Slashdot Mirror


User: avera

avera's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
2
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 2

  1. OO not enough if you have customers on OpenOffice.org, MS Office 2003 Compared, Evaluated · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The fly in the ointment: Docs from uncontrolled sources.

    Customers, for example.

    OO can't read all MS docs; therefore OO can not completely eliminate MS software unless you only get docs from other OO users, an impossible restriction in most jobs.

    For example, I often get MS docs from customers and management, and sometimes they use features OO does not understand [certain kinds of inserts become invisible, for example].

    "Tell them to not do that" is an unacceptable response. I have to deal with it.

    So, even though I my main computer runs Linux, I ALSO keep a Windows box with Outlook and Office XP 2003, just to read the occasional MS doc which OO doesn't like. To be truthful, I also need Outlook to deal with our corporate Exchange server [I do use Evolution+Connector but it is too unreliable to depend on exclusively]. I put up with this mess so I can use Linux; but it would be crazy to expect non-hackers to get work done this way.

    It's also expensive, but what't the alternative?

  2. Evolution requires forced change of Linux distro on Next Generation Mail Clients Reviewed · · Score: 2, Informative

    I like Evolution. But it has proven unstable, at least when using the MS/exchange plug-in (which
    my employer has licensed). So we tried to get
    support...

    Ximian says, in effect, that you have to stop
    updating your system from your distro (RedHat,
    SuSE, etc.) and instead use their distribution
    of gnome and other libraries exclusively.

    What they actually say is that they only support
    Evolution if you also Ximian Desktop, or at
    least their home-brewed versions gnome, glib2, etc. available on their server (e.g., using
    red-carpet). The catch: This causes massive
    RPM version conflicts because their versions
    use different version number/names,
    and the auto-update tools provided by RedHat
    or SuSE don't work any longer.

    I understand their problem: They have to assume
    certain updates & features in external libraries
    and can't test with all possible combinations.
    So they say "get everything from us". Of course,
    if another application vendor did the same thing
    it would be impossible to use both applications!

    What do other app vendors do (e.g., in the Sun
    world)? They spell out which patches or updated
    library versions *from the OS vendor* must be
    installed to have a supported system. I wish
    Ximian did that for Evolution!