I don't think we have to have the equivalent of a 5 yo for something to be considered intelligent. But as I wrote in another post actually defining intelligence is a hard problem.
1) Why was chess considered something obviously needing _intelligence_? 2) Why isn't playing chess a display of intelligence of computers?
Answers: 1) Because the possible positions were far to large to be stored in a computer at the time (and also now - but not relevant here). And as computers couldn't store all possible combinations a human obviously couldn't - hence the human showed intelligence and to beat the human the computer must be smarter than the human. 2) Because the algorithms developed to play chess at an advanced level is basically pattern matching combined with huge memory (which humans doesn't have) combined with algorithms developed by humans (no intelligence from the computer) plus a lot of computation (which humans can't do).
So why is the "redefinition" of what AI is so strange? It's called learning - learning that what we thought was a obvious demonstration of intelligence isn't. The majority of chess engines are still using algorithms manually tweaked by humans to perform the steps outlined before. So _humans_ display intelligence doing what was previously thought impossible by analyzing the problem and spending a lot of extra data and computational power - not the computer.
Now defining exactly what intelligence (and IMO more importantly creativity) is... It's hard, very hard. But that we as intelligent beings see, analyze and conclude that previous ideas were ill-founded _is_ a demonstration of intelligence in its own right.
Idiots like you pop up all the time, always cranking out the same old lines: "the new generation is crap". FFS we have that exact sentiment written down on some of the oldest written texts we have found. As soon as you type such shit you tell us all you are nothing - and you can't think.
While this update tells a completely different story than was previously told (selecting wrong item in a menu) the problem is the same: bad user interface.
It's obvious that the correct action when having the job of alerting the public of a missile attack and hearing "this is not a drill" is to send the warning message. Compare the SLBM launch training (as documented in public media - never been on board a submarine) where it the fact that it is an exercise/simulation is always repeated embedded into orders.
From the paper: "According to a native speaker of the language, this is not quite a coherent sentence. However, after making a couple of spelling corrections, Google Translate is able to convert it into passable English: “She made recommendations to the priest, man of the house and me and people.”"
So it is manually "corrected" input that produces that result.
To show that this is a valid approach to decode the document they have to be able to decode larger parts of the text to something that make sense. That of course doesn't mean that it isn't a valid approach, there may have been deliberate misspellings by the writer before encryption and similar things. But unless they can produce longer readable texts IMO they haven't proved anything.
I'd say bitter. Really don't like the taste of stevia.
Stevia is natural* as is cyanide and strychnine. IOW not relevant. Stevia is actually the sweetener used today that have most experimental evidence of being potentially dangerous, this is why it was only relatively recently declared as safe enough for general use in the US and the EU (and a lot of other countries).
(* not what is sold though - it's a purified extraction often done with methanol** as a solvent) (** that isn't bad in itself but "natural" types often freak out when "artificial" sweeteners have any type of relation to methanol)
The states that have claimed to be communist didn't come into existence as following the "natural law" described by Marx*. One of the requirement for a communist society is that it develop in an industrialized society by the worker class. Communism is then according to Marx the logical and natural society that will form with a certain definition.
None of the so-called communist states that have ever existed have followed the development described nor followed the definition! The communism described by Marx is democratic** for instance, there are many other significant differences to anything that have actually existed.
So saying "there have never been a true communist society" is as true as "traditional conservatism is not fascism".
(* not Groucho Marx - his works are funnier and easier to digest though) (** If someone point out that Marx talk about the dictatorship of the proletariat as transitional period in forming the communist society there are still obvious differences between that (which is the working class changing the society to a communist one) and the dictatorship of the other "communist" states which were not a transitional period and not by the working class)
Slashdot Mirror
I don't think we have to have the equivalent of a 5 yo for something to be considered intelligent.
But as I wrote in another post actually defining intelligence is a hard problem.
It isn't puzzling - it's obvious.
1) Why was chess considered something obviously needing _intelligence_?
2) Why isn't playing chess a display of intelligence of computers?
Answers:
1) Because the possible positions were far to large to be stored in a computer at the time (and also now - but not relevant here). And as computers couldn't store all possible combinations a human obviously couldn't - hence the human showed intelligence and to beat the human the computer must be smarter than the human.
2) Because the algorithms developed to play chess at an advanced level is basically pattern matching combined with huge memory (which humans doesn't have) combined with algorithms developed by humans (no intelligence from the computer) plus a lot of computation (which humans can't do).
So why is the "redefinition" of what AI is so strange? It's called learning - learning that what we thought was a obvious demonstration of intelligence isn't.
The majority of chess engines are still using algorithms manually tweaked by humans to perform the steps outlined before. So _humans_ display intelligence doing what was previously thought impossible by analyzing the problem and spending a lot of extra data and computational power - not the computer.
Now defining exactly what intelligence (and IMO more importantly creativity) is... It's hard, very hard.
But that we as intelligent beings see, analyze and conclude that previous ideas were ill-founded _is_ a demonstration of intelligence in its own right.
As some don't look at AC posts I'll repeat: Microsoft isn't admitting anything, one person have that as his personal opinion.
Maybe the ignorance is on your side? Because kfsone didn't claim that was the _only_ problem he(?) have with the language...
So instead of thinking and replying you react.
Strange that there are no examples of him being incompetent - he was even praised by Trump FFS.
Don't bring logic to a troll fight.
Do you really not understand that type systems have associated algorithms?
Type inference?
Type checking?
Remember reading about some (Indian?) guru that claimed drinking urine was the true source of health.
Maybe he just confused #1 and #2?
Few things were invented by Tesla. You could have picked a better example.
Idiots like you pop up all the time, always cranking out the same old lines: "the new generation is crap".
FFS we have that exact sentiment written down on some of the oldest written texts we have found.
As soon as you type such shit you tell us all you are nothing - and you can't think.
No I'm not a millenial.
If you can't see that longevity research _is_ health research you shouldn't be blathering.
While this update tells a completely different story than was previously told (selecting wrong item in a menu) the problem is the same: bad user interface.
It's obvious that the correct action when having the job of alerting the public of a missile attack and hearing "this is not a drill" is to send the warning message.
Compare the SLBM launch training (as documented in public media - never been on board a submarine) where it the fact that it is an exercise/simulation is always repeated embedded into orders.
From the paper:
"According to a native speaker of the language,
this is not quite a coherent sentence. However,
after making a couple of spelling corrections,
Google Translate is able to convert it into passable
English: “She made recommendations to the priest,
man of the house and me and people.”"
So it is manually "corrected" input that produces that result.
To show that this is a valid approach to decode the document they have to be able to decode larger parts of the text to something that make sense.
That of course doesn't mean that it isn't a valid approach, there may have been deliberate misspellings by the writer before encryption and similar things. But unless they can produce longer readable texts IMO they haven't proved anything.
I'd say bitter. Really don't like the taste of stevia.
Stevia is natural* as is cyanide and strychnine. IOW not relevant.
Stevia is actually the sweetener used today that have most experimental evidence of being potentially dangerous, this is why it was only relatively recently declared as safe enough for general use in the US and the EU (and a lot of other countries).
(* not what is sold though - it's a purified extraction often done with methanol** as a solvent)
(** that isn't bad in itself but "natural" types often freak out when "artificial" sweeteners have any type of relation to methanol)
Way to fail basic logic. Since when is New Mexico located in Germany?
More correct (but still idiotic and dishonest would be): "What is it with US corporations supporting gas chambers?"
And you prefer that the country we know attack internal and external targets using exploits should have the ability to exploit others?
Fuck you.
Google it.
The states that have claimed to be communist didn't come into existence as following the "natural law" described by Marx*. One of the requirement for a communist society is that it develop in an industrialized society by the worker class. Communism is then according to Marx the logical and natural society that will form with a certain definition.
None of the so-called communist states that have ever existed have followed the development described nor followed the definition! The communism described by Marx is democratic** for instance, there are many other significant differences to anything that have actually existed.
So saying "there have never been a true communist society" is as true as "traditional conservatism is not fascism".
(* not Groucho Marx - his works are funnier and easier to digest though)
(** If someone point out that Marx talk about the dictatorship of the proletariat as transitional period in forming the communist society there are still obvious differences between that (which is the working class changing the society to a communist one) and the dictatorship of the other "communist" states which were not a transitional period and not by the working class)
SJW is the new "Jew" for certain groups.
I don't think most conservatives would think of Heinlein as spokesperson of their views.
But the story isn't really fascist and anybody that doesn't even care to read X before declaring it Y is a fool.
Still liked the movie.
You don't think that's a bit of overreaction? Perhaps you just like the word "fuck"?
Maybe he did?
Are you wanting a discussion and therefore posting (bad) bait or do you really not understand this?
I've heard systemd is under suspicion of being a serial killer!
I don't actually think they got any measurable performance increase.