Slashdot Mirror


Hackers: Uncle Sam Wants You!

scraemondaemon writes: "A new TV public service announcement targets U.S. computer hacktivists with a blunt message: Uncle Sam wants you to help fight the war on terrorism. They demonize you and criminalize you and then ask for your help. What's a hacker to do?"

590 comments

  1. Hell, Why Not? by Foxxz · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    We probably cant be any more tarnighed than we are now. It cant hurt, so lets try and help out and get a good rap for once.

    -Foxxz

    1. Re:Hell, Why Not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      You want to support the bloodthirsty empire and it's mission, then you do that. The men, women, and children of Afganistan(or any other country we bomb) are not my enemies, and I will not support the allies in their world wide campaign of terror and bloodshed, comitted in the name of stopping terror and bloodshed.

      Long live freedom. Long live liberty. Tyranny, politicians, and the people who follow them can all die in the war they crave so badly.

    2. Re:Hell, Why Not? by MrSquish · · Score: 0, Troll

      what about if you quit? they'll arrest you because you'll be in the public eye again ;) they'll think you left this "great job" (they being really anyone who beleaves stuff on tv all the time) to go hack some website (your oun! ahck ti's php really but they won't know waht that means from "pgp") basicly i think that you'd get in trouble or just get watched all day long if you joined and left.

      -(F+o(x*6-4)) == Foxx =]

      --
      If i was you, you'd be me and we wouldn't be having this conversation
    3. Re:Hell, Why Not? by JoeyPea · · Score: 1
      I can tell you why I decline the offer to join the Navy writing manuals on their electronics? Even when I'm laid off three times in one year, I still make more than their $30K salary. They'll have to do something more than that to get me to join.

      "So you're telling me no more free bottled water, no casual clothes, *and* I have to travel?"

    4. Re:Hell, Why Not? by n2dasun · · Score: 2, Funny

      funny... I'm just getting started, and make a bit more than $30K.

      --
      I'm determined to reclaim my karma. Now, if I can only find a groundbreaking article and something witty to say....
    5. Re:Hell, Why Not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What country do you live in? Name one country that hasn't done this same thing? Do you know that in Vietnam, the Vietnamese would put bombs wrapped in babies blankets(and baby also) and throw them at the US troops? They would then report that the US had killed innocent babies, when it was the other way around. Did mommy and daddy not buy you the car you wanted and sent you to a school in the US instead of Europe? You now want to get back at them don't you? Grow up already!

    6. Re:Hell, Why Not? by Albion · · Score: 1

      Paranoia is our enemy. You can't avoid it. It's everywhere.

      You don't have to love the government to want to save society, unless you aren't part of society.

    7. Re:Hell, Why Not? by Albion · · Score: 1

      Who said they were? I don't think anybody wants to kill Afghanistani civilians. More like liberate them from the oppression of the Taliban and get rid of terrorist. If they win, these guys won't be allowing anybody to own or use computers.

    8. Re:Hell, Why Not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pathetic half-baked responses like that are conclusive proof that some people clearly DON'T deserve civil liberties and freedom of speech.

      Try thinking for yourself, instead of spouting guilt-ridden middle class rhetoric. You've had it easy all your life. In this so-called "Bloodthirsty Empire". The same "Bloodthirsty Empire" that puts clothes on your back and food on your table. And when the time comes to give your all in the name of freedom, all you can muster are excuses and cowardice.

      Subhuman filth.

    9. Re:Hell, Why Not? by bbcat · · Score: 1

      He must be pissed off that his parole officer
      gave him shit for not reporting in when he
      was supposed to.

    10. Re:Hell, Why Not? by CBravo · · Score: 1

      Hell I wouldn't mind writing a manual on Echolon or whatever it's name is now.

      --
      nosig today
    11. Re:Hell, Why Not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you know that in Vietnam, the Vietnamese would put bombs wrapped in babies blankets(and baby also) and throw them at the US troops?

      I'm extremely sceptical as to the truth of your claim, at least with regards to the babies being included. Are you able to cite a source?

    12. Re:Hell, Why Not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pathetic half-baked responses like that are conclusive proof that some people clearly DON'T deserve civil liberties and freedom of speech.

      That's right, he should only be 'free' to say the right things!

  2. In the famous words of... by The+Slashdolt · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Ask not, what your country can hack for you. Ask what you can hack for your country"
    -The Slashdolt

    --
    mp3's are only for those with bad memories
    1. Re:In the famous words of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel the same as you. Lucky for me, I have IQ to spare. Now you're only one IQ point above imbecile.

    2. Re:In the famous words of... by atrowe · · Score: 4, Funny

      They're not going to recruit anyone with that crap. They need to appeal the the hackers themselves. Something along the lines of "hax0rs, uncle sam wants j00!"

      --

      -atrowe: Card-carrying Mensa member. I have no toleranse for stupidity.

    3. Re:In the famous words of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell them to FUCK OFF. It aint your building that blew up

    4. Re:In the famous words of... by ChaoticWorks · · Score: 1

      no real hacker types with numbers.

    5. Re:In the famous words of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      j00 r ju57 j3410u5 b3c4u53 j00 r n07 1337.

  3. What's a hacker to do? by Che+Guevarra · · Score: 2, Insightful



    They demonize you and criminalize you and then ask for your help. What's a hacker to do?"

    Be an American and fight for our survival. You think they'd have messed with 767's if they had nukes? This isn't a game.

    1. Re:What's a hacker to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Except this may be the one and only chance we, as a community, get for the government to have to do what we say. If we refuse to work for them on the basis that we're afraid of getting arrested, and they really need us that badly, then just watch some of the "anti-terrorism" bills get shot down. This isn't about refusing to work, it's about holding out for a fair shake, because this is probably our only chance to get it.

      Agreed, this is not a game, but we're not the Army either. We're not getting paid for being at the government's beck and call everytime they feel like it. If they want our services, they better give us some respect.

      If you think for a minute the government will turn around and be nice to the /. community if we give them any choice about it, you're sorely mistaken. The only things that speak in government are money and necessity, and we now have the latter.

    2. Re:What's a hacker to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I can't get to the M$ website right now, maybe they have already started? Oh and if you really want to do something useful go and work on fussion reactors, once we have nice clean feul we don't need that region of the world.. a few well aimed nukes, the Soviet 50megaton city busters, and we could get rid of the whole problem in a day.

    3. Re:What's a hacker to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Be an American and fight for our survival."

      Be a HUMAN and fight for OUR surivival. Don't support either side of these madmen who crave blood above all else.

      Look at that nazi Bill by Ashcroft, that would make many computer crimes a life in prison offense, not to mention clasify it as a terrorist act. That's the America you want us to fight for? That America can go straight to hell for all I care.

    4. Re:What's a hacker to do? by sc7007 · · Score: 1

      Be careful and remember one very important thing: The government is you, or at least a representation of you (ala Abe Lincoln). You have no right to expect anything from the government that you, yourself, are not willing to give.

    5. Re:What's a hacker to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree. The United States government is like the abusive parent that beats the crap out of you when no one's looking and then expects you to act like it's the best thing since sliced bread when company's over.

      War sucks. I'd rather not contribute in any way.

    6. Re:What's a hacker to do? by Platinum+Dragon · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You think they'd have messed with 767's if they had nukes? This isn't a game.

      You think they'd have done anything at all if the CIA, through Pakistan's ISI, hadn't trained them to be extremists? Like you said, this isn't a game - I just wish states and their "intelligence" arms would realize that next time someone involved with them feels like installing a military junta or training "freedom fighters" to "uphold policy". Nations in both East and West are guilty of this, and until these deadly cloak-and-dagger games of subversion and manipulation stop, there will be more incidents involving "blowback," where innocent civilians - like WTC employees, and women in Afghanistan - get caught in the crossfire of others who should know better.

      And you wonder why people trust their governments less and less...

      --

      Someday, you're going to die. Get over it.
    7. Re:What's a hacker to do? by Fifth+of+Five · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They were extremists already, we just toaught them to be more efficient and effective during a time (the Cold War era) when "the enemy of my enemy" was my friend. Shortly after the WTC/Pentagon attacks one of the previous administration's policy men (sorry, I don't remember who) hit the nail on the head when he said (paraphrasing here) that walking away from Afghanistan after the Soviet withdrawal was clearly one of the worst mistakes the west had ever made.

      One would hope we learn from this...

      --
      "Melt the ice; eat the moose; drill the oil; get it over with." -Max Boot
    8. Re:What's a hacker to do? by jiheison · · Score: 1

      You have no right to expect anything from the government that you, yourself, are not willing to give.

      If you have been paying attention, you'll also note that you have no right to expect anything from the government that you are willing to give. Take respect, justice, fair-play for examples. The government of Abe Lincolns time is not the government of today.

    9. Re:What's a hacker to do? by Guppy06 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "You think they'd have messed with 767's if they had nukes?"

      Hell yes! The goal of these extremists is to destabalize the US and give their own forces a chance to set up what is essentially a police state across the Muslim world. Think of the Iron Curtain back in the bad old days.

      Stratfor.com suggests that bin Laden and his peers feel that they can get the US out of the picture by dragging the US into another Vietnam-esque war, destabalizing the US government as Americans get pissed off once again at the meat grinder war a conventional invasion of Afghanistan would turn out to be.

      The reason such an invasion of Afghanistan would be such a pain is because we need to borrow other countries' airspace (if not ground bases). A nuclear attack by these terrorists, on the other hand, would justify a nuclear response by the US on the terrorsits and their sponsor countries (legally if not morally). ICBMs don't need to travel through anybody's airspace but ours and the target's. We might be nice and borrow Pakistan's airspace just long enough to send over B-52s to drop leaflets warning civilians near targets to get out of the way, but that's it.

      When it's all over, instead of taking over the Islamic world, there may not be an Islamic world for these people to take over.

      These people may be cruel, but they're not stupid. They know they need a US hampered by it's own morality/decadence/sloth (depends on your point of view) than MIRVs raining down on their heads.

    10. Re:What's a hacker to do? by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      You think they'd have done anything at all if the CIA, through Pakistan's ISI, hadn't trained [globalresearch.ca] them [public-i.org] to be extremists [msnbc.com]? Like you said, this isn't a game.

      It never has been a game. Why don't you look at why we did what we did, rather than use 20/20 hindsite? The Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan for the purpose of eventually invading Saudi Arabia.

      It's easy to criticize now, but it's hard to argue with the result that Saudi Arabia did NOT fall into Soviet hands, which would have been a disaster for the free world. How soon we forget the threat of Soviet expansionism.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    11. Re:What's a hacker to do? by Redline · · Score: 3, Funny

      Be an American and fight for our survival.

      Rather odd to hear "Che Guevarra" say that, considering he was executed by the CIA in Bolivia in 1967.

    12. Re:What's a hacker to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What region of the earth are you talking about?

      Afghanistan is where opium comes from, not petroleum.

    13. Re:What's a hacker to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, the world would just suck if the soviets had invaded saudi arabia... why exactly? is someone still stuck in the cold war, re-reading bad military fiction?

    14. Re:What's a hacker to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you've clearly not got a clue.

      bin Laden isn't trying to set up a police state.

      He's a religous fundamentalist trying to wreck revenge on the United States and western civilisation.

      Yes. He's just a nut.

      The problem is he's got backers for whatever reason.

    15. Re:What's a hacker to do? by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "He's a religous fundamentalist trying to wreck revenge on the United States and western civilisation."

      Why? Just because? For the heck of it?

      "Yes. He's just a nut."

      You really think that somebody who can organize something like what we've seen is "just a nut?" You think that flying planes into buildings almost simultaneously is the "limit" of is stratiegic skills?

      If these people were all "just nuts," they'd be easier to spot and we wouldn't have had 9/11.

    16. Re:What's a hacker to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Soviets didn't invade Afghanistan, you imbecile. There was a Communist government in Afghanistan which was happy to cooperate with the Soviet military. The government was popular in Afghanistan (unlike the Taliban), but of course we can't let the will of the people get in the way of teaching them the American Way, can we? After all, a US citizen is worth more than an Afghan citizen.

    17. Re:What's a hacker to do? by Platinum+Dragon · · Score: 2

      yeah, the world would just suck if the soviets had invaded saudi arabia... why exactly?

      This didn't occur to me while mulling over RM101's post, but your post reminded me that a lot of the battling over the Middle East can be summed up in one word: "oil." A Soviet invasion of Saudi Arabia (assuming they made it through Iran and Afghanistan) would give them control over massive oilfields, also assuming they managed to win.

      This would either have triggered an all-out, direct U.S.-Soviet conflict, or pushed the U.S. to find alternative sources of fuel and raw materials. In fact, there's an easily-available one that can be grown in the U.S. right now... but it's illegal, thanks to Will Hearst, DuPont, the Mellon Bank, et al.

      Back to the Soviets... I'm not a fan of their regime either. I don't like imperialist nations, whether they claim to be socialist or democratic. The true colors of a nation come out in their treatment of smaller populations - and neither the U.S. or the U.S.S.R. did great in that regard during the Cold War. Arguably, the U.S. has tried to rebuild some bridges since... but those darn intelligence and military arms manage to keep futzing things up for everyone, under the guise of "national interests."

      More later, once I feel like writing a direct reply to RM101.

      --

      Someday, you're going to die. Get over it.
    18. Re:What's a hacker to do? by Platinum+Dragon · · Score: 1

      There was a Communist government in Afghanistan which was happy to cooperate with the Soviet military. The government was popular in Afghanistan (unlike the Taliban),

      Weeeellllll.... I dunno if you could call many of the big-C Communist governments "popular," though I was surprised to find out recently that Afghanistan already had a pro-Soviet government by the 1979 invasion. Now that I know this, further research should prove... interesting.

      Friggin' empire builders... always saying they're working for their subjects, while finding new and interesting ways to get them - and everyone else - killed.

      Hell, I'll just throw my support behind RAWA; they at least seem to give a flying fuck about the rights and well-being of Afghan citizens, as opposed to the CIA/Pakistan-backed occupation force known as the Taliban.

      Interesting side note: "Talib" is apparently an Urdu word for "student." The Taliban were students of extremist schools in Pakistan, funded by the CIA through the ISI and Pakistani military. Witness the power of education, and the results of its abuse.

      --

      Someday, you're going to die. Get over it.
    19. Re:What's a hacker to do? by ldopa1 · · Score: 1

      We might be nice and borrow Pakistan's airspace just long enough to send over B-52s to drop leaflets warning civilians near targets to get out of the way, but that's it.

      Except that more than 66% of the population can't read!!! (three references, I got bored finding more good ones...) Less than 16% of the women can read, they can't have an education, they can't hold a job. Propaganda won't work unless it's by word of mouth.

      All of these statistics were gathered before the Taliban (who executes anyone that tries to teach women) was firmly in place. It has become even worse since...

      --
      The Dopester
      "Yes, I'm a Karma Whore, but I'm doing it to pay my way through school."
    20. Re:What's a hacker to do? by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
      Be careful and remember one very important thing: The government is you...


      I'm sick of hearing this platitude. So the Davidians at Waco killed themselves? Because the gov't did it to them, but they are the gov't, right? So they killed themselves. Help me here--what am I missing?

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    21. Re:What's a hacker to do? by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

      Funny how the Afghanistan citizens are so proud of the fact that they drove out the Soviets. If they were so "popular" as you state, one would think they would be pissed that they weren't allowed to join such a great totalitarian state.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    22. Re:What's a hacker to do? by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I guess the Soviet Union was just a misunderstood "alternative" system. The fact that they slaughtered 30 million of their own citizens is just a vicious rumor. All those stories of people being put into psychiatric hospitals when they "mental illness" caused them to doubt communism are just fantasies. I guess all those countries they invaded just welcomed them in.

      How foolish that the ENTIRE WORLD was to believe that they were oppressing their citizens. Too many spy novels, apparently. I mean, who needs free press, free speech and other silly liberties when the government is giving you free bread?

      And Hitler was just a misunderstood Libertarian who wanted to "free" the Jews.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    23. Re:What's a hacker to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, you know the Slashdotters are ignorant when they start defending the Soviet Union. What next -- Hitler was just a misunderstood artist?

    24. Re:What's a hacker to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It the whole fscking region, just a bunch of dumb people who think that some deity is on thier side so its ok to kill and steal, and that goes for the Jews as well, all as bad as each other, the rest of us would do alot better without them dragging us all down, so my vote is get rid of them all before they endanger us as a species with their stupidity.

    25. Re:What's a hacker to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well Said!
      Its good to see some of the people on Slashdot haven't been sucked into believing the crap that our representatives and government officials have been feeding us in the past few weeks.

    26. Re:What's a hacker to do? by RelliK · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just want to correct the false statement. Soviet Union did not "invade" Afganistan. They went there to stop the civil war and restore the communist government. And where did you get the information that Soviet Union wanted to invade Saudi Arabia?

      --
      ___
      If you think big enough, you'll never have to do it.
    27. Re:What's a hacker to do? by xmedar · · Score: 1

      By the same argument Hitler was sane because he managed to launch a Blitzkreg over a large swathe of Europe. All these people have one thing in common, they believe they know best for everyone, and use whatever historical justification they can to reek havoc, there is only one way out take away the historic justifications, beleif in relgion is a big part of that, once thats gone, once everyone starts to realise that hey, we're all trying to life and take care of those we care about and there is no deity looking after us, we are on our own then, and only then will humanity be able to come together, otherwise I give one to two hundred years before we eliminate ourselves as a species.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced man is indistinguishable from God
    28. Re:What's a hacker to do? by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      And where did you get the information that Soviet Union wanted to invade Saudi Arabia?

      I was reading an article recently, but unfortunately I can't find it. It had quite a bit of recent middle east history. It might have been Time or Newsweek, but I don't seem to be able to find it.

      The gist of it was that the bases that we used in Saudi Arabia during the Gulf War had been built after the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan. It went on to say that they were built because it was believed that Saudi Arabia was a target of the Soviet Union.

      Unfortunately, I can't find a direct reference, so I can't back up the statement.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    29. Re:What's a hacker to do? by Platinum+Dragon · · Score: 1

      I was reading an article recently, but unfortunately I can't find it. It had quite a bit of recent middle east history. It might have been Time or Newsweek, but I don't seem to be able to find it.

      If you do, let me know. I'm taking a course on the Cold War next semester, and this might make interesting background research for the obligatory essay.

      --

      Someday, you're going to die. Get over it.
    30. Re:What's a hacker to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Tell "Uncle" Sam to take a long hike, that's what. He ain't no uncle of yours, and he sure ain't on your side. All he cares for these days is to take away all your freedoms and use you to help the rich get richer.

      As said above, "They demonize you and criminalize you and then ask for your help." I don't care if you believe me or not. Just remember the DMCA and its brethren.

    31. Re:What's a hacker to do? by RelliK · · Score: 3, Informative
      The gist of it was that the bases that we used in Saudi Arabia during the Gulf War had been built after the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan

      Hah! That's true only insofar as the bases in Saudi Arabia were built for the purpose of attacking Iraq in the Gulf War, which chronologically was after Soviet Union had moved into Afganistan. It was also after Soviet Union had moved out :-) By no means was it a result of the war in Afganistan.

      This is exactly what pissed off Osama bin Laden, BTW -- the presence of US troops in the holy land and their continued attacks on Iraq.

      --
      ___
      If you think big enough, you'll never have to do it.
    32. Re:What's a hacker to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A "sane" does not automatically imply as "intelligent". A person might be "insane" or even "stark raving mad" and simultaneously be "intelligent" or "clever strategist".

      People have quite often a misconception that being "intelligent" also means being "nice". Not true.

    33. Re:What's a hacker to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think they'd have messed with 767's if they had nukes? This isn't a game. Who's "they"? How can you imagine what "their" intentions are without knowing who it is you're talking about? You're assuming Bin Laden and cohorts are to blame but there's no shred of evidence to it and there are a lot more interested in the all the backlash this led to. Did you know Israel has been attacking and killing palestinians all these days since 11th Sep.? Did you know Iraq's people and cities are being bombed on a daily basis since then? It's not in the news, but it sure is real. Damn right this isn't a game. When did you find this out? People all over the world, in countries with oil or in which economic interests from US corporations have know this. They know it at least from the moment US bombs and bullets started to pour in.

    34. Re:What's a hacker to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny how the Afghanistan citizens are so proud of the fact that they drove out the Soviets.

      What proportion of them exactly, or do you just mean you're aware that some are proud of it? Assuming you do mean a majorirty of them, can you cite sources?

    35. Re:What's a hacker to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once again, more BS from Reality Master 101. Too proud to admit "I was wrong," too stupid to just STFU.

    36. Re:What's a hacker to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My brother is a member of the IDF and you, my friend, are a popularist idiot. We NEVER attack except in retaliation. The number of Israeli civillians killed in this conflict outnumbers palestinians 20 to 1. And Iraqi cities are not being bombed. Whoever told you that is as much as an idiot as you are for believing it. The news, and in fact - no report anywhere will suggest any western nations are doing this - because they are not. Not even Iraqi propaganda is saying their cities are being bombed. WHo the fuck are you to make up shit like this? Who told you this? Your daddy? Your friends in the "underground". It's a bunch of bullshit and you've proven your own ignorance by posting your views here. My brother is in intelligence and recieves reports of every mortar launched, every bullet fired, and every grenade thrown on both the Palestinian AND Israeli sides. Here's some interesting stats for you: ON average, 40 grenades each night are thrown at IDF positions in Israel, and 2000 rounds of ammunition fired by Palestinaians, and 35 mortars launched. In average, no Israeli grenades are thrown, 400 rounds of ammunition fired, 4 rounds of tank rounds fired. Here's another stat for you: Number of sniper targeted Israeli civilians murdered in the past 6 months - 112. Number of sniper targeted Palestinian civilians murdered in the past 6 months - 0. Check your facts before taking sides in a conflict you know nothing about.

    37. Re:What's a hacker to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One logical flaw there. The government is not the embodiment of the individual, but the society as a whole. If it worked the other way around, Timothy McVeigh could have requested government funding for his bombing. I'm not going to go any deeper into the complexities of political science, I think you know what I mean.

    38. Re:What's a hacker to do? by 17028 · · Score: 1

      Err, going into a country with troops to fight an indigenous army is an invasion in my book. Let's hear what encyclopedia.com has to say:

      "Afghanistan War,
      1978-92, conflict between anti-Communist Afghan guerrillas and Afghan government and USSR forces. In 1978, a coup installed a new Communist government under Nur Mohammad Taraki. In 1979, another coup, which brought in Hafizullah Amin, resulted in an invasion (Dec., 1979) of USSR forces and the installation of Babrak Karmal as president. The number of USSR troops, originally estimated at 30,000, grew to 100,000, and the conflict settled into a stalemate. The Muslims were supported by aid from the U.S., China, and Saudi Arabia, channeled through Pakistan, and from Iran. Although the USSR had superior weapons and complete air control, the rebels successfully eluded them. As the war progressed, the rebels improved their organization and tactics and began using imported and captured weapons, included U.S. anti-aircraft missiles, to neutralize the technological advantages of the USSR..."

      I'll spare you the rest. Evidently I'm not the only one who considers it an invasion. I would think that most history books outside of the old Soviet Union does too. Prove me wrong. And no, an assertion from you does not constitute proof.

  4. question by WeaselGod · · Score: 4, Funny

    Do I get Stock Options?

    --
    - WeaselGod
    Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet turbines
    1. Re:question by Lizard_King · · Score: 3, Interesting

      hmmm... laughed at this comment at first, but then something struck me. If the government is serious about finding legitimate hackers to help, they may have to offer some sort of benefit to them. Really, this is not a joke...the gov does not want an army of kiddies who don't know shit about computers and infiltration other than running other people's code. They're gonna want the best of the best (if they are serious about launching some sort of information attack). These people probably all have very time consuming jobs and may not necessarily want to start virtual freedom fighting for their country (grandiose assumption).

      I guess my point is that the government may want to consider a benefit for someone who volunteers their time. I know that the righteous argument is that everyone should want to help/fight for their country, but we all know that this is clearly not the case. If we want the best, we may need to offer something in return

      --
      "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch." - Jack Nicholson
    2. Re:question by mmcshane · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but they call them bonds.

    3. Re:question by xmedar · · Score: 0

      All your options are belong to Bin Laden! (well the airline, banking and insurance ones anyway)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced man is indistinguishable from God
    4. Re:question by ethereal · · Score: 1

      Terror has no chance to survive, make your time?

      --

      Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

    5. Re:question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way to beat that long-dead horse, Mister Creativity.

    6. Re:question by StikyPad · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The government's philosophy has been that if patriotism isn't incentive enough, you probably aren't trustworthy enough. If it takes money to get you to work for our government, then theoretically, money could just as easily get you to work for an opposing government or entity. That said, they do pay comparable rates of a job in the civilian sector, but don't expect to get rich.

    7. Re:question by agdv · · Score: 1

      Sure, you get billed a small percentage of the national debt!

  5. you've won a new car! by Choco-man · · Score: 5, Insightful

    simply come to the (insert local large public gathering place here) to pick up your prize!

    a trick routinely employed by authorities to catch wanted criminals. they send out a mass mailing to wanted individuals stating they've won something fantastic, and all they have to do is show up to claim it. they show up, and their prize is an all expense stay in levenworth 8-)

    of course, i'm sure our government wouldn't do something like this to hackers.

    for the motivated, self starter, http://www.shamalbank.com/ is a bank with known bin laden accounts 8-)

    not that i'm suggesting anything...

    1. Re:you've won a new car! by passion · · Score: 5, Informative

      The bin Laden family is rich and large - at least 53 members in the business.

      Do you have a black sheep to your family? I do, but he drives fast cars, smokes cigars, and lives alone. He isn't a rich raving lunatic with a chip on his shoulder.

      Is the rest of the bin Laden family necessarily guilty? Perhaps you've been watching too much of the Sopranos.

      --
      - passion
    2. Re:you've won a new car! by Zathrus · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, that tactic is often used to serve warrants. Not sure if it's ever been used to arrest people.

      On topic, however, note that they don't appear to ask you to "come forward", they just ask you to not screw up the Net in retalitory attacks.

      Oh, and finally, do you know that the bank in question has accounts owned by Osama bin Laden, or merely by the bin Laden family? The bin Laden family disowned Osama nearly a decade ago, froze most of his funds, and have done a great deal of good work, both in Saudi Arabia and elsewhere. Including a Israeli-Palestinian student exchange program to try and reduce misunderstandings and violence in Israel.

    3. Re:you've won a new car! by big_cat79 · · Score: 1

      Or, you can do like Chief Wiggum on the Simpsons and offer them boats. Although, I don't think Homer is much of a hacker.

      --

      BigCat79

      "The dead have risen and are voting Republican!" --Bart Simpson
    4. Re:you've won a new car! by Andux · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Like I said in my journal, sounds like classic good-cop/bad-cop to me:

      Ashcroft: "Hey, you! Yeah, you! Quit fucking with government websites, you little twerp! Do you want life in prison? Do you aspire to be a terrorist? Listen, you little bastard! If you think you can get away with this, you don't stand a snowball's chance in hell! I will find you, and I will bury you in the deepest hole–"
      Cyberangels: "Please excuse him, he's having a bad day. See, we're having trouble getting intel on bin Laden and his pals. Maybe you can help us out here..."

      --
      (Do not sign anything.) -- Fell, Planescape: Torment
    5. Re:you've won a new car! by GOD_ALMIGHTY · · Score: 4, Informative

      http://www.shamalbank.com is hosted at http://www.activeisp.com which appears to have the colo in London but the HQ addy on the contact page is in San Jose. Considering that Shamal Bank looks like a static site only, they're prolly on a shared host. I would highly recommend not attempting to take this box out, since you could be facing a number of criminal charges from both US and European companies. Besides activeisp.com is prolly pretty innocent. Shamal Bank's website was done by http://www.sudanshop.co.uk who also hosts at activeisp.com (on a different box -- merkur vs. neptun). If anyone wants to go figure out how many domains are pointing to these boxes, it would be nice to know how many lawsuits the motivated, self starter will be facing.

      On the bright side though, this is most definately a W2K box as that is what activeisp seems to be pushing, so breaking in should be really easy.
      Again, use your own time and tools to figure this info out for sure.... I can't be bothered right now.

      --
      Arrogance is Confidence which lacks integrity. -- me
    6. Re:you've won a new car! by snubber1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      except most criminals could get out due to this kind of arrest being called entrapment. Only if they are legimately giving away a prize may that do such a thing. I heard of some cops sending out free baseball tickes to one parcular game to a bunch of convicted DUI people with suspended licenses. Anyone who didn't show up in a taxi/bus/passenger vehicle (driving without a license) was arrested on the spot. All the other guys got to go to the game.

      --
      I don't really mind double posts on //..
    7. Re:you've won a new car! by ethereal · · Score: 1

      Wiggum: Did the backwards-talking girl tell you that too?

      Lou, deadpan: I'll drive.

      --

      Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

    8. Re:you've won a new car! by jiheison · · Score: 1

      It's not entrapment unless they entice you to do something illegal. It is not illegal to claim a prize, real or not.

    9. Re:you've won a new car! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did anyone see "emeny of the state"? This could lead to interesting covert type work, but you would have to be the bad guy as in hacker good guy, government bad guy. I can't get a job with the government, I tried at MIT, but failed the background check. So, I wouldn't even try for this.

    10. Re:you've won a new car! by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 1

      That bank was funded with 50 million in startup capital from Osama. He was also involved in another bank scandal in the early 90s that was basically just a front to funnel money into various Islamic extremist groups. Interpol ended up shutting him down.

    11. Re:you've won a new car! by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 2, Informative

      The rest of the bin Laden family wants absolutely nothing to do with Osama. They disowned him years ago and took away what they could of his money. Osama bin Laden:Islam::David Koresh:Christianity. The bin Laden family is actually a respectible family who have done a lot of good, they just have one wacko cousin who gives them all a bad name.

      They have actually returned to Saudi Arabia in fear of vigilantism against them. Probably a smart idea, even though they have and want nothing to do with Osama.

    12. Re:you've won a new car! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cnn:
      "Levin cited a 1996 State Department report that said bin Laden reportedly provided the AlShamal Islamic Bank with $50 million in start-up capital.

      The senator noted a bin Laden associate testified earlier this year at the embassy bombings trial in New York that al Qaeda held a half-dozen bank accounts at AlShamal, including one in bin Laden's name.

      The AlShamal bank's Web site cites correspondent relationships with major banks in financial capitals, Levin said, including three in the United States: Citibank, American Express Bank and the Arab American Bank, the latter recently purchased by the National Bank of Egypt."

  6. They ask hackers to help them. by SpanishInquisition · · Score: 4, Funny

    But they don't say how.
    For all we know maybe they just want to test biological weapons on us.

    --
    Je t'aime Stéphanie
    1. Re:They ask hackers to help them. by xmedar · · Score: 1

      They are looking for the "hacker gene" so they can use genetherapy to weed us out of the next generation, so whatever you do don't let them take blood from you.. oops... should have posted to alt.conspiracy.us.ciggerette.smoking.man.is.going. to.get.you, oh well..

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced man is indistinguishable from God
    2. Re:They ask hackers to help them. by AaronStJ · · Score: 5, Informative

      They ask hackers to help them.
      But they don't say how.
      For all we know maybe they just want to test biological weapons on us.


      From the article:

      "Cyberangels hopes to enlist politically motivated hackers instead to help with online intelligence gathering, such as tracking down computer criminals who attempt to attack the Internet infrastructure, said Aftab.

      The organization is also seeking information on any terrorist groups that may have attempted to commission computer security experts to aid them, she said."

      Seems pretty clear to me. Contact the cyberangels and offer your services if you believe you can help gather intelligence, or give them ayn info you may have on terrorists attemptimg to commission security experts.

      It looks to me like they have contact info on their website

      --
      Stupid like a fox!
  7. well, they actually don't want you by Archie+Binnie · · Score: 2, Informative

    The largest part of the campaign actually seems to not be so much that they want your help, but that they want to politely ask you to not go an muck stuff up that you shouldn't...

  8. Agreed by geek · · Score: 4, Informative

    Plus the Marines, Navy and Army have never to my knowledge demonized hackers, I believe that was all the DOJ's doing.

    1. Re:Agreed by WhiteKnight07 · · Score: 1

      Of course they don't demonize them, where do you think they get most of their best electronics warfare engineers?

      --


      We're going to make information free Mr. Anderson, whether you like it, or not.
    2. Re:Agreed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really don't understand how the DoD, and the government in general, "hire" personnel for sensitive work like EW. While they seek out and reward highly intelligent and capable people, the primary "test" of a potential employee is trust. Can they trust that the person with access to sensitive information/equipment/networks/etc. will not do harm to the trusting institutions.
      I can understand why the public in general has the opinion that the hacker community is the only source of true genius internet/computer geeks, because that's the only aspect that ever gets publicized. It's the fairy tale of true genius being recognized and applauded for coming over to the good side. Use your powers for good. Reality is there are many more "hackers" (in the original sense of the term) that have always worked on the good side. For obvious reasons the public never hears of these exploits and feats. It doesn't pay to announce your capabilities to potential enemies.
      If all this sounds too militaristic, it's because those are the terms that best describe this situation.

      As for 3 years of training, that's about the right amount of training time for the very people that work this problem day-in and day-out. While each and every soldier has basic infantry skills, the DoD does invest great amounts of time and money in training the very EW engineers you speak of. You'll never hear about these guys and gals because they don't advertise.

      BTW, the first soldier killed in Vietnam was an EW Linguist.

      "Sometimes you have to listen for the silence." --Unknown

  9. "retaliatory hacking " attack what? by Lawmeister · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Earlier this month, a German group known as the Chaos Computer Club publicly appealed to hackers worldwide not to engage in retaliatory hacking in the wake of the terrorist attacks."

    Aren't the Afgan's essentially in the stone age? - at least that's what has been spun in the media to us all.

    What potential targets would hackers have?

    1. Re:"retaliatory hacking " attack what? by BryceH · · Score: 1

      banks

      --
      "Shut up brain or ill stab you with a Q-tip" Homer Simpson
    2. Re:"retaliatory hacking " attack what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you actually read the article, what they're actually asking is this:

      "Stop hacking all the arabic websites you little kiddies, it doesn't help and just makes you look moronic, thanks"

    3. Re:"retaliatory hacking " attack what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Attack E-bay.

      Osama uses this to send his super secret stenography messages

    4. Re:"retaliatory hacking " attack what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Antiglobalization websites like indymedia.org?

    5. Re:"retaliatory hacking " attack what? by bark76 · · Score: 1

      The war is on the terrorists groups, not the Afghans. Haven't you been paying attention to Bush? It'll become a war on the Afghans if they don't give up Bin Laden after Bush offers proof of his guilt, but until then they are not the target of this war. (just really close to the target)

    6. Re:"retaliatory hacking " attack what? by faichai · · Score: 1

      No...it will become a war on the Taliban, NOT the Afghan people.

    7. Re:"retaliatory hacking " attack what? by Danse · · Score: 2

      We can only hope you're right about that. But most likely the Afghans will end up being the innocent victims this time.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    8. Re:"retaliatory hacking " attack what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are not talking about the Afghans directly. This directed towards possible support groups. Such is sniffing major bank transaction to watch for suspicous activity. putting key loggins ect on executive PC who may have direct or indirect ties.

      Putting shredder or DOS type software in other sympethetic coutries networks. There are a huge scope of posiblilties. Even some US banks are a little shady on some these global deals. Loyalty always stops at cash. Think about it.

      We Will Rebuild

    9. Re:"retaliatory hacking " attack what? by NullAndVoid · · Score: 1

      Wonder if we'll end up killing more than 6,000 innocent people. I wonder if anyone will notice or care if we do.

      --


      -- Sigs are for losers
  10. I'm in favor of this by xTown · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Frankly, I was hoping that there'd be an opportunity for those of us who are old and/or out of shape to do something more to help the war effort than just giving blood. I can't shoot for beans, but I can run cables and configure routers and code and so on and so on. I'd love to do something meaningful.

    1. Re:I'm in favor of this by ZaMoose · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...Or suffer from scoliosis and some of the worst eyes in the world, but can code some mean admin scripts!

      I can shoot, theoretically, 'cause I've played all the Quake games, and, according to Lieberman and crew, this qualifies me as a triple-A marksman.

      Plus, I have extensive anti-terrorist training by way of all the Counterstrike hours I've logged. The gov't could just drop be into de_kabul and let me frag away!

      --
      I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
    2. Re:I'm in favor of this by ZaMoose · · Score: 2

      Errrm, "s/drop be/drop me/g"

      --
      I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
    3. Re:I'm in favor of this by Rupert · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think dropping Be on Kabul would be a bad idea. There are no rootkits for BeOS. How would we haXor Al Qeyda then?

      --

      --
      E_NOSIG
    4. Re:I'm in favor of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God knows the "allies" will need their information systems intact as we bomb civilian targets and neutralize hospitals the way we did in the Iraqi campaign and the Aggression on Yugoslavia.

      But, only by doing so, will we realize justice against those terrorists who attack us, no matter how many innocent civilians get killed, because after all our leaders are American, and the way they spin the story, that's the way we're to see it. Not sure why exactly, just cuz I reckon.

      Makes me wonder who exactly the psychotic extremists really are.

    5. Re:I'm in favor of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell them thanks to BeOS advanced capabilities, they can play several MP3's at once. As they sit there mesmerized with 50 media players open playing various Muslim prayer chants, we sneak up behind them and give them a Boot to the Head (TM)

    6. Re:I'm in favor of this by ZaMoose · · Score: 2

      If we dropped enough BeOS CD's from a great enough altitude... we'd have shiny, deadly missiles with superior multimedia capabilites!

      Plus, everyone knows, every bit of marketshare Be can grab is a good thing.

      --
      I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
    7. Re:I'm in favor of this by Dexx · · Score: 1

      Now I know what to do with all those AOL CD's.. anybody got a handy catapult? Or a bomber?

      --
      Feel the fear and do it anyway.
    8. Re:I'm in favor of this by ZaMoose · · Score: 3, Funny

      No no no! That's what we don't want! Can you imagine the "Taliban rox0rs, US sux0rs" spamming of the AIM servers?

      Wait a tick... Maybe it could be a good thing. Sure, those poor Afghanis think they're going to be able to call up AOHell after their 1000 hours runs out and cancel, but have you ever tried to get through to Tech Support? We'd cripple their financial infrastructure by way of recurring credit card charges that won't go away!

      'Course, last I checked AOL wasn't accepting either rocks or opium as valid currency...

      --
      I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
    9. Re:I'm in favor of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd be willing to do so too. I donated to the Red Cross, but I can't give blood or serve in the Army because I have chronic illness (high blood pressure and more! at the young age of 28 - take care of yourselves - it can happen to you - don't think you can start living right when you hit 30 - by then it is often too late!).

      This is something people like me can do in service of our country.

    10. Re:I'm in favor of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aie Aie brother!

      50hours a week of Urban Terror.
      #1 on all server
      -=CLuSTeR=- is ready to frag some terrorist!

      GG

    11. Re:I'm in favor of this by someonehasmyname · · Score: 1

      ROTFL! Sign me up! I'm usually a T when I play CS, but if I can frag one of them and take their AK, I'll gladly be a CT.

      --
      Common sense is not so common.
    12. Re:I'm in favor of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean cs_kabul, don't you? Why would the Afghans wanna blow up their own capital? Besides, there are still US hostages (detainees) being held in Afghanistan...

    13. Re:I'm in favor of this by oh · · Score: 1

      Help the war effort?

      What war? You can't go to war on a group of people, even if that group has about 4,000 members.

      Before you jump to "do something more to help the war effort" think about what that "war" means. In this case it will mean bombing the hell out of a country that is one of the poorest in the world, and has been a battle ground between the USSR and the US (US by proxy).

      How are you going to get the "terrorists"? Bomb cities and towns that have terrorists? Do terrorists live in army camps, nice targets with no civilians, or do they live with their families, their wives and CHILDREN! Do they have day jobs? What about the people they work with?

      How would you like it if Russia said the "terrorists" from Chechnya who bomb apartment buildings live in your town. If you don't hand him over then we'll bomb you. We won't make an extradition request, we won't give you evidence that this person is responsible, but give him up or else.

      Never mind that up until the bombing the US was giving the Taliban millions of dollars in aid, and now they are a terrorist state who we are going to war with. There are a lot of things the Taliban do I don't agree with, but at least there honest and consistent.

      The bottom line is what has the US ever done to help democracy and improve happiness outside the US? They've done lots of things to help the US but to aid some one who isn't a US citizen? Forget it!

      I know this is a rant, but it makes me angry when people say things like "help the war effort" without any understanding of what they are saying. Why not say "I'd like to help some one drop bombs on a child care centre" or "I'll do networks for these people who stop medicines and food being delivered to a country who's people are starving".

      Anyone who knows the facts that the US actions are hypocritical, but for a lot of people, its "my country, right or wrong".

      If that's your attitude, then your just as bad as the people who carried out the airliner attacks.

      --
      Democracy isn't about no one telling you what to do. It's about everyone telling you what to do.
  11. No mixed messages here. by alhaz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Go read the actual article. Fret not, they're still demonizing and criminalizing.

    (They're asking 'hacktivists' to lay off)

    --
    This is just like television, only you can see much further.
    1. Re:No mixed messages here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are criminilizing criminal activity? uh oh!

      What should they do? Praise a bunch of stupid script kiddies?

      "Thank you l33t p1mpz0r for your service to the country, by replacing that companies web page with the message 'Osoma sux0rz, p1mpz0r 0wnz0rz j00' you have helped advance this war on terrorism! You are helping us to make the world a better place, thanks for your service!"

      Give me a fucking break.

    2. Re:No mixed messages here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't touch either sides equipment, or support either sides cause. Both sides are full of madmen who are so insane as to be beyond all reason. The only thing that makes this situation bearable is the knowledge that in the end, the money powers will be overthrown, they will be trampled to the ground. The US will not win this war against evil, that war can not be won with weapons.

      Evil is overthrown in our hearts, by ourselves, through the light(awareness) of the truth of our existance. We are interdependent, we are one race. It is the rich and the politically powerful who cause us to wage war. In the end, this will be recognized, and we will not do their bidding anymore. They will weep because no one will buy their wares anymore, and the Kings of the earth, and the merchants will weep at the fall of Babylon the great.

      For us people, on the otherhand, we will enter a thousand years of peace.

    3. Re:No mixed messages here. by carlos_benj · · Score: 1
      Go read the actual article. Fret not, they're still demonizing and criminalizing.

      (They're asking 'hacktivists' to lay off)


      Go back and read the whole article....

      Cyberangels hopes to enlist politically motivated hackers instead to help with online intelligence gathering, such as tracking down computer criminals who attempt to attack the Internet infrastructure....


      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

  12. trap? by IP,+Daily · · Score: 0

    Watch out, this could be one of those deals like when they published a list of criminals in the paper, saying that they'd won the lottery and to come pick up their money. When they showed up, with the cuffs.

    1. Re:trap? by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Criminals? no....

      The scenario I have heard of is they send out notices about winning som eprize (lottoey, whatever) to everyone who they have outstanding arrest warrents for, and then arrest them en mass when they show up.

      Having an arrest warrent just means there is good evidence that you commited a crime, it does not, in and of itself, make you a criminal. Only the court system can determine that. (at least, thats the idea that the system is based on - right?)

      Just a nice way to get things done... alot cheaper than spending hours tracking them down individually, sending uniformed officers to their houses etc.... saves time is all.

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  13. Sounds like a Good Thing by dohcvtec · · Score: 1

    Does this mean that hacking will not be considered terrorism?

    --
    -- Never hit a man with glasses. Hit him with a baseball bat.
    1. Re:Sounds like a Good Thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its only terrorism if the US government didnt sanction it, not that they have double standards or are hypocritical you understand...

    2. Re:Sounds like a Good Thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as the politican's boss aka the big corporation isn't on the receiving end of the hack. ie "Copy MP3, go to jail for life."

  14. good lord - this world today by macsox · · Score: 5, Funny

    six months ago i would never have imagined vint cerf appearing in an ad during a new buffy on upn telling me not to hack web sites in afghanistan.

    funny how things change.

  15. Easy to see why they're doing this. by jd · · Score: 2, Interesting
    They want the best! If the best are given the choice of being locked up, or serving Uncle Sam, they're not going to take much convincing.


    This is really the greatest recruitment campaign ever! If the Govt wants to let the hacker go, but doesn't want to risk them breaking into their former boss' company, label them a terrorist and have them serve 50 years. Before trial.


    If the hacker is hired by someone else, then their current bosses are "harboring a terrorist" and have two choices - let them go, or go to jail themselves. Again, that's a no-brainer for most bosses.


    Since hackers tend to be more into the craft than martyrdom, the consequences are painfully obvious. Every single highly-skilled computer geek under the sun will switch to working for the US Government, under duress and with their new boss under NO obligation to honor any kind of ethical standard. The risks of not doing so are just too high for most people.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Easy to see why they're doing this. by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      Since hackers tend to be more into the craft than martyrdom, the consequences are painfully obvious. Every single highly-skilled computer geek under the sun will switch to working for the US Government, under duress and with their new boss under NO obligation to honor any kind of ethical standard. The risks of not doing so are just too high for most people.

      Or it could turn out like System Shock. Hacker cracks system, hacker gets caught, hacker given amnesty + toys (no military-grade neural interface yet, though) in exchange for helping the 'boss' (government) with some hacking activities they need done.

      Interesting concept, really.
    2. Re:Easy to see why they're doing this. by fataugie · · Score: 1

      They want the best! If the best are given the choice of being locked up, or serving Uncle Sam, they're not going to take much convincing

      Kinda like La Femm Nakita?

      --

      WTF? Over?

    3. Re:Easy to see why they're doing this. by xmedar · · Score: 1

      The dirty, pale faced, ponytailed, nerd dozen!

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced man is indistinguishable from God
    4. Re:Easy to see why they're doing this. by ethereal · · Score: 1

      Or the Invisible Man (the TV show).

      --

      Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

  16. Re:well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Informative? Yeah. Real informative. I'm glad everyone is thankful for what they have.

  17. remember Alan Turing... by jptxs · · Score: 2, Insightful

    it's far from being the first time hackers have been called to serve in the way only they can. we can probably thank goodness for it too or guys like Turing would never had had the chance to invent these curious machines we're all so occupied with...

    --
    we speak the way we breathe --Fugazi
    1. Re:remember Alan Turing... by Matthew+Luckie · · Score: 2, Interesting

      using this line of reasoning, the government and the church will then persecute us after we have become surplus.

    2. Re:remember Alan Turing... by Xawen · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and look what happened to him, the Brittish government had him killed because he became a liability. (yeah, yeah, I know he committed suicide... believe what you want). I think this is a great opportunity, it just makes me a little wary.

    3. Re:remember Alan Turing... by xmedar · · Score: 1

      And remember the shit they gave him afterwards for being gay? So much that he took his own life? Those who don't learn from history are bound to repeat it.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced man is indistinguishable from God
  18. This was done on the Simpsons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hehe. One of my favorite episodes.

    Has there ever been hackers on the Simpsons?

    1. Re:This was done on the Simpsons by ocie · · Score: 1

      Owww, That's my boating arm.

      --
      JET Program: see Japan, meet intere
    2. Re:This was done on the Simpsons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bill Gates got shot in the head on South Park.

  19. Yes, spam the enemy! by cruelworld · · Score: 5, Funny

    After we haxor his boxen and root his servers and change all of their index.html files, then and ONLY then will Omar Bin Laden and his cohorts know they have been owned.

    Their server farms and e-commerce terrorist sites that litter the internet cafes of Afghanistan will feel our rath. Our exploits will decimate their ftp sites and not a single router will go unpunished.

    1. Re:Yes, spam the enemy! by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      Well, seeing as how this was a direct attack against a citizenry, as opposed to an attack against a country or a military, it does seem fitting for the citizenry to strike back....

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    2. Re:Yes, spam the enemy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well thats not much help seen as how the bankers are the ones with his money, helping him make more of it, maybe we should just take out the bankers, oh wait he did that for us, maybe we should ask him for help with the lawyers next?

    3. Re:Yes, spam the enemy! by snake_dad · · Score: 1
      Looking for a sysadmin in Mississauga/West Toronto? Contact me!

      And this sig you append to an article with a great job opportunity? :-)

      --
      karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
    4. Re:Yes, spam the enemy! by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      Afghan server farms : If they exist, aren't likely to be in Afghanistan


      Afghan e-Commerce : Commerce? You have to have something to sell, without opium, they have little the world, in general, wants.


      Afghan Internet Cafes : In a country without television, theaters, and failure to appear at the mosque for prayers is punishable, owning, let alone visiting, an internet Cafe in Kabul or Kandahar is probably begging a death sentence.


      Most hackers sympathetic to Afghanistan probably live in Pakistan.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    5. Re:Yes, spam the enemy! by COAngler · · Score: 1
      Afghan e-Commerce : Commerce? You have to have something to sell, without opium, they have little the world, in general, wants.



      Even with opium they have nothing. "Golden Crescent" (Afghan/Pakistani) opium tends to be of very poor quality. Almost none leaves the region, because the Mexican, Colombian, and Golden Triangle (SE Asia) stuff is of far higher grade. Why would hopheads with money, like Americans or Europeans, shell out for crap when good stuff is grown more cheaply in places that still have shipping?



      [1] The really high-grade stuff, China White, has been grown in Mexico for maybe five years now. Some of the Colombian growers are experimenting with it, as the market for cocaine is slowly shrinking.

  20. Uncle Sam?? by karb · · Score: 2

    Maybe I'm crazy, but usually Uncle Sam is representative of the U.S. government, or possibly the country. But I don't think most people associate him with the 'cyberangels', which, incidentally, sounds like saturday afternoon programming on UPN.

    --

    Jack Valenti and the MPAA are to technology as the Boston strangler is to the woman home alone

  21. so, what's this CyberAgenls? by 2Bits · · Score: 1

    A crime-fighting police now?

    1. Re:so, what's this CyberAgenls? by starlingX · · Score: 2, Informative

      The CyberAngels are a branch of the ever-popular Guardian Angels vigilante group. When they formed, sometime around 1996-ish, they attracted a lot of attention because they drew a lot of concerns about individual's rights online and free speech. I don't remember exactly what the problem was, but for a long time they had a bad name with free speech supporters. I though they'd fizzled out and disappeared. But I guess not. A search through old EFF newsletters or something similar should turn up some info.

  22. Rubicom for hacktivists by perdida · · Score: 2

    Well, I have said for a long time that the computer medium was just as "real" in a philosophical sense as any other territory. The people who wage battles on this territory need to decide why they use their skills to make political statements in "hacktivism."

    Do they want to criticize the system which establishes the Internet on which they operate? To reform it?

    Or do they want to transform it?

    Hacktivism may involve what I call "Matrix" tactics soon - like the people in the Matrix, people who want freedom on the internet will have to evade universal identification and tracking systems that are put there by a central, all-encompassing authority in whose name the internet itself is maintained and operated.

    That means, instead of throwing up a banner with some poorly written political prose, they will have to maintain entire alternate networks of communication to maintain their own freedom.

    I fear that many people, seeing the true weaponry and force of the enforcement authorities arrayed against them (and ready to name them "terrorist") will drop into Uncle Sam's ranks.

    I hope that more people will stick their foot in the door of technological freedom before it slams shut, and will keep it there for free communication.

  23. Simple solution... by TWX_the_Linux_Zealot · · Score: 2, Funny

    "They demonize you and criminalize you and then ask for your help. What's a hacker to do?"

    Simple... hold out for more money :)

    --

    IBM had PL/1, with syntax worse than JOSS,
    And everywhere the language went, it was a total loss...
  24. Uhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't Slashdot just post a few days ago that Ashcroft stated hackers where basically terrorists. Now American wants their services?

    Also if hackers are in America, and they are basically terrorists, and America wants to basically nuke anyone who harbors terrorists, dosen't that mean we should nuke ourselves?

    Heh

  25. Precedent already exists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Japanese Americans were poorly treated during WWII. They could have complained, and whined, but they volunteered for the military. A famous Army unit was most made up of Japanese Americans. They fought well and heroically on the European front. Their sacrifice and committment helped change American opinion of Japanese Americans.

    Hackers who help the US could help generate the same perception change.

    1. Re:Precedent already exists by David+Hume · · Score: 2, Insightful

      scraemondaemon writes:

      Uncle Sam wants you to help fight the war on terrorism. They demonize you and criminalize you and then ask for your help. What's a hacker to do?


      To which an Anonymous Coward responds:

      Japanese Americans were poorly treated during WWII. They could have complained, and whined, but they volunteered for the military. A famous Army unit was most made up of Japanese Americans. They fought well and heroically on the European front. Their sacrifice and committment helped change American opinion of Japanese Americans.


      I'm very glad you mentioned this, Mr. Anonymous. There are at least two possible responses to the U.S. government's request for help. One, the "scraemondaemon" response, is to whine about being "demonized" and "criminalized" at the same time bodies are still being dug from the ruble. Another is to act like you care about someone other than yourself, and perhaps even about your country, prove your critics wrong, and volunteer to help prevent a similar, or worse, terrorist attack in the near future.

      One inspirational site describes the heroism of then Lieutenant, and future Senator, Daniel K. Inouye.

      Other sites concerning the 442d Regimental Combat Team and the 100th Infantry Battalion include:

      Asian - Pacific Americans & the U.S. Army

      National Japanese American Historical Society - 442nd Research Page.

      Service Battery.

      Silent Warriors - Silent Heroes .

      Katonk.com .

      Similarly, one could emulate the hundreds of Muslims, Arabs, Iranians, Afghans, etc. who have responded to the request by the FBI for people who speak Arabic and other Middle Eastern languages ("The phones have just been ringing off the hook"). See also FBI targets Arab-Americans for recruitment; hundreds respond to appeal.

      .

      Or, as I said, one can whine about perceived slights while others bury their dead.

  26. Solution to all Terrorist problems by SexPig · · Score: 1

    I told my local CIA recruiter that a modified deflector dish or a recursive algorithm will be satisfactory for most any problem.

    With this in our arsenal there is nothing to stop us in our war against terrorism!

    --
    "...and generally behaved in a manner one can only describe as despicable." - February 27 2001, Michael Sims
  27. Overestimating "Hacker skillz" by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    The trouble is, the majority of "Hackers" are dopey script kiddies that know very little except how to launch a DDoS attack. This is only useful for minor harrasment against sits they don't like.

    The skills required to track down criminals is simply not something they're capable of.

    1. Re:Overestimating "Hacker skillz" by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      WEll, mr. Anonymous coward. I'm impressed with your skills so far. You have managed to anonymise yourself! I am so impressed!

  28. hacktivists wanted by aicra · · Score: 0

    Wanted:

    Hacktivists Dead or Alive

    Qualifications:

    Must be able to undermine authority, accept extreme levels of criticism from peers and outsiders, and must be patriotic.

    Perks:

    Get to work for the Gov't.

    Could we cut a deal where if we do assist, we can get the gov't to change some of the DMCA, SSSCA, ECPA, ACPA and CIPA?

  29. who is in the... by BigBir3d · · Score: 0

    "stone age" - obviously not :-(

    remember, we are talking about rich militant muslims, not the general populice of Afghanistan.

  30. Do Script Kiddies watch TV? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't they just troll IRC with these PSA's? The people who know who Vint Cerf is aren't the ones they need to be concerned about.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  31. ::raises hand:: by cyberfr0g · · Score: 1

    plain and simple .... where do i sign up?

    1. Re:::raises hand:: by WhiteKnight07 · · Score: 1

      *also raises hand* Count me in.

      --


      We're going to make information free Mr. Anderson, whether you like it, or not.
  32. this is the same government... by Rai · · Score: 1

    who wants to make hacking an act of terrorism? god only knows what they'll do with this hackers after their purpose is served. my reply would be a hardy fsck you.

  33. This is an important step for white-hat hackers by Starship+Trooper · · Score: 3, Funny
    Hackers, until now, have received nothing but bad press. They have been vilified and alienated ever since personal computing took off in the mid-80's. This negative portrayal was one of the major reasons the MPAA was able to win their case against 2600 and DeCSS: by painting the defendants as "hackers", the case instantly became upper-class versus no-class, a battle the upper class always wins.

    It looks like this can change. If we hackers take up the United States' call for help, it will help garner the positive attention we need to get our views heard. While fighting terrorism, we will also be fighting the image of the "evil" hacker that has been ingrained in the public psyche. I urge you to take this major step. Once hackers become heroes, we will finally be able to stand up against Corporate Interest. Remember, image is everything.

    --
    Loneliness is a power that we possess to give or take away forever
    1. Re:This is an important step for white-hat hackers by Rkane · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ## begin sarcasm ##
      You nailed it, bud. The American Government has always been honest and true to what it says. Politicians never lie, so we know that every hacker will be free to go when this war is over. They would never jump on the opportunity to go after someone after that helped the U.S.!
      ## end sarcasm ##

      Ironically, it isn't even Uncle sam that is putting out this message. In fact, the government has nothing to do with it. Even if you did become a hero, it would be in the eyes of the "Cyberangels"... and I'm sorry, but that just sounds too much like a cheap movie title where cameron diaz learns how to be an 31337 haX0r...

    2. Re:This is an important step for white-hat hackers by camusflage · · Score: 2

      I'm sorry, but that just sounds too much like a cheap movie title where cameron diaz learns how to be an 31337 haX0r...

      Shit, Cameron Diaz is there? Hacking, government job, and Cameron Diaz. Where do I sign up?!

      --
      The truth about Scientology, Xenu, and you: Operation Clambake
  34. It's not so much that they're asking for help... by TheTomcat · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's not so much that they're asking for help... more like "If you're going to spraypaint stuff, at least come to us, and we'll put you to work on a mural or something."

    The write-up made it sound like Uncle Sam was putting together a crack commando unit of hackers.

  35. Do they talk to each other by TheStruuus · · Score: 2, Informative

    Didn't they just bring up a bill that would consider hacking as terrorism? Do any of these people talk to each other?

    Hackers are 'Terrorists' Under Ashcroft's New Act


    -TheStruuus

    1. Re:Do they talk to each other by visualight · · Score: 1

      This is not the government calling hackers to service. It's a corporation called "cyberangels" trying to raise it's stature in the public eye.

      --
      Samsung took back my unlocked bootloader because Google wants me to rent movies. They're both evil.
    2. Re:Do they talk to each other by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, hacking=terrorism in the government's eyes.

      However... the word 'hacker' has to be defined. To the U.S., it probably goes something like this: "Hacking is considered criminal activity... unless given consent by the U.S." It's also like saying: "Being mean to others is fair. But if someone is mean to me, then it's no longer fair." So it goes.

  36. I can see it now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Crack encryption, invade peoples' privacy, save the world!

  37. Foreign Policy deja vu by eknuds · · Score: 4, Redundant

    Wow, this sounds like our foreign policy.

    Step 1: Fight those bad people.

    Step 2: Hey, they could be useful to us.

    Step 3: Let's give them tools and have them fight our war for us. Call CNN and let them know about these freedom fighters

    Step 4: Hmmmm, they aren't useful to us anymore. Better call CNN and tell them to start calling them bad people again. At least we know who they are now.

    1. Re:Foreign Policy deja vu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Step 5: Oops, they hacked the WTC mk2.

      Step 6: Let's wage a war upon them, anyone with us?

  38. Laughable! by don_carnage · · Score: 4, Funny
    Two hacker favorites -- USA Cable's Sci-Fi Channel, and UPN's hit show Buffy the Vampire Slayer -- would be perfect places to air the spot, said Aftab, who is on the advisory committee of the Advertising Council, a nonprofit which helped put together the "Friends Don't Let Friends Drive Drunk" public service campaign.

    Wow. I'm in awe here people. They've got them there hackers pegged!

    1. Re:Laughable! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Two hacker favorites -- USA Cable's Sci-Fi Channel, and UPN's hit show Buffy the Vampire Slayer -- would be perfect places to air the spot, said Aftab, who is on the advisory committee of the Advertising Council, a nonprofit which helped put together the "Friends Don't Let Friends Drive Drunk" public service campaign.
      Wow. I'm in awe here people. They've got them there hackers pegged!"

      They're forgetting the Simpsons, and unfortunately, they just missed the release of the new They Might Be Giants CD. They could have thrown a message on there too.. subliminal perhaps?

    2. Re:Laughable! by BumbaCLot · · Score: 1

      Apparently they should have said Star Trek Enterprise instead, or as a trailer attached to Natalie Portman. (from what I know about 'hackers' and /.)

    3. Re:Laughable! by Guignol · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely right !
      I'm glad I checked if anybody posted it before I did it myself
      This article is really a good troll
      So they have the hackers very well focused !
      This is so ridicuouls I don't even know where to start from
      They must be confusing hackers with script kiddies (which btw are precisely the ones likely to act DOSing before the spot even ends)
      But even if we did assume that, for some reason hackers (real ones I mean) favorites are sci-fi channel and Buffy the vampire slayer, and they will chose those programs to pass the spot, how in the world do they expect just anybody to understand the message in a non agressive way ???
      That's almost like implying the answer. "hey, now go kick some bad guy's ass !!"
      - Too bad I can't mod you up -

    4. Re:Laughable! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they wanted to get quality hackers they would have to go after a non-TV medium. If you watch TV, you clearly aren't on the computer. What is wrong with you people anyway?

    5. Re:Laughable! by visualight · · Score: 1

      heh. If Cyberangels really wante some attention they'd pay gobs of money to Ms. Portman to be their spokeswoman.

      --
      Samsung took back my unlocked bootloader because Google wants me to rent movies. They're both evil.
    6. Re:Laughable! by shwim · · Score: 1

      Hey...there are lots of people with Tivo's connected to their LAN's...But then again, the Tivo's filter out all the commercials...hehehe

  39. Don't do it! by wackysootroom · · Score: 1

    What do you think that the government will do when you are all used up? Will they put you up in a posh house with a butler and a maid?

    No. They will lock you up and throw away the key, because you will kow too much by the time they are through with you.

    If you get involved with a war, you will become a casualty of war.

    The government hates hackers no matter what side that they are on because they pose a threat to authority.

    1. Re:Don't do it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I deffinitely agree. Going to a goverment that hates you and sees you not only as a criminal but also as a terrorist and saying "I have a lot of experience in hacking, I can help" (this would sound as "I am guilty of every crime this country has a law for" sounds just plain stupid to me.

      And getting involved in a war is just more stupid. I don't think they would miss a chance and let you go unpunished no matter which side you are. They are just too afraid of us.

      P.S. Could you mod the parent up?

  40. The Government is funny like that by DA_MAN_DA_MYTH · · Score: 1

    Oh it's okay for the government to read your email. But it's not okay to read someone else's. It's okay for the government to browse your file and directories, but not for you to read anyone else's. Invasion of privacy is not wrong! Well only if you work for the government. (That's what they tell me)

    Don't get me wrong I think this is a good way for individuals, who aren't as capable physical fighters on the battlefield to join the good fight, by providing military intelligence / espionage via whatever medium. But what happens after the government is done using these persons in this computer counter terroist taskforce. One of two things, either we have elite computer hackers still invading the privacy of Citizen Joe User checking for suspicious emails in the future, or these patriots are sent back to the grazing fields of cyberspace, and Hacker becomes a bad word again.

    --
    "It takes many nails to build a crib, but one screw to fill it."
  41. Don't forget Jon Von Neumann by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I probably misspelled his name, but any way Turing created the abstact machine while Von Nuemann put it into practice.

  42. Thankfully, "double jeopardy" still governs by alewando · · Score: 5, Interesting

    While the superficial similarities between rewarding spook hackers and punishing civilian hackers seem sufficient to establish gross hypocrisy on the part of the Federal government, it's in fact little different from the time-honored tradition of our military and other militaries which, for aeons, have hired people to commit the same act of killing that would be punished as murder if it had been committed by a civilian acting without state authorization. Big deal.

    What's more, the Sixth Amendment's "double jeopardy" clause is still in effect (one of the few clauses with some teeth left in it after decades of judicial erosion). If the Federal government establishes an arrangement whereby criminal acts are committed by individuals acting under government aegis and with the encouragement of state agents, then those acts cannot be subsequently punished (apart from certain situations such as genocide and other circumscribed offenses). One only need remind oneself of Whitey Bulger (on the FBI's most wanted list) who has gotten the FBI into a bit of a morass by acting as an informant for many years and during those years receiving tacit permission from the FBI to commit all manner of offenses including murder. The egg on the FBI's face hangs pendulously, because the FBI is now without legal recourse to punish those acts.

    That glib tone is unbecoming, by the way.

    1. Re:Thankfully, "double jeopardy" still governs by stubear · · Score: 1

      There is a difference between law enforcement and vigilante justice. If you are not authorized to hack a system (i.e. a security consultant on retainer or contract) then don't whine when FBI comes knocking.

    2. Re:Thankfully, "double jeopardy" still governs by ecampbel · · Score: 2

      The sixth amendment says nothing about receiving immunity from prosecution if your offences where committed while working for the government. It reads:

      In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.


      What you say sounds logical (you're obviously not going to be prosecuted for hacking into the computer systems of Afghanistan while working for the CIA), but the bill of rights is not what gives you this immunity. Finally, there are numerous examples of people being prosecuted for crimes committed while working for the government. Remember Oli North? Saying, "I was ordered to do it," is not always a valid excuse."

      --

      Sig goes here
    3. Re:Thankfully, "double jeopardy" still governs by PxT · · Score: 1

      What's more, the Sixth Amendment's "double jeopardy" clause is still in effect...

      Actually, that would be the 5th amendment.

    4. Re:Thankfully, "double jeopardy" still governs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My nick is colindiz, forget the bloody password though. I wonder if my account still exists here...

      Actually, the man has a point. His facts are wrong, but we don't punish idiots merely for their stupidity.

      Amendment Five (and I'm not even American), is the one you want.

      Basically, you won't be held accountable if you're doing it in service of your country in times of war. Working for the CIA in a war against terrorism could be construed like this. But yeah, the CIA is the CIA - they could make you disappear just as easily.

      No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

    5. Re:Thankfully, "double jeopardy" still governs by Mtgman · · Score: 1

      What's more, the Sixth Amendment's "double jeopardy" clause is still in effect (one of the few clauses with some teeth left in it after decades of judicial erosion).

      Hmm, like the First Ammendment? Or the Second, or the...

      Methinks you're being naieve.

      Steven

      --
      -- I have marked myself unwilling to moderate-- I don't have other accounts to artificially inflate the karma of
  43. Kill 2 birds (parrots?) with one stone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never mind that, my lad. I wish to complain about this H4X0R dude what I recruited not half an hour ago from this very cybercafe....

  44. This might be just what the linux community needs. by t0qer · · Score: 1, Interesting

    One of my major beef's with the Linux community in general has been their fanatical anti .gov and .mil views. I've always thought of it as being unpatriotic to bring down the net, via dos attacks, defacing a .gov website. Or just generally being an asshole to anyone who is running a Redmond product on their desktop. This issue of wired does a pretty good job of summarizing all the "bad stuff" that has plagued this community. Really take the time to read the article and understand it before you start tossing flames.
    With that said, I think this is a great oppertunity for the linux scene in general to get a chance to grow out of their stereotype, and actually become the hero's of the computing world, heck the world. It's all about putting your money where your mouth is. Imagine seeing a story like this in the news..

    Dec, 31st 2001, San Francisco CA
    Nuclear disaster was averted new years eve when a group of hackers listening in on alphanumeric pager transmission foiled a plot by the teleban to detonate a nuclear bomb in the middle of the cities finacial district. Working with the FBI and the CIA

    I'm gonna stop because thats fantasy at this point, but IT COULD HAPPEN. If you are a patriotic american, and you care about linux, you need to step up to the plate and give the .gov a hand. Instead of making fun of their shortcomings. Remember, this could change everything.

    --Toq

  45. You forgot... by schon · · Score: 1

    I told my local CIA recruiter that a modified deflector dish or a recursive algorithm will be satisfactory for most any problem.

    You forgot about adjusting the shield harmonics!

    1. Re:You forgot... by SexPig · · Score: 1

      I also forgot about the "Harry Kim" defense system whereas anything fired at a target will non-lethally strike him instead.

      --
      "...and generally behaved in a manner one can only describe as despicable." - February 27 2001, Michael Sims
  46. Re:It's a trap by BigBir3d · · Score: 0

    they keep changing the IP of my cable modem, so...

    besides, it's those damn cookies that scare me!

  47. uh, hello by olim · · Score: 2, Informative

    I hope that screamondaemon is aware that the CEO of WorldCom isn't exactly representative of the US Government. The spot sounds to me like a bunch of network owners (those who have the most to lose from even friendly hacking) utilizing the national situation to further their own anti-hacking ends. "Please mister hacker, secure my system for free -- we all have to unite against terrorists after all."

    On the other hand, I don't exaactly think that a bunch of vigilante crackers is going to do more good than harm, so I'm not really against the message of the ad.

  48. Target audience by StikyPad · · Score: 2, Funny

    Two hacker favorites -- USA Cable's Sci-Fi Channel, and UPN's hit show Buffy the Vampire Slayer -- would be perfect places to air the spot, said Aftab, who is on the advisory committee of the Advertising Council, a nonprofit which helped put together the "Friends Don't Let Friends Drive Drunk" public service campaign.

    Buffy? You'd get better hacker demographics by advertising on AOL. Or Slashdot. Oh wait..

  49. What this is all about (?) by sharp-bang · · Score: 1

    Looking at the Cyberangels Web site, it looks as though they need people to train law enforcement and help WTC-bereaved families sort crap from gold on the Net when search for missing loved ones, etc. (They also help search out child pornographers, which I imagine is spectacularly un-fun...) Not really a call to arms. Anybody actually _seen_ the PSA?

    --
    #!
  50. One word... Mitnick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They want to hack into banks...let ole Kev near a computer.

    1. Re:One word... Mitnick by Rai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      somehow i doubt mitnick will be rushing to the frontlines of this campaign.

      "not today, uncle sam, not today. i've dealt with you before. didn't work out too well for me."

    2. Re:One word... Mitnick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kevin Mitnick is a washed up retard that gets pay checks for writing articles at script kiddie websites. What use could that washed up wanker be, last time he was allowed to touch a computer both Windows NT and Linux had not been released yet.

  51. You've been watching too many Simpsons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This was a gag on the Simpsons. Nothing more, nothing less.

    1. Re:You've been watching too many Simpsons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should do something other than watch the simpsons on the 'magic box' in your house. This is a classic law enforcement technique that is still in use today...

    2. Re:You've been watching too many Simpsons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this flamebait? It's a legitimate response to a blatantly ignorant post.

  52. Carpet Bombing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "Computer attacks and hate speech do not contribute in any constructive way to dealing with the many problems our global civilization faces," said WorldCom senior vice president Vinton Cerf, who is scheduled to appear in the televised announcement.

    Yea, but carpet bomb seems to do the trick, just look at Viet Nam. Well maybe that didn't work out so well. Hey there is Japan. There is a fine example that losing to the US is always better then wining. Yea I know you can include Germany in the as well. But since the "Big One" carpet bombing has had less than satisfactory results. You know I have seems to miss my point, so I'll jsut stop now.

    1. Re:Carpet Bombing! by sunking2 · · Score: 1

      Carpet bombing does work. It works very well. Its failure in Vietnam was simply because it wasn't utilized enough, primarily up north because of fear of drawing the Chineese into the war, one Korea was enough. Whenever the Vietnamese left the table, guess what always brought them back? B52s heading to Hanoi.

      In Korea, carpet bombing held a Chineese force that had over a 10 to 1 superiority on the ground at bay.

      In Vietnam carpet bombing reached its objective 100% of the time. Look at the Khe Sahn and tell me that carpet bombing didn't meet its objectives.

      Desert storm? Republican Army who? Enough said.

      Next to the nuclear option there is nothing more awe inspring than seeing the contrails of 4 wings of B52s fly over head, and then feeling the ground shake when you know that you are 30+ miles away from impact.

      Proximity to Diego Garcia means that if there is a target that needs to be removed, it will be the 40+ year old B52 that will get the job done.

      Anyone who has either lived through, or witnessed carpet bombing in action will point out that the armchair general who claims they don't work simply doesn't know his history.

  53. Re:This might be just what the linux community nee by BigBir3d · · Score: 0

    here here! and now you know why i dont use Linux...anymore :-P

  54. Wait a second... by BIGJIMSLATE · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...I thought under the ATA, hackers WERE terrorists! ;)

    1. Re:Wait a second... by Rothfuss · · Score: 3, Funny

      No...

      If you are hacking for the Gubment, I assure you, you will be called a Freedom Fighter.

    2. Re:Wait a second... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until about 10 seconds after the war is over.

  55. ...and then they killed him. by Joseph+Vigneau · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Turing's work saved countless thousands of lives, and was instrumental in developing the theories of modern mathematics and computer science.

    But, that wasn't good enough for the British, who later killed him for being a homosexual..

    1. Re:...and then they killed him. by ichimunki · · Score: 2

      Not to mention that the air force is actively ousting out gays right now-- in spite of their other orders to discontinue many types of discharge to stem personnel loss.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    2. Re:...and then they killed him. by xkenny13 · · Score: 1
      • Not to mention that the air force is actively ousting out gays right now -- in spite of their other orders to discontinue many types of discharge to stem personnel loss.
      Interesting ... and dissapointing. I have a friend who is gay and was serving in the Air Force. A few years ago, he "came out" and his Commanding Officer got really pissed . He was pissed because NOW he was forced to lose a good officer, not because he gave a shit that this guy was gay. In fact, he told him outright that ANYTIME he wants to sign that "I am not gay" (or more accurately, "I won't act gay") waiver-whatchamacallit ... that he would be fully reinstated. It's too bad that that Air Force (in general) is still being so stupid. I guess times never change, what with Alan Turing's problems with the military and homosexuality. *sigh* I wonder what they would do with a gay hacker? :-)
    3. Re:...and then they killed him. by testharness · · Score: 1

      For those of you that don't read links ( Joseph ) here is what is said on the turing.org.uk page

      He was found by his cleaner when she came in on 8 June 1954. He had died the day before of cyanide poisoning, a half-eaten apple beside his bed. His mother believed he had accidentally ingested cyanide from his fingers after an amateur chemistry experiment, but it is more credible that he had successfully contrived his death to allow her alone to believe this. The coroner's verdict was suicide.

      I don't see how you can state the British killed him.

      Perhaps you should read your sources first.

  56. Why Draft doesn't worry me (too much) by Ted+V · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This is why the possibility of a draft wouldn't worry me too much. If I was ever actually drafted to fight in a war, I know the DOD would rather have a talented computer programmer than another warm body in the front lines. Besides, it takes 3 years to train a soldier to do his (or her) job well. Why waste training on combat situations when I'm better used for hacking?

    That said, I'm still not in favor of a draft. It's a huge drain on public support.

    -Ted

    1. Re:Why Draft doesn't worry me (too much) by StudMuffin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If I was ever actually drafted to fight in a war, I know the DOD would rather have a talented computer programmer than another warm body in the front lines. Besides, it takes 3 years to train a soldier to do his (or her) job well.

      Ummm, yeah. Right.

      Be careful, here. US Marine Corps Boot Camp is 13 weeks, plus anoth 12 weeks of advanced infantry training. That's just over six months, start to finish. Training HVPI's (High Velocity Projective Interceptors) doesn't take three years at all. How is that possible, when the Army has a two-year contract for an Infantry position?

      And, as a former Marine, I would state that any "talented computer hacker" who knows nothing about the actual operations of the military would be better off catching bullets than writing bugs.

      - Hans

      --
      Weaseling out of things is important to learn. It's what separates us from the animals... except the weasel. -
    2. Re:Why Draft doesn't worry me (too much) by jheinen · · Score: 5, Informative

      You've never been in the military I take it? Let me fill you in. It don't mean squat what you know when you go in. Yes you could get lucky and they make use of your computer skills, but I've seen plenty of people with technical skills get plopped right in the infantry. I've even seen people sign up for technical training, receive it, and THEN get sent to infantry school. When you sign the contract, all they gaurantee you is training in a particular MOS (miltary occupational specialty). It does NOT mean that's how you will be assigned. If combat arms needs bodies, that's where you go. Three years to train a soldier? Where'd you get that from? You go from raw recruit to front line soldier in 12 weeks. And this is in the peacetime military, where the need for combat soldiers is not so great. In a draft situation, you're pretty much gauranteed nice comfy accomodations in a foxhole.

      -Jeff

      --
      -Vercingetorix
      "Necessitas non habet legem." -St. Augustine
    3. Re:Why Draft doesn't worry me (too much) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This is why the possibility of a draft wouldn't worry me too much. If I was ever actually drafted to fight in a war, I know the DOD would rather have a talented computer programmer than another warm body in the front lines."

      That may be true, but just why does that make you feel any better?

    4. Re:Why Draft doesn't worry me (too much) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for saying so I didn't have to. Also former Marine infantry (well, tow missle gunner, I rode around a lot :) but I have found that the infantry seems to have the smarter people many times than some of the other more myopic .. I mean FOCUS driven schools...no thinking on their feet I suppose, kills em every time.

    5. Re:Why Draft doesn't worry me (too much) by ldopa1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Besides, it takes 3 years to train a soldier to do his (or her) job well.

      The key word in that phrase is well. If you want to tell me that PFC Jack Hoff is an experienced fighting man, then I'll ask YOU to sit in a foxhole with him. Mind you, I'm not slamming Marines. The same hold true for all of the services. Flight training alone does not make an ace fighter pilot. It takes actual experience. Trust me, I know what I'm talking about.

      Anyone can look up the length of training for any MOS (or Rating, if you're in the Navy). Some of them are 9 months (Navy Fire Controlman, for example, my rating). Go to any Staff Seargent or Master Chief and ask him if he (or she) thinks that someone straight out of boot camp and an occupational school is actually experienced. I can tell you right now that they will probably wet themselves laughing. That's where the term "Boot" came from to decribe an inexperienced soldier/sailor/airman.

      And, as a former Marine, I would state that any "talented computer hacker" who knows nothing about the actual operations of the military would be better off catching bullets than writing bugs.

      Now I think I know why you're a former Marine. How long were you in? What was your MOS? I'd bet (and I'm not flaming here, I want to know) that you probably didn't make it past E-4. I say this because any Marine over E-4 that has had actual combat experience and has lost brothers in the fighting knows that a warm body catching bullets doesn't do a DAMN thing except hose the operation and make people sad. Frankly, that's why Squids call green Marines "Bullet Sponges." Lesson #1 in combat: The first casualty of combat is the battle plan.

      Obligatory Navy-Marine joke: Why are bananas and Marines alike? They both die on the beach in bunches.. (Rimshot)

      --
      The Dopester
      "Yes, I'm a Karma Whore, but I'm doing it to pay my way through school."
    6. Re:Why Draft doesn't worry me (too much) by sigwinch · · Score: 2
      You've never been in the military I take it? Let me fill you in. It don't mean squat what you know when you go in. Yes you could get lucky and they make use of your computer skills, but I've seen plenty of people with technical skills get plopped right in the infantry.
      Which is why you don't enlist in the Marines unless you really don't mind a personal visit to the front line. Instead you get a job at a national laboratory, defense contractor, intelligence agency, military base, university with a military research contract, or whatever. I think that's what the original comment meant. An extended campaign creates numerous non-rifle-totin' jobs.
      --

      --
      Kuro5hin.org: where the good times never end. ;-)

    7. Re:Why Draft doesn't worry me (too much) by Mr.+Foogle · · Score: 1

      are you serious?

      I know the DOD would rather have a talented computer programmer than another warm body in the front lines

      - The "DOD" doesn't give a good god damn what you know. Neither will the Army. Your Drill Instructor, on the other hand, is a caring Nice Guy who wants to see that your every whim and need taken care of, pronto. He wants to be your friend, I gar-un-tee it. He has to be nice to you, it's The Law.

      - They draft your young pampered ass. They tell you where to go and what to do. Options? You have options. Do what you're told or go to the brig. If you're lucky a good NCO will take you out back and give you um, administrative punishment.

      Besides, it takes 3 years to train a soldier to do his (or her) job well.

      - The USMC can turn out trained killers in 60 days. The Army can do the same, but they look like a mob. An 'A' school for REMFs could last from 30 days to 6 months depending. If you think a draftee is going to glimpse those schools dream on. They'll be reserved for the smart guys that volunteer.

      Why waste training on combat situations when I'm better used for hacking?

      Sweet heart, if you EVER find yourself hitting the bricks at a recruit depot, I want to be there to see the look on your face when you find out what reality is.

      No offense.

      --
      Display some adaptability.
    8. Re:Why Draft doesn't worry me (too much) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It doesn't worry me because I'm 32 years old, have poor eyesight, diabetic, and a father of two children. But believe, for any fans of mr. bin Laden who may be reading this, if something ever happened to those children I wouldn't have a reason to stick around here any longer, and army or no army I'd be finding a way to devote all of my talents and skills to wiping out the motherfuckers who did this.

    9. Re:Why Draft doesn't worry me (too much) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know the DOD would rather have a talented computer programmer than another warm body in the front lines

      Offtopic: You don't read much non-fiction do you? :-)

      Back ontopic ...

      "Talented" in your eyes may not be "talented" in their eyes. Analogy: Some inductees who already "know how to shoot" are more trouble than those with no experience. It is sometimes better to start from scratch than to have to have a person un-learn their bad habits.

      Volunteers are more likely to get those choice assignments.

      It is more likely that you will tell them you have computer skills and they will put you into combat engineering so you can check the computers in the caves for booby traps prior to removal.

    10. Re:Why Draft doesn't worry me (too much) by Albion · · Score: 1

      I think the kind of warfare we're in is not going to be bullet sponge intensive. Mostly support for special ops missions.

      It will take a lot of intelligence, which you don't get with the draft. Just the opposite.

  57. What's a hacker to do? by donutello · · Score: 2

    They demonize you and criminalize you and then ask for your help. What's a hacker to do?

    If this is a reference to the proposed measures against "hacking offences", then you need to re-read the laws that are being proposed. They are neither as bad or as radical as the Slashdot article about it like to make it to be.

    As far as what's a hacker to do, it's very simple: Do your part to protect the lives of innocent people and fight the war against those who don't respect the rights of humans to live.

    --
    Mmmm.. Donuts
  58. I am still gonna hax0r em... by Fizzlewhiff · · Score: 1
    Only I will fool them and pass the blame by placing the message "Hacked by Chinese" on any site I deface.

    Mua-ha-ha-ha! Mua-ha-ha-ha!! Mua-ha-ha-ha!!! Mua-ha-ha-ha!!!!

    *cough* *cough*

    --

    'Same speed C but faster'
  59. Hackers are terrorists? by souleman · · Score: 1

    Wasn't it just in the last couple of days that they called hackers terrorists. Now they want hackers help? So they get your help until they are done with you, and then they arrest you for being a terrorist. If I am not mistake, you can ask Kevin Poulsen about that. I believe he was the hacker working for the FBI that did time for hacking.

    1. Re:Hackers are terrorists? by Fizzlewhiff · · Score: 2, Informative

      Did you read the linked article?

      A new TV public service announcement targets U.S. computer hacktivists with a blunt message: Uncle Sam wants you to help fight the war on terrorism.

      But the spot, which organizers hope to begin airing nationwide next week on major networks, will warn that misguided patriotic efforts from software experts can hurt the cause.

      "Computer attacks and hate speech do not contribute in any constructive way to dealing with the many problems our global civilization faces," said WorldCom senior vice president Vinton Cerf, who is scheduled to appear in the televised announcement.


      In other words, they want hackers to help by not hacking.

      --

      'Same speed C but faster'
    2. Re:Hackers are terrorists? by cca93014 · · Score: 1
      "The hacker community is very important in the fight against terrorism. But we want to get the message out that if they want to get busy doing good stuff, they should come to us and not try to take action on their own," said Aftab.

      Er, no. They don't want you to hack. They want you to help them hack.

  60. Worst episode ever! by Galvatron · · Score: 1

    I think the Comic Book Guy is the closest they have. Well, that and the time where Snake holds up the cybercafe, and steals Homer's bank account ("Oh yeah, download to Papa. Goodbye, alt-backslash-losers"). Nothing else really occurs to me.

    --
    "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    1. Re:Worst episode ever! by SpanishInquisition · · Score: 2, Informative

      When Homer went to college, his 3 roomates changed his grades by hacking into the school computers.

      --
      Je t'aime Stéphanie
    2. Re:Worst episode ever! by istartedi · · Score: 2

      There was an episode where some guy was under a table at a meeting with a laptop, and information was passed through a complex network that included the artist formerly known as Prince. I can't remember too many details of that episode off the top of my head.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    3. Re:Worst episode ever! by Galvatron · · Score: 1

      I am presently at work on a secret project which I am not at liberty to divulge. *cough* cyborgs! *cough*

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    4. Re:Worst episode ever! by SpanishInquisition · · Score: 1

      it was the Radioactive Man:The Movie episode, nerds were trying to find out where the movie was to be shot ( ended up in Springfield of course...)

      --
      Je t'aime Stéphanie
    5. Re:Worst episode ever! by jiheison · · Score: 1

      alt.nerd.obsessive, need know star of RM movie.

  61. Its our time now by fosh · · Score: 4, Troll

    Let me just start by letting everyone know I live (and am currently typing this) from Manhattan.

    I used to dislike cops. THey harassed me, the were disrespectful to me, and messed with my friends.

    I take it all back. All of it.

    I have a new respect for all police in New York City since the attacks on the world trade center. They, along with the firemen all risked thier lives to help get people out of the buildings as quickly as they could. But, as you know, the building collapsed, trapping thousands (literally) of New York's finest men and women, who selflessly gave thier lives to help the rest of us.

    Now, when I see a police man on the street, I smile at him. He is ensuring my safety, and the safety of others.

    Now, its our turn. Sure, the government may have "demonized" us before. But times are fundamentally different now. This is not about image, or public policy, this is about honest to god people. People's lives, thousands, mabey millions of people, are at risk. I for one will do ANYTHING, yes ANTHING, the government needs done. (And yes, if they have enough tech people, I will gladly go to the front line in Afganistan, or Iraq, or wherever).

    It is now our turn to step up, and help defend our country.

    Make no mistake, our society, our values, the very things that allowed us to achieve such levels of science and technology, is under attack.

    Lets show those bastards they messed with the wrong people
    --Alex Fishman

    1. Re:Its our time now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      I for one will do ANYTHING, yes ANTHING, the government needs done.

      Hello citizen. This is George Women Bush. Osama bin Laden has faxed us his demands. He wants a video of Janet Reno getting it on with a citizen. Don't ask us why, we don't know. I call upon you, great American! Rise to the occasion!

    2. Re:Its our time now by tester13 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As a resident of Brooklyn I can sympathize with your statement to a point. However, just because the police did a good job with this current tragedy does not mean that all their other behavior is acceptable. We still need to keep a close eye on those that are protecting us, as they have proven themselves in the past to be not responsible enough for us to ignore.

      I caution you to avoid the urge to let things slide that should not. The police department may have acted well in this situation (and I assume they have), however very few residents will deny that their past abuses make them a completely trustworthy agency.

      I urge you not to ignore the facts in the name of patritoism

    3. Re:Its our time now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Sieg fuckin' heil! This guy's goose is in step with the rest of the troops.

    4. Re:Its our time now by mattkime · · Score: 3, Insightful

      About 24 hours ago I might have agreed with you. But now, I do not.

      Last night I was walking through a park in Manhattan at 11 pm. I do this a lot, it clears my head. I saw an NYPD patrol car cruising through the park. Rather than run away or hide from them, I continued on my path as they approached. What did I have to hide?

      They asked me to approach the car, I did. They explained to me that the park closed at 10 and that I was not supposed to be there. They asked for id, which I gave them. Then they explained to me that I would need to appear in court in about a month. I have to go to court because I was walking through a park, no reason more.

      What will happen in court? I have no idea. The police claimed that I will probably just be told not to walk through the park anymore. If I don't go? A warrant for my arrest...for not appearing in court on charges for "Failure to Comply With Sign."

      Yes, some members of the NYPD have done heroic things. However, there are at least two of them that have nothing better to do than to treat a harmless citizen as though a criminal.

      This doesn't necessarily apply to my experience but I can understand that we need to tight up security in light of recent events. However, we are running the risk of a new era of McCarthyism, where we create criminals out of those who simply step out of line.

      I did not meet two heros in a patrol car last night.

      --
      Know what I like about atheists? I've yet to meet one that believes God is on their side.
    5. Re:Its our time now by caferace · · Score: 1
      >I did not meet two heros in a patrol car last night.

      It sounds to me like you met two cops who were doing their job. Granted, some latitude would be expected in normal times, right? I'm guessing things aren't normal in Manhattan right now. It sounds like you were cool about the whole deal (smart) and will likely get off scott-free.

      Shit is a bit different now. Things may get back to "normal", whatever the hell that was but that particular episode sounds like no big deal. It's when your liberties get seriously stomped on I have problems.

      And before someone tries to say it's an incremental process, it really isn't. Deal with it until it either gets worse or goes away. Better yet, work with TPTB to form it to your expectations.....

    6. Re:Its our time now by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • I have a new respect for all police in New York City since the attacks on the world trade center. They all risked thier lives to help get people out of the buildings as quickly as they could

      For which we all thank and admire them. It's a curious quirk of human nature that in a real crisis, a little switch gets thrown in our brains, and we put aside petty selfishness and start acting like real balls out heroes.

      What we have to hope now is that we learn the lesson that the little stuff, all the petty bullshit and power plays, doesn't matter. Citizens, let the cops do their jobs. Cops, don't hassle the citizens for the little stuff.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    7. Re:Its our time now by nellardo · · Score: 2
      Let me just start by letting everyone know I live (and am currently typing this) from Manhattan.
      Me too. East 11th Street between First and Second Avenues. For those readers not so intimately familiar with Manhattan geography, that puts me a couple miles, perhaps, from the WTC (takes about 30 minutes to walk there). It also put my apartment inside the neighborhood Rudy Giuliani closed in the wake of the WTC attack.
      I used to dislike cops. THey harassed me, the were disrespectful to me, and messed with my friends.
      I had no such direct personal beef with cops. I'm white. Aside from tattoos (pretty common in my neighborhood), I don't especially stand out as a trouble-maker. I had severe reservations on police behavior, based on ethical profiling, the spurious War on Drugs, and other abuses, but this wasn't based on anything police did to me personally.
      I take it all back. All of it.
      I don't. I'm more scared of cops than ever before. Perhaps you live in a part of Manhattan where didn't have to show a police officer your ID simply to take a right turn on 14th street to walk home. The prospect of police being given that kind of power at all is terrifying.
      I have a new respect for all police in New York City since the attacks on the world trade center. They, along with the firemen all risked thier lives to help get people out of the buildings as quickly as they could. But, as you know, the building collapsed, trapping thousands (literally) of New York's finest men and women, who selflessly gave thier lives to help the rest of us.
      I'm reminded instead of a scene in Ashes of Victory by David Weber. This is the latest in the Honor Harrington series of sci-fi novels. Honor has recently broken out of the worst prison planet known, taking more than 400,000 prisoners with her. Starting out imprisoned herself, with no access to equipment other than two shuttlecraft and short her own left arm and left eye. The Queen of Manticore (Honor's boss) and her Prime Minister want to give Honor the highest award for valor that she can.

      Honor declines. Because everything she did was her duty. It was her job. It was amazing and heroic and spectacular, but it was nothing more and nothing less than her duty required of her. It was her duty to escape if she could. It was her duty to help subordinates if she could. So she did.

      I don't mean to denigrate or reduce in any way, shape, or form, the efforts rescuers have put into the WTC situation. But bluntly, the police and fireworkers did exactly what they were supposed to. They risked their lives, but that's what they signed up for. For a while, police recruiting posters in New York had a line to the effect of "Most people wouldn't take this job for a million dollars. Some do it for a lot less."

      Their heroic actions in rescue efforts doesn't mitigate or excuse abuses or crimes of the past. Does pulling a corpse out of the rubble make it okay for a cop to shoot a black man whose "gun" was his wallet?

      Now, when I see a police man on the street, I smile at him. He is ensuring my safety, and the safety of others.
      I smile too, but only out of self-defense. No reason to give them a reason to harass me.
      Now, its our turn. Sure, the government may have "demonized" us before. But times are fundamentally different now.
      Not in the way you mean, they aren't. Terrorists have been around for a long time. Robin Hood was a terrorist. The fact that "weapons" of mass destruction are a heck of a lot nastier now doesn't change the ethical basis of terrorism and how to deal with it.

      No, the way times might be different now is that Bush has what many people consider legitimate cause to impose the equivalent of martial law, all with Senate and Congressional approval and encouragement. The Office of Homeland Security is a name worthy of George Orwell and Stalin. When I was young, I read 1984. Then I lived through the year and chuckled at the Apple ads spoofing IBM as Big Brother. Remember those t-shirts about "Win95=Mac84"? George Bush 2001 = Big Brother 1984 is too scary to let me sleep comfortably. And the ATA and the Office of Homeland Security help make it possible.

      Don't think the death of bin Laden will be anything more than proof that Big Brother Loves You. There will always be terrorists and if terrorists justify totalitarianism in the Land of the Free, that totalitarianism will only go away with revolution. No Senator ever got re-elected for repealing anything except Prohibition. Today's politicians (or their handlers) understand bread and circuses too well for that. Just a couple of months ago, Bush was bribing most citizens with $300 checks.

      I'm getting a little heated now, so I'm gonna shut up. But the logic is there. Look at the history and expansion of the War on Drugs and the potential for the War on Terrorism is, well, terrifying.

      Brook Conner, aka nellardo

      --
      -----
      Klactovedestene!
  62. Vint Cerf Radio Interview 9/25/01 by Cy+Guy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Vint Cerf was interviewed on NPR's Public Interest yesterday. You can listen to it in RealAudio here. He makes a great case for how the Internet was put its first real test of the original intention of using packet switching, which was to ensure a reliable method of communication in the event of an enemy attack here on US soil - and passed the test pretty well, with the exception of some of the major media sites being slashdotted.

    He is joined by George Sadowski, Executive Director of the Global Internet Policy Initiative, GIPI.

    1. Re:Vint Cerf Radio Interview 9/25/01 by error0x100 · · Score: 1

      to ensure a reliable method of communication in the event of an enemy attack here on US soil - and passed the test pretty well

      Well .. interestingly .. in South Africa, we lost a fair chunk of international bandwidth (45 MBits, which (sadly) represents probably 20-30% of the entire country's commercial international bandwidth, if www.ispmap.org.za is anything to go by), which landed via a satellite connection in New York and ran through fiber near the WTC. It took roughly an hour or two before I could even access international sites again (compounded obviously by the "slashdotting" of many major sites). Still, thats not too bad overall. The bandwidth hasn't been replaced, so what was already horribly starved international bandwidth here is now even worse.

      Of course, 45 MBits must sound horribly pitiful to developed countries :)

    2. Re:Vint Cerf Radio Interview 9/25/01 by dillon_rinker · · Score: 2

      Interestingly, South Africa is not part of the United States and its communications capabilities (or inabilities) have NOTHING to do with the original goal of the internet. In fact, as a potential enemy of the US (no offense, but y'all have nukes and don't have US military posted on you, right? So by definition...) I'd suggest that making YOUR communications dependent on OUR well-being is a Good Thing (tm).

    3. Re:Vint Cerf Radio Interview 9/25/01 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude i dunno when last you checked, but the internet is now a WORLDWIDE thing, its not just in america anymore. so if routing around damage applied only to america before, it now applies to the WHOLE WORLD. some simple logic for ya. or are you saying that if the terrorists had attacked london, that that couldnt possibly also have served as an example of the original goals of the internet because "london is not part of the united states" and thus "has nothing to do with those original goals"??? come on, dont be stupid.

    4. Re:Vint Cerf Radio Interview 9/25/01 by geomcbay · · Score: 3, Interesting

      With all due respect to his technical achievements, Vint is pretty full of shit.

      The way network peering works (and the politics and money involved) at the highest levels is actually quite different than what they originally intended for the Internet. The only reason the Internet didn't come crashing down (at least in major portions of the country) is that the WTC, while a financial and business center, represents just an isolated leaf node on the Internet.

      Had the terrorists slammed a plane into one of the major NAP centers, things would have been extremely different, with vast portions of the population denied access to vast portions of the Internet.

      Of course, doing this wouldn't really be in the terrorists best interest..Loss of internet access is nothing compared to the loss of 6k+ lives, but Vint's argument is very weak because the circumstances involving the attack aren't at all related to an enemy purposefully trying to take out communication channels.

    5. Re:Vint Cerf Radio Interview 9/25/01 by mudshark · · Score: 1

      I can vouch for this firsthand. When my sister phoned in the morning to tell us to turn on the news, the first thing we thought about was my best friend from high school, who lives in the East Village. He often has occasion to be downtown (designs retail spaces). Of course, I tried the phones first, with zero success. Then I emailed him, hoping that he was already at his office in the garment district and would let me know he was OK.

      Anyway, I got a reply from him within the hour. His DSL circuit in the apartment was moving packets just fine, his ISP was alive, and I got his eyewitness account of something that he said "never wanted to see in my lifetime." It might have been days before a phone line opened up and I got to talk to him, but packet switched data transmission got our messages up with alacrity.

      --
      In other news, astrophysicists have announced that they now know what all that dark matter is: it's stupidity.
  63. not asking for help obviously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This looks like a plea for the dispatchers to cease their operations.

  64. Be careful by griffjon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The FBI and CIA have been known to do turnabouts on hackers. Just ask Max Vision. The gov't fought long and hard to demonize and criminalize even the whitest hats of hacking, and Ashcroft's pushing to get them labeled as terrorist acts on top of that.

    The DoD's had it's fair share of smudged histories. Be Alert. Keep your pistol handy.

    Yes, you can be useful in combatting terrorism. Just make sure you know where the line is getting drawn and be on the correct side of it.

    And realize that some of combatting terrorism may go against projects you've been supporting, like anonymous remailers, strong crypto for everyone, anti-censorship protections, and the elusive set of projects working to enable dissidents in countries such as China to safely communicate with the outside world. These and other tools can also be used by the bad guys, and will no doubt become targets.

    --
    Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
    1. Re:Be careful by DoomPlague · · Score: 1

      I don't think anyone is trying to demonize whitehats. That's a major misunderstanding. I don't completely agree with this new terrorism bill but I do think some hackers should be considered terrorists. Certainly there are terrorists who at least double as hackers.

      Some of you guys need to lay off this anti-Ashcroft crap.

      I recall Janet Reno proclaiming that any religious person or anyone that homeschools their children as cultists and a threat to the government. Ofcourse many slashdotters probably agree with that.

    2. Re:Be careful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Janet Reno never said anything like that. The claim that she said this on 60 minutes is a known hoax (check a hoax sites). You can't believe everything an idiot forwards to you.

    3. Re:Be careful by Vspirit · · Score: 1

      After the 'war' you are a treat to the military. They have trained you, empowered you and introduced you to their secrets.

      Just look at SOME of the afghans.
      and anywhere else US have drafted on location/inside human fighting power.

      Not saying they shouldn't either. But don't come and say you didn't knew afterwards - history reveals.

  65. hey, they've nothing better to do... by SirEdward · · Score: 1

    this might finally give script kiddies something useful to do with their spare time :-)

  66. the only solution.. by pecka · · Score: 1

    hack...ehm i mean crack them all...

  67. Don't Hack or DoS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If the target machines are screwed then our special net ops can't get in and grab valuable info. Info is power. It's all about following the money.

    And if they want consultants, I'd be happy to get a security clearance.

  68. Laughable indeed ... by FreeUser · · Score: 2

    Two hacker favorites -- USA Cable's Sci-Fi Channel, and UPN's hit show Buffy the Vampire Slayer -- would be perfect places to air the spot

    And in all seriousness, tonights premier of "Star Trek: Enterprise" would be the most suitable ... probably more computer literate people will be watching that show than all of SciFi and Slayer together ... at least for the first episode or two. Even then they will only be reaching a fraction of the hackers (in the traditional sense of the words) or network crackers (what they misguidedly call hackers), as geeks are at least as eclectic and diverse as any other group.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  69. Blanket pardon first, please by Autonomous+Crowhard · · Score: 1

    Unless I see a blanket pardon first, I do nothing. I don't want to do the right thing then get hunted down by my own government.

    1. Re:Blanket pardon first, please by TastyWheat · · Score: 1

      Yep I agree. I want my self completely released forever. Next thing you know after this thing is over, they will start coming for people for various computer crimes and the first people who they will target will be the ones that helped in the past. The US governemtn has no credibility in this.

  70. If they REALLY want to hit their demographic... by -=OmegaMan=- · · Score: 2, Funny

    Replace all those X10 popups with "WTF D00D PLZ DONT H4X0R ROFFLL!!!!" ;-)

    --

    This sig is xenon coated, and will glow red when in the presence of aliens

  71. Rubico_n_ with an _n_, jackass... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    As in 'crossing the'. It's a river in Italy. Look it up.

  72. Time to show them the truth by M_Talon · · Score: 1

    Ok, if they're serious about using hackers, here's some good things to do.

    1) Use those DDoS attacks on the Taliban and the terrorists. Block out their news, their proproganda. Stick it to their networks so they can't share information. At the same time reroute any pro-fundamentalist web pages to sites that promote more moderate approaches and demonstrate the stupidity behind radicalism. Show them the truth, at the same time you're snuffing out the lies.

    2) Backdoor their servers and use the unauthorized access to swipe important details of operation. Set up sniffers on any communications you can for intelligence. I'm sure the CIA is already working on that one :)

    3) Any crypto breakers should offer their services in some fashion, since they're going to be needed.


    Things not to do:

    1) Attack any and all Islam/Arab related sites. Keep in mind the enemy we're fighting, and don't drag innocents into it.

    2) Deface sites not related to the struggle based on the idea of "making a message". That plays into their hands.

    If the government is willing to sanction the good things, like everyone said this could improve the image of "freelance security experts". Heh.

    --
    Electronic Frontier Foundation for online civil rights information
    1. Re:Time to show them the truth by zztzed · · Score: 3, Funny
      1) Use those DDoS attacks on the Taliban and the terrorists. Block out their news, their proproganda. Stick it to their networks so they can't share information. At the same time reroute any pro-fundamentalist web pages to sites that promote more moderate approaches and demonstrate the stupidity behind radicalism. Show them the truth, at the same time you're snuffing out the lies.
      DDoS? Hell, all you need is some scissors to cut the string linking their two tin cans together.
    2. Re:Time to show them the truth by Occam's+Nailfile · · Score: 1
      Use those DDoS attacks on the Taliban and the terrorists. Block out their news, their proproganda.

      Sorry, this is the same government that recently moved to ban floppy disks, in addition to the internet. Not a lot of propaganda flowing through the digital world in Afghanistan, chum.

    3. Re:Time to show them the truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DAMMIT FOR THE MILLIONTH TIME THE TALIBAN IS ANTI INTERNET, do you really think you can ddos their rocks and sticks and tents?

      you good intentioned tho, about keeping focused

    4. Re:Time to show them the truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you must be a very happy person (are you on crack or something?).

      Indeed ignorance is a bliss.

      the watcher.

  73. They really are missing an opportunity. by sheldon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Buffy the Vampire slayer? What do they want the high school 3l33t hack0r3?

    The perfect opportunity is tonight on UPN when the new Star Trek premiers.

    Sheesh. :)

    1. Re:They really are missing an opportunity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm in high school and I don't even watch Buffy the Vampire Slayer. Hell, I probably spend more time reading /. than watching TV.

    2. Re:They really are missing an opportunity. by Dexx · · Score: 1

      What about during Junkyard Wars? Wouldn't that also attract the type of person they're looking for?

      --
      Feel the fear and do it anyway.
  74. Tonight's Enterprise Premier by beavis_kc · · Score: 1

    They're too late, tonight's Enterprise Premier is the perfect place for this 'public service' announcement.

    --
    Liberty is an inherently offensive lifestyle. Living in a free society guarantees that each one of us will see our most
  75. Honeypot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Before anyone goes rushing off to deface anti-US websites (I can't imagine "real" hackers responding to something this idiotic) stop and consider the honeypot implications. For years the government line as been "hacking bad, hacking evil, we'll jail you on any inane pretext and fine you into the next century". Now all of a sudden they see an opportunity to pounce on the gullible: "tell us who you are so we can help you fight the Evil Not-US bad guys."

    Can't you just see some gleeful little pinhead suit rubbing his hands gleefully at the prospect that the "hackers" they've been trying for so long to catch might be gullible enough to respond?

    Next week's big story: government operatives nab hundreds of evil hackers while organizing "hack attack" on terrorists.

    Pfft! I don't think so.

  76. Seems straightforward enough ... by bryanp · · Score: 1

    rm -rf /bin/Laden

    --
    "An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." Col. Jeff Cooper
    1. Re:Seems straightforward enough ... by kill+-9+$$ · · Score: 1
      Another one I heard that was pretty funny is:
      chmod a+x binladen
      --

      -- A computer without COBOL and Fortran is like a piece of chocolate cake without ketchup and mustard
    2. Re:Seems straightforward enough ... by crazyprogrammer · · Score: 1

      what about this one.

      $ps
      PID TTY TIME CMD
      666 tty0 00:00:00 binladen
      $kill -9 666

      or

      $mv /bin/laden /dev/null

      --
      "the fax machine is nothing but a waffle iron with a phone attached to it." - Grandpa Simpson
    3. Re:Seems straightforward enough ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hrm. I prefer to:

      su -c 'rm -rf /usr/bin/Laden' taliban
      more freedom
      less violence
      Wow that was incredible fun. hrm. I'll have to type something like that again some time. BTW, I did rm -rf / today. Lots of fun. Anywho, read some more posts.

  77. Your as dense as a post aren't you? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

    There are more true hackers around then you know about. Regardless, us *hackers* whether we are white, black, or greyhat's are all around and you would never know...unless you asked us.

    On another point, a hacker writes their own tools, script kiddies use the tools we have written.

    Come to Defcon sometime, and you'll see how many "true" hackers are around. But that's only the ones that can make it. Otherwise you can always try the 2600 meetings.

    Mashiki
    --
    Whitehat, why yes!
    --

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
    1. Re:Your as dense as a post aren't you? by 13013dobbs · · Score: 1
      There are more true hackers around then you know about. Regardless, us *hackers* whether we are white, black, or greyhat's are all around and you would never know...unless you
      asked us.

      On another point, a hacker writes their own tools, script kiddies use the tools we have written.

      Come to Defcon sometime, and you'll see how many "true" hackers are around. But that's only the ones that can make it. Otherwise you can always try the 2600 meetings.


      A hacker is what others call you, not what you call yourself. Most people I've met that have claimed to be an eleet hacker have not been. Sure they can install hedhat and grab a copy of 'land.c', but that is the limit of their skillz. By your definition of a hacker, you will find that, at best, 5% of 'hackers' aren't. I have been to Defcon; you can fit all the true hackers in attendance in a hotel suite.

      --

      No replies made to AC posts. Please log in.

    2. Re:Your as dense as a post aren't you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Yeah heh... last Defcon I think there was like 5 people in attendance that knew what was up, and 40,000 pimple-faced script kiddies whose online endeavors are roughly analogous to their primitive vandalism of the convention's hotel facilities.

    3. Re:Your as dense as a post aren't you? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Guess what, I am one of those hackers that would find in that room. Sometimes publicly flaunting something, usually the desired effect. Much like your comment.

      But wondering off...as Heinlein said, speciliazation is for insects. I am a Renaissance man true and though.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    4. Re:Your as dense as a post aren't you? by 13013dobbs · · Score: 1

      BS. You are no hacker. You are just some kid who figured out how to install redhat on an old PC and grabbed some leet hacker files. You should re-read my comment. Most people, like you, who run around shouting, "I am a hacker. I am 'leet!", are not.

      --

      No replies made to AC posts. Please log in.

  78. Sure by cford · · Score: 1

    I'd hack for the feds. It'd be nice, though if they'd cover my student loan debt in return. Seriously, teachers, health care professionals, and other groups can have their student loans wiped out by offering their services in underpriviledged areas, but computer science types can't really go code in the ghetto and expect the government to wipe out their loans. I'd be happy to offer any help I can, debts cancelled or not, but still, it'd be nice.

  79. US Govt = Two-Faced? by SilverThorn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There was an article a few days ago posted here that the Justice Department wants Congress to pass John Ashcroft's proposed 'Anti-Terrorist Act' that would treat hacking as a form of terrorism.

    Is it just me or does this sound like a stab in the back to provoke hackers into the open, then after they have done the work the US Govt would like them to do, jail them for breaking this so-called Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA)?

    -- M

    --
    Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity.
  80. At it again by zoftie · · Score: 1

    Haven't americans learnt it already? So they will patronize and pay hackers to fight bin ladden. So they will win. So they have a ton of uneasy hackers spinning on their chairs. So they will collect them and lock them up befor they will become computer binladdens. NOW. Most of Afganisatan does not even have radios, nevermind computers and networks. Hack Afganistan? Nope. Hack the hackers. Tie people who will rebel on the event when miliarty order will descend, and you got no resistance, at least from computer side. Remember embarrasments DOD and CIA had when their sites were defaced? Time to get back at those pranksters, with a national pride as a tool.

    BEAWARE!

  81. Re:This might be just what the linux community nee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    First of all, your link to an article only shows a picture of the magazine.

    One of my major beef's with the Linux community in general has been their fanatical anti .gov and .mil views. I've always thought of it as being unpatriotic to bring down the net, via dos attacks, defacing a .gov website.

    Yes, clearly only the Linux community would do such things. As I understand it, products from Redmond are the cause of the latest security problems (Code Red, Sircam, et al), no?

    You, sir, are a luser.

  82. No Kidding... by visualight · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yeah, what's up with corporations thinking it's okay to act like some kind of authority figure? I'm getting kinda tired of it.

    Anybody here work in advertising or media produciton? If you want to serve your country organize a "I Call Bullshit" ad campaign. So we all chip in cash and run ads to address all the misinformation put out by the spin doctors in the government. Fight fire with fire.

    I've got 23 dollars to chip in.

    --
    Samsung took back my unlocked bootloader because Google wants me to rent movies. They're both evil.
    1. Re:No Kidding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you'll donate 24 dollars, we'll throw in this wonderful premium gift:

      Yes, it's a Trixie Belden lunch box. Complete with thermos.

  83. Huh? by Publicus · · Score: 1

    They're worried that well-meaning U.S. hackers may launch denial-of-service attacks or release worms or viruses aimed at disrupting terrorists

    Question: How dumb do they think we are?

    Answer: As dumb as they are.

    Explanation: To combat terrorism the government is busy restricting every possible liberty they can get their hands on. In the end, it will only hurt good citizins and do nothing to the terrorists. Just as these feared attacks would.

    --

    My Karma was at 49, then they switched to words. All that work for nothing!

  84. reminds me of turing... by klog23 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In WWII Alan Turing was recruited by the allies for his mathematical genius. He essentially saved the world from fascism, and afterwards he was demonized and led to suicide by a government that disagreed with his lifestyle.

    1. Re:reminds me of turing... by TastyWheat · · Score: 1

      Yep Turing saved more lives than any one general by cracking Enigma, the german code box, and how did they repay him? These people use you up and shit on you later. I want some guarantees first!

    2. Re:reminds me of turing... by MyMarty · · Score: 1

      just serves to remind us that government is not a person, but a beareucracy - no loyalty.

    3. Re:reminds me of turing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alan Turing was a gayboy. Don't ask, don't tell--that's what I say.

    4. Re:reminds me of turing... by Martin+S. · · Score: 2

      ...afterwards he was demonized and led to suicide by a government that disagreed with his lifestyle.

      1) Actually he was not 'demonised' by the 'government', he received honours for his work.
      2) It is much more acurate to say he was ostrocised by society & victimised by Police because of his homosexuality [that where ignorant of his contribution].
      3) His Finnish toy boy lover was almost certainly a honey trap.
      4) There is also a strong likelyhood that his suicide had as much to do with to post traumatic stress, as his prosecution.
      5) His suicide may have actually been murder.

  85. YOU'LL NEVER SILENCE THE VOICE OF THE VOICELESS by dtinferno · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The Fact that the government wats "hacktivists" to chill out only gives them more reason to do more damage. The way I figure it, if u wanted to do some mess like that to say, Taliban alligned web sites, they very well deserve it. The slipping of a nimba worm would shure as hell put some sugar in their gas tank. Under these circumstances however, I would go pester the Army, Navy, Marines, and FBI to give u a job doing what u do best. If ur gonna get lost in a sea of lies, u might as well have some fun doing it.
    DTINFERNO@netzero.net
    www.DTINFERNO.com

  86. Hate is already all over the newsgroups. by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 2

    I regularly hang out in alt.2600, and I lurk in many other Newsgroups. Apart from the usual spam and trolls a new troll is breeding:

    The Hate Troll.

    A large number of posts are dominated by "Hack this Muslim site" or, "Hackers fight back against terror!" And of course these twits then list a site (which often has nothing to do with terrorisim, and often is hosted in the U.S... Not that the posters have discovered whois or nslookup yet...)

    Fortunately the regulars (those who actually deserve the monoinker "hacker") ignore or flame the hell out of the poster. Not that that is an issue. The regulars can determine between free speech (freedom) and censorship (terrorism of words).

    Unfortunately, the skript kiddies can't. Of course, this is the crowd that the advertisements are targeted towards. Not that it will help - the kiddies are incredibly thick skulled.

    I just wish I could see the commercial (I don't watch T.V.) maybe it will show up on adcritic.

    --
    Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
  87. I thought they said we were terrorists? by TastyWheat · · Score: 1

    So are we scum sucking terrorists or heros. I think they better make up their fucking minds before I touch one of their computers. I won't do it if they pass that law.

  88. What do they want by NitsujTPU · · Score: 2

    The article doesn't say what they want people to do, and I havent found where they want people to do anything on the website. Perhaps some contact information? I've got free time if it's volunteering somehow.

  89. Oh yeah... by Dan+D. · · Score: 1
    All your Al-qaeda are belong to us.

    If I had another account I'd mod myself down.

    --
    People who quote themselves bug the crap out of me -- Me.
  90. FBI IT Recruiting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    It may not be much but the FBI is offering up to 138K for qualified IT pros. I sent in my resume. Even willing to leave my operations job with one of Pepsico's major Competitors (not coke). Gotta do my part.

    P.S. NSA is also hiring, but the CIA doesn't want IT people. I didn't want to be a spook anyways.

    1. Re:FBI IT Recruiting by eadint · · Score: 0

      hey where do ya sentd your resume . let me know eadint@hotmail.com

  91. Where Are the Maids In Waiting? by Baldrson · · Score: 2
    They have no idea what they're doing. A tournament of knights requires visible maids in waiting who are waiting to do more than pat the little geeks on the head for being good eunix.

    However, after Operation Desert Storm and a wide variety of other opportunities for culling the male population of the Arab Middle East...

  92. Re:It's a trap by BigBir3d · · Score: 0

    not at all! do you??

  93. Be very careful by Estragon · · Score: 5, Informative

    The government has been known to do turnabouts. Just ask Osama Bin Laden.

    --
    I rejoice that there are owls.
  94. Now, this is stupid. by WasterDave · · Score: 3, Insightful

    OK, so a week ago we have the FBI complaining that /bin/laden has given up on his satellite phones and computers in favour of sending messengers on camels (or whatever, apologies for lame western stereotyping) since they can't be wiretapped. Now: Please r00t his servers for us.

    Piss poor. And anyway, a whole bunch of people are going to want a whole load of legal protection for what they know before they will do this. I mean, spend the next six months breaking terrorists servers apart and in a years time when .Net takes it up the arse... well, they're going to know whose door to break down, aren't they?

    But if anyone goes for this: good luck. I do have some pretty serious problems with piling into Afghanistan and blowing shit up; but no moral qualms whatsoever when it comes to merely trashing terrorists ability to operate.

    Dave

    --
    I write a blog now, you should be afraid.
    1. Re:Now, this is stupid. by snake_dad · · Score: 2

      ls -la /bin shows a bit more than just laden (.laden?). So, /bin/laden is paranoid, and does not use technology in order to ensure his own safety. That does not mean that other people, groups or cells have taken the same precautions.

      Wouldn't it be great if at least some of the other bad guys out there could be stopped and/or eliminated because of a couple of techs with uptodate knowledge?

      I do agree about the legal protection part. Stranger schemes have been used to arrest hard-to-get people. I know, I saw it on Discovery :)

      --
      karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
  95. Rumor has it by aantix · · Score: 0, Troll

    MafiaBoy is planning a DOS attack on "Yahoo! Afghanistan". That'll teach 'em.

    --
    "Shake yur bon bon"
  96. I've seen this movie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It turns out vinton cerf was the real mastermind behind the terrorist attacks, and when he realizes I know, he threatens to alter my mom's identity.

    then all the hackers head down to grand central station with their macintosh laptops and beat him at his own game!

    yay!!

  97. uh...can we have our stuff back now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    might have to write a parser for pashtun and several arabic dialects besides.

  98. Do Slashdot editors even reads the links? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    The linked story makes it pretty clear (at least after the first sentence) that:

    1) the organization doing the ads is not part of the US government

    2) They're asking hackers to NOT deface sites, etc.

    I guess I shouldn't be too critical of /., since Wired did provide the totally misleading info in the 1st sentence of the article...

    1. Re:Do Slashdot editors even reads the links? by visualight · · Score: 1

      It's seems most of the people posting comments dont' read the links either.

      --
      Samsung took back my unlocked bootloader because Google wants me to rent movies. They're both evil.
    2. Re:Do Slashdot editors even reads the links? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No

      Something is wrong: parent=2354917 dups=1 discussion=21995 Didja forget a subject? Duplicate. Did you submit twice? Let us know if anything exceptionally strange happens Slow Down Cowboy! Slashdot requires you to wait 20 seconds between hitting 'reply' and submitting a comment. It's been 17 seconds since you hit 'reply'! If you this error seems to be incorrect, please provide the following in your report to Source Forge: Browser type User ID/Nickname or AC What steps caused this error Whether or not you know your ISP to be using a proxy or some sort of service that gives you an IP that others are using simultaneously. How many posts to this form you successfully submitted during the day * Please choose 'formkeys' for the category! Thank you.

  99. Hi! How are you? by sgt_getraer · · Score: 2, Funny
    To: Osama Bin Laden
    Subject: Hi! How are you?

    I send you this file in order to have your advice

  100. Re:so are you volunteering? by SpanishInquisition · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I installed linux a couple of times, that makes me a hacker right?

    --
    Je t'aime Stéphanie
  101. Denning - photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Whoa! I was all set to hack Dorothy Denning's web site and make her photo look silly. But someone beat me to it!

  102. Simple. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simple. Do it. Non-Christians have not made an issue of the decidedly pro-Christian coverage of memorial services. It is time for us to show that we can be as gracious. Now is the time for us to put aside our petty differences and come together against the worse of two evils. Yes, the federal government has been particularly myopic when it comes to technology and personal freedoms. All we can do is educate them and help them understand.

    In the meantime, their ignorance is no reason to refuse to help where we can.

  103. Why don't we wait until next week and see? by jflynn · · Score: 3, Informative
    If the ATA is passed as is and they start rounding up the strong encryption users, gnutella "pirates", and drug "terrorists", I'll pass, I think.

    It they were hiring at the NSA or FBI it would be far more attractive. They could use some new blood from what they *say*. Joining a semi-approved vigilante organization is different. The alphabet agencies are somewhat well known for using and discarding people with plausible deniability, like Noreiga for example.

    It's all whether they are really looking for people to protect the Internet, or to help them with the Big Brother program. Some of the provisions of the ATA are nonsensical -- they help the terrorists more than us. They are all very nifty domestic surveillance measures however. So I'm not following any leaders until this measure is finalized. If you want to protect the Internet what could be better, for now, than protecting your own systems?

    The ATA makes it life in prison without chance for parole for defacing a web site. While I agree that action is illegal, I am not in favor of paying taxes to support the script-kiddies for life.

    If you'd like to help them decide here's a petitition getting broad bipartisan support.

    In Defense Of Freedom

    1. Re:Why don't we wait until next week and see? by Howie · · Score: 1


      5. We can, as we have in the past, in times of war and of peace, reconcile the requirements of security with the demands of liberty.



      7. We should resist efforts to target people because of their race, religion, ethnic background or appearance, including immigrants in general, Arab Americans and Muslims.


      Ask some older Japanese Americans about these two clauses.

      --
      "don't fall into the fallacy of believing that Perl can solve social problems. Maybe Perl 6 can, but that's a ways off"
  104. this is the weirdest news i've heard in all week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ..and it's been a weird week.

    Gov. want to make hacking a crime punishable by life in prison? Gov. also encourages that this crime be committed by random individuals towards semi-random targets without control of the gov.? Isn't that sorta like.. asking the people of the US to kill someone that's conceivably a terrorist instead of bringing him to justice in a court?

    Hrm.. this post is confused, but that is because I'm confused. Better stop writing.

  105. It was a joke! by megaduck · · Score: 5, Informative

    At least, I hope it was a joke. There is nothing to attack in Afghanistan.. The Taliban banned the internet a while back because it permitted access to "immoral content". Afghanistan doesn't have an information infrastructure, much less one that connects to the big wide world.

    Check out the .af domain sometime. Totally barren. That's what makes this whole thing so ridiculous.

    --
    This .sig for rent.
    1. Re:It was a joke! by locust · · Score: 2
      There is nothing to attack in Afghanistan


      I don't think its Afghanistan they're after, but rather the networking resources that the terrorists use in first world powers. I wonder if there is a #osama channel somewhere? Seriously, with the ubiquity of internet access both for private individuals and students it stands to reason that a terror network would use the internet to communicate.


      --locust

    2. Re:It was a joke! by elmegil · · Score: 1

      And do you think we'll be any more successful in shutting them down than the government has been in shutting down MP3 trading and kiddie porn?

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    3. Re:It was a joke! by MyMarty · · Score: 1

      I agree it was a joke, but in any case i don't believe that your government will request you to hack anything (leave that to the NSA). I think it will be much more the case that they'll simply ask you to be hardening your servers to resist attack. And if that leads to less Code Red in my box i'm all for it.

    4. Re:It was a joke! by Dolly_Llama · · Score: 2
      Check out the .af domain sometime.



      You might want to check out the af.mil domain. Those Afghans appear to have quite the arsenal of advanced aircraft and ICBMs. What's more, they're recruiting!

      --

      Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan

    5. Re:It was a joke! by gol64738 · · Score: 1

      The Taliban banned the internet a while back because it permitted access to "immoral content"./I

      haha, you mean it permitted access to "the truth", don't you?

    6. Re:It was a joke! by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • Those Afghans appear to have quite the arsenal of advanced aircraft and ICBMs. What's more, they're recruiting!

      The primary effect of the US military buildup in that region so far has been to generate a huge surge of Taliban recruits.

      There's a very simple lesson there. Think how the US would react to being bombed, sanctioned and threatened, then ask yourself why any nation on the face of the earth would react differently.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  106. goat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yes.

  107. Very Good by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Like the poster said above about the Police in NYC. Times have changed.

    In the past, it was us against them, because there wasn't an widely reguarded outside threat. Now there is.

    So people can either keep bitching about the past and all the "injustices". Or they can realize that Now isn't like it was Before 9.11.01.

    Times have changed. I've known for a while that the Taliban and Militantist Terrorist groups were bad, but I didn't know how bad. And the attacks on 9.11.01 wern't the final release, it's a step up.

    So I'd say - let bygones be bygones and step upto the plate and help the Gov and Mil if they need help and you are willing. But don't bitch about what happened before, cause it was a different world.

    The Anti-Terror thing in the House and Senate is already being ripped apart by the Committees, I doubt it'll get to a floor vote.

    1. Re:Very Good by t0qer · · Score: 1

      Thank you Wyatt, feels good when I get a "Atta boy" for posting something good :)

      --toq

    2. Re:Very Good by I_redwolf · · Score: 1

      Right and it will be a different world after they think everything is ok. If you're in their roster except to get some good old broomstick luving from police, gov and the military.. They will rape you in public, jail you and throw away the key into some sulfuric acid trap.

      The terrorists are getting exactly what they wanted.. They wanted us to get scared and unite and give up ALL of our rights. Game over.

    3. Re:Very Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >So I'd say - let bygones be bygones and step upto the plate and help
      >the Gov and Mil if they need help and you are willing. But don't bitch
      >about what happened before, cause it was a different world.
      >
      Go to hell.

  108. Token paranoid comment by trauma · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is similar to the police stings you hear about from time to time (at least in the movies) where known felons are contacted in large groups and told they have won some attractive prize; all who show up are promptly arrested.

    Not that anybody will be arrested as a result of dialing 1-800-usa-hack to sign up, but if you think a job offer is going to be the result as opposed to an immediate phone tap and lots of extra attention on your ip address, you are sadly deluded...

  109. BBSpot - Predicting the future again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So would this be Life imitating art? Or maybe someone in the US Gov't read it and thought it sounded logical

    http://www.bbspot.com/News/2001/09/surrender.htm l

  110. quick update!! by evilpaul13 · · Score: 1

    This just in, '"I want you, evil hackers," Says Uncle Sam Website' hacked.

  111. Hackers Against Terrorism - HAT by sheetsda · · Score: 2
    "Hackers Against Terrorism"

    Well, looks like we need to come up with another color. To me, this doesn't appear to fall under either BlackHAT or WhiteHAT activity. Perhaps Red/White/BlueHAT?

    1. Re:Hackers Against Terrorism - HAT by NullAndVoid · · Score: 1

      Green hat hackers

      --


      -- Sigs are for losers
  112. What's the real point? by startled · · Score: 2

    I don't mean to sound like a conspiracy theorist here, but what's the real point of this ad? It doesn't sound like anyone actually thinks it'll deter anyone. And on TV? Much more effective on-line. And there really aren't enough script kiddiez and whatnot to have a TV campaign make any sense.

    The people who will actually be influenced by this are the ones who aren't very computer-literate. While the script kiddiez will scoff (or not even notice), there are far more computer illiterates (or semi-literates), and they'll be more easily swayed. Is this just another attempt at demonizing non-corporate computer types?

  113. punnery by Mercuria · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Actually, this is a worse joke than either of you realize... Bin Laden's organization is called Al-Qaeda, which translates to "The Base"...

    1. Re:punnery by xmedar · · Score: 1

      So why did someone rate the post that pointed it out +1 Funny and my orginal post -1 Overrated, the joke was twofold, a) The Base as indicated above and b) the fact that the buying and selling of derivative options on the companies that have been hit yeilding around $50M for the terrorists. Please if you're going to mod me think about why I would post THAT particular joke at THIS time, thanks in advance.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced man is indistinguishable from God
  114. Wrong title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's unclesam w4nt$ joo

  115. Buffy the Vampire Slayer ????????? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hacker listening to this stupid show???

    Well, ok, 15yld kids would.

    Are you all watching Buffy the Vampire???
    I would guess next show Buffy will be slayering Taliban vampires.

    CNN is much more interesting these days.

    Actually, they should simply but a banner on /., cheaper and more effective way of targetting them.

    Yeah...banner marketing doesn't work...I forgot :)

  116. Two Birds by Chris+Y+Taylor · · Score: 4, Troll

    My advice is that as many people in the hacker community that can, should help out the old .gov people in winning this 1st war of the 21st century and/or help out the less technically inclined NGO's doing disaster response in NY and DC. It is the patriotic thing to do. It is the right thing to do, and that should be enough reason.

    Many of these .gov groups are the same ones that have misunderstood and/or demonized technology and the hacking community in the past. So what. It's still the right thing to do to pitch in and help, even if you don't like some of the people who will be on the team. If hackers are magnanimous here, then maybe some of those old political adversaries could be educated and shown that hackers are not criminals (those would be crackers). This could be an opportunity to win the "hearts and minds" of some local .gov people in addition to the ones we'll be fighting for in Afghanistan, the Sudan, and Iraq.

    But don't just take this opportunity to show .gov how patriotic and productive the hacking community is. Ask Dr. Gerald Bull about the hazards of doing favors for the gov't in secret. Joe and Jane Sixpack need to be won over as well. Buy a book on public relations for small organizations; befriend a reporter; do a little of that social engineering to make sure that when the media is talking about what groups are doing what to help out, they mention your work as well. I am not suggesting that PR should take priority over actually helping out, but rather that with a little extra effort this is an opportunity to kill two birds with one stone. An opportunity that may not come again soon.

    And besides, even if no one but you ever knows what you did... donating time and effort to help the war efforts and/or disaster victims is still the right thing to do.

    1. Re:Two Birds by I_redwolf · · Score: 1

      There is currently nothing that a hacker could do in this region of the US to help anything. If you didn't know the gov't rarely changes it's views on anything and when they do it takes an event as large as the actual downing of the WTC to make a difference. If anyone is thinking about doing this; think again, I can guarantee that you will be screwed and you will be screwed hard.

  117. Re:This might be just what the linux community nee by t0qer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This [wired.com] issue of wired

    Where did that sentance say I was linking to an article, go out and buy a copy. BTW only charma whore's post as anonymous cowards. I take full responsibility for my posts, even if I know they will get modded down to -1. You sir obviously do not stand behind your comment otherwise you wouldn't have posted anonymously, therefore it is you that is the luser.

    --Toq

  118. whaaaa.. cry me a river by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    They demonize you and criminalize you and then ask for your help. What's a hacker to do?

    Why are some geeks such whiners. Here's an anology which might help. If you drive your car on the freeway at 120 mph they will demonize you and criminalize you. If you drive 200 mph on a race track and win races they will cheer you and pay you lots of money. Can you see the difference? Do you understand? Take the tin foil hat off for a while and join humanity.

    1. Re:whaaaa.. cry me a river by I_redwolf · · Score: 1

      Driving a car in and of itself isn't criminal. Hacking is of a criminalistic nature and when I say hacker I don't mean the term cracker or whatever nonsense people wanna call it. Not some dude who hacks code. Someone who takes the time and researches a system to know it's ins and outs. They take the time to research their target. Months upon months of research, dumpster diving, phone phreaking etc. When it's all done they will attack when they see fit. I for one don't trust the .gov, .ss, .mil, .whatever at all.. And I'm in the military.

      Anyone that was seriously considering doing this is probably not capable of hacking or cracking any systems to begin with.

      Back to my bat cave.

    2. Re:whaaaa.. cry me a river by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh...what?????

      Since when is hacking "of a criminalistic nature?" I can hack all I want, hell I can hack until the cows come home and it's not against the law. It's only when I violate the law and break into someones system without their permission that it becomes illegal, as it should be. I'll never understand the argument that something should be legal just because a band of rouge 13 year old geeks want it to be.

    3. Re:whaaaa.. cry me a river by I_redwolf · · Score: 1

      You hack but you don't violate the law and break into someone elses system. So umm what are you hacking?? your own systems at home for vital information that you could also login as root and get?? There is no argument about hacking being made legal... IT IS illegal to do so, whether good or bad is a totally diff subject. You don't start hacking systems over night.. It takes a long long long time and the payoff has to be worth it..

  119. Yarr matey by interiot · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Finally, a case where the word "pirate" really applies.

    The English tried this before... giving ships the right to be privateers, attack their opponents, and keep the loot. When the war ended, the government took back the permission, and pirates were born.

    1. Re:Yarr matey by HiThere · · Score: 2

      And there's at least one example of a captain (and crew?) that was hung because the war ended while they were at sea, and they didn't get the word in time.

      "Put not your faith in princes." -- R.A.H. (I believe ... he may have been quoting someone else.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  120. Quid pro quo by JCCyC · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm not an USA citizen, but if I was, that's what I'd do: write an open letter to the Govt, saying I'd be happy to help if they (a) nullify the DMCA, (b) nullify the Sonny Bono Act, (c) abort the SSSCA and (d) FIRE ASHCROFT!

    Publish on a Web site. Ask for signatures. Make clear that the signers DO mean to enlist if the above happens.

    As I said, I'm not from the US, so it'd be weird if I made such page myself. Anyone who likes the suggestion, fell free to go ahead. The idea is hereby placed in the public domain.

    1. Re:Quid pro quo by kilgore_47 · · Score: 3, Funny

      The idea is hereby placed in the public domain.

      Thats good.
      Because I was worried you got a patent on political activism.
      And that would fuck up my whole production. ;-)

      --
      ___
      The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason. --Ben Franklin
  121. I wonder... by rant-mode-on · · Score: 1

    ... who has the most to lose in a hacking war, terrorists or the USA?

  122. What Brought This On by Chris+Y+Taylor · · Score: 4, Informative

    Exclusive: Crackers Prepare Retaliation for Tues. Terrorist Attacks
    www.govtech.net/news/features/news_feature.phtml ?d ocid=3030000000002974
    (take out the extra space between d and o)

    Crackers Prepare Retaliation for Tues. Terrorist Attacks
    www.newsbytes.com/news/01/170117.html

    These stories from last week are probably what brought about this PSA.

  123. work for uncle sam. as a terrorist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ironic. Heard news about John Ashcroft lumping hackers in together with terrorists in the new anti-terrorism legislation: so the US is now starting its own Corps of Terrorists?

  124. The Return of Joe McCarthy by hillct · · Score: 3, Funny
    Hackers, come register at your nearest recruiting station, where you will be interogated and evaluated to determine thay you are not a terrorist, since J. 'McCarthy' Ashcroft's proposed legislation states that hacksrs are terrorists unless proven innocent.

    Seriously though, the slippery slope arguent with regard to civil liberties is vary difficult to make, since based on that argument, organizations such as the ACLU and other organizations have had to defend all sorts of morally reprehensible (yet still legal) activities/things/people, to such a degree as to alienate a large portion of the population. This effect of having to act based on the slippery slope argument, has resulted in members of the news media recently making statements such as those on the ABC sunday discussion program This Week, which were to the effect (and not an exact quote):
    There are some internet users who are concerned about the loss of the use of certain arcane privlages like the use of certain types of cryptography but most Americans won't be concerned with this.
    These light treatments by the news media, of the civil liberties issues around the right to privacy, as manifested by the ability to use cryptographic mechanisms in communication, are inexcusable. Unfortunately, here I suppose I'm preaching to the choir.

    --CTH
    --

    --Got Lists? | Top 95 Star Wars Line
    1. Re:The Return of Joe McCarthy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "There are some internet users who are concerned about the loss of the use of certain arcane privlages like the use of certain types of cryptography but most Americans won't be concerned with this."

      Arcane ???
      Reading this by a bunch of wimpy wheeny
      Yuppie writers makes one crinch.
      The blind leading the blind.

    2. Re:The Return of Joe McCarthy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'cringe'

    3. Re:The Return of Joe McCarthy by Albion · · Score: 1

      Do you really think they will care about anybody they don't already have reason to suspect? They have to get a warrant for tapping/decrypting and that won't happen unless they have probable cause.

      BTW, there is no "right" to privacy, only a right against unreasonable searches and seizures.

      Of course, if you're working for bin Laden, all bets are off.

    4. Re:The Return of Joe McCarthy by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      The full text of the Fourth Amendment:

      The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

      Please note that the first clause guarrantees the security of all people in their property and effects. This has been interpreted by the Supreme Court as an undeniable right to privacy.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
  125. Slashdot's double standard by regexp · · Score: 3, Informative

    As others have pointed out, the U.S. government is not advocating cracker attacks; it's "Cyberangels."

    How come when the "major media" get stuff wrong, it's due to pro-corporate bias and part of an evil conspiracy, but when michael or someone else on Slashdot publishes falsehoods, it's an honest mistake?

    Which is it?

    1. Re:Slashdot's double standard by sulli · · Score: 1

      Easy - when Slashdot gets it wrong, it's part of an evil conspiracy too.

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
  126. Carrot and Stick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Well, we saw the "stick" a few days ago - life sentences for hacking websites...this is suppoed to be "dubya's" version of a patriotic call-to-arms?


    Fuck that shit. I'm all about helping, especially now, but not when I'm being threatened with life imprisonment with no possibility of parole. If you don't know what I'm talking about, look up Ashcoft's new anti-terrorism bill, where in the the tradition of "encryption == munitions" they now give us "hacking == crime worth a mandatory life sentence".


    Are they serious? or just very insulting???

  127. ohh.. by berk!feedme! · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The irony is strong in this one. Can anyone remind me when exactly we established Bin Laden used the internet?

  128. better than being drafted... by smirkleton · · Score: 5, Funny
    Better step up and be patriotic, Hacker Squints of Slashdot. Better to be serving your country while sitting behind a monitor in an air-conditioned room than be drafted and sent out.

    ...I can just picture a special 3L1T3 squadron of slashdot users, sent out into the plains of Afghanistan. Everyone wheezing and gasping for breath before they even got out of the copter. Eyes darting around nervously for the nearest coin-operated soda machine selling Mountain Dew (which, if you must know, is probably in Jordan or Israel).

    EXT - NAMELESS AFGHAN PLAIN - MORNING.

    An Apache helicopter settles onto the barren plain. Out from it emerge three plain males. They wear an assortment of camouflage combined with curious t-shirts, with sayings like "I don't work here" and "will frag for bandwidth".
    Geek 1: "(wheeze, wheeze) I thought...(gasp)...All that Quake...(gasp gasp)... Prepared me for this..."

    Geek2: "...I haven't... (HACK! HACK!)... moved this much...(cough cough)... since I got off the couch... to get the UPS delivery... of BAWLS..."

    JonKatz: "I just...(argh)...had an idea for...a follow-up series....(gasp)...to Voices From The Hellmouth Revisited: Part Ten...(cough gasp cough...)You guys want to... hear... it?"

    Geek1: "Give me...that...damn...machine...gun. (cough cough cough)..."

    JonKatz: "Alright! (cough gag) Wrong time..." (mutters into dictaphone) "...note to self. Idea...for commentary... Why today's geeks... (cough gasp cough) are unfairly stigmatized... (wheeeeeeze) ...as being insensitive... (HACK!)...to violence..."
    Just as Geek1 begins to aim his machine gun at JonKatz, to put an end to his ravings once and for all, a crazed member of the Taliban comes flying over the desert horizon. He is screaming something.

    The Geeks all stop and look at him. Terror strikes into their very hearts and souls. The words of their enemy shock them into utter panic.
    Crazed Taliban Member: "ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US! ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US! ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US! "

    Geek1, Geek2, JonKatz: "Aiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!"
    The three begin to flee in the opposite direction, now heading directly into a minefield.
    Crazed Taliban Member: "YOU ARE ON YOUR WAY TO DESTRUCTION! YOU HAVE NO CHANCE TO SURVIVE MAKE YOUR TIME! HA HA HA HA!"
    Geek1 stops running, a serene expression coming across his face. He grabs Geek2's shoulder by his t-shirt, quietly, allowing JonKatz to continue to flee further into the minefield.
    Geek1 (teary-eyed): "Take off every 'zig'."

    Geek2 (smiling): "You know what you're doing?"

    Geek1 (nodding through tears): "Move 'zig'."

    Geek2 (embracing him): "For great justice."

    The two geeks turn to face their adversary, brandishing their weapons with a newfound confidence and sense of purpose. JonKatz vanishes over the horizon, screaming wildly.

    CUT TO...
    1. Re:better than being drafted... by kaxman · · Score: 1

      this is the funniest thing i have read in weeks. you got any more?

      -----

      --
      Everyone on slashdot has a journal.
  129. Well you are criminals...maybe not demons tho by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, I'm not a criminal if I pick your Chub 5902b lock with my credit card and loot around your house setting traps and spray painting Drrrooo Wassss Heeeerreeee in a nice orange colour because you didnt realise that that model lock wasnt resistant against the trusty ABC Plastic Card, available from Script Kiddies Bank of Dom..... :)

  130. How do we know this isn't a "sting"? by Robber+Baron · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You know the drill: They have a bunch of felons at large. Rather than try to serve warrants on them singly, they just send out a mailer. "Congratulations! You'vewon tickets to the Superbowl! Now all you have to do to claim your prize is show up at the stadium on such and such a date and get your picture taken!" And the dumb 'cons' fall for it every time... So go ahead, send them your resumes. Then they'll know where you live and can drag you in for questioning any time they want.

    Besides, is this something you want to be supporting?

    --

    You're using her as bait, Master!

    1. Re:How do we know this isn't a "sting"? by Fire+Dragon · · Score: 1

      You know the drill: They have a bunch of felons at large. Rather than try to serve warrants on them singly, they just send out a mailer. "Congratulations! You'vewon tickets to the Superbowl! Now all you have to do to claim your prize is show up at the stadium on such and such a date and get your picture taken!" And the dumb 'cons' fall for it every time... So go ahead, send them your resumes. Then they'll know where you live and can drag you in for questioning any time they want

      No, it's more like the pre-WWII era of Nazi goverment, where they first registerred everybody(jews) and after a while when the time and 'laws' were right, they went after them.

  131. Some people just don't get it... by cca93014 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As a Brit that has been living in the States for the last couple of months I've had the opportunity to experience the behaviour of the US media and the government first hand, and to be honest it makes me sick. Let's get a few things straight:

    - America is the largest producer and exporter of weapons on the planet.
    - America has the largest arsenal of nuclear and toxic weapeons on the planet.
    - America is the largest producer and exportor of torture equipment on the planet.
    - America is the largest producer and exportor of anti-personnel landmines on the planet.

    America supports more oppressive regimes around the world than anyone else, as and when it suits them. A while ago they were supplying the Iraqis with weapons. Then they went after them. During the Russo-Afghan war, they were funding, supplying and even training the very afghans that are now described as 'evil'. 20 years ago they were called freedom fighter. Now they are deemed 'evil'.

    Two weeks ago hacking was illegal. Now it's OK, just as long as it's not a .mil or a .gov.

    Just because you are not shooting at someone doesn't mean your actions are peaceful. This is another attempt by the American government to whip up what is already a frenzy of 'They're evil! Get them!' sentiment.

    If people had the foresight to try and work out *why* the events of the 11th happened, then maybe we could make some progress. As it is we'll be bombarded with the same old footage of disaster and death followed by Bush claiming that these people are 'evil'.

    No doubt people will start port-scanning the few afghan/islamic websites that are around. Maybe while you are waiting you go to Amazon and buy The Plague by Camus. Oh, and switch of CNN.

    1. Re:Some people just don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a Brit that has been living in the States for the last couple of months I've had the opportunity to experience the behaviour of the US media and the government first hand, and to be honest it makes me sick.

      Yeah, so sick that you come to the US to reap the benefits of its oppresive foreign policies. Hypocrit.

    2. Re:Some people just don't get it... by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      Too true..

      Bush is using this to get as much attention as he can.. plenty of propaganda speeches, Blair is just sucking up to bush, he doesn't want to seem left out so he made London a no-fly zone for a few days just to get some news coverage off the yanks. I'm sure we'll soon see more propaganda films "Do your duty, and fight against freedom.. oops.. i mean, _for_ freedom, yeah, thats it"

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    3. Re:Some people just don't get it... by cca93014 · · Score: 1

      Two things:

      1 - You have no idea why I came to the States.
      2 - Unfortunately my country is not much better.

      However, something I said really got you pissed, huh?

    4. Re:Some people just don't get it... by Fnkmaster · · Score: 3, Flamebait
      1) The US is the largest producer and exporter of sophisticated manufactured goods on the planet, not just guns.


      2) When was the last time we used them on a civilian target? It's only happened once, and the vast majority of us would say we never want it to happen again. Terrorists on the other hand don't feel that way towards our civilians.


      3) See point 1. This is a silly straw man.


      4) See point 1 again.


      The fact that companies in the US manufacture and export lots of stuff does not in any way legitimize terrorist attacks against our civilians. Colombian organizations produce and manufacture lots of cocaine that has resulted in lots of deaths around the world. I don't use that to legitimize killing civilians in that country either.


      Eurotrolling has become absurdly common on Slashdot and its entirely uninteresting. Whiny leftist eurotrash drivel spewed all over the place does not make it any more correct. Come up with some real arguments next time.

    5. Re:Some people just don't get it... by cca93014 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your argument for mass-producing arms, chemical weapons, torture equipment and nuclear weapons is that you also make colour laser printers, automatic milking machines and fabricated car plants? Are you serious?

      The fact that the US sells them on to whoever will pay the list price, irrespective of their social or humanitarian policy doesn't bother you? And you are accusing me of not coming up with any real arguments? That's pretty funny!

      I wasn't in any way condoning what happened on the 11th, which is what you seem to be accusing me of. I was trying to shed some light on *why* it happened.

      My 'whiny leftist eurotrash drivel', as you so delicately put it, is anti-torture devices, anti-landmines, anti-bombs and anti-guns. If you disagree with that then I suggest you take a look at yourself and your views and try to consider just why people outside of America dislike the country and some of the people that live there.

    6. Re:Some people just don't get it... by The+Mayor · · Score: 5, Informative

      Hmmm...you've got a few statements wrong.

      America isn't currrently producing nuclear and (if we believe our government, at least) toxic weapons.

      America hasn't produced landmines in years.

      Now, as for the part about working out *why* the events happened, I think our responses to date have shown an effort to figure out *why* the events happened. We're not going to carpet bomb Afghanistan (I think and hope...again, if we are to believe our leaders). We're going to do something that is more effective against the terrorists in a manner that will minimize the likelyhood of future terrorist attacks. That likely means toppling the Taliban, and supporting a secular government in its place, following up with tons of humanitarian aid. This sounds to me like the US is beginning to understand the threat, and what drives this threat.

      I, quite frankly, am totally surprised. I have been pretty strongly anti-Bush until this conflict. Even now, I'd say I'm more pro-Powell than anything. But I have been thoroughly impressed with our government's handling of this situation.

      As an American in the UK, let me say how amazed I have been at the compassion and solidarity shown by the Brits in this crisis. There are a few people that have been rather offensive. And a few more that criticized our certain heavy hand in the early days, only to turn around and criticize our lack of response now. You're damned if you do and you're damned if you don't, I guess.

      Oh well. I'm just sitting here hoping this isn't the beginning of WWIII. Cheers, and peace!

      --
      --Be human.
    7. Re:Some people just don't get it... by jmkaza · · Score: 1

      As an American that has been living in the States for most of my life, I've had the opportunity to experience the behavior of the US media and the government first hand, and to be honest, listening to Brits talk trash about us makes me sick. Let's get a few things straight:

      - America is the largest producer and exporter of Medical Supplies on the planet.
      - America has provided more humanitarian aid to to foriegn countries, be they friend or foe, than any country on the planet.
      - America has drafted virtually every peace seeking treaty/resolution to become law in the past century.

      America provided training and supplies to Iraqi revolutionary forces, so that they could rise up against oppressive rulers. America supported Afghanistan when communism threatened to destroy their way of life. Both later turned against their allie.

      The people of the United States are pissed off. Many of them have the skill and knowledge necessary to take it upon themselves and act. The US gov't is asking them to abandon anarchistic plots of revenge, and combine their talents for a more constructive purpose. It's not an attempt by the American gov't to whip up a frenzy, it's a way of saying "O.K., if your going to do this, let's do it right."

    8. Re:Some people just don't get it... by Absynthe · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually I was wondering where all the euro's had gone lately. I think silly ass chest pounding in uninteresting. I'm a long, long, long, way from a pacifist. As a matter of fact I'm a fairly brutal asshole when it comes to people who go after me and mine.
      This does not mean I can just turn off my brain and quit thinking. Israeli's are crazy, they've been driven crazy by terrorism and do crazy things. The difference between them and us is that at least they know what they have done. They understand the causes and the issues. If you really believe we've only used military force against civilians once (I don't even know what you could be referring to) then you obviously don't keep in touch with reality.
      I've got a friend in the 101st airborne who just got back from tours in Columbia and Korea. He was showing me his souvenier pics which included him standing over all kinds of different bodies with handwritten signs that said "11th confirmed kill" or whatever the number that it happened to be and the date. He knows damn well that there is no way to draw a line and come up with "that is a rebel" and "that is a civilian". He and I might disagree about foreign policy but we both understood the reality.
      That's just one example that I can come up with where the U.S. military is killing civilians as we speak. That doesn't count the regimes that we give military aid to and tacit support.

    9. Re:Some people just don't get it... by TWR · · Score: 1
      So, oh genius, why did the same band of fucks try to blow up the UN in 1993?

      I know your pointy liberal head won't understand this, but the US is also the largest supplier of aid to Afghanistan. In the last 10 years, we've deployed troops to help Muslims in Kuwait, Somalia, Kosovo, and Bosnia. We give $2Billion/year to Egypt. We're negotiating a NAFTA-style free-trade pact with Jordan. The only thing keeping Saddam from committing genocide against the Kurds in the North of Iraq and the Shi'ites in the South of Iraq is the US-UK enforced No-Fly Zone.

      The simple fact is they hate us, no matter how nice we are, no matter what we do. It's time to just kill the fuckers and be done with it. Bring back the Neutron Bomb and use the Middle East as the testing grounds.

      -jon

      --

      Remember Amalek.

    10. Re:Some people just don't get it... by cca93014 · · Score: 1

      What was it that I said that was trash, precisely? Let's get a few things straight:

      - US Medical Sanctions has killed many times more people in peacetime than have died in conflict with the US since the second world war. Take a look at what is happening to the Iraqi people RIGHT NOW.
      - The amount of aid given to foreign countries by the US (and many other first world nations) is a tiny fraction of that made back in terms of third-world debt interest given to the US and other first world nations.
      - If the US has such strong ties to peace treaties, how come they are now reneging on unarguably the most important; the 1972 Anti Ballistic Missle Treaty?

    11. Re:Some people just don't get it... by cca93014 · · Score: 1

      And you think they are attacking your freedom...

      Dear oh dear.

    12. Re:Some people just don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If people had the foresight to try and work out *why* the events of the 11th happened, then maybe we could make some progress. As it is we'll be bombarded with the same old footage of disaster and death followed by Bush claiming that these people are 'evil'.

      Oh great. Another fucking brit to explain things to us. In my world running three planeloads full of innocent people into buildings is pretty evil.

      If I shot your mother in the face 'cause I thought your sister was ugly, would you try to figure out what you had done to bring such horror upon your family?

    13. Re:Some people just don't get it... by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1
      "The simple fact is they hate us, no matter how nice we are, no matter what we do. It's time to just kill the fuckers and be done with it. Bring back the Neutron Bomb and use the Middle East as the testing grounds."

      People are making comments like this, and then they wonder why some people would consider a 767 flying into the side of the WTC to be a good thing.

    14. Re:Some people just don't get it... by cca93014 · · Score: 1

      If we spent all our energy reacting to what happened, and none of it considering why they did it, the long term situation won't change and we won't have a long term solution, right?

      Why do you think they did it?

    15. Re:Some people just don't get it... by tconnors · · Score: 1

      In the last 10 years, we've deployed troops to help Muslims in Kuwait

      That and to help secure cheap oil supplies for the US.

      TimC.

    16. Re:Some people just don't get it... by sh_mmer · · Score: 1

      ...I don't even know what you could be referring to...

      i think it was probably to dropping A-bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki

      --
      Interested in learning Chinese or Japanese? check out Chinese/Japanese-English Dictiona
    17. Re:Some people just don't get it... by prizog · · Score: 2

      Um, so we gave money to the Taliban, a theocracy which oppresses women, non-muslims, and people who fly kites (really!). That's supposed to be a good thing?

      And Saddam doesn't need to commit genocide against the Kurds when he has the US-sponsored Turkish Air Force to do it for him.

    18. Re:Some people just don't get it... by Absynthe · · Score: 1

      That's actually kinda funny. After we dropped the bomb on Hiroshima Truman made this long speech about how Hiroshima was a military base. That we hadn't attacked helpless civilians, they were just in the way.
      No politician ever comes out and says we will attack civilians for terror purposes. Well, unless Osama counts, I guess he's a wierd sort of politician but he doesn't have borders and he knows his entire constituancy is behind him. A conventional politician has to appeal to a little more broad base.

    19. Re:Some people just don't get it... by Platinum+Dragon · · Score: 2

      2) When was the last time we used them on a civilian target?

      Quite possibly, Aug. 20, 1998.

      Colombian organizations produce and manufacture lots of cocaine that has resulted in lots of deaths around the world. I don't use that to legitimize killing civilians in that country either.

      You don't. Your government doesn't seem to worry about that, though. Hell, they're paying a private contractor to do the dirty work!

      --

      Someday, you're going to die. Get over it.
    20. Re:Some people just don't get it... by bacchusrx · · Score: 2

      When was the last time we used them on a civilian target?

      Hm! How about Kosovo? Or Serbia? Or Iraq? What about the US involvement in Kenya or Afghanistan... or in Vietnam, Colombia, El Salvador, Somalia, or Haiti...? Let's of course not forget Japan.

      The fact that companies in the United States manufacture and export lots of stuff does not in any way legitimize terrorist attacks against our civilians.

      I don't think anyone has made that argument. The original poster's arguments had nothing to do with legitimizing terrorist attacks against American civilians.

      His arguments went to the naïvety (or ignorance) in the American reaction to the recent bombings in New York and Washington D.C.

      Your country was not attacked because it is a "beacon for freedom and opportunity in the world" but precisely because your country is seen to be the root of despair and suffering throughout the world--a cause of war and poverty for millions of people internationally.

      Colombian organizations produce and manufacture lots of cocaine that has resulted in lots of deaths around the world.

      Certainly not as many deaths as the American "War on Drugs."

      Prohibition has caused more death and ruined more lives than so-called "drug abuse" could ever have. Drug prohibition leads to poor treatment of actual cases of abuse, jails otherwise innocent people--ruining lives & crowding prisons, not to mention that it creates and maintains a criminal black market.

      Furthermore, American involvement in Colombia can certainly be considered "terrorist" activity--unless you're about a rather acrobatic leap in logic.

      I don't use that to legitimize killing civilians in that country either.

      First off--the original poster did not make that argument. Secondly, by your own argument, you ought to condemn your own country for its terrorist activities specifically in Columbia.

      Your rebuttal, sir, is fallacious.

      BRx.

      --
      Life after capitalism? The participatory economics project
    21. Re:Some people just don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      America hasn't produced landmines in years.

      It has and not just plain-old landmines but those that can be scattered from the air.

    22. Re:Some people just don't get it... by Tom · · Score: 1

      1) The US is the largest producer and exporter of sophisticated manufactured goods on the planet, not just guns.

      3) See point 1. This is a silly straw man.

      4) See point 1 again.

      just because you do one thing right doesn't mean you are absolved of everything else you do. I'll be the first to agree that the US is doing a ton of good things, and not only inside their own country. but I'll also be the first to point out that you guys also do a ton of not-so-good and quite a lot of outright evil things.

      2) When was the last time we used them on a civilian target?

      when was the last time anyone else used them on any target, civilian or not?

      you used "the bomb" (and twice, not once), and you'll have to live with that just like we over here (germany) have to live with being called nazis forever, even though the war was over long before most of us living today were born.

      Eurotrolling has become absurdly common on Slashdot and its entirely uninteresting. Whiny leftist eurotrash drivel spewed all over the place does not make it any more correct. Come up with some real arguments next time.

      any real argument that includes pointing out that the US may happen not to be the pinacle of civilisation and the earthly manifestation of pure goodness is quite easily commented on like you do.

      PS: the original poster was british. most british aren't very comfortable in calling themselves "europeans".

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    23. Re:Some people just don't get it... by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • America isn't currrently producing [...] toxic weapons.

      Try something like http://www.google.com/search?q=depleted+uranium+pr ojectiles+birth+defects+UNICEF

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    24. Re:Some people just don't get it... by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • When was the last time we used [weapons] on a civilian target?

      Directly and deliberately, I think Vietnam (but am open to suggestions). Indirectly, today. Iraqis and Kuwaitis are being killed by depleted uranium projectile dust and unexploded cluster munitions right up to the present moment.

      If you have any kind of an open mind, please do some quick searches for this information before just writing it off as US bashing. The US people are the kindest and best in the world. The US government are the most evil stone cold motherfuckers in the world. Those statements aren't mutually exclusive.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    25. Re:Some people just don't get it... by D+Anderson+n'Swaart · · Score: 2

      This is the most ridiculous, blindly patriotic counter-argument that I have heard in a long time. I don't need to reiterate the points in the many posts above, which are largely independent of this particular "America is the largest producer of X in the world" thread. But I can end this silly argument right here. The US, which takes up less than a third the entire land mass of America, is the most powerful country in the world! Considering the resources it has available, and its GDP, I think its humanitarian efforts are shameful. What happened to those billions of dollars of surplus the country seemed to have at the end of the last (or second-last, iirc) fiscal year? It sure wasn't going anywhere near countries that could be transformed from bottom of the pit third-world to top of the pile first-world with that kind of budget (and no I'm not so naive as to think that giving a country a huge heap of money will solve their problems overnight, but it's hardly going to hurt to give them some aid, absolve them of some debts, since it's not like you need to suck any more of their resources anyway...)

    26. Re:Some people just don't get it... by Martin+S. · · Score: 2

      - US Medical Sanctions has killed many times more people in peacetime than have died in conflict with the US since the second world war. Take a look at what is happening to the Iraqi people RIGHT NOW.

      Only one person responsible for the horrific plight of the Iraqi people and that is Saddam Hussein. He has been ferreting the cash intended for food and medical aid to rebuild his military. Indeed it's only a matter of time before we have to sort out that problem again. Next time without pandering to the assorted peaceniks and bleeding hearts who are responsible for job only being half done in the first place. Indeed going by the figures they have more blood on their hands, 300,000 Iraqi people's blood.

    27. Re:Some people just don't get it... by cca93014 · · Score: 1

      There is a US and Eurooean embargo on medical aid to Iraq YOU MORON!

    28. Re:Some people just don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Ummm,... aren't these the same Americans who
      saved your limey ass during WWII?


      You're probably just pissed because Merry
      English isn't the Imperial Power it used to be.

    29. Re:Some people just don't get it... by muleboy · · Score: 1
      America isn't currrently producing nuclear and (if we believe our government, at least) toxic weapons.

      Depends on how you define "producing".

      http://www.lanl.gov/worldview/news/releases/archiv e/98-037.shtml

    30. Re:Some people just don't get it... by Fnkmaster · · Score: 2
      Read my post again. I said we've only used nuclear weapons once against civilian targets (Fat Man and Little Boy in Japan in 1945). Never used "toxic" weapons against explicitly civilian targets, though I'm sure there were civilians killed by some pretty brutal weapons in Vietnam (a fairly indefensible, brutal, awful incursion in the name of fighting communism, which was an indefensible, brutal awful set of regimes parading around under the veil of leftist ideology).


      As for the rest of your post, I mostly agree - it's really hard to tell the difference, and civilian casualties are inevitable in any large scale military action (i.e. other than pinpoint special ops actions) - but are different from explicitly attacking civilian targets (Hiroshima, Nagasaki, which though they probably saved hundreds of thousands of American soldier's lives meet that criteria).


      Then again, look at Dresden and London - the Germans and British/Allied forces firebombed each other to hell. The Germans legitimized the use of civilian targets in warfare, and this is why I say they were evil and deserved everything they got and more. Likewise for bin Laden and Al Qaeda - if you are willing to legitimize attacks on civilian targets, you are changing the rules of engagement.

    31. Re:Some people just don't get it... by Fnkmaster · · Score: 2
      That was neither a nuclear nor chemical weapon we used. It was just a conventional warhead on a cruise missile.


      Furthermore, that's not even a civilian target, it was a part of Al Qaeda, and a place they manufactured chemicals for use in chemical weapons. Furthermore, it was a precision strike, designed to minimize incidental civilian casualties. So shut the fuck up until you have a clue.

    32. Re:Some people just don't get it... by Fnkmaster · · Score: 2

      Hm! How about Kosovo? Or Serbia? Or Iraq? What about the US involvement in Kenya or Afghanistan... or in Vietnam, Colombia, El Salvador, Somalia, or Haiti...? Let's of course not forget Japan.


      We used nuclear and "toxic" (i.e. chemical) weapons? Funny, I never heard about that. We used conventional weapons, which I do not dispute and never did. You misunderstood my post and didn't read carefully the post I was responding to.



      Your country was not attacked because it is a "beacon for freedom and opportunity in the world" but precisely because your country is seen to be the root of despair and suffering throughout the world--a cause of war and poverty for millions of people internationally.


      That's your problem if you believe that. It's false, but I can't prove it any more than you or anyone else can. Give me a specific, credible set of facts to back up that claim, and I can give you a far more credible argument to the contrary.



      Furthermore, American involvement in Colombia can certainly be considered "terrorist" activity--unless you're about a rather acrobatic leap in logic.


      Oh, you mean we blow up civilians in Colombia? No, wait, actually we blow up men armed with AK-47s guarding drug shipments and cocaine plantations and the armed rebels paid off by drug producers to guard their interests. I am no more a fan of the War On Some Drugs than anybody, but that's not a credible comparison.

    33. Re:Some people just don't get it... by Absynthe · · Score: 1

      Actually if you still follow this thread, my reply was to http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=21995&cid=2355 387

      I wasn't following it that close after that, but I did read your other comments. I've got a little second-hand knowledge about Columbia. This is just something to think about. What we do down there is keep sniper positions on the routes that drug smugglers usually use. We kill people who use those roads. They may be up to no good. They may just be trying to stay the hell away from the para-militarys that we support. They are just as likely to grab your stuff and kill you as FARC rebels or anyone else out there.
      We essentially use terror to keep people on the beaten paths.
      I'm just passsing this on because you seem fairly up on what is happening in the world. Make your own judgements on what is terrorism or what it isn't.

    34. Re:Some people just don't get it... by Platinum+Dragon · · Score: 1

      That was neither a nuclear nor chemical weapon we used. It was just a conventional warhead on a cruise missile.

      Point taken, but it was still a civilian target... and I'm getting to that.

      Furthermore, that's not even a civilian target, it was a part of Al Qaeda, and a place they manufactured chemicals for use in chemical weapons. Furthermore, it was a precision strike, designed to minimize incidental civilian casualties.

      Furthermore, that was Clinton's claim, and it didn't pan out. To this day, no concrete proof has come out indicating chemical weapons were even developed at the site. The plant was transferred to a new owner five months before the attack, and the CIA completely missed that. One person was killed, the night watchman; the U.S. is damned lucky they didn't strike during the day. He should never have been killed in the first place, thanks to bad intelligence and Clinton's need to divert everyone's attention away from a stained blue dress. In fact, the Sudanese government asked for an investigation into the American claims; the U.S. blocked it.

      Their justification for thinking the Al Shifa plant was a chemical weapons factory? A single soil sample, supposedly taken nine months before the attack, a claim that has been questioned and/or refuted, depending on who you ask.

      Now, you shut the fuck up until you get a clue. For starters, try looking for sources of news and information outside of CNN, and don't blindly trust information from a government that has been caught in exaggerations and lies when it serves the purposes of the state, and/or the individuals that make it up.

      --

      Someday, you're going to die. Get over it.
    35. Re:Some people just don't get it... by Platinum+Dragon · · Score: 1

      We used nuclear and "toxic" (i.e. chemical) weapons? Funny, I never heard about that. We used conventional weapons, which I do not dispute and never did.

      Weeeellllll....

      How about Kosovo? Or Serbia? Or Iraq?

      Depleted-uranium ammunition was used in these three theatres. The long-term effects of radioactive weapons are not entirely known, and there's at least anecdotal evidence that spent ammunition and d-u dust is toxic, causing leukemia and other cancers in those exposed to the stuff. "Gulf War syndrome" may possibly be a result of this.

      Vietnam

      Agent Orange.
      Let's of course not forget Japan.

      Nuclear, of course. Although it's difficult to argue with wanting a quick end to the war, I've run across an argument that the first target of the Bomb should have been a definite military target, or a relatively empty area, as opposed to a city of 100 000.

      --

      Someday, you're going to die. Get over it.
    36. Re:Some people just don't get it... by TWR · · Score: 2
      That and to help secure cheap oil supplies for the US.

      And explain Somalia, Bosnia, and Kosovo. While you're at it, explain US troops in Haiti. Or Panama.

      Must be those vast oil fields of West Africa, Central Europe, Hispaniola, and Central America.

      -jon

      --

      Remember Amalek.

    37. Re:Some people just don't get it... by Fnkmaster · · Score: 2
      If you see my other post, I assumed it was obvious that everybody knew about Hiroshima and Nagasaki and that those were ill-placed civilian targets. Agent Orange - used in Vietnam, but was it used against "civilian" targets? Damned if I know how you tell the difference or can meaningfully answer that question. It was used as a deforestation agent to root out enemy guerilla positions. Not going to deny civilians may have died from it, obviously, but I don't think it was used as a weapon against them.


      Depleted Uranium is not a radiological or toxic _weapon_ - that's a farcical argument. It's a weapon, and it can be toxic, but it is an armor piercing projectile weapon. It's used in anti-tank rounds, but not with the primary intention of killing civilians, and it's definitely not used in anti-personnel rounds fired at civilian targets. It may be toxic and it is clearly radiologically active, but there are far more effective "toxic weapons" out there if we wanted to use them on civilian targets. As you pointed out clearly, they seem possibly as likely to hurt our own soldiers from long term incidental effects as it is to hurt civilians in war-torn areas.

  132. Last Issue of 2600 by SnicklesTheElf · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I saw a letter about this in the most recent (summer 2001, p. 52) issue of 2600. It is as follows...

    "Dear 2600: I was going to send you an e-mail two weeks ago stating that we should channel many of our frustrations with the U.S. justice system toward our adversaries, i.e., China. All of us in the U.S. hacker community are still U.S. citizens. Let us not completely denounce our country. We can utilize our special skills in a constructive manner that is conducive to U.S. information warfare policy. Later, we may use this as legal leverage for future legislation. -ICFN PMP

    *response* As one of many such messages we got from the Navy, let us remind you that hackers are not soldiers and are far too individualistic and free-thinking to buy into jingoistic nonsense, regardless of the source. You should seriously consider the effects of reducing hackers to the equivalent of some kind of weapon. It will only increase paranoia and fear. And we find it extremely telling that the authorities, the media, and apparantly a whole lof of people in the military feel it's OK to vandalize sites if it's done for nationalistic purposes."

    (As an aside, there's an interesting picture of an Ewok holding a rifle behind the article)

    It would seem quite hypocritical for us (typical /. posters), who are so against Big Brother poking his nose into our business to turn right back around and do EXACTLY the same thing to other members of the US public. I seriously doubt "fighting terrorism" involves busting into a secret (insert arabic country here) computer and taking vital military plans. Rather, it will involve spying on your neighbors and seeking internal 'threats,' probably in ways which violate the 4th amendment to the constitution.

    1. Re:Last Issue of 2600 by mcknation · · Score: 1

      ..Rather, it will involve spying on your neighbors and seeking internal 'threats,' probably in ways which violate the 4th amendment to the constitution...

      So who you gonna hack for them in this "war"? Obviously this is intended to increse "Homeland Securtity". -McK

  133. It's called the CIA... by Robber+Baron · · Score: 2

    Ironic. Heard news about John Ashcroft lumping hackers in together with terrorists in the new anti-terrorism legislation: so the US is now starting its own Corps of Terrorists?

    What do you mean starting? Theyve had a terrorist corps for years...it's called the CIA.

    --

    You're using her as bait, Master!

  134. hate us, love us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When .gov need hackers skill they pretend to love and care about them, after .gov get what they want, they gonna put all the hackers into jail.

    is this what we want?

  135. Mod parent up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gladto see I'm not the only one who is not afraid to ask "why"?

  136. Re:Some people just don't get it...(Mod Parent Up! by Malic · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Everything cca93014 says is true. To some degree, America may have brought this mess on itself. :(

    --
    I swear by MacOS X. Although I use to swear *at* MacOS 9...
  137. Hackers are 'Terrorists' Under Ashcroft's New Act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    let help them and go to jail together
    read
    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/09/24/204424 2
    i think this is a trick from .gov

  138. Public Service announcement airing on . . . . by jgaynor · · Score: 2
    Two hacker favorites -- USA Cable's Sci-Fi Channel, and UPN's hit show Buffy the Vampire Slayer -- would be perfect places to air the spot, said Aftab . . .

    I can understand Sci-Fi but BUFFY??!! No discerning slashdotter watches Buffy unless its to see a LOTR trailer. Try Battlebots, Toonami or better yet - pay-per view porn.

    1. Re:Public Service announcement airing on . . . . by metachimp · · Score: 1

      Screw You, Buffy is awesome, and as every true geek knows, Willow isn't really a lesbian. She's just experimental right now.

      --
      The system has failed you, don't fail yourself. --Billy Bragg
  139. Expendable by ZaneMcAuley · · Score: 1

    Remember for any .gov work, you are expendable and disposable.

    When it comes to the crunch, its always the small man that gets crunched.

    --
    ----- Whats wrong with this picture? http://www.revoh.org:1234/whatswrong
  140. Bull fucking shit by NateKid · · Score: 2, Insightful
    If you let one bombing change your opinions about ANYTHING (other than stiffer package checks at the airport), Osama Bin Laden has completely won. The poiont of terrorism is to instill terror in civilians and in your case it looks like they've succeeded.

    There were good cops and bad cops, and there still are. That hasn't changed even though the dangers of their profession has become more apparent to us. And, speaking as someone with a law enforcement background, I still feel that we shouldn't be scared into handing over the keys to our freedom. Yeah, a bunch of them died, but I'd say 95% had no clue of the dangers (except for some firefighters who work the building collapse units) that awaited them in that death trap. Yeah they risk their lives every day but they get paid pretty well to do it (after top pay over 60+/ per annum with great benefits) and, in the case of firefighters, get all the tang they can drink (I'm on the firefighter list myself and should be going in in a few months - maybe sooner now). So for the same reason we shouldn't profile all arabs as terrorists, we shouldn't paint all cops with the martyr brush. Many are good men and women, but just as many as before still have lubed up broomsticks. The heroism of some of them still does not give them the right to harrass you and your friends.

    1. Re:Bull fucking shit by COAngler · · Score: 1
      Yeah, a bunch of them died, but I'd say 95% had no clue of the dangers (except for some firefighters who work the building collapse units) that awaited them in that death trap.



      IOW, the officers all said to each other: "A plane just hit the building. It's perfectly safe, so we'd better go in and evacuate it right the fuck now!"



      Unlikely.



      Yeah they risk their lives every day but they get paid pretty well to do it (after top pay over 60+/ per annum with great benefits)



      Which benefits? The comp time that we never get to take? The wonderful schedule that precludes having to be paged out of bed to investigate a traffic accident in which a five-year-old died? The cost-of-living adjustments that my jurisdiction hasn't had for about five years?



      Also, command staff makes that kind of money. The working officers/detectives don't without working an assload of overtime, and the sergeants may not either. And ISTR that $60K isn't a whole lot in New York's housing market. Hell, I've been in this for a long time. I've got a number of instructor certifications. I've got special-unit certification two separate ways (SWAT and Traffic Accident Investigation). And I sure don't make $60K/year.



      and, in the case of firefighters, get all the tang they can drink (I'm on the firefighter list myself and should be going in in a few months - maybe sooner now).



      And with the ignorance you show above, I hope like hell you're not going to be a firefighter in my area.



      So for the same reason we shouldn't profile all arabs as terrorists, we shouldn't paint all cops with the martyr brush. Many are good men and women, but just as many as before still have lubed up broomsticks.



      Just as many cops of lubed up broomsticks as have been good men and women? In other words, you're either saying that most cops sexually molest suspects, or that there are about five good cops in the US. Now I really hope you were lying about being a firefighter.

    2. Re:Bull fucking shit by NateKid · · Score: 1

      Hey genius, the phrase was "just as many as before" not "just as many as are good men and women". In other words I wrote that cops are the same people they were before this whole thing happened - no better and no worse. For the most part they are good folks, but they're not doing the Lord's work by not banging in. So your hostility is completely misdirected.

      And the majority of cops don't get beeped on their days off. Those that do usually are in special VOLUNTARY units like yourself (Traffic Accident Investigation, SWAT). New York's real estate aside (you can live outside the city and still work there too, you know), money's good in civil service and the benefits are very good. The ESU guys here make a fortune - maybe you should move here.

      Now it IS a fact that most firefighters had no clue how dangerous it would be in the WTC. Do you think the 1st Dep and the Chief had a suicide pact? No way! Despite FDNY's noble tradition of leading from the front, I suspect they had multiple motives WRT being at the most famous disaster in this city's history. I know I would...one being curiousity which is a very human emotion.
      Nate

      p.s. Note that I never said I was a firefighter, just that I'm on a long list to be one. And I never said I was against the police in the slightest, just that I feel people should take a measured approach to things like this & not let panic do the thinking for them. Now take that anger and do something constructive...

  141. Who actually handles computer crimes, anyways? by Ryu2 · · Score: 2

    FBI? Secret Service? I've heard both names... who has the jurisdiction for computer related crimes in the US, anyways? Or some other agency?

    --
    There's 10 types of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
    1. Re:Who actually handles computer crimes, anyways? by metachimp · · Score: 1

      That would most likely be the FBI, although depending on what you were doing, it could also be the Treasury, DEA, county sherriff, etc. Note that the NSA and other intelligence agencies are not law enforcement agencies, and don't have the kind of powers that the good ol' FBI has.

      --
      The system has failed you, don't fail yourself. --Billy Bragg
    2. Re:Who actually handles computer crimes, anyways? by majestyk2000 · · Score: 0

      Secret Service (so the Treasury ultimately) has jurisdiction for computer crimes. Although, FBI and several other TLAs do investigations as well. This from my brother, who worked at a federal computer crime training center.

  142. so nslookup, google, & nmap give you all that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that doesn't say squat. Assume a honeypot, or at the very least a lone web server on an entirely different network than the bank's internal net/trans.servers. I work for a co that does A F'ING LOT of VERY MANY banks' transactions, and hacking the 'pretty little face' to their brick & mortar buildings (ie their web site) won't do SHIT. Here's just ONE example: Chase Manhattan pays the co I work for mucho $ to do all of their damned work, especially with their credit and debit depts. We just bill em at the end of the month. Anymore, banks are just, well, brokers who take your money and give it people like, well, ME and the company I work for. I am AC, but don't underestimate what I've told you, there are more large datacenters getting a piece of this pie every day.

  143. IT Jobs at the FBI: www.fbijobs.com by David+Hume · · Score: 1

    The FBI is looking or IT professionals:

    Computer Science & Engineering Professionals:

    Computer Scientists

    Computer Specialists

    Computer Specialists (Programmer)

    Computer Specialists (Systems Analyst)
    Electronics Engineer

    Telecommunications Managers

    High priority technologies...and compensation.

    Equally as high profile as our I.T. impact are the compensation packages we offer. They are highly competitive, recognizing the unique expertise of today's brightest technical leaders. Consider:

    Salaries up to $125,900

    Sign-on bonuses available to those who qualify

    Excellent group health & life insurance plans

    Vacation & sick pay

    Comprehensive retirement plan


  144. What too do? by ddavid · · Score: 1

    If available, take a nice long walk away from the computer, and as they say, Smell the Roses.

  145. Should we do it? by lowtekneq · · Score: 1

    Should we help the government? Sure last week they wanted to call us terrorists but if we help them maybe it will inform the public who we really are. Lets use this chance to get rid of the rep that the media has made for us.

    --
    Carpe meam simiam!
  146. this whole thing reminds me of many scifi novels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you know...and even some low budget detective movies..."you're going away for a long time, mr hacker, but work with us and we'll cut ya a deal, maybe even wipe your slate clean". I still prefer the more serious approach of Neuromancer to the patriotic call-to-arms tone this stuff carries.

  147. recruiting spies by Alien+Being · · Score: 0

    Read between the lines ( steganography? ).

    They want citizens to spy on their neighbors. Seems like the U.S. is using all the classic techniques of the old U.S.S.R.

    We're more likely to survive Bin Laden than Bin Ashcroft.

  148. Yeah, whatever... by Kukuman · · Score: 1

    Two hacker favorites -- USA Cable's Sci-Fi Channel, and UPN's hit show Buffy the Vampire Slayer -- would be perfect places to air the spot...

    They stereotype you and generalize you and then ask you for help.

  149. Do they take us for suckers? by Rimbo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In the grand tradition of governments and hackers as usual. They do everything they can to criminalize us and demonize us, and now they want our help. Will they reward us the same way the British government rewarded Alan Turing, by "treating" his homosexuality "disease?"

    If you're a hacker, my suggestion to you is that you don't just help out of the goodness of your heart. Fair is fair: Demand just compensation, in the form of pro-hacker legislation and ditching the DMCA and the laws that are currently on the table. If they want hacker help, they're going to have to change the laws to be more hacker friendly.

    It's that simple, folks. If they don't support you, you don't support them. If the USA really wants hackers to help them, the first thing the USA can do is to help the hackers.

  150. You're kidding me right? by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

    The best show a real interest, get a few degrees, and spend the rest of their lives theorizing or writing standards.

    Script kiddies go over the L0pht, get a "hacker tool" if there is such a thing, and deface websites. We're not talking about special relativity here. At best they learn to use a debugger and find overflows. I've met FEW "hackers" who actually possess any potential for becoming mroe than that.

  151. Re:"In the famous words of..." I can see it now by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Funny

    "All your Al-Qaeda (the base) are belong to U.S."

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  152. Something silly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I cannot resist dropping a few alternate nicknames.

    Osama bin Laden = Old Salami BinBox

    Taliban = TalentFan

    Yes, it's probably off-topic. Mod it down if you want... I don't give a rip...

  153. Wrong by Augusto · · Score: 2

    The CIA didn't train them to be "Islamic extremists", they trained them to be guerrilla warriors.

    They were chosen because they opposed the "godless" Russians, which happened to be our enemies too.

    > cloak-and-dagger games of subversion and manipulation stop,

    LOL. They HAVE stopped, that's why we didn't have "intelligence" on this attack and why we can't infiltrate Bin Laden. Actually, this whole mess is a justification to get back into dirty Cold War era "cloack-and-dagger" tactics.

    --

    - sigs are for wimps.
    1. Re:Wrong by xmedar · · Score: 1

      They HAVE stopped, that's why we didn't have "intelligence" on this attack and why we can't infiltrate Bin Laden.

      Perhaps you don't have the same press as over here, but I should point out two things a) an interview with a neighbour of one of the hijackers was broadcast here in the UK, she told how she contacted and warned the CIA of her suspictions, and now today here in the UK we here that the CIA DID know, and that they tare saying that they told the FBI who REFUSED to act. Whether it was a CIA or FBI clusterfuck they DID have the intelligence pointing to the perpetrators. Now I know there are conspiracy theorists out there that will say they let it happen so they could get more funding, but I take what a former CIA man was saying the other day, that the US "intelligence community" is like a room full of 3 year olds each with theri own toys trying to take toys off the others. Given that the insurance industry is going to be seeing tens of billions of dollars in claims coming in I can't wait for them to sue the US government for not doing its job and refusing to pay up.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced man is indistinguishable from God
    2. Re:Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The CIA didn't train them to be "Islamic extremists", they trained them to be guerrilla warriors.

      I hope you call them "guerilla warriors" when you talk about the WTC too. To call them "terrorists" when they're working against you and "guerilla warriors" when they're working for you is just hipocracy. They were trained to do what they're doing. And yes, they were trained to attack valuable civilian targets, not just military ones so don't try that tack it really is pathetic when people get all morally outraged that they actually attacked Americans instead of Afghans.

    3. Re:Wrong by Augusto · · Score: 2

      They were guerrilla warriors when they were fighting military targets, specifically the Russian invaders.

      No, we didn't teach them to mow down civilians.

      And yes, there's a big difference between fighting a foreign invader in your land and blowing up buildings full of innocent people.

      BTW, none of the hijackers were Afghanis.

      --

      - sigs are for wimps.
  154. If you wish to attract hackers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If you wish to attract really good hackers you do not even think about discussing filtering software. Hackers hate corporate bs and I am sure a porn manhunt is not high on the list either. I went and took a look at the site because I quickly considered joining. As soon as I had gone through the fist page I left the site, total bs....

    I am sure they will get their fill of wannabe VB Programmers quickly!

  155. This and after Monday's posting by mrBoB · · Score: 3, Interesting
    They must think we are stupid. Give the FEDERAL Government the evidence they _NEED_ to try AMERICAN CITIZENS as TERRORISTS?? Remember that post from Monday? It's not legal to allow a Government agency the right to do one thing when Citizens are liable under another law. Or did I miss something?

    -Bob

  156. What commercials? by mclem · · Score: 2

    My TiVo playback of the pirated DirectTV downlink (on my iPaq, running wireless in my bathroom) doesn't show any commercials.

    :-) all around

  157. Well if your me by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 2, Informative

    And you just got laid (heh heh) off from a .com or whatever you call it (www.rulespace.com) and just graduated from college you sign up :).

    1. Re:Well if your me by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      Then again I just realized they don't want to pay anyone.

      Sure - whatever.

  158. I'm insulted. by Velex · · Score: 3, Insightful

    America this, America that. Isn't this the same Uncle Sam that creates messes like the DMCA and SSSCA? Isn't this the same Uncle Sam that's trying to keep us all from using GPG and copy files? And now this Uncle Sam comes crawling back to us hackers and ask for us to help him?

    Go ahead and mod me down, but it has to be said. Uncle Sam is not the entity to be helping. He's become old, senile, and tyrannical. If it we up to him, all hackers would be in jail! So instead he's giving us a choice: work for me or get labeled a terrorist. I think not. I don't know about other Slashdot readers, but I've about had it with these shenanigans.

    I don't care if Uncle Sam wants to hunt me down, but I'm keeping my 31337 5k1Llz to myself. If I get drafted I'll move to Canada or get a sex change. (Why is it that only males are drafted?)

    Anyway, I'm pissed. Uncle Sam can shove it where the sun don't shine.

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Stay away entirely Feb 10 thru Feb 17! Close all tabs to prevent autorefresh!
  159. Poor Recruitment Effort by Dark+Coder · · Score: 1
    Believe me, I've tried.

    I've contacted several FBI employment offices via phone as well as the FBI employment websites, even checked the C3I and the DSS and the NSA websites.

    There are no listings of a "Computer Hacker Extraordinaire" position.

    Perhaps, the Cult of the Dead Cows are hiring...

    We have met the enemy and he is us

  160. CounterStrike players go to war by sunconscious · · Score: 0

    I can see it now: Hordes of little kids crying about how they cant hit the enemy with a sniper rifle while jumping up and down. "What? He killed me in one hit? Thats such bullshit. I'm l33t!!"

    1. Re:CounterStrike players go to war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kid no.

      Fragging at distance while jumping in the air, doupt it.

      Trained for warfare under the best combat simulator and physically trained with hours of working out, yes.

      Bottom line, Uncle sam want YOU to play theses games so they can drop you off and let you get some in a near future. Haven't you read the article on how the terrorists learn how to fly with Flight Simulator? Theses games aren't all you need, but their the best part of a complete training.

      Until than, enjoy your peacefull living.

  161. AOL CDs should be part of airline safety package by Augusto · · Score: 3, Funny

    > Now I know what to do with all those AOL CD's..

    Next time you're in a plane, and some crazed fanatical "Holy Warrior" threatens you with a box cutter, take out the AOL CDs, distrubute them among the passengers and break them apart.

    Voila, now everybody is armed with sharp CD fragments ready to impale the "Holy Warriors".

    See, AOL CDs are very useful. Thank you AOL !

    --

    - sigs are for wimps.
  162. Re:"In the famous words of..." I can see it now by LinuxHam · · Score: 1

    All your Al-Qaeda (the base) are belong to U.S.

    Definitely +1, Underrated!

    --
    Intelligent Life on Earth
  163. Suspicious, neh? by ForbidnDonut · · Score: 3, Funny
    if they want to get busy doing good stuff, they should come to us and not try to take action on their own

    Hmm...Last week they were calling hackers terrorists, this week they're telling them to identify themselves. Seems a bit suspicious to me...like you're going to be doing the aforementioned hacking from within a jail cell



  164. What about a bin Laden honeypot? by LenE · · Score: 1

    What if someone were to setup a honeypot for finding Osama?

    You could set-up several sites like binladenpornos.com and feature things like doctored pictures of him in compromising positions with livestock and such.

    Anyway, by following the attempts to crack and rectify this site, you would flesh out the information on the technical side of his network. If you get sued, all the better to track funds and connections through the representing lawyers.

    -- Len

  165. wasn't there a movie about this?? by josepha48 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I know that there have been so many sci fi movies, but wasn't there a movie about something like this?

    I know that there have been a lot of movies that have portraid hackers to be the bad guys, but there have also been some shows that portray them as the good guys. Independance day where he hacked the enemy and blew up the mother ship. The movie hackers where they saved the oiltanker. I think one of the big reasons that hackers got such a bad rap was that movie with mathew brodrick in it that portraid hackers as bad guys and the goverment was trying to lock them up, rather than getting his help.

    Now being a war vetran myself (Desert Storm), I can tell you that if the goverment wants to recruit hackers then I'd say that is probably the best way to serve your country. You would probably not have to fire a gun, you could do what you like, and if htey are understanding and don't get in your way (hahaha) then you can pretty much write your own ticket at that point. Anyway I'd do it, if I were a hacker.

    --

    Only 'flamers' flame!

    1. Re:wasn't there a movie about this?? by Legion303 · · Score: 1
      I think one of the big reasons that hackers got such a bad rap was that movie with mathew brodrick in it that portraid hackers as bad guys and the goverment was trying to lock them up, rather than getting his help.

      The movie in question--War Games--portrayed (note correct spelling) hackers as bad guys, eh? Did you even watch it?

      -Legion

  166. Hack the Afghan phone system by konmaskisin · · Score: 1

    phreak them right out .. make their long distance bills so large even bin Laden can't pay.

  167. Ashcroft != Entire Government by JohnG · · Score: 2

    Everyone here keeps saying that last week THEY were trying to call hackers terrorists, and now THEY are trying to recruit them.
    I think it is important to recognize the difference between Ashcroft and THEY.

  168. CONGRATULATION!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A.D. 2111

    ALL BASES OF AL-QAEDA WERE DESTROYED.

    It seems to be peaceful.

    BUT IT IS INCORRECT.

    Katz is still alive.

    Geek1 LOST FIGHT

    AGAINST Katz AGAIN.

    AND DOWN WITH HIM

    COMPLETELY! GOOD LUCK.

  169. It looks like more of a CEASE AND DESIST by twitter · · Score: 4, Interesting
    "Computer attacks and hate speech do not contribute in any constructive way to dealing with the many problems our global civilization faces," said WorldCom senior vice president Vinton Cerf, who is scheduled to appear in the televised announcement.

    Translation, "Script kiddies and trolls put down your keyboards." Not a bad thing to ask, and the appeal to patriotism is nice too. The message is consistent with others, such as making DOS attacks and cracks a terrorist offense with a real death penalty. "Doodz, you got the death penalty?", not to funny anymore and much less nice.

    You don't really think the US government wants to hire out 10,000 script kiddies do you? What, with every CS teacher, National Lab researcher and defense contractor willing to jump right in the US has no shortage of computer operators. OK, they might use one or two. Warrez operators please report to the office of cracker mobilization right next door to the Imigration and Nationalization Free Refridgerator Service Office for Illegal Aliens.

    Give it up, bitches! Turn off your crack bots and behave. Carry out useful and constructive protests instead. In the end, survival is cultural victory, so build up rather than tear down.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  170. Re:This might be just what the linux community nee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um, no. What you're suggesting is really what the NSA is paid to do. Actually, this whole campaign really is what the NSA is paid to do. So, I'm asking, whenever you're "hacking" these various sites associated with terrorists, don't you think you're just fscking with the NSA's job by making them waste time trying to determine whether your transmissions are "friend" or "foe"?

    Another thing, as many others have posted, this isn't a government job offering. If it was, and you're introduced to their equipment as part of your new occupation, then you'd know their true capabilities in the electronic communications department. And when you think you're going to be able to "leave your job", you'll find that you've become "too much of an asset" to be let go, easily.

  171. Re:Vint Cerf Radio Interview 9/25/01 [OT] by error0x100 · · Score: 1

    Interestingly, South Africa is not part of the United States and its communications capabilities (or inabilities) have NOTHING to do with the original goal of the internet

    Hmm .. I wasn't making any statement of the sort .. I just thought it was interesting, given the original goals of the internet ("routing around damage" etc), and the post made me think of it. Obviously those original goals now apply worldwide, not just in the US anymore.

    No offense, but if you think that South Africa has any chance of being an enemy of the US, you can't know very much about it. We used to have nukes, yes, but the nuclear program was dismantled as I remember it a little over ten years ago. And in case you hadn't noticed, SA became has become a democracy during the last ten years, we have a very liberal constitution that was modelled partially after the US constitution, have a government that supports not only democracy but capitalism (which is actively in the process of privatisation of government assets), and South Africa has officially stated its support of the US in its "war on terrorism". If we're not committing specific *military* support, its because, well, we have a very weak military and given SAs own economic problems we can't exactly pull funds out of anything else. And not one South African I know of has any notion of being against the US in any sense. Whats with this isolationist nationalist stance of yours towards any country other than the US? You seem to be confusing South Africa with some of the hardline middle-east countries such as Afghanistan, although I can't imagine how you could possibly draw any connection, if you look on a map you'll notice its not even the same continent...

    I don't have a problem with making our communications "dependent" (in that sense) on the well-being of the US. I'm not sure how you might have thought I was implying otherwise?? I'm all for bandwidth, the more the better.

    Sheesh .. I'm afraid my imagination isn't vivid enough to think up all the strange ways people can possibly misunderstand the intent of a poster in an online forum.

  172. Is this the part where.. by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 1

    the news will have "America Strikes Back"?

    (for those that missed it, titles in the news were "terror in america, america under fire and such... think Star Wars, Return of the Jedi and the "empire strikes back"

    Moose

    --
    Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
  173. They have to have a phone system before you can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hack it, you dolt.

  174. Al your Qeyda are belong to us! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have no chance to surivve. Make your time.

  175. What about Indonesia, for instance? by wytcld · · Score: 1

    The main Council of Muslim Clerics in Indonesia ruled that in the event of any American action whatsoever in Afghanistan jihad is declared. This is not a minor threat - Indonesia has the largest Muslim population, with extensive trade with the US. Since 'jihad' is a declaration of 'holy war,' and since 'holy war,' as the Muslims will tell us regarding crusades, is truly 'war,' are we to expected to be neutral about a people who have declared war on us, should this come about?

    This also is just a joke. I would never suggest that anyone take down the Indonesian banking and communications systems, since that would interfere with America's supply of Nikes.

    --
    "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
  176. There was an old lady who swallowed a fly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember the old song,

    "There was an old lady who swallowed a fly..."

    It goes on to list the other critters she supposedly swallowed.

    "She swallowed a spider to catch the fly,
    but I don't know why, she swallowed the fly."

    Bird
    Cat
    Dog
    Hog

    It ends with the lines:

    "She swallowed a horse.
    She's dead, of course."

  177. Hackers need to ask for policy changes first. by Rimbo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Bingo. Turing served a government that demonized him.

    Hackers shouldn't provide the same blind devotion. If the US Government really wants help from hackers, the first thing the US Government can do is STOP DEMONIZING THE HACKERS! Drop the DMCA, drop the case against Dmitry, drop the new laws being introduce that criminalize the use of a computer for everything but shopping on eBay, and GIVE US SOME GUARANTEES THAT OUR FREEDOMS WILL BE PROTECTED!

    If the US Government wants our aid, they need to make efforts to indicate their good faith towards us. And they have a LOT of catching up to do.

    I'll be the biggest patriot you've ever seen when the Liberty this country is supposed to stand for is restored to me. It is Liberty that makes the country great, not the fact that it happens to be (out of some random chance) where I was born, live, and work.

    1. Re:Hackers need to ask for policy changes first. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a moron.

      The DMCA is not intended to demonize 'hackers'. It is intended to protect intellectual properties.

      If you think that your right to circumvent copy protection is something that should be protected, I've got a sledgehammer that'll circumvent your door, then I'll redistribute your Talking Heads CDs to the masses... You are a communist.

      You need the government much more than the government needs you. Go move to Mexico, you can sell chicklets & your sister for bribe money for the Federali's... when you run out of money, you go to prison and get ape-raped by Juan Valdez & his burro.

  178. Fantasy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Man - a lot of people here are lost in fantasy worlds...

  179. just remember.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just remember to stop hacking once their 'war on terrorism' is over.

  180. What's a Hacker to do? by Muggs+McGinnis · · Score: 1

    Take the money and run! It's the patriotic, the American thing to do.

  181. Idiocy reigns on Slashdot once again... by lkaos · · Score: 1

    The ad was developed by cyberangels.com and may or may not ever make it to air. The US government has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with this. Don't be fooled either, no matter how good you think you are, if you were convicted of a computer related crime you will not receive a security clearance.

    Besides, most "hackers" are silly script kiddies with no real skills. There is a great oppertunity for truely skilled hackers out there though. Check out the NSA if you want to work with some really cool stuff.

    Biggest problem though with working for the Government is that the pay isn't really that great. This is where true hackers, who are also patriots can put their money where their mouth is. If you are a true hacker, then take a salary hit and get a job with the NSA/FBI/CIA.

    Military jobs are not really that grand and don't won't accomadate rouge genius. They are all about reproducability. They would rather know that they can always get certain results by throwing this much money at grade b programmers than not being sure how well something would turn out by throwing same amount of money at grade a programmers even if it was guarenteed to be better.

    Sorry for ranting a bit but that's reality. Oh, BTW, there are plenty of grade b programmers out there that are past draft age so don't expect for the military to care two shits if you can hax0r a windoze box...

    --
    int func(int a);
    func((b += 3, b));
  182. Uncle Sam Declares War on Hackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting


    And this is his first volley.

    How? Modern democracies can't appear to be too draconian in the treatment of segments of their own population. So the first step in the battle is to pave the way for the coming clampdown. Take control of the vocabulary surrounding the issue. Spin, spin, spin, until you have reframed the debate. Make a distinction between 'good' hackers and 'evil' black hat hackers. And make sure that the masses of your population have bought into this.

    Now you can maintain your pretext of being a fair, just and rational government. You have clearly acknowledged that only some hackers are evil. Because even the masses understand that not all hackers can be bad. So now you have eliminated the "the government is being too extreme, too narrowminded" objection that its citizens are so sensitive to.

    Then, let the games begin. Clamp down all you want. Resistance and claims of civil liberties infringments will be much easier to fluster your way through when you can point to the false duality you have spun: [GOV] "Hey, we're not the bad guys here. Were helping our citizens out. Were only getting rid of the evil hackers."

    It's a great little sleight of hand. Because who would disagree that evil hackers must be fought? (You might disagree with what the punishment should be or what qualifies as evil, but once you decide what actions you believe are evil, or malicious or whatever, then, by definition, you are pointing at something that you don't think is good).

    Want to see if you can find evidence that this might be the case? Just watch how the they discuss this issue over the coming weeks and months. What words do they use? What phrases and metaphors are used to describe hackers and the controversy? Is there repeated focus on the distinction between the good and the bad hackers? Is the spin consistent in creating fear and suspicion of hackers who don't wrear their goodness and patriotism on their sleeves? If so it's most reasonable to conclude that the war has begun and uncle Sam has announced his intention to get medieval on hackers.

    Not so sure? Just look at how declaring a group to be terrorist has become grounds to annihilate it. Once a group is declared terrorist, the government has the overwhelming support of its citizens in combatting it. That is a phenomenal display of unity. It provides to the government an almost absolute power to deal with those groups it declares to be terrorists. With it comes the danger of corrupted abuse of that power. Who gets to decide which organizations are added to the terrorist list? How many groups on this list are completely unrelated, in deed and in action, to the other groups on the list. Yet we are encouraged to think of them as a single group. Whose to say that evil hackers won't be declared terrorists as well?

  183. fair trade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The reason for me posting anonymously is because I have been indicted on federal charges of computer hacking into government computers (and no, I was not in the news for it), and await trial.
    I find myself in somewhat of an ironic situation should I be found guilty of this crime, while at the same time being asked to help the same government body that is prosecuting me.
    No point am i trying to make; I just find it a weird situation.

  184. Picture a recruiting poster... by Giant+Hairy+Spider · · Score: 2

    Now imagine the words, "Previous killing and/or mass destruction experience preferred."

    --

    ---
    You'd be surprised at the broadband connection available to things crawling around in your hair.
  185. what, exactly by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

    chemical weapons, torture equipment

    What kind of chemical weapons and who exactly are we selling them to? Even more so on the "torture equipment"?

    Either come up with some hard data to back up your statements, or you're just trolling. Put up or shut up.

    1. Re:what, exactly by cca93014 · · Score: 1
      BBC News

      I have a book at home that has the reference to both the torture equipment and the chemical weapons at home. I'll post that when I get in.

    2. Re:what, exactly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of chemical weapons and who exactly are we selling them to? Even more so on the "torture equipment"?

      This should be common knowledge...
      But then again the WTC shouldn't have been a surprise either

  186. a few things to keep in mind by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

    Just because some brain dead policy comes from our government, doesn't mean that many people (inside or outside) the goverment support it.

    If the US has such strong ties to peace treaties, how come they are now reneging on unarguably the most important; the 1972 Anti Ballistic Missle Treaty?

    "They" is mostly President Bush. Missle defense was probably going to die in the Democrat controlled Senate, but it looks like opposition is giving way in the name of "national security". Why a group of terrorists would spend millions and millions of dollars developing a nuclear bomb and an intercontinental ballisic missle is beyond me when a $3 box cutter will get you a 747 to fly into a skyscraper........

  187. Was I called to 'arms'? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1


    I recieved this E-Mail with an atteched .rtf file and no useful content inline ...

    "Sperling, Sheldon" wrote:
    Shelly

    Sheldon J. (Shelly) Sperling
    United States Attorney
    Eastern District of Oklahoma
    1200 West Okmulgee
    Muskogee, OK 74401
    918/684-5151 (phone)
    918/684-5150 (fax)
    sheldon.sperling@usdoj.gov

    Name:westpr.rtf
    westpr.rtf
    Type: Rich Text Format (application/rtf)
    Encoding: base64

    And my reply?

    Dear Sir,

    I recently recieved an E-Mail that either originated at your address, or originated elsewhere with your address 'spoofed.' Attached was a 'Rich Text Format' document. I cannot view that document without using the Microsoft Operating system, which as a US Citizen I excercise my right to *NOT* do. If you really wish to correspond with me, and this is not a 'spoofed' E-Mail, please follow standard E-Mail conventions. No HTML. No attachments in proprietary closed source formats. Just plain text like every responsible netizen since the Internet's inception. At that time I would be glad to review what you have to say and consider replying with something meaningful by way of a response. However, given that the title of the document is westpr.rtf, I can only conclude that either:

    a) The file is innappropriately named
    b) The file was not sent by the US DOJ
    or
    c) The US DOJ has taken to SPAMMing me.

    I certainly hope it isn't option c.

    Sincerely yours,

    reluctant US citizen [name ommitted here, but included in actual E-Mail]

    In reality I could use StarOffice, but why should I have to?

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  188. Ugh, that's plain evil... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Getting it on with Janet Reno? I couldn't close my eyes tight enough for that...

  189. Re:"In the famous words of..." I can see it now by darylp · · Score: 1

    "Move F-16 for Infinite Justice"

    I can see why they changed the codename now...

  190. Re: afgan uses rfc 1149 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RFC 1149 is how afgan gets all thier communications delivered.

  191. We need a +-1 idyllic rating.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see the point, but is making a deal with (for real) Satan gonna help you in the long run? seriously...

    I'll give you a +1 for wanting to do a good thing, but -1 for thinking that such a deal with the "good ole" USGov would be a good thing...

  192. Damn right! by darylp · · Score: 1

    That's the most sensible thing anyones said here so far. Damn right it isn't a game. It's war, and we've all got to do what we can to defend life and liberty.

    The first World Information War is being fought as you read this. Or do you HONESTLY think that Nimda, and now WTC.EXE, are someone-elses-problem because they don't affect your precious Linux machines.

    To all the Quislings out there: Notice the sudden drop in stock prices because of the double whammy of WTC followed by Nimda? Think there isn't a co-incidence? You can't very well play in your Open Source Geek Utopia if the financial and telecoms infrastructure that supports it has been reduced to tatters.

    Grow up.

    1. Re:Damn right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >To all the Quislings out there: Notice the sudden drop in stock prices
      >because of the double whammy of WTC followed by Nimda? Think there
      >isn't a co-incidence? You can't very well play in your Open Source
      >Geek Utopia if the financial and telecoms infrastructure that supports
      >it has been reduced to tatters.
      >Grow up.
      >
      Get a life. We don't don't give a shit about your now-worthless stock opitions. Not our problem if your greed has finally caught up with you and you're now recieving your just deserts.
      We were doing just fine before garbage like you showed up on the scene and we'll still be around long after you're a pile of dust. Get over yourself, because we're not impressed by you.

    2. Re:Damn right! by WhiteKnight07 · · Score: 1

      A call to arms (or mice/keyboards) then!

      Can we sit by and watch that which we have worked so hard to build be destroyed by the enemies of justice and freedom? HELL NO!

      I say we bust out the l33t shiznit and show them the meaning of attrition! Let us defend the internet from those who would seek to destroy it! As members of a free society, as civilized human beings, we have a duty to do so! For the sake of our future, the world's future, we must do so!

      I don't know about you, but I stand ready to defend that which I hold dear.

      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."

      --


      We're going to make information free Mr. Anderson, whether you like it, or not.
  193. Re:It was a joke! they could use rfc 1149 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RFC 1149 I hope they have birds in afganistan.

  194. Re:email me for osama pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is this "Offtopic"? Clearly the subject is about hackers using their skills against the Raghead Menace.

    I'm going to 0wN j00r A55 in Metamod, fuckflap!

  195. Mod this guy up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All cops are not heroes. The heroes died rushing into the building. The ones you see on TV, directing traffic, standing around, etc. are NOT heros.

  196. Kevin Mitnick should offer his services by Pseudonym · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Subject line says it all.


    --
    sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
  197. ha ha ha !!! by cyberbob2010 · · Score: 1
    When I read this I wanted to roll around on the ground laughing.


    Just one more example of how the society can't live without the Geeks.

    --
    We seldom regret saying too little but often regret saying too much.
  198. Re:This might be just what the linux community nee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .... foiled a plot by the ->teleban- to detonate....

    It's TALIBAN. Study your facts first. Tele- in tele-something is a greek word and means "from a distance". That is tele-vision e.t.c. It beats me what a tele-ban means to you......

    Oh and by the way, and then the camera pans back and you get lost in the sunset?.

    You watch to many (american) movies i think.

    There is no war without caualties. There is no war without pain. These people there are real living people, with blood in their veins, just like you. What you (the great patriot) is proposing is to make a war with the downtroddens there.

    Study the facts first. The talibans there are 40.000 and have killed nearly half a million of their OWN people. And yet you want to go to war with all of them.

    You are a classic example of ignorance.

    the watcher.

  199. And meanwhile the Brits . . . . by ProfDumb · · Score: 1

    As a Brit that has been living in the States for the last couple of months I've had the opportunity to experience the behaviour of the US media and the government first hand, and to be honest it makes me sick.

    Odd, how nearly everything you say about the US applies to Britain as well, but that doesn't seem to bother you. Britain Special Forces did a huge amount of the training of the Afghan rebels agaisnt the USSR. Britain has a large cache of nuclear weapons and Britain has fought against Iraq toe-to-toe with the U.S.

    I also note how you hate it when the US opposes dictators and hate it when the US attacks dictators. I guess it is the US you hate, but when your own country does it, it is all OK. European countries support and fund dictators whenever it suits their commercial purposes. France recently overthrew a democratically elected regime in Africa in order to get a contract for the French company Elf. When Europe does this it is "realistic". When the US does it, it is evil US imperialism.

    You say the US should examine the causes of this attack. OK: the attact was by Fascist right-wing religious extremists who want to impose dictatorial "Islamic Emirates" in (at least) every country of the "Islamic World" from North Africa through Central Asia. They attack us because only we can stop them -- the Europeans (Brits aside) will sell out the entire world for a few oil contracts.

  200. Time to unite to beat the terrorists by bbcat · · Score: 1

    Ashcroft is a jerk. Why do you think that
    my mother in law and many like here voted
    for a dead man instead of voting for him?

    Despite this fact, I am solidly behind him
    and Georges Bush for the time being as we
    should all unite to fight a common enemy.
    Hopefully the congress will not let Ashchroft
    tamper with our civil rights to get what he
    wants. It is important to get the criminals
    but also important not to can innocent people.
    Remember the Arab doctor from Texas?

    As for things we don't agree with in politic
    we can always resume our quarrels after we
    beat the shit out of those motherfuckers
    who killed so many of our people.

    For the time being it is more important to
    be united and do all we can to help our
    government win the war. Even if it means
    fraternizing with fundies and right wingers
    and other weird people.
    No matter what our political views are, as
    Americans we all feel the pain of the families
    who lost their love ones in those mass murders.

  201. mods on crack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how the FUCK is that off-topic?

    1. Re:mods on crack by Stopper · · Score: 1

      Because you misspelled "classified."

  202. The quid-pro-quo may be necessary... by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2

    As for things we don't agree with in politic we can always resume our quarrels after we beat the shit out of those motherfuckers who killed so many of our people.

    I note that if crackers use their skills for information warfare they'll still be breaking the laws mentioned in the quid-pro-quo request.

    Orders from officers or officials in the executive branch is no excuse for committing felonies.

    So some of the requested actions may be necessary if the government wants to legally use the crackers in their efforts.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  203. mods on crack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's not a troll, that's a good point. see ya in meta-mod!

  204. Re:dude by bbcat · · Score: 1

    >Republicans want *less* government and more freedoms.

    Republicans wants *less* government that limits the abuses from some companies and protects
    the environment
    but want *more* government to make sure that people don't commit any sin while having sex.

  205. let me get this straight ... by ananke · · Score: 1


    script-kiddie-hax0rs = BAD!
    patriotic script-kiddie-hax0rs = GOOD!

    :)

    --
    --- d'oh
  206. Re:This might be just what the linux community nee by t0qer · · Score: 1

    and im sure your ip has been noted and forwarded to the FBI as a taliban sympathizer by cmdrtaco.

    You are a classic example of karma whore. Try using your real /. account next time you got something stupid to say.

    Fuckhead. Grow up.

    --toq

  207. Be very very careful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The government has been known to do turnabouts. Just ask the Albanian terrorist organization, the KLA.

    They went from being the 'largest and best (US) armed terrorist organization' according to the CIA in 1998 to the reason why the US bombed civilians for 3 consecutive months in 1999.

    Now that is a quick turnabout!!

    (Of course, since the KLA still controls 60-90% of the heroin going into Europe, they are now paying protection to Uncle Sam.)

    Terrorism isnt a bad thing. Its only bad when its used against you.

    zeke

  208. think again by Technodummy · · Score: 3, Interesting



    NateKid said: If you let one bombing change your opinions about ANYTHING (other than stiffer package checks at the airport), Osama Bin Laden has completely won. The poiont of terrorism is to instill terror in civilians and in your case it looks like they've succeeded.

    Some have said that allowing the attacks to change the way we think is wrong, and I think that argument is flawed.

    People are more grateful for the good things they have and grateful for those who have survived. They are more aware of the world they live in, aware that vigilance is necessary and that freedom is not always easy.

    Not learning anything from events is a backward step in evolution.
    Humans attempt to learn, to improve ourselves, it's what we do.


    And that includes improvements in airport security *and* gratitude replacing taken-for-granted attitudes towards the police.

    fosh said: Sure, the government may have "demonized" us before.

    Putting aside the past mistakes of the police when they ask for your help (showing that you in fact can help and are capable) is putting aside pettiness for something more important, something constructive.

    Pettiness begets fighting and achieves very little.

    Maybe not all cops are heroes, but very little in this world is absolute. Be grateful for the good things you have and do what you can to change the bad things, without becoming bad yourself.

    If you want to improve the police force, do something positive like joining it and doing it right.

    1. Re:think again by NateKid · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying we shouldn't be grateful for having police and learn as we go through life, but we should realize that we are paying for them and they are therefore just doing their fucking jobs when they protect us. If they ever harrass you and your friends, you should in no way tolerate that. And you should not forgive them for that simply because you consider them heroes now.

      Maybe I was exagerating by saying "ANYTHING" but I basically meant that we knew all along that this thing (or something of its magnitude) was possible, so for this one thing to trigger an attitude change (and I have friends who are rescue workers in there and are taking me down there to help) shows that you're thinking out of fear. Or maybe you never cracked open a magazine or newspaper to realize what sort of nuclear, biological and chemical threats are out there. 5-6 thousand people is drop in the bucket compared to what could happen.

      I'm definitely for taking a proactive (damn it hurt to say that) approach to combatting terrorism. I always was, because I was very aware of the threats lurking out there. But let's not think out of fear. After all, "The Enemy of my Enemy is also My Enemy" (Drago Musevini).

  209. Britain did this too. by Max+the+Merciless · · Score: 1

    This problem is not specific to the United States. When Britian was the most powerful and advanced nation in the world it did exactly the same. Many of the problems in the Middle East can be traced back to British (and French) semi-colonial rule. I'd say in a parrallel universe where Afganistan is the Super Power, they would behave the same way too.

    The incredible hypocracy, foolish, myopic, greedy policies of the USA is perhaps a level of intensity above Britain - but perhaps this is only because technology has intensified and hastened most things.

    It is the problem of Empires. It is the problem of our increasingly centralised 'States' system.

    We need to hand power back to the people. I'm not talking about lowering taxes or other BS, I'm talking about industrial democracy, community rule etc. As the people of NYC showed, most common folk are decent and willing to help others. It is States and Corporations which allow indecent folk to exploit and kill others for their own greed and ambitions (Bush, Blair and Bin Laden are all in the same camp here)

    --
    * * Always question "the National Interest" - 9 times out of 10 it is a cover for evil
  210. Armies of script kiddies by hearingaid · · Score: 2
    the gov does not want an army of kiddies who don't know shit about computers and infiltration other than running other people's code.

    This seems intuitively obvious. However, I'm not sure it's true.

    Just how many script kiddies are there out there? I suspect the ratio of them to serious security professionals is probably pretty severe.

    While I wouldn't want to hand off responsibilities for securing systems to script kiddies, I can think that they could well be useful on the other side of infowar: taking down the enemies' systems. After all, script kiddies tend to be quite adept at acquiring tools... the possibility of using a large number of them as a kind of electronic human wave does have a kind of appeal.

    then again, what would boot camp be like? I can just see it now... :)

    --

    my old sig used to be funny, but then slashcode ate it and now it's not funny anymore

  211. What's being said here is... by teleny · · Score: 1
    "Just say no." Well, that worked wonderfully, didn't it?


    "Sorry, this is a job for grownups, not children. Stay out of trouble and we'll keep you safe."

    Sorry, indeed. We're really sorry that we MIGHT want to help. We're really, really, sorry that the effort that's been done to stop SPAM and crack the RC-5 challenge can't be turned to "real", wartime use.

    Yes, this is an attempt to keep terrorists from breaking into sensitive military secrets. Yes, this is probably work that might get people into trouble, if not with us, than with someone else.

    But if there isn't something you can tell us that we CAN do, someone's going to try to do it anyway.And yes, maybe they'll get hurt. But maybe they'll save others from getting hurt. We aren't all under 35. We aren't the right shape, the right size, or even the right ideology for you. But we can't just sit there while others bumble. That's just not our way. Harness us. Use us. But don't ever insult us in this manner. That's all.

    --
    teleny, friend of cats.
  212. He wrote THIS a while ago, pretty funny, too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ion Storm bashing... Save it for 2018...(Score:5)
    by smirkleton on Friday July 20, @08:42AM (#72450)
    (User #69652 Info | http://www.smirkleton.com

    Amazing to see the continued vitriol.

    If only Ion Storm had released a 3d shooter called "Storming Ion Storm", in which you play an opinionated geek running around a virtual community armed with an obnoxiously deadly penchant for regurgitating old jokes about Daikatana, they might have had a grassroots hit on their hands.

    Clearly, there are already legions of players here.

    FWIW, I'd prefer not to play that game. It was fun two years ago maybe. And maybe it'll come back on a wave of retro-nostalgia when today's /. young bucks are having the 20 year reunion in 2018. Picture it with me, won't you?

    It'll be at a 10x10 booth at PC Expo, the Linux "Woulda Coulda Shoulda" gathering. Two dozen middle-aged dorks sitting around bashing Microsoft and AOL/Time Warner (their booths occupying 95% of the entire tradefloor). Then the subject of crappy games will come up, because X-Box Ultra is the only gaming system around. Then invariably, with the sense of nostalgia for the halcyon days causing all sorts of synaptic activity, someone will say, "You know who used to really SUCK?" - "Jon Katz?" - "No, even more than Katz..." - "Who?" - "Ion Storm!"

    A burst of chuckles. Then someone shouts "First Post!", causing everyone else to await his comment.

    "Hah- turns out KillCreek made John Romero HER bitch!"

    Laughter. One person comments, "Funny +1". Another repeats it. Another. Then someone else says, "Overrated -1". More laughter. Some high fives.

    Life will go on, even for those who, while living, do not have a life.

  213. Fuck them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck them.

  214. more famous words by jezmund · · Score: 1

    "Many in government and industry are now concerned that well-meaning U.S. hackers may launch denial-of-service attacks or release worms or viruses aimed at disrupting terrorists, and in the process hurt the overall Internet."

    or...

    "Many in privacy and civil rights groups are now concerned that well-meaning U.S. congressmen may launch bills or release laws or regulations aimed at disrupting terrorists, and in the process hurt the overall Internet."

    --

    "fist in the air in the land of hypocrisy"
  215. Re:dude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "An inefficient government that stays out of your bedroom is much preferable to an efficient government that doesn't." ~ someone who I can't recall

  216. MOD UP PARENT by socratic+method · · Score: 1

    Best.. post... ever.

  217. How about an anti-terrorist SETI@home? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It now appears we've been seriously overestimating the capabilities of the NSA/FBI/CIA/Echelon. What about refocusing those idle cycles currently being used by SETI/distributed.net, etc. for something actually useful like decrypting unclassified portions of encrypted terrorist communications, or searching for steganographically hidden messages in publicly available sources, or 'triangulating' information from multiple sources, similar to what's being done in historical research to figure out what really happened during a particular event, or forensically determinining the source of a rumour, for instance.

  218. Interest is Evil by Chris+Y+Taylor · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That's odd, I was fairly sure that bin Laden's beliefs prevented him from keeping his money in banks, because they pay interest and interest is evil. I guess if he can pervert Islam into blowing up buildings with planes, he can have his money in a bank... but that does seem very uncharacteristic of him.

    1. Re:Interest is Evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup.

      "Interest = usury. Usury is *bad*"
      -- Jesus of Nazareth, 30 AD.

      Any good Christian should know that they go to hell for it.

  219. Re:dude by DoomPlague · · Score: 1

    I don't recall any real "sex laws" in quite some time. And like Democrats don't want to limit certain liberties.

    You're another brainwashed freak with monochrome vision.

  220. get real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They demonize you and criminalize you and then ask for your help. What's a hacker to do?

    You're either paranoid or a megalamaniac or both, and I doubt you're a hacker.

    Hint : if you find it challenging to "hack" with a script someone else wrote, no
    one is after you. They're laughing at you. Hard.

  221. Oh!, There are many targets. by egommer · · Score: 1

    Aren't the Afgan's essentially in the stone age? - at least that's what has been spun in the media to us all.

    What potential targets would hackers have
    ?


    We are not talking about the Afghans directly. This directed towards possible support groups. Such is sniffing major bank transaction to watch for suspicous activity. putting key loggins ect on executive PC who may have direct or indirect ties.

    Putting shredder or DOS type software in other sympethetic coutries networks. There are a huge scope of posiblilties. Even some US banks are a little shady on some these global deals. Loyalty always stops at cash. Think about it.

    PS. Sorry for the previous Anon Post. I forgot to login.


    We Will Rebuild

    --
    Two Towers-Two Worlds.One seeks triumphs and freedom for man.The other deems man unworthy and wrecks them.
  222. As if. by underpaidISPtech · · Score: 1
    First, if any of you bothered to read the article you will see that it is simply a request no to go around fucking things up. It makes the job of the intelligence community alot easier to sort out the real terrorists from the s'kiddie who just watched the Matrix 30 times in a row and wants to hack the CIA website to impress his 13-year old crush.


    Second, any hacker would make a better bullet-catcher, and yield better results too, rather than gulping Cola in a dark room in front of a monitor at the Pentagon. Besides, just *what* in Afghanistan are you going to hack?

  223. Uncle sam isn't in this... by cabbey · · Score: 3

    I don't know who pulled that uncle sam refference out of thin air, but I've been all over the cyberangels website, they *aren't* the government, just a standard non-profit organization. No where do they claim any connection to the government, which is what the figure head of "uncle sam" traditionally represents.

  224. /. = Propaganda Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /. links to a blurb in Wired which links to another blurb? Man oh man, the war has truly begun... the propoganda machine is firing on all pistons now, and Slashdot (and the internet as a whole) is another government tool?! Mind you, I personally believe cracking is flat out wrong (especially now!), but I hope vigilant sysadmins and joe-hackers aren't equated to terrorists in the eyes of the US gov forchrissakes! That's called paranoia!

  225. The Unix solution by Ripper · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't a simple:
    rm -rf /bin/laden
    fix the terrorist problem?

  226. standard tactics by Tom · · Score: 1

    > They demonize you and criminalize you and
    > then ask for your help. What's a hacker to do?"

    and that surprises you? standard bait & switch, isn't it? put pressure on someone, then give him a way out to reconcile himself. CIA torture manual, page 2.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  227. Death to Islam. Exterminate Muslims. Kill Them All by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Our precious dead cry out for vengeance:
    1. Kill all Muslims.
    2. Kill all Mohammedans.
    3. Kill all Arabs.
    4. Kill all Towel Heads.
    5. Kill all Camel Jockeys.
    6. Kill all Dune Coons.
    7. Kill all Islam.
    8. Nuke their countries to hell.
    9. Nuke them again.
    10. Death to Islam.

    I piss on Mecca. I spit on the Koran. I shit on Mohammed.

  228. ActiveISP by KjetilK · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Hehe, ActiveISP is a Norwegian ISP, and one with a Very Bad Reputation. The CEO said to a newspaper a couple of years ago "we're spending tons and tons of money on marketing, because in this market, you have to establish yourself within a year or two if you want to become rich, or your out. And I'm going to be very rich", or something like that.

    They had a few persistent spammers too, that they didn't want to terminate. Spammers were good for their business. Then, a stupid admin there managed to tell a nanaeity "Fuck off, you shouldn't tell me what spam is!", but fortunately, they realize soon thereafter that being RBLed was even worse for business. :-)

    Well, I wouldn't want to do business with these guys, that's for sure...

    --
    Employee of Inrupt, Project Release Manager and Community Manager for Solid
  229. Nonsense. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    I did not know NY was under martial law and that freedom of movement was restricted....

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  230. Hacker favorites? by Caid+Raspa · · Score: 2
    Two hacker favorites -- USA Cable's Sci-Fi Channel, and UPN's hit show Buffy the Vampire Slayer -- would be perfect places to air the spot.


    Saying TV==hacker_favourite is idiotic.


    I threw away my TV in 1996, three months after 'checking out that net'. Books and the net are the channels I use for getting information. For entertainment: books, the net, coding, computer games and of course, real life(TM). TV is for people with 5-min attention span, hackers (I hope) have longer spans.


    I hate to see how people build their 'living room' around the TV. Then they are in front of it like statues around an altar. Yuck.

  231. Don't forget the TV station in Serbia. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    It was full of civilians whose only crime was to be showing Milosevic propaganda (like if they could have refused).

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  232. Hmmm, what 'ist' will come next... by browman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Anyone noticed any similarities to the word "terrorist"'s use today when compared with the word "communist" about 20 years ago?

    --
    You fool! You've given cheese to a lactose intolerant volcano god! Do you know what that means?
  233. Later.... by LittleGuy · · Score: 1

    A long-lasting shot of CowboyNeal riding a nuke heading to Kabul....

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  234. UK residents by nwetters · · Score: 1

    If you're not eligible to work for Uncle Sam, try here.

  235. One does feel badly for the innocents, but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    civilian deaths are unaviodable in war. If a religous extremist group in your country (Afghanistan) supports and protects terrorists who declare war on the USA (I won't even go into proving WTC was Bin Laden - it doesn't matter, he declared war years ago) then the citizens of that country are going to incur the punishment brought on them by their own governments actions. I agree that other western (and eastern) nations have taken part in the training of these individuals, and it now they are feeling the repucussions. But too bad! They were trained to fight in THEIR countries - and when they do this to USA, its an unforgivable act of war. And in war - innocent people die. Sometimes thousands, sometimes millions. Considering the number of Russian nukes that went missing (were sold) in the later period of last century - it is entirely concievable that these individuals have nuclear weapons, and the deployment of them is fairly simple - fly a chartered 747 towards Dulles International and the people on the ground can't tell it's got no passengers - just a nuke on board. The way these people work, they'd put a nuke on a plane WITH passengers and praise their unknowing sacrifice afterwards. Not only that, but agents of Osama's have now been tracked to 64 countries rather than the inital confirmed 55. And many many of these are in USA. Biological warfare on American soil is a very real possibility. By the time you figured out why you were getting so many sick people into the hospital, it would have spread to every other corner of America, and to other nations through people as hosts (thanks to our global transport system).

    Before you start a war, you know many innocents are going to die - on both sides. The cost on the American side could very well be high - but the cost of those deaths when the war is finally won, protects the legacy of the nation and the wars and deaths that have already brought it so far. Its a history that Americans have fought to protect for centuries, and the cost now, although it may be high, is the price that must be paid for that continued freedom - otherwise the deaths of Americans in every war from the war of independence, through the civil wars, the world wars, and every other skirmish to this day - was for nothing. We owe it to those people to do our duty.

    No, I'm not American. I've only been there once - but I'm a citizen of one of your eternal allies, and I'm dying for some payback on those individuals responsible, and every person who supports their cause. They are brainwashed into believing theirs is the good cause - hence all the phones and international communication in Afghanistan being disconnected. Foreign documentation has been frowned upon for years and the citizens themselves can not be blamed for this. But even with the mistakes our allied nations have made, their course has been proven to be that of evil. Their celebration, not of a military victory, but of the deaths of thousands of innocent civilians who never wanted a part in a war - sealed their own fate.

    Kill them all.

  236. One does feel badly for the civilian deaths, but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    civilian deaths are unaviodable in war. If a religous extremist group in your country (Afghanistan) supports and protects terrorists who declare war on the USA (I won't even go into proving WTC was Bin Laden - it doesn't matter, he declared war years ago) then the citizens of that country are going to incur the punishment brought on them by their own governments actions. I agree that other western (and eastern) nations have taken part in the training of these individuals, and it now they are feeling the repucussions. But too bad! They were trained to fight in THEIR countries - and when they do this to USA, its an unforgivable act of war. And in war - innocent people die. Sometimes thousands, sometimes millions. Considering the number of Russian nukes that went missing (were sold) in the later period of last century - it is entirely concievable that these individuals have nuclear weapons, and the deployment of them is fairly simple - fly a chartered 747 towards Dulles International and the people on the ground can't tell it's got no passengers - just a nuke on board. The way these people work, they'd put a nuke on a plane WITH passengers and praise their unknowing sacrifice afterwards. Not only that, but agents of Osama's have now been tracked to 64 countries rather than the inital confirmed 55. And many many of these are in USA. Biological warfare on American soil is a very real possibility. By the time you figured out why you were getting so many sick people into the hospital, it would have spread to every other corner of America, and to other nations through people as hosts (thanks to our global transport system).

    Before you start a war, you know many innocents are going to die - on both sides. The cost on the American side could very well be high - but the cost of those deaths when the war is finally won, protects the legacy of the nation and the wars and deaths that have already brought it so far. Its a history that Americans have fought to protect for centuries, and the cost now, although it may be high, is the price that must be paid for that continued freedom - otherwise the deaths of Americans in every war from the war of independence, through the civil wars, the world wars, and every other skirmish to this day - was for nothing. We owe it to those people to do our duty.

    No, I'm not American. I've only been there once - but I'm a citizen of one of your eternal allies, and I'm dying for some payback on those individuals responsible, and every person who supports their cause. They are brainwashed into believing theirs is the good cause - hence all the phones and international communication in Afghanistan being disconnected. Foreign documentation has been frowned upon for years and the citizens themselves can not be blamed for this. But even with the mistakes our allied nations have made, their course has been proven to be that of evil. Their celebration, not of a military victory, but of the deaths of thousands of innocent civilians who never wanted a part in a war - sealed their own fate.

    Kill them all.

  237. Real Hackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real hackers out there are hacking out of a sense of duty anyway. Realize two forms of hackers, those who do it to promote security and improved functionality and then those morons out there who find a recipe to hack and do so with malicious intend. The self proclaimed geeks that can't think for them selves can go to hell and for those who hack with intelligent purpose--do something brilliant for your nation!

  238. INT -- W's TEXAS RANCH -- DAY by Sam+Williams · · Score: 1
    George Bush and Condolezza Rice are watching the Texas A&M, Southern Methodist football game. W. is seated in a leather couch, drinking a beer, his feet propped up on the wagon-wheel coffee table. Condi is in her third mile on the stairmaster.

      • W.

    Any word on how that elite [pronounced e-light] team of computer hackers getting along?

      • CONDI

      The latest from CINCPER is they touched down outside of Kabul an hour ago.

      • W.

    Outstanding!


    W. slips hand in waistband Al Bundy-style and takes a sip of his beer.

    CUT TO. . .

  239. What's a hacker to do? by Syberghost · · Score: 2

    Get it in writing, with your name specifically on it, and signed the President, that's what.

    Otherwise, you're gonna have to fight it as "entrapment", and good luck when the jury is made up of 12 people who were too dumb to get out of jury duty, and who's definition of "hacker" comes from typing the word in on AOL.

  240. Re:you've won a new car!---yea, a hearse! by DecimalThree · · Score: 1

    They can have my keyboard when they pry it from my COLD DEAD FINGERS. First they try to take it away, now they want to borrow it?? I trow not.

  241. Counterstrike by sychon · · Score: 0

    They need hackers because they don't have enough players for the Counter-Terrorist team.

  242. What they really want. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is people with internet savvy to assist in mining information from the internet on terrorist. They should really air that spot on TLC,DSC and the history channel, during robot wars on comedy central.. I think that would reach the intended target audience.

  243. Organization. by generic · · Score: 1

    They should organize a defcon like meeting, to organize and inform the computer hacker community.
    (and of course to secretly take our pictures)

    They should have one in boston and in SF.

    --
    Microsoft aggravates my tourettes syndrome.
  244. You can Hack This Terroris sites!!!!! by Douglasmaioli · · Score: 1

    http://www.azzam.com/ http://www.qoqaz.co.za/ http://www.hizbollah.org/english/frames/index_eg.h tm http://209.204.204.153/index_e.htm I am not a hacker, but if you are fuck this sits out of hell!! I will know that USA won this war when no terrorist cell will be able to watch this sites!

    1. Re:You can Hack This Terroris sites!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are one very stupid asshole.

  245. hackers manifesto by Vspirit · · Score: 1

    hehe I searched for this in the thread without finding it, weird.. well here goes then..

    "You build atomic bombs, you wage wars, you murder, cheat, and lie to us and try to make us believe it's for our own good, yet we're the criminals."

    my questions are few and my answers are even lesser - yet I live and smile.

    ---

    HACKERS MANIFESTO

    The Conscience of a Hacker

    Another one got caught today, it's all over the papers.

    "Teenager Arrested in Computer Crime Scandal",

    "Hacker Arrested after Bank Tampering"...Damn kids. They're all alike.

    But did you, in your three-piece psychology and 1950's

    technobrain, ever take a look behind the eyes of the hacker? Did

    you ever wonder what made him tick, what forces shaped him, what

    may have molded him?

    I am a hacker, enter my world...

    Mine is a world that begins with school... I'm smarter

    than most of the other kids, this crap they teach us bores me...

    Damn underachiever. They're all alike.

    I'm in junior high or high school. I've listened to teachers

    explain forthe fifteenth time how to reduce a fraction. I

    understand it. "No, Ms. Smith, I didn't show my work. I did it

    in my head..." Damn kid. Probably copied it. They're all alike.

    I made a discovery today. I found a computer. Wait a second,

    this is cool. It does what I want it to. If it makes a mistake,

    it's because I screwed it up. Not because it doesn't like me...

    Or feels threatened by me... Or thinks I'm a smart ass...

    Or doesn't like teaching and shouldn't be here...

    Damn kid. All he does is play games. They're all alike.

    And then it happened... a door opened to a world... rushing

    through the phone line like heroin through an addict's veins, an

    electronic pulse is sent out, a refuge from the day-to-day

    incompetencies is sought... a board is found.

    "This is it... this is where I belong..."

    I know everyone here... even if I've never met them, never talked to them, may never hear from them again... I know you all...

    Damn kid. Tying up the phone line again. They're all alike...

    You bet your ass we're all alike... we've been spoon-fed baby food at school when we hungered for steak... the bits of meat that you

    did let slip through were pre-chewed and tasteless. We've been

    dominated by sadists, or ignored by the apathetic. The few that

    had something to teach found us willing pupils, but those few are

    like drops of water in the desert.

    This is our world now... the world of the electron and the switch,

    the beauty of the baud. We make use of a service already

    existing without paying for what could be dirt-cheap if it wasn't

    run by profiteering gluttons, and you callus criminals. We

    explore... and you call us criminals. We seek after knowledge...

    and you call us criminals. We exist without skin color, without

    nationality, without religious bias... and you call us criminals.

    You build atomic bombs, you wage wars, you murder, cheat, and lie

    to us and try to make us believe it's for our own good, yet we're

    the criminals.

    Yes, I am a criminal. My crime is that of curiosity. My crime is that of judging people by what they say and think, not what they

    look like. My crime is that of outsmarting you, something that

    you will never forgive me for.

    I am a hacker, and this is my manifesto. You may stop this

    individual, but you can't stop us all... after all, we're all alike.

    +++The Mentor+++

  246. Cyberangels in the outfield. by datatrash · · Score: 1

    I should suspect that the .gov and Disney will rally folks to the cause by co-working on a film whereby a young boy realizes that the only way his wayward traveling hacker of a dad will come back to the family is when "the US wins the war." Following a good old fashioned American prayer session a CEO makes him the CTO and voila a rag-tag group of washed up hackers and coders (Tony Danza as "hckN4beats") come together to crash the massive infrastructure that is Afghanistan thereby reuniting said boy with poppa - Cyberangels in the Outfield.

    Coincidentally is this what Horge Mush was talking about when on his inauguration he started tossing out quotes about angels in a whirlwind?"

  247. Alien Crossfire by HiThere · · Score: 2

    The term Cyberangels is the name of one of the groups in Alien Crossfire. I doubt this is a coincidence, but as to whether it means anything....

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  248. Free Kevin! by timt25 · · Score: 1

    I'll bet Mitnick is Pissed!

  249. Re:Vint Cerf Radio Interview 9/25/01 [OT] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of the _interesting_ things I've learned about Americans over the last two weeks is how ignorant we as a people are of the rest of the world. It extends well beyond the backwoods coal mining families or the prairie dog ranchers. This lack of world knowledge reaches the media, the government, (and major organized religous moguls ... which, come to think of it, are basically media-wannabes trying to establish government rule), just to name a few.
    There can be no doubt that countries such as South Africa have much more to lose than their internet connectivity in this ordeal. Simply by standing up and stating that they back the Anti-Terrorist Coalition led by the US, they add their names to the list of potential terrorist targets.

    I would ask forgiveness for the wayward American, but while ignorance can be accepted, refusing to learn cannot.

  250. Anti-WW3 by Drunken+Buddhist · · Score: 1

    Ok, this is kinda more towards the Please Don't Start World War III edge of the topic spectrum, don't kill (recruit) me for it...

    Is it just me, or every time we back one side of a foriegn conflict, we suddenly realize a double-decade later that we made the wrong move. I think, if we want to stop having wars, WE SHOULD STOP ENCOURAGING OTHERS TO HAVE WARS!!!! My god...for a peace-loving country, we sure do love to get involved in war, we sure do love to flip a coin and back whichever 'donkey' it lands on, and we sure do love to miraculously ignore any wrongdoings that country does/did until after they've won (and of course, they will, thanks to the irresistable force that is (begin echo)American Egoism -ism -ism -ism -ism...(end echo)) So what *should* we do? Well, we should handle our own damn business! We need to swallow our inflated ego, and realize that the more we get involved in everyone else's business, the more everyone else resents it. The only problem is, I think it's already too late, considering that given our american paranoia, we're going to see terrorists (just like communists) bloody everywhere, and we'll end up declaring war on everyone that doesn't eunanimously support us. Hasn't anyone else realized that this war is the perfect excuse for america to do whatever it damn well pleases to whomever it could possibly find a reason to move against. I say the best thing anyone can do to make an intelligent decision of position in this conflict is to research it, bin laden, the US history with afghanistan/terrorist groups, etc... (And I mean from unbiased sources, like...umm...ENCYCLOPEDIAS, and not relying on the networks' sensationalism of what little truth they allow to trickle down to inform them)

    --
    -1, Disagree is not a valid option. Troll, Flamebait and Offtopic are not a substitute.
  251. Re:Vint Cerf Radio Interview 9/25/01 [OT] by error0x100 · · Score: 1

    is how ignorant we as a people are of the rest of the world

    It hasn't gone unnoticed by the rest of the world, either :) Very often there are revealing comments on /. like "Ghana is practically next door to South Africa", or responses to an article about a plan to build fiber optic connections around africa (funded by african companies no less) along the lines of "throwing pearls to pigs" and "what are these people going to do with the internet, they still talk in click languages". Another example was when a south african utility company (Eskom, one of the biggest utility companies in the world) was mentioned as being one of the main researchers of nuclear bubble reactors, there were comments like "third world countries should not be allowed to have nuclear power stations, they can't handle it" (neglecting that South Africa has built and maintained a nuclear power station without incident since the 1970s). Comments like that indicate a desire to form strong opinions about something that a person clearly knows very little about. (Lets not even go to comments about turning 3rd world countries into parking lots :)

    I get the impression its a sort of deliberate arrogant ignorance, a sort of "other places in the world don't actually matter so why bother to learn" attitude. And its usually essentially impossible to even mention anything like this on /. without getting modded down instantly. Still, Americans have worked hard to attain the successes that do set them apart from so many other countries economically, and in a way it might be seen that they have a right to be a bit arrogant. But it does seem to come down to simply refusing to learn about other cultures, a willful ignorance that embodies the attitude of "who cares, other non-US people don't mean anything to the world".

    Of course, thats only the general impression that the US gives of themselves outside of the US, I would hope that the majority of americans are not as arrogant as the more vocal ones.

    At any rate, regarding terrorism, some parts of South Africa (particularly the Cape) have also had a problem for many years now with terrorist bombings, not as bad as places like Israel, but typically we have maybe two or three incidents a year. These are perpetrated by certain minority fringe groups. So we have everything to gain from an anti-terrorism campaign. Additionally, several South Africans also died in the WTC (one of which it seems may have been a distant relation of mine). South Africa did stand up and state that we back the anti-terrorist coalition (as have many other African countries), but I can't remember seeing any mention of any of them on CNN.

    Anyway, thanks for the more positive comments :) I must admit I have never visited the states (although I plan to), so my opinions may be wrong, as I base them partially on the image that the US projects of themselves.

  252. Do what I did by thejake316 · · Score: 1

    Freelance a bit. I translated "I send you this file in order to have your advice" to Farsi and emailed it to binladin@aol.com. I hear it pissed him and his followers off off and he changed his email address to an MSN account, I think it's binladin69king@msn.com now.

    --
    AC's cheerfully ignored
  253. so? by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

    It's not uncommon knowledge that the US has a large chemical weapons stockpile. But all the article that you're linking to talks about is the problem of safely destroying this stockpile, not about exporting it.

    About the torture equipment: the sarcastic saying of "well if its printed on the Internet then it must be true!" also applies to print.

  254. Ack! Don't hit them - they host me too! by Dr_Cheeks · · Score: 2
    OK, firstly a quick traceroute says that the site is hosted on a machine in Norway, not London - try Visualroute to see.

    Next, Netcraft say it's an NT 4 box.

    AFAIK, this is a shared host - if you knock over the box then you'll take down a whole bunch of sites run by people who're totally innocent (not to mention all the innocent people who bank with this company who'll be affected by such an irresponsible attack).

    Having checked IPs, my site doesn't seem to be hosted on the same box, but I know I'd be pretty pissed if my visitors couldn't get to my site because someone had decided, with pretty tenuous reasons, to hAx0R the host machine. If you (understandably) feel a need to take action, please try to do it in a more productive manner.

    --

  255. Bring It On! - Cheer Fever by http101 · · Score: 1

    Would you believe that was the original movie title for "Bring It On!"? Cheer Fever? C'Mon Hollywood, you can crank out something better than that.

    Anyway, what I've been saying in relation to the war for the past few days is, "Gimme 20 bucks, a shotgun, and keep the ammo comin'!" I've had enough of these sleeper agents screwing us over in America. I'd love to be part of the special forces team that goes in there and wipes out the little buggers. I'm not sure if any of you have seen the recent issue of the Houston Chronicle, but there's a comic strip in it showing the country, Afghanistan, as a smoking crater in the ground with scattered debris and scorch marks trailing out into the surrounding countries. The quote in the cartoon is, "...and this is Afghanistan before we start bombing."

    Clap if you love fruit cake!
    raptorGT

    --
    -- Game Developers: Stop porting badly-textured games from crappy console systems!
  256. Scene from "Full Silicon Jacket" by Conspir8or · · Score: 1

    Hartmann: Private Joker!

    Joker: Sir, yes, sir!

    Hartmann [reading from PDA] "Twenty-six hundred. Basic Military Cyber Warfare." You gotta be shitting me! You want to be some fuckin' hacker? You wanna be Captain Crunch?

    Joker: Sir, I was in the Legion of Doom in high school, Sir!

    Hartmann: Jeeezus H. Christ. You're not a hacker. You're a killer!

    Joker: Sir, a killer, Sir!

  257. Re:dude by Jazu · · Score: 1

    Yeah, that's the problem with Leiberman. But the point was that Rebublicans don't stick with the small govt. concept through thick and thin, so to speak.

    --
    My joke got modded as Insightful and my insight got modded as Funny.
  258. The real deal...from Cyberangels by Cyberangels · · Score: 1

    I am Parry Aftan the executive director of Cyberangels.org. Vint Cerf agreed to do this PSA with me. It's not a PSA for the US government. It's just a PSA to try to explain how "hackers" is an honorable title, but means people who protect the Network and live by the hackers ethics, and are expert in network and software engineering. Vint (one fo the inventors of the Internet) prides himself at being a "hacker." He asks that all real hackers put their talents to positive uses, like finding and defending against malicious codes, or working with groups such as ours. We're a charity designed to help online victims of cybercrimes. We're not uncle Sam, we're the Internet community defending the Net, and trying to get the word out that patriotic cracking only hurts the Net and hurts our military's ability to find information about terrorism activity. those of us who love the Net know the real meaning of hacking, and wish that everyone did. Many of you have come to us, asking how to help. we welcome all the help we can get, and hope that you will spread the word to others. Let's defend the Net and keep it open, and protect America and oppose terrorism of all forms. we have 10,000 volunteers (all unpaid including me) from 76 countries around the world. All virtual...and all love the Internet and know how much we can do to make the lives of others better. We are working with many of the families of the victims of the WTC and Pentagon attacks, rescue workers and rescue dogs, relief efforts, and others who want to contribute to the healing and to help. Few are as caring as the hacker community. And we have so much to give. What we lack in money, we make up for in skills.... The Interenet Society needs our input too. I am a member of the ISSG, the Interent Society's Societal Steering Group, which leads the Internet Societal Task Force. This arm of the Internet Society deals with all policy and societal issues, such as digital divide, equitable access, privacy and security... we need your experience and voices there too. You can learn how to get involved at isoc.org... If there is anything I haven't answered, feel free to e-mail me at parry@aftab.com. thanks! Parry Aftab Exec Director Cyberangels