From what I remember you can have a w2k client authenticate against a MIT Kerberos server, but, it won't be able to access any w2k server resources. In that field they embed something like the SID/UID, but the format for it isn't documented. So there will not be real interoperability until they do.
p.s. If you think this is evil, look into how they do their DynDNS updating
I recently did something very similar to this. I worked 130hrs in 8 days. By the end of it I was literally living at work. When everyone came back from holiday the next day, I got bitched at for being late by the CEO. All the work and none of the reward, what a wonderful industry we work in.
Slashdot Mirror
From what I remember you can have a w2k client authenticate against a MIT Kerberos server, but, it won't be able to access any w2k server resources. In that field they embed something like the SID/UID, but the format for it isn't documented. So there will not be real interoperability until they do.
p.s. If you think this is evil, look into how they do their DynDNS updating
I recently did something very similar to this. I worked 130hrs in 8 days. By the end of it I was literally living at work. When everyone came back from holiday the next day, I got bitched at for being late by the CEO. All the work and none of the reward, what a wonderful industry we work in.
There is a benchmark page at http://www.rarcoa.com/~thebard/X11-performance.htm l that gives some basic Xmark scores for various cards.
These scores still lag quite a bit behind Xig's Accelerated X, and are completely blown away by an HP Visualize fx6, which posts an Xmark of 53.
This still doesn't address the lack of client side telephony software. What good does a server do us if we lack the methods to communicate with it.