Nowhere in that article is there an apology. Whenever you mouth something and then say "but", the words you mouthed are just a cover. She was not talking about Israel with her antisemitic tweet. The was talking about Jews. She had met with Jewish members of her district two years ago to discuss her antisemitic statements, and they came away stating that she wasn't interested in learning how her antisemitic statements are damaging. She had made a similar apology only two weeks before. The House resolution was initiated to call out her antisemitism, but Nancy couldn't politically bury it since the two of them had just appeared on the cover of "Rolling Stones" together, so they chose to water it down to disguise the real target.
Fortunately, we have Jew haters like GameboyRMH to run cover for her anyway.
When I get a new phone, the first step is to disable every unnecessary pre-installed app; but, distinguishing what is unnecessary from what will completely brick the phone is generally hard. What is "Mobile Services Manager"? "Gboard"? Why would "NFL Mobile" EVER be pre-installed? How about "Standard Home"?
Why are they so ashamed of their pre-installed apps that they won't even tell you what they do?
Omar didn't apologize for her antisemitism. She apologized that it made others feel bad.
And taking a resolution denouncing antisemitism that was written to rebuke an antisemitic muslim and watering it down to denunciate all "hate" so that the particular hate in evidence can be hidden in the crowd is disgusting.
You start with the fact that he controls 3.1 billion in property, but then imply that he is used car salesman level con artist without a penny to back anything up. I'm simply amazed that such a convoluted model of the world can exist in anyone's head.
If he can maintain a con like that for the past 40 years, he is the most amazing, hard-working con-artist the world has ever known.
If there was intent, then why did he pay off the other mistresses BEFORE he ever started running for President. This is not Trump's first payoff rodeo. The evidence is that National Enquirer had quite a little side-line going where they would buy up and bury these types of stories.
Well, we have your analysis, and we have the analysis from former FEC Chairmen. They say you're wrong. I think they probably know more about it than you.
Please read up on FEMA. You don't have just one person doing this on an airliner, but there should be someone on the design team for that component that is doing the analysis. Each of those parts you mention has to be designed, the designs submitted for manufacturing quotes, tracked, and then assembled. There is plenty of time for failure analysis on each. For the airplane I built, considering that I had to manufacture each of those "so many parts", doing the analysis is easily doable.
Depends on the level of corruption in the particular city/county/state, but, no.
Consider that you have both a plumbing AND an electrical inspector. The scope is small enough that a single expert can confirm the code is followed. The houses are pretty much all built the same, so the inspector can be an expert in "pipes must have a 1" fall every 18", or "load bearing walls require no more than X" spacing", or whatever the code might state.
An airplane is such a complex structure, it would require an engineer of equal talent as the lead design engineer to determine if the design is adequate. Consider whether someone of that talent wants to be employed as a government pencil pusher.
The real fix is giving putting the government in charge of the infrastructure. The cable lines should never have been privately owned in the first place. I lean Libertarian, but the libertarian ideal of all roads being privately owned is insane. The ridiculous debate we're having over NN exemplifies how.
Most Americans support a $15 minimum wage, Medicare for All, ending the 8 wars we're in, tuition free college and even a federal jobs program of one kind or another. This is one nail in the coffin of the guys who've been screwing us over since the 80s (and that goes for any Dems who don't vote for it, especially in the Senate).
And the polls show that the support fades faster than a Walmart t-shirt when people are told how much those programs will cost them.
If the government were doing there job, the communications lines would be a public asset just like the roads. Anything that requires the power of imminent domain is a public asset. If it is important enough to take it by force for the public good, it is important enough to remain in the public's control. All of these issues about NN would go away if the communications infrastructure was not abusable by private entities.
they may as well step back, clean house of the likes of clinton and pelosi, regroup and try again in a decade. Hopefully by then clinton and pelosi will have croaked.
And replace it with what? Acasio-Cortez? Ilhan Omar? Kamala Harris? Corey Booker? It's amazing that I'm sitting here thinking the current crop of Dems are seasoned, respectable statesmen, due to the new loons their pushing forward.
You are right about optics, but it seems like a really stupid use of resources given it cannot actually pass, nor do any candidate any good whatsoever.
Well, other than bogus investigations that the populace is starting to see for the fishing expeditions they are, what else do the Democrats have as legislative priorities? They can't exactly vote on reparations. All the candidates are jumping on that for their presidential platforms.
Whatever the causes of the two recent failures in terms of the operational characteristics of the two aircraft involved, I think the 2011 Inspector General's report clearly shows that both of these events were clearly avoidable and could have been prevented had the FAA leadership performed their duties responsibly.
I had to pay an "inspector" $500 to review my airplane before I could fly it. I built it and knew every detail. He had never seen the plans to a 601XL before. How in the world could he have known if it was built correctly or not?
In this case, you have some bureaucrat to fly in from DC at the end of the development to "inspect" the design. These are some of the most complex machines of modern creation, and you're telling me that a pencil pusher can comprehend the end result at any useful level? All the bureaucrat is going to be able to do is verify that the paper work is filled out correctly. Because, that is the only part of the process that he truly understands. That is all my inspector really did. That is all my inspector could reasonably do. In order for him to do any more would require the sort of intimate knowledge that I had from building the thing,
This was done (so I understand) solely to make the plane more attractive to airlines that didn't want the extra expense of having to get their pilots "rated" for a new aircraft type.
And this I don't understand. Last month I was up for my BFR (In the US, private pilots have to fly with an instructor at least once every two years). I had been fly my 601XL which has a stick, but for the BFR we switch to his Cherokee that has a yoke. Totally different airplane, and I didn't have a problem, even though I hadn't flown in 6 months and we went at night. These are PROFESSIONAL pilots. I can't believe that a slightly different feel would throw them off that much.
Of course, getting a "new rating" probably means 20 hours of simulator time as if it is a completely different airplane. That would be totally on par for the FAA.
The catch is that designing a new airframe leads to new, unknown failure modes. The 737 is a tried and true airframe that a wide array of mechanics and inspectors know intimately. It's failure modes are known and protocols are in place to deal with them.
Take the Airbus crash in New York many years ago. One of the problems that led to that was an under powered horizontal stabilizer that had been serviced improperly that gave way when it fell into the wake turbulence. (It's been said that aviation accidents follow the "power of three") You had a marginal, but normally adequate structure, that was weakened by servicemen that were unfamiliar with it (repaired a composite structure as if it were aluminum), that was subsequently put into extreme service. The exact same wake turbulence was handled flawlessly by more mature airframes.
Slashdot Mirror
It'll never happen. Al Gore Rythm only has one song.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Nowhere in that article is there an apology. Whenever you mouth something and then say "but", the words you mouthed are just a cover. She was not talking about Israel with her antisemitic tweet. The was talking about Jews. She had met with Jewish members of her district two years ago to discuss her antisemitic statements, and they came away stating that she wasn't interested in learning how her antisemitic statements are damaging. She had made a similar apology only two weeks before. The House resolution was initiated to call out her antisemitism, but Nancy couldn't politically bury it since the two of them had just appeared on the cover of "Rolling Stones" together, so they chose to water it down to disguise the real target.
Fortunately, we have Jew haters like GameboyRMH to run cover for her anyway.
This more than anything else.
When I get a new phone, the first step is to disable every unnecessary pre-installed app; but, distinguishing what is unnecessary from what will completely brick the phone is generally hard. What is "Mobile Services Manager"? "Gboard"? Why would "NFL Mobile" EVER be pre-installed? How about "Standard Home"?
Why are they so ashamed of their pre-installed apps that they won't even tell you what they do?
Omar didn't apologize for her antisemitism. She apologized that it made others feel bad.
And taking a resolution denouncing antisemitism that was written to rebuke an antisemitic muslim and watering it down to denunciate all "hate" so that the particular hate in evidence can be hidden in the crowd is disgusting.
The whole investigation. Tell us this. What was Paragraph One? What was the piece of evidence that indicated a crime had occurred?
You're apparently delusional.
You start with the fact that he controls 3.1 billion in property, but then imply that he is used car salesman level con artist without a penny to back anything up. I'm simply amazed that such a convoluted model of the world can exist in anyone's head.
If he can maintain a con like that for the past 40 years, he is the most amazing, hard-working con-artist the world has ever known.
Yes. And to keep their love child a secret.
If there was intent, then why did he pay off the other mistresses BEFORE he ever started running for President. This is not Trump's first payoff rodeo. The evidence is that National Enquirer had quite a little side-line going where they would buy up and bury these types of stories.
Well, we have your analysis, and we have the analysis from former FEC Chairmen. They say you're wrong. I think they probably know more about it than you.
Difference is, Barr is the AG. Not a glorified policeman.
Please read up on FEMA. You don't have just one person doing this on an airliner, but there should be someone on the design team for that component that is doing the analysis. Each of those parts you mention has to be designed, the designs submitted for manufacturing quotes, tracked, and then assembled. There is plenty of time for failure analysis on each. For the airplane I built, considering that I had to manufacture each of those "so many parts", doing the analysis is easily doable.
Depends on the level of corruption in the particular city/county/state, but, no.
Consider that you have both a plumbing AND an electrical inspector. The scope is small enough that a single expert can confirm the code is followed. The houses are pretty much all built the same, so the inspector can be an expert in "pipes must have a 1" fall every 18", or "load bearing walls require no more than X" spacing", or whatever the code might state.
An airplane is such a complex structure, it would require an engineer of equal talent as the lead design engineer to determine if the design is adequate. Consider whether someone of that talent wants to be employed as a government pencil pusher.
The real fix is giving putting the government in charge of the infrastructure. The cable lines should never have been privately owned in the first place. I lean Libertarian, but the libertarian ideal of all roads being privately owned is insane. The ridiculous debate we're having over NN exemplifies how.
Most Americans support a $15 minimum wage, Medicare for All, ending the 8 wars we're in, tuition free college and even a federal jobs program of one kind or another. This is one nail in the coffin of the guys who've been screwing us over since the 80s (and that goes for any Dems who don't vote for it, especially in the Senate).
And the polls show that the support fades faster than a Walmart t-shirt when people are told how much those programs will cost them.
If the government were doing there job, the communications lines would be a public asset just like the roads. Anything that requires the power of imminent domain is a public asset. If it is important enough to take it by force for the public good, it is important enough to remain in the public's control. All of these issues about NN would go away if the communications infrastructure was not abusable by private entities.
you're a treasonous lying faggot.
Why the homophobia?
they may as well step back, clean house of the likes of clinton and pelosi, regroup and try again in a decade. Hopefully by then clinton and pelosi will have croaked.
And replace it with what? Acasio-Cortez? Ilhan Omar? Kamala Harris? Corey Booker?
It's amazing that I'm sitting here thinking the current crop of Dems are seasoned, respectable statesmen, due to the new loons their pushing forward.
You are right about optics, but it seems like a really stupid use of resources given it cannot actually pass, nor do any candidate any good whatsoever.
Well, other than bogus investigations that the populace is starting to see for the fishing expeditions they are, what else do the Democrats have as legislative priorities? They can't exactly vote on reparations. All the candidates are jumping on that for their presidential platforms.
The "certification process" is "filling out the correct paperwork". Yes. All the paperwork was filled out, in triplicate.
Adding more paperwork to the process will not make the plane any safer.
Whatever the causes of the two recent failures in terms of the operational characteristics of the two aircraft involved, I think the 2011 Inspector General's report clearly shows that both of these events were clearly avoidable and could have been prevented had the FAA leadership performed their duties responsibly.
I had to pay an "inspector" $500 to review my airplane before I could fly it. I built it and knew every detail. He had never seen the plans to a 601XL before. How in the world could he have known if it was built correctly or not?
In this case, you have some bureaucrat to fly in from DC at the end of the development to "inspect" the design. These are some of the most complex machines of modern creation, and you're telling me that a pencil pusher can comprehend the end result at any useful level? All the bureaucrat is going to be able to do is verify that the paper work is filled out correctly. Because, that is the only part of the process that he truly understands. That is all my inspector really did. That is all my inspector could reasonably do. In order for him to do any more would require the sort of intimate knowledge that I had from building the thing,
Because China and Soviet Russia never had any airplanes crash?
To generate paperwork.
This was done (so I understand) solely to make the plane more attractive to airlines that didn't want the extra expense of having to get their pilots "rated" for a new aircraft type.
And this I don't understand. Last month I was up for my BFR (In the US, private pilots have to fly with an instructor at least once every two years). I had been fly my 601XL which has a stick, but for the BFR we switch to his Cherokee that has a yoke. Totally different airplane, and I didn't have a problem, even though I hadn't flown in 6 months and we went at night. These are PROFESSIONAL pilots. I can't believe that a slightly different feel would throw them off that much.
Of course, getting a "new rating" probably means 20 hours of simulator time as if it is a completely different airplane. That would be totally on par for the FAA.
Correct. For me, the answer to system reliability is to put my hand on each piece and ask, "What happens when this piece fails?"
The catch is that designing a new airframe leads to new, unknown failure modes. The 737 is a tried and true airframe that a wide array of mechanics and inspectors know intimately. It's failure modes are known and protocols are in place to deal with them.
Take the Airbus crash in New York many years ago. One of the problems that led to that was an under powered horizontal stabilizer that had been serviced improperly that gave way when it fell into the wake turbulence. (It's been said that aviation accidents follow the "power of three") You had a marginal, but normally adequate structure, that was weakened by servicemen that were unfamiliar with it (repaired a composite structure as if it were aluminum), that was subsequently put into extreme service. The exact same wake turbulence was handled flawlessly by more mature airframes.