I don't see the problem. The existing process simply needs to require you to send something (by snailmail, email, or fax) on Company Letterhead.
Since "using fake letterhead to spoof a request to a CA" has recently been patented as a business method, the patent would stop any bad guys from requesting fake certs, and all your certs are now secure, again.
Wholly untrue. If I'm building a house to sell, and install a hidden CCTV camera in each bedroom for my own use after the sale... all joking aside, there is no doubt what would happen to me when the buyer discovers them in 10 or 20 years. And that's without playing the "OMG there were children in that bedroom" card, and nevermind the "OMG they were MAKING children in that bedroom" card.
In a training weekend last year, I met a girl who'd come down from Alaska to participate. Her "district", if they took a left turn out of the firehouse, was 45 minutes to the nearest district border. A right turn would be up to 93 minutes to the border.
Note that the word used was "border". NOT "next firehouse".
Yes, I did ask the obvious question - "Are there many houses out that far?" "Oh yes, quite a few. But mostly it's car wrecks."
Clearly, no reasonable person would consider that situation to be compatible with "since it lies upon the government... the voters have no say in the matter", in any way, shape or form. Any good-faith compliance would require a fully staffed firehouse next to... every SINGLE damned house, out there. Clearly, an interpretation saying that fire/emergency response is a forced-issue... is based on a grossly myopic life.
> Yes you still can delete the history automatically, but there is no indication that this actually is taking place. > It's less about what's being done or not...it's about *knowing*...in a very clear and obvious way...that something to protect your privacy is being done.
Totally agree. And they should never have removed that "Firefox is shutting down" confirmation window, nor the "Firefox has exited" confirmation window either. It's less about if the program actually quits or not.... it's about *knowing*... in a very clear an obvious way... that something to manage a running process is being done.
You seem to have confused "feel good" with actual results.
You are mistaken - both my previous PocketPC phones were webservers that could be reached by the public; my current phone does so as well, which includes a webcam on an alternate port. Obviously don't use it often, but it does work.
Slashdot Mirror
...I still have an SB8 sitting in the drawer, right next to me.
When your $3,000,000/yr pool of employees is replaced by robots, OF COURSE the percentage of IT goes up. The other costs have been eliminated, silly.
Offshore data processing is just so Web 1.0. In the Web 2.0 world, it's "Data Rendition".
I don't see the problem. The existing process simply needs to require you to send something (by snailmail, email, or fax) on Company Letterhead.
Since "using fake letterhead to spoof a request to a CA" has recently been patented as a business method, the patent would stop any bad guys from requesting fake certs, and all your certs are now secure, again.
You do realize that they could simply throw a few OS-specific turds into the firmware, right? Or even bypass the OS entirely?
Wholly untrue. If I'm building a house to sell, and install a hidden CCTV camera in each bedroom for my own use after the sale... all joking aside, there is no doubt what would happen to me when the buyer discovers them in 10 or 20 years. And that's without playing the "OMG there were children in that bedroom" card, and nevermind the "OMG they were MAKING children in that bedroom" card.
> It only takes one person in the world to have an insightful thought,
The last time that happened, the Vogons showed up.
I remember that incident. Their computer processor got thrown into an Nth complexity binary loop. It was horrible!
No. Once we move everything into the cloud, all of this will be moot. The cloud uses SSL, for chrissake!
Can't we just use Comodo?
Worse than that... "5" is clearly a derivative work of your product.
Err, "the inherent right to a free internet"... means that I can do whatever I want with my little chunk of it.
Just sayin.
Putting a
return;
at the tail of a function is unusual? Are you high?
Wrong. The firefighters did not set the fire. Also, you have no clue what "negligence" means.
Also, the homeowner had TWO HOURS to get those animals out of the house. He didn't.
You put a lien on his burnt double-wide?
Ok, there's $12. Where's the remaining $14988 come from?
You also neglect to mention the timeframe involved - how much time the homeowner had to remove the pets, himself.
Two hours, I hear?
You're a full of sh*t troll.
If there were humans in that fire, the FFs would have done what was necessary to rescue them. It's called a Duty to Act.
Once life-safety issues are resolved, the duty ends.
Period.
In a training weekend last year, I met a girl who'd come down from Alaska to participate. Her "district", if they took a left turn out of the firehouse, was 45 minutes to the nearest district border. A right turn would be up to 93 minutes to the border.
Note that the word used was "border". NOT "next firehouse".
Yes, I did ask the obvious question - "Are there many houses out that far?" "Oh yes, quite a few. But mostly it's car wrecks."
Clearly, no reasonable person would consider that situation to be compatible with "since it lies upon the government ... the voters have no say in the matter", in any way, shape or form. Any good-faith compliance would require a fully staffed firehouse next to... every SINGLE damned house, out there. Clearly, an interpretation saying that fire/emergency response is a forced-issue... is based on a grossly myopic life.
...or the check bounces.
Then what, reignite it?
Damn those irresponsible zero-day announcements!
They should arrest those people that told everyone we're running out of these addresses. Now all the bad guys know, too!
> Yes you still can delete the history automatically, but there is no indication that this actually is taking place.
> It's less about what's being done or not...it's about *knowing*...in a very clear and obvious way...that something to protect your privacy is being done.
Totally agree. And they should never have removed that "Firefox is shutting down" confirmation window, nor the "Firefox has exited" confirmation window either.
It's less about if the program actually quits or not.... it's about *knowing*... in a very clear an obvious way... that something to manage a running process is being done.
You seem to have confused "feel good" with actual results.
Verizon.
Support? "Complete failure of Oracle security response and utter neglect of their responsibility to their customers":
http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2005/Oct/56 (the infamous Litchfield letter)
You mean,
3. Charge for Support
Big difference. :)
You are mistaken - both my previous PocketPC phones were webservers that could be reached by the public; my current phone does so as well, which includes a webcam on an alternate port. Obviously don't use it often, but it does work.
They're just uploading it wrong.