But the dependenices, order, library versioning is horribly complicated. I calculate I would need 3 or 4 full days to make a compile succesful... if at all...
If the former, sanctions are failing by all measures. Miserably. The only thing they are achieving is killing innocent people. This is akin to try to execute a crminial by shooting squad, but the squad keeps killing people around the condemned guy who remains untouched.
If the later, then lets go for it. Lets keep Saddam another 20 years and 1 million more children later please.
If one loses sight of the objective and does not have a measure of when to change tactics once it is evident the current tactics don't work to reach the objective, one runs the risk of keep doing stupid things that damage innocent people.
What gives the US and Britain the right to attack a sovereign nation in this manner?
7000 dead people.
Using that logic the 500000 Iraq children that have died (lets forget about the estimated 200000 civilians dead during the Gulf War) would give ObL the right to attack the US.
Even if you are in war it is your duty to scrutinize your goverment's every single step to make sure they do what has to be done and nothing else more...
At least half the cost of delivering spam is covered by the receiver (bandwith, disk space, time). It is akingto the funny example I put in my previous comment in this thread.
MS wants to police the right to use of its software. As such, would they dare to disobey a judge that has ruled somebody has the right to use the software?
I don't think so. They would be contravening the order of a judge, not a position in which they would like to be I guess.
I have a wonderful offer to make you. It is a product that will change your life.
See you tomorrow at your place, I need your computer, one of your CD-RWs, and your desk to make a presentation. I will need also 20 sheets of paper to print the prospectus bu I guess you have some paper at home, I prefer the shiny expensive one. I will get there at 3:00am because it is convenient for me.
Thanks for helping me to keep safe my freedom to work.
If right to use was declared transferable, MS would be obliged to grant the use of their product to the new licensee.
No warranty perhaps, no support if you like, but the only thing any software company could arguably do would be to ensure that one and only one copy derived from a given right to use is running at the same time.
Why to get into this mess? Open Source is the way to go.
Slashdot Mirror
.... then the makers are emulating to the smallest detail the original...
One that does exactly the same but has long luscious hair, full lips, long legs and looks like ... er ..., no better I will not write it here....
But the dependenices, order, library versioning is horribly complicated. I calculate I would need 3 or 4 full days to make a compile succesful... if at all ...
All the oil industry is shaken by your comments.
There Solaris is the main desktop in use.
Any other examples would be welcomed.
I have tried to install both in Solaris 2.6 (is what we have).Pain,pain, pain.
And that is only the installation.
CDE runs for months before Netscape manges to kill it once in a blue moon.
To get rid of Hussein or to make him look bad.
If the former, sanctions are failing by all measures. Miserably. The only thing they are achieving is killing innocent people. This is akin to try to execute a crminial by shooting squad, but the squad keeps killing people around the condemned guy who remains untouched.
If the later, then lets go for it. Lets keep Saddam another 20 years and 1 million more children later please.
If one loses sight of the objective and does not have a measure of when to change tactics once it is evident the current tactics don't work to reach the objective, one runs the risk of keep doing stupid things that damage innocent people.
Please, go and check the several UN resolutions regarding this matter. That is international law.
Also there is one reason why the term "occupied territories" is used.
I will not mention Amnesty International. Oh! I did. Damn.
...and when nobody is willing to scrutinize and criticize it is important to get out of either sheep mentality.
So, not 'nuf was said.
He changed the world.
Bombs don't.
What gives the US and Britain the right to attack a sovereign nation in this manner?
...
7000 dead people.
Using that logic the 500000 Iraq children that have died (lets forget about the estimated 200000 civilians dead during the Gulf War) would give ObL the right to attack the US.
Messy world we live in
Muslims can eat anything when they are under duress.
If you fail to see how that is offensive then there is no wonder why we have the mess we have.
How is the people suppossed to make their goverment accountable during war situations?
There is one place invaded.
The refugees come from one die of the conflict only.
Only one side is violating international law (with the support of a country that fights for international freedom).
I yo are European thank your ancestors, the US and the USSR.
....
If you are Asian thank your ancestors, the British, the Chinese, the USSR and certainly the US.
Americans did not fight to free other countries only. Had Europe and Asia fallen, the US would have been next
... inform yourself and stop all the paranoid nonsense....
It works.
Enough said.
...give support no matter what....
Even if you are in war it is your duty to scrutinize your goverment's every single step to make sure they do what has to be done and nothing else more...
Why should we pay for UCE (a.k.a. spam)?
At least half the cost of delivering spam is covered by the receiver (bandwith, disk space, time). It is akingto the funny example I put in my previous comment in this thread.
MS wants to police the right to use of its software. As such, would they dare to disobey a judge that has ruled somebody has the right to use the software?
I don't think so. They would be contravening the order of a judge, not a position in which they would like to be I guess.
I didn't request it, I don't want it. Particularly if I have to pay for the privilege.
Is that so difficult to be descibed in legal terms?
I have a wonderful offer to make you. It is a product that will change your life.
See you tomorrow at your place, I need your computer, one of your CD-RWs, and your desk to make a presentation. I will need also 20 sheets of paper to print the prospectus bu I guess you have some paper at home, I prefer the shiny expensive one. I will get there at 3:00am because it is convenient for me.
Thanks for helping me to keep safe my freedom to work.
I don't want anything even if it is targeted if I did not implicitly or explicitly request it.
Nobody has the right to use my resources (bandwith, mailbox space, time) without my consent.
If right to use was declared transferable, MS would be obliged to grant the use of their product to the new licensee.
No warranty perhaps, no support if you like, but the only thing any software company could arguably do would be to ensure that one and only one copy derived from a given right to use is running at the same time.
Why to get into this mess? Open Source is the way to go.
It was full of civilians whose only crime was to be showing Milosevic propaganda (like if they could have refused).