I remember buying into Freescale when they announced MRAM. A month or so later, Blackrock (or Blackstone, it's hard to tell those hedgies apart; they all dress alike and have the same forked tails) offered a bundle to take the company private. Haven't heard a word about MRAM from Freescale since.
Cheaper to get a new laptop than to dick around with compression and deletion for hours on end, multiple times a month, until you still just run out of room.
Winning Nobel prizes generally requires more than one paper, or, if they only take one paper, they take years of confirmation and important effects due to that paper.
But journals, which are a profit center, don't seem to mind publishing junk any more.
Psychology, as this experiment proves, is a ripe target for bullshit artists. It should probably publish about 10% of what it publishes, and grant degrees to 20% of those to whom it does.
The peer review process is supposed to be about having trained people determine if the science is real.
Otherwise you could just have professional writers do all the reviews.
The fact that none of his reviewers found his results bizarre enough to be investigated or commented on critically at the time they were published means that the entire field is full of morons.
That bulb under the pilot is a Swiss Ball, and it's there because it's cheap, light, tough, and pretty foolproof as a landing gear for a hovering vehicle.
The best reason to depress the CM below the rotors is that you don't have to do so much fine control to get what you want. You won't get terrific responsiveness, but you won't be wobbling about a nearly-unstable balance point.
If they do that, though, it stops being really different and becomes similar to any other lightweight helicopter, only with 8 small motors and propellors instead of one big one, and no need for a tail rotor. You can steer it without any control other than a throttle and a stick that angles the propellor frame relative to whatever you're hanging from.
So in order to release that one video as evidence of a coverup, I would have to also release all of the classified information gathered in the theater for the duration of the war, without any redactions to protect anyone mentioned in them?
You're a moron.
We, the non-terrorist side in that war, are the good guys. If Assange had a clue, he could have revealed the malefactors in our midst, and got us to support him all the way with our own legal system. But he doesn't. Nor do you, because somehow you think that committing 100,000 crimes is justified by revealing one crime.
It wasn't (just) about a broken condom. You need to reread the allegations. "Rape" may not be the exact word in the Swedish law that applies, but it's the word in English that applies.
Why doesn't Julian Assange release this data, then?
Oh, right. He's too busy begging for money ever since he made his organization a pariah by raping two chicks and haphazardly giving up the secrets of the good guys.
The filesystem is a database with a schema that's baked into the operating system or (in the case of savvy operating systems) bolted onto it.
Oracle has made a mint by doing away with files and using bare disks to hold data in schemas their users develop (or buy), but all they're doing is generalizing disk access. They do this because dealing with both the filesystem schema and the user schema is redundant and a waste of time, and time is money to users with megajumbo databases. They also do it because it involves a lot of proprietary middleware they can overcharge for, even though it's pretty simple and even Larry Ellison could implement it.
If Microsoft wants to beef up the filesystem trope beyond directories and inodes and open/close/read/write, then let them. They've cut several versions of the Windows filesystem over the years, there's no reason they can't roll out a new one and let the market vote with its feet.
You don't put the CM right in the plane of the rotors. That's the critically stable point. You put it a few cm or dm below that. Now you have stability, and only a small moment to overcome to hold a non-level attitude. But, if you suspend the pilot below the frame, and gimbal the strut he's hanging from, now you're not worried about that moment at all. Make the gimbal an actively controlled joint, and you can use it for control, too. I call prior art.
Slashdot Mirror
I remember buying into Freescale when they announced MRAM. A month or so later, Blackrock (or Blackstone, it's hard to tell those hedgies apart; they all dress alike and have the same forked tails) offered a bundle to take the company private. Haven't heard a word about MRAM from Freescale since.
A tablet without a fast wi-fi connection to a honking big server is a serving tray for the beer you're going to go get me.
Cheaper to get a new laptop than to dick around with compression and deletion for hours on end, multiple times a month, until you still just run out of room.
True dat. There isn't a space-saving methodology in the world that's more cost effective than slapping another terabyte into the rack.
Yup. Column editing is the killer app that vi never had.
Cscope integration is a close second through fifth.
If you're using the same sized RAM she could easily be swapping and you, who wouldn't be, would be oblivious to it.
:qa!
I like Vim.
But why isn't it the default editor in this edit box?
I think what it proves is there's no such thing as global McNuggets.
Winning Nobel prizes generally requires more than one paper, or, if they only take one paper, they take years of confirmation and important effects due to that paper.
But journals, which are a profit center, don't seem to mind publishing junk any more.
Psychology, as this experiment proves, is a ripe target for bullshit artists. It should probably publish about 10% of what it publishes, and grant degrees to 20% of those to whom it does.
The peer review process is supposed to be about having trained people determine if the science is real.
Otherwise you could just have professional writers do all the reviews.
The fact that none of his reviewers found his results bizarre enough to be investigated or commented on critically at the time they were published means that the entire field is full of morons.
Fucking women who don't want you to fuck them is rape. Learn that now, if you haven't.
See, that's why we're the good guys. We know right from wrong, and why the other side is terrorists.
That bulb under the pilot is a Swiss Ball, and it's there because it's cheap, light, tough, and pretty foolproof as a landing gear for a hovering vehicle.
The best reason to depress the CM below the rotors is that you don't have to do so much fine control to get what you want. You won't get terrific responsiveness, but you won't be wobbling about a nearly-unstable balance point.
If they do that, though, it stops being really different and becomes similar to any other lightweight helicopter, only with 8 small motors and propellors instead of one big one, and no need for a tail rotor. You can steer it without any control other than a throttle and a stick that angles the propellor frame relative to whatever you're hanging from.
I have the same goal, and plan to have transferred my assets before pulling up the sheet for the last time. Tax purposes, you know.
So in order to release that one video as evidence of a coverup, I would have to also release all of the classified information gathered in the theater for the duration of the war, without any redactions to protect anyone mentioned in them?
You're a moron.
We, the non-terrorist side in that war, are the good guys. If Assange had a clue, he could have revealed the malefactors in our midst, and got us to support him all the way with our own legal system. But he doesn't. Nor do you, because somehow you think that committing 100,000 crimes is justified by revealing one crime.
It wasn't (just) about a broken condom. You need to reread the allegations. "Rape" may not be the exact word in the Swedish law that applies, but it's the word in English that applies.
Why doesn't Julian Assange release this data, then?
Oh, right. He's too busy begging for money ever since he made his organization a pariah by raping two chicks and haphazardly giving up the secrets of the good guys.
The filesystem is a database with a schema that's baked into the operating system or (in the case of savvy operating systems) bolted onto it.
Oracle has made a mint by doing away with files and using bare disks to hold data in schemas their users develop (or buy), but all they're doing is generalizing disk access. They do this because dealing with both the filesystem schema and the user schema is redundant and a waste of time, and time is money to users with megajumbo databases. They also do it because it involves a lot of proprietary middleware they can overcharge for, even though it's pretty simple and even Larry Ellison could implement it.
If Microsoft wants to beef up the filesystem trope beyond directories and inodes and open/close/read/write, then let them. They've cut several versions of the Windows filesystem over the years, there's no reason they can't roll out a new one and let the market vote with its feet.
Um, maybe second best.
(BT, DT)
This is seriously cool and way safer than that dude flying his rocket pack across the Channel.
The infinite coolness of Yves Rossy's flights makes up for any unsafeness they may exhibit. Times about a billion.
This is toenail clipping compared with that.
It's the battery that gets me.
The batteries in a Chevy Volt hold a couple of dollars worth of electricity, and weigh 175 kilos. That's twice what that pilot there weighs.
Sorry, kids. You're not getting an hour-long flight off the ground until you change the laws of physics.
You don't put the CM right in the plane of the rotors. That's the critically stable point. You put it a few cm or dm below that. Now you have stability, and only a small moment to overcome to hold a non-level attitude. But, if you suspend the pilot below the frame, and gimbal the strut he's hanging from, now you're not worried about that moment at all. Make the gimbal an actively controlled joint, and you can use it for control, too. I call prior art.
Must be fun when someone misconfigures the spam filters three nodes up your bang-path.