Wanna hear my theory? I think it's some sort of personal flying device, perhaps using some sort of antigravity or magnetic repulsion. Here is my evidence.
From the MSNBC article;
IT is not a medical invention.
The invention has a fun element to it, because once a Ginger was turned on, Bezos started laughing his "loud, honking laugh".
-What could be more fun than flying?
Bezos is quoted as saying that IT "...is a product so revolutionary, you'll have no problem selling it. The question is, are people going to be allowed to use it?"
-People may not be allowed to use it? This suggests that it will break existing rules. There are many rules about airspace in cities, for instance. Also, pay attention to this, scooter fans; revolutionary. An electric scooter would not be revolutionary
Jobs is quoted as saying: "...If enough people see the machine you won't have to convince them to architect cities around it. It'll just happen."
-If you could fly, architecture would have to take advantage of that. Roofs would suddenly be parking lots. Balconies would be landing pads.
The "core technology and its implementations" will, according to Kamen, "have a big, broad impact not only on social institutions but some billion-dollar old-line companies."
-Billion dollar old line companies? Like car companies?
And the invention will "profoundly affect our environment and the way people live worldwide. It will be an alternative to products that are dirty, expensive, sometimes dangerous and often frustrating, especially for people in the cities."
-Once again, what else is dirty, expensive and dangerous except the auto?
Here are my final two points. The inventor is an avid aviator, and he drives a helecopter to work. And finally, the code name, 'Ginger' evokes Ginger Rogers, the girl who could 'dance on air.'
Don't you wish you could dance on air too?
Slashdot Mirror
Wanna hear my theory? I think it's some sort of personal flying device, perhaps using some sort of antigravity or magnetic repulsion. Here is my evidence.
From the MSNBC article;
IT is not a medical invention.
The invention has a fun element to it, because once a Ginger was turned on, Bezos started laughing his "loud, honking laugh".
-What could be more fun than flying?
Bezos is quoted as saying that IT "...is a product so revolutionary, you'll have no problem selling it. The question is, are people going to be allowed to use it?"
-People may not be allowed to use it? This suggests that it will break existing rules. There are many rules about airspace in cities, for instance. Also, pay attention to this, scooter fans; revolutionary. An electric scooter would not be revolutionary
Jobs is quoted as saying: "...If enough people see the machine you won't have to convince them to architect cities around it. It'll just happen."
-If you could fly, architecture would have to take advantage of that. Roofs would suddenly be parking lots. Balconies would be landing pads.
The "core technology and its implementations" will, according to Kamen, "have a big, broad impact not only on social institutions but some billion-dollar old-line companies."
-Billion dollar old line companies? Like car companies?
And the invention will "profoundly affect our environment and the way people live worldwide. It will be an alternative to products that are dirty, expensive, sometimes dangerous and often frustrating, especially for people in the cities."
-Once again, what else is dirty, expensive and dangerous except the auto?
Here are my final two points. The inventor is an avid aviator, and he drives a helecopter to work. And finally, the code name, 'Ginger' evokes Ginger Rogers, the girl who could 'dance on air.'
Don't you wish you could dance on air too?