Open source would be nothing with out corporate source. Companies create new ideas and uses that idea to make a profit. Then the open source community makes it better and makes it free. It is really just that simple.
Theoretically, microsoft doesn't have a problem in a "capitalist" economy. If they would just make better software (that doesn't crash) people would choose them. The only problem they may have is when they stop making better software. I am glad the GPL is keeping these guys on their toes.
I always thought Young's double slit experiment was about porn.
A good way to find out if the number of hours relates to performance is to do a small "lines of code"/hour test.
It is not totally accurate of performance but it would be nice to see.
Or he can finish Tom's lines by reading the teleprompter directly.
But that would be too easy.
Open source would be nothing with out corporate source. Companies create new ideas and uses that idea to make a profit. Then the open source community makes it better and makes it free. It is really just that simple.
Theoretically, microsoft doesn't have a problem in a "capitalist" economy. If they would just make better software (that doesn't crash) people would choose them. The only problem they may have is when they stop making better software. I am glad the GPL is keeping these guys on their toes.