This goes with this investing advice that "the ideal amount of time to hold a stock for is forever".
If that was the ideal time and everyone did it, then there would be no need for a market because no one would trade. I don't think anyone would advise "forever". The "ideal" time, if one exists (and it doesn't) would be some non-trivial fraction of the investor's lifetime.
While stealing your previous employer's customers may not be illegal (I'm not sure), using confidential and proprietary knowledge (that is necessarily not in the public domain) to do so is. I think you'd better be careful about what you tell your new employer about your old employer's customers.
Using confidential info is a different issue from non-competition clauses.
As I've responded before, let the Interface Hall of Shame disuade you of the opinion that Windows, MS apps on Windows, or third party apps on Windows are consistant in their user interface. That being said, it is difficult for any OS to enforce consistancy of third party apps.
IBM is now making most of its money doing services. In addition, their technology group (storage technology, basic research, chip research (SOI, coppoer, who do you think helps AMD fabricate)) is doing a booming business. IBM is not the same company it was ten or twenty years ago.
Hmm...As far as I know, Monterey is 90% AIX. SCO figures into it in that they are bringing their application base and marketing.
Besides, AIX is really a good operating system. Traditional UNIX people say that it isn't but when they talk about filesytems they tout UNIX's journalled filesystems without recognizing that AIX had JFS since 1990. They talk about HP/UX's logical volume manager and Solaris' (actually Vertitas') disksuite and volume manager, little recognizing that AIX had it since 1990 (in fact, HP licensed theirs from IBM). They bemoan AIX's non-standard management with the ODM being used for LPP's (package management) and device managment, but since when is Solaris' package system "true UNIX", and look at how we tout systems like RPM or Debian's dpkg/apt, when the package mgmt. has been in AIX since 1990.
IBM brought some good technology from their mainframe experience. The brought a credibility to UNIX in the business community's eyes when they rolled out their own UNIX in 1990/1. Look at how sales of HP/UX systems grew only after IBM launched AIX.
Distros are for wimps! I install everything from source! If I want to build another system, I attach a disk to a running system and install from source! Why back in the old days, we didn't even have autoconfigure. Make!? For wimps!. Figure out the dependencies yourself! And you should know all the compile options by heart.
Jeez you kids. You don't know how easy you have it.
The DHCP server communicates with the DDNS, advising it of necessary updates. You set up your DDNS server so that it only accepts DNS change requests from the DHCP servers in your network.
I'll point you to the User Interface Hall of Shame in hopes of disuading you of the notion that Microsoft creates a good user interface that is also consistent...
I believe IBM introduced into AIX 4.3.x some system calls that allow you to read from disk then send over the network without having to copy from kernel space into user space and back again. That should speed up static web page serving and even FTP's. There is no reason why this should cause security problems, as long as you are not allowed to modify the buffer contents.
Slashdot Mirror
This goes with this investing advice that "the ideal amount of time to hold a stock for is forever".
If that was the ideal time and everyone did it, then there would be no need for a market because no one would trade. I don't think anyone would advise "forever". The "ideal" time, if one exists (and it doesn't) would be some non-trivial fraction of the investor's lifetime.
While stealing your previous employer's customers may not be illegal (I'm not sure), using confidential and proprietary knowledge (that is necessarily not in the public domain) to do so is. I think you'd better be careful about what you tell your new employer about your old employer's customers.
Using confidential info is a different issue from non-competition clauses.
Well, I thought I read on a Government of Canada Website that it hadn't been decided yet, but perhaps they have chosen NU:
http://www.gov.nu.ca/
As I've responded before, let the Interface Hall of Shame disuade you of the opinion that Windows, MS apps on Windows, or third party apps on Windows are consistant in their user interface. That being said, it is difficult for any OS to enforce consistancy of third party apps.
I thinnk you misspelled "CD-ROM tray" as "cupholder". :-)
IBM is now making most of its money doing services. In addition, their technology group (storage technology, basic research, chip research (SOI, coppoer, who do you think helps AMD fabricate)) is doing a booming business. IBM is not the same company it was ten or twenty years ago.
Hmm...As far as I know, Monterey is 90% AIX. SCO figures into it in that they are bringing their application base and marketing.
Besides, AIX is really a good operating system. Traditional UNIX people say that it isn't but when they talk about filesytems they tout UNIX's journalled filesystems without recognizing that AIX had JFS since 1990. They talk about HP/UX's logical volume manager and Solaris' (actually Vertitas') disksuite and volume manager, little recognizing that AIX had it since 1990 (in fact, HP licensed theirs from IBM). They bemoan AIX's non-standard management with the ODM being used for LPP's (package management) and device managment, but since when is Solaris' package system "true UNIX", and look at how we tout systems like RPM or Debian's dpkg/apt, when the package mgmt. has been in AIX since 1990.
IBM brought some good technology from their mainframe experience. The brought a credibility to UNIX in the business community's eyes when they rolled out their own UNIX in 1990/1. Look at how sales of HP/UX systems grew only after IBM launched AIX.
'Nuf said.
Distros are for wimps! I install everything from source! If I want to build another system, I attach a disk to a running system and install from source! Why back in the old days, we didn't even have autoconfigure. Make!? For wimps!. Figure out the dependencies yourself! And you should know all the compile options by heart.
Jeez you kids. You don't know how easy you have it.
The secure server edition includes Apache with mod_ssl, plus docs on how to obtain a public key from a couple of the bigs CA's using your DUNS number.
What an amazing quote! The more things change, the more they stay the same.
The DHCP server communicates with the DDNS, advising it of necessary updates. You set up your DDNS server so that it only accepts DNS change requests from the DHCP servers in your network.
I'll point you to the User Interface Hall of Shame in hopes of disuading you of the notion that Microsoft creates a good user interface that is also consistent...
Bruce
I believe IBM introduced into AIX 4.3.x some system calls that allow you to read from disk then send over the network without having to copy from kernel space into user space and back again. That should speed up static web page serving and even FTP's. There is no reason why this should cause security problems, as long as you are not allowed to modify the buffer contents.