If you would like a account , i'd be happy to sign you up for a account with your desired email/username/default password and read the captcha for you.
Re:Swiss Internet voting built on two-factor authe
on
Buggy Voting Machines
·
· Score: 1
What a bullshit statement , that fault is common to every form of voting.Frankly its upto a person if they want to vote. How do you solve your problem with postal votes?How bout normal votes with people in adjacent booths?essentially what voters are concerned about is that only eligible votes count (only one vote per person) and the fact that the vote they cast gets counted for that candidate.
The australian election was decided by many issues.
Some of these are:
1. John Howard is the best political operator in australias history for manipulating the people.I don't like the man or his policies, but he plays the game well.
2. Latham was inexperienced and seen as lacking the experience to be PM. Labour since Keating lost has lacked a leader with the qualities to inspire confidence in the leader as a PM , Beazely was seen as lacking charisma (he just lacked the touch with the people),Crean was ultimately seen the same way and not given a chance by the beazley faction in labour.
3. Most importantly for me , labour didn't put it policies across right.
4. Liberals played a scare tactic game with interest rates that labour didn't respond too. Which was frankly bullshit. Australias interest raters are lower than nearly everywhere else and are far under the world average.
5. Liberals bought votes prior to the election with some family assistance payments that was plain out cash bribery.
6. The australian populace seems to be a sucker for believing in john howard (many scandals which i think should have brought him down such as children overboard,the governor generals history with coverups in the anglican church,lies over WMD in iraq etc.
Frankly John Howard seems to have a very slick exterior and nothing sticks to him.
The man is doing some damage to our country and is imho one of our most damaging politicians for the people but he is the best at playing the game at the moment.
Disclaimer I'm a aussie and i've voted labour last two elections because i disagree with the Liberals policies.
Re:Swiss Internet voting built on two-factor authe
on
Buggy Voting Machines
·
· Score: 1
It could be made anonymous using public key authentication , read up on the work of david chaum on anonymous and secure e-cash. simply 1 token allows 1 vote. secure the token dispensation (electoral roll) and secure the voting machine which could be a website or a pc running with a browser and a net connection and checked by third parties. personally i see an approach like this to be only way to get secure and anonymous e-voting. bonus no disputed elections, no need for recounts though in theory they could be performed.voters could check there vote, and verify it went to who it was they voted for.
on the topic of diebold and bush , i just say diebold has a history of insecure machines based on what i have read and shouldn't be allowed near it with a barge pole. also the source code for voting should be open , and the exes able to be checksummed so independant authorities can verify the software is the version it says it is.
Disclaimer : I'm not a fucking american and i give thanks for that.
Slashdot Mirror
php5 seems just to be a copy of java.. pffft i've got no time for it. real men code stuff in perl :p
Email me ze@ii.net with your desired details
If you would like a account , i'd be happy to sign you up for a account with your desired email /username/default password and read the captcha for you.
What a bullshit statement , that fault is common to every form of voting.Frankly its upto a person if they want to vote. How do you solve your problem with postal votes?How bout normal votes with people in adjacent booths?essentially what voters are concerned about is that only eligible votes count (only one vote per person) and the fact that the vote they cast gets counted for that candidate.
The australian election was decided by many issues.
:
Some of these are
1. John Howard is the best political operator in australias history for manipulating the people.I don't like the man or his policies, but he plays the game well.
2. Latham was inexperienced and seen as lacking the experience to be PM. Labour since Keating lost has lacked a leader with the qualities to inspire confidence in the leader as a PM , Beazely was seen as lacking charisma (he just lacked the touch with the people),Crean was ultimately seen the same way and not given a chance by the beazley faction in labour.
3. Most importantly for me , labour didn't put it policies across right.
4. Liberals played a scare tactic game with interest rates that labour didn't respond too. Which was frankly bullshit. Australias interest raters are lower than nearly everywhere else and are far under the world average.
5. Liberals bought votes prior to the election with some family assistance payments that was plain out cash bribery.
6. The australian populace seems to be a sucker for believing in john howard (many scandals which i think should have brought him down such as children overboard,the governor generals history with coverups in the anglican church,lies over WMD in iraq etc.
Frankly John Howard seems to have a very slick exterior and nothing sticks to him.
The man is doing some damage to our country and is imho one of our most damaging politicians for the people but he is the best at playing the game at the moment.
Disclaimer
I'm a aussie and i've voted labour last two elections because i disagree with the Liberals policies.
It could be made anonymous using public key authentication , read up on the work of david chaum on anonymous and secure e-cash. simply 1 token allows 1 vote. secure the token dispensation (electoral roll) and secure the voting machine which could be a website or a pc running with a browser and a net connection and checked by third parties.
personally i see an approach like this to be only way to get secure and anonymous e-voting. bonus no disputed elections, no need for recounts though in theory they could be performed.voters could check there vote, and verify it went to who it was they voted for.
on the topic of diebold and bush , i just say diebold has a history of insecure machines based on what i have read and shouldn't be allowed near it with a barge pole. also the source code for voting should be open , and the exes able to be checksummed so independant authorities can verify the software is the version it says it is.
Disclaimer : I'm not a fucking american and i give thanks for that.
Fantastic book its gonna permantly sit on my bookshelf , Truly great read.