You seem to have a wonderful life. You screw women you don't respect and that don't respect you. Instead, you're both out to secretly manipulate each other.
There is only one way to conduct the next phase of testing. At some point you've got to roll it out to the real world. I guess I'll take one for the team and volunteer my services.
Since your President wasn't executed, can we then conclude that he is not a traitor.
And read the context of you copy-pasta, which was carefully chosen to reflect alternate facts. Bob Mueller was saying that he didn't want to be the one making the decision and turned it over to the AG. The AG then made the decision. NO OBSTRUCTION.
My wife is Polish, and grew up under communism. When you make college free, you have to implement some other mechanism to determine who gets to go. Otherwise, mother's would push every single child to be either a doctor or a lawyer. She aced all the tests, but was not able to get into medical school without her father making the right connection. Turns out, that is how ALL the med students got in. We're seeing the same thing here with the publication of the recent admission scandals.
People pushing socialism and communism like to pretend that it would just make everyone equal. It won't. It just hands the decision making off to bureaucrats and politicians, which then use their power for personal gain. The resources are still limited, only the person getting rich off their utilization changes.
How is this any different than a typical 4 year degree? At least they have a vested interest in getting you placed in a job somewhere. It'll probably be a crap job, but I've been in positions before that were "great places to be from".
And after two and a half years, you have a career (or at least a job) and two years of work experience.
If you can afford it, a university will cost you 15 to 20K per year, not provide you with a stipend to cross the gap, and take four years. At the end of all that, you'll have 100K of debt and no work experience.
For someone starting out, coming from meager means, getting started fast is more beneficial than the "castle in the sky" university. This program would offer a large swath of people hope...a way out. A four year degree is not even a consideration, no matter how smart they are.
Once they have the low end job making a decent wage, they can then work on a 4 year degree, usually with the company they're working for picking up the tab on tuition, fees, and books. It's how I got through college without debt.
More sensors of the same type is not good FEMA. You want to cross reference sensors of completely different type. This is what actual pilots do when they do not have outside reference.
The altimeter is increasing. The engine is at a climb RPM. Airspeed is near stall. GPS confirms speed and shows altitude is increasing. The AoA sensor indicates high. ALL of these conditions are necessary for a power on stall. It is criminally irresponsible to modify the flight characteristics without a crosscheck.
The engine is nearly over revving. The VSI indicates a descent. Airpseed is high. GPS says ground speed is high and altitude is decreasing. AoA indicator is high. A clear indication that the AoA is BROKEN.
FUCK BOEING!! They didn't even need to add the second sensor. ALL of that data is in their computer and transmitted to the airlines flight controllers already. Please, for the love of God, would somebody please tell me I have something wrong here!
But, those physical objects are meant to provide information about the physical world, which should correlate with the information garnered from other physical devices meant to provide information about the physical world. Barring a micro-burst, which by definition is very small, all of the sensors should correlate. If the AoA indicator is reading high, the altimeter should be increasing, or the airspeed should be very low. The GPS would confirm the readings of all three. This is how actual pilots confirm their instruments are reading correctly when they are in the clouds and have no ground reference.
Question: Why does Boeing NOT have a computer that cross references all available data and flag a bad indicator? Hell, I could do that in a spreadsheet with the data that my Dynon D-100 flight computer provides, and it's over ten years old.
The logical fallacy is that the effects from the amount of BPA ingested that way, pales in comparison to the effects of eating the fast food. You're worrying about starving to death in a vacuum.
It's 2019. Recycling paper is at just virtue signalling in its best light. In realistic light, it is counter productive. It cost more to collect and recycle, than to make new paper from farmed trees.
And because of the email, there is no longer any point to a daily mail operation, and it is long past time that we got rid of home delivery for all but the disabled. Most of that infrastructure needs to be rolled back.
I live in an area covered by "forest" that are nothing but pine trees slated to make paper. I'm not sure if it is still the case, but the largest landowner in North Carolina used to be a paper producer. Nobody wants your old growth forest, with its knarled trees of varying sizes and species, for paper making. The want truckloads of small, soft pine trees all of practically the exact same size.
The paper will also wind up in a bio-reactor land fill, where it will be converted to methane, and then clean electricity.
I'd prefer not to get most receipts, as they just pile up in my car until I get around to throwing them out, but passing a law to ban in an age when most places are starting to ask you if you even want them is just political groping.
Slashdot Mirror
Not yours. And not as an introduction.
The problem is that Mueller released his "report" a week too early.
You seem to have a wonderful life. You screw women you don't respect and that don't respect you. Instead, you're both out to secretly manipulate each other.
Do you have a newsletter I could subscribe to?
No. That is socialism. At least the horse in Animal Farm said it was so.
There is only one way to conduct the next phase of testing. At some point you've got to roll it out to the real world. I guess I'll take one for the team and volunteer my services.
Since your President wasn't executed, can we then conclude that he is not a traitor.
And read the context of you copy-pasta, which was carefully chosen to reflect alternate facts. Bob Mueller was saying that he didn't want to be the one making the decision and turned it over to the AG. The AG then made the decision. NO OBSTRUCTION.
My wife is Polish, and grew up under communism. When you make college free, you have to implement some other mechanism to determine who gets to go. Otherwise, mother's would push every single child to be either a doctor or a lawyer. She aced all the tests, but was not able to get into medical school without her father making the right connection. Turns out, that is how ALL the med students got in. We're seeing the same thing here with the publication of the recent admission scandals.
People pushing socialism and communism like to pretend that it would just make everyone equal. It won't. It just hands the decision making off to bureaucrats and politicians, which then use their power for personal gain. The resources are still limited, only the person getting rich off their utilization changes.
How is this any different than a typical 4 year degree? At least they have a vested interest in getting you placed in a job somewhere. It'll probably be a crap job, but I've been in positions before that were "great places to be from".
And after two and a half years, you have a career (or at least a job) and two years of work experience.
If you can afford it, a university will cost you 15 to 20K per year, not provide you with a stipend to cross the gap, and take four years. At the end of all that, you'll have 100K of debt and no work experience.
For someone starting out, coming from meager means, getting started fast is more beneficial than the "castle in the sky" university. This program would offer a large swath of people hope...a way out. A four year degree is not even a consideration, no matter how smart they are.
Once they have the low end job making a decent wage, they can then work on a 4 year degree, usually with the company they're working for picking up the tab on tuition, fees, and books. It's how I got through college without debt.
I've talked to many of them. I'd go with indoctrinated over educated. Their critical thinking skills rank on level with an 18 yr old.
With all the money he's got, tell him to get his lazy ass up and by a decent chair. Quit sitting on the data storage box.
Said the guy that has obviously never tried walking barefoot across an asphalt road in summer.
Hint: To avoid blisters on the bottom of your feet, walk on the white stripes.
And theft resistant.
Could you have a Beowulf cluster of toll sign monitors?
You're obviously a racist. Lawyers and politicians ARE the same species. Just like, due to the cross breading, journalists now are.
Which raises a question. Why doesn't Kim have it, with his close resemblance to a frog?
More sensors of the same type is not good FEMA. You want to cross reference sensors of completely different type. This is what actual pilots do when they do not have outside reference.
The altimeter is increasing. The engine is at a climb RPM. Airspeed is near stall. GPS confirms speed and shows altitude is increasing. The AoA sensor indicates high. ALL of these conditions are necessary for a power on stall. It is criminally irresponsible to modify the flight characteristics without a crosscheck.
The engine is nearly over revving. The VSI indicates a descent. Airpseed is high. GPS says ground speed is high and altitude is decreasing. AoA indicator is high. A clear indication that the AoA is BROKEN.
FUCK BOEING!! They didn't even need to add the second sensor. ALL of that data is in their computer and transmitted to the airlines flight controllers already. Please, for the love of God, would somebody please tell me I have something wrong here!
But, those physical objects are meant to provide information about the physical world, which should correlate with the information garnered from other physical devices meant to provide information about the physical world. Barring a micro-burst, which by definition is very small, all of the sensors should correlate. If the AoA indicator is reading high, the altimeter should be increasing, or the airspeed should be very low. The GPS would confirm the readings of all three. This is how actual pilots confirm their instruments are reading correctly when they are in the clouds and have no ground reference.
Question: Why does Boeing NOT have a computer that cross references all available data and flag a bad indicator? Hell, I could do that in a spreadsheet with the data that my Dynon D-100 flight computer provides, and it's over ten years old.
No. He (and everyone else) needs to walk out without taking the receipt.
-OR-
Tear off the useful part, and leave them with the rest.
The logical fallacy is that the effects from the amount of BPA ingested that way, pales in comparison to the effects of eating the fast food. You're worrying about starving to death in a vacuum.
It's 2019. Recycling paper is at just virtue signalling in its best light. In realistic light, it is counter productive. It cost more to collect and recycle, than to make new paper from farmed trees.
And because of the email, there is no longer any point to a daily mail operation, and it is long past time that we got rid of home delivery for all but the disabled. Most of that infrastructure needs to be rolled back.
I live in an area covered by "forest" that are nothing but pine trees slated to make paper. I'm not sure if it is still the case, but the largest landowner in North Carolina used to be a paper producer. Nobody wants your old growth forest, with its knarled trees of varying sizes and species, for paper making. The want truckloads of small, soft pine trees all of practically the exact same size.
The paper will also wind up in a bio-reactor land fill, where it will be converted to methane, and then clean electricity.
I'd prefer not to get most receipts, as they just pile up in my car until I get around to throwing them out, but passing a law to ban in an age when most places are starting to ask you if you even want them is just political groping.
Then why are people lining up at our southern border to get in here?
Yes, and removal of our troops from places like Syria and South Korea.
you could even give it a fancy, Chinese name. I suggest "Qi"