Apollo 9 was a earth orbital mission only. Apollo 8 orbited the moon, but without a Lunar Module. Apollo 9 was the first manned test of the Lunar Module - but only in Earth Orbit. Also it launched March 9th, 1969, after Soyuz 4 and 5.
The early model wrt54g s did use linux, then they "upgraded" the later models (actually cut the amount of ram) and replaced linux with something else. By popular demand the produced the GL, which is the original model.
I'm upset with RH... Here I am trying to sell, sell, sell Linux to my company. I have some sort of success but I suck it up and we standardize on what is NOT my first choice, namely RedHat. Now they pull the rug out from under me.
But the carbon that would be lost during the conversion from plants to fossil fuel would eventually be recycled back into plants, which would be converted into fossil fuels...
Actually, this statement is pretty consistent with their (ridiculous) viewpoint and legal opinion that anything that was every developed for or from or used the same bathroom as sysV is their IP and belongs to them.
They are claiming that they OWN linux, because their view is, it is a deriviative (by their definition) of sysV.
they're crooks and they lie too!
on
SCO's Plan Examined
·
· Score: -1, Flamebait
I wonder just how lone it took how many monkeys to detirmine that there is millions of lines of infringing code.
I just flatly DO NOT believe its possible!
Seriously, what is there algorithm for detecting infringing lines of code? Maybe they are going by file names? ie there is a file name called printk.c in the linux kernel and one in sys V.... It must be a copy!!!!
Funny, in 2.4.22-rc2 I could only find "mutex_spinlock" in./arch/ia64/sn/io/sn2/pcibr/pcibr_intr.c./arch/ia64/sn/io/sn2/xbow.c./arch/ia64/sn/io/io.c./include/asm-ia64/sn/sgi.h./include/asm-ia64/sn/router.h
Why does Ballmer think that allowing more people to just look at the source code is going to do any good? Why would anybody want to? You can't do anything with it... in fact, it could be argued that one would be forever "tainted" in some legal sense... If you argue to so that one could possible use some undocumentated feature, I say it shouldn't be undocumented!
Doesn't the BSD license allow other companies
to use your code without compensation? I understand that parts of the windows TCP stack are actually from BSD.
I believe sleepycat software http://www.sleepycat.com uses GPL for people who want it free and their own license for companies
who need it.
Slashdot Mirror
What really drives things (no pun intended) around here are the school buses.
First they go around and pick up and deliver the High and Middle schoolers ,
then the Elementary school kids.
Suggesting two sets of buses or (gasp!) doing the elementary kids first would
be dismissed as lunacy.
Apollo 9 was a earth orbital mission only. Apollo 8 orbited the moon, but
without a Lunar Module. Apollo 9 was the first manned test of the Lunar Module - but
only in Earth Orbit. Also it launched March 9th, 1969, after Soyuz 4 and 5.
The early model wrt54g s did use linux,
then they "upgraded" the later models
(actually cut the amount of ram) and replaced
linux with something else. By popular
demand the produced the GL, which is the
original model.
It can really analyse the water samples? Wow, I'm impressed.
NASA really wants the probe to get a wash down.
Buy More is such a rip of Best Buy.
The end of TinyURL is in sight. Yes, this is (probably) a clever hack.
But this is a misuse of a really useful service.
When TinyURL's administrator has to either go out and buy his
second 2Terabyte disk array in a week or shutdown, which do
you think he will pick?
This is just another indication that
IBM "gets" Open Source
I'm upset with RH... Here I am
trying to sell, sell, sell
Linux to my company.
I have some sort of success but I
suck it up and we standardize on
what is NOT my first choice, namely
RedHat. Now they pull the rug out from
under me.
But the carbon that would be lost during the
conversion from plants to fossil fuel would
eventually be recycled back into plants, which would
be converted into fossil fuels...
etc. etc.
Actually, this statement is pretty consistent with
their (ridiculous) viewpoint and legal opinion that anything that was every developed for or from or used the same bathroom as sysV is their IP and belongs to them.
They are claiming that they OWN linux, because their
view is, it is a deriviative (by their definition) of sysV.
What a surprise.
This code, indeed the whole module, is
not even in 2.4.22-rc2.
Is it legal to copy code from bsd and
apply the GPL to it?
I wonder just how lone it took how many
monkeys to detirmine that there is millions
of lines of infringing code.
I just flatly DO NOT believe its possible!
Seriously, what is there algorithm for detecting
infringing lines of code? Maybe they are going
by file names? ie there is a file name called
printk.c in the linux kernel and one in sys V....
It must be a copy!!!!
Funny, in 2.4.22-rc2 ./arch/ia64/sn/io/sn2/pcibr/pcibr_intr.c ./arch/ia64/sn/io/sn2/xbow.c ./arch/ia64/sn/io/io.c ./include/asm-ia64/sn/sgi.h ./include/asm-ia64/sn/router.h
I could only find "mutex_spinlock" in
"mutex_spinlock(maplock"
appears NOWHERE!
... will they get any smarter?
Why does Ballmer think that allowing more people
to just look at the source code is going to do
any good? Why would anybody want to? You can't
do anything with it... in fact, it could be
argued that one would be forever "tainted" in
some legal sense... If you argue to so that
one could possible use some undocumentated feature, I say it shouldn't be undocumented!
Doesn't the BSD license allow other companies
to use your code without compensation? I understand that parts of the windows TCP stack are actually from BSD.
I believe sleepycat software http://www.sleepycat.com uses GPL for people who want it free and their own license for companies
who need it.