well Orin Hatch (R) thought it necessary to damn bin Laden and demand his death. Without any actual information at this poínt. How much better is this?

    2. Re:Oh christ, the politics already... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Laden needs to die anyways you dumbfuk . It doesnt matter what party blamed him for it . He's threatened U.S. many of times . He deserves to die .

    3. Re:Oh christ, the politics already... by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Of course it's politics. The notion of the US being the 'Great Satan' is politics. The way the US has been inflicting uncontrolled freemarket capitalism on the rest of the world is politics, and the people who freak out over this are also politics.

      Attempting to destroy New York City is beyond politics- that's war. The response will be war.

      But the _causes_ of this are politics. I've seen a few brave posters from outside the US saying, "Um, you really think this is unprovoked?" and they should be listened to.

      In my opinion, we are obviously heading into a world where the nation-state is no longer the focus. I've heard the terrorist organisation responsible for this is multinational and extends all over the world. That's much like the corporations we have, which do things like try and sue Indian farmers over growing rice that was native to India in the first place, which try and tie economic relief to a political system, which try and inflict our screwed-up intellectual property notions on the rest of the world- and those guys are multinational too, and often with economic coercion to rival actual countries.

      I'm not sure there is a country that could have done us as much damage, in a conventional military attack, as this multinational 'terrorist' organization did in its attack.

      As to the democrat/republican thing: hell, I voted Green/Progressive, and lost. I believe if Gore had won, this day would still have happened. BOTH the Dems and Reps represent a particular type of American political system- one that obviously has insane, fanatical enemies.

      The fact that the enemies are fanatics making suicide attacks does not make the American political system right. The fact that we need to fight back now does not make us blameless- we just happen to be the ones expected to deliver the counterstrike. When we've done that, we damn well better take a look at whether we're really 'all that and a bag of chips' ourselves. How can we face ourselves knowing that our country wields huge force in the world, and yet half of us won't even vote for _President_ much less pay attention to what our country is doing? That's got to stop- we've got to smarten up and take responsibility.

      If we want all the world to _agree_ that we aren't 'the great satan', we have got to pay closer attention to what our country, our capitalist economic system, our political system, are doing out there. This didn't come out of nowhere. We've known about the resentment for a long time, over all sorts of things and in all sorts of ways, and mostly we've just flat out ignored anyone who dared to suggest we weren't the apex of creation.

      Once we've got through this next bit, we have _got_ to grow up...

    4. Re:Oh christ, the politics already... by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      Partisan politics sucks. Of course, I voted for Nader...

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    5. Re:Oh christ, the politics already... by bflame · · Score: 1

      The truth is that this was possible because of the policy put in place by former President Clinton. During his terms in office he greatly weakened the military, NSA, CIA and FBI. If these great institutions would have been allowed to remain strong it is possible that President Bush would not be forced to deal with this crises.

    6. Re:Oh christ, the politics already... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Just heard a senator (I believe) ranting about the fact that this is the very sort of thing that our goverment is supposed to protect us against, and that this shows how badly our republican led government has failed in their duty.

      Sigh! He is a Republican, and a prominent one at that. You may disagree with what he says (I don't), but to accuse him of engaging in party politics is misguided.

    7. Re:Oh christ, the politics already... by weslocke · · Score: 1

      Ok, as a followup clarification...

      The "this is the very sort of thing that our goverment is supposed to protect us against, and that this shows how badly our republican led government has failed in their duty" should've been quoted & italicized since it was as close to what he said as I could get with my sluggish memory.

      I was just pointing out that (Democrat or Republican) it's sickening that one of our elected representatives would start trying to lay the blame politically before the rubble from our former landmarks had even stopped falling.

      --

      'Life is like a spoonful of Drain-O, it feels good on the way down but leaves you feeling hollow inside'
    8. Re:Oh christ, the politics already... by mpe · · Score: 2

      The fact that the enemies are fanatics making suicide attacks does not make the American political system right.

      Nearly 60 years ago the people making suicide attacks against the US were Japanese, certainly not Arabs. Anyway do you think the US military would never enguage in suicide missions...

  45. except... by kirby697 · · Score: 2

    if we DON'T get rid of them, I guarantee they will strike again. we need to strike back, fast and harshly and show that the US is not going to tolerate this any longer.

    1. Re:except... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      We strike back, they strike back, we strike back again and they reciprocate. Seems like a good idea?


      No, mod parent down. How about we learn that we can not behave as a nation belligerently with imputiny, and instead become a well behaved nation and try to enjoy imputiny?

    2. Re:except... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you want to systematically exterminate the entire population of palestinians (maybe we can get all arabs!) in death camps?

      Fucking nazi, I hope they land on your house next.

    3. Re:except... by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

      We strike back, they strike back, we strike back again and they reciprocate. Seems like a good idea?

      "Hitler strikes, we strike back, Hitler strikes again, why can't we all just get along?"

      Yes, it seems like a great idea. There are way more of us than there are of them. This was a declaration of war. War is the only appropriate, and necessary response.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    4. Re:except... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      God know how many impoverished and persecuted arab kids have been saying for years "this cannot be tolerated, they will be made to pay!" And if we go back and kill more of them now we will create ever more enemies. And as they've just demonstrated they can hurt us a hell of a lot more than we can hurt them. Because they have nothing to lose.

      We have to worry about being civilized, even with our trillions of $$$ of military we can't go kill 50k palestinians. We may pick off a few of their honchos, but it's a losing battle for our side. Face it.

    5. Re:except... by a.tomaka · · Score: 1

      Whoever did it is probably long since dead. My bet is that it was a few random angry people who decided that they needed to get some sort of revenge on the US.

      --
      -------------
      Andy Tomaka :: www.whoisandy.com atomaka@cybernox.com
    6. Re:except... by matty · · Score: 1

      I don't think it could have been random people, a.t. This was a very coordinated attack. This required a great deal of planning and knowledge of American airports and our commercial airline system.

    7. Re:except... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So do you think sympathetic states like china, India etc etc will stand by and watch. Think again!

      Then the US would be outnumbered by about 1 billion people I reckon....

      I personally think religion should be made illegal in all coutries. Seems to be the root of ALL violence!!

    8. Re:except... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It took you a while to figure it out but I guess you've (people of the US) suddenly got it now; How do you counter terrorist acts? - You do what Israel is forced to do daily - you try to contain and control, Search and seize and always retaliate quickly.
      - Your luxury of being able to stand on the sidelines complaining about the excessive use of force against the palestinians is now over. Welcome into the ring.

    9. Re:except... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      how can you 'get rid of them'? If you know how, tell that to GWB. People were trying to 'get rid
      of them' for years.


      Well, it seem if the US do something in Middle-east a few weeks ago, those palestanian would hate US so much. Oh, it is not confirmed who did that yet...

    10. Re:except... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeh right, like they have stopped human bomb in Isreal already.

    11. Re:except... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So your point is ... what? - that you roll over and submit to terorrism? That you do nothing? Do you think that this improves your chances?
      - This is not an option .. maybe now you understand why Israel is acting the way it does.

      Its a hard world of terrorism out there - sorry that you now have to experience it - but it has to be dealt with, and you dont do that by closing your eyes. You do it by systematically going after the leaders of the terrorist organisations and the states that support/harbour these leaders.

      Ironically, I think that this will probably increase the chances for peace in the middle east - the palestinians have now been newtered; any supporter of terrorism will now be viewed in a different light

    12. Re:except... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was the point. Read and UNDERSTAND.

    13. Re:except... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the FUCK can't we just kill 50,000 Palestinians?

    14. Re:except... by kirby697 · · Score: 1

      since when did the Jews slam planes into the most populated place in the world? I'm talking about getting rid of the people involved in what happened, not the whole country. Fucking moron.

    15. Re:except... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So it was probably a bunch of disillusioned US airline pilots then.

    16. Re:except... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because that would make you Hitler you Nazi ape fuck!

  46. Better... by imipak · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Hemos: THANK YOU for your words urging restraint. There'll be plenty of time to work out who did it and bring them to justice in the following months.

    major parts of European cities, Britain in particular are being shutdown,
    I'm two miles from the House of Commons (central London) and, as far as I'm aware, Hemos is mistaken. (Source?) Specific buioldings such as Lloyds, the Nat West tower, Canary Wharf and so on are evacuated, but Londoners are used to that sort of thing: we had an IRA bombing campaign (and still do, of a sort) and there are plenty of false alarms and practice drills.

    1. Re:Better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can say with that Ford Motor company (Fortune 4) has evacuated its England HQ, as well as several other of its business offices. Email to employees states something like "fear that attacks may be centered on big business"

    2. Re:Better... by perelgut · · Score: 1
      The biggest problem with retaliation is that it doesn't work. The Israeli's have been trying that policy for years and they can't retaliate enough to make a difference. And nobody would want them to retaliate that much!

      • Keep in mind that there are people who think nothing of strapping pounds of explosive to their bodies and detonating themselves.
      • And keep in mind that a highly trained, assumedly intelligent person took over the controls of a very fussy piece of machinery and hit a relatively small target with great accuracy, committing certain suicide.

      I think that something needs to be done, but I am very skeptical that the answer lies in carpet bombing.

  47. September 11th by aoihai · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've already posted this in the earlier topic, but it's a bit buried.

    The date itself indicated that this is probably a Palestinian action. September 11th is the mean date of the Camp David Accords, which essentially ended the conflict between Egypt and Israel and indirectly lead to the current conflict there.

    --
    You were eaten by a grue.
    1. Re:September 11th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also the eighth anniversary of Israel and the PLO officially recognizing each other (9/9/93) and the signing of their first peace accord (9/12/93).
      -Kincyhle

    2. Re:September 11th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Teleban were formed in September 1994, and
      on 11th September 1996, five years ago today,
      they took their first city, Jalalabad on the Pakistan/Afghan border. Soon after (27 Sep) they
      took Kabul the capital.

      Amazing what an google search will turn up on
      the Internet. CIA/FBI take note.

      This may be co-incidence, or even misdirection.
      Many things have probably happened on the 11th September in the past. I'm sure these sort of facts will be collated and checked.

      Please Mr Bush (and the USA), be sensible, get all the facts first, consult everyone sensible, then do something reasonable and with the backing of as many people as possible.

      My condolences to those affected, and utter shock. I'm sure people alive during WWI and WWII would have felt familiar feelings.

  48. Re:Cowards by TobyWong · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I can confirm the navy is mobilized as well, all 3 of our canoes are en route as I type this

    --
    - Toby
  49. Re:Plea for peace - Huh? Get Real! by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Violence induces more violence. Retaliation will only lead to more deaths. If you are a citizen of the U.S. of America, please write your representative right now and ask him to join a plea for peace. Historically the U.S. reaction to this kind of attack is to counter strike. It's highly probably that it's already being planned or even carried on. That will solve nothing.

    Dude. This is worse than Pearl Harbor.

    Get with the real world. You're dealing, most likely, with Arab terrorists. They're born and raised to think martyrdom after destroying civilian targets is the way to Mecca.

    The only thing they understand is violence. This is the start of World War III. Make no mistake about it.

    It's time to clean up the Middle East. And I'm afraid that will mean a lot of collateral damage to their civilians, but *the fucking World Trade Center* went down.

    I don't care about a few Syrian or Afghani or whoever women and children in the face of *at least 50,000 innocent civilians* dying.

    This is war. It's not pretty.

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
  50. I watched the whole thing. by Neck_of_the_Woods · · Score: 1

    I watched the 2nd plane this the WTC, I watched the towers fall. It is just scary as hell if you ask me. I am more scared of what the US is going to do, and god help all the people that have died in this. Lets hope our leaders keep there heads and people do the right thing here.

    You can check out the pictures from my digital camera I took from the hudson if you want.

    WTC Pics

    --
    Neck_of_the_Woods
    #/usr/local/surf/glassy/overhead
  51. Kennedy Space Center by Libertius · · Score: 1

    Anyone heard anything about it? I heard something about an attack.

    1. Re:Kennedy Space Center by TrollMan+5000 · · Score: 1

      Nope. Kennedy Space Center has been closed, as well as Disney.

      Makes sense, one's an important government facility, and other holds many thousands of people.

    2. Re:Kennedy Space Center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Nope. Kennedy Space Center has been closed, as well as Disney.

      > Makes sense, one's an important government facility, and other holds many thousands of people.

      which one is which? =]

  52. Re:This WAS BS - Page edited today by PeterMiller · · Score: 1

    BS.....page was last edited.....TODAY. Sorry dude, nice try.

  53. Eye opener by travway · · Score: 1

    What happened today in the US is probably something that all people will never forget. I pray for the victims, families, and workers who are trying to save lives.

    I have been thinking, if and when we find out who is responsible for this (assuming it is a group, and assuming they are not dead already) there would be no way you could possibly punish them. My gut feeling is through out the Eighth amendment and inflict as much pain and suffering as one could take. But this is America, who ever is responsible will probably go thru a trial that will last decades.

    Its kinda funny how the Middle East folk that are considered to be our adversaries are celebrating in light of these attacks. One has to ask, where would those nations be without the US? We have done too much catering to these ungrateful nations.

    --
    When cars are outlawed, only Outlaws will drive them...
    1. Re:Eye opener by Zachary+Kessin · · Score: 2

      They probably won't treat this as a criminal act. It will be treated as an act of war. Which it is. You can bet that the US and Nato millitary assets will deal with this. As soon as they figure out which bunch of cowards did this.

      --
      Erlang Developer and podcaster
    2. Re:Eye opener by weslocke · · Score: 1

      The problem is what will be the end result?

      If they go and personally kill every person involved in this action (even with no loss of non-participant life), wouldn't that just place those figures into martyr status and serve to inflame yet more terrorism?

      Also how fitting is the revenge if the person you're condemning looks upon death at the hands of their enemy as a golden path to a glorious afterlife?

      Sickening, all in all.

      --

      'Life is like a spoonful of Drain-O, it feels good on the way down but leaves you feeling hollow inside'
    3. Re:Eye opener by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone who would celebrate the death of thousands for any reason is a sociopath Sicko that needs a labatomy performed quickly to protect the rest of us. anyone who is a small bit normal should be puking at the sight and disgusted at the news that someone could be as insane as these terrorists are. and any nation that is happy about what happened is a nation of horrible people.

    4. Re:Eye opener by PedroReish · · Score: 1

      " Its kinda funny how the Middle East folk that are considered to be our adversaries are celebrating in light of these attacks. One has to ask, where would those nations be without the US? "

      So what did the US do lately apart from vetoing every vote at the UN security council that would have sent observers or peace keeping troops in Palestine? Of course, the US gov. tried to get negociations going but does not want to take tough decisions take could anger Israel, it's strategic ally in the middle east.

      Don't get me wrong. I do not agree with today's events, it's the worst act of terrorism ever. But comments like the "eye opener" are just dumbing down huge geopolitical issues. Saying "where would they be without us" is just looking at one side of the story. You can't look at the middle east situation without looking at those who had a hand in it (in no particular order and i'm forgetting some im sure): Israel, Palestine, Syria, England, France, Egypt, the US. All these countries had something to do with the development of the region and its conflicts and not one of them is an angel, and as hard as it may sound for some, even the US.

      --
      I won't say i'm the best or portray that role, but i'm up to top two and my father's getting old.
    5. Re:Eye opener by fraktalisman · · Score: 1

      One thing the cruelties have done is to raise a talk that so dominated by national(istic) viewpoints.
      What happened to Internationalism?
      I am not primarily a German or European citizen, but first of all I am a human, and so are the Americans, the Israeli, the Arabs, etc.
      Please don't let terrorists and demagogues control your mind! There is no use for "US vs. Europe" flamewars. Or why are we all using the INTERnet?!

      --
      http://www.fraktalisman.de
    6. Re:Eye opener by Dacobi · · Score: 1
      Its kinda funny how the Middle East folk that are considered to be our adversaries are celebrating in light of these attacks. One has to ask, where would those nations be without the US? We have done too much catering to these ungrateful nations.

      First I'd like to say that I also pray* for the victims and their families,
      but can you tell me one thing that the western world has done (in the last 10 years) that the average Iraqian should be grateful for?

      Personally I think I would be pretty pissed at USA/EU/NATO if I were starving to death in Iraq due to sanctions posed by the western world.

      (*, I don't actually pray since I'm sort of a Zen buddhist)

      --
      .NOT
    7. Re:Eye opener by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen

    8. Re:Eye opener by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err, if the Iraqi people are so bad off then why do they continue to let the leadership lead them? It is not the responsibility of the US to make sure that Iraqi citizens get enough to eat and drink. It is the responsibility of the Iraqi leadership. If US/EU/NATO sanctions are causing hardship on the people of Iraq they should do something about it. Sanctions are not permanent. And if the "lazy, overpowered, devil Americans" can rise up in rebellion and create a wholly new government, then SURELY the chosen of Allah can do the same.

    9. Re:Eye opener by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aye, lets not kill them. Lets put them in the American prison system for the rest of their lives. Preferrably Rikers Island.

    10. Re:Eye opener by Dacobi · · Score: 1
      Err, if the Iraqi people are so bad off then why do they continue to let the leadership lead them?

      You have to remember that the "government" in Iraq is a dictatorship that control everything including the flow of information.

      IMO Sadam has managed to twist the perception of "his people" in order to use the sanctions to his advantage. So in effect, the perception of Iraqis might very well be that these sanctions ARE unprovoked attacks by, as you put it: "lazy, overpowered, devil Americans".

      If this is true, (and I think it is) the sanctions have the exact opposite effect, as Sadam will end up even more powerful thanks to that HUGE propaganda weapon that has been placed in his hands.

      --
      .NOT
    11. Re:Eye opener by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh, so the Iraqi people are stupid enough to be used as helpless little pawns. I understand now.

    12. Re:Eye opener by Dacobi · · Score: 1
      Ahh, so the Iraqi people are stupid enough to be used as helpless little pawns. I understand now.

      Well, I guess you don't...

      --
      .NOT
  54. Pictures of WTC burning by louissypher · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here are some pictures taken by a co-worker. I could see the WTC burning this morning on my way to work. http://www.netbsd.org/~groo/

    --
    www.bleepyou.com
    1. Re:Pictures of WTC burning by Rackemup · · Score: 2

      Nice photos ... much cleaner than some of the news sites (canoe.ca had digi-photos of their TV tuned to CNN).

  55. September 11 = by LordKariya · · Score: 3, Informative

    Not sure if this has been posted yet...

    Today is September 11th...

    September 11th was also the date that certain conditions were reached under the Camp David accord, a treaty which terrorist groups have regularly rallied against.

    --
    I alternate between posting +5 and -1 Comments. Karma: +53 -47 = 6
    1. Re:September 11 = by alcmena · · Score: 1

      One observation that I'm not sure how many people made...

      Today is 9-11

    2. Re:September 11 = by schroedinbug · · Score: 0

      Also I noted that today's numerical date is 9-11. As in 911.

  56. More Maryland news: MD STATE OF EMERGENCY by strredwolf · · Score: 2

    States offices and courts are closing down. All off-duty police are being called in.

    Governeor Glendening is declaring a state of emergency in MD. Text from WBAL TV's coverage says that the declaration will allow schools to close early.

    --

    --
    # Canmephians for a better Linux Kernel
    $Stalag99{"URL"}="http://stalag99.net";
  57. Up to date page.. by Ramion · · Score: 0

    Check:
    http://www.dal.net/wtc/
    It has news (comfirmed and uncomfirmed) from the attacts..

  58. Even in South Florida by TrollMan+5000 · · Score: 1

    States of emergencies have been declared in Broward and Miami-Dade counties. The tolls on the Florida Turnpike have been lifted. All local airports have been evacuated.

    However, no threats or unusual activity have been reported. Our guard is up.

    1. Re:Even in South Florida by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      All local airports have been evacuated.

      I have a good friend who works at Palm Beach International Airport... the employees are sitting around, unable to leave. I have no idea why.

      You can smell the jet fuel for miles around the airport. The chemical stench is incredible around my house. All the planes that were forced to turn back with full tanks had to dump fuel to land. Amazing.

      --
      Evan (off of Military Trail, between Okeechobee and Belvedere).

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    2. Re:Even in South Florida by TrollMan+5000 · · Score: 1

      Sorry. I should have been nore precise. I was reporting from the Broward/Miami-Dade area. Palm Beach has no such state of emergency, so I do not know why that airport is under lockdown.

  59. Webcams by Jordy · · Score: 2

    There were several webcams in the WTC on the top floors which are obviously now no longer working.

    The washington post has a webcam pointed at the pentagon which updates every 30 seconds showing the fire which is bellowing smoke into the air.

    I have a feeling that this disaster will be the most highly covered one in history simply because of the number of webcams scattered around both DC and NYC.

    --
    The world is neither black nor white nor good nor evil, only many shades of CowboyNeal.
    1. Re:Webcams by Pope · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Does anyone have images from the webcams before the planes hit? Those would be some Pullitzer-calibre photos if they showed anything.

      That footage of the South Tower getting hit by the 757(?) is just chilling.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    2. Re:Webcams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first tower was a bomb, not a plane. The CIA is behind it all.

    3. Re:Webcams by uchian · · Score: 1

      One of those planes alone crashing, with the hundred people on board would have been enough to be considered a tradegy.

      The fact that so little has been said about the people on those flights really puts this tradegy into perspective.

  60. thanks to religion by Sebastopol · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    remember, when you hear someone say "pray for xxxxx", it's prayer that started this.

    a battle over a piece of land in mythology. that is why 50000+ people died today.

    when people say 'pray to god for the vicitms', what god do they mean? the god of the muslim palenstinians, or the jewish god of the israelis, or the catholic god???

    it is all religion's fault.

    wake up sheep, your sacred texts are no different then the stories lof odin, zeus, or thoth.

    --
    https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    1. Re:thanks to religion by sandidge · · Score: 2
      Um, today is not the day for Trolling such as this. Please crawl back into your hole. It's sad that the only way for you to understand a tragedy such as this would be for one of your family members to have been involved. Such a shame.

    2. Re:thanks to religion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen.

      this text added to pass the lameness^H^H^H^H filter

    3. Re:thanks to religion by Sebastopol · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      i understand the tragedy completely, you do not. the fact that i awoke to the terrifying notion that the lives of close friends were in jeopardy because of religious insanity enlightened me.

      but attempts by people like you to crush the true cause of the tragedy is the real shame.

      --
      https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    4. Re:thanks to religion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not the fault of religeon. This is the fault of religeous zealots. There is a difference.

      Any spiritual man I have ever met of any faith has NEVER wanted any more death that what was needed in the world.

    5. Re:thanks to religion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One can't help but realize that the twin towers where symbolic to the religion of capatolism. Some religious group attacked the root American belief. There's hell to be paid.

    6. Re:thanks to religion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may denounce the God of the Bible (God of Israel) now, but where will you be 5ms after you die? If you reject Christ, I'm afraid you will NOT end up in Heaven which means there's only one other place. Please reconsider your attitude, before it becomes too late for you.

      John 3:16 "For God so loved the world (that's you), that He gave His only begotten Son (that's Christ), that whosoever (that's you again) believeth on Him, should not parish, but HAVE everlasting life."

    7. Re:thanks to religion by Nigel+Stepp · · Score: 1

      The people responsible for this did not do it because of religion. Religion is a great motivator, especially when it is misused as it so often is. These attacks are political.

      Prayer started this? Influential leaders with agendas started this.

      --
      4096R/EF7BAFA6 79E1 DF98 D09D 898F 9A11 F6F0 DDDC 23FA EF7B AFA6
    8. Re:thanks to religion by loosenut · · Score: 1

      There's a difference between rejecting religion and rejection spirituality.

    9. Re:thanks to religion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      true, and God hates "religion". He doesn't want religion (man trying to reach to God), He wants a presonal relationship with you -- Christianity (Christ/God reaches down to sinning man).

    10. Re:thanks to religion by Alex+Belits · · Score: 2

      You may denounce the God of the Bible (God of Israel) now, but where will you be 5ms after you die?

      In /dev/null, just like everyone else, including you. Lie, no matter how sweet, is for cowards.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    11. Re:thanks to religion by Drazi100 · · Score: 1

      ah yes blame people who beleive in a diety.perhaps BAN such thoughts? Is that your idea?

  61. Re:I hope... by Pope · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Take a look at what's been going on in Britain and Northern Ireland, especially recently, and see if retaliation has ever solved anything.

    This is certainly one of the worst things I have ever witnessed, and that includes being in London during IRA bombings.

    I just have been thinking: who on Earth is going to take responsibility for this?? As soon as one has spoken up, yes, he will be a flat spot on the wall.

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  62. this IS pearl Harbour by JohnSmith1138 · · Score: 1

    This is bigger than Pearl Harbor. Probably thousands dead. Maybe tens of thousands.

  63. more pics and vids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.evilcode.net/eck/

  64. CALL 1-800-448-3543 by Adler · · Score: 1

    If you want to give blood or you don't call 1-800-448-3543 to find out where you can.

    If you don't want to give blood call anyway and go do it. Dammit its a free cookie, think of it that way. You like cookies don't you geek boy?!

    --

    Everybody denies I am a genius--but nobody ever called me one!

  65. It's the damn pirates! It's the damn freeloaders! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ...all US Disney parks shutdown...

    Why's that? Do they think that the copyright opponents are responsible for the attacks, and that they will also punish Disney for their nefarious involvment in various copyright laws?

  66. national labs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was notified that Los Alamos is closing.

    1. Re:national labs? by Pinball+Wizard · · Score: 1

      Sandia National Labs closed too...everyone got sent home, thankfully.

      --

      No, Thursday's out. How about never - is never good for you?

  67. Taliban renounces by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wakil Ahmel Mutawakel renounces attack in news conference

  68. Smoke seen from ISS by yzquxnet · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Fox News just reported that smoke from New York City is visible from the ISS (or Alpha, whatever you call it).

    1. Re:Smoke seen from ISS by Walker+Evans · · Score: 1

      there any pictures of that?

      that would be quite a sight to see.

      --
      Shameless Self Promotion : Webhosting at Blender Networks.
    2. Re:Smoke seen from ISS by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
    3. Re:Smoke seen from ISS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      with what is going on here now i think i would rather be out there on the ISS

  69. Peace at the cost of liberty? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not responding to this attack will not lead to peace. Unfortunately there is a large and organized group of people that are willing to give their lives to take ours and threaten our way of life. It's not about getting even.

    The capacity of the world trade center is twenty thousand people. Perhaps you would sit by and watch this tragedy happen, but I would give up my own life to prevent this from occurring again.

    1. Re:Peace at the cost of liberty? by m2 · · Score: 2
      Not responding to this attack will not lead to peace.

      But a military attack on the suspects won't either. Just look at this forum which is supposed to have lots of highly educated people that can really assess the benefits derived from U.S.A.'s previous military responses. They are roaring for blood.


      I never said this has to go unanswered. But wiping some country out of the map isn't the correct answer. Today fifty thousand died. How many does it take to get even? Fifty thousand, too? Five hundred thousand? Five million? All of them?

    2. Re:Peace at the cost of liberty? by osu-neko · · Score: 1
      All of them?

      I wouldn't call this getting even, but it would prevent them from ever attacking again.

      "Getting even" is not now nor has it ever been the point of any US response. That would serve no practical purpose. The point is to deter future attacks. This has worked in the past. It's not a perfect or permament solution (witness today's activities), but it often does work, somewhat, for a time...

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    3. Re:Peace at the cost of liberty? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      all of them...

    4. Re:Peace at the cost of liberty? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of them, and their supporters.

  70. You're right, it is MUCH WORSE by Carnage4Life · · Score: 4, Informative

    BBC reported that a US statesman as saying this is the second pearl harbour

    It is not


    Pearl Harbor was an attack during a time of global war on a military installation that cost a total of 2,403 lives.

    This attack occured during a time of peace on civilain installations and the death toll is being estimated at over ten times that of Pearl Harbor (at least).

  71. Ships Scrambling by dbCooper0 · · Score: 1

    My son is stationed in Mayport (Jacksonville) and reports that all East Coast Navy ships will be out of Port within the hour.

    --
    db
    Cig:
    ôô
    /`
    1. Re:Ships Scrambling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard it was all but 3 . Anywho NAS is pretty much on lockdown . No 1 gets in and NO 1 gets out .

    2. Re:Ships Scrambling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work at the Naval Station in San Diego. As of 9am (PST) (when all us civilians were told to leave the base) all units of the Pacific Fleet, currently in port, that were capable of getting under way, were doing so or making preperations to do so.

    3. Re:Ships Scrambling by dbCooper0 · · Score: 1

      All but three - that would make sense. We obviously cannot stray too far with the entire fleet, or we leave ourselves open to futher attack. Thanks for the correction.

      --
      db
      Cig:
      ôô
      /`
    4. Re:Ships Scrambling by m0ng00se · · Score: 1

      That information is confidential and should remain so for obvious security reasons.

      Do not imperil your son.

      --


      Is madness a syptom of genius or vice-versa?
    5. Re:Ships Scrambling by dbCooper0 · · Score: 1

      AND BY THE WAY - our nation is PISSED!

      --
      db
      Cig:
      ôô
      /`
  72. North of the border... by sundae · · Score: 2, Informative
    Toronto has shut down CN Tower. Words of highrises in Toronto denying entry and exit circulating. Flights have been landing in Canada, Toronto and Vancouver particularly busy.

    Phone Center number 1-800-387-3624. Not sure if that's just for Canadian or for generally anyone in NYC.

    1. Re:North of the border... by sundae · · Score: 1
      Toronto is basically in chaos. Most people are allowed to leave downtown area as curtesy. Public transit is running rush hour service.


      Canadian-US border not sealed; some parts of the border is still open, but all cars going into the States are searched pretty throughly.

    2. Re:North of the border... by Malc · · Score: 2

      "Flights have been landing in Canada, Toronto and Vancouver particularly busy. "

      Toronto isn't that busy. I've just seen an interview with the GTAA on CBC Newsworld. Pearson airport can handle 84 flights an hour, they've only had 25 of the outstanding 100 flights re-routed there.

      I can imagine Vancouver will be worse hit, and I think I heard of sever 747's on approach. With the RCMP searches, those people are going be on those planes for a long, only to get off in a place they don't want to be. Really though, the place that will be worse hit is out east. Many planes have been re-routed to Nova Scotia, and they're not equipped to deal with that kind of capacity.

  73. Re:better sources by marcop · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    When the news first broke out many of these web sites were down. I found out what was going on by checking slashdot. Many people posted links to news sites that were still working. It was interesting to watch newly posted links successively become bogged down. It took me a while to be able to find a working video feed of the event. I got the latest news from my wife at home who was watching regular television.
    This event has really tested the ability of the Internet to handle news.

    BTW, I have finally found a good news site that is providing continual video coverage: http://www.sky.com/skynews/home/
    I have been watching it for the past hour and a half - although it has been jumpy lately.

  74. Texan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Time to see if all that talk about Texans is true.

    I say kill who ever did this, and kill anybody that stands in our way to find out who did this. If one country says they don't want to give us help, bomb them into submission.

    At least it will help the economy.

    1. Re:Texan by Gizzmonic · · Score: 1

      Yep, nothing like greasing the wheels of the economy with the blood of the innocent.

      It'll tell you what-this Texan would like to get out his lariat, hogtie ya, and make you look at the footage of the US bombing the pharmeutical factory in Sudan from Clinton's administration. Or how about Nixon's secret bombing raids on Cambodia?

      Folks, the self-righteous attitude that the US has never done anything wrong builds on the foundation of hatred that these terrorists already possess.

      We as a country need to concentrate on helping those affected by the tragedy. We also need to find the people responsible and bring them to justice.

      We all want retribution for this heinous act. But randomly choosing a country to bomb will do no good. As a matter of fact, that only makes the US into the bully that these terrorists would like to believe we are.

      I shudder when I read how many posts on this board are calling out for war-without even knowing who is responsible. Please, let's go after the bad guys-and let's keep the innocent blood off OUR hands.

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
  75. the US got what they deserved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    From what i can see, while i am very sorry for the loss of innocent life. i have absolutly no pity for the US as a whole.. US has been bulling people around for most of existance, DCMA, Canadian softwood tarrif(this put me out of work),etc,etc,etc.. im personally surprised that it took so long for somone for finally whoop their ass. they are simply getting what they deserve.. a proverb i think would fit well here is a nail standing up will eventualy get hammered down.. or keep sticking you neck out you will get your head cut off.

  76. Re:I hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Don't rule out anti-globalist anarchists. How do you strike them if they are responsible?

  77. Also try... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    try for an australian site http://www.abc.net.au/news

    they are updating and being 3am here its relatively quick

  78. Re:Plea for peace - Huh? Get Real! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After this the US will not allow for arab countries to protect terrorists. Hopefully they won't strip away any more freedoms from US citizens.

  79. Real tragedy yet to come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As horrible as this is, the real tragedy is yet to come. The death toll today will probably be less than an average year's traffic accidents. Horrible to be sure, but soon to be announced attack on American freedom by its politicians will be worse. Expect our politicians in general and the corrupt NY Senators in particular, to start pushing for more "gun control", face scanning, restrictions on encryption, national ID cards, etc., as part of "anti terrorist" measures. "Something MUST be done", they will cry. Look at the death toll of socialist history to see tragedy that eclipses what was done today. Airlines are already testing biometric ID databases for "enhanced security and expedited check in". Today is bad news for several reasons.

    1. Re:Real tragedy yet to come by psykocrime · · Score: 1

      Agreed. "The real tragedy is yet to come", couldn't have said it better myself.

      --
      // TODO: Insert Cool Sig
    2. Re:Real tragedy yet to come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen. That's all I can say.. most people don't have a clue what's coming but the US has a long history of destroying one's individual freedom bit by bit in the name of security.

  80. a feedback loop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Terorists are very sure people. They are quite sure that will not be heard and their opnion will be ignored. And usually they are right. More opposition they face, more radical they became, and therefore face more opposition. More oppressing and US will become more people will be sure of it and will provide a feedback in form terorism, and as result US will soon became even more oppressing. There are vicious cycles here. US is seeking domination over other countries. US seems to think that its way is best one and world exists to serve it.

    US will not solve any problem (except percived by goverment lack of power of goverment structures) by making anti-teroristic forces stronger. The understanding and love are not the only exit from this vicious cycle. There is other one to which US is going and leading. The Death and Self-Destruction.

  81. Exactly. by marcus · · Score: 1

    That's the way the world works.

    What you suggest is to lay down and be bulldozed, not a very attractive proposition.

    --
    Good judgement comes from experience, and experience comes from bad judgement.
    - W. Wriston, former Citibank CEO
  82. Re:I hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They can if they train monkeys to do it, or use robots. Or use robotic monkeys.

  83. Anybody knows Amtrak's stock symbol? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Might be a good investment these times.

  84. Swedish comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Swedish prime minister, Mr Göran Persson, said today that "this unprecedented attack on the open democratic society is a concern for all democratic countries" (my translation) This is one of very few things that he and I agree on. USA does not stand alone in this. The entire western world is behind you.

    My thoughts and prayers goes with the American people tonight.

    Peter Svedman,
    Tyresö, Sweden.
    Oh2@telia.com

  85. Ban Encryption by Porag_Spliffing · · Score: 1

    If only the NSA had been able to read all comms this would never have happened...

    This will be used as an excuse to futher limit privact/freedom.............

    --
    Maybe you live in interesting times
    1. Re:Ban Encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's face it, there's a nontrivial price to be paid for the freedom to communicate securely... we're seeing it today.

    2. Re:Ban Encryption by dirtyhippie · · Score: 1

      What??!? Get the hell out of here, what other than suspicion would lead you to believe that encryption was involved at all? Do you think this kind of coordinated mission could be done entirely through encrypted email, and not as personal meetings, not to mention training missions?

      Don't be an idiot.

    3. Re:Ban Encryption by Porag_Spliffing · · Score: 1

      There was a note of sarcasm in my first post, sorry I did not tag it.

      I would think encryption _would_ be involved to co-ordinate something of this magnitude. Of course encryption is not the cause, look to US foriegn policy for that.

      Aside from that I believe we should have the right to privacy (& that means encryption in the wired world) but I think this will be used by the big brother faction to denigrate encryption/privacy and those who support it.

      --
      Maybe you live in interesting times
  86. PENTAGON != COLLAPSED INTO A HOLE! Stay off phone! by GMontag · · Score: 5, Informative

    There is a big hole IN the Pentagon where an airplane crashed into it. It is ONLY 5 stories tall (well, there is that *alleged* basement), 5 sides, 5 rings. A 300 foot hole can not swollow the worlds most massive office building.

    Plane crashed by the helliport, on the Southwest side. Most reports are that it hit between the E and D rings (outermost ring is E).

    Not sure if this was the wedge that is currently under renovation or not.

    There are confirmed dead adults in the building. None of the children in the daycare center were harmed. All of the children are accounted for and safe.

    Verizon is asking everybody in the DC area to stay off of ANY phone line unless it is an emergency.

  87. But it *does* solve things by hawk · · Score: 2
    OUr entry into WWII was one of those responses. That solved a lot.


    Bombing Tripoli in the 80's caused an overnight drop in world Terrorism.


    At least at times, violent reponses *are* effective. You can still make a moral case against them, but the dotion that they are ineffective is demonstrably false.


    I'm a belligerent evangelical pacifist. I am opposed to violence (pacifist), and want to spread this attitude to everyone else (evangelical). But I'm also willing to use massive military force to bring them to this enlightenment.


    hawk

    1. Re:But it *does* solve things by Noel · · Score: 1

      OUr entry into WWII was one of those responses. That solved a lot.

      There's a slight difference between a military attack and a terrorist attack. You can declare war on a country, and you know where to counter-attack.

      Bombing Tripoli in the 80's caused an overnight drop in world Terrorism.

      And what has caused the increase since then?

      At least at times, violent reponses *are* effective. You can still make a moral case against them, but the dotion that they are ineffective is demonstrably false.

      I would agree that they are effective in the short-term. In the long term, though, I really wonder. Does a nation's agressive attitude make them more of a target for later hatred and terrorism?

      I'm a belligerent evangelical pacifist. I am opposed to violence (pacifist), and want to spread this attitude to everyone else (evangelical). But I'm also willing to use massive military force to bring them to this enlightenment.

      Hmmm...how can military force bring pacifict enlightenment??

    2. Re:But it *does* solve things by hearingaid · · Score: 2
      Bombing Tripoli in the 80's caused an overnight drop in world Terrorism.

      That's arguable. Some would say that the Tripoli bombing shifted world terrorist activity from the left to the right: instead of communists doing relatively minor things, instead we had contras bombing civilian targets in Nicaragua and things like that.

      However, '80s terrorism aside. Look at the historical example of the Germans in World War II. They bombed the living daylights out of England. The result?

      Dresden.

      If it does turn out that this was the work of bin Laden, then it's hard to avoid the observation that the U.S. bombed Afghanistan in an attempt to get bin Laden (much like the Nazis bombed England in an attempt to get Churchill), and in response terrorists bombed the biggest civilian target they could find (compare: Bomber Harris vs. modern terrorist).

      The only difference was that Bomber Harris had access to a much greater array of weaponry than the terrorists who attacked today. Certainly, the reaction of New Yorkers that I'm hearing on my TV today is similar to the reaction of the Germans when Dresden was bombed.

      --

      my old sig used to be funny, but then slashcode ate it and now it's not funny anymore

    3. Re:But it *does* solve things by fireant · · Score: 2, Interesting
      At least at times, violent reponses *are* effective. You can still make a moral case against them, but the dotion that they are ineffective is demonstrably false.

      Okay, they are effective. In the short term. The fact that this hapenned, shows that retaliations are not effective in the long term.

      Say you have a garden. Rabbits are always trying to get in. You have a couple of options. One option is to post a guard day and night with a rifle and pick them off. You'll probably get a lot of them, but occasionally, one will probably get by while you're busy aiming for others. This seems to be the current situation as far as the US and international terrorists.

      Another option is to track one of the rabbits to the hole, and get rid of the source. Are you done with the rabbits? Yes. Until the next group of rabbits comes around.

      Yet another option is to put up an electric fence, which is what some farmers generally do, but only if it's a small garden. It's not very practical for a large field, or a whole country.

      What's the solution? Hell if I know.

      I'm a belligerent evangelical pacifist. I am opposed to violence (pacifist), and want to spread this attitude to everyone else (evangelical). But I'm also willing to use massive military force to bring them to this enlightenment.

      I think this statement is the very definition of the word paradox.

    4. Re:But it *does* solve things by Jason+Earl · · Score: 2

      Yes, and Great Britain and its citizens are free to walk around today only because they opposed the Hitler and his allies. If they had simply capitulated then things would have been very different. The Germans can tell you what it was like to belong to a nation run by a madman. Millions people from the German occupied territories were slaughtered out of hand. Including hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of German citizens. However, once the Nazis were destroyed the danger vanished. Today Germany and Great Britain are even allies. The damage done to German cities was regrettable, but they were the price that had to be paid for peace.

      Madmen must be opposed, at whatever cost. The Germans caused Dresden themselves, and not by bombing London. They caused Dresden when they failed to oppose Hitler, and when they followed his lead in his attempt to "take over the world."

    5. Re:But it *does* solve things by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
      OUr entry into WWII was one of those responses. That solved a lot.


      Solved one problem, opened another, bigger can of worms: Soviet domination of Eastern Europe. Let's do a quick tally: The Baltic states (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania), Poland, East Germany, Hungaria, Rumania, Czeckoslovakia, Albania. Did I miss any? Oh, Yugoslavia. 45 Years total under the Boot. Big Problem, and it was Roosevelt that sold them all out at Yalta in February, 1945. What an evil weenie.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    6. Re:But it *does* solve things by coolgeek · · Score: 2
      And what has caused the increase since then?

      A lack of bombing terrorist bases?

      --

      cat /dev/null >sig
    7. Re:But it *does* solve things by hearingaid · · Score: 2

      What evidence do you have that Dresden, or Hiroshima, or Nagasaki, was necessary for peace?

      Besides, it sounds to me like you're arguing on the side of the terrorists. Assume that bin Laden is responsible for today's attack, and look at it this way:

      • Great Britain launches an attack against military targets controlled by Germany in World War II; similarly, bin Laden launches attacks against military targets controlled by the United States in the '90s;
      • Germany responds by bombing civilian targets in Britain; similarly, the United States responds by bombing civilian targets in Afghanistan;
      • Britain responds by carpet-bombing Dresden; and today, we have... well.

      See my point yet?

      Note: I loathe Bomber Harris, and think what he did was both unnecessary and wrong. Still, I can't see how what he did is really any different from the terrorist attack today, except that he had a lot more bombs at his disposal and so caused more damage.

      --

      my old sig used to be funny, but then slashcode ate it and now it's not funny anymore

    8. Re:But it *does* solve things by IronChef · · Score: 2

      Okay, they are effective. In the short term.

      When was the last time we were attacked by Nazis or imperialist Japanese forces?

      Sure looks like violence can be a long-term solution to me.

    9. Re:But it *does* solve things by fireant · · Score: 2
      When was the last time we were attacked by Nazis or imperialist Japanese forces?

      Yes. You are right. Violence is a long term solution when you're dealing with a specific threat that is highly visible and easy to pinpoint. It's easy to say that we got rid of the Nazis. What about the neo-Nazis? They certainly aren't as highly visible as the "real" Nazis, but they're still out there, breeding hate and violence.

      What about Tim McVeigh? We sure got him didn't we! Is that the end of crazy bombers who target US government buildings?

      By destroying the Nazis, did we end antisemitism (or racism)? By defeating the "imperialist Japanese" did we defeat imperialism? I think you need to look at a bigger picture. The people that orchestrate these kinds of things are smarter now. They know that taking over a country and making a direct assault doesn't work. It gives us a target.

      If someone does a drive-by on my house, and I find out who it is, and I kill them, is that a long-term solution to drive-by's on my house? Well, that person certainly won't do a drive-by again, but what about the rest of his gang? If they are all captured by the cops, what about fifteen years from now, is there going to be another gang?

    10. Re:But it *does* solve things by Jason+Earl · · Score: 2

      The only rational way to wage war is to play to win, and to win quickly. Prolonging the engagement only guarantees that there will be more casualties. That is why Hiroshima and Nagasaki were necessary for peace. It would have cost hundreds of thousands of U.S. lives and would have cost millions of Japanese lives to take Japan, and the U.S. could not afford to leave a hostile nation with the ability to wage war on us in the future to rebuild their nation. It is certainly a tragedy that so many died at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, but many more would have died had those bombs not been dropped.

      War is hell, but once you are engaged the only sane thing to do is to beat your opponent so badly that they surrender quickly and never dream of attacking you again. The leaders of the Axis powers were destroyed, and then America went to war with the destruction that we had caused. We realized that the citizens of these countries were not really to blame, and we helped get these countries back on their feet.

      Because of this both Japan and Germany (and Italy as well) are now all U.S. allies, and we wage war the civilized way, economically. And no matter who wins or loses the economic war both of our nations citizens are given better standards of living. Anyone who thinks that the future we have today because of the actions of the Allied forces is worse than the future that Hitler offered is clearly insane.

      If Bin Laden feels that he is at war with the U.S. then the attack today was almost certainly an effective one. However, as the Germans learned in World War II it doesn't matter who starts the war, it only matters who finishes it. The world no longer has to worry about the Nazis as a threat because they were utterly destroyed in World War II. Now today a new threat to the United States has arisen, and it will continue to plague us until it is eradicated in the same vicious bloodthirsty manner. The madmen responsible, and all who would support and ally themselves with these terrorists must die. They have declared war on us, and we will give them war until they are dead.

      Yes, a new set of madmen will pop up in the future, and they will almost certainly drag the U.S. into yet another conflict. Such conflicts have occurred since the dawn of time, and anyone that thinks that we can wish them away is sadly mistaken. The best that we can do is to try and guarantee that this particular madman isn't able to threaten us in the future.

      Also remember that Great Britain did not start the aggression in World War II. Hitler would have attacked Great Britain eventually one way or another. Allowing your enemy to choose the time and place for your battles is a sure fire way to guarantee that you lose. Blaming the Blitz on the British is like blaming a rape victim for her the actions of her assailant.

      The real cause of World War II was not the British aggression, but instead it was the failure of the German people to remove Hitler from power. Giving in to madmen, even if they are your leaders, only leads to destruction. Madmen must be opposed at all costs. Any other road leads to destruction.

    11. Re:But it *does* solve things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dresden was firebombed. First, concussion bombs to break things, like windows in particular. Then incendiary bombs to start fires, which spread rapidly due to the structural damage already done. Then, a short time later, anti-personnel bombs, to kill any firefighting attempts. Quite possibly the most efficient way to kill enormous numbers of people. The death toll even exceded Hiroshima.

      Dresden had little if any strategic importance. The attack was near the end of the war - Germany may have been managing to launch a few V2 rockets against London, but Germany's offensive power was pretty well destroyed at that point and the Battle of Britain was over. Dresden was simple punishment - an attempt to destroy any will left in the German people to continue fighting.

      Not saying it was right or wrong - just adding some facts.

    12. Re:But it *does* solve things by tomblackwell · · Score: 1

      When was the last time we were attacked by rabbits?

    13. Re:But it *does* solve things by hearingaid · · Score: 2
      That is why Hiroshima and Nagasaki were necessary for peace. It would have cost hundreds of thousands of U.S. lives and would have cost millions of Japanese lives to take Japan, and the U.S. could not afford to leave a hostile nation with the ability to wage war on us in the future to rebuild their nation.

      The U.S. could have easily blockaded Japan. The Japanese had no remaining navy. Given a blockade of a month or two, they would have surrendered.

      No: Hiroshima and Nagasaki happened because the U.S. was irritated. The Japanese had lost: how dare they show any pride whatsoever in their country. Also, they wanted to play with their New Toy. (Remember Bikini Atoll? Same thing.)

      Also remember that Great Britain did not start the aggression in World War II. Hitler would have attacked Great Britain eventually one way or another. Allowing your enemy to choose the time and place for your battles is a sure fire way to guarantee that you lose. Blaming the Blitz on the British is like blaming a rape victim for her the actions of her assailant.

      It's true that Britain didn't start the aggression. That was actually my point too.

      I'm equating bin Laden with the Brits, and the Americans with the Germans. Please read my posts more carefully in the future.

      (Also note that I'm only discussing German military strategy. I don't mean to suggest that the current American regime suffers from the racism that infected the Hitler government.)

      --

      my old sig used to be funny, but then slashcode ate it and now it's not funny anymore

    14. Re:But it *does* solve things by fireant · · Score: 1

      Sorry, about that. I just checked my calendar and it appears to be duck season.

  88. Hell. . . by steveeq2 · · Score: 0

    There's going to be hell for this, that's for sure!

  89. pictures give good idea of tower collapse by stego · · Score: 1

    it is one thing to read it, another to see them just gone. great photos and thanks for putting them up. I hope all of your people are oK.

  90. my site - cnn mirror by slhack3r · · Score: 1

    i'm mirroring CNN's site and trying to update as much as i can - http://www.jessenewland.net/article.php?sid=87&mod e=thread&order=0

  91. Flight Tracking by ahoehn · · Score: 1

    Every flight tracking site i tried was flooded, but if you go to you can download a demo of their flight tracking software wich seems to work fine, showing me nothing directly over the US, with a fiew flights heading out of the atlantic towards the US, and one heading out of the pacific towards SoCal.

    --
    Mod my comments down. It'll be fun.
    1. Re:Flight Tracking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AirNav's servers are down apparently... my client cant update...

      oh well.

  92. Re:Plea for peace - Huh? Get Real! by fetta · · Score: 1
    They're born and raised to think martyrdom after destroying civilian targets is the way to Mecca.

    Mecca is a city in Saudi Arabia, you dunce.

    These attacks are serious business, and will require a serious response once the guilty parties have been identified. Condemning a religion (about which you clearly know very little) does not help here.

    --
    ** The opinions expressed here are my own, and do not reflect those of my employers - past, present, or future**
  93. Has anybody noticed that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We claim not to have any intellegnce before hand, but we are already blaming bin laden. What is wrong with this? It sounds like we might have had an idea and DID NOTHING. While I believe this should be treated as act of war, we need to make certain as to who this is. It could very well be that we did this to ourselves, remember waco. Our own terriorists may very much want to do this, but it does look external.

  94. whether they knew? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    us embassy had hightened security since Fri, someone just told me.

    this and the whisper and address 1/2 hour later make me wonder how much more open us goverment could be to us citizens.

  95. See that one.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  96. Johnson and Toronto by Pope · · Score: 2
    Johnson Space Center in Florida has been shut down, about the same time they started closing the borders (Mexico and Canada)

    Where down the street from NASA? It must be pretty nuts anywhere near the government buildings.

    I mean, shit, a friend just called me: he works 3 blocks from the US consulate here in Toronto and they all got sent home because everyone was watching the news, and because of proximity to the consulate!

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    1. Re:Johnson and Toronto by Jin+Wicked · · Score: 1

      Kennedy Space Centre and Cape Canaveral are in Florida; that's where they launch...mission control and the Johnson Centre are in Houston.

      --
      My Webcomic: Asylum on 5th Street
  97. oh, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait


    remember the past -- near or far -- and realize that the u.s. and its cronies are/were responsible for inflicting much anguish to the rest of the planet.

    i am in no way justifying this unprecedented act of violence, but on the other hand you should be aware that there are a lot of people out there who are getting tired of your "righteous might" shoving everyone else about.

    and please: let's avoid the childish pearl harbour / fdr references. that was sixty years ago and we are all in a very different situation now.

    i wipe my ass with your stars and stripes

    1. Re:oh, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "i wipe my ass with your stars and stripes "
      Try that with me in the room, a$$hole.

    2. Re:oh, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      Yeah, thats aright, justa adda fuel to the fire... which someone is about to be thrown in.

      We dont know who had this mess done,
      but when we do

    3. Re:oh, please by WNight · · Score: 2

      I didn't know you enjoyed watching people shit...

      You know, a flag is just a bit of cloth. If you're so fired up about what it represents, you're an utter moron.

    4. Re:oh, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      yes, but he does have a point. finally, the big bully america has been punched in the face - and it hurt.

      maybe now you'll wake up and smell the coffee. shame it took ten thousand people dying to show that, but if that's what it takes, then that is what must happen. oh well.

      *shrugs* they're only americans, after all.

    5. Re:oh, please by coflow · · Score: 1

      the person who wrote the original post was right. we were punched in the face. and it hurt. and it is time that we wake up and smell the coffee that the rest of the world is incredibly jealous of us. We carry Europe on our shoulders through two world wars, we invent tons of useful things relative to the amount of time we have actually been a country, our businesses are the envy of the world, we were the only country (other than maybe canada and britain) brave enough to stand up and defeat the soviet union, we are tolerant of other viewpoints (which unfortunately makes attacks like these easier), and we have more people coming into our borders than any other country. The twin towers in particular, and the city of New York in general, are the very epitomy of what makes this country so enviable. And just like when a jealous lunatic destroys a piece of someone else's property, some insanse group took it upon themselves to orchestrate this attack. Congratulations. You've ruined something beautiful. But that is much easier to do than to create something beautiful. And in 5 or 10 years, believe that towers will stand again where the world trade center once did. and believe that New York city will remain the cultural center that it was before today. And believe that it will stand in defiance of all of the hatred and jealousy of Islam and every other backwards culture out there that cannot understand what makes the west so great. We are a superior culture and a superior military power and a superior economy, and all you have managed to do is piss off a group of people who have not been mad in a long time. We Americans have enjoyed prosperity unmatched in the history of the world for quite some time now, and we were willing to overlook for the most part transgressions by the dictators and lunatic leaders of the world. But now you have "hurt" us--as the originator of this post so eloquently pointed out. And you know what, the rest of the world can choose to wipe their asses with our stars and stripes. I understand that most of you are so concrete bound that you can't understand that the flag is nothing more than an icon to us, that which makes the US what it is is the spirit of the individual. And for those of you who think we can't beat terrorism, maybe you are right. But we sure as hell are going to try. There were more people saying we couldn't beat england at one point, but those who underestimate the United States and the philosophical principals on which it was founded are generally wrong. Ask Hitler, Hirohito, Lenin, Stalin, or Qadaffi.

    6. Re:oh, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      haha, you amuse me, you fool. it makes me glad to think that more of your type were destroyed so mercilessly today.

      not so much murder as natural selection, i would say.

      i've got to say i admire the arabs, they sure know how to sort things out, unlike most of my fellow countrymen.

    7. Re:oh, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what country men would that be out of curiosity?

  98. To Give Blood by aozilla · · Score: 2

    Call 1-800-GIVE-LIFE. There is no need to rush things. Any time in the next week or so is fine. The current blood supply is being sent to the needed areas, and the new donations will be used to replenish things.

    --
    ok then your [sic] infringing on my copyright! Could you as [sic] me next time before STEALING my comments for your own?
  99. Happened on this date by blamario · · Score: 2

    Why the September 11? Well, here's a list of possible causes. I've picked this from scopesys and filtered to leave everyting that might have pissed off somebody. Pick your choice! 1919 US marines invade Honduras 1922 British mandate of Palestine begins 1926 Aloha Tower dedicated in Honolulu 1926 US defeats France for their 7th straight Davis Cup championship 1935 US captures Davis Cup for 7th straight year 1941 FDR orders any Axis ship found in American waters be shot on sight 1954 1st Miss America TV broadcast 1961 Bob Dylan's 1st NY performance mont 1973 Chile's President, Salvador Allende, deposed by Pinoche in a military coup

    1. Re:Happened on this date by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

      1609 Henry Hudson discovers Manhattan island

    2. Re:Happened on this date by Ratbert42 · · Score: 1

      One of the stations reported that September 11th is the anniversary of the 1978 Camp David peace accord. It doesn't appear to be true though.

    3. Re:Happened on this date by Serial-Killah · · Score: 1

      This is probably coincidence but
      9/11 == 911????

      --
      If ignorance is bliss, then knock the smile off my face. RATM
    4. Re:Happened on this date by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably, considering most other countries state the day before the month. Thus 11/9, not 9/11.

    5. Re:Happened on this date by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very odd you brought up Dylan (since today marks the release of his new album.)

    6. Re:Happened on this date by baz00f · · Score: 1

      Sept 17 is date of the Camp David Accord signing

    7. Re:Happened on this date by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Taiwan, at least, I'm told the emergency number is 119 !

  100. More places closed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't seem to login, so maybe posting as an anonymous coward will work...

    Los Alamos National Laboratory along with all other national labs have also been shut down. Just received the email telling me to go home. Glad I decided to stay home and telecommute while watching CNN...

  101. cbs.marketwatch.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they have the best coverage and no lag .... great videos and a latest update ticker....

    "Traffic to CBS.MarketWatch.com tripled. Akamai (AKAM: news, chart, profile) pumped out almost 5,500 simultaneous video and audio streams from MarketWatch.com's site. That is over 382 megabits per second."

    and someone has claimed responsibility....

    "Report: Palestinian group claims credit
    Reuters reports that a Palestinian group has claimed responsibility for attacks on U.S. targets including the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. "

  102. Bases are in lockdown by hawk · · Score: 2
    This is the last state below wartime. Given the attackes, they'd be damned fools not to.


    But this points to another strategic error by these chuckleheads--attacking the Pentagon is going to make this *personal* for the U.S. military.


    Think of *all* the stupid things you've done in your lifetime. Add them all up. Now compare this to the United States Marine Corp being your personal enemy . . .


    hawk

    1. Re:Bases are in lockdown by coolgeek · · Score: 2
      I don't think the Pentagon was the target...One of the news sites said that plane was being "tracked" by a pair of F-16s at the time of the crash. My money is on the target being the White House, and the Air Force shooting down a civilian aircraft. Not that we like to do that sort of thing, or talk about it once it happens, it is necessary to defend the White House at almost any expense. Imagine the crush to the psyche of Americans if this icon of our freedom were destroyed. I'll bet the Air Force has standing orders/protocols to shoot any planes that get too close. If not them, then the AAA installed at the White House must.

      Anyway, I am going to move away from the keyboard and attempt to go about my business today. I do not mean disrespect to the victims and their families; indeed I fear a friend of mine was working at his office in Tower 2 when the attack started. I know that the ultimate weapons of the terrorist are disruption and confusion. My personal counter attack comes in the form of getting back to business.

      I hope we rebuild bigger and better WTC Towers. Adding panic buttons as standard cockpit equipment may be a good idea too.

      --

      cat /dev/null >sig
  103. Re:I hope... by l33t+j03 · · Score: 0

    You mean cyborg_monkeys?

  104. Re:better sources by kisrael · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    It's a good point, the web isn't that great as "mass media" for time critical. You can get your message to a lot of people over a long time, or a few people very quickly, and for the end user it has custom content like nothing before in history, but anything from breaking news to that Victoria's Secret model multimedia thing they planned is vulnerable to "slashdot effect"-like things.

    --
    SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
  105. Statement from Prime Minister of Canada by Nos. · · Score: 5, Informative
    September 11, 2001


    Immediate


    STATEMENT BY THE PRIME MINISTER


    Prime Minister Jean Chrétien expressed his horror at the news that the United States has been the victim of multiple terrorist attacks :



    "I was stricken by news and television pictures coming from the United States this morning. It is impossible to fully comprehend the evil that would have conjured up such a cowardly and depraved assault upon thousands of innocent people. There can be no cause or grievance that could ever justify such unspeakable violence. Indeed, such an attack is an assault not only on the targets but an offense against the freedom and rights of all civilized nations.


    All Canadians are praying that the brave firefighters and rescue crews who currently on the scene will be successful in limiting the casualties. We stand ready to provide any assistance that our American friends may need at this very, very difficult hour and in the subsequent investigation.


    Aline joins me in offering, on behalf of all Canadians, our deepest sympathies to the families of the victims and to the American people.



    - 30 -


    PMO Press Office: (613) 957-5555
    This document is also available on the following Web site:
    http://pm.gc.ca

    1. Re:Statement from Prime Minister of Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks Jean. Now, by the way, seeing as Ahmed Ressam came from you guys and built bombs with your welfare money, believe me, we'll be looking into your country's reputation as a haven for terrorists in the next little while to see how much of a threat you are.

    2. Re:Statement from Prime Minister of Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure he had a temp write that.

    3. Re:Statement from Prime Minister of Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I found Jean's comments moving, and as a Canadian who has lived in the U.S., I share in your shock and anger at this act. As for your comments about a middle-east terrorist operating in Canada -- he was caught, wasn't he? You will probably find that some of these terrorists lived in the U.S. No free country is immune to this -- which is why the free nations of the world have to band together to fight and condemn terrorism once and for all -- without giving up our own freedoms.

    4. Re:Statement from Prime Minister of Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Likewise, but let's not ignore two facts:

      1) Ressam was caught, sure. How many more operatives are there? Look into how he got into Canada, and got funding. That would not have happened in the USA.

      2) Canada IS a haven for terrorists, and high ranking Liberals HAVE attended funding dinners for Tamil terrorist groups.

      As a Canadian living in the US as well, I think Canada should wise up and start thinking about security pretty soon before the border is slammed shut for good, with very good reason.

    5. Re:Statement from Prime Minister of Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Blame Canada! (With their flappin' heads and beady eyes...)

      Sorry - I need a little levity just now :-/

    6. Re:Statement from Prime Minister of Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a representative of the French government, I'd like to offer our surrender now, before things get any worse.

  106. movie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't this exact same thing happen in Escape from New York?

    1. Re:movie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are you thinking of 'Under Siege'?

    2. Re:movie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Snake landed his glider on the WTC. There's another sci-fi movie that's obsolete.

  107. AIRLINE INFORMATION by FFFish · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First plane: American Airlines, Flight 11, Boston=>LA, 92 on board.
    Second: UA, 175, Boston=>LA, ?.
    Third (Pentagon): AA, 77, Dulles=>LA, 64.
    Four: UA, 93, Newark=>SF, ?.
    Five: UA, Camp David.
    Six: (PA crash),
    Seven: (CO crash?), UA?, 175, =>LA?

    Many planes still in the air, none currently threatened.

    Crash Five may be a rumour. I keep seeing it scroll by on the TV, but I've read that it's been denied.

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    1. Re:AIRLINE INFORMATION by HunkaHunkaBurninLove · · Score: 1

      Some things are still fuzzy. I've been writing everything down. Here are my notes.

      AA011 BOS-LAX 07:59-
      first to hit WTC

      AA077 IAD-LAX 08:21-
      most are saying this hit the Pentagon (some thought WTC earlier)
      but flight tracker http://www.fboweb.com/ has it mapped into Kansas(!)

      UA093 EWR-SFO 08:42-
      rural Pennsylvania (some speculation targeting Camp David)

      UA175 BOS-LAX 08:14-
      second to hit WTC

    2. Re:AIRLINE INFORMATION by bark76 · · Score: 1

      The camp david crash has been confirmed to be a rumour. I've heard another rumour that France has declared Marshall Law, can anyone confirm this?

    3. Re:AIRLINE INFORMATION by ethereal · · Score: 1

      They've declared that the U.S. will send them millions of dollars of economic aid? That would be strange...

      Oh, martial law. Never mind.

      --

      Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

    4. Re:AIRLINE INFORMATION by FFFish · · Score: 5, Informative

      CORRECTION:

      There are five confirmed crashes. The "Camp David" one is actually the PA crash; it crashed relatively close to Camp David. The flight number is still unknown.

      I've got flight 175 listed twice. I haven't heard confirmation of the rumoured CO crash, so presumably it didn't happen.

      All the flights were East Coast take-offs heading for the West Coast. This is not because LA or SF were under threat of attack, as some stations are stupidly reporting, but because these are the flights with the most fuel onboard.

      Transalantic flights would have provided even bigger planes and more fuel, but security on them is more stringent than those for domestic flights.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    5. Re:AIRLINE INFORMATION by pricorde · · Score: 1

      No, it ain't.
      France has raised the "Vigipirate Plan", this is a plan used in case of risk of terrorism, and includes the deployment of more police forces and preventive measures. But this has nothing to do with martial law.

    6. Re:AIRLINE INFORMATION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I currently attend university about 5-10 miles from camp david. Nothing seems to be too out of the ordinary here. Earlier there was a lot of helicopter traffic but that was the extent. I haven't heard anything about a crash, or even a close call. I have numerous friends on EMT and fire squads in the area,so im sure i would know.

  108. thought from planet Earth by Mattygfunk · · Score: 1

    Not only will America's flags be at half mast, the worlds will be. For the record it will only damage the perpertators "cause". _

  109. might be internal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to a friend who has a husband that works in NATO, the attack may be internal to the US, ie: not Benladen. Only time will tell. However, I do think it's related to the US (rightly) pulling out of the conf. on racism due to anti-israel language. Israel is STILL God's chosen people. don't mess with them.

    (sorry, i forgot my pw at home)

    1. Re:might be internal by pa-guy · · Score: 0

      It's idiots like you that bring your non-existent 'GOD' into everything that cause shit like this.

  110. Baseball canceled tonight by ElDuque · · Score: 1

    not really important though

    1. Re:Baseball canceled tonight by naasking · · Score: 1

      Cancelling baseball was a good move. You do NOT want to give Americans bats right now.

  111. For perspective by peterdaly · · Score: 2

    The world trade center has its own zipcode. It also has more telephone exhanges than the city of Detroit, MI.

    As per the 50,000 people rumor. That is how many people work in the building. Since the attack happened just before 9am, we can hope not everyone was there. 50,000 people is the size of many medium size counties in the US.

    The 4 jetliners along have the capicity to carry almost 1000 passengers.

    Many of the NYC financial companies are based in the towers. The world economy is not at the best state for this to happen right now.

    1. Re:For perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      world economy is not at the best state for this to happen right now

      Somehow I think there are more important things to worry about than the economy right now!

  112. what rot by /dev/zero · · Score: 1

    The only moral response is to identify and destroy the organizations responsible and any governments who gave aid and comfort to the terrorists.


    The issue is justice. Those who initiate force against others must be identified and punished.


    We (the US) should not rely on the fiction of "international law" -- there is no such thing. This is an act of war and war is the appropriate response.



    I'm glad you're not a citizen of the US. You clearly don't deserve to be.



    Gordon.

    --

    He that breaks a thing to find out what it is has left the path of wisdom.
    -- J.R.R. Tolkien
    1. Re:what rot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I'm glad you're not a citizen of the US. You >clearly don't deserve to be

      You are a complete fucking moron. 'Careful what you wish for. You might be on your knees with a gun to your head begging for your life if you go to WAR. What would you say then?

      You should shut-up.

      Your angry and irrational. I'm sure you would think it's just fine for your country to go to war... so long as it wasn't you fighting and you're protected by the BIG BAD US military.

      Get a fucking clue and think it out first.

    2. Re:what rot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may be correct, but that still isn't a valid argument not to go to war. Hiding and pretending nothing happend will almost certainly send a message to those responsible that this is an effective means of control over the US. Yes, war sucks, people die; but that certainly doesn't imply that it should not happen.

  113. we can't just get along... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    with people whose purpose is to destroy the USA.

    Learn some history, not every country will disarm if the USA plays nice (China).

    "Can't we all just get along" won't work for a foreign policy. (The Democrat Party foreign policy).

  114. Where to donate blood in Mass.? by ljnelson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hi; I've never posted here and I've never given blood either, but I need to do both. Can someone please post where in the Worcester-Acton-Littleton-Marlborough, MA (USA) area I can donate blood? http://www.newenglandblood.org is down.

    1. Re:Where to donate blood in Mass.? by JCMay · · Score: 2

      Look inside the front of your phone book; there's normally emergency services contact information in there.

  115. Draft by Dirk+Stiletto · · Score: 0

    What really worries me, is that if we go to war, with the state that the country is in right now, what are the possibilities of a National Draft?

    --
    Do You Have Stairs In Your House?
  116. If you are in the Mid-East by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Get out while you can.

    There is a WORLD OF SHIT coming right at you.

    We can still pump oil through the layer of glass.

  117. Three Steps: ID, Locate, Retaliate by cybrpnk · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    The time for peace is over. We must identify who did this, find out where they are, go in after them, and wipe them off the face of the Earth. We will suffer more casualties doing it this way. Too bad. The death toll is going to exceed Pearl Harbor and approach if not exceed use of a tactical nuke. We are at war.

    1. Re:Three Steps: ID, Locate, Retaliate by Steffen · · Score: 1

      And thus begins the circle of violence...

      Seriously, it is an absoloute atrocity, I understand your anger, but if I were in charge I'd be seeking a solution which focused on:

      1) Bringing those responsible to justice.
      2) Minimizing the number of deaths from this in the future, on both sides of whichever divide this happened.

      I live in a country where the exact opposite of this has been going on for 30 years (Ireland, in case you care), and it isn't nice, and it just makes people angry. It's on a much smaller scale than today's events, but seeking blood will eventually result in the blood of someone you love being taken.

      On top of that, I honestly don't believe this planet will survive another world war.

    2. Re:Three Steps: ID, Locate, Retaliate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because you morons can't get it right. People only fuck with the U.S.A. once.

  118. Re:I hope... by Prion23 · · Score: 0, Troll

    I doubt Bush is doing much of anything besides keeping his own ass safe...

    And trying to figure out a way to blame Clinton for this.

    --

    Become a FIST.
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Fists_of_Righteous_H armony
  119. Please Give Blood by cetan · · Score: 2

    I know this is redundant. But please, if you can, give blood. Even if you're not in the NY area, give blood because it's the gift of life.

    --
    In Soviet Russia...michael would be rotting in Siberia!
    1. Re:Please Give Blood by BenCJedi · · Score: 1

      I would like to, but we have been asked not to in central Kentucky.. the blood center is packed with people (from what I have been told)

  120. If this is Bin Laden by Perldivr · · Score: 1


    then, I think it's time to open a 55 gallon drum of whoop-ass all over Afghanistan.

    - Perldivr

    1. Re:If this is Bin Laden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We should reduce the home country of whoever did this to a glowing sheet of glass.

  121. Facial recognition software, anyone? by osgeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's pretty easy for us on /. to decry law enforcement aids like facial recognition hardware and software when times are good. However, it's at times of senseless tragedy like this when we really need to stop and think about letting law enforcement have the tools they need to prevent wanton acts of distruction like this.

    Abuses of those tools should be another discussion entirely -- an important discussion, but not a paranoid paralyzing one.

    I'm usually fairly detached during times like this, but by myself, watching the coverage, and imagining the enormity of the loss of life, mental health, peace, property, and productivity -- I couldn't help but cry in frustration at not being able to do anything.

    I'm sure I wasn't the only one. To those of you who felt likewise, don't forget that feeling. When the time comes when you're able to voice your support for tools and methods to stop these methods of terrorism, don't be silent.

    1. Re:Facial recognition software, anyone? by geekoid · · Score: 2

      I couldn't help but cry in frustration at not being able to do anything

      go give blood if you havent in the last 56 days.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Facial recognition software, anyone? by bnenning · · Score: 2

      Neither you nor I have any idea if increased ssecurity measures would have made any difference. What happened today was a tragedy and an assault on American freedom. If as a result we sacrifice our liberty in what is likely to be a futile attempt to future occurrences, then the terrorists have truly won.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    3. Re:Facial recognition software, anyone? by jafac · · Score: 2

      You have to wonder at HOW these terrorists got ahold of these planes.

      Hijacking. How? How were they able to smuggle bombs or guns (most likely guns) aboard these planes? When every time I fly somewhere, I am photographed, poked, prodded, xrayed, and scanned?

      Somebody was not doing their job.

      We don't need MORE invasion of privacy and abridgement of civil liberties. We need to plug the gaps in the system that allowed this to happen. Our system SHOULD already have been good enough to prevent something like this. It was not. Apparently.

      If you're talking about how they coordinated this attack? Well, isn't it obvious? Email? Computers? usenet? Encryption?
      We've discussed this issue to death here on slashdot - and it always comes down to more control=less security.

      I fear that those arguments will be lost in the near future as tempers flare. Say goodbye to your freedoms. It was nice while it lasted, wasn't it?

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    4. Re:Facial recognition software, anyone? by dachshund · · Score: 2
      First of all, we learned today (several times), that any security measure can be overcome by somebody with enough motivation. Since these people are the ones we're trying to combat, it's doubtful that increased civilian monitoring is going to prevent this sort of tragedy in the future. The people who will pay the price, in lost freedom, will be regular American citizens.

      What your plan will do is convince a lot of Americans that the American gov't can't be trusted. That's certainly going to make us stronger... And don't forget that these restrictions on our freedom will be around long after the immediate danger is gone. Take the first step and we'll always have to live with it.

    5. Re:Facial recognition software, anyone? by mrdisco99 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And so it begins...

      Something like this happens, and suddenly we're more willing to be lax on our liberties.

      We can't let events like this damage the values and ideals that we live by. If we do, then they win.

      --

      +++
      NO CARRIER

    6. Re:Facial recognition software, anyone? by remande · · Score: 2
      Hijacking. How? How were they able to smuggle bombs or guns (most likely guns) aboard these planes? When every time I fly somewhere, I am photographed, poked, prodded, xrayed, and scanned?


      Somebody was not doing their job.


      I think that we had extremely competent terrorists, not incompetent security. Remember that they made four attempts, on the same day, and they succeeded every time. If it was incompetence, you wouldn't expect it across the board--we would have reports of unsuccessful attempts to smuggle weapons onto an airplane this morning.


      I can think of three ways to get through this sort of security.

      1. Compromise the security people themselves, by having your own people as security moles. They see their friends coming through, they don't mention what they see on the X-ray. I don't know enough about airport security to guess the difficulties involved.
      2. A non-metal replica handgun, packed in the carry-on. If you aim something that looks like a Glock at me, I'll believe that it is a Glock and act accordingly. For best results, core out an actual Glock, since the exterior is plastic anyhow. Without the metal working parts, it should make it through carry-on.

      3. A ceramic knife. Again, deadly and undetected. I can go to the mall and pick up one for slicing lettuce with. It's not that hard.
      --

      --The basis of all love is respect

    7. Re:Facial recognition software, anyone? by Tyndareos · · Score: 1

      The only thing proved today is that whatever precautions they can think up, someone willing to bypass them, will succeed. Only if the government has absolute complete control over every citizen by means of microchips implanted in their brains, will they be able to ensure completely that things like this can't happen and still someone might be able to do it.

      So every single precaution the goverment takes isn't really protecting the citizens, but only limiting the freedom and privacy of those same citizens. It's very easy to demand more protection, but there's none. You can only fool yourself into thinking that the goverment will be able to increase your protection, by watching you and every other citizen continously, but the harsh reality is that if it has any effect at all, it decreases your safety, because with every single bit of information on you on the street, you're more vulnerable than ever.

    8. Re:Facial recognition software, anyone? by Safety+Cap · · Score: 2, Insightful
      When the time comes when you're able to voice your support for tools and methods to stop these methods of terrorism, don't be silent.

      Don't you dare!

      If we give up our freedom for security, then we'll just end up as a police state with NO increased safety.

      Anyone who can hijack (at least) three planes simultaneously is a PROFESSIONAL, and--just as no car alarm will prevent a pro from taking your vehicle--no amount of jack-booted, machinegun-toting "peace police" stationed on every corner along with cameras and sniffers will protect your butt from terrorists.

      --
      Yeah, right.
    9. Re:Facial recognition software, anyone? by 4eak · · Score: 1

      Hear Hear. I agree that allowing law enforcement the tools they need to ATTEMPT to combat this sort of thing is a good idea. But this horrible tragedy does not change the fact that giving law enforcement (not to mention the NSA, FBI etc.) more power (in the form of more legal ways for them to observe/record/surveil people) will also increase the severity of potential abuse of that power. Terrorism is a difficult animal to combat because it can be perpetrated by as little as one person. It can be a person who, until they commit their terrorist act, was no more suspicious than "the quiet man who kept to himself." The question we should be asking is, how can law enforcement and the barrage of gov't acronyms combat this sort of thing. The most effective way is to thoroughly monitor and surveil as much of the population of this country and others as possible. I don't have to point out to this crowd the invasions of privacy that can result from this sort of strategy. We all saw _Enemy of the State_. I am not saying that I am necessarily against taking extreme measures to combat terrorism, but it is important to be aware of the sacrifices that may have to be made to combat it effectively.

      --
      --Damn! We're in a tight spot!
    10. Re:Facial recognition software, anyone? by edack · · Score: 1

      And I can only echo the words of Benjamin Franklin in 1759

      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nore safety"

      Bartletts 13th ed. p331

    11. Re:Facial recognition software, anyone? by cwest · · Score: 1

      I fly almost every week. How could these terroists do it? Have you seen the quality of personnel manning the security checkpoints? If there are 3 of them, then there you have a combined IQ of 3 - plus or minus 5. Most of these people couldn't get a job in your states Motor Vehicle Dept. And, lest anyone forget, how many times has some local TV news person reported on how easy it was for him/her to get into an empty plane on the ground at some large airport? The sad truth is, security is mostly directed at the honest individuals. Others will find the flaws and exploit them. Facial recognition systems are not likely to remedy that.

    12. Re:Facial recognition software, anyone? by osgeek · · Score: 2

      We sacrifice our liberty by subjecting ourselves to metal detectors at airports now. We sacrifice our liberty by giving our policemen the power to stop us in our vehicles for various probable infractions. The question isn't whether or not we sacrifice some liberty for some freedom, because we do. Ben Franklin was engaging in a bit of hyperbolic rhetoric in his oft-quoted line about "he who sacrifices liberty for security deserves neither."

      The question we have to ask is "how much?" liberty should we sacrifice, and "in what ways?"

    13. Re:Facial recognition software, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Think about our own arguments regarding MP3 encoding: don't criminalize a tool, criminalize wrongful uses of that tool.

    14. Re:Facial recognition software, anyone? by osgeek · · Score: 3

      Something like this happens, and suddenly we're more willing to be lax on our liberties.

      I think of it more as examining the total cost of ownership of liberties. Ironically, liberty isn't free, it must be paid for in a myriad of ways. And which liberty we're paying for, when we make choices, isn't even clear. One person's liberty to not be filmed in a public place sacrifices another person's liberty to be free from a violent terrorist attack. This isn't a black and white issue.

      We can't let events like this damage the values and ideals that we live by.

      If we do, then they win.


      Damage of these things is inevitable. Every day when you manage keys to lock your doors or passwords to access your servers, you're dealing with the damage that is done to us by the unscrupulous. This is no different.

    15. Re:Facial recognition software, anyone? by pischke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's pretty easy for us on /. to decry law enforcement aids like facial recognition hardware and software when times are good. However, it's at times of senseless tragedy like this when we really need to stop and think about letting law enforcement have the tools they need to prevent wanton acts of distruction like this...When the time comes when you're able to voice your support for tools and methods to stop these methods of terrorism, don't be silent.

      I've quoted this before, and I'll quote it again.

      "Those who would trade their essential Liberty for a perceived temporary Security deserve neither Liberty nor Security." --Benjamin Franklin.

    16. Re:Facial recognition software, anyone? by mpe · · Score: 2

      The only thing proved today is that whatever precautions they can think up, someone willing to bypass them, will succeed.

      Indeed being more complex and/or comprehensive may actually make them easier to subvert or bypass.

      Only if the government has absolute complete control over every citizen by means of microchips implanted in their brains, will they be able to ensure completely that things like this can't happen and still someone might be able to do it.

      Except that even this dosn't work, the two problems are "information overload" and "who watches the watchers"...

    17. Re:Facial recognition software, anyone? by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      One step better, my step-father has two completely non-metal pistols (and yes he is licenced, and he does take them on planes).

      They weigh about 5 OZ each and the only metal in them is the bullets. He doesn't carry them with him.

      Another thought, if we had some armed peeps in the air (say 1/4 of the passengers on any given flight) would this stuff happen? I'd like to think that I, and most normal people, are responsable enough to not use a weapon unless my/their life was in danger. But, I'm probably wrong.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    18. Re:Facial recognition software, anyone? by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2

      It's pretty easy for us on /. to decry law enforcement aids like facial recognition hardware and software when times are good. However, it's at times of senseless tragedy like this when we really need to stop and think about letting law enforcement have the tools they need to prevent wanton acts of distruction like this.

      Yeah, because of a few rotten apple (terrorists), we oughta scrap all our hard-won freedoms and liberties.


      What's next to justify that? For the children?

    19. Re:Facial recognition software, anyone? by bridgette · · Score: 3, Insightful

      4. ceramic gun
      http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/Alley/7931/ ce ramicguns.html

      Compromise the security people themselves, by having your own people as security moles. They see their friends coming through, they don't mention what they see on the X-ray. I don't know enough about airport security to guess the difficulties involved.

      I remember seeing Coolio on a talk show saying that he used to work airport security at LAX when he was a crackhead. Seriously. If you can get and hold down a job as airport security while addicted to crack then pretty much anything's possible. And it's probably not very hard to bribe any current crackheads on the job.

      --
      - bridgette
    20. Re:Facial recognition software, anyone? by Moofie · · Score: 2

      Liberty has only one price: Blood. Blood of soliders, and sometimes blood of innocents. It's an unfortunate side effect of the human condition. I would MUCH rather live in a free society and run the risk of being killed by terrorists than live in a police state and risk being killed by the government. Terrorists are typically less well-organized.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    21. Re:Facial recognition software, anyone? by dvdeug · · Score: 2

      But few living pilots are going to deliberately run into the World Trade Center when they can crash it into the bay. A replica handgun won't be good enough, especially if one of the passengers gets the idea you aren't {willing|going} to kill anyone with the guns.

    22. Re:Facial recognition software, anyone? by Myopic · · Score: 1
      Um, no. A tragedy this may be, but nothing close to the level which that loss of freedom would be.

      Those who would trade freedom for security deserve neither.

    23. Re:Facial recognition software, anyone? by sjames · · Score: 2

      It's pretty easy for us on /. to decry law enforcement aids like facial recognition hardware and software when times are good. However, it's at times of senseless tragedy like this when we really need to stop and think about letting law enforcement have the tools they need to prevent wanton acts of distruction like this.

      If enough people think that way, the terrorists won! They will have created terror and destroyed the American way of life.

      If you want a technological solution, look at the airplane. We have technology that allows a plane to be flown remotely or even automatically (even land). Consider an emergency control in the cockpit. Pull the ring, and the flight controls go dead (actually fire squibs to break the connections, do damage). Let the plane continue on course and land at it's intended destination. There's no point in hijacking a plane that can and will do nothing but fly it's intended route and then land.

      Consider the probability that the people who hijacked the planes probably were unknown to authorities at the time. How would face recognition pick out an unknown face in a crowd of unknown faces?

    24. Re:Facial recognition software, anyone? by nikster · · Score: 1

      i am sad i cannot do anything about this as well. i feel powerless in the face of great evil.

      however: the only way to react is in a civilized and rational manner. let's take our good time looking at who did it, then react.

      as much as we wish there was, there is no easy solution. for one thing, i don't think any technology could have prevented this attack. facial recognition is easy to fool - it will catch petty thieves and other criminals too stupid to evade it, but it won't even slow down a well trained guerilla force. at the same time, the potential for abuse is enormous.

      other than praying, i think the only solution is long term conflict prevention - so that there are not enough angry/insane people left in this world to carry out such an attack. the art of peace. happy people do not carry out such an attack. i am serious.

    25. Re:Facial recognition software, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I couldn't help but cry in frustration at not being able to do anything.

      Have you read 1984? You are quite gullible, aren't you? How do you know this attack wasn't done by the US government? It's playing right into their hands.
    26. Re:Facial recognition software, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Facial recognition wouldn't help much here.
      For that you would have to know the faces of the
      terrorist. How would you make Afghanistan to send you descriptions
      of every new terrorist ?
      You are saying that everyone in USA ( and elsewhere ) should be put
      on chains , in the name of ... what was it , peace ? freedom ?

      stein
      ( http://surf.to/stein )

  122. Re:Plea for peace ^H^H^H^H JUSTICE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck you damn pacifist assholes.
    We're talking about people who would kill thousands of innocent people in order to terrorize the rest.

    Find these people. And make them pay.
    And hey, to any "innocent bystanders" that get stomped in the process, just think of the people in the world trade center.

  123. Palestinians celebrate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take a look at the pictures on the Jerusalem Post site:

    "Reports are indicating residents of eastern Jerusalem, the West Bank, and southern Lebanon are celebrating the mass terror attacks in the United States at this time".

    "Dozens of Palestinian youths have taken to the streets and are distributing candies on a main thoroughfare passing through eastern Jerusalem".

    1. Re:Palestinians celebrate by Cletus+the+yokel · · Score: 1

      If this is true then any sympathy the the palestinian people may have enjoyed has died a quick and certain death. The U.S. will find out who is reponsible for this. They will nuke the place into a parking lot. They will send in the Marines to paint the lines. And nobody will care.
      As many commentators have been quick to point out, this IS an act of war. I just saw the Taleban on TV; their ridiculous proouncement that they've been keeping Bin laden reined in will only provoke the US gov't to a very violent response.

      --
      Wanted: One witty yet thought provoking .sig - Apply here.
    2. Re:Palestinians celebrate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anybody that claims responsibilty for this or rejoices in such carnage should get the same in return.

    3. Re:Palestinians celebrate by JWhitlock · · Score: 2
      Take a look at the pictures on the Jerusalem Post [jpost.com] site:

      "Reports are indicating residents of eastern Jerusalem, the West Bank, and southern Lebanon are celebrating the mass terror attacks in the United States at this time".

      "Dozens of Palestinian youths have taken to the streets and are distributing candies on a main thoroughfare passing through eastern Jerusalem".

      For one, I won't believe it until I hear the BBC or another independant source confirm it - I don't trust anything either side says in that area.

      Second - why not? For months, Isreal has been giving the Palestinians hell, and Palestine has asked the U.S. for support. The U.S. has said that Israli/Palestinian affairs are not high priority for them. Maybe now it will be.

      However, I don't think that was their intent. Personally, the historical date, the anniversary of the Camp David accord, is significant - we are now back to where we were with Carter in the 1970's, or perhaps even before that. I seriously hope that GW is up to the task.

    4. Re:Palestinians celebrate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There you go. A BBC report of the celebrations: "In Palestinian refugee camps in the West Bank and Lebanon, shots were fired in celebration and some said that as Israel's chief backer, the United States deserved this punishment".

  124. Stop it ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm getting bored of this, where are my linux news ?

    1. Re:Stop it ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heh. yeah, same thing here.

    2. Re:Stop it ! by Maxthemax2000 · · Score: 1

      I came to slashdot to get away from This Amd look at what I find.
      <b>slashdot</B>
      <b>News for Nerds. Stuff that matters.</b>

      --
      No Sig
  125. Nostradamus by KenDUDE · · Score: 1

    I know we are all pretty much tech oriented around here but a friend sent me this I just wanted to know what you guys thought.

    "In the City of God there will be a great thunder, Two brothers torn apart by Chaos, while the fortress endures, the great leader will succumb" , "The third big war will begin when the big city is burning" - Nostradamus 1654

  126. qotd by slamden · · Score: 1

    i think /.'s QOTD is rather inappropriate, given the circumstances...

  127. Guys, it's okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just another form of expression -- really just free speech in a way. It's one "symbol" to whoever committed this tragedy that, to them, served some view of "justice". After all, we killed McVeigh. Who are you and I to say that 50,000 dead in the U.S. wasn't "just" -- until you have heard all the facts from the misguided fools who thought it would be. Remember: when death is an O.K. form of expression toward Justice, then you can only call political deaths unwarranted when you have seen the reasons for which they were committed and you, personally, agree that those reasons did not serve a just cause. As of now, you don't know those reasons. So don't diss the most somber tragedy in the peaceable history of our nation -- it's just another form of expression, and as of now, you don't know what it's trying to express or why.

    (I don't mean what I think I mean.)

  128. Re:September 11th - palestinians are celebrating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to

    thisananova photo and

    this ananova story

    the Palestinian people are dancing in the streets. Arafat has
    condemned the attack, but he clearly doesn't control much of anything.
    Here's the text: (sorry for trampling ananova's copyright)

    Palestinians celebrate US tragedy

    Thousands of Palestinians are celebrating the terror attacks on the US.

    They have been chanting God is Great and distributing sweets to
    passers-by, even as their leader, Yasser Arafat, said he was horrified.

    In the West Bank town of Nablus, about 3,000 people poured into the
    street shortly after the attacks.

    Reports from the West Bank claim Palestinian extremists say the
    attacks in the US are a consequence of the country's policy in the
    Middle East.

    Demonstrators have distributed sweets in a traditional gesture of
    celebration and several Palestinian gunmen have shot in the air, while
    other marchers carried Palestinian flags.

    Nawal Abdel Fatah, 48, wearing a long black dress, threw sweets in the
    air, saying she was happy because "America is the head of the snake,
    America always stands by Israel in its war against us."

    Her daughter Maysoon, 22, said she hoped the next attack will be
    launched against Tel Aviv.

    In traditionally Arab east Jerusalem, there was a smaller gathering of
    about two dozen people, many of them young children led in chants by
    adults. Some drivers passing the scene honked their horns and flashed
    victory signs from their windows.

    Yasser Arafat and his top advisers huddled at his office in Gaza City,
    watching the events unfold on television.

    He said: "We are completely shocked. It's unbelievable. We completely
    condemn this very dangerous attack, and I convey my condolences to
    the American people, to the American president and to the American
    administration, not only in my name but on behalf of the Palestinian
    people.

    In the West Bank, meanwhile, the leader the Democratic Front for the
    Liberation of Palestine denied his group was involved in the attacks.

    Story filed: 17:06 Tuesday 11th September 2001

  129. peace is not an abscence of war by johnrpenner · · Score: 2, Insightful

    'Peace is not an absence of war, it is a virtue,
    a state of mind; a disposition for benevolence, trust
    and justice.' (Spinoza)

    'Peace is a habit of mind, a way of seeing, that will make
    harmony suceed. We have made mistrust and coercion our habit
    of mind, and built our civilisation on the balance of power,
    therefore we will reap war after war, and there will be violence
    in our streets and even in our schools and homes.'
    (Eknath Easwaran, Three Harmonies, Parabola Magazine,
    November 1991, p. 50)

    When those who are economically powerful are in a position to use
    their power to wrest privileged rights for themselves, then among the
    economically weak there will grow up a corresponding opposition to
    these privileges; and this opposition must as soon as it has grown
    strong enough lead to revolutionary disturbances. If the existence of
    a special province of rights makes it impossible for such privileged
    rights to arise, then disturbances of this sort cannot occur. . .
    (Rudolf Steiner - Social Threefolding, 1920)

    http://home.earthlink.net/~johnrpenner/Articles/ St einer-Social.html

  130. Re:I hope... by cnkeller · · Score: 2
    As soon as one has spoken up, yes, he will be a flat spot on the wall.

    Quote from US senator interview (Orin Hatch and JOhn MCCain) -- CNN

    "We are going to find out who did this and hunt the bastards down."

    You go boy, time to start kicking some terrorist ass...

    --

    there are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots

  131. An eye for an eye, and the whole world goes blind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "An eye for an eye, and the whole world goes blind" - Ghandi

    Are more dead people the answer here? Take a minute to think before screaming for vengence.

  132. Webcams in NYC and D.C. by bahtama · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/mmedia/webcam s/eyeondc.htm - just got the idea to search for webcams and I found this one aimed at the Pentagon. You could probably find many more out there from http://www.webcam-index.com/USA/ or something like this site.

    --

    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    Oh bother.

    1. Re:Webcams in NYC and D.C. by ByteHog · · Score: 1

      www.earthcam.com is a good one also, although it seems to be slashdotted or something. It has webcams pointing various places in NYC.

      --
      - This isn't the sig you're looking for. Move along, move along..
  133. ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i've always hated arabs. middle east bastards. this fucking incident definately makes matter worse. fucking assholes

  134. hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i can smell a crackdown on the net in general, encryption, asylum seekers, anonymous net usage, people complaining about the need for spies...

  135. Only one thing to do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nuke the shit out of Baghdad, Tehran, Kabul, Palestine... shoot first, ask questions later.

  136. hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to whoever did this:
    uum, you're fucked. this is america, idiots.

  137. CNN.COM MIRROR AT http://gro.o000o.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CNN.COM MIRROR AT http://gro.o000o.org

  138. Re:I hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and I doubt you have a clue.

    NO one is taking this lightly...especially not the president. Clinton, Bush, Gore, or whoever would probably be doing what is being done right now. Getting things safe first, and resolving what we can of the problems as quickly and safely as possible.

    And hopefully...then will come the correction of this situation...but that is my hope...I can't speak for anyone else on that.

  139. firemen probably took heavy losses by caveat · · Score: 1

    NY channel 7 is reporting that most of the workers below the 80th floors got out...but a survivor they had on set reported that hundreds of firemen were climbing the stairs as he was leaving....which was less than two minutes before the collapse of the south tower. prayers to those who lost their lives doing their duty today.

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
    1. Re:firemen probably took heavy losses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a firefighter myself, I can only tell you those firefighters (and other emergency responders) who died today are the true heroes. If you know a firefighter, emt, police officer or other emergency responder, today is good day to tell them thank you. No matter the cost, every single remaining emergency responder in the country would go and put themselves in harms way to save those victims. Peace to those who died today in the service of others.

  140. Re:Plea for peace - Huh? Get Real! by Paulo · · Score: 1
    Get with the real world. You're dealing, most likely, with Arab terrorists. They're born and raised to think
    martyrdom after destroying civilian targets is the way to Mecca.


    Glad to see that you're so sure of that. Are you sure that this wasn't done by another WASP militia member who served formerly in the Gulf War?


    We might argue about whether retaliation is the answer here (and I can certainly understand homicidal impulses in this case), but you want to nail the actual culprit, not just some random scapegoat.

  141. Sniff... Ahhh :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    There's nothing like the smell of nuclear weapons in the morning.

  142. Maybe ... by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

    Maybe its time we had another election? Before this guy [George Double-yah Bush] came in I am sure our country had a few more friends - then again it could be me smoking some good pot, uh weed, um cigarette (still legal?).

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    1. Re:Maybe ... by issachar · · Score: 1

      This absolute disaster happens, and you are such an ABSOLUTE PRICK as to be making political jokes? Grow up!

      --
      . --- If you're looking for free e-mail you won't find it here! http://www.noemailhere.com
    2. Re:Maybe ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True the poster was making a joke at the wrong time, but sometimes shock of a situation makes people act irrationaly and also some way of releasing the stress of the situation can help.

    3. Re:Maybe ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A few more dead americans... where's the disaster in that?

    4. Re:Maybe ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lighten up. Yes it's very tragic what happened, but everyone deals with it in their own way. I still have the freedom (for today, anyway) to say whatever I want about this situation. Chill out.

  143. news still flowing in at www.poenews.com by Walker+Evans · · Score: 1

    Check out pictures / video / live feed and news updates every few minutes : POENEWS.COM

    --
    Shameless Self Promotion : Webhosting at Blender Networks.
  144. assumptions by kentyman23 · · Score: 1

    Though I agree that most likely (just from sheer probability) an attack from the Middle Eastern area, I really think you should refrain from making assumptions about an entire religion. I am embarassed for you, as what you said was clearly from lack of education on the topic.

    My girlfriend comes from an Iranian family, an in know way was she "born and raised to think martyrdom after destroying civilian targets is the way to Mecca". Islam is not to blame here, terrorism is.

    1. Re:assumptions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a valid assumption though. With all the shit going down between Isreal and Palastine it's only logical to deduct that this catastrophy has something to do with it.

    2. Re:assumptions by kentyman23 · · Score: 0

      you obviously didn't read the post you replied to.. i said that i too assume if came from a middle eastern terrorist group, but he should NOT assume since these people may be muslim that islam teaches you this is right... real muslims do not consider these people muslims.
      i wouldn't say catholics and protestants are taught from day one to bomb each other, though they have been known to do it very often

  145. You have to be strong, or why should you exist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To foreign pacifist: go have a suicide.

    To American people: your enemies is not palestian or others, your enemies are too rich people (including politics and billionairs, not only Americans) who have set business and money over ethic, kindness and justice. Religion is just another way to slave people to make more money.

    And please, stop this f***ing playing muscles - we strong, we brave - you stayed alive, they are dead, you have to build a better world, so that those who died could be proud of you... Not just shutting in the Internet how cool you could be.

    P.S. Being from Russia, Moscow I actually know, what does it mean - hundreds of sleeping civilians dying in a moment three nights in a row.

    Vitaly

  146. President Bush's Comments by FFFish · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    A minor aside to the tragedy, perhaps worth considering a week from now. Bush has talked to the media twice now.

    Note that he didn't fumble and stutter.

    The man can speak well. His mumblemouth facade is an act.

    Question is, why does he act like a moron? What's his goal, his payoff?

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    1. Re:President Bush's Comments by Chester+K · · Score: 2

      Note that he didn't fumble and stutter.

      Yes, he did. He also took three seconds between each sentence to prepare for the next sentence. I'm glad Chaney's running the Situation Room.

      --

      NO CARRIER
    2. Re:President Bush's Comments by Hilary+Rosen · · Score: 2

      Read the story. Cheney is in charge now. Perhaps Bush's inarticulacy was caused by the stress of thinking he was President.

      --
      Yes, the nick is flamebait
    3. Re:President Bush's Comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      He also took three seconds between each sentence to prepare for the next sentence.

      He is a man of action, not words. Look out bastard terrorists everywhere!

    4. Re:President Bush's Comments by ethereal · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but we're still only a heartbeat or two away from Bush becoming President :)

      --

      Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

    5. Re:President Bush's Comments by Shadarr · · Score: 1

      His payoff is obfuscation. Someone asks him a tough question that he doesn't want to answer, and he says something stupid or makes up a word. The news carries a story about how "Bush is a moron" and has nothing about whatever he was trying to dodge.

  147. Re:I hope... by Evil+Adrian · · Score: 1, Insightful
    I think Bush will do well. He has Cheney, Powell, and his father to call, not too shabby. Not to mention anyone else, even Clinton.

    All the things we bitch about on Slashdot seem like nothing today.

    --
    evil adrian
  148. Re:I hope... by ahknight · · Score: 1

    Yeah, it's only taken us twenty years to grow the balls needed to get off our asses and defend ourselves from these rats.

  149. Osama Bin Laden? by The+G+Man · · Score: 1

    OK, so the Afghanis have denied knowledge, Palestinians have as well, so the next inquiry will probably be Osama Bin Laden. Now, can someone please tell me
    1. What his goals are
    2. Why he'd attack the US
    3. What we know of him?

    --

    Quoth the zombie, braaaaaaaains
  150. Bush is himself responsible of this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...'coz of his politics. this would have never happened if Gore would have been elected.

    1. Re:Bush is himself responsible of this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats right if gore would of been elected, he would of done as Clinton would of done and sold them some of our secerts

    2. Re:Bush is himself responsible of this... by SquierStrat · · Score: 1

      I hope you're using sarcasm, if not you're on crack.

      --
      Derek Greene
  151. Google disagrees by almightyjustin · · Score: 1

    For the first quote, Google only returns a page that says it's a bogus quote they made up as an example, and no results at all for the second. If these were authentic predictions, they should be listed on many pages.

    --

    Omnes arx vestrum sunt adiuncta nobis.

    1. Re:Google disagrees by DebianDog · · Score: 1

      Found this on Google
      http://www.ed.brocku.ca/~nmarshal/nostradamus.ht m

  152. Re:PENTAGON != COLLAPSED INTO A HOLE! Stay off pho by MadMorf · · Score: 1

    It is ONLY 5 stories tall (well, there is that *alleged* basement), 5 sides, 5 rings.

    Not an alleged basement. It's actual.

    I have worked in it.

    There is as much below ground as above.

    My NEW Sig: Nuke the fucking bastards NOW!

  153. Peace is not an absence of war by johnrpenner · · Score: 1


    'Peace is not an absence of war, it is a virtue,
    a state of mind; a disposition for benevolence, trust
    and justice.' (Spinoza)

    'Peace is a habit of mind, a way of seeing, that will make
    harmony suceed. We have made mistrust and coercion our habit
    of mind, and built our civilisation on the balance of power,
    therefore we will reap war after war, and there will be violence
    in our streets and even in our schools and homes.'
    (Eknath Easwaran, Three Harmonies, Parabola Magazine,
    November 1991, p. 50)

    When those who are economically powerful are in a position to use
    their power to wrest privileged rights for themselves, then among the
    economically weak there will grow up a corresponding opposition to
    these privileges; and this opposition must as soon as it has grown
    strong enough lead to revolutionary disturbances. If the existence of
    a special province of rights makes it impossible for such privileged
    rights to arise, then disturbances of this sort cannot occur. . .
    (Rudolf Steiner - Social Threefolding, 1920)

    http://home.earthlink.net/~johnrpenner/Articles/ St einer-Social.html

  154. hello desire? this is logic... LISTEN UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hey desire, how long have we been doing this site? Quite a while, eh? How about we set up a mirroring system so that sites won't be slashdotted? Sound like action instead of couch potatoing? Good, I thought so too

  155. ESPN.com carrying news by e4 · · Score: 1

    Since the majority of news sites are down, I thought I'd let everybody know that the ESPN web site is carrying news reports on the terrorist attacks, and the site is responding quickly at this time.

  156. I don't know what to say... by aed · · Score: 1

    I'm watching this live on CNN here in the Netherlands (Europe) and I really do not know what to say.... except for one word: horrible.
    My sincere condoleances to all the people in the United States of America.

  157. Plane in Penn. was shot down (unconfirmed) by Newer+Guy · · Score: 1

    The plane thet went down over PA was shot down according to my source at the Pentagon.

  158. Re:I hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gov't officials keep referring to those responsible as cowards. however, Bush has gone into hiding instead of returning to washington. for those of you who will scream it isn't safe for him to return, that may be true. But, i would hope my leader would be willing to show no fear and give the country a feeling of confidence instead of being just as cowardly.

  159. Mexico Border is open by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    I'm in San Diego and I just heard on the radio (10:15 PST) that the Otay Mesa crossing and the San Ysidro crossing are open. However, because of the hightened security the wait is around 2 hours right now (and bound to get longer as the day goes by)

    Also, Major League Baseball has canceled all games tonight in order to reduce traffic country wide and also because they felt it would be more important for families to spend time together at home rather than go to an entertainment event.

    Here in San Diego there are several buildings that have been cleared and are shut down. Remember, even though we're on the opposite side of the country from New York we do have a tremendous amount of military installations here. (North Island Navy, Miramar Marines, Point Loma Submarine base, Camp Penalton Marine base, Point Loma SPAWAR and NOSC (battle simulation research and development) as well as the Marine Corp Recriutment Training Depot (Marine Boot Camp)) So when stuff like this happens we get justifiably nervous.

    Just heard that the city is on "tactical alert". All non-essential city workers have been sent home. Only Fire, Police etc are working today. The San Diego Federal Buiding and most of the tall downtown buildings are closed.

    Hey folks, give your kids some extra hugs. It's been a rough day.

    1. Re:Mexico Border is open by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      All non-essential city workers have been sent home. Only Fire, Police etc are working today.


      Not true. I just saw the street sweepers driving by in North Park.

  160. Parasites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Terrorists are parasites. What should we do? Turn the other check and let another mosquito bite us? I think not. You go to the source - the infested water source - and wipe them out. This is what an intelligent organism does. It kill parasites that attack it. Can the terrorists think that any better can come of this?

  161. Universities Closed Down? by gotscheme · · Score: 1

    The University of Minnesota shut down today. My roommate talked with a polisci instructor here who said large campuses are general targets in terrorism of the future. This is no major cause for alarm at universities in general, but something to understand. Where does the US go from here? The next battle is in the financial institutions. The government needs to inform business that it MUST set up safeguards against digital attacks.

    It is easy to start pointing fingers toward Osama Bin Laden, but let's hold on for a while. Let's remember we still need investigation before going on a witchhunt, if any.

    Don't engage in Jihad. It is akin to WW3.

    1. Re:Universities Closed Down? by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      I seem to recall the last major terrorist attack in America (Oklahoma City) was caused by Americans. As you said, more investigation is definately needed. If we're going to wipe someone off the map, we need to makre sure it's the right someone...

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    2. Re:Universities Closed Down? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The University of Pittsburgh has shut down as well.

  162. Did Bush really ask for this? by chargen · · Score: 0

    Would this have happened if Gore got into power instead of gun-slinging Bush? Has he really been that bad toward the Saudis/Palestinians/whoever caused this attack?

    Hmmmmm...

  163. This is where brains come in by MarkusQ · · Score: 5, Insightful
    To summarize:

    Counter attacking is not a good solution, for several reasons. 1) We do not know who to blame, and blind lynching leads to many problems, 2) even if we did know who to blame, counter attacking stands a good chance of angering others, and perpetuating the cycle, 3) even if we knew which nation to attack, and could get away with it, it is still wrong to kill people for the actions of others--we would be no better than the terrorists.

    On the other hand, doing nothing is likewise unacceptable. It will send the message that these actions can be taken with impunity, and likely lead to further assaults. Failing to stand up for yourself is the best way to become a victim.

    So, logically, we need to do something that is not a counter attack.

    This is where brains come in. What can we do that will reduce or eliminate this kind of threat but isn't a blind reprisal? That is the question we should be turning our brains to.

    -- MarkusQ

    1. Re:This is where brains come in by Innova · · Score: 1

      Counter attacking is not a good solution, for several reasons. 1) We do not know who to blame, and blind lynching leads to many problems,


      Counter attacking by definition means attacking the people who attacked us. It does not mean blink lynching.

    2. Re:This is where brains come in by aralin · · Score: 2

      Well, I think that get the fuck out of the Saudi Arabia and stop supporting their unjust government so bin Laden could fight them instead of bombing US targets could be a good start. No?

      --
      If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
    3. Re:This is where brains come in by Zoop · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You should study the history of hijackings in the 1960s and 1970s before you talk about the "cycle of violence" that is perpetuated by standing up to terrorists. We appeased and appeased and negotiated and whined, and the incidents got more and more frequent until after we retaliated for the Berlin Disco bombing. And it wasn't a blind counterstrike, either. It was a very well-targeted counterstrike on the man responsible--who lives but doesn't cause us much trouble anymore.

      So we know what will reduce the threat, the question is, do you have the guts to do it?

    4. Re:This is where brains come in by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      I hope some US radical doesn't decide to nuke the world...

    5. Re:This is where brains come in by sydb · · Score: 2

      That's called "giving in to terrorism" and is not de rigeur.

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
    6. Re:This is where brains come in by MarkusQ · · Score: 2
      We appeased and appeased and negotiated and whined, and the incidents got more and more frequent until after we retaliated for the Berlin Disco bombing. And it wasn't a blind counterstrike, either. It was a very well-targeted counterstrike on the man responsible--who lives but doesn't cause us much trouble anymore.

      I agree. The key concept here was that it was well targeted. Neither appeasement nor sweeping counterstrikes are the answer. We need to be smarter than that. One idea might be a reasoned and stately arrest and trial of the leaders, after they have been identified by a fair and honest investigation.

      Another might be a move to decentralization. Or a re-examination of our foreign policy. Or equipping our planes with automated anti-hijacking systems that automatically fly them to a designated desert air strip and land them there on receipt of a command from the ground.

      Or...

      --MarkusQ

    7. Re:This is where brains come in by anshil · · Score: 2

      At local televisoin (non US) they said most proparly they fear that the US will counterstrike on just anybody. If they will not know who it was it will be:

      Where is the next best target?

      --

      --
      Karma 50, and all I got was this lousy T-Shirt.
    8. Re:This is where brains come in by geekoid · · Score: 2

      You can not threaten fanatics into submission, they're fanatics. Fanatics don't care if they die.

      what we can do is destroy any country that supports them, so next time these cowards need support other countries will think twice.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    9. Re:This is where brains come in by Cyno · · Score: 1


      I think we should not be focussing on who to attack at the moment and get our facts straight. If we tie this directly to one organisation or country then fine, let the missles fly. However, this could be an internal assult. It could very easily be americans that hijacked that plane and crashed them into the WTC and pentagon. Why those two targets. What significance do those targets have? I know the WTC had an attempted bombing a few years ago. What was the reason for the attempt at that time?

      I'm mostly just curious about this and less concerned with revenge until it makes sense.

    10. Re:This is where brains come in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Their families need to be found, and killed.

      Whoever it is needs to walk from real life to the pages of a history book, with no one left to make a martyr.

    11. Re:This is where brains come in by aralin · · Score: 2
      No, thats called minding your own business and its the smart thing to do. Of course, we would later retaliate for the attacks on US, but tell me one reason why shall we give to the terrorist a reason for these attacks. It would be much harder for bin Laden to say: "Lets give our lives to attack us because they fucked with me and killed my troopers." than it is now when he can say: "Lets give our lives for a freedom of our country and fight these who occupy its land and support current unjust and oppresive government."

      No supporters, no money, no big scale terror.

      --
      If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
    12. Re:This is where brains come in by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

      No, it's called not fucking in other people affairs and trying to reshape them in our image so that everybody hates us and WANTS to commit these acts against us. The ONLY solution for acts of hatred against the United States is simply to have *less people hate the United States*. Duh. There is no other response to terrorism. Terrorism lives on fear and hatred.

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    13. Re:This is where brains come in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it is still wrong to kill people for the actions of others--we would be no better than the terrorists. Do you think this is star wars? Are you worried about falling to the dark side? They killed innocent civilians for political reasons. Their reasons: we let Israel kill innocent people for political reasons. WE ARE ALREADY GUILTY! There is no good or evil. Just winners and losers. The winners get to decide who was good when all the losers are dead. We have all the guns. Lets finish this thing.

    14. Re:This is where brains come in by gsherman · · Score: 1

      Retaliation at this point will be about as effective as a blindfolded man trying to kill a flea. The people responsible for this destruction are dead already; not much you can do about that.

      But now that we know any US airplane can be used as an offensive weapon, capable of killing thousands of people, I offer these solutions:

      * Install a remotely-activated self-destruct capability in every plane. Once it's been determined that a plane has been compromised, this option can be considered.
      * Well, nobody's gonna fly on a plane with remote self-destruct installed, so here's another idea: have a remotely-activated fuel dump capability, so that an official on the ground can empty a plane's fuel once we know the plane is not under our control. Not only would it cripple the plane's flight radius, it'd also strip it of much of its explosive power.

      Just some thoughts on this significant, nation-changing day.

    15. Re:This is where brains come in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A counter attack is absolutely unproductive should there only be one. The solution lies in not stopping.

      There should be a full offensive against terrorists on a full time basis. We are much too reactionary. There should never be a counter attack.

      We will never be in a position such that the all peoples, states, or religions will not hate us.

      If those groups feel it necessary to use violence then they should be prepared for the consequences. Violence ceases when the opponent is completely destroyed.

    16. Re:This is where brains come in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know if I agree with point 3. There is a well developed concept of collective guilt: The German people, IMHO shared a collective guilt for the Holocaust. To me, the hordes who have spent years talking about how they want the US to be destroyed, who blame all problems -- even those fo their own making -- on the US, share a portion of the guilt for this attack, whether they specifically took part in planning it or carrying it out.

    17. Re:This is where brains come in by Targetman · · Score: 1

      The first thing that comes to my mind is how little protection pilots have. If a terrorist can't get to the cockpit, the plane can't be used in this manner. Yes, the plane might blow up (less likely because of existing security measures), but it won't cause the directed loss of life.

      I think that we're going to see more security personel in the cockpit until we figure this thing out.

      Did nobody ever consider this happening?

      --
      I didn't do it, and if I did, you can't prove it. Bart Simpson
    18. Re:This is where brains come in by error0x100 · · Score: 1

      Install a remotely-activated self-destruct capability in every plane. Once it's been determined that a plane has been compromised, this option can be considered

      I was thinking, it might be possible to combine GPS with a big database and build airline control systems that will physically prevent it from being possible to fly the plane into a big building. Hardest part would be keeping the system secure (e.g. making sure it could not easily be disabled by a clued up person).

      In future decades to come it will probably also become possible to build enough sensors and AI into the planes to allow the planes to examine their own environment and prevent something like this. Thats far down the line though.

      Of course, these are just technical workarounds, symptomatic treatment of a problem that otherwise wouldn't be solved (the fundamentalism that creates the desire in the first place to do something like this)

    19. Re:This is where brains come in by DarthSmeg · · Score: 1

      Thats nice.

      These bastards take out two buildings and kill 10.000 people, so lets take out their entire country

      What does that make you, killing a country full of mostly innocent people?

      --
      Tarald - The Lord of Smeg
      You're not drunk if you can lie on the floor without holding on
      --
      Tarald - The Lord of Smeg
      You're not drunk if you can lie on the floor without holding on
  164. Pics and Video by bert_mcdoy · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://mambo.fiberio.net/ has quite a bit of both TV captures, personal pics, and video of whats been happening. It still amazes me how quickly news, pictures, and video can spread today thanks to our little friend, the internet.

    1. Re:Pics and Video by cryosis · · Score: 1

      I have a mirror of all your mirrors (bit redundant but I have plenty of bandwidth to waste) and a few others that I found. the link is http://www.llamaporn.org

  165. How does the own medicine taste? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Where were the calls of horror, when US planes bombed radio stations in Yugoslavia and "collateral damage" accrued? While prescribing bombs and cruise missiles to other countries seems to be without moral questions, this kind of medicine doesn't seem to taste too good when applied to the doctor himself.

  166. Anyone notice the date? 911? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wicked!

    1. Re:Anyone notice the date? 911? by LordCodeman · · Score: 0

      Actually its 91101.

  167. I concur... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any joojooflop that's engaging in partisan finger pointing at a time like this should definately be booted out of office next election. Any idea who this dumbass was?

  168. Re:Plea for peace (eat the murderer) by idResponse · · Score: 1

    I agree that a hasty counterattack is a really dumb texan's way to do things (hold my beer, watch this!) but...

    I think that the golden rule (whatever you want to call it) should be put into effect... it should be a world standard for living in the first place... if someone is going to crash our planes into innocent people, then we should crash their heads into innocent concrete...

    I agree that war is something that should not happen, should never happen, but damnit, you don't watch someone shoot your friend in the head and then just walk away, do you? what would you do if someone killed a friend of yours or a loved one of yours out of cold blood? i'm fairly sure that you'd want to do something to strike revenge for the loss...

    i may live in america, but i hate this country... this makes me hate it even more... we've got fucked-up politics full of bickering and stupidity. we've got corporate-run everything these days. we've got "freedom" but that doesn't seem to exist much anymore... and it's probably going to fall further away from us because of this incident.

    we started with the ten amendments. those amendments then were edited "to fit with the current times" which is complete bollocks.
    now look what we have ...
    "freedom of speech" - yet i can't say "shit" in public without getting stared down funny, even if i am talking about fecal matter
    "freedom of religion" - only THE LAWRD JEEZUZ CHRIST in this country! AMEN!
    "freedom of assembly" - uh, cops, we're having a street party, go away please (thwack thwack thwack - ouch) they don't let us do that...
    "right to bear arms" - which is slowly being taken away, but heed this: if you take the guns away from the citizens, who has guns? the CRIMINALS... therefore it's like putting a huge sign in front of your house saying "I DON'T HAVE A WEAPON IN HERE! BUST IN AND STEAL MY STUFF!"

    it goes on...

    so we pour millions of our tax dollars into what? we have a government "for the people and by the people" but they don't seem to give a damn about what i really think as a citizen. we have a defense system that doesn't seem to be defending very well today. we have intelligence that obviously isn't so intelligent today. what we have here is proof that america's egotistical "better than thou" views are completely corrupting the country and we need to shape something up before we completely fall under.

    this act today was sick, sad, and wrong, and i believe that the people who attacked us, whomever it was, -should- be dealt with. as for war? war is useless and stupid. it's killing lots of people for political reasons. if you fight a war you're fighting yourself just as much as the "enemy" that you fight.

    what the united states needs to do is get a goddamned life. anyone recommend a better country to move to? i'm getting sick of this place...

    --
    [)(]subliminal labs[)(]
  169. Just be sure who you're blaming... by stungod · · Score: 1

    First off, I have to agree that this is the worst abomination I have seen. There is no excuse for this.

    The thing that worries me is that (again...remember OK City) people are already blaming Arab terrorists for this and saying it could only have been accomplished by a few people.

    Just how many people does it take to hijack a plane? 2? 3? Certainly not more than that. So we have maybe 12 people who downed 4 planes today. That seems like something that just about any fanatical organization could handle. Shit, the Michigan Militia could have decided over the weekend that they wanted to do this.

    And now every Republican in congress is ranting on TV about how we need more money for defense and the military, but I can't see how 1000 more tanks or planes would have helped this situation at all. It's just a bunch of politicians jumping on the opportunity to funnel some more money into their pet projects and I think it's disgraceful.

    Don't get me wrong, this is the worst thing I've seen and somebody needs to pay for it. But before we go bombing everything in the Middle East, we need to make sure we know who did this.

    My heart goes out to all those who lost loved ones in this disaster. I truly hope you see justice served.

    1. Re:Just be sure who you're blaming... by mpe · · Score: 2

      Just how many people does it take to hijack a plane? 2? 3? Certainly not more than that. So we have maybe 12 people who downed 4 planes today.

      Though it would help if they had support from airport/airline employees. Even then this could be under 20 people. Indeed it may only take one person actually on each plane.

  170. Where the F! was the CIA, FBI, NSA, etc? by Telecommando · · Score: 1

    Why didn't anyone see this coming? What are all our tax dollars being spent on if not to prevent incidents like this? I can see where ONE hijacked plane could slip by, but FOUR? This is inexcusable.

    Sorry, but this just makes me so angry I can hardly contain myself.

    --
    Beta sux! Join the Slashcott! http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4760465&cid=46173047
    1. Re:Where the F! was the CIA, FBI, NSA, etc? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, we need more survaillance! This would not have happend in 1982! WE NEED A BIG BROTHER TO POTECT US!

      Oh, think twice,...

    2. Re:Where the F! was the CIA, FBI, NSA, etc? by MSZ · · Score: 1

      Why didn't anyone see this coming? What are all our tax dollars being spent on if not to prevent incidents like this? I can see where ONE hijacked plane could slip by, but FOUR? This is inexcusable.


      They were sticking their collective noses into affairs of other nations. How could they imagine, that some of the people reviled by US media and politicians would strike back?

      While I do not support such ways of getting even, America gets what it's government wanted. Play with fire, get burned. Fuck with "terrorists"(*), get terrorized.

      (*)Terrorist: any person or state not liking US govt interference in his matters and vocal about that.
      --
      The moon is not fully subjugated. I demand a second assault wave preceded by a massive nuclear bombardment.
    3. Re:Where the F! was the CIA, FBI, NSA, etc? by ayjay29 · · Score: 1

      Wern't we all suposed to be putting words like 'BOMB' and 'TERRORISM' and 'HIJACK' in all our emails to jam up this suposed Echolon-big brother thing.

      Sheeesh!

      --
      Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated up.
    4. Re:Where the F! was the CIA, FBI, NSA, etc? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While it may be true that you think that if you mess with terrorists you get terrorized. You seem to fail to realize that people in the world have always had the ability to impose their will on others through violence.

      War: "an act of political violence intended to compel our oponent to fulfill our will"
      --Carl von Clauswitz

      What the US and the rest of the world has to realize is that just as the methodology of war changed from war clans in caves to long bows in the battle of Agincourt, to tanks in WWI, the "face of war" has changed again.

      New war is done without taking credit for the damage on a National level. Today we call it "terrorism"... it is really WAR, and has always been.

      Our reaction to these events should not be as though they were criminal acts, but we should react in the same way that we would to an open act of war. The only preliminaries to our action are to locate the home nation or nations of the responsible individiuals. These nations have commited an act of war, regardless of whether or not they have declared so openly.

      So in response to your comment... Declare war on the US... get warred on by the US

  171. Sorry here are actual linked mirrors by ZOP · · Score: 1

    http://www.wgops.com/wtc-pix/

    There linked this time, sorry ppl.

  172. Re:I hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh shut up. My god, you are so full of shit.

    GW does not even know where he is, much less what is going on.

    He is a fucking retart, like you.

    Now shut the fuck up, and die while you are at it.

  173. Canadian border still open by alienated · · Score: 1
    News here is reporting the border is still open, on ground at least. Several checkpoints have closed for a few hours, but are supposed to be reopened.

    Our airports are filling up with US and international flights -- even the small ones like St. John's Newfoundland 9it can only handle 16 wide-body jets and already has 14 on the ground). Passengers are milling around on ground level and being questioned by police.

    --
    ----- Trapped in time. Surrounded by evil. Low on gas. --Army of Darkness
  174. Today's Date by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Not sure if anyone noticed yet, but have you noticed the semblance of today's date? (911)

  175. Re:September 11 (this is non-sense) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First of all, i'm really shocked and outraged of what happened..
    And I would just say don't surrender to hatred calls.. It is the right time to give a chance to peace and logic.. And remember that there were many Arab-American citizens who were killed too..
    Don't give hasty conclusions : we don't know yet who made it but we do know that these are cowards' deeds..
    All my sympathy with the american people..

  176. Gun Rights by t0qer · · Score: 1

    I'm not hoping a full scale invasion happens, but I'm glad my forefathers fought for our right to defend ourselves in our homes.

    .22 is the best round to buy. Forget about everything they say about stopping power, you want something cheap because if something really bad does go down, expect to be hunting down cats and dogs for food as well as needing a shitton of ammo for cover fire.

    --toq

    1. Re:Gun Rights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, your fucking .22 is going to be a LOT of help stopping those 747's as they crash down on your fucking house. Moron.

    2. Re:Gun Rights by osu-neko · · Score: 1
      Ahh, but can you get a .22 automatic?

      "Wee! Now I can flatten bullets against body armor faster than ever before!"

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    3. Re:Gun Rights by t0qer · · Score: 1

      I don't know the exact sales figures are on commercial jet-liners, but I would bet you anything that it is so few I got a better chance of being hit by lightning. Wise up smart ass, stop being the grasshopper and start being the ant. Prepare now for the future. Remember fight club you ass? This was exactly brad pitt's scheme for destroying the world economy. All the stock exchanges are close. CLOSED ARE YOU LISTENING? If shit goes down its gonna be chaos in the supermarkets. If you give a shit about your home, family, pets, anything you have ever loved or cared about, you need to get ready. Go ahead, spend 20 or 30 thousand on a black market SAM. I'd like to see any edible meat left on that bluejay you just shot down for food.

      I'm off to buy more ammo.

      --toq

    4. Re:Gun Rights by JennyWL · · Score: 0, Troll

      Go ahead, spend 20 or 30 thousand on a black market SAM.

      Why, are you still trying to unload the one you bought to defend your house during the Y2K meltdown?

      Is the existing disaster not enough for you, adrenaline junkie? Fight Club was a MOVIE, not a documentary. Go donate some blood while you're out shopping for ammo, and quit bothering us.

      Numenaster

  177. Re:I hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only retaliation the British government has handed out to the IRA, is to release a few more of there members from prison.

    hmmmm, was that some kind of reverse psychology thing???

  178. Website emergency plan? by BMonger · · Score: 1

    On a different topic... this is probably the first time I can think of that almost every major news site has gone down. Do you think that major news sites will now have a plan in case an event of this magnitude were to happen in the future? I noticed CNN is "back up" but it's almost purely text. Will websites detect the traffic overload and automatically stop dishing out huge graphics and such so the important things like the news can be displayed? Just something to stimulate conversation (I hope...).

  179. terrorism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This attack shows in a very cruel way the shortcoming of a missile defense shield. The son of Star Wars could not have stopped this, and what we have seen today is an example of terrorism of the next millennium.

    These things have been written about in fiction books and made into plots of movies, but it still surprises (and shocks) us when it happens. What about all the other plots that still are just fiction? I am thinking about a nuclear suitcase bomb in a major city, biological warfare etc etc.

    It really shows that it is time for politicians and people all over the world to think about what terrorism can mean in this age of easy access to powerful technology.

  180. KILL ALL HUMANS by Brian+Boitano · · Score: 1

    solve the problem once and for all >:(

    --
    What would Brian Boitano do?
    1. Re:KILL ALL HUMANS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly this is the first and only idea on this msg board that would actually work.

      ThreeyThree

  181. One Way Its Lihe PH - NO WARNING!!!! by cybrpnk · · Score: 2

    How in the HELL do you get FOUR hijackings with SUICIDAL leaders COORDINATED without ANY hint this was going down from the NSA or CIA??? Boy, those guys are going to get clobbered but good...

    1. Re:One Way Its Lihe PH - NO WARNING!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah.

      But what I find is incredible that it was possible for 4 (four) airplanes to go way of course and crash into buildings in the centre of new york and washington dc without the FAA noticing it. In fact, it took them an impressive while to confirm that they actually lost track of 4 airplanes. If they can lose airplanes that easily, what are they doing in the traffic control centers? Playing cards? Holding nude mud-wrestling contests?

      Geez, one of the planes in NYC was even underway from boston to lax. That's some course change, if you ask me.

    2. Re:One Way Its Lihe PH - NO WARNING!!!! by Asgard · · Score: 1

      I'll bet they blame PGP / crypto.

    3. Re:One Way Its Lihe PH - NO WARNING!!!! by cybrpnk · · Score: 2

      Hooboy - I'll bet you're right....

    4. Re:One Way Its Lihe PH - NO WARNING!!!! by GungaDan · · Score: 1
      "Boy, those guys are going to get clobbered but good..."

      Let's round up the defective spooks and snoops, load 'em on a 747, and crash it into [insert name of irrationally selected structure/individual/race of people].

      --
      Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
    5. Re:One Way Its Lihe PH - NO WARNING!!!! by BitwizeGHC · · Score: 2

      FDR had the Japanese codes months before Pearl Harbor.

      He knew it would happen, and let it happen because he wanted the US in the war.

      How many US government officials knew about this, and let it happen?

      --
      N4st0r, trixx0r h0bb1tz0rz! Th3y st0l3 0ur pr3c10uzz!
    6. Re:One Way Its Lihe PH - NO WARNING!!!! by SlippyToad · · Score: 2

      Yeah. I imagine it's because our system is shit because it's too expensive to upgrade. I imagine after this a plane going off course will probably be instantly surrounded by fighter jets.

      --
      One day I feel I'm ahead of the wheel / the next it's rolling over me / I can get back on / I can get back on
    7. Re:One Way Its Lihe PH - NO WARNING!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And your basis for this assumption?

  182. Privacy is going bye-bye... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, how much more money will the NSA receive now?

    The people cry for more and stronger government.

    If I would try to take the absolute power over a country (from a governmental view), this would be the most efficient way. People actually wanting to exchange their privacy against security...

    And, oh, please do not start WW III, since it might be the end of the world...

  183. Re:Also since CNN is /. by ZOP · · Score: 1

    http://usterror.nashlink.net

    We'll be trying to post news there (or atleast I will)...

    ZOP

  184. Martial Law by pipeb0mb · · Score: 1

    Expect, within the next 24 hours:

    *All Govt services closed
    *Limited mobility
    *The closing down of all cellular communications
    *Limited Internet based communications
    *Semi martial law

    America is under attack, and the world is NEVER going to be the same.

    1. Re:Martial Law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      America is under attack, and the world is NEVER going to be the same.

      Umm, since when does America == world?

      Sorry, had to be said.

    2. Re:Martial Law by pipeb0mb · · Score: 1

      "Umm, since when does America == world?"

      What happens in America, especially events such as these, affect the 'world' as you know it, like it or not.

      Just as events in Japan and Germany and the USSR affected the 'world'.

      Stop trying to be politically correct and look around you...things are going to change, and whether it affects you financially, physically or via the web, it WILL trickle down to whatever hole you live in.

  185. justice, not war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's calm down. I am an American citizen and here's what I think. We should not take the attitude, especially at this early date, that we should "bomb 'em back to the stone age."

    First, that attitude does nothing but inflame the jingos and racist groups. Remember Oklahoma City? Turns out the big terrorists were white guys.

    As a corollary, it incites hatred against an entire country, not the specific groups and peoples involved. Someone actually posted here that they didn't care about the civilian casualties of our potential retaliation. How does our bombing innocents make the perpetrators pay. We went through this before with Dresden.

    The solution is justice. Bring the perpetrators to justice, through any rational means. But make them stand trial, make them sit, confined in the cells while the whole world watches. All of the perpetrators didn't die in the suicide hijackings. If there was a group, as seems necessary, to coordinate the attacks, then all the members of that group are guilty. All those whole knowingly aided the group are guilty. And all of those individuals should be punished.

    But not one innocent life should be lost in our retaliation. If we are to hold ourselves up as a role model (which we already do) then we should act like it (which we don't).

    We can be better then we are. Our response to this, like our reponses to all the little challenges we face individually on a daily basis, must move us to be better than we are.

  186. Gathering Images & Facts by packphour · · Score: 1
    I'm documenting the events at my site.

    Please feel free to contribute or read over what's currently up. I plan to possibly build a section off of the material gathered- so statements and additions are appreciated.

    packphour

    --

    -p4

    (c) All Rights Released.

  187. The United States is at war by Camelot · · Score: 2
    As has already been noted elsewhere - this is an act of war, and it can only responded to accordingly.


    (FYI - I'm not a citizen of the US either).

    1. Re:The United States is at war by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 2

      Untrue.

      Technically, war only comes about after the leaders of the country have agreed that it is war.

      No leader of any country have declared war on the US (or vice versa); and long may this situation remain.

      It's just terrorism. ;-(

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
  188. News Summary by Wolfbaine · · Score: 1

    Im putting together a news summary and a mirror for a bunch of multimedia here. Ill continue to work on it as developments continue.

  189. BBC TV 6:00 GMT news update by Isofarro · · Score: 1

    Knock-on effects of terrorist attack



    All flights from UK to US have been cancelled. All military and security operations in the UK have been moved up one level of alert status. Yasser Arafat has condemned the attack. Afganistan Taliban have said this operation is too big for someone like the main suspect Osman Lad Bin (no idea - someone correct his name!) to undertake.



    FTSE down 300 at close



    I heard (unconfirmed) the $/£ exchange rate hit $2 per pound - normally $1.40 per pound.

    1. Re:BBC TV 6:00 GMT news update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, wow, the Taliban says that this was too big of an operation for Bin Laden? Last I heard, he was a billionaire....even if he isn't, how exactly does the Taliban know what resources are required to hijack planes and crash them into downtown new york?
      Their statement just makes them more suspect...

  190. Not mistaken by frost22 · · Score: 1

    sitting in Frankfurt right now. sources from the city tell us most companies in skyscrapers either evacuated or let most of their people go home earlier without formal evacuation (it's now 7pm here.). Most large banks are reported to be run with skeleton staff.

    --
    ...and here I stand, with all my lore, poor fool, no wiser than before.
  191. Excellent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Atleast now, some sense will be driven into you stupid Americans.

    After all when India and Israel wanted some muslim countries to be declared as terrorist nations, you pl were thinking of contemplating about considering bilateral talks.

    Now I'd like you see you talk you bastards.

    Man, I love this.

    Atleast now wipe out some stupid countries off the world map. If you need, here is a list -

    1. Afghanistan
    2. Pakistan
    3. Palestine
    4. Any damn mozzy fundamentalist barbaric country.

    Great stuff, I sure hopes this blows into a full fledged war, so that you "americans" learn it the hard way.

    1. Re:Excellent! by pressman · · Score: 1

      I have no idea what country you are from or what your particular reasons for hating Americans is, but, wow, are you ever a heartless bastard!

      I'd like to consider myself to be a conscientious, good natured American, but apparently in your eyes, we are all rather bad people and that we actually deserved this!

      I'm not defending the foreign policy of our government, but thousands of innocent people have just lost their lives!

      I'm no fan of the governments in Israel or Palestine, or Afghanistan, or any other religiously ruled government, but I know I sure don't get excited when people, innocent civilians, needlessly die in those countries due to acts of terrorism, political oppression or genocide. And anyone who does cheer the events that cause such needless loss of life are cold-hearted, callous bastards!

      --
      Pooty tweet
  192. To idResponse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I advise Sweden or Luxemburg.

  193. Worse than Pearl Harbor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This attack is probably much worse than Pearl Harbor. According to this page at historylink.org there were 2403 deaths, and 1178 wounded in the Pearl Harbor attack. Pearl Harbor mobilized the nation for over four years; of course there was a clear enemy to respond to. How in hell do we respond to this day of infamy?

  194. Update from CNN.com by theguru · · Score: 1

    American Airlines told CNN that it lost two planes, both en route to Los Angeles: American Flight 11 from Boston with 81 passengers and 11 crew aboard was lost. This is believed, but not confirmed, to have been one of the planes that crashed into the trade center. ... American Flight 77, a Boeing 757 from Washington Dulles airport to Los Angeles with 58 passengers and six crew is unaccounted for. The jet that crashed into the Pentagon may have been this one, but that is still unknown.

    United Airlines lost two planes: United Airlines Flight 93 airliner headed from Newark, New Jersey, to San Francisco, crashed near Somerset, Pennsylvania -- police said initial reports indicated no survivors. ... United confirmed the crash of Flight 175 from Boston to Los Angeles with 56 passengers and seven crew aboard. It's possible, but not confirmed, that this is the second plane that hit the World Trade Center.

  195. Re:next time the reich marches on the UK we wont.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    be there to bail your socialist asses...

  196. Re:Plea for peace - Huh? Get Real! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So how exactly are Syrian and Afghani innocent civilians worse and deserve death more than american ones?

  197. Is this a residential area? by smcniven · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sorry for being selfish and/or offtopic, but can anyone from New York tell me if there are residential areas near the World Trade Center? My sister-in-law is visiting some guy in New York and we can't get in touch with her (which is driving my wife crazy). All we know is that he is doing an Engineering PHD at a University in New York City. I'm pretty sure that she would be okay, but would appreciate any insight on the surrounding neighbourhoods. Thanks in advance.

    1. Re:Is this a residential area? by Bigbambo · · Score: 1

      no residentail down there. Its all commercal. There are some UNi's down there..Pace and BMCC. NYU is a mile or so away, and columbia is way uptown. Hope everything is ok.

      --
      ***There is no point in asking, you'll get no reply***
    2. Re:Is this a residential area? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is some residential occupancy nearby. My friends/boss live ~3 blocks from WTC. The biggest is Battery Park City, butthat seems too far away to be hit.

      Our building at the Battery is still fine, as evidenced by our e-mail server still working.

      Only university nearby is Pace, about 4 blocks away. Your friend is probably at NYU, about 1.5 miles north of WTC

    3. Re:Is this a residential area? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't get through b/c the phone lines are jammed. You are not the only person trying to call in or out.

      anyway, the news reports that phone lines are full.

    4. Re:Is this a residential area? by Mr.Phil · · Score: 1

      To answer your question. Yes it is... However, I don't now if the WTC was residential itself. If your sister in law was in the area, she most likly was evac'ed when the first plane crashed into the towers. Most civilians will be quite far away from the towers before they fell. Your problems contacting her will be from the lack of cell phone "cells" that were powered from the top of the WTC. Her reaching a land line phone that is operational is also questionable, because of the massive infrastructure damage in the NYC area.

      Your best advice is to pray for her and wait by the phone.

    5. Re:Is this a residential area? by smcniven · · Score: 1

      Thanks for everyone's response. I figured that the phone lines would be jammed etc (another sister-in-law actually called the one number we had) but I needed to get that bit of info. Once again thanks for the input.

  198. Re:I hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Better late than never... (or before you're dead)

  199. News and Images by MrBrklyn · · Score: 1

    http://www2.mrbrklyn.com/wtc

    and see

    http://www.brooklynonline.com

    --
    http://www.mrbrklyn.com/amsterdam.html http://www.brooklyn-living.com
  200. Predicted 400 years ago - Nostradamus by Joe+Jordan · · Score: 0, Troll

    "In the City of God there will be a great thunder, Two brothers torn apart by Chaos, while the fortress endures, the great leader will succumb" , "The third big war will begin when the big city is burning"
    - Nostradamus 1654

  201. Predictions by BarefootClown · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First of all, I hope and pray for the safety of all involved, and commend the rescue workers who are putting their lives on the line to save others. These people are heroes in the truest sense, and deserve our undying admiration and respect.

    Watching the news, all of the stations, particularly the military correspondents (Gen. Schwarzkopf included) talked about the complete failure of our intelligence community to provide us with any warning about this attack. Reporters asking "how could such a thing have happened with no warning," "haven't we infiltrated these groups," "how can you maintain secrecy on something this widespread," etc.

    In a couple of weeks, I'm going to look like a prophet for this one. I predict that somebody will mention data security, including e-mail encryption. Whether correctly or not, somebody will propose it, and encryption, already a hot topic in National Security circles, will gain focus.

    I predict that within a month, Congress will have drafted, and probably passed, a National Security Act to address the threat of terrorism. In that act, I fully expect to see severe restrictions on the use of secure data systems, including encryption of any form (e-mail, PGP file encryption/encrypted file systems, even SSH and SSL), anonymity (anonymous bulletin boards, including such things as Slashdot), and relaxation of wiretapping laws. E-mail will be required to be send in plaintext, Carnivore will be restored to active duty, and put on more servers with more keywords and more aggressive monitoring. Cell phones, already ruled to be not private, will be actively monitored by the government, as will landline phones--remember, cordless phones (you know you all have them) emit RF too, and the few that have scrambling systems are easily compromised.

    Also expect to see civil liberties severely curtailed, at least for a while. Meeting with friends at odd hours (odd to the rest of the world, normal to geeks)? Suspicious. Phone calls to friends in other countries, or of other nationailities (particularly Middle Eastern)? Suspicious. Use of encryption/security? Suspicious squared--after all, what do you have to hide?

    My big prediction, though, is that the American Sheeple will hail this as a Good Thing, and support it wholeheartedly. The Sheeple will automatically say that anything that improves security must be a Good Idea, and will fall into line without even considering the ramifications.

    Mark my words, my friends: today has been one small step for terrorism, but one giant leap for the police state.

    --

    "Make it ten--I am only a poor corrupt official."
    --Captain Louis Renault (Claude Rains), Casablanca

    1. Re:Predictions by Ratbert42 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Reasonable predictions. I'll add one: we'll occupy Afganistan by the end of the year.

    2. Re:Predictions by ronys · · Score: 1

      Probably correct, in essence, if not in detail.

      _This_ is the long term damage that terror brings to the fabric of society.

      The short term is painfully obvious today.

      --
      Ubi dubium ibi libertas: Where there is doubt, there is freedom.
    3. Re:Predictions by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      You didn't phrase it as a bet, but I'll take the bet anyway.

      It's not going to happen. My question is whether people like you will learn anything when it doesn't.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    4. Re:Predictions by FortKnox · · Score: 1

      Terrorism only survives in a democracy.

      Why? Think about this:
      Terrorism happens in Cuba. Anyone that has the slightest reason to do it, anyone near the scene of the crime, and anyone suspected all will be executed. No more terrorism.

      Its "due process" that allows terrorism to strive. So the ultimate way to eliminate terrorism is to create a police state.

      So, the question is, do you want to fear terrorists or the government?

      The ultimate goal is to strive for the middle ground.

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    5. Re:Predictions by killmenow · · Score: 1

      Mark my words, my friends: today has been one small step for terrorism, but one giant leap for the police state.
      Which is why I've already written letters to both of my Senators, my Representative, and President Bush.

      I will follow-up by sending one to my Governor, State Congresspeople, Mayor, and local city council.

      It may not do much good, but we should all be writing letters to our lawmakers to give them feedback on what the actual people want. If you don't know who your Representative in the House is, check here and find your Senators here.

      Write the President at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, D.C. 20500.
    6. Re:Predictions by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2

      Given that terrorism isn't going to go away, and that it can send multiple coordinated suicide airliners into your buildings, how exactly is a no-privacy surveillance state worse?

    7. Re:Predictions by jafac · · Score: 2

      wheee! maybe I can get a job reading your email for the US Govt! That sounds absolutely POSH!

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    8. Re:Predictions by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 2

      "Nah... It was just a bit of hyperbole. But mark my words ... in a couple hundred years or so, it'll happen. I guarantee."

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    9. Re:Predictions by locust · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Watching the news, all of the stations, particularly the military correspondents (Gen. Schwarzkopf included) talked about the complete failure of our intelligence community to provide us with any warning about this attack. Reporters asking "how could such a thing have happened with no warning," "haven't we infiltrated these groups," "how can you maintain secrecy on something this widespread," etc.


      A co-worker and I did the math on this. You need a minum of 4 people, 8 for better success. They have to coordinate... But: If they are people working at air ports (in bagadge handling or cleaning) they can get a weapon(s) on a plane. Security at US airports isn't exactly tight. Then you need someone who can fly an aircraft enough to steer, not take it off or land it. After take off, the armed party goes to the front bathroom, slips into the cockpit kills both pilots, and locks the door (or there is another person there for crowd control). You need one, but more likely two people per plane. In a country of 300 million, with our freedoms you have to look out for 8 guys.


      --
      locust

    10. Re:Predictions by AdamHaun · · Score: 2

      Actually, Orrin Hatch was on CNN talking about the need for better *human* intelligence, and the need to better understand the motivations of the people involved in these attacks. Here's holding out hope that we buy more spies instead of more cameras.

      --
      Visit the
    11. Re:Predictions by BlueTurnip · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Can't happen. An outright ban on encryption would completely collapse the e-commerce sector. Encryption is far to ingrained in business to business transactions in the form of VPNs, SSL secure websites owned by vendors, banking transactions, etc. Not only would an outright ban like you suggest weaken security to the point of making such transactions impossible, but the logistics of removing or disabling encryption from the working software systems that run today's e-conomy would be far too formidable to make it possible.

      At worst, some sort of key-escrow proposal will be put forward, but would take so long to implement, that people will have cooled down and saner heads will previal.

      The thing to watch out for is a SSSCA-like law being passed under the guise of protecting us from terrorists.

    12. Re:Predictions by Hilary+Rosen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Right. That worked for the Russians, after all.

      --
      Yes, the nick is flamebait
    13. Re:Predictions by Pinball+Wizard · · Score: 2
      and may I remind you, that the US has declared martial law before, and suspended habeous corpus and other civil liberties.


      Abraham Lincoln declared martial law during the Civil War. It was necessary then, it may be necessary in the near future.


      Don't bother with your "Those who would give up their freedom for safety" quotes. When we are in the midst of defending our lives and our freedom, keeping people alive must come first.


      We declare martial law in order to preserve freedom, not destroy it. You need to look at the bigger picture.

      --

      No, Thursday's out. How about never - is never good for you?

    14. Re:Predictions by ez76 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Prophecy is cheap. It's a cowardly way to straddle history, not participate in it.

      Why not try and propose a solution to the debacle we're going to face in the near-term, rather than parrot your overzealous liberal peers?

    15. Re:Predictions by mpe · · Score: 2

      Then you need someone who can fly an aircraft enough to steer, not take it off or land it.

      Or more likely you get the regular flight crew to get you into the right kind of location. Which makes it look more like a regular hijacking, which pilots and ATC are trained to cope with.

    16. Re:Predictions by Kombat · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You self-proclaimed prophets really irritate me. Here's something I'll bet you don't see in your little crystal ball: people just like you came out of the woodwork after the Oklahoma City bombing and made the EXACT SAME ridiculous predictions. Underestimating the intelligence of your fellow citizens (or "Sheeple", as you like to call them) does not serve to make you look smarter - it only makes you look arrogant.

      In times like this, the LAST thing your country needs is fear-mongerers like you spreading FUD. What it needs is blood donations. So can the doomsday garbage that we've all seen a thousand times before, every time there's a Columbine or a Lockerbie. It's CRAP, people are smarter than you give them credit for, and you're really annoying.

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    17. Re:Predictions by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      I do not think that any politico could spin this in any direction to get americans from using encryption, since this was most likely perpetrated by non-americans who did most of the comunications in person and out side the US. I can see however, congress not allowing the export of security technologies as they did before. perhaps even putting restrictions on the types of tech that can be exported

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    18. Re:Predictions by Zoop · · Score: 1

      I know you were kidding, but ugh, no thanks.

      I want to flay the f**kers who did this as much as the next guy, but I don't want to a) take it out on innocent women and children (and please no anarchist wannabe give me any crap about how we bomb women and children--if we wanted to, there wouldn't *be* a Serbia now), or b) take over a place that even the bloodthirsty Soviets couldn't handle. I say let them sort themselves out, maybe fund some of the more rational people there.

    19. Re:Predictions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://lockless.dyndns.org:8080/~malverian/texts/s eptember11.txt

  202. Re:I hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind. God cares as much for the people we Americans have killed(1 million + Iraqi's since the begining of the our aggression on them), as he does for the Americans who have died today. But I'm willing to bet your prayers do not go out to those people in Iraqi who have suffered.

    I'm not against america, but I am against it's world wide idiocy of waging war, bullying, and all the other crap we pull, that aggravates people to these acts. More security is not the answer. Leaving other countries and peoples alone to determine their own destiny is.

  203. Google has emergency cache by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    Google cache of cnn.com, they should have the bandwith do deal with this kind of thing

  204. leeches die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I sincerely hope that those who are saying this is Bush's fault, blaming it on the Republicans or any such crap find a way to remove their lobotomy. Try using logic and reason. Stop using things like this as a way to further your agenda of hate and malice. Stop the stupidity please!

    Please realize that what you are saying is not helping. Also realize that if you can't back that up (and especially if you don't apply your 'method' [you probably don't have one] to your self and your own organization [read: your 'team, political party or other hypocritical crap'])

    So, please just realize that you are nothing but a talking monkey that is angrily slinging his feces at your self constructed cage of slavery [hate] all the while you are shaking your fist at those who throw things at their cages. Please disappear from the planet and let the intelligent and rational humans handle this.

  205. Well Great. by FFFish · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm watching CBC television, The National. The desk reporter is superlative, and I'll be writing CBC to give accolades.

    Now that there's less action on the ground, we're getting all the "experts" in as talking heads.

    And the unfortunate thing is that some of them are instigating racial hatred. Well, cultural hatred, at any rate.

    The same thing is beginning to happen on Slashdot: wingnuts wanting to obliterate Palestian, and even some who want to nuke the entire mid-East.

    GET A CLUE!

    The US can't just walk in and kill every damn Muslim and Arab. That'd be a worse atrocity than the attack on the WTC -- and the retaliation would make today's events look like a trip to Disneyland.

    There must be retaliation...but it must be rational!

    Use your cluesticks with impunity. Contact your news stations and let them know that they're being destructive, not constructive; join the message boards and preach cautious, considered reactions; and remain calm.

    [Please also note that more people die every day or two in traffic accidents, than were killed in the attack. It's a tragedy, but not much worse than the tragedy we live with every day... it's just that we don't expect terrorist attacks.]

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    1. Re:Well Great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, annual (one year) traffic fatalities in the US number 30,000-50,000.

      50,000 people work in the WTC buildings.

    2. Re:Well Great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Actually, if you use the common yardstick used by Romans, NAZI and other imperialist states that some people like to liken the US to -- that is kill one of us we kill ten of you, we could quite easily wipe out every male Palestinian in retribution. Something for you terrorist fucks to contemplate over the next 100 years.

      And quite frankly, I am afraid bringing those responsible to JUSTICE will not send an adequate message to like minded people. To actually prevent terror in the future, there will have to be retribution -- but luckily for you, the US really doesn't have the stomach for behaving that way -- unluckily for you, Isreal does.

    3. Re:Well Great. by dillon_rinker · · Score: 2

      Approximately 25,000 die annually in traffic accidents. There have been reasonable estimates of deaths in the tens of thousands in this attack. We'll know how bad it was in a week or so; it always looks worse than it really is right in the middle of a crises.

    4. Re:Well Great. by ajna · · Score: 1

      "Please also note that more people die every day or two in traffic accidents, than were killed in the attack. "

      Bullshit. ~50k die each year on our highways (courtesy of NHTSA). 50k may have died _today_ alone in the WTC twin towers.

    5. Re:Well Great. by CaptTrips · · Score: 1

      As far as I am concerned, the media is very liberal. They excel at igniting fires. It's like they get off on it or something. Several reporters that applied for positions at ABC News were immediately let go after finding out they were conservative and wouldn't change to be liberal.

      --

      grep >= ! == $your
    6. Re:Well Great. by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      I have a little problem with the whole 'liberal media' stereotype. Socially the major media outlets are very liberal, but economically, they're fairly conservative.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    7. Re:Well Great. by nublord · · Score: 2

      Amen!!!

    8. Re:Well Great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As others have pointed out, while appealing to the rest of us to use our cluesticks, you massively exaggerate your figures on traffic accidents.



      For a different perspective, American fatalities in the entirety of the Vietnam War were ~60,000.



      Finally, there is a large difference between loss of life in a goddamn traffic accident and a premeditated murder. It is absolutely amazing someone would even attempt to make an analogy "Well, we're mad, but being the err, rational, clear-headed folk we are, we realize that you only killed about as many people as so we can put it in perspective!". Good grief - beyond the appeal for attempting to remain calm and use good judgement, this is a worthless post

    9. Re:Well Great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Uh... no.

      [Please also note that more people die every day or two in traffic accidents, than were killed
      in the attack. It's a tragedy, but not much worse than the tragedy we live with every day... it's
      just that we don't expect terrorist attacks.]



      Could dissect this, but why bother. Look up the stats. Best estimates of number of people working in the twin towers is ~50k. Of which, something like 10% (5000) were killed in the first few minutes on the top floors (big error bars, +/- 50%). The NYPD and NYFD had under 90 minutes to evacuate people. Got one of the towers about 1/2 empty, and the other, who knows.

      There are thousands, more likely tens of thousands of people dead here. Get a grip on the magnitude. The number of people killed daily on the roads in the US is a few hundred. This is, in a statistical sense, a real signal, not noise.

      Note also that weapons of mass destruction were used against civilians. Note that at minimum 4 terrorists slipped weapons past security, boarded airlines, and took control of the aircraft. Said aircraft were used as the instruments of murder.

      This fits the defs of an act of war against the citizens of the United States.

      So who did it? Your point was, wait and see, be rational, and then give a measured response.

      I disagree with the last item. The people responsible can either be brought up in front of a court of law, tried, convicted and spend the rest of their life in prison, or simply destroyed. Along with their mechanisms. As an object lesson to others who will follow in their footsteps. In the most painful excruciating manner.

      When you deal with terrorists, you can show no mercy. Ever. You must destroy every one of them. This does not mean killing all palestinians. Not all are terrorists. This doesnt mean decapitating Shin Fein. And so forth.

      It does mean brutally punishing those responsible, in an extrajudicial process. War is extrajudicial. This, is not in the criminal justice realm anymore. This is an issue of national self defence.

      That is, unless you want these twits to keep doing this stuff.

      Make an object out of them. Vivisection comes to mind. Make them suffer. They took lives in the most cowardly and brutal manner. We have to make sure they understand our responses will be so completely out of proportion with their actions that they will think twice.

      Dont like it? Tough. That is called a deterent. We have had a policy called MAD (mutually assured destruction) assoicated with our nukes for a while. Time to implement something overwhelming in response to this.

      Yeah yeah, argue if you want that only rationality will matter, being measured in response will solve things.

      Ask the Israelis how the attacks have grown since they started being measured and stopped being overwhelming?

      Which world do you want to live in? The capitualation to terror, or the world free of terror?

      BTW: on the turban wearers... you may be partially right, though the MO of this event lines up with the PLFP. Arafat is painfully aware of this. And he is scrambling to distance himself from them.

      I do not think it was bin laden. It starting to smell more and more like old Palestinian tactics coupled with some nation-states resources.

      Not all Palestinians are terrorists, and actually Islam and Arabic culture is fundamentally peaceful. But there are a few bad apples. Turbin wearing or not, it doesnt matter. Arabic or not, Islamic or not, Bosnian or not.... none of this matters. What matters is that someone is going to pay a terrible price for this. I am not sure if they realize what they have done.

  206. buh-bye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This act of terrorism will result in someone/someplace/somepeople being exterminated. Is it right, I say yes. My family fought for freedom and so do I. Someone has attacked that on a mass murder/ act of war action. They there families, friends and government will pay in blood. Why? Becuase we can and now will show we will.

    1. Re:buh-bye by faze78 · · Score: 1

      "Because you can and now you will" Isn't that the exact kind of thinking that has gotten America in this situation. For once, THINK FIRST!!!!

    2. Re:buh-bye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay. I've thought about it. If they did it, kill 'em. If they helped, kill 'em. If they applaud it, kill 'em. If they approve, kill 'em.

      You're right. Thinking it through helped a lot.

    3. Re:buh-bye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a surprising amount of people in the middle east thinking what you just thought too.

      Just a hint: There's more of them than you.

  207. This Mess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They've turned all the navigational becons in the continental US off as well

  208. update, summary by abde · · Score: 2


    All news outlets on the Internet are shut down due to massive surge in traffic, so I am summarizing from reports collected via television, as well as friends in CNN , New York, and Boston. The best source for news is probably television broadcast, or your local city's newspaper website. CNN.com has dropped all extraneous links and ads and has a single story at : http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/09/11/worldtrade.crash/ story.html , which summarizes most of the available confirmed information so far.

    Around 8:00 AM (Central Time), two passenger planes smashed into one each of the towers of the World Trade Center in New York City, not more than twenty minutes apart. Around 9:00 AM, one tower of the WTC collapsed. People were seen jumping out of the 101-story (1,360 feet) building's topmost floors. At about 9:30, the second tower also collapsed. Both towers of the World Trade Center have been utterly destroyed.

    At about the same time, a passenger plane also crashed into the Pentagon building in Washington DC, collapsing part of the building.

    American Airlines confirmed today that it lost two aircraft, Flight 11, a Boeing 767 en route from Boston to Los Angeles with 81 passengers, nine flight attendants and two pilots; and Flight 77, a Boeing 757 operating from Washington Dulles to Los Angeles with 58 passengers, four flight attendants and two pilots. These two flights were likely the ones that crashed into the WTC.

    United airlines confirms that it has lost two flights. Flight 93 from Newark to San Francisco was apparently deliberately crashed by the pilot, sacrificed to avoid hitting a target. Another rumor states that it was shot down by an F-16. Flight 175 from Boston to Los Angeles is unaccounted for, possibly crashed. It is possible but unconfirmed that Flight 175 was the one that hit the Pentagon.

    Car bombs have been reported at the US Capitol and the State Department, but the reports were contradictory. There also seems to be an explosion of some kind on the National Mall.

    The White House, State Department, Treasury, and Pentagon have all been evacuated. Manhattan island has been quarantined, United Nations has been evacuated, and Wall Street has suspended trading. Canary Wharf in London, CN Tower in Toronto, The Sears Tower, Chicago Board of Trade, and John Hancock Center in Chicago, the John Hancock and Prudential Towers in Boston, and CNN Center in Atlanta have all been evacuated/locked down. All Disney parks in Orlando, Florida, and Disneyland in Anaheim, California have been closed. Major downtown centers in cities across the United States are also being evacuated. The Federal Aviation Authority (FAA) has grounded *all* flights in the USA, for the first time in history. F16s from the US Air Force has been instructed to shoot down flights in a no-fly zone over NYC.

    The foreign office in the UK has issued the following number for worried relatives here, regarding the recent attacks upon buildings inthe US: 020 7008 0000

    Yasser Arafat condemned the attack: "I send my condolences, the condolences of the Palestinian people to American President (George W.) Bush and his government and to the American people for this terrible act," Arafat told reporters in Gaza on Tuesday.
    "We completely condemn this serious operation...We were completely shocked. It's unbelievable, unbelievable, unbelievable."
    (http://uk.news.yahoo.com/010911/80/c3l1a.html)

    Mullah Abdul Salam Zaeef, the Taliban ambassador to Pakistan, said in reaction to the news of the terror attacks that "we want to tell the American children that Afghanistan feels your pain and we hope that the courts find justice."
    (http://www.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/asiapcf/central/0 9/ 11/afghan.taliban/index.html)

    There have been a number of denials of responsibility by Palestinian groups and by the Al Quaida group headed by fugitive Saudi accused terrorist Osama bin Laden.

    (Foxnews.com) Smoke from New York City is visible from the International Space Station.

    --
    Don't blame me - I voted for Howard Dean. http://dean2004.blogspot.com
  209. Re:I hope... by coflow · · Score: 1

    you fucking idiot. bush coming to washington serves no purpose other than to further the incentive to bring another attack on washington. My I hope for the day is that all of you fucking little cowards out there denouncing retaliation or blaming the president for this action are realized for the partisan inhumane people that you are. Innocent people died today, and all you can think about is either protecting those responsible or blaming the president? I for one cannnot wait for the reports of islamic people being beaten to death by americans. It could be time for us to stoop to their level and kill innocent people. But this will not happen, because despite our emotions, we as Americans still defer to reason (thankfully), and will allow the rule of law to triumph.

  210. Re:How does the own medicine taste? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FUCK YOU

  211. Re:Nuke the bastards by Shadarr · · Score: 1

    Who, exactly, do you want to nuke? Hmmm? No one has claimed responsibility yet.

  212. Probably the first sick joke on the incident... by Anaplexian · · Score: 0, Troll

    i belive the planes had XP beta versions running on them. This was probably the first reported "crash".

  213. Re:Plea for peace - Huh? Get Real! by uchian · · Score: 1

    It's nice to see how ready you are to enrol yourself in the army and go on the front line in all this.

    But please don't start world war III - I would get dragged into it too if it escalated. Whether through conscription, or through the effects that the nuclear weapons that would fly around the world would have on me.

    I have been in a state of shock from what I've seen on television today, even though I live in England, thousands of miles away. I know people who are touring America. They visited the white house last week. I don't know where they are at this moment in time. But more than anything else, the thought that goes through my head is that if this had happened in 5 years time, it could just have easily been me, or people who I know trapped at the top of one of those twin towers when they collapsed. And that truly terrifies me.

    Even though it happened in America because it is the largest target, I also cannot think of any reason why the same attack could not have succeeded in England, and neither can the rest of the country - our stock exchange has been evacuated, airport security has been increased, our Government has gone into a state of emergency.

    I do not disagree with you that the people involved should be brought to justice, but by waging war on everyone whom you even think could be involved with this tradegy is a terrible thought. I truly hope that you calm down and think the situation through rationally, rather than acting on you emotions which you are understandably doing at the moment.

  214. Bomb in front of the State Department true by male · · Score: 1

    I was woken up by my roomate to the news that planes crashed into the WTC. As a stupid but curious individual I was walking around the DC Mall checking out the huge plume of smoke created from the pentagon crash that happened just as I left my dorm. About 10 minutes after getting to the mall and talkign with evacuated officials and news crews I heard two quick *BOOM* *BOOM*s then a shockwave that kept echoing.

    I never saw any smoke rise into the air, but the noise came from (I think, it's hard to pinpoint these things with echos) from a block northwest of me -- the State Department. I don't know why the news isn't reporting this, but something went off other, and it sure as hell wasn't backfire. I heard over the radio that a car bomb was discovered and then detonated -- but that doesn't really make much sense to me. Anyone know more?

    jc

  215. Re:Plea for peace - Huh? Get Real! by bradleyjay · · Score: 0

    Dude, like get a fucking clue.

    How do you know it was Arab terrorists? And do us all a favor and let us know how exactly you came across the great knowledge that:

    "They're born and raised to think martyrdom after destroying civilian targets is the way to Mecca. "

    Were you raised that way?
    Are you an Arab?
    Are you Muslim?

    I am a Muslim, and an American. Can I blame the OK city tragedy on all Christians just because McVeigh was christian?

    DO US ALL A FUCKING FAVOR AND KEEP YOUR GODDAMNED MOUTH SHUT...ESPECIALLY IF YOU HAVE NO FUCKING INTELLIGENCE WHATSOEVER!

    --
    Karma...what's that? I just speak my mind.
  216. Could these horrible events occur with no Internet by BaconMakinRabbit · · Score: 1

    I wonder if these attacks could have happened if this group of insane maniacs had no Internet access. I have seen some stories about how Usama bin Ladin uses messages embedded in jpgs and posts coded messages on porn sites and sports chat sites. Not to mention timing flights and operatives etc. How can we stop suicidal crazies like this? My heart and prayers are with all the victims, families, rescuers and innocent American citizens who have had to be a part of this disaster. I think the world will be different after today.

    --
    "Laugh, and the whole world laughs with you. Cry, and they still think it's funny." - Mr. Boffo
  217. Re:I hope... by J'raxis · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    All the things we bitch about on Slashdot seem like nothing today.
    You are absolutely right. The DMCA is nothing compared to what Americas government is probably going to try in response to this in the interest of national security.
  218. Las Vegas Security by torklugnutz · · Score: 2, Informative

    So far, Nellis AFB is on Delta Security Level (as are all military bases, by now, I'm sure) and the Hoover Dam is closed to traffic. People are being diverted to Laughlin by US 95. The Meadows Mall, Stratosphere Tower and Convention Center are also closed. School is still in session, as well as UNLV.

    US currency is trading at 1.4759 USD to 1 GBP, according to Yahoo! Finance.

    --
    Often in Error, Never in Doubt.
  219. Considering a Cowardly Act of Muder by ChaoticCoyote · · Score: 2

    Reading the responses here on Slashdot, I'm both hopeful and disgusted. EVen something as terrible as this morning's murders is food for the trolls of the universe. On the other hand, I proud to call myself a geek when I read mesages from many fine, caring people here.

    So perhaps Slashdot is a good reflection of humanity in general, showing both our good and bad sides.

    Here at Coyote Gulch, we're still trying to cope with today's terrorist attacks on New York and Washington. We've finally accounted for family, friends and coworkers; I'm grateful that everyone is all right.

    Everyone, American or not, must be vigilant that these vcious acts of cowardice do not become tools of self-serving politicians; we can not allow horror to destroy what it is that makes us Americans: our freedoms. This is not the time to hide in our shells, or to the U.S. government turn against its own citizens. As the emotion subsides, we need to find the strength to approach this from the standpoint of justice.

    It is never acceptable to kill innocents, whether by terrorist bomb or high-tech missile. I'm all in favor of revenge against the sources of today's atrocities. But revenge must be tempered by knowledge; flattening Kabul or Baghdad is not the solution. We must find who did this, and cleanly ensure that they cannot murder again.

    And a final plea: Give blood. Wherever you are. Now. Don't wait. Just do it. Call the Red Cross, call your local hospital, and give a pint to save a life. The best way to respond to death is the celebrate and protect life.

  220. The world you live in is full of hate dont add to by Ripat · · Score: 1

    >The world you live in is full of hate dont add to it

    It's a tragedy, but thats exactly the thing to remember! Well spoken!

  221. What will the next be? by haxor.dk · · Score: 1

    Nuclear terrorism? My soul trembles at the prospect. :(

    I'm 21 years of age. This the the world I'm going to grow up into. And it's being shaken time and time again by psychopaths who doesn't give a shit about my or your or whoevers life.

    Fucking great. NOT: :(

    1. Re:What will the next be? by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      And people wonder why I don't want children. It's not fair to them, IMHO.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  222. There will be HELL to pay by MtViewGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Folks,

    This is way more than an act of terrorism.

    WE MAY BE TALKING 50,000 DEAD! That is without doubt an act of war.

    I know I'll get modded way down for this, but I will not be surprised if our nuclear forces are now at DEFCON 2 alert, and instructions to target every terrorist-sponsoring state in the Middle East are already sent to our nuclear forces in preparation for a truly massive retaliatory attack. We may be kissing Damascus, Tehran, Baghdad, Tripoli, Khartoom and Kabul goodbye by the end of this week. :-(

    1. Re:There will be HELL to pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      We may be kissing Damascus, Tehran, Baghdad, Tripoli, Khartoom and Kabul goodbye by the end of this week.

      GOD I hope so!! Enough is ENOUGH -- destroy the ENTIRE middle east now! I don't care who is innocent. That whole place is a big shithole. We MUST END THIS now

    2. Re:There will be HELL to pay by nagora · · Score: 2, Insightful
      WE MAY BE TALKING 50,000 DEAD!

      Oh, calm down. Why does everything have to be made worse by people exagerating? Isn't the truth bad enough for you, for fuck's sake?

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    3. Re:There will be HELL to pay by Oztun · · Score: 2

      I wish someone would post how many people we or our weapons have killed in the middle east in the past few years. I bet its a lot more than 50,000.

    4. Re:There will be HELL to pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason for this is people who think like you.
      You are to fucking blame moron.

    5. Re:There will be HELL to pay by Ryu2 · · Score: 2

      It was very early in the morning (0545 Eastern), thank goodness! So, hopefully actual casualities will be much, much lower than 50000! One can only hope.

      --
      There's 10 types of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
    6. Re:There will be HELL to pay by Ryu2 · · Score: 2

      Correction, sorry, 0845 Eastern! Still hoping that people didn't show up too early for work...

      --
      There's 10 types of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
    7. Re:There will be HELL to pay by Ioldanach · · Score: 1

      Where did you see that??? It was 8:42 and 9:00 am. The height of morning business.

    8. Re:There will be HELL to pay by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      What, you think this is an exaggeration?

      50,000 people work in the trade towers. Not all of them were there today, but there were a lot of people in the area that may have been hit and killed by falling debris. It's safe to say that a lot of people didn't get out of the buildings before they fell down.

      50,000 may (may) end up being high, but it's not a large exaggeration.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    9. Re:There will be HELL to pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wait for the offical count, moron, before you start your hatemongering.

  223. Static URL To Get Into MSNBC by Tails · · Score: 0

    For those of you who can't reach MSNBC directly, Visit This Link it's a static page with good response times.

    --
    --
  224. It was the RAGHEAD TALIBAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    DEATH to all TALIBAN RAGHEADS!

    DEATH to them ALL!

    We call for nuclear deployment to completely destroy the shithole called Afghanistan.

    Declare WAR immediately!!!

    No investigation! No debate!! Destroy the TALIBAN NOW!!!!!!

    1. Re:It was the RAGHEAD TALIBAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Death to all fanatics!

      (jeeze, isn't it about time for the Kizinti solution to kick in with the human race? You'd figger after 5,000 years, all the really disagreeable fuckers would have cleared themselves from the gene pool.)

    2. Re:It was the RAGHEAD TALIBAN by pressman · · Score: 1

      I'm just going to keep posting this.


      It's this kind of mentality that makes the rest of the world hate us. I'm no fan of governments run by religious institutions, the Taliban included, but baseless calls for war against governments whose ideology doesn't mesh with our own is just ridiculous.


      Innocent people were used as weapons against other innocent people. Declaring war out of hand and killing more innocent people is not the answer. If it is a foreign governmental agency that is responsible for this attack, we should focus all retaliatory efforts on their government and military and not the innocent lives governed by that body.


      Hammurabi's code is no basis for justice in this so-called civilized age!

      --
      Pooty tweet
  225. Re:Nostradamus by gamgee5273 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Which easily could describe the Civil War...

  226. Re:President's e-mail by tpm · · Score: 1

    For those of you who don't know, the President's e-mail is president@whitehouse.gov. (Duh) Some staff flunkie is probably charged with reading his e-mail and giving him a statistical analysis of the contents, although I would assume the President will be quite busy for the next few hours.

    Anyway, forget your rep and send a note to the Commander-in-Chief himself. Personally, I respectfully requested that he unleash hell on those responsible, but that's just my opinion....

    --
    "I can't learn anything from you I can't read in some fucking book." -- Sean in "Good Will Hunting"
  227. We citizens reap what our leaders sow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The innocent lives lost are tragic and unprecendented (in the US at least--think of Vietnam, Bosnia, WW2, Siege of Leningrad and others). But we reap what our leaders past and present sow. We are a super power and an empire and so draw the wrath of thesoe we hold dominion over. And we are a free society, so hitting us from within is easier than it could be. The Roman Empire faced terroism by the Gauls and other tribes on their borders. If we as a nation, continue to support land theft, assasination and torture in throughout the world in order to maintain our empire (Chile, Vietnam, Agentina, Iran, Israel, and many more: Ask Kissinger/Bush Sr./Rumsfeld for details) then we must expect retribution will at least be attempted. It is sad to see it apparently acheived by somebody with some axe to grind: for they never kill the guilty, but instead destroy the lives of many innocent people for no purpose. They can even come from our own as in McVeigh. Terrorism is a sad, sad tactic for in leaving the guilty unpunished and killing innocents does nothing to help a cause. It jsut makes the world a meaner, less humane place. Funny huamne derives from human and it is humans who are the least humane of all animals.

    1. Re:We citizens reap what our leaders sow by cHALiTO · · Score: 0

      If we as a nation, continue to support land theft, assasination and torture in throughout the world in order to maintain our empire (Chile, Vietnam, Agentina, Iran, Israel, and many more: Ask Kissinger/Bush Sr./Rumsfeld for details)

      I hope you're talking about the military repression back in the 70's.


      --
      "Luck is my middle name," said Rincewind, indistinctly. "Mind you, my first name is Bad." -- Terry Pratchett
    2. Re:We citizens reap what our leaders sow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > If we as a nation, continue to support land theft, assasination and torture in throughout
      > the world in order to maintain our empire [...] then we must expect retribution will
      > at least be attempted.

      you are so right. violence creates violence.

      it's sad that it always hits the innocent though.

    3. Re:We citizens reap what our leaders sow by Zoop · · Score: 1

      Man's inhumanity to man, yes.

      But come on, imperialism? Please go see a real empire (try ranting anti-Chinese stuff in Tibet, then rant anti-American slogans in Vietnam and see which one gets you arrested).

      No, we are hit because a) we're big, and you make your name by smiting the big boy and then running away quickly and b) we matter, in which we introduce dangerous (to religious bigots and petty tyrants) ideas such as free trade and the free flow of ideas. And yes, even with its problems, Israel is still more free than any of its neighbors--even if you're a Palestinian.

    4. Re:We citizens reap what our leaders sow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "And yes, even with its problems, Israel is still more free than any of its neighbors--even if you're a Palestinian."

      It's this last point, that shows where you're coming from. "Even with its problems" - quite an understatement. I don't think you realize the tragedy that is taking place daily there, and the inhumane practices the Israelis subjected the Palestinians to, even before the war. I just wonder *what* exactly Isreal's neighbors could have done that's worse...

      As America defends and funds Isreal, well they've got to be the good guys, right?

      If Saddam Hussein is the ultimate evil, then what was America doing funding him? And if Bin Laden is the new ultimate evil, what was America doing funding him? Neither of these are debated points, no one's denying America's early involvement with these two bastards. So you have to ask yourself the question: what other bastards are Americans backing for our interests?

    5. Re:We citizens reap what our leaders sow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a life on this free trade thing.
      The USA supports free trade where it dominates.

      Cut the nationalistic pride, the USA put sadam in power, the USA put pinochet in power.

      The USA supported/supports the taliban.
      The USA supports pakistan.

      Find me a fascist dictator and I bet you will find an american advisor.

      This is karma, you reap what you sow.

    6. Re:We citizens reap what our leaders sow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >The USA supported/supports the taliban

      How so? I might be missing something, but as far as I know only Saudi Arabia, Palestine and the United Arab Emerites recognize the Taliban as the legel government.

  228. Retaliation/Retribution will not work by dada21 · · Score: 2

    Click on 09-11-2001

    I don't believe fighting back will work. History has proven that the big country can not fight guerilla warfare battles and succeed. One reason we won our fight against England 250 years ago is because WE were the terrorists.

    I say get out of funding wars (on one side, or on both sides) and bring peace back to American soil.

  229. BRITAIN IS NOT SHUTTING DOWN! by nagora · · Score: 2
    London is open and fairly unconcerned (although appalled); US and financial institutions are on alert or closed but they make up a very small part of the population.

    TWW

    --
    "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
  230. Serious questions for anyone who's been in the WTC by ergo98 · · Score: 2

    1) How long does it take to evacuate one? Presume it's by stairs on the first one given that the elevators were likely blown out of service immediately.


    2) Would they have evacuated the first hit building immediately? This sounds absurd but often people seem to have a "whatever" attitude, so I wonder if anyone from there knows if an evacuation started immediately.


    3) Would they have simultaneously evacuated the second building? Don't they share a common section at the bottom?


    My questions are because I'm unwilling to think that 40,000 people in the building = 40,000 deaths. There was a good period of time between the first plane hitting and the second hitting, and then a period of time before the buildings collapsed. It is my hope that many survived and made it out.

  231. Bombings at the Pentagon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rompress is reporting that two bombs went off at the pentagon at 14:30 GMT.

    Israel is taking out its representatives from the US.

    Shady sources are pointing at the Japanese the Red Army, who allegedly alledge that they were responsible.

  232. I can't stop crying... thank you slashdot by NickV · · Score: 1

    I can't stop crying....

    A complete heartfelt thanks to Slashdot for providign better coverage than any other news site. I was at first appalled by Taco's non-chlant first news post of this tragedy, but I guess nobody knew the scope of it.

    Now that people do, /. has performed admirably, and I am thankful to all of you, and all the comments for helping us survive this horrific tragedy.

    Hemos is right... things WILL NEVER be the same again.

    1. Re:I can't stop crying... thank you slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good coverage? I mean, its been completely piece meal and littered with total misinformation. Granted, you can get to it but I would hardly consider it great. If you are at a computer with inet access i can't believe you haven't got a tv or radio available to get some better coverage. At least you wouldn't have to weed through all the trolls then.

  233. Re:better sources by grammar+nazi · · Score: 2
    What you say, marcop, is very interesting.

    On another very interesting note, (I live in NYC, work on Wall St, was evacuated after the first tower collapsed), of the major media channels in the city, television, telephone, cel phone, the only one that still currently works is my internet connection.

    However, websites as you mentioned, are still going down. These internet sites are going down based *NOT* on geographic location, rather on content of the incident. The other media channels are going down due to geographic their location.

    I'm either babbling or it's an interesting sidenote.

    Anyways, I'm off to go give blood. IF you live in NYC or in the USA, please GIVE BLOOD TODAY!!!!!

    GIVE BLOOD

    GIVE BLOOD

    Somebody's life may depend upon it.

    --

    Keeping /. free of grammatical errors for ~5 years.
  234. No - turban recognition by gruntvald · · Score: 0, Troll

    That would do it.

  235. Nuclear War by FortKnox · · Score: 2

    You know what's scary? This is one of those rare, rare times when the government can use nuclear weapons on a country (that is found responsible), and the majority (day I say all?) of the US will completely back it.

    We need justice, but I hope you understand conventional warfare can provide justice just as much as nuclear war. Nukes are a scary thing...

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    1. Re:Nuclear War by stikves · · Score: 2
      Actually frech news site AFP says that a japanese terrorist group, called "Red Army" has claimed that they have done this as a conter to the nuclear attacks which are infameous.


      The site is down. Even the google cache does not work. So I cannot add any more details. Anyway Filistin, Usame bin Ladin or Japanese, this even is NO GOOD!

    2. Re:Nuclear War by SledgeHammerSeb · · Score: 1

      Okay, let's not panic. Please remember that nukes are strategic weapons. We need them because others have them. If we do use them, then their mission has failed. Besides, we can kick some serious butt with our well trained troops and conventional weapons.

    3. Re:Nuclear War by FortKnox · · Score: 1

      No, the message is clear. This was a terroristic strike to show the terrorists have power over the US by striking at a non-military target that affects *THOUSANDS* of innocent people, and destroys world-wide financial institutions.

      If it was this "Red Army", I suspect they would of attacked a military base that house nuclear weapons, or some nuclear manufacturer. We, also, would of recieved a video shortly after the strike announcing their reasoning.

      The only thing puzzling was why they went after the pentagon, other than to put the military in disarray. I believe the Pittsburgh airliner that went down was also going to hit the pentagon. Nothing in Pittsburgh would have the impact like the pentagon and WTC towers.

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    4. Re:Nuclear War by cybrpnk · · Score: 2

      You are absolutely right and it is very scary. I personally think there are better than even odds at this point about at least one nuke getting used just to emphasize the point that if America gets hit like this, we are going to pull out ALL the stops.

    5. Re:Nuclear War by InadequateCamel · · Score: 1

      One nuke by the US translates into countless retaliatory attacks from at least one group/country, not to mention their "friends" who could care less about the US. A nuke will kill tens of thousands of innocent people, no matter which country they live in, not to mention international outrage and repercussions. Remember, just because Bin Laden is from Afghanistan, that doesn't mean everyone in Afghanistan is a crazy religious zealot.

    6. Re:Nuclear War by ronys · · Score: 1

      Yes, but a _country_ is not responsible here, apparently. How do you use nukes against a loose, dispersed organization?

      --
      Ubi dubium ibi libertas: Where there is doubt, there is freedom.
    7. Re:Nuclear War by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "nukes are strategic weapons"

      This is true. However, the Field Artillery's 155mm howitzers can deliver 155mm tactical nuclear shells. I dunno what the yield is.

  236. In the immortal words of Theodore Roosevelt by Hangtime · · Score: 1

    Walk softly but carry a big stick...the time has come to bust out the stick.

  237. inappropriate by nahdude812 · · Score: 1

    creative, but not appropriate, sorry man, if I could, I'd mod you down.

    1. Re:inappropriate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is this inappropriate? They are emergency numbers and should presumably be distributed as widely as possible in order that those who need them are aware of what they are.

      Given that alot of slashdotters are in the valley it seems reasonable they are close friends/family members of people who may have been on those flights. As long as dumbfucks who know no one don't call and clog up the lines his post (while it may be karma hoaring) is a valuable service

    2. Re:inappropriate by fiziko · · Score: 1

      Why is this inappropriate? They are emergency numbers and should presumably be distributed as widely as possible in order that those who need them are aware of what they are.

      That was the person who started this thread. The person you responded to is talking about the insensitive nimrod who decided it would be funny to post a joke combining today's tragedy with "All your base are belong to us."

      --
      - W. Blaine Dowler
      http://www.bureau42.com
    3. Re:inappropriate by nahdude812 · · Score: 1

      See the comment by fiziko that is also a reply to yours. Cheers to the guy who's making information available, but jeers to the one who makes fun of the situation.

  238. So much for missile defense by Tokens · · Score: 1

    Maybe Bush can try to kill the terrorists with his latest toy: the missile defense system...

    1. Re:So much for missile defense by wbav · · Score: 1

      It is fairly clear, that there is no way for someone who will trade their life for others can be stopped. If they are willing to trade their life, what can you bargin with? And shooting down planes, when their is a hope, no matter how small, of rescuing the passangers, would make us no better.

      --

      =================
      Unix is very user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are.
  239. WAR! by Louis+Savain · · Score: 2

    I pray that I am wrong but I see a major war between the Western Christian world (mainly U.S. and Europe) and the Muslim world (especially the Arab world) in the not too distant future. The hatred between these two major groups have moved to unprecedented levels. I also see a complete destruction of the Muslim world. I don't think the people who did this realize the magnitude of the military and economic power of the Western world. Neither Jihad nor Mohammed will protect them from what's coming.

    Sorry for sounding so pessimistic. I am normally an optimist but this is the two-by-four between the eyes that will bring the wrath and fury of a really pissed off giant.

    1. Re:WAR! by nagora · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Hate to tell you this, but much of Europe has out-grown Christianity and the tooth fairy. If you want to start a religious war don't drag us into it. Religion is the cause of this crime, not the solution.

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    2. Re:WAR! by Mr.Phil · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Religion is NOT the cause of this crime. The criminals that did this have TWISTED thier religion to pretend that this is a Holy War.

      Islam, at it's heart, is about peace. The killing of innocents is abhorent to Allah (God).

    3. Re:WAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Religion" is simply a tool of control that the powerful elite use to suppress and control their minions. The zealotry of Christians, Islamics, Judaists, etc is simply an offshoot of the immaturity of modern man. Humanity needs to shuck the chains of mythology and fear that fuels hatred and terrorism. We need to evolve beyond religion.

    4. Re:WAR! by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1
      Religion is NOT the cause of this crime.

      I would think, though, it's a contributing factor. Islam does provide the concept of a holy war, and like many religions it has a strong measure of intolerance in it. (See: "I'm a jeleaous god")

      You can be islamic and be a peaceful man, you can read the bibel, the tora and the koran, and extract a message of peace from it, that's certainly true. (And makes you a lot more sympathical than those who don't.)

      However forcing your beliefs on others, intolerance and hatred - those ideas are a core part of many faiths. There are many stories of genocide justified in the bible. - So I don't think it's fair to say religion is blameless.

      I applaud your attempt to interpret your religion in a peaceful way, though - and I hope some day that will be the way in which the vast majority of people do it.

    5. Re:WAR! by Autumnmist · · Score: 1

      Not all Muslims or Arabs are fanatical terrorists. I'll bet you there were Muslims killed along with Christians, Jews, and aethiests in the attacks; we can't choose to blame a group of people because of the acts of a small number of them. The US has been responsible for many injustices against its minorities, but we don't blame all Americans.

      On a side note, I remember back in 1993 when the WTC was bombed (I was only in elementary school at the time), Channel 2 was the only one broadcasting (from the Empire State Building) because everyone else was on the Twin Towers. Eight years later, the Twin Towers no longer even exist, and Channel 2 is STILL the only one left broadcasting. You would have thought that the other channels would have learned about redundancy and backup antennas by now!

      Today, in my high school, one of my classmates remarked, "Hey, look the Internet is actually still up!" What a bittersweet triumph for the Internet; it can definitely be said now that even if NYC, most television and radio stations in the tri-state area, and Washington are out of the picture, news will still get out via the many nodes of the net. Of course, we already knew that, but still...

      History in the making... I think I'm gonna be investing in some Lockheed Martin/Boeing right about now. Who else forsees an increased military budget and more contracts?

      --
      --- "Many of the truths we cling to depend greatly on our own point of view." ~ Ben Kenobi, 'Return of the Jedi'
    6. Re:WAR! by zwerf · · Score: 1

      Why do you assume that the perpetrators of this incident are Muslims? There is nothing at this stage to suggest this.

      Let's not jump to conclusions. Hopefully, time will reveal their true identity.

      --
      This .sig down for maintenance.
    7. Re:WAR! by bcboy · · Score: 1

      > Religion is NOT the cause of this crime.

      If (a very big "if") it was carried out by Islamic fundamentalists, then religion IS one of the causes. Fairy tales about an "afterlife" do motivate people to commit horrible crimes that they otherwise wouldn't consider.

      Of course, there are crimes that might be committed by an atheist that someone with religion wouldn't consider. But my point is belief systems do affect actions, and in this case it may be that religion was a cause.

    8. Re:WAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...TWISTED thier religion..."

      Yes, but without religion, this would not have happened. Colombian drug lords would never do something like this. Why? Because they have sanity. They are after money, their conflict is not religious. Someone who acts in self interest would never do something like this. That religion could be twisted in such a way is itself scary. Whether it is "twisted" religion or simply religion, it is still religion.

    9. Re:WAR! by hanwen · · Score: 1
      "...TWISTED thier religion..."




      Yes, but without religion, this would not have happened.



      Oh, get real. Nutcases are everywhere, religion is everywhere. Stomping religion out doesn't solve anything. One stupid motivation will be replaced by another. Hitler's anti-semitism was not predominantly religious, for example.

      --

      Han-Wen Nienhuys -- LilyPond

  240. world trade web cam by macsox · · Score: 1

    ...was at http://iserve.wtca.org/view.html -- not sure when if it was served from the tower -- if not it may have an interesting final image that was uploaded, like the stopped watches from hiroshima. i'm on dialup -- any broadbanders able to connect to it?

  241. Well spoken by Ripat · · Score: 1

    Well spoken!

    As some one else here said: "the world you live in is full of hate dont add to it"

  242. Re:I hope... by Big+Fun · · Score: 1

    And I thought this might bring americans together. This is honestly sad that yall are having a flame was at a time like this.

    --
    Lemonade Rocks.
  243. Awaken and enraged by wbav · · Score: 1

    I feel that whoever did this has awaken and enraged the American people. I can see a real backlash from this, where people will want to hurt others as they have been hurt. However, we must remember not to hurt innocent people, just becuase how they act or what we think of them. I ask all of you, think before you act.

    --

    =================
    Unix is very user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are.
  244. damn straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All countries in the world will be flying their flags at half mast for the next year or they will bow down under America's iron heel.

    This is it you chowderheads. We're taking off the gloves and we're in the driver's seat from now on. This is the beginning of a new world order.

  245. the hell it won't by ArchieBunker · · Score: 0

    Its time to carpet bomb all those towelheads in the middle east. Anyone remember what happened to japan after pearl harbor? Bush should do the same.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  246. Other news sources by hearingaid · · Score: 2

    Salon is still up. Also, so is The Toronto Star, the largest-circulation paper in Canada. Salon's newswire listings are flooding with coverage.

    --

    my old sig used to be funny, but then slashcode ate it and now it's not funny anymore

  247. Look to the slightly farther future by The+Original+Atrox · · Score: 1

    For a time now the government has been pushing to regulate internet comunicaitons. One of the arguments arizeing from this ordeal is that no one knew it was comming. There was a complete information loss in our government. They were in the dark. I can see the ramifications for regulation that will no doubt come of this. The government is going to push for regulation of internet comunications. That includes encrypted communications. There will be a loss of freedom here in cyberspace as we know it. The government is going to mandate its own jurisdiction in cyberspace. Brace youselves members of the cyber world.

    -The Orginal Atrox
    -Security is mostly superstition. It does not exist in nature. -Hellen Keller

    --
    -Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master.
  248. Re:I hope... by b0r1s · · Score: 1

    all the things you bitch about on /. seem like nothing every day, today they seem like less than nothing ...

    --
    Mooniacs for iOS and Android
  249. Just announced State of Emergency: DC and VA by GMontag · · Score: 3, Informative

    Latest from WTPOP-FM Washington, DC/Manassas, VA

    Mayor Williams of DC has just declaired state of emergency in DC. DC Government closed.

    VA Governor declairs State of Emergency.

    Camp David airplane crash report is false.

    Regan National Airport to remain closed until at least 1100 12 Sep 2001

    Massive gridlock leaving DC, similar to the first flake of snow day in this area (locals will know what I mean).

    Reminders that low flying aircraft around Dulles and National Airports are US MILITARY aircraft, NOT foreign.

    Reminders to stay off the phone.

  250. Join the Army by ColtCougar · · Score: 0

    I am an American. I look forward to going to war, because someone has to protect all those that can't, and won't fight. I am a 30 year old male in the National Guard with many years active duty...I love being a system admin, but I am a soldier first.

    We need to deploy to every country that has terrorist activities and capture and/or kill them, period.

    -There are only men who are soldiers, and men who wish they were.

    --
    -There are only soldiers, and men who wish they were soldiers.
  251. Retaliation won't do bugger-all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last time US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania were hit, US retaliated witha missile strike against Sudan and Afghanistan. Result? Destroyed aspirin factory that was the only source of medicine in southern Sudan, built by Brits and Germans. In Afghanistan, they destroyed an *abandoned* training camp, formerly used by Taleban during Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. Everybody laughed (especially those cunts who planted the bombs) at the Yanks firing their Tomahawks like someone throwing their fists around blindly, having been sprayed with Mace!

    BTW, you do realise that the very Taleban that you're all talking about has been in fact organised and armed/trained by the US military during the Reagan and early Bush administration. For fuck's sake, CIA had a permanent post in Pakistan near Afghanistan border where Taleban was launching attacks on the Soviets! Read some history, then shoot your stupid mouth.1

    1. Re:Retaliation won't do bugger-all by gimple · · Score: 1

      I will remind you that the above was under Clintons watch.

    2. Re:Retaliation won't do bugger-all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stupid prick...

      Haven't you ever heard of erasing a mistake?

    3. Re:Retaliation won't do bugger-all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      GO FUCK yourself.

      Retaliation WILL work if there's nothing left of the country.

      Go eat shit, you goddamn pussy british asswipe. There's a REASON you lost the war. Just thank god we were there for you in WWII.

    4. Re:Retaliation won't do bugger-all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah? Go fuck yourself with one of those guns you love so much, you yankee cunt. And do the world a favour.. I hear pulling the trigger when it scratches a gspot enhances the experience. Thank god you were here? You fucks would have let the Nazis roam free in Europe, and tolerated genocide along the way. Who the fuck had the balls then, eh?

  252. MEMEPOOL found this... by wdavies · · Score: 1

    Memepool spotted this link -- The pilot of the short lived
    The Lonegunmen had a plot to fly a plane into the WTC...

    Mind you so did Tom Clancy.

    In complete shock at these events.

    Winton

    1. Re:MEMEPOOL found this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And apparently an actual plan to carry out a similar attack was thwarted by US Intelligence agencies a few years ago.

  253. Real Flight Information by ZxCv · · Score: 3, Informative

    The flights that crashed into the WTC towers were both American flights. Straight from a story on Boston.com, there's a breakdown on the known plane crashes:

    -American Flight 11
    Boston to Los Angeles
    A Boeing 767 with 81 passengers, nine flight attendants, and two pilots aboard crashed into the World Trade Center.

    -American Flight 77
    Washington-Dulles to Los Angeles
    A Boeing 757 with 58 passengers, four flight attendants and two pilots crashed into the World Trade Center.

    -United Flight 93
    Newark, N.J. to San Francisco
    A Boeing 757 with 38 passengers, two pilots and five flight attendants crashed southeast of Pittsburgh.

    -United Flight 175
    Boston to Los Angeles
    A Boeing 767 with 56 passengers, two pilots and seven flight attendants crashed, but United won't say where

    --

    Perl - $Just @when->$you ${thought} s/yn/tax/ &couldn\'t %get $worse;
    1. Re:Real Flight Information by Telecommando · · Score: 1

      United Flight 175
      Boston to Los Angeles
      A Boeing 767 with 56 passengers, two pilots and seven flight attendants crashed, but United won't say where


      Word is it crashed near Denver, no survivors. May not be related to the others.

      --
      Beta sux! Join the Slashcott! http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4760465&cid=46173047
  254. Re:I hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...retart"?

  255. The Prez and his message! by sdelic · · Score: 1

    Just an investigation? Just hunting down the people involved?!

    Is it just me or does this warrant a huge action against countries that harbor these terrorists worldwide?!

    We've been at peace for many years and while I hate war I find myself sitting here this morning thinking and thinking alot.

    If the U.S. doesn't hit back with a vengence that will send fear into those whom oppose the existance of American lives I think this stuff will just become more and more frequent.

    I could be wrong but I think we have been to soft towards these countries and need to take care of this problem as a whole or we will suffer down the road with more attacks of this nature.

  256. Working realplayer link by Arcturax · · Score: 1

    This link has been working all day

    http://mfile.akamai.com/95/live/reflector:20305. ra m?bkup=20307

    Maybe redundant but its another link to try if none others are working.

    --

    --Won't that be grand? Computers and the programs will start thinking and the people will stop. - Dr. Walter Gibbs
  257. Re:I hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Neutrality doesnt work!
    I believe we left everyone alone before world war II and look what happened, we have to be involved in the world we live in...

  258. It was under renovation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From what I heard on northwest cable news, that section was just finished being renovated, and some of the offices were vacant or were just being reoccupied. Of course, there were still casualties, but it could've been worse.

  259. I'm with you...after all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    every time an abortion doctor is shot and killed, most CLEAR HEADED people don't blame the entire Christian populace...only irrational angry reactionists do that.

  260. This probably was a Palestinian attack.... by Chris-en-topper · · Score: 1

    "We don't even know who did it yet. I'm already seeing anti Middle Eastern sentiments popping up around me. It makes me sick. "

    I realize info isn't getting around very quick, but from what I undestand the DFLP has indeed claimed responsibility for this act. Regardless of whether that claim is authentic, this has all the key features of a Middle Eatern-style terrorist attack. The people involved in the plotting and execution clearly had prior competence and knowledge of how to properly hijack a plane, the operatives had to be well-trained and well-organized, the operatives had no problem dying themselves in the course of the attack. And the same target has been hit by Middle Eastern terrorists before, back in 1993.

    1. Re:This probably was a Palestinian attack.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DFLP's leader has denied responsibility, which probably means they didn't do it.

  261. Re:It's not a pentagon anymore... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stupid terrorists breached the pentagram, thereby letting Hastur (?) out. Now they'll learn what real terror is.

  262. It's all about the eleven's (11) by vt0asta · · Score: 2, Funny

    "American" Airlines Flight "11"

    Today is September 11th

    What did the two towers look like?

    --
    No.
    1. Re:It's all about the eleven's (11) by geekoid · · Score: 2

      are you saying were being attacked by 2 face?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  263. Re:Nuke the bastards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The bastards, that's who!

  264. Re:Please Americans, think two times... by dirtyhippie · · Score: 0, Troll

    Wouldn't it be nice if we even could do anything about it. But that's how democracy works, we've given Bush the right to control our military for the next 4 years, and he will do with it as he sees fit. I think I am probably the only american who isn't concerned with striking back immediately.

  265. CNN alternate page by precize · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://robots.cnn.com...it's mostly text and hasn't been overloaded yet.

  266. Thats the most stupid and dangerous idea today by Ripat · · Score: 1

    Thats the most stupid and dangerous idea I've heard today.

    Both extremes are equaly wrong, the only solution is to find the middle way.

    Your way won't work, and neither will it do to just sit around, and wait for another attack.

    1. Re:Thats the most stupid and dangerous idea today by mesocyclone · · Score: 2
      What works in war is to wage war. Anyone who feels that this attack is short of war is a fool. It is now time to stop the practice of government sponsored terrorism. Perhaps you can suggest how to do that without extreme means. Perhaps you will mail some flowers to the Taliban in hopes that they will see the world your way!


      The US has tried many things to answer terrorism. It is time to give up on the judicial approach and use more effective assets and send a stronger message.


      These attacks are supported by governments - even if they are not exactly in the line of planning (the Afghans, for example, have already demonstrated their knowledge of "plausable deniability). With the growing sophistication of terror devices, and the mounting death toll, the free nations of the world must treat sponsorship of terrorism as equivalent to acts of war.


      The US probably lost more citizens in this attack than in the Pearl Harbor attack, and these citizens were civilians of a free and generous society. We will respond. We can only hope that those other free countries, such as France and Germany, which have been happy to trade with terrorist countries, will join us.

      --

      The only good weather is bad weather.

    2. Re:Thats the most stupid and dangerous idea today by Ripat · · Score: 2

      Hmm... yes... sometimes war is what is required, like WWII. Sometimes one must make a stand and fight.

      But one must also take into account what can be acieved with war. War with the only goal of venegance is pointless, it will certainly not stop more terrorist attacks in the future.

      If there was a clear target, open war *might* have been a needed action.

      Before it is known who carried out these attacks it's far to early to even consider war. It would lead to nothing more than enormously more destruction, on both sides.

    3. Re:Thats the most stupid and dangerous idea today by xmedar · · Score: 1

      The US has tried many things to answer terrorism.

      Very true, American politicians have for years let the IRA raise money in the US through well known groups to fund atrocities over here in the UK, tho I am sad to see the murder of so many innocent people maybe the US will at last stop allowing American citizens to openly support terrorism in my country.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced man is indistinguishable from God
    4. Re:Thats the most stupid and dangerous idea today by mesocyclone · · Score: 2
      Because we have a legal process here that is founded on our written constitution, the power of the government to stop such organizations as NORAID is limited. You can be sure that few politicians support the funding of the IRA. Too many Americans are uninformed about the true use of the funds they donate. It is also true that some of the groups that fund terror against Americans get funding in the US. We are not funding a war against you any more than we are funding a war aginst us!


      There is no comparison between a free society where bad guys raise money and government sponsored terrorism.

      --

      The only good weather is bad weather.

    5. Re:Thats the most stupid and dangerous idea today by xmedar · · Score: 1

      Sorry but thats not true, the US recently outlawed fundraising for groups that support the Real IRA which is basically a bunch of IRA members that no longer report to the Provisional IRA heirachy they are the ones still bombing us in London, if they can ban fundraising for a group not under there "appoved" bunch of terrorists then they could have banned the fundraising for the Provisional IRA long ago, the US has been giving tacit approval for the Provisionals for years as the US politicals want the votes of Irish Americans, I'm sorry that the hypocracy of your politicains has come home to roost in such a terrible way on your population, I hope more Americans will now realise what you have created, remember the IRA members detained in South America recently, terrorism is global and they share information, they have done for a long time, going back to WWII the Irish gave some tacit support to Hitler including intelligence, as Irishmen could blend into British society even tho they were supposed to be neutral, and they all share supporters like Gaddafi, by allowing the support of violence in our country your "leaders" have helped bring about the current catastrophy, maybe you need to start asking your leaders some serious questions before its too late.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced man is indistinguishable from God
    6. Re:Thats the most stupid and dangerous idea today by mesocyclone · · Score: 2
      I'm sorry but you are also misconstruing things. I suspect some politicians (Ted Kennedy for example) want to look the other way, but the US government in general certainly is against the IRA and does not approve of the funding.


      Please recognize the distinction: we do not support terrorists. We cannot, however, prevent our people from doing so unless certain legal findings have been made... and those people can sue in court to make sure this isn't done arbitrarily.


      The US has tried to stop the IRA, we share critical intelligence with Britain.


      We have just taken a monstrous attack, and I am offended that you can equate this to the silliness of those misguided americans who send money to causes they don't understand. But to imply that the US gave tacit approval to the Provos is a slur on the US government and is simply not true.

      --

      The only good weather is bad weather.

    7. Re:Thats the most stupid and dangerous idea today by xmedar · · Score: 1

      We cannot, however, prevent our people from doing so unless certain legal findings have been made..

      Where were the legal findings about the groups supporting the Real IRA, I have seen none, they were made a proscribed terrorist group by the administratio nover there, something that never happened with the Provos, again I'd like to stress that its all the same really, terrorism is terrorism, oh and no one seems to have mentioned yet that the weapons that were being tested by the IRA members in the jungles cntrolled by FARC were FUEL bombs, testing there distructive capacity, hows that for a coincidence? Like I said before terrosism is global, groups exchange information and training, and those that have and continue to support terrorism in Northern Ireland, of any political or relegous persuasion are indirectly helping ALL terrorist activity including this horrible act, I know that the truth is unpalatable, to many but its there, and you should be offended that this has been allowed to continue for so long, I again hope that you will ensure that your politicians now take the steps necessary to help us all build a peaceful and secure world for us and for our children.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced man is indistinguishable from God
  267. Re:I hope... by wheniwasjust · · Score: 1

    coflow said "It could be time for us to stoop to their level and kill innocent people"

    You already do.
    Your government and mine both support the Israeli government, who torture dissedents and kill children DAILY in the West Bank. Wake up. They are the ones retaliating.
    Read a newspaper or two before ya spew

  268. NYC Blood Donor Info--PLEASE MOD UP by remande · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I got these in a search for NYC blood banks and centers via www.bigyellow.com. I cannot confirm that these are blood donor centers, nor can I contact the Red Cross 800 number (both the phone line and the Web page are slashdotted).

    If you are in NYC and looking to donate blood, I would consider physically going to the site rather than using the phone. I am not in the city; those there should decide for themselves whether the transportation system or the phone lines are clogged up worse.

    American Red Cross - Family Respite Center
    4 East 28th Street, New York, NY 10016
    (212) 213-0755

    American Red Cross
    150 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY 10023
    (212) 580-2821

    International Committee of the Red Cross
    801 2nd Avenue, New York, NY 10017
    (212) 599-6021

    International Federation of Red Cross
    800 2nd Avenue, New York, NY 10017
    (212) 338-0161


    Also, if you are in the NYC area, consider seeing if these Red Cross chapters or anyone providing relief efforts to see if they need unskilled volunteers--setting up tents, manning the food lines, etc. See your local place of worship, regardless of your religious persuasions--many of them may be providing relief efforts.

    --

    --The basis of all love is respect

  269. Re:PENTAGON != COLLAPSED INTO A HOLE! Stay off pho by wik · · Score: 1

    NPR reported that this section of the pentagon was recently renovated and many people had not yet moved back into their offices.

    --
    / \
    \ / ASCII ribbon campaign for peace
    x
    / \
  270. FBI Websites Document Evidence Against Bin Laden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://usinfo.state.gov/topical/pol/terror/9912950

  271. The End of the Innocence. by whizzmo · · Score: 1

    Perhaps this is the "December 7th" for our generation.

    I hate to say it, but this will probably lead to more infringement on the privacy of US citizens.

    I think it's time for a little Don Henley, all of a sudden.

    --
    nuclear presidential echelon assassination encryption virulent strain
    Whizzmo
  272. NYC casualties == Vietnam casualties by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Just to put in perspective the enormous magnitude of these terrible, terrible events, the number of US casualties during the entire Vietnam conflict was 58,193, and I hear the WTC casualties could be easily 50k+. That in only a single morning.

    Very much in shock.

  273. Re:I hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is an act of war against the United States. To say that violence doesn't solve anything is incorrect. Peace did not stop Hitler; peace did not stop the Axis Powers. If viable proof of guilt of Osama bin Laden is brought forth, and the Taliban refuses to turn him over to the United States, then they are an accomplice to an act of war and should be dealt with appropriately. Given the magnitude of the actions taken today, and the loss of life, I can honestly say I would not have any problem whatsoever with a full military response using whatever means neccessary to ensure that the same individuals responsible for this are unable to ever cause anything like this ever again. This is a war involving American citizens. There must be a message sent to the world that terrorist actions against the United States will be met with such an incredible and unimaginably horrific response, than no one sane, fanatical, insane, or otherwise would even conceive of the idea. As for the Palastinian people cheering, I now have no pity for them when Israeli tanks bulldoze their homes and obliterate their towns. And I would support any military action to protect Israel from any attacks from other Arab nations while they eliminate the terrorist elements in the area. To cheer in favor of terrorist actions is to align yourself with the perpetrators. This is the real thing. Thousands of people have died, thousands are wounded. It is time to obliterate those who would cause this to happen using every means at our disposal, including the most destructive and horrific weapons ever developed by man. If some civilians die along the way, they are unfortunate casualties of war.

  274. Why can't they make armored cockpits? by MongooseCN · · Score: 2

    If the terrorists can't get into the cockpit, they can't steer the plane to where they want.

    1. Re:Why can't they make armored cockpits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are already armored!

    2. Re:Why can't they make armored cockpits? by ConsumedByTV · · Score: 2

      Perhaps it would help if it wasnt someone that was allowed to be in the cockpit (ie pilot stewart etc)

      --


      "Not my manner of thinking but the manner of thinking of others has been the source of my unhappiness." - M
  275. Anyone seen th pictures of the paleo's celebrating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For all that Sadat expresses his "sorrow" there sure are a lot of PLO members doing the Lindy Hop.Go ahead and dance in the streets. As you sow so shall you reap.

  276. YUO = FAG0T by ebbv · · Score: 1


    they don't even know who it is yet you jackass! how can they plan a retaliation, let alone be carrying it out?!

    you know your hole? the one you put pie in? SHUT IT!
    ...dave

    --

    Think different? I'd be happy if most people would just think...
  277. Re:Nostradamus by K_Bomb · · Score: 0

    but you have to admit, the two brothers could be interpreted as the WTC, and the great fortress could be either the Pentagon or the White House...

    the great leader(probly GWB) has yet to succumb and the big city(NYC??) is not yet burning, but it could still happen, you never know...

    i think this is all too F*cked up to be coincidence, but im still just a little scared at what else could happen in the next little while should they find out who orchestrated this attack

  278. Re:Airlines chosen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, I noticed it too. I suspect it was done on purpose, after all, this is about getting attention and delivering a message. I heard some comments on the radio about this being the largest attck on the US since Pearl Harbor. Well, I suspect the backlash from this will leave whoever did it thinking twice about pissing off America as a whole again.

  279. Baha'i Perspective by under_score · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "The well-being of mankind, its peace and security are unattainable unless and until its unity is firmly established." - Baha'u'llah "The winds of despair are, alas, blowing from every direction, and the strife that divides and afflicts the human race is daily increasing. The signs of impending convulsions and chaos can now be discerned, inasmuch as the prevailing order appears to be lamentably defective." - Baha'u'llah "The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." - Baha'u'llah Official Baha'i Web Site

    1. Re:Baha'i Perspective by Warthog9 · · Score: 1

      To be honest I wish I could get back home and get on my computer to get back in the the Baha'i chat channel on Dalnet (with service to the other major irc servers through our cross-over bots) and find out what the friends in there are saying, and to touch base with them. But it's wonderful to see this on slashdot. But yes, at this point the Baha'i stand point is going to be one of shock and dismay at the loss of life, LOTS of praying for them and their families (well the dead don't really need our help right now they are in better hands then what we can give them) but their families will be needing any kind of support that can be found. If any of the communities in the NY area need help with anything please give a shout out I know I for one am willing to do what I can. Our prayers are with them

    2. Re:Baha'i Perspective by pschmied · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing. I'm not a Baha'i (I think?), but if people embraced some of the very progressive, enlightened, and gentle philosophies of the Baha'i, I think that such horrors might be averted.

      Ofcourse, many of the same things could be said about many religions / philosophies.

      Cheers,
      Peter

    3. Re:Baha'i Perspective by rossdee · · Score: 1

      With Baha'is being everywhere in the world, its very likely that there will be some who will be casualties in this

      (The Baha'i Faith is the 2 most widespread religion in the world)

    4. Re:Baha'i Perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another Baha'i principle that is relevant to this situation is that religion should be a source of unity, peace, love, etc., and that is it becomes a source of emnity and strife, it is better NOT to HAVE IT at ALL.

      No one bother with any drivel about how Stalin or Hitler killed lots of people, and wasn't religious. In fact, Hitler was, and Communism, while not a religion, did involve the idea that they had an absolute truth that was more important that people's lives. That is the part of religion which is a problem anyway.

  280. vid caps of wtc collapse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a sad day http://scorpius.spaceports.com/~wtcdown/wtc-collap se.zip (660+ KB)

  281. Nuke the bastards. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Remove them from the face of the planet. That will fix it.

    Alexandria Virginia

    1. Re:Nuke the bastards. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We should target ALL who have treatened terrorist attacks. (Pardon my spelling.) Hussin, Ben Landen, Arafat, etc.

      They all MUST be destroyed. NO MORE!

      Pearl Harbor pales in comparison to this. Hiroshima should as well.

    2. Re:Nuke the bastards. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you. You (and the guy who modded you up) are the lone voices of reason on /.

  282. Re:Plea for peace (eat the murderer) by Kandrathe · · Score: 1

    "anyone recommend a better country to move to? i'm getting sick of this place.." I suggest palestine.

  283. Nah... by Gorimek · · Score: 2

    There are 15 million potential blood donors in the NY region, and all air traffic is down, so I unless you're in the area, extra blood donations probably won't make any difference.

    Also, in event like these, most people either die immediately or escape unharmed. I expect tens of thousands of dead, but not too many injuried.

    Of course, if there are new attacks, a good blood supply will be good.

    1. Re:Nah... by Exedore · · Score: 1

      All civillian air traffic is down. I'm sure National Guard or other military/government units would happily fly shipments of blood to NY.

      Also, I agree that the highest demand for blood is likely to occur shortly after a disaster, but that shouldn't prevent you from giving blood. What happens when someone in your town is in an auto accident, but no blood is available because the lion's share was flown to NY the previous day?
      --

      I take drugs seriously.

  284. I'm O-Negative by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 2

    I'm O-Negative, but they don't want my blood. Once, after bicycling to a blood drive, my liver was working too hard (probably removing the shit from the fat I'd just burned), and produced enzymes in my blood saying that it was working too hard. The Red Cross thinks I have Hepatitis, and they have banned me FOREVER from giving blood. Haven't they ever heard of experimental error?
    -russ

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  285. time for prayer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Despite slashdot being based around technology it is time for all of us to pray for those in this tragedy. Many of us are personally affected by this event.

  286. The Federal Reserve Banks by moojin · · Score: 1

    All 12 Federal Reserve Banks and their branches are open and although their security is at a high level it is business as usual. The NYC Federal Reserve Bank, which is a few blocks from the WTC, is still open, as is the bank in Washington D.C.

    --
    Why did I lurk so long before registering for a Slashdot account? I could have had a Slashdot ID of less than 100000.
  287. BLACK BOXES by SpookComix · · Score: 3, Interesting
    If we want to gather intelligence to at least point us in the right direction of the organization responsible--we need to at *least* recover the "black box" from the aircraft that went down in PA. Perhaps we could get something from the pilot, or other background noise, to explain what happend to that particular flight, and help us understand the other hijacked flights.

    --SC

    --
    You read fiction? I write it! Lemme know what you th
    1. Re:BLACK BOXES by Telecommando · · Score: 1

      Several news sources are reporting that a 911 call was made from the bathroom of the plane that went down in PA. The caller said they were being hijacked and that it was not a joke, then there was the sound of an explosion and the phone went dead.

      --
      Beta sux! Join the Slashcott! http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4760465&cid=46173047
    2. Re:BLACK BOXES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought you weren't meant to use cellphones in planes in case they cause a crash??

    3. Re:BLACK BOXES by passion · · Score: 2

      Don't they give off signals, so that they can be found at the bottom of the ocean, etc.? Any chance they'll be discovered at the bottom ot the pile of the WTC rubble?

      --
      - passion
    4. Re:BLACK BOXES by almightyjustin · · Score: 1

      Oh, yeah, you can recover a little black box from the giant pile of rubble of one of the tallest buildings in the world, after it collapsed on itself, after a jet crashed into it and exploded. That'll work.

      --

      Omnes arx vestrum sunt adiuncta nobis.

    5. Re:BLACK BOXES by SpookComix · · Score: 2
      Oh, yeah, you can recover a little black box from the giant pile of rubble of one of the tallest buildings in the world, after it collapsed on itself, after a jet crashed into it and exploded. That'll work.

      Exactly, dumbass, that's why I specifed that "we need to at *least* recover the "black box" from the aircraft that went down in PA."

      PA = Pennsylvania, if you didn't know.

      --SC

      --
      You read fiction? I write it! Lemme know what you th
    6. Re:BLACK BOXES by cyclist1200 · · Score: 1

      The signals that voice recorders and flight data recorders give off when they are submerged are sonic. There's almost no chance that, even if they could possibly have survived, they would be detectible in that manner.

    7. Re:BLACK BOXES by Howlett · · Score: 1

      "Black Box" is a bit of a misnomer. They are usualy orange and yellow so they can be found easier and are normally refferd to as the "Flight Data Recorder" and the "Cockpit Voice Recorder". But what do you really expect to learn from them in this case. The planes where hijacked, and then they where crashed on purpose. These things we already know. The "Black Boxes" are only really valuable to figure out WHY a plane crashed, and this we already know.

      H

    8. Re:BLACK BOXES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard that a congressional aide was on board the Pentagon plane and phoned in as it was being hijacked, but I also heard the story about the one in PA, I think from www.pittsburgh.com. It could be a recurring story or two similar stories.

    9. Re:BLACK BOXES by SpookComix · · Score: 2
      I understand that the "black boxes" aren't actually black. I also know that there are many of them, and that they are scattared throughout the plane. I also understand that they record many things, mostly about the actual operation of the craft.

      I also know, however, that cockpit conversation is recorded as well. That's what is most interesting to me. Anything the pilot might have said to leave a clue as to what exactly was happening, who was behind it, *where the PA plane was actually supposed to crash*, etc...this would all be great information to have.

      --SC

      --
      You read fiction? I write it! Lemme know what you th
    10. Re:BLACK BOXES by urtica · · Score: 1

      I heard a report that in one of the planes, a pilot had a microphone on when the hijacking took place. Flight control heard a voice saying "Don't do anything stupid" (in English - no report on any accent). And the microphone went off. Shortly afterwards the transponder for the plane went off. With an act this well planned it would not surprise me if the terrorist knew the location of black box recorders and destroyed them before crashing the plane if they wished to do so. Certainly the transponder going off is disturbing evidence that they knew something of the plane's equipment.

  288. "Claim and you are dead" doesn't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You propose:
    "If you claim responsibility, you are dead."
    This doesn't work.
    Best way for an enemy of an org. to take it
    out would be to pose as one of their people
    and claim responsiblity for WTC.

    I agree with utterly destroying those
    responsible.

  289. NYC Hospital Locations -- DONATE BLOOD!!! by autarkeia · · Score: 4, Informative

    You can find a listing here and good old MapQuest here.

    My boyfriend and I are going to Goveurnor's on the Lower East Side. You can also call 800.933.BLOOD (800.933.2566) for locations, but good luck getting through.

    Peace, everyone.

  290. Agreed.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe it was actually a representative from Pennsylvania. It disgusted me how he was using this horrible occasion to point fingers at whoever happened to be his political opponent. What scum.

  291. New perspective by slasho81 · · Score: 1

    So far, the US gov. pressured Israeli gov. not to act upon terrorist attacks. It all gets a new perspective when stuff blow up in NYC and Washington and not just in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem.

    1. Re:New perspective by nagora · · Score: 2
      You obviously have no idea how many more Palestinians have been killed by the Israelis this year that the other way 'round. I think the current ratio is about 10:1 (even after the suicide bombers). Of course, I suppose you think the various Palestinian office workers aren't as important as New York office workers?

      A new perspective indeed.

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    2. Re:New perspective by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 2
      I suppose you think the various Palestinian office workers aren't as important as New York office workers?

      No. But on the other hand, I don't recall ever hearing of New York office workers celebrating in the streets when Palestinians were killed...

    3. Re:New perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is absolutely right, fuckhead.

    4. Re:New perspective by duckyd · · Score: 1

      don't forget the fact that the US government has a nasty habit of pretending that everything Israel does is all well fine and dandy, and chooses to portray the Palestinians as the vilans - the real situation is much more complex than what the US gov gives lip service to.

    5. Re:New perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see.. and a policy of systematic destruction of the Palestinian Authority's infrastructure is just holding back, is it? The US government was putting pressure on the Palestinian Authority to clamp down on various terror groups, but how the hell is it supposed to do that without a police presence?

      Logic, as ever, remains Israel's friend.

    6. Re:New perspective by SailorBob · · Score: 1
      You obviously have no idea how many more Palestinians have been killed by the Israelis this year that the other way 'round. I think the current ratio is about 10:1 (even after the suicide bombers).

      The Palestine Red Cross lists the number of Arab dead at about 611 since September last year. About 180 Israeli's have been killed. The difference is that about 90% of the Arabs killed were engaged in acts of violence at the time of their death whereas 90% of the Israelis killed were randomly murdered civilians going about their daily business.

      --

      Woopty Doo Basil, what does it all mean?!

    7. Re:New perspective by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 2
      the real situation is much more complex than what the US gov gives lip service to.the real situation is much more complex than what the US gov gives lip service to.

      I have no trouble believing this. However, I reiterate the point that the US Government was hurt far less than a whole bunch of comparatively innocent office workers who, as I pointed out, don't generally take to the streets in celebration when Israel does something violent to Palestinians.

  292. Re:Bastards. by eastern · · Score: 1

    The Middle Eastern crazies are all muslims. The 8-armed godesss and the elephant god (seperate entities) are of the Hindus. The muslim crazies consider jews, hindus and americans their enemies. So the 8 armed and the elepjhant god are your enemy's enemies.

    You really won't be able to anything about any of this if you refuse to inform yourself, you know.

  293. Sen. Orin Hatch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    "The United States is in a state of war."

    "This is WAR."

  294. Re:Canadian border still open- Closed by Nos. · · Score: 2

    Canadian and Mexican borders are now being closed according to news sources (CBC, NBC). Some are still open, but will soon be closed to ALL ground traffic.

  295. A better solution... by nagora · · Score: 2
    Perhaps the US, instead of initiating another useless "investigation" (ie frame-up) like the Lockerbie trial, it should just stop interfering in other people's countries?

    I come from Northern Ireland and I can assure everyone here that the type of people that did this are the same sort of people that Americans have supported with fund-raising events for decades.

    This is a horror of a crime, but it was bound to happen. If you throw your weight around everywhere you have to accept that some day someone, good or evil, will object and in the latter case, they won't care too much about who gets in the way.

    --
    "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    1. Re:A better solution... by dvdeug · · Score: 2

      How long should Britian have waited before getting involved in WWI? Should they have let Germany conquer Russia, and murder every Jew and Slav west of France?

      When does it become our buisness? Apparently, the mere massacre of innocents does not concern us. Apparently neither does the murder of American citizens (the Lockerbie trail), nor attacks on American embassies, nor bombs on American soil (the earlier World Trade Center bombing.)

      When the US should get involved is a good question, but the answer is _not_ never. At the very least, the US has the obligation to protect American citizens, and respond to threats to them, especially on American soil.

    2. Re:A better solution... by nagora · · Score: 2
      When the US should get involved is a good question, but the answer is _not_ never.

      I agree. Unfortunately, the current answer seems to be "at the whiff of money". There is such a thing as getting involved to often, as well as too infrequently.

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
  296. Re:Plea for peace - Huh? Get Real! by beardcz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So what you are saying is that it is OK to harm Afghani or Sudanese women, children, and innocent civilians but it is not OK to harm innocent US civilians.

    Would I like to see your face when Bush determines that it was someone from (say) Dallas Texas and shoots a few cruise missiles into the town center to punish those responsible... Sure, there might be some collateral damage but THEY HAVE TO BE TAUGHT A LESSON!!!

    --
    No sig for me - too lazy to fill one in...
  297. :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No country could get away with attacking a civilian target. If it were a country they would be fighting the world. It is a radical who will be claiming responsibility soon. As will many others who aren't involved. I'd say religious motivation, probably islamic (no offense). Also, its odd how they hijacked the planes. Its almost impossible to get in the cockpits. Either you'd have to have the flight crew involved... Honestly I'm thinking what if the auto pilot...

    But enough speculation.

    This is a tragic day indeed.

  298. Said After pearl Harbor by KingKire64 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Washington Governor Arthur B. Langlie (1900-1966) made the following statement shortly the United States declared war:

    "Your state government is prepared and ready to perform every defense task which has or will be assigned to it. The State of Washington is on the frontier of a great war. We do not know what the future holds in store for us. We do not know what trials we must go through or what sacrifices we will be called upon to make. We do know what is at stake. We know that our country, our liberties and our very homes are threatened. We are individually and as a nation being called upon to make good our pledge of allegiance to flag and country" (Seattle Star).

    --
    "All I can tell the "lesser of two evils" folks is that if they keep voting for evil, they'll keep getting evil."-Lp.org
  299. Agreed by FreeUser · · Score: 2

    I will probably regret expressing this opinion once emotions have calmed down, but after watching circa 50k people die live on television I, at this moment, have to agree.

    This is war.

    We find whoever did this. We kill them. We kill their families. We kill their friends, and we kill their allies.

    If it turns out to be a domestic attack then the situation is more complicated, as protecting our democracy becomes paramount over revenge or even complete justice. However, if, as it appears, this was a foreign act (such as Bin Laden), then we should exterminate those who did this (such as his organization) as well as any and all who gave the enemy aid and comfort (e.g. hypothetically, if it was bin laden, Afghanistan most definitely, perhaps others as well).

    The only way to secure one against these kinds of attacks is to completely exterminate those who would commit them. This is most definetely war, and we have the means to put an end to this, perminently.

    We should do so.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    1. Re:Agreed by loudici · · Score: 1

      >The only way to secure one against these kinds of >attacks is to completely exterminate those who >would commit them. This is most definetely war, >and we have the means to put an end to this, >perminently.

      will you kill the one billion muslims?

      or only the few millions who believe anything american is satanical?

      but then don't you think the 900 and something millions muslims left would retaliate?

      --
      Dev elpizw tipota, dev phoboumai tipota eimai lephteros http://euclidian.org
    2. Re:Agreed by FreeUser · · Score: 2

      We kill as many as is needed to put an end to this kind of atrocity. If that means all of them, then so be it. I hope not, but this is war, and if it is us or them, I vote most emphatically that it be them.

      --
      The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  300. America is too nice! by h8macs · · Score: 1

    We have long been way to nice when it comes to disputes with other countries. We tolerate too much when it comes to terrorism. Our enemies with their Jihad issues an eye for an eye a tooth for a tooth. Let's adopt their ways, turn them into glass!

    --
    :-( --- argh. Despair, I owe again. :-b
    1. Re:America is too nice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give me a break. Get a clue, dude. The United States has been begging for this type of retaliation for years!

  301. interesting by British · · Score: 2

    In times of Emergency, churches and such are turned into makeshift hospitals,etc.

    Now on the internet I am seeing various un-slammed websites(fark,etc) are now turning into realtime newsites, etc as fast as they get the info on what's going on today.

    Intresting. Especially when ESPN is now reporting on the attacks.

  302. Thanks for the pics [EOM] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [eom]

  303. Special memorial service in SF by sulli · · Score: 2

    Presumably in many other areas as well. There is a special service at Grace Cathedral in San Francisco at noon PDT to mourn the victims and pray for peace. Also tomorrow at 6 pm.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  304. Re:I hope... by l33t+j03 · · Score: 0
    spork_testicle? Taco?

    Regardless, the hatred is mutual, and I don't even know who you are.

  305. Re:September 11th = 911 by swordboy · · Score: 1

    September is the 9th month... Just as I wrote this date earlier, I realized that the date was 911.

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
  306. Israel blocks foreign air traffic by slasho81 · · Score: 1

    Israel currently prevents any foreign air flights to enter its air space. All foreign traffic is directed to nearby airports.

  307. Re:I hope... by BigBir3d · · Score: 0

    world war one??

  308. Terrorists want Retaliation by Arkaein · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There's been a lot of posts talking about how we need to strike back, and hard. I hope everyone here realizes that's what the terrorists want.

    Terrorism is not about strategy or tacticts, these acts were not battles in a war. they served no strategic or tactical purpose, the group that perpetrated these acts is not going to move in and conquer, or anything like that. The purpose of terrorism is to generate fear and political tension.

    All this commotion the politicians are making is exactly what the terrorists wanted. They have succeeded in the first steps of disrupting American lifestyle. By making huge reactions we're fulfilling the terrorists goals.

    What we need to do is first keep calm and tend to our victims. Second we need to take a few days (at least) to cool off and evaluate ways we can improve security and information access (why was it so hard to figure out which planes crashed? can't we keep track of where a plane is in the air?). Finally, and most difficult, we need to figure how to go back about our lives. We need to show that terrorism is an impotent tool.

    1. Re:Terrorists want Retaliation by Lonath · · Score: 1

      I have the distinct feeling that *all* terrorist groups and *all* nations that harbor terrorist groups will eventually pay for this. I am not suggesting that the US will nuke those countries, or that they will take action this week or even this year, but there will be a push to make it totally unacceptable for nations to perpetuate these kinds of organizations.

      And, I totally agree with the sentiments on disrupting the American lifestyle. I am still at work, I will teach my class today, even if no one shows up. Please encourage everyone you know to do the best they can at continuing their normal lives.

    2. Re:Terrorists want Retaliation by MarqDaLuser · · Score: 1
      We need to show that terrorism is an impotent tool.

      Impossible. The point of the strikes this morning has already hit home. YOU ARE NOT IMMUNE. The entire country has been paralyzed.

      Granted, I don't think the answer is to level a few countries to the ground. But this can't go unchecked or unanswered. Otherwise they'll just go and do it again.

      To not retaliate means we render the loss of life meaningless and the destruction of property irrelevant. Sure, it would in the long run discourage the terrorists out of pure apathy, but how many have to die before this happens?

    3. Re:Terrorists want Retaliation by lavaforge · · Score: 2
      Pearl Harbor disrupted our lifestyle too.



      I agree with the need for calm and rational thought, but we cannot allow individuals to commit such acts with impunity. I guess we'll find out if the U.S. can still go balls to the wall or if that fire has gone out of us.

    4. Re:Terrorists want Retaliation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good call. Retribution breeds retribution. The whole vengeance attitude is animalistic, and those who contemplate such things are not human.

    5. Re:Terrorists want Retaliation by pressman · · Score: 1

      You, sir/maam, are the reason that the rest of the world hates Americans. You give us all a bad name.

      --
      Pooty tweet
    6. Re:Terrorists want Retaliation by Arkaein · · Score: 1

      I agree that we can't just ignore the terrorists. I mainly want to emphasize that enough damage has been done without doing terrorists work for them by playing into their type of game.

      Terrorism is a truly despicable activity. It is important at times like this to keep a level head and not let surges of emotion dictate our behavior. I believe that military retaliation will do more harm than good *unless* it can be assured that only the group responsible pays for their actions, it would be even more tragic if innocents in Palestine or wherever are brought into conflict due to US retaliation. To act otherwise would bring us down to their level. We have to act civilized, even when other groups don't want to.

      I believe a better solution may be (once the group responsible is reliably identified) to put pressure on the nation the group originated from to clean them up themselves. A lot of people don't like the US because it sticks its nose where it doesn't belong, lets keep our muscle out of other nations unless it becomes clear that these terrorists are being tolerated within their own borders.

      This may seem to be too soft, but if a terrorist group ever originated in the US and waged this kind of attack on another nation, the US gov't would assure the victim nation that it would take care of things. We would never allow another country to go terrorist hunting on our turf, even if that country seemed entitled to swift retribution.

    7. Re:Terrorists want Retaliation by Arkaein · · Score: 1

      Pearl Harbor was an act of war, by a soverign (sp?) nation, against a military installation. This was terrorism, by a group probably not allied with any national government, against civilians.

      In war a lot more is at stake, and there was a clear target to respond against. With terrorism, even if the group responsible is reliably identified, issues are more difficult. i believe that the primary responsibility with cleaning up terrorist groups lies with the nation they reside in, only only upon that nation's failure to respond does the US have the right to take action against/within a foreign country.

    8. Re:Terrorists want Retaliation by multimed · · Score: 1

      I agree that the point of this was to get attention--and it worked perfectly for them in that sense--all the cameras were already focused on the towers when the second plane hit. And there's no question, seeing the Twin Towers and the Pentagon crumble on television has a dramatic impact.

      However, my questions is at what point does it become a war? Violence usually begets violence. But if this is Bin Laden (most experts believe he is one of a very few who could have orchestrated this) then what is the cost of doing nothing? Does it make us seem weak and send the message that there are no reprecussions for such acts?

      I'm very much afraid this could mark the end of personal encryption and probably other freedoms. Then at some point, this becomes an issue of fighting for our freedoms as well.

      steve

      --
      Vote Quimby.
    9. Re:Terrorists want Retaliation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no strategic or tactical purpose

      What's NOT strategic about hitting two major commercial and military buildings?

    10. Re:Terrorists want Retaliation by sien · · Score: 2

      Ok, first of all I'd like to say that I am going to wildly speculate and say that I believe that this action was carried out by a muslim group.
      The reason this has been done was not completely illogical or irrational. The fact is that American efforts in the middle east backing up Israel and the continued blockade or Iraq - that has killed at least 200 000 people can be seen as a defacto war. Check this link for details on deaths in Iraq.
      As for Israel, the United States gives around $5 000 000 000 in direct aid to Israel, plus access to military secrets and weapons of untold value. Israel has nuclear weapons. Secondly ~$2 000 000 000 in aid is given to Egypt on the proviso that they leave Israel alone.
      The Bush administration has said on Israel it intends to step back - if stepping back is billions of dollars of aid and backing up Israel unquesionably I sincerely ask the US to step back with regard to me too.
      This action is not silly terrorism, it is simply another act in a war that the United States has been fighting for 50 years.

    11. Re:Terrorists want Retaliation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has anyone considered that this might be a response to terrorist action by the US?

      Why were we bombed?

      Ask people in:

      -Iraq (bombed and starved by sanctions, over 1 million dead, thousands killed in Gulf War)
      -Tanzania (spends more $ on repaying loans to the IMF than on healthcare or education)
      -Japan (occupied by US Army)
      -Palestine (US supports Israel in illegal occupation of West Bank and Gaza, thousands dead)
      -Nicaragua (thousands of civilians murdered by US funded death squads, now forced to cut health and education spending due to an IMF structural adjustment plan)
      -Chile (US backed Fascist military coup, resulting in the deaths of thousands)
      -El Salvador (US backed death squads overthrow democratically elected officials and murder thousands)
      -Guatemala (US backed death squads, at the behest of United Fruit Company, overthrow democratically elected president and murder thousands)
      -Vieques, Puerto Rico (Used for bombing practice by US Navy)
      -Mozambique (because of IMF/World Bank policies, spend more on debt repayments than on social services)
      -Europe (US backs out of Kyoto Accords on Climate Change, pushes ahead with "Star Wars" missle defense system, despite ABM treaty)
      -Colombia (US military aid currently funding Colombian military and therein right-wing paramilitary death squads that have killed thousands)
      -Sudan (Factory producing children's pharmaceuticals bombed by US; mistaken for weapons factory)
      -Serbia (Violating the Geneva Conventions on War, the US destroyed Belgrade's civilian infrastructure (bridges, water, sanitation))
      -Russia (US poised to pull out of ABM treaty and build missle defense system)
      -Kenya (IMF threatens to withdraw loan if public school teachers are given raise)
      -South Africa (US drug companies attempt to stop govt. from producing generic AIDS meds, would cause millions to lose prescription coverage)

      The US military, corporations and their instruments of financial control, the IMF and the World Bank adversely affect millions of people worldwide.

      The easy thing for you to do now is to embrace nationalism, revenge and violence. Thousands of innocent people are dead and that's something to be angry about. It's easy enough; Arab cab drivers have already been attacked in New York. It's painful to critically examine the motivations of the terrorists. However, it is no coincidence that the centers of both US financial and military control were bombed today. These attacks are a direct result of, and probably a response to, US imperialism. The only way to protect ourselves from violence is to stop perpetrating it against others. We've long lived by the sword and are now curious why we die. Now's the time to act constructively; give blood to the Red Cross, comfort your friends and family and spread words of peace. Now's the time for us as a nation to stop thinking about retaliation and start acting on ways to prevent a tragedy like this from ever happening again.

    12. Re:Terrorists want Retaliation by MarqDaLuser · · Score: 1
      This may seem to be too soft, but if a terrorist group ever originated in the US and waged this kind of attack on another nation, the US gov't would assure the victim nation that it would take care of things. We would never allow another country to go terrorist hunting on our turf, even if that country seemed entitled to swift retribution.

      You're spot-on there. We'd see it as an invasion, and I'm sure whoever's hosting the mastermind behind these attacks would see it the same.

  309. Im setting up a mirror of his pictures by Mes · · Score: 2, Informative

    Im setting up a mirror of Neck_of_the_Woods' pictures.

    http://mesmerism.net/wtc.html

  310. Re:Serious questions for anyone who's been in the by TomK32 · · Score: 1

    I think that at least 10k died. Not only the people who work there, but also many brave fireworker are still missing :-(

    --
    -- just a geek - trying to change the world
  311. Re:Just Give Blood Components! by bungalow · · Score: 4, Informative

    Consider giving blood components.

    I know a lot of places run people in to "donate" plasma - and then give the donors a check for a ~1 - 2 donation. The check structure is based so that those who need the income, are prompted to go in on a regular basis:

    1st week:
    Day 1 $25
    Day 2 $15
    2ND WEEK:
    DAY 3 $20
    DAY 4 $25

    These places take in just about anyone, but test blood before thaey take it. There is usually long lines and it's uncomfortable.

    If you don't like taking money for blood donations, check out Carter Blood Center. They will accept platelet donations 2x per week, and repay donors with the standard cookie / apple juice fare. It's also a longer process - about 1n hour, and you've got needles in both arms. But the nurses have to totally wait on you, and they let you bring in movies to watch, or watch the ones there. An excellent setup. As an added bonus, there's the excuse to drink two extra milkshakes a week - this is recommended to make up for the Calcium and protein loss.

  312. Family by KenDUDE · · Score: 1

    I have just found out that some family members of mine that where in the pentagon got out ok. My heart goes out to those that don't know and also those that have gotton bad news. Needless to say. I am deaply hurt buy these actions like the rest of us here in the US. I am also on my way out the door to give blood if any of you can please do the same the country will beed it bad.

  313. They aren't laughing now... by eltardo · · Score: 1

    People give me funny looks when I rant and rave about how we're not as safe as we like to think, they think we're not vulnerable. They laugh when I tell them I want a bomb shelter. Well, I'm sure they won't be laughing now. We've got a long ways to go in this world and I for one don't know if we'll make it.

    Mr. Cynical =D

    --
    plop
  314. This Is a Test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at all the news sites running high bandwidth pages. The web is being put through the wringer right now. The true impact of this event will show itself over the months to come. This smells like the beginning of some hard times.

  315. Re:Serious questions for anyone who's been in the by Fatal0E · · Score: 2

    The time diff between the first crash and the second is only about 20 minutes. I think most of the people didn't need to be told that they need to evacuate Tower 2 after Tower 1 was attacked. Most NYers do have that whatever attitude, that much is true, but sticking around would be stupid. Having been in there a number of times, I don't think the majority of the people had the time or even the ability to escape but I pray I'm wrong.

  316. Shock and Disbelief by Pinchy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    First, unless the major news outlets are keeping it hushed up, we don't even know who is responsible for this, and speculation by all the news media and politicians is reckless and just adding to the atmosphere of hysteria. If it turns out to be Mid-East terrorists, fine. But until we know for sure, I'm getting tired listening to all these speculations.

    Second, I'm getting sick and tired of listening to American's disbelief and shock over this tragedy. How is it that the US can enjoy the highest standard of living and quality of life in the world? How is it that the US consumes the most resources, far more than its far share, in the world? Do Americans really think that all of our wealth has just been willingly handed to us by grateful people throughout the world? Do Americans really think that we have no blood on our hands?

    I'm sick about these terrorist attacks. When I first heard about them this morning, I felt sick to my stomach. But I feel that way about any terrorist attack in any country, not just in the US. And unless you work at being ignorant, you will know that the US has been responsible for its share of terrorism throughtout the world.

    We can continue to feel free to go about our daily lives, enjoying our excess of resources and high quality of living, never asking where it all came from or why the majority of people in the world don't seem to enjoy the same. But we have no right to be shocked that someone out there doesn't like us.

  317. wow by ReidMaynard · · Score: 1

    I guess we should let all the criminals out of prison too....

    Maybe a better idea is to just let the prisoners out in your neighborhood, let them steal, rape and murder, while you stand on a soapbox spouting your message of peace and your desire to compromise.

    The people behind this are criminals. And *if* co-ordinated in *any* fashion by a recognised country, said country in fact just declared war against the USA.

    I imagine with the multiple attacks, the responsible parties will become obvious fairly quickly ... punishment will be swift, and we will probably only hear about it after the fact.

    --
    -- www.globaltics.net

    Political discussion for a new world

    1. Re:wow by Creepy · · Score: 1

      I'd take it even one step further -
      not only have they declared war on the USA, they've declared war on the people of the USA. These terrorists have attacked an ideology, a people, and not just a country itself. Their goals were not to aquire land or freedom, which is the cause for most wars, their goals were only to kill, and that's the greatest horror of all. I can think of nothing that has ever happened that has truely united the people of the United States, and to value all that they have, and that is merely from observations of the people around my office and the general outrage I've seen online.

  318. what does this mean for our freedoms? by fringd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    all i can think is that this will only mean tightened security. i don't doubt that this might be cited for any number of measures to quash our right to bear cryptography. people will wonder who these folks are, and how they organized. "why," they shall wonder, "didn't the cia or fbi intercept their phone calls, emails, or whatever, and stop them before they acted?"

    what do you think? are they right? do we need to give up our right to privacy to stop tragedies like this? i for one fear what may come of this, ontop of the seemingly staggering death count.

    1. Re:what does this mean for our freedoms? by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
      It's a good question. Having crypto, privacy, and the ability to secretly communicate with anyone anywhere in the world, means one thing when the 'risk' of it is that someone will take a car bomb and blow up a building. And that is what we have tended to think of, when we think of terrorist action- and a lot of us have been ready to accept that, in exchange for the freedom of the many, and personal privacy.

      When the 'private' thing turns out to be a fucking all-out assault on NEW YORK CITY levelling the World Trade Center with multiple fucking suicide airliners, never mind the simultaneous attacks on many other targets... well, just how bad _do_ you need to be private? Does your need for privacy in your harmless personal stuff balance out with organisations that can use the same privacy to send fucking AIRLINERS into the World Trade Center until the buildings fall over with God knows what loss of life? This isn't like a car-bomb.

      I'm not sure I'm ready to place my privacy rights over the ability of my government to find out about these things and act to stop or block them. Supposing the government literally did read my hard drive anytime they wanted, looked at my naughty pictures, respected no boundary to my electronic privacy... and in so doing, someone found out about Tuesday, September 11th 2001 before it happened?

      Because it is an insult, and unjust, to have some government spook peeking through my data- but right now the World Trade Center is destroyed by multiple coordinated suicide airliner crashes. And that actually happened- it wasn't some NSA spook making scare stories to improve their budget, it HAPPENED. Some of those NSA spooks are probably dead in the wreckage of the Pentagon. With all their Carnivore stuff, all their attempts (bitterly protested by slashdotters and others) to spy out signs of possible danger... they didn't spot THIS. And it couldn't have happened without extensive communications.

      Now that we have proof that organisations (not even just countries!) can coordinate staggering attacks and damned near take out whole cities, do we tell the spooks to pack up their wiretaps and go home?

    2. Re:what does this mean for our freedoms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your freedom? do you think the cia really care what you and your girlfriend plan to do for dinner tonight? what your boss said that irked you? even if they tapped every phone in the country yours probably wouldn't get a mention unless you mentioned allah at a time they were worried about muslim extremists. And when they realized you weren't one they'd disconnect. Seriously, you can probably have all the phone sex you want without mummy ever finding out.

    3. Re:what does this mean for our freedoms? by Spotless+Tiger · · Score: 1

      ...because we all know that the terrorists will cooperate with such invasions of privacy, and will make sure they don't use encryption or code words or any of the other stuff routinely used by criminals who, to be quite honest, are routinely bugged anyway.

      This "It's awful, so awful that we must throw logic out of the window when we come up with 'solutions' and anyone who disagrees is a goddamned terrorist themselves" crap has got to stop. Wiretapping laws making it easy to monitor drugs users are not going to stop terrorism. Bombing asprin factories or civilians in a few capital cities of countries friendly towards terrorism isn't going to help either (though a nuke in Belfast right now might solve a few problems.)

      If you don't handle this correctly, you'll end up in a nasty, unpleasant, dictatorship - a dictatorship not unlike those espoused by those who thought it worth their while committing today's attrocity. Who will have won then?

      --
      Racists should be sent back to where they came from
    4. Re:what does this mean for our freedoms? by LtFiend · · Score: 1

      I've had the same thoughts post this tragedy. What are my rights really worth.. Should we stop fighting for our rights in exchange for prevention against such attacks? But then I heard what Col. Powell said this morning. He talked of where the US went wring when they switched to all surveilence technology over spys and espionage. He believe that's one of the biggest mistakes the US has made. I agree... alot of our problems get solved when you use spys. You get the ability to infiltrate a organization without compromised privacy for the whole of the people. This is a sad day, There will be much debate in the weeks/months/years to come.

    5. Re:what does this mean for our freedoms? by imipak · · Score: 3
      I think you're spot on: whether the motivations are benevolent or not, the TLAs and their associated law-passers are unlikely to miss the opportunity to ratchet the freedom of crypto down, and surveillance up. This, of course, is not inconsistent with the theory that they might be doing this for entirely good reasons...

      One for the conspiracy theorists out there: the comparison I keep hearing is Pearl Harbour. Isn't there a sizable school of thought & some evidence that some portion of the US Govt in 1941 knew that something was going to happen, and deliberately held off doing anything (a) to avoid giving away that they had the intelligence, and (b) to allow the US to be sucked straight into the war they'd spent the previous 20 years trying NOT to get involved with?

    6. Re:what does this mean for our freedoms? by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Right, it's obvious that if we ban encryption, there's no way the terrorists could get it. After all, everyone knows those Arab fuckwits are far too stupid to develop their own software, or even to communicate in code, so that should be easy enough for us to ban. We'll have fewer liberties, but it should be obvious to all that we would be much much safer.

    7. Re:what does this mean for our freedoms? by Rakarra · · Score: 1
      Why are you assuming the CIA is the only agency that will be able to tap into communications? Quite frankly, if the CIA can, then others will be able to as well, such as "hackers."

  319. We look for the enemy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but the enemy is within.

    1. Re:We look for the enemy by b0r1s · · Score: 2

      are you referring to this book? ...

      Very good book on terrorist cells working within the country ...

      --
      Mooniacs for iOS and Android
  320. Re:Nuke the french bastards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everybody knows that the french pulled this.

  321. From UN.org by PeterMiller · · Score: 1

    http://www.un.org/News/dh/pages/lookingahead.html

    Tuesday, 11 September

    The General Assembly will formally open its 56th session, selecting a new President. The Secretary-General will open the day's work by ringing the Peace Bell at UN Headquarters.

    The Secretary-General will also speak to the Council on Foreign Relations on preventive action.

    The Security Council will hold consultations on the UN Mission in Ethiopia and Eritrea (UNMEE).

    At 11:15 a.m., there will be a press conference to launch the UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) Africa Report, with Odyek Agona, an UNCTAD economist.

    Not sure if this has anything to do with anything, but it seemed relevant.

  322. Re:How does the own medicine taste? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which is why most Doctors don't go for the same
    treatments they so happily prescribe :-)

  323. Weren't the Taliban once US alies against Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Weren't Taliban Mudschaheddin "freedom" fighters once allies of the US fighting against bad bad commies from Russia? Didn't the US even provide anti aircraft missiles so that freedom fighter could shoot down airplaines (civilians too). How does your own medicine taste?

    And wait some time and you may find out that these latest US allies, the UCK "freedom" fighters from Kosovo will behave pretty nasty too. But happily human memory is so short lived.

  324. Osama make kaka here now. by ScottBob · · Score: 1

    I have seen some stories about how Usama bin Ladin uses messages embedded in jpgs and posts coded messages on porn sites and sports chat sites.

    Last night, I found thousands and thousands of posts on alt.binaries.misc with the message header "***** make kaka here now." with ***** being replaced with names (e.g. Bob, Skunkie, Vrodok, etc. No, Osama wasn't one of the names.) I tried to open a couple up, and they contained gibberish unlike the regular base64 coding. Encrypted messages? Anybody else seen these? Does anyone know how to decode these? Maybe it's just a coincidence and it's kiddie pr0n, but maybe it's not. Somebody definitely make kaka here now.

  325. Reuters says: by Smallest · · Score: 1
    this:

    "Bin Laden, a Saudi millionaire and Islamic militant, believed to be in exile in Afghanistan, was blamed for the 1998 bombings of the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania in which 224 people died.

    An Arab journalist with access to bin Laden told Reuters in London that the renegade Saudi three weeks ago had warned of an "unprecedented attack" on U.S. interests. "

    -c

    --
    I have discovered a truly remarkable proof which this margin is too small to contain.
  326. Maybe ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we should start playing their game - just as in the Revolutionary war we changed our tactics to guerilla warfare, ie, hiding in bushes and ambushing like the Native Americans. Maybe we should resort to terrorism? Maybe we should resort to assasinations?

  327. Re:Eye opener. You must be joking by tomcio.s · · Score: 1

    You know what, you must be the most brainwashed person to ever post here. US has done nothing but 'f**k' up everything everywhere else in the world.
    I come from a place where we see you gsys as a bunch if lazy, overpowered freaks. Yes, you impose Holywood. But guess what, you are not what you think you are in the eyes of others. Most time you do more harm than good.

    A couple of examples from reacent past:
    Vietnam,
    Balcans,
    Africa (forget the name of the country)
    Cold War... Yea this one helped the European economy a lot../SARCASM/ Man thanks for all you have done. We could never survive without the allmighty US of A! /SARCASM/

    My condolences to all that grieve in this tragedy.

  328. Re:How does the own medicine taste? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are you dumb!!! there was a war over there , that stuff as stupid but at least there was a war!!! dumb ass

  329. Re:Cowards by RichMeatyTaste · · Score: 0

    I always liked Canada, but I truly salute you for your statement. It was truly the first thing that made me laugh and smile today. I needed a smile, even if is only temporary.

    Thanks

    Jason

    --


    Ever feel like you are driving the getaway car?
  330. Pearl Harbor? Try Antietam...... by Guil+Rarey · · Score: 1

    Yeah, Pearl Harbor was a surprise attack. Antietam was the bloodiest single day in American history - 26,134 casualties. Three days in Gettysburg cost 51,112 casualties.

    --
    Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball
  331. Nets use in conflict by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i would just like to say that i am sure many people feel that this is something a long time comming for the united states, yes i am a citizen of the united states but i do not feel that who ever did this was justified in any form or fashion it was a cowerdly act of terrisom. I would also like to comment on how the use of online media and general media has affected this situation. Personally i feel that the amount of media suronding this subject will only worsen things. I first heard of this while in school and thanks to the media i have heard many many conflicitng stories. But i have found the internet to be much more realiable source than i would have excpected i am just interested to see how this will progress, and wether or not a news site such as slashdot that reaches milllions will adversly affect this.
    Also i feel all flags should fly half staff

    --WE Find True Genius In The Most Extreme Cha0s--
    irc.afternet.org
    #cyberealism
    Silenz.

  332. Not true at all!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I'd first heard about the first plane crashed into the WTC, before even the second plane crashed I stopped and said a prayer to our Lord asking Him to show mercy to the people responsible for this tragedy and to help and bless the families of the victims. I asked Him to help enlighten the perpetrators of this tragedy, to show them that this sort of violence was unnecessary. Prayers for the people responsible for this was one of the first things I thought of, and I certainly cannot be the only Christian to do so.

    Shalia

  333. Plasma as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    It should be noted that plasma can be donated every 48 hours prn for use. Plasma is mainly used for preemies, and in this case, burn victims. From what they told me, if you are a burn victim and don't get enough plasma, you die.

    Plasma is just the fluid portion of your blood. The process takes about 45min with a machine that looks like a dialysis machine. I've done it before, boring, but real easy to do. I suggest if you want to donate, think about plasma. If you drink enough Gatorade/water, you can come back two days later and do the same thing. Call the RedCross if you are interested. I'm sure they need it right now.

  334. Re:An eye for an eye, and the whole world goes bli by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay, Ive taken ten minutes and rationalized there motives. Now I don't just want they dead but the culture that spawned them. By best estimates so far 10k+ dead, that equals or beats some countries. They wanted terror, they won't get it. They get our anger, which will be far more destructive and deadly. Revenge is a dish best served cold. I can wait a bit. Anyone else?

  335. What does this have to do with Israel? by KingKenny · · Score: 0

    What am I missing here? Why isn't Britain or other close allies doing this? What does Israel think is going on here?

    I am missing something, right?

    1. Re:What does this have to do with Israel? by N0Nick · · Score: 1

      Probably.

      There is a suspicion that the organization responsable to the attack is a muslim pro-Palastine one.
      The Palastenians always blamed USA for taking Israel' side in the middle-east conflict, and there is a good choice that it (US) was attacked today by groups of such people or supporters of such opinions.

  336. Re:An eye for an eye, and the whole world goes bli by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    If youre saying something out of the bible, you should have READ IT !

    so in Luke 5:38 Jesus said:
    5:38 "You have heard that it was said, `An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.' But I say to you, do not resist the evildoer. But whoever strikes you on the right cheek, turn the other to him as well. And if someone wants to sue you and to take your tunic, also give him your coat. And if anyone forces you to go one mile, go with him two. Give to the one who asks you, and do not reject the one who wants to borrow from you.

    (http://www.bible.org/netbible/mat.htm#5)

  337. This is WRONG by katsushiro · · Score: 1

    I am ashamed to be part of the human race today. For those of you who don't know, a terrorist organization today attacked, deliberately and without apparent provocation, the World Trade Center towers in NYC, the Pentagon, and apparently even the State Department. They did this not with bombs or missiles, but with hijacked passenger planes. Using human life to end human life. Tens, possibly hundreds of thousands of people are dead due to this act. I have not yet heard what reasons the terrorist organization that claims responsibility for this act (Democratic Front for Palestinian Liberation, or some other idiocy). But there is no reason that could ever be valid for such an attack. Such an act is a product of utter and complete cowardice, and I say now that whoever is responsible for this, deserves nothing less than the worst possible punishment we as a race can devise. They may justify their acts by saying that the United States is some sort of evil nation, but no amount of lame excuses could justify the loss of even a single human life in the name of what amounts to nothing more than empty rethoric. I am deeply ashamed to be in the same species as the individuals responsible for this action. An act such as this cannot go unanswered, and yet, I almost fear the answer we give even more than this attack itself, for the nature of our response, both as a nation and as a race, will say much about our nature as human beings. I am not a religious man, but today, I'm praying, for all of us.


    A part of me, a naive, innocent part, dares to hope that after witnessing such an act, we may understand the true value of human life once and for all, and put to an end the petty, ridiculous differences that we give so much importance to, and that lead to so muhc violence and needless loss of life. But I know that this will not be so. This act may well the beggingin of a war, or worse, a War. It makes me feel like I have been personally cheated out of a dream, and I cannot even begin to imagine what it must be for those directly affected by this attack. I feel powerless to act against this, yet do somethig I must. All I can do for now is write here and express my outrage, my anger, my disillusionment, my fear and my weak hope for something better to rise from the ashes of this disaster. I am desperate to find something more I can do.


    -out.
    .Katsushiro.
    --
    "Two things are infinite: the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the first one." - Albert Einstein
  338. Large scale retaliation isn't the answer by WishesWereFishes · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This has been a sad day, and the half-cocked, gung ho reaction of most of the people out there, while understandable as an expression of their grief and outrage, is also completely the wrong way to go. Large scale retaliation will only make things worse. Don't get me wrong I'm not advocating doing nothing. The people who committed this act should be tracked down i.e a serious investigation into which terrorist organisation is responsible. But it is likely that this involves only a relatively small amount of people. This is not an excuse for retaliation against an entire country - the argument that the country from where the terrorists originate( which might possibly be more than one) share the blame because they haven't done enough to stop the terrorists, is flawed. Firstly,most of the countries in question don't have the resources for adequate health, education or even military, let alone for internal manhunts of a terrorist organisation. Secondly, even if the country in question is antagonistic towards the united states, and so doesn't hunt down it's terrorists for political reasons - this shouldn't be interpreted as an action by that government, but as wilful negligence, - a crime but a lesser one - not worthy of warfare against an entire people!! So what should be done : 1)as I said, find the people responsible (and make damn sure you've got the right people) then take action - something directly against the people in question(I'm talkin' surgical). 2) Tighten security - how the hell does a plane manage to get within spitting distance of the Pentagon. I'm sure there are a lot of difficult practicalities, but this tragedy should be enough of spur to overcome them. So don't do anything until your blood pressures have lowered a bit - emotional murderous responses are understandable as an initial reaction but as the considered reaction of a civilised democratic government - NO WAY!

    1. Re:Large scale retaliation isn't the answer by doomicon · · Score: 1

      You are incorrect in stating, "this involves only a relatively small amount of people"
      An act as complex, and well coordinated as this is definetely state sponsered, and I would venture to reason by more than one.

      This was not a "crime" of terrorism, this was an act of war. Past actions of tracking down individuals, and bringing them before a court has not and will not work. Sending a terrorist to prison for 20 years, isn't going to deter his peers that are willing to crash a plane filled with passengers.

      If a movement within the U.S. openly supported roaming streets and shooting children, would we only arrest those who fired the gun? Or would we track down all those involved with the group.

      Same with terrorism, it is not a crime, it is an act of war. Terrorists and those sympathic and supportive such acts, should be eradicated from this planet as they have nothing to offer but hate and death of innocents.

      --

      Awesome!
    2. Re:Large scale retaliation isn't the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      most of the countries in question don't have the resources for adequate health, education or even military, let alone for internal manhunts of a terrorist organisation
      We do. If allowed we are certainly capable of doing the work ourselves. It isn't the lack of money, it's the lack of will.
      These "terrorist havens" hate the US...nothing would cause them to root out terrorists. They like terrorists.

  339. UK Foreign Office number by MikeCamel · · Score: 5, Informative

    For those in the UK (who may be unable to get through to the US), the UK Foreign office has issued a number: 020 7008 0000.

  340. What have we done to deserve this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Retaliation can come in many forms, and we have many options as to how to handle this. But what have we done to deserve this? Did we somehow provoke the attack, whether by a single act or years of accumulated hatred? I hear that the Palastinian people cheer, though their leaders do not outwardly. Our nation is not without enemies in this world, but our intentions have been good. Do we deserve this? What point is someone trying to make?

    That is not to say that we are responsible, not directly, but perhaps we have engrossed ourselves in affairs too complicated to escape from without some major burns. Shall we fight fire with fire, or water instead? Obviously, what we've been doing so far has brought down the WTC. The time has come to do something different.

    bitman_squared@hotmail.com

  341. operation too big to be Bin Laden? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Afganistan Taliban have said this operation is too big for someone like the main suspect Osman Bin Laden (no idea - someone correct his name!) to undertake.

    Sheesh, that doesn't leave us with any obvious supsects then. Unless this was a joint operation between many groups.

  342. If it's bin Laden... by smagruder · · Score: 1, Troll

    then, anything short of a full invasion/takeover of Afghanistan by the US, Russia and our allies will be a failure of response. The American people must press Bush to undertake a very massive response no matter who the perpetrators and their host nation is. This is *not* a time for peace.

    --
    Steve Magruder, Metro Foodist
    1. Re:If it's bin Laden... by tjgrant · · Score: 1

      While I tend to agree on a visceral level, I think you forget just what kickass fighters the Afghans proved to be when they were fighting the Russians.

      I don't know if I would want to get involved in a groundwar over there, and I doubt whether an air war would accomplish much. That leaves one other option that I don't even want to think about.

      --

      Stand Fast,
      tjg.

    2. Re:If it's bin Laden... by fleck_99_99 · · Score: 1

      I don't wanna crush your good down-home all-American fun, but..

      WE DON'T KNOW THAT IT'S BIN LADEN.

      Doesn't that make it a little bit premature for dictating the course of our retaliation? Just my opinion.

      --
      seven two six five
      seven four six one seven
      two six four two e
    3. Re:If it's bin Laden... by Tazzy531 · · Score: 1

      And what afterwards? What will you suggest we do after we take over Afghanistan? Annex it? Make it part of the US? Put a new leader in charge?

      Don't forget, we were the ones that put Castro in charge of Cuba. We were responsible for Castro.

      Also, don't forget that Osama bin Ladin's group fought off the Russians when they occupied Afghanistan...

      --


      _______________________________
      "I'm not Conceited...I'm just a realist..."
  343. News From the Web by rajah · · Score: 1

    I guess it makes sense...If you have the bandwidth and servers, you owe it to people to post pictures and information...If anyone is still looking for updates on the web...

    ESPN.com has quite a bit of coverage on the attack:

    http://espn.go.com/main.html

    And I've found that the newspaper sites haven't been completely swamped:

    http://www.newyorktimes.com/
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/
    http://www.boston.com/

    Also while I'm posting this list of links, I might as well mention that you can search for your local chapter of the American Red Cross at http://www.redcross.org and obviously for people living outside of the United States, donating blood through your own country's Red Cross/Crescent Society can't hurt:

    http://www.ifrc.org/address/rclinks.asp

  344. Re:Serious questions for anyone who's been in the by tcc · · Score: 2

    My questions are because I'm unwilling to think that 40,000 people in the building = 40,000 deaths. There was a good period of time between the first plane hitting and the second hitting, and then a period of time before the buildings collapsed. It is my hope that many survived and made it out.

    Dude, do you know how much time it takes to evacuate a 120 store building???

    --
    --- Metamoderating abusive downgraders since my 300th post.
  345. Domain available for memorial. by Richthofen80 · · Score: 1

    go to http://worldtradecenter.com

    how chilling.

    --
    Reason, free market capitalism, and individualism
    1. Re:Domain available for memorial. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would not a 404 be appropriate?

    2. Re:Domain available for memorial. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Internal Error 500
      The server encountered an unexpected condition which prevented it from fulfilling the request.

      sounds more appropriate to me.

  346. Statement from IBM (yeah, trivial, I know) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Lou Gertsner posted the following announcement to IBM's internal network a few minutes ago.

    ------------

    Dear Colleague

    To: IBM Colleagues
    From: L.V. Gerstner, Jr.
    Subject: Today's Tragic Events
    Dear Colleague:

    As today's tragic events unfold, I know that IBMers around the world are anxious for news about the health and safety of our colleagues. I'll take just a moment to tell you what IBM has done immediately in the wake of these terrorist attacks.

    Of course, the thoughts and prayers of IBMers worldwide are with all of those who have been affected. The welfare of our people is our foremost priority. We do have a small number of IBMers whose offices are located in lower Manhattan, and we're working urgently to account for them, as well as all of our colleagues across New York City and Washington, D.C.

    While no IBM facility has been directly affected, every IBM colleague should use discretion as they conduct their business today. We will continue to monitor this on a global basis, and adapt our business operations as necessary and prudent.

    In the coming days, the full resources of IBM will be turned out to assist our customers in their recovery efforts and to government authorities.

    I know that IBMers everywhere stand ready to aid and comfort their colleagues and support the customers who will need our help. In the face of these incomprehensible acts, we will do all that we can -- as individuals, and as an institution. That, and remember the victims in our prayers.

    Lou

    1. Re:Statement from IBM (yeah, trivial, I know) by Glove+d'OJ · · Score: 1

      I believe that the IBM group is just off Wall Street, in an old Lotus bldg. They are part of a multimedia group with whom I used to work. I earnestly hope that they are all AOK.

  347. a dead terrorist kills nobody by Smallest · · Score: 1

    at the very least, we should find the orginzation responsible and skin each member.

    -c

    --
    I have discovered a truly remarkable proof which this margin is too small to contain.
    1. Re:a dead terrorist kills nobody by Arkaein · · Score: 1

      I do believe the ones responsible (besides the suicide attackers) deserve to be punished, but I'm not sure if it would really be effective in preventive future terrorist activities.

      I use to think as a kid that jailing drug dealers would solve drug problems. Now I realize that as long as people want drugs, there will be drug dealers to fill "the market". I think that terrorists may always appear under conditions of sufficient social unrest.

      The only way punishment is an effective deterrent is if it is fast and sure. Neither of these conditions seems likely in this case, and it is very hard to deter people willing (for good OR bad reasons) to die for their cause.

    2. Re:a dead terrorist kills nobody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations, you have a small penis! Now embark on a lifetime of issuing meaningless threats on internet forums in order to make up for your tiny, stumpy "manhood"!

    3. Re:a dead terrorist kills nobody by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      To the contrary, a dead terrorist creates many more terrorists. If you play the terrorist's game, you are caught in the endless cycle of revenge.

  348. "The third big war" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    In the City of God there will be a great thunder, Two brothers torn apart by Chaos, while the fortress endures, the great leader will succumb" , "The third big war will begin when the big city is burning"

    - Nostradamus 1654

    1. Re:"The third big war" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think that NYC is the "City of God", you must be smoking more crack than Nostradamus was.

      Like most prophecies, N.'s quatrains are so vague and general that hey can be easily twisted to fit any situation. In N.'s case it's even worse, because of the layers of translation and decryption involved.

    2. Re:"The third big war" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Nostrodamus was writing about what America is going to do to Jerusalem.
      Nobody's gonna want it enough to fight over it once we're done.

    3. Re:"The third big war" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, don't forget this cryptic but obviously relevant passage:

      The heads of rag will tremble before they burn.

      The fire will streak from the sky and scorch their land.

      The land of the jockeys of the camel will be no more.

    4. Re:"The third big war" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, don't forget this cryptic but relevant passage:

      The heads of rag will tremble before they burn.
      The fire will streak from the sky and scorch their land.
      The land of the jockeys of the camel will be no more.

      Nostradamus, 1657

  349. national 911 day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    in utter irony.. today is 911 day..

    http://www.nih.gov/news/pr/sep2001/nhlbi-10.htm

  350. MacDill AFB, BARKSDALE,AFB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I live in Tampa. MacDill AFB has locked down and is the home of the Central Command, which the logistics and control center for the MidEast. There is a large contengent of heavily armed MP's
    guarding the gate. VERY throughly searching all persons that need to go to work there.

    Barksdale AirForce Base is a SAC (Strategic Air Command) base. The base is the home of the B52's
    is very secure and does have an underground bunker for those wondering why the President was flown there.

    What REALLY pisses me off is the 100's of millions
    of dollars that our government have been spent on 'cyberwar', persecutions of intellectual property 'crimes', and other vaporous made up problems when we do obviously have real world problems that should have been addressed.
    There does exist the technology that could have lessoned the chance of this getting by the airport
    security. Our priorities have been skewed and now
    we've been caught in Pearl Harbor fashion.

  351. Re:Could these horrible events occur with no Inter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do we stop suicidal crazies like these? Easy. Kill them. All. Any questions?

  352. Re:I hope... by Winged+Cat · · Score: 2

    Good point. If I may toss out a theory...

    Attacks make Americans willing to trade liberty for security. Laws get passed to take away liberty, but are lax on actually implementing security (real security is a lot more expensive than the illusion of security that, for instance, the NSA and CIA have been giving us). However, the take-away in liberty does allow (short term) profits to the currently-largest organizations, which might otherwise be threatened if just anyone could do an innocuous activity that could become a terrorist action. (Anything that can disrupt large organizations, no matter its other uses, is potentially useful to terrorists.) Some of the take-away will be labelled as "temporary", but will happen to remain on the books for a long time (maybe someone will point out that actual "temporary" laws have, at the least, sunset provisions). And, of course, media attention is diverted away from the SSSCA (and maybe other similar issues) just long enough for it to gain momentum.

    It'd be totally ironic if it turns out the party responsible was a McVeigh wannabe trying to thwart the American government and the corporations that (in their opinion) bought it. Or if it was some faction that thought the lax, free American culture was threatening their rigidly-controlled police state - in which case, would not this extra security be the fastest way to cave in to their demands?

  353. Re:I hope... by Shinnou · · Score: 1

    God, do you have any idea of what you're talking about!?

    Have you no sense of the global community in which we all live? You cannot allow religiously led nations to perform acts of aggression because their mystical "God" book says they should. This is especially true of nations that can so dramatically effect the global economy!

    If you want to see a horrible world, let the global economy fall apart. So many "bad thing" situations come to mind it's staggering.

    When it's all said and done, humans are animals and self preservation is RULE NUMBER ONE. Come to terms with your ignorance and just remain quiet. -Shinn

  354. Re:Anyone seen th pictures of the paleo's celebrat by JCMay · · Score: 2

    I doubt that Anwar Sadat, the long-dead president of Egypt, expresses much of anything anymore.

    Yassir Arafat, however, did say that he did not approve of the attack. Yeah, whatever.

  355. GWB reported at Barksdale air base, Louisiana by ab762 · · Score: 1

    Heard on CBC radio, about 13:50 EDT.

  356. A little late for peace... by BlackHawk · · Score: 1
    It will solve a great deal.

    The decision made to initiate this level of attack was made by someone else, who apparently never read the history books to learn what Americans do when someone attacks us in this fashion. We retaliate, in spades.

    Yes, there will be a lot of people in danger in whatever other part of the world we have to go to, in order to get to those responsible. And yes, there will be innocent blood spilled. The kind of cowards who perpetrate these kinds of attacks will hide behind them, thinking themselves safe. But we'll have the memory of our own innocents in mind. And when we've finished, assuming our politicians don't cave in to those who think appeasement is the answer and stop us too soon, then anyone in the future who wants to try this will certainly think twice.

    Barbaric? Perhaps. Sometimes, you have to meet the problem head on. And destroy it.

    --

    Believe nothing, not even if I say it, if it violates your sense of reason -- Buddha

    1. Re:A little late for peace... by Znork · · Score: 2

      Certainly think twice? Or what? The US will... kill them? Perhaps it escaped your notice, but some of these people actually flew planes right into buildings. They dont strike me as someone who will certainly think twice just because you threaten to kill them.

      The US, or preferably the entire international community, because in my opinion this is an attack on humanity, will likely find any surviving responsible people and deal with those, and with all right.

      But I dont think for a second that that will deter any further future attacks. They have very likely read the history books. They know the US will retaliate. They just dont care. At all.

    2. Re:A little late for peace... by Rand+Race · · Score: 1
      Sometimes, you have to meet the problem head on.


      But your solution adresses only the symptoms. Counter to what I've seen a distressing number of people say, this was not done out of pure evil. These people have their reasons and those reasons are what we must eradicate. Sure, if we find out who did it, we must retaliate and retaliate hard, but this is not a solution but rather a deterrent.

      --
      Insanity is the last line of defence for the master diplomat. But you have to lay the groundwork early.
  357. News site, no lag by mrsmalkav · · Score: 1

    Straits Times in Singapore has a large section on the incidents today.

  358. Re:I hope... by Zard+Biomatrix · · Score: 0

    wether or not it actually helps is irrelevant.

    they bombed us, and we have to respond.

    otherwise it's like we're saying that it's okay to bomb us. (yes, i know that we were hit by planes, but they work a lot like bombs when you run them into things)

    what amazes me is that Hardcore terrorists are denouncing these actions.

    i'm not saying we should go to war - i mean, this could be the actions of a small minority in some country. but do we want to wait for a 'second wave'?

    /zard

  359. "god is great!" by Sebastopol · · Score: 0, Troll



    "God is Great!" -- unnamed person celebrating in the streets of Palestine.

    Let me try to state this in a non-troll:

    It is good to see people on this site reaching out to each other in sympathy and empathy, but when you say, "God bless", which god do you mean? The god of the people that performed this act? Or the god of the victims?

    --
    https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
  360. mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is anybody mirroring the avi/mpg files? I can't get to them from here

  361. Help through RedCross by Utopia · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you plan on helping
    Visit American Red Cross at RedCross.org
    Type your zip code to find your local Redcross chapter or call
    1-800-GIVE-LIFE to make an appointment to donate blood.

  362. Re:I hope... by mattx · · Score: 0

    It took this to make you realize that the stuff that /.'ers bitch about is petty???

  363. America will survive by cbull · · Score: 1

    A colleague sent me this link.

    The article was written about 1 hour after the attacks on the World Trade Center. I think the last paragraph sums things up very well:

    "Let nobody think that Americans are incapable of facing this foe and
    defeating him. Let nobody think that this country is any less able to
    "face the naked days" than she was in 1861, in 1917, in 1941 and 1950.
    We shall rise to this. We shall take our revenge. We shall absorb
    these blows, and strike back a hundred times harder. Let America's
    enemies crow today: Tomorrow they will tremble, and weep."

    1. Re:America will survive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what about 1914 and 1939?

      since the largest terrorist attack prior to today was OKC, what if it turns out the attack is indeed from 'Patriotic Freedom Loving Amuricans'. Nuke Montana?

    2. Re:America will survive by cbull · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying we nuke anyone, and I don't think the author is either. However, if the attack was from 'Patriotic Freedom Loving Amuricans', then they should be put on trial and punished accordingly (ie, McVeigh). In that case, I think you'll see an insane increase of the oversight of militia groups.
      I think it would also be highly likely that you may see a return of Old West lynch mobs.

  364. Re:PENTAGON != COLLAPSED INTO A HOLE! Stay off pho by Zapp+Brannigan · · Score: 1

    Verizon is asking everybody in the DC area to stay off of ANY phone line unless it is an emergency.

    Verizon didn't turn off their automated calling system which called to tell us that the call-waiting service we had ordered had been switched on, and that we could listen to instructions on how to use it.

  365. Re:I hope... by daanger0us · · Score: 1

    I'm in a state of shock somewhat.

    To those that think that retaliation is not the answer.... Look. The amount of people who have died is most likely more than the amount that died in Perl Harbor. It maybe MORE then the amount of Americans that died in Vietnam! If that many innocent civilian people died in this terrorist attack, then imagine if they hit again with an even larger attack. What if they used biological weapons. If we don't retaliate, its open season on us. It's open season on anyone they have a problem with.

    To not act is giving them the green light. What we need to do is provide methods to not only stop them before they have a chance to board those planes, etc... but to stop them before they start trying to plan.

    My thoughts go out to those who have lost any family and friends in what has transpired today.

    --
    Aliens? Magnetic Rings?! Bah! Who needs that when we have
  366. Hudson Valley Blood Services location by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All you IBM geeks and anyone else in the Hudson Valley (~60 mi. north of NYC), head to Building 330 at the East Fishkill site; HVBS has a permanent location there and will take your donation.

  367. World Trade Center Pictures by ga1adrie1 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Pictures of the World Trade Center

    Taken from the New Jersey side at about 10 a.m., except the last one, which was taken about an hour later. What words cannot describe, I hope these pictures have captured.

  368. EVIL BEGETS EVIL by kerb · · Score: 1

    im not from US but from asia, but my initial reaction to this one is, any counter strike would only worsen the situation. us citizens, pls understand why these things are happening. i symphatize for the deaths of ur brothers and sisters.
    this lesson tells u guys that even if u think u are the worlds toughest superpower, u can never underestimate and oppress these litte guys in the middle east.
    consider a little moth that gets into ur eyes, so little, it will make u cry and wince in pain.

  369. Attacks also in EU ? by fyren · · Score: 1

    the german news channel n-tv reports that bomb threads have been made regarding the german stock exchange in frankfurt and the office building of germany's chancellor, gerhard schroeder.
    might the wave of terror spread to western europe?

    --

    "What we cannot speak about we must pass over in silence." -Wittgenstein
    1. Re:Attacks also in EU ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope not. One country is more than enough.

    2. Re:Attacks also in EU ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, it's exactly one country too much.
      luckyly, as i just heard, there was appearently no bomb thread in frankfurt.. but local police recomended people to leave the major high rise buildings..
      still, i think most countries here in the EU (i can only talk for germany, though) have secured their govt. buildings (and also any us-connected organizations or jewish institutions)

  370. Re:Cowards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is not funny.

    Whoever mod'ed this up is probably in shock.

    This is an unjustifiable attack on blameless people. I'm just hoping that some of my friends who work in the area aren't dead under tone of falling masonry and burning aviation fuel. Ha Ha Ha.

    If these unspeakably evil and misguided people had wanted to make some kind of point they could have done it at night, when no-one was there.

    This is my first posting on slashdot, I'm just sorry that it's under these circumstances.

  371. Auditorium of Metlife building taking donations by rconybea · · Score: 1

    The auditorium of the Metlife building (1 madison avenue, just north of 23rd street) has been setup as an emergency blood donation center.

  372. The Israeli Army put all on alert? by weslocke · · Score: 1

    Just heard a report on the radio that Israel has put everyone in the army (active/reserve/inactive) on alert, and that has struck enough fear into a large number of terrorist organizations for them to call and essentially say "It wasn't us, we swear."

    Also been hearing reports about what's essentially parties in the street in different Middle Eastern countries in support of the attack. Probably not the best place to ask, but is anyone actually anywhere near that environment that might have a more verifiable view?

    --

    'Life is like a spoonful of Drain-O, it feels good on the way down but leaves you feeling hollow inside'
    1. Re:The Israeli Army put all on alert? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As for parties in the street... so what? Most palestinians probably think the world is coming to an end!! Wouldn't you get a little crazy???

  373. Re:Warcraft Wisdom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, dude, put the D&D books down and back away from the computer...

  374. Today is national 911 day n/t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

  375. Stop the Rhetoric by Wretch1970 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Drawing parallels between terrorists and Hitler are inappropriate.

    Hitler was the leader of a nation, therefore the nation of Germany was a legitmate target for military strikes.

    There are some nations that sponsor terorist activities and those government should be targeted, but the terrorist organizations are self appointed, and not representatives of any specific nation or nationality.

    Also quit the lets invade BS. That sort of rhetoric is easy when you're not the one on the ground with a weapon in your hand. I'm a soldier (infantry) and I will be. If my commanders order me to go I will, and I do believe we should retaliate, but when a 17 year old computer geek screams invade all he/she does is look like ignorant asshole.

  376. I hope... by kcjuggle · · Score: 1

    I personally am damn happy we have Bush as president right now. Sure he's gonna keep his own ass safe, but only so he can raise some hell when they figure out who's responsible.

  377. Re:Cowards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As always ...Thank You Canada. You are great neighbors!

  378. You dumb anonymous twat! by ahfoo · · Score: 1

    I wrote that line before you sucked off my first cock and I had to grow a new one.
    I can't stand it when people steal my material and then do around posting it anonymously.

  379. Our poor freedoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Until war is declared, our freedoms should be protected by the Constitution, but now I fear that even that may no longer be enough.

    As to whether we need to give up our freedoms to prevent this, I say NO! How tight is airport security already, how much of a burden upon weary travelers, and this still happened? Take away the means of crime and new means will be found. Take away the reasons for crime and this garbage wont happen! (Dang terrorist have gone and made me angry now!)

    bitman_squared@hotmail.com

  380. 9-11-2001 Internet domains by Kent+Brewster · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... are going like hotcakes. I checked Network Solutions this morning an hour or so after the first reports and you cannot get anything associated with 9112001, 9-11-2001, sep112001, 11sep2001, september11, sep11, 11sep, 20019091, or 2001-9-11.

    One hopes these domains are going to people who have something to say about the event, and not just squatters or CNN.

  381. Blood Centers Packed In Atlanta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    WGST News Radio is reporting that lines at Red Cross blood donation points in Atlanta are 6 to 8 hours deep, and that people should return Wednesday.

  382. WILL EVERYBODY STOP WITH THE TURBAN THING? by remande · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The above and a slew of other posts assume that this is some form of Islamic attack, likely under Bin Laden. I have heard no evidence to this effect. One terrorist group was supposed to have claimed responsibility; my understanding is that this was a false report.


    It could be Muslims. It could be Christians. It could be Athiests, (White|Black|Yellow|Red|Purple) supremacists, anarchists, fascists, disgruntled pilots, almost anybody. I am not blaming any of the above groups; I am demonstrating that we just don't know.


    Here's what we do know. This was a group of people (at least four, one for each aircraft) rather than one person. Those who carried out the plan (rather than any possible planners we don't see yet) were willing to die for this. They were trained for this mission (highjacking an aircraft is not an easy job today, and the fact that we have heard of no failed hijacking attempts today implies that all attempts were successful; we didn't have four successes in sixteen attempts or whatever). This implies premeditation and weeks of planning. Note that this also implies that the act was not a Columbine-type killing. The rash of Columbine events in the past few years show a lot of premeditation, but not the level of skill needed to hijack an aircraft.


    Going from here to the conclusion that it must be some turban-wearing, gun-toting radical Islamic militants is a huge leap to a conclusion, and symptomatic of some deep seated hatred.


    Let's not try to pin this on somebody until we get some more facts.

    --

    --The basis of all love is respect

    1. Re:WILL EVERYBODY STOP WITH THE TURBAN THING? by passion · · Score: 2

      Racial epithets will simply lead to further hate - on both sides (of the giver and receiver), and lead to further violence.

      --
      - passion
    2. Re:WILL EVERYBODY STOP WITH THE TURBAN THING? by Spunk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      remande makes an excellent point. I'd like to add one thing:

      Who did we immediately suspect bombed the Oklahoma City building? Arab extremists. But no, it was an American!

      We shouldn't retaliate until we get more facts on who did this. THEN kill the motherfuckers.

    3. Re:WILL EVERYBODY STOP WITH THE TURBAN THING? by warnerve · · Score: 1

      Lets pretend that I had said that I was going to cause a major act of terrorism in the United States and lets also say I am one of the select few in the world to have the resources to do such a thing. Then lets say a major terrorism act happens just a few weeks after I say such a thing. That, in my mind, is a great reason for suspicion of guilt. Ergo, Bin Laden is a prime suspect.

    4. Re:WILL EVERYBODY STOP WITH THE TURBAN THING? by smallpaul · · Score: 2

      Going from here to the conclusion that it must be some turban-wearing, gun-toting radical Islamic militants is a huge leap to a conclusion, and symptomatic of some deep seated hatred.

      Of course it is too early to make any judgement. But it is not racist to think first of those who have been loudest in calling for the destruction of the United States (both recently and historically). None of your other "suspects" really make any historical or contextual sense. Atheist suicide bombers? Racists who kill people of all races indescriminately? Are we so politically correct that we must abandon logic?

      Another reason to believe (not conclude, but believe) that it might be Islamic militants is that they have a tradition of organized suicide bombing that most other radical organizations do not.

      I'm not saying it was Islamic militants but I don't think that I am a racist because that was the first thing that popped into my mind. They followed the MO of those groups, not the MO of domestic terrorists or European terrorists etc.

      I just read this: "Three Palestinian groups -- Hamas, the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine and Islamic Jihad -- deny responsibility for the attacks, but blame U.S. policies in the Mideast." I guess these guys are racist too...they also think it likely that it was someone from the Mideast.

    5. Re:WILL EVERYBODY STOP WITH THE TURBAN THING? by olafva · · Score: 1

      Where have you been? Out of touch?
      Why not take a look at CNN documented
      reports by known officials before writing such
      things, or perhaps you wrote this before the latest reports?

      --
      What's past is NOT ALWAYS prologue for the future!
    6. Re:WILL EVERYBODY STOP WITH THE TURBAN THING? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Bin Laden connection is not only due to the American "Muslim toting guns" image, but rather by Bin Laden's reputation. Take the American embassy bombings in Africa. It was very very well planned out, with two targets being hit almost simultaneously. Sound farmiliar? NO, NOT EVERY WHITE MAN IS OUT TO GET YOU AND MAKE YOUR LIFE A LIVING HELL... THE MEDIA JUST MAKES IT SEEM THAT WAY.

    7. Re:WILL EVERYBODY STOP WITH THE TURBAN THING? by Quixote · · Score: 1

      The above and a slew of other posts assume that this is some form of Islamic attack, likely under Bin Laden. I have heard no evidence to this effect.
      Maybe because you haven't been listening? The intelligence agencies have intercepted messages from some in the Al-Qaeda organization (OBL's gang) reporting success. Given the modus operandi, it is very likely that OBL was behind this.

    8. Re:WILL EVERYBODY STOP WITH THE TURBAN THING? by jjoyce · · Score: 1

      What does connect this to Columbine is that we'll blame everyone but ourselves, as usual.

  383. Re:PENTAGON != COLLAPSED INTO A HOLE! Stay off pho by Jeremi · · Score: 3, Insightful
    My NEW Sig: Nuke the fucking bastards NOW!


    The worst thing about violence is that it causes people who were previously non-violent to become violent. Don't let the terrorists make you one of them!

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  384. Re:Eye opener. You must be joking by SquierStrat · · Score: 1

    Vietnam was stupid the Balkans (not Balcans) uh we weren't the only ones, Cold War...blame Russia. Africa...maybe Somalia or Libya? umm how'd we screw them up? and i sure hope your not french cause we could have jus let the nazis run your country, or if you're a brit we didn't have to help you gus and if you're chinese...we didnt have to help you either. (Nuke on hiroshima and nagasaki...)

    You don't like America? I got 2 words, FUCK YOU! We frankly don't give a damn!

    --
    Derek Greene
  385. Tony Blair statement 19:00 GMT by Isofarro · · Score: 1

    "It is not the United States of America versus terrorism, but the free democratic world against terrorism".



    "Acts of the terrorists will live in shame for eternity"



    He is visibly shocked.



    NATO have convened an emergency meeting 9:00 tommorrow morning. All UK forces are on highest alert all over the world. No flights over London allowed, all private flights grounded. No commercial flights will take off unless completely safe.



    1. Re:Tony Blair statement 19:00 GMT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      He is visibly shocked.
      Bollocks is he. He's doing his "pretend to be emotional by putting a little crack in my voice" that I've seen him do 1000000 times before, on demand.
      "It is not the United States of America versus terrorism, but the free democratic world against terrorism".
      Doesn't look like it to me. Looks to me like the States got 0wned by someone who's better at this than them. Don't see any damage in the UK. Perhaps that's because we're not (quite) as evil in our global policies as the States? Course, we're pretty bad so we did deserve something...
    2. Re:Tony Blair statement 19:00 GMT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GET OFF of my internet, you ungrateful fucking pussy brit. You bent over and took it from Hitler in WWII and if it wasn't for the US you'd still have German Cock in your ass. FUCK OFF.

    3. Re:Tony Blair statement 19:00 GMT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only dumb but misinformed too ... oh well

    4. Re:Tony Blair statement 19:00 GMT by John+F.+Ketamine · · Score: 1

      I love Britain and I love British people. However, sir, you eat cock.

      I remember seeing some damage in the UK, only it was done by the IRA. Fuck you. Fuck you repeatedly.

      You people had no idea what you had in Churchill. Ungrateful limey. Fuck you and all your descendents for your poor memory.

      --
      "Upgrade your grey matter, 'cause one day it may matter." --Deltron Zero
    5. Re:Tony Blair statement 19:00 GMT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I remember seeing some damage in the UK, only it was done by the IRA.
      And how are we SUCCEEDING in containing and (hopefully) ending this damage? By engaging in dialogue, by legitimising those with a complaint against us, by bringing them into a political process. In the light of this, warlike comments like "It is not the United States of America versus terrorism, but the free democratic world against terrorism" deserve the contempt that I showed for it. It's bullshit popularity-contest stuff; not what the world needs right now.

      Churchill? Brandy-soaked old men are good for morale in wartime; right now we need someone with a clue.
    6. Re:Tony Blair statement 19:00 GMT by JCMay · · Score: 2

      I think you may be speaking of the French (just kidding).

      The English were able to successfully repel the Germans during World War 2; don't you know your history? If I remember correctly, the English won the Battle of Brittain. Before the United States entered the war.

    7. Re:Tony Blair statement 19:00 GMT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey!
      It's people like YOU who start the hate, it's people like YOU who still believe in the rule of "an eye for an eye".
      In the era of internet there are virtually no borders, but in your mind.
      The germans are shocked, as well as the rest of the world.
      (don't believe me? visit gflash.de )

  386. On another note.. by SideshowBob · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I personally am mildly disgusted by some of the mainstream media coverage I've seen of the aftermath. I really hate when obnoxious camera crews stick cameras in the faces of obviously traumatized survivors and ask inane questions like 'were you scared?', 'did you see anyone die?', or 'does this make you angry?'

    Sheesh, I wish the media would a) let these people have some dignity, and b) quit asking so many stupid Sally Jessy-esque questions.

    1. Re:On another note.. by rw2 · · Score: 2

      I'm with you on the disgust. MSNBC is running a "Terror Timline" for fucks sake. (It's linked from poliglut if you're interested)

      What also disgusts me is the idea that this is Pearl Harbor ][.

      Want to talk about sequels, this is more like Hiroshima ][. A death toll of perhaps 50K dwarfs Pearl Harbor but is darn close to Hiroshima.

      And there isn't a thing that Bush's Star Wars sequal would have done to save us.

    2. Re:On another note.. by wwight · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, I am amazed at the quality and breadth of the reports streaming into /. From numerous eyewitness accounts in NYC and DC and reports from military personnel in Germany to the insughtful discussion about the causes and solutions to todays acts of terrorism, no other network or news source I've looked at today has appeared to me to be as accurate, as timely, or as intelligent.

      The latest I've heard from NYC is that many people are still known to be alive and trapped in the rubble of the WTC. Additionally, the collapse of the towers has taken down some other nearby buildings. In Boston, where I live, most people have left the city, particularly anyone working in tall buildings or in the financial district. Despite the mass exodus from downtown and our fears for friends and loved ones in NYC and DC, Bostonians seem to be reacting quietly and calmly.

  387. Yes, I am willing to die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a member of our US Military, I am willing to die to rid this world of the evil scourge. The people responsible for this will not stop now. Not everyone responsible died in the planes... someone ordered that attack. And I will do anything I can to get rid of that person.

    Shalia - proud sailor hoping we can find the person/people responsible.

  388. Whodunit? Check the Black Boxes... by StaticLimit · · Score: 2

    It may not be too difficult to figure out how events played out. The cockpit voice records in each of these planes should be VERY telling as to how these planes were taken over, who was doing it, and potentially why! Suicidal terrorists need to bring attention to their agenda in order to advance that agenda. I would expect them to be at least somewhat talkative as they were going down, especially since the presence of cockpit voice recorders is quite well known.

    - StaticLimit

  389. Source of Bombings (UNCONFIRMED) by ccraciun · · Score: 1

    Anonymous sources said that The Japanese extremist group the Red Army is in fact responsible for the bombings, that their purpose was to "repay the United States for their crimes at Hiroshima."

    The Japanese are offering support to the Americans, and to the American military bases in Japan. Stationed in Japan are 51,000 American military forces, which might be targetted for attack if indeed the terrorists are Japanese.

    -- rompres

  390. Re:September 11th = 911 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except that in other countries the practice is to list the day first, then the month so it's 11/9 not 9/11. Also, isn't 911 only an emergency # in the US and not anywhere else?

  391. "Fight Club" not so funny by Sebastopol · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In "Fight Club", the plot to take out the skyscrapers seemed cool and funny. And at the end, it seemed carefree and rewarding that the monoliths of capitalism were toppling, I'm sure everyone felt good about that.

    Now seeing people jumping out of windows in terror, thousands crushed burned and killed, a city closed, an infrastructure disabled, and world on high-alert, it doesn't seem so cool anymore.

    I feel the full effect of desensitization in the movies, and I am disturbed that I can't find the right words to communicate with friends who are in the midst of this crisis. Where can compassion be found? I'm not blaming the media for anything, I'm just sharply aware of the before and after I'm feeling toward fightclub vs. the real thing.

    --
    https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    1. Re:"Fight Club" not so funny by patrick_jones · · Score: 2, Informative

      The skyscrapers in fight club were empty, these were not. there is a big difference. fight club was not about killing people it was about killing the debt record. dont mix these two things up.

      --
      Treason doth never prosper. What's the reason? For if it prosper, none dare call it treason.
    2. Re:"Fight Club" not so funny by Smegma4U · · Score: 1

      One thing to remember about the movie though - they did it at night when the buildings would be mostly empty, in order to avoid killing innocents...not that there isn't still a horrible parralel between the movie and today's events.

      --
      If it's supposed to move and doesn't, use WD-40. If it moves and it shouldn't, use duct tape.
    3. Re:"Fight Club" not so funny by kneeo · · Score: 1

      They also did it at night, and made sure the buildings were evacuated.

    4. Re:"Fight Club" not so funny by puck71 · · Score: 4, Informative

      The only people in the exploded buildings in "Fight Club" were Tyler's people - in other words, the people in on the plot (suicide bombing if you will). Don't even try to compare the two. 0 innocent lives lost compared to tens of thousands? That's not a comparison. I suggest you watch the movie again and get your facts straight.

    5. Re:"Fight Club" not so funny by vanza · · Score: 2

      "Fight Club" is not nearly a good comparisson. Try watching "New York Under Siege" (I think this is the original name; I hate translations!). That one paints a much closer scenario to what we have seen today. And it's god damn scary (aside from the "in the end all is fine" ending).

      --
      Marcelo Vanzin
    6. Re:"Fight Club" not so funny by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      the difference was, there was no one in the buildings in fight club. No death, just a lot of rubble....

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    7. Re:"Fight Club" not so funny by jacobito · · Score: 2

      It was also a twistedly conservative cry for masculinity. Note how men are emasculated by consumer culture and New Age-y therapy culture. Note how women and femininity (usually exaggerated and absurd: "bitch tits") in the movie are objects of fear, disdain, or ridicule. It was a solid and fascinating movie, but I wanted to point these aspects out, since people tend to fawn all over it.

      Sorry for being off-topic.

  392. Sickness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know something's wrong when you see this, and your first thought is to cheer them on in their attempts to decapitate American government, in the hopes that this will stop them from passing laws to enslave you and your kind - with no empathy for the innocent lives lost, or accepting them as a reasonable, perhaps inevitable, cost for this goal. And then you realize, it's a botched attempt since whatever government survives will instinctively try to make America more repressive, thus encouraging yet more violent protests against American repression - either against foreign targets, or against its own citizens. And only then do you shed a tear for the wasted lives - not for the dead themselves, nor for their surviving friends and family, but because the objective they were sacrificed for was in vain.

    What have we come to, that such a thought chain could seem reasonable to an ordinary American citizen?

  393. IQ Matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I saw an interview with a man with the supposed highest IQ. His claim was that we cannot raise ourselves above the current system of punishment, retaliation, etc., etc. This system of war without a change in thinking. His proposal was to rank people on IQ. Move the highest IQs to world leader positions. The problem with the current system is the bell curve - because there are more average people in the world, the world will be an average place. He said we should screen people for history of diseases before allowing them to reproduce - thus eliminating certain diseases from the human race.

    Leads to the GATACA senario, but isn't that utopia? Isn't that our only hope in a world of terrorism?

  394. Re:Serious questions for anyone who's been in the by ergo98 · · Score: 1

    Hence the message! Do YOU know how long it takes to evacuate a 120 story building? I have absolutely no clue. I do know that there was roughly an hour or more between the initial strike and the collapse, so I'm hoping many did get out.

  395. Arafat sends his condolences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If he was really concerned, he'd give blood.

    Maybe that's what we need to do -- round up everyone in the middle East and force them to have transfusions -- Muslims get a pint of Jewish blood, Jews get a pint of Arab blood.

  396. Re:Makeshift News Sites by Blitherakt! · · Score: 1
    I think it's a statement to the far-reaching devestation of this cowardly attack.

    I attempted to go to CNN, Fox News and MSNBC this morning and could get no response from their servers.

    I do find it heartwarming that sites that normally have nothing to do with most types of news ( Slashdot, CNET, ESPN, etc.) are doing their best to help keep the flow of information going during this tragedy.

    /tma

    --
    /tma
    ----
  397. Re:Plea for peace - Huh? Get Real! by Yokaze · · Score: 1

    > The only thing they understand is violence.

    I guess that's why Baskia, Northern Ireland and Isreal have so much problems with terrorism. Not enough violence.

    > I don't care about a few Syrian or Afghani or whoever women and children in the face of *at least 50,000 innocent civilians* dying

    As they did not care about a few civilians.

    How many arabic civilians have to die for the american civilians?
    How much more worth is the life of an american person than a arabic civilian?
    You probably notice that your going a slippery road here.

    BTW Afghani women and children are already dying by the hands of their "goverment".

    >This is war. It's not pretty.

    It's not war, it's terrorism. And it's in some way even worse. You don't have a clear enemy you can point on nor clear frontiers to defend.

    --
    "Between strong and weak, between rich and poor [...], it is freedom which oppresses and the law which sets free"
  398. No car bomb by MattGWU · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Trust me...there was no car bomb at the State Department. When I heard that on whatever local news station I was watching at the time, I took a look out my window, and the State Department, one block diagonally from me, is still there. If a bomb went off at the State Department, I'd be the first to know.

    --
    "These people look deep within my soul and assign me a number based on the order in which I joined" --Homer re:
  399. Alternative info channel by Ktistec+Machine · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you're without a radio or TV in your office, try #CNN_Newsfeed on chat.cnn.com. It shows the closed captions for what's currently on-screen on CNN.

    1. Re:Alternative info channel by ChaosDiscordSimple · · Score: 4, Informative

      As Ktistec Machine points out, CNN runs an IRC server. It's working fine right now.The channel #CNN_Newsfeed contains the closed caption information from the live broadcast. It's a resonable fall back if you don't have access to television or radio.

      If you've got an IRC client, connect to irc://chat.cnn.com:7000/. If you've got Java support in your web browser, connect to CNN's java interface. Once you've logged in and given it a nickname, type "/join #CNN_Newsfeed" in the box.

    2. Re:Alternative info channel by jallen02 · · Score: 1

      News coverage is over until 8am Wednesday

  400. Life Imitating Art (Fight Club) by t0qer · · Score: 1

    WTC Destroyed
    All Exchanges Closed
    Scary isn't it?

    --toq

  401. Video by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

    Since I can't get near a tv now I managed to get a video from someone. I have placed it here.

    1. Re:Video by Rackemup · · Score: 2

      I should've known that link wouldn't work... posting a video clip from geocities would get the account shut down pretty damn fast. The bandwidth transfer limit is pretty low.

  402. It could be worse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope they don't have "the bomb".

    1. Re:It could be worse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Count on it. It's/they probably in place now. You guys should think a bit. Your entire society is *wide* open and you have seriously pissed 'bout 50% of humanity. There is no one to go to war with, anyone with enough will can pull one of these off.

      Not at all pleased with this, glad I live back in the bush in BC. Good luck eh'.

  403. Webcam of pentagon by azzario · · Score: 1

    Found a link to the washington post's site, that has a live webcam pointed at the smoldering ruins at the pentagon.

    http://a188.g.akamaitech.net/f/188/920/1m/www.wa sh ingtonpost.com/wp-srv/mmedia/webcams/eyeondc.htm

  404. I know what we can do by stupkid · · Score: 1

    Instead of blowing them up we can send them hugs. Because hugs have solved more problems then bombs right guys? And we can have a nice hippy orgy, smoke a fat joint, and then all our problems will be solved and the whole world will be a better place {:D Sounds great huh?

    Do you think that the Palenstinians would like a hug? Perhaps while they celebrate the deaths of thousands of US civilians in their streets. I wonder how some of you anti-retaliation posters would feel if someone murdered your family and then celebrated in the streets?

    Food for thought I hope.

  405. They expect retaliation. What have they prepared? by captinpoo · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Any group that has planned this complicated terrorist attack in such a calculated fashion must be expecting a retaliation from the US, and ALOT of the other first world countries. What I am wondering is what they have planned for the aftermath. What are they going to do to the swift responce that is sure to follow.

    The terrorist group that has organized this attack is probably the largest and most organized. But how big are they? they are by no means in size and sophistication as the US, and cannot fight face to face, but will have instead prepared an other extreme action.

    The attacks today were prime targets for 2 reasons. Casualties, and media impact. This has severely shocked America and the rest of the world. What must be done in the future to produce such horrific results?

  406. This is not a terrorist attack by Obliqueness · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Even though it may have been performed by career terrorists, this was an infrastructure attack, designed to destablize.
    A joint attack on WTC and Pentagon, the major financial and military centers in the U.S., is a direct physical attack against the practicioners of capitalism, and the command/control center of the organization that defends them. The method of attack also demonstrates the inherent weakness of skyscrapers and jumbo jets, two more vital pieces of infrastructure.

    If we don't actually go to war over this, I will be more than surprised.

    --
    The American Dream went to hell in a handbasket when someone decided that "The Customer" was King, and the customer beli
    1. Re:This is not a terrorist attack by n-baxley · · Score: 1

      If we don't actually go to war over this, I will be more than surprised.

      Who would we go to war with? The terrorists are so elusive and nomadic, where and who can you attack?

    2. Re:This is not a terrorist attack by Obliqueness · · Score: 1

      With whomever sanctioned the attack, anyone who assisted, and any other target of opportunity that could be included in the scope of the operations. That includes countries, political groups, and demographical groups.

      Note: Prediction != Endorsement. Although I think it will happen, I don't particularly like the idea.

      --
      The American Dream went to hell in a handbasket when someone decided that "The Customer" was King, and the customer beli
    3. Re:This is not a terrorist attack by Tazzy531 · · Score: 1

      What if this was another domestic attack? Another Oklahoma?

      --


      _______________________________
      "I'm not Conceited...I'm just a realist..."
    4. Re:This is not a terrorist attack by Obliqueness · · Score: 1

      Then with any luck, a few people get tried, and some more people get "disappeared".

      --
      The American Dream went to hell in a handbasket when someone decided that "The Customer" was King, and the customer beli
  407. Everyone just stop for a second....Please!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Most of you people here have got exactly the wrong mentality. Where is your humanity? Do you people not realize that a lot of people have died today. All of our thoughts and efforts should be on councilling the family and friends of those who have died. We should be helping to find the living who are still under those buildings. 99% of the population should not be concerned with who did this!! The other 1% should be trying to figure out why this happened and what to do about it. We don't need a bunch of people who have no idea about such things walking around pointing fingers and acting like they know what they are talking about. Everyone who is doing this should be ashamed of yourselves for not having the decency to worry about the real problem, getting our friends and families safe.

    I am not ashamed at all to admit I had tears in my eyes when I first heard the news. This is a horrible act by a small group of people. This is not war people. So please think before you point your fingers at someone. Because remember who ever did this had a reason to. And you (most anyway who read this) live in this country. That makes each of us partially responsible for what happened.

    Don't even think of taking an innocent attitude at this. The US is not the friendliest country in the world. We have many enemies both in our borders and out. The way a country acts is directly proportional to the way it's people act. The government of this great nation does not act 100% freely from what the general desires of the populous want. (All you conspiracy theorist can say what you want, but if you really believe that the US government doesn't work this way then you need psycological treatment)

    This rant is not pointless, and you will get no satisfaction from flaming me because deep down you know I'm right.

    God. Please give the men and women the strength and courage to overcome tremendous hardship and prevail in the darkest hour. Let your loving light pierce through the rubble and show us the people. Give us the power to do super human feats and quickly bring this trajedy to and end. Allow us to prevail and grow stronger from this deed. Allow the country to pull together and show that American's can over come any obstical no matter how great. We will prevail and continue to thrive as a prosperous country. Please bless everyone, including those who have commited this act. For they too must face you in the end. Allow them to understand the horrible act they have unleashed on us and allow them the ability to repent. We will probably never accept and apology, but your infinite goodness can. Amen.

    1. Re:Everyone just stop for a second....Please!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where is our humanity? Where are your brains? It doesn't matter what we do or don't do, these types will always hate us. There is no reasoning with them because they are not reasonable. This attitude of rolling over and being the gentle giant is what has gotten us into this trouble in the first place!!!! I am so sick of you traitors whining about how horrible we americans are to everyone else. We bend over backwards for this entire planet, but it is never enough. We always get spit in our faces by the veryones we try to help. If you don't like capitalizm, LEAVE!!!! Go to one of these third wold countries and find out why they REALLY are poor. They bringit upon themselves. I have worked in afew of them in refugee camps and hurricane relief camps, and believe me.... NOTHING will ever be enough. We will always be hated by them.Most people in these countries just want to be left alone and work and live, but the ones who do this sort of thing are not going to change thier mind. The reasons they state for why they perpetuate these sort of actions are only thier favorite excuse. Even if that reason went away, they will find another. The only solution is to destroy them like you do with a mad dog. Hopefully not too many innocents will be hurt in the process, but you can't blame the ones who strike against these types.. The resposibility for ALL of the innocent dead and hurt goes upon the head of those who commit acts like this one. Economic hostility, I've never heard of such a preposterous notion!!! If anything, we help others financially more than anything else. JUST SHUT YOUR HOLE!!!!!!

  408. News from Internet Exchange in SoHo by wbeckler · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've been getting emails from a friend at Globix, the giant internet exchange in southern Manhattan. Here is the latest news:

    Globix is located on Centre Street south of Canal Street. Businesses south of Canal have been asked to evacuate. The dust from the WTC collapse has forced buildings to shut down their air conditioning. Only a few large computer operations can operate without normal air conditioning, but major exchanges, like the AT&T telephone building and Globix, have backup cooling systems that should hopefully operate in these conditions.

    Globix engineers are taking care of major service problems and trying to prevent potential major problems so they can leave as soon as possible.

    Globix is hooked into the 3 largest backbones that pass through the region, and at least one must still be operating. Email messages originating from Globix are making their way out, but messages sent to Globix are not coming in.

    A telephone call to (212-334-xxxx) from NJ (856-672-xxxx) got through, but no calls to the 718 area code are working. I just received a call from a 212 phone as well.

    My friend at Globix was walking to a class at Sun Microsystems at the World Trade Center when the first plane hit. His view of the collision was obscured, and he was not injured. He commented:

    > I ran down to the woolworth building and stood
    > looking in shock at the North tower, the smoke
    > billowing out of it and the thousands of papers
    > fluttering down against the blue sky. Suddenly
    > I saw something hurtling down the side of the
    > building. It was a man, limbs, tie and suitcoat
    > flailing. several more followed. I turned and
    > slowly walked back towars the sunny, newly
    > renovated park in front of city hall.
    >
    > I heard the second explosion hit, and people
    > began screaming and running past me.
    >
    > As I sit here at my comfortable nest of a
    > workspace, my skin crawls, and I feel sick to
    > my stomach. I have read about events this bad
    > or worse a hundred times in the novels my
    > father derisively terms storybooks, but the
    > reality is completely incomparable. Perhaps he
    > had a point.
    >

    Another friend of mine was in the 70th floor of the second building to get hit, and he made it out alive. I don't yet have the details on that.

    Transportation update (from a Brooklyn friend):
    Subway lines are running off and on, and bridges and tunnels are closed to cars. The W line was still bringing people into Manhattan at 9:30, but that has ceased. The N/R is now running above 14th Street. Pedestrian traffic is allowed on the Brooklyn Bridge and the Manhattan Bridge. People in suits have been streaming over these bridges into Brooklyn all morning.

    Historical Note:
    Today, September 11, is the 28th anniversary of the CIA-led coup that overthrew the democratically elected government headed by Allende in Chile. Why is this relevant? I feel an immense amount of anger towards the people who caused this, and I think the people who caused this are the murderers sitting in Washington D.C. who direct U.S. foreign policy. They recklessly inspire anti-U.S. sentiment in every other country in this world. We ruthlessly bombed civilian targets in Yugoslavia (including water purification sites); we starve the children of Iraq; we blockade Cuba for no good reason; we topple democratically elected socialist governments in order to install pro-U.S. dictatorships. My anger does not direct itself solely towards the government officials who have perpetrated these crimes. I am furious at the millions of Americans who voted for George W. Bush. They are responsible for putting into power a person who is walking all over international agreements about global warming and arms control. And anybody who sits by and pays taxes and watches our imperialistic military and State Department do its dirty work has to take some responsibility for these murders. WAKE UP AMERICA: THIS IS YOUR FAULT. No missile defense shield will protect us from the hate that is justifiably spawned worldwide by our pro-corporate foreign policy.

    Experience of an anarchist:
    When the mail carrier knocked on my door this morning, I was worried that I was about to be taken in by the FBI. If you know what I've been through, you would not think this was a paranoid reaction. There will be a witchhunt following these events, and the U.S. government will probably use it as an excuse to harass activists. Right now the joint anti-terrorism task forces around the country spend most of their money tracking and harassing the anti-corporate activists who have been targeting world financial summits. A good chunk is also spent on the Earth Liberation Front and the Animal Liberation Front, neither of which actually have any members; they are just slogans that autonomous cells apply to their acts of vandalism. Today's events show yet again that money spent on national security does not in fact serve national security, but rather serves the insidious ends of the people controlling this country. Expect there to be calls for more money to fund politically motivated witchhunts against the Left. Expect calls for outlawing consumer use of encryption.

    Finally:
    Eben Moglen, Columbia University Law Professor and general counsel of the FSF once said about the inevitable rise of encrypted communications:

    I don't doubt that there will be downsides. You should accept the truth that harms will be caused, as harms are caused by free speech all the time. But don't let yourself be panicked about this. The world of the twenty-first century will be more free, and will continue to be, as the spooks often say, "a tough neighborhood." Indeed, some bombs will go off; there will be, in Stewart Baker's signature phrase, "some mangled, burnt bodies." You will notice that there are already. But fewer of them will be in Iraqi prisons; none of them will ever again be in a gulag or Lager maintained by a KGB or SS state with a tap on every telephone. And of that you should be very proud, because it is we who will have made it possible.

    1. Re:News from Internet Exchange in SoHo by thanq · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Hold on a moment, what is written in "Historical Note" sounds more like a page out of a terrorist manual under the "What it is about".

      Let's look at it briefly and distinguish the dirty, blind propaganda and actual reality:

      They recklessly inspire anti-U.S. sentiment in every other country in this world

      It's not every country of the world. Only those that have dictatorships or socialist fundamental governments that spew out propaganda about how deprived Western society is and how good it is to be a slave with no wages no food and no human rights (Iraq, Somalia, Africa, Cambodia, so on...).

      we blockade Cuba for no good reason

      I don't think that anyone who knows history wouldn't argue this. We blocked Cuba in 60s in repsponse to Russians installing nuclear warheads aimed at the US on the island. Avoiding globar thermo-nuclear reason is a pretty damn good reason to me.



      we starve the children of Iraq

      WE? US starves children of Iraq? I am sorry but the reason why chidlren in Iraq are starving is because of the dictatorhip regime that rules that country and has a point in keeping people suffer without food and human rights in a country where you have to say you hate USA and love the great leader, otherwise your family disappears and you get a bullet in your head.

      And anybody who sits by and pays taxes and watches our imperialistic military (...)

      Excuse me, but I read words like that before from the mouths of people liek Stalin, Hitler, Saddam, Khaddafi, and all other fundamental radicalist groups that are the ones who kill women and children, who chop people to death with machetes, who bomb schools, malls, cinemas.

      Think about it, that's not a historical note, that's something that you try to put into small kids heads in Syria, Palestine, Iraq, Libya, so when they grow up they can kill thousands of INNOCENT people and feel right about it.

    2. Re:News from Internet Exchange in SoHo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whatever senor Saddam. If you don't like our country then why don't you get the fuck out and go join the other chicken shits who won't fess up for their deeds which they seem to be so proud of.

    3. Re:News from Internet Exchange in SoHo by jcoleman · · Score: 1

      Mod this up!!!

    4. Re:News from Internet Exchange in SoHo by hummer · · Score: 1

      My friend at Globix was walking to a class at Sun Microsystems at the World Trade Center when the first plane hit. His view of the collision was obscured, and he was not injured. He commented:

      I have just been speaking with Solnet, who provide Sales and support for Sun here in New Zealand. Evidently Sun's offices were on one of the lower floors, and all staff were evacuated safely.

      No doubt many of you here have dealings with Sun so I thought you may be interested...

      -hummer

    5. Re:News from Internet Exchange in SoHo by nikster · · Score: 1

      while the original poster may be exaggerating, he has a point:
      ALL AMERICANS should think about why they are so hated by many people in the arab states. why are palestinians celebrating this horrible disaster?

      are all palestinians insane? are all arabs insane? hmm... unlikely, i would say.

      because the US is a superpower, it needs to be very, very nimble and smart in its dealings with other nations. right now, the US is perceived as schoolyard-bully, even by friends.

    6. Re:News from Internet Exchange in SoHo by ckedge · · Score: 2

      I just want you to know that there are many more people out there, myself included, whose stomachs got sick when we saw our first documentary about what happened in Chile, and the fact that the CIA engineered it because they thought the democratically elected government was leaning "too far to the left". To think of all the people who died at the hands of the Military Junta that took over afterwards...

    7. Re:News from Internet Exchange in SoHo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>They recklessly inspire anti-U.S. sentiment in >>every other country in this world

      It's not every country of the world. Only those that have dictatorships or socialist fundamental governments that spew out propaganda about how deprived Western society is and how good it is to be a slave with no wages no food and no human rights (Iraq, Somalia, Africa, Cambodia, so on...).
      ever heard of growing anti-US sentiment in Europe? Ask the French. Ask the Italians. Ask some of the Germans. Reasons? Behaving like an axe in the woods. Kyoto. Spionage. Others.

      >>we starve the children of Iraq
      WE? US starves children of Iraq?
      In a certain way, yes. It is quite clear that there are two ways of stopping the starving.

      1) a new (and better) Iraqi government OR

      2) stopping the blockade

      As theres hardly a way to solve the problem via 1) you have to consider 2). Thus you admittedly give up the advantages of the blockade which are about zero. It is known that blockades have _never_ brought any government down.

      so when they grow up they can kill thousands of INNOCENT people and feel right about it.
      Does the word "Hiroshima" ring a bell? Sure. That was "necessary", "for a greater good". I dont want to judge that. But as ol Jesus says: Whoever is without sin shall throw the first stone.

    8. Re:News from Internet Exchange in SoHo by bwoodring · · Score: 1

      Wow.

      Your connection to reality is very tenuous indeed my friend.

      You thought you were going to be hauled of in an anarchist witch-hunt? Do you really think anyone in the government gives a shit about you and your views? Do you really think they care if you want to Marx and listen to Rage Against the Machine?

  409. AIRLINE INFORMATION by Goldmund · · Score: 1

    List of Planes That Crashed Today

    Details on the planes that crashed Tuesday:

    -American Airlines Flight 11: A Boeing 767 en route from Boston to Los Angeles. The plane was carrying 81 passengers, nine flight attendants and two pilots. The location of the crash has not been determined.

    -American Airlines Flight 77: A Boeing 757 en route from Dulles Airport near Washington to Los Angeles. The plane was carrying 58 passengers, four flight attendants and two pilots. The location of the crash has not been determined.

    -United Airlines Flight 93: A Boeing 757, crashed southeast of Pittsburgh while en route from Newark, N.J. to San Francisco. The plane was carrying 38 passengers, two pilots and five flight attendants.

    -United Airlines Flight 175: A Boeing 767. The flight was bound from Boston to Los Angeles. It was carrying 56 passengers, two pilots and seven flight attendants. The airline would not say where the plane crashed.

    What we know now...

  410. Three Step Process: ID, Locate, Eradicate by cybrpnk · · Score: 2, Troll

    The time for peace is over. We must identify who did this, find out where they are, go in after them, and wipe them off the face of the Earth. We will suffer more casualties doing it this way. Too bad. The death toll is going to exceed Pearl Harbor and approach if not exceed use of a tactical nuke. We are at war.

    1. Re:Three Step Process: ID, Locate, Eradicate by tomblackwell · · Score: 1

      The last major terrorist attack in America was carried out by Americans. The people responsible for this attack could very well be your neighbours. Still interested in using that nuke?

    2. Re:Three Step Process: ID, Locate, Eradicate by swm · · Score: 2
      Still interested in using that nuke?

      I think he means the death toll from the attack on the WTC.

    3. Re:Three Step Process: ID, Locate, Eradicate by tomblackwell · · Score: 1

      Of course. I apologize for my apparent inability to read.

    4. Re:Three Step Process: ID, Locate, Eradicate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that i cannot think of any American group with that kind of resourse and coordination.

    5. Re:Three Step Process: ID, Locate, Eradicate by Syberghost · · Score: 2

      No; we need to change the policies that cause the terrorists to be pissed off at us, so they'll go bother somebody else.

      Let Israel fend for themselves, and not only will the terrorists leave us alone, but Israel will probably do a better job without our help.

      To declare war on them merely legitimizes them as soldiers, and they are NOT soldiers; they are criminals, and the way you deal with criminals is to arrest them, try them, and stick them in little boxes for the rest of their lives, like the animals they are.

    6. Re:Three Step Process: ID, Locate, Eradicate by Metrol · · Score: 2

      Let Israel fend for themselves, and not only will the terrorists leave us alone, but Israel will probably do a better job without our help.

      Wouldn't that very thing acknowledge a victory for the terrorists? I'm not a big advocate of Israel, but by gosh now is the time more than ever to stand behind it. To not do so gives these cowards a victory they do not deserve.

      --
      The line must be drawn here. This far. No further.
    7. Re:Three Step Process: ID, Locate, Eradicate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The way you deal with terrorist soldiers is catch them, pry their kneecaps off with screwdrivers, stab them repeatedly, then leave them to die like they deserve to.

    8. Re:Three Step Process: ID, Locate, Eradicate by Syberghost · · Score: 2

      Wouldn't that very thing acknowledge a victory for the terrorists?

      A minor one. But since the policy was wrong in the first place, and since it's costing thousands of American lives, sticking with it to make a political point is awfully cynical.

      Exactly how many women and children are we willing to exchange for machismo?

    9. Re:Three Step Process: ID, Locate, Eradicate by Syberghost · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The way you deal with terrorist soldiers is catch them, pry their kneecaps off with screwdrivers, stab them repeatedly, then leave them to die like they deserve to.

      Thereby becoming a less-free society, which is exactly their goal. When the police begin to violate the laws, and everybody has less freedom, the terrorists have won.

      And in the process, you've made some new martyrs for their cause. Do you really think death frightens people who are willing to kamikaze the WTC? Irrelevancy frightens them. Dying of old age in prison frightens them. Being killed by infidels makes them happy.

  411. Domestic terrorism? by msebae · · Score: 1

    In the wake of this terrible tragedy, I'm beginning to feel that this could possibly be a domestic act of terrorism. Even the most advanced and highly-networked foreign terrorist organisation (Bin Laden seem to top the list) cannot coordinate and implement an attack of such magnitude and precision. I'm afraid it's Oklahoma all over again!

  412. Re:I hope... by ackthpt · · Score: 2
    For all the worry about Carnivore, we can see what handsome payoffs all the eyes and ears we know about and those we don't have done to prevent today.


    Maybe more tapping, eavesdropping, sifting, etc. will be on the way. Maybe the missile defense plan will be reconsidered to beef up intelligence. Or maybe those who commit such heinous acts will see, by the way the US conducts itself in the aftermath, that terrorism is not an effective weapon.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  413. closing down... by mach-5 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    OK, I don't see why there is a reason for all kinds of business, schools, etc to close down. It just shows are weakness in time of disaster.

    I can see how it is important for the immediate areas surrounding the disaster, and for other areas where there is a threat. However, I think a lot of places are over reacting. You can't just close down the country.

    1. Re:closing down... by Peyna · · Score: 1

      Businesses, schools, etc. are closing down all over the world in reverence to these events, some as precautionary efforts, but mostly in reverence. The same way many places closed for the Challenger disaster, etc.

      --
      What?
    2. Re:closing down... by tjgrant · · Score: 1

      Actually, we have pretty much shut down our company. It's not a matter of fear, but of respect for the dead.

      This is not a normal day. Business should not continue as usual.

      --

      Stand Fast,
      tjg.

  414. CNN Timeline mirror by ZOP · · Score: 1

    http://www.wgops.com/cnn-mir/

    Don't have the image yet, but will try to get it.

    Anyone who's got stuff that should go up drop me a note, mloftis aht wgops dawt com. If you don't know how to make that a real mail, then you can just stay quiet.

  415. President Reagan by jhaberman · · Score: 1
    Its times like this that make me wish we had President Reagan back in office. Not only could he take the entire nation under his wing like a gentle father figure (anyone remember the address he gave the nation after the Challenger explosion? Still brings tears to my eyes), he could make the rotten sons-a-bitches pay and pay dearly for this.


    I know his domestic policy was crap and he was a conservative republican... but in times of crisis, I would have no one else.


    Jason

    --
    He's totally creeping out the Great One, eh...
    1. Re:President Reagan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this the same President Reagan who absolutely, unequivocally stated that we will never accede to terrorist demands and then sold arms to the Iranians for political gain?

      I suggest that we were played like a Stradivarius, and, no, I would rather have an honest man up top in times of crisis.

    2. Re:President Reagan by Qrlx · · Score: 1

      That was a great speech. It was written by Peggy Noonan. I do remember that speech and I'm feeling today much like I did on Jan 28 1986. It's tough to tell right now, but I think this is worse than the Challenger disaster.

      Bush will not be able to pull off a speech as good as Reagan's, regarless of who writes it. Reagan was a STAR HOLLYWOOD ACTOR, Bush was a BASEBALL TEAM OWNER. Do you really think someone in the same league as Marge Schottenheimer or George Steinbrenner can give a useful speech at a time like this?

  416. Call first, make appointment by bgdarnel · · Score: 4, Informative

    Red Cross offices (in the Raleigh NC area at least) are being overwhelmed by donors and are asking everyone to call and make an appointment rather than just dropping by.

    -Ben

    1. Re:Call first, make appointment by update() · · Score: 1

      Same in Boston. By all means give blood, but unless you're in the NYC area wait a couple of days until things calm down. They'll still be needing it.

  417. Speaking for Yourself by virg_mattes · · Score: 2

    > I for one cannnot wait for the reports of islamic
    > people being beaten to death by americans.


    You, sir, are the "fscking idiot". Comparing all Islamics to Shiite terrorists is very much like comparing all Christians to the Branch Davidians. Perhaps you should pick up a book or two before you begin tarring innocents with your far-too-wide brush.

    > It could be time for us to stoop to their level and kill innocent people.

    This is lunacy. Killing innocent people is worse than pointless. If they're innocent, they have no connection to the perpetrators, so (A) the perpetrators won't care if they die, and (B) the innocents' relatives become your enemies as well. Grow up.

    > ...because despite our emotions, we as Americans
    > still defer to reason (thankfully)...


    Don't dare speak for me, fool. Your statement above demonstrates firmly that you don't defer to reason at all, instead blowing off impotent anger at people whose only connection to the crime is your deranged sense of community. You, who cannot get outside his own head and his own hate, are a demonstration of the very worst of egocentrism. Now go home, and tell your mother not to let you post again until you're an adult.

    Virg

    1. Re:Speaking for Yourself by togofspookware · · Score: 1

      Uhhh.... No. I don't think you understood what he said. He said that that is the reason we don't do such things. Why did you get +2?

      --
      Duct tape, XML, democracy: Not doing the job? Use more.
  418. Lone Gunman, Scenario 12-D by darekana · · Score: 1

    Hey, looks like the X-Files, Lone Gunman was right about something. Except the part where the good guys win.

    The thing will destroy us is the thing we can't or don't stop. I hope its the "can't" option.

    Peace.

  419. Violence is the only answer by jubchai · · Score: 1

    The only way to stop these attacks is to kill those responsible - likely Osama Bin Laden. The WTC attacks were not in retaliation for previous U.S. counterstrikes - they are part of an ongoing jihad against the U.S. We (America) might see this as terrorism, but the terrorists see this as a war. They will continue to attack us whether we retaliate or not. A U.S. counterstrike that kills Bin Laden or whoever is responsible will not only "get even" with terrorists, but it will prevent future attacks by lopping off the head of the organization. Yes, this will make a martyr of Bin Laden to all the Muslim fundamentalists - but Bin Laden was not doubt swelling his ranks with fundamentalists before the attacks anyway, so what's the difference? Violence is regrettable, but necessary. Off topic, I'm sure that the Arab world will condemn these attacks. Maybe not Iraq or Iran, but Arafat has already expressed his sympathies, and the Taliban have assured us that Bin Laden has been kept in isolation from the outside world (the Taliban must be shitting their collective shalwar-kameeses right now, knowing that while no one will officially speculate, they are suspects #1). Even so, I'd be scared to be an Arab in America right now...

  420. Re:They expect retaliation. What have they prepare by Brian+Boitano · · Score: 1

    terrorist group prepared for aftermath?
    wasn't it a suicide mission?

    --
    What would Brian Boitano do?
  421. Re:He is mistaken (I'M in London, YOUR not) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am am in London and can say he is mistaken, the Wharf is now empty, and a couple of financial institutions have closed, but that's it.

    We are used to terrorist threats. We have had the IRA blowing people up for over quarter of a century (though not on this scale).

    Your in Frankfurt, fucking stop second guessing what's going on in London tell us what YOU *THINK* is going on. ARGH! LUSER!

  422. Downton Ottawa by Deadplant · · Score: 1

    I've just heard (second hand)that there has been a bomb threat at the world exchange plaza in downtown ottawa. A couple of my co-workers who were downtown this morning are stuck there because the underground parking garage has been sealed off!

  423. Re:I hope... by kcjuggle · · Score: 1

    I think coflow understands the situation. He's the first person I've found on slashdot so far who doesn't think like a damn treehugging hippie.

    I'm usually proud to be a geek, until I heard the comments made by many of my fellow slashdot readers. I'm surprised at how many people don't support Bush and are calling him a coward. I personally don't even think the news channels should be reporting where he's going. He's playing smart so he can stay in the game long enough to win. He's got a great team and lots of good contacts at his fingers. He will take action and make this country proud.

    And why are all of you still talking about Clinton? Isn't he the one who butchered the Defense budget anyway.

  424. Live by force of arms or deal with world inequity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sparta was a greek city state which had 100 slaves for every Spartan citizen. As a result of the huge number of slaves, the Spartans had a very high standard of living (huge houses, every whim indulged). This high standard of living came at a high price. The Spartans lived under constant threat of rebellion from the resentful slaves. Every Spartan male was trained from birth to be a soldier and was expected to be ready for the call to arms at a moments notice. Not a very relaxing way of life. Civil liberties were very limited in Spartan society.

    Many people are advocating a hardline military response to the terrorist attacks. Although this may be emotionally satisfying, it will only increase the likelyhood of future attacks. As long as 4/5ths of the worlds people live in 3rd world conditions and see their family lands being purchased on a whim by wealthy forigners who earn more in an hour than they do in a year, as long as people in Cuba, Columbia, Palistine, Iraq and many other areas of the world feel they are being persecuted for their way of life, then there will be a long line of frustrated would be terrorists waiting to hijack planes to fly into buildings.

    It is possible to subjgate these people through force. This approach as been used many times in history. Unfortunately if you look at the history books, frightening people by punishing them through force of arms only works if you apply truly horrific punishments on a massive scale. Witness the death camps in WW2, or the killing fields of Cambodia. Another approach that works is a massive suspension of civil liberties through a secret police force like the KGB in the USSR, or the reign of terror in revolutionary France.

    If the citizens of the US want to live in safety from terrorist attacks then they must make a choice: Either work toward spreading the worlds wealth more evenly and allowing people outside the US to practice their chosen government and religion as they choose, or live like the Spartans and reduce civil liberties, develop an intrusive and sophistocated monitoring system for suspicious behaviour and have a powerful military force able to deal with situations quickly and live with the ugliness of bullying your neibours until they are too frightened oppose you in any way.

  425. Re:Serious questions for anyone who's been in the by 1g$man · · Score: 2, Informative

    According to a witness interviewed on MSNBC, the people from the second building were NOT evacuated when the first building was hit. At that point, they had no idea what really was going on and assummed it was an accident.

  426. Re:I hope... by baptiste · · Score: 2, Insightful
    You go boy, time to start kicking some terrorist ass...

    AMEN! You set off a bomb, kill a few people, maybe a couple hundred - you might get away without retaliation. You destroy the World Trade Center Towers, smash a plane into the Pentagon, and kill thousands of Americans - you've gone to war with the United States. Whoever you are, you may be pretty happy with yourself, but you can't imagine what an event like this will do to the American psyche, ESPECIALLY if it was an Arab sect that did this (and even if it wasn't - Palestinians dancing in the streets???). Support for a free Palestine? GONE. Somewhat restrained responses to things like the Saudi apt bombings, the USS Cole Bombing? GONE. Americans don't take attacks like this lightly. One guy with a truck bomb changed the way America viewed terrorism and safety. This event will have a much broader impact.

    All I know is IF bin Laden did this AND the Taliban continue to turn a blind eye, I for one will happily press the launch button of an ICBM to level the whole freaking country. No pin point attack with minimal collatoral damage - you harbor a terrorist you ARE a terrorist. Yeah, yeah, nukes, fallout, sucks for neighbroing countries and I realize that but you have to realize that many Americans WILL have these inflamed feelings and they won't be thinking about 'innocents' Call us hypocrits, callous, whatever. But if President Bush (first time I've called him that!) wants to drop every freaking conventional bomb we have on a country that knowingly harbored the people that did this - amen. If it was an American group that did this - I'll pull the switch myself or behappy to load the rifles.

    My only hope is perhaps this will show missle defense to be the joke it is and maybe we can apply the billions Bush wants to spend on it on other more important things like finding the bastards that did this and improving security where we can without living in a police state. Oh - and I for one am MORE than happy to take a few billion from Missle defense, Social Security, WHATEVER to rebuild the World Trade Center in ALL its glory - we will NOT be cowed.

  427. Businesses in WTC? by Chump1422 · · Score: 1

    Is there any list online of the businesses in the WTC??? I really wnat to know if my friends are ok, I have a lot of banker/financial type friends.

    Thanks!

    1. Re:Businesses in WTC? by Blitherakt! · · Score: 1
      I tried to find a place to e-mail this to ya, Clump, but I couldn't. Hope you're reading.

      I'm linking directly in these posts and not doing the normal goatse.cx paranoid stuff. Anybody providing goatse.cx links on a topic like this should be hunted down and eviscerated.

      Source: C|Net News.com website.

      Story lead in:

      The World Trade Center houses 350 tenants within the 16-acre complex, which includes approximately 12 million square feet of rentable office space, including the two collapsed 110-story office towers, a 47-story office building, two nine-story office buildings, an eight-story U.S. Customhouse and a 22-story Marriott hotel.
      Among the largest tenants is Morgan Stanley, which has its retail trading operation headquartered in the south tower of the World Trade Center.

      The story also lists a couple of websites, one of which is a list of tenants that "is not clear how often" it is updated. The list doesn't appear to be responding at this moment.

      Hope this helps.

      --
      /tma
      ----
    2. Re:Businesses in WTC? by tino_sup · · Score: 1

      Here is the emergency number to obtain information about employees of the Morgan Stanley Corporation.

      888-883-4391 - only to verify employee status for family members

      Hope this helps

      --
      I am me...I think
    3. Re:Businesses in WTC? by manuellabor2 · · Score: 1

      here is a list of the buisnesses in the WTC:
      the site is down, but if you use the Google (God bless) toolbar, you can get a cached copy of the page by clicking "page info" and "cached shot of page"

      http://www.onisland.com/wtc/bizdir/index.html

    4. Re:Businesses in WTC? by Chump1422 · · Score: 1

      Thanks so much. I know that my best friend at Morgan Stanley quit in January, but there are plenty of other acquaintances of mine that could be there.

      If I had some mod points, I'd give 'em to you. Thanks again for the resource.

  428. War by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What have I seen so far?
    Death, poetry... it surely seems that massive elements of propaganda have already arisen.

    Why is it that as a Non-American I found it hard not to wish Bush and his cronies dead after hearing some of their various statements - as ridiculous as that may be?

    1. Re:War by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 2

      dude...

      on behalf of all americans

      shut the fuck up.

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
  429. State Department was attacked. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "A car bomb that was supposed to have gone off int front the State Department has been denied."

    Really? I am watching BBC news on satellite and the front of the state department looks all black and chunky.

  430. More information by lordkalibah · · Score: 1

    First off civilins in Afganistan are celebrating, throwing candy to eachother, and saying GOD IS GREAT, and THE US IS THE HEAD OF THE SNAKE.... So i can only speculate that it was an attack from Afganistan, the goverment there denies that it was them, and gives it condolences, but the civilians are celebrating wildly. 1 plane hit near camp david, about .5 miles away from it to be exact. The south tower was the first to be hit. 21 min later at 9:03 eastern time the eastern tower was hit, people jumped and fell from towers, at 930 am, pentagon it , 959 south tower colapses, and 30 min later, the other colappases, in pennsivania, i heard rumors of a car bomb going off in boston, near the airport, - which was the origin point of the 2 planes that hit the towers, there were secondary devices on all planes, some had 3rd devices, that is 30 min after they hit, 1st went off, then the 2nd after an hour . all flights in us and canada canclled, j crew in st.louis closed , afraid of terrorists ??? all tall office building evacuated in major cities, 200 firemen missing, that went into the WTC buildings when the planes hit before they fell. Rumors say that they will have 1 incident every hour today...car bomb suscpected outside the white house, , 6 planes hijacked. some are rumors just saying what i hear. more later....

    1. Re:More information by Tazzy531 · · Score: 1

      Check your sources.

      First of all..that video that you watched was Palestine.

      --


      _______________________________
      "I'm not Conceited...I'm just a realist..."
  431. where is kate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i didnt know her real well but she worked in manhattan,
    marketing, vegan, caucasian, ... anyone know?

  432. Plea for Justice by Hot+Turkey+Ed · · Score: 1

    I am an American citizen and I demand justice. I am going to write my representatives to encourage them to muster the full strength of the United States so that retaliation does indeed lead to more deaths, specifically of those who are directly responsible. This is an attack on our country, our values, and our way of life. If it was sponsored or facilitated by any foreign power, the United States should respond with its full might and fury against it. No meetings at the United Nation. No consultations with allies. No warning. Just death. There is a time for peace. Now is the time for war.

  433. Re:Palestinians celebrate - so what? by Zard+Biomatrix · · Score: 1

    that's a stupid statement. there are a lot of countries that hate us. This kind of violence is commonplace to them in their own countries. of course they are going to celebrate. everyday they lose children and family members to bombings in their countries while America gets fat and happy.

    I'm not saying it's right...but there could be a dangerous backlash...

    there are a lot of foreign nationals that work here - i DO NOT want to send them to concentration camps.

    we need to find out who is responsible. i don't necessarily think it's a good idea to flatten the first country who pisses us off.

    i mean, let's say 5 guys from the US blow up a few buildings in some country. would you want to get Nuked for it?

    /zard

  434. All too true... by AlXtreme · · Score: 1

    According to Nostradamus, the next great war would start in the year of the first millenium, in the late-summer (august/september). A year ago, i read his book and watched for signs of something terrible happening, if only sub-conciously, but i guess i miscalculated: the first year of the millenium is 2001...

    Anyone can say what he wants about him, but i'm afraid, in retrospect, Nostradamus was awfully correct.

    I morn for the people who died in this attack, i morn for America, and i morn for the dark age the world has just entered.

    I hope he will be wrong...

    --
    This sig is intentionally left blank
    1. Re:All too true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, don't forget this cryptic but seemingly relevant passage:

      The heads of rag will tremble before they burn.
      The fire will streak from the sky and scorch their land.
      The land of the jockeys of the camel will be no more.

  435. Re:I hope... by crush · · Score: 1

    I posted a story (rejected) yesterday to slashdot about a "pro-Palestinian" web hoster being raided by an anti-terrorism unit. This was in Texas .
    One of the knock-on effects of terrorism is the extension of powers to security forces - lots of incredible changes were made to U.K. legislation in response to the P.I.R.A.: things like removal of the right to silence, the ability to be held on suspicion(!) for up to two weeks, trial by non-jury courts.
    I hope that American citizens aren't bamboozled into giving their security forces undue powers that can be misused.

  436. Go further by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want war against those who caused a national crisis, look at the assassination that lead to World War I. Retaliation, and pointing blame to third parties lead us to a war of trenches, mass-scale slaughters, and a war only to be supersceded by another war caused by World War I, also known as World War II.
    And the deprivation also caused the Germans to look for a scapegoat, which led to the Holocaust, which lead to the need for an Israeli state, which lead to Israel, which lead to the exiled Palestinians, (....) which leads right here today.

  437. Re:Plea for peace (eat the murderer) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try Canada. But you'll have to give up your love of a "right to bear arms" before you coming here because that is not our way. Why a civilized society believes it should have a right to wield weapons is beyond me .. I think you all have been brainwashed by the NRA. As a Canadian, every time I watch an NRA infomercial about how we "canadians are miserable" ever since our right to bear arms was taken away -- I can only think, geez, the Americans actually believe this propoganda. Over here, you need a special permit to wield a handgun, and even politicians have trouble getting one. Compare canadian cities to american ones. Take the majot city in America that has the lowest crime rate (when compared to other American cities) and divide by 10 to get the crime rate of the major city in Canada with the highest crime rate.

  438. German Stock Exchange in Frankfurt shut down by anno1602 · · Score: 1

    ..early at 19:15 local time. By now (20:15), the police has allowed access to the buildings again.

  439. I am of the same mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A small island would do. Give IQ tests upon arrival. He who has the highest IQ becomes the new leader and sets the rules. Obviously my faith in IQ is a little blind, but the smart have done well in the past and history tends to repeat itself.

  440. Radar image of New York by Braudo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The National Weather Service put up this amazing picture. Is this for real?

    (The link was spotted on BBSpot.com)

    1. Re:Radar image of New York by JennyWL · · Score: 1

      That's a radar image of cloud cover over New York, not explosion or heat. Compare this shot from farther south: "hot" colors only indicate lots of particulates, which is probably true every day over New Jersey. More true today than usual in New York, sad to say.

      Numenaster

    2. Re:Radar image of New York by psydeshow · · Score: 1

      That's what unprocessed NWS doppler radar always looks like-- the radar scans at a very low angle, so buildings, boats, even ocean waves in the vicinity of the radar station on Long Island create that halo of noise.

      Skies are clear here in Manhattan.

  441. Peak user count on #wtc IRCnet: 3194 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Peak user count on #wtc IRCnet: 3194

    I've _never_ seen so many ppl on one channel.

  442. Re:President's e-mail by Jeffrey+Baker · · Score: 2

    Why isn't is president@us ?

  443. insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and after we know who they are, should we then try to derive their state of mind. maybe these people grew up in a broken home. maybe we should send them to therapy. that will work. not. find them. nuke them. 'nough said.

  444. stenography and ebay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see ebay is shutting down that trade center auctions that are starting to pop up. While looking through these, I ran across this:

    http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem& item=1004701319

    which states:

    PHOTO TO FOLLOW, AFTERNOON OF Tuesday, SEPT 11.

    and also says:

    international bidders are most welcome at my auctions.

    Kinda' begs the question: Are terrorists using ebay auctions to coordinate attacks?

  445. Re:But it *doesn't* solve things by Simon+Brooke · · Score: 5, Insightful

    [disclaimer: I'm Scots, posting from Scotland]

    The only difference was that Bomber Harris had access to a much greater array of weaponry than the terrorists who attacked today.

    What's scary about this is that the perpetrators did not need access to a 'greater array of weaponry'. While the US President commits huge sums of money, and breaches solemn international treaty obligations, to develop missile defence, the perpetrators were able to use fifty tons of aviation fuel that they didn't even have to pay for. Who needs a suitcase bomb, when you've got domestic aircraft?

    This was a superbly well organised and executed operation on the part of the perpetrators, whoever they were, but it was also an incredibly cheap one. I should be surprised if the whole budget for the operation exceeded $100,000.

    So what can a government do in response to this? It's easy (and depressing) to predict what Dubya will do - just what so many here are urging him to do. And it's easy to see exactly why it will be counter productive. If the US Government lauches its predictable 'massive strike' against the assumed perpetrators, there will inevitably be enough 'colateral damage' to radicalise a whole new population of people who don't yet hate the US that much. And they'll get together and launch more strikes like todays, because (if you are sufficiently organised, disciplined, ruthless and security conscious) strikes like todays are cheap to mount out of all proportion to the damage they cause.

    The US cannot run. It cannot hide. It cannot - ever - protect itself against this sort of thing. It has thousands of miles of coastline, thousands of miles of borders, which it can never effectively monitor. Today shows that wannabe terrorists don't have to smuggle in large quantities of explosives.

    For the US as for the rest of the democracies of the world, the only solution to this problem is not to be hated that much. And the only way to not be hated that much is to not act unreasonably. Which means - among other things - that the response to today's event must be strictly limited to individuals who are provably in the direct chain of command to today's event - and not thousands of civilians who just happen to live in the same town.

    --
    I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
  446. What about the other planes? by ElDuque · · Score: 1

    First of all WAY TO GO /.
    Best source of news for me all day...had to sort the wheat from the chaff, but the comments were moderated even today.

    What is going on with the int'l flights still up there...especially the ones that cannot be contacted?

  447. Nostradamus predictions of course.... by prototype · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Nostradamus was a philosopher from the 15th century who apparently predicted most of the world events through his writings. One such writing went something like this:

    "In the City of God there will be a great thunder, Two brothers torn apart by Chaos, while the fortress endures, the great leader will succumb" , "The third big war will begin when the big city is burning" - Nostradamus 1654

    True that some people have said the City of God is Mecca or something and the brothers represented some form of government however if you dice this apart you get:

    Two brothers (the World Trade Center towers) torn apart (collapse) by Chaos, while the fortress endures (The White House? Pentagon?)...

    I'm not a big believer in this sort of thing, but one of Nostradamus' quatrains seems to be very eerily shadowed in this verse which has yet to married with a historical event, until now.

    While this is rather eerie let's keep our heads about us. People tend to treat these in such a way that they become a self-fulfilling prophecy. Much like music lyrics of rock songs. The more obscure the language or symbolism, the more ominous it seems and the more likely some wack-job will use it as his creed. Let's hope old Nostie is wrong this time.

    Scary stuff.

    liB

    1. Re:Nostradamus predictions of course.... by Legion303 · · Score: 1
      You forgot the literally *thousands* of "predictions" by him that didn't come close to being fulfilled. No, people only remember the ones that vaguely resemble something that happens in the real world.

      -Legion

    2. Re:Nostradamus predictions of course.... by nparr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is not real


      Just do a search on google for this phrase. If I make say a thousand prophecies that are fairly abstract for example:

      In the City of God there will be a great thunder, Two brothers torn apart by Chaos, while the fortress endures, the great leader will succumb

      Well let us analyse this. For Example what does City of God mean? It could be Mecca, Medina, Rome, Jeruselum, Salt Lake City, or any holy city depending on your religion. What do I mean by thunder--a storm? War? EarthQuake? lots of stuff can be described by thunder. There are a lot of two brothers on this world (I think the Number runs among the Billions) and fortress edure's what--Besiegement, Famine, etc? What Great Leader? How will he succumb? To what?

      http://www.ed.brocku.ca/~nmarshal/nostradamus.ht m

    3. Re:Nostradamus predictions of course.... by wjr · · Score: 1
      While the first lines appear to be genuine Nostradamus, not something put together today (remember the "village idiot will lead" fake Nostradamus from the last US election?), the last line ("The third big war") was almost certainly written today. Nostradamus' verses were quatrains, and that line makes five; furthermore no poet or translator would repeat "big" like that.

      See here for commentary on Nostradamus that happens to use this exact quatrain as an example of a prophecy that's vague enough that a huge number of possible events could seem to fit it. Of the four specifics ("City of God", "two brothers", "fortress endures", "great leader will succumb") only two are actually even close ("City of God" for New York, or maybe Washington or maybe both - seems like a very poor fit; no leaders have succumbed).

      This prophecy would apply just as well (in fact, better) to something like political/ecclesiastical family infighting in Renaissance Rome: City of God (seat of the Church), two brothers (family conflict, and remember that the Popehood was often controlled by the powerful political families), fortress endures (easy enough to come up with interpretations like "the glory of the Church endures"), great leader will succumb (the struggle causes the fall of one of the rulers).

  448. Re:How does the own medicine taste? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those such as you do not deserve the very air you breath. This is the *worst* disaster i've ever seen, and you go and turn it into your own convoulted view of the world.

    I'm from canada, and even here we feel the tragidy of what has happened. Our hearts and prayers go out to the victoms and their families

  449. WTC Contained... by Collectonian · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...for those who may not know. Government agencies housed in the World Trade Center include the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, U.S. Animal Plant Health Inspection, Federal Maritime Commission, U.S. Customs Service, Internal Revenue Service, Customs Service, Treasury Department, Secret Service, and the ATF. Financial exchanges include the Coffee, Sugar and Cocoa Exchange and the New York Cotton Exchange. Businesses include Morgan Stanley, Hyundai Securities, Tokyo Securities, Charles Schwab, Yamaichi International America, Smith Barney Inc., Keefe Bruyette & Woods Inc., Cantor Fitzgerald Inc. and Dean Witter Reynolds Inc.

  450. Microsoft provides tools for terrorists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MS Flight Simulator..

    Please - donate blood!!

  451. Now you know how it feels... by nishikigoi · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Now you know...

    How the people of Palestine feel when you provide the weapons for Israel's modern-day Holocaust against them

    How the people of Tripoli felt when your airforce unleashed a night of bombing because your president thought Libya was a good enough scapegoat for somebody else's crime.

    How the people of Cambodia felt when your miltary slaughtered two million of them because Henry Kissinger didn't like the government in the next country.

    How the people of Viet Nam felt having you wage total war on them because you didn't like the government they were about to (democratically) elect.

    How people suffering life under dictators installed by the US feel.

    How the people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki felt when the US used atomic bombs on their ready-to-surrender country just to prove that they worked.

    How the passengers on that Iranian Airbus felt when your navy decided it hadn't killed enough civilians.

    How the innocent civilians of Baghdad feel every night when your heroic USAF drops tonnes of high explosive on them from the safety of a great height.

    Maybe the USA will realise that there are actually good reasons why much of the world hates it. Maybe the USA will stop trying to impose its own view on anybody who has the temerity to elect a government that Uncle Sam doesn't approve of.
    Maybe, but I'm not holding my breath. Especially with a war-monger like Bush in the White House.

    1. Re:Now you know how it feels... by sparky+vunderblunt · · Score: 1

      So we had it coming? And now that 50,000 of our civilians are dead we will see the error of our ways? I respectfully disagree.

      --
      "mmmmm.... Minty Fresh!"
  452. North Bay too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just got this email from a flight instructor buddy up in North Bay ON:

    I just got home from the airport. I was taxing out for my first flight
    around 1030ish at first it was an IFR ground stop, 2 minutes later I called
    for taxi and then it was a national ground stop for all aircraft in Canada
    IFR or VFR. Everyone in the air had to get down on the ground wherever they
    could ASAP for "Extremely important issues of National Safety" That's what
    they have going on the ATIS. We have possibly 25 - 30 commercial jets being
    diverted for North Bay from Atlantic flights and Canadian flights. We've had
    one in so far. All airborne flights taken off from the USA are not allowed
    into Canadian Airspace. The base up here is sealed off and the MPs pretty
    much kicked our asses off the Base & Airport.

  453. Re:I hope... by rtscts · · Score: 1

    it's most likely the USA Govt's existing powers being abused that is responsible for this attack.

    Lots of people don't like the USA, and they don't like you for a reason.

  454. I bet somebody would be selling a piece of WTC... by albert_tam · · Score: 1

    I bet somebody would be selling a piece of WTC on eBay soon... We'll see.

  455. Re:How does the own medicine taste? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is not necessarily a justification or an exoneration of American acts of agression on foreign powers. However, the comparison is not accurate. The US participated in an international action of war against Yugoslavia in response to verified actions of genocide after a long period of explicit, public, official warnings and attempts to negotiate a solution. The Yugoslavian government and people were clearly warned that they would be the target of acts of war. And although one can argue how targetted the bombings were, they were not made in a manner to maximize civilian casualties. Today's terroristic actions were carried out completely without warning with a clear goal to cause catastrophic civilian casualties. So how about you shut the fuck up.

  456. Rhetoric is the politician's tool. by ahfoo · · Score: 1

    Obfuscation is a rhetorical tactic. Effective rhetoric is often far from elegant.
    Look at Reagan! Jeez, talkin' about a hustling bitch. The man didn't --nor does-- know truth from fiction, but he was effective rhetorically.
    DubYa is just doing what a good ol' boy oughtta by tearin off a page from the ol' Gipper's play book.

  457. Re:An eye for an eye, and the whole world goes bli by N473 · · Score: 1

    His quote is PLAINLY attributed to Ghandi. The poster was not directly quoting anything biblical. Save your rhetoric bible-boy. I for one ain't giving anyone my other cheek, my coat or another mile.

  458. Re:Warcraft Wisdom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod this mf down. He makes me embarresed to be to be an American. Its a troll of the highest degree, the poster is advocating genocide. It is an insult to humanity. If I ever saw him on the street, blah blah blah blah my foot up his ass.

  459. Missle Defence Shield??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate to be macabre, but it has to be said. This has been a serious object lesson.

    That lesson is: a few hijacked aircraft can trump any "Missle Defence Shield". There could have been nuclear or biological weapons on board.

    How could the hijackers have got on board the airliners? I hope that it does not turn out that the affected airlines outsourced all their baggage handling, food services, security!

  460. A solution by einhverfr · · Score: 2

    First, I argue that it is fundamentally impossible to stop these sorts of attacks. We simply cannot handle all the highjacking possibilities.

    However, that is not to say that we are helpless. I would propose the following policies:

    1: Targeting those responsible will be necessary but will not really accomplish much if we are trying to kill people (remember, they are willing to die anyway). It is more impossible to target facilities, economic material, etc.

    2: Any counterstrikes must be balanced with attacks that are much more meaningful in a real struggle against terrorism. We must, in addition to attacking terrorist organizations, attack the economic structures that allow them to be successful. This means that we have to sacrifice cheap oil and help OPEC nations economically develop and become more economically independent. We have to target the terrorists in their pocket-book. If this is not done, we are doomed to fighting a reactive war against an opponent which rises organically from the oil-rich areas of the world.

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  461. Re:Plea for peace (eat the murderer) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're not helping, idiot.

  462. Online Poll by faldore · · Score: 1

    Let your opinion be heard on Zogby's interactive poll. http://www.zogby.com/

  463. Re:Eye opener. You must be joking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You f*cking idiot. Opposing communism was something the rest of the world was just too cowardly and weak to do. France left Vietnam (and Cambodia and Laos) a mess, not the USA. Africa, with the help of Europe, was messed up well before the USA came into existence. If it were not for the USA and countries like us, you would be a f*cking slave without any rights. You deserve it, too.

  464. And the point? by ConsumedByTV · · Score: 2

    Perhaps you really think it could help to do this kind of crap but it really wont. How many terrorist groups would know that airports have this? Then they (assuming they arent headless cells) can send in someone that hasnt ever been arrrested, or even just someone that hasnt been in the country before. Or perhaps you want to have the software tell the police that some non white people are around (better go beat them down). You dont even know what group did this, stop thinking that group profiling or anything on the same note would help. This very well could have been an inside job, perhaps the pilots jumped out? Perhaps perhaps perhaps. The only thing that is a fact is that no one in the US government is going to say this was one person acting alone.

    --


    "Not my manner of thinking but the manner of thinking of others has been the source of my unhappiness." - M
    1. Re:And the point? by osgeek · · Score: 2

      Perhaps you really think it could help to do this kind of crap but it really wont.

      Sez you, but it stands to reason that if our law enforcement agencies already stop X number of such attacks every year (where X > 0, which we already know that they do), then giving them more tools to do their jobs wills most likely stop some number greater than X such attacks.

      Then they (assuming they arent headless cells) can send in someone that hasnt ever been arrrested

      But we have operatives in some of those terrorist organizations, operatives who could in many cases get pictures of terrorist agents back to our own surveillance system. We don't need to sit around and let these guys be arrested before looking out for them.

      stop thinking that group profiling or anything on the same note would help

      Uh, straw man? Who said anything about group profiling?

  465. Don't give plasma! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Epsecially at the places that PAY you for it.
    It's used for cosmetic purposes, seriously... Like eye-shadow and shit.
    Give whole blood.

    'Sup blood?

  466. Mourning by AlpineR · · Score: 2, Insightful
    While I agree that we must soon carry on and be productive despite attempts to destroy our nation, closing schools and businesses today makes good sense. There could be tens of thousands of deaths from these attacks. That makes it quite probable that you or a coworker just lost a friend or relative. Even those who aren't effected directly are understandably upset and shocked. We need a time without school or work for reflection and mourning.

    AlpineR

  467. What you really mean. by uchian · · Score: 1

    The only response I can think of is to identify and destroy the organizations responsible and any governments who gave aid and comfort to the terrorists. Fuck the civilians of these countries, they obviously are like the Borg and believe everything that there goverment says because they are lesser lifeforms than us Americans and deserve to Die.

    The issue is revenge. Those who initiate force against us must be identified and killed as a warning to the rest of the world not to fuck with America.

    We (the US) should not rely on the fiction of "international law" -- we believe that we are the law. This is an act of war and war is the appropriate response, even though we don't know who we are fighting yet - we'll pick a likely target, because as I said, we need to make an example to the rest of the world.

    I'm glad you're not a citizen of the US. You clearly don't deserve to be, because your not like me.

    * * *

    This is the message that your post sends to me. I sure as hell hope that I am wrong.

  468. Was the date just a coincidence? by zor_prime · · Score: 1

    Has anyone else noticed that today is 911 day? As in 9/11/01?

    Just a random thought that popped up through the shock.

    --
    "We all do no end of feeling, and we mistake it for thinking." -Mark Twain
    1. Re:Was the date just a coincidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      perhaps someting in the bible... i dont have one right here.... anyone?

    2. Re:Was the date just a coincidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      9+11+2+0+0+1= _23_

      Yog Sothoth is free!

  469. Re:Cowards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lighten up. It's a joke. And not even a joke directed at the actual tragedy; it's directed at the Canadian's effort to help. Just because something terrible happened doesn't mean you can't laugh.

  470. TROLL by yzquxnet · · Score: 1

    TROLL of the lowest kind.

  471. Re:An eye for an eye, and the whole world goes bli by jonathan_ingram · · Score: 1

    No, he was quoting Ghandi, who was responding to 'an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth', in much the same way that Jesus did.

    Amazing how the 'fundamentalist' Christians are those furthest away from the teachings of Christ.

  472. Re:Plea for peace - HELL NO! by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
    If you are a citizen of the U.S. of America, please write your representative right now and ask him to join a plea for peace.

    Okay... I started to do a nice little logical essay on why this won't work, but let me put it very simply:

    If you kill my family and say you'll do it again, I will fucking come down your chimney and tear out your black, twisted heart.

    This was an act against my neighbors, my country. Thousands of people were killed... people who could have easily been my mother, father, sister or brother. Or me. And these people *were* mothers, fathers and siblings to people across the country. You wiped out two of our symbols of pride... the tallest buildings in our largest city. I stayed there for a week a few months ago, and I was proud of our human accomplishments - and you, in your narrow little mindset, slaughtered thousands of people - of whom, let's face it, only a few had ever even heard of your group.

    Our battle flag has been a venemous rattlesnake with the motto emblazoned: "Don't Tread On Me". Left alone, the US falls into a sort of ambiguious philosophical debate... because we have the freedom to go in a hundred different directions. Polarize us, unite us in anger, attack and *KILL* *OUR* *CHILDREN* *AND* *PARENTS*, and YES... I think we have the right, and *will* eliminate you.

    This was a military attack. The Pentagon, the center of our military coordination, was targeted. And that begs a military response.

    --
    Evan

    --
    "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  473. clips from wtc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://24.216.235.113/planecrash/

  474. The root cause by supernerd22 · · Score: 1

    of this problem is the US's continued support for Isreal. We have been supporting the inhumane actions of Isreal both economically and militarily for a very long time. The Palestinians are a repressed people that have been living under the supervision of their enemies for a very long time.

    This attack is a desperate cry from a help by a besieged people. The situation in Palestine is unsustainable. People die there nearly every day. They want the American people to understand this.

    I AM NOT defending the actions of the individuals involved in these attacks. They are criminals and should be punished as such. I'm just saying that every problem has a ROOT cause. If we want this type of terrorist activity to stop we must identify this cause and eliminate it.

  475. NY Police Radio scanner by pajama · · Score: 1

    NY Police Radio scanner here:
    http://www.globalsoundwave.com:8000/listen.pls

  476. Inbound 747 to Whitehorse Yukon escorted by US and by Lawmeister · · Score: 1

    CDN fighter aircraft. This is not a scheduled flight, it is apparently being treated as a possible hijacked aircraft. The airport is evacuated as is everything in it's flight path.

    I will post an update when I have more info..

  477. respond ... but how ? by beanerspace · · Score: 2


    I'm curious. How do we now respond ? Do we ...

    take out someone like Ben Ladin as an example, whether he's guilty or not ?

    eye for an eye, 86 some of their planes ?

    empty our prisons of our most dangerous criminals, arm them and air-drop them on the guilty ?

    nuke someone ?

    turn the other cheek ?

    And what are the long-term reprecussions of how we resond ?

    1. Re:respond ... but how ? by Nicolas+MONNET · · Score: 1

      What do you do to "them"?

      But who are they? As long as this is not answered, you can speculate all you want.

  478. Clinton does bear some blame, but as usual... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... you will see Clinton supporters deny Clinton's blame at all. He bears the blame because 8 years of his strong arm tactics worldwide has soured many people even further against the U.S. But I'm sure that Clinton's foreign policy will somehow be blamed on the conservatives in Congress during that time, the same way so-called "liberals" blame the conservatives in Congress as the reason the then democrat command in chief got us involved in Vietnam. This is one of many reasons why democrats are a sad joke. They crap their pants and blame others for the mess.

    It's a shame democrats can't seem to figure out exactly what a president is and is not responsible for. Although an even greater shame is that they believe that democrats are somehow better than republicans, even though they both seem to pull the same crap. The only thing that changes are the names, the industries that own them, and the people who suffer for it all.

  479. Are you insane? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's time to show the world who really has the balls. You're not serious.. right?.. The one with the balls will be the side which scores more bodycounts? This is insane! As for the non-US thing.. listen up carefully. The rest of the world fears a US impulsive attack. Such a thing will bring the whole earth down to its knees. All those countries that have absolutely nothing to do with this us and whoever it is dispute will suffer consequences that are not targeted towards them. Take heed and think a moment.. the bombing in Serbia caused more damage than what the average mind might percept. Even now and for many years to come, depleted uranium is spreading across the balkans and the mediterannean sea. Does this sound like a fair result to you? Especially if you consider that the bombing in Serbia was not even counterstrike.

  480. Freedom by Trolocsis · · Score: 1

    "Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, in order to assure the survival and the success of liberty."

    -JFK

  481. This is not Nostradamus by NullGrey · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ok, allow me to stamp this out before it goes much furter. This quote is from this page: http://www.ed.brocku.ca/~nmarshal/nostradamus.htm

    As I posted in a similar thread on the earlier story, this is not from Nostradamus, but rather an attempt by the author of the site (who does NOT claim to be psychic) to show how, given a vague "prediction", that something in the future will fit it. Seems to have backfired, tho.

    But, I suppose that some people would rather believe it is from Nostadamus, and feel 'eerie' about it, rather than facing the truth, and seeing that it is just a coincidence.

    --
    +-- (Score:-1, Moderator on Power Trip)
  482. Re:I hope... by nishikigoi · · Score: 1

    Yeah, right!

    Never mind how many innocent civilians get killed. After all, they won't be American civilians, so they don't matter, do they?

    And the USA wonders why people hate it with jerks like you around.

  483. Some random thoughts by Yes · · Score: 1
    The attack caught us all by suprice. Who would have believed that the WTC would collapse today? Who expected that civil planes could be used as powerful weapons? This really shows how vulnerable big cities are. Lots of people, lots of damage. This time the damage was limited to a relatively small area.

    I doubt any pilot would have crashed to WTC even if threatened (knowing that he would die *anyway*). The pilot would probably have tried to crash to a more safe place. The terrorists must have known how to fly a plane.

    The attacks required suicides by terrorists - a group of terrorists in every plane. They did not land to an airport to hold hostages for a few days. They didn't just leave a bomb to an unmanned car. They didn't warn, they didn't ask anything, they didn't threaten. They just took it to the end personally. They just flew a plane filled with people directly to a crowded scyscraper. Just like that, just direct mean action. Some people must hate USA very much.

    This is one step to wrong direction. And the next step...nonconventional weapons? Maybe. Today's attack clearly shows that there is no limit to terrorists' imagination.

  484. Red Cross Phone Number by Klowner · · Score: 1

    Unless I heard incorrectly, the number to call (Red Cross) to find out where you can give blood is 1-800-GIVE-LIFE

    this whole thing is not good..
    Mark

  485. Hiroshima, Nagasaki by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The Biggest Mass Murder in History"...

    except for the Japanese civilians targeted by American nukes.

    1. Re:Hiroshima, Nagasaki by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      idiot. dropping "the bombs" was a necessary evil. fighting an enemy that would sooner die down to the last man than give in would have been a worse option for us, costing far more lives.

      do not overlook the fact that, as in this situation, we were aggressed upon. when you attack you must be prepared for the consequences of your actions. you automatically commit yourself and your families to those consequences. such is war.

    2. Re:Hiroshima, Nagasaki by CodeShark · · Score: 1
      'xcuse me but the combined death toll from both atomic bombs, horrific as they were, is only a drop in the bucket compared to the millions killed by the Nazi's in and before WW-II.

      Nor does it hold up to the slaughter of innocents by the Khmer Rouge in the killing fields of Kampuchea (Cambodia) in the 1970's, the 800,000 in Rwanda a few years ago, or the estimated millions of Christians in southern Sudan in the last few years, Sadam Hussein's chemical warfare against his own people -- any number of massacres by tuly horrific groups and individuals. Not even counting the from the fact that the Allies warned Japan weeks before the a-bombs wqere dropped-- with no response from Tokyo.

      Get your history right, or shut the f--- up.

      --
      ...Open Source isn't the only answer -- but it's almost always a better value than the alternatives...
    3. Re:Hiroshima, Nagasaki by AxelBoldt · · Score: 2

      You may not know this, but even in war you are not allowed to target civilians. And it doesn't matter who attacked first; it's an absolute rule.

    4. Re:Hiroshima, Nagasaki by alexdw · · Score: 1

      Actually, you can target whoever you like, just as long as you don't care about PR.

      --
      Deliver yesterday, code today, think tomorrow.
    5. Re:Hiroshima, Nagasaki by WNight · · Score: 2

      Damn right. Stalin, Pol Pot, both ordered the deaths of far more people than Hitler.

      And, for death tolls, the US bombing of Dresden killed more people than the atomic bomb in Hiroshima did. In a slower, more painful way probably. And Germany was closer to surrender at that point than Japan was.

      People are such sheep. I know many people who think the allies were completely unjustified in bombing Japan. When I question them, I find that many don't know that Hiroshima was a military target, that Japan had vowed to never surrender, that a land assault would have cost the lives of an estimated 150-250k allied troops alone, as well as many more Japanese.

      The ignorance of the general public is fucking pathetic. And these people's votes carry as much say as anyone else. Ugh. (I'm not saying people have to agree with me, just that they should at least make an effort to learn about an issue before taking a strong stand on it.)

    6. Re:Hiroshima, Nagasaki by dghcasp · · Score: 1
      The ignorance of the general public is fucking pathetic. And these people's votes carry as much say as anyone else.

      People that can't factor binomials shouldn't be allowed to vote.

      OBQuoteSource: Chris Nadovich, from a newsgroup post

    7. Re:Hiroshima, Nagasaki by AxelBoldt · · Score: 2

      ... and as long as you don't care being prosecuted as a war criminal afterwards.

    8. Re:Hiroshima, Nagasaki by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and as long as you don't care being prosecuted as a war criminal afterwards.

      You don't have to worry about that as long as you win, so you use the tactics most likely to let you win.

    9. Re:Hiroshima, Nagasaki by zveryk · · Score: 1

      a necessary evil? i guess, in the U.S. of A., it's whatever it takes to convince yourself...

  486. Please check your facts by thejake316 · · Score: 1

    I've heard on NPR that all flights and planes are now accounted before - but that a fifth crash has ocurred in an undisclosed location. As well, a car bomb *did* go off in front of the State Department, and there was a crash at Camp David.

    You guys aren't even close to reporters, and you have no resources for verification, but you still have some editorial responsibility, please don't pass bullshit off as facts (at least without saying "unconfirmed").

    --
    AC's cheerfully ignored
  487. Interesting Pentagon tidbits by krital · · Score: 5, Informative

    I just wanted tos ay that I was at the Pentagon this morning, and that everything there seems to be like it's very well under control. There were a bunch of different people there watching the flames be put out - TV stations and such, as well as tourists and residents who, like me, wanted to see what the hell was going on.
    Probably the most interesting thing that happened was talking to one of the officers who works at the Pentagon. She told me not to get any nearer (which I declined to listen to) and then said, I don't know if this was a joke or not, that I should try to stay alive so I could serve the country. God save us if we have to go to war!

    DC is currently in a state of emergency, and almost all the streets are closed - it's pretty eerie. I walked by the state department, and the whole thing is shut down. There are cops and agents from every sort of government department everywhere - you literally can't go a block without seeing a handful sitting around or directing traffic or doing whatever they do. Washingtonians are being pretty calm, though, so there aren't any riots or looting or anything like that.

    Just to give another view on the situation here in DC :)

    --
    -- K
  488. listen up by caseydk · · Score: 1
    Alright, I work in DC for a government contractor., so our people have been in contact with each other directly after evacuating safely from all federal job sites. There have been a total of 4 crashes..

    two in nyc, one at the pentagon (none of our people were there), and in pennsylvannia...

    there have been no bombing and no other crashes at this time... camp david was not hit and neither was the state department..

    most of the internet "news sources" have been useless today because of being overwhelmed or complete and total lies abounding...

    1. Re:listen up by caseydk · · Score: 1
      Who ever is updating the post has no clue...

      At that site, it has a picture of the Washington Mall buring (the area between the Smithsonians, the Capital, and the Wash Monument for non-Washitonians) supposedly from cnn... oh, and for those not from the area, the pentagon is not within DC, it's in virginia jsut across the river...

      Now, it seems if this truly happened, it would be mentioned SOMEWHERE in cnn's timeline of events... that part is a hoax!

      If you want to do something useful, call your local blood bank or hospital and see if they're accepting donations... or start contacting churches and see if they could use a hand getting together care packages...

      The only bloodbanks around Arlington, Va that are accepting blood is Alexandia and somewhere called Fair Oaks... I'm going to go give a pint.

  489. Re:I hope... by kcjuggle · · Score: 1

    if this does turn out to be a terrorist act, and it most likely is, they will proudly take responsibility. Otherwise their work was in vain. The happenings today are obviously a very well planned attack, and done for a reason. If they don't take reponsibility, their cause isn't helped at all.

    I'm not saying that it's not a possibility that nobody will assume responsibility, it would be suicide. But they already sent quite a few of their people on suicide missions as well.

  490. another NYPD live stream by Atilla · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://www.live365.com/stations/206780

    --
    --- sig moved for great justice.
  491. Re:Nostradamus by th3walrus · · Score: 1

    There is another Nostradamus prophecy that points to a great fire making buildings collapse in the new city at 45 degrees. Century I - Quatrain 83 I believe it is. I remember years ago hearing that this was a reference to New York City (something about NYC is on 45 degrees lattitude or longitude).

    There was also a television program I saw on Nostradamus that said something about WWIII would be started first by an attack on NYC, followed by an attack on Paris, followed by an attack on DC.
    Anything going down in Paris?

  492. Pig Wash by snStarter · · Score: 1

    The correct response is against ALL terrorist organizations not just ONE. A big time response against an organization we can finger is required.

    But all terrorists should now be targeted by all governments: Basque, IRA, you name it: if they can be identified they should be hit VERY VERY soon.

  493. you're full of shit by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 2

    "How the people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki felt when the US used atomic bombs on their ready-to-surrender country just to prove that they worked."

    Japan was not ready to surrender, they were willing to fight until they completely used up all their resources. Millions more people would likely have been killed in battle had we not dropped those bombs, Japanese and American. Don't forget who started that war either. Not only that, the day before we dropped the bombs, we alerted their civilian populations that they should evacuate those cities.
    Yes, America is guilty of plenty of wrongdoings, but your type of anti-American bullshit rhetoric helps nothing.
    And of all times to spout your bullshit, you do it after thousands of innocent people are killed by acts of terrorism.

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
    1. Re:you're full of shit by DaTestcase · · Score: 1

      Not only were they not prepared to surrender, Japan was, in fact, preparing their own weapon of mass destruction thanks to the biologically criminal research of Unit 731. They had the groundwork and practical evidence that they could deliver massive biological infections on US soil. Had the war in the Pacific not ended with the atomic bomb on Hiroshima/Nagasaki, it may have ended with the Plague on the West Coast.

  494. Re:Cowards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good joke. Actually Canada has a fairly modern military. They just haven't really used them since WWII.

  495. Cel networks are down, but SMS works! by wadeb · · Score: 1

    I just got a text message from my girlfriend in Brooklyn. She's okay *whew* :)

    -Wade

  496. Blind Reprisal.. No. Kill Those Responsible. by Hot+Turkey+Ed · · Score: 1

    The United States will find out who did it. This is the sort of secret which can not be kept.

    I do not know if you are an American or not but there are people on this planet who would like to kill you just for being one. You do not reason with them. You do not chant songs of peace. You do not appeace them. You either isolate them so they can do no harm or kill them in defense of your own life and country.

  497. http://www.nybloodcenter.org/ by Evro · · Score: 4, Informative
    If you are in the NYC/Long Island area, here is a URL with locations to donate blood: http://www.nybloodcenter.org/blood_window.htm. Additionally, EMS is now saying you can donate blood at any hospital in the area.

    I tried to give blood at 2500 Marcus (very near Long Island Jewish hospital) and I couldn't even get in the parking lot. I'll try again later or tomorrow. Please, if you are in the area, help out...

    I feel so useless... giving blood is all I can do to help.

    Here's the text of that URL in case it's down for whatever reason:

    NEW YORK, NY, SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 - Due to this morning's hijack plane attacks on two World Trade Center buildings, resulting in unknown medical emergencies, New York Blood Center has announced a blood emergency for the greater New York/New Jersey metropolitan area.

    Dr. Robert Jones, New York Blood Center President and Chief Executive Officer, is urging all eligible donors to make a blood donation at donor sites in Manhattan at 310 East 67th Street (between 1st and 2nd Avenues) and 150 Amsterdam Avenue (66-67th Streets); in Brooklyn at 120 Lawrence Street near MetroTech; on Staten Island at 1625 Forest Avenue; on Long Island at 2500 Marcus Avenue in Lake Success, 3125 Veterans Highway in Bohemia; 333 Merrick Road in Rockville Centre and Route 110N in Melville/Huntington; at 167 New Street in New Brunswick, New Jersey; and 525 Executive Blvd. in Elmsford in Westchester. For more details on available donor locations, call 1-800-933-2566. Hours at all sites have been extended until further notice.

    Who Can Help?

    Donors must be at least age 17**, weigh a minimum of 110 pounds and be in good general health. Photo or signature ID is required.

    To find the nearest donation location call 1-800-933-2566 or refer to our blood drive locator.

    *New York Blood Center regions include:
    Brooklyn/Staten Island Blood Services
    serving over 25 hospitals in Brooklyn & Staten Island
    Hudson Valley Blood Services
    serving over 50 hospitals in the Bronx and lower Hudson Valley
    Long Island Blood Services
    serving over 50 hospitals in Queens, Nassau & Suffolk
    New Jersey Blood Services
    serving over 65 hospitals in northern and central New Jersey
    New York Blood Services
    serving over 30 hospitals in Manhattan

    **17-year-olds in New Jersey require parents' written permission to donate.

    --
    rooooar
  498. How about the obvious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    September 11 = 9-11

  499. WTC holds 500,000 by y10k_complient · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure why this has been overlooked in the media, but the combined occupancy of both towers is 1/2 million. This is according to the architect of the buildings in a Jerusalem Post interview . I hope the estimates of 50,000 casualties hold up.

    1. Re:WTC holds 500,000 by AxelBoldt · · Score: 3, Informative

      50,000 people work in the towers, not half a million.

    2. Re:WTC holds 500,000 by Cederic · · Score: 1


      >> 50,000 people work in the towers, not half a million.

      Not any more.

  500. How do we respond? by AlXtreme · · Score: 1

    The most probable way is war. war against the group who did this. I'm talking about WW3...

    --
    This sig is intentionally left blank
  501. Morgan Stanley Emergency Contact Number by tino_sup · · Score: 1

    Here is the emergency number to obtain information about employees of the Morgan Stanley Corporation.

    888-883-4391

    PLEASE Only to verify employee status for family members.

    --
    I am me...I think
  502. Wait until tomorrow by b0bby · · Score: 1

    The Red Cross is overwhelmed by donors right now (at least here in DC). Wait until tomorrow or the next day.
    I'm not eligible, due to having lived in the UK & fears of mad cow, even though I'm a vegetarian...

  503. Isn't this the 15th anniversary of Black Thursday by beacher · · Score: 1

    Don't know if there's a common link, but isn't this the day everything went to &#*() on the stock market?

  504. Re:The Palestinians are Celebrating! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pretty ironic, given that I used to feel sympathy for the Palestinians and hoped a peaceful agreement could be reached.

    Fuck that.

    I agree with the previous poster. We don't have the balls to act ourselves, but I hope Israel wipes them out entirely.

    Maybe other shitheads will think twice about trying something like this in the future.

  505. No Quarter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These terrorists must cease to exist. I had friends working in the World Trade Center. Damn all apologists. Damn all molly-coddled jackasses who excuse terrorism. These people must die, period.

  506. I was there by Gingko · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was in D.C. centre round about the time the plane hit the Pentagon. I'm a Brit, and flew out for two weeks holiday here to visit some friends yesterday. Getting out of D.C. was not easy - various subway stations were closed. For those of you who don't know D.C., the Mall area (where the Pentagon and Capitol are) is surrounded by government buildings. The streets were full of scared people, trying to play the odds on a macabre game of chance as they decided which buildings would be least likely to be hit. It was terrifying - everybody was certain another strike was coming. There were rumours flying around - a car bomb had hit the Capitol, another plane was incoming, all sorts. The roads became gridlocked very quickly. I got talking to a lady who was just standing around outside the agriculture department. Turns out her husband was in the Pentagon. We hitched a lift down to Crystal City - I owe the driver of that black van a beer. From there we picked up a couple of other ladies and got a meal in McDonalds. We went our separate ways, since some guy said he could get me to Tyson's Corner - which was near where I wanted to go. After half-an-hour stuck in traffic, not moving, I heard that some subway stations were open, and took my chances. I got lucky, and got home.

    Many didn't.

    I have never been so scared.

    --
    i don't do sigs. oops.
  507. 9/11 at around 9:11 by pryan · · Score: 1

    Does the date and approximate time bother anyone?

    I'll be very upset if it was known by various intelligence gathering agencies that something was going to take place today and we did nothing about it.

    Just like Pearl Harbor.

  508. Re:I hope... by jonathan_ingram · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Releasing the prisoners was a culmination of a process going back many many years (involving, among other things, Ireland re-writing its constitution to remove the claim on Northern Ireland).

    Israel and Palestine have had 50 years to hate each other -- the Protestants and Catholics in Ireland have had about 300. You don't defuse a situation like that by bombing the hell out of one side (we know, Thatcher did her best).

    Peace and reconciliation is, in the long run, the only way forward.

    The biggest thing the American government can do now is say 'What have we done to these people? How have the affected their lives so badly that they will kill themselves just to hurt our civilians? How can *we* change *our* behaviour so that something like this never happens again.'

    But they won't. They'll pick some small, badly defended country, and have a one-sided TV war so all the folks back home can sit back and see that Uncle Sam is *sorting them bastards out*. And the whole thing will start all over again.

    Don't make the US into Zimbabwe. Make it into South Africa.

  509. My condolences.... by Warthog9 · · Score: 1

    to the families and the loved ones who were unfortunatley cought in this atrocious cross fire. The loss of life in this scale is at VERY LEAST saddening and dis-heartening and I wish them the best because they are TRUELY going to need it.

    However as I was talking with a collegue of mine over lunch today we were amazed that something like this hadn't happened earlier, and shocked that the papers (At least around here) were claiming that this took some genious tactician to pull off, when in reality this was a brute force effort but a small group of people and it just happened to work out for them for the most part. I mean this was in one of Tom Clancy's books (can't remember exactly which one) quite a while ago and I'm surprised no one has tried to re-create this particular event, although now I guess it has happened.

    And I realize my next comment is going to be rather hurtfull but again my collegue and I were discussing just how cool a movie (mpeg clip or what not) of watching the planes collide, or parts of the towers falling would be, and I'm sure I will be bombarded by those tonight.... although the loss of life that was neccisary to create those clips was by far unnecisary and I am sadend by this most tragic event.

    1. Re:My condolences.... by caldodge · · Score: 1
      > I mean this was in one of Tom Clancy's books (can't
      >remember exactly which one) quite a while ago

      "Debt of Honor"

  510. Multi-armed gods. by ahfoo · · Score: 1

    As a big multi-armed god fan, I would like to elaborate on this comment a bit.
    While there may be many armed gods in Hindu beliefs, Buddhist tradition in many countries, particularly in eastern China/western MidEast also feature statues of multi-armed gods and goddesses dating back many centuries.
    These ancient dieties are also found in Far Eastern and even Pacific Islander temples. Furthermore, to get back to the idiotic parent post, these gods are very real as long as someone continues to have faith in them such as myself.
    In fact, there is nowhere in the Koran or either the new or old testaments of the the Bible or the book of Mormon that indicates that the Judeo Christian/Muslim monotheistic deity does not, in fact have multiple arms, faces or perahps even a vagina or two, bulbous breasts and groovy hips.

  511. Re:Plea for peace - Huh? Get Real! by IronChef · · Score: 2


    He may have screwed up the Mecca thing but there is some truth to his words. The BBC recently ran a spot on the international news show about a school that trained Arab kids to be suicide bombers. They showed 12 year old kids drawing pictures of themselves with bombs strapped to them... the poor kids were being brainwashed into blowing themselves up. The school has since been shut down under international pressure, but it has probably just gone underground.

    I realize that this is not typical of all Muslims, of course. Chilling nonetheless.

  512. Palistinian Civilian = Oxymoron by Kengineer · · Score: 1

    There are no civilians in Palestine. Every 10 year old who picks up a rock or done a recon mission for his local PLO officer has made the transition from Civilian to Soldier.

  513. Arise! Cast away the weary weight of the world! by Braintrust · · Score: 1

    It begins here. Right now. With us. Both you and I. This is a time of sadness, of tragedy. Mark it not as an end to things, but as a beginning. Arise! Cast aside your prejudice; cast aside what keeps you from loving your fellow man. To not feel helpless. That is what must be done. We must come together. Now. What you believe in, if it keeps you from understanding and loving your fellow man, must be discarded. The black man and the white man, your differences are small now. Unimportant. They must be let go. To galvanize our better nature, to stand side by side, that is what must be done. Tell your brother, your sister, of your love for them. We are one now. It can be no other way. To think that your time, your moment on this earth, is not important, is no longer true. This is the time we were born for, to come together, to close the divisions between us. We must be strong, and always reasoning, in the months to come. This was meant to divide us, to shake our faith within ourselves. Make this a beginning. Make this the moment where we strive for the world of which we all dream. Each of us, can have no more than the last of us. Never think that you were not born into a great moment. We, together, never divided. The time is now. Peace to all my brothers and sisters, to all of you.

    --
    Years later, a doctor will tell me that I have an I.Q. of 48, and am what some people call "mentally retarded".
  514. I quote from Conan the Barbarian: by ForsakenRegex · · Score: 1

    on the future of these terrorists... "They shall all die in lakes of blood."

    --
    "A man talking sense to himself is no madder than a man talking nonsense not to himself."
  515. please mod the parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it is the only reasonable response to the original post.

  516. How bad do I need privacy? by Hilary+Rosen · · Score: 2

    Worse than this.

    If you want to read what I'm writing in my encrypted emails, go tell a judge and get a warrant. Easy enough. After all, I'm a foreign national known to have subversive opinions. Install a keyboard logger to uncover my thought crimes. For that's what conspiracies are. Up until the hijackers walked into the airport with their weapons, no real crime had been committed.

    God forbid that we should ever be twenty years without such a rebellion (Jefferson).

    --
    Yes, the nick is flamebait
  517. Re:"Fight Club" [still] funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the destruction of the buildings in fight club were done without the loss of human life. this was made clear in the film. the attacks today are tragedies of human loss. fuck the buildings.

  518. Re:How does the own medicine taste? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The calls of horror were there from those who felt them. The people authorised their government quite overtly for those strikes.

  519. They've already won by J'raxis · · Score: 2

    Every airport, government office and school closed, stock market shut down (and rumors of it crashing), military patrolling the capital, office buildings evacuated, Bush and company all in hiding. They blow up three buildings and a few jets and we shut down the whole country.

    If whoever did this wants to disrupt the nations infrastructure, I believe were already doing a good job of it for them.

    1. Re:They've already won by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These people who have done this horrific act of terrorism want to shut our Federal Government down not necessarily our country. Our government has become one of the strongest in the world (if not THE strongest) and have the ability to control every aspect of our lives in THIS country and will eventually push for a one world government where the few will have total control over the rest of the world (which is too close for comfort already). Anywho, we need to look at what is really going on in our own country and start at home...we will have a civil war in this country someday....bet your ass! {P.S. I do not condone terrorism actions and think they are the cowardly way to make a statement.}

    2. Re: They've already won by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? I was at work all day. I work for a transportation company. FedEx, UPS, Airborne, USPS, the airlines, etc are grounded. My day was a mess. But no one killed me.

  520. Terrorism Vs. Guerilla Warfare by remande · · Score: 2
    I don't believe fighting back will work. History has proven that the big country can not fight guerilla warfare battles and succeed. One reason we won our fight against England 250 years ago is because WE were the terrorists.


    We were not terrorists in the American Revolutionary War. We were guerillas.


    Guerillas fight by performing sneak attacks on opposing military forces, by sniping and similar means. Guerillas are usually quite interested in saving their own hides, and avoid suicide attacks. By avoiding the standard massed musket tactics of the day and learning hide-and-shoot from the natives, we were able to inflict massive casualties on British military targets. The aim of guerilla warfare is the same as that of conventional warfare: to destroy your opponent's military assets until they are no longer able to make war with you, and must sue for peace.


    Terrorists "fight" by performing secret operations to cause massive damage to civilian (and sometimes military) centers. The aim is not to damage military assets, but to produce political pressure by panicking the civilian base. Our representative government makes us a prime target for terrorism, since what affects the civilians affects our leadership. States where the government "hates" its own people (such as Iraq) are basically immune to terrorism; if you blow up a bunch of Iraqis, Hussein will just laugh. Passenger aircraft, shopping malls, sporting events, and large buildings are usual targets for terrorism.


    The US has arguably engaged in terrorism. Our atomic attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were terrorist in nature, but military rather than sneaky. IMHO, US economic sanctions are a "less violent" relative to a terrorist attack; see above for why we haven't overthrown Hussein by sanctioning Iraq, nor Castro by sanctioning Cuba.

    --

    --The basis of all love is respect

  521. This was an attack on the U.S. Economy by JWhitlock · · Score: 2
    I don't know if people are reading new posts or not, but here it goes...

    This was not your "normal" terrorist attack. There were no demands, it was planned before the Israel elections, and it was coordinated. This was a terrorist attack on the U.S. and Western economy.

    It was timed for the opening of the stock markets, while the markets in London were still open. It was timed for the LA commute. It was timed for when most people would be in the office, in the morning.

    The use of planes insured that all planes would be grounded. No planes in the sky means business people do not travel, packages are not delivered, even the U.S. Mail is not delivered. It looks like other transportation services, such as Greyhound, are also shutting down.

    The president wasn't really targeted, and government offices weren't targetted. The Pentagon was targeted. Was this to ensure a crisis way of thinking from the military folks? Already people are lining up for the gas pumps in my home town. If we make some sort of surgical strike against an Arab nation, then will the Arab states retaliate with an oil embargo?

    This is hitting us where it hurts - in our struggling economy. Don't be fooled - the fact that Washington and New York are shut down fills the terrorists with as much joy as the fact that Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Dallas are all in a panic, vacating all the state offices and high office buildings. They are thrilled that every American is taking a day off work, and wondering what is happening to their 401K.

    Don't let this terrorism hurt the economy. Keep your money where it is - you'll buy cheap stocks that will only go up in value. bin Laudin probably has his money in gold, which will go up in value and fund the next adventure. Try to lessen his speculative portfolio a bit.

    Above all, keep doing your jobs, think about the freedoms you do have as an American, and, if you are in a position to help, do so.

    1. Re:This was an attack on the U.S. Economy by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 2

      Ironically, I'd predict that the end result will be beneficial to the US Economy. There's going to be a major investigation, obviously. That requires the purchase of a lot of goods and services. I'd be surprised if it didn't at some point involve a great deal of money going to defence contractors, ironically enough. It's almost funny that one of the primary beneficiaries, economically speaking, of this attack on US Economy and military are organizations that are sometimes reviled as being the worst of both...

      Nice going, terrorist boogerheads.

    2. Re:This was an attack on the U.S. Economy by Pseudo-Dionysios · · Score: 1

      You are absolutely right. George W. Bush and others have missed the point when they said that the attack was against "freedom" or "democracy". What the terrorists were trying to achieve was just the freedom and democracy - power to express themselves and decide for themselves. Their views of these are just bit different from how westeners think. And their means to these ends are horrible.

      The terrorists do not represent the majority of arabs in the world (if they even are arabs at all), but they are mirror sharply and strongly - maybe too strongly - the feelings the arabs or many other people may have.

      What they feel is a threat, and that threat is United States and the whole capitalistic world. They are threathened by the capitalistic economy which makes them its slaves, and they feel they are repressed by an imperialistic power. It does not only threat them economically, it also threaths them culturally. It threaths to take avay from them their very identity.

      I'm afraid to say this at this kind of situation, but the thruth is, that the United States has given too much reason for this kind of anger by very selflisly and one-eyedly seeking its on good in every corner of the world. A lot of people in the world can cope with it, they like to play the same game, but a lot don't.

      So what is yet to be understood by Americans and also other capitalistic countries is that it is maybe not always wise to try to make every civilization in the world to join the same game. They may have their game, which they enjoy as much as we do our.

  522. Re:I hope... by micdow · · Score: 2

    Oi... so what are you saying? Let's just spray them all and hope we get the ones responsible?! What bothers me about this whole thing is the veiled hysteria being shown by people--both in the media and the population-at-large. At this point, I think the preventative measures have already been taken--the air force has been deployed and the monitoring air space. Planes already in mid-flight have been diverted to airports outside the US... AND Dick Cheney is now at the helm while Bush is off somewhere under protection. This is actually the one of the most lingering power of terrorism, isn't it?! The power to induce fear and see the "unseen" enemy everywhere. Don't play into it!

  523. Barrel of crude seems to have jumped from 27 to 29 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you are probably right, fuel might rise. Do not forget that every time middle east become more hot directly or indirectly , crude rise in price due to fear of investor/refinery shortage.

  524. Islam != terrorism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My thoughts go out to all who suffer, and to the families who lost their loved ones.
    I hope that the GWB administration will punish those who are responsible.
    Don't mistake Islam for terrorism.
    Madmen will always be. We can only try to stop them. Which obviously isn't always possible.

    1. Re:Islam != terrorism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe Islam != terrorism, but Islam sure doesn't seem to have much of a problem with it. If you really want to prove something, dissolve Islam now.

    2. Re:Islam != terrorism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the attacks haven't been claimed by any islamic group.
      their is a difference between the religion of Islam, and it's so called followers. Islam preaches tolerance of people.

  525. Re:ALL YOUR WTC ARE BELONG TO US by wysoft · · Score: 0

    Real funny. Thousands of people just died, some of which were probably your fellow Slashdotters. You couldn't have chosen a worse situation to mold into the image of "All your base." You sir, are a terrible excuse for a human.

    --
    -- I'll cut you up so bad, you'll wish I'd never cut you up so bad!
  526. Video Mirrors? by flakier · · Score: 1

    Of either wtc_divx.avi or wtc.mpg

    --
    --
  527. From CNN, What's confirmed by BigGar' · · Score: 5, Informative

    NEW YORK (CNN) -- Terrorists struck the United States Tuesday morning in harrowing, widespread attacks that included at least three commercial jet crashes into significant buildings.

    In the first attack, a plane hits the north tower of the World Trade Center in Manhattan shortly before 9 a.m., followed by another plane into the second tower about 20 minutes later. Both towers later collapse.

    About an hour later, a plane crashes into the Pentagon, part of which later collapses.

    American Airlines tells CNN that it lost two planes, both en route to Los Angeles: American Flight 11 from Boston with 81 passengers and 11 crew aboard is lost. This is believed, but not confirmed, to have been one of the planes that crashed into the trade center. ... American Flight 77, a Boeing 757 from Washington Dulles airport to Los Angeles with 58 passengers and six crew is unaccounted for. Witness says plane that hit Pentagon was an American Airlines Boeing 757.

    United Airlines loses two planes: United Airlines Flight 93 airliner headed from Newark, New Jersey, to San Francisco, crashes near Somerset, Pennsylvania -- police say initial reports indicate no survivors. ... United confirms the crash of Flight 175 from Boston to Los Angeles with 56 passengers and seven crew aboard. It's possible, but not confirmed, that this is the second plane that hit the World Trade Center.

    FBI sources said all four planes that crashed had been hijacked.

    The Pentagon, the White House, the State Department, the Justice Department, the Capitol, the CIA and all other government buildings in Washington are evacuated.

    President Bush calls the crashes "a national tragedy." Later in the day, Bush issues a statement from Barksdale AFB near Shreveport, Louisiana. "Make no mistake: The United States will hunt down and punish those responsible for these cowardly acts."

    In the first-ever national ground stop of aircraft, all flights nationwide are stopped at their departure airports.

    International flights are initially diverted to Canada; FAA says later, however, that 22 U.S.-bound international flights will be allowed to land.

    Mullah Abdul Salam Zaeef, the Taliban ambassador to Pakistan, says in reaction to the terror attacks that "we want to tell the American children that Afghanistan feels your pain and we hope that the courts find justice."

    In New York, more than 10,000 rescue personnel rush to the scene. Evacuation of lower Manhattan begins.

    Israel evacuates all of its missions around the world.

    The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta is evacuated. CDC prepares bioterrorism teams in case they become necessary.

    Philadelphia landmarks are evacuated.

    In Chicago, the Sears Tower is evacuated; United Nations in New York is evacuated.

    Five battleships and two aircraft are deployed along the East Coast of the United States, and two aircraft carriers go to New York area, all from Norfolk, Virginia.

    The New York Port Authority closes all bridges and tunnels into the city.

    U.S. stock markets close after the New York attacks.

    NATO sends home all non-essential personnel from its Brussels, Belgium, headquarters.

    The Immigration and Naturalization Service puts the U.S. borders with Mexico and Canada on highest state of alert.

    Los Angeles International Airport is evacuated.

    Disney closes its parks in Orlando, Florida, and Disneyland in Anaheim, California.

    FEMA implements plan established for such events: FBI leads investigation, and Justice Deptartment heads crisis management.

    Three Palestinian groups -- Hamas, the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine and Islamic Jihad -- deny responsibility for the attacks, but blame U.S. policies in the Mideast.

    Mayor Anthony Williams of Washington, D.C., declares a state of emergency.

    A Delta flight makes emergency landing in Cleveland and all passengers are safely evacuated. Federal officials search the plane for a possible bomb.

    --


    Shop smart, Shop S-Mart.
  528. State Dept explosion cause unknown by acroyear · · Score: 2

    State Department Is Evacuated
    WASHINGTON

    The State Department was evacuated Tuesday due to a possible explosion or fire amid a rash of explosions in New York and Washington.

    A senior government official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the incident appeared connected with two plane crashes at the World Trade Center, an explosion at the Pentagon and the evacuation of the White House.

    "Something has happened at the State Department," the source said. "We don't know what yet. We hear it might have been a plane."

    source : http://www.wtop.com/

    earlier they reported on the explosion, claiming it was a car bomb, but later rescinded that. other news sources continue to insist the state department was not touched (that the building is intact, regardless of any incident) including eyewitness accounts.

    --
    "But remember, most lynch mobs aren't this nice." (H.Simpson)
    -- Joe
  529. Don't need face recognition to stop hijacking by alienmole · · Score: 2
    You don't need face recognition to stop hijacking. There are any number of technological measures that could be taken to make it much more difficult for terrorists to crash planes into buildings, without affecting the life of the average citizen other than making it more secure.

    A kneejerk lockdown reaction which takes away freedoms from the citizens of the U.S. is the most direct way to serve the ends of the terrorists. The U.S. is one of the world's superpowers in large measure because it does not oppress its own citizens in the overt way that other nations have done (and in some cases, are still doing). That freedom is essential if the U.S. is to continue to thrive - in fact, it is the main thing that should be protected.

  530. !!!MOD UP!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And someone please mirror this site!

  531. Bounty time. by EllisDees · · Score: 1

    When we determine exactly who is responsible for these attacks, instead of mobilizing our armed forces I suggest the following: A one hundred million dollar bounty on the head of the leader of the organization, and half a million for any verified members of the group. This would still be way cheaper than sending in the military, and wouldn't mean the loss of any more American lives.

    --
    -- Give me ambiguity or give me something else!
    1. Re:Bounty time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with this sort of response is that it'll destroy what little credibility we have left.

      "We think that your Judicial system is a mess. Fix it or we won't give you any more of our money." -- It just doesn't make sense if we don't follow the same rules we enforce elsewhere.

      I think we should catch the guys that did this and then give them a fair trial.

      I dislike that, but it's the only sane and civilized thing to do.

      Period.

    2. Re:Bounty time. by EllisDees · · Score: 1

      My suggestion is just an alternative to sending troops in anywhere. If we can actually catch the people, put them on trial by all means.

      --
      -- Give me ambiguity or give me something else!
    3. Re:Bounty time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      money and troops. how american...

    4. Re:Bounty time. by EllisDees · · Score: 1

      Just being pragmatic. Why not minimize both costs and lives lost?

      --
      -- Give me ambiguity or give me something else!
  532. THE BOOK ENDS DIFFERENTLY (Fight Club) by stego · · Score: 1

    and I think for the exact same reason that today seems so horrible... the movie gives the idea that we should just toss it all and start from scratch - the book I think acknowledges that our culture has some value, and even the extraneous crap (like IKEA) exists because we have achieved something worthwhile. or something like that...

  533. One thing We DEFINITELY need to do by Drazi100 · · Score: 1

    is to rebuild the world trade center and make it taller than before!

    a symbol that we who are free will continue ot be
    no matter what mosq

    1. Re:One thing We DEFINITELY need to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about putting a middle finger on the top of the both towers pointing at the middle east?

    2. Re:One thing We DEFINITELY need to do by Tazzy531 · · Score: 1
      Before we do that though..we have to look into the technology that we have. These skyscrapers were built in the 40s and 50s as a way for the super rich of the time to show off their "manliness"

      In one of the news reports, they were saying that in any of these buildings, if there were a fire above the 10th floor, it would be rather difficult, if not impossible to fight due to the lack of technology (ie water pressure)

      Imagine this..these buildings contained 50,000 people. I remember reading on /. a couple months ago about people building Atriums that contained over 100,000 people. Imagine if 100,000 people died in one incident!

      --


      _______________________________
      "I'm not Conceited...I'm just a realist..."
    3. Re:One thing We DEFINITELY need to do by yellowjacket03 · · Score: 1

      Just FYI, the WTC was built from 1969-1973.

    4. Re:One thing We DEFINITELY need to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just FYI, the WTC was built from 1969-1973. yeah... the same years we built automobiles with 400+ horsepower huge V-8 gas guzzling engines and no crashworthiness protection for occupants and just barely had begun to put shoulder harnesses in addition to lap belts.

    5. Re:One thing We DEFINITELY need to do by yellowjacket03 · · Score: 1

      What does that have to do with anything? These buildings were built with potential disaster in mind. 50,000 people work there in a day. How many people, not counting muscle car enthusiasts, have cars that old?

  534. Re:Nostradamus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "At forty-five degrees, the sky will burn, Fire approaches the great new city, Immediately a huge, scattered flame leaps up When they want to have verification from the Normans"

    NYC is at 45 Degree north latitude
    looked up verification in the thesaurus... Demonstration comes up

  535. Franklin D. Roosevelt's Pearl Harbor Speech by CaptTrips · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The original

    Yesterday, Dec. 7, 1941 - a date which will live in infamy - the United States of America was suddenly and deliberately attacked by naval and air forces of the Empire of Japan.

    The modified

    "Today, Sept. 11, 2001 - a date which will live in infamy, again - the United States of America was suddenly and deliberately attacked by cowardly Islamic terriorist forces of the Milertistic group lead by Osama bin Laden."

    Make no mistake. We are at war.

    --

    grep >= ! == $your
    1. Re:Franklin D. Roosevelt's Pearl Harbor Speech by CaptTrips · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Let's compare the difference:


      PEARL HARBOR:

      1. Japan attacked us and we knew for sure.

      2. 3,581 were either killed, went missing, wounded, or those who died of their wounds.

      3. The attack was on a Military base not on the U.S. soil directly.


      TODAY:

      1. We don't know exactly who did it. I have my feelings it was Osama bin Laden based a warning he gave the U.S. in which we would receive an "unprecidented" attack.

      2. I'm estimating around 53894 people died today. Breaking down the number:

      • at least 50,000 in total from the WTC buildings
      • 194 confirmed totals on both airliners that hit the WTC
      • estimating 1000 from major injuries suffered from debree from the collapsing towers
      • estimating 2500 from the section of the Pentagon taken out
      • 50 from the plane that hit the Pentagon
      • 150 from the plane that hit outside Pittsburgh, PA

      3. The attack was on a Civilian, Government and Military buildings ON the U.S. soil directly.
      --

      grep >= ! == $your
    2. Re:Franklin D. Roosevelt's Pearl Harbor Speech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The amended:

      "Today, Sept. 11, 2001 - a date which will live in infamy, again - the United States of America was suddenly and deliberately attacked by cowardly domestic terrorist forces consisting of sympathizers to Timothy McVeigh."

      You don't know shit, so shut the fuck up.

    3. Re:Franklin D. Roosevelt's Pearl Harbor Speech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You, "sir", are a moron.

  536. Misinformation by Wonko42 · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    Hemos, CmdrTaco, my intent is not to flame, but this misinformation you are spreading disguised as news has got to stop. Slashdot is, at its core, user-reported technology news. When it comes to anything more than that, the potential damage that can be caused by misinformation spread on such a large scale is far too much.

    The Slashdot articles regarding the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon are literally filled with misinformation that is represented as fact. I can't help but wonder how many people are reading Slashdot and not bothering to verify the information.

    Please, let's leave the high-risk reporting to those qualified to do it. You're doing more harm than good.

    1. Re:Misinformation by NerveGas · · Score: 1

      You might do more good be telling us just what you think is mis-informed.

      steve

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
    2. Re:Misinformation by ctid · · Score: 1
      I'm afraid I have to disagree here. I've been watching this on UK and US television stations and they too have struggled to cope with the scale of the reports they have been getting. It seems to me that Slashdot has been no more or less inaccurate than the professional news services, and as such have been providing a very useful service, given that many news websites have been overwhelmed.


      All IMHO, of course.

      --
      Reality is defined by the maddest person in the room
    3. Re:Misinformation by Tazzy531 · · Score: 1

      I'm up at Columbia University up on 116th st. (5 miles away) And the air is definitely thick around here. Not visibly cloudly, but definitely harder to breathe.

      --


      _______________________________
      "I'm not Conceited...I'm just a realist..."
    4. Re:Misinformation by Wonko42 · · Score: 2

      I am no more qualified to inform you of the events taking place in New York and Washington, D.C. than CmdrTaco or Hemos are. I recommend you watch NBC or CBS; I've been following their coverage throughout the day and have found them to have what seems to be the most accurate and up-to-date information.

  537. however big they were... by ebbv · · Score: 1


    they're at least 5 members smaller now..
    ...dave

    --

    Think different? I'd be happy if most people would just think...
  538. Re:better sources by geekoid · · Score: 2

    Good use for spam. The The goernment could "spam" everyone , kind of like an emergency braod cast system. Actually, just tell the major ISP's whats up and ask them to forward the news to there customers. Word of mouth would get the info out to everyone else.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  539. Nostradamus by RembrandtX · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My Nostradamus is very rusty from my freshmen theology classes 10 years ago but ...

    Wasnt there some prediction about a great conflict involving world powers would be started by a man in a blue turban, who killed with fire in the sky ?

    --

    --Ne auderis delere orbem rigidum meum, non erravi pernicose!
  540. Here is how far the dust cloud extends by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Here's a link to the NOAA website showing the radar image of the northeast US, showing the extent of the dust cloud.

  541. Akamai CTO confirmed by rschroeder · · Score: 3, Informative

    From Boston.com

    Akamai Technologies of Cambridge announced that Daniel C. Lewin, co-founder, chief technology officer, and board member of the company, died in the American Airlines Flight 11 crash in NYC today. Lewin, 31, is survived by his wife and two sons.

    1. Re:Akamai CTO confirmed by portnoy · · Score: 1

      Lewin was my TA for a distributed algorithms class at MIT a couple of years ago (taught by Tom Leighton, the other Akamai founder). Nice, caring, helpful individual. He will be missed.

    2. Re:Akamai CTO confirmed by Ratcrow · · Score: 1

      There's slightly more information available (also confirming this) at Excite news.

  542. Type of Aircraft and Tech info. by Aaton · · Score: 1
    I found a site listing the different planes that crashed today.

    Boeing 757-200
    Boeing 767-200

    Lots of stock pictures of the planes and details about the types of planes...

  543. You Are Dumb (was Re:Plea for peace) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If those responsible for this terrorist attack get away with it, then we are only destined for more attacks. Find the terrorists who did this and destroy them utterly. That's the only message the others will understand.

  544. Loss of Life and Perspective by virg_mattes · · Score: 5, Insightful

    > This is an act of war against the United States.

    No, it's not. It's an act of terrorism. There's an enormous difference, a lesson that Vietnam taught us, and that you've apparently forgotten.

    > Peace did not stop Hitler; peace did not stop the Axis Powers.

    This would be a great analogy if it was accurate, but it isn't. Nations cannot operate without infrastructure, but most terrorist organizations can. You're fighting a different animal, and the weapon that's most effective against one can be entirely ineffective against the other. Think of trying to use an elephant gun (good against elephants, naturally) to kill a swarm of bees, and you'll get the idea.

    > If viable proof of guilt of Osama bin Laden is brought forth,
    > and the Taliban refuses to turn him over to the United States, then
    > they are an accomplice to an act of war and should be dealt with
    > appropriately.


    What if they aren't really harboring him? Or what if they are? What would be an appropriate response to that? Invasion? Do you really think that the rest of the world will stand idly by and watch us annex Afghanistan? Do you really think that this incident warrants a war against Iran and Iraq? How about Russia? How about China? Both world wars started over annexations of territory, and in both wars nations with no initial stake were eventually pulled in (like the U.S. in WWI, which we entered because of our alliance with Britain and France). The number of Americans that would die in World War III would eclipse the deaths today within weeks.

    > There must be a message sent to the world that terrorist actions
    > against the United States will be met with such an incredible and
    > unimaginably horrific response, than no one sane, fanatical, insane,
    > or otherwise would even conceive of the idea.


    Get your temper back in check and read that again. Sane people don't use terrorism, and fanaticals and the insane don't care about consequences. So, our "horrific response" will only serve to turn the collateral damage victims into more enemies.

    > It is time to obliterate those who would cause this to happen
    > using every means at our disposal, including the most destructive
    > and horrific weapons ever developed by man. If some civilians die
    > along the way, they are unfortunate casualties of war.


    It is almost astonishing that your comment reflects very closely the words used by Timothy McVeigh in describing his destruction of the Murrah building. But then, it's not that astonishing after all, in that you're advocating the same sort of terrorism as he was ("if the (fill-in-the-blank) government is going to protect people who commit crimes against the (fill-in-the-blank) people, then I'm justified in killing them and anyone else who happens to get in the way, and I'll call them "unfortunate casualties of war" because it soothes my sense of justice and makes my position less abhorrent").

    Until you (and many more like you) realize that fighting terrorism isn't just about brute force, we as a nation are destined to suffer from more of these attacks. Fighting terrorism is a high art form, and it can be done with a high degree of success, but it's never perfect, and it's never about simple military might. Read more about counter-terrorism, and you'll be surprised (and educated) by what you find.

    Virg

    1. Re:Loss of Life and Perspective by Wavicle · · Score: 2
      Nations cannot operate without infrastructure, but most terrorist organizations can.

      Yeah, whatever. Clearly an organization that can simultaneously hijack 4 aircraft has no infrastructure, financial backing, or central leadership. Uh huh. Let's stick to the point... *this* terrorist organization was *very* well organized. And bombing it into oblivion, and sending a very clear and violent message to any government in support of the organization would be an effective deterrent. You don't see Libya downing too many planes anymore, now do you?

      What if they aren't really harboring him? Or what if they are?

      Let's cut the pointless rhetoric. Either A) They are harboring him, or B) They are lying about it. I believe the intelligence community and the Taliban are telling the truth when they say Bin Laden is in Afghanistan. What did the Taliban spokesman say in their press conference today? It couldn't have been Bin Laden because it was too well organized? That's a lot different than saying "he isn't here".

      Do you really think that the rest of the world will stand idly by and watch us annex Afghanistan?

      What I think is that Afghanistan has lost any sympathy it had with those countries. Are you trying in the slightest way to imply that the Russians are buddies with Afghanistan?!

      The number of Americans that would die in World War III would eclipse the deaths today within weeks.

      blah blah blah... And who, might I ask, would be our enemies in a war over this who would have the tactical capability to deliver a weapon of mass destruction onto our soil? You aren't still saying that the Russians so love Afghanistan that they would enter such a conflict, are you? I don't think the Chinese, who are getting extraordinary benefit from the U.S. economy, are going to be real sympathetic to a country harboring someone suspected of an attack that could seriously curtail american imports of Chinese manufactured goods.

      If Osama Bin Laden is the one responsible for these attacks, and he has been harbored by the Taliban, then I don't think those countries we would be concerned about are going to shed too many tears if we declare war on Afghanistan and remove the incumbent leadership.

      --
      Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army.
      Edward Everett (1794 - 1865)
    2. Re:Loss of Life and Perspective by vnsnes · · Score: 1
      What would be an appropriate response to that? Invasion?

      Just answering a rhetorical question.... Remember the USSR and their campaign in Afghanistan. A huge world power fighting guerillas fortified in the mountains and loosing miserably.

      Sane people don't use terrorism, and fanaticals and the insane don't care about consequences.

      I agree with the rest of your response, but I don't think it's right to dismiss whoever did this as insane because that simply perpetuates the idea that these people are impossible to reason with, which is not true. Desperate is probably what these people are. If the United States and its allies are going to retaliate with more force it will just perpetuate the violence further down the spiral. I am not condoning these acts of terrorism, but the world power should be the one to rise above this and find a solution other than violence.

    3. Re:Loss of Life and Perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are one seriously deluded person. Hope to see you in the front lines of WWIII...

    4. Re:Loss of Life and Perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And who, might I ask, would be our enemies in a war over this who would have the tactical capability to deliver a weapon of mass destruction onto our soil?
      I've been looking at some pictures on my telly, and it looks to me like there is some enemy that can deliver a weapon of mass destruction onto US soil. What's it going to take to wake you up? A nuke?

      Make peace. Or you might be dead next.

    5. Re:Loss of Life and Perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make peace, like we should have done with Hitler??

      You think we can make peace with these fanatics? Bending to their will is what they WANT. If we respond by doing what they want, they will find terrorism as an effective method for achieving their ends. The result of your capitulation is slavery to anyone who wants to commit such acts.

    6. Re:Loss of Life and Perspective by joolios · · Score: 0

      "Reason" with them? Dude. Life is too short to spend getting f****d up the butt by a bunch of religious psychos.

      Do you think there is some "rationale" behind the attacks? That I doubt. They (including the suicidal hijackers) were/are most likely thinking "let's hurt the Americans as much as we can in the service of Allah, Islam, etc, or for eternal paradise after death, whatever) They knew that they would only earn the hatred and vengeance of the US and its allies. While they've earned the admiration of a certain portion of the muslim world, this they know will not bring them or their people any earthly benefit.

      Reason. God you sound dumb.

    7. Re:Loss of Life and Perspective by Wavicle · · Score: 2
      I'll ignore for the moment the fact that you are clueless as to what a weapon of mass destruction is and how many orders of magnitude more destructive than a jumbo jet it is.

      Make peace. Or you might be dead next.

      What kind of clueless idiot are you? Palestinians are dancing in the street upon hearing the news. Why? Because we aren't doing anything to Israel for Israel's actions. They see us as their enemy.

      "Make peace" indeed. Make peace with whom? Which side? Inaction angers one side, action will definitely anger one side. Where is your middle ground? If you have all the answers, perhaps you should get a post at the U.N..

      --
      Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army.
      Edward Everett (1794 - 1865)
    8. Re:Loss of Life and Perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of clueless idiot are you? Palestinians are dancing in the street upon hearing the news. Why? Because we aren't doing anything to Israel for Israel's actions. They see us as their enemy.

      No, they don't hate you for not doing anything about Israel. They hate you because they perceive you as supporting Israel, financially and militarily.

    9. Re:Loss of Life and Perspective by mr_monkey56k · · Score: 1

      I partially agree with you, violence should never follow violence, but the people who are responsible for this have to be apprehended. Even though I'm hardly a military expert, I think that the correct response to this atrocity would be a small, coordinated attack, backed by solid military intelligence (something that has been rather lacking) on whatever organization (if it in fact is a terrorist group) was responsible. If you don't think was a declaration of war, I don't know what you would consider one to be. And I'm certain you would feel very differently if someone you knew was in those buildings.

    10. Re:Loss of Life and Perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make peace? Who should we make peace with? Who is it that we are so seriously at conflict with right now that feels these means are justified

      Why not tell the terrorists the same thing. If I had to put money on either the terrorists or the US of A, I know where it's going?

    11. Re:Loss of Life and Perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's cut the pointless rhetoric. Either A) They are harboring him, or B) They are lying about it.

      Mmmm, are you in possession of some information that we aren't knowing of?

      >Do you really think that the rest of the
      > world will stand idly by and watch us annex
      > Afghanistan?

      What I think is that Afghanistan has lost any sympathy it had with those countries. Are you trying in the slightest way to imply that the Russians are buddies with Afghanistan?!


      Not necessarily, but look at your world map, and think farther. Do you think Russia, Iraq, Iran and all middle-east would be happy of knowing the Us next to their door? Think about Cuba and the russians with their missiles... You liked the crappy movie that went out on the subject? You think that the US did the right thing with their embargo? Then Russia and all the others would have the right to react the same way.,.. no?

      blah blah blah... And who, might I ask, would be our enemies in a war over this who would have the tactical capability to deliver a weapon of mass destruction onto our soil?

      Anybody owning intercontinental missiles. And do not count on your super anti-missile shield to protect you, it as been proven to be useless (2% of chance of interception...)

      I don't think the Chinese, who are getting extraordinary benefit from the U.S. economy, are going to be real sympathetic to a country harboring someone suspected of an attack that could seriously curtail american imports of Chinese manufactured goods.

      Looking at the news lately? What about the us plane taken on chinese ground? And all the hype surrounding the two countries lately?

      If Osama Bin Laden is the one responsible for these attacks, and he has been harbored by the Taliban, then I don't think those countries we would be concerned about are going to shed too many tears if we declare war on Afghanistan and remove the incumbent leadership.

      As said above, military force of a potential enemy neer your territory isn't necessary pleasant.

      Also, think about what your so good nation does to all the middle-east contries:

      - The airsrtikes by night on Bagdad. This is what would be called coward attacks as said so well your beloved president.

      - The embargos on Iraq to punish Sadam (also known as Satan in Us i think) but that had no more effect than to affect the life of thousands and thousands of innocent people.

      I am not saying that what happened is a good thing, but what happened to the united states is the result of what they started, the sad thing is that innocent people died for the stupidity of your government. And the worse in all of that is that chances are that no one will leanr about that, and we are only going to assist to an escalation of violence

    12. Re:Loss of Life and Perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bin Laden is not a fanatic. He's crafty. If he was so willing to die, why wasn't he piloting the plane? He wasn't. He's a manipulator that gets others to do the dangerous work for him.

      By the way, terrorism and war are merely different ways in which violence is inflicted. Was WW2 not a war because some of the attacks were by kamikaze terrorists? If the perpetrators also used a "conventional" military weapon plus a suicide plane it would qualify as a war?

      Hey, the war was declared long ago. It's called jihad. Once Americans respect what that means to those who declared it, they'll have a better idea of what the future bodes.

    13. Re:Loss of Life and Perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's cut the pointless rhetoric. Either A) They are harboring him, or B) They are lying about it.

      Mmmm, are you in possession of some information that we aren't knowing of?

      >Do you really think that the rest of the
      > world will stand idly by and watch us annex
      > Afghanistan?

      What I think is that Afghanistan has lost any sympathy it had with those countries. Are you trying in the slightest way to imply that the Russians are buddies with Afghanistan?!


      Not necessarily, but look at your world map, and think farther. Do you think Russia, Iraq, Iran and all middle-east would be happy of knowing the Us next to their door? Think about Cuba and the russians with their missiles... You liked the crappy movie that went out on the subject? You think that the US did the right thing with their embargo? Then Russia and all the others would have the right to react the same way.,.. no?

      blah blah blah... And who, might I ask, would be our enemies in a war over this who would have the tactical capability to deliver a weapon of mass destruction onto our soil?

      Anybody owning intercontinental missiles. And do not count on your super anti-missile shield to protect you, it as been proven to be useless (2% of chance of interception...)

      I don't think the Chinese, who are getting extraordinary benefit from the U.S. economy, are going to be real sympathetic to a country harboring someone suspected of an attack that could seriously curtail american imports of Chinese manufactured goods.

      Looking at the news lately? What about the us plane taken on chinese ground? And all the hype surrounding the two countries lately?

      If Osama Bin Laden is the one responsible for these attacks, and he has been harbored by the Taliban, then I don't think those countries we would be concerned about are going to shed too many tears if we declare war on Afghanistan and remove the incumbent leadership.

      As said above, military force of a potential enemy neer your territory isn't necessary pleasant.

      Also, think about what your so good nation does to all the middle-east contries:

      - The airsrtikes by night on Bagdad. This is what would be called coward attacks as said so well your beloved president.

      - The embargos on Iraq to punish Sadam (also known as Satan in Us i think) but that had no more effect than to affect the life of thousands and thousands of innocent people.

      I am not saying that what happened is a good thing, but what happened to the united states is the result of what they started, the sad thing is that innocent people died for the stupidity of your government. And the worse in all of that is that chances are that no one will leanr about that, and we are only going to assist to an escalation of violence

    14. Re:Loss of Life and Perspective by vnsnes · · Score: 1
      You don't know what they are most likely thinking, you're just using an image that was developed in your head through the media or whatever experiences you've had to paint a picture that most comfortably fits your view of the world. And that picture is that they are unreasonable and insane -- freaks. That in itself is part of the problem that the United States is facing right now.

      Islam "officials" have long established that suicide bombers are not martyrs and do not go to heaven. So, some groups are training these people to think otherwise. Trying to eradicate those groups with force has obviously failed, so why not try to understand the motivation for their hatered and find some common ground. Because the US knows that it will continue to earn hatred and vengeance of those who they attack in retribution and their allies. It's a spiral of violence that is self-propetuating.

      Unfortunatelly most of the public agrees with you, and non-violent alternatives will be brushed aside as not having enough impact to correct the situation in the public's eye. I mean, broadcasting a boring summit or a debate is much less fun than showing bombs drop.

    15. Re:Loss of Life and Perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mmmm, are you in possession of some information that we aren't knowing of?

      How about: this information.

      Try doing at least a little footwork, dumbass troll.

    16. Re:Loss of Life and Perspective by ghjm · · Score: 1

      No. Make peace, like Hitler should have done.

      It has really come to that.

      -Graham

  545. Re:Plea for peace - Huh? Get Real! by jonathan_ingram · · Score: 2

    You're dealing, most likely, with Arab terrorists.

    Damn right - just like Oklahoma, yes?

    I'm more sorry than I can express about the loss of life in your country. I wish there were some way I could help the families and friends of the people who died.

    I know what *won't* help: a war.

    It must be terribly hard for you to realise, given that you've probably never been out your country, but Syrians and Afghani are *just as human as you*. One American isn't worth *more* in some sense than a non-American, despite what you might think.

    You know how to stop hatred? Build prosperity. Pick the countries that you think may have caused this, and make them happy, so they never need to resort to something like this again. Suicide missions aren't something that you do lightly -- there is years of hatred and tension that America needs to *defuse*.

    And yes, I said the same about Britain when the IRA were killing people in my country.

  546. Inadequate fire protection systems by Animats · · Score: 5, Informative
    The World Trade Center was structurally strong enough to survive being hit by a large aircraft. And it did; the towers were not knocked down. But it had an inadequate fire protection system, and the fire softened the structural steel, causing building collapse.

    The World Trade Center had inadequate protection systems in the 1993 bombing; the truck bomb in the parking garage knocked out emergency power and the fire pumps. Last time, they didn't even have battery backup on the emergency lighting. The FEMA study of the bombing and fire indicates only minor upgrades were made to fire protection systems; better emergency lighting and such. No improvements to sprinklers or new fire barriers were made, other than improving backup power to the fire pumps. Most of the improvements were to communications and control.

    This was much worse than it should have been.

    1. Re:Inadequate fire protection systems by yzquxnet · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure that even a majorly beefed up fir protection system would have helped. The planes, bound for LA, were fully loaded with fuel. Videos of the impacts show explosions ripping all the way through the building. This surely would have damaged any existing fire suppresent system majorly. The fuel would have severly damnpened any sprinklers efforts as putting out such a blaze. In fact, if I'm not mistaken. If a fire gets hot enough, water can actually be used to fuel the fire as the molecule can be broken apart into hydrogen and oxygen.

    2. Re:Inadequate fire protection systems by F.Prefect · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Perhaps the fire-supression system was inadequate in many respects. That said, how can you seriously blame the scale of this catastrophe on the fire-supression system? Who in their right mind would equip an office building with a fire-suppression system that could extinguish a fire caused by enough jet fuel to take a 767 across the continent?! I think that even if it were up to a higher standard, it would have been absurd for the designing engineers to say, "hey, let's put in a sprinkler system that could extinguish a fire caused by a 767 slamming into the building with a near-full load of fuel!"

      --
      --Ford Prefect
    3. Re:Inadequate fire protection systems by zhensel · · Score: 2

      OK, elementary physics for you - a lesson in torque. When a multi-hundred ton plane crashes at 400 miles an hour into the top of a hundred story building, that's a lot of force. It's nothing compared to the force on the foundation - the foundation was fubared the moment the planet hit. It was a matter of time before it fell, the gradual destruction of the top portion and the massive whole didn't help anyone either. I'm watching the second impact on TV right now, and the thing flew all the way through the building. No building in a non-earthquake prone area is built to survive anything even close to resembling this. It could've been flooded with water and the result would be the same.

    4. Re:Inadequate fire protection systems by bridgette · · Score: 4, Informative

      Who in their right mind would equip an office building with a fire-suppression system that could extinguish a fire caused by enough jet fuel to take a 767 across the continent?!

      Apparently, the structural engineer that worked on the WTC would, he's quoted as saying I designed it for a 707 to smash into it.

      http://chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-0 10 911kamin-towers.story

      --
      - bridgette
    5. Re:Inadequate fire protection systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then there is the matter of weight, it has been said that the towers were specificly build to survive the impact of a large airplane *not* to keep the tons of steal up that would inevitabely end up hanging in the tower.

      If a building is strong enough to keep standing after the power of both the inpact of a complete aircraft and the folowing explosion then there is very little reason for it to collapse after that, a fire alone would unlikely be enough to make it crash after that. Not even the unstopable kerosine fire.

    6. Re:Inadequate fire protection systems by phunkymunkey · · Score: 1

      Jet fuel cannot be extinguished using water. A special foam substance (which I don't know too much more about) must be used. More sprinklers wouldn't have made much of a difference.

    7. Re:Inadequate fire protection systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm...
      Need to reexamine your statement there.

      In kindergarten I learned the difference btwn numbers.

      For example, 767 > 707

  547. Video links that haven't been /.'d by ncc74656 · · Score: 2

    The local paper has some links in their copy of an AP story on this incident. HTH, and whoever's responsible ought to consider that his days are numbered.

    --
    20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  548. Tragical and sobering by Toshio · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My position
    I will write this in first person, as the thoughts and opinions here are expressed as mine only. When I say "you", I mean you personally, when I say USA, I mean the country as it exists in legal term. I strongly differentiate between the country that you live in and you personaly.

    What do I see
    I don't know who commited this crime, but I don't see them completely unprovoked. The choice of the day itself (international peace day) hints, that it might not be immediately connected to recent events on UN racism conference, but rather something that can be shown as direct result of USA policy of involving in every regional conflict in last decade. Playing the role of world police and trying to establish new world order isn't something that will go down lightly with vast majority of world population. Even if this resolves to be act of internal terrorism (like OC bombing was) it means that USA is growing more and more extremist by the day. Could you imagine something like this happening in the land of truly free?

    What I think about it
    For the most of the world I would say that it has it's feelings mixed. I, for one, am fed over my head with all of your freedom exports as of lately and think this might be clear signal that USA is trying to do what no country is (or ever should) be allowed to do. On the other hand I do not condone this way of acting in any way justifiable. World policing is something that UN was designed to do and internal freedoms and rights are something that USA seems to be failing in, but this kind of response is never justified.

    What do I mean with mixed feelings
    For one, I cheer, that civilians in USA are meeting the horror and uncertainty of war. UN general secretary Gali once said for Sarajevo, there's 13 places in the world were the have it worse. This time the civilians in USA for the first time in their history get the chance to experience the fact that there is no other place on Earth where it's worse. They are targeted to change the politics of their country. They are simply used as tools to achieve the goal. And at the end of the day, they are the only ones that could change the policy of the country as a whole. But before you cry that this is wrong and this will only achieve opposite effects, let me assure you, that you are right. This way of acting will never achieve the desired result unless the enemy is overhelmingly stronger. This time the enemy has showed it has weapon of FUD readily available and is capable of using it. Do you really think that you country (assuming your from the USA) really did something else when decided to bomb Yugoslavia? Can you honestly say you didn't target your war aginst civil population in order to destabilize the government? Can you really claim that power plants, car production lines, television station offices, bridges, and other things you managed to destroy or disable aren't civilian targets? In what way does USA justification of the way that it handled that war differ from justification that someone (be it international or internal) will use in its defence?

    Since I'm so smart, what do you want us to do?
    Can you honestly expect that harsh retaliation (while the bodies are still warm) will solve anything expect serve to prolong the conflict? If that someone will be taken to court, then things will have to be proven; exhibits A and B will be presented; judgement will be passed and sentence will be executed. This is the way things are done. This is the way that equality works. When taken to international stage, USA will probably act as sole judge, jury and executioner. What makes you think, that it morally can. If some country just did this and you're saying it's wrong, what makes you right? Rule of the mob?

    And what would I do?
    If I would be you (but I'm obviously not), I wouldn't be thinking about revenge (revenge for what exactly?), but I would rather be thinking abut helping those in need. I would be thinking about saying a pray for those dead. I would be thinking about correct course of action after taking care of this. If I would be president of USA, I wouldn't be talking about hunting down the enemy, I would be talking about helping those in need, I would be talking about rebuilding and healing. If I would have the power he has, I wouldn't want to help the thirst for blood, I would want to bring out the good in all the people. Only after that I would be looking to bring justice to whoever did this. Bring justice, not hunt down mind you. Headhunts and public lynch never helped anyone, but correctly executing the justice deterred other from getting help in commiting crimes.

    And your point is?
    Don't walk around, saying how good/bad this thing is, but the next time elections are around go to the voting booth and tell the country how do you want it to run the business. This will actualy mean that you will alter your behaviour based on some terrorist action, but think about the alternatives. Do you want to live in real FUD state (as in state of mind) or do you want to influence the politics to minimize the chances of this occuring again. The answer is yours. But bottom line is whether you would rather use this as an excuse to do something abou your whole society, or use this as the point of justifying more violence.

    Don't go down the spiral of violence. Don't retaliate. Don't assume.
    Act with thought. Seek international involvement. Check and present all the facts. Take the road of justice.

    If you want to know why I put this in bold, it simply because USA haven't shown much it lately. Sometimes the biggest bully on the block just needs to take the cold shower and admit that fists don't solve everything.

    --
    To boldly invent more hot water.
    1. Re:Tragical and sobering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an American, I have to agree that we should not strike out in FUD.

      Revenge is a dish best served cold.

      We need to unite, find the people (and countries) responsible. Then put them on trial by full military assult. This was an act of war by a terrorist organization - one who obviously does not care if they kill civilians - they do not deserve the "right" to a trial; just executed in justice - but NOT by blindly stabbing at suspects.

    2. Re:Tragical and sobering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't be thinking about revenge

      bull shit!! what makes you so special?

    3. Re:Tragical and sobering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For one, I cheer, that civilians in USA are meeting the horror and uncertainty of war.

      You have the right to hate my country and my people. You have the right to hate my government; you aren't an American, after all. My government does not even pretend to act on your behalf.

      I'm sure your country, whatever it is, does not act on behalf of Americans or any other nationality. It acts on behalf of the rest of the losers that make up the population of your shithole of a country. As you are such as smart guy, you should know that. The problem is, that the power of your country is much less than the power of my country. This is your real problem. Face it. Admit it. The first step on the road to recovery from a problem like yours is to admit you have the problem. And believe me, this is the real problem.

      However, the fact is, that if your country were as powerful as mine, the world would hate your country much more than parts of the world sometimes hate mine. Your country would throw its weight around much more. Your country would shamelessly and unapologetically pursue its interests much more agressively than my country, knowing that it can completely ignore the protests of the weaker nations it would oppress.

      Now that a disaster has struck my country and my people, people like you are undoubtably very happy, as you state above.

      Now is time for the USA to stand with its friends and clearly identify its enemies.

      By your statement you have clearly identified yourself.

      You try to put out such a reasonable and intelligent image. But you are happy that we have been attacked by terrorists.

      Go fuck yourself.

    4. Re:Tragical and sobering by Toshio · · Score: 1

      You try to put out such a reasonable and intelligent image. But you are happy that we have been attacked by terrorists.
      Go fuck yourself.

      I agree with all you said. I am trying to put out reasonable face. I'm nobody special. I'm no bully. I have my own personal limitations.

      The point you're missing is that I also read 0 and -1 comments. The point that I regret all victims of this mindless crime. The point that I'm not religeus for if I was I would probably be praying for them.

      Bottom line is that I'm calm as it didn't happen to me. I've seen wars from much closer than you think and much closer than anyone would like to see them if he could take a choice. I've seen how the wars have begun and I don't see anything different here. Yes, I also find this to be poetic justice.

      USA has been dealing wars, uncertainty, and fear throughout the world since the end of WW2. In all this time, there was nothimg to expose the population of continental USA to any of the horrors of the war in any way other than media and video games. I guess that war in Vietnam was doomed the day first maimed combatman started returning home.

      For last decade USA had nobody to confront it with enough power on diplomatic levels so it started to take sides in more and more questionable ventures culminating in legaly (I'm not talking morals here, I have none - remember) unlawful and unprovoked bombing of Yugoslavia. What happened to continental USA today MIGHT be logical and imminent response to more and more arrogant stance USA takes in international stage.

      Since you only replied to single sentence of my thoughts, I'll give you direct reply here. This time please at least read it in whole:
      People of USA had direct touch with everyday realities of war. I'm saddened since untold number of people (even one would be too many) died in this event. I'm happy since the lesson was delivered. If you think I'm an asshole, then just think about biological or chemical agents. There are many nastier ways to deliver a message to some country that bullied so many others. Now just wait for FUD to go away and think rationally. I challenge you that in 1 year you'll have movie and TV production all over USA collecting money on these peoples deaths. Who will be sensless then?


      Now is time for the USA to stand with its friends and clearly identify its enemies.

      Friends come and go, enemies accumulate. Let's just say this is the crust of the problem. Kings are lonely and court jesters are useless when assasins come. This time USA will get all the help needs. It will be deserved and needed. But where were the friends yesterday? Did they warn you. I guess bullying (echelon, spying, trade wars, unfounded bombings, threatening) doesn't bring you much of that. The fact is that USA stands alone today and court jesters are jumping around to make it smile again. I'm probably not considerate, but I'm no court jester either. Just remeber that you get to know your friends before the accident. Just hop to next article... Short lookup of the current known enemies.

      I guess you should add me to the retaliation list: Ljubljana, Slovenia. 1MT nuke should do the trick if you can actually find the place (I guess Chinese embassy in Belgrade wasn't supposed to be there).

      --
      To boldly invent more hot water.
    5. Re:Tragical and sobering by Toshio · · Score: 1

      What makes you so special you could question me being special?

      Call me stupid, but when I cut my finger I don't think about "punishing" the knife but rather about finding the first aid kit.

      --
      To boldly invent more hot water.
    6. Re:Tragical and sobering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point you're missing is that I also read 0 and -1 comments.

      I don't see the relevence of this statement.

      Anyway, as I am not so far away from you (Sopron, Hungary) I could potentially deliver the bomb you discussed. Unfortunately, I don't have one, and, aside from yourself, I have had very positive experiences with Slovenians. So I don't want to kill the rest of the people in your city. Actually I don't want to kill you either.

      Anyway your point was already clear. The reason I quoted the one sentence is because that's the part I take issue with, in case that wasn't clear from my side from the beginning.

      I still take issue with it. Your follow-up explanation does not clarify your point any more than it already was.

      At the end of the day, you cannot separate the fact that this "lesson" was delivered by people dying by terrible acts of terrorism - mass-murder of civilians. You cannot, in my book, say that you are sorry for the people that died but happy that this wonderful "message" was delivered. That's hypocritical bullshit. Be honest with yourself. You don't really care that those people died. They represent a country whose influence, policies, and politics you despise. They mean nothing to you. You don't know them, and, if you did, you wouldn't like them anyway, would you? They aren't cultured, superior, well-educated Europeans with wonderful, liberated, altruistic minds like yourself.

      As am American living in Europe, I personally want my country to be more friendly to the world, but particularly to Europe. I can see the European point of view well; my wife is European, my kid has dual nationality, and I speak 3 European languages fluently (and can communicate in 3 more). I've lived in Germany, Belgium, Austria, and Italy as well as in the Caribbean for the past 10 years.

      I understand to the European attitudes about my country.

      However I'm sitting here watching CNN and watching an airplane hit the WTC at full speed, knowing that on that one and at least 3 others, the all of the people on board many in the buildings they hit and on the ground died, innocent civilians who didn't deserve to die.

      And then I have you, the cultured, superior, well-educated European, who speaks my language as a second language so well, telling the Slashdot readers how you are happy that my country is experiencing this tragedy, so that we can learn firsthand what we bring on other people.

      So, yeah, you're right, I certainly do think negatively of you.

      But then, I love my country. I feel bad when I see them die. I feel bad when I see sybols of my country destroyed by terrorists.

      As for the movie, there won't be one. You are underestimating the impact this is having on my people.

      David living in Sopron

      P.S.
      Why don't you ask yourself, what would Slovenia do if Slovenia were the world's number 1 economic and military power?

      How would Slovenia handle the reponsibility? Would your leaders balance the responsibility to pursue your own country's and people's agenda with that of the rest of the world? What would the rest of the world think about Slovenia if we were the #1 power? (note I'm not talking about the EU. I am talking about Slovenia - it's a hypothetical question).

      These are not questions you ask yourself. Why? Because if Slovenia were #1, you probably wouldn't care what the rest of the world thought. You may tell yourself something different, but if you are honest with yourself you may find that the truth is not so pretty.

      At the end of the day, despite the fact that Europe's emerging persona is increasingly being defined as anti-American, Europe and America will grow closer in the end. The American people will slowly adopt more European views on the environment (this is already happening BTW, despite Bush's stances), capital punishment, and other things. Europe has been slowly adopting American attitudes towards business, marketing, service, deregulation, privatization, among others. When I say this to Europeans who really have a psychological need to dislike my country and its people, it makes them angry. They also hate it when I point out the similarities between my people and Europeans (hardly surprising that there would be similarities since my society and culture are European-based). Maybe you do too. If so, it's because it's an emotional issue. For me, I was surprised when I learned how many Europeans actually hate my country. Really hate my country and my people for political reasons.

      But that's the only motivation I can think of for someone to speak out when a terrible tragedy happens to my country and say that it was a good thing. Hate. You have the right to hate my country and my people. And I have the right not to like you for it.

    7. Re:Tragical and sobering by Toshio · · Score: 1

      I have prepared the complete answer, but I found it overly offensive for the time being. I will send it to you personaly after a week and no sooner directly over an e-mail, if you will send me your e-mail address. You don't like me and my opinion, but I have couple of hard questions that would be right out sensless right now, but I would still like to see the answers.

      --
      To boldly invent more hot water.
    8. Re:Tragical and sobering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Toshio, that you are amoral is your whole problem.
      You have no foundation for what is right and wrong, therefore you have no concept of what is good and what is evil.
      Therefore, listening to you is like listening to the babbling of a child. You have a comparable lack of grasp on the reality of things.
      I sincerely hope that you learn and mature in your life to understand what exactly morality is.

    9. Re:Tragical and sobering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Toshio,

      I didn't write the other comment. But I agree with the sentiment 100%.

      I don't like this conversation, and I really don't want to continue it. I started it with an emotional reaction from my side; normally I never say (or write) things like "go fuck yourself".

      I can already guess what you are going to write, so I don't want to read it. Why you would think I would want to get an email that you already characterize as offensive, from a stranger, is beyond me.

      I have had many conversations with Europeans like yourself. I can repeat all of your drivel before it exits from your mouth.

      You are not an American. You are not from my country. My country does not look after your interests. My country tries to look after the interests of Americans. You do not like my country or its people. That is your right.

      I know that my country is not perfect. I know that my country makes mistakes. I know that my country has caused the deaths of innocent civilians. I know that my country most likely will cause the death of innocent civilians again in the future. I know that my country has made and will make foreign policy mistakes. I am not proud of these things.

      Having said the above I can also say that I love my country and its people very much, more than ever now that an incredible tragedy has occurred. I love my country, mistakes and all ("warts and all" as the expression goes, if you know it). I feel incredibly strong emotions; I am working in Rome at the moment, travelling home to Sopron every weekend, but I want to get on a flight to New York and help out instead. It's useless; I could do nothing, but I have the feeling very strong.

      This is a very personal issue for me and my fellow Americans. I personally don't appreciate your sentiments that you are happy my country has been taught a lesson by mass-murdering its civilians. That's my one and only point.

      The bottom line is that I don't need you to educate me on my country's faults. I don't need it or want it. Particularly now that an incredible tragedy has ocurred, my country, its people, and its symbols have been attacked, and many of my people have died and are dying. I neither need nor want your "hard questions".

      I don't appreciate your message. I don't like it. It has raised negative emotions in me that were best left unraised. Your timing couldn't be worse.

      David Nichols
      Sopron Hungary

      P.S. I take back what I said before I knew where you were from. Slovenia is an incredibly beautiful country. Most of the people there are quite nice. Thank God for all the Europeans and other non-Americans who are standing with us this this moment of incredible tragedy and emotion. Those people may not always like what my country does, but do not take the opportunity to gloat when innocent cilivians die. Rather, they see my people as human beings, and commisserate with their suffering.

  549. Re:better sources by Mayflower · · Score: 0

    fucking idiot

  550. WTC collapse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most likely caused by structural damage due to impact and heat weakening of the structural steel.

    You can see the plastic deformation of the building frame prior to collapse.

    The planes should have had a full load of fuel on board.

  551. Domains by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    SHIT!!! i just thought of this but its probably too late by now: imagine all the domains you could buy on thi, and sell to the highest bidder.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  552. Re:I hope... by Svartalf · · Score: 2

    Sadly, your wishes are sadly naive, based off of flawed thinking.

    "Israel and Palestine have had 50 years to hate each other -- the Protestants and Catholics in Ireland have had about 300. You don't defuse a situation like that by bombing the hell out of one side (we know, Thatcher did her best)."


    The peoples of Israel and Palestine have had centuries of time to hate each other. This is a conflict that has been well over 2000 years in progress. Because we support Israel, many over there transfer the same conflict to us. Perhaps you might read the Holy Bible sometime- it documents the source of the conflict in detail and shows why it's not likely to ever go away as long as we're on this Earth.

    "Peace and reconciliation is, in the long run, the only way forward."

    Nice sentiment. Unfortunately, they don't believe that peace will win them anything- in fact, many believe that dying while killing infidels will buy their way into Heaven. You can't have peace with these people. You can't have reconcilliation with them. They don't reason. They don't ask for any quarter. The crash, a suicide attack on the WTC and Pentagon, should tell you just how wrong you are in this regard.

    "The biggest thing the American government can do now is say 'What have we done to these people? How have the affected their lives so badly that they will kill themselves just to hurt our civilians? How can *we* change *our* behaviour so that something like this never happens again.' "

    Funny thing is, we've really done nothing to them other than befriend Israel. Having done so, we've involved ourselves with a blood feud that is centuries old. Once you realize that there's nothing we can do except utterly condemn Israel and help bomb the Israelites into oblivion that would appease them, then you come to the conclusion there's no middle ground for us to have to come to a peaceful resolve of this.

    Biggest thing we can do is to ensure that they don't repeat this incident- ever. If that means bombing some "poorly defended" country that is financing/training them- so be it.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  553. visit a mosque by kevin+lyda · · Score: 1

    if there's a mosque in your area, today might be a day to visit it. like non-muslims, i'm sure most muslims in amaerica are horrified and shocked by what's happened. they too might have friends and relatives who have died, and worse still there segments of the media inciting hatred of them. i know very little about islam, but i'm sure there are people who horribly misinterpret islam just like they misinterpret christianity or judiaism.

    terrorism is about spreading terror, fear and divisions between people. fight back. broaden your world, reduce fear and help add to the voices of condemnation.

    --
    US Citizen living abroad? Register to vote!
    1. Re:visit a mosque by beanerspace · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You make a very good point. Talk to someone Islamic. I am not Islamic, but a rather identify with the type of 'Reformed' Christianity espoused as websites like Antithesis.com and the Credenda Agenda.

      That said, I know enough to know that it is ONLY the most radical and a minority of Islamics who preach violence. Most, if not all, condemn such CSCB terrorist acts. It would be victory for the chicken-shit-coward-bastard (CSCB)-terrorists if they could take these sad events and make us hate our Islamic neihbor.

      While we may disagree about God and country, I would prefer to debate our differences over some cold beer and hummus, as opposed to hot lead and fire.

    2. Re:visit a mosque by uigrad_2000 · · Score: 1
      That said, I know enough to know that it is ONLY the most radical and a minority of Islamics who preach violence. Most, if not all, condemn such CSCB terrorist acts.

      Here in the US, you would be correct. But not everywhere. Take a look at this photo from the yahoo photo service (yimg.com is yahoo images)

      Remember that Osama bin Laden warned three weeks ago that he and his followers would carry out an "unprecedented attack on U.S. interests for its support of Israel"

      Also, the editor of London-based al-Quds al-Arabi newspaper said Islamic fundamentalists led by bin Laden were 'almost certainly' behind the attack of the World Trade Center in New York.

      If the perptrators are Muslim, that doesn't mean that all Muslims are to blame.

      --
      Free unix account: freeshell.org
    3. Re:visit a mosque by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "terrorism is about spreading terror, fear and divisions between people. fight back. broaden your world, reduce fear and help add to the voices of condemnation"

      That is an excellent quote, and well worth remembering during these times of tragedy...

  554. Terrorism by CaptTrips · · Score: 1, Informative

    The unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence by a person or an organized group against people or property with the intention of intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for ideological or political reasons.

    Terrorism, term usually applied to organized acts or threats of violence designed to intimidate opponents or to publicize grievances. The term dates from the Reign of Terror (1793-94) in the French Revolution but has taken on additional meaning in the 20th cent. Political terrorism may be part of a government campaign to eliminate the opposition, as under Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, and others, or it may be part of a revolutionary effort to overthrow a regime, a common tactic in guerrilla warfare. Terrorism by radicals (of both the left and right) and by nationalists became widespread after World War II. Contemporary revolutionary groups that engage in terrorist activity include the "provisional" wing of the Irish Republican Army; the Palestine Liberation Organization; and the Shining Path, in Peru.

    --

    grep >= ! == $your
  555. I'm confused.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    the rumour is that the pilot of United Flight 193 flew it in into the ground, outside Pittsburgh, rather then fly into the USX building,

    So they guy flew the plane into the building after he flew it into the ground outside the city?!?!!

    How the hell did he do that? I'd think that once he flew the plane into the ground, it would take a miracle to get the thing to take off to be able to fly it into a building.

    1. Re:I'm confused.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First off, the plane didn't crash near Pittsburgh. It crashed in Somerset, that's 80 miles southeast of Pittsburgh. Second, the USX building wasn't hit by a plane.

    2. Re:I'm confused.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the USX building wasn't hit by a plane.

      Then why did Taco say it was?

      He said "The pilot crashed the plane into the ground, then into the building."

      And why did he stick the word "rather" in there?

    3. Re:I'm confused.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in the words of homer,

      "You sir, are a stupid head"

  556. Jet Fighters and Helicopters by beanerspace · · Score: 2

    Just to add to your observations. I live here in a nearby burb, inbetween all three major DC aiports and in direct flight line to Camp David.

    Which may explain the occasional jet fighter and helicopter that buzzes overhead.

  557. Not Perl Harbor by souleman · · Score: 1

    This has very few comparisons to Perl Harbor. There is not another "World War" going on, although there are some serious disputes.
    The World Trade Center is not a military base, civilians were attacked. The pentagon is military, but should have been a lot more protected then Perl Harbor.
    Supposedly, the NSA new about the attack at Perl Harbor, but the military didn't respond properly. In this case......As far as I know, we didn't have any warning. I saw no reports about a plane hijacking before the attack. Normally, we here about a hijack right after it happens, but not this time.

  558. Taleban.com hacked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.taleban.com/

    Let the info-war begin!

  559. Re:Nostradamus by AlXtreme · · Score: 1

    Yep, and the third great war would errupt on a late summer day in the first year of the millenium. War for 30+ years, world economy crash, hunderds of thousands dead, bla bla bla...

    i really hope he is wrong...

    --
    This sig is intentionally left blank
  560. The alliance will pay! by PFactor · · Score: 1

    Now witness the firepower of this fully-armed and operational Death Star!

    ~~~~~~
    Terrorist assmasters beware...

    --
    Don't believe anything I say. I crash test crack pipes for a living.
  561. Re:I hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trolls, trolls, please, gentlemen (heh), hatred's what caused this disater.
    Plus, everyone knows CM claims to be a 12 year old Pakistani girl.

  562. Re:I hope... by MonsterMasher · · Score: 1

    I would not expect all Palastinian's to react with sadness at this event. The USA supports their oppressors, while making lip service to peace.

  563. Russian News Gets it Wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Lets hope so. According to lenta.ru (in Russian, sorry) 11 airplanes were hijacked in all and 8 of them came down. Here is this Russian news source's breakdown:

    The first two hit the WTC towers.

    The third got the west wing of the Pentagon

    The fourth in Pennsylvania.

    The fifth in Pittsburgh.

    The sixth was simply shot down by our US Air Defenses.

    The seventh crashed in to Washington's Dulles Airport.

    The eighth plane was forced down in the area of Camp David.

    Yikes, sounds like they got their facts screwed up. Or CNN and BBC do. Well, you can see how hard it is to put together this kind of puzzle. I imagine the other media are more reliable. Maybe Lenta needs some better translators. They certainly need to update their main page.

    1. Re:Russian News Gets it Wrong? by dbirchall · · Score: 2

      Oy. 2 hit WTC, yes. 1 hit Pentagon. Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh and near Camp David were all the 4th plane, which had been rumored to be shot down, but US says they haven't shot down anybody. And nothing crashed at DCA - the one that hit the Pentagon had taken off from there.

  564. Video of the 2nd WTC plane crash by Turmio · · Score: 1

    worldtrade_plane2.wmv - Too bad it's in Windows media format :(

    If someone managed to get the videos mentioned in the story before they were slashdotted, I'd be happy to host'em on my box with 100Mbit/s connection.

    1. Re:Video of the 2nd WTC plane crash by Jac_no_k · · Score: 1
  565. Re:Plea for peace - Huh? Get Real! by fetta · · Score: 1
    "He may have screwed up the Mecca thing but there is some truth to his words."

    Certainly, there are some highly visible fanatics out there. My point was that we should just be careful about the kinds of generalizations we throw around at a time like this.

    --
    ** The opinions expressed here are my own, and do not reflect those of my employers - past, present, or future**
  566. I go to school right near New York City by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I go to high school in irvington (A amall town on the hudson river, about 10 miles from New York), and I was in class when it happened, we saw smoke coming over the horizon, we could tell aur teachers knew what was going on, All the police and fire departments in the are were brought out, but it wasint until luch that I found out from slashdot what was happening.

    Kind of scary thought, seeing smoke coming from New york, and haaving all the local law enforcemwnt people coming out like that with out them telling us what was going on.
    I was sent home early.

  567. Re:Just Give Blood!!!--good argument for HemoPure by bewert · · Score: 1

    This is s great example of the usefulness of a little known invention called Hemopure. See http://www.biopure.com/oxy_therapeutics/home_oxyth er.html It is a blood replacement made from bovine hemoglobin and saline solution. I know about it because it is rumored to currently be a very popular "blood doping" product, and I'm a bike racer. I spent over 10 years as an emergency responder, so the stability and lack of blood typing needed caught my eye--we could have really used this stuff at times! "In addition, Hemopure is compatible with all blood types and is approved in South Africa as stable over a broad temperature range, including room temperature, for two years. In contrast, refrigerated red blood cells are type specific and have a maximum shelf life of 42 days."

  568. President in Omaha, NE (Offutt AFB) by dimer0 · · Score: 1, Informative

    Just saw - Air Force One and fighter escort arrived at Offutt a few minutes ago.. Very safe place to be.

    1. Re:President in Omaha, NE (Offutt AFB) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not anymore it isn't.

  569. Re:I hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jesus H. Christ, quit moderating this thing. Jumping all over it, dammit. I see nothing here worth 9 moderations.

  570. Quote from Braveheart by Amon+CMB · · Score: 1

    "They're sheep, mere sheep! Easily dispersed if we strike the shepherd." - King Edward

    --


    Men believe what they want. - Caesar
  571. Online Radio Stations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I just noticed on soutcast [www.shoutcast.com] there are two diffrent news feeds listed on the top page if any one wants to listen through something other then WMP and Real.

  572. About Disaster Requests regarding Blood Donation by Daniel+Joannidi · · Score: 2, Redundant
    For those in Austin, TX please note the following:
    Those in other cities of the US should also keep this in mind


    September 11, 2001

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

    Contact: Nicolette Abernathy, 512-206-1125; Leslie Searcey, 512-206-1120; or Dolly Mogonye, 512-206-1265

    DISASTER REQUESTS REGARDING BLOOD DONATION

    Austin, TX - The Blood and Tissue Center has been in communication all morning with the National Blood Exchange and the New York Blood Center. The National Blood Exchange is coordinating the efforts of all blood centers across the country and the tremendous outpouring of people wanting to donate blood. They are working with people at the two disaster sites to determine what blood products are needed and how many. They are also coordinating the transportation of the blood products to the disaster sites or nearby facilities that will be handling victims. As of right now, they have asked that people do not YET organize blood drives until the needs for blood have been determined - they do not want to have to waste blood products.
    Currently at the Blood and Tissue Center, there have been so many people who have come to donate that there is at least a three-hour wait. The Center has pulled every available staff member into the Center at 4300 North Lamar Blvd to help process donors as quickly and efficiently as we can. In light of the requests from the New York Blood Center and the National Blood Exchange, we ask people to come donate blood later this week. Given the magnitude of these disasters, blood is going to be critically needed tomorrow, next week and beyond.
    The Center will continue to update the community as developments occur. If you have questions regarding blood donation, please call the Center at 512-206-1266.


    The Blood and Tissue Center of Central Texas
    4300 N. Lamar Boulevard

    Austin, TX 78756
    Mon-Fri 8:00am-6:00pm

    Sat 8:00am- 2:00pm

    (512) 206-1266 Fax: (512) 458-3859
    For more information, contact us at bloodandtissue@tcms.com

    ©1996-2001 The Blood and Tissue Center of Central Texas
    Updated September 11, 2001. Online since February, 1999.
  573. Re:But it *doesn't* solve things by sql*kitten · · Score: 1

    For the US as for the rest of the democracies of the world, the only solution to this problem is not to be hated that much. And the only way to not be hated that much is to not act unreasonably.

    Great idea. The democracies of the world should abandon the principles on which our nations are built, so we aren't disliked by nations of religious fanatics who make Stalin look benign. Get a grip. No matter what the Western nations do, they will never be popular, because we have principles, like human rights, which we champion, but aren't convenient for dictators and fundamentalists. There is one thing these rogue states respect, and it is strength. And if they don't respect, then they need to be taught to fear it.

    And that, my friend, is the New World Order.

  574. Hijacked plane forced down in Yukon by alienated · · Score: 1

    One of the remaining planes that had been flying into North Americna air space (and refusing to respond) has been forced down in Whitehorse, Yukon Territory (Canada). Air Force officials are locking it down immediately.

    --
    ----- Trapped in time. Surrounded by evil. Low on gas. --Army of Darkness
    1. Re:Hijacked plane forced down in Yukon by alienated · · Score: 1
      Two Korean Air Lines planes (escorted by Canadian fighter jets) eventually landed in Whitehorse, one a cargo jet, the other commercial. Neither had been allowed to land in Alaska because of the closing of US airspace.


      Though the passenger jet was initially treated as a potential hijack, it was cleared within 1/2 hour of the initial announcement. Now they're merely part of the crowds of thousands who are a long-ass way from their destination.

      --
      ----- Trapped in time. Surrounded by evil. Low on gas. --Army of Darkness
  575. archive of stories by crazyprogrammer · · Score: 1

    I have started making an archive of news stories on my website, including the timeline in the last update for this story.

    you can see it here

    I haven't been able to get the videos, but if I do, I'll post them too.

    --
    "the fax machine is nothing but a waffle iron with a phone attached to it." - Grandpa Simpson
  576. Audio of Roosevelt's Pearl Harbor Speech by 4ginandtonics · · Score: 1

    " A Date Which Will Live in Infamy "

    Actual audio at:


    http://www.soundsofhistory.com/RooseveltFD/DayOf In famy.ram

  577. Americanization by subgeek · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have been reading through the comments on this subject. I do not claim to have read them all.

    It seems that many people, especially those outside the US, are susggesting that this attack was some sort of retaliation for crimes the US commits against the world. I am American. I am not always proud of everything the US does. It is stupidity to say that any country had this coming.

    Comments about America inflicting itself can only be taken seriously to a point. Yes, many American companies are "invading" other countries. But the people there buy it. No one is forced to buy food at McDonalds or drink Coca-Cola. The same thing happens in the US. Businesses I previously patroned are dissappearing and being replaced by things like Starbucks and Blockbuster. I say the same thing applies here as anywhere else. If you don't like a business, don't give it your money. If you don't like Hollywood being "imposed" on your country, don't see any Hollywood films. Encourage others to do the same. In the end, the people get what they want. If they want Americanization, it will certainly find them. It is easier to blame America than it is to blame the people who let our evil nation "invade" yours.

    I would also like to point out that every world power has been viewed negatively by the less powerfull. Before America it was the European Powers. It is always easy to tell America what to do when you only have to consider the consequences outside of America. If you are not American, you will not understand how the consequences will affect us.

    --
    you probably shouldn't have read this.
    1. Re:Americanization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It seems that many people ... are susggesting that this attack was some sort of retaliation for crimes the US commits against the world.

      Yes, I've seen this too, and I think it just may be true.

      It is stupidity to say that any country had this coming.

      I wouldn't call it stupidity, I would call it fanaticism or irrationality. But the core of the statement is correct, there is no way that any rational person could say that anyone had something like this coming.

      Yes, many American companies are "invading" other countries.

      This is where you're lost. If this is 'retaliation', it's (probably?) not due to corporate invasion, but because of military involvement.

      Some examples:

      Saddam Hussein finally gets his revenge on the US for invading his country

      Friends of McVeigh seek to avenge the assassination of their martyr.

      Manuel Noriega finally got his military supporters to teach the US a lesson for invading another country and kidnapping their leader.

      'Freedom Fighters' from Wherethefuckistan are pissed because of CIA-backed weapons given to their leaders

      Whether you believe that such (fictitious or not) actions were warranted by the US, the point is that from the perspective of the 'oppressed' party, they are the underdogs.

      Fanatics are not rational. That's why they're called fanatics.

    2. Re:Americanization by subgeek · · Score: 1

      I do not disagree with your statements.

      I was equating fanaticism and other types of irrational behavior with stupidity.

      I was responding to those comments saying this was the result of Commercial acts of America. I do not believe that to be the cause.

      It is nice to know at least one person read a comment I posted.

      --
      you probably shouldn't have read this.
  578. Re:ALL YOUR WTC ARE BELONG TO US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree with wysoft - /. was not made for this sort of immature crap.

  579. My condolences. by shd99004 · · Score: 1

    I wish to give the american people and others who have suffered from this horrible attack my condolences. It was a huge blow against americans and other innocent people, it was a mockery against the value of human lives, it was a strike against freedom and democracy.

    Please do never let these cowardly bastards get away with this. Never let freedom and democracy lose. Show the world and the cowards that noone can ever get away with murder - murder on humans, murder on civilization, murder on freedom.

    --
    Will work for bandwidth
    1. Re:My condolences. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hear, hear. Everyone here in the UK shocked. Sympathy for all those involved.

  580. The NSA isn't the bad guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When the NSA wants to be able to read all the communications in the world, this is why. It's not because they want to create a dictatorship or a tyranny (though communication monitoring is certainly a very powerful and essential tool for creating a tyranny). The NSA wants to be able to monitor all communications because they want to prevent stuff like this from happening.
    So everyone on /. who has pissed and moaned about the NSA trying to monitor communications, go take a good hard look at yourself in the mirror. Many of you have been fond of repeating Ben Franklin's quote, "Those who sacrifice liberty for a little temporary safety deserve neither freedom or safety." Do you have the balls to repeat it today? A bit harder, isn't it?
    The NSA isn't evil. It may be wrong - we may still have to oppose their attempts to limit crypto - but the NSA serves a very necessary function, and does so with the best intentions.

  581. Akamai issues press release by Scooby+Snacks · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yahoo news is carrying a press release that confirms that one of their founders is dead.

    --

    --
    Runnin' around, robbin' banks all whacked on the Scooby Snacks...
  582. Re:How does the own medicine taste? by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1
    There is always a moral question.

    The difference between from what you are referencing and what has happened today is that former is a strike meant to minimize "collateral damage" or unnecessary loss of innocent life and the later was clearly intended to maximize the number of lives taken.

    It is the difference between a doctor performing surgery and a maniac attacking a crowd with a sword.

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  583. redcross.org inaccessible by RoscoeVill · · Score: 1

    If anyone out there can scrape American Red Cross locations, I think that could be useful. Their site is clogged or down.

    TIA

    1. Re:redcross.org inaccessible by remande · · Score: 2

      For Red Cross centers in your area, see Big Yellow or your local phone book.

      --

      --The basis of all love is respect

  584. It took long enough. by man_ls · · Score: 1

    You knew SOMEONE was going to do it. I swear it wasn't me, but I did find the picture.

    Don't mod me down...Please.

    http://kotisivu.raketti.net/wadez/ter.jpg

    JKoebel

    1. Re: It took long enough. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bad taste in your mouth? It's my ass. Shithead.

  585. Re:I hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The peoples of Israel and Palestine have had centuries of time to hate each other.

    Anti-semitism in general is thousands of years old. This particular conflict, however, is relatively recent. What I can't understand is why more Palestinians don't blame UK -- it was that country that was the controller of the Palestinian territory after the second world war, and that country that gave it over for the formation of Israel. So, the UK should be hated even more than the Americans...

    Funny thing is, we've really done nothing to them other than befriend Israel.

    And a very politically loaded thing that is. The US haven't just befriended Israel -- (just like the UK) they provide them with weapons... and have used their veto at the UN to block every pro-Palestinian measure proposed.

    Israel seem to have been playing a game in recent years -- 'let's see how many Palestinians we can kill without the US caring.' They're doing quite well so far.

  586. Strange... by kaldari · · Score: 0

    I heard on the radio that all domestic flights have landed and are accounted for, but strangely I just saw a large jet flying west overhead (away from the nearest airport) here in Nashville. I guess they haven't all landed yet after all. Very weird. It's 2pm CST as I write this.

    1. Re:Strange... by eastern · · Score: 1

      Military, must be

  587. MY take on this, you idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The US DESERVED it"

    That's what many of you are saying.

    "The US needs to stay out of everyone else's business"

    Well, remember WWII? The US stayed out of it, only honoring their commitments to their European partners by sending guns and money but not troops. The US tried to stay out as far as it could while honoring its commitments to its allies.

    Then Pearl Harbour brought us into the war.

    What if the US jumped in when Poland was being taken? WWII might have been shortened by YEARS, but no, the US leaders chose to let the War in Europe go without any true committment.

    As a world superpower, we have a responsibility to diffuse situations which may pose a threat. Will people resent that?

    Sure

    Will the US suffer acts of terrorism for it?

    Yes.

    Will the US STOP impacting world affairs?

    NOPE.

    The ONLY thing this COWARDLY act will do is bring not just the US, but 99% of the international community down on them. That's all. The US will survive, the terrorists will be punished, and the world will keep turning.

    Losers ALWAYS resent winners.

    Microsoft is villified (on SLASHDOT esp.) because they are the biggest. If Linux was the size of MS empire, there would be hundreds of Anti-Linux sites. HUMANS root for the UNDERDOG. When the UNDERDOG becomes the clear victor, they attack them and support the next underdog.

    The US has no intention of giving up our Superpower status or the responsibilities that come with it.

  588. It's not funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Potentially 50,000+ people have lost their lives

  589. Early estimates of 10,000 dead. by Kibo · · Score: 2

    On CNN, Guliani, at a press conference, said that people around him had guessed about 10,000 people have lost their lives. He stressed that this was just a guess.

    --
    --Jimmy has fancy plans; and pants to match.
  590. Insurance Concerns by UserChrisCanter4 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Okay, So it's probably safe to assume that a good amount of people in the WTC towers were wealthy investment banker-ish types. Many of these guys were probably the only source of income their families had (since they would probably make enough that their wives didn't have to work). They probably had 1 million+ dollar houses mortgaged, nice cars, etc. So it would probably be safe to assume that their life insurance policies were for several million dollars. Of course, we can't discount that there were also plenty of secretaries/sys admins/janitorial staff/deli proprietors etc. in thee towers as well. Most of them also probably had life insurance policies.

    And of course we have the World Trade Center towers themselves, who are probably insured for billions.

    Well, watching CNN and various other news channels, I keep seeing that many politicians and journalists are calling this "an act of war"

    Folks, what is the one thing that almost no life or property insurance policies cover? You guessed it: WAR!

    We're going to have possibly tens of thousands of families who depended upon a primary wage-earner to survive. These families could potentially be told by insurance companies, "Sorry, but we don't have to provide coverage for your loved ones. It was war...".

    Additionally, we will have whatever group of investors counts on rental income from the WTC go completely to pot, because their property insurance on the buildings will echo the same sentiment.

    As far as I'm concerned, this isn't an act of war, it's an act of terrorism. The "war" clause in insurance policies is there as a last resort... it's meant to protect the insurance companies if half the major cities in the US get nuked to the ground. But I have no doubt that many of these companies will try to use this clause to their advantage.

    I'm going to be sending a letter to my Senators and Representatives in a few days (obviously they have more important things on their minds right now) urging them to pass a temporary law that prevents insurance companies from pulling these sorts of sh> igans. I urge everyone else to do the same.

    1. Re:Insurance Concerns by Hertog · · Score: 1

      Even if it is not considered a act of war... Most of the time, the next paragraph in your policy states that acts of terrorism aren't insured either (look for nuclear things too, not insured.....)

      --
      -=- I heard rumours about an OS called "Social Life", heard of it? Is it stable? -=-
    2. Re:Insurance Concerns by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 2, Informative


      Most of the commercial insurance policies in the US do in fact cover terrorism and shares of insurance and reinsurance carriers are already suffering today. The World Trade Center is insured for 1.5 billion. Swiss Re and Munich Re probably have the most exposure in this incident. As of this morning, Swiss Re shares are down more than 17% and Munich Re shares had fallen more than 15%. Lloyds of London also has exposure, most likely through the aircraft. This is not good for Lloyds, who is just getting back on its feet after liabilities from asbestos, Exxon Valdez, and some big storms in 1989

      maru
      www.mp3.com/pixal

    3. Re:Insurance Concerns by Windrip · · Score: 1

      The BBC have a good story w/r/t to this issue
      see Insurers face record claims

    4. Re:Insurance Concerns by Ozric · · Score: 1

      It is only War if it was declared, I don't recall the USA being at War with anyone at the time of the attacks.

  591. New Rules: Buy a plane ticket? Bring your gun. by emil · · Score: 2

    You should be required to pack a gun to fly on a commercial airliner.

    I'm tired of worrying about feeling helpless while some maniac mows down the passengers and points the plane at a skyscraper.

    If everyone packs a gun, and the airlines fly at an altitude where depressurization is not catastrophic, this problem is solved.

    1. Re:New Rules: Buy a plane ticket? Bring your gun. by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1
      You should be required to pack a gun to fly on a commercial airliner.

      Unfortunately this also means, that the suicide terrorist has no problem anymore to get his gun on the plane. If he doesn't care about his own life, all he has to do is shoot out a window and hope for the sudden pressure drop to destroy and bring down the plane.

      Even if he just threatens someone with his gun, you'll have a hard time, just shooting him (instead of the hostage) and not damaging the plane severley. Even worse if he just sneaks in the cockpit and pulls the door shut. The pilot, even if armed, would probably be busy flying the plane and not be in a position to resist. The attacker has always the advantage of knowing exactly when the attack is taking place.

      What might maybe help, is a guard at the cockpit, armed with a special gun and ammo and well trained. I believe the Israelis are doing that. There is a danger though, that this would cause more fatalities in a kidnapping which does not involve a suicide strategy.

      Another alternative might be an armored cockpit which has no passage to the passenger cabin.

      Also: amendment rights should only apply to citizens - wouldn't it be possible to ban non-citizens from bearing arms? Might just make it a little harder for the terrorists.

  592. Just heard on the radio by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

    GWB's political pukes are aruging with the Secret Service about where airforce One is going to go...the SS wants bush in NORAD, and the pukes want him in the freakin whitehouse

    --
    If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
  593. Politics by Artano · · Score: 0

    I thought a lot about the events and this is what I came to:

    The most profit(overall) was gained by U.S. government. Why? Let me tell you.

    U.S. actions are not really in favor outside the country. Lots of people are really depressed by what US is/was doing at Syria, Livan, Bosnia, Afganistan and others.
    Now - with such facts (many people died, that's only _proven_ thing) - and with 'right' press coverage the government will turn all world against muslim & arabic countries. Just look at the news - Britain, Germany, Russia and lots of others say - 'yeah we must fight'.
    Think about it - is it REALLY profitable for, e.g. Osama Bin Laden? Does he really look like kamikaze? No, he makes money that way.

    Looking further in the future I can draw this:
    US will occupate some middle-eastern countries and PLEASE NOTE THIS, gain access to LOTS of oil. This means very big money.

    Yes, maybe I am f*cking paranoid. But maybe not?

    And by the way, I am not muslim or arabic or terrorist and I don't like killing people. It's rather big tragedy that so many people died. Enought said, everybody now is saying it's horrible, and it is indeed. From my point of view it is much more horrible :(
    --
    artano

  594. Bin Laden associate sentencing by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 2

    Tomorrow one of Bin Laden's associates was scheduled to be sentenced, in a courthouse right across from the WTC.

  595. He that gives up his freedom... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A wise man once said, "He that gives up his freedom for security, soon loses both."

  596. Re:But it *doesn't* solve things by The+Panther! · · Score: 1

    For the US as for the rest of the democracies of the world, the only solution to this problem is not to be hated that much. And the only way to not be hated that much is to not act unreasonably. Which means - among other things - that the response to today's event must be strictly limited to individuals who are provably in the direct chain of command to today's event - and not thousands of civilians who just happen to live in the same town.

    Thus spake the mantra of the weak and foolish. I agree that in a closed society which lives by the same mores and can agree amiably on how punishment works, this approach may work. However, we are talking about a diverse set of peoples who have vastly differing world perceptions than our own--there can be no meeting of minds, no consolidation of belief, and no amicable parting. The world cannot expect a country to be attacked and lay silent just because it's inconvenient for the grass when elephants fight. If you want to do something to make the world sitation better, help us extinguish the threat, don't mock us for doing something about it.

    The US chooses its allies, aids the countries which stand for the same causes and beliefs that are harmonious with ours, and that's final. Every country with enough money to do so, does. Communist Russia did so for ages. China still does. It's common sense that it serves a country's purposes to forward its idealism wherever it can. This conflicts with countries who are opposed to our allies, and indirectly the USA.

    As far as this day's atrocities are concerned, they are an act of war. They were committed on an unsuspecting civilian populace in times of outward peace, on our nation's soil. It should not, and will not be, tolerated. The peacemongers in the world might roll over and be marched to their deaths like so many cattle--fine, let them--but in this world the meek inherit the scraps.

    --
    Any connection between your reality and mine is purely coincidental.
  597. My take... by BombTechnician · · Score: 0

    Here's my take
    i agree...... that just blindly going in and blowing the shit out of everything we can find that had some association to this event isn't a good idea. But i cannot, for the life of me, fathom letting this slide!! i mean, for Christ's Sake! there is no way you can let a group of people who killed this many innocent lives go on. if we take the pacifist route, turn the other cheek, we will be walked all over, we will loose our freedom. We must show the world that this will not stand. we will not put up with this. but a bullet in the head of every person who was involved is not enought for those who feel that if they die against America they automaticaly go to heaven. we must find a just punishment, to make them feel that they've royaly fucked up the works.
    let them feel that they awoke the bear, and it's real fucking pissed

    I sit here and think of all the options we have, and the only one i can see that comes out best is the revenge/retaliation route. if someone sees other ways, tell us........ i want to hear it

    Justin Hart

    --

    If you see me running, try and keep up
    There's a good chance I don't know what the hell I'm talking about
  598. And by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    rebuild the Pentagon and give it six sides!

    1. Re:And by Maxthemax2000 · · Score: 1

      Good idea

      --
      No Sig
  599. Re:PENTAGON != COLLAPSED INTO A HOLE! Stay off pho by gotroot801 · · Score: 1

    Fox News just confirmed that the area of the Pentagon that the plane crashed into this morning was under construction, and as such there weren't as many people there as there could have been.

    Whether it's related or not, one of the offices destroyed was the Office for Homeland Defense, which does anti-terrorism work.

  600. I want to be friends with bin laden! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We will take your shit DOWN!

  601. Stand Behind the President by ColGraff · · Score: 2

    I know we've all said snide things about the President in the past - myself included - , but the time for that is over. As another poster already mentioned, we are either at war, or so close as to make no difference. And in wartime, we stand behind our leaders and trust them - any other way leads to chaos. President Bush is pissed as hell, and he will get the nation the vengeance it needs. What we need to do is support him.

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
    1. Re:Stand Behind the President by chinton · · Score: 1

      Almost right -- in times like this he is not the President, he is Our President. Politics be damned.

  602. Hard Die Five by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where is John McClau (Bruce Willis) when somebody more need him?

  603. Check In if your ok by rschroeder · · Score: 1

    Check in here if you're alive in New York City or any other affected city:

    http://www.shunn.net/okay/

  604. Re:He is mistaken (I'M in London, YOUR not) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm also in London (the Wharf), and we had a large proportion of staff on hand to deal with potential problems this week handling NY business.

    'Going home' was an option for everyone - only a few people did though...

  605. Recollections, Terrorism and Retribution by Ronin+Developer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Like many of you, I watched todays unfolding events with horror, disbelief, anger and sadness. And, there will be those who are jumping up and down in jubilation that the Great Satan has been hit.

    But, let's look at this for what it is, pure cowardise designed to strike terror in the hearts of people who have done no harm to anyone. The dead and wounded are people who were going to work, visiting relatives, or going home. They are people, much like those who have experienced terror at the hands of fanatics simply for living in a land whose government the fanatics deplore. There is no rational for the killing of innocent people. Anyone who thinks otherwise are clearly not of sound mind or thinking in a manner that western civilization can not comprehend.

    The United States takes a lot of blame for some of the stances it takes on many issues. The same United States provided food, shelter, medicine and other humanitarian assistance to many nations that are incapable of doing so themselves during a disaster or national emergency. The United States provides assistance to nations who fall prey to aggression from outside nations such as the invasion of Kuwait by Iraq or the killing of the Kurds by Iraq. They do so because of treaties, agreements, national interest or purely on moral grounds.

    Where would these people be if the United States and other nations stood idly by and did absolutely nothing? What would happen if the United States simple turned a blind eye to the plights of millions because of a few ignorant or fanatical people?

    I do not know who is responsible for this attrocity. And, I strongly feel that once the identity of the those response are discovered, that no expense be spared until they are either brought to justice of meet their maker. But, I also implore that we don't take to the streets and exact revenge on anyone simple because of their heritage. We need to rise above the feelings of anger and hate.

    Let's find out who is truly responsible for this attack and then make it clear, by our very strong actions, that terrorism will not be tolerated. Let those governments and individuals that support terrorism know that we have had enough and we will exercise our might to erratic them at all costs.

    But, for now, let's pray for those who perished and their families. Tomorrow, we fight back against those that did this to us. Then, it will be time to grieve and remember so that this does not happen again.

    1. Re:Recollections, Terrorism and Retribution by fleck_99_99 · · Score: 1

      You're right, we were very humane in saving the poor Kuwaiti (oil supplies) from the evil invading Iraqi scum. And the Kurds... oh wait, we didn't really save the Kurds.

      Hey, in fact, aren't we starving the common people of Iraq now with our sanctions and no-fly rules? And.. they hate us more every day for it? And... um..

      Where was I going with this?

      --
      seven two six five
      seven four six one seven
      two six four two e
    2. Re:Recollections, Terrorism and Retribution by Ronin+Developer · · Score: 2

      Okay...let's set the record straight.

      Yes, we saved the Kuwaiti primarily because of their oil. We have a treaty with them...and it is in our national interest to do so. The rest of the world thought it important as well. Our world revolves around oil and it is our obligation to protect those that provide it to us. At the time of Desert Storm, Iraq's military was 3rd strongest in the world. While he built up his military machine, his people lived in huts, had unpaved roads, and limited medical access. He, on the other hand, lived in palacial, well..palaces...something like fourteen of them if I recall correctly.

      The Kurds...As a naval officer, I can speak first hand, my ship was one of the first on the scene to provide relief to them during Operation Provide Comfort after immediately following Desert Storm. The rest of the world eventually turned their backs on them, not us. International sentiment turned against them and it is now not in their best interests to provide help to them.

      We and the Brits are the only ones trying to keep them alive through the enforcement of the northern and southern no-fly zones. If Saddam is not contained, he will kill the kurds as well as the marsh arabs in the South.

      As for the sanctions...well, the Iraqi people are partly to blame. The rest belongs to Clintonian era politics, budget cuts and decreased military spending. But, if they are so bad off, then why don't THEY remove the gov't that has put them in their current situation? Think about it. Bottom line is they WANT to believe in their leader and WANT to believe he is infallable. It's easy to believe everybody else is the bad guy when, if you speak out against Saddam, they kill you and/or your family. Yes, their economic condition has not improved. And, Saddam is rebuilding the military and his palaces. Whose to blame here?

      The only reason we didn't knock him off or remove him from power ourselves is that:
      1) It's illegal for us to assassinate him.
      2) International sentiment dictated that we not finish the job.
      3) Our former Whitehouse administration was unwilling to finish the job that international politics prevented Bush from finishing. They then cut military spending, reduced the size of our military, and deployed what forces we did have in a manner that prevented the military from doing their job effectively.

      For someone who is supposed to be so bright (I read your resume), you are showing your lack of knowledge regarding real world historical events. What kind of crap did the profs feed you in college? As a recent grad, you are idealistic. That's not necesarily a bad thing, but won't get you very far in the real world. I suggest you read history books written by historians and not fiction authors.

      You are young and have never had to fight for the freedoms you enjoy. You have never had to put you life on the line so that others, such as yourself, can think openly and disagree with the gov't. Guess what? You may be called to do just that in the very near future. I wish you luck.
      I'm probably too old now to be recalled into service.

  606. Thanks by music+tinker · · Score: 1

    I'd just like to applaud those people out there that have really been on the ball the past few hours keeping us updated. That must be a whole lot of work.

    -Music Tinker

  607. World Trade Center Victims by alexburke · · Score: 2

    Our sympathies to the relatives of the victims of the World Trade Center collapse.

    Now do the right thing, Mr. Bush -- if Osama bin Laden was behind this, find him and his henchmen and blow them into the next dimension.

  608. the cliche's have set in. by carmagideon · · Score: 1

    Its amazing our media has begun repeating themselves. you would think there was not enough news to report on. I have heard we havent seen this since pearl harbour no less than 100 times. To of all things "Oh the humanity" - hindinberg
    But lets look at some key points here. I have heard them ask how could this happen with our tight security also I have heard they were well organized to even be able to get these people into the US. I think alot of these statements are missfounded. Chances are these people who hijacked the planes have been in the US for awhile. Assuming this was some eastern world group. There are more than enough of them In the US so as to not be to challenged pulling this off. A worker at the metal detector and xray machine. letting people through Its not hard to believe. Look at what happened in SAC california earlier this weeK a security gaurd killed 5 people. Christ did you see this guys house. He had a 12 foot fence around it with razor wire. And this guy passed a back ground check? So its not far fetched to believe that people of legal or illegal nature have cam to the US and have participated in this action in some way. The prob becomes who do you trust? I am not a white supremacist or any other affiliationi. I could care less who lives in the US. If you abide by the laws. But it is obvious that our security is too lax and our rules for entering this company on an H1b or however do not go far enough to keep the dirt out of our streets.

  609. need dynabooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (deep breath... this is the most horrible thing I have ever experienced)

    Is it currently feasible to completely map and simulate the infrastructure of the modern industrialized world with a virtual, networked "home/mobile version" that allow us to get around the requirement having to fly or enter tall buildings which we could carry around on our laptops or pdas?

    Buildings and cities are ultimately communication centers. We don't need to be in close proximity to communicate (very intimately even) anymore.

    Buildings and cities should remain in their communication center roles, only as computer centers, not people centers. This is a trend which has already begun and should be continued.

  610. blood donation by bark76 · · Score: 1

    Sorry if this is redundant, but if you need to find out where you can donate blood, call the red cross at 1-888-393-GIVE

  611. Structural design flaws or ... by Telecommando · · Score: 5, Informative

    Structural design flaws or additional explosives involved? Of course a 757 is bigger than a 707.

    Engineers shocked by
    towers' collapse

    BY BLAIR KAMIN
    Chicago Tribune

    CHICAGO -- The World Trade Center, a
    symbol of American economic might, survived
    one terrorist attack in 1993. It was designed to
    withstand the impact of a jet, but both its
    towers collapsed this morning after planes
    rammed them.

    The structural engineer who designed the
    towers said as recently as last week that their
    steel columns could remain standing if they
    were hit by a 707.

    Les Robertson, the Trade Center's structural
    engineer, spoke last week at a conference on
    tall buildings in Frankfurt, Germany. He was
    asked during a question-and-answer session
    what he had done to protect the twin towers
    from terrorist attacks, according to Joseph
    Burns, a principal at the Chicago firm of
    Thornton-Thomasetti Engineers.

    Burns, who was present, said that Robertson
    said of the center, ``I designed it for a 707 to
    smash into it.''

    Burns, whose firm did the structural engineering
    for the Petronas Twin Towers in Malaysia --
    the world's tallest buildings -- said Robertson
    did not elaborate on the remark. Robertson
    could not be reached early Tuesday.

    Completed in 1972 and 1973, the 110-story
    twin towers were the fifth and sixth tallest
    buildings in the world. One World Trade
    Center, finished in 1972, was briefly after its
    construction the world's tallest building. The towers have been called
    ``a monumental gate to New York and the United States.''

    They withstood the 1993 attack, when a bomb-laden van exploded,
    killing six people and injuring more than 1,000.

    Closely spaced steel columns that ringed their perimeter held up the
    World Trade Center towers. Chicago's Aon Center (formerly the
    Amoco Building), completed in 1973, uses a similar support system,
    known to structural engineers as a ``tube.''

    Shocked by the building's collapse, structural engineers pointed to fire
    as the likely cause of the structural failure.

    ``Fire melts steel,'' Burns said. In addition, he said, the impact of the
    plane could have severely damaged the building's sprinklers, allowing
    the fire to rage, despite fireproofing supposed to protect steel columns
    and beams.

    ``You never know in an explosion like that whether they (the
    sprinklers) get cut off,'' Burns said.

    Architects Minoru Yamasaki and Associates, in association with
    Emery Roth & Sons, designed the World Trade Center.

    The structural engineers were the firm of Skilling, Helle, Christiansen,
    Robertson. The developer was The Port Authority of New York and
    New Jersey.

    Tuesday's attack marked the second time that a plane has crashed
    into a New York City skyscraper, although the first incident was an
    accident.

    In 1945, a B-25 flying at 200 miles per hour slammed into the 78th
    and 79th floors of the Empire State Building, gouging an
    18-by-20-foot hole 913 feet above the streets of Manhattan. The
    pilot, Lt. Col. William F. Smith Jr., had been heading from New
    York's LaGuardia Airport to Newark, N.J., when he became
    disoriented.

    Fourteen people died in the crash and the fire that followed -- three
    people in the plane and 11 in what was then the world's tallest
    building.

    Like the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, which also was struck
    by a plane, provided a sizable and symbolic target.

    The Pentagon is the world's largest office building, with a total of 6.5
    million square feet, serves as headquarters for the world's most
    powerful military. Sears Tower, by comparison, has about 3.5 million
    square feet of office space.

    --
    Beta sux! Join the Slashcott! http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4760465&cid=46173047
    1. Re:Structural design flaws or ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They did withstand the hit from the planes.

      However, they were loaded with fuel for a cross country flight. The fire fueled by this weakened the support structures and THEN the building collapsed.

    2. Re:Structural design flaws or ... by Wakkow · · Score: 1

      Our local radio station (maybe broadcast of national CBS radio) had a Structural Engineering professor from CalPoly talk about the collapse. Although the article mentions it in passing, the crash didn't serverely cripple the structure of the building, but most likely the heat from the fire fueled by the enormous amount of jet fuel heated the steel to failing point. This causes one floor to buckle and dynamically crumpling all floor beneath it like hitting a nail on its head.

      And like the article stated, the fire protection systems might have been severed or possibly couldnt handle the enormity of the fire and heat.

  612. Re:An eye for an eye, and the whole world goes bli by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ghandi was gunned down by a religious fanatic. That's what happens when you spout candyass pacifist bromides instead of fighting back against those who attack you.

  613. Re:I hope... by jonathan_ingram · · Score: 2

    Talking about the middle east is a little premature. I only put the Israel vs Palestine thing in as an aside -- I should have realised it was too sensitive. That said:

    You can't have reconcilliation with them. They don't reason. They don't ask for any quarter.

    Oh, they reason, and you can have reconcilliation. Don't make the mistake of making Islam into some uncaring, sand-blast the world religion. Just like the Spanish Inquisition, like the Crusaders, like the Conquistadors were no representatives of Christianity, Islam can be twisted and tainted by fanatical madman. They don't represent Islam, but their own idiocy.

    The trick is to make countries secure enough that they don't need to resort to extremism. Isolating a country is not the way to do this (I am amazed, for example, that the US still isolate Cuba -- this is another example that the fundamentalist uses to illustate the arbirary uncaring nature of the US).

    Laugh all you want, but bombing places into the ground and killing isn't the answer. If it were, 1/4 of the world would still be part of the glorious British empire. The US is now the biggest, the wealthiest, the most important country in the world. Learn from the lessons of previous empires if you want to stay that way.

  614. Bomb found in Baltimore @ BG&E building by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A friend of a friend who works there reported that a bomb was found in front of a building quartering Baltimore Gas & Electric.

    We'll probably never know exactly how much more mayhem was planned for us today.

  615. tactical nukes by kaisyain · · Score: 5, Informative

    No, it's not even close to what a tactical nuke would have done. A 5-kiloton yield warhead would kill 98% of the people within one square kilometer instantly just from the pressure (~12psi). Out to about 3 square km you have 50% fatalies from pressure (~5psi). The thermal effects would be fatal (6.7 cal/cm^2) to a radius of about 1.3km and there would be significant injuries out to about 1.8km radius. Immediate radiation would be lethal to 90% of those within 1.2 km of this "low-yield" "clean" burst.

    Also thanks to the radiation, clean up and rescue proceeds at a snail's pace.

    And that's the low end of sub-strategic yields. The B-61 is lower, at about 1 kiloton, but you also have tactical nukes like those on the Trident that would cause an estimated 200,000 fatalities in an urban area with density similar to Moscow.

    Only for a loose definition of "approach" does this tragedy begin to approach the amount of destruction nuclear weapons are capable of even in their tactical form.

    1. Re:tactical nukes by cybrpnk · · Score: 2

      I agree that even a tactical nuke would cause more PHYSICAL DAMAGE than a couple of jetliners and collapse of a couple of huge 110 story skyscrapers. However, the DEATH TOLL is going to be in the high thousands if not tens of thousands. That is a death toll associated with nukes, not conventional explosives. There are very few scenarios where you can kill tens of thousands of people with conventional weapons inside of an hour. This was one of them. This level of deaths is definitely in the "weapons of mass destruction" range and US policy has been that use of a weapon of mass destruction will be retaliated in kind. During the Gulf War (Dubya's dad), that was a veiled threat of going nuclear if Sadddam used nerve gas or anthrax. I believe we may very well (fifty-fifty odds with better than 90% public suppport this time next week) use a single tactical nuke this time around just to show everybody that when this level of violence happens, the US will pull out ALL the stops. And that tactical nuke, if used, isn't going to be a B-61 which is a HELL of a lot bigger than 1 kiloton. A tactical nuke is more like a W-79 nuclear artillery shell... For info on the US nuclear arsenal, check here).

    2. Re:tactical nukes by Trepidity · · Score: 2

      I severely doubt the US will use nuclear weapons. There's very little international support for that, even after such a tragedy, and it's simply not necessary - the US has enough firepower to turn anything they want into dust with conventional weaponry.

    3. Re:tactical nukes by BravoXL · · Score: 0

      Listen, even though a tactical nuke would of been much worse that dosen't make what happend any more acceptable or better. This is one of the most tragic events in US history. thousands are dead. Don't brush that aside.

    4. Re:tactical nukes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the present figure of about 50000, the really shocking thing about this is not the number of people killed, or even the number of people killed in a short space of time - not if you compare it to things like the Holocaust or the massacres in Bosnia. The shocking thing is the cold-blooded callousness with which these acts of destruction were committed. I can't begin to imagine the sort of sick mind that could sit down and plan a thing like this.

  616. Almost as in the Tom Clancy book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But it doesn't look like a one-man show.
    Unbelievable!
    Who can possibly gain anything from this?
    Religious fanatics?
    Financial interests?
    Wag the dog...

    All the "experts" in the news believe that a large organisation is behind this and that it has been planned for months, but how many people does it take to hijack and crash 4 planes?
    The world is full of crazy fanatics willing to die for a cause and some of them knows how to get through airport security and possibly fly a plane as well - I can't believe the real pilot crashed it into the buildings.

    1. Re:Almost as in the Tom Clancy book by pcmills · · Score: 1

      I am currently reading this book. Eerily similar!

      --
      Ask Slashdot - google for stupid people.
  617. Revenge is Sweet and Productive if done right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We need to take decisive and immediate action
    to send a message to the rest of the world and
    in particular the middle east.

    I hope that we allocate 50 percent of the US
    nuclear arsenal and bombard the area east of
    Israel with at least 10 kilotons/square mile
    of ordinance, using ICBMs is possible. We should
    ask Russia and the eastern bloc to contribute
    some of their weapons as well.

    By doing this we will permenantly remove the
    threats from these (former) countries and put
    and end, once and for all to the continuous
    fighting in that region.

    Of course, this will have some side effects, but
    they should be manageable, especially in the US
    and western Europe.

    All talk of peace and appeasement are the words
    of fools or worse. No good has ever come of
    cooperating with terrorists or the nations that
    house them. Many innocent arabs and others will
    have to die to solve this problem. The blood of
    these innocents will be upon those who planned
    and condoned the attacks against the US today.

    1. Re:Revenge is Sweet and Productive if done right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Whoever did this was probably thinking of it as revenge also.

      Many innocent arabs and others will
      have to die to solve this problem. The blood of
      these innocents will be upon those who planned
      and condoned the attacks against the US today.
      s/Arab/American/g and you have what they were thinking when they did this.
    2. Re:Revenge is Sweet and Productive if done right by duckyd · · Score: 1

      I'm dissapointed by the number of ignorance laden posts like yours that I've run across - the *last* thing anyone needs right now is a nuclear weapon detonated...

  618. Akamai Technologies Mourns the Loss of Co-Founder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://sf-web1.businesswire.com/cgi-bin/f_headline .cgi?day0/212542407&ticker=akam

    BW2407 SEP 11,2001 11:23 PACIFIC 14:23 EASTERN

    ( BW)(MA-AKAMAI-TECHNOLOGIES)(AKAM) Akamai Technologies Mourns the Loss of Co-Founder and CTO Daniel Lewin

    Business Editors

    CAMBRIDGE, Mass.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Sept. 11, 2001--With great sadness, Akamai Technologies, Inc. (Nasdaq:AKAM) today announced the passing of Daniel C. Lewin, co-founder, chief technology officer and board member of the Company. American Airlines confirmed that he was on board the Boston to Los Angeles flight that crashed in New York City today. Danny was 31 years old and is survived by his wife and two sons.
    George H. Conrades, chairman and chief executive officer of Akamai said, "Danny was a wonderful human being. He will be deeply missed by his many friends at Akamai. Our thoughts and prayers are with Danny's family, friends and colleagues during this time of national tragedy and personal loss."

    Akamai Technologies, Inc. (Nasdaq:AKAM).

    --30--KO/na*

    CONTACT: Akamai
    Caryn Brownell, 617/444-4661
    cbrownell@akamai.com

    KEYWORD: MASSACHUSETTS
    INDUSTRY KEYWORD: COMPUTERS/ELECTRONICS
    SOURCE: Akamai Technologies, Inc.

  619. Re:I hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Biggest thing we can do is to ensure that they don't repeat this incident- ever. If that means bombing some "poorly defended" country that is financing/training them- so be it.

    You're wrong, there is a third way. We pull 100% of the 2-30 billion dollars a year we give to Israel in financial aid. We pull 100% of any market presence, business, or diplomatic relations we have in that area. No trade, no money, no bizness, no nothing. To them we will no longer exist. Let all sides have at it til they are fighting with sticks and stones or are all dead. Then we go back in and pick up the peices.

  620. There are multiple "black boxes" by GlenRaphael · · Score: 1
    It's a myth that there is a single black box.

    There are multiple "black boxes" found on aircraft that are used as data recorders. These are typically manufactured from stainless steel. The boxes are no longer black but painted high visibility orange or red to aid in their recovery in the event of an accident.

    Incidentally, most of what the "black boxes" measure has to do with figuring out what the plane was doing rather than what the pilots are doing and saying.

    --
    I play Nerd-Folk!
  621. Re:Live by force of arms or deal with world inequi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a load of bunk! The U.S. has worked to reduce world inequity -- and this is what we get in return?! Screw 'em, I'm all for using force now!!!

  622. 10 easy steps to kill a country! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    10 Steps to drive a country to his knees :

    1- Shut down the stock market, so no one can longer differ by saying he have a lot of $$$ since its no longer valued and leave them die like animals
    2- Kill thousands of innocents poeple with, as exemple, 2 plane crash on the in the biggest city of the country
    3- Put the blame on your actual biggest problematic enneny country (ex. Israel)
    4- Bring few major compagny to a so slow day that they will close by themselve and leave their staff homeless
    5- Kill the communications, this will bring the folks down the street to manifest all toghether
    6- Seal the border wich you used to keep open (w/ Canada and Mexico) - no more food, water, electricity, wood and metal so required by
    7- Put the army down the street by saying some stupidity...
    8- Request the President to tell some patriotic speech and go kill every musulman for the love of God
    9- Invoke Satan to get some help and turn your country into darkness for the next century to come...
    10- No need for #10, every citizens will already be dead from the nuclear attack of the Israli...

    Any intelligent comments now ?? Why do American always thinks they are the only humans to live over the whole planet. Stupids A$$h0l3

  623. We should stop thinking in military terms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What we need to do is:
    1. Find out who is responsible.
    2. Try to bring those who are responsible to justice WITHOUT USING MILITARY METHODS.
    Instead we should focus on building a strong international cooparation and use the countries combined police and antiterrosist resources to apprehend them and bring them to an international court.

    We should really try to stop thinking about this issue in military terms. Military actions are meant to be used in confrontations betwen nations and/or large groups of united people. I do not think they are the best method to bring down small groups of people, like terroristgroups. Its just not the right tool for the job, and might damage the process to find and convict the people responsible.

  624. interesting commentary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there is an interesting commentary on today's events here.

    http://techienews.utropicmedia.com help us beta!!!

    1. Re:interesting commentary by mons · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but this commentary is not even close to be considered interesting, by the way is there something wrong with karl's keyboard? the article is full of typos 'evironment','somthing','destory'

  625. Re:About Disaster Requests regarding Blood Donatio by junk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    you can't donate blood if you're a smoker, can you? i really wanted to, but i think i've been told before that i can't.

  626. Our Response by JibbaJabba · · Score: 1
    Whoever did this really fucked up. Terrorists around the world are going to be scrambling for cover within the week. Here is what our response should be:

    "To all countries who harbor or support the training of terrorist factions, you have 48 hours to eliminate any camps within your borders and turn over all leaders to the US for interrogation. Failure to do so will result in direct military action against said camps by the Armed Forces of the United States of America. This is directed in particular against the nations of Sudan, Afghanistan, and Syria. Sovereignty be damned; this has been an act of war."

    "You fools have woken the sleeping giant. This deed will be punished and punished harshly. THIS ENDS NOW.


    Every terrorist faction in the world will be affected by this. We know where the camps are, we know who the leaders are ... even those who have had nothing to do with this will go down. We have to make sure nothing like this ever happens again, here or anywhere else in the world.

    --
    What's the use of the truth if you can't tell a lie sometimes?
    1. Re:Our Response by EnglishTim · · Score: 2

      So it would be fine if Britain had gone storming into Ireland every time the IRA bombed London?

    2. Re:Our Response by JibbaJabba · · Score: 1
      So it would be fine if Britain had gone storming into Ireland every time the IRA bombed London?


      If tens of thousands of Londoners died, YES! Let me repeat this: TENS OF THOUSANDS of Americans are dead because of this. Two skyscrapers are GONE! This is not some yahoo with a bomb strapped to his chest killing a dozen or so people outside a disco. When the dust clears, TENS OF THOUSANDS of people will be dead.

      --
      What's the use of the truth if you can't tell a lie sometimes?
    3. Re:Our Response by EnglishTim · · Score: 1

      It's looking like it will be more like 'thousands..' but you do have a valid point.

      However, international law must prevail.

  627. Why Palestinians might be pissed... by FFFish · · Score: 5, Informative

    Why would Palestinian terrorists target the USA?

    Well, perhaps because the USA has exacerbated the mid-East problems, rather than help reduce them.

    From BigEye's Foreign Correspondent. No idea how truthful all this is, mind you, but I'm fairly sure it's worth consideration:

    BUSH FIDDLES WHILE PALESTINE BURNS

    NEW YORK - Pre-election concerns that George W. Bush had a weak grasp of world affairs have been confirmed by a succession of ideology-driven blunders and amateurish fumbles made by his administration that have damaged America's interests and image around the globe.

    To whit: trying to rush the anti-missile defense project when there was no need for haste; the tactless rejection of the Kyoto environment accords; Washington's crude enlistment of India in a new anti-Chinese alliance; boycotting this weekend's UN racism conference at Durban: and, most disturbingly, fiddling while Palestine burns.

    Who, one wonders, is running US foreign policy? Certainly not the nearly invisible `stealth' Secretary of State Colin Powell. America's first black Secretary of State was not allowed to go to an African-oriented conference in Durban because Israel was being accused of racism.

    Last week, Bush berated PLO chief Yasser Arafat for failing to end `Palestinian violence.' Soon after, Israel assassinated Mustafa Zibri, a senior Palestinian political leader, by firing Maverick missiles from Apache helicopter gunships into his office.

    The next day, Israeli M-60 tanks and M-113 armored personnel carriers occupied the Palestinian Christian town of Beit Jala.

    Meanwhile, it has been revealed that Israel is using the M494 105mm APERS-T tank round against Palestinians. This deadly round, designed for use against enemy anti-tank missile crews, disperses a conical spray of 5,000 tiny, razor-sharp darts known as flechettes. In the past, Israel has also used anti-personnel cluster bombs against Palestinian refugee camps.

    All of the above-noted weapons were supplied to Israel by the United States. Israel is also using an arsenal of other US-supplied weapons, from F-16 fighters to M-16 rifles, against Palestinians. Israeli-designed Merkava tanks `pacifying' rebellious Palestinians were built with US military aid.

    Israel is the largest ever recipient of US foreign aid - at least $91 billion since 1949, a sum that could have bought four complete aircraft carrier battle groups ( about 80 ships) for the US Navy. Each year, Israel gets $3-5 billion in US aid.

    The 1998 Wye River `peace' accords negotiated by President Clinton gave Israel an extra US $380 million for Apache helicopter gunships and armored vehicles - both currently being used against Palestinians. Just before leaving office, Clinton, quietly sent Congress a request for an additional US$800 million in military aid for Israel, a gift no doubt aimed at securing his future in publishing and Hollywood. Soon after, in a startling coincidence, Clinton received a book contract for $12 million.

    Many American conservatives and Jewish Americans are praising Bush for giving Israel's rightwing government carte blanche to crush the Palestinian uprising and assassinate its leadership. VP Dick Cheney has repeatedly accused Palestinian of `terrorism' while praising Israel's `restraint.' One wonders what Washington's response would be if the PLO began assassinating Israeli politicians who advocate murdering or ethnic cleansing of Palestinians.

    Israel brushes aside occasional tut-tuts from the US State Department, and ignores charges its American-supplied weapons are being used in direct violation of the US Arms Export Control Act, which forbids recipients use of American arms except for national self defense in wartime.

    The White House and US Congress, fearful of antagonizing the Israel lobby, have refused to address this issue. Ironically, it was left to Gush Shalom, the courageous Israeli peace movement, to protest to Bush the clearly illegal use of American arms against Palestinians.

    It is increasingly clear that unless the mayhem in Palestine is ended, the entire Mideast could careen towards an explosion. Ariel Sharon, Israel's rightwing Prime Minister, has painted himself into a corner by vowing to crush the `intifada' and never allow a viable Palestinian state. Having provoked the current uprising, and vowed to break its back, Sharon now finds himself trapped in a cycle of violence, terror and counter-terror.

    Sharon's only answer so far is more of what he has done his entire career: blowing up houses, assassination, martial law, collective punishments. Now Sharon's aides are hinting at attacks against Syria, Lebanon, Iran, and even Egypt. Israeli critics are warning the Sharon is running amok and must be reigned in.

    Given Sharon's adamant refusal to halt Jewish colonization or allow a Palestinian state, Palestinians have no reason to halt their uprising. Only America has the power to push the two sides into an eventual peace agreement.

    Israel's brutal repression of the Palestinian `intifada' is being telecast around the globe, producing rage against Israel and its patron, the United States, and a worldwide surge of anti-semitism. America's strategic and economic interests across the Mideast and Muslim World are being threatened by the agony of Palestine, which inevitably invites terrorist attacks against US citizens and property.

    President Bush needs to act urgently. He needs to help Sharon find a way out of the corner in which he is stuck. Sharon has left himself no line of political retreat - other than being seen to bow to irresistible American pressure. Bush and VP Dick Cheney should cease helping Israel's rightwing and its American media mouthpieces demonize Yasser Arafat, who, however guilty of condoning violence, is the man with whom Israel has to make peace. Being rightwing does not automatically make one right.

    Bush's vanishing act over the Mideast has handed the initiative by default to Arab and Israeli extremists. Unless the US forcefully intervenes, Hamas suicide bombers and Sharon's death squads will determine policy. The result will be a disaster for Jews and Arabs alike.

    Bush is being irresponsible and dishonest by pretending America has nothing to do with this horrible mess. America has everything to do with it and could stop the carnage overnight if the White House showed sufficient political will and courage. Bush needs to recall the old adage, he who pays the piper, calls the tune.

    Copyright: Eric S. Margolis 2001

    Again, perhaps this fellow is lying or out-to-lunch. But if what he states is truthful, I think it's fair to say that the fanatics have just cause to be pissed off (and that's not to say that they are excused for being terrorists.)

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    1. Re:Why Palestinians might be pissed... by FFFish · · Score: 1

      Guess I better lay some disclaimers:

      I'm not excusing the terrorist actions. Killing civilians is not an acceptable mode of protest. The rat bastards need to be dealt with.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    2. Re:Why Palestinians might be pissed... by xTown · · Score: 1
      Yeah, you better lay down some disclaimers for posting an article that is as blatantly racist as this one. I mean, come on:



      Just before leaving office, Clinton, quietly sent Congress a request for an additional
      US$800 million in military aid for Israel, a gift no doubt aimed at securing his future in publishing and Hollywood. Soon after, in a startling
      coincidence, Clinton received a book contract for $12 million.


      The "Jews run Hollywood and New York" stuff is old, tired, and disgusting. What's next? An article that says "America is mobilizing its black citizens, who are better athletes and more savage fighters"?


      Articles like this one perpetuate the kinds of attitudes that caused this thing in the first place.

    3. Re:Why Palestinians might be pissed... by seebs · · Score: 2

      ... or it might be because people go out of their way to fan the flames.

      Maybe, just maybe, the people who are bombing innocents *aren't* actually the victims in this picture. You can bet I am less willing now than ever before to believe the palestinian people to be "victims" of anything but their own bloodlust. People who cheer and dance at the news that ten thousand innocent people are dead are *sick*, and if those are the people being "repressed", then it's not such a bad thing.

      --
      My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    4. Re:Why Palestinians might be pissed... by FFFish · · Score: 2

      Wholly agree. I wish I'd twigged on that: I would have addressed it.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    5. Re:Why Palestinians might be pissed... by FFFish · · Score: 1

      They're not sick: their religion -- *just like Christianity* -- claims that the afterlife is a helluva lot better than this miserable life. And given the horrible conditions they live in, it's little wonder they don't much value human lives.

      The people cheering and dancing are also performing for the camera. Note how many people are *NOT* celebrating. But they're in the background... because they're not newsworthy.

      Yes, it's a fucked culture they're living in. But you can't blame the individuals for it: they're mainly a product of the culture. It's a self-feeding thing, with no clear resolution.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    6. Re:Why Palestinians might be pissed... by MrEfficient · · Score: 2
      You seem quite happy about todays events. You've been posting all day about this and I've seen several of your comments. You obviously have a hatred of the US and you're using the events in Israel and Palestine to try and justify what happened today. And don't say that you aren't, don't say that you abhor today's events, because you know deep in your heart that you love it. You've made your feelings quite clear. You're a real piece of shit if you can justify the number of innocent lives taken today, you're no better than the terrorists themselves.

      --
      Check out AbiWord.
    7. Re:Why Palestinians might be pissed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yes, it's a fucked culture they're living in. But you can't blame the individuals for it: they're mainly a product of the culture. It's a self-feeding thing, with no clear resolution.



      Wrong. I can blame them, and I and many American citizens DO. The next time Isreal wants to kill a few PLO leaders, I for one will be jumping up and down and cheering, just like those wacko Palestinians.

    8. Re:Why Palestinians might be pissed... by FFFish · · Score: 2

      Which creates an environment in which these people grow up hating the USA, expecting to civilians to die in terrorist attacks, don't much value life, and remain fucked up.

      I dunno what the solution is. I doubt there is one. Someone needs to pay, but I'm not sure that will actually solve anything.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    9. Re:Why Palestinians might be pissed... by FFFish · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      You are completely fucked up, buddy.

      Probably the same single fuckup that has tried to moderate my posts down, in the face of the dozens of up-moderations that they've received.

      Lots of people figure you're wrong. Perhaps you should listen to them.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    10. Re:Why Palestinians might be pissed... by kwerle · · Score: 1

      They're not sick: their religion -- *just like Christianity* -- claims that the afterlife is a helluva lot better than this miserable life. And given the horrible conditions they live in, it's little wonder they don't much value human lives.

      Speaking to what I know - Christianity claims that the afterlife is much better or 'a helluva lot worse' (so to speak). Certainly the teachings of the bible don't encourage the celebration of the taking of life (and by this, I mean especially the new testament).

    11. Re:Why Palestinians might be pissed... by MrEfficient · · Score: 2
      Why am I fucked up, because I don't buy in to your inane comments, your support for this terrible act? You obviously have a chip on your shoulder about something and you've finally found a forum that listens to your ranting.

      And what people think I'm wrong, the slashdot moderators? Do you think that I'm in the minority because I'm infuriated by what happened and at anyone who supports it. Do you think that you're in the majority in thinking that the US deserves this attack. If so, then you have not only not paid attention to the news today, but you've completely lost touch with reality. You've done nothing today but make excuses as to why the US deserves this attack. How can you call yourself human when you take such great pleasure in great suffering?

      --
      Check out AbiWord.
    12. Re:Why Palestinians might be pissed... by seebs · · Score: 2

      Essentially, the people who are cheering about this have made it clear that they think it's a great thing. If they think this is a great thing, we know that, while they might be *unable* to do it, they would if they could.

      It's hard to have any sympathy for them, given that. Does this justify Israel's treatment of Palestinians in general? No, but it makes it a lot easier to understand.

      Just think about it. Try to imagine someone whose first response to ten thousand innocent bystanders being killed is to say "It's like I'm dreaming, it's so wonderful". What possible grounds can we have for not shooting this rabid dog? He has gone beyond any possible redemption on this earth.

      Israel has, so far as I can tell, *responded* to acts of violence. Maybe the violent people should stop for a while, and see if the retaliation stops, too.

      --
      My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    13. Re:Why Palestinians might be pissed... by SailorBob · · Score: 1
      Again, perhaps this fellow is lying or out-to-lunch. But if what he states is truthful, I think it's fair to say that the fanatics have just cause to be pissed off (and that's not to say that they are excused for being terrorists.)

      The guy is spurting propaganda and lies. I live in Jerusalem and I serve in the Israeli army. The Arabs have accused us of just about everything. Here's a short list of the BS accusations:

      1. We've been accused of using depleted uranium ammo.

      2. We've been accused of dropping candy on Arab towns from planes which cause sterility.

      3. We've been accused of using poison gas against the Arabs.

      4. We've been accused of sending female soldiers into Arab towns who do stripteases to lure young Arabs out into the open and then they pull pistols out of their panties and shoot the young Arabs.

      5. We've been accused of spreading AIDS amoung the Arabs.

      6. We've been accused of genocide and sending Arabs to gas chambers.

      The list goes on and on. The fact is that Israel's policy minimizes civilian casualties. We've go after individual terrorists who are directly responsible for planning and executing terrorist attacks. Israel's attacks are pinpoint attacks whose purpose is to take out terrorists with an absolute minimum of collarteral damage. The Arabs on the other hand specifically target civilians and purpetrate random acts of mass murder as a strategy of sowing fear and confusion. Just look at what happened today...

      The fact is that this guy is just another anti-semitic propagandist.

      --

      Woopty Doo Basil, what does it all mean?!

    14. Re:Why Palestinians might be pissed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just by throwing around american buzzwords like ethnic cleansing, assasinating leaders, etc. you can't pull the wool over everyone's eyes.

      Israel has killed much less than a thousand palestinians in this whole affair, many many less than died in NY today in 1 day.
      Of those, the majority were combatants in active engagement, call them 'policemen', 'activists' or what you will but they were armed and dangerous. That's not even mentioning the numerous suicide bombers included in that figure.

      If Israel wanted palestinian civilians dead, as you seem to imply, it would have cut off their power, water, and phones months ago, all of which are supplied by israeli companies. It would have also bombed their cities to hell, which it is perfectly capable of but has not done. It would have stopped providing them with Israeli-goverment funded medical plans and medical treatment in Israeli hospitals, which it continues to provide.

      The 'leaders' you speak of are terrorists, just like the ones who blew up the WTC only less competent. They have only been able to pull off nightly drive by shootings of random individuals, the occasional mall bomb, and a restaraunt now ant then. If they could pull stunts like the WTC crew, they damn well would. Have you totally forgotten Arafat's renouned terrorist past? They are fit leaders for the savages who dance in the streets when thousands of people they have never met die tragically.

      If Israel would deal with the Palestinians with half the resolve which the US will use to respond to this, there wouldn't be any left. Israel has targeted.

      Just because Yasser Arafat and the Taliban didn't do this, this time, doesn't mean they care one whit about israelis, americans, or other westerners dying. Arafat orchestrated all the violence in Israel, suicide bombs in malls and restaraunts, etc. Even Clinton, who kinda liked him at first, basically blamed him for ruining everything. Anyone who is even a little bit knowledeagble about mideast history and thinks about how americans are going to react to this will realize that Israel is DAMN restrained by comparison, and the Palestinians should be very thankful for that.

    15. Re:Why Palestinians might be pissed... by FFFish · · Score: 2

      Fuck you. In no way am I supporting terrorism. What they did is inexcusably atrocious.

      What I have advocated is a calm and rational approach in creating a response, and cautioned against painting entire nations/cultures with a broad brush.

      I daresay most Americans celebrated the execution of Timothy McVeigh, and rightly so: he was a monster. I do not find it difficult to understand that people who have been raised in an environment of hatred would just as easily celebrate attacks against their version of the monster.

      Why do these people view the USA as a monster? I do not know, but the article I posted provides some sort of rationale -- and whether it's true or not, it's certainly the sort of information that they're being fed through propaganda.

      I will not condemn en masse an ignorant population. Joe Public walking the streets of Nablus does not deserve to be nuked to glass.

      Don't do what the terrorists do: do not desire the destruction of an entire nation as retaliation for the actions of a few. Just as the average American is not personally responsible for the atrocities the terrorists claim against the USA, the average [name your countryfellow] is not to blame for the atrocities perpetrated by the terrorists.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    16. Re:Why Palestinians might be pissed... by FFFish · · Score: 2

      Revision: if it turns out that a government sponsored the attack, then this is a declaration of war and there will be civilian casualties. And while that's a shame, it's an acceptable consequence of warfare.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    17. Re:Why Palestinians might be pissed... by Zalbik · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this article is from the same guy who once stated that: "the US and its allies should recognize Taliban as the legitimate Afghan government".

      He also stated in regards to Bin Laden that "the US has blown him out of all proportion".

      The article is available here

      Read a few of his other articles, and you might notice that this person may not be the most objective source of information.

    18. Re:Why Palestinians might be pissed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FFFish,

      There are many who support your point of view. Of course it was horrible what happened.

      Remember that Isreal have broken internatinal law and treaties they have signed in order to get at those who threaten their national security. I'm not saying they don't have a right to do this, or that they are not justified. All I'm saying is that that sort of behaviour is going to provoke a reaction. The sort of reactions that are provoked often involve suicide bombers, and there is very little we can do to stop them. No measures of national security will stop it. I have a feeling America will have a long and painful time accepting this.

      So long as America continues it's international policies which bring a lot of hardship to a lot of people ( as well as a lot of wealth and prosperity to a lot of people too ) then terrorist attacks on American soil will continue.

      And please don't label me as an America hater. I also see a lot of great good coming out of your country. You have done a lot for world stability and prosperity too. Everyone makes mistakes everyone makes bad judgements. I'm not sayint that the responsibilty for any terrorist actions lies in the US political system, all I'm saying is that this has a certain ring of enevitability to it.

      You know, it's one of the most fundamental christian morals 'turn the other cheek'. I don't think we're capable of that at the moment. I wish we were. ( for the record, I'm not a christian )

      I really hope I'm wrong.

    19. Re:Why Palestinians might be pissed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Solution is simple, complete genocide, wipe out their whole culture, then they can't have upset children/relatives/bystanders/whatever coming back to try to return the favor.
      Sounds like a nice tidy solution to me.

      Of course, we can't know yet who it was, but assuming it's who we all think it was, we should just wipe out all of Palestine, Afghanistan, and any other nation/country/people who think what happened today was great/justice/skippy.

      If we just sit around punching each other the fighting drags on for years and years and years, just like the middle east. Fsck that, that's not the country this was made to be... living in fear.

      Peace through total annihilation. It's either us or them. Both cannot exist peaceably, as has been clearly demonstrated. No amount of mediation is going to help, look at the middle east, it's been embroiled in war since time began. Time to end it all.

      Let's end it and kill them all. Kill everyone in their lands. Destroy, flatten, nuke, whatever, just rid the planet of them.

      That is the solution.

    20. Re:Why Palestinians might be pissed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That isn't necessarily the best solution. These people will never have a chance to see the error of their ways. This is only a solution for the godless.
      These people are lashing out, albeit wrongly, because of the oppression they have been suffering. You are responding in like manner. The eventual tide of violence will only end in futile destruction.
      There must be a better solution. It takes time to come up with them.

    21. Re:Why Palestinians might be pissed... by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and I have an palestinian anarchist friend that will tell you how is brother was shot dead for picking up a rock. Israel was a terrible idea, and should never of existed in the first place. Calling people anti-semites and hoping someone cares isn't going to work much longer in the face of what israel is doing now. Shame on you. . .

    22. Re:Why Palestinians might be pissed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yeah, and I have an palestinian anarchist friend that will tell you how is brother was shot dead for picking up a rock.


      Was it the fact that he picked up a rock, or that he was throwing it at an armed soldier? Or perhaps cowardly militants were hiding behind the rock throwers shooting at the soldiers?
      Please name one Arab country that wouldn't respond with equal or more force than Israel if children threw rocks at the soldiers.


      Just in Egypt a few months ago, 24 men were killed because they were SUSPECTED of being homosexual. Some Palestinians have been lynched by their fellow palestinians because they were accused of supporting the Israelis.


      So, what arab country wouldn't respond with deadly force if an Israeli kid was throwing rocks at their police and army?

    23. Re:Why Palestinians might be pissed... by linzeal · · Score: 1
      Ever hear of the phrase treat others as how you want to be treated? The jewish people wanted a homeland and got one. What about the palestinians? What some islamic countries do is beyond the pale especially in regards to women, but treating human beings as subhuman because they are your enemy is not especially better.

      I wholeheartedly support the idea of freedom throughout the middle east, but it cannot happen with a US backed israel in the area.

    24. Re:Why Palestinians might be pissed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Solution is simple, complete genocide, wipe out their whole culture

      YOU are the problem!

      It's people like YOU who care so little for human life that they'd kill thousands of civilians for revenge.

      It's people like YOU who scream rather than think, demonizing and dehumanizing anyone they don't like until all manner of atrocities seem justifiable.

      It's people like YOU who cheered Hitler when he said "Solution is simple, complete genocide, wipe out their whole culture" 60 years ago.

      It's people like YOU who hijacked those planes!

      Unthinking revenge will solve NOTHING; evil begets more evil. The only way out is to break the cycle - look at the root causes, and fix them.

      One of the root causes is that some group - we don't know which! - feels the US has been oppressing them, and that this is their only way to strike back. If the US takes unthinking revenge, that group - and others - will just feel even more oppressed, and even more like killing US civilians in retaliation for the US killing their civilians.

      You can't scare angry people who feel they've got nothing left to lose; you can't make an example of someone who's willing to die for his cause.

      What you CAN do is break the illusion that the US is an evil and oppressing monster. *Make these people feel like they've got an alternative!*

      It's the same thing that leads to inner-city violence - lack of hope and lack of someone who cares. If the US shows it cares, the hatred against it evaporates.

      If the US makes senseless attacks against civilian targets, things will only get worse - the US will have perpetuated the vicious cycle of "you kill my civilians so I kill yours", and will be no better than the terrorists it despises.

      Thankfully, they don't let anyone as stupid and morally bankrupt as you anywhere near positions of authority, so the US will not commit genocide. Which is a very good thing, for so many reasons - would YOU want to live in a country that cavalierly murdered millions of people for pissing it off? What do you think a country like that would do to unruly citizens?

      The US should do what is justified - hunt down the terrorists involved like the dogs they are - but should be careful to avoid doing anything foolish.

    25. Re:Why Palestinians might be pissed... by MrEfficient · · Score: 2
      All of your posts that I read up to the point where I first responded where about why people are angry at the US. And guess what, I agree, but your timing stinks and it comes across as trying to justify the terrorist attacks. If you were'nt trying to justify it, then you should have made your intentions more clear. Personally I think the creation Israel where it is was a real boneheaded move, it's caused more problems than any other single event I can think of. And I have never been in favor of our sending money and weapons to them. But as an ordinary citizen, there isn't a damn thing I can do about it. And the recent events pretty much guarantee that we won't stop supporting Israel. That would look like we were giving in to terrorism, and we can't do that.

      If you want to educate people about the other side of an issue like this, then fine, but remember that there is a time and place for everything. And the day of the attack was definately not the right time to explain the side of the people we see burning our flag on TV. I've been sick of the anti-American attitude of what seems like the rest of the world for a long time, and the recent events have pushed me over the edge. Where I might have been willing to see their side of things before, I can have no sympathy for them right now.

      --
      Check out AbiWord.
  628. This has huge repercussions by scott37 · · Score: 1

    What is most shocking of all is how easy the terrorists made this look. I can imagine a situation with a single person undertaking this alone. It requires no weapons at all. Any seemingly ordinary person can walk abord a loaded flight. If the person is large/strong enough, it seems conceivable he/she would be able to knock down the few flight staff necessary to get to the cockpit and take over from there. Is it so hard to believe that someone could have knowledge of how to fly these widely used aircraft with precision? The plane could then be aimed at any building desired. It can happen so fast, it will be over before we know it.

    As far as I'm concerned, this changes the entire concept of commercial aviation. The industry will never be the same again. Every detail of the flight experience must be completely rethought. And think about other countries flying in here. Any person in the world can go on a kamikaze mission like this alone. Every legal flight must be totally monitored and that requires international cooperation.

    Don't even get me started about the prospects of commercial spacecraft.

    I think I'll take the train for now.

    1. Re:This has huge repercussions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What needs to be done is to post an armed gaurd (automatic weapon, not pistol) right in front of the cockpit door. Instruct this gaurd to kill anyone that comes within 5 feet of the door, even members of the flight crew. However the captain and such shall be allowed to leave the cockpit as necessary and not be killed upon return, only the cockpit crew shall be granted this priviledge. This gaurd shall not be held responsible for his elimination of the possible terrorist do to the fact that all passengers will be informed of these rules and the cockpit door and gaurd will be under video surveillance. This video image will be transmitted to a central reposiory to ensure that it will not be tampered with.

      Or maybe we could just hand every American citizen a fully loaded handgun when they board the plane and tell them to kill anyone attempting to hijack the plane. They of course will not be held responsible for this cleansing of the gene pool

    2. Re:This has huge repercussions by wayward_son · · Score: 1

      Not quite:

      Gunfire + Pressurized Cabin = Really Bad Idea

      Perhaps they could install a silent alarm, much like those they have at banks. Plane is hijacked, alarm is tripped, military is alerted. Plane will be shot down if it goes near a populated area.

  629. Re:Cowards by Pyrosz · · Score: 1

    Who modded this as a troll? It was a modded as funny and thats what it is. Some Moderators are just plain stupid.

    --

    An optimist believes we live in the best world possible; a pessimist fears this is true.
  630. Re:Airlines chosen by AxelBoldt · · Score: 2, Flamebait
    Well, I suspect the backlash from this will leave whoever did it thinking twice about pissing off America as a whole again.



    Well, whoever did this is dead. Apparently, they were more than happy to die in order to piss off America.

  631. Stick to Rumors about Linux and Computing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, I am posting anonymously because I don't have an account nor do I percieve a need for one.

    Stick to posting rumours about Linux and computing, this is the most childish reporting I have seen since my high school newspaper.

    You guys will just thow any rumour you hear in an article and breathlessly relate it as substantiated fact.

    Leave hard news reporting to the adults, kiddies, you are just displaying your unworthiness to report ANY news.

    For readers, turn to a reliable source and disregard ANYTHING concerning this recent tragedy that you read on this site.

  632. Jerusalem post article by theDEFT · · Score: 0

    (16:45) BBC: Palestinian group says responsible for WTC attack

    This Jerusalem post article says.

    basically questions whether the DFLP is responsible.

  633. READ THIS and MODERATE THIS UP by Pelam · · Score: 1

    I just spent all my moderation points and ignored
    this, but this one certainly needs it. INSIGHTFUL would be proper.

  634. Re:respond ... but how ? .... WACK'm Mafia Style by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like the first suggestion. Do a good-old NYC style Mafia hit and wack Ben Laden ... guilty or not ... just to send a message.

  635. MusicCity Morpheus by KilBee · · Score: 1

    I've found that the best place to find videos of the attack is on Morpheus, a free P2P file sharing community like Gnutella (but with banner ads). The software can be downloaded at http://www.musiccity.com

    See, MPAA/RIAA? Filesharing is GOOD.

    1. Re:MusicCity Morpheus by Erik+Fish · · Score: 1

      Grokster uses the same network but it doesn't require IE and it's ads can be filtered by Junkbuster.

      It's also not spyware (unlike KaZaa).

  636. more building collapses in NYC? by hyperstation · · Score: 1

    i've been listening to an NYPD shoutcast stream, and they're talking about a possible day care center collapsing (?). does anyone have news on this?

  637. OKC -- McVeigh wasn't involved by Penguinoflight · · Score: 1

    The chances that a truckload of fertilizer could blow the whole building is extremely remote. Plus Timothy wouldn't plea "guilty" if he really did it. Yeah, he may have been hired by Arafat, but he didn't blow it up, that was done by an Arab.

    --
    "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
    1 John 4:14
    1. Re:OKC -- McVeigh wasn't involved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should learn something about explosives before you say that a truckload of properly prepared fertilzer couldn't blow up a building.

    2. Re:OKC -- McVeigh wasn't involved by Penguinoflight · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should sign in before you say I don't know what I'm talking about.

      Also why whould the FBI withhold evidence? Especially considering the risk involved in doing so.

      --
      "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
      1 John 4:14
  638. Seattle... by TheRain · · Score: 1

    I'm on Elliot Ave. W. in Seattle and what I'm wondering is why like every 20 mins. for the last like 3 hours have emergency vehichles been screeming by? I mean... what are they doing??

    --
    Please help! I'm stuck inside my virtual reality headset!
  639. Confirmed: Akamai CTO on Flight 11 by daoine · · Score: 2, Informative

    Boston.com is listing that Daniel Lewin, co-founder of Akamai, did in fact die in the WTC plane crash

  640. Re:September 11 = FALSE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is not true. The actual date is the 17th. There're things all over the web, but the Jimmy Carter Library is a good place to start.

    OTOH, the Bin-Ladin associate whose trial was scheduled in NYC, in the courthouse down the street from the trade center, seems a more likely explanation to me.

    But then, I don't know what's going on, so grain of salt yourself.

    - Stonecypher

  641. Re:no Athiests by climer · · Score: 1
    It could be Muslims. It could be Christians. It could be Athiests, (White|Black|Yellow|Red|Purple) supremacists, anarchists, fascists, disgruntled pilots, almost anybody. I am not blaming any of the above groups;


    I gaurantee you that it wasn't Athiests. Four planes with suicide attacks. It had to have been a group with strong religious beliefs about the attack. Only those with a 'holy' mission would end their own lives like this.

    /Duncan
    --

    Duncan Watson
  642. Flight recorders will be vital by Thagg · · Score: 2

    I am certain that there are tremendous efforts underway to find and interpret the data on the flight recorders of the airplanes. Rarely are suicide bombers recorded during their attacks, but these people should have been.

    I cannot bring myself to believe that the captains of the planes were alive during these attacks, but I also don't understand how the planes could have been flown so precisely by amateurs -- unless the purchase of the jetliner simulator by that Saudi prince is not just the toy that it was taken to be. And, if the terrorists were schooled well in the airplanes, they would have known how to disable the flight recorders, unfortunately.

    We'll see.

    thad

    --
    I love Mondays. On a Monday, anything is possible.
  643. Moral fiber. by saintlupus · · Score: 1

    The large portion of Americans would die on their feet before living on their knees.

    Only if they had trouble seeing the television from their knees, I'm afraid.

    --saint

  644. Akamai founder/CTO killed on plane - confirmed by rekoil · · Score: 2, Informative

    Akamai's press release can be found here.

  645. pics taken from Hoboken, NJ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    This is a series of pictures from taken from Hoboken, NJ around the time when the 2nd plane hit the remaining WTC tower.

    NYC September 11th, 2001

    1. Re:pics taken from Hoboken, NJ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      all pix gone?

  646. Re:Nostradamus by SuperGordito · · Score: 1

    From the book of Centuries (Nostradamus)

    In the City of God there will be a great thunder, Two brothers torn apart by Chaos, while the fortress endures, the great leader will succumb

    brothers = Twin towers?
    fortress = The Pentagon?
    great leader = GWB, USA?

  647. Isn't this over yet? by dghcasp · · Score: 1

    Can we please stop seeing what it's like to live everyday in other countries in the world?

    Can we go back to pretending the world is a happy and safe place soon?

    Can we please do so before my favourite television program is on tonight? Because I'll be really mad if it's pre-empted because of this.

    Disclaimer: If you need a disclaimer to recognize sarcasm, then you should read more.

  648. anniversary of camp david peace accord by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

    In addition to the fact that Osama bin Ladin (sp?) is one of the few people with the resoures and organization to do somthing like this, he has set off explosives at the trade center before. Furthermore, this is the anniversary of the camp david peace accord. All circumstantial evidence, true, but it does make bin Laden the most likely suspect.

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
  649. What did he say after killing 125,000 at Hiroshima by james(honest) · · Score: 2, Flamebait
    What did he say after he killed 125,000 civilians by bombing Hiroshima?

    Did he say "its ok because these civilians supported a government that we were at war with?"

    How did he justify killing civilians, deliberately? With an atom bomb. That killed 70,000 instantly and 55,000 later from radiation poisoning?

    So the question is, are civilians of an aggressive nation accountable for the actions of its government? If so, then Hiroshima was ok, but then so was this attack.

    If not, of course, then I'm sure the US will happily bring to trial, or assasinate, its own diplomats who were fully aware of the civilian deaths in central america, africa, vietnam, indonesia, iraq...

    The guy responsible for the deaths in central america (the disappeared) is about to take his place in the senate, I believe. Start with him, why dont you.

    Dont get me wrong, I think the deaths are totally unacceptable. The question is, "How could they have been avoided?". Is there a change in US foreign policy that might reduce the suffering of the rest of the world cause by american aggression?

  650. time to get nuclear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if this is state-sponsored, we need to seriously consider tactical nuclear weapons on military targets. NOT CONVENTIONAL, NUCLEAR! We need to show these fucks who's the fucking boss in this world. If these fucks think they can mess with the United States, they have another thing coming. Bin Laden just commited suicide, as well as his other fucking terrorist buddies. Hit squads are already being formed.

  651. Re:Blind Reprisal.. No. Kill Those Responsible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good point.

    Now please substitute other country names in the place of "America". eg.
    "I do not know if you are Iraqi or not but.."
    "I do not know if you are Palestinan or not but.."
    "I do not know if you are Mexican or not but.."
    "I do not know if you are Afghani or not but.."
    "I do not know if you are Africa-America or not but.."
    etc.

    Using your point of view all of today's events might be easily explained. If you are any one of these other nationalities you can quickly rule out your first option "isolate", which brings us to your second option.(See today's headlines)

  652. Re:Plea for peace - Huh? Get Real! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    McViegh was an Atheist, but you are right.

  653. Neo-Pearl-Harbor rhetoric may not work... by symplegades · · Score: 1

    Obviously, given the disturbing unreadiness of our system of national defense, a Neanderthal-territorial attitude will do nothing if looney fanatics are responsible (especially if those loonies are residents of Israel). Shall we invade the state of Israel and take military control of the West Bank etc.? I don't want WWIII and neither does anyone else! Full scale war will not result in anything good, as far as I can tell, and as the country with the most to lose it is not in our best interest to start one. Particularly against a country that may not exist! The terrorists may have had Russian, Chinese, or American weapons and equipment for all we know. Maybe they were Americans.

    We all despise these people and want them brought into the system so we can have our way with them, and that's fine, but content-free statements about getting tough and this incident "not standing" only bring disorder. Let's find them, bring them, and if the evidence convinces us, throw the motherfucking book at them. But let's do it with a level head, and save the barbarism for the execution.

    A bigger problem: what to do about the hordes of Palestinians celebrating in the street over the tragic deaths of tens of thousands of Americans? These people are human beings, and any human easily grasps the "wrongness" of mass slaughter, so why are people happy about this?

    The true issue falls along these lines.

    -Rene

    --

    See you on the playa.

  654. Misinformation by vslashg · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is not right. ALL radars show bad values near the radar station. This is not a dust cloud at all. (Unless you believe that there's also a huge dust cloud around, say, Nashville or Houston as well.)

    The cloud wouldn't extend that far. However, papers from the blast were seen miles away, and a reporter ten blocks from the explosions said he could taste the dust in the air.

  655. Homegrown terrorists? by TeachingMachines · · Score: 1


    Incredible coordination and piloting skills... How is it possible that two airplanes were flown into those targets on the NY skyline? Those guys were trained, and trained well. NPR mentioned that the attacks couldn't have happened without a lot of help from the inside (i.e., U.S. citizens). Was it conducted by U.S. citizens, a sort of Timothy McVeigh rerun? It really makes you wonder.

    --

    The Death Penalty: Killing people to show others that killing people is wrong.
  656. Nostradamus predicted this! (spooky) by jancastermans · · Score: 1

    "In the City of God there will be a great thunder,
    Two brothers torn apart by Chaos,
    while the fortress endures,
    the great leader will succumb" ,
    "The third big war will begin when the big city is burning"
    - Nostradamus 1654

    1. Re:Nostradamus predicted this! (spooky) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what great leader has succumbed????
      what city is burning??? I've only head of a few buildings being destroyed. not of a city burning

  657. Repercussions by MxTxL · · Score: 1
    In the wake of this tragedy, I think we need to examine the repercussions.

    As for the US's retaliation, I think it should be swift and decisive. I think there should be a battery of cruise missles launched at every known, suspected or rumored terrorist hangout, EVERYWHERE in the world. There are arguments to this that we should wait until we are sure who it is, that we should not retaliate at all because this will just perpetuate the hostilities.

    This is bull-shit. When colombian drug dealers killed DEA agent, Kiki Camarena, the DEA broke down every suspected drug dealer's door with or without evidence of any crimes. The DEA fucked them up really good. Since that time, DEA agents have led charmed lives. In many cases DEA agents are in peril, but only live because the Druggies know better than to touch a DEA agent for the repercussions. In the same light, it is clear to me and should be to everyone else that a serious strike against ALL possible/suspected terrorist organizations will send a similar message.

    I think we should consider the movie "The Siege" with Denzel Washington. In the movie, following three or four terrorist attacks the city of New York was brought to a standstill. They declared Marshall Law. This was the effect on one city. In real life, with todays terrorist attacks, most state universities were shut down, many, many businesses all over the nation are closed. Lots of people will begin to live in fear.

    This is, of course, what the terrorists want. When we begin to live in fear, we have betrayed the principles of our very country. We must strike back at these and all terrorists. We must send a message to this sick and twisted community that the US will not stand for this.

    Beyond whatever reprisals the President decides to launch. I think we will begin to see some other serious repercussions. Do you think air travel will be the same? I thought it was very strict as it was. We may have to submit to cavity searches before too long.

    Here's an interesting issue and one that is well to debate on Slashdot. It is said on just about all the major news networks that there has been an intelligence breakdown. That the terrorists use sophisticated encryption measures and that our intelligence agencies are under-funded and don't have the ability to keep tabs on the terrorists. Question: would you be willing to trade your personal privacy for maybe some further measure of security from terrorists? Would you grant the people running Carnivore greater rights into your life in order to perhaps prevent more events like this? Is the encryption export ban such a bad thing when stacked against 50,000 people's lives?

    "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
    safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin


    I don't know if we should put up with a greater intelligence presence. I know that is what we will experience. That is pretty clear. But what is obvious to me is that we must rise above this, we must not live in fear, and we must make these sons-of-bitches PAY for what they've done to assure that they can never do it again.

    1. Re:Repercussions by slykens · · Score: 2, Interesting
      AMEN! I agree the first thing that needs to happen is the launch of total annihilating attacks against any and all known terrorist camps, harborers, and supporters.

      These pieces of shit need to know that if they fuck with the bull they're gonna get the horns, and those horns are anything from B-52s with cruise missiles to low-yield tactical nuclear weapons.

      I don't know how else to send the message appropriately. Terrorists need to know that we're not going to play cat-and-mouse anymore and that if we think they're planning something then we're coming and not just to say hello.

  658. I live in NYC by grepnyc · · Score: 1

    >>Violence induces more violence. Retaliation will only lead to more deaths. If you are a citizen of the U.S. of America, please write your representative right now and ask him to join a plea for peace. Historically the U.S. reaction to this kind of attack is to counter strike.

    You should spend some time walking around downtown NYC, then see what kind of letter you'd like to write.

    There are bodies in the streets here. There are Firemen and Cops (rescue workers) buried beneath the towers. There are thousands of dead here. Maybe 10's of thousands. We don't know yet.

    I don't know who's dead yet, but I know that I'm going to funerals soon. Funerals that I shouldn't have to have attended for many many years.

    My sister works in the WTC.

    The only letter I'll be writing to a representative (if at all)is for more military spending, and for a tougher policy against terrorism.

    America will survive this, but today everything changed.

    --


    Microsoft Fucking Sucks!! Up The Penguins!!
  659. Flight Simulator by bareman · · Score: 1

    Which Flight sim is the favorite terrorist training tool?

    Obviously the terrorist have had some flight training.

    How to keep a plane flying.
    How to identify where they are flying to.
    How to fly into a target.

    etc..

    1. Re:Flight Simulator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WW2 kamikaze pilots were taught how to take off and basic navigation... but not to land.

      Oddly enough, they wore helmets too.

  660. Whoo hoo! This is the shit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Serves them fuckers right for putting the boot on Homers car in front of those gawd forsaken twin towers... This ones for you Homer! Whoooo... Whoooo!!!!

    1. Re:Whoo hoo! This is the shit! by -cryodragon- · · Score: 1

      Serves them fuckers right for putting the boot on Homers car in front of those gawd forsaken twin towers... This ones for you Homer! Whoooo... Whoooo!!!!

      That's not even funny. Thousands of people died because of what happened today. "Serves them fuckers right ..." You fool.

      Many of those "fuckers" were parents of children who came home from school today to find out that their mother or father would not do the same. Some of those "fuckers" died trying to rescue other "fuckers" from the "gawd forsaken twin towers." All those "fuckers" did not deserve what they got today. You're sick.

  661. Dear Government by Stalcair · · Score: 1
    I address you as 'Government' because like the greatest thinkers and action takers of history, including the US founding fathers, did not believe it was logical to get wrapped up in politics and partisanship. Plus, history (and those men and women) have taught those who wish to learn that you are the same spiked wheel that crushes all freedom and liberty, regardless of the color of paint you have on your outside or who turns the wheel.

    So, without further delay... dear Uncle Sam. It has come to my attention that you have been ignoring the constitution for a quite some time now. I notice that you are pulling yourself and the country (and perhaps the world) down into a bottomless pit of despair, slavery and subjective servitude. I noticed that you are following the pattern of so many great civilizations that fell from within, by going against your core foundations while extending and expanding beyond what you were meant to do.

    I notice that defense has taken a backseat to police actions and 'wag-the-dog' situations in order to further your members' political careers and fame. I have also seen that in your laughable Department of Defense, you have chosen to abandon the code of the warrior and instead focus on creating and promoting politicians, yes-men, career-minded wimps and fraternity laden pretty boys.

    I have also noticed that a rather alarming amount of resources (economical, personnel and chronological) has been diverted to give lip service and fill government buildings in order to give off the front that you 'care' about various causes. I notice that, just like the founding fathers warned against and made the constitution for, that you are stripping the honest hard working and decent citizens of this country of their rights, liberties, property and dignity all in the name of 'the people' (although it is more accurate to say "For the CHILDREN"). I notice that criminals of all sorts, the world over are living in a Utopia of opportunity while victims are ignored and forgotten just as the lessons from the past and present are forgotten.

    I notice that you have mimicked countries like the USSR and Nazi Germany in your policy of having the general populace always under suspicion, while you play your little power nabbing games and empower the criminals. I notice that while I myself choose not to poison my mind and body with drugs, that you have deigned it necessary to involve yourself in that personal decision, while always as a policy of 'helping protect us from ourselves'.... yet as history has shown before, you punish the choosers, but the criminals that hurt and kill regardless of their chemistry at the time are set free.

    I notice that our military and other 'agencies' are being used to extend that iron fist to other countries even after innocents are murdered and the cause later justified as righteous because you 'meant well'. I notice on the technological front that there is a borderless and boundary-less communication and interaction network in place that you wish to subvert and: monitor, censor, control, restrict, incarcerate and zone off because you 'don't know what people might be trading, sharing or discussing'. I notice that the government is the largest employer in the world, and that despite the well known fact that government is full of incompetent self serving politicians (especially the officer corps of the military), that you only laugh at the comedians jokes but don't heed the call for change.

    I notice that you spend sooooo much to punish citizens that you don't protect those very citizens you are charged to defend.

    I would ask that you open up the constitution, the Bill of Rights and the writings of our founding fathers and gain from the collective wisdom. I would specifically ask that you end the War on Innocents that you call 'The War on Drugs' that has proven to only stuff our prisons, kill innocents and erode the foundations of personal responsibility and vigilance that this country was founded on. End that, and then run a filter through the military... get rid of the bags, and then start acting like a military. Then commit to defending the citizens of this country as well as the very country itself (the combination of the citizens and the Constitution that guarantees that we are citizens... not subjects). Please do this so that we may continue to live the lives we choose, free from fear of either an international terrorist or a domestic governmental terrorist or any other thug and criminal out for personal gain at our expense.

    Thank you, American Citizen (by choice not by birth)

    --

    I seek not only to follow in the footsteps of the men of old, I seek the things they sought.

  662. What have they prepared? What DID they prepare? by 4eak · · Score: 1
    Good Question. What have they prepared? What was on those planes? I haven't heard anyone mention this yet, but what about the possibility of biological/chemical weapons? I read somewhere that the CDC mobilized its biological weapons units, but what, in short, is up with that? Does anyone have any SOLID information?

    And assuming (and hoping) that there were no chemical or biological weapons involved, what about the next skirmish in what many people are calling a War? I hear many people crying WAR, but I wonder how many of us are prepared for the kind of war this would appear to be?

    --
    --Damn! We're in a tight spot!
  663. The Twin Towers should NOT have collapsed!!!... by Douglas · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When The World Trade Center was being built there
    was a heated controversy over the possibility of
    one of the Twin Towers buildings collapsing if it
    was hit by a large airliner.

    People remembered that the Empire State Building
    was twice hit by a plane. once by a small plane
    and then by a WW2 vintage bomber.

    New Yorkers were promised that the Twin Towers
    were designed to survive a crash of a Boeng 747
    Airliner into the middle of one side of the
    building or a corner.

    The virtical steel columns that make up the sides
    of the Towers were supposed to be strong enough
    to survive the impact of a 747 and also to be
    strong enough so that 1/2 of the columns on 2
    sides could be destroyed and the Tower would still
    remain standing.

    Each virtical column is supposed to be tied to the
    2 adjacent column by a heavy steel I beam at each
    floor. The interior floors could collapse onto
    lower floors but the engineerring spaces that are
    placed every 10 floors are supposed to halt such
    a collapse.

    The way that the Twin Towers both collapsed from
    the top down with the virtical columns peeling
    apart indicates that the contracters and the
    World Trade Authority lied about how the Towers
    were constructed.

    If the World Trade Center Towerrs had been built
    as they were supposed to have been they would have
    been severely damaged but they would not have
    collapsed and 10,000 people would still be alive.

    --
    Thanx Doug...
    1. Re:The Twin Towers should NOT have collapsed!!!... by FileNotFound · · Score: 4, Informative

      A 707 NOT 747.

      A 707 is a MUCH smaller plane. It's MUCH smaller than than a 747 and still smaller than the 757's that were involved.

      Get your facts straight.

      The towers survied the impact. They did not survive the fire.

      Just because a bullet proof vest can stop a bullet doesn't mean it will prevent you from burning alive.

      Same applies to this. The supports were destroyed by the extreme fire.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, the television watches YOU!
    2. Re:The Twin Towers should NOT have collapsed!!!... by magicsquid · · Score: 1

      I have heard that there were secondary explosions that caused the collapse of the towers. Reports from the street say that they were heard seconds before the collapses. I don't know if they were caused by the plane crashes, or if they were secondary terrorist attacks.

      At this point, the cause of the problems don't matter. What is important now is that everyone bands together and does whatever is possible to help.

      --


      "Chances of RHIC-induced Armageddon are exceedingly rare, but... you never know." - MIT Physicist Bob Jaffe
    3. Re:The Twin Towers should NOT have collapsed!!!... by ArcadeNut · · Score: 1

      Famous last words that go along with "The Titanic is Unsikable".

      They can plan all they want and simulate all they want, but until it actually happens, they really don't know EXACTLY what is going to happen.

      I've seen "Earth quake Proof" builds collapse durring earth quakes. Engineers can only predict so much.

      --
      Visit the Arcade Restoration Workshop @ http://www.arcaderestoration.com
    4. Re:The Twin Towers should NOT have collapsed!!!... by killmenow · · Score: 2, Informative

      A 707 is a MUCH smaller plane. It's MUCH smaller than than a 747 and still smaller than the 757's that were involved.
      Actually, it is now being said that both planes that hit the towers were 767s. The 757s were to attack the Pentagon and Camp David. The Pentagon plane hit its target. The Camp David plane did not.
    5. Re:The Twin Towers should NOT have collapsed!!!... by cascadefx · · Score: 2, Informative
      The virtical steel columns that make up the sides of the Towers were supposed to be strong enough to survive the impact of a 747 and also to be strong enough so that 1/2 of the columns on 2
      sides could be destroyed and the Tower would still remain standing.


      OK, I'll bite. You'll notice that the towers did survive the crash. They didn't, however, survive the aftermath. As an earlier post said "fire melts steel." Take a highly combustible substance like, um, I don't know, jet fuel, and toss a few hundred (thousand ?) gallons around and add a crash to kick it all off and I bet you have a fire to best almost any solid engineering.

      Besides, if you watched Building Big, you'd realize that the worst place to hit a skyscraper is about two thirds of the way up. You see, they have these huge stabilizers in their upper floors that glide back and forth to help combat the effects of wind shear. If the building is hit around this area it turns into a critical breakpoint. It seems, from the series at least, that wind alone can tear skyscapers apart if they don't have systems actively counteracting the affects of wind.

      My guess is that the planes started the job (which the building survived), but the fire and Mother Nature finished it up.

  664. Satellite image of WTC plume by Qwerty+Augustus · · Score: 2, Informative

    The plume extends about 100 miles along the NJ coastline.
    http://www.iceaxe.org/misc/010911WTCPlume.jpg

  665. Re:Could these horrible events occur with no Inter by SlippyToad · · Score: 2
    Sure. They could have used those insidious phones and paper letters!

    Get real. The people planning this probably spent some time training together to get it right.

    You've "seen some stories." We've all seen some fucking stories on the Internet. I remember, before I ever used the Internet, reading Vernor Vinge's "Fire on the Deep." My favorite quote was "They don't call it the Net of A Million Lies for nothing."

    Yes, I think the world will be different after today too. But I don't think the answer (implied in your premise) is preventing people from communicating with each other.

    --
    One day I feel I'm ahead of the wheel / the next it's rolling over me / I can get back on / I can get back on
  666. Damn Canada and it's restrictions by Malc · · Score: 2

    I live in Ontario, which of course shares a border with NY state. I can't give blood normally, and today is no exception (I called and emailed them (http://www.bloodservices.ca/home.html)).

    It's because I'm British. Anybody who has spent more than 3 mos in the UK since 1980 cannot give blood due to fears of vCJD. I also know for a fact that the US doesn't have such restrictions as I gave blood 2 years ago whilst living in Colorado.

    Oh well, I shall have to think of some other way of helping.

  667. Re:Three Step Loop: ID, Locate, Eradicate by JWhitlock · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The time for peace is over. We must identify who did this, find out where they are, go in after them, and wipe them off the face of the Earth. We will suffer more casualties doing it this way. Too bad. The death toll is going to exceed Pearl Harbor and approach if not exceed use of a tactical nuke. We are at war.

    This is not state-based terrorism. This is a small group of fanatics. Your stupid, stupid tactic would make it a war.

    Terrorism is cyclical, not a three step process. You are attacked, you get angry, you retaliate. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat.

    Look at Ireland, the Middle East, etc. Do you want our grandchildren to still be fighting the same damn "war"?

    We wait. We continue to work. We find the black boxes, the voice recorders, we investigate. Those that did it are on the run. They are in hiding, and think we don't know where they are. Let they sweat a little. When we have the evidence, when the world knows, then we act. Maybe not even violently - put them in front of the same court as Millosevich, make them stand trial.

    Above all, we show that we are rational humans, and not dogs that bite because we were bit.

  668. Anti-terrorism & small tech by MackBob24 · · Score: 1

    There's already a great deal of R&D going on in small tech (nanotechnology, MEMS, etc) that could prove incredibly useful in anti-terrorist efforts. Given the horrible events today, the government may be spurred to push more money into research in this area. Small Times has an interesting article already today on some of these technologies. -Bob

  669. American Imperialism (was This is where brains...) by furiousgreencloud · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I see this Attack on the US, as a reaction to American Cultural Imperialism. You don't see anyone attacking Canada like this, because Canada supports diversity of cultures. I can only hope that Ammericans will see how out of sync their virtual reality is with other cultural environments in the rest of the world and the powerless americans. I grew up in South Africa during apartheid, and the whites always felt they were morally justified. Only mounting weight of dead demostrators and freedom fighters woke up the international community and only finally the regimes of political power.

    If this is a war, it is a war of culture.

    Notice, nobody has asked why someone would give up their life for these actions? Why are they so desperate? Why do these people have no other medium for expresion? Talk about democracy these people are voting with their lives.

    The eye-witness (americans) think is this a movie, because that is the only way their culture represents these type of acts. Explosions == Movies. Violence is not real to americans, it is very real to the people who have commited to these acts of terrorfing horror.

    Rethink america freedom and democracy, it's a joke. How can a system that claims to be open to the pillars of human desire -- freedom and self expression, have evolved to the point where such extreme action is the only way to critize it.

    --
    mark c. brady; http://www.inter-mission.org/
  670. How to solve this? by Zopilote · · Score: 1

    How can we solve/prevent problems like this? Here are some suggestions:

    1. Require every airplane to have a secure remote override feature, and some way to alert HQ of aberrant behavior or flight patterns.

    2. Anti-aircraft installations in major metropolitan areas? Sounds extreme, but the technology is evolving (in fact, much faster than the aircraft technology to avoid it).

    3. Other suggestions?

    1. Re:How to solve this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) Isolate pilots from passengers.
      2) Set non-flying zones over big cities, Hover Damb, Atomic Power Plants and so on.

    2. Re:How to solve this? by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 2

      1) armed guards on every flight

      2) Sealed cockpits

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    3. Re:How to solve this? by yomahz · · Score: 1

      How can we solve/prevent problems like this? Here are some suggestions:

      1. Require every airplane to have a secure remote override feature, and some way to alert HQ of aberrant behavior or flight patterns.

      2. Anti-aircraft installations in major metropolitan areas? Sounds extreme, but the technology is evolving (in fact, much faster than the aircraft technology to avoid it).

      3. Other suggestions?


      More secure cockpit cabins.

      --
      "A mind is a terrible thing to taste."
  671. PROPOSED NAME by GigsVT · · Score: 2

    I propose this day be known as the "911 massacre", which might just have been the intent of the attackers, deciding to attack on 9/11/2001.

    Condolences to those who lost loved ones today. When will we learn?

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  672. Crackers raise some hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a call out to all the crackers out there for assistance. Deface as many websites as you can find that are pro-terrorist. Remind the world that THOUSANDS of people -- individuals with parents, spouses, children, friends ... people who love them -- have been KILLED by these fucking cowards. You did this when China was holding our spy-plane; this is millions time worse. I want to see attrition.org have to upgrade their disk space to hold the mirrors of these sites.

    Portscan the hell out of networks that are on subnets located in the Middle East. Break into them and copy all of the data. Send it from that rooted university box to the CIA, FBI, NSA, whoever ... we may get lucky and find that one piece of info that breaks this thing wide open and finds out who orchestrated this travesty.

    Shit, even a DDOS against these sites would be acceptable. JUST DO SOMETHING! THIS IS YOUR FUCKING COUNTRYMEN THAT HAVE JUST BEEN ATTACKED AND KILLED! Let's show these bastards whose boss.

  673. from the Sky News website by hswoolve · · Score: 1
    Apologies to the Sky News website, mirrored text follows:

    'Attack On Freedom'

    It's being called the worst terrorist attack in history. At the end of the New York rush hour, a carefully planned and well coordinated series of hijacks and kamikaze crashes wiped out America's major landmarks - killing hundreds if not thousands of people.

    In what George W Bush called "an attack on freedom" the first target was the city's World Trade Centre. A commercial aircraft was flown straight at one of the towers, setting the huge structure ablaze.

    Up in smoke

    Then, just a few minutes later, another hijacked passenger plane was deliberately flown into the landmark building's second tower. With both engulfed in flames it didn't take long before first one then the other crashed to the ground.

    More than 50,000 people work in the complex. An unknown number of people have been killed, but the figure is expected to reach catastrophic proportions.

    Next, The Pentagon, perhaps one of the most potent symbols of American might was also hit by an aircraft. A 60-ft section of the building collapsed.

    Warplanes scrambled

    Another hijacked passenger aircraft crashed near Pittsburgh.

    Fighter aircraft have been scrambled and are patrolling the skies over the US capital in case of further attacks on the capital.

    Sky's Washington Correspondent Keith Graves said "There can be no doubt that any aircraft flying over Washington now will be shot down."

    A separate fire forced the evacuation of the White House.

    Hijack

    American Airlines says two of the planes involved were theirs. One, flight 11 from Boston to LA had 81 passengers, nine crew and two pilots on board, the second, a flight from Washington Dulles to LA had 51 passengers, four crew and two pilots on board.

    United Airlines says one of its aircraft, flight 175 from Boston to LA, a Boeing 757 has also gone down with 56 passengers, seven crew and two pilots on board.

    A second hijacked United flight - number 93 from Newark to San Francisco - is also confirmed crashed. It went down 80 miles south of Pittsburgh.

    'We're dying'

    A person who answered the phone on the trading floor at interdealer-broker Cantor Fitzgerald, located near the top of the World Trade Center, said: "We're f***ing dying," then hung up. There was screaming and yelling in the background. A follow up call was not answered.

    "This has got to be one of the most horrendous terrorist attacks perhaps ever perpetrated," terrorism expert Chris Yates told Sky News.

    The Foreign Office has issued a number for worried relatives 020 7008 0000

    Last Modified: 18:54 UK, Tuesday September 11, 2001

  674. some people do things honestly. by twitter · · Score: 2
    We're up again, and clearly we're going to be smashing the hell out of _somebody_...

    Not so fast. W has promised to hunt and punish those responsible. That does not mean he's going to do the coward Bill Clinton thing and lob cruise missiles to cover some kind of domestic scandal. No, I expect US agents will hunt down the dirt bags responsible for this, extridite them, prove them guilty beyond a shadow of a doubt, and hang them high.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:some people do things honestly. by joedavis123 · · Score: 1

      If proven guilty in a court of law, I think it would be good to have these individuals hung on national television (ABC, CBS, NBC, live internet feed, etc..) and left to rott in a public place.

  675. Give blood in Seattle, elsewhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a flight leaving McChord AFB (near Seattle) this PM with blood for NYC. There may be others. The local authorities are calling for donations - anywhere - to fill that flight.

  676. Cowardly? by Molf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    An act of murder? Yes. Apalling? Yes. Horrifying? Yes. Cowardly? Not to anyone who knows what the word means. No matter what atrocity is committed, no matter how senselessly violent, a kamikaze attack is not the work of a coward. Giving your life for a cause you believe in is about as far from cowardly as it is possible to get.

  677. Arab embassy bombed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Im not sure how true this is there are a lot of rumors flying around as is to be expected, but I have heard from quite a few people that some angered americans or american supporters have bombed the arab embassy. Another thing i've noticed is that many script kiddies and others have taken to defaceing and DOS'ing sites of whoever they think is to blame

  678. WTOP reports that PA plane WAS SHOT DOWN by GMontag · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just a few moments ago WTOP - FM, Washington DC, interviewed a Congressman (sorry, missed his name) and the Congressman confirmed that the PA crash was from a shoot down by US Military.

    Note: info is from a Congressman, could be total BS, ya never know. Might be why WTOP is not running it on their website, but the descriptoin from a witness on the plane in this story:
    http://www.wtop.com/news/news-story.jhtml?NewsId =1 87235 indicates that some sort of explosion happened before the plane went down.

    The same radio story reported that the Congressional Leadership has been evacuated to their safe facility.

    Flight 77 is confirmed to be the one that hit the Pentagon. A Congressional aide was on the flight and reporting to someone by cell phone about what was going on.

  679. Police scanner shoutcast streams by rschroeder · · Score: 2, Informative

    from: http://www.myacen.com.au/

    The Myacen Network, wishes to send our condolences to the people in America, we have made a few servers that you can listen to events unfold live

    213.112.17.26:8000

    mille.ath.cx:8000

    217.208.77.17:8000

    166.90.143.147:23160

    213.204.131.71:8000

    194.236.120.230:8000

  680. Re:Serious questions for anyone who's been in the by Royster · · Score: 2

    I understand that it takes at least 30 minutes to evacuate the tower if they can use the elevators. It takes about an hour to walk down from one of the top floors if the elevators are not available.

    My next door neighbor was in one of the towers this morning when the first plane struck. They began evacuations before the second plane hit. My neighbor was completely out of the building before the collapse and was uninjured.

    --
    I have discovered a truly marvelous sig, unfortunately the sig limit is too small to contain i
  681. Rationale... by doorbot.com · · Score: 1

    ...and something to consider.

    http://www.thequran.com/flyer/flyer1.html

    http://www.thequran.com/flyer/flyer3.html

    Also, those of you "pacifists" who claim that further violence (retaliation) would be "too much" death, please understand something. A true pacifist will choose all alternate paths of resolution to a problem until violence is the only answer. After which, the pacifist will use any and all force necessary to permanently subdue their aggressor. Pacifism is not allowing yourself to be used as a punching bag.

    I consider myself a pacifist, but I'm concerned that any amount of "reasonable" retaliation will be enough to stop further attacks (in fact, I think it is impossible to stop further attacks). Retaliation will be a political decision, one which will be decided not on public emotion but on the political stability of the world as a whole.

  682. Canadian Borders Closed by ByteHog · · Score: 1

    Just heard on NPR that Canada has closed the borders for a while, not sure for how long.

    Ya know, sometimes I hate the people in this country. I was just out at a client's place earlier today, and they hadn't heard of the bombing. I told them what was going on, and they turned on the TV for a few minutes, then kinda lost interest. I got the impression they didn't care because nothing exciting was occuring here (rural northeast washington state). I'm almost getting sick to my stomach just sitting here thinking about all the death and destruction.

    --
    - This isn't the sig you're looking for. Move along, move along..
  683. Where was Echelon on this one? by emkman · · Score: 1

    If Echelon is everything people are afraid it is, shouldn't this have been picked up. These attacks obviously were not forseen, so I can not belive that Echelon is doing its job if it does exist.

    --
    Moderation Totals: Flamebait=2, Troll=1, Redundant=1, Insightful=6, Overrated=1, Underrated=1, Total=12. (not mine)
    1. Re:Where was Echelon on this one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was talking long distace to my friend who was at work and had nothing but a phone and radio to hear the news on, so I relayed what was unfolding on the TV and the Internet.

      As soon as he asked if it was bin laden, there was a loud click on the line, 1.5 seconds of silence, then we could hear each other again.

      Echelon in action. We both hung up and he called me back, hopefully to throw off the monitoring party.

  684. WTC design by InterGuru · · Score: 2, Interesting
    From ">John Young

    quoted in Dave Farber's Newsletter


    A word on the structure of the WTC towers:

    The WTC towers had a distinctive structural system which utilized
    the exterior wall framing for lateral bracing -- a so-called lattice
    framework. This allowed minimization of internal lateral bracing
    and opened up the floor plans. You can see the effect of that when
    the buildings collapsed, with the lattice framework crumbling and
    the interior imploding. The lattice works so long as it remains
    intact as a system: if a part of it goes, then the whole system
    goes.

    The planes punched holes in the lattice, one tower punched
    on two sides, maybe the other too. Portions of the lattice of
    the second tower briefly remained standing after the collapse,
    then fell.

    The system was considered daring at the time of construction, for
    it distributed loads more efficiently than legacy column-and-beam-
    supported systems. Probably the legacy systems would not have
    totally collapsed due to damage at upper floors, although floors
    above the damage would have come down if columns were
    weakened.



    Below is a comment by me.

    The designers could never have forseen a terrorist attack, but the should have forseen
    an airplace collision.
    One happened in 1945 at the Empire State Building
    1. Re:WTC design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I apologize for being "Anonymous Coward", but I'm not registered, nor see a need. I am not a jerk posting though.
      To those reading this, I understand that the designer of the WTC towers as recently as last week stated that the tower was designed to withstand impact of a 707. Please realize that these planes were considerably larger than a 707, if I'm not mistaken.
      I read that statement on this board.

  685. More domains by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    worldtradecenterplanecrash.com is unavailiable on networksolutions.com but the whois record doesn't exist...

    worldtradecenternomore.com is available
    goodbyeworldtradecenter.com is available

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  686. IANAA by bravni · · Score: 1

    I Am Not An American.

    Yes I'm French, a people much mocked by Anglo-Saxon folks. But yes, tonight, let me be an American.... I'm shocked, I'm upset, I'm mourning with you. I have friends there whom I'm waiting to hear from, and friends here who are shocked, upset, mourning with you....

    I'm an American, tonight. I'm French either.
    Maybe, you and your friends and my friends are human beings and those responsible for this aren't?

    I don't know, but good luck, and godspeed.

  687. Re:But it *doesn't* solve things by mpe · · Score: 3

    While the US President commits huge sums of money, and breaches solemn international treaty obligations, to develop missile defence,

    No one in their right mind would launch a missile attack against the US. Even if they had an accurate 20MT nuke to fire off at NORAD. For the simple reason that doing so pinpoints their exact location, which would then be passed to USAF and/or USN.

    the perpetrators were able to use fifty tons of aviation fuel that they didn't even have to pay for.

    Nor did they have to pay for the aircraft.

  688. Arrest Marilyn Manson Today! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Obviously those kids were listening to his music when they decided to commit these dastardly deeds. With all these kids running around hopped up on ecstacy, it's a wonder this sort of thing doesn't happen everyday.




    While we're at it, let's ban all forms of encryption. This internet thing is just a vehicle for the liberal agenda, anyway. Let's put the 10 Commandments back in the schools!!!


  689. Murder Simulators by Gorobei · · Score: 2

    So some people complained that Doom, etc, were murder simulators. Everyone missed the fact that Microsoft Flight Simulator, etc, are probably the real murder simulators. A terrorist organization can now train a person to fly a big jet well enough to hit a building. Maybe not taking off and landing, but the easy flying skills are easily attainable.

    No pilot, even with a gun at his head, is going to hit the TWC rather than the Hudson river.

    This is really, really, scary.

    1. Re:Murder Simulators by vjzuylen · · Score: 1

      No doubt some politician somewhere is going to try to sell this as an argument for stricter controls on computer games - or perhaps on encryption technology, as the terrorist probably communicated through encrypted messages.

      The irony here is that, if you follow this rationale of "outlaw any technology that could be misused" to its extreme, the first thing you should outlaw is the kerosine-filled airplanes which actually caused all the damage. But you won't hear any politician suggest that.

      --

      Hee-hee. Dying tickles!
  690. FUCK YOU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FUCK YOU. The people who did this deserve to die horrible, miserable deaths. You fucking pussy. I'm so glad that you're not an American. No wonder you're a fucking pussy. You fucking douchebag. You're as bad as those fucking terrorists.

  691. Re:Whodunit? Check the Black Boxes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, they will be able to find those.

  692. Re:But it *doesn't* solve things by Malcontent · · Score: 2

    "No matter what the Western nations do, they will never be popular, because we have principles, like human rights, which we champion, but aren't convenient for dictators and fundamentalists. "

    Are you seriously suggesting that the western nations don't fund and support dictators and fundamentalists? That we alway act in the good of democracy and human rights? If we held fast to our principles and refused to prop up murderous regimes and refused to fund state supported genocides then people would not hate us so much.

    BTW this attack was most likely organized and carried out by no more then a dozen people. You would have to kill enough arabs to make hitler look like a saint to prevent it from happening again. As long as people would rather die then live under your thumb they will commit suicide attacks. You either have to make peace somehow or commit acts of massive genocide. In the case of Germany the people chose to commit genocide I hope the US can resists the calls for racial cleansing that are sure to follow (and from reading /. and your post are already being called for).

    --

    War is necrophilia.

  693. Beyond by halftrack · · Score: 1

    The american people will cry out for revenge, but you should calm down before striking whoever responsible. Revenging - you must remember - is hard. Traditionally, revenge leads to someone revenging the revenge, unless the revenge is targeted with high political and practical accuracy. Remember, a missil can't tell Bush from e.g. BinLaden. In addition the pressision is not high enough to avoid hitting civilians. If civilians is hit the governmet controlled media in the target country can:

    1. condemn the action agains WTC and the Pentagon, thus condemning the attack on their country.
    2. using their government controlled media to make the people - even those personally neutral to the US - condemn the US, thus making new terrorist killing more people.

    I would like to urge the American people to look for other solutions, silent actions. For instance they can through heavy intelligence - which will be conducted - locate and arrest the people responsible. A trial and conviction would be a much more satisfying and peaceful solution.

    Two bonuses will also be given by doing it this way:
    1. you are sertain the people responsible are caught, not just presumingly dead.
    2. the country housing the terrorist would be put in an - for them - unbeneficial position giving the western countries a good way to excess political pressure on them with a small, but larger than normal effect.

    People of america: let the your government know this!!

    --
    Look a monkey!
    1. Re:Beyond by Vanguard(DC) · · Score: 1

      wrong. bomb EVERY known terrorist training or hosting facility/location...

      THEN hunt them all down individually an cut their throats.

      and this STILL wont be enough to make up for this day...

      --
      "I think, therefore I get paid."
  694. CRAKAZ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ANOTHER CALL to all you MAD crackaz out there.

    TAKE DOWN this raghead site, its the main site for the Taliban terrorist organization, no kidding. They even have Jihad mentioned on their home page.

    www.afghanistan-ie.com
    203.128.6.31

    Initial scans show the server is very vulnerable and may already have been cracked.

    OWN this MACHINE!!! Show US your m@d skillz!

    Interesting ports on (203.128.6.31):
    (The 1502 ports scanned but not shown below are in state: closed)
    Port State Service
    21/tcp open ftp
    23/tcp open telnet
    25/tcp open smtp
    53/tcp open domain
    79/tcp filtered finger
    80/tcp open http
    81/tcp open hosts2-ns
    110/tcp open pop-3
    139/tcp filtered netbios-ssn
    143/tcp open imap2
    444/tcp open snpp
    515/tcp filtered printer
    555/tcp filtered dsf
    617/tcp open unknown
    1524/tcp filtered ingreslock
    3306/tcp open mysql
    6969/tcp filtered acmsoda
    12345/tcp filtered NetBus
    12346/tcp filtered NetBus
    27665/tcp filtered Trinoo_Master
    31337/tcp filtered Elite

    1. Re:CRAKAZ by Vanguard(DC) · · Score: 1

      anyone hit this yet? cobalt linux 5.0... no known flaws... but obviously seeing as that netbus, elite, and trinoo are there, someone has some control...

      ill keep probing... but if there ever needed to be a website defaced, this is this one...

      --
      "I think, therefore I get paid."
  695. good job slashdot by geekoid · · Score: 2

    Just a moment to say Good Job to the /. crew.
    You saw these events as critical, and you posted information we all needed.

    also, congrats on the system hanging in, true test of the new code.

    God Bless.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  696. Unlikelyhood of sucessful simultaneous hijackings by Robber+Baron · · Score: 2

    Knowing the kind of security surrounding civil aviation, it is highly unlikely that any group could successfully pull off 4+ simultaneous hijackings. How much do you want to bet some "intelligence" agency knew about these hijackings in advance and allowed them to happen in order to make the case for greater funding to combat terrorism, not realising what the outcome of these hijackings would be?

    --

    You're using her as bait, Master!

  697. A thought about prevention of hyjack of planes by Julz · · Score: 1

    I know this is a bit too late, but could the autopilot be setup to accept a code and then lock all controls and set a standard avoidance course out of main areas and notify the ground of a possible problem onboard the aircraft. This could then be used to alert the ground and authorities as well as stop hyjackers taking over a plane by immobilising the pilot/copilot. This code could be changed for every flight or whatever. I haven't thought it through anymore than this as I still can't believe that people would do this. This sort of thing doesn't get us, the world, anywhere in the big scheme of things and I sincerely hope that the people responsible are found and condemned. Maybe we could use these sort of people on death row as the lab rats that are being tortured in the name of science.

    --
    When shit hits the fan get some of these https://youtu.be/pY-GncsZ-UE
  698. There is only one way to avoid this in the future. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Require that all major airlines equip there planes with the ability to destruct before they can do such damage. Also remote destruct should be required as well. As soon as the plane is hijacked is should be considered lost, period. This may seem cold to the passangers on board but flyers know the risks. Think about this thousands of lives could have been saved. If terrorists knew that either the pilot, crew, or ground personal would vaporise the plane instantly as soon as they pull their guns or head to the cockpit then it probably would discourage such behavior.

  699. Re:I hope... by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 1

    Watching the news it had a quote on the bottom

    Bush Says "Apparent Terror Attack"

    Maybe three planes flew into buildings by accident.

    Tim

    --
    Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
  700. Where to donate blood? by imadork · · Score: 2
    I'm trying to find a place to donate blood here in Rochester, NY.

    I've tried calling the Red Cross's national numbers, but they're flooded with calls. Area hospitals here aren't set up to recieve blood donations yet.

    I'm sure they'll have information in the paper tomorrow, and my blood will be just as useful then.

  701. Idea of retribution by rufus+t+firefly · · Score: 1
    I remember when OKC happened Rush LImbaugh started calling for bombing of "whoever is responsible". Once we found that it was an American and that bombing "whoever is responsible" meant bombing Michigan Rush shut up. I guess killing innocent people is much more palatable in Iran or Iraq then Michigan.

    In the end our tendency to look at Arab and Muslim life as basically worthless will determine the scope of the attack. Not the desire to punish the people who are actually guilty. My guess is many many innocent people will die as a result of our retaliation which will make us exactly like the monsters who committed these crimes.

    And we did end up killing the person responsible. If he had lived in another country we would have bombed him. It doesn't necessarily make anyone feel better, but satisfies some peoples' need for justice.

    I don't think it has anything to do with the value of one human life over another in a religious or cultural context. I personally believe that not many people in the United States care at all about people that they have no contact with. I can't honestly pretend that I care about people that don't mean anything to me.

    So, Timothy McVeigh, being a possible next-door neighbor, is not someone you want to be scared of. Foreigners in general one can divide out and separate, but if you cannot divide out the "evil" parties, what remains to base your fears upon?

    --
    "He may look like an idiot, and talk like an idiot, but don't let that fool you. He really is an idiot." - Duck Soup
    1. Re:Idea of retribution by DeBeuk · · Score: 1

      I fear that a lot of people will find it easy to wipe out an entire nation when they can't even find it on a globe.
      I understand that when something terrible is done to you and your country, you'll want retribution.
      I can't honestly say I wouldn't feel the need for retribution myself.
      But does that make it right or justified?

      --
      Reality has a notoriously liberal bias -- Stephen Colbert
    2. Re:Idea of retribution by DeBeuk · · Score: 1

      My signature has been changed now,I should have done that before I posted. I want to apologise for placing it here at this moment and just having this sig. I understand some people will hate me for putting it there in the first place.
      It's a quote from a song, it does NOT represent my view on things.

      --
      Reality has a notoriously liberal bias -- Stephen Colbert
  702. Prophesized by Nostradamus? by mrsmalkav · · Score: 1, Interesting

    "In the City of God there will be a great thunder, Two brothers torn apart by Chaos, while the fortress endures, the great leader will succumb" , "The third big war will begin when the big city is burning" - Nostradamus 1654

    1. Re:Prophesized by Nostradamus? by Control-Z · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "In the City of God there will be a great thunder, Two brothers torn apart by Chaos, while the fortress endures, the great leader will succumb" , "The third big war will begin when the big city is burning" - Nostradamus 1654

      Will people stop it with the Nostradamus posts already? I can't imagine that NYC would be considered the City of God, and who exactly are the two brothers? There will be no world war unless we find out this attack was sanctioned by a specific country, which I consider very unlikely.

    2. Re:Prophesized by Nostradamus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if you consider Guilani to be God...

    3. Re:Prophesized by Nostradamus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how about this:

      http://www.247news.net/2001/20010911-towers.shtm l

  703. A perfect world wouldn't need any encryption by TeknoHog · · Score: 2
    In the world of my dreams, there will be no encryption. Not for personal messages, but neither for movies or music. In that sense, I would support a ban on all encryption, but that would also mean essentially free distribution of all information.

    The problem, of course, is that you cannot control the ban. There are already systems of encryption that convert terrorist messages into harmless looking chats. And encryption is like a weapon in the sense that the natural way to fight it is by using it yourself.

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  704. There's an error in this article. by MongooseCN · · Score: 2

    Maybe I'm just nitpicking here, or this posting was not based on anything substantion.

    firing Maverick missiles from Apache helicopter gunships

    These missles are huge. I don't think an apache can even carry one of them. They are only used on large jets. Hellfires and stingers are the only missles apaches can use.

    1. Re:There's an error in this article. by Atrophis · · Score: 0
      --

      i cant seem to come up with a sig.
  705. /bin/laden/facts by twitter · · Score: 2

    Why would anyone think to blame the dude who tried to do this in 1995, and again in 1998, and openly states the goal of his organization is to "kill Americans"? Concluding that this as you put it, gun-toting radical Islamic militant, did this is common sense. When the facts come in, that man is going to swing. Hell, if he were ever brought to trial he might just hang for all the other things he's done.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  706. Virtue of poverty? Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real condition of the current prosperity of the US is a side-effect of the confluence of history, geography, and culture. Of course the US has interfered with other countries. Of course the US has killed people to further their own aims. But no matter how much they try, Nepal will NEVER NEVER produce a large wheat crop. NEVER. We aren't "oppressing" them, their geography is the limiting factor, and a factor in their poverty. What I have found living in other countries (South America and Africa), is a jealousy of the US. Not a "please let us compete on a even playing field" mentality, but a "roll over and be ashamed of your hard-working culture and give us your money" mentality.

    Oppression comes in many forms. I will not be oppressed by a small contigent of people who are ashamed of my country and dole out blanket statements about our evils as if we are the sole source of the world's misery. We are not the sole source, it often comes from within. You come very close to giving approval to these violent acts.

  707. "Menace" from Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Don't be stupid. Canada is USA's biggest and most loyal ally. We're your largest trading partner and we have been sharing the largest unprotected border (not for long from the looks of it). We've even signed the NAFTA agreement that benefits US corporations more than it does Canadian ones.

    Although we may be more a socialist country (welfare, public healthcare, refuguees, etc), we are linked almost in the same manner as the EC members are.
    We are genuinely concerned about how the US does IN EVERY WAY since it affects us directly.

    Do you know what the biggest fear we have? It's not a terrorist attack. It's a terrorist attack on US soil where the maniac crossed the Canadian border. We spend a lot of time, money, and resources to screen people as well as we can before they cross the US border.

    The terrorists could have come from anywhere. They could have been living in the US for years. They could have just arrived from an transatlantic flight.
    What about the scientist at Los Alamos who sold secrets to the Chinese? He was a US citizen? Tim McVie? And the latest wave of FBI turncoats?

    There's only so much humanly possible to stop these lunatics. We're doing it.

    I have a feeling this will trigger a war. And quite frankly I would consider re-enlisting, because tomorrow they could do the same here in Toronto, over in Hamburg, or across the ocean in Porto. The only thing these savages understand is brute force.

    My prayers are with the victims and their families.

    1. Re:"Menace" from Canada by sys$manager · · Score: 1

      I've crossed the Canada/US borders at Blaine, WA literally HUNDREDS of times (I'm from Canada) and NEVER been "screened" by anyone but US Customs heading south. What are you talking about when you say we spend so much time and money screening people going south?

    2. Re:"Menace" from Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope this is finally the wake up call this country needs to see that we are vulnerable. I imagine we'll see a much larger armed presence in airports, etc. Also at our borders and all flights coming in, you'll see thinks taking months to get through customs and agents, pull apart, cut over, x-ray, sniff and then just explode for good measure anything they don't like.

      This does have a bunch of horrible side effects.
      1. I could see the issuing of personal ID's that must be carried at all times, anybody without and ID would be in deep shit.
      2. Broad laws that would allow sniffing all our communications...

  708. Elephant guns by bildstorm · · Score: 2

    Good point here:

    -----quote-----
    This would be a great analogy if it was accurate, but it isn't. Nations cannot operate without infrastructure, but most terrorist organizations can. You're fighting a different animal, and the weapon that's most effective against one can be entirely ineffective against the other. Think of trying to use an elephant gun (good against elephants, naturally) to kill a swarm of bees, and you'll get the idea.
    ----end quote----

    Terrorist organisations generally tend to leech of the resources of nations and their infrastructures. That's what makes them hard to find. But then again, it's hard find a bee's nest. Once found, though, no point in using that elephant gun on the swarm. Elephant guns do wonders to bee hives.

    --
    The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it. - G.B. Shaw
  709. Re:Cowards by TobyWong · · Score: 1

    It's called self deprecating humour, please buy a clue.

    --
    - Toby
  710. some urls... by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

    Afghan Government http://www.afghan-ie.com/

    Also this site has links to middle eastern news sites http://www.ipl.org/cgi-bin/reading/news.out.pl?co= United%20Arab%20Emirates

    1. Re:some urls... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      INFO FOR YOU MAD CRACKAZ, take this box OUT!!!

      Port State Service
      21/tcp open ftp
      23/tcp open telnet
      25/tcp open smtp
      53/tcp open domain
      79/tcp filtered finger
      80/tcp open http
      81/tcp open hosts2-ns
      110/tcp open pop-3
      139/tcp filtered netbios-ssn
      143/tcp open imap2
      444/tcp open snpp
      515/tcp filtered printer
      555/tcp filtered dsf
      617/tcp open unknown
      1524/tcp filtered ingreslock
      3306/tcp open mysql
      6969/tcp filtered acmsoda
      12345/tcp filtered NetBus
      12346/tcp filtered NetBus
      27665/tcp filtered Trinoo_Master
      31337/tcp filtered Elite

  711. George W by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi, I'm George W. Bush, President of the United States and when the going gets tough, I run away.

    Laura and Dick can look after Washington.

  712. It's not what people want that is important by dg123 · · Score: 0

    It's what must be done and going to arrange things.

  713. Re:Eye opener. You must be joking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > You don't like America? I got 2 words, FUCK YOU! We frankly don't give a damn!

    And this, exactly, is your problem. Be glad the rest of the world actually does give a damn, not just shrug it off "they had it coming, shit happens".

    Michael

  714. Re:Eye opener. You must be joking by fireman · · Score: 1

    Strange how you like using an AMERICAN invention... the Internet.

    Strange that the US did not want to get involved in Yugoslavia... blame the Brits for getting us in there.

    --
    M.
  715. /.being slashdotted by gss · · Score: 1

    This is a first, /. is getting slower by the minute. Slashdot is slashdotted!

  716. Biggest mass murders in history (incorrect) by rufus+t+firefly · · Score: 1
    So far, the biggest mass murders in history were performed in Hiroshima and Nagasaki (approx 2x150,000 died) and I think today's incident is not going to change that.

    That is a fallacy, mainly spread by those attempting to instill a sense of fear and awe in nuclear weapons.

    The highest casualty count from a single attack was the bombing of Dresden in World War II, with upwards of 450,000 people killed. Hiroshima and Nagasaki are considered more severe due to long term effects of radition, and the limited nature (2 bombs) of the attack.

    --
    "He may look like an idiot, and talk like an idiot, but don't let that fool you. He really is an idiot." - Duck Soup
  717. Nothing good to read! by Penguinoflight · · Score: 1

    There are so many bad comments here, it's not even funny.
    1. Israel vs Palestine
    Israel was there first and the stupid Arabs took it after Nazi's took the country. Israel is going to win with, or without our help, the more we help them the more WE will be blessed. (Economy has been pretty good scince WWII hasn't it?)

    2. Peace?
    You can't have peace without Justice. End of subject. There's obviously massive planning in such a well-executed plan, and likely both Arafat, and Afghanastan.

    3. Koyoto.
    Koyoto is the most stupid idea ever thought up. Make the us lower CO2 but not China (who puts out more than us) Koyoto is NOT liked by other counties, only the super-liberals in some countries, and Chinese (guess why). And second, Global warming isn't an Issue. Things get Colder over time, not Hotter. The thermometers they test with are 200 miles apart, the fact that a swimming pool can be different temperatures 20 feet away doesn't make it look very acurate.

    --
    "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
    1 John 4:14
    1. Re:Nothing good to read! by vjzuylen · · Score: 1
      Israel was there first and the stupid Arabs took it after Nazi's took the country.

      I suggest you throw your computer in the waste bin and try to find the nearest history book. Comment priviliges will be revoked until you have a proper perspective on this situation. Sorry.

      --

      Hee-hee. Dying tickles!
    2. Re:Nothing good to read! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Israel vs Palestine
      Israel was there first and the stupid Arabs took it after Nazi's took the country. Israel is going to win with, or without our help, the more we help them the more WE will be blessed.


      Thats sarcasm isnt it? It must be. The Nazis didnt have anything to do with the country that is now palestine at any time. At that time the Arabs were living there while the Israeli were scattered all over Europe. Too bad the Germans invaded most of Europe killing the Jews where they found them. This makes it rather understandable that the survivors of the Holocaust wanted a nation of their own. Thats the historical part. Being a German myself I dare not comment on the current situation in the middle East but rather ask forgiveness for what my own country has done.

      Talking bout Kyoto I completely disagree with you. If the high-tech nations that we are want to be the good guys we have to prove it. Anyway we are the ones that can afford it most easily.

  718. Terrorists R US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love all that anti-terrorist bravado going on.
    Lets be clear, the US supports, arms and works closely with terrorists, we just call them different things.

    There was articles in German papers a few weeks back how over 400 Albanian terrorists who were
    working in Macedonia (FYROM) were encircled by Macedonian troops and how the US swooped down to 'disarm them' which meant they were whisked back to safety in Kosovo, where evidently NATO troops cant seem (or want) to stop armed bandits from roaming a puny parcel of land.

    Oh yeah, there were 2 dozen US 'militarty observers' with those 400 rescued...

    Yup, we should know pretty well how to deal with terrorists, there are still pictures out there of Madeleine Halfbright and Gen. W.Clark sipping coffee in French bistros with Albanian terrorists who were still wanted by Interpol at the time..

    Terrorists are our friends when we need them to do our dirty jobs.

  719. Those doctors owning the professional equipment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    may have an easy time bragging about its use. Those without the means have to use the tools they own.

  720. Confirmation: Akamai co-founder died aboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This directly from the newswire.
    CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS, Sep 11, 2001 (Newsbytes via COMTEX) -- The 31-year-old co-founder of Akamai Technologies [NASDAQ:AKAM] was aboard one of the hijacked jetliners that crashed into the World Trade Center in New York today. An Akamai news release said Daniel C. Lewin, co-founder, chief technology officer and board member of the company, was killed when the American Airlines jet on a flight from Boston to Los Angeles slammed into one of the towers. Another jetliner, hijacked on a Boston-to-San Francisco flight, plowed into the other WTC tower. Soon both structures crumbled, the result of what government officials say was the work of terrorists. Lewin leaves a wife and two children, Akamai said. By Dick Kelsey Reported by Newsbytes.com, http://www.newsbytes.com Copyright 2001 The Washington Post Company -delrinkenro The Syndicate Newswire

  721. Blame Microsoft (Of Course!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's obvious - If you want to learn how to fly a modern jet airplane, (say into a building), just get yourself a copy of Flight Simulator. It's quite realistic. The one time I was up in a glider, I knew all the dials and guages, also had the fine motor skills needed to actually fly. I'm quite serious here.

  722. Reports of price-gouging by car-rental agencies by Abdul2112 · · Score: 1

    I have heard several reports through work email and other sources that car rental companies are charging up to $1000 per day for cars. Does anyone have any confirmation on this?

    1. Re:Reports of price-gouging by car-rental agencies by Legion303 · · Score: 1
      Haven't heard anything about that, but apparently in Indiana gas stations are engaging in pre-emptive price-gouging with prices around $3.00 per gallon. Bloodsucking leeches.

      -Legion

  723. What Every American Must Know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll
    Okay folks. Let us look at the facts. INUACT (I'm not usually a conspiracy theorist), but I'm awfully suspicious.

    Fact One: It took one full hour between the first plane crash into the WTC and the plane crashing into the pentagon.
    Fact One.b: NOW the USAF is saying they've got jet's up to shoot down planes that aren't supposed to be where they are (This happens WAY after the plane crashes and the plane grounding)
    Possible Conclusion: You can't tell me they couldn't have scrambled a jet to protect the Pentagon. It is the FOOKING PENTAGON! They've probably got radar watching the air space, etc. They let these planes hit where they did. Read on to find how why.

    Fact Two: Several former US Secretaries of Defence/State are/were on CNN spouting on about how this is an (I quote) "Act of War" on "innocent civilians." They also are spouting on about how we must retaliate.
    Fact Two.b: They didn't crash into a theme park or a mall. They crashed into the WORLD TRADE CENTER (please note the words WORLD and TRADE) and the PENTAGON (read: military installment)
    Possible Conclusion: US government wants to go to war. War boosts the economy. They want US citizens to be angry and support this retaliation mentality. SHIT LIKE THIS HAPPENS BECAUSE GOVERNMENTS ONLY KNOW HOW TO HANDLE DIFFERENCES WITH VIOLENCE. We get hit with awful violence, so what should we do? Oh -- I know -- let's kill those responsible. (sigh)

    Fact Four: The same people mentioned in Fact Two are spouting on about how this should have never happened. About how we need highly tuned agencies (CIA, NSA, FBI, Military) with (I quote) "sophisticated technology" to prevent these attacks.
    Fact Four.b: Just recently the NSA made a big press splash by whining about how little money they had and how poor their technology was. (Please note: nobody believes the NSA)
    Possible Conclusion: 1984. Big Brother. Nuff said.

    Fact Five: Several wars have been started to give slacking economies a boost.

    Fact Six: Billions of dollars will be poured into the US economy to...

    • Repair damaged buildings
    • Support military action
    • Increase security
    • Create new office space for those displaced from their current buildings
    • Buy new office items (computers, papers, chairs, desks)
    Possible Conclusion: OUR GOVERNMENT DID THIS ALL!
    1. Re:What Every American Must Know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Don't trust comments from anyone that can't count from one to six without missing three.

      Deinhard

    2. Re:What Every American Must Know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IDIOT

  724. Radar image of the dust cloud by Harper · · Score: 1

    http://weather.noaa.gov/radar/latest/DS.p20-r/si.k okx.shtml

    --
    Producing satire is kind of hopeless because of the literacy rate of the American public. - Frank Zappa
  725. Why is America Hated? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So there are *some* Palestinians (and others) that are celebrating this act. While both the act and the celebration are clearly atrocious, I (as an American) still get frustrated that the average American cannot even fathom why other people hate them. This part - understanding the adversary - is as much a part of peace as it is for them to understand us.

    If you lived in a third world country, filled with disease and poverty, and now you are seeing scenes of fat Americans hustling down the street in their expensive suits (hey, that man wastes more money on his tie than I will see all month, or all year), while you are clothed in the same ragged clothes you have been wearing all week, you too might smile at the cheap shot that you got in against David.

    I love America as much as any other citizen. But it sickens me that people are too arrogant or ignorant to think that "the other guy" is always at fault, or that the casualties we inflict are always justified. We may be proud of our Democracy and think that hard work will get you anything, but the truth is that 99% of our lives may just be the fact that we were lucky enough to be born into a fortunate situation. No matter how smart or athletic or talented you are, it would probably mean squat if you were born into a different situation.

    My only point is that we should save the "bomb those a55holes" talk for the junior high kids who draw warplanes in their notebooks. A long term solution involves each and every American being more aware of our place in the world and how it affects others.

    1. Re:Why is America Hated? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      David -> Goliath, my mistake

    2. Re:Why is America Hated? by sklib · · Score: 1

      No matter how much your life sucks, there's no reason to explode any buildings that belong to the more fortunate guy.

      I think it's distasteful to make excuses for terrorism, no matter who is responsible.

      --
      -S
    3. Re:Why is America Hated? by Spike_/\_ · · Score: 1

      Hey Anonymous, nice try. So far, none of the brains in this thread seem to grasp the difference between an excuse and an explanation. An excuse is a moral/legal reason why something is "ok to do". An explanation is why something happens. They are totally different domains. The legal system concerns itself with the former, but National Security doesn't care - it needs to function on a cause/effect basis.

    4. Re:Why is America Hated? by Spike_/\_ · · Score: 1

      You misunderstand - he's talking about *explanation* not excuse. Excuse is a moral/legal concept, when we get to national security, we need to forget that and think cause / effect. Sure the perps are culpable. Duh. But it's stupid not to try and understand your enemy. How can you fight an enemy you don't understand? It's especially stupid not to even think about how you might have *created* your enemy.

  726. The lesson of September 11th by uriyan · · Score: 1

    Today, the 11th of September, 2001 is a day of calamity, the greatest disaster that has ever struck the United States. And it is only ironic that the great peril, which had given birth to it was left unnoticed and untreated by most until it was too late.

    I am deeply shocked by the inhumanity of this action and its perpetrator. Too great an evil has been allowed to happen. It is time now to stand up and to strike back.

    For three decades, has mindless terrorism been striking my country Israel; but I can only weep at the immense scale of the tragedy. It is too late now to solve the problem bloodlessly. But it has to be solved now no matter what is the price.

  727. Re:Nostradamus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck you. That is not a real quote from Nostradamus. It was a example of one that the author said would be vague enought to apply to many incidents.

  728. Re:I hope... by Dunall · · Score: 1

    Name me *1* person who would have been a ble to prevent this. God I hope you're not suggesting what I think you are.

  729. Unfortunately... by Tempus+Rex · · Score: 1

    I find it sad to have to say this about this tragedy on the US, and have to send my condolences out to all my american friends.

    However I must say that this terrorist attack om the states was brought upon themselves by their very invulnerability and their own Ivory tower.

    Simply put: People will covet what they don't have and will try to aquire that for themselves. However if they can't find a way to get it they will destroy it when they find it in others.

    Peace out

    --Rex

    --
    Take a left turn at sanity and go three miles past chaos
  730. Korean Air Lines jets diverted to the Yukon? by dd · · Score: 1
    Does anyone have any more information on these stories: I can't get through to the CBC web site for their story...
  731. Inaccuracy by virg_mattes · · Score: 2

    I'm not only unmoved by your mislabeling of the atomic attacks, but I also find that you're wrong. If you're going to count acts between nations in a declared state of war as "mass murder", the undisputed champion is Hitler, with 11 million Russians killed.

    Now go away.

    Virg

  732. Re:Eye opener. You must be joking by SquierStrat · · Score: 1

    Okay, you obviously don't if the person i was replying to represents the general consensus of other countries. Also, I was syaing we don't give a damn what you think of us. We obviously give a damna bout the rest of the world, cause hey, France in WW2...period. I wont even bring up France in WW1...how about Papua-New Guinea...they don't have anything to thank us for. Wha tdo we get? Made fun of, bad opinions of us, and so on so forth.

    --
    Derek Greene
  733. "As ye sow, so shall ye reap" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The bombing of the World Trade Center and Pentagon is already being hailed as a tragedy of major proportions, and American citizens will no doubt be expressing shock and disbelief that someone could do such a thing.

    As the moralists begin to thunder against terrorism and mourn for the victims, perhaps some thoughts should be spared for some other victims--the victims of Americanism. This country was founded on the extermination and enslavement of millions, and has grown fat off the continuing exploitation and repression of the world's poor. It is not so strange that this should happen, rather that things like this do not happen more often.

    There is a kind of rough justice that New York's financial district and the Pentagon should be targets, for they contribute to so much misery in this world. Wall Street, the center of global capitalism, is where traders skim the profits off the poverty of so much of the world. Rhetorical exaggeration? Ask youselves why so many countries where hunger is common grow and export cash crops in order to pay their debts to U.S. banks, and see whether the word "loanshark" comes to mind. Ask yourselves why the countries with the most debt and the most sweatshops are invariably those that adhere to the paternalistic advice of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, and are likely to have weapons and military training supplied by the Pentagon.

    The Pentagon, the heavily-armed attack dog which blithely calls its civilian victims "collateral damage", has never hesitated to massacre civilian populations, usually from a distance and at little risk to its own. You cannot bomb and starve people, whether in Yugoslavia or Iraq, and expect all to be forgiven and forgotten. You cannot arm and train the death squads and dictators from Chile to Indonesia, Peru to El Salvador, Viet Nam to the Congo and expect no repercussions. Somewhere, somehow, some of the many victims of America's imperial arrogance have just found a way to fight back.

    Today is September 11th, a day that will be remembered. But September 11th has a significance most Americans aren't aware of. September 11, 1973 was the day the Chilean military overthrew the democratically elected president, Salvador Allende. Thousands were killed and tortured by the military in the aftermath of the coup, and Chile lived under a brutal dictatorship for the next 16 years. Why is this relevant? Because the military coup was instigated and supported by the U.S. C.I.A, under the leadership of then-president Nixon and his henchman Kissinger. Who in America will remember for those victims of state terrorism, in which America bears at least partial responsibility?

    Already the local talk radio is taking calls from people who are saying we should "wipe out" the Palestinians. The Palestinians have been robbed of most of their land, they've seen many of their homes and farms destroyed, and their children killed. All of this with the assistance of billions of U.S. dollars and military technology. No doubt many of them feel they have no future. When you help rob someone of their future, what do you expect? That they'd feel bad when their oppressors' best friend gets targetted?

    For the victims of these bombings and their families, this must seem like inexplicable insanity. Yet there is a terrible logic here, the logic of the Old Testament: "As ye sow, so shall ye reap". In the calls for veangeance and soul-searching to come, perhaps some Americans will think about their country's global role and struggle for a fundamental change in direction.

    This is not meant to justify or condone the terrorist attacks in New York and D.C. in any way. Rather, it is meant to question why there is so little outrage for the victims of the U.S. sanctioned terrorism that goes on every day.

    by an American who may have lost a close friend in the WTC bombing

    1. Re:"As ye sow, so shall ye reap" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me guess, you are a Brit or Canadian? Both of whom are jealous.

  734. I'd love to, but... by gooberguy · · Score: 1

    I would love to give blood. I am over 16, weigh more than 110 lbs (of course) but there is one problem: People who have lived in many parts of Europe for more than 6 months are not eligible. The red cross thinks we have mad cow disease or something. A large amount of military families cannot give blood because they have been overseas. Leave it to the red cross to find a way to prevent people from helping in times of crisis.

    D/\ Gooberguy

    --


    Karma: Meh (Mostly from meh.)
  735. Volume of posts by SlapAyoda · · Score: 1

    This must be the most talked-about posting on Slashdot. I've been watching the news for 4 hours now, and condolences go out to anyone who knows any of the victims of this horrible act.

    Sean

    --
    # wrote sig.txt, 23 lines, 31337 chars
    1. Re:Volume of posts by AlXtreme · · Score: 1

      Heh, IRC is pretty busy aswell. Don't find it very surprising, mind you...

      --
      This sig is intentionally left blank
  736. humans suck by Yablo · · Score: 1

    only the human species is stupid enough to do something this terrible to members of the same species. i, for one, am embarassed to be human.

    1. Re:humans suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I see you've got you're new species already chosen. All you need now is a great website then we can all join.

      Let's see how much you like it when humans don't suck.

  737. WORLD REACTION & LINKS by FFFish · · Score: 3, Informative

    From a site that seems to be working well:

    World Leaders react -- "The following are reactions from around the world to the disasters at New York's World Trade Centre and the Pentagon."

    Related Links -- US Gov't, US Military, NYC, Airlines, and Anti-Terrorism Resources.

    Also worth noting that many mid-East leaders of all stripes and colours are denouncing this terrorist act.

    Don't paint all the mid-East with one brush. This terrorist attack was the action of a very, very small radical group that is roundly despised by many mid-East civilians.

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    1. Re:WORLD REACTION & LINKS by FFFish · · Score: 2

      Who Dunnit -- the BBC "Within minutes of the horrific chain of events unfolding at the World Trade Center, information began emerging suggesting it was not a terrible accident but a terrorist attack."

      World Shock -- BBC "The attacks on New York and Washington have brought swift reactions of horror and condemnation from around the world."

      Notable quotable: "But Iraqi television played a patriotic song that begins "Down with America!" as it showed the World Trade Center's towers falling, The Associated Press news agency reported."

      America has made a permanent enemy of Iraq. I can't imagine how that will ever be changed. :-(

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    2. Re:WORLD REACTION & LINKS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't paint all the mid-East with one brush. This terrorist attack was the action of a very, very small radical group that is roundly despised by many mid-East civilians.

      How many of those people are LYING? Ever heard of THAT? Osama Bin Laden promised an unprecedented attack on American interests 3 weeks ago. And yet the Taliban is saying he had nothing to do with it... should we believe them?

      Fsck NO! They all know that the nukes will land on THEIR heads if they are linked, so they are falling all over each other to deny that what they all WANTED to happen was due to them.

      I think Pakistan could use a parking lot nearby, don't you? One that would be called the former Afganistan and would be usable in about 300 years?

    3. Re:WORLD REACTION & LINKS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, several of the mideast leaders who condemned it seem to have done so more to disavow responsibility than to express moral outrage. I mean, Yasser Arafat and the Taliban certainly are capable of this sort of thing, they just happen to do it to Jews, Hindus, Kurds, or whatever other infidels/enemies-of-state they have locally. If they don't do it to the USA, it is not because they are democracy-loving, warm-hearted people, but because they would not like to have their privates perforated by numerous ICBM's. Don't be so shallow and naive as to take their self-serving condemnation of this as a sign of ethics and human decency

      That said, certainly many mideast civilians (like myself) want to live in peace. Most people do.

  738. Pearl Harbor by The_Shadows · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is the worst attack on America. Ever. The destruction at Pearl Harbor can only begin to compare with the carnage that has taken place in America today. September 11, 2001 is a day that will live on in infamy. It is an unprovoked attack on American soil.

    For those who don't seek vengeance, I can only say that you are likely not living in America. There will be a reckoning. Whoever did this, and it's looking like Bin Ladin, will be found an eradicated. Whoever is harboring them will be eradicated. Whoever defends them will be eradicated. War is now inevitable.

    Good may eventually come of it, as good did eventually come from Pearl Harbor and WWII. But for the time being, we will be mobilizing, preparing for war. We were shocked. Now we are angry.

    And anyone who says that we're going to war because "Bush is crzy enough to start one" as I've heard people say (though haven't looked closely on the forum here) is dead wrong. We will be going because it's the right thing to do. We need, firstly, to show the world that we will not be shaken by this, and to show the world what happens when you fsck with the USA. Any potential president, Bush, Gore, Nader, Bud Brown, Clinton, anyone would be looking for a perpetrator right now with the intent to kill. We can see this.

    From a purely political standpoint, the nation is calling for vengeance. Any preisdent who sought re-election for himself or anyone in his party would commit political suicide otherwise.

    This is edited slightly for content, mostly for length:

    "The United States of America was suddenly and deliberately attacked. The United States was at Peace with the world. We have been looking towards the maintenacne of world peace. This attack was deliberately planned days or even weeks ago. The attack on our cities has caused damage to civilians and economic centers. Very many America lives have been lost.

    The facts, so far, today speak for themselves. The American people have already formed their opinions, and well undertstand the implications to the very life and safety of our nation. The commander in chief has directed our forces in our defense. Always, will our whole nation remember the character of the onslaught against us.

    No matter how long it may take us to overcome this premeditated invasion, the America people in their righteous might will win through to absolute victory. We will not only defend ourselves to the uttermost, but we will make certain that this form of treachery shall never again endanger us again. We will gain the inevitable triumph, so help us God.
    This was an unprovoked and dastardly attack on the united states."

    Franklin D. Roosevelt, December 8, 1941

    December 7, 1941. A day that has lived on in infamy. September 11, 2001 will live on in infamy now as well.

    Never again. Never.

    1. Re:Pearl Harbor by mbanck · · Score: 1

      > It is an unprovoked attack on American soil

      That is a bit debateable. Ask some palestinesians what they think of it. I agree with this, though.

      > Any preisdent who sought re-election for himself or anyone in his
      > party would commit political suicide otherwise.

      Well, is this the declaration of bankrupcy of american politics? You want to tell us, that the President of the USofA _has_ to strike back in order to win the next election? How about thinking about America first and the political future seconds? A war with most countries of far east isn't exactly the thing I would find desirable.

      Roosevelts speach has been quoting several times already, btw.

      Michael

    2. Re:Pearl Harbor by msouth · · Score: 2
      For those who don't seek vengeance, I can only say that you are likely not living in America.

      I do not seek vengeance. I live in America. I wish America would wake up to the way it has ignored the horrible injustices that Palestinians have suffered at the hands of Israel and which we have supported or turned a blind eye to.

      You want to look around for a culprit--look at the demand side of the equation, instead of the shallow analysis focusing on the supply (Bin Ladin and his ilk).

      The demand comes from injustices that have gone unanswered, and left to fester and cause people to...

      ...seek for vengeance.

      --
      Liberty uber alles.
  739. Re:The Palestinians are Celebrating! by Danse · · Score: 2

    You might feel diferently if another country walked into your town and bulldozed your home down and kicked you out of town. The Palestinians have been fucked over by Israel, and the US is Israel's biggest backer. We give them all the money and military hardware they're using to kick the Palestinians out of their own homes. If I was Palestinian, I'd be pretty damn pissed too. Most of them probably have little or nothing to lose by attacking the US.


    I hear people claim all the time that we should bomb entire countries in the middle east. Their rationale is that if these people won't stand up to their government and make them act properly, then they are just as responsible and deserve to be bombed. We are now victims of that same sort of thinking. We are being held responsible for the actions of our government. We call it terrorism and cowardice. But most Americans aren't even aware of the actions our government carries out in our name around the world. I'm not sure which is the greater tragedy, a terrorist attack such as this, or the level of ignorance and apathy of the American people where our government and multinational corporations are concerned.

    --
    It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
  740. Good News and Bad news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've never been there but you can get some relevant information from eyewitness acounts.

    http://www.msnbc.com/news/627028_asp.htm
    MSNBC has an interview with a man working on floor 81 of the second tower hit. They did NOT evacuate after the other building was hit, but others may have. He did however manage to make it off of the 81st floor even after his tower was hit.

    http://www.msnbc.com/news/627064_asp.htm
    "Another man, Harvey Schonbrun, who works at the brokerage firm Cantor Fitzgerald, had been on the 78th floor of Tower One when the first plane hit"

    So we have people around the 80th floor on both towers who survive.

    I've heard/read reports of 50,000 workers and 100,000 visitors a day, but an "expert" was quoted on the radio saying only 10,000 would be in each of the towers at 9 AM, and thank God the observation levels were (reportedly)
    closed.

    With a little over 100 floors that's about 100 people per floor however. Looking at about where the planes seem to have hit and assuming that anyone at those floors and above are dead (which may be pessemistic, but the fireball from the second impact did go straight through the tower, probably destroying the entire floor) I think we're looking at 5-10,000 people dead.

    I hope I've been pessemistic, but I'm in fear that I haven't.

    I do suspect that the terrorists were stupid for not hitting the towers lower. This would have trapped more people and I think raised the chance of them toppling sidewise. I don't want to think about what it would have been like if both towers had been hit a around floors 30-40 at the same time...

  741. Re:Plea for peace (eat the murderer) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I moved north a few years ago. I am so glad to be living in Canada today instead of the US. We've got our problems, but nothing like the States.

  742. Re:I hope... by Golias · · Score: 1
    ...Palestinians dancing in the streets???). Support for a free Palestine? GONE. Somewhat restrained responses to things like the Saudi apt bombings, the USS Cole Bombing? GONE. Americans don't take attacks like this lightly.

    You're damn right.

    For as long as I have been familiar with the situation in the Middle East, I have felt a great deal of sympathy for the Palistinian people and their plight, particularilly those families living in exile camps near Israel, and those living within Israel itself. I've always been of the opinion that Israli forces were frequently going too far and behaving in a brutal and thuggish matter. My heart went out to many of these people, and I was glad to see that many of them were building good lives for themselves in Eurpoe and America.

    The sight of Palestinians celebrating in the streets, like they just won the fucking Superbowl or something... by throat fills with bile at the thought of it. There were probably about 50,000 innocent people in that building. I can't remember the last time I looked at the image of a living human being and hated them more. It was one of the most disgusting displays I've ever seen... an oppressed people, no strangers to human tragidy, jumping around like fucking monkeys cheering about the deaths of thousands of innocent people.

    Whoever did this, and whoever helped them... be assured that you have awoken a sleeping giant for the first time in 60 years. You are about to be fucking erased.

    As for your point about missile defense... I think this underscores the importance of spending on intellegence, conventional forces, AND missile defense.

    Missile defence may seem expensive now (even though it is a pittance compared to what we spend to fight terrorism), but one thing that we have always observed about technology is that it gets cheaper and better the more it is used. In the long run, missile defense may prove to be a net cost savings, because even with an SDI system that is only 10% effective, we could eventually retain second-strike capability with a much smaller arsonal of missiles.

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  743. Ahh, yes, civilized by esperandus · · Score: 1
    and we wage war the civilized way, economically.

    I am certain that there are several hundred thousand mothers in Iraq who would love that statement. I find it rather unfortunate that such sentiments still exist: the "civilized" nature of our (the US) empire has included the support of dictators, genocide, crimes against our own people and against humanity itself, and most recently the subjugation (through economic means) of most of the rest of the world.

    We have to take some rezponsbility here. We are responsible for the actions of our government, and, to a lesser extent, the actions of those corporations in which we have some influence. We have eternally permitted and often fostered the existence of anti-US sentiment. We helped to forge the sword that strikes us (Saddam used arms that were mostly givent ot him by the US military, for a physical example. Not really what Im talking about. )


    So, what should we do? Barring genocide, the only solution is to make the US a just place, and then spread the ideals of justice and freedom to the rest of the world. The alternative may be extinction. Dont beleieve me? Theink of the tools of the terrorists of the future. Think engineered viruses. Think nanotech. We WILL see theses things in our lifetime. Unless we are all more or less happy--or, barring that, not starving to death in a wasteland created by short-term thinking and greed--Terrorism will never go away. Never. Desperation itself is our foe.

    --
    The truth is out there - we'll let it back in after it sobers up a bit. -The Cube
  744. Occasionally Re:Facial recognition software, a...? by HiThere · · Score: 2

    There are legitimate uses of facial recognition software. One of them is securing an area where the people who should be allowed in are a small number, and it is reasonable to require everyone to identify themselves.

    If it's not already reasonable to require everyone to identify themselves, then it's not right to use facial recognition software.

    If you need to present a passport, then it's reasonable to say that you are identifying yourself. If you need to present an employee id badge, likewise. Walking down the street is a totally different circumstance.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  745. Bill Thinks by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 1

    Blue Dress, Embarassment, Cruise Missile, Aspirin Factory, Distraction.

    What Comes Around, Goes Around. Sort Of.

    Bill, Watching Through Eyes Addled By The Most Expensive Designer Drugs And Designer Whores, Thinks: "Got Out Just In Time."

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
  746. If you have friends or family on int. flights: by mlafranc · · Score: 1

    CBC News (Canada) is reporting that international flights to ports in the USA have been diverted to:
    Halifax (Serving East Coast)
    Toronto (East Coast and North)
    Vancouver (Servinge West Coast: SanFran, Seattle, LA, etc.)
    Whitehorse, Yukon Territioy (Serving Alaska, North)

    I understand that there are extreem delays, in the air, (wating for landing clearence) on the tarmacs and within the airports (Searches, Immigration/Customs).

    Emergency locations such as schools and halls will be housing passangers (reported in halifax, presumably elsewhere).

    I do not have contact numbers, perhaps call your local news media, or airline office, etc.

  747. you're wrong about Britain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >major parts of European cities, Britain in particular, are being shut down

    Erm, only a few small parts of London were evacuated.

  748. http://squeegie.thewebsiteco.com/logic/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://squeegie.thewebsiteco.com/logic/

  749. Re:What did he say after killing 125,000 at Hirosh by Chris+Y+Taylor · · Score: 1

    He didn't say anything. FDR was dead by then.

    The bombadier of the Enola Gay supposedly said "My God, what have we done."

  750. What security? by tru+junglist · · Score: 0

    I boarded a flight at 7pm last night in JFK. At the time of course, security was not an important issue in my mind, yet I noticed something rather surprising as I went to my boarding gate. After checking in, my aunt and uncle decided to join me as far as they could come before I got on the plane. We were all very surprised when the three of us found they were able to come with me *right up to the boarding gate itself*. There was no control of my passport and ticket, no barriers or checkpoints to make sure the person getting on the plane was the same person that checked in. I literally could have given my aunt or uncle my ticket and they could have boarded the plane in my place.
    Now can anybody explain to me exactly how the hell anyone can find out who is responsible for these atrocities when we can't even be sure who boarded the planes?

    --
    jungle is massive
  751. Let's give the planet to the cockroaches already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck it.
    If we can't resolve the Middle East issue without doing this kind of shit, and the inevitable counter attack that follows, and the inevitable Russian-China-US conflict, let's just get it over with already and nuke the fucking planet (ie, hit the proverbial reset button). Let the cockroaches take over the planet. Let them take a few million years to evolve into some higher order intelligence.

    When they do, I hope they're smarter than us and don't start getting into thinking:

    1) God wants us to take over someone else's land
    2) God wants me to commit suicide and blow up innocent civilians
    3) God wants us to eradicate _______ (fill in your favorite hate group here, Jews, Arabs, Blacks, etc)
    4) You killed my brother, so I'm going to kill you, and your brother is going to kill my uncle, and his nephew is going to kill your sister, and her husband is going to kill my neighbor, and on and fucking on and on and on

    Answer me one fucking question. How is it that religion, which professes love and peace, has brought us nothing but conflict since the first two religions appeared on the planet? If there is a God, he should come down RIGHT THE FUCK NOW, and straighten this shit out. ALL people who profess that they represent God should be cleaned out by Him right now

  752. Canadian Fighters Force Down Hijacked Jet by Phrogman · · Score: 4, Informative

    There is a report on the CBC website that Canadian Fighters have forced down two Korean aircraft in Whitehorse in the Yukon. It is believed that at least one of the jets was hijacked. It is currently surrounded by RCMP and the local Military from what I understand.

    Here is the article since the site is hard to reach at the moment:

    Suspect 747 escorted down in Yukon

    WebPosted Tue Sep 11 15:44:33 2001

    TORONTO - Schools and government offices in Whitehorse, Yukon were evacuated Tuesday as jet fighters escorted two commercial airliners to unscheduled landings, after aviation authorities suspected one of the aircraft may have been hijacked.

    One of the airliners is a Korean Airlines 747, the other an unknown 747. Both landed at Whitehorse airport. The jet fighters continue to circle over Whitehorse.

    Peter Novak of CBC Radio in Whitehorse told CBC News Online that aviation authorities said one of the aircraft may have been hijacked. Novak said highways in and out of town may have been closed, and a bomb squad was at the airport.

    The identified Korean aircraft is believed to have been low on fuel and was redirected to Whitehorse.

    Canadian transportation officials have also shut down all airports in Canada indefinitely as U.S.-bound international flights arrive on Canadian runways.

    All domestic and international flights have been grounded as a precautionary measure after a series of attacks on high-profile targets in the United States.

    Transportation Minister David Collenette says Canada is taking security very seriously and will be carefully monitoring the situation.

    Prime Minister Jean Chretien has condemned what he called a "cowardly attack" south of the border and pledged full assistance to the U.S. He assured Canadians to remain calm, noting that the government was increasing security.

    Canada's Department of Foreign Affairs has issued a phone number for anyone worried about friends or family in the New York area. Spokesperson Marie Lilkoff says Canadians can call 1-800-387-3124 for information.

    U.S. flights diverted to Canada

    The United States Federal Aviation Authority had earlier ordered all international flights to the United States to be diverted to Canada.

    Airports throughout Atlantic Canada are beginning to receive a large influx of flights. Moncton, N.B., and St. John's, Nfld., expect up to 25 diverted planes, and CFB Goose Bay in Labrador expects close to 60 unscheduled landings.

    Halifax airport says they currently have 23 planes on the ground and expect 27 more. The RCMP will search all of the passengers' luggage and they will be transported to large sports facilities in the city for the night. All the hotels in Halifax are full.

    Passengers arriving in St. John's will be put up in hotels, conference centres and private homes. Many Toronto residents are also offering their homes to travellers stranded at Pearson Airport.

    "All Canadian airspace has been closed other than for inbound overseas flights," said Calgary Airport Authority spokesperson Mike Cunnington.

    Effects across Canada

    All Canadian border traffic to New York state is limited. Border guards are on high alert and inspecting all vehicles, said Serge Charette, national president for the customs union. He says travellers with a valid reason to be in either country will be allowed through.

    The Chief of Maritime staff in Halifax has ordered a lock-down and has posted guards at the gates the navy dockyards and the Shearwater air base.

    The rocket-proof gates of the U.S. Embassy in Ottawa were surrounded by police cruisers and plain-clothes officers. Public Affairs officer Buck Shenkman says security will increase, but the embassy will remain open.

    The Canadian Blood Services is urging people to contact their local donor branch in a cross-country effort for blood donations to ship to emergency centres in the U.S.

    In Ontario, Premier Mike Harris offered his province's full support to the U.S. government, including medical support.

    Many office complexes in Toronto allowed their employees to leave work as a precaution, jamming subways and the downtown train station. The CN Tower has also been shut down.

    The CN tower belongs to the World Federation of Tall Towers, along with the World Trade Centre and the two work together frequently.

    "Quite a few of CN Tower staff work with World Trade Center staff. There was a lot of back and forth travel in the last month. We both belong to the same industry association and this tragedy has hit us personally," commented Bud Purves, President and GM of the CN Tower.

    Written by CBC News Online staff

    --
    "The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid
    1. Re:Canadian Fighters Force Down Hijacked Jet by sundbug · · Score: 1

      According to an updated CBC story, it was a false alarm. Both jets were running low on fuel.

    2. Re:Canadian Fighters Force Down Hijacked Jet by mlafranc · · Score: 2, Informative

      Reported on CBC -NOW- 3:58

      Hijacked plain in yukon was actually low on fuel, and sent the code indicating a Hijack, to gather attention. They certainly got it!

      from interview with -Wil Engle - Former Amer. Airlines.

      Also, in Kabul Afganastan, bombings or otherwise explosions are being broadcast.

  753. Nostradamus by kzagor · · Score: 1
    Nostradamus (1654)

    "In the City of God there will be a great thunder, Two brothers torn apart by Chaos, while the fortress endures, the great leader will succumb."

    "The third big war will begin when the big city is burning"

    Just a note by me God = Money

  754. Nostradmus prediction or terrorist rule book? by Newtype · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "In the City of God there will be a great thunder, Two brothers torn apart by Chaos, while the fortress endures, the great leader will succumb" , "The third big war will begin when the big city is burning"
    - Nostradamus 1654

  755. A thought from the Gospel by microcat · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just think about this

    Matteo 24:6 And you will hear of wars and rumors of wars; see that you are not alarmed; for this must take place, but the end is not yet.
    Matteo 24:7 For nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom, and there will be famines and earthquakes in various places:
    Matteo 24:8 all this is but the beginning of the birth-pangs.
    Matteo 24:9 "Then they will deliver you up to tribulation, and put you to death; and you will be hated by all nations for my name's sake.
    Matteo 24:10 And then many will fall away, and betray one another, and hate one another.
    Matteo 24:11 And many false prophets will arise and lead many astray.
    Matteo 24:12 And because wickedness is multiplied, most men's love will grow cold.
    Matteo 24:13 But he who endures to the end will be saved.
    Matteo 24:14 And this gospel of the kingdom will be preached throughout the whole world, as a testimony to all nations; and then the end will come.

    1. Re:A thought from the Gospel by mrfiddlehead · · Score: 1

      And this has come to be about 5 thousand fucking times since they nailed that nice guy to the cross. Spout enough bullshit and some of it is bound to come true and you biblical prigs will wave it above your fucking heads every goddamn time.

      --
      :wq
  756. DEFCON by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Hi,

    In the movie Wargames they talked about the DEFCON (1 = war, 5 = piece). Is this still used? Any guess about the current DEFCON status?

    1. Re:DEFCON by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, we do.
      We've gone up a level to DEFCON 4, apparently.

    2. Re:DEFCON by nparr · · Score: 1

      From a link in timeline in the main story. It explains about the various levels of DEFCON and what they mean.


      DEFCON Explained

    3. Re:DEFCON by hether · · Score: 1

      They do use defcon ratings, but on the radio today they reported instead reffering to the current situation using a different rating system. They gave our current status as rating Delta. This rating is the highest in relation to defense.

      --

      Most people would die sooner than think; in fact, they do.
  757. I just hope Bush doesn't get trigger-happy... by slimeypete2 · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't put it past him, to be honest. He'll want to be seen to be strong and in control. I just hope he doesn't take it too far. Worse than Pearl Harbour? If Pearl Harbour started the most catastrophic war in history, imagine what this could do if it gets out of hand...

  758. Re:Airlines chosen by SlippyToad · · Score: 2
    Someone is certain to have remained behind to benefit from this. I'm listening to a Tool song as I read this. "Ticks and Leeches" off of Lateralus. "Hope this is what you wanted. Hope this is what you had it mind. 'Cause this is what you're getting."

    I rather think the end result of this will be a zero tolerance policy for terrorists. They will not be able to pop their little fucking heads up to talk about their "message" anymore without fear of getting immediately capped.

    --
    One day I feel I'm ahead of the wheel / the next it's rolling over me / I can get back on / I can get back on
  759. Re:no Athiests by TheCaptain · · Score: 1

    I agree with you that there's almost no chance this was Athiests...however, simply because an individual has no religeous belief does not mean that they are a completely rational human being...or rational at all for that matter. I have met plenty of nutcases from EVERY religeous background...including people with no religeous background.

    The religeous aren't the only ones with strong beliefs...however...doesn't mean we all can't play alot nicer than this.

  760. Re:But it *doesn't* solve things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there will inevitably be enough 'colateral damage' to radicalise a whole new population of people

    Not if we kill them all.

  761. It wasn't jacked, it was low on fuel.. by Robber+Baron · · Score: 2

    But understandably everyone is very edgy...
    I'm close to Vancouver Intl. Just heard a very noisy military aircraft fly by.

    --

    You're using her as bait, Master!

  762. has anyone discussed: feds knew something was up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://thewhir.com/marketwatch/raid910.cfm

    excuse me if this was already discussed, but wasn't InfoCom raided last week for illegal activities (involving muslim oriented web sites)?
    did anyone catch what went on there? maybe fed somehow caught on to unusual amt of encrypted traffic going thru their servers, but couldn't figure it out.

  763. I just want to say... by macdaddy · · Score: 3
    I know this post is going to be lost in the unprecidented mass of posts that have occured today, but I want to say it just the same. To all those /.ers, foreign and domestic that have expressed their condolences for the tragic loss today, thank you. Your voices are heard, if only for an instant. For those of you in the US, please please please consider giving blood or a few dollars to the Red Cross Emergency Relief Fund. This was an attack on us as a nation and we need to stand together as one nation. Also, express your support to the government officials that represent you to take terminal action against those that threaten our great nation or any other nation for that matter. For you non-US /.ers, express your support to whomever represents you in your government for their support of anti-terrorist measures that need to be taken. Tomorrow it may be your country that falls under terrorist attack.

    Also, I don't recall any other /. series or stories (3 in all so far) receiving as great as attention as they have today. 3685 comments have been posted so far. I think that's a record.

    1. Re:I just want to say... by Placido · · Score: 1

      My condolences for your losses. I live in England and there is always the threat of terrorist attack from the IRA. I assume the situation is much the same in Spain, Israel and Russia not including war-torn coutries like Macedonia and Palestine.

      Tomorrow it may be your country that falls under terrorist attack.

      As always your ignorance of the world shines through. Welcome to the real world America.

      --

      Pinky: "What are we going to do tomorrow night Brain?"
      Brain: "I would tell you Pinky but this 120 char limi
  764. The World Trade Center was a monument. by fiore42 · · Score: 1

    It was a monument to men - men who loved life, and chose to create. Men who, with a strong back and stronger mind, chose to create something noble.

    It was a monument to those men, in that it was a living, useful building - not dead, pointless marble. It was a monument to those people who believed in life.

    It is still a monument.

    It is now a monument to "men" - men who hate life, hate nobility, hate those who are good - because they're good.

    It is a monument to those who try and hide their hatred of everything noble and true, by shoving it into some "greater good", be it the "greater good" of the "race", "proletariat", "people", "believers", "nation", and choose not to see that there are only men - precious, irreplacable, individual men, too precious to sacrifice to a fiction.

  765. Here's Mass Red Cross contacts. Try hospitals too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dug these out of the google cache;
    for example.
    My guess is the days & hours will be extended. Note: these are only
    Red Cross blood donor sites. Practically every hospital
    can also take blood donations. Latest I heard was
    red cross asking people not to dial in, so drive to your nearest site or listen on TV for a blood drive near you.

    Repeat: these are only Red Cross blood donor sites. Practically
    every hospital can also take blood donations.


    Boston Donor Center
    25 Stuart Street, 02116
    (617) 556-2200

    Hours:
    Mondays: 11:00 a.m. - 9:00 p.m.
    Tuesdays - Thursdays: 9:00 a.m. - 9:00 p.m.
    Fridays: 8:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m.
    One Saturday per month: 8:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m

    Braintree Donor Center
    179 Forbes Road, 02184
    (781) 794-1800

    Hours:
    Monday - Wednesday: 12:00 p.m. - 8:00 p.m.
    Thursday and Friday: 8:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m.
    Saturday: 6:30 a.m. - 2:00 p.m.
    Every other Sunday: 10:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m.

    Dedham Donor Center
    Administrative Headquarters
    Donor Center
    180 Rustcraft Road, Suite 115, Dedham, MA 02026
    (781) 461-2000 or toll free 1-800-GIVE-LIFE

    Administrative Hours:
    Monday - Friday: 9:00 am - 5:00 pm

    Donor Hours
    Tuesday and Thursday: 1:00 pm to 8:00 pm
    Saturday: 8:00 am to 3:00 pm

    Middleboro DonorCenter
    448 W. Grove St., 02346
    (508) 946-1300

    Hours:
    Monday and Tuesday: 1:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m.
    Wednesday and Thursday: 12:00 p.m. - 8:00 p.m.
    Friday and Saturday: 7:00 a.m. - 3 p.m.
    Every other Sunday: 10:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m.

    Peabody Donor Center
    McCarthy House
    85 Lowell Street, 01960

    (978) 532-0600 or toll free 1-800-GIVE-LIFE

    Blood Donor Hours
    Tuesday & Thursdays: 1 pm - 8 pm Saturdays: 8 am - 3
    pm

    Springfield Donor Center
    3500 Main Street, 01107-1117
    413-785-0901 or toll free 1-800-462-2229
    (Massachusetts only)

    Administrative Hours:
    Monday - Friday: 8:00 am to 5:00 pm

    Pheresis Donor Hours:
    Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday: 12:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.
    Friday and Saturday: 7:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m.

    Whole Blood Donor Hours:
    Tuesday and Thursday: 12:30 to 7:30 pm

    Central Massachusetts Donor Center
    290 Park Avenue
    Worcester, MA 01609
    (508) 791-7444 or toll free 1-800-462-4101

    Administrative Hours:
    Monday - Friday: 8:00 am to 5:00 pm

    Pheresis Donor Hours:
    Monday, Friday and Saturday: 7:30 am to 3:30 pm
    Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday: 12:00 noon to 8:00 p.m.

    Whole Blood Donor Hours:
    Tuesday and Thursday: 1:00 pm to 8:00 pm
    Saturday: 8:00 am to 3:00 pm

  766. Retaliation by Scytle · · Score: 1

    I see many highly moderated posts here saying one of two things either restraint is necessary in the face of this tragedy or that we in the US brought this upon ourselves. The first while a worthy sentiment is naive beyond imagining the other is foolish beyond belief. Anyone who thinks that there is any possibility restraint for this unprovoked massacre cleary does not appreciate the scale of what has occured. In all likelyhood thousands are now dead, this goes beyond terrorism, this is a declaration of war.


    If this does turn out to have been a product of terrorism from the middle east, something which can definately not be assumed, those who are now dancing in the streets of Palestine or think that we somehow deserved this are going to reap a harvest of destruction that no one is going to be able to look upon without sorrow. This is now inevitable.


    If this is terrorism out of the middle east many have stated that retaliation is foolish as we cannot be sure of the terrorist group who did it. Once again you fail to appreciate the scope of this action. We may not know exactly who did it but the finger beyond the trigger is obvious. Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan revel in their support of these terrorists. We may not know exactly who did this action, but we know enough.

    Scytle

  767. quack. waddle. feather-ruffle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    ...I for one will happily press the launch button of an ICBM to level the whole freaking country
    [Afghanistan]. No pin point attack with minimal collatoral damage - you harbor a terrorist you ARE a terrorist. Yeah, yeah, nukes, fallout, sucks for neighbroing countries and I realize that but you have to realize that many Americans WILL have these inflamed feelings and they won't be thinking about 'innocents'.
    Corollary: You act like a terrorist you ARE a terrorist. There are plenty of Afghani people who are every bit as innocent as an accounting secretary temp on the 43rd floor.

    I sincerely hope that this event will cause some people to realize that violence begets nothing but violence, and that pacifism is the only moral choice.
    1. Re:quack. waddle. feather-ruffle. by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      I like pacifism, but if few others are...

      If you were a pacifist, and i slapped you so hard you bled, what would you do to me? Do you know if I would do it again?

      I don't know the answer either. Maybe we need to put the 'deterrence' back in 'nuclear deterrence.'

  768. Pearl Harbor? What about Hiroshima? by james(honest) · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Just remember, its ok to kill 125,000 civilians, but only if you are already at war. Clearly these "terrorists" forgot to declare war, or even register as a country!

    As for terrorism, what must it feel like to have americans pouring napalm on your children, or to be denied AIDS medicine because the WIPO is backed by the US military, or not be able to feed your family because you cannot resow a crop of seeds because they are patented.

    Wake up.

    1. Re:Pearl Harbor? What about Hiroshima? by james(honest) · · Score: 1

      Just remember, its ok to kill 125,000 civilians, but only if you are already at war. Clearly these "terrorists" forgot to declare war, or even register as a country!

      As for terrorism, what must it feel like to have americans pouring napalm on your children, or to be denied AIDS medicine because the WIPO is backed by the US military, or not be able to feed your family because you cannot resow a crop of seeds because they are patented.

      Wake up.

      Oh yeah, and its ok to call for "kill the ragheads", but you cant criticise american foreign policy without getting modded down as flamebait. Re-read the second paragraph and see if thats flamebait or if its "food for thought" (ha, thats ironic).

  769. THIS IS SLASHDOT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    People, People! Remember, this is /.!!!

    Please limit your comments to the following topics:

    Why Windows XP is ultimately responsible for this tragedy

    How we can use Linux to ensure that this never happens again.

    I'd also like to point out that in 1600+ messages no one has managed to incorporate a beowulf cluster joke into their posts. I'm very disappointed in all of you.

  770. DrudgeReport says Palestinian Group... by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 1

    Headline: "Palestinian group says responsible for WTC attack..." appears to be a link to the Jerusalem Post, but it's not responding.

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
  771. YAHOO! did it by GungaDan · · Score: 1

    They've been warning us with those "feel left in" ads for months now. There were no hijackers. They siezed control of the planes with the same secret voodoo technology with which they've made all their porn pages disappear. Contacted for comment, the head of Yahoo! opined, "Shut up you moron. That's a terrible joke."

    --
    Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
  772. Hiding under his bed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    6 hours after the attack and our President is still hiding under his bed.
    Immediately after the attack New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani was at the scene.
    Immediately after the attack Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld was on the scene.
    Immediately after the attack our President was under the bed -
    he should have showed enough backbone to override the secret service and gone directly
    to Washington DC.

    1. Re:Hiding under his bed by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 2

      what, you want teh president to go to the white house and paint A BIG FUCKING BULLSEYE ON HIS ASS?

      i'm a raging liberal, and ya kmnow what, its time to get behind teh president. even if he is an illegitimate scumbag, he's still the president of the US, and the US is under attack.

      he should be in a bunker, far underground with reports of airforce one flying to different airforce bases and him getting out.

      oh yeh, thats whats happening

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
  773. Re:American Imperialism (was This is where brains. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody attacks Canada because there's nothing TO Canada. What is Canadian culture? What does Canada do for the world? Certainly not act as it's economic engine. There's no criticism of American culture at work here. This is obviously one of just plain terrorism. If this was an attack against cultural imperialism they would have attacked Hollywood or Madison Avenue (advertising district in NYC). No, this is just attention getting on the part of malcontents.

  774. Re:Nostradamus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No. this post is not flamebait. this post is a flame. the first post, which this one is a response to, is flamebait, which drew the flame.

    you can't read.

  775. I preach peace. by theghost · · Score: 1

    It is my country and i preach peace. Not the peace of cowardice, but the peace of justice. By all means, find those directly responsible for the planning and execution of the attack and give them their day in court - a real and impartial trial based not on bloodlust, but on evidence.

    Do not lash out blindly and unjustly at a nation, race or religion as though every individual member is equally responsible for the actions of an extremist minority.

    One of the aims of terrorism is to provoke an unjustified response. It spreads sympathy for the terrorists and makes their act seem justified. Let us not give them that satisfaction.

    Nothing can justify this attack, nor can this attack justify a response of the same scale from us.

    We must be more vigilant in our own defense. We must make greater efforts to treat the other citizens of the world as equals, not servants. We must remain true to our ideals in deed as well as word.

    September 11, 2001 will be remembered in history, but let us remember it as the darkness before the dawn, not as a step on the path of destruction.

    "When we have an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth, it leaves America toothless and blind"
    "Man must evolve for all human conflict a method which rejects revenge, aggression and retaliation. The foundation of such a method is love."
    ~ Martin Luther King Jr.

    --
    The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
  776. Cowards by [verse]Eskil · · Score: 1

    Bush clearly showed why this was inevitable in some form.

    He called the people who committed this crime cowards. People who commit suicide attacks are not cowards, they are
    impossible to stop only because they are not cowards. When the US sits 10.000 miles away pushes a button and sends of a
    cruse missile that hits poor countries they are the coward once. But most of all they are irresponsible because the tragedy
    the American people has to endure this day is the product of 60 years of irresponsible foreign policy.

    The US leaders should have learned form vietnam that you can not have a aggressive foreign policy whit out casualtys.

    you can never build a army large enough to protect you, the only true protection is to have no enemy

    my condolences go out to all the victims, their friends and families.

  777. blair.. by slimeypete2 · · Score: 1

    has been talking about how terrorism is "the new evil". Is it really? I thought we'd had this kind of "terrorism" for centuries, only we called it war. During WW2, each side killed millions of civilians through bombing campaigns, simply because they disagreed with the German/Allied political system. I realise that that wasn't during peace time, but surely it's still the same thing? And the Americans + USSR seemed quite ready to press the Big Red Button at any moment during the Cold War, nomatter how large the civilian casualties were.

  778. Re:Nostradamus by flashms010 · · Score: 1

    As I understand it, the Nostradamus quote was that the "new city in the new wold" would be destroyed by "the middle eastern prince" in the year 2000. Saw it on a PBS special about Nostradamus.

    Take it or leave it.

  779. Check out this site for some archived shots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have been to the top of the WTC and have enjoyed an incredible meal with my wife from this restaurant. The view was incredible.

    http://www.windowsontheworld.com/

  780. Re:Cowards by Flakeloaf · · Score: 0

    That's life I guess. I didn't write that to be inflammatory. What happened in NY is very unfortunate*, and I hope no more unnecessary deaths come from what happened after the fact.

    (*This is not a tragedy. A tragedy is a play or story in which the protagonist undoes himself with his own flaws. A whole lot of people dying at once is mass misfortune.)

    People say "this isn't funny"; and I'm very sorry to say that's bullpucky. It may not be funny to the person reading it because they're in a sensitive state, but everything is funny to someone. This happened to amuse me, and a few people agreed. To the rest of you: Blah.

    --

    Am I the only one who heard Roxette to sing "I'm gonna get blitzed for some sex"?

  781. Re:no Athiests by Rei · · Score: 2

    A humanist might. Not that killing innocent people for revenge would be remotely compatable with humanism, of course. ;)

    -= rei =-

    --
    "Oh, goodness. Look at my wrist, I have to go." "But what about your clothes?" "I don't love these."
  782. Moderators worse than Trolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would like to know how this subject is offtopic. For the past 3 articles Taco griped how hard it was to get reliable news feeds on this tragedy.

    /. moderation is broke because moderators are broke.

  783. Re:Unlikelyhood of sucessful simultaneous hijackin by Toony · · Score: 1

    Do you know the kind of security surrounding civil aviation?? I was a former airline employee...I have seen firsthand the security at our airports. Domestic flights were never considered as big a threat as international flights.

    Possibility of 4 hijackings well planned is good.

  784. AKAMAI Exec Killed - Verified by LaoTzePhuuk · · Score: 1

    http://www.montereyca.com/rc/business/docs/1002969 9.htm

    1. Re:AKAMAI Exec Killed - Verified by BdosError · · Score: 2, Informative

      I can't connect to that site, but the news is on Akamai's main page.

      --
      Complexity is Easy. Simplicity is Hard.
  785. Pearl Harbor Comparisons, Did the US Expect it? by kirn_malinus · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I've been reading a lot of posts and news stories comparing this horrific event to what happened at Pearl Harbor, and I can't help but think of another plausible similarity. Many of you have probably heard before that the United States government most likely knew about the attack on Pearl Harbor, or at least that evidence suggests this. (We had broken their codes, decoded messages sent to their embassy in DC implying the attack was coming, we wanted to get into the war, it made a good excuse).

    I can't help but think of the similarities here. The United States has been trying to capture bin Laden for years (assuming he is behind this, as current evidence seems to suggest), but has been unable to. In fact, intelligence information on bin Laden is a total void, no one knows much about his organization at all, "No nation has successfully penetrated the organization".

    Reports suggest that there have been hints that this attack was coming for as long as two months, and I personally find it hard to believe that an attack of this scale was orchestrated without any hint of it coming to the attention of US Intelligence agents. Also, the threat has been made and has been public knowledge for as long as two months:

    Reuters is reporting that Arabic satellite television channel MBC warned Sept. 8 that followers of suspected Saudi terrorist Osama bin Laden were planning a major attack on U.S. and Israeli interests in the next two weeks. Israeli Defense Minister Benjamin Ben-Eliezer also warned Sept. 10, the day before attacks on U.S. targets in New York and Washington, that "a coalition has been formed recently between terror organizations, Palestinians, Shiites and bin Laden operating against Israeli, American and European targets." (www.stratfor.com)

    Israeli daily Haaratz also reported that Saudi dissident Osama Bin Laden warned three weeks ago that he would carry out unprecedented attacks against U.S. for supporting Israel. (www.stratfor.com)
    The facts point to prior knowledge of today's events being in existance.

    So why would the US government not do anything about it? Perhaps they actually want to capture bin Laden so badly, that they were willing to let the attacks happen, so that they could be provided with an excuse to launch an attack on the scale of war. We are currently at Defcon Delta, only a step away from war. Perhaps they didn't think the attacks would be as horrible as they actually were, and assumed that the causualties would be minimal and worth the gains, namely the ability to attack bin Laden.

    Would you put this past our government? I know I wouldn't, I actually believe they've done it in the past.

    --
    All circuits busy.
    1. Re:Pearl Harbor Comparisons, Did the US Expect it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It the name of anti-terrorism law enforcement and intelligence communities will be given more and more power and our civil rights will be eroded.

      Americans have shown before they prefer safety over freedom.

      Expect the internet to be under close scrutiny.

    2. Re:Pearl Harbor Comparisons, Did the US Expect it? by jallen02 · · Score: 1

      Intelligence communities funding/erosian of civil rights do not coincide. Our rights have eroded very easily for a long time. Yet, Jimmy Carter is the one who removed the funding and gutted our intelligence agencies. We need coldwar level international intelligence again and NOW. We lost some of our most powerful and deeply rooted moles due to that man :(

      Jimmy was our worst president.

      Jeremy

  786. My theory how it happened by blang · · Score: 2

    No weapons were involved.

    2 to 3 people for each flight, but most likely 2. Most likely checked in with false ids to make it harder to trace their origins. Probably also had bought tickets at different times, and for different part of the plane. One of the terrorists, or possible all of them, in case any of them were hurt or killed during the operation, have received basic pilot training, just enough to steer it at target.

    Smuggling in firearms would have been too risky. But there are 1000's of ways to kill a person without the use of firearms. Piece of string, poison, martial arts techniques ... You can't spot a black belt in karate with x-rays

    It appears that they are trying to hide their identities, so the whole operation might have been done in silence, to avoid any conversation being stored on the flight recording box.

    They might even have worn masks or makeup during checkin to make it harder to identofy them from airport securoty tapes.

    --
    -- Another senseless waste of fine bytes.
  787. Flying a Boeing by PaxTech · · Score: 2

    Well, IANAP (I am not a pilot) but how hard could it really be? They weren't concerned with taking off or landing, and they could have had the regular pilots fly them to the general vicinity of the target. Then they kill the pilot, and all they have to do is steer the plane into the building. How hard could it be? A few days of flight sim training?

    Of course, I'm totally talking out my ass.. Any pilots out there have an opinion on this?

    --
    All movements for social change begin as missions, evolve into businesses, and end up as rackets.
    1. Re:Flying a Boeing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yes, it's easy. To prove it to yourself,
      go to a flight school and take their "sampler".
      For $50 or so they'll take you up and then
      actually let you play with the controls.


      Any idiot can steer a aircraft into the WTC.
      From the amount of bank involved, it looked
      to me like an amateur at the controls.


      I would not be surprised at all if this was
      a bunch of McVeigh types, who had no doubt
      rehearsed the crashing repeatedly on their
      home PCs.

  788. Why? because they're _terrorists_ by hodeleri · · Score: 2

    The terrorists would just start killing passengers and crew one by one until the pilot(s) opened the door. Making the cockpit completely self-sufficient would cost far, far too much (it'd need a bathroom, etc) so there would be no way to lock the pilot into the cockpit so they could only be let out once they land again.

    1. Re:Why? because they're _terrorists_ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All israeli planes have locked cockpits which cannot be opened during flight. Israeli news media are interviewing many israeli military and avaition personell who basically are saying 'we have been telling the americans for years'.

  789. Re:An eye for an eye, and the whole world goes bli by Spruitje · · Score: 1


    By best estimates so far 10k+ dead, that equals or beats some countries. They wanted terror, they won't get it. They get our anger, which will be far more destructive and deadly. Revenge is a dish best served cold. I can wait a bit. Anyone else?


    Kewl, especially if they find out that it were some stupid Amerikans which are against the government planned this.
    Would be a historic episode.
    The US bombing the US...
    The thing is, that there are enough idiot's capable of doing things like this inside the US.

  790. Crusade by anshil · · Score: 2

    For all who blame other religions think of the cristian holy crusades! How many people were killed in the past in the name of our god?

    --

    --
    Karma 50, and all I got was this lousy T-Shirt.
  791. Re:American Imperialism (was This is where brains. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um....What crack pipe were you smoking when your wrote this? It seems to have completely disconnected you from reality.

    I'm not saying the US is perfect in it's dealings with other nations, but NOTHING can justify this. This violence is very real to all Americans, and that fact that you would suggest otherwise tells me you have no idea what the hell you are talking about. You've obviously never been affiliated with a country that has this massive an attack against it. Pearl Harbor was bad, and this is worse.

    The people who have committed these violent acts of terror are cowards who refuse to fight for themselves. Anyone can die, it takes real people to live and fight for their cause. America is criticised by people and nations all the time (many people on slashdot do so daily), so to say these people had to resort to this sort of violence is stupid. In fact, since no one has taken credit for it, they can't be making much of a statement now can they? And when did killing tens of thousands of people help anyone's cause in ANY way? The answer is it doesn't. These people deserve no sympathy.

    Try thinking a little before you post next time. Your post is just offensive jibberish.

    Khyron

  792. Phone call from hi-jacked plane by yomahz · · Score: 3, Informative

    A co-worker recieved a call from a friend at American Airlines (he works at the airline's call center) and apparently there was a call from a flight attendant reporting that the hi-jackers where of arabic origin and that 2 flight attendants and a passenger (trying to put up a struggle) was killed with a knife.

    A key was taken from one of the flight attendants and they entered the cabin and killed the pilots.

    --
    "A mind is a terrible thing to taste."
  793. Excellent post by festers · · Score: 1

    It's good to see there are still some clear-thinking people left. More violence is not an effective solution to this kind of problem.

    --


    -------
    "Every artist is a cannibal, every poet is a thief."
  794. wake up from the american dream by diskis · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Well, the USA got what it deserved... They believed that they are above other people and that their army and missile defences can protect them. They lived in a ignorance of what really happened in the rest of the world. Little countries can be a big problem of stomped on enough. Hopefully USA understand that they are not alone on the earth. They could try some more humanitary tactics before firing tons of missiles against anything that remotely looks like a terrorist... I truly hope that Bush WILL NOT respond with violence, if he does, he is not any better than the terrorists who did this...and hopefully Americans will understand that they are not the only superpower in the world... and before the next few thousand people lose their lives.

    (Sorry for the bad language, i'm not a native english speaker)

    1. Re:wake up from the american dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      May I suggest you take a nice vacation to Afganistan

    2. Re:wake up from the american dream by yomahz · · Score: 1

      Well, the USA got what it deserved... They believed that they are above other people and that their army and missile defences can protect them. They lived in a ignorance of what really happened in the rest of the world.

      How do you rationalize killing thousands? You're as much of the problem as the terrorists. You should be ashamed of your attitude.

      --
      "A mind is a terrible thing to taste."
    3. Re:wake up from the american dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The people who did this were cowards. Plain and simple. The country/organization responsible for this will be bombed out of existence. :-)

    4. Re:wake up from the american dream by diskis · · Score: 0

      It's always a tragedy when a life is lost, but as far as i remember there is still death penalty in the USA and they seem to like nuking the shit out of small countries. I don't rationalize killing. Americans do.

    5. Re:wake up from the american dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... I truly hope that Bush WILL NOT respond with violence, if he does, he is not any better than the terrorists who did this...and hopefully Americans will understand that they are not the only superpower in the world... and before the next few thousand people lose their lives.

      The US didn't get anything. Thousands of inocent people where killed by ignorance and cowards. As an American I can only hope we reduce all known terrorist sites to ashes. Guilt by association. And by the way we are the only super power, and the only one who can handle the responsibility. It is obvious your ignorance couldn't.

    6. Re:wake up from the american dream by yomahz · · Score: 1


      It's always a tragedy when a life is lost, but as far as i remember there is still death penalty in the USA and they seem to like nuking the shit out of small countries. I don't rationalize killing. Americans do.


      The only time the death penalty is used is extreme murder cases and Japan was hardly a small, furry, harmless country at the time. They had just killed thousands of Americans without warning or provocation.

      I don't usually respond to such flame bait but you're level of ignorance mixed with your attitude is dangerous. Please think before you respond. I don't think you can shove that foot much further down your mouth.

      --
      "A mind is a terrible thing to taste."
    7. Re:wake up from the american dream by slimeypete2 · · Score: 1

      The death penalty is never justified. Ever. It's still murder, nomatter what the victim has done. And besides, Japan may have killed thousands over a few years of war, but you lot must've killed just as many in a split-second in 1945... Having said that, I'm on the American's side when it comes to these terrorist attacks, but only because I can't condone genocide nomatter what nation it happens in - I do not believe that America is a "great nation" in any way, shape or form.

  795. search/registry of survivors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    someone sent me these links:

    This site will register people who are safe:
    http://do.millennium.berkeley.edu/

    You can query this site to search for people:
    http://do.millennium.berkeley.edu/find.php

  796. Re:Cowards by Golias · · Score: 1
    All kidding aside (and it was pretty damn funny... thank you for that), as an American I would like to express my gratitude to the people of Canada. During the early hours of the crisis, it was reported that the Canadians allowed us to route some international flights to their airports. Also, the Canadian hospitals have opened their doors to victims of the attack.

    So hats off to Canada, eh?

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  797. Re:Nostradamus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Just a note by me God = Money

    Funny, I always thought God was Britney Spears' asshole.

    Shows how much I know...

  798. In "Fight Club" the buildings were empty. by moller · · Score: 2

    All of the people that "worked" on the buildings were Tyler's people, so they all knew about it and were elsewhere when the buildings went down.

    So it's 0 lives lost in the buildings being destroyed in "Fight Club" (not counting other deaths in the movie).

    ~Moller

    1. Re:In "Fight Club" the buildings were empty. by puck71 · · Score: 1

      They didn't explicitly say that nobody was in the buildings, but they did qualify that anyone who COULD be in them was in on the plot. Chances are nobody was.

      Were there any other deaths (besides Bob)? I can't think of any off the top of my head. For such a violent movie, it had a remarkably low body count.

      Hell, billions of people died in Star Wars, but was there an uproar over that?? I always thought that was fairly strange.

  799. Red Army? by Mr-Pope · · Score: 1

    See the story here:
    http://www.middleeastwire.com/newswire/stories/2 00 10911_3_meno.shtml

    I don't know what's up with this, how many other stories like this are going around? Would this lead to a war with Japan?

    -Mr-Pope

    --
    "The only way to learn a new programming language is by writing programs in it." - Brian Kernighan
  800. Canadian Foreign Office number by nano-second · · Score: 4, Informative

    For Canadians worried about relatives in NYC.

    1-800-387-3124

    --
    I hope you're not pretending to be evil while secretly being good. That would be dishonest.
    1. Re:Canadian Foreign Office number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want a pizza - do you have a number for that? As if *anyone* is going to use Slashdot as their first information source about a terrorist incident!

  801. Load of crap by Vermifax · · Score: 1
    "Terrorism comes from injustice. I don't mean to imply that terrorists are then on the side of justice -- but only that if people are treated justly and allowed redress for their grievences, they will not resort to self-destructive, violent behavior like this. "


    Liberal 'everybody is a victim and not responsible for their actions' crap. Terroism doesn't come from injustice, it comes from misguided hatred and ignorance. They were likely manipulated by their psychotic leader who they worship as an idol.

    --

    Vermifax

    Logout
    1. Re:Load of crap by Ian+Bicking · · Score: 1
      I never said terrorists weren't responsible for their actions. But to think that terrorism exists because of psychotic leaders is absurd (though apparently a view widely held).

      People value their lives. For a person -- whole groups of people -- to be driven to a suicidal and murderous hatred requires something much more than just a crazy charismatic leader. Psychotic leaders bent on destruction are the stuff of cartoons and James Bond movies.

      Hatred comes from injustice. That does not mean that the hatred is always directed correctly, or that acting on hatred is justified. But it doesn't appear spontaneously. In a more just world I don't think something like this would ever happen.

    2. Re:Load of crap by Zalbik · · Score: 1

      No, these people do not value their lives. Many of these individuals are born and raised in a society that tells them that to sacrifice their own lives in pursuit of their cause is the highest honor they can attain.

      These people have not necessarily suffered any actual injustice...they are indocrinated with the idea that their culture is suffering from injustice. It is this perception that leads to violence.

      What injustice had Timothy McVeigh suffered? The Japanese of WWII? The rebels of Sierra Lione? What injustices had been perpetuated on the Germans by the Jews?

      You are correct that hatred comes from perceived injustice. The fact is however, that these injustices may not be real, and there may be no way to repartation offered that will appease these individuals.

  802. Re:Whodunit? Check the Black Boxes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read "Airframe" by Michael Crichton. Then you know how limited the "black boxes" really are.

  803. "I hope they keep down the price of gas" by cipater · · Score: 1

    Time to dust off my old copy of Gang of Four's "Solid Gold" now. A forgotten gem, that record.

    --
    Guns don't kill people - bullets do!
  804. Re:I hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The sight of Palestinians celebrating in the streets, like they just won the fucking Superbowl or something... by throat fills with bile at the thought of it. There were probably about 50,000 innocent people in that building. I can't remember the last time I looked at the image of a living human being and hated them more. It was one of the most disgusting displays I've ever seen... an oppressed people, no strangers to human tragidy, jumping around like fucking monkeys cheering about the deaths of thousands of innocent people.
    So, you're saying you'd like these people dead? Would you jump around like a fucking monkey cheering if they were?

    You're a hater. You no better than the people who hijacked those planes. Deal with it.
  805. PROPOSED YOU SHUT THE FUCK UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see somebody's watched a little too much slickly-packaged network news. Have a little respect.

  806. DMCA claims responsibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In a recent press event, the reclusive leader of the DMCA mediaforce, along with Metallica and Charlie Pride, have formally claimed responsibility for todays attacks. They claim that their intelligence detected a high concentration of illegal file sharing taking place in several US office buildings and claimed to have taken appropriate action to suspend such activities. They added that Sony's armored division will be occupying several additional locations later today.

  807. Re:What did he say after killing 125,000 at Hirosh by cavemanf16 · · Score: 2

    Well, in order to actually beat Japan soundly, win the war, and stop the Pacific bickering over land issues, it was estimated it would take over 200,000 US soldiers (mostly under the age of 25) to take Japan by conventional methods. Dropping two nukes (it would have only been one if their leader hadn't been so stubborn) was more humane. Besides, the leaders of a country are directly responsible for the citizens in their charge, to God and to humanity, so when citizens die from moronic decisions (like reducing our defense budget - thanks, Clinton!), then yes, we will reap the consequences in the here and now. But guess who gets to bear the burden of 125,000 dead in Japan forevermore? The Japanese leader at the time does.

  808. US Withdrawal from the MidEast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, I'd be willing to bet that if the US withdrew from the Middle East, it wouldn't be Israel that would soon be gone. Without the US to count on, Israel would hardly be likely to wait to be annihilated by their neighbors. Therefore, I think it highly likely that some of their neighbors would soon cease to exist. Permanently.

  809. Re:Towelhead Payback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's fucked up dude.

    you need to check yourself

  810. Akamai: Co-founder dies in WTC plane crash by ath0mic · · Score: 3, Informative

    This from:
    http://www.cnn.com/TECH/
    Daniel Lewin, co-founder and chief technology officer (CTO) at Akamai Technologies Inc., is said by his company to have died Tuesday as a passenger aboard American Airlines Flight 11. The Boeing 767, originally bound for Los Angeles from Boston, crashed into the World Trade Center in New York and became the first of two airliners to slam into the 110-story structure, opening an apparently coordinated terrorist attack.

  811. Re:Nostradamus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, and there's another passage that is about the same thing. Its a little vague but it seems relavant.

    Those with heads covered with filthy rags
    will scream in terror before they die slowly
    camels will not be ridden again
    in the stinking land of the animals

    Nostradamus, 1658

  812. Re:ALL YOUR WTC ARE BELONG TO US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "/. was not made for this sort of immature crap."

    Are we talking about the same Slashdot?

  813. site offline too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    man this site is offline too:

    http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=world+trade+cen te r+map

  814. Re:Let's give the planet to the cockroaches alread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you first =)

  815. No car bomb by MattGWU · · Score: 1

    I can say this because I still have windows. If it weren't for a piece of my apartment building, I could see the State Department complex. It's still there, and dead silent...has been all day, save for the evacuation. Trust me, if anything went down at the State Department, I would have known in a hurry.

    --
    "These people look deep within my soul and assign me a number based on the order in which I joined" --Homer re:
  816. Re:Towelhead Payback by way0utwest · · Score: 1

    What a fucking moron! Are you a skinhead? If a black man shot the President, would you go around beating up all other men of color?

    Listen as*wipe, the wrapping on someone's head signifies their religeous belief. It has nothing to do with their politics.

    Millions of US citizens have skin that is not white. Should we persecute everyone who isn't a WASP?

    I'm not for censorship, but you are pushing the rights and limits of free speech while showcasing your ignorance and cowardice, Anonymous Coward!

  817. I was just hear a few weeks ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I will miss the incredible views and great people that worked in this fine restaurant. Check out this link for some archived shots of what you could see from the top of the WTC.

    http://www.windowsontheworld.com

  818. Nostradmus Prediction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Those with heads covered with filthy rags
    will scream in terror before they die slowly
    camels will not be ridden again
    in the stinking land of the swarthy oil pigs"

    Nostradamus, 1658

  819. He didn't, that was Truman by fishexe · · Score: 1

    Just to clarify, the president in question was dead by the end of that war and his successor, Harry Truman, authorized the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

    --
    "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
  820. Re:What did he say after killing 125,000 at Hirosh by Tokens · · Score: 1

    Apparently you don't know your history that well. It is commonly known and recogniced that the atomic bombs were dropped in a very late stage of the WWII. Many agree that Japan was about to surrender anyway. You can easily find statements by high generals and historians (mostly americans) that agree that dropping the nukes was entirely unnecessary, just by browsing the Internet.

  821. Nostradamus can't be credited with the quote..... by joolios · · Score: 0, Troll

    "fuck Allah." Rather it must have been someone with some sense in him.

  822. nostradamus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the city of God there will be a great thunder, two brothers torn apart by chaos, while the fortress endures, the great leader will succumb", "The third big war begin when the big city is burnning" --Nostradamus 1654

    weird huh

  823. black boxes CAN survive full building crash by sofar · · Score: 1


    The most famous example was the El al boing 747 that crashed almost 10 years ago into a 12 story or so. Notably both the FDR and the CVR were recovered (Flight data recorder and Cockpit voice recorder for non-spotters)

    This aircraft collided nearly vertically on the building and leveled it to a 6ft pile of rubble.

    I believe there is a definate possibility that ONE of the recorders in all 2 flights hitting the WTC can be recovered.

  824. Re:What did he say after killing 125,000 at Hirosh by NichG · · Score: 1

    I see, so it doesn't matter that people died as long as the blame is placed on the right person. I'll have to remember that and ensure that I live some place far away from anyone considered responsible for something, so that people won't bomb near me cause they can't blame it on anyone.

  825. reflection on comments posted by SpaceGhost · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A couple of days ago I heard a report about a Palistinian village. Israel had suspected that terrorists were there, so Israeli tanks surrounded the village, bombarded it, and left. It was a small report, almost an aside to the main news, which was lots of talk about the U.S. economy, and how not EVERYONE had a job.

    I kept thinking about that village. I wondered what it would feel like, to feel afraid for your life, to not know where they might strike next.

    Now I know. Today at work I kept looking out the window, reassured to see the un-marred Houston skyline. I thought of the many possible stategic sites that could be hit in Houston, of refineries that could spew poisens for days, of skyscrapers here full of people.

    And I thought of that Palistinian village. They've been living with this kind of terror for months, even years.

    This attack did not occur in a vacuum. Certainly those responsible committed a horrible act. But responding with another horrible act wouldn't help. Do we blow up Afghanni families, just in case it was Osama Bin Laden? Do we push the Israelis to attack large Palistinian areas, only to find it was another Timothy McVey?

    Regardless of whether one agrees with the current administrations foreign policies, it would be reasonable to recognize a very real arrogance in the dispensation of those policies. The United States acts like it is the invulnerable master, the king of the hill, casting justice and consensus aside. Just this week the US refused to participate in a UN conference on racism. We do anything we want, and dare anyone to try and do anything about it.

    Someone did. It would only make things worse to react in an agressive military fashion. Certainly justice must be served, but it should be measured, accurate and appropriate.

    America is a special place, luckier than most humans have ever seen. We spend most of our time planning parties and designing toys. When something like this happens we should step back, look at the BIG picture, and reflect - what have we done to help? Has any one of us written to a congressman, expressing concern over continued financial support of the heavy-handed Israelis? How many of us even NOTICE what our foreign policy is?

    Several media reports have referred to this as a second Pearl Harbour. We would be wise to recall that our enemies in that conflict are now some of our staunchest allies. Also forgotten was the American blockade of fuel oil to Japan, precipitating the attack.

    This morning the first person I talked to after I heard the news was a black man in an auto parts store. He was lamenting the fighting in the middle east, pointing out that here in Houston such strife is all but unthinkable. The Hispanic parts salesman and I agreed.

    The United States is a unique culture, made up of disparate cultures themselves sometimes at odds with each other in their respective homelands. Now one of these conflicts has struck our home. A strong response is appropriate, but we should also look at our actions and attitudes, and take what measure of responsibility is ours. Then, maybe instead of dealing with a symptom, we can address a cause - perhaps even right a wrong.

    1. Re:reflection on comments posted by SailorBob · · Score: 1
      A couple of days ago I heard a report about a Palistinian village. Israel had suspected that terrorists were there, so Israeli tanks surrounded the village, bombarded it, and left.

      The report you heard was wrong. It's straight Arab propaganda. Nothing like that has ever happened here in Israel. City have been surround by tanks at times of heavy fighting between Arab Police/Soldiers/Terrorists but Israel has NEVER bombarded an Arab town in the way that you describe. The only terror and the only terrorists here are Arabs.

      --

      Woopty Doo Basil, what does it all mean?!

    2. Re:reflection on comments posted by Placido · · Score: 1

      Israel has NEVER bombarded an Arab town in the way that you describe.

      Oh wait, I forgot - they use helicopters and missiles to bombard Arab towns... and then they leave.

      --

      Pinky: "What are we going to do tomorrow night Brain?"
      Brain: "I would tell you Pinky but this 120 char limi
    3. Re:reflection on comments posted by Spike_/\_ · · Score: 1

      What about refugee camps being shelled and rocketed? Because they harbored, or were suspected of harboring, terrorists. "The only terror and the only terrorists here are Arabs" - this also sounds like propaganda, because it paints one side as perfect. So the Israeli security forces, and the Mossad, they're perfect? Because they are carrying out the Will of God? You know, from an early age, I admired the Israelis - brave men and "sabras", standing together to defend their new nation against the treacherous arab hordes. It took decades for all my rationalizations to wear out.

  826. I work right there!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    holy shit!

    I work roughtly a mile from there (4 New York Plaza), right by the Staton Island ferry. I was just logging into my computer when somebody walked in and said that a plane had hit the WTC. I went downstairs to battery park, where there is a clear view of the towers, and saw the 2nd plane fly overhead and into the 2nd tower. Huge explosion and fireball. I will never forget that sight! People were in various stages of shock, many people crying or walking around in a daze. I stood there dumbfounded for about 10 minutes, in a state of disbelief, before remembering hearing that the last time terrorists tried to take out the WTC they put a bunch of poison with the bomb to kill more people - but the explosion burnt the poison. I feared that something like that would happen agian, so I told some people to get the hell out of there and took off. I went into my building and sent off a quick email to my parents that I was alive and headed out. The subways were all down, and I wouldn't have ridden them in any case, so I started the 4 mile walk home, making a wide skirt around the lower part of the island to stay as far away from the towers as possible. Then, when crossing an intersection, I saw that there was a clear view of the towers, so I stopped to look. Just then the 1st tower dropped!!! A huge dark cloud of smoke started rushing down the avenue directly towards me. Me and the hundreds of other people turned and fled for our lives - true panic. I kept looking over my shoulder and the smoke was getting closer. I don't think a huge skyscraper like this had ever collapsed before, so I had no idea what the behaviour of the debris would be like. For all I knew, there could be huge chunks of concrete rolling down the street towards me. I ran. I thought the that smoke was going to suffocate me if it caught me. It was coming fast. I got to the end of the road and was confronted with the water. The streets were clogged with panicing people, and I admit that I wasn't thinking to clearly either. I decided that my best bet would be to jump in the water and start swimming, but the smoke got to me and turned out to be dust. I was hanging over the edge of the railing trying to decide if not jumping would mean death by smoke inhalation. After realizing that it wasn't smoke that I was breathing, I decided that it would be better to run through the dust and get upwind of the towers. A few minutes later I heard the 2nd tower fall. Thousands of people were walking up the sidewalk, through the dust.


    I made it home, called all the relatives and friends, then paced back and forth across my living room for about 20 minutes before finding out that the hospitals were calling for blood donations. I went to two different hospitals but was turned away - they were flooded with donors. THANK YOU DONORS!


    I am not soon going to forget the sight of that
    plane flying into the building. The Horror.

  827. Compassion first, then action by cvanaver · · Score: 1

    Our first responsibility, as Americans, is to recover. To help the families and survivors of this horrible, cowardly act. Give blood (I already have). Call your loved ones, if they think you were indanger. I, personaly, was working in the WTC as little as 6 months ago. If my project had still been there, instead of moving to Mid-Town, myself and nearly all of my friends would be dead. With that said, I encourage discipline, as opposed to knee-jerk reactions, in response to these actions.

    Is bin Laden responsible, maybe, maybe not. I don't care. He was responsible for the last attack on WTC and should be hunted down and brought to justice. Anyone who harbors him should face the same consequences. In no way do I encourage mass-invasions or tactical nuclear strikes. Killing more innocents is not the answer.

    A better solution is to be aggressive about terroism. First and foremost, protect against terroism. Improve security, be more vigilant about pursing terroist organizations, support governments in their actions against terrorism (England, Isreal, India) and be more forceful (economic) in dealing with countries that support terrorism (Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, etc).

    Finally, acknowledge and react to the fact that the US is neither above nor immune to terrorism. Become active in the elimination of terror. This is in two aspects: 1) Become more sympathetic to world-opinion of the US behavior and react accordingly in areas where it does not comprimise our beliefs as a society 2)hunt down and eliminate those who are actively and violently opposed to the US presence in the international community.

    How long does it take for us to call an enemy and enemy? How long does it take to or us to realize there is a war oing on aroundus? How many civilians must die before we are willing to go over political concerns and take action into our own hands? Bombing Afghanistan is not the answer, infiltrating and eliminating danerous individuals and groups is. This attack has raised analogies about Pearl Harbor and the 'waking of a sleeping giant'. The US IS A GIANT, but a giant approach is not the reaction that will be effective. Aircraft carriers are not the answer. Nuclear weapons are not the answer. Intelligence and surgical operations are an acceptable response. The US has some of the best trained military professionals in the world. Now is the time to use them. No more courts, no more bombs, no more FBI, just well-placed bullets to the back of the head. And not just Bin Laden, all those who threaten the US with violence should be dealt with accordingly.

  828. Re:American Imperialism (was This is where brains. by khyron664 · · Score: 1

    Um....What crack pipe were you smoking when you wrote this? It seems to have completely disconnected you from reality.

    I'm not saying the US is perfect in it's dealings with other nations, but NOTHING can justify this. This violence is very real to all Americans, and that fact that you would suggest otherwise tells me you have no idea what the hell you are talking about. You've obviously never been affiliated with a country that has this massive an attack against it. Pearl Harbor was bad, and this is worse.

    The people who have committed these violent acts of terror are cowards who refuse to fight for themselves. Anyone can die, it takes real people to live and fight for their cause. America is criticised by people and nations all the time (many people on slashdot do so daily), so to say these people had to resort to this sort of violence is stupid. In fact, since no one has taken credit for it, they can't be making much of a statement now can they? And when did killing tens of thousands of people help anyone's cause in ANY way? The answer is it doesn't. These people deserve no sympathy.

    Try thinking a little before you post next time. Your post is just offensive jibberish.

    Khyron

  829. Re:But it *doesn't* solve things by hearingaid · · Score: 2
    This was a superbly well organised and executed operation on the part of the perpetrators, whoever they were, but it was also an incredibly cheap one. I should be surprised if the whole budget for the operation exceeded $100,000.

    In a way, this is true. In another way, it is not.

    Normally, when a terrorist group commandeers an airplane, all they need are weapons on board the plane and the ability to persuade the pilot to do what they want, normally achieved by threatening to kill everyone aboard.

    In this case, they could not have had the ability to persuade the pilot to do what they wanted --- because they wanted to do something which would kill everyone aboard, including the pilot. You can't threaten somebody like that: "Kill yourself or I will kill you." A rational person will refuse, and hope that you don't really mean it - there's no point in going along.

    So they must have had at least one trained pilot on each flight. Admittedly, they wouldn't have need a commercial pilot; an ordinary military pilot would be okay. But even that?

    How much is a military pilot worth? More than $20,000? Now multiply that by 5.

    This is why there are a limited number of possible organizations capable of pulling this off. Hell, the IRA couldn't have pulled this one off. (Not that they would have, at least not this way - even with the Manchester and Canary Wharf bombs, there were warning calls made.)

    And now those five pilots are lost. We just have to hope there's no terrorist organizations out there with 35 pilots in their ranks. Imagine... ugh.

    --

    my old sig used to be funny, but then slashcode ate it and now it's not funny anymore

  830. Preventing a Martial Law/Police State backlash by remande · · Score: 2, Insightful
    As other posters have mentioned, the government is likely to respond to this attack by attempting to severly curtail personal freedoms in a "war on terrorism".


    I am taking a pre-emptive strike against that, and I invite you all to join in. The fun part is, it's all completely non-violent and legal. All you kill are trees.


    I am writing my congressman and senators. I ask other Slashdotters to do the same. You can find them and their mailing addresses at www.house.gov and www.senate.gov.


    You will want to snailmail them on this one. Snailmail seems to have more impact on legislators than email.


    Come up with your own wording, or use my words below as a template (or even literally--I don't mind).


    This day has seen a tremendous tragedy. We must remember, however, to be deliberate in how we react to this horror.

    There has been a lot of political pressure lately to get on a "tough on crime" bandwagon. This bandwagon believes that we must give up certain constitutional freedoms in order to better protect ourselves. Thus we have attempts to limit ownership of weapons, attempts to legislate the internet, attempts to criminalize the civilian use of cryptographic privacy, and so forth. There is a knee-jerk reaction, whenever the United States is attacked, to trade basic American freedoms for supposed security.

    I am writing to plead with you to fight this bandwagon. Yes, we must be tough on crime. Yes, we absolutely must discover who did this to us and take whatever steps are necessary to neutralize the threat. But to attempt to do so by removing our freedoms is doomed to failure and destructive to America as a whole. To do that would be to cooperate with the terrorists who wish to destroy us.

    Though you are likely thinking along the same lines, I must point out that this was a difficult, professional attack that took elite personnel--something entirely different from the regular street crime our police face every day. They successfully hijacked three or four aircraft in one day, without one failed attempt. They bypassed some of the toughest security civilians are subject to. The caliber of terrorist that must have done this will be unfettered by attempts to control gun ownership, internet usage, cryptography or dozens of other laws. The penalty of law is irrelevant when you are willing to die in your attack. If you can get a weapon past security (which I must assume these people did), getting your hands on one in the first place is easy, regardless of how many laws are in place.

    If we, as a nation, react to this by instituting laws "for our own protection" that stomp all over the freedoms guaranteed in the Constitution of the United States, we will do no harm to those who attack us, but tremendous harm to our own law-abiding citizens.

    Terrorism is a form of warfare that does not attack our military assets, but the spirit of the civilians. Though it looks otherwise, the war is not fought in New York, not fought at the Pentagon, not fought at Oklahoma City. It is fought in the halls of Congress. I ask you to stand tall and fight for the values that make America great against your colleagues who think it is safest to stay in our foxholes and turn the United States into a police state. This will not be popular, but it is needed.

    I thank you for your time, your attention, and your courage.
    --

    --The basis of all love is respect

    1. Re:Preventing a Martial Law/Police State backlash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes please send your snail mail, by the time it gets to your senator (with mail being crippled by the fact that there are no flights atm) it might get there in time for them to read it as they watch the US Military turn the middle east into a giant fucking glass parking lot on CNN!

  831. Why? by vldmr_krn · · Score: 1

    Because America has taken sides in so many conflicts, because America has armed so many countris' enemies, because America has imposed so many "solutions" on so many people, because American troops occupy so many countries, the world has become dangerous for America.

    Foreigners generally love McDonald's but hate our government. Foreign politicians explot that hatred. And now and then foreign terrorists try--or pretend to try--to change our government's policies by bombing American targets here or abroad.

    But our policies don't change, because politicians never respond by letting go of their power. So, instead of doing something to eliminate the motive for actual or threatened terrorism, our politicians "fight" it with even more foreign adventures.

    And they issue a steady stream of alarms about frightening problems around the world--all of which supposedly require our immediate attention and intervention.

    But why should we have anything to fear? Our country is bounded by two friendly nations and two oceans that protect us from invasion. We are open only to the sky. Our first military concern should be to defend ourselves against missiles launched from overseas.

    [...]

    How would a Libertarian government assure our safety?

    Our foreign policy would be simple:

    • We are always ready to defend ourselves, but we threaten no one.

    [...]

    Harry Browne, The Great Libertarian Offer

  832. Korean Jet Forced Down in B.C. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.komotv.com/story24.htm

    WHITE HORSE, Yukon Territory -- A Korean Airlines 747 believed to have been hijacked has been forced to land by U.S. and Canadian military forces in White Horse, Yukon Territory.

    The plane, with an estimated 230 passengers, was destined for Alaska, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police said.

    The airport was in lockdown.

  833. Actually they did declare war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... at least if "they" are who most people think they are. That's what a jihad is, isn't it?

    So I guess not being a country is what makes you a terrorist rather than a soldier.

  834. Re:Three Step Loop: ID, Locate, Eradicate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Above all, we show that we are rational humans, and not dogs that bite because we were bit.

    Ah, the gentle voice of reason. You and I will be lonely people over the next few days and weeks, my friend.

  835. Never be the same.... by linuxrunner · · Score: 2

    Nothing will be the same again... Ever. This is truly a sad day. I'm not a religous man, but praying may be a good thing right now. I feel for those who may have lost loved ones... and don't know. I also feel for those who do. May mercy come swiftly for the perpetrators.... No act of terrorism on the US will be tolerated.

    Linuxrunner

    --
    www.slightlycrewed.com - Because aren't we all?
  836. words of thought by poil11 · · Score: 1

    i am deeply saddened by what has happened today. my sympathy for everyone who lost someone today. a stupid movie that people need to see, the siege. history that people need to read up on, pearl harbor. why? because you can learn what happened to the japanese after the attack in america. you should learn about internment camps that america had. Abortion, tax releif, are just ways to sidetrack the most important thing. education. education of history, education of people.

  837. Re:Unlikelyhood of sucessful simultaneous hijackin by mpe · · Score: 2

    Do you know the kind of security surrounding civil aviation?? I was a former airline employee...I have seen firsthand the security at our airports.

    There certainly are cases of airline employees crashing planes also the attempt to destroy Federal Express by a disruntaled employee.

  838. Don't Tread On Me! by zulux · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    Google Image Search for all your "Don't Tread On Me Flag" needs:

    http://images.google.com/images?q=don%27t+tread+on +me+flag

    --

    Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

  839. Where to DONATE BLOOD in the NY or NJ area by Glog · · Score: 2, Informative

    People will die without it - here is information on where to donate:

    http://www.nybloodcenter.org/

    Even if you don't live in the NY or NJ area any sort of blood donation is needed! There are huge lines today at Red Cross but blood will be needed in the coming days as well.

  840. What Would Jesus Read? by SomePoorSchmuck · · Score: 1
    The peoples of Israel and Palestine have had centuries of time to hate each other. This is a conflict that has been well over 2000 years in progress. Because we support Israel, many over there transfer the same conflict to us. Perhaps you might read the Holy Bible sometime- it documents the source of the conflict in detail and shows why it's not likely to ever go away as long as we're on this Earth.

    Perhaps you might put down your Holy Bible and pick up a History Book, and find out that the "Middle East Conflict" around which we all walk so carefully is primarily a land-use, and not an ethnic, issue resulting from the colonialism of European powers [the UK]. In fact, up until the early 20th century and the resurgence of Zionism, semitic peoples, muslim and jew, lived together in mostly amicable, though often separate, enclaves. By arbitrarily, forcefully partitioning the land and then giving control of it to one group, the United Kingdom & other post-WWII powers forced the semites into vehemently opposed ethnic positions. Palestinians lost their homelands, and Israelis were cast into the terrible position of having to wage eternal war on the Palestinians in order to survive. Both sides are the victims of history.

    The Bible is a great religious text, but it really disturbs me to know that Christians all assume that it is the only source of information, and so all other knowledge can be discarded.

    Of course, if you take the Bible to be the record of Jehovah's covenant[s] with different humans and groups of humans over the last 6000 years, then you already believe that the land east of the Mediterranean was given to the Israelites for all eternity and that no one else has any valid claim to it. It is precisely this poor separation of religious practice and realistic policy that has us supporting Israel financially and militarily, as it practices apartheid in its area.

    --

    Hollywood, Television, has become the dream machine. We need to take that back; each of us is a Dream Machine
    1. Re:What Would Jesus Read? by smartfart · · Score: 1
      By arbitrarily, forcefully partitioning the land...

      Um, you might want to pick up your Bible again and take a look at the maps in the back. The State of Israel today is exactly where it was in Old Testament times. Nothing arbitrary about it.

  841. My Dad says by mtaco · · Score: 1

    I was talking to my dad and he had some interesting facts:

    1. The WTC was built by the Port Authority, therefore it was mostly exempt from building codes.

    2. When the WTC was being built the fire department was up in arms about it.

    3. In 194x a B-52 crashed into the Empire State building doing minimal damage.

    4. When watching the footage of the collapse, my dad said it collapse from the top down, which indicates a structural failure.

    Elsewhere someone commented that the FEMA review of the WTC after the 1993 bombing pointed this out.

    1. Re:My Dad says by doce · · Score: 1

      If I'm not mistaken, the aircraft that crashed into the ESB was B-45, not a B-52.

      As well, the World Trade Center was built specifically to take a direct hit from a Boeing 707 jet, significantly smaller than the 757's and 767's used in the attacks.

      --
      woof!
    2. Re:My Dad says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe it was a B-24 lost in the fog. The B-52 didn't come around until 1953/4.

      -a

    3. Re:My Dad says by elh01 · · Score: 1

      You still got it wrong. The ESB crash was a B-25 and it occurred in 1945.

    4. Re:My Dad says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They collapsed from the top down? That indicates a structural failure? How fucking suprising, considering that two commercial airliners flew through them. Jesus fucking christ, how stupid are you?


      One of the towers survived a truck bomb that took out about 10 floors, withou falling. After that incident both towers were strengthened with reinforcing columns. There is no way any building engineers could plan for have designed enough strength into two 1300 foot towers of their size to prevent collapse after damage of this scale.

    5. Re:My Dad says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you knew anything about physics and structural engineering then you would look at your post and shoot yourself for YOU being such a dumbass.

    6. Re:My Dad says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you should shut your fuckin face, don't give me a load about physics and how right you are, a HUGE ass crisis just happened to the U.S, and you are worrying about some guy who is 100% RIGHT!!!! GOD! THE BUILDING GOT HIT BY TWO FUCKING HUGE COMMERCIAL JETS, WHAT THE HELL YOU THINK IS GONNA HAPPEN? MINIMAL DAMAGE? HELL NO.

  842. 2.5 hours by DrSpoo · · Score: 1

    It took 2.5 hours to evacuate the towers when the first bombing happened several years ago. There is no way they got even half the people out in 30 minutes, I'm afraid to say :(

    Not to mention the brave firefighters actually going into the building to help others get out.

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
  843. Israeli Civilian = Oxymoron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are no Israeli civilians either, everyone is part of the reserves and does military service.

  844. Americans? No way, man by ColGraff · · Score: 2

    I doubt even McVeigh would have done something THIS evil - compared to this, he was a rank amateur. No way an American would even think of this. More importantly, wouldn't it be sort of hard to hide all the planning and organization elements in the USA?

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
  845. It's easier than that. by iphayd · · Score: 1

    All someone has to do is bring a modified medicinal oxygen tank onboard. The modification is that it holds two separate gasses. One for the assailant to breathe (air) through the mouthpiece and one for everyone else to breathe through a modified valve. Since they aren't looking for hostages, this gas could either disable or kill through breathing.

    Once the gas has spread enough to disable everyone else, the assailant has free reign to shut off the autopilot, and steer the plane into whatever they want, without any need to use a projectile weapon.

    Now that I've explained how this could happen, I will introduce one method to reduce hijacking. Lock and seal the cockpit. Allow no communications to enter the cockpit.

    This would make it so that no matter what a hijacker would do, the pilot is not able to do anything about it. Also, because of a locked door, the assailant is no longer able to commandeer the plane, even if the pilot's abilities are disabled. With the ability to change the course of an aircraft disabled, there is no reason to hijack it anymore, although they could still try to keep people hostage on the ground.

  846. Reagan punted when 241 marines died Beiruit 1983 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reagan was pretty useless in the aftermath of the terrorist attack on the marine base in Beiruit in 1983. Oh, he swore to track down and punish, but no target was ever found. And the Marine presence in Beruit was "re-deployed" to ships on the Sixth Fleet offshore in Feb 1984.

    My point isn't that Reagan was particularly ineffective; rather that there's not much you can do until you identify an enemy, and terrorist enemies can be pretty hard to find. Most of the threats made are going to be pretty empty.

  847. Machiavelli would agree with you by ColGraff · · Score: 2

    He said, in essence, that while nonviolence is preferable in theory, when violence is neccessary it should be applied until your enemy is completely and utterly destroyed. That way, he can't see vengeance upon you.

    I don't want a war, but if we have to have one, let's win it. No mercy, no pulling back, no amnesty. We go into whatever the country is that sponsored this (if there is one), we destroy the military structure completely, and we occupy the country indefinatly. Everyone involved in today's atrocity, we kill. Let's not indulge in Gulf War type half-measures.

    We can never let this happen again. The best way to prevent it, as others have already pointed out, is to kill those with the desire and means to do such things. Worry about morality later - our nation's safety and security comes first.

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
  848. Dangerous Ideas by virg_mattes · · Score: 2

    > What works in war is to wage war.

    Agreed. Do not, however, interpret this to mean that I agree with your assessment that this was an act of war. I do not. See below.

    > Anyone who feels that this attack is short of war is a fool.

    Your opinion of what war and terrorism are is not even supported by terrorists, and your assessment that I'm a fool because I disagree with you is unfounded.

    > It is now time to stop the practice of government sponsored terrorism.

    You're treading on awesomely thin ice here if you're American. For example, the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan a while back, purportedly to counter terrorist attacks. A group named the Taliban (sound familiar?) sprang up to counter the invasion. The U.S. sent aids, guns and money to them, purportedly to stop the spread of communism. The caves and bunkers in Afghanistan that protected the rebels from carpet bombing (and, more recently, our cruise missiles) were built by Americans, for crying out loud. Guess how the Taliban fought the Russians? That's right, hit-and-run raids (with intelligance fed to them from U.S. sources) and bombings, including suicide bombings against buildings in cities thought to hold Russian military officials, including a hotel at one point. Please note that none of this is speculation, and is documented in government files (that are available under the FOIA). We were quite proud of our efforts to stem the Red tide then. Now, what was that you said about government-sponsored terrorism?

    > Perhaps you will mail some flowers to the Taliban in hopes
    > that they will see the world your way!


    Or maybe the flowers will remind them where they got their seed money. See above.

    > The US has tried many things to answer terrorism. It is time
    > to give up on the judicial approach and use more effective assets and
    > send a stronger message.


    We tried that, too. Remember a backwater country called Vietnam? We sent massive military forces to the country, only to find that massive military might doesn't work very well against terrorism. Take another try.

    > ...the Afghans, for example, have already demonstrated their
    > knowledge of "plausable deniability"...


    So have we. Review the Iran/Contra scandal documents and Oliver North's (and Ronald Reagan's) testimony.

    > With the growing sophistication of terror devices, and the
    > mounting death toll, the free nations of the world must treat
    > sponsorship of terrorism as equivalent to acts of war.


    They already do, which is a large part of the problem.

    > The US probably lost more citizens in this attack than in the
    > Pearl Harbor attack, and these citizens were civilians of a free and
    > generous society.


    How very patriotic, and how irrelevant. Does it matter how many people died? As a case in point, many fewer people died in the Murrah building's destruction than today, but that loss is just as tragic as this. This statement serves only to pump up the rage so that it interferes with resolution of the issue, and makes us all want to go out and do rash things that won't help in the end.

    > We will respond.

    As we should. The question remains how we respond.

    > We can only hope that those other free countries, such as France and
    > Germany, which have been happy to trade with terrorist countries, will join us.


    Again, you need to consider what your own country is doing before you accuse others. See above.

    I don't wish to imply that I'm unaffected by these events. In fact, I'm outraged and spitting bile at this point. But I must temper that anger with two thoughts: first, what was it that got us here to begin with, and second, what action will minimize the likelihood that we'll be here again? The "kill 'em all" attitude doesn't seem to fit the second part very well, so I'm left to consider what does.

    Virg

  849. not likely by Danse · · Score: 2

    Any terrorist group that can pull off an attack like this probably has people clamoring to join up. The suicide hijackers will be martyrs to the cause and an inspiration to the other memebers of the organization. This will likely cause the ranks of the organization to swell in the near future.

    --
    It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
  850. Canadian Border by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FYI

    The Canadian border is still open BUT get ready for some very strong verifications...

    Info from Radio-Canada TV and TVA television.

  851. More info and pics from an eyewitness by Legion303 · · Score: 2, Informative
  852. Echelon by onyxruby · · Score: 2

    Please, tell me, do people here still believe in Echelon? If this isn't overwhelming evidence that Echelon is a paranoids pipe dream, I don't know what is.

    1. Re:Echelon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      translating (roughly) from a German newssite:
      On todays Wednesday, September the 5th, the European Parliament passed of the "Echelon" investigation committee. [...]
      Five years after the publication of the book [Nicky Hagers first report on Echelon] the existence of echelon is no longer denied but confirmed and condemned by the European Union. The committee had worked for one year and presented its report in July. It concluded: Echelon exists but there is few that can be done against it.


      The report also states that there is significant industry spionage going on although that cannot be proven.

      As to the question if Echelon exists this should clear things. As to whether it is as powerful as some people think: thats another question. Personally I believe intercepting any communication is possible. But even with the means of modern technologies, reading it all is not.

  853. Perhaps now Americans will stop funding the IRA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Firstly, I'd like to express my deepest sympathies for today's tragic events. As a disclaimer, I would also like to add that I am pro-British.

    Americans seem to be largely sympathetic to the Irish Republic in this dispute. I'm hoping that with some first-hand experience of terrorism, many Americans will change their attitudes. Out of some kind of misguided sense of Irish decendency and loyalty, many Americans have funded the IRA--an illegal terrorist organisation.

    The IRA (and its new brand, The Real IRA) have caused death and destruction throughout the UK. Anyone who funds Sinn Fein (and thus IRA) is wholly irresponsible. Sinn Fein are little more than a shallow front for the IRA.

    The pro-British paramilitaries are no ray of sunshine, don't get me wrong. Yet compared to the IRA, they're naughty school kids. Take, for instance, the recent Holy Cross school dispute. Of course, it is wrong to harass children. But the situation is not as simple as that, and the international press seems unconcerned that a protestant boy has been brutally run over in a sectarian attack. Loyalists aren't the only bad guys.

    Please don't fund Sinn Fein / IRA. You've felt the same sort of pain we experience here. If you fund them, you're funding terrorism.

  854. This is where investigative work comes in by ColGraff · · Score: 2

    I agree killing people for the actions of others is wrong, so we need to find out who did the thing. And once we do, we need to kill them. Not talk with them - this was a premeditated attack on innocent, unarmed civilians. No, we kill them as quickly as possible. If they are just terrorists, then we are avenged and can stop. If the perpetrators were a nation-state, we must occupy that country to make sure they never do this again. Will that be bloody? Yes, in all liklihood. But we need to protect ourselves - this means we need to take away the ability of others to launch this sort of attack.

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
  855. Well, you had Hiroshima and Nagasaki... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, shut the fuck up, try to be a little less trouble seekers/makers and learn something from this.

  856. Re:Towelhead Payback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Are you a skinhead?
    No

    If a black man shot the President, would you go around beating up all other men of color?
    No, just black ones. Not even really beat them up, just some guerilla tatics. Most black guys could probably kick my ass.

    Listen as*wipe, the wrapping on someone's head signifies their religeous belief. It has nothing to do with their politics.
    So? Their people killed some of my people. For that they pay, I don't care what their politics are just like they didn't care about the politics of my people.

    I'm not for censorship, but you are pushing the rights and limits of free speech
    How is that? Why shouldn't I be able to express my racist views?

  857. Korean 747 NOT hijacked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seattle Television news is now reporting that the Korean 747 which recently made an unscheduled landing in Whitehorse, B.C. had not been hijacked, but was running low on fuel.

  858. Re:But it *doesn't* solve things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    As long as people would rather die then live under your thumb they will commit suicide attacks.

    Not pick at nits... but the people who funded, planned and carried out this attack almost assuredly do not live "under the thumb" of the US government.

    The truth of the matter is that while the US government has repeatedly done everything it can to promote peace in the Middle East, the people who live there do not want peace. They want to kill each other, and we - as a nation - are hated and called the "Great Satan" because we would (admittedly for very selfish reasons) like to see people not killing each other.

    Now, if you can tell me how asking people to not kill each other and instead sit down and talk like rational human beings about resolving their differences can be considered overbearing and worthy of the death of 10K+ civilians, then maybe I'll listen to you. But you can't.

  859. 11 Planes on the 11th Day by anneabel · · Score: 1

    Anyone else hear about this?

    The RUMOR is that there was a guy in the Phillipines, staying in a hotel, building a chemical bomb. (Quick note: chem bombs are undetectable by dogs. That is the kind of bomb suspected to have been set off when one of the planes crashed into the WTC, presumably planted there to make the explosion bigger.) The bomb blew up, inside the building. They later found his laptop, which contained the plans for hijacking 11 planes, and crashing them into strategic points. All of this has happened today as well.

    That's just the rumor I've heard. The 11 planes on the 11th day seems to be true, and you can quite easily come to the conlusion as to why this day was chosen.

    My thoughts and prayers go out to all those affected by today's horrific tragedy.

    --


    ---------
    You rip me up and spread me all around in the dust of the deed of time.
    1. Re:11 Planes on the 11th Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the plan was for 11 planes to be bombed, not rammed into buildings.

      They did find plans to crash a small plane into the CIA hq in langley virginia on the same laptop, though. They had even trained a pilot in Texas for such a task.

  860. False alarm by Animats · · Score: 3, Informative

    The CBC website is now reporting this was a mistake. The airliners were off course and low on fuel due to being diverted from closed airports.

  861. Holding an entire country responsible is insane by chris_7d0h · · Score: 1

    GWB's statement and others voiced in this forum about blaming an entire country for one (or a few) individuals' acts are crazy and send the wrong signals to the rest of the world.

    To highlight the absurdity of the statement, imagine that these planes had hit for example Big Ben or Buckingham palace in England. If it later turned out that it was some dissident american group responsible, would punishing the american nation by military means (say, by the combined forces of the EU and Russia for example) be justified? Killing thousands, hundred of thousands of americans for the sole reason that the dissident(s) came from american soil?

    I think not.

    GWB is hardly helping getting sympathies from other nations (not only for this incident).
    Hopefully the next american president will be a person with more reason than this hot-livered "boy". America needs and foremost deserves such a leader, suitable for governing this great nation with reason instead of boyish impulses and provocative statements.

    --
    In a society that believes in nothing, fear becomes the only agenda ~ Bill Durodié
    1. Re:Holding an entire country responsible is insane by flatrock · · Score: 2

      GWB's statement and others voiced in this forum about blaming an entire country for one (or a few) individuals' acts are crazy and send the wrong signals to the rest of the world.

      If the government of that country is harboring and supporting these terrorists, then that government must be held accountable. Unfortunately, citizens often pay the price for the actions of their government. If the govenment isn't acting in their best interests, then they need to put in place a new govenment that will better represent them. If there is a way to directly get at the people who are responsible for these acts, including those who harbor and support them, then that is the best solution. If however, we can't do that then the people of that nation will likely suffer through economic sanctions and possibly even war. If the facts lead us to Afganistan supporting these terrorist acts, then we will likely be imposing sanction and possibly supporting the rebels that are carying on a revolutionary war there. I don't know much about those rebels, and it is possible that we really don't want them in power either. In any case, the United States needs to take action to prevent this from happening again. We must send a message to those nations who make public announcement that they don't support such actions, but still harbor these people and let them operate and even train terrorists within their borders.

  862. Re:Bastards. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MiddleEasternCrazy==Muslim? You've got a short memory, haven't you? Remember some dude called Baruch Goldstein?

  863. David Brin's transparent society by TheFrood · · Score: 2

    David Brin, the science-fiction author, has long been a proponent of a transparent society, i.e., ubiquitous surveillance in public areas, with public access to all cameras. Law enforcement officials can watch everything you do out of doors, but you can also watch _them_. So the surveillance helps the police do their job, while at the same time providing a check against abuse of their power.

    Brin's rationale is that at some point the police/spooks/Bill Gates will have the ability to monitor everything that goes on in public whether we like it or not. Privacy is a lost cause, so let's not worry about it, but rather focus on keeping our freedom.

    Events this morning have made me start to think that this is the way to go.

    TheFrood

    --
    If you say "I'll probably get modded down for this..." then I will mod you down.
  864. Shame on you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Whoever made that picture must be some 12 year old idiot whose brain can't comprehend the sheer horror of what happened. tens of thousands of innocent people just died, and you would have to have some sort of emotional problem to be able to make fun of that. How can you even post a link to that? It's absolutely indecent.


    The same goes for those who think they are clever by posting SOMEONE SET UP WTC THE BOMB and shit like that. Fucking morons.

  865. Better than the alternatives. by Jason+Earl · · Score: 2

    The U.S. certainly isn't perfect, but it is far better than any of the alternatives that this world has ever seen. Sure, our economic policies don't always work 100% effectively, but the U.S. subjugation, as you term it, has been a lot more gentle than any other regime in the history of the world. We even let you keep your beliefs and as much as your culture as you can hang onto in the onslaught of McDonalds and Hollywood. Heck, we even let other countries beat us at the economic game. U.S. influence might be great, but so is the influence of several of our former enemies (Japan and Germany).

    As for those mothers in Iraq. It's not our fault that they live in a country lead by a madman. If the U.S. ignored Iraq, and let it's leaders do what they wanted (and attack whomever they pleased) things would only get worse for the normal Iraqi citizen. Don't throw that problem at the feet of the U.S. Sure, we are meddlers, and we drive a hard bargain for our aid, but would you honestly rather have a Middle East dominated by Iraqi warlords?

    I agree with your assessment that justice and freedom need to be spread. I would also add education to that mix, however. Educated citizenry will generally choose justice and freedom for themselves, and if they don't, well, there is little that can be done for them. Education is certainly the only viable way to get rid of hate and prejudice (and even that fails to work very well sometimes).

  866. Re:Predictions - Good bye DHCP by paranoic · · Score: 1
    One more prediction: A way of tying your IP address to a physical locatation. After all if the government is going to come busting down your door because of your encrypted emails, don't they need to know whose door to bust down?

    Oh wait a minute isn't there already a plan to tie them to your phone number? (Don't have the link though).

  867. Pentagon denied rumor F16 shot down PA plane by sulli · · Score: 2

    please update.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  868. There was _NO_ war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    US and NATO attacked Yugoslavia without declaration of war. Reason for attack was that Yugoslavia didn't sign treaty dictated by NATO. In everyday life such a behavior is called extortion.

    Terror does not taste sweet. How do you think did it taste for those people who died when the US bombed that
    Belgrade Hospital?

  869. I disagree. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You have to consider the possibility that there are some people whose way of life is fundamentally incompatable with yours.

    ...someone that I can make amends with without making an unacceptable compromise of my integrity.

    That's true, to an extent. But you're also saying (indirectly) that killing people in retaliation is not an unacceptable comprimise to your integrity. So you're saying that you're rather kill someone than live with someone whose ideas oppose yours.

    If you think about it, that's probably the exact attitude those people on the planes had. That same attitude allows people to commit an atrocity and say, "They deserved it." No one deserves it. The rights to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness should be universal - but because other people do not choose to think that way, this is the very reason that America must NOT choose to strike back against civilian targets. Total annihilation brings about only more extremists, more violence. The only real solution to prevent this from happening again is a peaceful one, followed up by a severe change in American foreign policy.

    I don't have an account on here, but feel free to email me at asjbc3@uaa.alaska.edu with comments or flames.

  870. Re:Nostradamus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "In the City of God [money/power]
    there will be a great thunder, [boom?]

    Two brothers [the towers?] torn apart by Chaos,

    while the fortress endures, [pentagon?]

    the great leader will succumb" , [usa?]

    "The third big war will begin when the big city is burning" [ny?]

    - Nostradamus 1654

  871. Bin Laden or Strangelove? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems interesting that we are so quick to blame the Arabs just as we did with OKC on this, the 3 month anniversary of McVeigh's execution. Obviously the pilots used in the attack had flown commercial (or military) planes before. You can't just thread the Manhattan skyline after a few rounds of flight sim. Does Bin Laden have access to 4 commecial pilots willing to suicide? Or is it more likely that some whacked disgruntled ex-military pilots, now part of a rightwing paramilitary, made good on the threat to try to overthrow the government. Who stands the better chance of hijacking a plane unnoticed, a guy with olive skin and a khafia or an average joe in a suit.

    Just as with OKC, all the major terrorist organizations have disavowed the attack (rather unlike the crowing you hear after a bomb blast in an Israeli market). Just like OKC, no one has come forward to claim their prize.

    I'm not saying Bin Laden didn't do it. Just keep in mind we have our share of disturbed zealots capable of this act right here in the good ole USA.

  872. Overview by Cairsten · · Score: 1
    Okay. We've batted the same arguments back and forth all day. Things are quieting down, now, and still the facts are horrible, and will get no less horrible as the numbers get tallied.

    We have dead terrorists, yes. Somehow, though, I doubt that the originators of the plot are among them. The leaders of such things never do seem to do us the favour of eliminating themselves for us.

    We have an atrocity.

    We have a situation that will decide the course of our foreign relations for a long time. The US will never again have as clear or as much justification for removing any known terrorist faction from the playing field as we do today, with ~50,000 dead.

    If we do nothing, we will never again have the support to take action that we've enjoyed till now. We will always be bullies. We will be accused of being discriminatory, of being cowards, of picking and choosing our fights as it suits us.

    The detractors will be correct, and we will have no defense against them.

    We will never again stand in the position we are in now. Can we afford to not act? Can we afford to turn the other cheek, and pretend this did not occur? What happens the next time some group with a temper nd contacts decides that 50,000 lives aren't too high a cost to make a statement?

    This is a foreign concept, I know, for us who haven't had to deal with the daily realities of war. But it is a matter of national honour. The line was drawn for us this morning. We have only two options. We can toe that line, or we can assert ourselves. You know which I favour.

    Of one thing, though, I am completely certain. America's days of believing herself inviolable are at an end. The innocent days are over. Are we going to grow up, and adjust to an adult position in the global community, rather than the petted/reviled brat princess role we've been playing? Or are we going to show ourselves as perpetual whingers who don't deserve the power we've amassed?

    Don't get me wrong. I'm not advocating war. I'm advocating a counter-terrorist strike or twenty, targeted at known terrorist groups, and removing just those people, with as much care and good planning as they showed this morning. They obviously know how to make a statement, and while I don't admire their actions, I think we could take a hint from their discipline. Eliminate the loss of innocent life from their strategy, and implement it against them, would be my choice of action. With no fanfare accompanying the claim of responsibility for the action afterward, but a simple statement of this is what happens to those who kill our people in our land, in this way. This is our policy from now on.

    Do I know the problems with this? Yes. I think that, within a great many sets of circumstances, the price of the action will be not too great to pay for achieving the desired result. My three children, and my children's children, should not have to grow up accepting terrorism as a fact of life.

    --
    We shall find peace. We shall hear angels, we shall see the sky sparkling with diamonds. - Chekov.
    1. Re:Overview by m2 · · Score: 2
      Don't get me wrong. I'm not advocating war. I'm advocating a counter-terrorist strike or twenty, targeted at known terrorist groups, and removing just those people, with as much care and good planning as they showed this morning.

      There's something fundamentally wrong with this line of reasoning, which is mostly what prompted me to write the message at the head of this thread. You are advocating a counter strike. Let's assume you are successful and do actually cause some damage to these groups? Do you think they'll stand there a do nothing about it? One of the things today's attack proved is that this is doable. These people are hoping the U.S.A. counter strikes. This is not war against a country. There's no country to declare war to (at least not atm, but I don't think this will change). This is terrorism. You can only target groups, but that's the problem. It's not like you bomb a building and that's it. To put this in terms people in this group can understand, it's just like MS trying to attack Linux. They can't because there's no single entity where your attack can be directed to. Think about what the U.S.A. did in Panama, and notice there are clear differences. You could break into some guy's house and bring him to the U.S.A. and prosecute and excecute him there, but you still have a group.

      You also have to notice something else: the purpose of the attack is to enrage, to create chaos, to make the people claim for revenge. This is not a military installation that was attacked, that probably would have failed. The target was a civilian target because that stood a chance of success. This attack is bait. Don't swallow it.

      And you implicitely noted something else: this is the first time is a lot of years that war has been brought to U.S.A.'s backyard, which is perhaps the reason why people in other parts of the world see it differently: they still remember having war on their backyards.

      Shit. Kabul, Afghanistan, seems to be under missile attack.

    2. Re:Overview by Cairsten · · Score: 1
      You also have to notice something else: the purpose of the attack is to enrage, to create chaos, to make the people claim for revenge. This is not a military installation that was attacked, that probably would have failed. The target was a civilian target because that stood a chance of success. This attack is bait. Don't swallow it.

      I disagree. The ultimate point of a terrorist attack is not to make the people claim for revenge. It is to frighten the populace, and through them, induce their leaders to make some change that the terrorists desire.

      I believe that all-out war, with no finely-identified target, will further no-one's interests except perhaps the terrorists', by stripping us of our support in the rest of the world, and making us bullies.

      On the other side of that coin, though, blind pacifism is not a course of action we, as a nation, can afford. Our government and military exist to provide solutions to these situations that will allow the public to lead their lives in peace, and if our leadership abdicates this role, then we fall prey to vigilanteeism, of necessity.

      The ideal solution would have been to have somehow intercepted this attack. Kudos to anyone who can figure out how to keep this from being successful another time. But, in the here and now, we have a situation which, in my opinion, requires a response from a position of strength. I don't claim that mine is the only viewpoint, I understand that many folks will disagree with me.

      I'm all for rebuilding and carrying on normal life; we cannot, we will not, spend all our days looking over our collective shoulder. If Americans know anything, it is how to build, and rebuild. I expect the WTC to exist again in some new form. However, we cannot close our eyes to the threat of terrorism, either. We were already beginning to focus on terrorism; I simply do not feel that relaxing that focus is in our best interests.

      In a perfect world, the guilty parties would already have been discovered and pilloried globally. No nation would countenance terrorists or shelter those with terrorist views. In this less than perfect world, however, a targeted series of counter strikes as a standard response to this problem is the best solution I can see.

      --
      We shall find peace. We shall hear angels, we shall see the sky sparkling with diamonds. - Chekov.
  873. Thank you by ColGraff · · Score: 2

    I hope more Canadians feel the same as you.

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
  874. Re:Nostradamus by mr100percent · · Score: 1

    If anything, I'd call that the vatican he's referring to.

    For that kind of burning in my mind, it'd have to be an atomic bomb.

  875. Pearl Harbor Comparison / Reichstag by crush · · Score: 1

    How about the hypotheses suggested at the following article which were written at Indymedia.Org. They suggest that it may be that this heinous act of bloodshed will be used as an excuse by the militaristic/authoritarian elements in the US to force their repressive agenda on the public and introduce a roll-back of freedoms. :
    more like the reichstag?
    or
    right-wing opportunistic backlash

  876. Re:Unlikelyhood of sucessful simultaneous hijackin by vjzuylen · · Score: 1

    I kinda got that feeling, too... Right after the first speculations on Bin Laden involvement began to surface, I was reminded of this article on Slashdot, posted last week:

    Hosting Provider Shut Down By FBI

    I wonder if the Feds were already on to something then? Or maybe they knew something was up, and they were desperately trying to find out what?

    --

    Hee-hee. Dying tickles!
  877. Correcting the Record re Limbaugh by cburley · · Score: 1
    That's not how I recall Limbaugh approaching the OKC bombing.

    I was listening to his show regularly then (and still do fairly often now).

    Whether he truly called from bombing of "whoever is responsible" -- not an unsurprising, or particularly conservative, response -- he did, quite early on, start telling his listeners that his "contacts", or experts who he trusted, were telling him the culprits were likely not outside the USA; that they were likely to turn out to be domestic terrorists. I believe he was doing that for days before the dominant liberal media came to the same conclusion, but am not sure.

    I also remember Bill Clinton coming out right away, blaming Rush Limbaugh (by association -- I think he actually blamed "talk radio") as soon as the domestic angle was finally established.

    What I'd like to hear from Rush -- if only our local radio station would stop preempting him! -- are answers to the following questions:

    • Did our prosecuting and imprisoning the perpetrators of the previous bombing of WTC discourage today's attack?
    • Did our prosecuting and executing the perpetrator of the OKC bombing discourage today's attack?
    • What makes you think our prosecuting and punishing or executing the (surviving) perpetrators of today's attack will prevent future attacks, even greater in scope?

    I'm asking these questions because I have no "easy" answers, and because I'm genuinely interested in hearing how someone as thoughtful and practical, as Rush generally is, would answer them.

    --
    Practice random senselessness and act kind of beautiful.
    1. Re:Correcting the Record re Limbaugh by Malcontent · · Score: 2

      " Whether he truly called from bombing of "whoever is responsible" -- not an unsurprising, or particularly conservative, response -- he did, quite early on, start telling his listeners that his "contacts", or experts who he trusted, were telling him the culprits were likely not outside the USA"

      Regardless. When the discussion was about killing iraqi civillians he was all for it. When the discussion was about US civilans he was against it. Neither the citizens of Iraq nor the citizens of michigan were responsible for that attack and he know that. Even if he bomber turned out to be an arab he knew the poor people struggling to stay alive in iraq had nothing to do with it. Despite this knowledge he was calling for mass murder of civilians.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    2. Re:Correcting the Record re Limbaugh by cburley · · Score: 1
      Could you provide quotes or references of Limbaugh actually calling for the killing of Iraqi civilians? In my experience, he typically makes quite clear distinctions between a populace whose government acts with complete disregard for the well-being of its citizens and one whose government is "of the people, by the people, for the people" as ours is supposed to be.

      I'm also curious -- do you hold Limbaugh to be more evil for supposedly calling for the killing of innocent civilians, or Clinton and Reno more evil for actually killing them while undertaking actions that were neither necessary nor constitutionally valid?

      --
      Practice random senselessness and act kind of beautiful.
    3. Re:Correcting the Record re Limbaugh by Malcontent · · Score: 2

      I could not prove references I don't have transcripts. I heard him with my own ears. he called for anhilating an entire country.

      " I'm also curious -- do you hold Limbaugh to be more evil for supposedly calling for the killing of innocent civilians, or Clinton and Reno more evil for actually killing them while undertaking actions that were neither necessary nor constitutionally valid?"

      Every president in recent history has taken upon himself to kill civilians at the earliest opportunity. We americans enjoy nothing more then seeing the blood of brown and black people spilled .Unfortunately like a mass murderer we start jonesing for some fresh meat every five to eight years. Clinton was not immune to this bloodlust but at least his number don't add up nearly as much as Bush SR or Reagan. So far Bush Sr. I think still has the lead with over a hundred thousand iraqis killed and millions suffering daily due to sanctions. I don't know if the jr Bush will try to beat his dads numbers but I suspect he will. Think really really hard now. When was the last time ten years passed without an american army killing people someplace in the world? Can you think of it? Now answer this question. When was the last time America was actually under attack by a foreign nation?

      BTW I am not counting people killed by proxy where we arm a country (or some people), train them, fund them, and then help them kill lots and lots of people (israel for example or in most of the south americas).

      So to answer your question. No I don't hold rush more evil but I do hold him plenty evil. He is an american and like all americans he too likes to see people being killed all over the world. He does not have the power to actually kill so like most americans he chooses to chant at the sidelines urging the leaders to kill. He just happens to have a bigger megaphone then most americans that's all. I strongly believe however that if he was ever elected he would probably kill more people then all of the rest of the recent presidents. Not only that but I don't think he would stop at our borders he would turn against the dark people inside the borders too.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    4. Re:Correcting the Record re Limbaugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could not prove references I don't have transcripts. I heard him with my own ears. he called for anhilating an entire country.

      I just have to say something. I've been listening to Limbaugh for years. He didn't say it, and never comes CLOSE to saying anything like that. Normally I would say you're just misinformed, but given the content of your other posts, I think you're a fucking liar. I doubt you've heard more than 5 minutes of his show, but you "just know" what he "would" say.

      Get a fucking life, get a fucking clue, and stop defaming others.

  878. another building by sewagemaster · · Score: 1





    another building has went down as of around 17:20PM ET. at the world trade center area



  879. Give bLood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tried. They said there were no more bags. Come back in a few days.

  880. Yeah, he blew a lot of hot air by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tony B. wasn't visibly shocked when British bombs blew up Belgrade radio stations and people were hanging visibly wedged in those ruins until they died.

    A field day for all those masters of rhethoric (and a gift for all who will strangle civil rights. Wait and see).

  881. Re:I hope... by delysid-x · · Score: 1

    It only took 3 planes to throw the entire country into confusion and chaos, terrorism has certainly proven to be an extremely effective weapon here.

  882. Gas Prices by joelhouse · · Score: 1

    I just got a call from a relative in Indiana that said she was sitting in a gas line about a mile long and gas was close to $4 a gallon. Two gas stations have run out of gas.

    Similiar situation in St. Louis, but not as bad.

  883. Thin edge of the wedge? by kimihia · · Score: 1

    Just wait for your freedoms to disappear. The thin edge of the wedge is nonsense. Just wait for the next Columbine / Oklahoma / Twin Towers, and PACHOW! You lose freedoms in the sake of stopping a repeat.

    Well, here's another one. Prepare to lose freedoms.

    I don't know what freedoms you had to give up last time, but they sure didn't stop this tragedy.

    All aside, this is a terrible tragedy.

  884. Re:What did he say after killing 125,000 at Hirosh by uebernewby · · Score: 2

    Well, in order to actually beat Japan soundly, win the war, and stop the Pacific bickering over land issues, it was estimated it would take over 200,000 US soldiers (mostly under the age of 25) to take Japan by conventional methods. Dropping two nukes (it would have only been one if their leader hadn't been so stubborn) was more humane.

    Not quite ... you're more or less right about the *first* bomb. That was dropped to give the Japanese that last push towards surrendering. The *second* bomb, however, wasn't necessary - the Japanese had seen what damage one lousy American bomb was capable of, and were about to surrender. The reason the americans decided to drop it anyway was because this bomb was using a different technique, and they wanted to see what this technique was capable of. Talk about cynical ...

    --

    News and bla for computer musicians: http://lomechanik.net/
  885. Terrorists Win by RedSynapse · · Score: 2, Informative
    Jane's Information Group has an article examining which groups would have the resources and inclination to carry out the attacks today here

    Race and religion is not the enemy, fundamentalism is the enemy. Only when one believes in something so strongly that there is no longer room for reason are acts like these possible. The Inquisition, the Holocaust, and the recent actions of the taliban come to mind.

    On another note, it seems to me that if the cockpits of the airplanes that had been hijacked had been sealed off, there would be many many fewer dead. The US has Tomahawks, the terrorists have 747s. Some people from the airlines, or airport security should go to jail, if multiple planes can be hijacked at the same time something is very wrong . Things will have to change, "just" blowing up a airliner is a far better thing than ramming the plane into a building full of 25,000 people.

    Also, I now have a much less harsh attitude towards "privacy invading" measures such as face recognition software. In fact I want my privacy invaded a whole lot more especially when I'm getting on a plane.

    Maybe the one good thing about this is that if Bin Laden is to blame, the US will certainly cease its support of the taliban, and will almost certainly take punitive measures. Of course whether such measures will hurt the taliban, or just the innocent people of Afghanistan remains to be seen. If of course it was bin laden.

    Finally, yes, give blood, as so many others have today.

  886. ... but an interesting possibility - other reasons by zauber · · Score: 1

    The Red Army claim is from an AFP wire story. It's getting remarkably little play in television coverage.

    Do a search on Lexis-Nexis or on Yahoo for the warning issued on 7 September to bases and US interests in Japan to be on alert for possible terrorist actions. These threats were not from bin-Laden, but had a "Middle-East connection" (as does the Red Army). Also note the Red Army's handy history with hijackings and recent arrests in Japan.

    Certainly worth looking into.

  887. Re:What did he say after killing 125,000 at Hirosh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is somewhat complicated, but it would have been very difficult for Japan to surrender. There would have had to be a unanomous vote by the Japanese cabinet, and at least half of them had said they would rather die than surrender. The only reason that they did finally surrender was an unprecidented request by the emperor.

    The second bomb was a different story.

  888. Re:Unlikelyhood of sucessful simultaneous hijackin by Toony · · Score: 1

    Exactly my point.

    If a disgruntled employee was paid off to make security breeches for some terrorist organization he's regretting it now.

    I personally was not a disgruntled employee, but I did get a good look at our security. It was good, but it could be much better.

    Paying security folks more than minimum wage will help.

  889. Re:September 11 = FALSE by LordKariya · · Score: 1

    I believe this is the information referred to.


    Arbitration Conditions (September 11, 1986)
    Negotiations between both parties extending for several years led in 1986, to a statement of arbitration conditions, which defined arbitration conditions and specific questions to be addressed to the jury, and the number and name of the designated jury members. Following lengthy discussions, a final agreement was reached on the arbitration conditions, which also defined the tribunal's mission and the portions of disputed border points and benchmarks on the recognized international border line between Egypt and Palestine under mandate, in accordance with the Camp David Accord. The conditions provided the award to be passed in this case shall be final and binding.


    From
    http://www.sis.gov.eg/calendar/html/cl2909b.htm

    --
    I alternate between posting +5 and -1 Comments. Karma: +53 -47 = 6
  890. Re:I hope... by mr100percent · · Score: 1

    I think you're talking about Jihad, a minority of palestinians who believe in 'convert to Islam or die' philosophy.

    I don't want them killed, just...restrained from doing this again. If they're kamikazie, then they may leave no choice but death, us or them. I know this smells of hatred, but from the previous poster, there will be a select few who will not compromise, hopefully we won't deal with them.

  891. Re:But it *doesn't* solve things by Wastl · · Score: 1
    First, I want to say that I am truly shocked by today's events, even although I am not living in the US, but in Germany.

    The US chooses its allies, aids the countries which stand for the same causes and beliefs that are harmonious with ours, and that's final.

    ...but I cannot accept this statement. The US has supported several dictatorships (Iraq, some Latin American countries, Indonesia) in the past. If it aids the strategic considerations, all beliefs are thrown away.

    Sebastian

  892. bad time for humor but.... by hypergreatthing · · Score: 0

    http://kotisivu.raketti.net/wadez/ter.jpg

    True, True

    1. Re:bad time for humor but.... by Tiresias_Mons · · Score: 1

      I am a worse person for having looked at that prolly....and an even worse person for laughing....but I mean, you gotta move on somehow right? This was a terrible act, but its good to see that there are some of the "sick twisted" people who can do something other than go charging down the throats of Afghanistan before any info is known.

      --
      "But that's just my opinion, I could be wrong" - Dennis Miller
  893. Blood Collection For USA In Israel by SailorBob · · Score: 2, Informative
    Israel Radio announced this evening that Magen David Adom is opening its blood collection centers in Jerusalem, Tel Aviv, Haifa and Tel Hashomer at midnight to collect blood that will be flown to the United States in the morning.

    There is a national call for everyone having type "O" blood to contribute to the effort.

    Israel Radio Military correspondent Carmela Menashe reported that Israel is sending its IDF emergency evacuation team to the United States and that the Israeli flag will fly at half mast.

    --

    Woopty Doo Basil, what does it all mean?!

  894. Yes, cowardly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One who anonymously destroys thousands of innocent, defenseless civilians without notice or foresight is a coward.

    A hero is one who HELPS people. It's pretty simple, really.

    The palestinians might be happy that we got fucked up, but are they any better off? I don't think so. Nobody is better off because of this.

  895. Yah, this would jive by ColGraff · · Score: 2

    Did you see the TV coverage? The attacks blasted truly massive amounts of smoke and dust into the air - I'm not surprised it showed up on the Doppler.

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
  896. Wars have tactical plans and targets... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...this was (costly) political statement, a media stunt. Please, don't buy into the BS war rhetoric.

    1. Re:Wars have tactical plans and targets... by Obliqueness · · Score: 1

      There's nothing BS about it, AC. Political statements target people, not infrastructure.

      --
      The American Dream went to hell in a handbasket when someone decided that "The Customer" was King, and the customer beli
  897. Inadequate my ass by cybercuzco · · Score: 2

    Fire suppression systems are designed specifically to prevent a small to medium size fire from becoming a large fire. i dont care what kind of system you are talking about, from a fire extinguisher to a halon system, you put out fires when theyre small with fire suppression systems. If they get big, thats why we have fire departments. Regardless YOU CANT PUT OUT A JET FUEL FIRE WITH WATER! Putting water on a jet fuel fire is like putting water on a grease fire, you just spread it around, and dont put it out. The WTC had a sprinkler system im sure, and im sure they also had tanks of water on the roof in case the mains werent working for some reason. But when the plane went through each building, it most likely shattered the mains leading to the roof and all the fire suppression equipment. Even if the mains had remained intact, you couldnt have put out the jet fuel with the water. Granted, after the jet fuel burns out, you might have done it, but by that time, you have an immense fire over several floors, and you cant put it out with simple sprinklers, even if you had the water, theres just too much heat. There is no way, short of making the building half out of ice, and half out of steel, that you could have prevented the collapse after the fire started with so much jet fuel.

    --

  898. Re:What did he say after killing 125,000 at Hirosh by Syberghost · · Score: 2

    The *second* bomb, however, wasn't necessary - the Japanese had seen what damage one lousy American bomb was capable of, and were about to surrender.

    No, actually, they thought we had conventionally firebombed Hiroshima, and couldn't possibly do it again quickly without massive preparation. They simply didn't believe it, until we did it again.

  899. Re:Three Step Loop: ID, Locate, Eradicate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    When we have the evidence, when the world knows, then we act. Maybe not even violently - put them in front of the same court as Millosevich, make them stand trial.


    But of course, you first had to bomb the hell out of innocent Serbians. It's hard to miss your own people when they are innocent, isn't it?

    Note that I do not support terrorist activity -- and I consider all bombings performed by the US in the name of money and (US americans) prosperity to be such. When the current situtation gets more clearer, count your victims (which I hope are as few as possible); then find out how many people have died in Iraq because of the embargo you have forced upon their nation.

  900. Re:September 11th = 911 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The interesting thing is, I'm told that in Taiwan the emergency number is 119!

    And it's my birthday, too. Happy, happy day...

  901. Re:But it *doesn't* solve things by ColaMan · · Score: 1
    Even if they had an accurate 20MT nuke to fire off at NORAD. For the simple reason that doing so pinpoints their exact location, which would then be passed to USAF and/or USN.


    *cough* international waters *cough*
    *cough* uninhabited islands *cough*
    *cough* cheap diesel subs bought from china *cough*

    Whole lotta ocean to fire that nuke from , you know.

    Or perhaps just a Learjet with nuke attached.

    You don't need to be to *close* to your target.
    Christ , you don't need to be accurate with a 20MT warhead. An airburst at say 15 thousand feet just about *anywhere* in the U.S. does a lotta damage when you're talking about nuke-sized yields.
    --

    You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
    There is a lot of hype here.
  902. Re:Airlines chosen by AxelBoldt · · Score: 3, Insightful
    They will not be able to pop their little fucking heads up to talk about their "message" anymore without fear of getting immediately capped.


    You still think like somebody who fears to die. They don't. They *want* to die for what they believe in.

  903. New from CNN by Legion303 · · Score: 1
    Afghanistan appears to have its own problems. Gunfire and explosions, possible air attack.

    -Legion

  904. What can I do? by scrytch · · Score: 2

    Don't know if this will get past the noise floor (one time I am glad to have the 2 threshold), since I really want an answer to that question. I'm unemployed, broke, can't give blood, unexperienced volunteers aren't likely going to be sent there anyway ...

    After Pearl Harbor, Americans lined up by the thousands outside recruitment offices to go off and fight. The enemies were clear, Germany, Italy, and most of all Japan. So even if we nail down exactly who did it (it's hard to plan something of this without pointing back to yourself, this was a suicide mission for the planners too) what the hell can I do? Now what?

    --
    I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
    1. Re:What can I do? by fishbowl · · Score: 2

      If you go and enlist NOW, you're hurting more than helping! That's 3 meals a day and housing that needs to go to someone on active duty, and that's only the start. Most jobs in the military are occupied already by volunteers. Don't go half cocked and join the army
      now! People did that after we started "liberating Kuwait", and many regretted it (and kept regretting it for the years they had to spend in the military.)

      All those who are worried about the draft, again, the armed forces aren't equipped to deal with large numbers of people who don't want to be there.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  905. Re:better sources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Yes, I agree. You are a fucking idiot.

    -- The_Messenger

  906. bombing Afghanstan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CNN is reporting bombs being dropped outside the capital..soryr i can't spell..trying to ge tti out.....

    1. Re:bombing Afghanstan by metachimp · · Score: 1

      I'm hoping that this is a conincedence... The alternative is too scary to think about.

      --
      The system has failed you, don't fail yourself. --Billy Bragg
  907. It is so very cowardly... by ChaoticCoyote · · Score: 2


    ...to kill innocent people anonymously. A coward skulks about, refusing to take responsibility for their actions. These fools disn't have the courage to face real soldiers in real combat... no, they killed unarmed civilians at their workplace.


    All terrorists are cowards, be they working for the Earth Liberation Front or Bin Ladan.


  908. Shalom my friend! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jewish interests have eaten into US administration like a tapeworn into the bowels of an animal. They are using the US as a trojan horse to pursue their interests. That's the reason Israel wasn't allowed to be named now at the anti racism conference in South Africa. That's the reason Palestine people are living in the world's biggest concentration camp. And nobody cares for them. American news media stations are controlled by jewish friendly ownership. So are most American news papers.

    1. Re:Shalom my friend! by Spike_/\_ · · Score: 1

      Y'know, those "tapeworm into the bowels of an animal" metaphors make you sound like a mouthpiece for some propaganda writer - whether it is an accurate metaphor or not. Do you see why? It's designed to produce an instinctive revulsion, for the situation and for the Israelis (the tapeworm), and to associate the American government to a dumb animal. When metaphors illuminate, they're useful, but I avoid people who try to manipulate my emotions. I think Americans would long ago have become sympathetic to the Palestinians, except that the Palestinians always figure out how to do something that makes them look like murderous criminals.

  909. Re:Three Step Loop: ID, Locate, Eradicate by sheetsda · · Score: 2
    We find the black boxes, the voice recorders

    You're kidding yourself if you think those things weren't completely vaporized in the two WTC planes, possibly the others as well. Also, CNN claims to have reliable information which links Bin Laden to the planes. The government has known for years that Afghanistan(sp?) is harboring Bin Laden, their spokespeople have openly supported him, so it only stands to reason that they're all on the same side. Obviously, it's arguable if we wiped that country off the face of the earth we'd be killing people who agreed with our point of view, my counter-argument to you is that there were likely people who agreed with the muslim fundamentalist points of view who were killed in these incidents, other than the perpetrators.

    Sadly, there are people who reason and humanity will not reach, some of which have a considerable amount of power, such as Bin Laden. The only solution is to make an example of these people in hopes of discouraging similar actions. I agree that violence is always the worst option, but sometimes it's the only option.

  910. Re:What did he say after killing 125,000 at Hirosh by kaisyain · · Score: 2

    It may have been estimated but the US Chiefs of Staff didn't believe that estimate. They estimated 20,000-40,000 US casualties from an invasion of mainland Japan.

    Try reading "A Postwar Myth: 500,000 U.S. Lives Saved" by Barton Bernstein before you continue to spread your sadly dated misinformation.

  911. Re:Three Step Loop: ID, Locate, Eradicate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    given USA interference and war games in the middle east the last few decades, the attack is not a real big suprise, though the scale is. maybe it's better to examine why these people are so angry, why a lot of countries are angry, with the US, and the West in general. we westerners generally live in a sanitised environment, these people have lived with warfare all their lives, with weapons and missiles supplied by USA, UK, France to name but a few. revenge attacks are not an answer, and dangerous to drum up that lynch-mob mentality. there is a bigger problem here, and it's hypocrisy, and global government corruption, and a disregard for those they are supposed to be governing.

  912. Re:ALL YOUR WTC ARE BELONG TO US by Trepidity · · Score: 2

    Oh but I disagree - this is precisely what /. was made for. That and l33t Linux users!

  913. Get your crypto software NOW. by Arkaengel · · Score: 1

    Want to bet it will no longer be available in the short run? Given the CIA and NSA's catastrophic failure to see this coming in any manner, they're going to need something to blame. Even before this happened, the spin was that "only terrorists and criminals use crypto". I'm certain that one of the short-term consequences of these events will be a) far more sanctioned wiretapping and b) the banning of any cryptosystem that doesn't involve either key escrow or backdoors for NSA use.

  914. Armchair Intellectual! by John+F.+Ketamine · · Score: 1

    Oh please! What a fuckwit. Please think about how the British remember old Chamberlain. Fondly? With reverence? Hardly. And Britain could have easily stood with his ilk through defeat and death.

    If I recall correctly, Churchill became PM before there was any such thing as a war over Britain. Only Churchill had the courage to resist Hitler, which of course drove Hitler mad. Was Churchill an economist? No! Was Churchill a perfect man? Of course not, he was a politician! But Churchill's courage in refusing to budge was what made him great, and it was that quality that aligned the nation with him. He was not always popular, but his character and strength in standing up to the Germans was self-evident. And to insult him by calling him a "brandy-soaked old man" shows the extent of your character. How dare you! Especially when he is responsible for the casual freedom that allows you to make such offhand remarks. Your comfortable lifestyle and wealth have turned you into a veritable model of the neoleftist coffeehouse invertibrate. And I'm pretty far to the left myself, friend.

    You seem to think we are not at war right now, and somehow we don't need the same quality of character in our highest offices.

    In the US we have a way of making one's complaints against the government known...it's called "voting." We already legitimize those with all kinds of views...we do it by allowing them to speak, and to vote, and to run for office. Now, I am not happy about how our current president attained his office. But I will rectify this situation by actively opposing his political career at the ballot box. It makes me angry sometimes, the kind of people who are allowed to vote, but I allow them their chance. So you can't vote in the US, eh? Well, I wonder if your views are particularly well-liked over here then. Nobody seems to be running on the Talk Your Way Out Of Terrorism Party ticket.

    However, I refuse to have my course of life determined by outsiders who disparage the very means for our citizens to have a voice...and perhaps you are one of those outsiders. So from the bottom of my heart, please heed my message:

    FUCK YOU. Fuck you ENTIRELY.

    "'Peace in our time'...Oh, thank you Herr Hitler. Tell that to the Polish. Tell that to the Jews."
    -Robyn Hitchcock

    --
    "Upgrade your grey matter, 'cause one day it may matter." --Deltron Zero
  915. Re:What did he say after killing 125,000 at Hirosh by Trepidity · · Score: 2

    He said nothing, because he did not bomb Hiroshima. He died several months before the bombing.

  916. Re:Nostradamus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "City Of God" may refer to fighting in Jerusalem recently....

  917. Re:Airlines chosen by Spyffe · · Score: 1

    Sure someone will profit - the anonymous thousands of people around the world who would just as soon see America wiped off the face of the earth - or at least get the hell out of their lives.

    Not that they're right - I'm sure they're greatly outnumbered by the moderates even in their own communities - but there are enough of them that killing them would mean killing way too many civilians to be feasible.

    --
    Sigmentation fault - core dumped
  918. kabul explosions by esperandus · · Score: 1
    (paraphrased from cnn--not redundant AFAIK)

    In the last 15 minutes or so, several explosions have rocked kabul. Aircraft may have been present. There was anti-aircraft fire. The target appears to be an ammunition dump, but this is also uncertain. Such an attack would be uncharacteristiuc of the northern alliance(oppponents of the dominant taliban regime), whihc have taken considerable flak for hitting civilian targets in the city in the past. The northern alliance forces are also thought to be incapable of launching such an attack (they are tens of miles away).



    I hope with all my might that this is not the result of a US attack.

    --
    The truth is out there - we'll let it back in after it sobers up a bit. -The Cube
  919. What about internal fanatics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No one seems to have entertained the idea that these terrorists could have been American. Just as with every other country on this planet America has fanatics, in fact due to the size of the country it has a large number of them. Is it not possible that a group of these people orchestrated this attack? Would it not have been slightly easier for them?

    I'm sure most people would like to believe that no American could do something this sickening, but it's certainly possible. And assuming it was a group of American citizens how would everyone's reactions differ? Would hatred turn to depression?

    1. Re:What about internal fanatics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I certainly hope so. I don't like the way that it's arabs (see all the turban/raghead/whatever) posts that get the blame each time. Maybe it'll force people into thinking beyond the ways of predigested news...

  920. Re:But it *doesn't* solve things by The+Panther! · · Score: 1

    A worthwhile correction. Thank you.

    But the overall tone and message of my prior post remains the same. The motivation to aid one country over another has some direct benefit to the USA. Several of the superpowers do/have done so. It has made us enemies, and some short term friends (Iraq).

    Were it up to the average Joe, I'm certain we'd be out of other people's hair as much as possible. It's not, and such is the pickle we're in today. And it can only get worse from this day forward.

    --
    Any connection between your reality and mine is purely coincidental.
  921. Re:Three Step Loop: ID, Locate, Eradicate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Obviously, it's arguable if we wiped that country off the face of the earth we'd be killing
    > people who agreed with our point of view, my counter-argument to you is that there were likely
    > people who agreed with the muslim fundamentalist points of view who were killed in these incidents,
    > other than the perpetrators.

    Ahh, the "two wrongs make a right" theory, which is just as stupid and juvenile now as it was when you were five years old.

    This attack does NOT justify killing innocent civilians - how's that not terrorism itself?

    This attack DOES justify expending time and resources to find those involved, remove their ability to do this again, and bring them to justice.

    The WORST thing to do is ham-handedly retaliate against everyone who looks at the US cross-eyed - that'll just breed more hatred against it and more terrorists.

    The BEST thing to do is to root out the perpetrators in a just and reasonable manner, and to make sure the justice and fairness of the process is SEEN by all. This will show people that the US is fair and just, and will remove incentive for future terrorists.

    Remember: retaliation is to prevent future attacks. Temperance now may save lives in the future. Which does NOT mean the guilty go unpunished - both are important.

  922. Jewish racism and truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Israel deprives Palestinin people for their civil rights and has made Palestine the biggest concentration camp in the world.

    Jewish interests have eaten into the US like a tapeworm into intestine. Racism gives birth to injustice. Injustice gives birth to hate. Hate gives birth to terror. And Israel is a racist state. Despite it was not allowed to say this fact at the UN anti racism conference in South Africa. (Thank you US and EU)

  923. The lesson is another one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you spread hatred and injustice, fire may come back one day. Isreal has made Palestine the biggest concentration camp of the world. Shalom!

  924. Re:THIS IS SLASHDOT! by feed_me_cereal · · Score: 1

    thats because one of the greatest tragedies america has ever suffered happened today. I'd say this is "stuff that matters". Is it not? Does it not matter that tens of thousands of innocent people were killed in a terrorist attack that will wreak global havoc for decades?

    --
    "Question with boldness even the existence of a god." - Thomas Jefferson
  925. Re:Three Step Loop: ID, Locate, Eradicate by mandolin · · Score: 2
    You're kidding yourself if you think those things weren't completely vaporized in the two WTC planes, possibly the others as well.

    You sure? I mean these things are designed to survive .. fiery plane crashes, are they not?

    Now of course it might be months before they're *found*...

  926. Re:Weren't the Taliban once US alies against Russi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oceania is at war with Eurasia. Oceania has always been at war with Eurasia.

  927. What I didn't realize by nahdude812 · · Score: 1

    I was actually responding to a comment that's been modded out of existance (sortof) so it looks like I'm replying to a comment that I'm not. The original comment was the text of the ALL YOUR BASE crap, replaced with ALL YOUR WTC instead. The context change makes my comment look inappropriate instead. Browse at -1 if you want to see what I was really replying to.

  928. alternatives by esperandus · · Score: 1
    "As for those mothers in Iraq. It's not our fault that they live in a country lead by a madman."


    I'm sorry, but I disgaree rather strongly with this statment. There is overwhelming evidence--documents, statements, wires, etc--that the US is more than a *little* responsible for the fact theat their country is lead by a madman. Not only did we support him when he first appeared (the opposition was feared to be more pro-soviet), we armed him. When portions of 'his' own population attempted to rebel (I am thinking of the kurds in the 80s), he proceeded to use these weapons to murder as many as he could.


    Of course, this leads to a complex debate concerning the cold war...Let's ignore it for now. After the Gulf war, we could have acted differently, however. It is inconceivable that an economic embargo would get rid of Saddam, given the kind of society he has shaped...he's about the only person who I would expect to be immune from the general carnage such an embargo mnust produce. the predictable result: thousands+ people who hate the US for effectively starving their children.

    The US has a history of not removing security threats, but rather exacerbating them. Am I preaching Assassinatoin? Maybe. But more than that, we need to not arm dictators in the first place!


    How is this relevant? my earlier intent was to state that many of the threats to natoinal security, terrorist and otherwise, are products of US policy. In many cases, these policies were not designed with the intent of protecting americans. Instead, they have been crafted for political palatability (read:stuff that makes the policy-makers get re-elected) or to satisy the short-term greed of corporate interest (Like the trade policies in Africa that have caused widespread economic devastation. Many there are unhappy with the US as well). If we want to fight terrorism, we will ultimately need to destroy the causes. In some cases, this means that we will need to change current policies and think quite a bit about how we design those policies (i.e., who determines US policy, accountabililty, etc)

    This is not a new statement, and has been repeated even here many times. Sorry if I sound a bit redundant; just want to make sure you understand me. Hope the day improves for us all and that nightfall finds you and yours in safety.


    Matt

    --
    The truth is out there - we'll let it back in after it sobers up a bit. -The Cube
  929. yeah, right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They can barely aim a rock into a window, and you have them piloting commercial airplanes into buildings.

  930. In case you've read this far: why they went down by TACD · · Score: 1
    The towers of the WTC were not constructed with many internal supporting pillars; most of the load is borne by the outer shell. So although internal bomb-blasts (or theoretically, earthquakes) could have been withstood, when the plans smashed throught the outside and mushed the inside...

    Boom.

    --
    Security through promiscuity is no better than security through obscurity.
  931. Unaccpectable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is absolutly unaccecptable. I live in Toronto Canada, and I couldn't imagine an attack on the CN tower or Bank of Montreal building (those in T. know what I am talking about). I've been in both of the twin towers, and this is terrible. All I can say is go after the fuckers. I don't care what's right or not, US/Canada, NATO should NEVER have to deal with this again

  932. A Different Spin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Violence does not always beget more violence. Throughout history this is seen many times (i.e. Japan has not retaliated against actions taken during World War II, Nor has Germany, or Italy). The fact that many people are loathe to admit is that in all humans is the seed for true and unimaginable evil. When you see Palastinians dancing in the street because of the death of thousands of innocents (though they are not innocent of all crimes they are innocent of the one they ended up dying because of) it is my oppinion that this utterly wrong.

  933. Re:no Athiests by Yebyen · · Score: 1

    Yeah... only thing is, it still doesn't work. You need to believe you're sane, and others need to believe you're sane. A massive conspiracy has gone to putting this together... It could have only been rationalized under the guise of a religious belief; there is no other way. Blah, I'm rambling, and not making any sense. Hopefully someone gets my point.

    --
    Restating the obvious since nineteen aught five.
  934. You don't get it, do you? by Wesley+Everest · · Score: 1

    I'm usually fairly detached during times like this, but by myself, watching the coverage, and imagining the enormity of the loss of life, mental health, peace, property, and productivity -- I couldn't help but cry in frustration at not being able to do anything.

    I also cried in frustration. Frustation at the thousands of innocent lives lost, the horror the injured and killed must have gone through, the tragedy for family and friends left behind. Frustration at the lives that will be destroyed in much the same way in the U.S. government's inevitable retaliation.


    And I am also very scared of what will inevitably happen to Arab-Americans -- vigilante violence, FBI interrogations, racial and religious intolerance.


    To tell you the truth, I am about out of tears. I can't help but become cynical. When the Oklahoma City federal building was blown up, I was shocked and saddened. But while I saw Time magazine printing pictures of every last person killed and information about their lives and families, the U.S. military had recently blown up an Iraqi apartment building killing a comparable number of women, children, and men. Each of them had as tragic a story, each of them had a family that was distrought. Here we had two situations of innocent civillians blown to bits for a political cause. I cried at both. I had empathy for their pain. Yet, I saw plenty of people brought to tears over the Time story that actually cheered on the Iraqi bombing.


    It is very easy to have empathy for your fellow countrymen while ignoring the suffering of others. Plenty of good Germans cried when fellow Germans were blown to bits by American bombs in WWII. That wasn't empathy or conscience, that was nationalism.


    To get back to the point of totalitarian security measures. You say to ignore the question of trust for now, but that is the central question. Do we have any proof that these new totalitarian security measures such as face recognition systems, echelon-style filters on phones and email, etc. will make the world a safer, freer place? And if they are abused, how might one start a dissident movement to correct the abuses?


    It's like asking, ok, suppose you are in Stalinist Russia, how do you fight for freedom of the press? The answer is it is best to never let it get that bad in the first place because it will be damn hard.


    Ah, but it will never happen here. No thanks. I feel the best way to stop terrorist attacks against the U.S. is for the U.S. to immediately stop it's support of terrorism around the world. Here we have a government that continually gives billions of dollars worth of weapons to various dictators that are torturing and killing their people, and you think it would be better to give our government more power over us rather than the much more effective solution of not giving people a reason to want revenge against us.

  935. Re:Three Step Loop: ID, Locate, Eradicate by sheetsda · · Score: 2

    The explosions destroyed steel beams probably several inches think, blew through countless feet of concrete, and in addition was subjected to the sudden stop of most plane crashes. They are designed to survive crashes, but they can only be protected so far. In a significant number of normal plane crashes (ones that don't explode and don't fall quite a distance after said explosion) the boxes do not survive or are never recovered. They are stored in the tail of the plane because statistically that is the section of the plane most likely to survive, but everything I've heard says that the planes were completely shattered into small pieces. I give it 10,000 to 1 odds that they'll never find them.

  936. Re:Three Step Loop: ID, Locate, Eradicate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ridiculous.

    You assume that by finding the people responsible and placing them before process of law we will even significantly diminish the chance of this happening again?

    The people who commited these acts died for their cause....you really think they will care if you catch some or all of their leaders and put them in prison?

    There is a time for a legal response, and there is a time for a military response. The lines have clearly been drawn....this was not a convenience store hold-up. This was not a bank robbery. This was not a drug deal. This was a attack on the fundamentals of democracy and freedom. This was an act of war and the response must be in kind.

    The U.S. must destroy these peoples ability to ever attempt this again, and show to the rest of the world that when act's like this are committed, the response is obliteration. Anything less is a failure to protect our way of life

    That said, the response should still be well thought out and rational. Identify who did this, find where they are located and remove them from the face of this planet. These things are well within the abilities of the American military. They just need the will and the direction to do so.

  937. tragedy vs catastrophe by chaos4ever · · Score: 1

    this may not be on topic, but i've noticed that the media, the government, and just about everyone, have called this event that happened to be a 'tragedy' this, 'tragedy' that. now, my question is this: is it really a 'tragedy'? how about catastrophe? i remembered back in the day of middle school english that 'tragedy' and 'catastrophe' have different connotations in their use. 'catastrophe' is a sudden disastrous event that occurs without warning, that could not be prevented because it could not be stopped because it completely came out of the blue. 'tragedy' is a disastrous event that occurs as a result as a domino effect, resulting from a buildup of events that are set into place, and are let loose to eventually spiral out of control, resulting in the disaster. perhaps the media and government body are misusing words? (i won't make any real criticism here).

  938. Appeasement by chazR · · Score: 2

    Appeasement NEVER works

    Unfortunately, you are completely right. History bears you out *without exception*.

    "Jaw, jaw is better than War, war". Yup. True. Except it *doesn't fucking work*".

    Ultimately, you have to blow the dust off your old copy of von Clausewitz "On War", and do something nasty. Accept that a lot of your people will die. Have a clear objective. Make use of everything you have. And remember your ancient history.

    After the third war, no trace of Great Carthage remained

  939. New Hall of Fame leader by rainer_d · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This story is now the absolute leader in the Slashdot Hall of Fame.

    I don't think we can top this.

    --
    Windows 2000 - from the guys who brought us edlin
    1. Re:New Hall of Fame leader by yzquxnet · · Score: 1

      But get this, combined posts related to this topic is over 6000 at my last count. The last 5 articles are all on the same topic. Wow!

  940. Partial list of deceased passengers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    Daniel C. Lewin, 31, billionaire co-founder of Akamai Technologies. Survived by wife and two sons.


    Edmund Glazer, 41, CFO of MRV Communications, an optical network vendor. Survived by wife and son.


    Barbara Olsen, 45, conservative commentator, lawyer, and wife of Solicitor General Theodore Olsen. Mrs. Olsen called her husband during the hijacking of America flight 77 from Dulles and reported details of the terrorist act as it occured.


    David Angell, 54, executive producer of the television show 'Fraiser.' Mr. Angell and his wife were killed aboard American flight 11 from Boston to Los Angeles. He is survived by his brother, Roman Catholic Bishop Kenneth Angell of Vermont.


    At this time, the explosions reported in Kabul, Afghanistan, are claimed to be the work of rebels retaliating against the ruling Taliban for their assassination attempt on the opposition leader Ahmed Shah Masood Sunday. Contradictory reports have left the for Mujahadeen rebel's future uncertain; Western intelligence sources believe he was killed by agents of Saudi billionaire Osama bin Laden, whereas Tajiki opposition members insist that Mr. Masood is still alive following the assault. His death would prove to be a decisive turn in the struggle for Afghanistan, as he forms the linchpin of the anti-Taliban coalition.


    The United States has denied any involvement in the attacks currently rocking Afghanistan.


    (killdash9)

  941. Re:Nostradamus by PotLegalizer · · Score: 1

    Speaking as a card-holding member of the new age hippy bastards, I'd like to let it be known that we do not endorse the writings of Nostradamus as a group. Go find some other group to put this guy in... how about just "annoying bastards".

  942. Asinine Proposals by nurightshu · · Score: 1

    It's possible the date was chosen for a reason, though I doubt it has anything to do with "911," which is simply asinine.

    Today is the anniversary of the Camp David accords, which were early overtures at Middle Eastern peace made by President Carter, Menachem Begin, and Anwar Sadat, if I remember correctly. I don't think it's coincidental that one of the aircraft was on the way to Camp David.

    Of course, like in OKC, this may well turn out to be domestic sociopaths, although the preponderance of evidence tends toward religiously-motivated foreign sociopaths (note that ideologically-motivated terrorists don't as a rule get involved in suicide missions).

    --
    They that would sacrifice their .sig space for that cliched Franklin quote deserve neither.
    1. Re:Asinine Proposals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The date was an interesting bit of coincidence

      Your comment violated the postercomment compression filter. Comment aborted

  943. Justice? by doomicon · · Score: 1

    What's this talk of bringing these terrorists to justice? This isn't a criminal act, yet I keep seeing posts as if we are talking about a crackhead killing the corner convienance store clerk.

    So let me get this straight this is how the cycle is supposed to go...

    1. Terrorists kill 5000 people
    2. We spend millions to hunt them down, beg countries to extradite.
    3. Try them and imprison them..
    4. Live in a police state, with soldiers guarding every corner
    5. goto step 1.

    Another poster said the only thing to stop this was..
    a. eradication (yes this will work)
    b. forgiveness.. how the hell is forgiveness going to stop this? Ok we forgive you, but since we don't agree with your beliefs, and just maybe have a different opinion.. BAM! we get hit again.

    "enough talk!"

    --

    Awesome!
  944. Re:Airlines chosen by kerincosford · · Score: 1

    The Airlines were more likely chosen because:

    They were internal flights. There is much lower security on internal flights than international.

    The planes that hit the WTC took off from Boston - fully loaded with fuel, and very near, providing the most fuel for an enormous explosion.

  945. I wish you all well America, I feel for you. by tedsvmax · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am a Canadian in Toronto and I feel so much anger for the people who did this.
    I feel great sorrow also for the victims and families.
    I wish their was something I could say that would make it better, but everyone I know also feels the same as I here in Canada.
    I hope these terrorists get what they got coming to them!!
    Ted

  946. A Tribute To Him Is ... by Poligraf · · Score: 2

    ... his work. I can bet, Akamai's servers played a significant role in everybody being able to read news on the Internet.

    --
    Tigers respect lions, elephants and hippos. Maggots respect no one. (C) S. Dovlatov
  947. reply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I may be anonymous, but i am not a coward!
    What has occured is an attack against humanity.
    no-one, no-one has a right to sponsor such an act. This is not an act against america, this is an act against humanity. I echo previous responses: give blood this is the greatest reponse that an individual can make. By giving blood, we show these scum that humanity stands against such acts, that regardless of who it is that has suffered, there is no justification for such an act of unmitigated BASTARDRY!
    these terrorists have spent some time sorting out their actions.
    They knew what they were doing. They have no excuse for their actions. I'm not the greatest fan of the US, but nothing deserves this kind of response. By giving blood you are making a supremely important statement. I support the people that suffered this indiscriminate attack.
    I support the human beings that were innocently caught up in a blatantly political action. These people may deserve to lose their BMW's, but not their lives
    Give Blood, that is the greatest individual humanitarian statement you can make to show your condemnation of this inhuman action!!!

  948. Re:Eye opener. You must be joking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >"they had it coming, shit happens".

    It seems that is exactly what half of slashdot is saying right now. The consensus seems to be that the US has done horrible things to the Middle Eastern countries and has therefore asked to be attacked in such a way. I think we as a country (the US) should close our borders, stop sending money elsewhere and stop getting involved in everyone elses conflicts. We can grow enough food to feed ourselves, and water is relatively plentiful. If the US is so bad, then fine, we will let everyone else have the world for awhile.

  949. Re:Three Step Loop: ID, Locate, Eradicate by zaius · · Score: 2

    Perhaps we won't be able to find the ones from the planes that hit the WTC, but we should be able to get the pentagon and at least the Penn. recorders.

  950. THINK ABOUT IT by aexandria · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Today is SEPTEMBER the 11TH- 911. GET IT!

  951. Re:But it *doesn't* solve things by Malcontent · · Score: 2

    " the people who live there do not want peace. They want to kill each other, and we - as a nation - are hated and called the "Great Satan" because we would (admittedly for very selfish reasons) like to see people not killing each other."

    I agree that people in the middle east want to kill each other. But I disagree that we are hated because want to stop the killing. We are hated because if it wasn't for us Israel could not continue killing palestenians. We fund Israel, we make bombs and give them to israel, we make planes and give them to israel, we make guns and give them to israel, we gather intelligence and give it to israel. We support israel 100 percent in whatever act of ongoing genocide they are undertaking. All we have to do is to say "stop it or else the funding gets cut off" and israel would behave.

    In short we are hated because we have taken one side of this conflict. As a result of that the ratio of dead palestenians to dead israelis is about 5 to 1. If Americans acted as an honest broker and held both sides responsible for their actions it would not be hated anymore.

    --

    War is necrophilia.

  952. Re:Three Step Loop: ID, Locate, Eradicate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does your arse have any other useful information you can pull out of it for us?

  953. Re:Plea for peace - Huh? Get Real! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He didnt blame all Muslims. He simply said it is an easy solution to wipe out Afghanistan. If it was Bin Laden, the "government" there habours him, and they are responsible for his actions. If they wont release him to the US, they can feel the wrath.

  954. Re:Plea for peace - Huh? Get Real! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fair enough, an equal amount of Afghani or Sudanese innocent fucking office working civilians will be blown the fuck up by a hijacked passenger jet! They are equal, and have an equal right to live, so the same amount should die, right?

  955. Re:PENTAGON != COLLAPSED INTO A HOLE! Stay off pho by Sniser · · Score: 1

    Not sure if this was the wedge that is currently under renovation or not.

    It was. At least I know the airplane approached from that side, because the reporter on german tv considered this the main reason the plane could slip through the defense in the first place. He also said that there was no real damage compared to the WTC.

  956. Geez - Duh! by dbCooper0 · · Score: 1

    Of course the ships will scramble - where have you been? This happens with much less serious incidents. No imperilment applicable.

    --
    db
    Cig:
    ôô
    /`
  957. Welcome into the Age of Aquarius... by DevilousAngel · · Score: 1

    About WW3 ...

    "I p 278 (cIX-73)

    The Antichrist will rule for "less than the revolution of Saturn" (29.5 years), far less than the grand span of time he envisions. His reign will be temporary, because his power is like building a fire with grass; it burns very hotly but quickly. His effect on history and his "time in the limelight" will be limited. The time from WWII to the end of WWWIII and the time of troubles will almost encompass a century in itself."

    http://www.faqs.org/faqs/nostradamus/part6/

    Look at it any ways you like, but for you maths fan, we're only 28 years away from 'celebrating' the start of WW2... If this prediction is right, now's the right time in order for something to happen!

    It's funny tho how one can find so many ressemblances from what's happening with what Nostradamus said would happen! Really, the anti-christ(read:bad guy) coming from the east, beeing wealthy, ressourful & all and when you compare it with whom the FBI's suspecting (Osama bin Laden) and, oh please, spare me the bs!!, the guy's a _billionaire_ (200-250 billions, that's more than a few countrys are worth... together!!)

    One would be a fool to refute the Nostradamus right away due to his/her lack of faith in anything aside from material things!

    It's about time humanity opens up it's eyes & stop believing in the 'mighty paper'! Some ppl want a change, how far would you be whilling to go? The lost of TWC is something disturbing that's been done in a _very_ awful away, but, up to a certain point, it's a necessary step in order to change our capitalist's point of view (Again, space me the socialism bs, please!)

    Just in case my thoughts would get a wrong interpretation, I am _NOT_ in favor of all human kind's madness that's been displayed today, but I _have_ to admit that hitting both TWC & Pentagon is something quite unorthodox, you have to give that out!

    For all of you believers in faith & destiny, we might be at the dawn of a new age, a time where communication as we know it, along with survival, the richness of our Earth (even if it's spoiled here & there...) is still very amazingly in good shape, as we might not even be able to connect on the Internet, eat our daily 3 meats (& sometimes more =]) & be 'stuck in our miserable, lonely lives' for quite longer...

    Say Nostradamus was right.... again!?

    --
    "Fighting for peace is like screwing for virginity!"
  958. I thought that I would be less angry by now... by errxn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...but after reading some of the moronic posts here on /., it's just gotten worse. I can live with the ones that are just obvious childish trolls, but I CAN NOT BELIEVE:

    A) the Americans who are sitting in front of their screens, enjoying the freedoms that they have long ago taken for granted in this country, and have the audacity to say that we are to blame for this attack, or that we had it coming, or that our way of life is "oppressive" and "evil". It is exactly this sort of thought that has led to the weakening of this country over the last eight years, and allowed this tragedy to happen.

    B) those Europeans (not all who have posted here, but some) who are sitting in front of their screens, enjoying the freedoms that they have only because America came to their rescue back in WWII, and have the audacity to mock our country and what it stands for after this attack. You'd think that they'd be more understanding, given the incidents of terrorism that happen in their own countries.

    C) those who wasted no time in blithely blaming President Bush for this incident because he is an "evil" Republican. How insane. If anyone or anything is to blame for this, it is the Clinton Administration. Yes, I know that you have been avoiding the truth, but it was because of the Clinton Administration that the military and intelligence agencies in this country were emasculated to the point of ineffectiveness. It was the Clinton Administration that sat idly by while terrorists such as Osama Bin-Laden, who is overwhelmingly likely to have perpetrated this incident, ran free with little more than a slap on the wrist. It was the Clinton Administration who presided over the transformation of Political Correctness from the exception to the rule in this country and effectively neutered our moral resolve. IMHO, this set of circumstances, which led to this terrorist attack, is the TRUE LEGACY of the Clinton Administration. So, sure, just keep on blaming Bush to your little heart's content, but if you do, you will know that you are in denial of the truth.

    I kept reading this morning about how this tragedy was going to unite this country and strengthen its resolve, but after reading the posts on /., and responding in blood-red anger like so many others, I'm not sure that we won't be torn further apart than ever. It can only be a matter of time before we start turning this anger on ourselves.

    Now that I've spilled my guts for the last time today, I'm going to stay away from /. for a while, and all other forums, until I can regain some semblance of sanity and composure. May I suggest that others who feel this rage and anger do the same.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, Chuck Norris will still kick your ass.
  959. Hijacked with knives? by packphour · · Score: 1
    After thinking more about the hijacking with knives... I've come to this conclusion. The hijackers herd the passengers into the back of the plane in which they're kept uninformed (or even mislead of their intentions). The hijackers continue with their agenda and get the pilots out of the cockpit, after which the hijackers (who may have been trained pilots) take control of the plane.

    Keep in mind, the people in the back are still uninformed... so they sit, wait, and expect the hijackers to negiotiate with authorities. Since the plane is still in the air and not doing a nose dive, the people sit and wait.

    Since they're in the back, they can't see that they're heading toward a building- therefor never get the chance to realize they never had any hope for negiotations to save their lives...

    - packphour
    http://packphour.com

    --

    -p4

    (c) All Rights Released.

  960. Re:Three Step Loop: ID, Locate, Eradicate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thats why I always wondered why they don't just record the data remotely, like send the data over a sattelite connection to some central recording center? Doesn't seem like it would be that expensive.

  961. For the record. by Faux_Pseudo · · Score: 2

    if you click on the hof [hall of fame] for the top 10 posted to stories on slashdot this is now number one by a margin of 200 votes.

    Also scroll down the main page and note that the post about linus speeking only got 100 posts and a story about MS ranked in at 300 posts. Current number of posts thus far on this submission is 2200. Not encluding the two others related submissions.

  962. Re:Three Step Loop: ID, Locate, Eradicate by cybrpnk · · Score: 2

    Thanks for agreeing with my original post! I was starting to wonder if anybody sees it this way. Folks, this is going to be the biggest attack in US history, even bigger than any of the Civil War bloodbaths. There were 50,000 people in those buildings. Nobody at the blast floors or above got out alive. The ones ON the blast floor were the lucky ones - they never knew what hit them. The ones ABOVE the blast floor had to wait an hour for the collapse before they died - they couldn't get THRU the blast floors to get to the street. The casualties encompassed half of one tower and a quarter of another - that's (0.5+0.25)*50,000 / 2 = 20,000 dead. WHEN TENS OF THOUSANDS OF YOUR CITIZENS DIE IN AN HOUR, IT'S NOT A CRIME SCENE - IT'S A BATTLE ZONE. THE CORRECT RESPONSE IS TO IDENTIFY THE ENEMY, TAKE THE WAR TO THEM, AND KILL THEM. THAT'S HOW WAR WORKS. THIS IS WAR.

  963. Re:Three Step Loop: ID, Locate, Eradicate by RockyJSquirel · · Score: 1
    You realize that this attack required only:

    1. Three guys who knew how to fly a plane.

    2. A few fighting men with knives (that's what an eye witness reported).

    3. A plane ticket for each man.

    That's it! No big organization necessary! No money, no expensive weaponry, and no planing other than a little research on flight routes.

    We may be thwarted by the tinyness of the operation. What's to look for? Where's the military solution - are we going to augment Star Wars so it can protect us from KNIVES?

    Rocky J. Squirrel

  964. Mod "modulus" up! He has a clue! by RockyJSquirel · · Score: 1
    Exactly! These guys had the best leverage possible. They leveraged a few fanatical pilots and men with knives into destroying the Pentagon and World Trade Center. The only way we can prevent this is to post armed guards on planes and perhaps block the cabin off from the rest of the airplane.

    Rocky J Squirrel

  965. Re:What did he say after killing 125,000 at Hirosh by mgblst · · Score: 1

    Dropping two nukes (it would have only been one if their leader hadn't been so stubborn)

    it would have only been one plane, if your leader hadnt been so stubborn.

    two really idiotic statements...

  966. Re:Call first, make appointment - WS, NC by Groovy2 · · Score: 1

    In Winston-Salem NC lines were were outside the building according to a friend. I am unable to donate for medical reasons, but just donated money online to the Red Cross. It took 2 minutes, look upward for links on how to contribute.

    With such a day full of sorrow I take some solice by the fact that Americans from all walks of life are coming together to help one another in the wak of this tragic.

    By the way the number to make an appt in Winston-Salem is 724-0511.

    Thanks

  967. Re:I hope... by togofspookware · · Score: 1
    I for one will happily press the launch button of an ICBM to level the whole freaking country. No pin point attack with minimal collatoral damage - you harbor a terrorist you ARE a terrorist. Yeah, yeah, nukes, fallout, sucks for neighbroing countries and I realize that but you have to realize that many Americans WILL have these inflamed feelings and they won't be thinking about 'innocents'

    Of course, you would feel different about this if you happened to be one of the 'innocents'.

    --
    Duct tape, XML, democracy: Not doing the job? Use more.
  968. wondering out loud about the economics of this by jmarca · · Score: 1
    Well, all the pundits are saying now Americans will wake up to the fact that we are vulnerable to terrorism on a grand scale, etc. But really, we are just vulnerable to rich terrorists. This was a major, well planned operation, obviously. Well financed, and by whom? Probably someone who has been profiting handsomely by our mass consumer habits.

    All fingers are pointing at Osama Bin Laden. I hate to join the crowd before any proof is offered, but if it is true, guess what, our massive dependence upon crude oil is paying for terrorist attacks on our soil.

    So all the yups driving SUVs, and so on and so forth, um, drive a damn fuel efficient car.

    Ironically, the oil market has reacted, rather over-reacted to the tragedy, which is driving gas prices way way up. CNN is reporting price gouging at $5 a gallon. Compound that with the fact that the major financial center of the world, and companies who run the stuff, have been creamed. So the futures markets are going to go nuts (tanking, etc). So maybe this attack will cut off the money pipe from the US to the Middle East.

    But probably, in a few months after a few thousand pounds of ordinance are dropped, everybody will forget about conservation (especially with our prezident) and go write back to writing the blank check that will fund the next round of attacks.

    okay, that's my conspiracy theory.

    1. Re:wondering out loud about the economics of this by Spike_/\_ · · Score: 1

      Sure. And bin Laden comes from a wealthy Saudi Arabian family, in the construction business. His own money, his donors' money, it's all oil money. But it's not just American - Japan is the biggest consumer of ME oil these days. And along the same lines, think there are any Stinger missiles left in Afghanistan? When I was a kid... we didn't fight so many wars with people we had previously financed and armed.

  969. Re:An eye for an eye, and the whole world goes bli by shepd · · Score: 1

    I would rather die having not killed others than die having done so. To think otherwise is grossly uninformed.

    If you think life is worth living after killing, you haven't killed. Ask a cop about this. Chances are they can give you a story of an ex-cop who is a nervous wreck after gunning someone down who threatened their life. Either that or the killer is a cold-blooded murderer lacking respect for life. No matter how much you hate someone, they are still human life. I'm sure the cop hated the person who tried to kill them, but I could find you examples of cops in the situation I describe who are in counselling for it right now.

    Come back and say what you've said after you've killed. Tell us it is as easy as you say.

    I think you won't and I think it isn't.

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  970. terrorism by kpeerless · · Score: 1

    It's interesting that two of these flights took off from Boston and terminated in New York... and a significant number of American Irish in both those cities have been sending money and arms to the IRA for fifty years to bomb London. Maybe what goes round comes etc.

  971. Re:ALL YOUR WTC ARE BELONG TO US by togofspookware · · Score: 1

    Oh good grief. Lighten up. Yes, people died, but there's nothing wrong with making a joke. I thought it was kinda funny.
    but...

    BOMB -> JUMBO JET
    SOMEONE -> SOMEBODY

    And here it is again for you browsing at -1 (so don't mod me down):

    IN A.D. 2001 WAR WAS BEGINNING. *BOOM* Dubya: WHAT HAPPEN ? CNN: SOMEBODY SET US UP THE JUMBO JET. Cheny: WE GET SIGNAL. Dubya: WHAT ! Cheny: MAIN SCREEN TURN ON. Dubya: IT'S YOU ! Terrorists: HOW ARE YOU AMERICANS !! Terrorists: ALL YOUR WTC ARE BELONG TO US Terrorists: YOU ARE ON THE WAY TO DESTRUCTION Dybya: WHAT YOU SAY ! Terrorists: YOU HAVE NO CHANCE TO SURVIVE MAKE YOUR TIME Dubya: TAKE OFF EVERY 'ZIG' !! Dubya: YOU KNOW WHAT YOU DOING. Dubya: MOVE 'ZIG' FOR GREAT JUSTICE

    There. That's more accurate.

    --
    Duct tape, XML, democracy: Not doing the job? Use more.
  972. Re:Three Step Loop: ID, Locate, Eradicate by shepd · · Score: 1

    >Anything less is a failure to protect our way of life.

    When did the American way of life become a life of constant fear of terrorism and the instant destruction of anyone suspected to disagree with us?

    I always thought the American way of life was Freedom, Life, Liberty, and Justice for All. There can be no justice for those who are dead.

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  973. Re:American Imperialism (was This is where brains. by zveryk · · Score: 1

    reality? Do you think that your president reading his speech off of a teleprompter is Real. WAKE UP america. The empire you call home has slipped responsibility for the slaughter of millions. what do you do for a 'living' my friend? let me guess...you're a slave to the capitalist regime just like the rest of the planet. NOTHING can justify this...? How about GOD? Does 'God is Great'ring any bells for you 'folks'? No, how about 'In God We Trust'? Your a dead man.

  974. Re:I hope... by J'raxis · · Score: 2

    American anti-terrorism laws (passed after the first WTC bombing or Oklahoma City; not sure) already allow for indefinite detention of suspects. And, if you want to take away someones fifth-amendment rights, all you have to do is require them to testify before Congress for some reason instead of in Court. The fifth amendment applies to judicial trials, not legislative hearings.

    Im sure things like requiring encryption public-key escrow or the outlawing of anonymous (FreeNet) and pseudonymous (Usenet, IRC) protocols will come quite quickly now.

    And, just to give the conspiracy nuts something to chew on: The government has always been out to opress online expression, it appears. Just when it seems there is mounting backlash against the recent intellectual-property excuses (DMCA), isnt it convenient that the government can once again roll out the old national security issue?

  975. Retaliation does solve one issue by SnakeOps · · Score: 1

    Those terrorists killed in retaliation does solve one issue, they will never be able to harm an innocent again.

  976. "I Stand Alone, On the Word of God. The B-I-B-L-E" by SomePoorSchmuck · · Score: 1
    Um, you might want to pick up your Bible again and take a look at the maps in the back. The State of Israel today is exactly where it was in Old Testament times. Nothing arbitrary about it.
    My parents met in Bible College, and pastored within the United Pentecostal Church for many years, so I assure you I have a reasonably firm knowledge of Scripture.

    The point I am making is that the map of "Old Testament Times" in a Bible is not a judicious precedent for setting modern policy. In 1948 the modern state of Israel was created with force and the threat of military force by the major post-WWII powers [in this case, primarily England], and the continuing existence of the state of Israel is a result of the continued application of violence and the threat of violence by the [US-supported] Israeli military.

    The brand of "ancient founding charter" mentality you are supporting is exactly the kind of rhetoric which both sides use to stir their populations to inhumane violence. Every culture, worldwide, has sacred writings which establish history and geographic origins. If the story of the covenant between YHWH and Abraham is to be used as a valid basis for establishing a nation in an area where people have been living for generations, then the United States of America must be prepared also to recognize any religious, historical, or tribal claims of its native peoples, and must immediately cede all previously claimed territories back to a tribal council, displacing without remedy every person currently living on the land in question. Undoubtedly, this land would include huge swaths of the continent, not just the relatively small, few reservations the government allows to exist. Where will the millions of displaced United States Citizens go? How will they rebuild their lives?

    According to your view it is okay to eject them from the land their families have inhabited for the last two centuries, because somebody else has an older, Grandfather Clause Charter. Do you understand that if this were to occur, there would immediately be rioting, lynching, and mass murder between the two groups? Do you understand that this Race War is the only possible result of the No Compromise / No Regard For Recent History policy you propose?

    I don't hold any special ill will towards the state of Israel. As I said previously, who can blame them for defending the only country in which they have an ethnic majority of the citizenry [leaving aside the volatile citizenship status of the Palestinian inhabitants]? And who can blame the Palestinians for bitterness against the forcibly-established "teacher's pet" of the Middle East?

    The second point I would make is that you have greatly oversimplified your Biblical History. "The State of Israel" to which you allude is just like every other nation throughout history. Specifically, its borders, citizens, and political identities were in a state of constant flux during the entire OT period. There were not enough members of the original House of Abraham to fill, use, or even claim the land we now know of as "Israel". Abraham was just one small part of a large-scale expansion of civilization emerging from the area around the Euphrates and Tigris rivers. By all Biblical indications, YHWH did indeed promise Abraham some land in the region where Israel currently exists, but the extent of that land -- its size and its borders, grew and receded with the tides of history and power.

    The OT is a working chronology of both the spiritual covenant between the Hebrews and their God, and the geopolitical realities of living on the coast of the incredibly culturally diverse sea which would play an essential part in the development of the entire Western World [and now, with 6 billion of us on the planet, the entire globe]. During the 4 books of Kings and Chronicles alone, the borders, the very existence of Israel were highly mutable. Do you think that the Ammonites, Midianites, Moabites, Hittites, Hamites, Assyrians, and the hundreds of other groups, didn't also have traditions of "This land is my land, that land is your land"? YHWH did not, as far as my Bible studies go, give Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, Joshua, David, Jehochiam, Hezekiah, Jereboam, and other Hebrew leaders a GPS hook-up so that they could know exactly where Israel stopped and the neighboring countries' lands began. Therefore, the locations of those borders were determined the same way nearly all borders are determined: might makes right. Who had the might, and thus the right, to define those borders changed frequently due to pressures both internal and external to the developing Hebrew civilization.

    Therefore, while working from the idea that "The State of Israel" is, and has always been a concrete, well-defined concept may be an expedient justification for uncompromising preservation of its current properties, but it is is both historically and politically unwarranted to do so.
    --

    Hollywood, Television, has become the dream machine. We need to take that back; each of us is a Dream Machine
  977. Re:What did he say after killing 125,000 at Hirosh by socialist+fish · · Score: 1

    More humane to drop nukes on civilians? You're so sick.

    --
    yadda yadda
  978. Re:I hope... by -brazil- · · Score: 1

    Moron. Retalitation will not stop anybody (we are talking about suicide attackers, remember?), it will only create more innocent victims with good reasons to hate the US so much that they don't care about hurting innocents.

    --

    The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer.
    --Henry Kissinger

  979. Re:Three Step Loop: ID, Locate, Eradicate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Commercial airliners are difficult beasts to pilot. They needed training.

  980. Re:What did he say after killing 125,000 at Hirosh by dpotter · · Score: 1
    Well, of course, FDR was dead when the bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, so the subject of your message is misleading. However, this is what Harry Truman said:

    "It was to spare the Japanese people from utter destruction that the ultimatum of July 26 was issued at Potsdam. Their leaders promptly rejected that ultimatum. If they do not now accept our terms they may expect a rain of ruin from the air, the like of which has never been seen on this earth. Behind this air attack will follow sea and land forces in such numbers and power as they have not yet seen and with the fighting skill of which they are already well aware."

    I am an American who has lived in Japan and loved Japan. I wholeheartedly agree with President Truman's decision to drop the bomb on Hiroshima, even when considered from today's historical perspective.

  981. Blood Donation In Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. I just thought it might make a lot of you who have relatives/friends that need blood feel better about the lack of blood situation.

    (I don't know if someone already mentioned this)

    The blood donation centre in Calgary has line ups for donations going to New York. As far as I have heard the case is similar throughout most major cities throughout Canada. I hope our contribution help where the US donations are lower.

  982. bin laden would agree with you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Worry about morality later"

    I dont know who Machiavello is, but maybe bin laden (one guy suspected of being behind this) would agree with you on this point

    Rise above it, dont sink to their level

  983. Why NOT to go to war by KurdtX · · Score: 2

    Allow me to poke some holes real quick like...
    Who are you "going to war" with?
    Since it's likely a terrorist organization, who are going to attack? OBL has been the FBI's PE#1 for a ton of years, you don't think they've been trying to kill him in that time?
    What good has come from war? Have you ever talked with anyone who's fough in one?

    Now for the reasons to just sit tight (and I'm an American who has always lived here, I just don't own a gun)
    This is retaliation, I'm sure you've heard it from other posters, so i won't get into it.
    Retaliation lowers us to their level.
    No other country messes with (spies on) us nearly as much as we mess with (spy on) other countries. You'd be pretty pissed if some other country took out Bush and his cabinet because the election didn't come out in their favor
    And then there are the conspiracy theories, which make a sick sort of sense, even if they are only coincidences; why would you possibly give your support to such efforts?

    My monologue...
    Certainly it is more a testament to the greatness of our nation that we are as angry and upset by this as we are purely through the rarity of such a tradgedy than anything else I can think of. Of all the civilized nations of the world (read: the ones who didn't celebrate the disaster), I would say none is as prominent as ours on the world stage. I would also say that the US security and defense is certainly the best in the world, particularly in light of the freedom we are allowed (blame this freedom if you need something to blame for the attacks) and the physical expanse and variety of the people of the US. No, I feel the best way for us to "strike back" is to show our compassion for all man, and that our love for our nation is too strong to be broken by such fear tactics. Okay, that was sappy, but you get the idea.

    And about that Roosevelt quote... it made sense because Japan was bent on destroying us, not scaring us. Do you like to watch scary movies?

    --

    Kurdt
    I'm not anti-social. Just pro-technology.
  984. Re:But it *doesn't* solve things by Placido · · Score: 1

    No one in their right mind would launch a missile attack against the US. Even if they had an accurate 20MT nuke to fire off at NORAD. For the simple reason that doing so pinpoints their exact location, which would then be passed to USAF and/or USN.

    Rubbish. These terrorists believe in their cause so much that they have sacraficed themselves. Do you think they would really stop and think twice about hi-jacking an ICBM and launching from a country other than their own? They obviously don't care about 10 - 50 thousand american lives and I suspect anyone who dies in a retaliation would have died for a 'greater cause' and as such it would be alright.

    --

    Pinky: "What are we going to do tomorrow night Brain?"
    Brain: "I would tell you Pinky but this 120 char limi
  985. Re:What did he say after killing 125,000 at Hirosh by james(honest) · · Score: 1

    So what you are saying, is that it was ok to kill 125,000 people because otherwise America was going to kill a lot more! Great thinking!

  986. Re:Nostradamus by rob_ert · · Score: 1

    Yeah and a german prince will come and make sure that there will be peace again....

  987. Re:But it *doesn't* solve things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First off I doubt the budget was anywhere near $100,000 as the most likely suspects for this terrorism are motivated by religious zealousness rather than payment as would be the entire training and support structure for the attack. It's not like they needed anything other than the price of the clothes on their backs and the plane tickets once the were in the US.

    Furthermore retaliation is an undeniable fact. If this attack was ordered by Bin Laden as the CIA claims, then even if we don't retaliate Bin Laden will continue to order terrorist attacks against the US. Don't believe me? Anyone remember the ABC interview with Bin Laden 2 years ago?
    Read the transcript here and tell me this man will leave the U.S. alone if we do nothing:
    http://abcnews.go.com/sections/world/dailynews/t er ror_980609.html

  988. Re:Nostradamus by Rieen · · Score: 1

    This quote does not come from Nostradamus, he died in 1566.

  989. What's the big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this had happened in a civilised country it would have been a disaster. But no country that practises capital punishment AND posseses nukes deserves peace.

    Would you stupid americans cared if this had happened in China?

    (Can i rate this message down myself? Euhm, noop, i'll leave that to the first reader)

  990. Re:Plea for peace - Huh? Get Real! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Certainly, there are some highly visible fanatics out there. My point was that we should just be careful about the kinds of generalizations we throw around at a time like this.

    Who cares? Like I said - and all the bleeding heart tree-hugging happy-go-lucky liberals on Slashdot modded me down for - WE ARE AT WAR.

    And I don't give a shit that Mecca is a city in Saudi Arabia. It's a holy city to Islam, and they see it either as heaven or a means to it.

    One wonderful shot on the news was the Palestinians jumping around and celebrating. My, their women are ugly. No wonder Arab men keep their faces hidden despite the sunstroke problems that must incur. But anyway, they were celebrating and partying with their Ford minivan.

    Apparently, they're not smart enough to understand their own hypocrisy.

    Don't they have Adbudullah-Wahid Motor Company there? Nope? So they have no problem driving one American institution while they blow up another?

    Nuke 'em. Men, women, children, all. Nuke 'em.

    We are at war. Mod this as you want - that's why I'm posting anonymously - but you will see that I'm right.

  991. Re:Airlines chosen by pallex · · Score: 1

    "greatly outnumbered by the moderates"

    The moderates will probably just not be that bothered that they`d want to risk their own life. They`re still pissed off about Americans poking their noses into their affairs like they are the worlds policeman, judges and jailors.
    If they had just attacked the pentagon, and hadnt use civilian aircraft, i believe they would have got a lot of respect from a lot more people (especially within America).

    Time to sort out some of the worlds problems, rather than making money from them. Although i doubt that will happen - instead it will be used to promote the new world order some more, you`ll have a whole load of CCTV cameras popping up, id cards, laws against encryption & anon net access...

  992. In other news.... by seanmeister · · Score: 2

    This thread has toppled The Star Fraction as the top most active post ever on Slashdot! Huzzah!

  993. Re:Three Step Loop: ID, Locate, Eradicate by vulgrin · · Score: 1

    You're forgetting one thing though... The plane outside of Pittsburg did NOT go down inside a building. They can pull the recorders from that plane and gather some evidence from it immediately.

    --
    I sig, therefore I am.
  994. Hear hear! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The most likely people to do this would seem to be Islamic groups due to US policy in the Middle East. People in Iraq and other countries are indoctrinated to believe that the US is some sort of monster and to blame for all their problems. Lashing out and quite possibly killing more innocent people in the process will only reinforce this view. The US should try to remain calm and the message it should try to send is that Americans are not monsters.

  995. Re:Three Step Loop: ID, Locate, Eradicate by JWhitlock · · Score: 2
    Commercial airliners are difficult beasts to pilot. They needed training.

    BS. I work in aircraft simulation, and I "flew" a plane the first time I sat behind the controls.

    The hard part is starting the engines, the flight check off, programming the nav computer, talking to the tower, and knowing when to abort a takeoff. Landing is also hard. Once you are in the air, near cruising altitude, it's damn easy - the nav computer does most of the flying, and even if you ignore the tower, there are now on-board computers that warn you if you are too close to another aircraft.

    No, if you kill or disable the pilot, even you can jump into that pilot seat, give the yoke a shake to disengage the flight computer, and point that plane where you want. If you don't know how to work the trim, you may have to flight the aero dynamics, but you could certainly target the plane. Hell, if you can work the radio enough to get in touch with the tower, you might even be able to land it.

  996. Re:Three Step Loop: ID, Locate, Eradicate by JWhitlock · · Score: 2
    WHEN TENS OF THOUSANDS OF YOUR CITIZENS DIE IN AN HOUR, IT'S NOT A CRIME SCENE - IT'S A BATTLE ZONE. THE CORRECT RESPONSE IS TO IDENTIFY THE ENEMY, TAKE THE WAR TO THEM, AND KILL THEM. THAT'S HOW WAR WORKS. THIS IS WAR.

    War? Against who?

    Anyone?

    I know we all have guesses, but do we really know?

    We have a short list - Bin Laudin (gonna have to learn how to spell that), Iran, Iraq, maybe Syria, probably not Libya, Cuba, Serbia, or a domestic group. Probably not. Should we bomb the hell out of them, because they are on the short list? For every father will kill, we'll create another supporter for terrorism. For every child, two or three. Nice strategy.

    What if the culprit flies to France, then turns himself in? What if the French refuse to turn him/them over until we agree to remove the death penalty from the possible punishments? Do we bomb France?

    What if all those involved were part of the plan, and buried with their victims? What then?

    Someone just punched us in the nose in the dark. We should stop the bleeding, and wait until morning to figure out who it is.

  997. Re:Virtue of poverty? Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >Nepal will NEVER NEVER produce a large wheat >crop. NEVER.
    This may be true
    >We aren't "oppressing" them, [...]
    >Oppression comes in many forms.

    Here I disagree with you. Maybe the people of Nepal really arent opressed by anyone. Maybe the western world has no "slaves" or something where oppression can be that easily seen. But think e.g. of South Africa where western pharmaceutical concerns tried to force the government not to produce affordable aids-treatments (as far as you can treat that disease by now) due to patent reasons. As the South Africans had bigger problems than patent violations (4.2 million infected - MILLIONS dying in the next years) the WTO stepped in and threatened to sanction South Africa.
    Think of (I think) India where western firms tried to push "terminator seeds" into the market which grow exactly one time and the die so you have to buy new ones every year.
    Think of the price for coffee. It has actually fallen by some 30-50% in the last 20 years. Why? People producing it need some things we have really desperately. So we dictate the price.
    Hell, think even of Europe. EU _officials_ stated less than a week ago that US intelligence services not only gather information for national security reasons but also commit industry spionage. And well, I recently heard the Europeans were not only Americas "friends" but "partners".
    BTW: strictly following UN statutes the US would already have had to be _expelled_ for not paying its contibutions.
    Way to go: Taking advantage of not having to follow the rules because everyone else is too weak to enforce them can be seen as kind of oppression too if you like.

    Great wealth and power bring great responsibility. And as long as workers in most of the world hardly earn enough to live while producing goods for _us_ we mustnt tell how much good we do to the world by paying a few international organizations.

  998. Re:Live by force of arms or deal with world inequi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    exactly. Thats the reason why theres no inequality in the world, especially in America.

    Thats why America gets richer while the rest of the world (excluding Europe/Japan/a few others) get poorer.

    Thank you America

    check the facts

  999. Re:I hope... by Golias · · Score: 2
    So, you're saying you'd like these people dead?

    No.

    Don't put words into other people's mouths, and then attack them for things they didn't say, anonymous coward asshole.

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  1000. Re:But it *doesn't* solve things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It doesn't take a trained pilot to keep a plane in the air. Takeoff and landing are hard, steering is not.

  1001. Re:I hope... by daanger0us · · Score: 1

    You must be thinking that the people that hi-jacked the planes did the planning and prepping alone...

    --
    Aliens? Magnetic Rings?! Bah! Who needs that when we have
  1002. Re:I hope... by gfreeman · · Score: 1
    If people are going to scream for the heads of those that support terrorists, can we invite NORAID to the party?

    --
    Ceci n'est pas un sig.
  1003. Re:Nostradamus by L41N14L · · Score: 1

    Surely you're not implying that GWB is a great leader?

  1004. Re:An eye for an eye, and the whole world goes bli by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Let's remove the assasination law and begin picking off these terrorist leaders one by one. There are alot of Navy SEALS waiting for their oppurtunity to show off their skills. Also, I heard that all US hackers are going to start taking down Middle Eastern sites. I praise them for this and will be trying to help out in any way possible.

  1005. Perspective and Wording by virg_mattes · · Score: 2

    > I agree with the rest of your response, but I don't think it's right
    > to dismiss whoever did this as insane because that simply perpetuates
    > the idea that these people are impossible to reason with, which is not true.


    I agree, but although I tend to think of fanaticism as a type of insanity, it's not, in the official sense. However, I have found that sectarians (and fanatics, by extension) are indeed very difficult to reason with.

    Virg

  1006. Re:nostradamus by TikkaMassala · · Score: 1
    It would be weird if it was actually written by Nostradamus. It's actually interesting because someone wrote that in an article about how anyone can make 'predictions'. Unfortunately, he was right.


    Tikka

  1007. Re:Nostradamus by TikkaMassala · · Score: 1
    That was not written by Nostradamus. Unlucky. It was written by a journalist to prove that anyone can make 'predictions'.


    Nostradamus [nostradamus-repository.com] - the real deal.

  1008. Re:Cowards by localman · · Score: 1

    Amen. It is reassuring to know that there are some people out there who see the bigger picture on this.

  1009. A Response by virg_mattes · · Score: 2

    I have an rebuttal to your post, but I can't get it past the content filter at work (triggered by "terrorism/anarchy terms", imagine!). Review your posts tonight for my reply.

    Virg

  1010. Re:I hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know the only way to fight and win against a terorist to to become a bigger terrorist. A terorist believes in fear, well megaton nuclear bombs can sure generate fear, heat and light. Let's show these idiots that if you forsake humanity then you need to be taken into the light. When you think about, we are helping them acheive everylast happiness they get to meet Allah first hand. It is time to put an end to the rabid dogs the culture that produces them.

  1011. Re:I hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no profit to be made, silly.

  1012. turn your left cheek in, turn your other cheek out by SomePoorSchmuck · · Score: 1

    do the hokey pokey and maybe get yourself killed is what it's all about.

    the interesting thing about pacifism is that it's not an angle which really allows for much wiggle room. Either you do not engage in violence at any time for any reason, or you engage in violence, however limited, and sacrifice the moral ground to condemn the violence of others, who possess their own set of grievances and justifications.

    what those who seek to learn about pacifism must understand is that it is a moral, spiritual, humane philosophy. as such, it asks its suscribers to subject to a seemingly impractical code. for if pacifists cannot find an effective nonviolent means of defense, they will tend to die out, leaving the world populated only by non-pacifists. this is where it is necessary to understand that pacifism is not a Religion or a God -- there are no promises of divine intervention to save you and not necessarily any eternal happiness awaiting should you die [although a significant portion of Western Pacifism derives from certain Christian sects who eschew the slash-and-burn evangelism practiced by the mainstream catholic and protestant denominations]. the hope of a pacifist is not necessarily to be rewarded in this life or the next, but rather to stand against the immorality of violence against fellow human beings.
    [one place to start would be http://www.catholicworker.org/ ]

    the other thing many people don't understand about pacifism is that it does not preclude solid self-defense. it only takes a shift of thinking away from the mainstream assumption of "we need to have the resources to kill anyone who tries to harm us" to "how can we best avoid violent conflict and what nonviolent defenses can we rely upon if we are attacked".

    --

    Hollywood, Television, has become the dream machine. We need to take that back; each of us is a Dream Machine
  1013. Re:In case you've read this far: why they went dow by Spike_/\_ · · Score: 1

    The Seattle Times quotes the CEO of the engineering firm that designed the towers, that 1 hr of burning jet fuel exceeded design specs of support beams, they buckle, impacted floor collapses, followed by chain reaction.
    Interview at:
    http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworl d/ 134340502_engineer12m.html
    Graphic version:
    http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/news/nation-wor ld /terrorism/collapse_12.html

  1014. Re:Eye opener. You must be joking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    of course you might do that.

    BUT: wheres your coffe from? wheres your oil from? wheres your stereo from? where are your nike shoes manufactured? wheres your [insert ten billion things] from?

    ok. while you might be able to do without all that you would not be able to keep your current standard of living. wealth always comes from having others working for you. its not like when you close the borders theres the same amount of money in america and it will stay there because you stop spending it on the foreign idiots. those foreign idiots are vital to your (and ours as well; im from europe btw) wealth. So dont be offended. the more power you have the more power is expected to be used for doing good and not for personal interests which seems exactly what the us are using it for.

  1015. Re:Eye opener. You must be joking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Strange how you like using an AMERICAN invention... the Internet.

    Strange how you like using a SWISS invention ... the World Wide Web (
    www.cern.ch/Public/ACHIEVEMENTS/web.html)
    Last time i checked there were also quite a few cars in the us (GERMAN invention). Also please stop using the train invented by the BRITISH. This is bullshit. But your being angry at anyone who dares criticize the Great&Allmighty U.S. makes it darn difficult to discuss seriously. While most US citizens are ok there is serious reasons to dislike the action of the United States as a whole. At least some of them. You have to leave behind your black/white view on things and be able to take criticism also from your friends.

    btw: i dont think that this "fuck everything American" comment beginning this threat was very wise but there are some things america seriously needs to rethink

  1016. posthumous medal of honor by SomePoorSchmuck · · Score: 1

    i salute your post and the objective you are helping to accomplish. trolling has become the most effective online method for putting a mirror up to the face of humanity and forcing it to see how morally ugly we can be. in two hundred years, slash/blog/usenet/e-diary archives will have become the sacred parables read by children learning the history of their species.
    thanks for being here on the front lines of discourse.

    "sincerity is the new irony" -the Brunching Shuttlecocks

    --

    Hollywood, Television, has become the dream machine. We need to take that back; each of us is a Dream Machine
  1017. Re:But it *doesn't* solve things by hearingaid · · Score: 2

    as it turns out, of course, I'm right.

    it doesn't take a trained pilot to keep a plane in the air. it does take a trained pilot to cause the plane to turn into a missile.

    and as it turns out, among the terrorists were several trained pilots: all of whom apparently received their training in the USA, and were on a list of known terrorists.

    this is a failure of intelligence at the highest level.

    --

    my old sig used to be funny, but then slashcode ate it and now it's not funny anymore

  1018. Anonymous Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I saw a flag at half mast today. It was blowing in the wind. I'm in Scotland.

    1. Re:Anonymous Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you should check that young man.

      I believe you wanted to space out those sentences like I am here.

      Good luck to you in the future.

  1019. Re:It's not a pentagon anymore... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cd /bin
    mkdir Laden

  1020. COME ON PEOPLE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We want a nice ROUND figure of 2500 (two thousand and fifty) posts on this article.

    Wouldn't that be swell?

    Ooooooooh yeah.

    1. Re:COME ON PEOPLE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Ah that guy is clever. Putting in the deliberate mistake, causing more comments to flood in to reach that wonderous target..
      Can't you just see that 2500 comment mark glistening in the sky.

      Almost sexual, isn't it?

  1021. Yes, I wasn't thinking. by Penguinoflight · · Score: 1

    I am sorry for my raging reply, and for it's incorrectness. Yes, Israel was driven out of Israel by their enemies because they turned away from God, not because of "stupid nazi's".

    I also need to say that I'm of German nationality, and therefore I hold nothing against the German people, just the Nazi ideas of the past.

    --
    "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
    1 John 4:14