Have you considered what you didn't see? The hours of demeaning questions and beratement from Katie Curric? I found the presses treatment of Palin to be very snotty. After a while of that treatment, my attitude would turn to "fuck you". Palin's response seemed to be very much in the "fuck you" territory to me.
Only if you moochers and looters get your way and install the authoritarian rule that is necessary to "spread the wealth". Then anyone speaking the truth will have to do it in hushed tones.
Newt isn't president yet. He doesn't even have the Republican nomination. It's amazing that you can see how much this issue didn't get in his way in the future.
Well the perjury part might come about because he lied under oath. Note the "under oath" part. It's important.
Again, I don't care. As I said before, if some slimy lawyer asked you under oath about the sexual positions you enjoy with your wife, should you answer him? No, he should be disbarred, and if the court doesn't do that, the court deserves no respect.
So, you don't answer him. You say, "I'm not going to answer that." If the judge thinks you SHOULD answer it, you can still refuse, though you might spend some time in the pokey on contempt charges. As it is, Clinton was on trial for sexual harassment charges. Having sex with subordinates is very germane to a sexual harassment trial. He was under oath and chose to lie. He didn't choose to refuse to answer the question. He chose to LIE, and thereby making a mockery of the entire justice system.
And Obstruction of Justice is one of those charges that frequently gets thrown at people who lie to the police and other government investigators.
Political BS. If the government investigators are asking inappropriate questions, then lying to them is not wrong. It was none of their business.
Lying under oath is WRONG. Saying "That is none of your damn business" is completely appropriate. Unfortunately, as I stated above, due to the circumstances the question was completely germaine.
Note also that this was NOT in regards to Monica, but in regards to a Sexual Harassment charge made by whatsername from Arkansas.
That's certainly not what I remember. I remember Monica and that fat bitch Linda Tripp that blew the story. The Paula whatshername thing was a separate matter from what I remember.
You might want to brush up. Your memory is failing you. Paula Jones brought a sexual harassment suit, and Linda Tripp tipped off the investigators that Slick Willie was still up to his old tricks.
Note further that the Supremes had rules shortly before that trial that "consent" didn't make it any less sexual harassment when your boss tells you he'd like to bang you.
So it's "sexual harassment" if you willingly have sex with your boss? That's BS. The Supremes can go fuck themselves for all I care. That's the same shitty court that ruled that private companies can use eminent domain to seize peoples' homes. I have no respect for any rulings they've made in the last couple decades.
Whether YOU have any respect is irrelevant. The feminazis have pushed the scope of sexual harassment beyond the point of being beyond ridiculous. One of the corporate training sessions I was forced to sit through claimed that if a woman overheard you commenting about another woman, it could be construed as sexual harassment. The Clinton trial simply demonstrated that with enough money or power, the rules that control the rest of us don't apply to you.
Considering how he has already announced his candidacy, how can your slander be considered "informative"? And how can ANYTHING from Rachel Maddow be considered informative? Who gave the Koolaid sippers mod points?
What makes you think he, or anyone in his organization, had/have any idea, whatsoever, what Tor is? Why do you assume that your area of expertise is common knowledge throughout the world?
Do you mean that the article is a dupe, or that Google is duplicating the mistake Microsoft made with ActiveX and the whole "it is so convenient to let anyone in the world do whatever they please on my computer" mentality?
That is a bother. It's about as bad as the HuffPo site comments that blame Bush for personally executing 15,000 Iraqis a day and physically planting the the explosive that brought down the Twin Towers, while Sarah Palin was rounding up operatives to shoot down moderate Democrats with the aid of campaign posters.
You won't notice it in the picture, but the rotor blades would not be spaced evenly. You disperse the energy amount different frequencies if you space the blades just so. You can learn a lot from searching through the NASA LARC servers (publicly available).
I thought it was neat when I pulled the fan from my 2000 Dodge Dakota pickup, and the blades weren't spaced evenly there either. (No,I hadn't wrecked it.)
Perhaps it's in us urban-dwellers' interest that at least some sane people be encouraged to grow our food?
The post office doesn't generally get any money from the general fund.
Are people who are incapable of socializing without a federally provided post-office counted among the clinically sane now? I'm sorry. I must have missed the memo.
And after all that verbiage, why would I care that you are so socially clueless, and so lacking in personal initiative that you can't talk to people unless the federal government provides you with a post-office to collect in?
Yeah, because people want know how to get out and talk to each other if there isn't a post-office to draw them together.
What is it with people that think every possible need they'd ever consider should be supplied by a national government? Jeesh, can't the Post Office just be a business tasked with delivering mail?
So, you're saying it is an extreme burden to drive the extra five miles? Or are you saying that the post office is close, and they're already having to walk through the snow uphill both both ways, and hitching up Betsy the horse it just to much work to go after a package? Or maybe it is your contention that it is the job of the Federal Postal Service to provide you with a point of social contact?
Do these red-herrings ever stain your hands? All these memes from the 1930's have me feeling like I should head home and watch some episodes of "Green Acres" (a sometimes funny American sit-com from the 1950's).
I will give you that you said it was "insane from a purely economic standpoint to maintain", so at least you do realize that it is economics we're talking about.
I'm using a MegaSquirt DIY electronic engine control unit. Currently, to get a full engine instrument cluster, I need to keep a full fledged laptop in the cockpit. (The tuning / engine gauge software is a program running on Linux.) Unless making updates to the tuning, no keyboard is required.
This device would be an INCREDIBLE advancement for me. I could hide it anywhere behind the panel, run a USB-to-Serial converter over to the MegaSquirt, and then run the HDMI to a 7" remote display.
I'm sure there could be a lot of other embedded applications where a nice GUI and portability to desktop systems would make a world of improvement.
I use my 3 monitor setup for my flight simulator, Xplane. I welded together a mount to hold all 3 so that I sit "inside" it, with one flat and the wings coming off at 45 degrees. A proper landing is done with a lot of attention paid to the peripheral vision. Forward vision helps you maintain pitch, but it is what is flashing by in the peripheral that gives you the sense of height.
My simulator landings improve 100% after I installed the three monitors.
Now, if my REAL landings could be improved so easily.
Certainly, OBL wasn't stupid - he'll have kept himself as cut-out as possible, against just this eventuality.
Stupidity or intelligence often doesn't cover up for emotional foibles. "That information is on a need-to-know basis, and I don't need to know it.", is a good movie line, but rarely heard in the real world. Do you think the guy could really keep his fingers completely out of the pie? I don't have a psychological analysis, but I would find that hard to believe.
The immediate targets this will provide may only be good for about 6 months before the value evaporates. The subsequent ripples of suspicion and fratricide however could be good for 2+ years in the future.
They got the nickname of the courier ten years ago from waterboarding. Even unreliable intelligence has a very long shelf life.
Stupid is contextual. He knew a lot about guns and explosives. Those were the tools of his trade. If I were in his position/mindset, I would think that my instinct would be to load the computer with explosive, with the mentality that I could blow it up. Most people here immediately think encryption as a solution, because that is a tool THEY are comfortable with.
Of course, he was living under the shadow of the Pakistan military. He had already been tipped off when Clinton tried to bomb him. He probably thought he was plenty safe from harm. He wasn't expecting us to break international protocol and invade Pakistan without getting permission (allowing him to get another tip-off).
Obama has pretty much been a complete buffoon for his entire Presidency, but he got this one right.
Slashdot Mirror
Have you considered what you didn't see? The hours of demeaning questions and beratement from Katie Curric? I found the presses treatment of Palin to be very snotty. After a while of that treatment, my attitude would turn to "fuck you". Palin's response seemed to be very much in the "fuck you" territory to me.
Only if you moochers and looters get your way and install the authoritarian rule that is necessary to "spread the wealth". Then anyone speaking the truth will have to do it in hushed tones.
Damn! That was good, Grishnakh.
That is the best refutation of this tired racist nonsense I have heard to date.
Newt isn't president yet. He doesn't even have the Republican nomination. It's amazing that you can see how much this issue didn't get in his way in the future.
Well the perjury part might come about because he lied under oath. Note the "under oath" part. It's important.
Again, I don't care. As I said before, if some slimy lawyer asked you under oath about the sexual positions you enjoy with your wife, should you answer him? No, he should be disbarred, and if the court doesn't do that, the court deserves no respect.
So, you don't answer him. You say, "I'm not going to answer that." If the judge thinks you SHOULD answer it, you can still refuse, though you might spend some time in the pokey on contempt charges. As it is, Clinton was on trial for sexual harassment charges. Having sex with subordinates is very germane to a sexual harassment trial. He was under oath and chose to lie. He didn't choose to refuse to answer the question. He chose to LIE, and thereby making a mockery of the entire justice system.
And Obstruction of Justice is one of those charges that frequently gets thrown at people who lie to the police and other government investigators.
Political BS. If the government investigators are asking inappropriate questions, then lying to them is not wrong. It was none of their business.
Lying under oath is WRONG. Saying "That is none of your damn business" is completely appropriate. Unfortunately, as I stated above, due to the circumstances the question was completely germaine.
Note also that this was NOT in regards to Monica, but in regards to a Sexual Harassment charge made by whatsername from Arkansas.
That's certainly not what I remember. I remember Monica and that fat bitch Linda Tripp that blew the story. The Paula whatshername thing was a separate matter from what I remember.
You might want to brush up. Your memory is failing you. Paula Jones brought a sexual harassment suit, and Linda Tripp tipped off the investigators that Slick Willie was still up to his old tricks.
Note further that the Supremes had rules shortly before that trial that "consent" didn't make it any less sexual harassment when your boss tells you he'd like to bang you.
So it's "sexual harassment" if you willingly have sex with your boss? That's BS. The Supremes can go fuck themselves for all I care. That's the same shitty court that ruled that private companies can use eminent domain to seize peoples' homes. I have no respect for any rulings they've made in the last couple decades.
Whether YOU have any respect is irrelevant. The feminazis have pushed the scope of sexual harassment beyond the point of being beyond ridiculous. One of the corporate training sessions I was forced to sit through claimed that if a woman overheard you commenting about another woman, it could be construed as sexual harassment. The Clinton trial simply demonstrated that with enough money or power, the rules that control the rest of us don't apply to you.
And since when does Obama care about unilateral invasions (re: Pakistand, Libya)?
Do you realize who New Gingrich is? You know, the big, fat, pasty old guy? I'd rather tune in to something starring Ron Jeremy over Newt.
Dude, I'm getting sick now.
Considering how he has already announced his candidacy, how can your slander be considered "informative"? And how can ANYTHING from Rachel Maddow be considered informative? Who gave the Koolaid sippers mod points?
What makes you think he, or anyone in his organization, had/have any idea, whatsoever, what Tor is? Why do you assume that your area of expertise is common knowledge throughout the world?
Do you mean that the article is a dupe, or that Google is duplicating the mistake Microsoft made with ActiveX and the whole "it is so convenient to let anyone in the world do whatever they please on my computer" mentality?
I still have mine. Found it in the closet the other day.
But will the Wesleys all wear red shirts?
That is a bother. It's about as bad as the HuffPo site comments that blame Bush for personally executing 15,000 Iraqis a day and physically planting the the explosive that brought down the Twin Towers, while Sarah Palin was rounding up operatives to shoot down moderate Democrats with the aid of campaign posters.
Counts just as much as the liberal propaganda.
I'm more into the libertarian propaganda lately, though.
You won't notice it in the picture, but the rotor blades would not be spaced evenly. You disperse the energy amount different frequencies if you space the blades just so. You can learn a lot from searching through the NASA LARC servers (publicly available).
I thought it was neat when I pulled the fan from my 2000 Dodge Dakota pickup, and the blades weren't spaced evenly there either. (No,I hadn't wrecked it.)
In Special Ops, the saying is, "If the public knows about it, it is obsolete."
So it is bad when a coal plant externalizes their cost. But just fine when rural people do it.
OK. I understand now (NOT!!)
Perhaps it's in us urban-dwellers' interest that at least some sane people be encouraged to grow our food?
The post office doesn't generally get any money from the general fund.
Are people who are incapable of socializing without a federally provided post-office counted among the clinically sane now? I'm sorry. I must have missed the memo.
And after all that verbiage, why would I care that you are so socially clueless, and so lacking in personal initiative that you can't talk to people unless the federal government provides you with a post-office to collect in?
Yeah, because people want know how to get out and talk to each other if there isn't a post-office to draw them together.
What is it with people that think every possible need they'd ever consider should be supplied by a national government? Jeesh, can't the Post Office just be a business tasked with delivering mail?
So, you're saying it is an extreme burden to drive the extra five miles? Or are you saying that the post office is close, and they're already having to walk through the snow uphill both both ways, and hitching up Betsy the horse it just to much work to go after a package? Or maybe it is your contention that it is the job of the Federal Postal Service to provide you with a point of social contact?
Do these red-herrings ever stain your hands? All these memes from the 1930's have me feeling like I should head home and watch some episodes of "Green Acres" (a sometimes funny American sit-com from the 1950's).
I will give you that you said it was "insane from a purely economic standpoint to maintain", so at least you do realize that it is economics we're talking about.
I'm using a MegaSquirt DIY electronic engine control unit. Currently, to get a full engine instrument cluster, I need to keep a full fledged laptop in the cockpit. (The tuning / engine gauge software is a program running on Linux.) Unless making updates to the tuning, no keyboard is required.
This device would be an INCREDIBLE advancement for me. I could hide it anywhere behind the panel, run a USB-to-Serial converter over to the MegaSquirt, and then run the HDMI to a 7" remote display.
I'm sure there could be a lot of other embedded applications where a nice GUI and portability to desktop systems would make a world of improvement.
I use my 3 monitor setup for my flight simulator, Xplane. I welded together a mount to hold all 3 so that I sit "inside" it, with one flat and the wings coming off at 45 degrees. A proper landing is done with a lot of attention paid to the peripheral vision. Forward vision helps you maintain pitch, but it is what is flashing by in the peripheral that gives you the sense of height.
My simulator landings improve 100% after I installed the three monitors.
Now, if my REAL landings could be improved so easily.
Certainly, OBL wasn't stupid - he'll have kept himself as cut-out as possible, against just this eventuality.
Stupidity or intelligence often doesn't cover up for emotional foibles. "That information is on a need-to-know basis, and I don't need to know it.", is a good movie line, but rarely heard in the real world. Do you think the guy could really keep his fingers completely out of the pie? I don't have a psychological analysis, but I would find that hard to believe.
The immediate targets this will provide may only be good for about 6 months before the value evaporates. The subsequent ripples of suspicion and fratricide however could be good for 2+ years in the future.
They got the nickname of the courier ten years ago from waterboarding. Even unreliable intelligence has a very long shelf life.
Stupid is contextual. He knew a lot about guns and explosives. Those were the tools of his trade. If I were in his position/mindset, I would think that my instinct would be to load the computer with explosive, with the mentality that I could blow it up. Most people here immediately think encryption as a solution, because that is a tool THEY are comfortable with.
Of course, he was living under the shadow of the Pakistan military. He had already been tipped off when Clinton tried to bomb him. He probably thought he was plenty safe from harm. He wasn't expecting us to break international protocol and invade Pakistan without getting permission (allowing him to get another tip-off).
Obama has pretty much been a complete buffoon for his entire Presidency, but he got this one right.